RankAlpha logo
Back to Rankings

SKYE

Skye BioscienceF
Nasdaq / Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences
Last Price
Quote time unavailable
View Chart
Documents
26
Stored
Transcripts
2
Recent loaded
Latest report
2026-08-17
Investor release

Document history

Earnings documents stored for SKYE.

12 shown
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-17

Skye Bioscience Inc (SKYE) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Strategic Pivot to Fibrex ...

GuruFocus.com
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: August 14, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Skye Bioscience Inc (NASDAQ:SKYE) shareholders will receive a contingent value right entitling them to 90% of net proceeds from any monetization of Nimacimab within 12 months post-closing. The combined company, Fibrex Therapeutics, will be well-capitalized with $125 million in financing, providing a cash runway into 2029. The lead asset RXC008 has demonstrated strong preclinical efficacy, including full reversal of established fibrosis in animal models. RXC008 has a favorable safety profile with negligible systemic exposure, confirmed by a 750-fold safety margin below the IC50 for hypotension. The transaction provides Skye Bioscience Inc (NASDAQ:SKYE) shareholders with a 5.4% stake in a new pure-play fibrosis company with multiple value inflection points, including Phase 2 data expected in H2 2028. Skye Bioscience Inc (NASDAQ:SKYE) shareholders will own only approximately 5.38% of the combined company, a significant dilution of their ownership. The legacy program Nimacimab has been discontinued due to an unfavorable market landscape, requiring a substantial multi-year Phase 3 investment with no assurance of a differentiated label. The transaction is subject to multiple conditions, including shareholder approvals and court sanction, creating uncertainty about completion. RXC008's Phase 2 trial is only set to begin in Q4 2026, with top-line data not expected until H2 2028, leaving a long period of no near-term catalysts. The discontinuation of Nimacimab development may be seen as a setback for investors who supported the original pipeline, and the CVR's value is uncertain as it depends on future monetization. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 1 Warning Sign with SKYE. Is SKYE fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Q: What is the rationale behind Skye Bioscience's decision to discontinue its legacy nimacimab program and merge with Redx Pharma?A: Punit Dhillon (CEO of Skye Bioscience) explained that the decision was driven by a capital allocation strategy rather than a conclusion about nimacimab's biology. The anti-obesity landscape has shifted rapidly with oral GLP-1 options and highly efficacious combination/triple agonists advancing. Nimacimab would require a dose of a…Read full document

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: August 14, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Skye Bioscience Inc (NASDAQ:SKYE) shareholders will receive a contingent value right entitling them to 90% of net proceeds from any monetization of Nimacimab within 12 months post-closing. The combined company, Fibrex Therapeutics, will be well-capitalized with $125 million in financing, providing a cash runway into 2029. The lead asset RXC008 has demonstrated strong preclinical efficacy, including full reversal of established fibrosis in animal models. RXC008 has a favorable safety profile with negligible systemic exposure, confirmed by a 750-fold safety margin below the IC50 for hypotension. The transaction provides Skye Bioscience Inc (NASDAQ:SKYE) shareholders with a 5.4% stake in a new pure-play fibrosis company with multiple value inflection points, including Phase 2 data expected in H2 2028. Skye Bioscience Inc (NASDAQ:SKYE) shareholders will own only approximately 5.38% of the combined company, a significant dilution of their ownership. The legacy program Nimacimab has been discontinued due to an unfavorable market landscape, requiring a substantial multi-year Phase 3 investment with no assurance of a differentiated label. The transaction is subject to multiple conditions, including shareholder approvals and court sanction, creating uncertainty about completion. RXC008's Phase 2 trial is only set to begin in Q4 2026, with top-line data not expected until H2 2028, leaving a long period of no near-term catalysts. The discontinuation of Nimacimab development may be seen as a setback for investors who supported the original pipeline, and the CVR's value is uncertain as it depends on future monetization. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 1 Warning Sign with SKYE. Is SKYE fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Q: What is the rationale behind Skye Bioscience's decision to discontinue its legacy nimacimab program and merge with Redx Pharma?A: Punit Dhillon (CEO of Skye Bioscience) explained that the decision was driven by a capital allocation strategy rather than a conclusion about nimacimab's biology. The anti-obesity landscape has shifted rapidly with oral GLP-1 options and highly efficacious combination/triple agonists advancing. Nimacimab would require a dose of at least 600 mg with an injection volume of roughly 6 mL weekly, which falls outside the convenience window, and would need substantial multi-year Phase 3 investment with no assurance of a differentiated label. Sky shareholders will receive a contingent value right entitling them to 90% of net cash proceeds from any monetization of nimacimab within 12 months post-closing, plus a 5.4% stake in the combined company. Q: What is the new combined company's focus and what are its lead assets?A: Lisa Anson (CEO of Redx Pharma) stated that the combined company will be named Fibrex Therapeutics and will focus on developing Redx's fibrosis portfolio. The lead asset is RXC008, a GI-restricted Pan-ROC inhibitor entering Phase 2 for fibrostenotic Crohn's disease. The pipeline also includes a preclinical discoidin domain receptor (DDR) inhibitor program and Zolacidil (RXC007), a selective ROCK2 inhibitor that completed a successful Phase 2 study in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Q: What is the expected ownership structure of the combined company post-transaction?A: Punit Dhillon detailed that pre-transaction Sky equity holders are expected to own approximately 5.38% of the combined company, pre-transaction Redx equity holders approximately 59.75%, and investors participating in the concurrent $125 million financing approximately 34.87%. These percentages are subject to adjustment based on Sky's actual net cash immediately prior to closing. Q: What is the unmet medical need and commercial opportunity for RXC008 in fibrostenotic Crohn's disease?A: Lisa Anson highlighted that fibrostenotic Crohn's disease affects roughly half of the 1.7 million Crohn's disease patients, with no approved therapeutics targeting the underlying fibrotic aspects. Current standard of care uses anti-inflammatory therapies that do not prevent fibrosis progression, often leading to debilitating surgical interventions. RXC008 is designed as a first-in-class approach that can be used in combination with patients' current standard-of-care anti-inflammatory drugs, representing a significant commercial opportunity. Q: What preclinical efficacy data supports RXC008's potential?A: Lisa Anson presented robust preclinical data demonstrating that RXC008 achieved 100% reversal of established fibrosis back to baseline in the DSS model of Crohn's disease. In the adoptive T-cell transfer model, which more closely mimics human autoimmune disease, anti-TNF monotherapy did not affect ongoing fibrosis, but the combination of anti-TNF with RXC008 showed full reversal of fibrosis. The drug also demonstrated penetration to multiple layers of GI tract tissue where fibrosis occurs, without systemic exposure. Q: How does RXC008's GI-restricted mechanism work and what safety data was shown?A: Lisa Anson explained that RXC008 achieves GI restriction through three distinct mechanisms: low permeability and high efflux to keep most of the dose in the GI tract, rapid metabolism by paraoxonases in plasma for any drug entering systemic circulation, and high clearance by CYP enzymes in the liver. The Phase 1 healthy volunteer study showed no serious adverse events and zero evidence of hypotension via 24-hour telemetry monitoring. Plasma exposure was negligible with a 750-fold safety margin below the ROCK IC50, while tissue concentrations in the ileum, ascending colon, and descending colon were within the predicted efficacious range. Q: What is the timeline for RXC008's Phase 2 trial and expected data readouts?A: Lisa Anson confirmed that Phase 2 preparation is well underway with the CRO partner selected and site setup initiated. First patient enrollment is expected in Q4 2026, with top-line data expected in H2 2028 and the full data set expected in the first half of 2029. The company is collaborating with the STAR consortium and the FDA to define appropriate regulatory endpoints. Q: What is the expected cash runway for the combined company?A: Punit Dhillon stated that the concurrent financing will provide the combined company with aggregate proceeds of $125 million, providing an expected cash runway into 2029 through significant value inflection points, including the Phase 2 data readout for RXC008. Q: What is the expected timeline for closing the transaction?A: Punit Dhillon confirmed that the transaction has been unanimously approved by both boards and is expected to close in Q4 2026, subject to customary closing conditions, shareholder approvals from both Sky and Redx, sanction of the scheme of arrangement by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, and approval of shares for listing on Nasdaq. Q: What is the status of Zolacidil (RXC007) and the DDR inhibitor program?A: Lisa Anson noted that Zolacidil has completed a successful signal-seeking Phase 2 study in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, with a broad preclinical dataset highlighting utility across other interstitial lung diseases, MASH, and cancer-associated fibrosis. The company is establishing the most appropriate clinical development plan, including the possibility of delivering its full potential through a partnership. The DDR program represents a novel target with a leading patent position for both selective DDR1 inhibitors and DDR1/2 inhibitors. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-05-13

UPDATE – Skye Bioscience Reports First Quarter 2026 Financial Results and Business Update

GlobeNewswire
CBeyond™ Expansion Study (Part C) initiated; Cohort Review Committee review scheduled for May 18, 2026, to evaluate available safety data and potential progression to Cohort 2 SAN DIEGO, May 12, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Skye Bioscience, Inc. (Nasdaq: SKYE) (“Skye” or the “Company”), a clinical stage biotechnology company developing next-generation molecules that modulate G-protein-coupled receptors to treat obesity, overweight, and related conditions, today reported financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026, along with recent business updates and anticipated milestones. “Since our March update, execution has focused on turning CBeyond into a Phase 2b-ready development program,” said Punit Dhillon, President & CEO of Skye. “We have now initiated enrollment of Cohort 1 of the CBeyond Expansion Study, executed the compatibility and in-use study with ENHANZE to support a practical high-volume subcutaneous approach, and engaged external development advisors to help pressure-test our target product profile, dose-selection rationale and Phase 2b trial design. Our objective in 2026 remains focused on defining the dose and exposure that can support a larger Phase 2b study evaluating nimacimab as a complementary add-on approach for GLP-1-experienced patients.” Business and Clinical Highlights CBeyond™ Expansion Study (Part C) Cohort 1 is designed to evaluate nimacimab 400 mg IV (equivalent to ~700 mg SC) once weekly versus matched placebo, randomized 3:1, over a 16-week treatment period followed by 12 weeks of follow-up. The Cohort Review Committee (CRC) is scheduled to meet on May 18, 2026 to review available Cohort 1 safety data and determine whether safe-to-proceed criteria have been met to initiate enrollment in Cohort 2. Cohort 2 is designed to evaluate nimacimab 600 mg IV (equivalent to ~1000 mg SC) once weekly versus matched placebo, randomized 3:1, over the same treatment and follow-up period. Skye continues to expect topline clinical data from the CBeyond Expansion Study in Q4 2026. The study is designed to generate higher-exposure human safety and pharmacokinetic data to inform dose selection for a planned Phase 2b study. Q1 Accomplishments Skye has completed all previously announced clinical milestones for Q1: reported CBeyond interim extension data, received FDA Type C meeting minutes, launched the CBeyond Expansion Study (Part C), and c…Read full document

CBeyond™ Expansion Study (Part C) initiated; Cohort Review Committee review scheduled for May 18, 2026, to evaluate available safety data and potential progression to Cohort 2 SAN DIEGO, May 12, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Skye Bioscience, Inc. (Nasdaq: SKYE) (“Skye” or the “Company”), a clinical stage biotechnology company developing next-generation molecules that modulate G-protein-coupled receptors to treat obesity, overweight, and related conditions, today reported financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026, along with recent business updates and anticipated milestones. “Since our March update, execution has focused on turning CBeyond into a Phase 2b-ready development program,” said Punit Dhillon, President & CEO of Skye. “We have now initiated enrollment of Cohort 1 of the CBeyond Expansion Study, executed the compatibility and in-use study with ENHANZE to support a practical high-volume subcutaneous approach, and engaged external development advisors to help pressure-test our target product profile, dose-selection rationale and Phase 2b trial design. Our objective in 2026 remains focused on defining the dose and exposure that can support a larger Phase 2b study evaluating nimacimab as a complementary add-on approach for GLP-1-experienced patients.” Business and Clinical Highlights CBeyond™ Expansion Study (Part C) Cohort 1 is designed to evaluate nimacimab 400 mg IV (equivalent to ~700 mg SC) once weekly versus matched placebo, randomized 3:1, over a 16-week treatment period followed by 12 weeks of follow-up. The Cohort Review Committee (CRC) is scheduled to meet on May 18, 2026 to review available Cohort 1 safety data and determine whether safe-to-proceed criteria have been met to initiate enrollment in Cohort 2. Cohort 2 is designed to evaluate nimacimab 600 mg IV (equivalent to ~1000 mg SC) once weekly versus matched placebo, randomized 3:1, over the same treatment and follow-up period. Skye continues to expect topline clinical data from the CBeyond Expansion Study in Q4 2026. The study is designed to generate higher-exposure human safety and pharmacokinetic data to inform dose selection for a planned Phase 2b study. Q1 Accomplishments Skye has completed all previously announced clinical milestones for Q1: reported CBeyond interim extension data, received FDA Type C meeting minutes, launched the CBeyond Expansion Study (Part C), and completed a compatibility and in-use stability study with ENHANZE. The Company remains on track to complete the Q2 2026 catalyst set, including initiation of Cohort 2 enrollment, pending receipt of the CRC’s determination that safe-to-proceed criteria have been met, completion of enrollment across Cohorts 1 and 2, presentation or disclosure of additional preclinical bioconjugation data, and completion of feasibility work for the high-concentration nimacimab program. Clinical Data Foundation Supporting the Current Development Strategy In previously reported CBeyond data, nimacimab plus semaglutide demonstrated an approximately 3% incremental weight-loss benefit versus semaglutide alone at 26 weeks, with statistically significant improvements in waist circumference and lean-to-fat mass ratio. In the previously reported interim 52-week combination update, participants receiving nimacimab 200 mg plus semaglutide 2.4 mg achieved 22.3% mean weight loss, with no plateau observed at the time of analysis. At the tested dose, nimacimab demonstrated a favorable tolerability profile, with no nimacimab-associated neuropsychiatric safety signal observed and no additive gastrointestinal adverse-event burden when combined with semaglutide. During off-therapy follow-up, the nimacimab plus semaglutide cohort demonstrated lower weight regain than the semaglutide-alone cohort, and available body-composition data suggested maintenance of fat-mass loss and improvement in lean-to-fat mass ratio during follow-up. Skye believes these findings support development of nimacimab as complementary to, rather than competitive with, incretin therapies, particularly for GLP-1-experienced patients who plateau, require additional weight loss, are titration-limited, or need more durable metabolic control. Phase 2b Planning Skye has received written FDA Type C meeting minutes and is incorporating feedback into ongoing Phase 2b planning, including dose, duration, endpoints, inclusion/exclusion criteria and a defined indication and patient population for nimacimab as an add-on therapy to incretins. Skye has engaged Lilly Catalyze360-ExploR&D in a development consulting engagement to provide written feedback on the nimacimab target product profile, and Phase 2b trial architecture. This engagement is a development advisory engagement and does not constitute a commitment regarding any future transaction, therapeutic interest, exclusivity or corporate business development process. CMC and Drug Delivery Strategy Skye has executed the compatibility and in-use study with Halozyme’s ENHANZE® (rHuPH20) technology to support a planned site-based “mix-and-deliver” approach for high-volume subcutaneous administration of nimacimab in future clinical development. Co-formulation with ENHANZE is intended to support practical subcutaneous delivery of higher nimacimab doses. Skye continues feasibility work on a high-concentration nimacimab formulation, with the objective of reducing injection volume and supporting patient-friendly subcutaneous administration across potential dose levels. Skye continues to evaluate manufacturing process improvements, supply-chain options and cost-of-goods levers to support late-stage development and potential commercial scalability if nimacimab is approved. Upcoming Anticipated Milestones Q2 2026: Cohort Review Committee review of available Cohort 1 safety data and potential initiation of Cohort 2 enrollment. Q2 2026: Complete enrollment across CBeyond Expansion Study Cohorts 1 and 2. Q2 2026: Complete feasibility work for the high-concentration nimacimab formulation program. Q4 2026: Report topline clinical data from the CBeyond Expansion Study. Q4 2026: Finalize planned Phase 2b study design, including dose-selection rationale, protocol architecture and operational readiness plan. First Quarter 2026 Financial Results: Balance Sheet and Cash Flow Highlights Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $17.1 million as of March 31, 2026. The Company expects its current capital to fund projected operations and key clinical milestones through the fourth quarter of 2026, including completion of its Phase 2a extension study for nimacimab and initial manufacturing to enable the anticipated Phase 2b clinical study, but excluding the anticipated clinical cost of a proposed Phase 2b clinical study and additional anticipated drug manufacturing costs to supply any such Phase 2b study. Operating Results R&D Expenses Research and development (R&D) expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026, were $7.9 million, as compared to $7.2 million for the same period in 2025. The increase was primarily due to contract manufacturing, clinical trial costs associated with our clinical study for nimacimab, discovery research and development expenses, salaries and stock-based compensation expense, and consulting advisory and professional fees. G&A Expenses General and administrative (G&A) expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026, were $4.7 million, as compared to $4.6 million for the same period in 2025. The increase was primarily related to increased legal fees, partially offset by decreases in investor relations, marketing and communications expenses, salaries, benefits and other direct employee related costs, and consulting, advisory and professional fees. Net Loss Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2026, totaled $12.5 million, with non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $1.5 million, compared to $11.1 million for the same period in 2025, with non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $2.2 million. ABOUT SKYE BIOSCIENCE Skye is focused on unlocking new therapeutic pathways for metabolic health through the development of next-generation molecules that modulate G-protein coupled receptors. Skye's strategy leverages biologic targets with substantial human proof of mechanism for the development of first-in-class therapeutics with clinical and commercial differentiation. Skye is conducting a Phase 2a clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06577090) in obesity for nimacimab, a negative allosteric modulating antibody that peripherally inhibits CB1. This study is also assessing the combination of nimacimab and a GLP-1R agonist (Wegovy®). For more information, please visit: www.skyebioscience.com. Connect with us on X and LinkedIn. FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS This press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained in this press release other than statements of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements relating to: nimacimab’s potential as a combination or maintenance therapy by supplement GLP-1 therapies; future clinical development of nimacimab, including the initiation and design of any future clinical trials; expectations regarding the CRC’s review of available Cohort 1 safety data to determine whether safe-to-proceed criteria have been met to initiate enrollment in Cohort 2; the outcome of Skye's evaluation of its manufacturing process improvements, supply-chain options and cost of goods levers; the expected timing for reporting data from the Phase 2a extension study; and the Company’s cash runway. When used herein, words including “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “designed,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “planning,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, though not all forward-looking statements use these words or expressions. All forward-looking statements are based upon the Company’s current expectations and various assumptions. The Company believes there is a reasonable basis for its expectations and beliefs, but they are inherently uncertain. The Company may not realize its expectations, and its beliefs may not prove correct. Actual results could differ materially from those described or implied by such forward-looking statements as a result of various important risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, the initiation and design of any future clinical trials will be impacted by the Company’s capital resources, the Company’s ability to obtain additional sources of capital, program considerations and potentially other factors outside the Company’s control; the potential for additional weight loss after 26 weeks may not ultimately be observed; there is no guarantee that higher dosing of nimacimab will achieve increased efficacy, and likewise it is possible that higher dosing will produce adversely different safety and tolerability results than those observed to date; the Company’s dependence on third parties in connection with product manufacturing; research and preclinical and clinical testing; the Company’s ability to advance, obtain regulatory approval of and ultimately commercialize nimacimab; competitive products or approaches limiting the commercial value of nimacimab; the timing and results of preclinical and clinical trials; the Company’s ability to fund development activities and achieve development goals; the impact of any global pandemics, inflation, supply chain issues, government shutdowns, high interest rates, adverse regulatory changes; the Company’s ability to protect its intellectual property; risks associated with the Company’s common stock and the other important factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, which are accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and the Investors section of the Company’s website. Any such forward-looking statements represent management’s estimates as of the date of this press release. While the Company may elect to update such forward-looking statements at some point in the future, except as required by law, it disclaims any obligation to do so, even if subsequent events cause the Company’s views to change. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing the Company’s views as of any date subsequent to the date of this press release. CONTACTS Investor Relations [email protected] (858) 410-0266 LifeSci Advisors, Mike Moyer [email protected] (617) 308-4306 Media Inquiries LifeSci Communications, Michael Fitzhugh [email protected] (628) 234-3889

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-05-12

Skye Bioscience Reports First Quarter 2026 Financial Results and Business Update

GlobeNewswire
CBeyond™ Expansion Study (Part C) initiated; Cohort Review Committee review scheduled for May 18, 2026, to evaluate available safety data and potential progression to Cohort 2 Engaged Lilly Catalyze360 to provide strategic guidance on nimacimab TPP and Phase 2b trial design SAN DIEGO, May 11, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Skye Bioscience, Inc. (Nasdaq: SKYE) (“Skye” or the “Company”), a clinical stage biotechnology company developing next-generation molecules that modulate G-protein-coupled receptors to treat obesity, overweight, and related conditions, today reported financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026, along with recent business updates and anticipated milestones. “Since our March update, execution has focused on turning CBeyond into a Phase 2b-ready development program,” said Punit Dhillon, President & CEO of Skye. “We have now initiated enrollment of Cohort 1 of the CBeyond Expansion Study, executed the compatibility and in-use study with ENHANZE to support a practical high-volume subcutaneous approach, and engaged external development advisors to help pressure-test our target product profile, dose-selection rationale and Phase 2b trial design. Our objective in 2026 remains focused on defining the dose and exposure that can support a larger Phase 2b study evaluating nimacimab as a complementary add-on approach for GLP-1-experienced patients.” Business and Clinical Highlights CBeyondTM Expansion Study (Part C) Cohort 1 is designed to evaluate nimacimab 400 mg IV (equivalent to ~700 mg SC) once weekly versus matched placebo, randomized 3:1, over a 16-week treatment period followed by 12 weeks of follow-up. The Cohort Review Committee (CRC) is scheduled to meet on May 18, 2026 to review available Cohort 1 safety data and determine whether safe-to-proceed criteria have been met to initiate enrollment in Cohort 2. Cohort 2 is designed to evaluate nimacimab 600 mg IV (equivalent to ~1000 mg SC) once weekly versus matched placebo, randomized 3:1, over the same treatment and follow-up period. Skye continues to expect topline clinical data from the CBeyond Expansion Study in Q4 2026. The study is designed to generate higher-exposure human safety and pharmacokinetic data to inform dose selection for a planned Phase 2b study. Q1 Accomplishments Skye has completed all previously announced clinical milestones for Q1: reported CBeyond interim exten…Read full document

CBeyond™ Expansion Study (Part C) initiated; Cohort Review Committee review scheduled for May 18, 2026, to evaluate available safety data and potential progression to Cohort 2 Engaged Lilly Catalyze360 to provide strategic guidance on nimacimab TPP and Phase 2b trial design SAN DIEGO, May 11, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Skye Bioscience, Inc. (Nasdaq: SKYE) (“Skye” or the “Company”), a clinical stage biotechnology company developing next-generation molecules that modulate G-protein-coupled receptors to treat obesity, overweight, and related conditions, today reported financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026, along with recent business updates and anticipated milestones. “Since our March update, execution has focused on turning CBeyond into a Phase 2b-ready development program,” said Punit Dhillon, President & CEO of Skye. “We have now initiated enrollment of Cohort 1 of the CBeyond Expansion Study, executed the compatibility and in-use study with ENHANZE to support a practical high-volume subcutaneous approach, and engaged external development advisors to help pressure-test our target product profile, dose-selection rationale and Phase 2b trial design. Our objective in 2026 remains focused on defining the dose and exposure that can support a larger Phase 2b study evaluating nimacimab as a complementary add-on approach for GLP-1-experienced patients.” Business and Clinical Highlights CBeyondTM Expansion Study (Part C) Cohort 1 is designed to evaluate nimacimab 400 mg IV (equivalent to ~700 mg SC) once weekly versus matched placebo, randomized 3:1, over a 16-week treatment period followed by 12 weeks of follow-up. The Cohort Review Committee (CRC) is scheduled to meet on May 18, 2026 to review available Cohort 1 safety data and determine whether safe-to-proceed criteria have been met to initiate enrollment in Cohort 2. Cohort 2 is designed to evaluate nimacimab 600 mg IV (equivalent to ~1000 mg SC) once weekly versus matched placebo, randomized 3:1, over the same treatment and follow-up period. Skye continues to expect topline clinical data from the CBeyond Expansion Study in Q4 2026. The study is designed to generate higher-exposure human safety and pharmacokinetic data to inform dose selection for a planned Phase 2b study. Q1 Accomplishments Skye has completed all previously announced clinical milestones for Q1: reported CBeyond interim extension data, received FDA Type C meeting minutes, launched the CBeyond Expansion Study (Part C), and completed a compatibility and in-use stability study with ENHANZE. The Company remains on track to complete the Q2 2026 catalyst set, including initiation of Cohort 2 enrollment, pending receipt of the CRC’s determination that safe-to-proceed criteria have been met, completion of enrollment across Cohorts 1 and 2, presentation or disclosure of additional preclinical bioconjugation data, and completion of feasibility work for the high-concentration nimacimab program. Clinical Data Foundation Supporting the Current Development Strategy In previously reported CBeyond data, nimacimab plus semaglutide demonstrated an approximately 3% incremental weight-loss benefit versus semaglutide alone at 26 weeks, with statistically significant improvements in waist circumference and lean-to-fat mass ratio. In the previously reported interim 52-week combination update, participants receiving nimacimab 200 mg plus semaglutide 2.4 mg achieved 22.3% mean weight loss, with no plateau observed at the time of analysis. At the tested dose, nimacimab demonstrated a favorable tolerability profile, with no nimacimab-associated neuropsychiatric safety signal observed and no additive gastrointestinal adverse-event burden when combined with semaglutide. During off-therapy follow-up, the nimacimab plus semaglutide cohort demonstrated lower weight regain than the semaglutide-alone cohort, and available body-composition data suggested maintenance of fat-mass loss and improvement in lean-to-fat mass ratio during follow-up. Skye believes these findings support development of nimacimab as complementary to, rather than competitive with, incretin therapies, particularly for GLP-1-experienced patients who plateau, require additional weight loss, are titration-limited, or need more durable metabolic control. Phase 2b Planning Skye has received written FDA Type C meeting minutes and is incorporating feedback into ongoing Phase 2b planning, including dose, duration, endpoints, inclusion/exclusion criteria and a defined indication and patient population for nimacimab as an add-on therapy to incretins. Skye has engaged Lilly Catalyze360 in a development consulting engagement to provide written feedback on the nimacimab target product profile, and Phase 2b trial architecture. This engagement is a development advisory engagement and does not constitute a commitment regarding any future transaction, therapeutic interest, exclusivity or corporate business development process. CMC and Drug Delivery Strategy Skye has executed the compatibility and in-use study with Halozyme’s ENHANZE® (rHuPH20) technology to support a planned site-based “mix-and-deliver” approach for high-volume subcutaneous administration of nimacimab in future clinical development. Co-formulation with ENHANZE is intended to support practical subcutaneous delivery of higher nimacimab doses. Skye continues feasibility work on a high-concentration nimacimab formulation, with the objective of reducing injection volume and supporting patient-friendly subcutaneous administration across potential dose levels. Skye continues to evaluate manufacturing process improvements, supply-chain options and cost-of-goods levers to support late-stage development and potential commercial scalability if nimacimab is approved. Upcoming Anticipated Milestones Q2 2026: Cohort Review Committee review of available Cohort 1 safety data and potential initiation of Cohort 2 enrollment. Q2 2026: Complete enrollment across CBeyond Expansion Study Cohorts 1 and 2. Q2 2026: Complete feasibility work for the high-concentration nimacimab formulation program. Q4 2026: Report topline clinical data from the CBeyond Expansion Study. Q4 2026: Finalize planned Phase 2b study design, including dose-selection rationale, protocol architecture and operational readiness plan. First Quarter 2026 Financial Results: Balance Sheet and Cash Flow Highlights Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $17.1 million as of March 31, 2026. The Company expects its current capital to fund projected operations and key clinical milestones through the fourth quarter of 2026, including completion of its Phase 2a extension study for nimacimab and initial manufacturing to enable the anticipated Phase 2b clinical study, but excluding the anticipated clinical cost of a proposed Phase 2b clinical study and additional anticipated drug manufacturing costs to supply any such Phase 2b study. Operating Results R&D Expenses Research and development (R&D) expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026, were $7.9 million, as compared to $7.2 million for the same period in 2025. The increase was primarily due to contract manufacturing, clinical trial costs associated with our clinical study for nimacimab, discovery research and development expenses, salaries and stock-based compensation expense, and consulting advisory and professional fees. G&A Expenses General and administrative (G&A) expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026, were $4.7 million, as compared to $4.6 million for the same period in 2025. The increase was primarily related to increased legal fees, partially offset by decreases in investor relations, marketing and communications expenses, salaries, benefits and other direct employee related costs, and consulting, advisory and professional fees. Net Loss Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2026, totaled $12.5 million, with non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $1.5 million, compared to $11.1 million for the same period in 2025, with non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $2.2 million. ABOUT SKYE BIOSCIENCE Skye is focused on unlocking new therapeutic pathways for metabolic health through the development of next-generation molecules that modulate G-protein coupled receptors. Skye's strategy leverages biologic targets with substantial human proof of mechanism for the development of first-in-class therapeutics with clinical and commercial differentiation. Skye is conducting a Phase 2a clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06577090) in obesity for nimacimab, a negative allosteric modulating antibody that peripherally inhibits CB1. This study is also assessing the combination of nimacimab and a GLP-1R agonist (Wegovy®). For more information, please visit: www.skyebioscience.com. Connect with us on X and LinkedIn. FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS This press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained in this press release other than statements of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements relating to: nimacimab’s potential as a combination or maintenance therapy by supplement GLP-1 therapies; future clinical development of nimacimab, including the initiation and design of any future clinical trials; expectations regarding the CRC’s review of available Cohort 1 safety data to determine whether safe-to-proceed criteria have been met to initiate enrollment in Cohort 2; the outcome of Skye's evaluation of its manufacturing process improvements, supply-chain options and cost of goods levers; the expected timing for reporting data from the Phase 2a extension study; and the Company’s cash runway. When used herein, words including “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “designed,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “planning,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, though not all forward-looking statements use these words or expressions. All forward-looking statements are based upon the Company’s current expectations and various assumptions. The Company believes there is a reasonable basis for its expectations and beliefs, but they are inherently uncertain. The Company may not realize its expectations, and its beliefs may not prove correct. Actual results could differ materially from those described or implied by such forward-looking statements as a result of various important risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, the initiation and design of any future clinical trials will be impacted by the Company’s capital resources, the Company’s ability to obtain additional sources of capital, program considerations and potentially other factors outside the Company’s control; the potential for additional weight loss after 26 weeks may not ultimately be observed; there is no guarantee that higher dosing of nimacimab will achieve increased efficacy, and likewise it is possible that higher dosing will produce adversely different safety and tolerability results than those observed to date; the Company’s dependence on third parties in connection with product manufacturing; research and preclinical and clinical testing; the Company’s ability to advance, obtain regulatory approval of and ultimately commercialize nimacimab; competitive products or approaches limiting the commercial value of nimacimab; the timing and results of preclinical and clinical trials; the Company’s ability to fund development activities and achieve development goals; the impact of any global pandemics, inflation, supply chain issues, government shutdowns, high interest rates, adverse regulatory changes; the Company’s ability to protect its intellectual property; risks associated with the Company’s common stock and the other important factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, which are accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and the Investors section of the Company’s website. Any such forward-looking statements represent management’s estimates as of the date of this press release. While the Company may elect to update such forward-looking statements at some point in the future, except as required by law, it disclaims any obligation to do so, even if subsequent events cause the Company’s views to change. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing the Company’s views as of any date subsequent to the date of this press release. CONTACTS Investor Relations [email protected] (858) 410-0266 LifeSci Advisors, Mike Moyer [email protected] (617) 308-4306 Media Inquiries LifeSci Communications, Michael Fitzhugh [email protected] (628) 234-3889

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-03-12

Skye Bioscience Inc (SKYE) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Pioneering Advances in Obesity ...

GuruFocus.com
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: March 10, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Skye Bioscience Inc (NASDAQ:SKYE) has established a potential path for namasimab alongside existing incretin therapies, showing additive weight loss and favorable tolerability. The company has delivered a series of firsts in the CB1 field, including the first human obesity program to evaluate a CB1 monoclonal antibody. Namasimab demonstrated a favorable safety profile with placebo-like tolerability and no neuropsychiatric events observed. The combination of namasimab and semaglutide achieved significant weight loss, with a 22.3% mean weight loss over 52 weeks. Skye Bioscience Inc (NASDAQ:SKYE) is advancing its R&D infrastructure, including a collaboration with Halozyme to develop a co-formulation for high-volume subcutaneous injections. The 200 mg weekly dose of namasimab was found to be underexposed for peripheral tissues, necessitating higher doses for efficacy. Despite similar serum target engagement, clinical outcomes diverged, with namasimab showing less weight loss compared to other treatments. The company is still in the process of confirming safety and PK at higher doses, which could delay further clinical trials. There is a need for a practical subcutaneous delivery path, which is still under development. The expansion study is primarily a PK and safety study, with no immediate efficacy readout expected, which may delay efficacy validation. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 1 Warning Sign with SKYE. Is SKYE fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Q: Can you talk about your plans to share data from the higher dose cohorts above 200 mg and the status of your formulation work using Halozyme technology? A: We are expanding into Part C of the CBond study to generate higher exposure data. We expect to have this data by Q4 2026. Regarding formulation, we are working with Halozyme on a mix-and-deliver approach for subcutaneous delivery, which will be ready for the Phase 2B study. The auto-injector component will be prepared for the Phase 3 trial. - Puneet Dillon, CEO; Tu, COO Q: Do you think you're going high enough with the doses in the expansion study, and is there a reason to explore even higher doses of nemasimab? A: The selected doses are consistent with our model…Read full document

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: March 10, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Skye Bioscience Inc (NASDAQ:SKYE) has established a potential path for namasimab alongside existing incretin therapies, showing additive weight loss and favorable tolerability. The company has delivered a series of firsts in the CB1 field, including the first human obesity program to evaluate a CB1 monoclonal antibody. Namasimab demonstrated a favorable safety profile with placebo-like tolerability and no neuropsychiatric events observed. The combination of namasimab and semaglutide achieved significant weight loss, with a 22.3% mean weight loss over 52 weeks. Skye Bioscience Inc (NASDAQ:SKYE) is advancing its R&D infrastructure, including a collaboration with Halozyme to develop a co-formulation for high-volume subcutaneous injections. The 200 mg weekly dose of namasimab was found to be underexposed for peripheral tissues, necessitating higher doses for efficacy. Despite similar serum target engagement, clinical outcomes diverged, with namasimab showing less weight loss compared to other treatments. The company is still in the process of confirming safety and PK at higher doses, which could delay further clinical trials. There is a need for a practical subcutaneous delivery path, which is still under development. The expansion study is primarily a PK and safety study, with no immediate efficacy readout expected, which may delay efficacy validation. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 1 Warning Sign with SKYE. Is SKYE fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Q: Can you talk about your plans to share data from the higher dose cohorts above 200 mg and the status of your formulation work using Halozyme technology? A: We are expanding into Part C of the CBond study to generate higher exposure data. We expect to have this data by Q4 2026. Regarding formulation, we are working with Halozyme on a mix-and-deliver approach for subcutaneous delivery, which will be ready for the Phase 2B study. The auto-injector component will be prepared for the Phase 3 trial. - Puneet Dillon, CEO; Tu, COO Q: Do you think you're going high enough with the doses in the expansion study, and is there a reason to explore even higher doses of nemasimab? A: The selected doses are consistent with our models for peripheral target engagement. We are confident these doses will provide the necessary exposure for Phase 2B selection. We are evaluating higher dosing, but the current doses should suffice. - Puneet Dillon, CEO; Chris Twitty, CSO Q: What do you see as the profile for the new program, and how do you anticipate developing it? A: The new program is long-term optionality, not a near-term value driver. The APC data supports a broader combination platform over time. Namassimab remains the core value driver, but the APC platform offers significant upside. - Puneet Dillon, CEO; Chris Twitty, CSO Q: Why are you using IV in the Part C phase of the study instead of using Enhance reconstituted at the site? A: IV provides the fastest way to generate high exposure PK and safety data. It's not the end-state product; we're building a subcutaneous path with Enhance for Phase 2B. We wouldn't have started the expansion study as quickly if we relied only on Enhance. - Puneet Dillon, CEO Q: What is the bar for success from the expanded study regarding the dose to be taken forward for monotherapy? A: The Part C study is primarily a PK and safety study. We expect the monotherapy directionality at higher exposure to validate our model. Any emerging signal will help finalize our Phase 2B dosing with confidence. - Puneet Dillon, CEO For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-03-11

Skye Bioscience Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Financial Results and Provides Business Update

GlobeNewswire
Initiated higher-dose CBeyond Expansion Study (Part C) to generate higher-exposure human safety and pharmacokinetic data with 400 mg and 600 mg IV cohorts; Received written FDA Type C meeting minutes; feedback is informing key Phase 2b combination design elements and the Company’s ongoing evaluation of a potential add-on development path with incretin therapy; Presented new body composition data demonstrating differentiated weight maintenance profile for patients that have discontinued combination therapy; Proof-of-concept preclinical data validates Skye's antigen-peptide conjugate platform, a single unimolecular therapeutic of nimacimab-GLP1RA that delivers additive weight-loss. SAN DIEGO, March 10, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Skye Bioscience, Inc. (NASDAQ: SKYE) (“Skye” or the “Company”), a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company pioneering next-generation molecules that modulate G-protein-coupled receptors to treat obesity, overweight, and related conditions, today reported financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2025, along with key accomplishments and upcoming milestones. “All of the data generated and reported in the past year along with the incremental data highlighted in todays release reinforces our strategy to develop nimacimab as a differentiated peripheral CB1 program designed to complement current incretin therapies and next-generation combination regimens. CBeyond confirmed the safety foundation and combination potential of peripheral CB1 inhibition, including a 22.3% mean weight loss at 52 weeks with nimacimab plus semaglutide and no plateau observed,” said Punit Dhillon, President & CEO of Skye. “Just as important, CBeyond has now given us three practical learnings that shape what comes next: a meaningful combination signal, clean safety with no drug-related central nervous system toxicity at the tested dose, and a clear exposure question to solve in monotherapy. Our next step is straightforward: define the peripheral exposure-response at higher doses through the Expansion Study while using the FDA Type C feedback to shape a disciplined Phase 2b evaluation with clear dose-selection logic and success criteria across monotherapy and combination development.” Clinical Highlights CBeyond Expansion Study (Part C): Higher-Exposure Evaluation Initiated the Expansion Study of CBeyond to assess preliminary safety and ph…Read full document

Initiated higher-dose CBeyond Expansion Study (Part C) to generate higher-exposure human safety and pharmacokinetic data with 400 mg and 600 mg IV cohorts; Received written FDA Type C meeting minutes; feedback is informing key Phase 2b combination design elements and the Company’s ongoing evaluation of a potential add-on development path with incretin therapy; Presented new body composition data demonstrating differentiated weight maintenance profile for patients that have discontinued combination therapy; Proof-of-concept preclinical data validates Skye's antigen-peptide conjugate platform, a single unimolecular therapeutic of nimacimab-GLP1RA that delivers additive weight-loss. SAN DIEGO, March 10, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Skye Bioscience, Inc. (NASDAQ: SKYE) (“Skye” or the “Company”), a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company pioneering next-generation molecules that modulate G-protein-coupled receptors to treat obesity, overweight, and related conditions, today reported financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2025, along with key accomplishments and upcoming milestones. “All of the data generated and reported in the past year along with the incremental data highlighted in todays release reinforces our strategy to develop nimacimab as a differentiated peripheral CB1 program designed to complement current incretin therapies and next-generation combination regimens. CBeyond confirmed the safety foundation and combination potential of peripheral CB1 inhibition, including a 22.3% mean weight loss at 52 weeks with nimacimab plus semaglutide and no plateau observed,” said Punit Dhillon, President & CEO of Skye. “Just as important, CBeyond has now given us three practical learnings that shape what comes next: a meaningful combination signal, clean safety with no drug-related central nervous system toxicity at the tested dose, and a clear exposure question to solve in monotherapy. Our next step is straightforward: define the peripheral exposure-response at higher doses through the Expansion Study while using the FDA Type C feedback to shape a disciplined Phase 2b evaluation with clear dose-selection logic and success criteria across monotherapy and combination development.” Clinical Highlights CBeyond Expansion Study (Part C): Higher-Exposure Evaluation Initiated the Expansion Study of CBeyond to assess preliminary safety and pharmacokinetics of nimacimab administered intravenously (IV) at doses higher than the subcutaneous (SC) regimen used in the main or extension portion of the Phase 2a trial. The CBeyond Expansion Study includes two dose cohorts of nimacimab monotherapy (400 mg IV and 600 mg IV) compared to placebo administered weekly over 15 weeks, with a 12-week follow-up period. The CBeyond Expansion Study will enroll eight (8) participants per cohort randomized 3:1 for a total of 16 participants. Skye expects to report topline data from the CBeyond Expansion Study in Q4 2026. Phase 2b (CBeyond 2): Regulatory Alignment and Protocol Finalization Completed an FDA Type C meeting and received written minutes. As Skye continues its review of the written feedback, the Company is using the minutes to sharpen its ongoing Phase 2b evaluation across key design elements (including dose, duration, endpoints and inclusion/exclusion criteria) and to assess the data package needed for potential combination development with an incretin therapy. Skye is evaluating a Phase 2b protocol that could study multiple doses of nimacimab as a monotherapy and in combination with an incretin therapy, using an adaptive design framework. Skye is continuing Phase 2b protocol development for the study. CBeyond Phase 2a Obesity Trial: 26-week Outcomes Combination signal with incretin therapy: At 26 weeks, nimacimab plus semaglutide achieved an approximately 3% incremental weight-loss benefit versus semaglutide alone, with statistically significant improvements in lean-to-fat mass ratio and waist circumference; no plateau observed through week 26. Safety and tolerability: Nimacimab demonstrated placebo-like tolerability. In combination with semaglutide, there was no increase in gastrointestinal adverse events and no difference in neuropsychiatric adverse events compared to placebo or semaglutide alone. Dose/exposure learning: Nimacimab monotherapy at 200 mg weekly did not achieve the targeted weight-loss effect; Skye believes dose and exposure are the primary variables to solve and is testing higher peripheral exposure of nimacimab. Interim 52-Week Combination Update In February 2026, Skye reported interim 52-week results in participants receiving nimacimab (200 mg dose) plus semaglutide (2.4 mg) combination, demonstrating 22.3% weight loss with no plateau observed, suggesting potential for further efficacy beyond one year and at higher nimacimab doses. Strong safety and tolerability profile maintained with no added gastrointestinal adverse events, and importantly, no drug-related neuropsychiatric adverse events. Follow-up Period 13-Week Weight Regain Update Weight regain during off-treatment follow-up was lower by over 50% — nimacimab plus semaglutide cohort regained only 17.8% of lost weight vs. 37.3% for semaglutide alone during 13-week off-therapy follow-up. Semaglutide weight regain profile similar to what has been reported in STEP-1 extension trial. Body composition data from 13-week follow-up period shows differentiated weight regain profile: Combination cohort maintained fat mass loss and gained lean mass over 13-week off-treatment follow-up period. Semaglutide cohort gained fat mass over 13-week off-treatment period. Overall, combination cohort improved lean-to-fat mass ratio during 13-week off-treatment period. Research & Development Highlights Dosing Rationale & CBeyond Trial The 200 mg weekly CBeyond dose was selected based on availability of drug and comparable Phase 1 PK modeling and IC90-normalized comparisons to monlunabant’s P2 mid-dose level — however, clinical outcomes diverged, with monlunabant achieving –6.3% weight loss versus nimacimab's –1.5%. Translational biodistribution studies across mice, NHP, and published human data revealed that peripheral tissue exposure — not serum levels — is the key determinant of efficacy. Increased dosing achieves the tissue target engagement required for robust metabolic benefit, while maintaining minimal central nervous system exposure and a strong safety margin. APC Pipeline Skye has developed an antibody-peptide conjugate (APC) program that unites nimacimab's unique CB1 inhibitory mechanism and extended half-life with the power of a GLP-1 receptor agonist in a single, unimolecular therapeutic, with a broader pipeline of novel bioconjugated molecules in development. In a preclinical proof-of-concept study, the APC dosed every three days matched the efficacy of a daily combination regimen and meaningfully exceeded either agent alone. Manufacturing Readiness and CMC Development Highlights Higher Volume Dose Delivery: Licensed ENHANZE® (recombinant human hyaluronidase) drug delivery technology from Halozyme to enable patient-friendly, high volume subcutaneous administration. Phase 2b Readiness: Manufacturing of nimacimab drug substance in anticipation of the proposed Phase 2b trial supply continued in Q4 2025, and will continue in 2026, along with manufacturing of nimacimab drug product. Optimizing Manufacturing Process for Supply & Competitive Cost of Goods (COGs): Continued evaluating manufacturing process development options aimed at increasing batch output via improvements in upstream process productivity (titer) and downstream process yield. Expanding and Strengthening the Supply Chain: Advanced diligence and discussions with commercial contract manufacturing organizations to support development and manufacturing of commercial-scale processes to enable cost-efficient supply of nimacimab for late-stage clinical trials and eventual commercial supply for the treatment of obesity, overweight, and related metabolic disorders. Drug Formulation Optimization: Continued progress in the development of a higher-concentration nimacimab formulation aimed at reducing SC injection volume in support of patient-friendly subcutaneous administration across a range of potential dose levels. Advancing Toward Monthly Dosing: Working to further evaluate and optimize nimacimab’s formulation, administration and dosing paradigm to potentially enable the transition from weekly to monthly dosing with the intent to improve the patient experience, patient and physician adoption, and overall commercial attractiveness for improved positioning of nimacimab in obesity and overweight market entry dynamics. Upcoming Anticipated Milestones Q2 2026: Present nimacimab preclinical data at scientific/medical conferences. Q2 2026: Analyst event in conjunction with the Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) in June to introduce additional clinical and preclinical data, market research insights, and other aspects of the Company’s development program. Q4 2026: CBeyond Phase 2a Expansion Study topline results to 16-weeks. Q4 2026: Finalize Phase 2b (CBeyond 2) study design. Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Financial Results Balance Sheet Highlights: Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments totaled $25.7 million as of December 31, 2025. The Company expects its current capital to fund projected operations and key clinical milestones through the fourth quarter of 2026, including completion of its Phase 2a extension study for nimacimab and initial manufacturing to enable the anticipated Phase 2b clinical study, but excluding the anticipated clinical cost of a proposed Phase 2b clinical study and additional anticipated drug manufacturing costs to supply any such Phase 2b study. Operating Results: R&D Expenses: Research and development (R&D) expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2025, were $11.5 million, as compared to $7.8 million for the same period in 2024. The increase was primarily due to contracted manufacturing costs associated with our anticipated Phase 2b clinical trial for nimacimab in obesity and overweight, and employee related benefits. Increases were offset by a decrease in clinical costs, for the three months ended December 31, 2025 vs. 2024. R&D expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025, were $42.4 million, as compared to $18.7 million for the same period in 2024. The increase was primarily due to contracted clinical study and manufacturing costs associated with our anticipated Phase 2b clinical trial for nimacimab in obesity and overweight. The remainder of the increase resulted from increases in discovery research efforts, salaries and stock based compensation expense, and consulting fees offset by a decrease in clinical study costs. G&A Expenses: General and administrative (G&A) expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2025, were $3.4 million, as compared to $4.6 million for the same period in 2024. The decrease was primarily related to non-cash incentive stock-based compensation, payroll, benefits and other employee costs, professional services including fees for tax, audit, financial advisory services, and other general business expenses. G&A expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025, were $15.8 million, as compared to $17.7 million for the same period in 2024. The decrease was primarily related to non-cash incentive stock-based compensation, professional services including fees for tax, audit, legal services, financial advisory services, patent prosecution for nimacimab intellectual property, other general business expenses. Net Loss: Net loss for the three months ended December 31, 2025, totaled $14.4 million, with non-cash share-based compensation expense of $1.6 million, compared to $9.7 million for the same period in ended 2024, with non-cash share-based compensation expense of $2.1 million. Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2025, totaled $55.9 million, with non-cash share-based compensation expense of $7.8 million, compared to $26.6 million for the year ended 2024, with non-cash share-based compensation expense of $8.3 million. The primary reason for the significant increase in net loss is related to a $20.7 million increase in contract manufacturing costs primarily related to the Phase 2a study extension and Phase 2b drug supply. In addition, during 2024 we recognized a $4.2 million gain from the partial derecognition of contingent liabilities and a $2.0 million gain from insurance recoveries related to legal proceedings, $3.0 million in interest income and a gain of $1.4 million from the sale of real estate. Conference Call Details Skye will host a conference call to discuss its FY 2025 and Q4 2025 results at 1:30 p.m. PT/4:30 p.m. ET today, March 10th. The live streaming of the call can be accessed at the Skye Investor Relations website, along with the Company's earnings press release, financial tables, and investor presentation. Following the call, a replay and transcript will be available at the same website. About Skye Bioscience Skye is focused on unlocking new therapeutic pathways for metabolic health through the development of next-generation molecules that modulate G-protein coupled receptors. Skye's strategy leverages biologic targets with substantial human proof of mechanism for the development of first-in-class therapeutics with clinical and commercial differentiation. Skye is conducting a Phase 2a clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06577090) in obesity and overweight for nimacimab, a negative allosteric modulating antibody that peripherally inhibits CB1. This study is also assessing the combination of nimacimab and a GLP-1R agonist (Wegovy®). For more information, please visit: www.skyebioscience.com. Connect with us on X and LinkedIn. Forward-looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements, among others, regarding: Skye’s expectations for nimacimab, including our clinical trial plans, enrollment in clinical trials, the potential applications of nimacimab; nimacimab’s potential as a combination or maintenance therapy by supplementing GLP-1 therapies, the timing of initiating clinical trials and data read-outs, including the expected timing for reporting topline data from the Phase 2a extension study; the potential for Skye to develop a leading orthogonal platform to intensify incretin outcomes and help patients achieve more durable metabolic benefit; Skye’s product development plan for nimacimab; and the Company’s cash runway. Such statements and other statements in this press release that are not descriptions of historical facts are forward-looking statements that are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties. If such risks or uncertainties materialize or such assumptions prove incorrect, our business, operating results, financial condition, and stock price could be materially negatively affected. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology including “anticipated,” “plans,” “goal,” “focus,” “aims,” “intends,” “believes,” “expects,” “can,” “could,” “challenge,” “predictable,” “will,” “would,” “may” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. We operate in a rapidly changing environment, and new risks emerge from time to time. As a result, it is not possible for our management to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements the Company may make. Risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially include, among others, our capital resources, uncertainty regarding the results of future testing and development efforts and other risks that are described in the Company’s periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including in the “Risk Factors” section of Skye’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as expressly required by law, Skye disclaims any intent or obligation to update these forward-looking statements. Contacts Investor Relations [email protected] (858) 410-0266 LifeSci Advisors, Mike Moyer [email protected] (617) 308-4306 Media Inquiries LifeSci Communications, Michael Fitzhugh [email protected] (628) 234-3889

TranscriptFY2025 Q42026-03-10

FY2025 Q4 earnings call transcript

Earnings source - 84 paragraphs
Operator

Good afternoon, and thank you for standing by. My name is Abby, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Skye Bioscience 2025 fourth quarter financial results and business update call.

Operator

Good afternoon.

Operator

All lines have been placed on mute.

Operator

My name is Abby.

Operator

All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise.

Operator

I would like to welcome everyone.

Operator

There will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during that time, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star one again. Before we begin, please note that today's discussion includes forward-looking statements subject to risks and uncertainties described in Sky's SEC filings. Actual results may differ materially. Thank you. I would now like to turn the conference over to Punit Dhillon, Chief Executive Officer. You may begin.

Punit Dhillon

Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us. I'll start with what we've accomplished since our Q3 update. CBeyond established a potential path for nimacimab alongside existing incretin therapies with additive weight loss, encouraging durability, and favorable tolerability. At the same time, we strengthened the plan around the signal with 52-week combination data and a clearer high dose rationale and as well as a feasible cutaneous or subcutaneous path for delivery. We've continued to work on the regulatory alignment and target product profile. In short, we've moved from a promising signal to a more coherent development case. That is the backdrop for the next question. What has objectively changed over the last two years? Since launching nimacimab into an obesity first indication, we've delivered a series of firsts for the CB1 field.

Punit Dhillon

A first-in-class allosteric GPCR antibody designed for peripheral inhibition, the first human obesity program to evaluate a CB1 monoclonal antibody and create a direct readout for the mechanism without any neuropsychiatric events, and three, the best or the first to test that mechanism in combination with the GLP-1. We also built the translational infrastructure and the R&D infrastructure to support our clinical program with a human CB1 knock-in DIO workflow, coupled with the quantitative biodistribution that really frames the CNS risk in a way that small molecules historically could not. CBeyond has now given us three key learnings. One, the combination signal is clinically meaningful and consistent with the mechanism. At 26 weeks, nimacimab plus semaglutide delivered a clinically meaningful 3% improvement in weight loss over semaglutide alone, with no plateau observed, with statistically significant improvements in waist circumference and lean to fat mass ratio.

Punit Dhillon

In the 52-week extension, the combination arm achieved 22.3% mean weight loss with no plateau observed. This is the first reported clinical CB1 + GLP-1 combination data set and one of a few dual target approaches that combine a peripherally targeted mechanism with a predominantly centrally driven incretin mimetic. Number two, nimacimab 200 mg demonstrated a favorable safety profile with placebo-like tolerability. Through 52 weeks, we also saw no nimacimab-associated neuropsychiatric signal, and in combination with semaglutide, we did not see an additive GI burden. The third point is that the monotherapy arm taught us a very solvable development variable, that the 200 mg weekly underexposed peripheral tissues.

Punit Dhillon

That is why we're initiating a Part C expansion study of CBeyond to evaluate higher doses, and in parallel, enabling a practical higher exposure subcutaneous delivery with Halozyme's ENHANZE technology for our planned phase IIb. As a reminder, CB1 biology is clinically validated, but the first generation approach failed for a specific reason. Small molecules promoted central CB1 inhibition and carried unacceptable neuropsychiatric risk. Nimacimab is designed to improve energy metabolism by inhibiting CB1 in the periphery while minimizing brain exposure. With that overall framing, I'll turn it over to Chris Twitty, our Chief Scientific Officer, to walk through the dosing and exposure to efficacy rationale and how it informs our near-term clinical plan.

Chris Twitty

Thanks, Punit. I'll focus on one question. Why 200 mg weekly was a reasonable starting point for CBeyond, and what the translational data now tell us about the exposure required for robust efficacy. Before phase II, we had robust phase I SAD/MAD safety and PK data and sufficient drug product. The highest phase I dose, approximately equivalent to 200 mg weekly, was well tolerated and showed encouraging trends in MAFLD-related biomarkers. While phase I was not designed to show weight loss, it did provide a high-quality PK data set. Using that data set, we modeled phase II steady-state Ctrough levels and compared this exposure to the known IC90 concentration for nimacimab. We also modeled published phase I PK data for Novo Nordisk small molecule CB1 inhibitor, monlunabant, and compared its exposure to its IC90 concentration.

Chris Twitty

On this basis, we projected that 200 mg weekly nimacimab dose to achieve approximately seven times the IC90 concentration in the serum. It's comparable to the 20 mg once daily mid dose evaluated in Novo Nordisk phase II monlunabant study. That made the 200 mg nimacimab dose a reasonable starting dose for our CBeyond trial. Despite similar projected levels of serum CB1 inhibition, clinical outcomes diverged. Monlunabant at 20 mg daily achieved 6.3% weight loss at 16 weeks, whereas nimacimab at 200 mg weekly resulted in a more modest 1.5% reduction at 26 weeks. The key reason is distribution. Small molecules and antibodies can show similar serum target engagement, yet deliver very different tissue exposure. Since CBeyond started, we have generated biodistribution data in our human CB1 knock-in obese mice.

Chris Twitty

These data show nimacimab distributes to key peripheral tissues relevant to metabolic efficacy, including adipose tissue, liver, GI tract, and muscle, while central nervous system exposure remains minimal, consistent with the clinical safety profile. When we integrate DIO dose-response and biodistribution into a compartmental exposure model, we believe the conclusion is clear. At 200 mg weekly, peripheral tissue concentrations are below IC90, the level we require for full inhibition of CB1 signaling. This translational work indicates that a half log increase to approximately 600mgs allows for full tissue engagement to occur and allows for robust inhibition and productive metabolic activity, including meaningful changes in weight loss and associated mechanisms. Equally important, even with conservative assumptions for brain penetration, modeled central target engagement remains a fraction of IC90, both at 200mgs and 600mgs.

Chris Twitty

Maintaining that peripheral versus central separation is fundamental to nimacimab's therapeutic index. The takeaway is that CB1 monotherapy result at 200mgs is an exposure question, not a pathway question. The higher dose expansion is designed to rapidly confirm PK and safety at higher exposures before we finalize dose selection for phase IIb. Back to you, Punit.

Punit Dhillon

Thanks, Chris. With that exposure framework, our near-term work is confirm safety and PK at higher doses, ensure a scalable subcutaneous path, and refine a phase IIb clinical trial that is both regulatory informed and clinically relevant. Our objective is to focus nimacimab where we believe an orthogonal mechanism can be most differentiated, particularly in patients already treated with GLP-1 who still need more weight loss. Tu, our chief operating officer will cover additional details and share updated durability data from our CBeyond program.

Tu Diep

Thank you, Punit. As we heard today, we believe that nimacimab has the potential to fill an important void in the current and future anti-obesity medicine landscape. While our conviction is strong, we recognize that we must have the clinical data to back it up. With that context, our focus is straightforward. First, we announced today an expansion of the CBeyond study to include new intravenous cohorts to rapidly generate safety and PK data at higher exposures, while specifically monitoring for neuropsychiatric events and continued safety monitoring through our independent DMC. Participants will enroll into one of two cohorts, 400mgs of nimacimab or placebo IV once weekly, or 600 mg nimacimab or placebo IV once weekly. These groups will be randomized 3-to-1, with six participants receiving active drug and two receiving placebo for a total duration of 16 weeks.

Tu Diep

For context, it is important to note that compared to subcutaneous doses, the 400 mg and 600 mg IV doses represent approximately 700 mg and 1,000 mg subcutaneous doses respectively. Based on our biodistribution work in mice and non-human primates, we have concluded that nimacimab's brain to serum ratio is approximately 0.01%. Based on these data, we expect central target engagement to remain well below levels associated with neuropsychiatric risks observed historically with small molecule CB1 antagonists. Even so, this expansion is designed to provide a clean safety data set with doses intended, we intend to take forward in future clinical trials. Second, in January, we announced a research and collaboration agreement with Halozyme to develop a co-formulation of nimacimab using their proprietary ENHANZE technology, a recombinant human PH20 enzyme.

Tu Diep

This collaboration will allow us to evaluate high volume subcutaneous injections of nimacimab in our planned phase IIb study. In parallel, we are advancing development of a high concentration nimacimab formulation up to 200mgs per mL, and we see a longer-term opportunity for next generation nimacimab with extended half-life through Fc domain modifications. Taken together, these improvements could support the objective of reducing injection volume and further improve dose convenience for nimacimab.

Tu Diep

Lastly, we received written feedback from the FDA in response to our Type C meeting request, including comments on our proposed phase IIb clinical trial design and our questions regarding potential registration path and on the data package relevant to potential combination therapy development for nimacimab with GLP-1s. While we are still completing our review of the written minutes, the feedback has helped sharpen how we are evaluating dose, duration, endpoints, and inclusion criteria for phase IIb. The agency's responses have provided insight into expectations for combination therapies. It also provides a clearer framework for how we think about potentially studying the nimacimab as a complementary add-on therapy alongside incretins, particularly in settings where durability and per-persistence may matter. We are incorporating that input as we refine the phase IIb protocol.

Tu Diep

Before I pass it back to the team, I want to take the opportunity to share updated data from the CBeyond study. If you recall, we previously reported weight regain data from participants who did not participate in the extension study and instead went off therapy. In this analysis, we showed that participants on semaglutide alone saw 38.7% of weight regained over 13 weeks, which is in line with what we have previously seen in the STEP 1 extension study. However, participants on the combination of nimacimab plus semaglutide only regained 17.8% over that same period. These data are consistent with those we previously shared in our in vivo DIO studies, which we have shown durable weight loss for 20+ days after stopping nimacimab.

Tu Diep

We believe the potential for nimacimab to drive more durable and tolerable weight loss for patients who may need to come off therapy because they go on holiday or lose access to therapy due to insurance limitations is a meaningful outcome and is a primary opportunity in the current anti-obesity medicine landscape. In the same follow-up population, we evaluated body composition during the 13-week off-therapy period, showing that while the main driver of weight regain in the combination cohort was lean mass gain, patients maintained their fat mass loss. These data suggest meaningful differences in body composition among patients who received nimacimab plus semaglutide, demonstrating that nimacimab's orthogonal mechanism of action has the potential to drive synergistic weight loss when combined with GLP-1s. I will leave you with one last comment relating to the target product profile of nimacimab.

Tu Diep

As Skye has stated multiple times, nimacimab is being developed as complementary, not competitive, to GLP-1s. We think that positioning is important because first-line obesity therapy will likely remain both crowded and increasingly price-compressed. Against that backdrop, the more differentiated opportunity may be in the second-line add-on setting, particularly for GLP-1-experienced patients. In that setting, nimacimab is not simply another incretin nimacimab maintenance story. It is an add-on strategy intended to expand what the incretin base can achieve through an orthogonal mechanism. We believe an important point in this category is that the opportunity extends beyond first-line induction. As the GLP-1 treatment population grows, so does the number of patients who are unable to achieve their weight loss goal, plateau, become titration limited, or need another therapy to maintain their weight loss for a more durable period of time.

Tu Diep

That is the setting where an orthogonal mechanism like nimacimab may have the clearest opportunity to matter if the data continues to support incremental efficacy without sacrificing tolerability. This distinction is in positioning matters in a market where first-line incretin pricing is compressing, competition is increasing, and where persistence and quality of weight loss continue to drive real-world outcomes. The blunt version of this is first-line incretin companies are trying to defend their installed base. Nimacimab is not wasting capital trying to dislodge that base. We are using that base as the entry point to address an unmet need. Back to you, Punit.

Punit Dhillon

Sorry, I realized I was on mute. Thank you, Tu. Actually, before I close, we want to highlight a separate R&D update that speaks to longer-term platform value, and it's our first antibody peptide conjugate program. Chris is going to offer more insight into the latest data on that program.

Chris Twitty

Thanks, Punit. Using both in vitro and in vivo systems, our R&D team has identified four distinct mechanistic pillars through which nimacimab modulates metabolic pathways that drive weight loss. These pillars that include blunting obesity-related inflammation, improving glycemic control, modulating appetite-regulating hormones, and enhancing lipid metabolism, have been characterized in published research as well as our own preclinical models, giving us a high degree of confidence in this differentiated profile of this asset. While there is some overlap, nimacimab's mechanism of action are primarily orthogonal to those of incretins, providing a strong rationale for a combination approach. Preclinical studies pairing nimacimab with either tirzepatide or semaglutide demonstrated additive, and in some cases, synergistic weight loss. Our phase two clinical data reinforced this finding. Even at suboptimal dose of nimacimab, the combination with semaglutide produced greater weight loss than either agent alone.

Chris Twitty

The mechanistic, preclinical, and even clinical evidence all converge on the same conclusion. Combining CB1 inhibition with an incretin-based therapeutic has the potential to meaningfully raise the ceiling on safe, durable, and efficacious weight loss outcomes. Sky has taken that insight a step further. I'm pleased to share early data on our first-generation antibody peptide conjugate, or APC, a molecule designed to unite nimacimab's unique mechanism of action and extended half-life with the power of a GLP-1 receptor agonist in a single unimolecular therapeutic. We have run two studies to date and are sharing data from the most recent experiment today. Each study was designed to evaluate the individual components alongside the APC, with inclusion of controls to enable a clean interpretation of the results.

Chris Twitty

Both the nimacimab and the APC were dosed at 75 mg per kg every three days, with the APC additionally delivering 1 micromole per kg of a GLP-one receptor agonist peptide on the same three-day schedule. Control arms included vehicle, an active dose of semaglutide at 10 nanomolar per kg daily, and SBI-403, that's our GLP-1 receptor agonist peptide, engineered specifically for conjugation to the APC, delivered at 333 nanomolar per kg daily. While these studies capture a rich data set, including caloric intake, body composition, rebound kinetics, or distribution plus pharmacokinetics, today we are focused on sharing weight loss during the active treatment phase. Looking at vehicle-adjusted change in body weight from baseline, the nimacimab produced approximately 14% weight loss. Meaningful as a monotherapy, though somewhat less than semaglutide or the SBI-403, is that 21% and 23% respectively.

Chris Twitty

Consistent with our prior work and the orthogonal mechanisms we have outlined, both the mixed combination arm and the APC arm produced highly encouraging additive weight loss. Most importantly, the APC dosed every three days achieved efficacy equivalent to the daily combination regimen, a compelling proof of concept for this approach and a meaningful step forward for the platform. We are excited by what these early results represent. Our R&D team, working alongside leading experts in peptide chemistry and bioconjugation, continues to advance a growing pipeline of novel antibody-peptide conjugates. These molecules are grounded in well-validated incretin biology, including GLP-1, and extend into peptidomimetic therapeutics beyond the incretin class, incorporating both stable and releasable conjugate chemistries tailored to the biology of each target. I will now turn it back to Punit.

Punit Dhillon

Thanks, Chris. This is a very exciting new product category for our pipeline and the cardiometabolic landscape. The takeaway is straightforward. We're seeing combination-like efficacy in a unimolecular construct with a potential to simplify dosing while preserving the mechanistic complementarity we've emphasized. That's appetite plus energy balance. And importantly, this isn't a one-off molecule. It is the first proof point for a bioconjugation-enabled antibody platform designed to attach one or more active agents to an antibody scaffold, and is supporting multi-mechanism metabolic combinations beyond CV one alone. We overall view this as the first proof point for the platform, and we intend to use nimacimab as the initial scaffold for this work, leveraging a clinically characterized GPCR antibody backbone while preserving the program's central sparing intent.

Punit Dhillon

The platform is mechanism-flexible, and we're applying a discipline selection framework prioritizing candidates with clear pharmacology, developability, and translational readouts before advancing any conjugate into formal preclinical development. All right, on to the business execution side and capital discipline side. We took steps to align our cost structure with the work that matters the most over this last period. As we discussed in our 10-K, we ended 2025 with $25.7 million in cash equivalents, and short-term investments, and we've been managing our operating plan to extend our runway through Q4 2026, including now with the new clinical data set that we expect with the CBeyond expansion study and the higher dose cohorts that we went over today. Let me close on two slides, the key takeaways from today and the anticipated catalysts through 2026. First, we initiated the CBeyond expansion study.

Punit Dhillon

This study is designed to rapidly generate safety and PK data at higher exposures that we intend to take forward in future clinical studies. Second is the off-treatment follow-up suggests a differentiated mechanism of weight regain. Body composition data show that fat mass loss was maintained after a 13-week off treatment and is supporting our hypothesis that nimacimab is differentiated and orthogonal to GLP-1s and is well-suited for combination treatment. Third, we delivered proof of principle for our APC program, a proprietary unimolecular dual-mechanism biologic designed to simplify dosing. Fourth, we are designing a very deliberate Phase IIb study, carefully selecting our TPP and development path in combination with an incretin. Our product is not trying to out-incretin the incretin field, especially in a first-line indication.

Punit Dhillon

The winning lane for nimacimab is an add-on for the GLP-1 experienced patient who has already proven willingness to be treated and has reached or is approaching maximum incretin exposure and still has a residual problem of plateau, tolerability, durability, body composition quality, or even economics. Then looking ahead, here are the anticipated catalysts throughout 2026. In Q1, we reported interim CBeyond extension data. We received the FDA Type C meeting minutes and initiated the CBeyond expansion study, the Part C that we're referring to. We also expect to complete the ENHANZE compatibility and in-use study. In Q2, we expect cohort two to initiate enrollment and for enrollment to complete for both cohort one and cohort two. We also plan to share additional preclinical bioconjugation data and complete the feasibility work on our high concentration formulation program.

Punit Dhillon

In Q4, we expect top-line clinical data from the expansion study alongside our planned phase IIb final study design and overall execution readiness. That includes the final protocol and the operational plan we aim to complete once dose selection, the regulatory input, and the drug product work are sufficiently mature. That cadence is really designed to set up a clear dose selection decision and a practical subcutaneous path before we commit to the phase IIb. That's the plan. It does not require reproving the pathway, and we're not trying to displace what first-line incretins have already established. Our objective is to determine whether peripheral CB1 inhibition can create meaningful value after incretin initiation.

Punit Dhillon

In 2026, our goal is to answer this very important value-driving question, what exposure and duration of peripheral CB1 engagement is required to produce clinically meaningful efficacy, and can we achieve that reliably with an acceptable safety margin? The expansion study and the related endpoints are designed to set up a clear dose selection decision and a practical subcutaneous path before we move into the phase IIb trial. All right, that's it for today, and thank you so much, and we'll now open up the call for analyst questions.

Operator

Thank you. We'll now begin the question and answer session. If you have dialed in and would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and join the queue. If you would like to withdraw your question, simply press star one a second time. If you are called upon to ask your question and are listening via speakerphone on your device, please pick up your handset and ensure that your phone is not on mute when asking your question. Again, it is star one to ask a question. Our first question comes from the line of Jay Olson with Oppenheimer. Your line is open.

Jay Olson

Oh, hey. Congrats on the progress, and thanks for taking our questions. Can you talk about your plans to share data from the higher dose cohorts above 200mgs? Also, can you just talk about the status of your formulation work using the Halozyme technology and if you plan to use a subcutaneous self-administered pen in future studies? Also, do you need to have that formulation available at higher doses before proceeding to phase IIb? Thank you.

Punit Dhillon

All right, Jay. Thanks so much for joining and the questions. I'll take the first part. As you heard today, we are expanding into the Part C expansion study, so that is the next important clinical data that we expect from the CBeyond study. Our objective here is that the higher exposure produces, you know, a clear PK step-up. It preserves the CNS sparing safety profile that we've seen and shows directionally that the monotherapy activity is consistent with that exposure response that would materially change how that overall program, you know, shows activity relative to what we saw in the earlier 200 mg dose.

Punit Dhillon

As we've gone over today, there's a very clear rationale of increasing that dose from what was in the 200 mg, which didn't get to the right peripheral exposure that we expected. So that's what we would expect to have before the end of the year. We're trying to generate that data as fast as possible, and we should, you know, everyone should expect that update from us as soon as that data is available. Right now we're guiding Q4 of 2026. With regards to the formulation work, I'm gonna turn that over to Tu, and he can give you some updates regarding that.

Tu Diep

Thanks, Punit. Hey, Jay. Thanks for the question. I think you were asking just about the status of our co-formulation work with ENHANZE. Yeah, that work is ongoing. We do expect it to be ready in time for the phase IIb study. We have disclosed in the past that the use of that co-formulation will be done through what was referred to as a mix-and-deliver approach, meaning that the two components will actually be mixed at the site and subcutaneously delivered at the site by either the patient or the participant or a nurse or a coordinator that's administering the drug. We have As a part of the Type C meeting, we did submit some questions around the co-formulation work and what the expectations are with the FDA, and they have given us guidance around that. We are working very closely with Halozyme as well as a part of the collaboration. They have obviously a lot of experience with this process, so we're quite confident, you know, we'll be able to meet those requirements laid out by the FDA to be able to not just use the product in this mix and deliver approach for the phase IIb study, but also be prepared to use it in a truly co-formulated formulation that will be likely delivered as a prefilled syringe first or something in that format.

Tu Diep

I think the second part of your question is whether or not the drug will be delivered in a, auto-injector type format as well.

Chris Twitty

Yes, that is obviously the intention, from a commercial standpoint. All of that work will need to be completed and done and prepared in advance of any phase III study.

Punit Dhillon

Jay, to answer your question on the timeline side of what Tu just answered, we're moving that work in parallel with the execution of the phase IIb, but we would have the auto-injector component for the phase III trial.

Jay Olson

Great. Thanks for taking all the questions, and congrats again on the progress.

Punit Dhillon

Thank you.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Ted Tenthoff with Piper Sandler. Your line is open.

Ted Tenthoff

Great. Thank you very much for all of the updates, and great to see the progress. I'm wondering, when it comes to the expansion, do you think you're going high enough? Is there a reason to explore maybe even higher doses of nimacimab based on the low brain penetration that we saw, and likely safe CNS, or are you worried about going beyond the doses that you laid out? Thank you.

Punit Dhillon

Thanks, Ted. Great to have you on the call. I'll let Chris answer that from a dosing rationale. I can just set it up here. In terms of what we've seen so far, what we expect to see is a clean exposure separation with these doses that we've selected. The exposure levels that we have outlined today in the call are consistent with what we've modeled in terms of peripheral target engagement, and that's what we would like to see in terms of that specific zone needed for the phase IIb selection. We believe that that's the bar. Of course, you know, we are continuing to evaluate higher dosing, but at the moment that we feel that these two doses that have been selected are sufficient.

Punit Dhillon

Chris, do you wanna elaborate?

Chris Twitty

I think you covered it well. I might just add a little bit of color. There's a couple pieces that we've really delved into, and one is the actual CBeyond data itself. We have pretty robust preliminary models that are clearly demonstrating a dose response, and those are getting finalized, and we feel very confident that that data set alone speaks to increased dosing, allowing for a more efficacious response. As I covered in the report, in the earnings call itself, we've looked carefully at a series of both non-human primate, the published human data, as well as our own DIO data, and we're able to carefully translate that exposure.

Chris Twitty

Critically, as Punit was saying, the exposure in the peripheral tissues really seems to be the fundamental driver of achieving that inhibition. We know much better now, the learnings from our study, coupled with the biodistribution data, tells us that we can get to that meaningful inhibition, really drive response. That's very clear from our DIO studies, and we see evidence of that in the non-human primate studies as well. Ultimately, addressing the last piece of your question, very comfortable with that, limited exposure in the CNS. That therapeutic index is really there. We feel we can get, you know, really beyond what, as you noted, beyond what we're potentially looking at, and still have that very comfortable, safety kind of built in, to this approach.

Chris Twitty

I think it's a great starting point. We're gonna see a nice dose response, and we should be able to maintain that safety even if we wanted to go up higher. Hopefully that adds a bit more context.

Ted Tenthoff

That's great. That's really, really helpful color. I appreciate it. A quick question on the new program. What do you sort of see as the profile for that? Is that the goal to improve in safety, efficacy, both? I mean, it seems to me like, the safety is pretty clear at this point. What really is the goal, and how do you anticipate developing that space?

Punit Dhillon

Hey, Ted. Yeah, I'm sure Chris is gonna love to go into a lot of detail on that, so we're gonna save a little bit for later on in the year because we will have opportunities to talk a lot more about that. I'll just say that we're really treating it as long-term optionality. It's not a lead kind of near-term value driver. Obviously, we're really betting on how we're moving forward with our TPP on nimacimab as the near term. As we've talked to you before, nimacimab remains that core value driver. The APC data today that we showed is really interesting scaffold that supports a much broader combination platform over time.

Punit Dhillon

We've alluded to this in the past, and now to finally start seeing data, repeated, coming out of the R&D group, it's been really exciting and that adds to a significant upside. Again, not to distract away from our near-term, clinical data points. Chris, do you wanna give any additional color to that?

Chris Twitty

No, you know, I would just note that, you know, from a scientific perspective, it's just it's incredibly exciting. You know, a bit like, just there's so many directions we can go, and there's clearly benefits just from a, you know. Tu could probably comment better on this in terms of, you know, the strategic angle in terms of its clinical development, having this unimolecular asset, not only from an IP perspective, but just, you know, thinking about leveraging our favorable half-life and all the safety that comes with that.

Chris Twitty

You know, getting engagement with this GLP-1 receptor agonist in the periphery and seeing pretty comparable weight loss to something that is, you know, a true combination that can, you know. At face value, engage in the centers of the brain and, you know, beyond that blood-brain barrier, yet we're able to achieve that with a three-day dosing as opposed to the daily dosing with semaglutide or our own SBI 403. It's really interesting. It really opens your eyes to what's possible with this platform. We're looking at, as I said, not just GLP-1 receptor agonists or not even incretins, looking even beyond that. Just, you know, a huge sort of ability to look at all kinds of metabolic modulators. The science is just super exciting for us.

Chris Twitty

Yeah, we'll have more. We'll have updates later on in the year, but it's, yeah, it's incredibly exciting for our R&D group.

Ted Tenthoff

Very cool. Thanks, guys.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Michael DiFiore with Evercore ISI. Your line is open.

Michael DiFiore

Hi, guys. Thanks so much for taking my question. Two questions from me. The first one is, as we think about the monotherapy versus combination therapy options, I guess one way to interpret it is that different peripheral compartments may contribute differently to efficacy. That said, how do you think about which peripheral tissues are the most important for nimacimab's clinical effect? And does that differ, or might that differ between monotherapy and combination therapy? I have a follow-up.

Punit Dhillon

Hey, thanks for joining, Michael. I'll let Chris maybe take those questions.

Chris Twitty

Yeah. That's a great question. Yes. The short answer is yes. I think there's likely to be sort of a different profile in terms of the metabolic tissue that are most relevant to either a mono or a combo play. If we're just focused on nimacimab, either monotherapy or even in combination, we really do think the adipose tissue is really critical in that, one, we think the lipid metabolism, although we certainly see this in the liver, so those two tissues kind of are both very important. Clearly, adipose tissue is a big player there in the productive changes in lipid metabolism. Also, we think that controlling appetite is really important, and that is really maintaining and reestablishing leptin signaling. We know that our that nimacimab does a great job of bringing that back into play, controlling hyperleptinemia. In a lot of our models, we see that clearly. Adipose tissue is one of the key ones. We see huge improvements in glycemic improvement, control of glucose, and that sort of. You know, whether you're pre-diabetic or even diabetic, that pathway is critical. When we think about the monotherapy, those are key peripheral tissues that are, you know, important, critical. Now, if we think about in the context of a combination, while still, you know, important, you know, we think maybe that there's a sort of a leverage point around the complementary.

Chris Twitty

Maybe control of the hormone-regulating peptides, so these hormones that can modulate appetite, you know, maybe aren't as critical in the combination context because we know the incretins do a great job of that. You know? Those may not be as relevant. Engagement in the GI tract, which we know nimacimab can do, maybe not quite as well as the incretins. That might not be the key engagement, but maybe more around ENHANZE energy expenditure and productive changes in body compositions, which we know are quite important, particularly in the context of sarcopenic obesity, et cetera. Again, maybe thinking about more the engagement in the adipose and in the liver compartment, those tissues might be a bit more relevant in terms of the combination with nimacimab, if that's helpful.

Chris Twitty

Those would be some of the thoughts I would have to that question, that first part of your question.

Michael DiFiore

Great. Very helpful, Chris. Thank you. My final question is just more of a, I guess, a housekeeping query on why you're choosing to use IV in this Part C phase of the study instead of just using ENHANZE that's reconstituted at the site. Is it just simply too early to use ENHANZE at this point? I would have thought that Part C would have just employed the on-site reconstitution with ENHANZE.

Punit Dhillon

Yeah. Thanks, Michael. Yeah, it's a good, very good observation. You're right. IV provides us the cleanest and fastest way to generate that high exposure PK and safety information. We're not presenting IV as the end-state product, obviously. We're just using IV right now to get that program data as fast as possible and building a practical and subcutaneous path with ENHANZE for the Phase IIb. We wouldn't have been able to start the expansion study as fast as we did if we had to rely only on ENHANZE instead. That'll be ready for Phase IIb.

Michael DiFiore

I see. Thanks again.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Andy Hsieh with William Blair. Your line is open.

Andy Hsieh

Thanks for taking our question. Just two quick ones for the expansion study, Part C. One is, I see that you kind of mentioned that 400 mg IV is equivalent to 600 or 700 mg subcutaneous.

Andy Hsieh

I'm just curious about what is that based on? Was there any sort of, you know, PK modeling that supports that? And just to clarify, Tu, you said 700, but then the presentations are 600. So I just wanna make sure that, you know, which number was correct. And then the second part is, you know, since now it's transitioned to an IV formulation, do you have a good sense of how long the infusion time will be? And then just the logistical things regarding, you know, how long the patients will be on the trial site visits, all that kind of things for the Part C part of the expansion study. Thank you.

Punit Dhillon

Tu, I'll put the slide up for you, but you wanna take that?

Tu Diep

Yeah. That's a good catch, Andy. It is closer to 700mgs, you're right, not 600mgs. We did conduct a bioavailability study in the past. This was an older study that was conducted to evaluate IV dosing versus sub-Q dosing. In that study, it was determined that the sub-Q dose has relative bioavailability compared to the IV of about 56%. That's what we base the sort of conversion factor on. In terms of the actual operations of the IV dose, how long it's gonna take and the sort of management of the patients at the clinical trial, we expect the IV dose to be about an hour in terms of the infusion time.

Tu Diep

The first few doses, we'll be asking patients to stay on site a little bit longer to continue to evaluate safety. After the first few doses, patients, you know, will generally be pretty much done within a couple hours after receiving the dose and doing some of the post-dose assessments.

Andy Hsieh

I see.

Tu Diep

Yeah.

Andy Hsieh

Cool. Thank you so much.

Operator

Our final question comes from the line of Albert Lowe with Craig-Hallum. Your line is open.

Albert Lowe

Hi. What do you see as the bar for success from the expanded study as far as the dose to be taken forward for monotherapy?

Punit Dhillon

Yeah. Thanks, Albert. Right now, kinda our current posture is to be disciplined that the Part C is really primarily a PK and safety study. The expectation here isn't an efficacy readout, but the expectation is whether the monotherapy directionality appears at the higher exposure in a way that validates the model that we just went over today. Every modest emerging kind of signal really matters for us on the monotherapy activity. It's obviously accompanied by this work that we put into understanding what we've learned from the 200 mg dose, as well as the DIO work and biodistribution work that Chris went over today.

Punit Dhillon

It's expected that the PK and safety is gonna be in line with that behavior. At the end of the day, like we're expecting that it really helps finalize and reshape our Phase IIb dosing with that confidence.

Albert Lowe

Do you still plan to share the full extension data with the 300 mg monotherapy patients?

Punit Dhillon

Yeah. At the moment, based on the dosing rationale that we presented today, we wouldn't anchor any expectations on efficacy signal from the 300 mg dose. It's the likely value for us and what we are planning to review with that data once it's available is that it's gonna improve our sensitivity of the PK model, sharpens our exposure response curve, and it's definitely not, you know, to define the commercial intent of our efficacy zone that we're expecting with these doses that we plan on moving into with Phase IIb. We will, once that data is available, it'll inform our PK and that'll be shared as a part of our PK modeling.

Albert Lowe

Okay. Thanks for taking the question.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-03-05

Skye Bioscience to Announce 2025 Financial Results and Business Update on March 10, 2026

GlobeNewswire

SAN DIEGO, March 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Skye Bioscience, Inc. (Nasdaq: SKYE) (“Skye”), a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on unlocking new therapeutic pathways for obesity and other metabolic health disorders, will host a conference call on Tuesday, March 10th at 1:30 p.m. PT/4:30 p.m. ET to discuss its 2025 fourth quarter and full-year financial results and business update. An earnings press release will be issued after the market closes on March 10th. The live webcast of the call can be accessed at the Skye Investor Relations website, along with the company's earnings press release, financial tables, and investor presentation. Please join the call 5-10 minutes prior to the scheduled start time. Following the call, a replay and transcript will be available at the same website. About Skye Bioscience Skye is focused on unlocking new therapeutic pathways for metabolic health through the development of next-generation molecules that modulate G-protein coupled receptors. Skye's strategy leverages biologic targets with substantial human proof of mechanism for the development of first-in-class therapeutics with clinical and commercial differentiation. Skye is conducting a Phase 2a clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06577090) in obesity for nimacimab, a negative allosteric modulating antibody that peripherally inhibits CB1. This study is also assessing the combination of nimacimab and a GLP-1R agonist (Wegovy®). For more information, please visit: www.skyebioscience.com. Connect with us on X and LinkedIn. CONTACTS Investor Relations [email protected] (858) 410-0266 LifeSci Advisors, Mike Moyer [email protected] (617) 308-4306 Media Inquiries LifeSci Communications, Michael Fitzhugh [email protected] (415) 269-7757

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-02-02

Skye Reports Positive CBeyond Phase 2a Extension Interim Study Results for Nimacimab in Combination With Semaglutide

GlobeNewswire
22.3% total weight loss at 52 weeks with nimacimab (200 mg dose) + semaglutide (2.4 mg) combination — no plateau observed, suggesting potential for further efficacy beyond one year and at higher nimacimab doses Weight regain during treatment interruption reduced by over 50% — nimacimab + semaglutide cohort regained only 17.8% of lost weight vs. 37.3% for semaglutide alone during 13-week off-therapy follow-up, demonstrating durability advantage Strong safety and tolerability profile maintained — no serious adverse events or adverse events of special interest reported during the 52-week extension period SAN DIEGO, Feb. 02, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Skye Bioscience, Inc. (Nasdaq: SKYE) (“Skye”) a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on unlocking new therapeutic pathways for obesity and other metabolic health disorders, today announced interim 52-week data from the combination therapy arms in the extension phase of the Phase 2a CBeyond™ proof-of-concept study of nimacimab, its peripherally-restricted CB1 inhibitor antibody. CBeyond Extension Study Design and Interim Data Summary The blinded extension of the CBeyond study for combination cohorts was opened in May 2025 for participants assigned to either nimacimab plus semaglutide or placebo plus semaglutide arms. Eligible patients completed 26 weeks of treatment and were precluded from being off therapy for longer than 4 weeks. In total, 19 participants in the combination cohorts who completed week 26 were eligible for and elected to enroll in the extension study. The extension continued in a blinded manner for an additional 26 weeks, maintaining their original treatment assignment (10 nimacimab plus semaglutide; 9 placebo plus semaglutide). An additional 22 participants completed week 26 and were either ineligible for the extension or chose not to join the extension study and continued for 13 weeks on post-treatment follow-up (11 nimacimab plus semaglutide; 11 placebo plus semaglutide). Of the 10 participants in the nimacimab plus semaglutide arm who joined the extension study, the mean weight loss at 26 weeks was 14.4%. Seven (7) participants completed the additional 26 weeks of treatment and lost an additional 7.9% of weight, resulting in a mean weight loss of 22.3% after 52 weeks of treatment with no weight loss plateau observed. The combination therapy continued to demonstrate safety and was well tole…Read full document

22.3% total weight loss at 52 weeks with nimacimab (200 mg dose) + semaglutide (2.4 mg) combination — no plateau observed, suggesting potential for further efficacy beyond one year and at higher nimacimab doses Weight regain during treatment interruption reduced by over 50% — nimacimab + semaglutide cohort regained only 17.8% of lost weight vs. 37.3% for semaglutide alone during 13-week off-therapy follow-up, demonstrating durability advantage Strong safety and tolerability profile maintained — no serious adverse events or adverse events of special interest reported during the 52-week extension period SAN DIEGO, Feb. 02, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Skye Bioscience, Inc. (Nasdaq: SKYE) (“Skye”) a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on unlocking new therapeutic pathways for obesity and other metabolic health disorders, today announced interim 52-week data from the combination therapy arms in the extension phase of the Phase 2a CBeyond™ proof-of-concept study of nimacimab, its peripherally-restricted CB1 inhibitor antibody. CBeyond Extension Study Design and Interim Data Summary The blinded extension of the CBeyond study for combination cohorts was opened in May 2025 for participants assigned to either nimacimab plus semaglutide or placebo plus semaglutide arms. Eligible patients completed 26 weeks of treatment and were precluded from being off therapy for longer than 4 weeks. In total, 19 participants in the combination cohorts who completed week 26 were eligible for and elected to enroll in the extension study. The extension continued in a blinded manner for an additional 26 weeks, maintaining their original treatment assignment (10 nimacimab plus semaglutide; 9 placebo plus semaglutide). An additional 22 participants completed week 26 and were either ineligible for the extension or chose not to join the extension study and continued for 13 weeks on post-treatment follow-up (11 nimacimab plus semaglutide; 11 placebo plus semaglutide). Of the 10 participants in the nimacimab plus semaglutide arm who joined the extension study, the mean weight loss at 26 weeks was 14.4%. Seven (7) participants completed the additional 26 weeks of treatment and lost an additional 7.9% of weight, resulting in a mean weight loss of 22.3% after 52 weeks of treatment with no weight loss plateau observed. The combination therapy continued to demonstrate safety and was well tolerated at the tested doses. No serious adverse events or adverse events of special interest were reported during the extension period. Of the 9 participants in the placebo plus semaglutide arm that joined the extension study, mean weight loss at 26 weeks was 13.9%. Seven (7) participants completed treatment of the additional 26 weeks and lost an additional 5.8% of weight during the extension period, resulting in a mean weight loss of 19.7% after 52 weeks of treatment. In October 2025, Skye reported top-line 26-week data from CBeyond showing that the nimacimab and semaglutide combination cohort achieved clinically meaningful weight loss compared with semaglutide alone (-13.2% vs -10.25%, p=0.0372, mITT), with no plateau observed. CBeyond Interim Results – Combination Arm “Compared to other combination treatments, we believe 22.3% weight loss with no observed plateau at 52 weeks is clinically meaningful and commercially competitive, and is comparable to other combinations that have been evaluated,” said Puneet Arora, MD, FACE, Chief Medical Officer of Skye. “These results suggest that we could see even more weight loss with treatment beyond 52 weeks. We also expect even deeper weight loss with more optimized dosing of nimacimab in potential future clinical trials. Importantly, the interim data showed that the combination treatment remains safe and tolerable at the tested doses.” Weight Regain During CBeyond Off-therapy Follow-Up Period The participants treated with nimacimab + semaglutide that continued to the 13-week off-therapy follow-up regained only 17.8% of the total weight loss at 26 weeks, which represents a greater than 50% mitigation of weight rebound. In comparison, semaglutide treatment alone demonstrated a weight regain of 37.3% from the weight lost at 26 weeks, indicating a potential durable response to treatment. “Today’s interim data reinforces our vision to build a leading platform that is distinct yet complementary and able to intensify incretin outcomes and help patients achieve more durable metabolic benefit,” said Punit Dhillon, Chief Executive Officer of Skye. “We believe nimacimab’s attributes complement GLP-1 therapy through peripheral CB1 inhibition, with the potential to deepen weight loss and mitigate rebound during treatment interruptions. Our focus now is characterizing peripheral drug exposure at higher doses, dose selection, and developing plans to advance a Phase 2b program to rigorously reproduce the combination effect at scale, and optimize dose and regimen, with a goal of positioning nimacimab as a potential differentiated long-term option in obesity and related metabolic diseases.” Full topline reporting of the CBeyond Phase 2a extension data, including nimacimab monotherapy data and 13-week off-therapy follow-up, is expected in Q3 2026. About Nimacimab Nimacimab is a potential first-in-class, peripherally-restricted monoclonal antibody inhibitor of the CB1 receptor. Unlike previous CB1-targeting drugs, nimacimab is designed to avoid central nervous system penetration, potentially limiting neuropsychiatric side effects seen with small-molecule antagonists. As a non-incretin, non-peptide agent, nimacimab acts independently of the GLP-1 pathway and has also demonstrated additive or complementary effects in combination with incretin-based therapies in preclinical and clinical studies. Skye Bioscience Skye is focused on unlocking new therapeutic pathways for metabolic health through the development of next-generation molecules that modulate G-protein coupled receptors. Skye's strategy leverages biologic targets with substantial human proof of mechanism for the development of first-in-class therapeutics with clinical and commercial differentiation. Skye is conducting a Phase 2a clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06577090) in obesity for nimacimab, a negative allosteric modulating antibody that peripherally inhibits CB1. This study is also assessing the combination of nimacimab and a GLP-1R agonist (Wegovy®). For more information, please visit: www.skyebioscience.com. Connect with us on X and LinkedIn. CONTACTS Investor Relations [email protected] (858) 410-0266 LifeSci Advisors, Mike Moyer [email protected] (617) 308-4306 Media Inquiries LifeSci Communications, Michael Fitzhugh [email protected] (415) 269-7757 FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS This press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained in this press release other than statements of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements relating to: the potential for higher dosing of nimacimab to achieve increased efficacy; the potential for the combination of nimacimab and semaglutide to deepen weight loss and mitigate weight rebound; the potential for future weight loss beyond 52 weeks; plans to advance nimacimab into the next stage of development to optimize dosing; future clinical development of nimacimab, including the initiation and design of any future clinical trials; the expected timing for reporting topline data from the Phase 2a extension study; the ability of nimacimab to drive weight loss without neuropsychiatric and other adverse events; the potential for nimacimab to be a first-in-class drug; the potential for Skye to develop a leading orthogonal platform to intensify incretin outcomes and help patients achieve more durable metabolic benefit; the commercially competitive nature of nimacimab combined with semaglutide; and the potential for nimacimab to be a long term option in obesity and related metabolic diseases. When used herein, words including “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “designed,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “planning,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, though not all forward-looking statements use these words or expressions. All forward-looking statements are based upon Skye’s current expectations and various assumptions. Skye believes there is a reasonable basis for its expectations and beliefs, but they are inherently uncertain. Skye may not realize its expectations, and its beliefs may not prove correct. Actual results could differ materially from those described or implied by such forward-looking statements as a result of various important risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, the initiation and design of any future clinical trials will be impacted by Skye’s capital resources, Skye’s ability to obtain additional sources of capital needed to run an additional Phase 2 clinical trial, program considerations and potentially other factors outside the Skye’s control; the potential for additional weight loss after 52 weeks may not ultimately be observed; there is no guarantee that higher dosing of nimacimab will achieve increased efficacy, and likewise it is possible that higher dosing will produce adversely different safety and tolerability results than those observed to date; Skye’s dependence on third parties in connection with product manufacturing; research and preclinical and clinical testing; Skye’s ability to advance, obtain regulatory approval of and ultimately commercialize nimacimab, competitive products or approaches limiting the commercial value of nimacimab; the timing and results of preclinical and clinical trials; Skye’s ability to fund development activities and achieve development goals; the impact of any global pandemics, inflation, supply chain issues, government shutdowns, high interest rates, adverse regulatory changes; Skye’s ability to protect its intellectual property; risks associated with Skye’s common stock and the other important factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in Skye’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, which are accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and the Investors section of Skye’s website. Any such forward-looking statements represent management’s estimates as of the date of this press release. While Skye may elect to update such forward-looking statements at some point in the future, except as required by law, it disclaims any obligation to do so, even if subsequent events cause Skye’s views to change. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing Skye’s views as of any date subsequent to the date of this press release.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2025-11-14

ObesityWeek 2025: Breakthrough Results Reshaping the Obesity Market Landscape | DelveInsight

PR Newswire
ObesityWeek 2025, held in Atlanta from November 4-7, showcased unprecedented clinical data that signals a fundamental shift in the obesity treatment landscape. The most striking breakthrough at ObesityWeek 2025 came from next-generation combination therapies and innovative approaches addressing treatment limitations that have plagued earlier interventions. LAS VEGAS, Nov. 13, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The annual conference presented over 100 scientific sessions featuring innovations from leading pharmaceutical companies, including Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and Company, Viking Therapeutics, Ascletis Pharma, Skye Bioscience, Palatin Technologies, Inc., Neurogastrx, Inc., OrsoBio, Metsera, and others, revealing not only significant advances in drug efficacy but also reshaping the multibillion-dollar obesity therapeutics market. These presentations collectively demonstrate that obesity management has matured from a niche pharmaceutical focus into a major healthcare and commercial priority. Download the updated obesity market report featuring key results from ObesityWeek 2025 @ Anti-Obesity Market Let's dive deep into the promising results presented at the ObesityWeek 2025 Novo Nordisk's CagriSema: Dual and Multi-Agonist Dominance The most impactful findings centered on dual agonist therapies. CagriSema, Novo Nordisk's once-weekly injection combining cagrilintide (an amylin analogue) with semaglutide (a GLP-1 receptor agonist), demonstrated superiority over monotherapy in the REDEFINE 5 trial presented at the conference. In 331 Asian participants with overweight or obesity across 22 sites in Japan and Taiwan, CagriSema achieved an 18.4% mean weight reduction compared to 11.9% with semaglutide alone. More impressively, 95.4% of CagriSema recipients achieved ≥5% weight loss versus 78.7% on semaglutide, and 39.4% achieved ≥20% weight loss compared to only 18.6% with semaglutide. The combination therapy also reduced waist circumference by 13.5 centimeters, compared to 9.7 centimeters with semaglutide, while maintaining a comparable safety profile. This development marks a significant shift in the pharmaceutical landscape for obesity. The synergistic approach of combining mechanism classes represents an emerging standard where incremental weight loss improvements, often 5-7 percentage points, translate into substantially different patient outcomes and market positioning. Nov…Read full document

ObesityWeek 2025, held in Atlanta from November 4-7, showcased unprecedented clinical data that signals a fundamental shift in the obesity treatment landscape. The most striking breakthrough at ObesityWeek 2025 came from next-generation combination therapies and innovative approaches addressing treatment limitations that have plagued earlier interventions. LAS VEGAS, Nov. 13, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The annual conference presented over 100 scientific sessions featuring innovations from leading pharmaceutical companies, including Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and Company, Viking Therapeutics, Ascletis Pharma, Skye Bioscience, Palatin Technologies, Inc., Neurogastrx, Inc., OrsoBio, Metsera, and others, revealing not only significant advances in drug efficacy but also reshaping the multibillion-dollar obesity therapeutics market. These presentations collectively demonstrate that obesity management has matured from a niche pharmaceutical focus into a major healthcare and commercial priority. Download the updated obesity market report featuring key results from ObesityWeek 2025 @ Anti-Obesity Market Let's dive deep into the promising results presented at the ObesityWeek 2025 Novo Nordisk's CagriSema: Dual and Multi-Agonist Dominance The most impactful findings centered on dual agonist therapies. CagriSema, Novo Nordisk's once-weekly injection combining cagrilintide (an amylin analogue) with semaglutide (a GLP-1 receptor agonist), demonstrated superiority over monotherapy in the REDEFINE 5 trial presented at the conference. In 331 Asian participants with overweight or obesity across 22 sites in Japan and Taiwan, CagriSema achieved an 18.4% mean weight reduction compared to 11.9% with semaglutide alone. More impressively, 95.4% of CagriSema recipients achieved ≥5% weight loss versus 78.7% on semaglutide, and 39.4% achieved ≥20% weight loss compared to only 18.6% with semaglutide. The combination therapy also reduced waist circumference by 13.5 centimeters, compared to 9.7 centimeters with semaglutide, while maintaining a comparable safety profile. This development marks a significant shift in the pharmaceutical landscape for obesity. The synergistic approach of combining mechanism classes represents an emerging standard where incremental weight loss improvements, often 5-7 percentage points, translate into substantially different patient outcomes and market positioning. Novo Nordisk's Oral Semaglutide Advances Novo Nordisk presented compelling data supporting oral semaglutide as a significant therapeutic advancement. The OASIS 4 trial, published simultaneously in The New England Journal of Medicine, demonstrated that oral semaglutide at 25 mg once daily resulted in a mean body weight reduction of 14%, compared to 2% with placebo. Notably, 30% of participants achieved a≥20% weight loss, compared to only 3% receiving the placebo, with comparable efficacy to injectable semaglutide formulations. Physical function scores improved significantly by 16 points with oral semaglutide versus 8 points with placebo, addressing a key quality-of-life metric that influences real-world adoption. The emergence of oral formulations with comparable efficacy to injectable versions fundamentally democratizes access to obesity treatment. Oral administration eliminates injection anxiety, enhances compliance, and broadens patient eligibility to those previously unwilling or unable to self-administer injectables, a substantial untapped obesity market segment. Eli Lilly's Novel Amylin Agonist Potential Eli Lilly's eloralintide, a selective amylin receptor agonist, presented impressive Phase 2 results at ObesityWeek that exceed previously established safety-efficacy trade-offs. Across 48 weeks, eloralintide demonstrated mean weight reductions ranging from 9.5% to 20.1%, depending on the dose, with all treatment arms significantly outperforming the placebo's 0.4% reduction. Remarkably, the Phase 2 results suggest improved tolerability compared to GLP-1-based agents while maintaining clinically meaningful weight loss. These findings triggered Lilly's decision to initiate Phase 3 clinical studies, anticipated to commence in December 2025. Eloralintide's distinct mechanism represents a critical therapeutic diversification. As GLP-1 supply constraints ease, this alternative pathway addresses the substantial patient population that experiences intolerance to the gastrointestinal side effects associated with incretin agonists. Viking Therapeutics' VK2735 Dual Agonist Success Viking Therapeutics presented compelling Phase 2 data from their VENTURE trial of VK2735, a dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist administered as a weekly subcutaneous injection. The exploratory analysis revealed that 78% of VK2735-treated patients who presented with prediabetes at baseline had successfully shifted to a normal glycemic status by week 13, dramatically outperforming the 29% normalization rate in placebo recipients (p = 0.0008). Similarly, profound results emerged for the reversal of metabolic syndrome: 68% of VK2735-treated patients who met the metabolic syndrome criteria at baseline no longer satisfied the diagnostic criteria at week 13, compared to 38% of placebo patients (p = 0.02). Previously reported data showed that VK2735 achieved statistically significant reductions in mean body weight up to 14.7% from baseline after 13 weeks, with no observed plateau. Remarkably, 88% of patients receiving VK2735 achieved ≥10% weight loss compared to only 4% in the placebo group, and the majority of treatment-emergent adverse events (92%) were mild to moderate in severity. Ascletis Pharma's Positive Obesity Pipeline Data Ascletis Pharma announced promising results from multiple studies of their obesity drug candidates at ObesityWeek 2025. The Phase Ib study of ASC30, a once-daily oral GLP-1R-biased small molecule agonist, demonstrated up to 6.5% placebo-adjusted mean body weight reduction after 28 days, with the highest dose cohort achieving a maximum weight reduction of 9.3%. The drug was well-tolerated, with only mild to moderate gastrointestinal side effects and no serious adverse events. In addition, ASC30 demonstrated ultra-long-acting potential in subcutaneous injectable forms, with half-lives supporting once-monthly treatment and once-quarterly maintenance dosing schedules. These formulations demonstrated favorable safety profiles, comparable to or superior to those of current GLP-1R agonists. Preclinical studies on a novel combination therapy of ASC31 (a dual GLP-1R and GIPR peptide agonist) with ASC47 (a thyroid hormone receptor beta-selective small molecule targeting adipose tissue) revealed significantly greater weight and body fat reduction compared to tirzepatide or ASC31 alone in diet-induced obese mice. The combination also preserved muscle and restored body composition closer to healthy levels. These data validate Ascletis' proprietary Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Structure-Based Drug Discovery (AISBDD) and Ultra-Long-Acting Platform (ULAP) technologies, highlighting a pipeline with both oral and injectable candidates offering potential breakthroughs in chronic weight management through improved efficacy, safety, and patient convenience. Ascletis is committed to advancing clinical development and strategic partnerships globally. Skye Bioscience's Combination Approach to Weight Regain Prevention One of the most strategically important presentations came from Skye Bioscience, addressing a critical unmet clinical need: preventing weight regain after discontinuation of GLP-1 agonists. Data from their Phase 2 CBeyond trial demonstrated that nimacimab (a peripherally-restricted CB1 inhibitor antibody) plus semaglutide blunted rebound weight gain during a 12-week post-treatment period, with only 18.1% weight regain compared to 49.8% in the semaglutide-alone group. At 12 weeks post-treatment, the combination group maintained statistical significance compared to placebo (p=0.006), while the semaglutide-alone group lost statistical significance (p=0.12), following the established trajectory of rebound weight gain documented in the STEP-1 Trial Extension. During the active treatment phase, nimacimab plus semaglutide achieved additional weight loss of −13.2% versus −10.25% with semaglutide alone (p=0.0372), representing approximately a 30% improvement in weight loss magnitude. Waist circumference reductions were also superior with the combination, showing −11.26 cm versus −8.09 cm with semaglutide alone (p=0.0492). Palatin Technologies' Melanocortin Pathway Innovation Palatin Technologies presented preclinical and clinical evidence for melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) agonists as a complementary mechanism to incretin-based therapies. Their poster presentations highlighted PL7737, an oral MC4R small molecule agonist, which demonstrated dose-dependent weight loss in diet-induced obese mice with no observed effects on systolic blood pressure and favorable pharmacokinetics, including approximately 50% oral bioavailability and a half-life exceeding three hours in rats. A Phase II study (BMT-801) evaluated combining bremelanotide, a melanocortin-4 receptor agonist, with tirzepatide in obesity patients, revealing that adding a low-dose MC4R agonist led to greater weight loss compared to tirzepatide alone while maintaining excellent tolerability with no increased gastrointestinal side effects. Critically, sustained weight maintenance was observed when low-dose MC4R activation was used to prevent weight regain after stopping tirzepatide, a finding that parallels Skye's discoveries with the CB1 pathway. Palatin received Orphan Drug Designation for PL7737 for the treatment of leptin receptor deficiency–related obesity, with IND filing and Phase 1 trial initiation expected in the first half of 2026. Neurogastrx's Solution to GLP-1 Tolerability Challenges Addressing perhaps the most commercially significant barrier to GLP-1 therapy utilization, Neurogastrx presented proof-of-concept data from its Phase 2 study of NG101 (metopimazine mesylate), an oral peripherally restricted dopamine D2 receptor antagonist for treating GLP-1-induced gastrointestinal side effects. The study enrolled 90 participants aged 18-55 who received semaglutide plus either NG101 20 mg twice daily or placebo. Results demonstrated that NG101 significantly reduced nausea incidence by 40% (p=0.0203) and vomiting incidence by 67% (p=0.0274), while decreasing the number of discrete vomiting episodes by 56% (p=0.0238). The duration of gastrointestinal symptoms also improved substantially, with nausea and vomiting lasting more than one day occurring in 22% of NG101 recipients versus 51% of placebo recipients (p = 0.0063). Patient-reported outcomes showed a 70% reduction in nausea severity (p = 0.0138). At 12 weeks post-treatment, NG101 recipients achieved significantly reduced maximum nausea ratings of moderate-severe nausea by 31% (p=0.0225). The significance of this data becomes apparent when contextualizing that only 30% of patients initiating GLP-1 therapy for weight loss remain on treatment after one year, with gastrointestinal side effects cited as the leading cause of discontinuation. Metsera's MET-097i Phase IIb Trial Results Metsera presented positive results from two Phase IIb trials (VESPER-1 and VESPER-3) of its weight-loss drug candidate MET-097i at ObesityWeek 2025, demonstrating a strong weight loss profile comparable to that of leading drugs, such as Eli Lilly's ZEPBOUND. In the VESPER-1 trial, MET-097i achieved a placebo-subtracted mean weight loss of up to 14.1% at 28 weeks, with some individuals experiencing weight loss as high as 26.5%. The drug demonstrated competitive efficacy comparable to that of dual-agonist therapies, despite being a mono-agonist. A key highlight was MET-097i's excellent tolerability, with a low discontinuation rate of 2.9% in VESPER-1 and minimal gastrointestinal side effects, including nausea (13%) and vomiting (11%) at the highest dose in VESPER-3, along with minimal diarrhea. This tolerability profile stands out compared to current market leaders, which often cause more side effects, leading to treatment discontinuation. This progress occurs amid a bidding war for Metsera between Pfizer and Novo Nordisk, with Pfizer emerging as the winner, signaling significant interest in MET-097i's market potential. OrsoBio's Mitochondrial Protonophore Therapies for Obesity OrsoBio presented Phase 1 data for TLC-6740, while also initiating first-in-human trials for TLC-1180, a novel oral amylin receptor agonist. Preliminary seven-week efficacy data showed that low-dose TLC-1180 and semaglutide achieved similar vehicle-adjusted weight loss (11% and 14%, respectively), high-dose TLC-1180 achieved 20% weight loss, and the combination of TLC-1180 and semaglutide produced 27% weight loss with 67% reduction in fat mass without affecting lean muscle mass—a critical differentiation factor versus existing therapies. Other Notable Results Presented at ObesityWeek 2025 ObesityWeek 2025 also featured a surge of promising findings from several other pharma companies involved in obesity treatment research and innovation, including Ro, Hengrui Pharma, Kailera Therapeutics, MetaVia, Veru, Currax Pharmaceuticals, Biomea Fusion, and Aion Medicines, among others. Ro, a direct-to-patient healthcare company, presented eight research abstracts highlighting the real-world outcomes of GLP-1 treatments, such as tirzepatide and semaglutide, delivered via telehealth. Their data show substantial weight loss (up to 19.5% at 12 months) and symptom improvements in specific populations such as those with osteoarthritis or post-bariatric surgery. Ro also demonstrated how AI, including large language model triage tools, improves patient care efficiency. Additionally, they explored patient experiences such as "food noise," a measure of intrusive food thoughts that negatively affect quality of life, aiming to refine obesity care through nuanced patient insights. Hengrui Pharma and Kailera Therapeutics unveiled results from the Phase 3 GEMINI-1 trial of HRS9531, a novel dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist developed for Chinese adults with obesity. The trial confirmed the drug's potential for significant weight loss, surpassing that of the placebo, and improvement in cardiometabolic risk factors, including blood pressure and insulin resistance. Kailera is planning global Phase 3 trials to evaluate higher doses and longer treatment durations, advancing this treatment further. MetaVia presented Phase 1 and preclinical data for DA-1726, a dual agonist, showing promising safety and pharmacokinetics that support once-weekly dosing, as well as meaningful reductions in body weight and waist circumference in obese adults. Preclinical rodent studies suggest DA-1726 improves weight loss through increased energy expenditure and superior lipid-lowering compared to comparators. Veru Inc. presented two abstracts at ObesityWeek 2025, highlighting their next-generation drug enobosarm, a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) designed to enhance the selectivity of GLP-1 RA-driven weight loss for fat reduction while preserving lean mass and physical function. Their Phase 2b QUALITY clinical trial and extension demonstrated that combining enobosarm with semaglutide preserves lean body mass and function, potentially enabling greater fat loss and increased energy expenditure during active weight reduction phases. Ongoing studies are planned to assess whether enobosarm can help break weight loss plateaus in patients receiving GLP-1 RAs. Currax Pharmaceuticals highlighted new research on their oral non-GLP-1 combination therapy, CONTRAVE, focusing on craving control, behavioral adherence, and efficacy in subpopulations. Their presentations underline CONTRAVE's role in expanding obesity treatment options by addressing biological and behavioral determinants of weight management. Biomea Fusion showcased preclinical advances for BMF-650 and Icovamenib, used in combination with low-dose semaglutide, demonstrating enhanced glycemic control and weight reduction effects in rodent models. Meanwhile, Aion Medicines shared preclinical data for AM-710, an ultra-long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist prodrug capable of dosing intervals every 3 to 6 months or longer, which showed profound and sustained weight loss and metabolic benefits in animal studies. These presentations collectively reflect significant progress in obesity treatment, emphasizing novel and long-acting therapeutics, innovative telehealth delivery models, and technology-enhanced patient management approaches, all of which are poised to redefine obesity care paradigms globally. Obesity Market Implications and Expansion ObesityWeek 2025 data crystallized a shifting competitive dynamic. The anti-obesity market is projected to grow from USD 12 billion in 2024 to approximately USD 86 billion by 2034 across the leading markets (the US, EU4, the UK, and Japan), representing a 617% increase, as per DelveInsight. These market projections reflect multiple expanding vectors: the newly diagnosed population under broadened diagnostic criteria, patients previously rationed or denied access now transitioning to treatment, and emerging therapeutic classes expanding beyond existing monotherapy limitations. While Novo Nordisk's WEGOVY and Eli Lilly's ZEPBOUND maintain dominant obesity market positioning, the proliferation of next-generation agents is establishing differentiation pathways. The emerging multi-option landscape enables precision medicine approaches where clinicians stratify patients by efficacy targets, tolerability preferences, and comorbidity profiles. This represents maturation from monotherapy-dominated markets toward personalized treatment algorithms, a transition that historically expands overall market volume by 30-50% through improved patient retention and expanded indication penetration. In summary, the conference highlighted the increasing importance of treating obesity as a chronic disease through multidisciplinary approaches that span basic science, clinical application, and public policy. Notable highlights included promising new data on GLP-1 agonists and emerging oral treatments, which showed meaningful weight loss and metabolic improvements. Notably, the event underscored challenges such as treatment adherence and access issues while highlighting innovative strategies to sustain long-term outcomes and improve quality of life for individuals living with obesity. As a global gathering of experts, ObesityWeek 2025 advanced the dialogue on transforming obesity care into personalized, patient-centered approaches. Source: Obesity Market Report Obesity Market Insights, Epidemiology, and Market Forecast – 2034 report delivers an in-depth understanding of the disease, historical and forecasted epidemiology, as well as the market trends, market drivers, market barriers, and key obesity companies, including Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and Company, MedImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Raziel Therapeutics, Altimmune, Saniona, YSOPIA Bioscience, Innovent Biologics, Glaceum, Shionogi, Aardvark Therapeutics, NuSirt Biopharma, Novartis, CSPC Baike (Shandong) Biopharmaceutical, Jiangsu HengRui Medicine, Carmot Therapeutics, Pfizer, Sciwind Biosciences, Empros Pharma, among others. Conference Coverage Services DelveInsight's Conference Coverage Services provide a comprehensive analysis of outcomes from major events, including ObesityWeek, AACR, ASCO, ESMO, ATS, ERS, EULAR, AAD, AAN, and SIRS, among others. Our expert team monitors key abstracts presented at conferences worldwide, delivering timely and actionable intelligence. This detailed examination provides businesses with essential insights for competitive intelligence and market trend forecasting, supporting the formulation of future strategies. Partner with DelveInsight to maximize your conference investments and stay informed on the latest industry trends, breakthroughs, and competitive dynamics. Connect with us to discover how our analysts can provide exclusive conference coverage for you @ Schedule a Meeting Now About DelveInsight DelveInsight is a leading Business Consultant and Market Research firm focused exclusively on life sciences. It supports pharmaceutical companies by providing comprehensive, end-to-end solutions to enhance their performance. Get hassle-free access to all the healthcare and pharma market research reports through our subscription-based platform PharmDelve. Contact Us Shruti Thakur [email protected] +14699457679 www.delveinsight.com Logo: https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1082265/3528414/DelveInsight_Logo.jpg View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/obesityweek-2025-breakthrough-results-reshaping-the-obesity-market-landscape--delveinsight-302614380.html

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2025-11-11

Skye Bioscience Inc (SKYE) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Promising Study Results and ...

GuruFocus.com
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: November 10, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Skye Bioscience Inc (NASDAQ:SKYE) ended the third quarter with $35.3 million in cash and cash equivalents, expected to fund operations into 2027. The company reported promising results from its phase 2A study, showing synergistic efficacy of nemasimab plus semaglutide, achieving approximately 3% additional weight loss compared to semaglutide alone. The combination of nemasimab and semaglutide improved lean to fat mass ratio and reduced waist circumference, indicating a quality weight loss. No neuropsychiatric signals or additive gastrointestinal burdens were observed, suggesting a favorable safety profile for nemasimab. Skye Bioscience Inc (NASDAQ:SKYE) is advancing its manufacturing and CMC work, focusing on scalability and reducing costs, which aligns with their target product profile. R&D expenses increased significantly to $9.4 million from $4.9 million in the same period in 2024, primarily due to contract manufacturing and clinical trial costs. The net loss for the quarter was $12.8 million, a substantial increase from $3.9 million in the same period in 2024. The 26-week extension study enrolled only 43 patients, raising concerns about the statistical significance of the insights that can be drawn. There is uncertainty regarding the optimal dosing for nemasimab, as the current doses did not achieve the expected efficacy. The company faces challenges in ensuring compliance and retention in clinical trials, which could impact the reliability of the data. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with RLGT. Is SKYE fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Q: Have you gained any additional insight between weight loss and exposure from the trial data? Also, regarding the 26-week extension, are 43 patients enough to draw statistically significant insights? A: We have looked at a more complete PK data set, and while the final PKPD analysis is still underway, the current data shows a credible response related to exposure. We are confident that better exposures will lead to better weight loss outcomes. Regarding the 26-week extension, although the number of patients is smaller, we believe there will be a clear separation in results, especially since the initial 26…Read full document

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: November 10, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Skye Bioscience Inc (NASDAQ:SKYE) ended the third quarter with $35.3 million in cash and cash equivalents, expected to fund operations into 2027. The company reported promising results from its phase 2A study, showing synergistic efficacy of nemasimab plus semaglutide, achieving approximately 3% additional weight loss compared to semaglutide alone. The combination of nemasimab and semaglutide improved lean to fat mass ratio and reduced waist circumference, indicating a quality weight loss. No neuropsychiatric signals or additive gastrointestinal burdens were observed, suggesting a favorable safety profile for nemasimab. Skye Bioscience Inc (NASDAQ:SKYE) is advancing its manufacturing and CMC work, focusing on scalability and reducing costs, which aligns with their target product profile. R&D expenses increased significantly to $9.4 million from $4.9 million in the same period in 2024, primarily due to contract manufacturing and clinical trial costs. The net loss for the quarter was $12.8 million, a substantial increase from $3.9 million in the same period in 2024. The 26-week extension study enrolled only 43 patients, raising concerns about the statistical significance of the insights that can be drawn. There is uncertainty regarding the optimal dosing for nemasimab, as the current doses did not achieve the expected efficacy. The company faces challenges in ensuring compliance and retention in clinical trials, which could impact the reliability of the data. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with RLGT. Is SKYE fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Q: Have you gained any additional insight between weight loss and exposure from the trial data? Also, regarding the 26-week extension, are 43 patients enough to draw statistically significant insights? A: We have looked at a more complete PK data set, and while the final PKPD analysis is still underway, the current data shows a credible response related to exposure. We are confident that better exposures will lead to better weight loss outcomes. Regarding the 26-week extension, although the number of patients is smaller, we believe there will be a clear separation in results, especially since the initial 26-week data showed strong differences without plateauing. Q: Do you need monotherapy approval before a potential maintenance approval? Also, why was the weight regain in the semaglutide arm faster than expected? A: For maintenance therapy with nemasimab as a monotherapy, monotherapy approval would be required. We are exploring the optimal dosing and frequency for monotherapy, including maintenance. Regarding the faster weight regain, we don't have specific demographic characteristics to explain it, but it was observed in the study. Q: What magnitude of data do you believe is clinically and commercially viable for the combo potential, and what was the quality of weight loss in terms of lean mass? A: Effective weight loss medications typically show around 20-22% weight loss. Our combination treatment has shown a 14% weight loss at 26 weeks, which is a 35% increase over semaglutide alone. The combination also improved body composition, with a higher percentage of fat loss and a better lean-to-fat mass ratio. Q: How are you weighing the pros and cons of studying a combination of namaszimab plus semaglutide for induction versus maintenance of weight loss? A: We are focused on the induction side, as the early data shows synergistic activity with no observed plateau at 26 weeks. We are evaluating the optimal dose in combination with semaglutide, and preclinical data supports the potential for deeper weight loss with higher dosing. Q: What feedback have you received from KOLs following the top-line CB on phase 2A data and at Obesity Week? A: The feedback has been positive, with interest in the combination data and the potential for a dosing holiday without significant weight regain. KOLs recognize the need for higher dosing in monotherapy and are enthusiastic about the lack of neuropsychiatric adverse events, which is a significant step forward for the class. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2025-11-11

Skye Bioscience Reports Third Quarter 2025 Financial Results and Business Update

GlobeNewswire
Topline nimacimab Phase 2a study data showed clinically meaningful weight loss in nimacimab/semaglutide combination cohort versus semaglutide alone after 26 weeks of treatment; the data demonstrated a clean neuropsychiatric safety profile and no increase in gastrointestinal adverse events. Nimacimab plus semaglutide showed additional reduction in waist circumference of -3.2 cm vs. semaglutide alone. Rebound weight gain was lower in the 12-week post-treatment follow-up period in patients treated with nimacimab plus semaglutide vs. semaglutide alone. SAN DIEGO, Nov. 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Skye Bioscience, Inc. (Nasdaq: SKYE) (“Skye” or the “Company”), a clinical stage biotechnology company developing next-generation molecules that modulate G-protein-coupled receptors to treat obesity, overweight, and related conditions, today reported financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2025, along with key accomplishments and upcoming milestones. “As we obtain additional data from our CBeyond Phase 2a study, a holistic review provides us with additional confidence that nimacimab’s biology is active and has the potential to fill notable gaps in the obesity and overweight landscape in order to support a healthier weight loss journey for patients,” said Punit Dhillon, President & CEO of Skye. “With the positive combination data, we are shifting our focus to a combination development pathway while simultaneously planning to further understand nimacimab’s potential benefit in a monotherapy setting. We anticipate that forthcoming biomarker data and the readout from the 26-week extension will continue to build upon this story and provide further insights into nimacimab’s full potential as a metabolic therapy.” Clinical Highlights: CBeyond™ Phase 2a Obesity Trial Phase 2a Data Highlights: In October 2025, Skye reported 26-week topline data from its ongoing CBeyond Phase 2a study demonstrating a 29% relative increase in weight loss when nimacimab was dosed in combination with semaglutide compared to semaglutide alone. At ObesityWeek 2025, Skye shared new weight rebound data highlighting that after treatment discontinuation nimacimab plus semaglutide blunted rebound weight gain compared to semaglutide alone (18.1% versus 49.8% weight regained over 12 weeks). Moreover, at 12 weeks post-treatment, the nimacimab plus semaglutide group maintained significant w…Read full document

Topline nimacimab Phase 2a study data showed clinically meaningful weight loss in nimacimab/semaglutide combination cohort versus semaglutide alone after 26 weeks of treatment; the data demonstrated a clean neuropsychiatric safety profile and no increase in gastrointestinal adverse events. Nimacimab plus semaglutide showed additional reduction in waist circumference of -3.2 cm vs. semaglutide alone. Rebound weight gain was lower in the 12-week post-treatment follow-up period in patients treated with nimacimab plus semaglutide vs. semaglutide alone. SAN DIEGO, Nov. 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Skye Bioscience, Inc. (Nasdaq: SKYE) (“Skye” or the “Company”), a clinical stage biotechnology company developing next-generation molecules that modulate G-protein-coupled receptors to treat obesity, overweight, and related conditions, today reported financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2025, along with key accomplishments and upcoming milestones. “As we obtain additional data from our CBeyond Phase 2a study, a holistic review provides us with additional confidence that nimacimab’s biology is active and has the potential to fill notable gaps in the obesity and overweight landscape in order to support a healthier weight loss journey for patients,” said Punit Dhillon, President & CEO of Skye. “With the positive combination data, we are shifting our focus to a combination development pathway while simultaneously planning to further understand nimacimab’s potential benefit in a monotherapy setting. We anticipate that forthcoming biomarker data and the readout from the 26-week extension will continue to build upon this story and provide further insights into nimacimab’s full potential as a metabolic therapy.” Clinical Highlights: CBeyond™ Phase 2a Obesity Trial Phase 2a Data Highlights: In October 2025, Skye reported 26-week topline data from its ongoing CBeyond Phase 2a study demonstrating a 29% relative increase in weight loss when nimacimab was dosed in combination with semaglutide compared to semaglutide alone. At ObesityWeek 2025, Skye shared new weight rebound data highlighting that after treatment discontinuation nimacimab plus semaglutide blunted rebound weight gain compared to semaglutide alone (18.1% versus 49.8% weight regained over 12 weeks). Moreover, at 12 weeks post-treatment, the nimacimab plus semaglutide group maintained significant weight loss compared to the placebo group. The nimacimab plus semaglutide combination also achieved an additional decrease in waist circumference of 3.2 cm (1.25 inches) compared to patients treated with semaglutide alone. In the context of the obesity treatment landscape, we believe that this data highlights nimacimab’s potential as a combination or maintenance therapy by supplementing GLP-1 therapeutics to enhance weight loss and improve body composition by targeting fat loss, without adding gastrointestinal side effects. Extension Study Fully Enrolled: In September, Skye completed the enrollment of its 26-week extension study. A total of 43 patients were enrolled, with 19 and 24 patients in the combination and monotherapy cohorts, respectively. Data from the 26-week extension is expected in Q1 2026 and will provide information on the potential full treatment duration of 52 weeks followed by a 12-week follow-up period. In the combination arms, patients will continue with blinded treatment with nimacimab or placebo and will continue receiving semaglutide (Wegovy®). Patients in the monotherapy arm will receive a higher dose of nimacimab (300 mg), which we expect will assist in refining our PK model. Third Quarter 2025 Financial Results: Balance Sheet and Cash Flow Highlights: Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $35.3 million as of September 30, 2025. The Company expects its current capital to fund projected operations and key clinical milestones into 2027, including completion of its Phase 2a extension study of nimacimab and certain manufacturing and clinical activities, initial manufacturing runs needed to start a subsequent trial, and planning activities. In addition, our runway supports our discovery, research and development efforts along with formulation and development work in preparation for nimacimab’s later stage studies. Operating Results: R&D Expenses: Research and development (R&D) expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2025, were $9.4 million, as compared to $4.9 million for the same period in 2024. The increase was primarily due to contract manufacturing, clinical trial costs associated with our clinical study for nimacimab, discovery research and development expenses, salaries and stock based compensation expense, and consulting advisory and professional fees. G&A Expenses: General and administrative (G&A) expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2025, were $3.9 million, as compared to $4.6 million for the same period in 2024. The decrease was primarily related to decreases in consulting, advisory and professional fees, recruitment fees, salaries, and stock based compensation expense. Net Loss: Net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2025, totaled $12.8 million, with non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $1.9 million, compared to $3.9 million for the same period in 2024, with non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $1.9 million. Conference Call Details Skye will host a conference call to discuss its Q3 2025 results at 1:30 p.m. PT/4:30 p.m. ET today, November 10, 2025. The live streaming of the call can be accessed at the Skye investor relations website, along with the Company's earnings press release and financial tables. Following the call, a replay and transcript will be available at the same website. ABOUT SKYE BIOSCIENCE Skye is focused on unlocking new therapeutic pathways for metabolic health through the development of next-generation molecules that modulate G-protein coupled receptors. Skye's strategy leverages biologic targets with substantial human proof of mechanism for the development of first-in-class therapeutics with clinical and commercial differentiation. Skye is conducting a Phase 2a clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06577090) in obesity for nimacimab, a negative allosteric modulating antibody that peripherally inhibits CB1. This study is also assessing the combination of nimacimab and a GLP-1R agonist (Wegovy®). For more information, please visit: www.skyebioscience.com. Connect with us on X and LinkedIn. FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS This press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained in this press release other than statements of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements relating to: nimacimab’s potential to fill notable gaps in the obesity and overweight landscape; nimacimab’s potential as a combination or maintenance therapy by supplement GLP-1 therapies; future clinical development of nimacimab, including the initiation and design of any future clinical trials; the expected timing for reporting data from the Phase 2a extension study; the Company’s cash runway. When used herein, words including “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “designed,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “planning,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, though not all forward-looking statements use these words or expressions. All forward-looking statements are based upon the Company’s current expectations and various assumptions. The Company believes there is a reasonable basis for its expectations and beliefs, but they are inherently uncertain. The Company may not realize its expectations, and its beliefs may not prove correct. Actual results could differ materially from those described or implied by such forward-looking statements as a result of various important risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, the initiation and design of any future clinical trials will be impacted by the Company’s capital resources, the Company’s ability to obtain additional sources of capital, program considerations and potentially other factors outside the Company’s control; the potential for additional weight loss after 26 weeks may not ultimately be observed; there is no guarantee that higher dosing of nimacimab will achieve increased efficacy, and likewise it is possible that higher dosing will produce adversely different safety and tolerability results than those observed to date; the Company’s dependence on third parties in connection with product manufacturing; research and preclinical and clinical testing; the Company’s ability to advance, obtain regulatory approval of and ultimately commercialize nimacimab; competitive products or approaches limiting the commercial value of nimacimab; the timing and results of preclinical and clinical trials; the Company’s ability to fund development activities and achieve development goals; the impact of any global pandemics, inflation, supply chain issues, government shutdowns, high interest rates, adverse regulatory changes; the Company’s ability to protect its intellectual property; risks associated with the Company’s common stock and the other important factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, which are accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and the Investors section of the Company’s website. Any such forward-looking statements represent management’s estimates as of the date of this press release. While the Company may elect to update such forward-looking statements at some point in the future, except as required by law, it disclaims any obligation to do so, even if subsequent events cause the Company’s views to change. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing the Company’s views as of any date subsequent to the date of this press release. CONTACTS Investor Relations [email protected] (858) 410-0266 LifeSci Advisors, Mike Moyer [email protected] (617) 308-4306 Media Inquiries LifeSci Communications, Michael Fitzhugh [email protected] (628) 234-3889

TranscriptFY2025 Q32025-11-10

FY2025 Q3 earnings call transcript

Earnings source - 55 paragraphs
Jordan

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. My name is Jordan, and I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Skye Bioscience, Inc. Third Quarter 2025 financial results and business update call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, I would now like to turn the conference over to Bernie Hertel, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Bernie Hertel

Hello, and thank you all for participating in today's call. Before we begin, I'd like to caution that comments made during this conference call will contain forward-looking statements under the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements of Skye Bioscience, Inc.'s expectations regarding its development activities, timelines, and milestones. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely, and reported results should not be considered as an indication of future performance. These forward-looking statements speak only as of today's date, and the company undertakes no obligation to revise or update any statements made today. I encourage you to review all of the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange concerning these and other matters. I'll now turn the call over to Kaitlyn Arsenault, Skye's CFO.

Kaitlyn Arsenault

Thanks, Bernie. After the market closed today, we issued a release and filed Skye Bioscience, Inc.'s Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission, outlining our quarterly financial results. We encourage you to reference our filings for the details of our financials and the risk factors described therein. I will now provide a brief overview of our key financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2025. We ended the third quarter with cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments totaling $35.3 million. We expect our current working capital to fund operations and key clinical milestones into 2027. This includes the completion of the extension of our Phase 2a study for Nimazumab, certain manufacturing, and preparatory clinical activities needed to initiate the next study. In addition, our runway continues to include a modest discovery R&D budget, the dose concentration, and process intensification work required to support our expected TPP and scale and support later-stage studies for Nimazumab. R&D expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2025, were $9.4 million as compared to $4.9 million for the same period in 2024. The increase was primarily due to contract manufacturing, clinical trial costs associated with our obesity study for Nolasimab, discovery R&D expenses, salary and stock-based compensation expense, and consulting, advisory, and professional fees. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2025, were $3.9 million as compared to $4.6 million for the same period in 2024. The decrease was primarily related to decreases in consulting, advisory, and professional fees, recruitment fees, salaries, and stock-based compensation expense. Our net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2025, totaled $12.8 million, including non-cash share-based compensation expense of $1.9 million, compared to $3.9 million for the same period in 2024 with non-cash share-based compensation expense of $1.9 million. Now, I'll turn the call over to our President and CEO, Punit Dhillon.

Punit Dhillon

Thanks, Kaitlyn. Today and during this quarter and the subsequent quarters, we're really focused on what matters most: turning the answers from our CBEYOND study into the logical next steps. We're going to walk you through what we've learned from our Phase 2a CBEYOND study so far, and how that data has really sharpened our focus, maintained our focus on our clinical path, and strengthened our conviction in the Nimazumab opportunity. From the start, we said that the next step for Nimazumab would be to determine an optimal dose for Nimazumab. And to that end, the top-line data from the Phase 2a study provided us with a wealth of information that we continue to mine for further insights. Most importantly, it gave us evidence in the biological activity of Nimazumab and the clarity on the PK to move forward confidently on our combination development pathway while simultaneously planning to further understand Nimazumab's benefit in a monotherapy setting. On today's call, we'll walk you through the progress that we've made over the past ninety days, the data that we've generated, and the path that we're really focused on in terms of charting forward. We're going to cover four key areas today. One is clinical development, specifically what we've learned from the CBEYOND study, how those insights are shaping the potential for future next studies. Number two is CMC and product economics, how we're designing Nimazumab for scalability and long-term market penetration. Number three is R&D and the work we're doing there, the science that continues to validate that peripheral CB1 antibody. And, or sorry, the Nimazumab or peripheral CB1 antibody is differentiated, and it's a durable mechanism. And four, the continued emphasis on just really strong accountability and consistency, how our actions this quarter measure against what we said that we would deliver. And I'm going to conclude with an outline of what's next. I'll look ahead at the key milestones and the catalysts over the coming ninety days. So first, let's get into clinical development. We'll start with what we said last quarter and where we are now. In Q2, we committed to three different things. One was to deliver top-line data in Q4 from CBEYOND. Two was to use that dataset to inform the dose-ranging strategy for the next clinical phase, and three, maintain operational and regulatory milestones and readiness to move efficiently into the next study. And we've delivered on each one of those commitments. At Obesity Week last week, Dr. Louis Aroni presented the late-breaking results from CBEYOND, and the findings are both clear and very encouraging. They showed synergistic efficacy with Nimazumab plus semaglutide and achieved an additional approximately 3% weight loss at twenty-six weeks compared with semaglutide alone. This is with a p-value of 0.0372 on a modified intent-to-treat population. That's nearly a 30% improvement with this combination with no observed plateau at twenty-six weeks. We also showed quality of weight loss that the combination of Nimazumab and semaglutide improved lean to fat mass ratio of 0.26 versus 0.13 with a p-value of 0.0126. And reduced waist circumference by an additional 3.17 centimeters with a p-value of 0.0492. We also showed durability that in the twelve-week post-treatment follow-up, Nimazumab plus semaglutide blunted weight regain with only an 18% regain or 2.3 kilograms versus 50% regain or 4.7 kilograms on the semaglutide alone arm. And that's with a p-value of 0.006 versus placebo. The safety signal has also been very positive. There's been no neuropsychiatric signal and no additive GI burden. And so this overall data really confirms that Nimazumab is biologically active, clinically meaningful in combination, and exceptionally well tolerated. They validate our long-held view that the mechanism is sound, and that the value now lies in refining, really, the dose to unlock the Nimazumab true efficacy window and fully capture the therapeutic potential of a peripheral CB1 antibody. Additionally, in September, we completed enrollment of the twenty-six-week extension study. A total of forty-three patients were enrolled with nineteen and twenty-four patients in the combination and monotherapy cohorts, respectively. Retention in the extension study has been very strong. And the data from the twenty-six-week extension study is expected in late Q1 2026, and we'll provide information on the potential for full treatment duration of fifty-two weeks followed by a twelve-week follow-up period. This long-term follow-up from the extension will be a new inflection point with a richer dataset and a more complete understanding of Nimazumab's clinical potential. In parallel, we're going to continue moving up the dose. So the monotherapy extension study is evaluating a slightly higher dose where we've stepped it up from two hundred milligrams to three hundred milligrams weekly, but our current plan is to even go higher. Analysis of our preliminary PKPD model showed that patients achieving higher systemic levels of Nimazumab corresponded with greater weight loss. And that aligns with the range where we expect to show clinically significant results. Our PKPD model based on the clinical data and the preclinical dose-ranging really gives us confidence that a higher dose of Nimazumab can potentially achieve better monotherapy efficacy and drive even further weight loss when combined with semaglutide. The parallel approach that we're taking with further clinical data from the extension study for the durability and then evaluating a higher dose-ranging in a well-powered Phase 2 focused combination study. With understanding a better characterization of the monotherapy dose, will really keep the development of Nimazumab on track and we're really focused on that. And we think that that's the next logical step for understanding our next important decision points. Next, I'll move to CMC. So another area that we've continued to make progress in has been all of our manufacturing and CMC work. That includes our high concentration formulation strategy. And that remains on track. And we believe a path to achieving the formulations that really align with our clinical protocols and expectations for our TPP. As well as patient convenience. Remain on track. This isn't simply, like, a technical milestone for us. It's really rooted in a commercial TPP, and our focus is on reducing overall injection volume, lowering costs per gram, and ensuring we can compete as pricing pressures on incretins continue to intensify. This aligns, we believe, perfectly with our titration-free target product profile. And that's a key advantage over the incretin-based injectables that require a step-up dosing for tolerability. To clarify, Nimazumab has shown no additive GI burden at the two hundred milligram once-weekly dose. And we expect to evaluate any higher dose without the need for titration, making it easier for both prescribers and patients. Equally important, we're continuing to evaluate and manage execute on measures that can significantly impact our cost of goods. This process includes optimization of the upstream and downstream manufacturing steps for Nimazumab and scaling up into high fermentation volumes, and we're continuing to evaluate multiple delivery devices, including autoinjectors, that will improve the patient experience. Together, these activities will have a significant impact on reducing our cost of goods to support an eventual pricing model that aligns with Medicare and is rapidly influencing the obesity market. Ultimately designing a product that is potentially not only clinically differentiated but commercially durable and real-world affordability. From a manufacturability standpoint, next, we'll move into R&D. So beneath all of the clinical data sits an increasingly powerful scientific base. The preclinical and translational work continue to show that Nimazumab reduces fat mass while preserving lean mass, improves insulin sensitivity and glucose control, lowers leptin, increases GLP-1, reduces hepatic steatosis and inflammatory markers, and maintains weight loss durability after treatment stops. And this is consistent with what we're seeing clinically. Combination studies in DIO models with tirzepatide and semaglutide show greater than additive weight loss and minimal rebound, confirming that peripheral CB1 inhibition complements incretin biology mechanistically. And collectively, these results reinforce why Nimazumab is really the right molecule, the right mechanism, and the right program to move forward. Our message to investors ever since we began development on the Nimazumab program has been about discipline and delivery, and that remains true today. In Q2, we said we'll complete the top-line readout by late Q3, early Q4, and we did that. And we presented late-breaking data at Obesity Week last week. We also said we're going to continue with the current dataset to guide our dose-ranging, and that's what we're doing. We're going to continue advancing our CMC readiness in parallel. And we continue to improve manufacturing capability. As well as process improvements are going to continue to be ongoing. We're focused on the higher concentration formulation path, and that's on track and synchronized with our clinical development planning. We ultimately expect our monoclonal antibody to be the best way to target CB1 inhibition to enable confidence in the safety, and this pathway will ultimately show the clearest mechanism validation in terms of targeting this particular pathway. With our Phase 2a data, we have now provided an important initial demonstration of Nimazumab's utility that does offer the validation of the mechanism and, notably, we did that by showing that there are no neuropsychiatric adverse events or other unexpected adverse signals across the different cohorts that receive Nimazumab. And we've just completed the fifth DMC meeting this past week with no concerns. So every commitment that we've made, we've made it on time, we've made it with precision, and we're going to continue doing that. Over the next ninety days and into 2026, our focus is on converting what we've learned from the clinical data into further execution. We're going to generate a more complete picture of Nimazumab's potential using insights from our PKPD modeling and the ongoing extension study. We're finalizing the next Phase 2 design. We're concentrating on combination and also in the maintenance indications where the data already point towards a really strong direction. And we're continuing to advance the formulation and manufacturing work so that Nimazumab can be delivered practically at scale and with the cost discipline that the market demands. We'll also be presenting at several investor conferences beginning next week and into December and gearing up for sharing new preclinical and clinical data at all the major scientific conferences and meetings in 2026. Across each of these fronts, the through line is really about consistency. We said what we would do, and we've delivered on the data, then on the timelines and on the execution. Our next steps are an extension of that same discipline, and we're interested in continuing to focus on translating all of this into momentum and the momentum into value. So this concludes the prepared remarks and comments today. We thank you everyone for joining the call, and we'll now open the call for questions from our covering sell-side analysts. Operator, over to you.

Jordan

Thank you. As a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question, press 1 on your telephone keypad. Our first question comes from the line of Michael D'Afurrier from Evercore ISI. Your line is live.

Michael D'Afurrier

Hi, guys. Thanks so much for taking my question. Just two for me. Now that you've had some time to further digest the data from the trial, have you gained any additional insight between late weight loss and exposure? Recalling at the time that the data were revealed, only had PK exposure versus weight loss up to sixteen weeks. That's my first question. My second question is regarding the twenty-six-week extension. Simply, are there enough patients? Forty-three patients seem sort of low, and do you have enough patients to draw any statistically significant insights? Thank you.

Punit Dhillon

Hey, Michael. Thanks for dialing in and the questions. So I'll take the first question and kind of hand it over to Chris because he can further elaborate. But as you indicated there, obviously, we showed a really strong validation of the mechanism in the combo efficacy. Monotherapy dosing, I think, has been evident in terms of issue with dose, not the biology. The exposure response really has demonstrated that the observed concentrations at the two hundred milligram dose didn't achieve the efficacy that we would expect because they were patients were underdosed. But Chris, yeah, can further elaborate in terms of what we've seen now based on the twenty-six-week dataset as well as any he wants to point to from the preclinical data.

Christopher Twitty

Thanks, Punit. Yeah. So to that point, we have, in fact, looked at a more complete PK dataset. I would just note that the final PKPD analysis is still underway, likely won't be available probably for another few more weeks to a month. But we do have a more robust build-out, and we looked at a mixed-effects model both controlling for the placebo effect as well as doing a similar type of modeling where we controlled for the semaglutide effect and looked at that in a combo setting, and in both instances, we see that there's really no bias in the residuals, so the models fit well. They align with the observed weight change that we saw in the trial. And importantly, they point to the point you're making. That is, we're seeing a nice slope, a very believable, credible slope that demonstrates this response related to exposure. We feel very comfortable that the PK data is holding. We'll again have the final PKPD model, but we feel very confident that, in fact, there is a dose response. And as we get to better and better exposures, we will see better and better weight loss as both monotherapy and in combination. And the other thing I've just pointed briefly since we've last talked, Michael, the translation of the DIO data has been further validated. We've done some important biodistribution studies looking at where are the compartments and how those fill relative to what's in the serum and using that along with some other approaches to really get a good fit in terms of how the DIO data, which demonstrates very clean dose response as well, how that translates to the clinical doses. So both those pieces are really supporting this concept of higher dosing in the clinic to see better weight loss.

Punit Dhillon

Michael, would you mind just repeating your second question? Or did we answer it?

Michael D'Afurrier

No. So my second question is regarding the twenty-six-week extension data. It just seems that only forty-three patients are enrolled, it seems kind of on the low side. And I was wondering if that's enough patients to draw any statistically significant insights for when the trial wraps up.

Punit Dhillon

Yeah. So the good news on the extension is that enrollment has been well, obviously, that was good. That we saw a good interest in the study, and then retention has continued to stay really strong. You know, it is a smaller number of patients relative to the core study, the first part. But we do believe that there will be a clear separation, that we would be able to see, especially, if you recall in the twenty-six-week time point, the first twenty-week time point in the combination, we did see a really strong difference. And then the slope wasn't plateauing. It continued at So we hope that we're going to continue to see that separation between semaglutide alone. On the monotherapy, you know, as we've indicated, we believe that there's still room to go higher in terms of dose. So we'll see what the data reveals. But, at this point, it's a little tough to comment on that because we don't have that separation that we expected in the first twenty-six weeks.

Michael D'Afurrier

Great. Thanks so much.

Jordan

Your next question comes from the line of Andy Isaiah from William Blair. Your line is live.

Andy Isaiah

Great. Thanks for taking our questions. We have two. One is more on the regulatory side. So we're curious, you know, very provocative data looking at the weight rebound. Do you need to have a monotherapy approval before a potential maintenance approval? Just trying to get a sense of the sequence and requirements, you know, based on your regulatory discussions with the agency. So that's number one. Number two is we looked at comparative kind of randomized withdrawal studies in particular step four. With semaglutide, it seems like in that study, the weight regain was about 50%. Out to one year. In this study, the weight regain was much faster. So I'm curious if there's any sort of patient baseline characteristics that you want to highlight that could explain the more rapid than expected weight regain from the semaglutide arm. Thank you.

Punit Dhillon

I think these are both great questions and interrelated. I can pass it over to Dr. Arora to take those, and then I might come back with some additional commentary on the maintenance setting.

Puneet Arora

Yeah. Andy, to address your first question, yes. If we were to do maintenance therapy with Nimazumab as a monotherapy, that would require monotherapy approval. Although, you know, if that is the strongest suit for the drug, then the approval could be as maintenance as well. And, you know, we are as part of our plan as we go forward is to continue looking at the monotherapy to find that optimal dose and frequency on how to dose monotherapy for varying indications, including maintenance. That's a question that we will be discussing with the agency, and I think that will be part of our continuing interaction with them as to how to push both monotherapy and combination forward and what differential path each one may need. So I'm sorry. What was your second question?

Punit Dhillon

It's just on the regain piece. Yeah. Dr. Arora, I think Oh, yeah.

Puneet Arora

So, you know, if you look across if you look at weight rebound data across a bunch of studies, there was a step one withdrawal study. I think it's one of the ones you're had some. And then tirzepatide did some randomized withdrawals. In one year, the total weight regain is about it does tend to be somewhat accelerated in the first half because the weight begins faster initially and then tends to plateau a little. We do see a somewhat faster regain in this study. We don't know why. It's, you know, we don't know particular characteristics that we're seeing in the demographics. The study of, frankly, the same as you see in most other studies. So we don't know why these patients regain their weight this quickly, but they did. And, you know, being a randomized trial, we figure that both the cohorts are effectively similar.

Punit Dhillon

If I could just elaborate on one thing, Andy. So you look. The durability data that we've showed last week with the only eighteen percent regain versus fifty percent semaglutide alone, is I believe, a real cornerstone of our strategy, and it really validates what you saw from an R&D preclinical perspective. It shows that peripheral CB1 inhibition can provide a durable effect after treatment stops, which is a significant issue for the incretin-only therapies. And I noticed, you know, from coming from Obesity Week, there's been a growing emphasis of the incretins or companies that have incretin pipelines focusing on the maintenance market as well. We believe that it's this comment we made at the last earnings call, and we stand by it, is we do believe that we really have an interesting opportunity for Nimazumab to aggressively pursue a maintenance indication, which we, you know, conformally kind of look at once we finalize our dosing strategy. But we see a massive commercial opportunity that's differentiated because it's more likely and doctors will confirm this, that they would treat with a differentiated mechanism rather than maintenance with another incretin after induction of incretin is completed. And, no twos investigated that from a commercial standpoint, from the survey that we've done. And that's been confirmed. Two, do you want to just expand on that?

Christopher Twitty

Yeah. No. I don't I think you kind of covered it. Pretty well. I think it is important to understand that the maintenance approach therapy is something that's being looked at a lot, not just by Skye Bioscience, Inc., but from investigators and clinicians as well as obviously, you know, other companies. And then as Punit said, you know, right now, there's not a lot of options other than another GLP-1 to go on. And so physicians are generally either reluctant or, in fact, I said at least the ones I've spoken to, generally, I should put them on something else other than a GLP-1. Like a phentermine or something like that. That makes more sense because it's a different mechanism of action. Even though it may have some other comorbidity issues as well as maybe not be as effective. So I think, again, in that space, I think there's a real market for a drug like Nimazumab. That we think we can where we think we can win.

Andy Isaiah

Oh, great. Thank you so much. Yep.

Jordan

Your next question comes from the line of Ananda Ghosh from H.C. Wainwright. Your line is live.

Ananda Ghosh

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my question, and congratulations on the combo data. Looks really impressive. One of the questions I have is, like, what kind of, you know, the magnitude of data do you believe can be clinically and commercially viable when you are thinking about the combo potential? And was also curious to know what was the quality of weight loss in terms of, you know, the lean mass. That will be helpful. Thanks.

Punit Dhillon

Yeah. I think it's a great thanks, Ananda. I'll turn it over to Puneet Arora. He can take both those questions.

Puneet Arora

Yes. Ananda, thanks for that question. Now you've seen that a lot of the effective weight loss medications that we've cluster is around the 22% range. In fact, if you, you know, if you speak to most basic physicians, they'll tell you that a lot of patients don't even need, frankly, once you start exceeding about 10% weight loss, you can reverse a lot of comorbidities. But insofar as the benchmark today is about 20%, semaglutide or a generic GLP-1 usually gives you about 15% and then you start seeing the other combinations adding up to another 6% like you see with tirzepatide, the differential that we would hope for. We're already seeing in our protocol set here of 14 and 14 something percent weight loss. At twenty-six weeks, which is three and a half percent more than semaglutide alone. So about a 35% increase. And we think that when we do a full 52, actually, a sixty-eight-week treatment, which is where all these are measured, we will have a combination treatment effect that will be in the range or better than what we are seeing with all these other current combinations. We are actually seeing improvement in body composition along with this thirty extra. So we had planned this at Obesity Week as well. What they're showing is that if you just look at the crude numbers, semaglutide alone has about 72% fat loss and 28% lean mass. And when you add Nimazumab to it, this actually becomes 76% fat loss and only 24% lean fat loss. So there is a transition towards fat mass loss. And when we break this down, we see that as you know, there is 30% extra weight loss. Right? But the fat loss goes from 15% for semaglutide to more than 20% when we look at the combination. Whereas the lean mass loss almost doesn't change. It goes from about 5.5 to 6%. And that is what is showing that is the effect that we are seeing in the Lean2FatMask ratios and why the body composition is improving. So all of the additional weight loss that we've seen is almost all fat mass loss. Our secondary endpoint, to be specific, was linked to fat mass ratio. And that ratio should increase with weight loss. And the more the increase, the better your body composition is. And in our trial, semaglutide increased that lean to fat mass by 0.13. And the combination improved it by 0.26, which is twice the improvement. And this number was actually significant. The p-value was 0.01.

Ananda Ghosh

Got it. Thanks. That was very helpful.

Jordan

Your next question comes from the line of Jay Olson from Oppenheimer. Your line is live.

Jay Olson

Oh, hey. Thank you for providing this update. We have two questions. Our first question is about your current thinking around the potential for studying a combination of Nimazumab plus semaglutide for induction of weight loss versus maintenance of weight loss. While acknowledging the regulatory considerations, it seems like they both may offer potentially significant commercial opportunities. So how are you weighing the pros and cons of induction versus maintenance? And then I had a second question, if I could.

Punit Dhillon

Yeah. Thanks, Jay. Thanks for joining the call today. That's a key question. We are certainly focused on the induction side, you know, when we're seeing this improvement that we've showed over the course of this early dataset with no observed plateau at twenty-six weeks. It really demonstrates a synergistic activity. And it's been very encouraging. We're looking forward to seeing what the fifty-two-week data reveals, but the current focus for the Phase 2b is on evaluating the right and optimal dose in combination with sema. And I think there's a little bit of other supportive data that we've seen from a preclinical perspective that Chris might be able to point to, in terms of why we feel confident that dosing higher can lead to a better deeper weight loss in sema because of the data that we've seen so far, which tirzepatide and SEMA in combination. Chris, do you want to discuss that?

Christopher Twitty

Sure. Yeah. To that point, we directly ask that question in light of our recent clinical data. It's important to understand as we get better exposure moving from what we've modeled to be something very similar to our CVRN lumasiran dose, which we're calling sort of a suboptimal dose in this DIO preclinical model, and then a more active dose. An active dose represents something that we're looking towards potentially using in future trials. So, comparing the difference between the active and the suboptimal, you can, of course, see that as a monotherapy in terms of weight loss. Importantly, when we look at this in the setting of combination, we see while the additive effect is there, we really see a large improvement beyond the magnitude you might expect with the monotherapy. So it seems to really unlock the combo potential as well and maybe even beyond what we said with monotherapy. It's important, we think, to really get the dose right as we look towards sort of that induction or that combination approach in the clinic.

Punit Dhillon

And I think it's just important to us to emphasize that it's really relevant in terms of being a truly differentiated, alternative or orthogonal approach to what's out there in terms of current combinations. So although the data is early in the twenty-six-week data, it is very, very encouraging. When you do stack it up across these other combinations, it's really interesting to see how deep that response is initially. So like, you know, we're all excited to see what how that reveals in a longer fifty-two-week data point. But it makes a at the moment, it makes a very compelling case for us to evaluate this in a Phase 2b combo. Hey, Jay. Jay, this is two. I just wanted sort of also add in the relevance of this sort of this rebound data and what I think that also means potentially for a market opportunity, not just in the maintenance setting, but also more in the combination setting where you can get that induction of weight loss. And if, you know, in the real world for patients, you know, need to go on a dosing holiday. For whatever reason. Maybe they're actually going on holiday. They just don't want to bring their drug with them. Or maybe they have other things. Maybe there's access issues, things like that. You know, what our data suggests is that that's not going to be a big as big of a problem as it has been when patients do either lose access to their GLP-1 or lose or have to go on vacation or have other reasons, that they're not going to have a significant rebound by like, we're seeing in that, like, the step one data has shown and that you can have this sort of holiday without sort of losing the gains that you've achieved through the treatment. So I think that's really meaningful. I think a lot of because physicians are looking at that and what that means as well, how you can manage patients' weight. Over a much longer period of time than just sort of these sort of compressed times you're seeing in clinical trials. And what that really, really means in the real world for patients.

Jay Olson

Okay. Great. Thank you. That's super helpful. And if I could ask a second question. Can you please talk about any KOL feedback you've received following your top-line, CBEYOND Phase 2a data and also any feedback you may have received at Obesity Week?

Punit Dhillon

Yeah. I think Chris is, or sorry. Two, probably versed and two and Dr. Arora, you guys can take those questions.

Christopher Twitty

Yeah. Thanks for the question, Jay. I'll say that the reaction was positive. I think they see the combination data as very intriguing. They think that the responses that they're seeing are different, and they definitely look forward to us looking at much at sort of the dose-ranging study. They obviously see that that's a key and that's going to be really important for us to establish that sort of baseline with that optimal dose. Dose is going to be. In terms of the blunting of the rebound, data that also has kind of resonated with a number of physicians and KOLs that we've spoken to to the point that I actually just brought up earlier in one specific physician actually brought that up and said, this is really cool data. And if this means that a patient can, you know, go on a dosing holiday and not have to worry about gaining their weight back, then this can be really meaningful for their practice. So, yeah, I think ultimately, positive. They and, again, from a monotherapy side, I think they recognize our need to dose higher. And but they don't see that as necessarily a deterrent for the future of the program.

Puneet Arora

And I think that, you know, some of the leading physicians out there had experience with CB1 before. So that's where they've had interest in for a long time. And the, you know, psychiatric events have been a source of trouble. They're really I think they're really enthusiastic about the idea that you can get these if and get them in a safe and tolerable manner. So there's a rekindled interest now that we are showing with this biological activity, and you can do that with an antibody without crossing the blood-brain barrier and getting these neuropsychiatric effects.

Punit Dhillon

Yeah. That's great that you emphasized that, Dr. Arora. I mean, I think that was the biggest immediate takeaway once the data hit the tape that we saw when we spoke to our clinical advisory board and other investigators that a lot of folks had recognized that this was a big leap forward for the class. This is the first time that any dataset has been shared with no neuropsychiatric adverse events. So that's a really important kind of step for us in being able to give us the comfort to be able to dose higher. And we feel confident that there's going to be biological activity.

Jay Olson

Excellent. That's super helpful. Thanks for taking the question.

Punit Dhillon

Thanks, Jay.

Jordan

Your next question comes from the line of John Wolleben from Citizens. Your line is live.

Catherine

Hi. This is Catherine on for John. I got kind of a quick question about what you expect from the monotherapy arm. In the twenty-sixth-week update. What do you want to see in order to give you confidence in kind of choosing the password? I know that we talk a lot about the comm arm because for obvious reasons. I was wondering about that.

Punit Dhillon

Hey, Catherine. Thanks for joining the call and stepping in for John. We, yeah. So from the next twenty-six-week data, the differences here is that we've added increased the dose from two hundred milligrams to three hundred milligrams. What we have emphasized, obviously, to our clinical sites is really making sure that there's strong follow-through in terms of the not only from a patient retention standpoint but ensuring that if there's any noise here regarding compliance, we rectify that. So at the end of the day, what we're really looking for is a better understanding for our PK model. At this dose. In terms of efficacy, so really hard to predict at this point in terms of what that's going to be relative to what we've seen so far in the first, you know, based on the twenty-six-week data. We're obviously encouraged by the PKPD modeling that we've done at higher doses that we should be able to reach the five percent or higher bar but we need to see that data, and we want to make sure that we have improvement in terms of our sensitivity around the PKPD understanding.

Puneet Arora

Okay. So much. Definitely. That's just to clarify, we did use a slightly higher dose in the extent but as Punit said, primarily to help us help us refine our PK models. We will be when we do a Phase 2 study, we will look at meaningfully higher doses and different exposures, and we think that will give us a more positive result.

Catherine

And I know that in the past, said about a thousand you're going to go up to a thousand milligrams. Have you changed your thinking at all on that on the target for the higher dose?

Punit Dhillon

Yeah. We're still working through that, Catherine. For monotherapy, we expect basically to unlock efficacy at higher doses. So we've, you know, like we said, it's in line with our exposure in response modeling, and it hasn't necessarily ruled out that the two hundred and three hundred are effective doses as well. I think we had some lack of consistency in terms of what we saw in the face in the first twenty-six weeks and in our slides that we shared during the top-line data review. I think we showed some indication of what the optimal dosing would reveal and those patients that had increased exposure response, they tended to do really well. Versus the patients that were suboptimally dosed or had lower exposure response. So I think what we need to see is if that is kind of course-correcting in what we're evaluating, and then we have confidence that dosing higher is definitely going to show a higher likelihood of efficacy signal that we expect to see and we expect that to be over five percent at twenty-six weeks. At these higher doses that we want to evaluate. Thank you.

Jordan

Your next question comes from the line of Ted Tenthoff from Piper Sandler. Your line is live.

Ted Tenthoff

Great. Thank you so much for taking that question. And I wanted to maybe dig into the other side of going higher on dose. And from the combination of earlier studies preclinical data, and then the initial CBEYOND results, obviously, we're going to keep a close eye on potential CNS side effects. Is there anything else that we should be really focused on or that could sneak up on us from a safety standpoint of taking the doses to the substantially higher level? Thanks so much for answering the question.

Punit Dhillon

Hey. Thanks, Ted. Yeah. I think we feel really confident about the safety signal and allowing us the room to go higher in terms of dose, especially from the standpoint of any concern of neuropsychiatric adverse events. So we, you know, in this study, based on our phase one data, based on our tox data, there's a substantial amount of room relative to where we're at in terms of dosing. In terms of other safety concerns, I think we have to see. So we don't have, you know, the data yet with at higher doses over this longer period of time, whether that's a change in terms of GI tolerability. But we feel at this point, based on the data that we've seen in the Phase 2 that there wasn't any concerns to be able to go higher. But, you know, across the class, it seems to be a little bit different. Some small molecules have had only about 30% GI issues, and then the 60% GI issues. And we don't know if that's linked to CB1 yet or if it's, you know, or it's, like, if it's molecule specific. At the moment, though, there still seems to be substantial room for us to be able to evaluate that. And mechanistically, it's not, you know, it's not the same. It doesn't the mechanism is different than what the GLP-1 drugs are doing. So we feel that we shouldn't have any exacerbated GI burden. But, Dr. Arora, you might want to take that further.

Puneet Arora

Yeah. You know, it's been my sense that even with the data, if you go back to rimonabant, that even though they showed 30% GI effects, there was a certain placebo effect as well that's worth comparing to, which seems to suggest that the GI effects that you see with the CB1 pathway are not that significant. And, of course, with Nimazumab, we are showing even better results at this dose where essentially there's no difference between placebo and what we are seeing with the drug. Some with the GLP-1s, which is where, you know, all the attention comes from, I believe that a lot of the GI effects tend to come because of the central action on the area on places near the hypothalamus like the area postrema, whose job is to see what's going on in your blood and cause you to have nausea or vomiting if they think that there is something that's deleterious and stimulating receptors that is causing that. And it's very possible that the CB1 mechanism doesn't actually do that. And that's why you see GI effects being so much more muted with this mechanism, and especially with the antibody, Nimazumab. We will test this as Punit said, with higher doses, but we're pleased to see that at least with the dose that we've tested, we are seeing really neutral effects.

Ted Tenthoff

Yeah. That's great. And in the next study, how long do you think you'd be able to dose? Thanks so much for taking my questions.

Punit Dhillon

Thanks, Ted. So in a yeah.

Puneet Arora

Oh, go ahead. Go ahead, Punit.

Punit Dhillon

Yeah. Go ahead. So in a Phase 2 study, I mean, we would we wanted those people all the way out to a year of fifty-two weeks, but we haven't we're still looking at what the primary structure of the study should be. What we'd like is to design a study that will move us meaningfully towards doing pivotal studies. So we may still read out data at, say, twenty-six weeks where, you know, you can get a substantial indication of how individual doses are working and get a lot of safety information. But, you know, we do want to design studies in the end where the patients that we recruit get longer-term treatment and can be treated for a year or even longer.

Ted Tenthoff

Yeah. That's great. I really appreciate all the answers, guys. Thanks so much.

Punit Dhillon

Thanks, Ted.

Jordan

There are no further questions for the Q&A session. Thank you for attending Skye Bioscience, Inc.'s Third Quarter 2025 earnings call. You may disconnect. We are now back in private mode. Great job, everybody. Have a great day.

As of 2026-08-22 • Updated weeklySource: Earnings sourceIngestion runbook