NWN

Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to Northwest Natural Holding Company's Q1 2026 earnings conference call. After today's prepared remarks, we will host a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press star one again. I will now hand the conference over to Nikki Sparley, Director of Investor Relations. Nikki, please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, welcome to our first quarter 2026 earnings call. In addition to the press release, a supplemental presentation is available on our investor relations website at ir.nwnaturalholdings.com. Following this call, a recording will also be available on our website.

As a reminder, some things that will be said this morning contain forward-looking statements. They are based on management's assumptions, which may or may not occur. For a complete list of cautionary statements, refer to the language at the end of our press release.

Additionally, our risk factors are provided in our 10-Q and 10-K filings. We will also refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. For additional disclosures about these non-GAAP measures, including reconciliations to comparable GAAP measures, please see the slides that accompany today's call, which are available on the investor relations page of our website.

Please note our guidance assumes continued customer growth, average weather conditions, and no significant changes in prevailing regulatory policies, mechanisms, or assumed outcomes, or significant changes in local, state, or federal laws, legislation, or regulations.

We expect to file our 10-Q later today. With us today are Justin Palfreyman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Ray Kaszuba, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Justin will provide highlights from the first quarter of 2026, a regulatory update, and a look forward. Ray will walk through our financial results and guidance. After Justin and Ray's prepared remarks, we will host a question and answer session. With that, I will turn the call over to Justin.

Thanks, Nikki. Good morning and welcome, everyone. Overall, the first quarter results were strong and in line with our expectations, reflecting another quarter of solid execution and putting us on solid footing for the year. As a result, we also reaffirmed our 2026 and long-term guidance. Our gas utility systems performed very well over the heating season.

Our team delivered strong operational performance across all our utilities, and we produced healthy customer growth. Importantly, the quarter underscored the strength of the Northwest Natural Holdings platform and the stability of having 3 distinct regulated utility businesses, making our results more predictable.

We are well-positioned to drive durable long-term growth while maintaining our core commitment to providing safe, reliable, and affordable service to our customers. Our focus remains on disciplined execution, steady earnings growth, and attractive overall shareholder returns. Related to that, we made meaningful progress on our regulatory initiatives this year.

Let me highlight a few of our recent filings. In March, Northwest Natural filed a multi-party settlement with the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, resolving all the revenue requirement aspects of our multi-year general rate case. While it remains subject to commission approval, the outcome is constructive for both customers and shareholders.

The settlement provides for annual revenue requirement increases over three years, including $20.1 million in the first year beginning August 1, 2026, $7.7 million in the second year, and $8.7 million in the third year.

The settlement includes a capital structure of 50% equity and 50% long-term debt and a return on equity of 9.5%. In Oregon, we remain constructively engaged with staff and parties on multi-year rate case rulemaking. As we've seen in other jurisdictions, we believe multi-year rate cases could provide greater clarity and predictability for both customers and utilities.

While we await the outcome of the multi-year framework in Oregon, which could extend into 2027, we filed an alternative rate mechanism to help recover certain safety, IT, and large public works investments. The proposal contemplates a modest 1.5% rate increase beginning October 31, 2026.

We've had productive conversations with staff and continue working closely with parties to reach agreement on the docket. Until the multi-year rulemaking process concludes, we have the ability to recover on our investments through additional mechanisms or general rate cases.

In addition, we have made progress on regulatory initiatives in our other key businesses. On May 4, SiEnergy filed a general rate case with the Texas Railroad Commission. The filing consolidates SiEnergy and the recently acquired Pines Gas entities, simplifying both our regulatory structure and operations in Texas. We are requesting a $12 million revenue requirement increase over current rates.

This increase is based on a 10.75% return on equity, a cost of capital of 8.73%, and a capital structure of 60% equity and 40% long-term debt, which is consistent with other Texas gas utilities. This request includes an increase in average rate base of $176.9 million since the last rate case for a total rate base of $343.1 million.

In addition to the existing beneficial mechanisms from Texas House Bill 4384 and weather normalization. We are requesting the factors necessary to file for the Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program, or GRIP.

This mechanism would further align capital investment with timely cost recovery. Even after the increase, SiEnergy's rates are projected to be competitive with peers in the state. Turning to our water and wastewater business. As it scales, we are beginning to see a more consistent regulatory cadence.

In 2025, we completed seven rate cases. We currently have four open rate cases in Oregon, Texas, and Arizona. Foothills, our largest water and wastewater utility, has made substantial investments over the past several years. That trend continues in 2026 as we invest in water storage and treatment to support growth in the region.

In Q1, we received approval for our second Certificate of Convenience and Necessity expansion, adding to our service territory in Arizona. We are excited to serve these growing communities and are committed to making the necessary investments to provide safe, reliable water and wastewater. We filed a rate case for Foothills last month that includes a request to use formula rates in the future. Formula rates are designed to support annual recovery of O&M and investments without going through a general rate case process.

Blue Topaz, our Texas water utility, recently filed its first rate case in approximately 20 years. The filing consolidates several of our Texas entities, recovers capital investments made since our ownership of these assets, and incorporates fair market value rate based adjustments.

As our first quarter actions demonstrate, we are taking a more proactive and coordinated approach to our regulatory strategy across the enterprise. Multi-year rate cases in Washington and Oregon, as well as the mechanisms we plan to use at SiEnergy and Northwest Natural Water, are all designed to reduce regulatory lag and produce a more balanced and linear consolidated earnings profile.

These mechanisms also maintain affordability and predictability for customers. Moving to a quick review of our key business segments. Starting with SiEnergy, our Texas gas utility delivered another strong quarter and performed well during the heating season.

Results were driven by healthy 16% organic customer growth. Our backlog exceeded 250,000 future meters at quarter end, highlighting the long-term growth potential of this business. Looking ahead, we are continuing to see solid growth in the Texas housing market and expect 15%-20% annual customer growth through 2030, with SiEnergy contributing approximately 10%-15% of consolidated EPS in 2026.

Moving to Northwest Natural Water, this business posted healthy overall customer growth of 4.1% in the quarter and organic customer growth of 2.2%. As a reminder, the seasonality of water complements our gas business, with the highest demand in the third quarter and lower demand in the first quarter. Even though results were consistent year-over-year, we continued to make progress on customer growth and regulatory execution.

We also remain active in greenfield opportunities for water and wastewater in Texas. We now have signed agreements with developers that represent a backlog of over 10,000 connections. Approximately 25% of these are in communities that have started development.

This platform is driven primarily by organic customer growth, and we expect it to achieve 2%-3% growth through 2030. Water is expected to contribute approximately 10%-15% of consolidated EPS in 2026.

Finally, turning to Northwest Natural Gas, our largest segment. This business continues to play a critical role in ensuring affordable and reliable energy for customers in Oregon and Washington. I'm pleased to report that our system performed well this winter, reliably serving our customers during the heating season. We remain incredibly excited about our MX3 storage project that we announced last quarter.

As a reminder, MX-3 is a $300 million FERC-regulated gas storage expansion that will add 4 to 5 BCF of capacity and is fully contracted with 25-year agreements. Since our last call, the project has continued to progress as we expected. Our timeline still contemplates receiving notice to proceed by the end of 2027, with an in-service date in 2029.

E3, a highly regarded energy consulting firm, recently updated a study reinforcing earlier conclusions that natural gas remains essential to system reliability in the Pacific Northwest, particularly as the region continues to add significant electric load. The latest study now points to an approximately 14 gigawatt shortfall in generation capacity by 2035.

That's why our storage capabilities are so important. They are uniquely positioned, expandable even beyond MX-3, and offer a cost-effective solution to our region's growing energy constraints.

MX3 is not contemplated in our current 4%-6% long-term EPS growth guidance. However, we do expect the project to have a sustained positive impact on earnings growth and plan to include the project in our guidance when we achieve notice to proceed, which would raise our long-term EPS outlook to 5%-7%. Overall, we remain confident in our strategy, our execution, and the growth platform that we've built.

The businesses are performing well. We are making progress on our regulatory initiatives, and the outlook across our company is strong. We are progressing through 2026 with solid momentum and remain focused on disciplined utility growth and long-term shareholder value. With that, I'll turn it over to Ray to walk through the financials.

Thank you, Justin. Good morning, everyone. Our first quarter performance was strong and in line with our expectations. Adjusted earnings per share was $2.33, compared to $2.28 in the prior year period. To simplify our financial reporting and clarify the underlying drivers of the business, we have updated our segments to better reflect our current business mix.

NW Natural Gas Company is now reported as a single segment, consolidating the gas utility and storage operations. This change does not affect our SiEnergy or Water segment reporting.

Adjusted net income was up $5.7 million. EPS increased $0.05 in the quarter, driven by new rates, particularly at Northwest Natural and customer growth. This was partially offset by investments in our systems, leading to higher depreciation expense and financing needs.

Northwest Natural reported an increase in net income of $2.7 million, reflecting new rates in Oregon with EPS down $0.02 due to equity financing. SiEnergy's EPS was up $0.08, driven by a full quarter of operations from SiEnergy and Pines Gas and strong organic customer growth of 16%.

NW Natural Water's EPS was essentially flat for the quarter, primarily reflecting higher O&M and depreciation expenses. This was largely offset by higher operating revenues, driven by continued customer growth and acquisitions. Please keep in mind that the first quarter is Water's lowest demand quarter. We are investing in the underlying business, and as Justin mentioned, we are executing on our regulatory strategy to recover these investments and earn a return in a timely manner.

Overall, we are pleased with first quarter results, are on track for the year, and reaffirmed our full year 2026 earnings guidance of $2.95 to $3.15 per share. SiEnergy and Water combined are still expected to contribute approximately 25% of consolidated EPS this year. Our long-term EPS growth target of 4%-6% remains intact.

As Justin noted, our expected long-term EPS growth rate is projected to increase to 5%-7% with the inclusion of MX3 once we receive notice to proceed. We still expect capital expenditures of $500 million-$550 million in 2026. Our funding plan remains disciplined and balanced, supported by strong operating cash flow, approximately $150 million of net long-term debt, and $40 million-$50 million of equity issued through our ATM.

We currently have approximately $590 million of available liquidity. Over the 5-year planning horizon, capital expenditures will be funded largely through operating cash flows, along with a balanced mix of long-term debt and equity. Through 2030, we expect to meet our equity needs through our ATM program.

Finally, on shareholder returns, as our dividend payout ratio comes in line with our 55%-65% target, we continue to expect to increase our dividend over time, consistent with earnings growth and cash flow generation. In summary, 2026 is off to a solid start, and we have a strong momentum heading into the balance of 2026 and beyond. With that, we'll open the call to questions.

We will now begin the question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press star one again. We ask that you pick up your handset when asking a question to allow for optimum sound quality. If you're muted locally, please remember to unmute your device. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Christopher Ellinghaus from Siebert Williams. Chris, please go ahead.

Hey, good morning, everybody. Justin, I think you quoted 16% organic growth at SiEnergy. What, I assume that means there was some acquisition in the quarter because the meters were up considerably more than that?

Thanks for the question, Chris. You're referring to SiEnergy, I assume?

Yeah.

Yeah, on the SiEnergy growth, there are no real acquisitions reflected in that because it's comparing Q1 of last year to Q1 of this year. The 16% reflects the energy.

Okay. I'm sort of detecting some weakness in the Oregon economy that's maybe even accelerating a little bit across some industries, you kind of see it maybe in your meter number for the quarter. Can you just sort of talk about what you're seeing for economic conditions in Oregon?

Yeah. Economic conditions in Oregon, they've been challenged a bit for I would say a few years now. We have seen a slowdown here over that timeframe, both in housing starts and other sort of macro indicators in the region.

However, the customer growth that we are seeing is largely in line with what we expected for the year here. A lot of the growth opportunities that we are seeing in Oregon relate to our gas storage facility as an expansion opportunities, as well as, just investing in, the safety and reliability of our system here.

Okay. By the way, thanks for the segment update. That's helpful. Your guidance for utility net income growth, I presume part of that is a result of the CUB or the FAIR Act, which is pretty restrictive.

You know, your rate base growth considerably more than that 1%-3% and customer growth is on the lower side. It sort of suggests that you end up with a bit of a bubble at the end of the period in terms of a catch-up, presuming you don't get some kind of great multi-year rate plan that like sort of keeps you on track.

What are your thoughts about, you know, potentially ending up with sort of an end of 5-year period, you know, sort of excess catch-up to make? That's sort of counterintuitive to what the FAIR Act was all about. You know, what are your thoughts there?

Chris, I think you are picking up on what could be driving that delta from the rate base growth to the net income growth. Part of it is our current view of what the rate case cadence is between now and 2030 and you could be growing rate base, net income hasn't quite caught up to it yet.

All that's gonna depend on where things end up with the FAIR Act and where we eventually end up with our rate case cadence in Oregon. Of course, there's always a little bit of lag that we have, regulatory lag that we have as well that would come into play. Between those two dynamics, that's driving that difference. It is timing in terms of the specific 5-year guidance range through 2030. I think you're picking up on that correctly.

Okay. I'll just ask you two more because I've got 1 million questions. One, the rate base increase that you guys quoted for C, if I'm not mistaken, the rate base number in the last rate case, and I might just be confusing what the request was versus what was approved, but I thought the last rate case was something like $152 million. Do you know what that discrepancy is versus the $170 whatever that you quoted?

Chris, we'll have to get back on, back to that question, for you, and we'll revert after the call.

Okay.

Don't know off the top of my head.

All right. I'll just stop there. I appreciate it. Thanks for the color.

Thanks, Chris.

Your next question comes from the line of Alex Kania from BTIG. Alex, please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. I've got 2 quick questions for you. I think the first one is just, Justin, if you could kind of maybe dive a little bit more in detail just on kind of the evolution of the framing of the multi-year rate structure in Oregon. Maybe when do you think you might have a little bit more clarity on that, just as a, you know, as a precursor to kind of finalizing, I guess, what the rate case plan might be in that jurisdiction. The second question is just from the perspective of obviously, lots of growth in SiEnergy and the like, and that's good to see.

Just also wondering if, you know, do you have a sense of any potential opportunities for additional tuck-ins there? Do you feel like you need any there? I'm just kind of curious maybe what the environment down there looks like.

Great. Thanks for the questions, Alex. On the Oregon multi-year plan, we have obviously been engaged there for fairly actively throughout the process. From a timing perspective, we anticipate it could slip into next year before we have clarity around what the multi-year planning framework is.

This is obviously new to Oregon, they're taking a lot of information in from other states that have successfully implemented this, whether that's Washington or California or others. There's a lot of parties involved and engaged in that process. Our expectation at this point is that we see some resolution on that next year.

In the meantime, just a reminder, we have filed for this alternative rate mechanism here in 2026, and we are in the middle of that process, which is moving along as expected. We also have, if you're familiar with the FAIR Energy Act, we do have the ability to file for a general rate case in that interim period as well, before the multi-year plans are established.

In general, I'd say it's all moving along as expected, and we look forward to driving that to resolution. On your second question, in Texas, there are other, you know, acquisition opportunities on both the gas and the water side, and you've seen us make a fair number of acquisitions in water there.

Obviously SiEnergy, we did this bolt-on with Pines Gas. We continue to look at that, but I will say the organic growth opportunity is so strong that we are very focused on that, investing in our systems.

If you look at the SiEnergy rate case as well as the Blue Topaz rate case, which is our water utility in Texas, you'll see there's a fair amount of growth embedded in that, as well as mechanisms that we believe are going to drive or reduce regulatory lag going forward. For the SiEnergy filing, we're actually filing for the factors that will allow us to file for GRIP in the future, which is a nice mechanism for reducing lag.

Great. Thanks very much.

Your next question comes from Selman Akyol from Stifel. Selman, please go ahead.

Okay. Just following up on that last comment you made about putting the pieces in place for filing for a GRIP. Can you just talk about what the timeframe is for that?

The timeframe for the rate case itself is approximately 6 months. We expect that we'll have the rate case resolved and new rates in effect by later this year, sometime in Q4. The way the GRIP process works, Selman, is in this rate case, we get the factors defined in terms of, you know, our ROE cap structure, et cetera.

We can then in future years, file for a rate adjustment under the GRIP mechanism. We can do that for up to 5 years before we would be required to come in for a new general rate case. You've seen that many other gas utilities in Texas have executed on that and it's been fairly successful.

In SiEnergy's previous, rate case a few years ago before our ownership, they did a black box settlement that did not allow them to have those factors that you would need to file for GRIP. We're taking a slightly different tact and, wanna make sure that we do everything we can to minimize the regulatory lag going forward for that business.

Got it. Thank you for that. Just thinking about or just staying with SiEnergy. You previously talked about sort of seeing opportunities for water there, as you can grow in conjunction with SiEnergy. I'm wondering are you actually executing on that and then, you know, seeing where you're actually installing both water and gas as you go into these new communities?

Yeah, that's a great question. One of the reasons that I highlighted the 10,000 connections we now have in backlog for water in Texas in my remarks. About six months ago, we combined our business development forces down in Texas really to leverage the SiEnergy platform who, you know, has a really strong relationship with developers and home builders.

For the first time, we are starting to see communities where we could install both gas, water, and potentially wastewater systems. Specifically on the water side, our utility down there is relatively small, but has the potential to grow significantly because of how we're approaching this.

With of the 10,000 in backlog, about 25% of those are already beginning development or construction on the water and wastewater portion of the project. It's exciting to see that momentum in this short period of time and we're highly confident that that's the right strategy to pursue. Just with the overall, you know, amount of growth that we see down in Texas, on the residential side, but also on the commercial and industrial side, we're excited about the opportunity.

Got it. Just the last one with me. Just thinking about water, are you guys continuing to see a lot of acquisition opportunities in 2026?

Yeah. We continue to look for acquisitions, but we've seen the market slow down a bit, and I think there's some data out there that reflects that. Where we are at with our water strategy is we're in a really good position because we don't need acquisitions to grow. The organic growth of 2% to 3% on customer growth is, you know, excludes any potential future acquisitions, and we are not relying on that for growth. We now have opportunities to invest in the platform that we've built. There's a long runway of investments there.

Really optimizing the platform both operationally and from a regulatory standpoint to try to, you know, minimize that gap between earned and allowed ROEs across our platform, which is why you're seeing, you know, multiple rate cases being filed each year in the water space.

In addition, we're very focused on organic growth. I mentioned the greenfield in Texas. On my prepared remarks, I mentioned the CCN expansion in Arizona. We have other opportunities like that to really just expand our existing footprint without going out and paying a premium for acquisitions.

Got it. Thank you so much.

We have reached the end of the Q&A session. I'll now turn the call to Justin Palfreyman for closing remarks. Justin, go ahead.

Thank you, Lucas, and thanks everyone for joining this morning. We appreciate the questions and your interest in Northwest Natural Holdings. Just to recap, 2026 is off to a promising start, and we are continuing to execute on our growth strategy. We look forward to seeing many of you at AGA later this month. As always, don't hesitate to reach out to Nikki with any further questions. Thanks, everyone.

This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.