Calendar

Carnival has a good operating backdrop—record Q1 revenues, strong demand, and bookings up double digits—but the screen stays skeptical because checked volume only reached about 1.37x on the best recent up day and other recent sessions were below average. That makes this more of a strong fundamental story than a fully confirmed tape-backed surprise setup.

Fervo has a compelling power-for-AI narrative, but the financial estimate base is still thin and the checked tape was not strong enough. This is a thematic story stock, not a clean surprise-setup name yet.

Sunbelt had one of the best raw tape setups in the list, with a strong close near highs and very large volume, but the screen could not verify a credible upcoming quarterly EPS-plus-revenue consensus/revision package from clean sources. Without that estimate spine, this stays a near miss.

Korn Ferry was already past the event date by the research anchor, so it cannot be scored as a pre-event setup in this window.

FedEx has real business momentum from stronger guidance and a solid beat streak, but the pre-event setup is incomplete. The stock is strong on a 1- and 3-month basis, yet it pulled back over the most recent 5-day window and the checked sources did not confirm a qualifying high-volume accumulation day.

Cerebras has a real AI backlog narrative and visible top-line growth, but the post-IPO tape is still too volatile and the checked volume ratio was only about 1.3x. This looks more like a high-beta story stock than a disciplined pre-earnings surprise setup.

General Mills failed the screen almost immediately because the checked Zacks sources leaned toward a miss rather than a beat and prior quarter results also missed. That is the opposite of the revision/whisper pattern sought here.

KB Home screened poorly because checked sources highlighted slowing earnings, lower deliveries, and a Zacks Rank #5 pre-print context. That is not the right psychology for a skeptical upside-surprise scout.

Paychex had strong same-day tape, strong volume, and visible revenue growth expectations into the print, but the decisive issue is that the checked Zacks calendar explicitly expected a slight miss and the stock still screened as structurally weak versus its own prior peak. That fails the key revision/ESP requirement.

McCormick had a serviceable consensus backdrop and good prior execution, but the screen could not verify the stronger tape and revision signals required for a pre-earnings upside-surprise setup.

NOVAGOLD is not suitable for this screen because checked public materials did not provide a credible current-quarter revenue consensus and the company remains a project-development story rather than a normal operating earnings setup. That makes surprise probability hard to measure using the rules required here.

Micron has the strongest fundamental pre-print story in the screen: positive ESP, management guidance far above older consensus, AI-memory demand, and a stock pressing record highs while semiconductor ETF SMH remains in a powerful uptrend. The setup is demoted from top tier because the checked cash-volume evidence did not confirm a recent 1.5x accumulation day and the stock is already extremely extended, which raises execution risk even if the earnings surprise odds look favorable.

Nike had a beat in the prior quarter, but the pre-event read was still turnaround-heavy rather than classic upside-surprise setup. Checked sources leaned more toward stabilization after a weak year than toward clear positive estimate momentum or bullish tape confirmation.

Jefferies has healthy underlying business momentum and above-average volume, but the closing-location evidence was too weak and no positive revision/ESP signal was verified. It is close to investable watchlist territory, but it misses the cleaner tape threshold.

H.B. Fuller had basic consensus support, but the setup lacked verified revision and tape confirmation. It did not stand out as a skeptical upside-surprise candidate.

Darden had a reasonable revenue-growth setup, but the check did not surface the kind of bullish revision-plus-tape combination needed for this screen. It remains a watch item, not a pre-earnings alpha scout favorite.

TD SYNNEX had enough consensus support to stay on the radar, but the screen could not verify the stronger tape-and-volume conditions needed to move it forward. It looks more ordinary than asymmetric.

Duplicate placeholder not used.

Commercial Metals had decent estimate support and one clear high-volume day, but the recent 5-day tape was negative and the close-location evidence was not strong enough for promotion. It is a close near miss rather than a top setup.

Primary-source results were solid on growth and operating leverage, but the market reaction was clearly negative because the Q2 revenue guide landed below expectations and management announced a sizable workforce reduction. Analyst reaction was mixed rather than uniformly supportive, with upgrades on one side and a downgrade on the other. Coverage quality is decent but still leaves the post-print setup best framed as a cautious monitoring view rather than a clean bullish thesis.

Primary-source evidence supports a constructive post-earnings setup: Okta beat on revenue, RPO/cRPO, income, and free cash flow, and management raised/affirmed FY27 guidance with a clear AI-agent thesis. Secondary market coverage reported a positive post-print reaction, but the lack of a hard transcript-digested estimate reset and the need to compare Okta against direct identity-security peers keep this in the monitoring bucket rather than a full conviction upgrade.

Primary-source tone is constructive but not outright bullish: Q1 set a record EPS mark and the balance sheet remained net-cash, yet revenue was slightly below the prior-year quarter and the reported profit mix leaned on production tax credit income. Secondary coverage described a muted-to-slightly negative reaction, and the packet does not show a fresh analyst target revision, so this is a cautious monitoring update rather than a clean re-rating.

Post-earnings tone was constructive: TipRanks summarized the call as positive and showed ESTC up 5.3% in the session summary, while the first analyst follow-ups remained Buy-rated even as Baird trimmed its target to $72 and Jefferies held $75. Coverage is still not dense, so this looks like a moderately positive follow-through rather than a high-conviction re-rating.

Primary-source evidence confirms the May 28 Q1 release. The reaction was modestly positive, but the move was small relative to the improvement in profitability, and the company still showed revenue and user pressure. Analyst follow-through remains thin, and the packet has no usable social-context coverage, so this stays a low-conviction monitoring view rather than a thesis upgrade.

Primary-source tone is constructive: Q1 revenue grew 55%, operating cash flow turned positive, cash increased to US$98.4 million, and full-year revenue guidance was raised. The tape was more cautious, with secondary coverage citing an after-hours drop of about 6.5% to US$15.39, so the market reaction looks mixed rather than euphoric. There is still no robust post-print analyst revision set in the packet, and low coverage means this remains a headline-driven monitor rather than a high-confidence momentum call.