About / Field Manual

Methodology

How RankAlpha calculates factors, grades, and screens

Factors

RankAlpha converts raw market data into comparable signals, grades, and screens. Momentum and Value are required for final grades; Sentiment is optional and reweighted when coverage is missing.

Learn more about scoring

Momentum

MOM

Measures the strength and persistence of recent price trends.

  • Captures 1-12 month trend strength
  • Uses risk-adjusted returns
  • Penalizes crowded and overbought states
See Rankings
How we measure it
Price History
Return Windows
Risk Adjust
Smoothing & Decay
Momentum Score
Example
AAPL
Current score
+0.62
Percentile
78th

Value

VAL

Measures how inexpensive a stock is relative to fundamentals.

  • Uses multi-metric composites
  • Normalizes versus sector and history
  • Rewards durable, high-quality value
See Rankings
How we measure it
Fundamentals
Valuation Ratios
Quality & Stability
Sector / History Norm
Value Score
Example
BRK.B
Current score
+0.41
Percentile
62nd

Sentiment

SENT

Captures the tone and positioning of investor sentiment.

  • News, social, and earnings tone
  • Positioning and options flow
  • Contrarian adjustments
See Sentiment / AI
How we measure it
Raw Signals
NLP & Classification
Aggregation & Weighting
Contrarian Adjustments
Sentiment Score
Example
TSLA
Current score
-0.18
Percentile
34th

Screener Methodology

How RankAlpha groups screen styles, builds consensus, and reads market breadth.

Where this shows up in the app
  • In Screener results, Consensus and Primary show how strongly different screens agree on the same name.
  • In Screener movements, new entrants, re-entries, and drops show which names are gaining or losing traction.
  • In Today, breadth and intensity help shape regime labels such as Trend, Chop, and Risk-Off.

1) Screeners by style

Each screener preset is built to catch a specific kind of setup. Basic trading hygiene such as stock-only universes, price floors, and liquidity gates is handled inside the screen before the ranking layer ever sees the result.

A) Momentum: breakouts and continuations

RA-Momo-50DayBreakout - Fresh 52-Week Breakout

Names breaking to new highs with real participation behind the move.

New 52-week highs, price above the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, healthy relative volume, price above $10, and average daily volume above roughly 1M shares.

RA-Momo-NearHighContinuation - Near-High Continuation

Leaders that are still trading close to their highs and keeping trend structure intact.

Within about 10% of the 52-week high, price above the 20-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving averages, with positive recent performance.

RA-Momo-Fresh52wBreakout - 50-Day Breakout

Earlier breakout candidates that have not yet made a fresh 52-week high.

New 50-day highs, price above the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, and a modest relative-volume gate.

B) Pullback in uptrend

RA-Pullback-Under50Over200 - Below 50, Above 200

Shallow pullbacks inside longer-term uptrends.

Price above the 200-day moving average but below the 50-day, usually with the shorter trend still intact and recent performance soft enough to signal a pullback rather than a breakout.

RA-Pullback-ChannelUpWeeklyDown - Channel-Up + Weekly Down

Stocks pulling back toward support while staying inside a rising trend channel.

Channel-up structure, weak recent performance, price above the 200-day moving average, and RSI in a neutral range.

C) Mean reversion

RA-MeanReversion-OversoldPop - Oversold Pop

Short-term bounce candidates after a washout.

Oversold RSI, heavy relative volume, and a same-day recovery, with minimum price and liquidity filters in place.

RA-MeanReversion-OversoldUptrend - Oversold but Structural Uptrend

Oversold names that still sit inside a healthier long-term trend.

Oversold RSI, price above the 200-day moving average, and at least moderate participation.

D) Quality growth

RA-QualityGrowth-EPS - EPS + Sales Acceleration + ROE, Low Leverage

Companies with genuine growth, healthy profitability, and manageable leverage.

Strong EPS and sales growth, solid return on equity, reasonable leverage, and acceptable trend structure.

RA-QualityGrowth-Trend - Sales + Margins + Trend

Names combining strong top-line growth with healthy margins and supportive technicals.

Fast sales growth, solid gross margins, strong return on equity, price above key moving averages, and supportive momentum.

E) Value / GARP / dividend

RA-Value-Quality - Quality Value

Cheaper stocks with solid business quality and balance-sheet support.

Reasonable valuation, lower leverage, solid profitability, longer-term trend support, and typically at least mid-cap liquidity.

RA-Value-Dividend - Dividend-GARP

Dividend payers with growth at a reasonable price.

Dividend support, sane payout ratios, reasonable valuation, and trend support, usually among larger-cap names.

RA-Value-IncomeQuality - Income Quality

Dividend franchises with stronger quality characteristics.

Dividend yield, restrained payout, healthy leverage, solid return on equity, and strong ownership or quality filters.

F) Short-squeeze candidates

RA-ShortSqueeze-OnTheMove - High Short + On the Move

Crowded shorts that are already starting to move.

High short interest, strong recent volume, and signs of technical acceleration.

RA-ShortSqueeze-NearHigh - High Short Near Highs

Structurally strong stocks near highs with meaningful short crowding.

High short float, trading near highs, and enough liquidity to matter.

G) Earnings plays

RA-Earnings-PreSqueeze - Pre-Earnings Squeeze Bias

Names attracting attention ahead of earnings.

Upcoming earnings, volume expansion, and supportive price action before the print.

RA-Earnings-PostMomo - Post-Earnings Momentum

Stocks showing strong continuation after earnings.

Strong recent performance after the event and price above major moving averages.

H) IPO momentum

RA-IPO-Momo - Young + Ripping

Recent IPOs with real business momentum and strong price action.

Young listings, fast sales growth, fresh highs, and strong participation.

I) Defensive quality / low-vol

RA-Quality-LowBeta - Low Beta Compounders

Lower-beta ballast with stronger quality characteristics.

Large-cap bias, lower beta, healthier leverage, solid returns on equity, and longer-term trend support.

J) Short / sell-bias

RA-Short-MomoBreakdown - Momentum Breakdown

Clear structural downtrends with fresh weakness.

Price below the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, new lows, and meaningful relative volume.

RA-Short-Resistance - Overbought Fade into Resistance

Overextended rallies running into nearby resistance.

Overbought RSI, price near recent highs, and signs of fading on the day.

2) How the screener score is built

Once the daily screens are produced, RankAlpha asks a narrower question: how many credible ways did this stock show up today, and how strong were those signals? The screener score is designed to reward agreement without letting duplicate-looking hits take over the table.

2.1 Daily inputs

Every screener belongs to a style family and carries a source weight. Each style also has its own weight and a long or short bias.

Consensus is based on weighted membership, not raw hit counts. Repeated appearances help, but they are measured in a controlled way so one noisy family does not drown out the rest.

2.2 Per-style contribution

Within each style, the first few confirmations matter most. Additional hits still help, but with diminishing returns.

decay = [1.00, 0.70, 0.50, 0.35, 0.25]
style_score = style_weight x sum(decay_k x source_weight_k)

2.3 Portfolio-friendly bonuses

  • Reinforcement: a stock gets a one-time bonus when multiple screens inside the same long style agree.
  • Breadth: a stock gets an additional bonus when different long styles agree with each other.

2.4 Streak overlay

  • Any-streak: rewards names that keep showing up across days.
  • Family-streak: adds extra weight when the same style family keeps firing repeatedly.

2.5 Final scores and percentiles

LongScore sums all long-side style contributions plus bonuses and streaks.

ShortScore does the same for short-side setups.

NetScore is simply LongScore minus ShortScore.

Percentiles are then computed by side so the leaderboard stays stable and readable from one day to the next.

2.6 Consensus composite

The final consensus score blends screen placement, breadth, and weighted coverage with the long, short, and net contributions. The result is clipped to a 0-100 range for display.

base = placement + weighted coverage + style breadth + source breadth
consensus = base + long contribution - short drag
consensus_score = clamp(consensus, 0, 100)
  • Coverage is weighted, not just counted.
  • The score is driven by screener membership and placement, not by a separate fundamentals model at this stage.

3) Breadth and regime logic

The screener system also helps explain the market backdrop. The goal is to show whether risk-on or risk-off styles are leading, and whether that leadership looks durable or fragile.

Signed breadth

Raw breadth can be misleading because bullish and bearish styles should not be treated the same way.

RankAlpha signs breadth by style bias, so bullish styles add to the total while bearish styles subtract from it.

signed breadth = bullish participation - bearish participation
net breadth = weighted average of signed style breadth

Dynamic pullback weight

Pullbacks are not always bullish. In a healthy tape they can reflect buy-the-dip behavior, but in a weak tape they can signal distribution instead.

RankAlpha adjusts the pullback contribution depending on how strong breakouts look and how much stress is coming from risk-off styles.

  • When Momentum leads and stress is low, pullbacks are treated more positively.
  • When pullbacks dominate and stress is elevated, their contribution is reduced or flipped negative.
  • Effective weights are stored and exposed through the API for transparency.

Flow-based regime rules

Beyond raw intensity, RankAlpha also tracks flows: new entrants, exits, continuers, churn, and how setups are resolving across days.

Those flow measures are standardized and rolled into broader composites such as Momentum Breadth, Breakdown Breadth, Defensive Breadth, and Risk-Off Pressure.

regime score = positive trend forces - negative defensive forces
smoothed regime score = rolling mean of regime score
labels = Trend / Chop / Risk-Off depending on sustained score levels
  • Outputs are stored in the regime rules tables and exposed through the screener regime API.
  • The UI can show both the older intensity view and the newer flow-based view.
  • All inputs use the same liquidity and eligibility rules as the main screener system.

4) How to read the results

  • LongScore and long percentile show how strongly a stock aligns with investable leadership themes.
  • ShortScore and short percentile show how strongly a stock aligns with breakdown or sell-bias characteristics.
  • NetScore is the fastest combined read when you want one number across both sides.
  • Repeated appearances across different styles are usually a feature, not a bug. They often mean conviction is broadening rather than narrowing.
  • This is a ranking framework, not a prediction engine. It is designed to surface stronger setups and push weaker noise lower in the stack.

5) Data pipeline

Each screener emits daily symbol hits into the screener fact tables.

Styles and sources are controlled by dimension tables so weights and opt-outs can be adjusted without rewriting the scoring logic.

Views expose both the latest screener values and the enriched consensus composite used by the API.

The screener consensus API returns daily long, short, and net aggregates plus percentiles for display in the app.

6) FAQ

Why use tiers?

Tiers capture selectivity. A fresh 52-week breakout should not be treated the same way as a looser near-high condition.

Why use decay?

Decay keeps six near-duplicate signals from overpowering the score. Early confirmation matters most.

Why reward breadth?

Different styles test a stock from different angles. Cross-style agreement is rarer and often more durable.

What about liquidity and price floors?

Those filters are enforced inside the screens themselves, so the ranking layer does not need to penalize them again later.

What if a screen definition changes?

The screener remains just one weighted source inside the system. Update the definition and weight, and the broader scoring framework still holds.

How to read this page
Start with the style families if you want to know what each preset is hunting for. Jump to the scoring and breadth sections if you want to understand why the table order or regime read changed.