RankAlpha logo
Back to Rankings

AGIO

AgiosF
Nasdaq / Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences
Last Price
Quote time unavailable
View Chart
Documents
64
Stored
Transcripts
1
Recent loaded
Latest report
2026-07-31
Investor release

Document history

Earnings documents stored for AGIO.

12 shown
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-31

AGIO Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates, Revenues Increase Year Over Year

Zacks
Agios Pharmaceuticals AGIO reported a loss of $1.69 per share for the second quarter of 2026, narrower than the Zacks Consensus Estimate of a loss of $1.86. In the year-ago quarter, the company had incurred a loss of $1.93 per share. Total revenues for the quarter came in at $44.7 million, significantly beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $23 million. Revenues surged 259.3% year over year, primarily driven by continued strong growth in Pyrukynd sales and robust demand for Aqvesme since the U.S. commercial launch in January this year. The company’s lead drug, mitapivat, is marketed under two brand names in the United States, Pyrukynd and Aqvesme. While Pyrukynd is approved for the treatment of hemolytic anemia in adult patients with pyruvate kinase (PK) deficiency, Aqvesme is approved to treat anemia in adults with alpha- or beta-thalassemia. Aqvesme received approval in the United States in December 2025 and was subsequently launched in January 2026, following the implementation of its Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program. Agios reported a strong initial uptake, with 442 prescriptions written as of June 30, 2026. Outside the United States, mitapivat continues to be marketed as Pyrukynd for PK deficiency and thalassemia indications. In May, Pyrukynd received approval for thalassemia in the European Union. Agios’ partner, Avanzanite Bioscience B.V., will commercialize and distribute Pyrukynd across the European Economic Area, the United Kingdom and Switzerland. The top line entirely comprises product revenues from Pyrukynd and Aqvesme. Agios generated $40.9 million of product revenues in the United States, up 235.2% year over year, driven by strong early momentum of the U.S. commercial launch of Aqvesme for thalassemia. The company added $3.8 million from ex-U.S. territories, driven by anticipated demand for Pyrukynd following its approval for thalassemia in Europe, as well as continued steady early demand across the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Research and development expenses increased by approximately 9.6% year over year to $100.8 million in the quarter. The increase was primarily driven by the $25.0 million upfront payment related to the licensing agreement with Oscotec for cevidoplenib. Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $51.5 million, up around 12.4% year over year, driven by higher spending associated with the co…Read full document

Agios Pharmaceuticals AGIO reported a loss of $1.69 per share for the second quarter of 2026, narrower than the Zacks Consensus Estimate of a loss of $1.86. In the year-ago quarter, the company had incurred a loss of $1.93 per share. Total revenues for the quarter came in at $44.7 million, significantly beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $23 million. Revenues surged 259.3% year over year, primarily driven by continued strong growth in Pyrukynd sales and robust demand for Aqvesme since the U.S. commercial launch in January this year. The company’s lead drug, mitapivat, is marketed under two brand names in the United States, Pyrukynd and Aqvesme. While Pyrukynd is approved for the treatment of hemolytic anemia in adult patients with pyruvate kinase (PK) deficiency, Aqvesme is approved to treat anemia in adults with alpha- or beta-thalassemia. Aqvesme received approval in the United States in December 2025 and was subsequently launched in January 2026, following the implementation of its Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program. Agios reported a strong initial uptake, with 442 prescriptions written as of June 30, 2026. Outside the United States, mitapivat continues to be marketed as Pyrukynd for PK deficiency and thalassemia indications. In May, Pyrukynd received approval for thalassemia in the European Union. Agios’ partner, Avanzanite Bioscience B.V., will commercialize and distribute Pyrukynd across the European Economic Area, the United Kingdom and Switzerland. The top line entirely comprises product revenues from Pyrukynd and Aqvesme. Agios generated $40.9 million of product revenues in the United States, up 235.2% year over year, driven by strong early momentum of the U.S. commercial launch of Aqvesme for thalassemia. The company added $3.8 million from ex-U.S. territories, driven by anticipated demand for Pyrukynd following its approval for thalassemia in Europe, as well as continued steady early demand across the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Research and development expenses increased by approximately 9.6% year over year to $100.8 million in the quarter. The increase was primarily driven by the $25.0 million upfront payment related to the licensing agreement with Oscotec for cevidoplenib. Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $51.5 million, up around 12.4% year over year, driven by higher spending associated with the commercial launch of Aqvesme. As of June 30, 2026, cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities totaled $964.8 million compared with $1.0 billion as of March 31, 2026. Management expects its existing cash balance, together with anticipated product revenues, to be sufficient to support the potential launch of mitapivat in sickle cell disease (SCD) if approved and advance its clinical pipeline. For full-year 2026, Agios expects to generate $45 million to $50 million in U.S. sales from Pyrukynd for PK deficiency.The company reiterated that full-year operating expenses are expected to remain approximately flat compared with 2025, excluding the $25 million upfront payment related to the cevidoplenib in-licensing agreement recognized in the second quarter. Beyond the marketed indications, Agios is also developing mitapivat for sickle cell disease (SCD). Earlier this month, the FDA accepted its supplemental new drug application (sNDA) seeking approval for mitapivat in SCD. The sNDA was submitted under the FDA’s accelerated approval pathway in May. With the FDA granting a priority review to the sNDA, a decision from the regulatory body is expected on Nov. 1, 2026. If approved, mitapivat is likely to become the first oral PK activator to be approved for patients with SCD. Agios had been developing another candidate, tebapivat, a novel PK activator, for the treatment of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) and SCD in separate mid-stage studies. However, the company has discontinued the development of tebapivat across all indications following setbacks in the clinical programs. In June, the company halted the candidate's development for LR-MDS after a phase II dose-finding study failed to demonstrate sufficient clinical benefit, despite showing biological activity and a favorable safety profile. Subsequently, in July, Agios also discontinued the SCD program after phase II data failed to demonstrate meaningful clinical differentiation from existing PK activators. These decisions marked the complete termination of the tebapivat development program. Despite the earnings beat, shares of AGIO were down 6.4% on Thursday, likely due to investor concern about the loss of tebapivat as a pipeline asset, which narrowed the company's growth prospects and increased its reliance on mitapivat, with its upcoming FDA decision now serving as the key catalyst. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Year to date, the stock has risen 20.4% compared with the industry’s 3.6% growth. In early June, the company entered into an agreement with Oscotec, a South Korea-based biotech to in-license exclusive global rights to develop and commercialize cevidoplenib for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Cevidoplenib is a next-generation, late-stage, highly selective oral spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor being developed for the treatment of patients with ITP, a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by low platelet counts and an elevated risk of bleeding. The agreement expands and diversifies Agios’ rare hematology portfolio by adding a potential treatment for ITP, with an estimated peak annual U.S. sales potential of up to $1 billion. Agios intends to advance cevidoplenib into a phase III study for ITP, with initiation expected in the first half of 2028. Per the agreement, Agios will fund all future development and commercialization costs associated with cevidoplenib. Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Quote Agios currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). Some better-ranked stocks in the biotech sector are Harmony Biosciences HRMY and Liquidia Corporation LQDA, each currently sporting a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) and Neurocrine Biosciences NBIX, which carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. Over the past 90 days, earnings per share estimates for Harmony Biosciences have decreased from $3.34 to $3.30 for 2026. Over the same period, estimates for earnings per share increased from $3.79 to $3.87 for 2027. HRMY shares have lost 4.2% year to date. Harmony Biosciences missed on earnings in each of the trailing four quarters, delivering an average negative surprise of 25.16%. Over the past 90 days, estimates for Liquidia’s 2026 earnings per share have increased to $3.02 from $1.50. Over the same period, EPS estimates for 2027 have risen to $5.31 from $2.91. LQDA shares have gained 151.7% year to date. Liquidia’s earnings beat estimates in three of the trailing four quarters and missed in the remaining one, with the average surprise being 54.40%. Over the past 90 days, estimates for Neurocrine Biosciences’ 2026 earnings per share have risen from $8.00 to $9.09. Over the same period, EPS estimates for 2027 have increased from $9.48 to $10.81. NBIX shares have gained 30.8% year to date. Neurocrine Biosciences’ earnings beat estimates in three of the trailing four quarters and missed in the remaining one, the average surprise being 9.08%. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AGIO) : Free Stock Analysis Report Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) : Free Stock Analysis Report Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) : Free Stock Analysis Report Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc. (HRMY) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30

Agios Reports Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results and Provides Business Update

GlobeNewswire
Mitapivat (PYRUKYND® and AQVESME™) delivered worldwide net revenues of $44.7 million in the second quarter of 2026, compared to $12.5 million in the second quarter of 2025 Strong U.S. commercial launch of AQVESME in thalassemia, with 442 cumulative prescriptions written as of June 30, 2026 sNDA for mitapivat granted FDA Priority Review in sickle cell disease with PDUFA goal date of November 1, 2026 Diversified and expanded late-stage pipeline with licensing of cevidoplenib for immune thrombocytopenia and advancement of AG-236 into Phase 2/3 development for polycythemia vera $964.8 million in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities as of June 30, 2026; well capitalized to support commercial execution and pipeline advancement CAMBRIDGE, Mass., July 30, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: AGIO), a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on delivering innovative medicines for patients with rare diseases, today announced financial results and updates for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026. “Our second-quarter performance reflects continued execution across the key priorities that will drive sustainable growth for Agios: strong commercial momentum, pipeline diversification, and strategic portfolio discipline,” said Brian Goff, Chief Executive Officer, Agios. “We are encouraged by the ongoing U.S. commercial launch of AQVESME in thalassemia, which continues to see robust engagement from both physicians and patients. We also progressed mitapivat toward a potential new indication in sickle cell disease, highlighted by the FDA granting Priority Review for our sNDA. Beyond these milestones, we strengthened our hematology pipeline with the licensing of cevidoplenib and advancement of AG-236 into Phase 2/3 development, while maintaining disciplined capital allocation. Together, these achievements underscore our ability to deliver meaningful innovation for patients and long-term shareholder value.” Second Quarter 2026 and Recent Corporate Highlights Mitapivat (PYRUKYND® and AQVESME™) Commercial Performance and Update – Business Development – Research and Development (R&D) Highlights Mitapivat (pyruvate kinase [PK] activator) AG-236 (siRNA targeting TMPRSS6) AG-181 (phenylalanine hydroxylase [PAH] stabilizer) Tebapivat (PK activator) Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results For the quarter ended June 30, 2026, net loss was $1…Read full document

Mitapivat (PYRUKYND® and AQVESME™) delivered worldwide net revenues of $44.7 million in the second quarter of 2026, compared to $12.5 million in the second quarter of 2025 Strong U.S. commercial launch of AQVESME in thalassemia, with 442 cumulative prescriptions written as of June 30, 2026 sNDA for mitapivat granted FDA Priority Review in sickle cell disease with PDUFA goal date of November 1, 2026 Diversified and expanded late-stage pipeline with licensing of cevidoplenib for immune thrombocytopenia and advancement of AG-236 into Phase 2/3 development for polycythemia vera $964.8 million in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities as of June 30, 2026; well capitalized to support commercial execution and pipeline advancement CAMBRIDGE, Mass., July 30, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: AGIO), a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on delivering innovative medicines for patients with rare diseases, today announced financial results and updates for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026. “Our second-quarter performance reflects continued execution across the key priorities that will drive sustainable growth for Agios: strong commercial momentum, pipeline diversification, and strategic portfolio discipline,” said Brian Goff, Chief Executive Officer, Agios. “We are encouraged by the ongoing U.S. commercial launch of AQVESME in thalassemia, which continues to see robust engagement from both physicians and patients. We also progressed mitapivat toward a potential new indication in sickle cell disease, highlighted by the FDA granting Priority Review for our sNDA. Beyond these milestones, we strengthened our hematology pipeline with the licensing of cevidoplenib and advancement of AG-236 into Phase 2/3 development, while maintaining disciplined capital allocation. Together, these achievements underscore our ability to deliver meaningful innovation for patients and long-term shareholder value.” Second Quarter 2026 and Recent Corporate Highlights Mitapivat (PYRUKYND® and AQVESME™) Commercial Performance and Update – Business Development – Research and Development (R&D) Highlights Mitapivat (pyruvate kinase [PK] activator) AG-236 (siRNA targeting TMPRSS6) AG-181 (phenylalanine hydroxylase [PAH] stabilizer) Tebapivat (PK activator) Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results For the quarter ended June 30, 2026, net loss was $100.7 million, compared to net loss of $112.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. Net product revenue from U.S. sales of mitapivat (PYRUKYND and AQVESME) for the second quarter of 2026 was $40.9 million, compared to $12.2 million for the second quarter of 2025. Net product revenue from ex-U.S. sales of mitapivat (PYRUKYND) for the second quarter of 2026 was $3.8 million, compared to $0.3 million for the second quarter of 2025. Cost of sales for the second quarter of 2026 was $3.0 million. Research and Development (R&D) expenses were $100.8 million for the second quarter of 2026, compared to $91.9 million for the second quarter of 2025, driven primarily by the $25.0 million up-front payment associated with the agreement with Oscotec to license cevidoplenib. Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) expenses were $51.5 million for the second quarter of 2026, compared to $45.9 million for the second quarter of 2025, due to an increase in activities related to the U.S. commercial launch of AQVESME in thalassemia. Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were $964.8 million as of June 30, 2026, compared to $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2025. Agios expects that its cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, together with anticipated product revenue and interest income, will provide the financial independence to execute the U.S. commercial launch of AQVESME in thalassemia, prepare for the potential U.S. commercial launch of mitapivat in sickle cell disease, advance the company’s existing clinical programs, and opportunistically expand its pipeline through both internally- and externally-discovered assets. Second Quarter 2026 Conference Call Information Agios will host a conference call and live webcast today, July 30, 2026, at 8:00 a.m. ET to discuss the company’s second quarter 2026 financial results and recent business highlights. The live webcast will be accessible on the Investors section of the company's website (www.agios.com) under the “Events & Presentations” tab. A replay of the webcast will be available on the company’s website approximately two hours after the event. About Agios: Fueled by Connections to Transform Rare Diseases™ At Agios, our vision is to redefine the future of rare disease treatment. Fueled by connections, we build trusted partnerships with communities – collaborating to develop and deliver innovative medicines that have the potential to transform lives. With a foundation in hematology, we combine biological expertise with real-world insights to advance a growing pipeline of rare disease medicines that reflect the priorities of the people we serve. Agios is a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. To learn more, visit www.agios.com and follow us on LinkedIn and X. Available Information about Agios To achieve broad dissemination, Agios may disclose information to the public through a variety of disclosure channels including press releases, SEC filings, and public conference calls and webcasts. Some of the information distributed through these disclosure channels may be considered material information. Investors and others should note that Agios plans to use its website (www.agios.com) as a distribution channel to announce and give notice of Agios’ upcoming events and presentations (including, but not limited to, presentations at medical or healthcare conferences). Such information, which may be deemed material, will be available on the Investors section of the company’s website under the “Events & Presentations” tab. In addition, you may sign up to automatically receive email alerts about Agios’ upcoming events and presentations (“Calendar Alerts”) by visiting the “Email Alerts” option under the “IR Resources” tab of the Investors section of the company’s website and submitting your email address. Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include those regarding the potential benefits of PYRUKYND® (mitapivat), AQVESME™ (mitapivat), tebapivat, AG-236, AG-181 and cevidoplenib; Agios’ plans, strategies and expectations for its preclinical, clinical and commercial advancement of its drug development, including mitapivat, tebapivat, AG-236, AG-181 and cevidoplenib; Agios’ expectations for the review of marketing applications for mitapivat by regulatory agencies, including the FDA and European Commission; Agios’ strategic vision and goals; and the potential benefits of Agios’ strategic plans and focus. The words “anticipate,” “expect,” “goal,” “hope,” “milestone,” “plan,” “potential,” “possible,” “strategy,” “will,” “vision,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Such statements are subject to numerous important factors, risks and uncertainties that may cause actual events or results to differ materially from Agios’ current expectations and beliefs. For example, there can be no guarantee that any product candidate Agios is developing will successfully commence or complete necessary preclinical and clinical development phases, or that development of any of Agios’ product candidates will successfully continue. There can be no guarantee that any positive developments in Agios’ business will result in stock price appreciation. Management's expectations and, therefore, any forward-looking statements in this press release could also be affected by risks and uncertainties relating to a number of other important factors, including, without limitation: risks and uncertainties related to the impact of pandemics or other public health emergencies to Agios’ business, operations, strategy, goals and anticipated milestones, including its ongoing and planned research activities, ability to conduct ongoing and planned clinical trials, clinical supply of current or future drug candidates, commercial supply of current or future approved products, and launching, marketing and selling current or future approved products; Agios’ results of clinical trials and preclinical studies, including subsequent analysis of existing data and new data received from ongoing and future studies; the content and timing of decisions made by the U.S. FDA, the EMA or other regulatory authorities, investigational review boards at clinical trial sites and publication review bodies; Agios’ ability to obtain and maintain requisite regulatory approvals and to enroll patients in its planned clinical trials; unplanned cash requirements and expenditures; competitive factors; Agios' ability to obtain, maintain and enforce patent and other intellectual property protection for any product candidates it is developing; Agios’ ability to establish and maintain key collaborations; uncertainty regarding any royalty payments related to the sale of its oncology business or any milestone or royalty payments related to its in-licensing of AG-236 and cevidoplenib, and the uncertainty of the timing of any such payments; uncertainty of the results and effectiveness of the use of Agios’ cash and cash equivalents; and general economic and market conditions. These and other risks are described in greater detail under the caption "Risk Factors" included in Agios’ public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any forward-looking statements contained in this press release speak only as of the date hereof, and Agios expressly disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. *June 30, 2026 balance includes $5.6 million of long-term inventory included in other non-current assets within our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Contacts:Investor ContactMorgan Sanford, Vice President, Investor Relations Agios [email protected] Media ContactEamonn Nolan, Senior Director, Corporate CommunicationsAgios [email protected]

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30

Agios Pharmaceuticals Q2 Earnings Call Highlights

MarketBeat
Interested in Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. Mitapivat revenue reached $44.7 million in Q2 2026, while Agios reported a $100.7 million net loss and ended June with approximately $1 billion in cash and marketable securities. The company maintained its 2026 U.S. pyruvate kinase deficiency revenue outlook of $45 million to $50 million. AQVESME’s U.S. thalassemia launch continued to expand, with 442 cumulative prescriptions and payer coverage for roughly 75% of patient lives. Agios plans to stop reporting prescription counts after Q3 and use revenue as its primary commercial metric. The FDA set Nov. 1 as the decision date for mitapivat in sickle cell disease, though Agios does not expect a material 2026 revenue contribution. The company is also advancing pipeline programs in immune thrombocytopenia, polycythemia vera and phenylketonuria. Agios Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:AGIO) reported second-quarter 2026 mitapivat net revenue of $44.7 million, including $40.9 million in the United States and $3.8 million outside the U.S., as the company continued the U.S. thalassemia launch of AQVESME and prepared for a potential sickle cell disease approval later this year. The company recorded a net loss of $100.7 million for the quarter, compared with a $112 million loss in the prior-year period. Agios ended June with approximately $1 billion in cash equivalents and marketable securities. → Why SK hynix Could Be the Best AI Chip Stock to Buy Now Chief Executive Officer Brian Goff said the company is pursuing several growth drivers, including the thalassemia launch, a potential expansion of mitapivat into sickle cell disease, and pipeline programs in rare hematology and other rare diseases. Cost of sales totaled $3 million during the quarter. Research and development expense rose to $100.8 million from $91.9 million a year earlier, primarily reflecting a $15 million increase in process research and development tied to the company’s agreement with Oscotec, including a $25 million upfront payment associated with the cevidoplenib licensing transaction. → 3 Value ETFs to Consider as Growth Stocks Lag Behind Selling, general and administrative expense increased to $61.5 million from $45.9 million in the second quarter of 2025, which Chief Financial Officer Cecilia Jones attributed to commercial activities associated with the February launch of AQVESM…Read full document

Interested in Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. Mitapivat revenue reached $44.7 million in Q2 2026, while Agios reported a $100.7 million net loss and ended June with approximately $1 billion in cash and marketable securities. The company maintained its 2026 U.S. pyruvate kinase deficiency revenue outlook of $45 million to $50 million. AQVESME’s U.S. thalassemia launch continued to expand, with 442 cumulative prescriptions and payer coverage for roughly 75% of patient lives. Agios plans to stop reporting prescription counts after Q3 and use revenue as its primary commercial metric. The FDA set Nov. 1 as the decision date for mitapivat in sickle cell disease, though Agios does not expect a material 2026 revenue contribution. The company is also advancing pipeline programs in immune thrombocytopenia, polycythemia vera and phenylketonuria. Agios Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:AGIO) reported second-quarter 2026 mitapivat net revenue of $44.7 million, including $40.9 million in the United States and $3.8 million outside the U.S., as the company continued the U.S. thalassemia launch of AQVESME and prepared for a potential sickle cell disease approval later this year. The company recorded a net loss of $100.7 million for the quarter, compared with a $112 million loss in the prior-year period. Agios ended June with approximately $1 billion in cash equivalents and marketable securities. → Why SK hynix Could Be the Best AI Chip Stock to Buy Now Chief Executive Officer Brian Goff said the company is pursuing several growth drivers, including the thalassemia launch, a potential expansion of mitapivat into sickle cell disease, and pipeline programs in rare hematology and other rare diseases. Cost of sales totaled $3 million during the quarter. Research and development expense rose to $100.8 million from $91.9 million a year earlier, primarily reflecting a $15 million increase in process research and development tied to the company’s agreement with Oscotec, including a $25 million upfront payment associated with the cevidoplenib licensing transaction. → 3 Value ETFs to Consider as Growth Stocks Lag Behind Selling, general and administrative expense increased to $61.5 million from $45.9 million in the second quarter of 2025, which Chief Financial Officer Cecilia Jones attributed to commercial activities associated with the February launch of AQVESME. Agios maintained its outlook for approximately $45 million to $50 million in 2026 U.S. revenue from pyruvate kinase deficiency. The company expects full-year operating expenses to be approximately flat compared with 2025, excluding the $25 million cevidoplenib upfront payment. Its expense outlook includes investment to prepare for a possible sickle cell disease launch. → 5 AI Stocks Are Pulling Back—Which Growth Catalysts Still Look Strongest? Agios reported 442 cumulative AQVESME prescriptions from REMS-certified physicians as of June 30, including 200 additional prescriptions during the second quarter. The metric represents unique prescriptions for patients with completed START forms from REMS-certified physicians. Chief Commercial Officer Tsveta Milanova said second-quarter revenue included about $5 million in one-time benefits related to thalassemia stocking, along with modest favorable gross-to-net dynamics. The company continues to expect gross-to-net adjustments in a 10% to 20% range, though it cautioned that results can vary by quarter. Approximately 75% of thalassemia patient lives are now covered under payer policies, according to Milanova. She said the mix of prescriptions is increasingly shifting toward non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients, who may have less frequent interactions with health-care providers and more deliberate treatment discussions. Agios said time from demand to treatment initiation has begun moving toward its anticipated 10- to 12-week range as adoption broadens. The company expects it to move within that range as it further penetrates the non-transfusion-dependent population. The company plans to stop reporting prescriptions from REMS-certified physicians after the third quarter and instead use revenue as its primary commercial performance measure. Milanova said revenue better incorporates new patient starts, treatment initiation timing, refills and persistence on therapy as the launch matures. Management said the earliest AQVESME patients are approaching six months of treatment, a point at which physicians may assess clinical benefit and determine whether therapy should continue. In response to analyst questions, Chief Medical Officer and Head of Research and Development Sarah Gheuens said more than 90% of patients in the ENERGIZE study continued treatment into its open-label extension, while noting that real-world persistence is still in the early stages of assessment. The Food and Drug Administration accepted Agios’ supplemental new drug application for mitapivat in sickle cell disease and granted priority review, setting a Prescription Drug User Fee Act goal date of Nov. 1. Agios recently dosed the first patient in REIGNITE, its Phase III confirmatory trial in sickle cell disease. Gheuens said data presented at the European Hematology Association meeting showed hemoglobin responses in the RISE UP Phase III study, with responders experiencing improvements in sickle cell pain crisis-related endpoints and fatigue. The company also presented data on reductions in transfusion burden and red blood cell units transfused. Agios is initially focusing its potential sickle cell launch on roughly 25,000 patients who are actively treated or need therapy. Management said sickle cell disease has a higher Medicaid mix than its existing commercial markets, which would lead to higher gross-to-net adjustments because of mandatory Medicaid rebates. Gheuens said the company had not disclosed which brand name would be used for sickle cell disease if approved. She added that hepatocellular injury was not observed among sickle cell trial participants and that a REMS program may not be warranted, though the company said it is prepared to launch with or without one. Agios does not expect sickle cell disease to materially contribute to 2026 revenue given the November decision date. During the quarter, Agios in-licensed cevidoplenib, a selective oral Syk inhibitor being developed for immune thrombocytopenia. The company said it intends to engage with the FDA in coming months to align on advancement to Phase III. Gheuens said available Phase II data showed dose-dependent activity, no dose-limiting toxicity through Phase II and evidence of durable platelet responses. Agios also plans to initiate the Phase II portion of an operationally seamless Phase II/III program for AG-236 in polycythemia vera during the second half of 2026. The program is designed to identify an optimal dose and advance efficiently into a registrational stage. Elsewhere, the company expects Phase Ib proof-of-mechanism data for AG-181 in phenylketonuria during the second half of the year. Goff said Agios is prioritizing investments in programs it believes can support long-term growth across rare disease markets that management estimates could exceed $10 billion in 2030. Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc is a biopharmaceutical company founded in 2008 as a spin-out from research at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and the Broad Institute. Headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts, Agios focuses on understanding and targeting cellular metabolism to develop novel therapies for cancer and rare genetic diseases. The company's scientific platform integrates genomic discovery, metabolic profiling and precision medicine approaches to identify and advance small-molecule candidates that correct or exploit metabolic dysfunction. Agios's lead products are IDH (isocitrate dehydrogenase) inhibitors that target specific cancer mutations. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "Agios Pharmaceuticals Q2 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for July 2026.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30

Agios Pharmaceuticals Inc (AGIO) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Mitapivat Revenue ...

GuruFocus.com
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Total Mitapivat Net Revenue: $44.7 million for Q2 2026, including $40.9 million in the US and $3.8 million outside the US. AQVESME Prescriptions: 442 cumulative prescriptions from REMS-certified physicians as of June 30, 2026, with 200 new prescriptions added in Q2. Cost of Sales: $3 million for Q2 2026. Research and Development (R&D) Expense: $100.8 million for Q2 2026, compared to $91.9 million in Q2 2025. Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) Expense: $61.5 million for Q2 2026, compared to $45.9 million in Q2 2025. Net Loss: $100.7 million for Q2 2026, compared to a net loss of $112 million for Q2 2025. Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Marketable Securities: Approximately $1 billion as of the end of Q2 2026. 2026 US PK Deficiency Revenue Outlook: Expected to be approximately $45 million to $50 million. 2026 Full-Year Operating Expenses Outlook: Expected to remain approximately flat versus 2025, excluding the $25 million upfront payment for the cevidoplenib license. Gross to Net (GtN) Guidance: Expected to remain within the previously guided 10% to 20% range. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with AGIO. Is AGIO fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: July 30, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Strong commercial momentum with $44.7 million in total net revenue and 442 cumulative AQVESME prescriptions for REMS-certified physicians. FDA acceptance of mitapivat sNDA for sickle cell disease with priority review and a PDUFA goal date of November 1, 2026. Pipeline diversification through in-licensing of cevidoplenib, a next-generation oral SYK inhibitor for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Advancement of AG-236 into an operationally seamless Phase 2/3 program for polycythemia vera, with Phase 2 initiation planned for H2 2026. Strong financial position with approximately $1 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities, providing flexibility for growth. Net loss of $100.7 million for Q2 2026, though improved from $112 million loss in Q2 2025. Revenue growth expected to moderate as launch shifts to non-transfusion-dependent patients with longer time-to-treatment initiation (10-12 weeks). Potential patient discontinuation risk as first cohort approaches six-month treatment evaluation point in…Read full document

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Total Mitapivat Net Revenue: $44.7 million for Q2 2026, including $40.9 million in the US and $3.8 million outside the US. AQVESME Prescriptions: 442 cumulative prescriptions from REMS-certified physicians as of June 30, 2026, with 200 new prescriptions added in Q2. Cost of Sales: $3 million for Q2 2026. Research and Development (R&D) Expense: $100.8 million for Q2 2026, compared to $91.9 million in Q2 2025. Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) Expense: $61.5 million for Q2 2026, compared to $45.9 million in Q2 2025. Net Loss: $100.7 million for Q2 2026, compared to a net loss of $112 million for Q2 2025. Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Marketable Securities: Approximately $1 billion as of the end of Q2 2026. 2026 US PK Deficiency Revenue Outlook: Expected to be approximately $45 million to $50 million. 2026 Full-Year Operating Expenses Outlook: Expected to remain approximately flat versus 2025, excluding the $25 million upfront payment for the cevidoplenib license. Gross to Net (GtN) Guidance: Expected to remain within the previously guided 10% to 20% range. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with AGIO. Is AGIO fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: July 30, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Strong commercial momentum with $44.7 million in total net revenue and 442 cumulative AQVESME prescriptions for REMS-certified physicians. FDA acceptance of mitapivat sNDA for sickle cell disease with priority review and a PDUFA goal date of November 1, 2026. Pipeline diversification through in-licensing of cevidoplenib, a next-generation oral SYK inhibitor for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Advancement of AG-236 into an operationally seamless Phase 2/3 program for polycythemia vera, with Phase 2 initiation planned for H2 2026. Strong financial position with approximately $1 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities, providing flexibility for growth. Net loss of $100.7 million for Q2 2026, though improved from $112 million loss in Q2 2025. Revenue growth expected to moderate as launch shifts to non-transfusion-dependent patients with longer time-to-treatment initiation (10-12 weeks). Potential patient discontinuation risk as first cohort approaches six-month treatment evaluation point in H2 2026. Higher gross-to-net dynamics expected for sickle cell disease due to larger Medicaid mix, impacting net revenue per patient. Quarter-to-quarter revenue variability anticipated due to order timing, inventory movements, and gross-to-net fluctuations. Here are the key highlights from the Agios Pharmaceuticals Inc (NASDAQ:AGIO) Q2 2026 earnings call. Q: What is the outlook for the AQVESME launch in thalassemia, and how should we think about the transition from prescription reporting to revenue as the primary metric? A: Tsveta Milanova, Chief Commercial Officer, stated that the launch is progressing well with 442 cumulative prescriptions. As the launch matures and adoption expands into the non-transfusion-dependent (NTDT) population, the correlation between new prescriptions and revenue will decrease due to longer time-to-treatment initiation (expected to settle at 10-12 weeks). Therefore, the company will stop reporting prescription metrics after Q3 2026 and transition to revenue as the primary measure of commercial performance, especially with a potential sickle cell disease launch on the horizon. Q: What are the key dynamics to watch in the second half of 2026 for the thalassemia launch? A: Tsveta Milanova noted that the first half of the year benefited from highly motivated patients and prescribers. In the second half, the focus will shift to the broader NTDT population, where treatment decisions take longer. A critical milestone will be the six-month treatment mark for early patients, where physicians will assess clinical response and determine continuation. The company expects time-to-treatment initiation to move well within the 10- to 12-week range as the patient mix shifts. Q: What is the potential for mitapivat in sickle cell disease, and what are the launch preparations? A: Brian Goff, CEO, highlighted the FDA acceptance of the sNDA with priority review and a PDUFA goal date of November 1, 2026. The company is actively preparing for a potential launch, focusing on approximately 25,000 actively treated patients. Tsveta Milanova added that the team is leveraging capabilities from the thalassemia launch and is ready to execute, with pricing to be determined based on the label and market environment at the time of approval. Q: What is the significance of the in-licensing of cevidoplenib, and how does it fit into the pipeline? A: Brian Goff explained that cevidoplenib is a next-generation, highly selective oral SYK inhibitor for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This expands the company's rare hematology franchise beyond PK activation. Sarah Gheuens, Chief Medical Officer, added that the drug was designed to address limitations of the SYK inhibitor class, with encouraging clinical data showing dose-dependent activity and durable platelet responses. The company plans to engage with the FDA to align on a Phase 3 program. Q: What is the progress on AG-236 for polycythemia vera? A: Sarah Gheuens stated that AG-236, an siRNA TMPRSS6 inhibitor, is advancing into an operationally seamless Phase 2/3 program. The molecule has shown hepcidin induction and favorable effects on iron parameters, supporting a potential every-six-month dosing regimen. The Phase 2 portion is designed to identify the optimal dose and is expected to begin in the second half of 2026. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30

Agios Pharmaceuticals: Q2 Earnings Snapshot

Associated Press

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (AP) — CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (AP) — Agios Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AGIO) on Thursday reported a loss of $100.7 million in its second quarter. The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based company said it had a loss of $1.69 per share. The results topped Wall Street expectations. The average estimate of four analysts surveyed by Zacks Investment Research was for a loss of $1.86 per share. The biopharmaceutical company posted revenue of $44.7 million in the period, also topping Street forecasts. Three analysts surveyed by Zacks expected $22.7 million. Agios Pharmaceuticals shares have risen 29% since the beginning of the year. The stock has dropped 7% in the last 12 months. _____ This story was generated by Automated Insights (http://automatedinsights.com/ap) using data from Zacks Investment Research. Access a Zacks stock report on AGIO at https://www.zacks.com/ap/AGIO

TranscriptFY2026 Q22026-07-30

FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript

Earnings source - 118 paragraphs
Operator

Morning, welcome to Agios Pharmaceuticals' second quarter 2026 conference call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. There will be a question-and-answer session at the end. Please be advised that this call is being recorded at Agios' request. I would now like to turn the call over to Morgan Sanford, Head of Investor Relations at Agios.

Morgan Sanford

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us to discuss Agios Pharmaceuticals' second quarter 2026 financial results and business highlights. You can access the slides for today's call by going to the investors section of our website, agios.com. Please note we'll be making certain forward-looking statements today. Actual events and results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements because of various risks, uncertainties, and other factors, including those set forth in our most recent filings with the SEC and any other future filings that we may make with the SEC. On the call with me today from Agios are Brian Goff, Chief Executive Officer; Cecilia Jones, Chief Financial Officer; Tsveta Milanova, Chief Commercial Officer; and Dr. Sarah Gheuens, Chief Medical Officer and Head of Research and Development. Following prepared remarks, we will open the call for questions.

Morgan Sanford

With that, I am pleased to turn the call over to Brian.

Brian Goff

Thanks, Morgan. Good morning, everyone, thank you for joining us. Before we review our second quarter results, I'd like to take a step back and highlight the strong position from which Agios is executing as we continue advancing toward our goal of building a multi-billion-dollar rare disease business. We are executing against multiple drivers of value creation, including the launch of AQVESME in thalassemia, the potential expansion of mitapivat into sickle cell disease, and a pipeline that continues to grow through both internal innovation and disciplined business development. During the quarter, we further strengthened our portfolio with the addition of cevidoplenib, a next-generation, highly selective oral Syk inhibitor that expands our rare hematology franchise into immune thrombocytopenia, or ITP. We also advanced AG-236 into an operationally seamless Phase II/III program in polycythemia vera, adding another potential growth driver within hematology.

Brian Goff

Beyond hematology, AG-181 continues to progress. We expect phase I-B proof of mechanism data in phenylketonuria patients in the second half of the year. We also continue to apply a disciplined approach to portfolio management, making focused investment decisions, and directing resources toward opportunities with the greatest potential to create value for patients and shareholders. As you'll hear throughout today's call, our progress this quarter reflects the strength of that strategy, combining commercial execution, pipeline advancement, disciplined capital allocation, and strategic business development to position Agios for sustainable long-term growth. Turning to our second quarter highlights on the next slide, we delivered a quarter marked by strong commercial performance, meaningful pipeline progress, and continued portfolio discipline. First, we delivered sustained commercial momentum with $44.7 million in total net revenue, including $40.9 million in the U.S. and 442 cumulative AQVESME prescriptions from REMS-certified physicians.

Brian Goff

Second, we further diversified our pipeline through the in-licensing of cevidoplenib, a next-generation, highly selective oral Syk inhibitor for ITP, progressing toward phase III and strengthening our rare hematology pipeline. Third, we advanced mitapivat toward a potential new indication in sickle cell disease. During the quarter, we received FDA acceptance of our sNDA with priority review and were assigned a PDUFA goal date of November 1st, bringing us one step closer to delivering a first-in-class medicine in an area of significant unmet need. Finally, we ended the quarter with approximately $1 billion in cash equivalents, and marketable securities, providing financial flexibility to support both commercial growth and pipeline progression. Overall, we entered the second half of 2026 with strong commercial delivery, a more diversified pipeline, an important near-term regulatory catalyst, and the capital position to execute on our strategy.

Brian Goff

With that, please advance to the next slide. I'll turn the call over to Cecilia to discuss financials.

Cecilia Jones

Thank you, Brian. Next slide, please. Turning to our second quarter financial results, total mitapivat net revenue was $44.7 million, including $40.9 million in the U.S. and $3.8 million outside the U.S. Cost of sales for the quarter was $3 million. Research and development expense was $100.8 million, compared to $91.9 million in the second quarter of 2025, primarily due to an increase in process research and development of $15 million, driven by the $25 million upfront payment associated with the agreement of Oscotec. Selling, general, and administrative expense was $61.5 million, compared to $45.9 million in the prior year's period, reflecting an increase in commercial-related activities as we executed a launch of AQVESME in February. Net loss for the second quarter of 2026 was $100.7 million, compared to a net loss of $112 million for the second quarter of 2025.

Cecilia Jones

We ended the quarter with approximately $1 billion in cash equivalents, and marketable securities, which we believe provides financial flexibility to support commercial execution, advancement of our pipeline, and continued investment in opportunities to create long-term value. Turning to our outlook for 2026, we continue to expect approximately $45 million-$50 million from PK deficiency revenues in the U.S. Full-year operating expenses are expected to remain approximately flat versus 2025, excluding the $25 million upfront payment associated with the cevidoplenib licensing transaction recognized in the second quarter and include investment to prepare for a potential sickle cell disease launch aligned with our November 1st PDUFA date. Our priorities for the remainder of the year remain clear: driving the AQVESME launch, preparing for a potential sickle cell disease approval, advancing our pipeline, and maintaining financial discipline.

Cecilia Jones

Please advance to the next slide, I'll turn it over to Tsveta to cover commercial highlights and AQVESME U.S. thalassemia launch progress.

Tsveta Milanova

Thanks, Cecilia. Next slide, please. With six months of launch experience now behind us, we're encouraged by the underlying drivers of performance. What we have seen so far continues to reinforce our confidence in the long-term PYRUKYND opportunity in thalassemia. Importantly, the strong execution across our commercial and patient-focused organization further strengthens our confidence in future launch opportunities. In the U.S., performance reflected continued growth in thalassemia demand and solid commercial execution. Net revenue in the quarter reflected approximately $5 million of one-time benefits related to stocking in thalassemia, along with modest gross-to-net favorability. We continue to expect gross to net within our previously guided 10%-20% range, with quarter-over-quarter variability. Outside the U.S., we delivered $3.8 million in net sales, reflecting anticipated demand for thalassemia in Europe following approval and continued consistent early demand for thalassemia in the GCC.

Tsveta Milanova

As we have seen consistently across rare disease launches, the shape of new patient starts naturally moderates as adoption broadens beyond the earliest wave of highly motivated patients and prescribers. We continue to expect quarter-over-quarter revenue variability reflecting order timing, inventory movement, and gross-to-net dynamics. Next slide, please. I'm very pleased with the continued U.S. launch performance of PYRUKYND. During the second quarter, we generated an additional 200 prescriptions from REMS-certified physicians, bringing cumulative prescriptions to 442 as of June 30th. As a reminder, this metric captures unique prescriptions for patients with completed START forms from REMS-certified physicians and serves as an early indicator of underlying demand. Importantly, the underlying launch dynamics remain healthy. While demand continues to come from highly motivated patients.

Tsveta Milanova

We saw a growing proportion of non-transfusion-dependent patients in the second quarter, a profile consistent with the therapy moving beyond the earliest, most motivated cohort of transfusion-dependent patients. We continue to see strong conversion from prescription to treatment initiation. Time to START is naturally trending towards our anticipated 10-12 -week range as adoption broadens across the NTDT population, where treatment decisions often involve more deliberate clinical discussions and patients may have less frequent interactions with the healthcare system. Access continues to strengthen. We now have approximately 75% of thalassemia lives covered under payer policies. Additionally, physician REMS certification continues to progress in step with prescribing activity. It's not a barrier to patient access. As the launch matures, prescriptions with completed START forms become a less informative measure of performance. Whereas revenue increasingly reflects both new patient starts and persistence on therapy.

Tsveta Milanova

For that reason, in anticipation of a potential FDA approval for mitapivat in sickle cell disease, we plan to discontinue reporting prescriptions from REMS-certified physicians after the third quarter and transition to revenue as our primary measure of commercial performance. Upon a potential sickle cell disease approval, we will assess the most meaningful metrics to communicate the progress and outlook of the broader mitapivat franchise. Next slide, please. I wanted to take a few moments to highlight thalassemia launch considerations in the second half of this year. The first half reflected a distinct initial phase of the launch. The first quarter benefited from a strong pre-launch anticipation and momentum built in the period leading to approval following the more than three-month PDUFA delay.

Tsveta Milanova

Second quarter demand continues to reflect adoption from highly motivated patients and prescribers, with time to treatment initiation beginning to approach our anticipated 10-12-week average at launch maturity. Looking ahead, we expect the shape of the launch to naturally evolve. Adoption is expanding into a broader non-transfusion-dependent population, where patients are typically seen less frequently and treatment decisions may take more time. As the patient mix continues to shift towards non-transfusion-dependent patients, we expect time to treatment initiation to move well within the 10-12-week range we consistently discuss. We are also mindful that the first cohort of patients who initiated therapy in the earliest month of launch is approaching six months of treatment, a natural point at which physicians assess clinical response.

Tsveta Milanova

This is an important part of the treatment journey. It is the period during which we will begin to build a broader real-world understanding of how physicians and patients evaluate response and integrate mitapivat into long-term care. Taken together, these dynamics reinforce that AQVESME is delivering a healthy launch that is successfully progressing beyond the initial wave of adoption and into a broader expansion phase. As we move through the second half of the first launch year, our focus remains on expanding reach across the thalassemia community, expanding adoption in the non-transfusion-dependent segment while continuing to add new prescribers. We remain highly confident in the long-term opportunity for AQVESME and in our ability to build a durable, growing thalassemia franchise over time. Please move to the next slide.

Tsveta Milanova

We are actively preparing for a potential sickle cell disease launch in the U.S. and are encouraged by both the commercial opportunity and the unmet need we see in this community. Our initial launch focus is on approximately 25,000 patients who are actively treated or in need of therapy today. We believe the population alone represents a meaningful opportunity for mitapivat, with potential to expand beyond the initial segment over time. Importantly, we are leveraging the capabilities, relationships, and insights we have developed through the thalassemia launch while continuing to invest in market access, education, and community engagement activities ahead of the PDUFA goal date. Pending FDA approval, we believe these efforts position us well to support a successful launch and to deliver mitapivat to patients in need of innovative treatment options. Please move to the next slide.

Tsveta Milanova

With that, I will hand the call over to Sarah to cover key R&D highlights from the quarter.

Sarah Gheuens

Thank you, Tsveta. Turning to our pipeline on the next slide. Following recent portfolio prioritization decisions, we remain focused on advancing a diversified rare hematology portfolio with opportunities across multiple stages of development. Mitapivat continues to anchor the portfolio with approved indications in pyruvate kinase deficiency and thalassemia, and a potential accelerated approval in sickle cell disease later this year. During the first half of this year, we achieved an important milestone with thalassemia approval in Europe and the UAE, completing regulatory approvals across all four priority launch geographies following prior approvals in the U.S. and KSA. Since first quarter results, we filed and received acceptance in the U.S. for the mitapivat sNDA in sickle cell disease, with priority review and a PDUFA goal date of November 1st.

Sarah Gheuens

We remain committed to bringing mitapivat to patients with sickle cell disease and recently dosed the first patient in reignite, our phase III confirmatory trial, an important milestone in advancing the program. We also strengthened the pipeline during the quarter through the in-licensing of cevidoplenib, a next-generation Syk inhibitor that expands our reach within rare hematology and adds a compelling opportunity in immune thrombocytopenia. Beyond mitapivat and cevidoplenib, we continue to invest in future growth drivers, including AG-236 in polycythemia vera and AG-181 in phenylketonuria. Taken together, we believe the pipeline reflects a focused allocation of capital and resources towards programs where we see the greatest potential to create long-term value for patients and shareholders. Please move to the next slide.

Sarah Gheuens

As we discussed when we announced the in-licensing of cevidoplenib, our interest in the program is grounded in its potential to address some of the limitations that have historically constrained the Syk inhibitor class. Cevidoplenib was designed to optimize both selectivity and pharmacokinetics, support a sustained target inhibition while maintaining a tolerability profile suitable for chronic use. The clinical data generated to date are encouraging and support this design rationale, demonstrating dose-dependent activity, no dose-limiting toxicity through phase II, and evidence of durable platelet responses. Taken together, these data support the rationale for advancing cevidoplenib as a next-generation highly selective Syk inhibitor. We're looking forward to engaging with the FDA in the coming months to align on progression to phase III. Next slide, please.

Sarah Gheuens

At EHA in June, we were pleased to share a broad body of data across both thalassemia and sickle cell disease that continues to strengthen our confidence in mitapivat. Across the portfolio, we have 10 abstracts accepted, including the RISE UP phase III study, which was selected for the EHA oral plenary session. In sickle cell disease, RISE UP demonstrated hemoglobin responses consistent with the mechanism of PK activation, with hemoglobin responders experiencing clinically meaningful improvement in sickle cell pain crisis-related endpoints and fatigue. At EHA, we presented new data showing clinically meaningful reductions in transfusion burden and red blood cell units transfused across the total trial population, exceeding historical experience with hydroxyurea. Importantly, outcomes from the subgroup of patients with at least one transfusion in the 52 weeks prior to enrollment directly informed the treatment effect and powering assumptions for the ongoing REIGNITE confirmatory trial, supporting accelerated approval.

Sarah Gheuens

We also presented additional patient-reported outcomes data showing clinically meaningful improvements in how hemoglobin responders feel and function, including reductions in physical pain. In addition, 56-week follow-up data from the SATISFY phase II investigator-sponsored trial in related hemoglobinopathies show robust hemoglobin response rates and mean hemoglobin improvement, as well as suggesting decreased iron burden. In non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia, we shared open-label extension data showing that 60% of patients continuing on mitapivat met criteria for hemoglobin response, and 60% of patients who switched onto mitapivat in the open-label extension achieved hemoglobin response. Additionally, subgroup analyses indicate high hemoglobin response rates for non-transfusion-dependent patients with high baseline hemoglobin levels, indicating that less severely anemic NTDT patients achieve improvements in hemoglobin levels and fatigue.

Sarah Gheuens

These data were received very favorably by the thalassemia community and reinforce the value of mitapivat in non-transfusion-dependent patients, which comprise the majority of the eligible adult patients in the U.S. Taken together, these data reinforce the consistency of mitapivat's profile across indications and further strengthen our confidence in the long-term potential of mitapivat in hemolytic anemia. While we continue to advance and expand the mitapivat opportunity, we're also focused on building the next generation of potential growth drivers within rare hematology. AG-236 is an important example of that strategy. Next slide, please. Following encouraging phase I data, we're advancing AG-236 into an operationally seamless phase II/III development program in polycythemia vera. What continues to differentiate AG-236 is its potential profile within an evolving treatment landscape.

Sarah Gheuens

The molecule demonstrated hepcidin induction through day 57 and favorable effects on iron parameters in extended follow-up, supporting the potential for an every six-month dosing regimen without saturation. The phase II portion of the study is designed to identify the optimal therapeutic window across multiple dose levels while enabling efficient progression into the registrational portion of the program. More broadly, the seamless phase II/III strategy reflects our commitment to disciplined execution while advancing development as efficiently as possible, with phase II initiation planned for the second half of 2026. We believe AG-236 has the potential to further diversify our rare hematology leadership and contribute to our long-term growth beyond mitapivat. With that, please move to the next slide, I will hand the call back to Brian for closing remarks.

Brian Goff

Thank you, Sarah. Next slide, please. As we look across the business, we continue to make meaningful progress against the strategic priorities we established for 2026. We're building commercial momentum with AQVESME and thalassemia, reaching 442 cumulative prescriptions as of June 30th. We're advancing mitapivat toward a potential approval in sickle cell disease, which represents an important opportunity to expand our PK activation franchise and a potential next growth driver for the company. We're also advancing AG-236, our siRNA TMPRSS6 inhibitor for polycythemia vera, into an operationally seamless phase II/III program expected to begin in the second half of this year. During the quarter, we further diversified our portfolio through the addition of cevidoplenib, a next-generation, highly selective Syk inhibitor in ITP progressing toward phase III. Importantly, our progress this year reflects both execution and discipline.

Brian Goff

We're investing behind the opportunities where we believe Agios can have the greatest impact for patients and create the strongest long-term value for shareholders. Next slide. Taken together, we enter the second half of the year with a growing commercial foundation, a meaningful near-term regulatory catalyst, and an increasingly diversified pipeline and the financial strength to execute on our strategy. Next slide, please. Today, Agios is anchored by a growing commercial business and supported by a pipeline spanning multiple development stages and disease areas. Across the portfolio, we are pursuing opportunities where differentiated biology, meaningful patient unmet need, and disciplined execution can support durable long-term growth. Collectively, these opportunities represent rare disease markets estimated at more than $10 billion in 2030.

Brian Goff

Before we open the call for questions, I'd like to thank the entire Agios team for their unwavering commitment to patients and their continued dedication to executing on our strategy. Their passion, resilience, and focus have been instrumental in the progress we've made this year. With that, thank you all for joining us today. Operator, we're ready to begin the question and answer session.

Operator

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, to ask the question, please press star one one on your telephone, then wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star one one again. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Our first question comes from the line of Alec Stranahan with Bank of America. Your line is open.

Alec Stranahan

Hi. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. Congrats on the really strong quarter here. Two questions from me. First, on time on treatment in the commercial setting, do you think the ENERGIZE studies are a good barometer here? Just trying to think about how the dynamic of patients potentially coming off their could play into second half sales. When you look at the time on treatment, did this change at all between 1Q to 2Q? Did it move closer or further away from that 10-12 week average range that you're setting out? I guess, are you starting to see any repeat prescriptions under the REMS program at this point? Thank you.

Brian Goff

Thanks, Alec. Two-parter. Tsveta, you can take the first one. Actually, you'll take both of these.

Tsveta Milanova

Yeah.

Brian Goff

On the time on treatment and ENERGIZE as an analog. The second one, I think, Alec, you're asking about not time on treatment, but time to treatment, from the demand to initiation. Tsveta, you want to take that?

Tsveta Milanova

Absolutely. We are very pleased with the strong initial start of the AQVESME launch, Alec. As we mentioned, we have in total 442 prescriptions from REMS-certified physicians for the first two quarters of the launch. As we look ahead, in the first couple of quarters, we benefited from faster than anticipated time to treatment initiation. It was faster than the 10-12 weeks, given that we have prescriptions coming from highly motivated patients and physicians. Keeping that in mind, we'll start to reach the natural point of the six months, at which physicians and patients are going to evaluate benefit for the product and continuation rates. That's going to be more in the second half of the year, and we'll monitor that closely. Currently, what we see from the market is a very strong feedback and a positive feedback from the community.

Tsveta Milanova

We expect continuation rates to be in line with the ENERGIZE study. We'll continue to monitor that, but the product performance is very strong in the market. When it comes to time to treatment initiation, we start seeing that as we penetrate into the entity settings to move closer and closer to what we initially expected, the 10-12-week range. As we move into the second half of the year, we will continue to monitor that, but we expect to be well within the 10-12 weeks given the strong penetration in the entity settings. Your third question was around repeat prescriptions for the REMS. When we look at that, of course, we have patients who have been on therapy for multiple months. We do start seeing the repeat prescriptions and patients and physicians are going through the REMS process very, very smoothly.

Alec Stranahan

Good. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Andrew Berens with Leerink. Your line is open.

Andrew Berens

Hi. Thanks, and congrats on the strong execution. I guess I just want to expand a little bit on the persistence rate since it's so important going forward. Is there anything that you can tell us about maybe the expanded access program at all? What the experience will be like for these patients in the real world? The other thing that's obviously very important is going to be the sickle cell label, whether it's on AQVESME or PYRUKYND. What factors will go into that? Is there anything you can tell us in these early days ahead of the November 1st PDUFA that should give us confidence that you won't have a REMS or have to potentially reduce the pricing for AQVESME in thalassemia? Thanks.

Brian Goff

Thanks, Andy. I will just say again, and thanks for the comments about the strong quarter. I am really pleased and proud with the continued execution from Tsveta and the team. I think on the persistency, Andy, maybe we'll start with Sarah just reflecting on the clinical trial, the open label extensions, and what we saw, because it still is early days for us to quantify persistence, but we always look at the trials and OLEs as a proxy.

Sarah Gheuens

Yes. Thanks, Brian. I think, Andy, here we can really look at the open label data that we presented at EHA recently as well. As you know, we have very high continuation rates for people who finish the clinical trials and then go into the open-label extension. Now we have the benefit of being able to have followed them for a period of time post randomized control trial, where you see there is a good maintenance of response.

Sarah Gheuens

Patients do continue on the drug. You see that maintenance of hemoglobin, the maintenance of anti-hemolytic response and people feeling good. Another point there, what was exciting to see at the EHA dataset was that people with a higher hemoglobin also had good response to the treatment, which is important, of course, as we continue to expand the patients we capture in the launch for the non-transfusion dependent patients. Yes, I think the clinical trial data is actually the best way to look at that question right now. Yeah.

Tsveta Milanova

Yeah. I just wanted to end that I've been spending a lot of time with clinicians in the field, had the opportunity to hear their feedback on the EHA data. As we enter into the second half of the year, and we start experiencing the real world evaluation of persistency, I'm very confident that we'll see the repetition of what we see in the clinical trials in terms of continuation rates for six months.

Sarah Gheuens

Then in regards to-

Andrew Berens

Can you give us-

Sarah Gheuens

Oh, sorry.

Andrew Berens

I'm just going to ask, can you give us a number, a percentage that you saw in the open label extension study of patients who stayed on?

Sarah Gheuens

For ENERGIZE, we had an over 90% continuation from the clinical trial. Yeah, then, of course, as time continues, clinical trials are burdensome, it drops a little, but it's very good persistence, both for PKD, for thalassemia, for sickle cell disease in the clinical trials. What was interesting there is also the response rate with longer exposure, which it's important for thalassemia from in the early 40%, we had some non-responders convert into responders. We got to a 60% response rate there. The clinical trial data is very good.

Brian Goff

We know obviously that's an important metric for us going forward. We're still early days. This is our second full quarter of launch, which in a way matches the period of time for the ENERGIZE trial. We'll continue to monitor and of course, implement appropriate patient services support to help patients continue on therapy. Andy, maybe you can just repeat the second part of your question.

Andrew Berens

Yeah. Obviously, I don't think anyone expects sickle cell pricing to be as resilient as thalassemia or PKD. It really depends on whether you get a sickle cell added to Exjade or PYRUKYND. What do you think is going to drive that decision and any insights, now that we're several months away from the PDUFA, about which brand sickle cell may be added to if approved?

Sarah Gheuens

Yeah. The PDUFA is indeed November 1st priority review. We're very excited about that. We have not further discussed which brand name is going to be used, but as you know, the clinical trial data looked very good. We did not have the hepatocellular injury observed in the sickle cell disease patients. Therefore it may not warrant a REMS. Either way, our teams are ready to execute a launch with or without a REMS. More to come.

Tsveta Milanova

Absolutely.

Andrew Berens

Okay.

Tsveta Milanova

As always, we'll provide more specifics at the time of launch once we have the label. We'll price the product for that indication and across the portfolio to maximize the opportunity based on the clinical data, of course, the market environment at the time. I must say, we are in a very strong position given that it's our third indication. There is a very high unmet need in sickle cell disease. We do have a very strong market access team. I'm very proud of the progress they made in thalassemia with the payer policies. We'll continue to learn and build from here.

Andrew Berens

Great. Thanks for answering the questions. Congrats again on the strong quarter. It looks like it's going to continue.

Brian Goff

Thanks, Andy.

Operator

Please stand by for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Gregory Renza with Truist Securities. Your line is open.

Speaker 8

Hi, team. This is Supath on for Greg. Congrats. Let me add the congrats to the team too on an excellent quarter. My question is two parts as well, if I may. As we enter the second half of 2026, and we move beyond the initial wave of highly motivated transfusion-dependent patients, how should we think about the run rate of new patient starts, particularly in the broader non-transfusion dependent population? The second part is, where are you at in terms of gross? I know it's favorable this quarter. Where are you at within the range of the 10%-20% expected target? Now you're at 75% of cover life. Thanks and congrats again.

Brian Goff

Thanks, Supath. Tsveta, maybe you can start with, and I think you said it the right way as we extend further into the broader reach in the NTD population. Tsveta, you want to take that and then we'll do gross to net separately?

Tsveta Milanova

Absolutely. I'm very pleased with the progress so far. We are really seeing a very healthy start of the launch, both from penetration into the community setting where the majority of prescribers are, as well as the penetration in the NTD setting, which is the bigger commercial opportunity.

Tsveta Milanova

As we mentioned in the second quarter, we added 200 prescriptions from REMS-certified physicians. As we move into the second half of the year, prescriptions growth and revenue growth are not going to be directly correlated on a perfect basis, given that we're moving into the more mature phase of the launch. The revenues really also depend on time to treatment initiations, REMS onboarding, and persistency as we've discussed. Moving ahead, as we move into the NTDT setting, we expect the time to treatment initiation to move well into the 10-12 weeks, given the fact that these patients have less frequent visits to the healthcare professionals, and they'll need to go through the insurance verification as well as the REMS process as well.

Tsveta Milanova

We are really, really encouraged by the rate of patient adoption, the progress that we are making, the way the patients are converting and staying on therapy at this part of the launch, and most importantly, the really positive feedback from what I'm hearing from the clinicians on the product profile in the real world.

Brian Goff

Great. Supath, I think the second part of your question was around the 10%-20% guidance that we've given on gross to net. Cecilia, you want to comment here?

Cecilia Jones

We expect that to continue to be in that range of 10%-20% as we've guided before. There's always some quarter-over-quarter variability, but on aggregate, that's a range we still expect to see.

Operator

Thank you. Please stand by for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Marc Frahm with TD Cowen. Your line is open.

Marc Frahm

Hi. Thanks for taking my questions. Completely get the pushes and pulls on turning a TRx into actual revenue, of course, there will be some drop-off of patients on the back end starting in the second half. Do you view that 200 patients at the top of the funnel as now a sustainable rate, or does that still reflect a little bit of that bolus that you talked about for Q1 of the backlog of REMS certifications and the highly motivated patients?

Brian Goff

Yeah. Maybe I'll start, I'm going to turn it over to Tsveta. I think, Marc, a good way to think about a comment we've made several times in terms of engaged patients, engaged clinicians, is that's a gradient. We know that we're still on the front end of that gradient. Tsveta just commented on it too. As we move further into the NTD population, by definition, these patients tend to have less frequency of clinical interactions. That's essentially the dynamic that we're up against. Tsveta, what would you add?

Tsveta Milanova

Yeah. No. Absolutely. As I also mentioned in my prepared remarks, looking into entering a new phase of the launch in the second quarter, we expect prescriptions growth and revenue growth not to correlate directly in every single quarter due to the time to treatment initiations, the patient conversion rate persistency, and inter-quarter ordering variability. That's why we'll actually move away from this initial indicator of demand after the third quarter, which is prescriptions, to something that we believe is more reflective of the underlying health of the business, which is going to be revenue. When you think about how the first half is going to transition into the next phase of the launch, which is the second half.

Tsveta Milanova

In the first half, in Q1 and partially in Q2, we really benefited from these early adopter, highly motivated patients and physicians, the delay in the PDUFA, which created the anticipation for the launch, and patients and physicians who are ready to start as quickly as possible. As we move into the second part of the launch, what I'm looking for is really the underlying dynamics of the launch, which allow us to further penetrate into the community setting, a very strong adoption into the NTDT setting across alpha and beta thalassemia patients, and moving into that more steady state of 10-12 weeks treatment initiation. We are very encouraged of the way the launch is going and the way the team is executing.

Marc Frahm

Okay. That's all helpful. Maybe just on the other end of the funnel on the discontinuation rate, do you view these initial very highly motivated patients and clinicians that were starting therapy in Q1 and early Q2, are those patients, you think, more likely to stay on drug because of that motivation? Or are they perhaps the very hard-to-treat patients, and maybe they'll have a somewhat higher discontinuation rate than the long-term number might end up being?

Tsveta Milanova

As we progress into the next phase of the launch, we'll provide more color on what we see in the real world. My suggestion for now and what we're hearing from the clinicians is that the core period in the clinical trials is a very good proxy for continuation, and we'll continue to learn more. I'm very pleased with the payer policies that have been issued. They really allow a lot of flexibility for patients and physicians to make informed treatment choices on continuation. The policies are really for managing patients to clinical trial criteria or better. Let's use for now the clinical trial as a proxy.

Marc Frahm

Okay. Thanks.

Brian Goff

Thanks, Marc.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Samantha Semenkow with Citi. Your line is open.

Samantha Semenkow

Hi, good morning. Thanks very much for taking the question, let me add my congrats on the strong quarter. I'm wondering if you could just speak a little bit more to the dynamics of the clinical evaluation after six months of treatment that you were speaking on in your prepared remarks. What are physicians viewing as acceptable clinical bar for continuing treatment? Is this six months clinical mark, is that pretty strict, or is there some flexibility where it could vary when a physician would be looking to assess the clinical progress for a patient? I have a follow-up.

Brian Goff

Thanks, Sam. This is another good one for Tsveta, also where we have important learnings from our experience already with PKD, now over many years in terms of evaluation.

Tsveta Milanova

Absolutely. There is a variability of how patients and physicians define benefit, and I'm going to use the word benefit because it quite often goes beyond what is defined as the primary endpoint in the clinical trials. Of course, for transfusion-dependent patients, both patients and physicians will look at transfusion reductions both in terms of ability to expand the time between transfusions, as well as reducing the amount of transfused blood, and both of these aspects are important. What we hear from physicians, and I had the opportunity to meet both with patients and physicians just recently at the Polycythemia Foundation meeting, is they really do that on a patient-by-patient basis. Majority of them mentioned the six months, both driven by the fact that our clinical trials were within that timeframe, but it's also a natural opportunity for them to evaluate initial benefits.

Tsveta Milanova

They'll make decisions based on that. Transfusion reduction in the TDT patients will be important. They're not necessarily going to stick to what was defined as a 50% reduction in the clinical study. It's going to be on an individual patient basis and if they want to continue on therapy as well, and how they feel between the transfusions is also important. On the NTDT settings, they're going to look on improvement in hemoglobin. The one gram per deciliter is not like a hard yes or no. They'll also look at the improvement in hemolytic parameters, and very importantly in the NTDT setting is how patients feel. The reduction in fatigue is a key driver both for patients and physicians to continue on therapy irrespective of the actual level of hemoglobin improvement.

Tsveta Milanova

We are very encouraged from what we hear from our customers and look forward to learning more in the second half of the year.

Samantha Semenkow

Great. Thanks very much. Then just a second question about the evolution of the prescriber base. Are you seeing physicians write scripts for multiple patients that they manage? I'm wondering if there's any sort of dynamic that you could share that you've seen over the first two quarters of launch. Thanks very much.

Tsveta Milanova

Absolutely. When I look at our prescriber base, the most important thing for me is to look for breadth of prescribing because the leukemia, majority of the patients are managed in the community, and we don't have that much breadth across the therapy area. I see a very strong breadth of prescribing across the country from different clinicians. I'm very pleased with the healthy start of the launch. We do have a small number of key opinion leaders who have written for more than one patient, and we continue to see prescriptions coming from these prescribers. We expect that to continue. They do have a stable patient base. Really our opportunity is to continue to penetrate the community setting.

Samantha Semenkow

Thanks very much.

Brian Goff

Thank you.

Operator

Please stand by for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Eric Schmidt with Cantor. Your line is open.

Eric Schmidt

Thanks, Mike. Congrats on all the progress as well, and unfortunately another question for Tsveta. She seems like she's on the hot seat today. I just want to be clear about what's in the 442 cumulative prescriptions that you're reporting. Historically, I think you've said those are for individual patients mapped to individual start forms and wouldn't include refills or anything like that. Is that still the case?

Tsveta Milanova

Absolutely. They are unique patient prescriptions. In a way, that's kind of the equivalent of a start form, and it's written by a REMS-certified physician.

Eric Schmidt

I assume, Tsveta, you have some insight into how many refills have also been written thus far?

Tsveta Milanova

Yeah, the refill rates continue as patients reach their second and third month of therapy. The refills are continuing according to plan. Depending on the patients that have started and are progressing to the REMS, the refills are coming in. We are not providing a specific kind of refill dynamics and total patients on therapy. As I said, moving forward, we'll move away from start forms and really start focusing on revenue more because it takes into account all of these dynamics that you're asking about, Eric. New patients start, time to treatment initiation, refills, and continuation.

Eric Schmidt

You anticipated all of my questions. I've just got one left, which is conversion of patients from START forms to therapy. Do you have a sense of whether there have been many or any patients who have dropped out of the queue as they await therapy? Thanks.

Tsveta Milanova

We have a very positive payer policies, and we have no market access hurdles. For now at the beginning of the launch, I'm very pleased with that.

Tsveta Milanova

Our fill rate, which is basically prescriptions to patients starting on therapy, is very high and it's very much in line with other rare diseases. Nothing unanticipated there. I'm very pleased with that very high conversion rate.

Brian Goff

Eric, I'll just add that this is again, where our PKD experience, smaller scale, but the experience really comes into play because it's usually a time element, not necessarily a loss element in the translation from a START form to a patient starting on therapy. Again, we know with these NTDT patients, as we move deeper into that penetration, it could take longer, which is why the translational aspect of going from a START form to revenue gets harder and harder from your perspective.

Eric Schmidt

Great. Thanks. Congrats again.

Brian Goff

Thanks a lot.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Emily Bodnar with H.C. Wainwright. Your line is open.

Emily Bodnar

Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Thanks. Congrats also on the positive quarter. I'll ask on Europe sales for thalassemia, were any of the 2Q revenues driven by Europe specifically? How do you think about ex-U.S. revenue growth for the remainder of the year? Maybe secondly, with the sickle cell disease PDUFA coming in November, are you expecting to launch by year-end, and should we be expecting any initial revenues for the fourth quarter? Thanks.

Brian Goff

Thanks, Emily. Cecilia can comment on the European question, then we can come back to the question about sickle cell.

Cecilia Jones

Yeah. Emily, the ex-U.S. revenue so far this quarter is a combination of the consistent continued demand in GCC as we have early access there, as well as anticipated demand for Thalassemia in Europe following the approval in May. I'd say the vast majority of our revenues are still expected to come from the U.S. for the upcoming quarters as we're still ramping up the other regions, early access for both. We don't expect either one to be material contributors. Then the other question on sickle. Again, given the PDUFA date being November, it wouldn't be a material contribution to our full-year revenues for 2026.

Brian Goff

I will just add, Emily, we're enthusiastic about the opportunity of a priority review and November 1st PDUFA for sickle cell. None of you will know this, but we're actually at a pretty important sickle cell KOL and community physician meeting. The reason I bring that up is I'm really proud of the work that Tsveta and the team are doing to get ready for that launch, and we're certainly looking to amortize as much as we can from the progress we're making in Thalassemia towards that launch as well.

Emily Bodnar

Thank you.

Brian Goff

Thank you.

Operator

Please stand by for our next question. Ladies and gentlemen, due to the interest of time, we ask that you limit yourself to one question please. Our next question comes from the line of Salveen Richter with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Speaker 13

Good morning. This is Lydia on for Salveen. Thanks so much for taking our question, and congrats on the progress. Could you just speak broadly to the current breakout between transfusion and non-transfusion-dependent patients, and when you anticipate the non-transfusion population to make up a majority of patients on treatment? Then as a quick follow-up, once you reach that 10-12-week range, do you expect that to be the run rate going forward? Thanks so much.

Brian Goff

Sure thing, Lydia. Tsveta?

Tsveta Milanova

Absolutely. What we're seeing now is a growing proportion of the NTDT segment, as we've always said and as anticipated. In the first quarter and partly in the second quarter, a significant proportion of the patients were the TDT patients, given they have more frequent interactions with the healthcare system and are in generally the more engaged patient population. We've seen a significant growth of the NTD patients in the second quarter. We expect that to continue. If you look at our breakdown of our initial launch focus, we have about 4,000 patients that we are initially targeting, and about 50% of them are the NTD patients. We'll continue to penetrate that segment. We expect the 10-12-week average time to treatment initiations to stabilize and remain constant over time.

Operator

Thank you. Please stand by for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Tessa Romero with J.P. Morgan. Your line is open.

Tessa Romero

Hi, Brian and team. Thanks so much for taking our question. As a matter of quick housekeeping, can you just remind us what is the right way to think about the LOE for mitapivat? Second, to double-click here, what is the right way to think about how cumulative scripts for AQVESME should evolve from end of 2Q to end of 3Q? When might you be in a position to guide to revenues if script count will no longer be reported after 3Q? Thank you.

Brian Goff

Thanks, Tess. First one will be quick. Mitapivat, you could think of LOE as 2035 of composition of matter plus extensions. There are additional potential for patent extensions beyond that. The second one, which of course for where we go from 2Q to 3Q will be directional. We're not giving specific guidance, but qualitatively, Tsveta, I think this will be similar to earlier comments you've made about further penetration.

Tsveta Milanova

Absolutely. As we look into the second half of the year, we're looking forward to continue to penetrate the NTDT segment. As we know, these patients have less frequent visits to the healthcare providers. With that in mind, we also anticipate time to treatment initiations to move into the 10-12-week range, which will be a key dynamic of the quarter. As well, we are reaching this important six-month point of treatment benefit evaluation, and that's one of the main reasons we will start transitioning beyond Q3 into actually providing revenue rather than continuous prescriptions. Very importantly, we have an important date, November 1st, with the addition of the sickle cell disease launch. Once we have hopefully that launch, we'll provide more information of how we can characterize the evolution of the mitapivat franchise across indications. We'll do that at the time of launch.

Brian Goff

Cecilia, Tess snuck in a third question about guidance and when, so do you want to comment on that one?

Cecilia Jones

Yeah. Tess, as Tsveta mentioned, also with sickle cell coming on board upon potential approval in November, we'll look into the appropriate time to provide guidance for the franchise going forward.

Brian Goff

Good. Thank you.

Tsveta Milanova

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Our final question comes from the line of Luca Issi with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Speaker 15

Hi, team. This is Shelby on for Luca, thanks for taking our question. Maybe on the commercial preparation for a potential launch in sickle cell. I believe this has a higher Medicaid mix versus thalassemia and PKU. One, is that correct? Two, how are you thinking about gross to net dynamics and net revenue per patient in sickle cell relative to your other existing commercial products? Also does the Novo competitive dynamic factor into your pricing approach at all? Any color there much appreciated.

Tsveta Milanova

Absolutely. We'll provide definitely more specifics on pricing at the time of approval, that's going to be driven by the label and the competitive environment at the time, we'll continue to observe that moving forward. Of course, the sickle cell disease population has a higher Medicaid proportion, that by definition has a mandatory rebate of 23%, which will drive the gross to net to a higher level compared to PKU and thalassemia. I can tell you we are super excited about the PDUFA date, the team is ready for launch.

Operator

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, I would like to turn the call back over to Brian Goff for closing remarks.

Brian Goff

All right. Thanks everyone for your questions and for joining us today. Tsveta was in the hot seat today, which we quite enjoy, thanks a lot for that. To close, we're really pleased with the progress we made in the second quarter. That includes delivering on continued AQVESME launch momentum, advancing mitapivat toward a potential sickle cell disease approval, as we just discussed, strengthening our pipeline with cevidoplenib and AG-236, and maintaining the financial flexibility to execute. Ultimately, we enter the second half of the year focused, disciplined, and confident in our ability to build long-term value for both patients and shareholders. Thanks a lot, and we look forward to speaking with you all soon.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-27

Neurocrine Gears Up to Report Q2 Earnings: What's in the Cards?

Zacks
Neurocrine Biosciences NBIX is scheduled to report second-quarter 2026 results on July 30, after market close. We expect investors to focus on the sales performance of NBIX’s marketed products and other pipeline updates when the company reports quarterly results. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for second-quarter 2026 revenues is pegged at $901.54 million, while the same for earnings is pegged at $2.26 per share. Over the past six months, shares of NBIX have risen 30.5% against the industry’s 4.1% decline. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Let’s see how things might have shaped up for NBIX in the to-be-reported quarter. Neurocrine’s top line primarily comprises product sales from Ingrezza and Crenessity with only a modest contribution from other revenue streams. Ingrezza, the company's flagship VMAT2 inhibitor, continues to anchor revenue growth with its leadership in the tardive dyskinesia market, while benefiting from its expanded indication in Huntington's disease chorea. Meanwhile, Crenessity is emerging as an important growth driver following its FDA approval in late 2024 for use as an adjunctive treatment for classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) in adults and children aged four years and older. We expect Ingrezza to sustain its solid commercial momentum in the upcoming quarter, supported by robust prescription demand. Management's reaffirmation of its full-year sales guidance of $2.7-$2.8 billion reflects continued confidence in the product's growth trajectory. Meanwhile, Crenessity is expected to deliver another quarter of sequential growth, driven by increasing physician adoption, expanding reimbursement coverage and rising patient uptake. Collectively, these products are likely to underpin Neurocrine's second-quarter commercial performance. Beyond its commercial portfolio, investors are likely to focus on updates across Neurocrine's diversified neuroscience pipeline, which remains a key driver of the company's long-term growth strategy. Particular attention will be on the phase III development of direclidine for schizophrenia, alongside its mid-stage evaluation in bipolar mania, as well as the late-stage development of osavampator for major depressive disorder with cognitive impairment. Investors will also look for updates on Crenessity's expansion, following the initiation of a phase II study in younger pediatric patients (less than four…Read full document

Neurocrine Biosciences NBIX is scheduled to report second-quarter 2026 results on July 30, after market close. We expect investors to focus on the sales performance of NBIX’s marketed products and other pipeline updates when the company reports quarterly results. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for second-quarter 2026 revenues is pegged at $901.54 million, while the same for earnings is pegged at $2.26 per share. Over the past six months, shares of NBIX have risen 30.5% against the industry’s 4.1% decline. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Let’s see how things might have shaped up for NBIX in the to-be-reported quarter. Neurocrine’s top line primarily comprises product sales from Ingrezza and Crenessity with only a modest contribution from other revenue streams. Ingrezza, the company's flagship VMAT2 inhibitor, continues to anchor revenue growth with its leadership in the tardive dyskinesia market, while benefiting from its expanded indication in Huntington's disease chorea. Meanwhile, Crenessity is emerging as an important growth driver following its FDA approval in late 2024 for use as an adjunctive treatment for classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) in adults and children aged four years and older. We expect Ingrezza to sustain its solid commercial momentum in the upcoming quarter, supported by robust prescription demand. Management's reaffirmation of its full-year sales guidance of $2.7-$2.8 billion reflects continued confidence in the product's growth trajectory. Meanwhile, Crenessity is expected to deliver another quarter of sequential growth, driven by increasing physician adoption, expanding reimbursement coverage and rising patient uptake. Collectively, these products are likely to underpin Neurocrine's second-quarter commercial performance. Beyond its commercial portfolio, investors are likely to focus on updates across Neurocrine's diversified neuroscience pipeline, which remains a key driver of the company's long-term growth strategy. Particular attention will be on the phase III development of direclidine for schizophrenia, alongside its mid-stage evaluation in bipolar mania, as well as the late-stage development of osavampator for major depressive disorder with cognitive impairment. Investors will also look for updates on Crenessity's expansion, following the initiation of a phase II study in younger pediatric patients (less than four years) with classic CAH and the completion of enrollment in a separate phase II study in the European Union involving children from birth to under two years of age. Another area of focus will be the Soleno Therapeutics acquisition, completed in May 2026. The transaction added Vykat XR (diazoxide choline), the first and only FDA-approved treatment for hyperphagia associated with Prader-Willi syndrome in adults and pediatric patients aged four years and older, to Neurocrine's commercial portfolio. Supported by patent protection extending into the mid-2040s, the acquisition is expected to strengthen the company's commercial platform and enhance its long-term growth profile. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. price-consensus-chart | Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. Quote Neurocrine has a mixed history of earnings surprises. The company’s earnings beat estimates in three of the trailing four quarters, while missing the same on the remaining occasion, delivering an average surprise of 9.08%. In the last reported quarter, the company delivered an earnings surprise of 15.48%. Our proven model does not conclusively predict an earnings beat for NBIX this time around. The combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the odds of an earnings beat. That is not the case here, as you will see below. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they are reported with our Earnings ESP Filter. Earnings ESP: Neurocrine has an Earnings ESP of -7.61% as the Most Accurate Estimate currently stands at $2.08 per share and the Zacks Consensus Estimate of earnings is pegged at $2.26. Zacks Rank: Neurocrine currently carries a Zacks Rank #2. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. Here are a few stocks worth considering from the healthcare space, as our model shows that these have the right combination of elements to beat on earnings this reporting cycle. Harmony Biosciences HRMY has an Earnings ESP of +14.14% and sports a Zacks Rank #1 at present. Shares of HRMY have lost 4.2% over the past six months. The company’s earnings missed estimates in each of the trailing four quarters, delivering a negative average surprise of 25.16%. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals ACAD has an Earnings ESP of +25.00% and carries a Zacks Rank #2 at present. Shares of ACAD have lost 3.1% over the past six months. The company’s earnings beat estimates in three of the trailing four quarters but missed in the remaining quarter, delivering an average surprise of 20.83%. Agios Pharmaceuticals AGIO has an Earnings ESP of +12.67% and holds a Zacks Rank #3 at present. Shares of AGIO have risen 28.4% over the past six months. The company’s earnings beat estimates in three of the trailing four quarters but missed in the remaining quarter, delivering an average surprise of 2.39%. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) : Free Stock Analysis Report Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AGIO) : Free Stock Analysis Report ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) : Free Stock Analysis Report Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc. (HRMY) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-27

Watch These 5 Biotech Stocks for Q2 Earnings: Beat or Miss?

Zacks
The second-quarter 2026 reporting cycle for the Medical sector is picking up pace. The sector primarily comprises pharma/biotech and medical device companies. The earnings season for the Medical sector kicked off earlier this month when pharma bellwether Johnson & Johnson posted encouraging earnings results. J&J also raised its 2026 outlook for the second time this year, driven by the strong performance of its Innovative Medicines/Pharma segment. Another large-cap company that recently reported impressive earnings results was Novartis, driven by strong demand for key growth brands. The Earnings Trends report indicates that, as of July 22, 10.2% of the companies in the Medical sector, representing about 25% of the sector’s market capitalization, have reported quarterly earnings. So far, all participants have outperformed both earnings and revenues. While earnings rose 14.6% year over year, sales increased 2.3%. Overall, second-quarter earnings are expected to fall 17.4% year over year, while revenues are expected to rise 5.2%. We have highlighted five biotech companies — Harmony Biosciences HRMY, Acadia Pharmaceuticals ACAD, Biogen BIIB, Insmed INSM and Agios Pharmaceuticals AGIO — that are expected to deliver a beat in their upcoming quarterly results. Earnings ESP is our proprietary methodology for determining the stocks with the best chance of delivering an earnings surprise. It shows the percentage difference between the Most Accurate Estimate and the Zacks Consensus Estimate. According to the Zacks model, the combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the odds of an earnings beat. The selection can be made with the help of the Zacks Stock Screener. Our research shows that the chance of an earnings surprise for stocks with this combination is as high as 70%. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they’re reported with our Earnings ESP Filter. HRMY is a commercial-stage company that develops and commercializes therapies for sleep/wake disorders and rare neurological diseases. The company has an Earnings ESP of +14.14% and a Zacks Rank #1 at present. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for second-quarter earnings is pegged at 97 cents per share. Harmony Biosciences missed on earnings in each of the trailing four quarters, d…Read full document

The second-quarter 2026 reporting cycle for the Medical sector is picking up pace. The sector primarily comprises pharma/biotech and medical device companies. The earnings season for the Medical sector kicked off earlier this month when pharma bellwether Johnson & Johnson posted encouraging earnings results. J&J also raised its 2026 outlook for the second time this year, driven by the strong performance of its Innovative Medicines/Pharma segment. Another large-cap company that recently reported impressive earnings results was Novartis, driven by strong demand for key growth brands. The Earnings Trends report indicates that, as of July 22, 10.2% of the companies in the Medical sector, representing about 25% of the sector’s market capitalization, have reported quarterly earnings. So far, all participants have outperformed both earnings and revenues. While earnings rose 14.6% year over year, sales increased 2.3%. Overall, second-quarter earnings are expected to fall 17.4% year over year, while revenues are expected to rise 5.2%. We have highlighted five biotech companies — Harmony Biosciences HRMY, Acadia Pharmaceuticals ACAD, Biogen BIIB, Insmed INSM and Agios Pharmaceuticals AGIO — that are expected to deliver a beat in their upcoming quarterly results. Earnings ESP is our proprietary methodology for determining the stocks with the best chance of delivering an earnings surprise. It shows the percentage difference between the Most Accurate Estimate and the Zacks Consensus Estimate. According to the Zacks model, the combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the odds of an earnings beat. The selection can be made with the help of the Zacks Stock Screener. Our research shows that the chance of an earnings surprise for stocks with this combination is as high as 70%. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they’re reported with our Earnings ESP Filter. HRMY is a commercial-stage company that develops and commercializes therapies for sleep/wake disorders and rare neurological diseases. The company has an Earnings ESP of +14.14% and a Zacks Rank #1 at present. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for second-quarter earnings is pegged at 97 cents per share. Harmony Biosciences missed on earnings in each of the trailing four quarters, delivering an average negative surprise of 25.16%. It is scheduled to report earnings on Aug. 4, before the opening bell. Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc. price-eps-surprise | Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc. Quote A commercial-stage company, ACAD, is focused on developing and marketing therapies for central nervous system disorders and rare diseases. The company has an Earnings ESP of +25.00% and a Zacks Rank #2 at present. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for second-quarter earnings is pegged at 6 cents per share. Acadia Pharmaceuticals beat on earnings in three of the trailing four quarters and missed the mark on one occasion, delivering an average surprise of 20.83%. The company is scheduled to release results on Aug. 4, after the market closes. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. price-eps-surprise | ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. Quote BIIB is one of the world’s leading biotechs, focusing on developing innovative therapies for treating serious neurological and neurodegenerative diseases. The company has an Earnings ESP of +220.79% and a Zacks Rank #3 at present. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for second-quarter earnings is pegged at 94 cents per share. Biogen beat on earnings in each of the trailing four quarters, delivering an average surprise of 26.87%. It is scheduled to report earnings on July 29, before the opening bell. Biogen Inc. price-eps-surprise | Biogen Inc. Quote INSM is a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of therapies targeting serious and rare indications. The company has an Earnings ESP of +22.32% and a Zacks Rank #3 at present. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for second-quarter earnings is pegged at a loss of 69 cents per share. Insmed missed on earnings in three of the trailing four quarters and beat the mark on one occasion, delivering an average negative surprise of 22.93%. The company is scheduled to release results on Aug. 6, before the opening bell. Insmed, Inc. price-eps-surprise | Insmed, Inc. Quote AGIO is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of treatments for rare genetic metabolic disorders, a subset of orphan genetic metabolic diseases. The company has an Earnings ESP of +12.67% and a Zacks Rank #3 at present. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for second-quarter earnings is pegged at a loss of $1.86 per share. Agios beat on earnings in three of the trailing four quarters and missed the mark on one occasion, delivering an average surprise of 2.39%. It is scheduled to report earnings on July 30, before the opening bell. Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. price-eps-surprise | Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Quote Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Biogen Inc. (BIIB) : Free Stock Analysis Report Insmed, Inc. (INSM) : Free Stock Analysis Report Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AGIO) : Free Stock Analysis Report ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) : Free Stock Analysis Report Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc. (HRMY) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-23

Agios Pharmaceuticals (AGIO) Expected to Beat Earnings Estimates: What to Know Ahead of Q2 Release

Zacks
Wall Street expects a year-over-year increase in earnings on higher revenues when Agios Pharmaceuticals (AGIO) reports results for the quarter ended June 2026. While this widely-known consensus outlook is important in gauging the company's earnings picture, a powerful factor that could impact its near-term stock price is how the actual results compare to these estimates. The earnings report, which is expected to be released on July 30, might help the stock move higher if these key numbers are better than expectations. On the other hand, if they miss, the stock may move lower. While the sustainability of the immediate price change and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's discussion of business conditions on the earnings call, it's worth handicapping the probability of a positive EPS surprise. This biopharmaceutical company is expected to post quarterly loss of $1.86 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +3.6%. Revenues are expected to be $22.68 million, up 82.2% from the year-ago quarter. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. This is essentially a reflection of how the covering analysts have collectively reassessed their initial estimates over this period. Investors should keep in mind that an aggregate change may not always reflect the direction of estimate revisions by each of the covering analysts. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise Estimate revisions ahead of a company's earnings release offer clues to the business conditions for the period whose results are coming out. Our proprietary surprise prediction model -- the Zacks Earnings ESP (Expected Surprise Prediction) -- has this insight at its core. The Zacks Earnings ESP compares the Most Accurate Estimate to the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the quarter; the Most Accurate Estimate is a more recent version of the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate. The idea here is that analysts revising their estimates right before an earnings release have the latest information, which could potentially be more accurate than what they and others contributing to the consensus had predicted earlier. Thus, a positive or negative Earnings ESP reading theoretically indicates the likely deviation of the actual earnings from the consensus estimate. However, the model's predictive power is significant for positive ESP r…Read full document

Wall Street expects a year-over-year increase in earnings on higher revenues when Agios Pharmaceuticals (AGIO) reports results for the quarter ended June 2026. While this widely-known consensus outlook is important in gauging the company's earnings picture, a powerful factor that could impact its near-term stock price is how the actual results compare to these estimates. The earnings report, which is expected to be released on July 30, might help the stock move higher if these key numbers are better than expectations. On the other hand, if they miss, the stock may move lower. While the sustainability of the immediate price change and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's discussion of business conditions on the earnings call, it's worth handicapping the probability of a positive EPS surprise. This biopharmaceutical company is expected to post quarterly loss of $1.86 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +3.6%. Revenues are expected to be $22.68 million, up 82.2% from the year-ago quarter. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. This is essentially a reflection of how the covering analysts have collectively reassessed their initial estimates over this period. Investors should keep in mind that an aggregate change may not always reflect the direction of estimate revisions by each of the covering analysts. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise Estimate revisions ahead of a company's earnings release offer clues to the business conditions for the period whose results are coming out. Our proprietary surprise prediction model -- the Zacks Earnings ESP (Expected Surprise Prediction) -- has this insight at its core. The Zacks Earnings ESP compares the Most Accurate Estimate to the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the quarter; the Most Accurate Estimate is a more recent version of the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate. The idea here is that analysts revising their estimates right before an earnings release have the latest information, which could potentially be more accurate than what they and others contributing to the consensus had predicted earlier. Thus, a positive or negative Earnings ESP reading theoretically indicates the likely deviation of the actual earnings from the consensus estimate. However, the model's predictive power is significant for positive ESP readings only. A positive Earnings ESP is a strong predictor of an earnings beat, particularly when combined with a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold). Our research shows that stocks with this combination produce a positive surprise nearly 70% of the time, and a solid Zacks Rank actually increases the predictive power of Earnings ESP. Please note that a negative Earnings ESP reading is not indicative of an earnings miss. Our research shows that it is difficult to predict an earnings beat with any degree of confidence for stocks with negative Earnings ESP readings and/or Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell) or 5 (Strong Sell). For Agios Pharmaceuticals, the Most Accurate Estimate is higher than the Zacks Consensus Estimate, suggesting that analysts have recently become bullish on the company's earnings prospects. This has resulted in an Earnings ESP of +12.67%. On the other hand, the stock currently carries a Zacks Rank of #3. So, this combination indicates that Agios Pharmaceuticals will most likely beat the consensus EPS estimate. Analysts often consider to what extent a company has been able to match consensus estimates in the past while calculating their estimates for its future earnings. So, it's worth taking a look at the surprise history for gauging its influence on the upcoming number. For the last reported quarter, it was expected that Agios Pharmaceuticals would post a loss of$1.81 per share when it actually produced a loss of -$1.69, delivering a surprise of +6.63%. Over the last four quarters, the company has beaten consensus EPS estimates three times. An earnings beat or miss may not be the sole basis for a stock moving higher or lower. Many stocks end up losing ground despite an earnings beat due to other factors that disappoint investors. Similarly, unforeseen catalysts help a number of stocks gain despite an earnings miss. That said, betting on stocks that are expected to beat earnings expectations does increase the odds of success. This is why it's worth checking a company's Earnings ESP and Zacks Rank ahead of its quarterly release. Make sure to utilize our Earnings ESP Filter to uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they've reported. Agios Pharmaceuticals appears a compelling earnings-beat candidate. However, investors should pay attention to other factors too for betting on this stock or staying away from it ahead of its earnings release. Among the stocks in the Zacks Medical - Biomedical and Genetics industry, Adaptive Biotechnologies (ADPT), is soon expected to post loss of $0.13 per share for the quarter ended June 2026. This estimate indicates a year-over-year change of +23.5%. This quarter's revenue is expected to be $66.27 million, up 12.6% from the year-ago quarter. The consensus EPS estimate for Adaptive Biotechnologies has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. However, an equal Most Accurate Estimate has resulted in an Earnings ESP of 0.00%. When combined with a Zacks Rank of #3 (Hold), this Earnings ESP makes it difficult to conclusively predict that Adaptive Biotechnologies will beat the consensus EPS estimate. The company beat consensus EPS estimates in each of the trailing four quarters. Stay on top of upcoming earnings announcements with the Zacks Earnings Calendar. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AGIO) : Free Stock Analysis Report Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation (ADPT) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-21

Agios Halts Sickle Cell Treatment Development After Phase 2 Results Fail to Show Differentiation

MT Newswires

Agios Pharmaceuticals (AGIO) said Tuesday it will halt development of its oral medicine, tebapivat,

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-07

Moderna, TG Therapeutics, Agios Pharmaceuticals Q2 Results May Face Increased Scrutiny, BofA Says

MT Newswires

Moderna (MRNA), TG Therapeutics (TGTX), and Agios Pharmaceuticals (AGIO) will see increased scrutiny

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-07

AGIO Stock Hits Over 7-Month Highs – FDA Catalyst, ‘Seasonally Strong’ Q2 Earnings Estimate Drive Optimism

Stocktwits
Agios submitted the application under the accelerated approval pathway based on positive data from its Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials. The FDA is expected to make its decision by November 1, 2026. RBC Capital raised its price target to $32 from $28 while maintaining a ‘Sector Perform’ rating, according to The Fly. Shares of Agios Pharmaceuticals (AGIO) jumped more than 14% to their highest level in over seven months after the company secured a key regulatory milestone for its sickle cell disease therapy, while upbeat Wall Street expectations ahead of second-quarter earnings further boosted investor sentiment. AGIO shares also clocked their biggest single-day gains in over three months. See what 10M+ investors are talking about. Get the Stocktwits Daily Rip for what retail is watching right now, free to your inbox On Tuesday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted Priority Review to Agios’ supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) for Mitapivat in sickle cell disease. If approved, Mitapivat would become the first oral pyruvate kinase (PK) activator available for patients with the condition, with the FDA expected to make its decision by Nov. 1, 2026. The Priority Review designation shortens the FDA’s review timeline from the standard 10 months to six months for therapies that could offer meaningful improvements for serious diseases. Agios submitted the application under the accelerated approval pathway based on positive data from its Phase 2 and Phase 3 Rise Up trials in patients aged 16 and older with sickle cell disease. The biotech firm is also conducting a separate Phase 3 confirmatory trial to support approval. In November 2025, the company reported that Mitapivat met the study’s primary endpoint by significantly improving hemoglobin response compared with placebo. However, it did not significantly reduce sickle cell pain crises or improve fatigue. Wall Street turned increasingly positive on Agios ahead of the second-quarter earnings season. According to The Fly, RBC Capital raised its price target to $32 from $28 while maintaining a ‘Sector Perform’ rating, citing expectations for a “seasonally strong” biotech earnings season. Agios is expected to report its Q2 earnings on July 30. Meanwhile, BofA lifted its price target on the stock to $46 from $40 and reiterated a ‘Buy’ rating. The firm said consensus revenue expectations of $26.9 million appea…Read full document

Agios submitted the application under the accelerated approval pathway based on positive data from its Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials. The FDA is expected to make its decision by November 1, 2026. RBC Capital raised its price target to $32 from $28 while maintaining a ‘Sector Perform’ rating, according to The Fly. Shares of Agios Pharmaceuticals (AGIO) jumped more than 14% to their highest level in over seven months after the company secured a key regulatory milestone for its sickle cell disease therapy, while upbeat Wall Street expectations ahead of second-quarter earnings further boosted investor sentiment. AGIO shares also clocked their biggest single-day gains in over three months. See what 10M+ investors are talking about. Get the Stocktwits Daily Rip for what retail is watching right now, free to your inbox On Tuesday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted Priority Review to Agios’ supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) for Mitapivat in sickle cell disease. If approved, Mitapivat would become the first oral pyruvate kinase (PK) activator available for patients with the condition, with the FDA expected to make its decision by Nov. 1, 2026. The Priority Review designation shortens the FDA’s review timeline from the standard 10 months to six months for therapies that could offer meaningful improvements for serious diseases. Agios submitted the application under the accelerated approval pathway based on positive data from its Phase 2 and Phase 3 Rise Up trials in patients aged 16 and older with sickle cell disease. The biotech firm is also conducting a separate Phase 3 confirmatory trial to support approval. In November 2025, the company reported that Mitapivat met the study’s primary endpoint by significantly improving hemoglobin response compared with placebo. However, it did not significantly reduce sickle cell pain crises or improve fatigue. Wall Street turned increasingly positive on Agios ahead of the second-quarter earnings season. According to The Fly, RBC Capital raised its price target to $32 from $28 while maintaining a ‘Sector Perform’ rating, citing expectations for a “seasonally strong” biotech earnings season. Agios is expected to report its Q2 earnings on July 30. Meanwhile, BofA lifted its price target on the stock to $46 from $40 and reiterated a ‘Buy’ rating. The firm said consensus revenue expectations of $26.9 million appear achievable, given that Mitapivat generated $20.7 million in worldwide revenue in Q1. However, the brokerage said reimbursement trends and the conversion of prescriptions into paid sales are the key factors to watch. Retail sentiment surrounding AGIO on Stocktwits remained ‘bullish’ over the past 24 hours, amid ‘high’ message volumes. AGIO shares have gained more than 56% so far this year. Also read: Trump Reignites Greenland Push At NATO Summit – ‘Greenland Should Be Controlled By The United States, Not By Denmark’ For updates and corrections, email newsroom[at]stocktwits[dot]com. Arnab Paul has no position in any of the stocks mentioned in this article. StockTwits' news team content is for informational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. For more, see our editorial policy. This article was originally published on StockTwits. Related: NFLX, DIS, YouTube Want FIFA's World Cup US Rights — Why A $2B Bidding War Is Brewing FCEL Stock Plummets After-Hours On $200M Share Offering US Launches Heavy Retaliatory Airstrikes On Iran Following Series Of Attacks On Ships

As of 2026-08-01 • Updated weeklySource: Earnings sourceIngestion runbook