SCZM
Santacruz Silver MiningCDocument history
Earnings documents stored for SCZM.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-20Santacruz Silver Mining Q2 Earnings Call Highlights
MarketBeat
Santacruz Silver Mining Q2 Earnings Call Highlights
Interested in Santacruz Silver Mining? Here are five stocks we like better. Operational performance improved: Q2 consolidated silver production rose 17% quarter over quarter and zinc production increased 7%, while silver all-in sustaining costs fell 24% to $21.87 per ounce. Bolivar’s dewatering and rehabilitation program remains on schedule, with full recovery targeted for Q4. Exports delayed sales but largely recovered: Bolivia’s 53-day road blockades left more than 7,800 tons of concentrate in inventory, temporarily reducing recognized sales. About 97% of the inventory had been sold by the webinar, generating nearly $23 million and helping lift treasury holdings above $100 million. Growth initiatives remain on track: Santacruz expects Soracaya permits in Q3 and plans to begin small-scale production by the end of Q4, with potential annual output of up to 3 million silver-equivalent ounces. Management is also pursuing renewal of the Illapa joint operation through 2043 and evaluating acquisitions of producing mines. Santacruz Silver Mining (NASDAQ:SCZM) said its second-quarter operating performance improved across its portfolio, with higher silver and zinc output, while temporary export constraints in Bolivia delayed some sales into subsequent periods. During the company’s Q2 results webinar, Executive Chairman and CEO Arturo Préstamo Elizondo said consolidated silver production rose 17% quarter over quarter and zinc production increased 7%. He attributed the silver increase primarily to the Bolivar mine, where production rose by 84,000 ounces as tons milled increased 11% and silver head grades improved 17%. → Datavault AI Locks Down CyberCatch in $94M Security Rollup Bolivar’s recovery remains tied to a dewatering program that Préstamo said is proceeding on schedule and on budget. The company continues to rehabilitate the main ramp toward lower levels and prepare stopes for mining, with full recovery still targeted for the fourth quarter. Santacruz has also identified two high-grade areas that had previously been left behind and incorporated them into its mining plans for next year. Management said operating improvements extended beyond Bolivar. At Zimapán, silver recoveries improved 10%, while zinc head grades and recoveries each increased 9%. Caballo Blanco increased silver production by 6%, supported by a 5% improvement in silver head grades. Porco proces…Read full documentShow less
Interested in Santacruz Silver Mining? Here are five stocks we like better. Operational performance improved: Q2 consolidated silver production rose 17% quarter over quarter and zinc production increased 7%, while silver all-in sustaining costs fell 24% to $21.87 per ounce. Bolivar’s dewatering and rehabilitation program remains on schedule, with full recovery targeted for Q4. Exports delayed sales but largely recovered: Bolivia’s 53-day road blockades left more than 7,800 tons of concentrate in inventory, temporarily reducing recognized sales. About 97% of the inventory had been sold by the webinar, generating nearly $23 million and helping lift treasury holdings above $100 million. Growth initiatives remain on track: Santacruz expects Soracaya permits in Q3 and plans to begin small-scale production by the end of Q4, with potential annual output of up to 3 million silver-equivalent ounces. Management is also pursuing renewal of the Illapa joint operation through 2043 and evaluating acquisitions of producing mines. Santacruz Silver Mining (NASDAQ:SCZM) said its second-quarter operating performance improved across its portfolio, with higher silver and zinc output, while temporary export constraints in Bolivia delayed some sales into subsequent periods. During the company’s Q2 results webinar, Executive Chairman and CEO Arturo Préstamo Elizondo said consolidated silver production rose 17% quarter over quarter and zinc production increased 7%. He attributed the silver increase primarily to the Bolivar mine, where production rose by 84,000 ounces as tons milled increased 11% and silver head grades improved 17%. → Datavault AI Locks Down CyberCatch in $94M Security Rollup Bolivar’s recovery remains tied to a dewatering program that Préstamo said is proceeding on schedule and on budget. The company continues to rehabilitate the main ramp toward lower levels and prepare stopes for mining, with full recovery still targeted for the fourth quarter. Santacruz has also identified two high-grade areas that had previously been left behind and incorporated them into its mining plans for next year. Management said operating improvements extended beyond Bolivar. At Zimapán, silver recoveries improved 10%, while zinc head grades and recoveries each increased 9%. Caballo Blanco increased silver production by 6%, supported by a 5% improvement in silver head grades. Porco processed 15% more tons and reported a 21% rise in silver head grades. → Michael Burry Is Betting Against Palantir Again—Should Investors Care? San Lucas processed 22% more tons than in the prior quarter and increased silver production by 20%, according to Préstamo. Consolidated mining throughput rose 7% during the quarter. Préstamo also pointed to the impact of capital investments at Zimapán, including flotation and flash-cell circuits. He said the investments are beginning to support improved recoveries for zinc, copper and silver. Management said Zimapán reached level 960 and that some stopes planned for the coming quarter are already in production. → Home Depot Analysts See a Path to $375 and Beyond Santacruz reported silver all-in sustaining costs of $21.87 per ounce, down 24% from the prior quarter. Préstamo said the reduction was driven mainly by better silver head grades, higher recoveries and a 7% increase in material processed across the company’s five operations. Higher copper and lead production also provided stronger byproduct credits, while lower sustaining capital and general costs reduced the all-in figure further. CFO Andrés Bedregal said the company generated strong underlying financial results despite a mismatch between production and sales caused by road blockades in Bolivia. The blockades lasted approximately 53 days, constraining concentrate exports while operations continued. Bedregal said revenue rose 55% year over year, gross profit nearly doubled, adjusted EBITDA increased 74%, and realized mining margin per silver ounce sold climbed to just over $50 from about $16 a year earlier. Santacruz ended the quarter with $73 million in cash and highly liquid marketable securities. However, sales volumes fell below production volumes because concentrate remained in inventory rather than being sold and recognized in revenue during the quarter. Préstamo said the affected inventory totaled more than 7,800 tons, including about 6,000 tons of zinc concentrate and 1,700 tons of lead concentrate. He valued the inventory at approximately $24 million. As of the webinar, 97% of that inventory had been sold, recovering nearly $23 million, with the remaining roughly $1.5 million expected to be sold in the third quarter. Préstamo said concentrate inventory was returning to a normal range of approximately 2,500 to 3,000 tons. He also said final settlements related to Mexican shipments brought in more than $22 million that week, lifting the company’s treasury above $100 million. Reported net income was about $2 million in Q2, compared with approximately $28 million in the first quarter. Bedregal said the decline was largely due to a $15.8 million non-cash fair-value loss on contingent value rights held by Glencore and a $36.1 million income-tax expense. The Glencore contingent value rights require payment only in months when average London Metal Exchange zinc prices exceed $3,850 per ton. Zinc averaged about $3,400 per ton in Q2, Bedregal said. Under IFRS accounting rules, however, the company must remeasure the potential obligation at each reporting date. At quarter-end, Santacruz had about $35 million recorded as a CVR liability. Monthly contractual payments are capped at roughly $1.33 million. Bedregal said higher zinc prices that would trigger CVR payments would also result in materially higher zinc revenue and margins for Santacruz. The tax expense included an impact from Bolivia’s shift away from a fixed official exchange rate. The official rate moved from 6.96 bolivianos per U.S. dollar to approximately 9.77 at quarter-end, creating taxable foreign-exchange gains in the local statutory financial statements of Santacruz’s Bolivian subsidiaries. Bedregal characterized the impact as a one-time event, noting that the new exchange-rate reference point has now been reset. Préstamo said Santacruz expects to receive permits for the Soracaya project during the third quarter and plans to begin small-scale production of approximately 300 tons per day by the end of the fourth quarter. Underground equipment has arrived at the site, while the company evaluates the optimal mine design and ramp configuration. Full production is targeted for next year, potentially by year-end, though management said the timeline remains subject to further planning. Under the current mine plan, Soracaya could produce up to 3 million silver-equivalent ounces annually, with most of that output expected to be silver, Préstamo said. The company also said it expects the Illapa joint operation agreement in Bolivia to be renewed through July 2043, subject to completion of Bolivia’s legislative and executive approval process. Management said the amended contract had cleared initial approvals and was moving through the remaining administrative steps. Looking ahead, Santacruz plans to focus on Bolivar’s Q4 recovery, sustained cost control, continued growth at San Lucas and Soracaya development. Management also said it is evaluating accretive acquisition opportunities, with a preference for producing mines in familiar jurisdictions that generate more than 4 million to 5 million silver-equivalent ounces annually. Santacruz Silver Mining Inc (Nasdaq: SCZM) is a precious metals company focused on the exploration, development and production of silver and gold resources. The company's business centers on acquiring and advancing mineral properties, conducting exploration programs to expand resources, and operating or re‑starting mines to produce payable metal. As a publicly traded issuer, Santacruz reports results and project updates through routine regulatory filings and investor communications. Operationally, Santacruz is primarily involved in the full cycle of mining activities that include drilling and resource definition, mine development and production, on‑site ore processing or concentrate production, and the sale of metal production to smelters and concentrate buyers. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "Santacruz Silver Mining Q2 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for August 2026.
TranscriptFY2026 Q22026-08-20FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript
Earnings source - 137 paragraphs
FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript
Hi, everyone. Thank you for joining us. Today, we have Santacruz's Q2 results webinar. I am joined by CEO and Executive Chairman, Arturo Préstamo, and CFO, Andrés Bedregal. We are going to get started right away with pre-submitted questions. We will be taking some live ones at the end, so feel free to submit a question in the question box below. Also, we may be making some forward-looking statements today, and if you would like to know more about those, you can find them on the company's website. With that out of the way, welcome, Arturo and Andrés, and thank you for being here today.
Thank you, Olenka. Thank you for having us. It is a pleasure for us to be here.
Always a pleasure, Olenka. Thank you very much.
Of course. Let us get started with the first question. Arturo, I will give this one to you.
Sure.
How would you characterize Santacruz's operating performance in Q2 in the first half of 2026, including the drivers behind higher silver and zinc production, the continued recovery of Bolivar, the strong improvement of San Lucas, and the opportunities for further production and growth through the balance of the year?
Well, Olenka, from an operating perspective, Q2 was a strong quarter for Santacruz, and the first half of 2026 has continued to show solid progress across all of our assets. We increased production at all of our operations with a consolidated silver production increase of 17% and a zinc production increase of 7% quarter-over-quarter. The main driver behind the increase in silver production was Bolivar, which once again delivered a very strong quarter. Silver production on Bolivar alone increased by 84,000 oz, supported by an 11% increase in tons milled and a 17% improvement, I am sorry, in the silver head grades as we run more ore from the dewatered area of Pomabamba and Anque. It is important to mention that the dewatering process is going on budget and on time.
We continue to do progress with the dewatering of the mine and the rehabilitation of the main ramp towards the lower levels. We are also preparing producing stopes at those levels where we feel comfortable and confident that our miners can work safely. That dewatering program remains on schedule towards a full recovery by Q4, as we have previously communicated. It is also important to mention, Olenka, the improvements was not limited to Bolivar. We saw meaningful progress across the entire portfolio. At Zimapan, for example, silver recoveries improved 10%. Caballo Blanco as well. Caballo Blanco increased silver production by 6% with a 5% improvement in silver head grades, while Porco, at the same time, increased tons processed by 15% and silver head grades by 21%.
San Lucas also has a particular and encouraging quarter, processing 22% more tons than in the previous quarter and increased its silver production by 20%. Overall, consolidated mining throughput increased by 7%, demonstrating the broad-based improvement across all of our operations. On the zinc side, the increase mainly was driven by Zimapan. Zinc head grades improved 9%, while zinc recoveries also increased by 9%. Given that Zimapan is a high-volume operation, this improvement had a significant impact on our consolidated zinc production. I would also like to highlight the continued progress at San Lucas. The more than 20% increase in processed tons demonstrates the opportunity that San Lucas keeps building. Improving this operation and making it a more meaningful contribution to our overall production was an important milestone as well for San Lucas.
Looking ahead, we see additional opportunities throughout the balance of 2026, particularly as Bolivar continues its recovery. Also, as we advance the dewatering process, we have identified two additional high-grade areas that we have now incorporated into our mining plans for next year's budget. These two areas are two areas that were left back in the years, and they have very high-grade silver contents. We believe that is going to help us to start the year in a very strong way for Bolivar. This gives us confidence that the Bolivar mine has the potential not only to return to its previous production levels, but to come back even stronger. When we look at the first half of the year and the opportunities ahead, what is particularly encouraging is that the improvements is broad-based.
Each of our operations is becoming more efficient, whether throughput, high-grade throughput, better grades, or improved recoveries. At every field, our operations are improving, and those efficiencies are translating, sorry, directly into higher production and stronger operating performance. Finally, I would like to add that by Bolivar continuing its recovery, further opportunities at San Lucas, and ongoing improvements across Zimapan, Porco, and Caballo Blanco, we believe we're well-positioned to continue building on this momentum throughout the balance of 2026. I don't know if that was an appropriate or the response that you were looking for, Olenka.
Yes, it was. Thank you for the thorough response and update. I'm sure lots of investors appreciate that. I have here a question. Let's move on to the next one for you, Andrés. Q2 delivered strong underlying operating performance, but reported net income was significantly affected by non-operating items, including Bolivia's FX, inflation environment, and the $15.8 million non-cash fair value loss on the Glencore CVR. Can you explain the impacts and how they may affect earnings, costs, and taxes going forward, and the potential cash and valuation exposure associated with the CVR?
Of course, Olenka, and thank you for the question. I think it is an important one because reported net income this quarter does not fully reflect the strength of our financial performance. I might take a while. Let me start with the financial results. By almost every measure, this was one of our strongest quarters. Revenue increased 55% year-over-year, gross profit nearly doubled, adjusted EBITDA increased 74%, and our realized mining margin per silver ounce sold increased from approximately $16 a year ago to just over $50 this quarter. We also ended the quarter with $73 million in cash and highly liquid marketable securities. It is also worth noting that these results were achieved despite a temporary timing difference between production and sales. As Arturo explained, production continued normally during the road blockades in Bolivia, but concentrate exports were temporarily constrained.
Kudos to our team in Bolivia, to our COO, Eduardo Torrecillas, because I looked firsthand into that, and they have done an amazing job.
Yeah.
As a result, sales volume during the quarter were meaningfully below production volumes, but that's just a temporary thing. If we look at this from a financial standpoint, that means a portion of what we produced during Q2 remained in inventory at quarter end, rather than being recognized in revenue and operating profit, of course. As export normalize, we expect, as Arturo was mentioning, that inventory to be sold and related revenue and earnings to be recognized in the subsequent periods. Now, let's turn to what affected net income, and I think that's something that all investors are very focused on right now. Despite those strong financial results, reported net income was approximately $2 million, compared with approximately $28 million in the first quarter. The difference is largely explained by two major items, Olenka.
First, a non-cash fair value adjustment related to the Glencore CVRs, which are the contingent value rights. Arturo explains a little bit more about them later. Second, an unusually high income tax expense, primarily associated with changes in the Bolivian exchange rate regime and the inflation environment. Let me take those one at a time. First, the first item will be this $15.8, let's say $16 million non-cash expense associated with the revaluation of the contingent value rights, the CVRs, held by Glencore. We have had some questions, and I think it is important to establish that this payment is basically in the income statement under loss on change in fair value of consideration payable. It's the only consideration payable that we have left with Glencore. So it's a contingent value right consideration payable.
From a financial standpoint, investors can very easily isolate this adjustment from the rest of our financial result. We have done that in our news release, in a recent news release. But the key point here is that this is a fair value accounting adjustment, Olenka. It is not a cash payment. Just as a reminder to our investors, under the terms of the CVR, a payment is only triggered in a month when the average LME zinc prices exceed $3,850 per ton. That threshold has not been reached yet. For example, for Q2, zinc averaged approximately $3,400 per ton during the quarter. Nevertheless, and this is very important, under IFRS, we are required to remeasure the fair value of that potential obligation at each reporting date. The evaluation is performed by an independent third-party valuation specialist using a Monte Carlo simulation methodology. Put it in simple terms.
The model evaluates a large number of potential future zinc prices scenarios using market-based assumption such as forward zinc prices, historical volatility, mean reversion, interest rates, and credit risk. As zinc prices and forward expectations increase, the model assign a higher value to the potential future obligation. That increase in the estimated liability resulted in this 15.8 million non-cash expense recognized through the income statement. I think it is particularly useful to put the balance sheet liability, not only the income statement expense, into perspective. Look, at quarter end, we had approximately $35 million recorded as a CVR liability or as a contingent payment.
Contingent.
Actual contractual payment are capped at approximately $1.33 million per month. That is correct, Arturo, yeah?
That is correct, yes. $1.33 million.
Perfect.
Yeah. A few threes afterward.
Yes, that's correct.
$1.3 million, round number.
$1.3 million. If you think about it, those $35 million recorded in our liabilities that are already recognized on our balance sheet are the equivalent of approximately 26 months of maximum monthly CVR payments.
Correct.
So, in other words, approximately 26 months of potential payments are already reflected in our liabilities and have already flowed through our income statement through this fair value accounting, even though zinc prices threshold required to make an actual tax payment only if it passes the $3,850. But let's look at it another way, and remember, we already have the liability, but if those prices stay above $3,850, we will see the revenues afterwards in the next following months. But there's an important economic point here. If zinc prices remain above that for a sufficient period to trigger the CVR payment, those higher zinc prices would also flow directly through our zinc revenue margins. So, the scenario in which we make CVR payments is also a scenario in which the company will be generating materially higher revenue from zinc.
I don't know if you remember, Olenka, but we always say we would love to pay those CVRs because that's a good thing to have. Second, a second major thing affecting net income was the income tax expense of $36.1 million. First of all, I want to make a difference. Some investors are saying, "Okay, you had a big payment also in Q1." That was a cash payment related to last year's all income tax. This one is a provision, and I was explaining why. There are two components within that number. First, and the largest, relate to the change in the Bolivian exchange regime. A little bit of background. For many years, Olenka, Bolivia maintained an official exchange rate of 6.96 Bolivianos per U.S. dollar.
In June this year, Bolivia moved away from that fixed regime toward a floating market-based exchange rate, and the official exchange rate was approximately 9.77 at the end of the quarter. So now it's a floating rate. There is an important distinction here between our IFRS financial statements and the local statutory books in Bolivia that I want to point out. For our consolidated IFRS financial statement, those that we see, that we are reported in NASDAQ, in the TSXV, et cetera, we were already using a market-based exchange rate. So, at a consolidated level, the economic value of, for example, our dollars and our account balances was already being reflected appropriately.
However, the local statutory financial statements of our Bolivian subsidiaries, which are based on the generally accepted accounting principles, were using the official exchange rate because that's the way you have to do it, and these financial statements are the ones that give you the basis for determining taxable income in Bolivia. So, when the official exchange rate changed, the U.S. dollars that we have in our accounts held by our Bolivian subsidiaries were immediately remeasured at the new official rate in Boliviano terms. That generated a significant foreign exchange gain in the local statutory financial statement. Under Bolivian tax rule, that gain is taxable even though that is unrealized yet. So let me explain a little bit with an example. If we had $50 million in our accounts, and let's say, remember the official rate was 6.97, but let's say it was 7.
If you multiply that, you have 350 million Bolivianos in your account. Suddenly, this official exchange rate changes. Let's say it was 9.7 something. Let's say 10. You multiply those 50 million by 10, you have 500 million. 500 minus 350 is 150 million Bolivianos. That divided by 10, that's basically 20-
15.
$15 million, and you have to pay 37.5% of income tax of those $15 million, but that's on our local books. That why it was not reflected on IFRS, but the tax that now has become a liability, it has to be in our IFRS. That's basically it in that matter. Also, we used to pay this benefit before, but it was gradually. Whenever we brought money into the country, for example, $5 million, we sell it at a market rate, we get the gain, and we pay the taxes, or we provision those taxes, but this time it happened all at once. Something that is important now is that going forward this reference point now has been reset. Future exchange rates movements will be measured from this new official exchange rate, which now moves.
Therefore, foreign exchange movements can continue to affect, of course, taxable income, but will also help us in our costs. From now, we shouldn't see this hit in our income statement. Despite the short-term impact on our tax expense, Olenka, we view the change in Bolivia exchange rate framework as a positive development. It represents an important normalization of the country's monetary and foreign exchange framework, price transparency, and should contribute to a more sustainable foreign exchange environment over time.
Actually-
Go ahead.
If you allow me. Actually, let's remember that about 85% of our cost in Bolivia are in Bolivianos. This will be beneficial for us in the working capital requirements based in U.S. dollars.
You are 100% right, Arturo. Of course, we were doing this for the last quarters, but this component, this big component, which is the cash that we have in U.S. dollars, is the one that hit one time. But you are completely right, Arturo. If the devaluation hits again, we benefit in our costs. And of course, we will be paying taxes, but we benefit on a-
Right.
How you say? On an equilibrium. Okay?
Of course.
There was also a second component within the tax line related to the mine closure provision. Since January 2026, the Central Bank of Bolivia has established a restrictive monetary policy that resulted in a significant decline in inflation. It was about 20% last year, and it came down now below 5%. Lower expected inflation reduces the estimated future cost in Bolivianos of our mine closure and remediation obligations. As a result, the accounting value of that mine closure provision decreased, generating a gain. That gain is also taxable under the local tax framework. Given the magnitude of the decline from 20%-5%, we consider this as an extraordinary adjustment. I would not expect an impact of this size to recur in the future periods. The remainder of the tax expense is much more straightforward. Basically, stronger profitability resulted in higher taxable income.
Right.
To bring it all together, the key message is simple. Our financial performance was very strong. Revenue, gross profit, adjusted EBITDA, realized margins, et cetera. Those were achieved despite a temporary mismatch between production and sales that defer a portion of revenue and earnings into subsequent periods, as Arturo mentioned before. The other are non-cash or either a one-time tax event. I think, I hope with that, I know I expanded a lot my answer, but I think investors were looking for that message. I do not know, Olenka, if we have responded that. Arturo, I do not know if you want to say something about these special items that we had on our financial statements.
No, I think it was well explained and very clear.
Yes.
Thank you for having this.
Thank you, Andrés. Very helpful context on the impact on that income overall performance. I think people hopefully will understand.
Yeah.
Let's move on to the next question. Arturo, maybe you can answer this one. As Andrés touched on, revenue declined quarter-over-quarter in Q2 as road blockades in Bolivia affected concentrate exports for approximately 53 days. This resulted in a significant buildup in concentrate inventory at quarter end. With that inventory available for sales, as exports normalize, how should investors think about the potential benefit to sales and revenue in Q3, and how much of that inventory has been monetized to date?
That's a good question, Olenka, especially as you see our treasury remaining pretty much flat from last quarter, but there's a reason for that. The affected stock or inventory totals a little bit more of 7,800 tons approximately. Of those 7,800, we have around 6,000 tons of zinc and 1,700 tons of lead, where let's remember, the lead holds the silver contents in our concentrates. So the value of these two concentrates is around $24 million. Those were $24 million that we were not able to ship out and to collect those monies at that time, during Q2. As of today, 97% of that stock has been sold, meaning that we have recovered around close to $23 million, and the remaining $1.5 million will be sold now during the third quarter. Q3, I would like to say that Q3 is normalized. Our concentrate inventory is normalized now.
We're in the process of getting into the 2,500, 3,000 tons on our warehouses. That's our normal inventory. As well as we have already normalized our warehouse. Before these road blockades, we and that was married to the risk assessment team and our management, which I really commend for doing such a great job. We saw this risk was coming, and that some blockades might take place throughout the country. So, our risk assessment team and the procurement department bought all the consumables that we required to run our operations for the following two months before these road closures or blockades begin. Being ahead of that at that moment allows us to run our operations smoothly. But of course, the roads were experiencing some blockades, so our exports or our shipments, all of them, especially the ones being by truck, were not able to leave our patios.
That is the main reason. Now, as I was pointing out, our concentrate inventory is normalizing, and our warehouse inventory and consumables as well is normalizing. Let us remember that the warehouse and consumables required significant capital. Normalizing them is very important for us. On top of that, our Mexican operation has also closed the final settlements of the shipments related to prior months, collecting this week, as we speak, more than $22 million, taking now our treasury as we speak again, sorry for that, but taking our treasury today beyond the $100 million, marking definitely a new milestone for our company in terms of our treasury management. We are good now and getting back on track in the shipments and collecting the accounts receivable.
Well, that is great to hear. Congratulations, and thank you for the response. I have another question for you, Arturo.
As we saw, silver all-in sustaining costs declined 24% quarter-over-quarter to $21.87/oz. What were the key drivers of the improvement, and how should investors think about the underlying cost run rate going forward?
That is important. I want to spend a moment on our all-in sustaining costs this quarter because it is a good story, and I want to be clear about what is really driving it. Our all-in sustaining per silver ounce came down 24%, as we see on our financials. It is indeed a big improvement in a single quarter, and it is the kind of improvements we are looking to achieve in the company. This was not about squeezing the mills. This was really about changing how much silver we pull out of each of those tons we process. We improve our silver head grades and, of course, our recoveries, and the treatment, or our milling facilities. Those were the two main drivers. We saw better head grades in Bolivar. We saw better head grades in Porco, a real step up in silver recovery at Zimapan.
We put about 7% more material through the milling facilities across all of our five operations. More payable silver ounces over a steady cost base. That is what brought our cost down, and that is technically the main driver. On top of that, our by-product credits were stronger. These are polymetallic mines, Olenka, let us remember, and the higher copper and lead production through this quarter offset more of the cost we carry on each silver ounce. Then there is the sustaining side. The lower sustaining capital and general cost per ounce, which is why our all-in number came down even further than our cash cost did. If you allow me, I want to flag one thing that actually makes these results more impressive. This quarter, as we have been discussing, we dealt with road blockades in Bolivia. These lasted more than 50 days. They last actually 53 days.
Production kept running as if nothing was happening. Those blockades, as we discussed previously, held back some of our concentrate shipments and put roughly $70 million into inventory. In plain terms, we produced the silver, but we were not able to ship and sell all of these concentrates right away, especially our lead concentrate, where we have most of our silver. This is what we discussed in the previous question, I think, but I just want to highlight that because I really commend our team for looking ahead, planning ahead, and having a very clear and very broad risk assessment in place that allows us to prevent a situation where we could possibly be running out of consumables, and that will definitely put our milling facilities and our mines into a standstill situation.
That was not the case, and catching up in the shipments is, I do not want to say it is an easy thing but let us say it is the way to fix things and bring our treasury to where it should be.
Arturo.
Yes, Andrés.
I think if you can dive a little bit more into the. Remember that we have spent a lot of CapEx into Mexico, these flash cells, et cetera, and now we are seeing the results. There's better recoveries in Mexico. I do not know if you can tell our investors a little bit about it.
Yeah. Mexico, definitely. As you may recall, we have been investing some CapEx throughout the last year, especially in the new flotation circuit, the flash cell circuits. We are starting to see the benefits of those investments now. They are starting to pay back. That is why we are seeing improved recoveries at Zimapan, especially for zinc, copper, and silver as well. As we speak, we have very optimistic outlook for Zimapan. We have arrived to level 960, as you may recall. Some of the stopes that are budgeted for this next quarter are already into production. We expect the rest of the year for 2026 for Zimapan.
Yes. That is important, Olenka, because remember, we always said our Mexican mine, Zimapan, is a high-volume mine. If we are able to increase these recoveries, that is very important for our revenue. Yeah. The Mexico team did an amazing job as well.
Correct.
Yes. Got it. Let us move on to the next question. Thank you, Arturo. Andrés, I have one for you now. Santacruz reported a significant VAT receivable balance at June 30th. Can you explain how the balance is affected by inflation and currency movements, and when you expect for it to be collected?
Okay. Yes. A little bit of background. Every month, as a normal part of operating an export business in Bolivia and in Mexico, we generate a value-added tax credit within the tax authority, and that credit accumulates until it is refunded. This is a structural feature of a tax system for exporters in the country, not only Bolivia but also in Mexico. As of June 30, our total value-added tax receivable stood approximately $74 million, with $42 million classified as current, which means that our objective is to collect them in the next year, and $32 million as non-current. Importantly, collections are taking place. During the year, we have already collected more than $10 million.
The reason that the overall balance does not decline in the same amount is that we continue to generate new value-added tax credits every month as part of our normal operations, and we are increasing now our production. Our objective, of course, is to accelerate the pace of those collections over time so we can maintain an outstanding balance at a lower level. One thing I want to highlight here is that we are current on our tax obligations, and we have consistently met our tax payments requirements, which has allowed us to maintain a constructive relationship with the Bolivian tax authority. We are working closely with them to identify ways to streamline and accelerate this value-added tax refund process. The process remains relatively complex because each refund is subject to an extensive review and audit by the tax authority, et cetera.
However, the process has been improving, and we believe there is an opportunity to continue increasing the efficiency and pace of the collections going forward. On your question regarding the inflation and currency movements, look, these are receivables that are denominated in Bolivianos. So, there are two important effects. Inflation actually provides some protection because the amounts owed to us are indexed to inflation, which increases the receivables over time and is reflected in our income statement through interest income on VAT receivables. On the other hand, currency movements can work in either direction. Because the balances are in Bolivianos, a weaker Boliviano reduces its U.S. dollar value. A stronger Boliviano will increase it. So, in summary, this is structural receivable generated through our export activities. It is collected on an ongoing basis. It benefits from this indexation to inflation.
Our focus, and that is something that we always discuss with our team, is to continue to work with the tax authority to improve the refund process, accelerate collections, and ultimately maintain a receivable at lower normalized levels. So, it is normal, Olenka. That is part of our export process, and we will try to collect it faster.
Okay, got it. Thank you, Andrés.
Arturo, I have a question for you. Touching on Soracaya, and I do see a few audience questions on this. But what is the current timeline for permitting an initial production? What approvals remain outstanding? Has the development schedule changed from earlier guidance?
Well, that is an organic growth as we have mentioned previously. We are still on track to receive the permits for Soracaya during the third quarter, and we expect, Olenka, to begin with a small production rate of around 300 tons per day by the end of Q4. The underground equipment has already arrived at site, and we are now building our different teams that will be needed to develop the mine. Geologists, miners, services, and so on. At the same time, we are taking a very disciplined approach to the mine development. We want to be careful and review the best mining plan and determine the most efficient main ramp in this case. That is what we are working at this moment. Or maybe ramps.
We have so many veins parallel to each other that we are still reviewing if it is one main ramp or maybe we might require an additional one to access some of the block models or mineable areas. We want to make sure that we get the mine design right from the beginning. It is always very costly to get a wrong mine design and at the end of the day, trying to correct those designs once they were built. With that approach, we expect Soracaya to start contributing some production toward the end of this year, but with full production targeted for next year. Exact time is yet to be determined, but our idea is to have that mine at full production, let us say, I want to be cautious, but let us say by the end of next year.
But at least running at 300 tons per day will be by the end of this fourth quarter.
Okay. Thank you. And roughly how much would Soracaya contribute annually on production, roughly?
Well, that's a good question. But with today's mine plan and as we see the block models, it's still a little bit hard to say because we're designing the main ramps, but it can take us up to 3 million ounces of silver equivalent in production where you have most of it pure silver.
Okay, perfect. Thank you. Andrés, a question for you. San Lucas has completed additional issuances under its Boliviano Note Program. Do you expect to expand the program beyond the current amount? And how should investors think about refinancing and interest costs as the notes mature?
Yeah, good question. Let me start with the structure of the program, because I think it explains how to think about the refinancing question that you just asked. The San Lucas Promissory Note Program is authorized for a total of 140 million Bolivianos. That is roughly $17 million at today exchange rate, issued in the Bolivian Stock Exchange. As of today, the full authorized amount is in use, and it operates on a rolling basis. The notes are issued in tranches of 70 million Bolivianos, and as each tranche matures, it is repaid and replaced with a new one. That is exactly what you have seen this year. The first two offerings were repaid in full at maturity. A third tranche was issued in April. A fourth one was issued just this early August.
What you have observing is not an expansion of the program, it is a normal rotation of the tranches within the authorized amount. Now to the question, if we are going to expand it or maintain it, our intention is to keep the full program in place for as long as it is beneficial for the company. To date, every one of these issuance has worked in our favor for two reasons. First, currency matching. These are Boliviano-denominated liability, funding a business with substantial Boliviano-denominated cost. Remember, Arturo just mentioned, 85% of our cost are in Bolivianos. So they provide a natural hedge. Second, the devaluation of the Boliviano has reduced this effective cost of this debt in U.S. dollar terms. Now, those conditions may or may not persist.
Before each new issuance, we run a prospective analysis of our funding needs and the macroeconomic environment, and we will only roll a tranche when that analysis supports it. On interest cost, the second question. Nominal rates in Bolivianos have risen with local monetary conditions from 6.5%, which was our first offering, to around 11% on the most recent one. But let us put that into perspective. The government is financing itself at 11%, so we are basically getting the same as the government. But the right way to evaluate that cost is in dollar terms, net of this currency effect, of course. On that basis, the program has remained clearly attractive for us. The notes, remember, unsecured, they carry standard financial covenants, and San Lucas is fully compliant with all of them.
Yeah.
Okay. Thank you. That is very helpful. Arturo, I have a question for you. The Illapa joint operation agreement covering Bolivia and Porco expires in 2028. Can you provide an update on discussions with COMIBOL regarding an extension or renewal, and explain what happens to Santacruz's investment in the assets if the agreement is not extended?
Oh, I hear you. Yeah. Well, the Illapa agreement with COMIBOL, let me just start to say that it has an automatic approval embedded within the agreement. We need to meet certain, let's say, steps. For the approval, the path, the agreement has to work its way to four. Let me describe it very clearly, to four steps in Bolivia.
The first step is the Ministry of Mining and Metallurgy signs off, and it sends the agreement, it sends the supporting reports and the draft approval over the UDAPE, the Economic Policy Analysis Unit in Bolivia. The UDAPE job is essentially to look at what the contract means or the agreement means for the state finance, and whether it's in line or not with the national economic policy. Definitely, this agreement is in line at its full extent. This step has also already been done and has been approved.
Then you have a second step. Let's remember, there are four steps. The second step, UDAPE, the agreement is already in UDAPEs hands, reviews and approves the agreement. Then the package is sent and moved to the CONAPE. The CONAPE is the council made up for the economic and social ministers. They validate the documents before anything goes to the legislature.
This step has been done as well and also has been approved. From there, it goes to the General Assembly. We're now in the third step. The General Assembly is technically mechanics, where the committees review the reports from CONAPE and from Ministry of Mining and Metallurgy, and then the Assembly votes to approve the draft law. This will take place, by the way, in the next coming weeks. Once this is approved, it goes back to the executive.
Finally, the president, Mr. Rodrigo Paz, in this case, receives the approval or the approved law, now it's already a law, and orders this to be published in the Gaceta Oficial de Bolivia. Those are the four steps. We're halfway there. We're just in the administrative process part of the renewal, and we expect this to take place very shortly.
Where things stand right now, the amended contract has already cleared, as I was pointing out, the first two steps. UDAPE has approved it, and it's sitting with the CONAPE. We're expected to take it up in the following weeks to the next General Assembly. As I was pointing out, we're weeks from now. Since the document has been already signed and the legislative has already approved, the process is on its way, and consent is effectively locked at this point. There's nothing to do.
This is just an administrative process mechanism, a mechanical process, if you allow me to put it that way. We have not announced it yet, because we need to be respectful with the full process that takes in Bolivia now. Our news about this should be out soon and, let's remember, it includes an automatic renewal clause. Technically everything has been met and we're just waiting for this General Assembly to take place and go from there. It's going really well.
Yes, Arturo, I think that's the important thing. Our first contract, remember, it is the only contract that is a law in Bolivia.
Yeah.
We are the only ones who have a contract which is a law. Embedded in that contract, it says that we can renew for another 15 years. We already signed an agreement with COMIBOL, which is our counterparty, our associate. I don't know how you call-
Our partner.
Our partner, sorry. Our partner. We already have signed that. The parties want to continue this contract. It already passed to the mining minister, it already passed UDAPE, which means that the economic factors of this contract are positive. Now we just have to follow the legislative process. It is just a process. We all know that this contract is very beneficial for the country or the government, for the states in Bolivia, for everyone, the communities, et cetera. It has to just to pass their regular processes.
Right.
As Arturo was mentioning, we are not saying anything yet because all of these steps have to pass in order for us to publish something or continue this process. We feel very comfortable with it.
Oh, yeah.
We know there is. Yeah.
There is no doubt about it. Just as a reference, this will be renewed, Olenka, until July 2043.
Okay.
Until then. It still includes an automatic renewal clause. We will see the movie at that point in 2043, right?
Well, thank you for the update. We have one last pre-submit question before we take some live ones.
Arturo, maybe you can answer this. What are the most important operational, financial, and strategic milestones investors should watch out for the remainder of 2026?
Well, operationally speaking, getting back on track our Bolivar mine is very important. We are on track to get that in Q4. Convert the road blockage inventory into cats. I think we are almost there. Still a few thousand tons to be chipped out. Hold and sustain a trajectory or an all-in sustaining cost in a very good range, where we feel comfortable at 21 levels and in those ranges. We will keep working hard. We will keep focused on getting our mines as efficient as they can be, and our cost as controlled and well managed as they can be across all of our areas. Administratively speaking, we are making sure and being diligent on every single cost that we have in the company, where, as you saw from Andrés' explanation about the promissory note, those are for treasury efficiencies.
We are doing what we can do at every area in the company to make it as efficient as possible. Financially speaking, we want to deliver a strong Q3. I am sure that we, all remaining the same, will be delivering a very strong Q3. Now with our treasury today, north of $100 million and still building. We will keep watching the CVR trigger. Which by the way, it is a positive one. If we see that we are paying $1.3 million to Glencore every month, that means we are making a lot of money when zinc is at $3,850 per ton. We see that as a positive one. And why not to pay what it is on those CVRs? We want to set as well and have already always a clear capital allocation framework, so that we can keep building the company.
And from a strategic point of view, Olenka, if you allow me, we will pursue the organic growth with Soracaya. We will keep building as well San Lucas into a larger organic growth. The company has proved to have more room to keep growing in a significant way. We will keep pushing in that front as well. And we will keep looking, not start, we will keep looking for accretive opportunities outside of our portfolio of assets. We really want to keep growing the company, of course, as always, and in a very disciplined way, with a disciplined approach across all the different disciplines in the company.
Perfect. Thank you. M&A was one of the audience live questions, so I am sure they appreciate the response.
Let us just move on to a few other live questions. Could you provide an update on the share buyback program? Any intention for one this year?
Yep. Yeah, absolutely. We're working and, hopefully very soon, we're going to be up-listing the company to the big board, to the TSX. We were a bit delayed there a few weeks because we were required to update some of the technical reports. We finally accomplished those tasks. Yeah, we should up-list the company soon, and it'll be followed by an appropriate share buyback program, which we will love to put in place as soon as possible. Yes, Olenka, that's still with our plans.
Perfect. Thank you. Just touching on Zimapan really quickly. It was up quarter-over-quarter after the power outages in Q1, but it was still down 2% year-over-year despite investments made. Why are we not seeing the growth benefits?
Olenka, can you repeat again that question? Sorry.
Yes. Zimapan recovered quarter-over-quarter after the power outages in Q1, but was still down 2% year-over-year, despite the investments made. Why are we not seeing the growth benefits?
Well, actually, we saw Zimapan improving. We saw improvements in the recoveries, we saw improvements in the head grades, as we point out, 9% improvement. But we are not there yet. We will keep working. I think there is very good news to come out of Zimapan in the exploration side of the formula. I kindly invite our investors to stay tuned. The mine is really proving to be a strong asset. And we will see, I am very positive, we will see the fruits or the benefits of the CapEx invested throughout the last 15 months. Zimapan is going to be a very strong mine and a very productive one.
Olenka, I invite our investors to look at our production numbers. If you compare them to Q1 2026, I understand comparing it to last year, but if you compare Q2 against Q1. Our silver head grade has improved. Our zinc as well. So we are improving our average head grades, especially our recovery, sorry. Our recoveries. From 65 Q1 to 72 Q2 2026. If we keep this pace for Q3 and Q4, we will definitely be above what we had in 2025. So we are going to get that. We are going to get there.
It's important to mention or to remember that this is a very wide ore body, underground mine, very mechanized, very efficient in terms of its mining cost. What we will always try to keep is a very healthy margin. I think the mine is delivering, but definitely, we're not staying there. There's a lot to be done, and I'm sure we will see that mine improving, as Andrés points out, over the coming quarters, and not to say next year.
Remember, I think we have to be fair. With these prices, et cetera, we got cash. We have been taking care of our operations, not only to grow them, but it's to taking care of them. Remember, four years ago, prices were not in that realm, so CapEx had to be halted. Now we invest what we had to invest, and of course, we're doing some things in the milling facility to increase this recovery. Not all the CapEx, of course, goes to increased production itself. It's taking care of your operation because that's a normal part of the mining-
Yeah.
The mining industry are the prices that we always have.
Yeah, I don't want to extend in that, but that's a good point, Andrés. When I mean we have a disciplined approach toward our mines, as Andrés points out, I mean, nowadays is the time to invest in the mines, to prepare the mines, to have stopes ready to make those investments that will allow us to be an efficient mine when the margins for metal prices are not as good as they are today, or maybe when inflation in the industry rises and it close the margins again, we'll have the mine ready for those times. That's what we do. Sometimes we don't see the CapEx coming back as a payback right away, but rest assured, we have been preparing our mines for whatever comes
Yeah
In the future.
Thank you for the clarification. Just have time for one more today, really quickly. It is going to be on the M&A. Just what type of asset would you be most interested in acquiring? So, a producing mine, development stage asset, or something with more operational upside?
That is a good question. Let us say we have a few premises for that. The first one, and one of the main drivers is overall, it should be an accretive acquisition to all of our investors. An acquisition where we add value, as management, where we add value because we know how to run underground mines, narrow veins. Because we add value because we know the jurisdiction, we feel comfortable, and we can transition that mine into the Santacruz way of doing things. So, those premises, I think they are the drivers. From a technical point of view, preferable, sorry, mines that are in production, mines that produce more than 4 million ounces or 5 million ounces of silver equivalent, will be the preferable.
But if we see something that it is mature in an exploration, more than a brownfield, we might be taking a close look. To date, we are active in that front and, hopefully we can have good and successful progress in that front.
As Arturo mentions, I think it is important to understand the jurisdiction. For Santacruz, it is important to have many jurisdictions, like being in Mexico, Bolivia, and maybe another country to get at least 5 million ounces of silver equivalent. Preferable if it is precious metal, a combination between precious metal. But we have proven that we can take over operations like the ones in Bolivia that were very sophisticated, to start with and improve them. We will be looking for a reasonable life of mine, operations where we can bring value.
Value.
Like Arturo was mentioning, I think our teams have proven to be the right team to do that. Yes, that is the type of M&A we are looking for right now.
Yes.
Okay, got it. Well, thank you so much for your time today, Arturo and Andrés.
Okay.
Before we wrap up, any final questions or remarks you want to address or anything like that?
No, all of our investors can rest assured that we will keep working very disciplined. We will keep working with full transparency and trying to get the most out of our mines and make this a very accretive investment for all of our stakeholders, not only our shareholders. Thanks to everyone who is giving us their vote of trust, and we will keep focused on what we do.
Perfect. Well, thank you so much again. If anyone has any additional questions, please feel free to email me directly at [email protected]. I hope everyone has a great day, and thanks again for joining.
Thanks.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-17Santacruz Silver Reports Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results
TMX Newsfile
Santacruz Silver Reports Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results
Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - August 17, 2026) - Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (NASDAQ: SCZM) (TSXV: SCZ) ("Santacruz" or the "Company") reports its financial and operating results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 ("Q2 2026"). The full version of the unaudited Q2 2026 financial statements (the "Financial Statements") and accompanying Management's Discussion and Analysis (the "MD&A") can be viewed on the Company's website at www.santacruzsilver.com or on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. All amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated. Q2 2026 Highlights Revenues of $113.5 million, a 55% increase year-over-year. Gross profit of $51.1 million, a 102% increase year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA(1) of $46.7 million, a 74% increase year-over-year. Cash and highly-liquid marketable securities(2) of $72.8 million, an 82% increase year-over-year. Working capital of $86.1 million, a 43% increase year-over-year. Net income of $2.0 million, a 90% decrease year-over-year, reflecting the impact of the non-recurring tax event and non-cash CVR revaluation discussed below. Average realized price per silver ounce sold(1) of $72.17, a 118% increase year-over-year. AISC per silver ounce sold(1) of $21.87, a 25% increase year-over-year. Realized mining margin per silver ounce sold(1) of $50.30, a 222% increase year-over-year. Average realized price per zinc tonne sold(1) of $3,302, a 12% increase year-over year. AISC per zinc tonne sold(1) of $2,219, a 46% increase year-over-year. Realized mining margin per zinc tonne sold(1) of $1,083, a 24% decrease year-over-year. The Company reports non-GAAP measures, which includes: adjusted EBITDA, average realized price per silver ounce and zinc tonne sold, all-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver and zinc tonne sold (AISC) and realized mining margin per silver ounce and zinc tonne sold. These measures are widely used in the mining industry as a benchmark for performance, but do not have a standardized meaning and may differ from methods used by other companies even though the metrics have the same or similar names. Refer to the section titled "Non-GAAP Measures" in the MD&A for more information. Cash includes $50.4 million and highly-liquid marketable securities includes $22.4 million, consisting of US treasury notes and bills, of which $15.8 million serves as collateral for short-term borrowings. Arturo P…Read full documentShow less
Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - August 17, 2026) - Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (NASDAQ: SCZM) (TSXV: SCZ) ("Santacruz" or the "Company") reports its financial and operating results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 ("Q2 2026"). The full version of the unaudited Q2 2026 financial statements (the "Financial Statements") and accompanying Management's Discussion and Analysis (the "MD&A") can be viewed on the Company's website at www.santacruzsilver.com or on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. All amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated. Q2 2026 Highlights Revenues of $113.5 million, a 55% increase year-over-year. Gross profit of $51.1 million, a 102% increase year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA(1) of $46.7 million, a 74% increase year-over-year. Cash and highly-liquid marketable securities(2) of $72.8 million, an 82% increase year-over-year. Working capital of $86.1 million, a 43% increase year-over-year. Net income of $2.0 million, a 90% decrease year-over-year, reflecting the impact of the non-recurring tax event and non-cash CVR revaluation discussed below. Average realized price per silver ounce sold(1) of $72.17, a 118% increase year-over-year. AISC per silver ounce sold(1) of $21.87, a 25% increase year-over-year. Realized mining margin per silver ounce sold(1) of $50.30, a 222% increase year-over-year. Average realized price per zinc tonne sold(1) of $3,302, a 12% increase year-over year. AISC per zinc tonne sold(1) of $2,219, a 46% increase year-over-year. Realized mining margin per zinc tonne sold(1) of $1,083, a 24% decrease year-over-year. The Company reports non-GAAP measures, which includes: adjusted EBITDA, average realized price per silver ounce and zinc tonne sold, all-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver and zinc tonne sold (AISC) and realized mining margin per silver ounce and zinc tonne sold. These measures are widely used in the mining industry as a benchmark for performance, but do not have a standardized meaning and may differ from methods used by other companies even though the metrics have the same or similar names. Refer to the section titled "Non-GAAP Measures" in the MD&A for more information. Cash includes $50.4 million and highly-liquid marketable securities includes $22.4 million, consisting of US treasury notes and bills, of which $15.8 million serves as collateral for short-term borrowings. Arturo Préstamo, Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Santacruz, commented: "Santacruz delivered strong operating and financial performance in Q2 2026, with revenue up 55% year-over-year to $113.5 million, Adjusted EBITDA up 74% to $46.7 million, and realized mining margin per silver ounce sold rising to $50.30 from $15.63. The Company ended the quarter with $72.8 million in cash and highly liquid marketable securities. Our cash position was affected by the $7.7 million repayment of San Lucas promissory notes in June, which have been reissued in Q3 2026. In addition, we further expect to grow our cash reserves from the reduction of our unusually high trade receivables balance at the current quarter end." Andrés Bedregal, CFO of Santacruz, stated: "It's important to note that our net income for the quarter was significantly impacted by two non-recurring tax events associated with changes in Bolivia's exchange rate and inflation assumptions, as well as a non-cash fair value adjustment related to the Glencore contingent value rights (CVRs). These items obscure the underlying strength of our operating performance this quarter." Mr. Bedregal added: "The largest impact on net income was an unusually high $36.1 million income tax expense caused by two non-recurring events. One event was the result of the revaluation of the Boliviano following the change in the official exchange rate from 6.96 to 9.77 Bolivianos per U.S. dollar, a 40% decrease. The change resulted in a taxable foreign exchange gain, despite not representing a cash gain. In future quarters, we expect the impact of foreign exchange revaluation to be significantly lower, as any future changes will be measured from the new closing rate of 9.77 rather than the previous rate of 6.96. Income tax expense was also impacted by a non-recurring taxable gain related to a reduction in our decommissioning and restoration provision which was driven by forecasted lower inflation over the lives of our mining operations in Bolivia." Mr. Bedregal concluded: "Our net income was further affected by a $15.8 million non-cash fair value adjustment to the consideration payable balance arising from the CVRs granted to Glencore. The consideration payable balance does not represent a cash payment currently owed to Glencore. The value of the CVR liability is a valuation of the payouts that could occur up to the end of 2032. The payments are only triggered when the month's average LME zinc price exceeds $3,850 per tonne, a threshold that has not been exceeded since the inception of the agreement in 2024. Its important to consider that any payments triggered by higher zinc prices would be accompanied by increased sales revenues from the higher price. Excluding the loss from the change in fair value of the CVR, net income for the quarter would have been $17.8 million." The following table reconciles net income as reported in the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements to show the net income excluding the non-cash CVR adjustment for the three months ended June 30, 2026 (US$ thousands): Note: (1) "Adjusted net income for non-cash CVR loss" is a non-GAAP measure which excludes the loss on change in fair value of consideration payable reported in the Interim consolidated statement of comprehensive income. refer to note 9 - Consideration payable in the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for the Three and Six Months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 for details. Arturo Préstamo, Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Santacruz, added: "During Q2 2026, some parts of Bolivia experienced road blockades that disrupted logistics for approximately 53 days. Operationally, our production was not affected by the blockades, which is a testament to the strength of our operations and the dedication of our teams. Production increased quarter-over-quarter at all five of Santacruz's operations, consolidated silver production increased 17% year-over-year, and notably, silver production at Bolivar increased 32% quarter-over-quarter. The blockades did, however, temporarily constrain concentrate exports — particularly lead concentrate, which contains the majority of our silver production. As a result, sales were below production volumes during the quarter, contributing to an approximately $17.0 million increase in inventories. The blockades were resolved at the end of Q2 2026 and exports have normalized during Q3 2026. We have since been drawing down the inventory accumulated during Q2 2026, with the related revenue expected to be recognized as those shipments are completed." Mr. Prestamo concluded: "Looking ahead to the second half of 2026, we are focused on our operations, which we expect will provide strong financial performance, including realizing the benefit of the concentrate sales that were deferred from Q2 2026. At the Bolivar mine, we are on track to achieve full operational recovery and return to full production by Q4 2026, with continued quarter-over-quarter improvement expected in Q3 2026. Across our broader portfolio, we continue to evaluate opportunities to increase production and improve operating performance, including initiatives to strengthen San Lucas. As we optimize our existing operations and bring new production online, we are building scale across our portfolio and advancing our goal of becoming a leading silver and base metals producer in Latin America — a trajectory we believe positions us to create meaningful long-term value for our shareholders." Selected consolidated financial and operating information for Q2 2026, Q1 2026 and Q2 2025 is presented below. All financial information is prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"), and all dollar amounts are expressed in thousands of US dollars, except per unit amounts, unless otherwise indicated. Update to Non-GAAP Performance Measures and Silver/Zinc Equivalent Ounces Metrics Commencing in Q1 2026, the Company updated its non-GAAP performance measures to provide management and readers with useful information to evaluate the performance of the Company. Refer to the Non-GAAP measures section in the Company's Q2 2026 MD&A for a detailed explanation of the metrics and methodology used to determine them. 2026 Second Quarter Operational Highlights Notes: (1) Mining operations includes only production from Bolivar, Porco, Caballo Blanco and Zimapan. Ore processing operations includes only production from San Lucas ore processing business. Readers are cautioned that Bolivar and Porco production figures are presented at 100% however the Company records only its 45% interest in the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the Illapa business in its consolidated financial statements. The Company reports its segment information on a 100% basis with respect to Bolivar and Porco together with an elimination column representing COMIBOL's 55% interest (refer to segment information note of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements).(2) Silver equivalent ounces and zinc equivalent tonnes produced have been calculated using the period's average metal prices quoted on the London Metal Exchange. The silver and zinc equivalent production is calculated by dividing each metal's price by the price of Silver or Zinc to arrive at their equivalent. Refer to the section titled "Non-GAAP Measures" for further information.(3) Silver ounces sold and zinc tonnes sold may be lower or higher than the volumes produced in the period due to two effects: (i) timing - concentrates produced in a quarter may be shipped and invoiced in a subsequent period or have been produced in a prior period; and (ii) commercial terms - payable ounces under offtake agreements are lower than produced ounces due to standard treatment and quality deductions applied by the customer.(4) The Company reports non-GAAP measures, which include: cash cost of production per tonne milled, cash cost per silver ounce and zinc tonne sold, average realized price per silver ounce and zinc tonne sold, all-in sustaining cost per silver ounce, zinc tonne sold, realized mining margin per silver ounce or zinc tonne sold and realized ore processing margin per silver ounce or zinc tonne sold. These measures are widely used in the mining industry as a benchmark for performance, but do not have a standardized meaning and may differ from methods used by other companies even though the metrics have the same or similar names. Refer to the section titled "Non-GAAP Measures" in this MD&A. 2026 Second Quarter Financial Highlights Notes: (1) On December 10, 2025 the Company consolidated its issued and outstanding common shares on the basis of one post-consolidated common share for every four pre-consolidated common shares. The number of issued and outstanding shares and any per share amounts have been retrospectively restated.(2) The Company reports non-GAAP measures, which includes Adjusted EBITDA, these measures are widely used in the mining industry as a benchmark for performance, but do not have a standardized meaning and may differ from methods used by other companies even though the metrics have the same or similar names. Refer to the section titled "Non-GAAP Measures" in the MD&A. Summary Q2 2026 vs Q1 2026 Consolidated silver production increased 17% to 1,573,100 ounces in Q2 2026 from 1,341,499 ounces in Q1 2026, with quarter-over-quarter increases at all five operations. The improvement was driven primarily by higher processed volumes, with consolidated tonnes milled increasing 7% to 521,956 tonnes, together with higher silver head grades at Bolivar and Porco and a marked improvement in silver recovery at Zimapan. Bolivar contributed the largest single increase as rehabilitation of the areas affected by the May 2025 flooding event continued to advance, while San Lucas processed 22% more ore than in the prior quarter. Consolidated zinc production increased 7% to 23,240 tonnes, driven principally by higher throughput, which more than offset lower zinc grades at Bolivar and Porco. Lead production increased 18% to 3,165 tonnes and copper production increased 9% to 337 tonnes. Sales volumes did not rise to the same degree as production. During the quarter, road blockades in certain parts of Bolivia extended for approximately 53 days, disrupting supply chains across many sectors of the Bolivian economy. The blockades temporarily disrupted the export of the Company's concentrates but did not affect production, which continued without interruption at all operations. Silver ounces sold from mining operations of 894,167 increased 3% from 871,752 in Q1 2026, lagging the 16% increase in mining silver production, and silver ounces sold at San Lucas declined 47% to 333,899, as concentrate produced during the blockade period could not be shipped and was accumulated as inventory; first-quarter San Lucas sales had also been elevated by the shipment of previously accumulated concentrate. Consolidated inventories increased to $71,876 at June 30, 2026 from $57,517 at December 31, 2025, driven by higher concentrate inventory ($36,445 compared with $30,172) and higher ore stockpiles ($19,493 compared with $11,983). The Company expects this inventory to be sold in the subsequent quarter as export logistics have normalized. Zinc tonnes sold increased quarter over quarter at both mining operations (14,419 tonnes, up 3%) and San Lucas (8,796 tonnes, up 19%). The average realized price per silver ounce sold from mining operations decreased 10% to $72.17 from $80.61 in Q1 2026, in line with lower average silver prices during the quarter (the average LME silver price declined 13% to $73.44 per ounce). This was largely offset by lower unit costs: cash cost per silver ounce sold decreased 15% to $15.54 from $18.34, and all-in sustaining cost per silver ounce sold decreased 24% to $21.87 from $28.90, leaving the realized mining margin per silver ounce sold broadly stable at $50.30 (Q1 2026 — $51.71). Cash cost of production per tonne milled was also stable at $86.83 (Q1 2026 — $87.19). For zinc, the average realized price per tonne sold of $3,302 was 1% higher, while all-in sustaining cost per zinc tonne sold decreased 13% to $2,219, and the realized mining margin per zinc tonne sold increased 48% to $1,083 from $731. At San Lucas, the realized ore processing margin per silver ounce sold more than doubled to $33.42 from $16.49, and the realized ore processing margin per zinc tonne sold increased 23% to $819. Consolidated revenues of $113,458 were 11% lower than the $127,529 recorded in Q1 2026, as the lower silver prices and the blockade-related reduction in silver ounces sold at San Lucas more than offset the higher zinc volumes sold; Adjusted EBITDA nonetheless increased 10% quarter over quarter to $46,663 on the stronger unit margins. Q2 2026 vs Q2 2025 Compared with Q2 2025, consolidated silver production increased 11% and zinc production increased 10%, on 9% higher consolidated tonnes milled. Readers should note that Q2 2025 production was adversely affected by the May 2025 flooding event at Bolivar; refer to the news releases dated July 29, 2025 and August 21, 2025 for more information. The average realized price per silver ounce sold from mining operations increased 118% to $72.17 from $33.13 in Q2 2025, and the average realized price per zinc tonne sold increased 12% to $3,302 from $2,938. Silver ounces sold from mining operations decreased 30% year over year, with the largest reductions at Bolivar (down 46%) and Caballo Blanco (down 48%), reflecting the blockade-related timing of concentrate exports, while Zimapan, tons sold were broadly in line with its production. Zinc tonnes sold increased 18% from mining operations and 35% at San Lucas. Unit costs increased against the prior-year quarter, cash cost per silver ounce sold of $15.54 (Q2 2025 — $13.17) and all-in sustaining cost per silver ounce sold of $21.87 (Q2 2025 — $17.50), with cash cost of production per tonne milled of $86.83 (Q2 2025 — $69.92). The substantially higher realized silver price more than offset the cost increases, and the realized mining margin per silver ounce sold expanded 222% to $50.30 from $15.63. For zinc, all-in sustaining cost per tonne sold increased 46% to $2,219 (Q2 2025 — $1,517), and the realized mining margin per zinc tonne sold was $1,083, compared with $1,421 in Q2 2025. The combination of substantially higher realized prices and higher zinc volumes sold more than offset the lower silver volumes, and consolidated revenues increased 55% year over year to $113,458, with gross profit increasing 102% to $51,139 and Adjusted EBITDA increasing 74% to $46,663. Webinar Details CEO Arturo Préstamo and CFO Andrés Bedregal will discuss the Company's financial results in a webinar hosted by Adelaide Capital on Thursday, August 20th at 2:00 pm ET. Investors and shareholders are invited to participate in the webinar. Registration Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_45DXDP6HTR2IqjauiLFlaw. The webinar will also be live-streamed on the Adelaide Capital YouTube Channel, where a replay will be available after the event: https://bit.ly/adcap-youtube. Questions can be submitted during the session or in advance to [email protected]. Non-GAAP Measures The financial results in this news release include references to non-GAAP measures which include: Adjusted EBITDA, cash cost of production per tonne milled, cash cost per silver ounce and zinc tonne sold, Average realized price per silver ounce and zinc tonne sold, All-in sustaining cost per silver ounce, zinc tonne sold, realized mining margin per silver ounce or zinc tonne sold and realized ore processing margin per silver ounce or zinc tonne sold. These measures are widely used in the mining industry as a benchmark for performance, but do not have a standardized meaning and may differ from methods used by other companies even though the metrics have the same or similar names. The data is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. For a reconciliation of non-GAAP and GAAP measures, please refer to the "Non-GAAP Measures" section in the Company's Q2 2026 MD&A, which is available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. Qualified Person Garth Kirkham P.Geo., an independent consultant to the Company and a Qualified Person as defined under NI 43-101, has approved the scientific and technical information contained within this news release. About Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. Santacruz Silver is engaged in the operation, acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties across Latin America. In Bolivia, the Company operates the Bolivar, Porco, and Caballo Blanco mining complexes, with Caballo Blanco comprising the Tres Amigos and Colquechaquita mines. The Reserva mine, whose production is provided to the San Lucas ore sourcing and trading business, is also located in Bolivia. Additionally, the Company oversees the Soracaya exploration project. In Mexico, Santacruz operates the Zimapan mine. 'signed' Arturo Préstamo Elizondo, Executive Chairman and CEO For further information, please contact: Arturo Préstamo Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.Email: [email protected] Telephone: +52 81 83 785707 Andrés BedregalSantacruz Silver Mining Ltd.Email: [email protected]: +591 22444849 Eduardo TorrecillasSantacruz Silver Mining Ltd.Email: [email protected]: +591 22444849 Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) nor the Nasdaq Capital Market LLC accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein. Forward-Looking Information This news release includes certain statements and information that may constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or future performance reflect the expectations or beliefs of the management of the Company regarding future events. Generally, forward-looking statements and information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "intends", "expects" or "anticipates", or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "should", "would" or will "potentially" or "likely" occur. This information and these statements, referred to herein as "forward-looking statements", are not historical facts, are made as of the date of this news release. These forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties and actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, risks related to changes in general economic, business and political conditions, including changes in the financial markets, changes in applicable laws, and compliance with extensive government regulation, as well as those risk factors discussed or referred to in the Company's disclosure documents filed with the securities regulatory authorities in certain provinces of Canada and available at SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca). There can be no assurance that any forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, the reader should not place any undue reliance on forward-looking information or statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information or statements, other than as required by applicable law. To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/309844
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-28Santacruz Silver Achieves Strong Q2 2026 Production Results, Producing 1,573,100 Ounces of Silver and 23,240 Tonnes of Zinc
TMX Newsfile
Santacruz Silver Achieves Strong Q2 2026 Production Results, Producing 1,573,100 Ounces of Silver and 23,240 Tonnes of Zinc
Santacruz also produced 3,165 Tonnes of Lead and 337 Tonnes of Copper in Q2 2026 Silver Production at Bolivar Increased by 32% QoQ Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - July 28, 2026) - Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (NASDAQ: SCZM) (TSXV: SCZ) ("Santacruz" or the "Company") announces that total production in the second quarter of 2026 ("Q2 2026") was 1,573,100 ounces of silver, 23,240 tonnes of zinc, 3,165 tonnes of lead, and 337 tonnes of copper. This production was generated across the Company's operations in Bolivia, including the Bolivar mine, the Porco mine, the Caballo Blanco Group of mines ("Caballo Blanco"), and the San Lucas Ore Sourcing Business, which includes the Reserva Mine ("San Lucas"), as well as the Zimapan mine in Mexico. Q2 2026 Production Highlights Primary Production Metrics: Silver: 1,573,100 ounces Zinc: 23,240 tonnes Lead: 3,165 tonnes Copper: 337 tonnes Supplemental Production Metrics: Silver Equivalent Production: 2,814,489 silver equivalent ounces Zinc Equivalent Production: 59,680 zinc equivalent tonnes Arturo Préstamo, Executive Chairman and CEO of Santacruz, commented: "Q2 2026 was marked by strong operational performance across our portfolio, with silver and zinc production increasing quarter-over-quarter at each of our operations. At Bolivar, silver production increased 32% quarter-over-quarter to 343,522 ounces, driven by ongoing recovery efforts in the areas affected by the localized flooding event that occurred in May 2025. Porco delivered higher silver and zinc production, driven by stronger silver grades and improved metal recoveries, while Caballo Blanco continued to make steady, meaningful contributions. At Zimapan, operations rebounded from the temporary constraints experienced during the first quarter, including limited ventilation in the higher-grade zones at Level 960 due to a contractor delay in completing the ventilation Robbins incline shaft, as well as repeated power interruptions caused by the local service provider's maintenance of the power grid. As a result, metal recoveries improved across all four payable metals." Mr. Préstamo added: "This quarter's solid production results show how the Company's operations were resilient despite the challenging conditions experienced in Bolivia. During this second quarter, road blockades in Bolivia extended for more than 50 days, disrupting supply chains across ma…Read full documentShow less
Santacruz also produced 3,165 Tonnes of Lead and 337 Tonnes of Copper in Q2 2026 Silver Production at Bolivar Increased by 32% QoQ Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - July 28, 2026) - Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (NASDAQ: SCZM) (TSXV: SCZ) ("Santacruz" or the "Company") announces that total production in the second quarter of 2026 ("Q2 2026") was 1,573,100 ounces of silver, 23,240 tonnes of zinc, 3,165 tonnes of lead, and 337 tonnes of copper. This production was generated across the Company's operations in Bolivia, including the Bolivar mine, the Porco mine, the Caballo Blanco Group of mines ("Caballo Blanco"), and the San Lucas Ore Sourcing Business, which includes the Reserva Mine ("San Lucas"), as well as the Zimapan mine in Mexico. Q2 2026 Production Highlights Primary Production Metrics: Silver: 1,573,100 ounces Zinc: 23,240 tonnes Lead: 3,165 tonnes Copper: 337 tonnes Supplemental Production Metrics: Silver Equivalent Production: 2,814,489 silver equivalent ounces Zinc Equivalent Production: 59,680 zinc equivalent tonnes Arturo Préstamo, Executive Chairman and CEO of Santacruz, commented: "Q2 2026 was marked by strong operational performance across our portfolio, with silver and zinc production increasing quarter-over-quarter at each of our operations. At Bolivar, silver production increased 32% quarter-over-quarter to 343,522 ounces, driven by ongoing recovery efforts in the areas affected by the localized flooding event that occurred in May 2025. Porco delivered higher silver and zinc production, driven by stronger silver grades and improved metal recoveries, while Caballo Blanco continued to make steady, meaningful contributions. At Zimapan, operations rebounded from the temporary constraints experienced during the first quarter, including limited ventilation in the higher-grade zones at Level 960 due to a contractor delay in completing the ventilation Robbins incline shaft, as well as repeated power interruptions caused by the local service provider's maintenance of the power grid. As a result, metal recoveries improved across all four payable metals." Mr. Préstamo added: "This quarter's solid production results show how the Company's operations were resilient despite the challenging conditions experienced in Bolivia. During this second quarter, road blockades in Bolivia extended for more than 50 days, disrupting supply chains across many sectors of the economy. Despite these challenges, our teams leveraged their operational expertise and regional experience to keep our mines fully supplied and producing without interruption. I would like to extend my sincere appreciation to our Bolivian team, whose commitment and exceptional execution under difficult circumstances were instrumental in achieving this quarter's solid production results. Their dedication exemplifies the strength of our organization and the values that define Santacruz. I also want to recognize our team at Zimapan in Mexico for their commitment to continuous improvement. Through innovation, operational discipline, and a continuous focus on optimizing performance, they have continued to enhance our operations. The progress achieved in dewatering the Bolívar mine, the continued advancement of Level 960 at Zimapan, improved metallurgical recoveries, and the operational efficiencies delivered across our business give us confidence that we are entering the second half of 2026 with strong momentum. These initiatives continue to strengthen the foundation of our operations and position us well to create long-term value from our silver and zinc assets for our shareholders." Consolidated Production Summary – Mining & Ore Processing Operations Consolidated Production Summary – Mining Operations(2) Consolidated Production Summary – Ore Processing Operations(2) (1) Silver equivalent ounces and zinc equivalent tonnes produced have been calculated using the period's average metal prices quoted on the London Metal Exchange. The silver and zinc equivalent production is calculated by dividing each metal's price by the price of Silver or Zinc to arrive at their equivalent. Refer to the section titled "Methodology for the Calculation of Silver Equivalent and Zinc Equivalent Production Figures" below.(2) Mining operations includes only production from Bolivar, Porco, Caballo Blanco and Zimapan. Ore processing includes only production from San Lucas ore processing business.(3) Readers are cautioned that Bolivar and Porco production figures are presented at 100% however the Company records only its 45% interest in the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the Illapa business in its consolidated financial statements. The Company reports its segment information on a 100% basis with respect to Bolivar and Porco together with an elimination column representing COMIBOL's 55% interest (refer to segment information note of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements). Consolidated silver production increased 17% to 1,573,100 ounces in Q2 2026 from 1,341,499 ounces in Q1 2026, with quarter-over-quarter increases at all five operations. The improvement was driven primarily by higher processed volumes, with consolidated tonnes milled increasing 7% to 521,956 tonnes, together with higher silver head grades at Bolivar and Porco and a marked improvement in silver recovery at Zimapan. Bolivar contributed the largest single increase as rehabilitation of the areas affected by the May 2025 flooding event continued to advance, while San Lucas processed 22% more ore than in the prior quarter. Consolidated zinc production increased 7% to 23,240 tonnes, driven principally by higher throughput, which more than offset lower zinc grades at Bolivar and Porco. Lead production increased 18% to 3,165 tonnes and copper production increased 9% to 337 tonnes. Compared with Q2 2025, consolidated silver production increased 11%, and zinc production increased 10%, on 9% higher consolidated tonnes milled. Readers should note that Q2 2025 production was adversely affected by the May 2025 flooding event at Bolivar; refer to the news release dated July 29, 2025, for more information. For additional context, and as a supplement to the Company's primary metal production disclosure, silver-equivalent ("AgEq") production for Q2 2026 totaled 2,814,489 ounces, while zinc-equivalent ("ZnEq") production reached 59,680 tonnes. As both metrics are influenced by relative metal prices, the Company believes the quarter is best assessed based on actual metal production, particularly silver and zinc, with AgEq and ZnEq presented solely as supplemental reference metrics reflecting the Company's multi-metal production profile. Readers are cautioned that silver-equivalent calculations can become less representative in periods when silver price significantly outperforms or underperforms the prices of other metals, which is particularly applicable when comparing the quarters year-over-year. Bolivar Mine Production Summary (1) Readers are cautioned that Bolivar and Porco production figures are presented at 100% however the Company records only its 45% interest in the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the Illapa business in its consolidated financial statements. The Company reports its segment information on a 100% basis with respect to Bolivar and Porco together with an elimination column representing COMIBOL's 55% interest (refer to segment information note of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements). Q2 2026 vs Q1 2026Compared with Q1 2026, Bolivar's silver production increased 32% to 343,522 ounces from 259,635 ounces. The increase was driven by an 11% increase in tonnes milled and a 17% higher silver head grade (165 g/t versus 141 g/t), together with a modest improvement in silver recovery, as rehabilitation of the areas affected by the May 2025 flooding event continued to advance. Zinc production of 3,684 tonnes was broadly unchanged quarter over quarter, as higher throughput was largely offset by an 8% lower zinc grade. Lead production increased 18% to 233 tonnes, supported by higher throughput and improved lead recovery. Q2 2026 vs Q2 2025Compared with Q2 2025, Bolivar's silver production increased 13% from 304,468 ounces and zinc production increased 14% from 3,225 tonnes, driven by a 32% increase in tonnes milled as mining areas continued to be restored. Head grades remained below the prior-year quarter (silver of 165 g/t versus 190 g/t; zinc of 5.55% versus 6.52%), reflecting the areas currently being mined as the operation advances through its recovery plan, with higher processed volumes more than offsetting the lower grades. Lead production increased 28% to 233 tonnes. Porco Mine Production Summary (1) Readers are cautioned that Bolivar and Porco production figures are presented at 100% however the Company records only its 45% interest in the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the Illapa business in its consolidated financial statements. The Company reports its segment information on a 100% basis with respect to Bolivar and Porco together with an elimination column representing COMIBOL's 55% interest (refer to segment information note of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements). Q2 2026 vs Q1 2026Porco is a predominantly zinc-oriented underground operation, and its performance is best assessed on zinc output. Compared with Q1 2026, zinc production increased 5% to 2,974 tonnes, as a 15% increase in tonnes milled more than offset a 10% lower zinc grade, with zinc recovery remaining strong at 96%. Silver production increased 43% to 100,875 ounces from 70,708 ounces, and lead production increased 19% to 136 tonnes. Q2 2026 vs Q2 2025Compared with Q2 2025, zinc production increased 7% from 2,786 tonnes on 6% higher tonnes milled and continued strong zinc recoveries. Silver production decreased 5% from 105,901 ounces, primarily reflecting an 8% lower silver head grade. This profile reflects mine sequencing deliberately focused on zinc-rich areas, rather than an operational shortfall, and is consistent with Porco's role within the Company's silver-zinc co-product portfolio. Caballo Blanco Group(1) Production Summary (1) The Caballo Blanco Group consists of the Colquechaquita and Tres Amigos mines. Q2 2026 vs Q1 2026Compared with Q1 2026, Caballo Blanco's silver production increased 6% to 326,215 ounces from 306,888 ounces, driven by a 5% higher silver head grade (183 g/t versus 175 g/t) on modestly higher throughput. Zinc production increased 4% to 4,126 tonnes, and lead production was unchanged at 765 tonnes. Recoveries remained stable across all metals, and the operation continued to perform as one of the Company's most consistent contributors. Q2 2026 vs Q2 2025Compared with Q2 2025, Caballo Blanco's silver production increased 11% from 294,786 ounces, on 4% higher tonnes milled and a 9% higher silver head grade, while zinc production increased 4% from 3,974 tonnes. Lead production increased 29% from 595 tonnes, reflecting a 23% higher lead grade in the areas mined during the quarter. Grades and recoveries remained stable across periods, underscoring Caballo Blanco's operating consistency. Zimapan Production Summary Q2 2026 vs Q1 2026Compared with Q1 2026, Zimapan's silver production increased 8% to 391,121 ounces from 362,863 ounces despite broadly unchanged throughput and a slightly lower silver head grade, driven by a significant improvement in silver recovery to 72% from 65%. Zinc production increased 18% to 4,764 tonnes, supported by a 9% higher zinc grade and improved zinc recovery, while lead production increased 15% to 1,159 tonnes and copper production increased 9% to 337 tonnes. Q2 2026 vs Q2 2025Compared with Q2 2025, Zimapan's silver production was broadly stable, decreasing 2% from 398,292 ounces, while zinc production increased 5% from 4,521 tonnes on a higher zinc grade. Lead production decreased 14% from 1,354 tonnes, primarily reflecting a 15% lower lead grade associated with mine sequencing, while copper production increased 47% from 229 tonnes on materially higher copper grades and recoveries. Zimapan remained an important contributor to consolidated output and continues to be managed with a focus on recoveries and concentrate quality. San Lucas Group(1) Ore Processing Production Summary (1) The San Lucas Group production volumes and results are primarily from purchased ore from third party miners but also includes production from the Company's wholly owned Reserva mine which makes up a small portion of the total production. San Lucas is the Company's ore sourcing and trading business in Bolivia and should be regarded as a strategic component of the broader Bolivian production portfolio. By procuring mineralized material from third-party suppliers and processing it through the Company's existing plants, San Lucas supports higher plant utilization, enhances fixed-cost absorption, and increases overall operating flexibility. Given its margin-based structure, purchase prices are aligned to contained metal value. San Lucas is best evaluated on the basis of margin generation and its contribution to overall operating efficiency, rather than on average feed grade alone. Q2 2026 vs Q1 2026Compared with Q1 2026, San Lucas processed 115,424 tonnes, a 22% increase, and produced 411,367 ounces of silver (up 20%), 7,692 tonnes of zinc (up 8%), and 872 tonnes of lead (up 45%). The increase was driven primarily by higher volumes of purchased ore delivered by third-party suppliers, with recoveries broadly stable to modestly improved. The higher volumes directly supported plant utilization and fixed-cost absorption across the Company's Bolivian processing facilities. Q2 2026 vs Q2 2025Compared with Q2 2025, San Lucas increased silver production by 29% from 319,634 ounces, zinc production by 16% from 6,643 tonnes, and lead production by 71% from 509 tonnes, on 22% higher processed tonnes. The year-over-year growth underscores the flexibility of the San Lucas model, which allows the Company to scale third-party feed sourcing in response to plant availability and market conditions. Methodology for the Calculation of Silver Equivalent and Zinc Equivalent Production Figures Commencing Q1 2026, the Company has improved its production disclosure by reporting Zinc Equivalent tonnes produced and has changed the method of calculating Silver Equivalent Ounces produced. The Company considers silver equivalent ("AgEq") ounces and zinc equivalent ("ZnEq") tonnes to be useful supplemental production metrics for evaluating its multi-metal production profile. These measures are commonly used in the mining industry as reference metrics to facilitate period-over-period comparisons and, where relevant, benchmarking against industry peers. They should be viewed as supplemental to, and not a substitute for, the actual metal production volumes disclosed on a metal-by-metal basis. AgEq ounces and ZnEq tonnes are calculated by applying conversion factors that normalize the value of each non-reference metal to the selected reference metal. For AgEq ounces, the values of zinc, lead, and copper are converted into silver equivalent ounces. For ZnEq tonnes, the values of silver, lead, and copper are converted into zinc equivalent tonnes. Each conversion factor is derived from the ratio of the in-situ metal value of the contained fine metal to the price of the reference metal used in the equivalency calculation. The denominator used to calculate silver equivalent ounces is the silver price, while the denominator used to calculate zinc equivalent tonnes is the zinc price. This methodology expresses multi-metal production in a common unit of measure. Since the silver price and zinc price are the denominators in each metric, price variations of these metals can significantly affect the result, especially when one metal price changes significantly relative to the other metal prices. The metal prices used in the calculation of AgEq and ZnEq are based on the average quarterly prices quoted on the London Metal Exchange ("LME"). Previously, the Company used budgeted metal prices which were only updated annually. The Company considers that it is more appropriate to use the quarter's actual prices to determine the period's AgEq and ZnEq production volumes to better reflect production results in the context of volatile market prices. Previously reported AgEq ounces produced have been updated using the period's corresponding quarterly average LME prices instead of the budgeted prices which were previously used. The methods used by the Company to calculate these equivalencies may differ from those used by other companies reporting similar metrics and therefore may not be directly comparable. These measures are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"). Qualified Person Garth Kirkham, P.Geo., an independent consultant to the Company, is a qualified person under NI 43-101 and has approved the scientific and technical information contained within this news release. About Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. Santacruz Silver is engaged in the operation, acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties across Latin America. In Bolivia, the Company operates the Bolivar, Porco, and Caballo Blanco mining complexes, with Caballo Blanco comprising the Tres Amigos and Colquechaquita mines. The Reserva mine, whose production is provided to the San Lucas ore sourcing and trading business, is also located in Bolivia. Additionally, the Company oversees the Soracaya exploration project. In Mexico, Santacruz operates the Zimapan mine. 'signed' Arturo Préstamo Elizondo, Executive Chairman and CEO For further information, please contact: Arturo Préstamo Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. Email: [email protected] Telephone: +52 81 83 785707 Andrés Bedregal Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. Email: [email protected] Telephone: +591 22444849 Eduardo Torrecillas Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. Email: [email protected] Telephone: +591 22444849 Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) nor the Nasdaq Capital Market LLC accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein. Forward-Looking Information This news release includes certain statements and information that may constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or future performance and reflect the expectations or beliefs of management of the Company regarding future events. Generally, forward-looking statements and information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "intends", "expects" or "anticipates", or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "should", "would" or will "potentially" or "likely" occur. These forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties and actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, risks related to changes in general economic, business and political conditions, including changes in the financial markets, changes in applicable laws, and compliance with extensive government regulation, as well as those risk factors discussed or referred to in the Company's disclosure documents filed with the securities regulatory authorities in certain provinces of Canada and available at www.sedarplus.ca. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Company has applied several material assumptions, including without limitation, that operations will continue as planned and that production, recoveries and operating performance will be consistent with management's expectations. There can be no assurance that any forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, the reader should not place any undue reliance on forward-looking information or statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information or statements, other than as required by applicable law. To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/306882
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-05-23A Look At Santacruz Silver Mining (TSXV:SCZ) Valuation After Strong Q1 2026 Sales And Net Income Results
Simply Wall St.
A Look At Santacruz Silver Mining (TSXV:SCZ) Valuation After Strong Q1 2026 Sales And Net Income Results
Never miss an important update on your stock portfolio and cut through the noise. Over 7 million investors trust Simply Wall St to stay informed where it matters for FREE. Santacruz Silver Mining (TSXV:SCZ) is back on investor radar after first quarter 2026 results showed sales of US$127.53 million and net income of US$28.47 million, each above the figures reported a year earlier. See our latest analysis for Santacruz Silver Mining. The share price is at CA$11.03 after pulling back over the past week and quarter. However, the very large 1 year and 3 year total shareholder returns suggest longer term momentum has been strong even as near term sentiment cools. If strong earnings from Santacruz have you rethinking silver exposure, it could be a good moment to broaden your watchlist with 9 top silver producer stocks With Santacruz posting higher quarterly sales and earnings, yet the share price sitting at CA$11.03 after recent declines, investors may wonder whether the stock is still undervalued or if the market is already pricing in future growth. According to the most followed narrative, Santacruz Silver Mining's fair value of CA$240 sits far above the last close at CA$11.03, which puts a spotlight on how the business model is expected to work. Read the complete narrative. Curious what underpins such a large gap between price and fair value? The narrative leans heavily on polymetal production, margin assumptions, and future cash flow torque across several operating mines. Result: Fair Value of CA$240 (UNDERVALUED) Have a read of the narrative in full and understand what's behind the forecasts. However, this hinges on smooth operations, and issues such as balance sheet pressure or setbacks at Bolivian and Mexican mines could quickly challenge that undervalued story. Find out about the key risks to this Santacruz Silver Mining narrative. Given the mix of excitement around potential upside and concern about real risks, it makes sense to move quickly and test the numbers for yourself, starting with 4 key rewards and 1 important warning sign. If you stop with just one stock, you miss out on fresh angles, smarter diversification, and potential opportunities that better match your risk and income goals. Target strong fundamentals by scanning companies on our solid balance sheet and fundamentals stocks screener (9 results) and focus your time on businesses with sturdi…Read full documentShow less
Never miss an important update on your stock portfolio and cut through the noise. Over 7 million investors trust Simply Wall St to stay informed where it matters for FREE. Santacruz Silver Mining (TSXV:SCZ) is back on investor radar after first quarter 2026 results showed sales of US$127.53 million and net income of US$28.47 million, each above the figures reported a year earlier. See our latest analysis for Santacruz Silver Mining. The share price is at CA$11.03 after pulling back over the past week and quarter. However, the very large 1 year and 3 year total shareholder returns suggest longer term momentum has been strong even as near term sentiment cools. If strong earnings from Santacruz have you rethinking silver exposure, it could be a good moment to broaden your watchlist with 9 top silver producer stocks With Santacruz posting higher quarterly sales and earnings, yet the share price sitting at CA$11.03 after recent declines, investors may wonder whether the stock is still undervalued or if the market is already pricing in future growth. According to the most followed narrative, Santacruz Silver Mining's fair value of CA$240 sits far above the last close at CA$11.03, which puts a spotlight on how the business model is expected to work. Read the complete narrative. Curious what underpins such a large gap between price and fair value? The narrative leans heavily on polymetal production, margin assumptions, and future cash flow torque across several operating mines. Result: Fair Value of CA$240 (UNDERVALUED) Have a read of the narrative in full and understand what's behind the forecasts. However, this hinges on smooth operations, and issues such as balance sheet pressure or setbacks at Bolivian and Mexican mines could quickly challenge that undervalued story. Find out about the key risks to this Santacruz Silver Mining narrative. Given the mix of excitement around potential upside and concern about real risks, it makes sense to move quickly and test the numbers for yourself, starting with 4 key rewards and 1 important warning sign. If you stop with just one stock, you miss out on fresh angles, smarter diversification, and potential opportunities that better match your risk and income goals. Target strong fundamentals by scanning companies on our solid balance sheet and fundamentals stocks screener (9 results) and focus your time on businesses with sturdier financial footing. Hunt for potential mispricings using the 9 high quality undervalued stocks so you can quickly spot stocks where the current price sits below their assessed quality. Strengthen your income focus with the 6 dividend fortresses and zero in on companies offering higher yields backed by more resilient payouts. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include SCZ.V. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email [email protected]
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-05-22Shareholders Can Be Confident That Santacruz Silver Mining's (CVE:SCZ) Earnings Are High Quality
Simply Wall St.
Shareholders Can Be Confident That Santacruz Silver Mining's (CVE:SCZ) Earnings Are High Quality
Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.'s (CVE:SCZ) earnings announcement last week was disappointing for investors, despite the decent profit numbers. We have done some analysis and have found some comforting factors beneath the profit numbers. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. To properly understand Santacruz Silver Mining's profit results, we need to consider the US$13m expense attributed to unusual items. While deductions due to unusual items are disappointing in the first instance, there is a silver lining. When we analysed the vast majority of listed companies worldwide, we found that significant unusual items are often not repeated. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. If Santacruz Silver Mining doesn't see those unusual expenses repeat, then all else being equal we'd expect its profit to increase over the coming year. That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates. Because unusual items detracted from Santacruz Silver Mining's earnings over the last year, you could argue that we can expect an improved result in the current quarter. Based on this observation, we consider it likely that Santacruz Silver Mining's statutory profit actually understates its earnings potential! And the EPS is up 45% over the last twelve months. At the end of the day, it's essential to consider more than just the factors above, if you want to understand the company properly. So if you'd like to dive deeper into this stock, it's crucial to consider any risks it's facing. In terms of investment risks, we've identified 1 warning sign with Santacruz Silver Mining, and understanding it should be part of your investment process. This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Santacruz Silver Mining's profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get…Read full documentShow less
Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.'s (CVE:SCZ) earnings announcement last week was disappointing for investors, despite the decent profit numbers. We have done some analysis and have found some comforting factors beneath the profit numbers. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. To properly understand Santacruz Silver Mining's profit results, we need to consider the US$13m expense attributed to unusual items. While deductions due to unusual items are disappointing in the first instance, there is a silver lining. When we analysed the vast majority of listed companies worldwide, we found that significant unusual items are often not repeated. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. If Santacruz Silver Mining doesn't see those unusual expenses repeat, then all else being equal we'd expect its profit to increase over the coming year. That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates. Because unusual items detracted from Santacruz Silver Mining's earnings over the last year, you could argue that we can expect an improved result in the current quarter. Based on this observation, we consider it likely that Santacruz Silver Mining's statutory profit actually understates its earnings potential! And the EPS is up 45% over the last twelve months. At the end of the day, it's essential to consider more than just the factors above, if you want to understand the company properly. So if you'd like to dive deeper into this stock, it's crucial to consider any risks it's facing. In terms of investment risks, we've identified 1 warning sign with Santacruz Silver Mining, and understanding it should be part of your investment process. This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Santacruz Silver Mining's profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-05-16How Q1 2026 Results and Bolivar Recovery Will Impact Santacruz Silver Mining (TSXV:SCZ) Investors
Simply Wall St.
How Q1 2026 Results and Bolivar Recovery Will Impact Santacruz Silver Mining (TSXV:SCZ) Investors
Santacruz Silver Mining reported past first-quarter 2026 results showing an 81% revenue increase and a more than tripling of net income, supported by operational stability and mine recovery efforts. The company also introduced a new reporting format that separates silver and zinc co-product performance, aiming to give investors clearer insight into its production mix and financial health. We’ll now examine how these strong quarterly results and the Bolivar mine’s recovery shape Santacruz Silver Mining’s broader investment narrative. Capitalize on the AI infrastructure supercycle with our selection of the 42 best 'picks and shovels' of the AI gold rush converting record-breaking demand into massive cash flow. To own Santacruz Silver Mining, you need to believe the company can convert its improving operations into durable cash generation in a very cyclical metals space. The latest quarter’s sharp revenue and net income gains, alongside the Bolivar mine’s recovery from the 2025 water inflow, directly reinforce the near term catalyst of stabilizing production after last year’s disruption. The new split reporting of silver and zinc co-products also matters, as it makes it easier to judge how each driver contributes to margins and capital allocation. That said, the share price pullback this year after a very large one year run, the relatively high earnings multiple versus the wider Canadian metals group, and recent insider selling keep valuation and execution risk firmly on the table. However, one operational issue still has the potential to pressure margins and future flexibility. Despite retreating, Santacruz Silver Mining's shares might still be trading above their fair value and there could be some more downside. Discover how much. Five Simply Wall St Community fair value views span roughly US$5 to US$240, underscoring how far apart individual expectations can be. Set those against the recent earnings rebound and mine recovery, and it becomes clear why closely tracking operational progress and balance sheet resilience matters for how the story ultimately plays out. Explore 5 other fair value estimates on Santacruz Silver Mining - why the stock might be worth less than half the current price! Disagree with existing narratives? Extraordinary investment returns rarely come from following the herd, so go with your instincts. A great starting point for your Santacr…Read full documentShow less
Santacruz Silver Mining reported past first-quarter 2026 results showing an 81% revenue increase and a more than tripling of net income, supported by operational stability and mine recovery efforts. The company also introduced a new reporting format that separates silver and zinc co-product performance, aiming to give investors clearer insight into its production mix and financial health. We’ll now examine how these strong quarterly results and the Bolivar mine’s recovery shape Santacruz Silver Mining’s broader investment narrative. Capitalize on the AI infrastructure supercycle with our selection of the 42 best 'picks and shovels' of the AI gold rush converting record-breaking demand into massive cash flow. To own Santacruz Silver Mining, you need to believe the company can convert its improving operations into durable cash generation in a very cyclical metals space. The latest quarter’s sharp revenue and net income gains, alongside the Bolivar mine’s recovery from the 2025 water inflow, directly reinforce the near term catalyst of stabilizing production after last year’s disruption. The new split reporting of silver and zinc co-products also matters, as it makes it easier to judge how each driver contributes to margins and capital allocation. That said, the share price pullback this year after a very large one year run, the relatively high earnings multiple versus the wider Canadian metals group, and recent insider selling keep valuation and execution risk firmly on the table. However, one operational issue still has the potential to pressure margins and future flexibility. Despite retreating, Santacruz Silver Mining's shares might still be trading above their fair value and there could be some more downside. Discover how much. Five Simply Wall St Community fair value views span roughly US$5 to US$240, underscoring how far apart individual expectations can be. Set those against the recent earnings rebound and mine recovery, and it becomes clear why closely tracking operational progress and balance sheet resilience matters for how the story ultimately plays out. Explore 5 other fair value estimates on Santacruz Silver Mining - why the stock might be worth less than half the current price! Disagree with existing narratives? Extraordinary investment returns rarely come from following the herd, so go with your instincts. A great starting point for your Santacruz Silver Mining research is our analysis highlighting 2 key rewards and 2 important warning signs that could impact your investment decision. Our free Santacruz Silver Mining research report provides a comprehensive fundamental analysis summarized in a single visual - the Snowflake - making it easy to evaluate Santacruz Silver Mining's overall financial health at a glance. Right now could be the best entry point. These picks are fresh from our daily scans. Don't delay: Invest in the nuclear renaissance through our list of 87 elite nuclear energy infrastructure plays powering the global AI revolution. AI is about to change healthcare. These 6 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10b in market cap - there's still time to get in early. The best AI stocks today may lie beyond giants like Nvidia and Microsoft. Find the next big opportunity with these 16 smaller AI-focused companies with strong growth potential through early-stage innovation in machine learning, automation, and data intelligence that could fund your retirement. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include SCZ.V. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email [email protected]
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-05-16Santacruz Silver Reports First Quarter 2026 Financial Results
TMX Newsfile
Santacruz Silver Reports First Quarter 2026 Financial Results
Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - May 15, 2026) - Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (NASDAQ: SCZM) (TSXV: SCZ) ("Santacruz" or the "Company") reports its financial and operating results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026 ("Q1 2026"). The full version of the unaudited Q1 2026 financial statements (the "Financial Statements") and accompanying Management's Discussion and Analysis (the "MD&A") can be viewed on the Company's website at www.santacruzsilver.com or on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. All amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated. Q1 2026 Highlights Revenues of $127.5 million, a 81% increase year-over-year. Gross profit of $42.9 million, a 54% increase year-over-year. Net income of $28.5 million, a 201% increase year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA(1) of $42.6 million, a 55% increase year-over-year. Cash and highly-liquid marketable securities(2)of $64.9 million, a 100% increase year-over-year. Working capital of $75.9 million, a 47% increase year-over-year. Average realized price per silver ounce sold(1) of $63.30, a 128% increase year-over-year. AISC per silver ounce sold(1)of $31.60, a 76% increase year-over-year. Realized mining margin per silver ounce sold(1)of $31.70, a 221% increase year-over-year. Average realized price per zinc tonne sold(1) of $3,116, a 12% increase year-over year. AISC per zinc tonne sold(1) of $2,729, a 32% increase year-over-year. Realized mining margin per zinc tonne sold(1) of $387, a 46% decrease year-over-year. Arturo Pr←stamo, Executive Chairman and CEO of Santacruz, commented: "Santacruz delivered a strong start to 2026, with revenue of $127.5 million, gross profit of $42.9 million and Adjusted EBITDA of $42.6 million, representing improvements of 81%, 54%, and 55%, respectively, compared to the same period last year. Combined with our stable AISC this quarter, the stronger silver price environment drove robust margins of $31.70 per silver ounce sold, a 221% increase year-over-year. This reinforces the strength of our cash flow generation across our operations, reflecting both a stronger commodity environment and the operating discipline we have embedded across every asset. It is also important to highlight that after paying $31.5 million in taxes during this first quarter, we ended Q1 2026 with a healthy cash and highly liquid marketable securities position of $64.9 million, providing Santacru…Read full documentShow less
Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - May 15, 2026) - Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (NASDAQ: SCZM) (TSXV: SCZ) ("Santacruz" or the "Company") reports its financial and operating results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026 ("Q1 2026"). The full version of the unaudited Q1 2026 financial statements (the "Financial Statements") and accompanying Management's Discussion and Analysis (the "MD&A") can be viewed on the Company's website at www.santacruzsilver.com or on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. All amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated. Q1 2026 Highlights Revenues of $127.5 million, a 81% increase year-over-year. Gross profit of $42.9 million, a 54% increase year-over-year. Net income of $28.5 million, a 201% increase year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA(1) of $42.6 million, a 55% increase year-over-year. Cash and highly-liquid marketable securities(2)of $64.9 million, a 100% increase year-over-year. Working capital of $75.9 million, a 47% increase year-over-year. Average realized price per silver ounce sold(1) of $63.30, a 128% increase year-over-year. AISC per silver ounce sold(1)of $31.60, a 76% increase year-over-year. Realized mining margin per silver ounce sold(1)of $31.70, a 221% increase year-over-year. Average realized price per zinc tonne sold(1) of $3,116, a 12% increase year-over year. AISC per zinc tonne sold(1) of $2,729, a 32% increase year-over-year. Realized mining margin per zinc tonne sold(1) of $387, a 46% decrease year-over-year. Arturo Pr←stamo, Executive Chairman and CEO of Santacruz, commented: "Santacruz delivered a strong start to 2026, with revenue of $127.5 million, gross profit of $42.9 million and Adjusted EBITDA of $42.6 million, representing improvements of 81%, 54%, and 55%, respectively, compared to the same period last year. Combined with our stable AISC this quarter, the stronger silver price environment drove robust margins of $31.70 per silver ounce sold, a 221% increase year-over-year. This reinforces the strength of our cash flow generation across our operations, reflecting both a stronger commodity environment and the operating discipline we have embedded across every asset. It is also important to highlight that after paying $31.5 million in taxes during this first quarter, we ended Q1 2026 with a healthy cash and highly liquid marketable securities position of $64.9 million, providing Santacruz with the financial flexibility to continue funding operational improvements while maintaining a strong treasury position." Mr. Pr←stamo continued: "During the quarter, we also introduced a more comprehensive reporting format designed to provide investors with a clearer view of our operating performance and the underlying strength of our business model. The new presentation better reflects Santacruz as a silver and zinc co-product producer, while separately highlighting San Lucas as a margin-based ore sourcing and processing business that supports plant utilization, fixed-cost absorption and operating flexibility. We believe this enhanced reporting framework provides a more complete basis for investors to assess production, costs, margins and cash generation across the Company." Mr. Pr←stamo added: "Operationally, the first quarter demonstrated the strength of our diversified asset base and the benefits of our silver and zinc co-product profile. At Bolivar, the recovery of the areas affected by the May 2025 localized water inflow event continues to advance. We remain focused on restoring production while maintaining operating discipline, with Q4 2026 still targeted for Bolivar's full recovery. Across Bolivia, our priorities remain focused on operational stability, cost control and plant performance, with San Lucas continuing to play a strategic role in supporting plant utilization, fixed-cost absorption and margin contribution through third-party ore sourcing." Mr. Pr←stamo concluded: "In Mexico, our principal focus remains on improving metallurgical recoveries and concentrate quality at Zimapan, our highest-volume operation. The capital already invested in Zimapan is expected to support continued operating improvements throughout 2026. Across all of our processing plants, we remain focused on improving metallurgical recoveries, generating stronger margins and preserving the flexibility of our integrated operating platform to support long-term value creation for shareholders." Selected consolidated financial and operating information for Q1 2026, Q4 2025 and Q1 2025 is presented below. All financial information is prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"), and all dollar amounts are expressed in thousands of US dollars, except per unit amounts, unless otherwise indicated. Update to Non-GAAP Performance Measures and Silver/Zinc Equivalent Ounces Metrics In Q1 2026, the Company updated its non-GAAP performances measures to provide management and readers with useful information to evaluate the performance of the Company. The following section provides a summary of the changes made: Segregation of mining operations & ore processing: Operational and cost metrics are now presented as either Mining operations or Ore processing operations because the underlying business processes and profitability drivers each type of operation are fundamentally different. Mining operations include the production metrics, revenues and costs from extracting ore from the Company's mineral properties which is then processed and sold in concentrate form. Santacruz's mining operations consist of the Bolivar, Porco, Caballo Blanco and Zimapan mines. Ore processing operations consist of the San Lucas feed sourcing business and includes the production metrics, revenue and costs from purchasing ore from third-party miners which is then processed and sold in concentrate form. Mining operations generate high margins because the input for the final product, metal concentrates, is from ore that is extracted from the Company's mine properties that it owns. Ore processing operations generate significantly lower margins because the ore is purchased from third-party miners and the amount paid for the purchased ore is based upon the ore's metal content and prevailing metal prices at the time of purchase. Co-product costing methodology: The Company will no longer focus on costs per silver equivalent ounces sold and will now provide costs per actual silver ounce and zinc tonne sold in the period using a co-product cost methodology which allocates costs between each metal. The Santacruz's primary payable metals are silver and zinc, the revenue generated by each metal varies depending on prevailing metal prices but because each metal generates greater than 30% of the total revenues, the Company has concluded that reporting costs as co-products by silver ounce sold and zinc tonne sold is the most appropriate way to assess the performance of its operations. The total tonnes of ore milled in the period generates silver and zinc payable metals for sale, the ratio of payable silver and zinc produced from each tonne milled is used to allocate each period's production costs between silver ounces sold and zinc tonnes sold, which will generate the following metrics: cash cost per silver ounce and zinc tonne sold, all-in sustaining cost ("AISC") per silver ounce and zinc tonne sold and will also provide an average realized price per silver ounce and zinc tonne sold. By-product credits from secondary metal sales: Santacruz's operations are poly-metallic whereby each tonne of ore milled generates primarily payable ounces of silver and tonnes of zinc but also generates payable tonnes of lead and copper. The combined revenues of lead and copper are incidental to the Company's primary metal production of silver and zinc because they generate less than 10% of total revenues. Lead and copper concentrate is produced primarily to obtain the silver contained within, so the Company has adopted the practice of calculating the net cost of producing an ounce of silver, after deducting revenues gained from incidental by-product production of lead and copper. Realized mining margin and realized ore processing margin: Santacruz has created two new non-GAAP measures: the realized mining margin and realized ore processing margin. Management believes the margins are an effective way to evaluate the profitability of the Company's operations. The margin is calculated by subtracting the all-in sustaining cost per silver ounce or zinc tonne sold from the average realized price per silver ounce or zinc tonne sold. Silver equivalent ounces and Zinc equivalent tonnes: Commencing Q1 2026, the Company has modified its production disclosure to include zinc equivalent tonnes produced and has updated the method of calculating silver equivalent ounces produced. The Company considers silver equivalent ("AgEq") ounces and zinc equivalent ("ZnEq") tonnes to be useful production metrics for evaluating its multi-metal production profile, but they should be considered only supplemental to the actual production volumes of silver and zinc produced and sold. The Company will continue to present the silver equivalent ounces produced and zinc equivalent ounces produced for the combined mining and ore processing operations, but will no longer report its costs per silver ounce to focus on the more relevant metrics of cost per payable silver ounce and cost per payable zinc tonne sold instead. As there are no standardized methods of calculating non-GAAP measures, the Company's methods may differ from those used by others and, accordingly, the Company's use of these measures may not be directly comparable to similarly titled measures used by others. Accordingly, these non-GAAP measures are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Refer to the Non-GAAP Measures section in the Company's Q1 2026 MD&A for a detailed explanation of the metrics, the methodology used and a reconciliation of these measures to the Company's revenues and operating expenses, as reported in its condensed interim consolidated financial statements which are prepared under IFRS. All the changes made to the non-GAAP measures have been applied retrospectively to comparative periods. 2026 First Quarter Operational Highlights Notes: (1) Mining operations includes only production from Bolivar, Porco, Caballo Blanco and Zimapan. Ore processing includes only production from San Lucas ore processing business. Readers are cautioned that Bolivar and Porco production figures are presented at 100% however the Company records only its 45% interest in the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the Illapa business in its consolidated financial statements. The Company reports its segment information on a 100% basis with respect to Bolivar and Porco together with an elimination column representing COMIBOL's 55% interest (refer to segment information note of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements). (2) Silver equivalent ounces and zinc equivalent tonnes produced have been calculated using the period's average metal prices quoted on the London Metal Exchange. The silver and zinc equivalent production is calculated by dividing each metal's price by the price of Silver or Zinc to arrive at their equivalent. Refer to the section titled "Methodology for the Calculation of Silver and Zinc Equivalent Production Figures" in the MD&A for further information. (3) Silver ounces sold (payable) and Zinc tonnes sold (payable) are lower than the volumes produced due to two effects: (i) timing - concentrates produced in a quarter may be shipped and invoiced in a subsequent period; and (ii) commercial terms - payable ounces under offtake agreements are lower than produced ounces due to standard treatment and quality deductions applied by the customer. (4) The Company reports non-GAAP measures, which include: cash cost of production per tonne milled, cash cost per silver ounce and zinc tonne sold, average realized price per silver ounce and zinc tonne sold, all-in sustaining cost per silver ounce, zinc tonne sold, realized mining margin per silver ounce or zinc tonne sold and realized ore processing margin per silver ounce or zinc tonne sold. These measures are widely used in the mining industry as a benchmark for performance, but do not have a standardized meaning and may differ from methods used by other companies even though the metrics have the same or similar names. Refer to the section titled "Non-GAAP Measures" below for further information. 2026 First Quarter Financial Highlights Notes: (1) On December 10, 2025, the Company consolidated its issued and outstanding common shares on the basis of one post-consolidated common share for every four pre-consolidated common shares. The number of issued and outstanding shares and any per share amounts have been retrospectively restated. (2) The Company reports non-GAAP measures, which includes: Adjusted EBITDA. These measures are widely used in the mining industry as a benchmark for performance, but do not have a standardized meaning and may differ from methods used by other companies even though the metrics have the same or similar names. Refer to the section titled "Non-GAAP Measures" below for further information. Summary Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025 On a consolidated basis, Santacruz's mining operations produced 1.0 million ounces of silver in Q1 2026, representing a 2% increase compared with Q4 2025. When including San Lucas's ore processing activities, total silver production was broadly unchanged at 1.3 million ounces. This indicates that the Company maintained stable silver output at the consolidated level, supported by improved performance in certain mining operations, including the continued recovery at Bolivar and stronger silver production at Caballo Blanco, which offset lower silver production at Zimapan and Porco. Zinc production from mining operations decreased by 10% to 14,496 tonnes, while total zinc production, including ore processing, decreased by 9% to 21,640 tonnes. The reduction in zinc production mainly reflected lower zinc output at Zimapan and Caballo Blanco, partially offset by the contribution from other operating areas and ore processing activities. From a financial contribution perspective, the margin analysis evaluates how consolidated productive performance translates into unit economics by comparing the Average Realized Price for each metal against its respective AISC. For silver, the Average Realized Price increased to $63.30 per ounce, while AISC decreased to $31.60 per ounce. As a result, the realized mining margin per silver ounce sold increased to $31.70 from $13.56 in Q4 2025. This represents a significant improvement in silver unit margins, driven primarily by stronger realized silver prices and lower AISC. For zinc, the Average Realized Price decreased to $3,116 per tonne, while AISC increased to $2,729 per tonne. The resulting realized mining margin per zinc tonne sold was $387, compared with $704 in Q4 2025. Zinc therefore remained positive on a unit-margin basis, although the margin narrowed as the decrease in realized zinc price and the increase in AISC reduced the spread between realized price and cost. Overall, both silver and zinc generated positive consolidated unit margins in Q1 2026, with silver providing the stronger financial contribution based on the spread between realized price and AISC. Q1 2026 vs Q1 2025 Compared with Q1 2025, consolidated mining operations produced 1.0 million ounces of silver, a decrease of 23%. Including San Lucas's ore processing activities, total silver production decreased by 16% to 1.3 million ounces. The year-over-year decline was mainly attributable to lower silver production from mining operations, including the effect of lower silver output at Bolivar following the water inflow event that affected that operation toward the end of Q2 2025, as well as lower silver production at Zimapan and Caballo Blanco. This was partially mitigated by operational execution and ore processing activities, which continued to support consolidated metal production. Zinc production from mining operations was broadly stable, decreasing by 1% to 14,496 tonnes, while total zinc production, including ore processing, increased by 4% to 21,640 tonnes. This indicates that zinc output remained comparatively resilient at the consolidated level, supported by the broader contribution of the Company's operating platform. From a financial contribution perspective, Santacruz generated positive unit margins for both silver and zinc in Q1 2026. The Average Realized Silver Price increased to $63.30 per ounce from $27.80 per ounce in Q1 2025, while silver AISC increased to $31.60 per ounce from $17.91 per ounce. As a result, the realized mining margin per silver ounce sold increased to $31.70 from $9.89, reflecting the strong increase in realized silver prices, which more than offset higher unit costs. For zinc, the Average Realized Price increased to $3,116 per tonne, while AISC increased to $2,729 per tonne. The resulting realized mining margin was $387 per tonne, compared with $718 per tonne in Q1 2025. Zinc therefore remained positive on a unit-margin basis, although the margin contracted year over year due to the increase in AISC. Overall, silver was the primary driver of improved consolidated unit-margin performance in Q1 2026, while zinc continued to contribute positively but at a lower margin than in the prior-year period. Webinar Details CEO Arturo Pr←stamo and CFO Andr←s Bedregal will discuss the Company's financial results in a webinar hosted by Adelaide Capital on Tuesday, May 19th at 3:00 pm ET. Investors and shareholders are invited to participate in the webinar. Registration Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_pkr1gJCkT-2GxhAik3gStg. The webinar will also be live-streamed on the Adelaide Capital YouTube Channel, where a replay will be available after the event: https://bit.ly/adcap-youtube. Questions can be submitted during the session or in advance to [email protected]. Non-GAAP Measures The financial results in this news release include references to non-GAAP measures which include: Adjusted EBITDA, cash cost of production per tonne milled, cash cost per silver ounce and zinc tonne sold, Average realized price per silver ounce and zinc tonne sold, All-in sustaining cost per silver ounce, zinc tonne sold, realized mining margin per silver ounce or zinc tonne sold and realized ore processing margin per silver ounce or zinc tonne sold. These measures are widely used in the mining industry as a benchmark for performance, but do not have a standardized meaning and may differ from methods used by other companies even though the metrics have the same or similar names. The data is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. For a reconciliation of non-GAAP and GAAP measures, please refer to the "Non-GAAP Measures" section in the Company's Q1 2026 Management Discussion and Analysis, which is available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. Qualified Person Garth Kirkham P.Geo., an independent consultant to the Company and a Qualified Person as defined under NI 43-101, has approved the scientific and technical information contained within this news release. About Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. Santacruz Silver is engaged in the operation, acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties across Latin America. In Bolivia, the Company operates the Bolivar, Porco, and Caballo Blanco mining complexes, with Caballo Blanco comprising the Tres Amigos and Colquechaquita mines. The Reserva mine, whose production is provided to the San Lucas ore sourcing and trading business, is also located in Bolivia. Additionally, the Company oversees the Soracaya exploration project. In Mexico, Santacruz operates the Zimapan mine. 'signed' Arturo Pr←stamo Elizondo, Executive Chairman and CEO For further information, please contact: Arturo Pr←stamo Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. Email: [email protected] Telephone: +52 81 83 785707 Andr←s Bedregal Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. Email: [email protected] Telephone: +591 22444849 Eduardo Torrecillas Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. Email: [email protected] Telephone: +591 22444849 Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) nor the Nasdaq Capital Market LLC accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein. Forward-Looking Information This news release includes certain statements and information that may constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or future performance reflect the expectations or beliefs of the management of the Company regarding future events. Generally, forward-looking statements and information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "intends", "expects" or "anticipates", or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "should", "would" or will "potentially" or "likely" occur. This information and these statements, referred to herein as "forward-looking statements", are not historical facts, are made as of the date of this news release. These forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties and actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, risks related to changes in general economic, business and political conditions, including changes in the financial markets, changes in applicable laws, and compliance with extensive government regulation, as well as those risk factors discussed or referred to in the Company's disclosure documents filed with the securities regulatory authorities in certain provinces of Canada and available at SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca). There can be no assurance that any forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, the reader should not place any undue reliance on forward-looking information or statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information or statements, other than as required by applicable law. To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/297731
TranscriptFY2025 Q42026-04-07FY2025 Q4 earnings call transcript
Earnings source - 93 paragraphs
FY2025 Q4 earnings call transcript
and CEO, and Andrés Bedregal, CFO. The format for today's webinar will be a Q&A, and we're going to start off with a question submitted in advance. You are welcome to submit a question in the question box or in the webinar, and we may be making some forward-looking statements. If you'd like to know more about those, you can find them on the company's website. With that out of the way, welcome, Arturo and Andrés.
Thank you, Olenka. Thank you for having us here. It's a pleasure.
Yeah. Thank you, Olenka. Thank you for having us here.
Thank you. Let's start off with the first question.
Sure.
Looking at the big picture, Arturo, could you provide a summary of the Q4 and full year 2025 performance?
Absolutely, Olenka. Well, I will describe 2025 as a very strong year for Santacruz, and in many ways, a defining year for the company. Even with the water inflow event at the Bolivar Mine in May, the company really demonstrated the strength of our business platform, the value of its diversified asset, and the importance of the San Lucas outsourcing business. Just to give you a few highlights, Olenka. We increased revenues by 15%. We grew our profit more than 90%. We increased our EBITDA almost twice, to 99%. A very important item here is we fully extinguished the Glencore base purchase price obligation, which saves us $40 million in future payments. We end up with a much stronger balance sheet, including $67 million in cash and marketable securities, with a working capital of $64 million-$65 million. Financially speaking, 2025 was a strong year for the company.
Operationally speaking, what I would like to highlight is the quality and resilience of our business platform, where you have multiple assets which complement and add value to each other in a very interesting way. As an example, Bolivar was clearly impacted by this flooding event in March 2025, and San Lucas was able to come in and offset some of the lower production that was experienced at Bolivar. Both, they complement really well. Also, San Lucas helped us to absorb some of the fixed costs across the Bolivian operations. Importantly, the diversified asset base that allowed us to manage the disruption while keeping the company profitable and generating cash flow. That's a clear proof for us that Santacruz is not only able to perform in normal conditions, but also capable of navigating real operational challenges and at the same time preserving financial strength.
Q4 was especially important because it showed both momentum and a path forward into this year, 2026. Revenues of around $100 million, EBITDA approximately $30 million, and one of the strongest quarterly contributions of the year. Silver equivalent production increased 9%, driven mainly by a 34% increase at Bolivar and supported, of course, by San Lucas, Caballo Blanco, Zimapan, and Porco's operation. Q4 margins increased significantly, driven by the initial recovery at Bolivar, higher consolidated production, and a strong operating leverage across our operations, with San Lucas continuing to support utilization and cost absorption at our Bolivian operations. That was a brief résumé of 2025, Olenka.
Well, it definitely was a milestone year for sure. Now turning to profitability, Andrés. Full year 2025 was profitable overall, but Q4 posted a net loss. How should investors think about that result in context of operating income, EBITDA, and cash flow?
Thank you, Olenka. I think the clearest way to look at Q4 is to distinguish between the company's operating performance and the below-the-line items that affected net income. From an operating and financial standpoint, Q4 was a very strong quarter for the company, and materially stronger than Q3 across the key financial metrics. Just let me give you some examples of it. Just in Q4, Olenka, revenue was $103 million. That's up 28% quarter-over-quarter. Gross profit was $36 million in Q4. That's up 79% compared to Q3. Operating income was $29 million. That is up $126 million against the third quarter. I know net income was negative, but I'll explain why in a few moments. At year-end, the company had approximately, as Arturo was mentioning, $44 million in cash and approximately $23 million in highly liquid marketable securities.
That was after paying $40 million to Glencore under the base purchase price agreement. In our view, not only Q4 was a stronger quarter, but 2025 was a strong year for the company overall, even after the flooding event at Bolivar. Arturo is going to explain a little bit more about the good progress we have made on that front later. Having said that, reported net income in Q4 was affected by a few items that need to be understood in the right context, Olenka. First, let's look at lines below operating income. Net income was affected by items that were mostly accounting-related rather than cash-related. The largest one was the revaluation of the CVR liability, which affected finance cost by approximately $11 million. That is not an operating expense. That is not the same as cash outflow. It is a financial remeasurement.
Let me take a moment to remind the investment community what the CVRs are and how they work. The CVRs are contingent value rights that we have given to Glencore. Those kick in only when zinc prices go above $3,850. Only when prices go there, we start paying $1.3 million per month. However, since it's like an option, those options or CVRs get revalued using the Monte Carlo analysis. The liability of those options went up. That liability goes into our income statements as an expense, although we are not doing anything. However, we have to look into our cash as well. That's basically what the CVRs are. We have $11 million on that. In addition, we have a foreign exchange effect of approximately $2.1 million, mainly related to the appreciation of the Bolivian boliviano and the Mexican peso.
Not only are they in the cost, these $2 million are only related to the revaluation of certain assets and liabilities. As you know, Olenka, if you have liabilities in a local currency, the currency appreciates, you have more in terms of dollars. Those items that were below the line of their operating income affected our net income for the quarter. There is a second reason, though, and it's a revenue timing issue. In Q4, we sold more zinc than silver. The main reason is that our lead concentrate, which is the highest silver content, is sold FOB, free on board, and depends much more on the availability of the vessels. During the second half of the year, Olenka, vessel availability was tighter due to certain logistics in Bolivia, which have since been addressed. However, as a result, we were not able to export some of the lead concentrate.
Just to give you an example, Olenka, our regular inventory of lead concentrate is about 2,500 tons. We end up the year with more than 5,000 tons.
That's very significant. That timing difference had an approximate impact of around, let's say, $16 million-$20 million on revenue.
Zinc is different, because it is sold under DPU terms, deliver at port unloaded. Once it's delivered at port, the sale can already be recognized. However, importantly, the lead remained in our inventory, Olenka, and the effect now is normalized in Q1 2026. If we step back and look at the quarter as a whole, the takeaway is very clear. Q4 was a strong quarter, both operationally and financially, Olenka.
Okay, got it. Thank you. Now, digging into the cost, Andrés, how should investors think about the Q4 all-in sustaining cost, including how it's calculated, sensitivity to silver and zinc prices, specific Q4 cost drivers, and why margin is the better performance lens?
Oh, that is a very good question, Olenka. Let me answer that very clearly, because there are really two main things to consider behind the all-in sustaining cost result. First, there is a methodology effect. Our all-in sustaining cost is reported on a per silver equivalent ounce sold basis. So it depends not only on costs, but also on the number of equivalent ounces in the denominator. When silver prices rise faster than zinc prices, remember, we are a co-product company, each ton of zinc converts into fewer silver equivalent ounces. As a result, even if the underlying cost base does not increase at the same pace, all-in sustaining cost per ounce can still move higher. That's one of the reasons all-in sustaining cost is higher in Q4.
That is why we believe as a company that the more meaningful ounce-based measure is the margin between average realized silver price and all-in sustaining cost, because it provides a better quarter-to-quarter overview of the economics. We have doubled that this quarter, Olenka. Second, there are also real cost drivers in Q4. The main was San Lucas, which is normal for that business model, because ore is purchased at market prices. When metal prices increase, ore purchase costs also rise. San Lucas is a margin-based business model. What is important for San Lucas, it is not just the cost. It is the margin it gets from that ore, and it's still getting a healthy margin from it.
As I said before, we have also experienced the appreciation of the boliviano and the Mexican peso, which increases the reported U.S. dollar cost, as well as some additional spending in Zimapan that are related to plant performance, recoveries, and concentrate quality. Overall, I think our message is straightforward, Olenka. All-in sustaining cost needs to be interpreted carefully. If you remain as an investor, focus on an ounce-based framework. The most meaningful measure is the margin over all-in sustaining cost. Not just all-in sustaining cost, but the margin from average realized prices and all-in sustaining cost. If you want to assess the overall strength of the business, you also need to look at operating performance, cash generation, and on both fronts, I think we are very strong, Olenka.
Yeah. Just as an example, Olenka, on what Andrés is pointing out, imagine silver coming back to $40, right? You'll have more silver equivalent in production, but lower margins and lower revenues now.
Lower all-in sustaining cost.
lower all-in sustaining, of course.
That's number one.
Yeah.
Well, thank you, and the next question's on operations. Arturo, how did the Bolivar flooding and lower grade ore affect Q4? What is the current status, and why does full recovery take time?
Yeah, absolutely, Olenka. Well, Bolivar continued to affect our Q4 production. The important point is that during Q4, we started seeing the recovery of Pomabamba and Nané veins, improving Bolivar throughput, head grades, and recoveries. That's why we reflect a 34% increase quarter-over-quarter in the silver-equivalent production at Bolivar. As of today, the situation is well under control, and the recovery plan continues to advance as expected. The main reason why full recovery takes time is that this is not just a matter of adding more pumping capacity. We also must treat the water and manage it properly. It has a lot of acidity. To do this in a responsible way, we need to treat it properly before sending it out to the different areas. At the same time, we're restoring safety underground access.
We are rehabilitating affected areas and bringing the mining sequence back on track. In an underground operation, all those steps need to have a well-coordinated pattern, and that's what we're doing at this moment. Bolivar is definitely coming back. Pomabamba and Nané veins are increasing production quarter-over-quarter, and we are in line to our dewatering plan.
Okay, got it. That's good to hear. Now staying on operations, Arturo, how should investors think about San Lucas and Zimapan in the Q4 cost profile and in 2026?
That's a good question, Olenka. Well, investors should think about San Lucas and Zimapan in a different way. San Lucas is an ore-sourcing business that buys ore at market prices from small miners under a margin-basis model, as Andrés points out. When metal prices increase, purchase cost increase as well. That is normal in San Lucas' business model, and it does not mean the business is under pressure in any kind. The important matter here is whether San Lucas continues to generate good margins while supporting mill utilization and absorbing some of the milling facility fixed cost. This is very important. San Lucas not only brings margin and profitability to the company, it also help us to absorb part of the fixed cost that our milling facilities have in Bolivia. On that basis, it remains strategically important and a great contributor to our Bolivian operations.
Let's remember that San Lucas is a margin business, and it's always keeping a healthy and profitable margin regardless of the metal price environment. Zimapan is a different story. As we arrive to level 960, and we announced that early in January 2025, we need to prepare that area for the future years to come. Since that area, Olenka, is so important for the future of Zimapan, as we have a sizable deposit, which we believe will run for many years to come, and the mine has definitely merits to become a significant mine for the company for many years to come. It is important to make developments, bring services, and prepare safety areas for our miners, build underground equipment maintenance facilities, and finally, build developments and production, and producing and exploration developments as well. All of this in addition to the improvements that the milling facility required.
We just installed a new flash cell circuit, which is improving the silver recoveries in Zimapan in a significant way. All these CapEx that we incurred throughout 2025 and during this first quarter 2026 are going to start paying back on the second quarter of this year. Definitely, this CapEx put some pressure on cost throughout the year, and especially during Q4. We really think that we're going to start seeing the benefits, and as we're seeing improved recoveries, we're seeing already better concentrate quality, and more consistent operation is expected through 2026 and beyond. When investors look at these two assets, San Lucas should be viewed as a margin-driven business, and as a strategic ore-sourcing contributor with costs that move in line with market prices.
Also, reading between the lines, San Lucas contributes to offset some of the fixed cost in our milling facilities in Bolivia. That's very important to consider, and those are kind of the hidden benefits of San Lucas. While Zimapan should be viewed as a core asset with strong underlying fundamentals that justify the significant capital investments that we have been allocating throughout the year. We expect this recent investment to translate into meaningful operational improvements in the near term, and we feel that this is the right moment to position that mine ready for what we clearly have identified as a very promising future for this Zimapan mine. That's, in my opinion, how investors and how I would like to invite them to see Santacruz.
Just let me add something, Arturo, about Zimapan.
Mm-hmm.
We always say that Zimapan is a high-volume mine, so if those investments are able to get better recoveries, we will get a lot of revenue from it. Those investments should pay their CapEx really soon, and we expect it to do that. Does that-
Correct.
Okay, got it. Now shifting to pricing dynamics. Andrés, why does realized silver price differ from spot? And do stronger commodity prices support better margins and cash flow?
Sorry, my mic was off. That's a very important question, Olenka, because it helps to explain the difference between spot silver prices and our average realized silver prices. The first point to understand is that silver producers such as Santacruz do not typically sell pure, refined silver. We sell concentrates, mainly lead, zinc, and copper concentrate with high silver content with payable silver. As a result, the spot silver price is only the starting point. The silver we are paid for and the ounces we report as payable silver are based on the silver fine content that they have. They are subject to the normal, and let me highlight that, normal treatment, smelting, refining, and other commercial deductions that apply in concentrate sales. The realized price is naturally lower than the spot price for a pure ounce of silver.
Like in LME, the price is for a pure ounce of silver. That is why when investors compare spot silver prices with our realized silver price, it is important to remember that our revenues are reported net of those standard metallurgical and commercial deductions. That is not unique to Santacruz. It is simply the normal commercial structure for mining companies that sell concentrate. On the second part of your question, the answer is clearly yes. Stronger commodity prices support higher revenue, stronger margins, and better cash flow. We saw that very clearly in our results, where higher prices contribute meaningfully to our growth, both in sales and in profitability. Olenka, the right takeaway here is spot prices matter a great deal, but realized prices will always reflect the commercial structure of concentrate sales in all mining companies. I want to highlight that.
Okay, got it. Now, looking ahead to this year, Arturo, how should investors think about production and cost direction in 2026?
Yeah. No, absolutely. Olenka, that's a good question. Well, we view 2026 as a year defined by improved production quality, improved metal recoveries, and more consistent operating performance across our portfolio of assets. In other words, a year driven by efficiencies and stability from a production point of view. In that sense, one of the biggest drivers will be the full recovery of Pomabamba and Nané veins at our Bolivar Mine. This mine should keep ramping up quarter-over-quarter throughout the year. At Zimapan, the focus is on turning the recent CapEx invested into better recoveries and to a stronger operating performance. In other words, we should see by mid this year the payback of this last year's investments coming into fruition. With regards to the other producing assets, we remain very focused on cost optimization and on protecting margins through disciplined execution.
At the same time, our revenue mix combine precious metals like silver with base metals such as zinc in our case. This also calls for a more refined breakdown of our metrics so that both operational and financial performance are properly understood from any reader. Starting Q1, we plan to enhance or to improve our MD&A disclosure to provide a clearer, more representative view of these measures, helping investors to better understand our performance in the current metal environment, where we're seeing a lot of volatility and definitely silver, in our case, silver stepping away or opening a gap related to zinc. We want investors to see the company as a disciplined, high-quality operator, one that delivers consistent performance, maintains margins, and a strong cash flow across the cycles.
Our focus is on operational excellence, transparency, and continuous improvement, ensuring that the strength of the business is clearly reflected in our results and in the way we communicate these results to the investment community. That's how we want the company to be seen.
Thank you, Arturo. Now touching on liquidity. Andrés, what is your current liquidity position? What's included in your marketable securities, and how are you thinking about capital allocation?
Thank you, Olenka. Liquidity was one of the clearest areas of strength at the end of 2025. At the year-end, the company had approximately, as Arturo was mentioning at the beginning, $44 million in cash and approximately $23 million in highly liquid market securities. Those securities consist primarily of treasury bills and treasury notes, which reinforces the conservative nature of our treasury structure and provides an additional layer of liquidity and financial flexibility. For your second question there, in terms of capital allocation, our approach remains disciplined and return-focused. Our first priority is to protect and optimize the operating base, particularly in areas where capital can improve recoveries, concentrate quality, as in Zimapán, plant performance, or mine access. The second priority is to maintain sufficient liquidity to fund organic growth opportunities, including Soracaya, that Arturo, I guess, will mention later, while preserving overall balance sheet strength.
Beyond that, we will continue to evaluate external growth opportunities, Olenka, selectively and from a position of financial strength. The message is that we are not just simply accumulating cash or hoarding cash. The message is that after materially de-risking our balance sheet, it's very clear, we now have the flexibility to allocate capital more selectively, more efficiently, and with greater discipline. That is exactly the position we want to be in as we move into the next phase of growth.
Okay. Thank you. Now, on working capital, Andrés, what caused the increase in trade receivables during the quarter?
Okay. Great question. Yeah. The increase in trade receivables during the quarter was basically driven by the value-added tax receivables. There are two main reasons behind that. First, those value-added taxes are denominated in local currency. As both the Bolivian boliviano and the Mexican peso have appreciated, the U.S. dollar value of those value-added tax receivables have increased when you translate it into our balance sheet. Second, these VAT receivables also tend to grow naturally with the business.
They are linked to tax recoveries associated with operating costs and capital investments related to our export activities. As the business continues, Olenka, to operate and invest, those balances can increase as a normal part of working capital. However, I think it's important to understand that these are tax-related receivables generated by the business. During 2025, the company was actually collecting VAT at a faster pace than in 2024. If you look at our balance sheet in 2024, we have similar amount, but that means that we have collected what we have been creating. We are getting that faster. We are working on that, but that's good news. Overall, we view this as a normal component of working capital in an export-oriented mining business like we have.
Thank you. That's very helpful. Now turning to growth and strategy. Arturo, what is the current view on Soracaya and on disciplined M&A?
Yeah, absolutely, Olenka. Well, Soracaya is part of our organic growth pipeline. It's a very silver-oriented mine, and we feel this is going to be a very strong addition to our silver production. We see it as an important internal growth for the company. That said, investors should see 2026 as a development and ramp-up year for Soracaya rather than a full production year or commercial production for Soracaya. The mine will not be in commercial production this year, but we will end up the year with small production that will allow us to prepare the mine for 2027, where at that moment, within that year, this mine should get actually into commercial production. The focus in 2026 will be, as I was pointing out, the development and the conditioning of the mine rather than reaching a full scale. On the M&A, yes, we continue to evaluate opportunities.
We have demonstrated that we are actually a strong operator, and we have the human capital not just to run the mines, but to evaluate opportunities and to actually add value to them when we take over these assets. Our approach remains, and will always remain very disciplined. We want assets that fit the portfolio strategically, that can create value over the long term, and that we will be comfortable owing them as part of the company for many years to come, just like the portfolio of assets we have today. We remain open to M&A, but always with a cautious approach and investment return-focused and with long-term approach as part of our assets. That's how we see the M&A into the company.
Perfect. Thank you. Just a question on the operations. On San Lucas, is it a lower margin business compared to your main mining operations? Should we think of it as hurting margins or something that adds strategic value?
San Lucas?
Yes.
Oh, yeah. Well, San Lucas definitely. That's a good question. It's a very important point, and I want to be very clear about it, because San Lucas is absolutely a strategic business for us. We do not view it as a business that hurts our margins in any way. In fact, it does the opposite. San Lucas is a key part of our operating business model because it help us keep our milling facilities running at full capacity all year round. That is extremely important in mining because higher plant utilization absorb fixed cost in a more efficient way, as you might imagine. When you look at San Lucas, you should not think about it as a competitor to our mines or somehow a margin-squeezing operation that is compromising our margins. It does not take production away from our mines, first of all.
What it does, it maximizes our plant utilization. It absorbs some of the fixed cost and generates additional margin to that ore feed that is continually running into our milling facilities. It is also important, Olenka, to remember that San Lucas works under a margin business model. It always generates profit. Its margins, the ore is purchased at market prices. When metal prices increase, the purchase cost increases as well. As a consequence, the all-in sustaining cost for San Lucas increases. That can create the impression that San Lucas is pushing costs higher, especially when people focus only on all-in sustaining cost to measure the performance of the company. That is the wrong approach to look at it. The right way to evaluate San Lucas is through the margins that it generates.
Now, this is a company that it's profitable all year round, and we run no chances in that regard. Once we buy the ore, it's the only company where we use hedging. We hedge the metal contents for one month alone so that we can make sure that once we sell the product that is produced, it's sold in protecting the margin that since day one we wanted to have on those contents. Finally, from a strategic point of view, San Lucas gives us a real competitive advantage. It gives us flexibility, better plant utilization or milling facilities utilization. It gives us a stronger fixed cost absorption throughout our Bolivian operations and more operating stability than many other producers, which they don't have the advantage of a San Lucas.
A very good example was the Bolivar, as we experienced this last year, when Bolivar was affected by the flooding event. San Lucas helped us continuing operating the Bolivar plant or milling facility at full capacity, which reduced the overall impact on that disruption. For us, San Lucas is not compromising our mining-related margins on the business. It is a strategic business, and it is important part of why our operation model is resilient in challenging times or events as we just experienced with Bolivar.
Yeah. If I can add something, Arturo, there. We always say that we have both comparative and competitive advantage because comparative, because we have very strong mines, very high-grade mines with very good ore, et cetera. We also have a competitive advantage because of San Lucas. San Lucas is very strategic for us. It is important to understand that it give us this, as an operators, we know how to work in Latin America. San Lucas is not only strategically because it help us keep our milling facility running at 100% or because it give us margins, but it help us control the environment also. We pay taxes. We are with the communities. All those things that add value. We definitely know how to work in Latin America, and I think our business model should be appreciated in that front.
Yeah, that's a good point. San Lucas also adds a lot of value to the mining industry in Bolivia. We have discussed this before, but we even provide safety training to the small miners in some cases. The KYC process to become a San Lucas supplier is a very thorough. We make sure that they met values of life, like no child labor, best safety standards as possible, and of course, women's rights and many other things. In addition to all those contributions, we bring them to the formal economy. We retain taxes and pay them on their behalf. Even the authorities are receiving more monies in their communities by these taxes that otherwise in the informality, they will never see. It is a very interesting circle where it complements in a very positive way.
Perfect. Thank you. Now on the equity story, Arturo, after a strong share price performance in 2025, how should investors think about expectations for 2026, sustaining that momentum, and the potential path for a TSX up-listing?
Yes. Interesting question. Well, I guess there's only one way that we can sustain momentum in 2026, and this is by an appropriate execution in our plans. This must come from execution. Eventually, these will translate into financial performance, and the rest will come along. Let me walk you in more detail through how we're thinking about our priorities, Olenka. Well, first, as I have said before, our focus is to bring Bolivar Mine back into full production. We're well ahead on that, and the dewatering program is very advanced. At Zimapán, for example, we're continuing to improve recoveries and improve the quality of our concentrate. That will make this mine a very strong producer for many years to come. That's our focus as well, also to capitalize on all the CapEx that we have been investing at Zimapán.
The results will come shortly and will be expressed in our financials. Across our portfolio of assets, we remain very firmly committed to cost discipline, while at the same time reinforcing our operational performance at each mine. In parallel to all this, we're advancing Soracaya projects towards a full permitting, with the objective of achieving initial small-scale production by the end of this year. At the same time, as you point out, we remain disciplined on a corporate side. The Nasdaq listing was an important milestone for us, and we will continue working on an up-listing of the company on the TSX in the next coming months. If we execute well in these priorities, our operating and financial results will reflect that progress, and we believe that this is what will ultimately drive the market momentum for the company in this year, 2026.
Perfect. Well, thank you so much. We have a few live questions. The first one is, can investors expect a buyback program?
That's a good question. Definitely, we have a strong treasury today. We are comfortable with implementing a buyback program. First, I think it's first things first, and we should uplist the company to the big board, into the TSX, and definitely, afterwards, a buyback program should be in place. We believe that the share price today is undervaluated by any metrics that we want to see. With that, I think the share buyback program, it's in the right moment for us to put in place and to start getting shares out of the markets.
Olenka-
In a few words.
Sorry, Arturo.
No, please carry on.
Olenka, as we have said before, our first priority is to protect our operating base, particularly doing investments in order to get better recoveries. I think we have proven that we can do that. In Caballo Blanco, we have done that.
Yeah.
We were able to get better recoveries. I think we have the organic growth in Soracaya. We're also doing some investments to improve our milling facility. Yeah, it's definitely on our radar. However, first things first, as Arturo have said. We are a growth company. We believe we can grow it more. We maybe acquire some other things that we can improve. We have proven that we are able to do that we have proven that we are good operators. Yes, first things first, we are going to protect our company. We're going to have this flexibility going forward. We need that flexibility. It is important to have it. I think most of producers will want to have what we have. We'll keep that for the time being.
Okay, got it. How should investors look at CapEx in 2026 compared to 2025?
CapEx, that's a good question, especially for Zimapán, Olenka. Zimapán CapEx is starting to settle. The last investment, or let's say important investment, was the flash cell circuits for lead. That circuit is proving to be the very right decision. It's improving the silver recoveries in an important way. Just to give you some metrics, that cell circuit cost us around $2.5 million. We are increasing revenues at Zimapán for around $700,000 a month by the increased recoveries that we're having with this flash cell circuit. It's paying back on three months now, technically. Three, four months. Those are the kind of investments or CapEx that we're doing and our driver. Every CapEx needs to be justified. To answer your question in a short way, CapEx will be normalizing now in 2026.
Especially in Zimapán, CapEx by the second quarter should be more of a sustained CapEx alone.
Got it. What drove production declines in 2025 at Caballo Blanco and Porco, and what is the outlook for these this year?
I think it is important to see Porco of the kind of mine it is. Porco is a zinc-oriented mine, and I want investors to understand that. We have some, the head grades were a little bit lower this year, but zinc performed well. Caballo Blanco, on the other hand, remember that we have this change in Q3 2024, and that's something they have to look in the MD&A. Before we had three mines in Caballo Blanco, which were called Colquechaquita, Tres Amigos, and Reserva mine, that reported to just one mill facility, which is the Don Diego facility. If you look into the numbers, now we have only two mines sending mineral to that plant. With only two mines, we have been able almost to get the same amount of metal than when we got three mines.
The other mine, the Reserva mine now sends it all to San Lucas, and we mix it with the small miners because they have higher grades. We need to see it that way. We have not decreased the production, it's just that we have changed it a little bit. That has given us more revenue and better operating income, Olenka.
Got it. I think we have time for one more question. How has the new mining-friendly Bolivian government helped Santacruz?
I will leave Andrés as Bolivian to respond on that one, but I'm very positive.
Oh, yes. Yes, of course. As we were hoping for, this new government has been very supporting, not only to the mining sector, but all exporters in Bolivia. Remember that Bolivia is experiencing a balance of payment problems, so exports are very important for them. We, as miners, bring a lot of dollars into the economy. We bring a lot of labor into the economy. They are working on changing the law. We know we have spoken with them. They know that they have to have more, what do you call it, security. Investors have to have more security when they invest in Bolivia. We're very positive on that front. Rodrigo Paz and his government are very supportive of foreign investment. I think we are happy with that.
They are talking to all the investor community here in Bolivia, the companies, not only to us, but also to the other exporters that are more related to energy, et cetera. Yeah, it's positive overall, Olenka.
Good to hear. Well, thank you so much for your time today, Arturo and Andrés. Anything else you'd like to cover today?
No, I guess, just stay tuned. We'll keep working. We'll keep very focused on our operations and making sure that we deliver. We'll be definitely cautious on how we manage both corporate side of the company and our operations. Yeah, this should be a very important year for us, and a very interesting one in terms of cash flow.
Yeah. I think, Olenka, it's something that we want to leave investors with, is that we are going to improve our reporting going forward in Q1. I know sometimes our business model can be a little bit difficult to understand, but it's a very good business model. We're going to improve our production news release, our MD&A. We're going to give our investor community more information.
They just need to look our balance sheet, our production, our cash flow statements, et cetera, and they will see that we are a very strong company, we're building cash, and we have paid the Glencore base purchase price. We're definitely on a good track. We're always welcome to answer questions. If you have any other questions that we're not able to cover in this webinar, please just drop us a line and we will be able to respond.
Absolutely. Yeah.
Perfect. Thank you again, and thank you to everyone who joined today. If you have any questions, feel free to email us, and I hope you have a great afternoon.
Thank you, Olenka. Thanks, everyone.
Thank you everyone
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-04-01Santacruz Silver Reports Year End 2025 Financial Results
TMX Newsfile
Santacruz Silver Reports Year End 2025 Financial Results
Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - March 31, 2026) - Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (NASDAQ: SCZM) (TSXV: SCZ) ("Santacruz" or the "Company") reports its financial and operating results for the year ended December 31, 2025 ("FY 2025"). The full version of the audited consolidated financial statements for FY 2025 (the "Financial Statements") and accompanying Management's Discussion and Analysis (the "MD&A") can be viewed on the Company's website at www.santacruzsilver.com or on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. All amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated. FY 2025 Highlights Revenues of $326.4 million, a 15% increase year-over-year. Gross Profit of $109.4 million, a 91% increase year-over-year. Net Income of $42.2 million, a 74% decrease year-over-year1. Adjusted EBITDA of $104.6 million, a 99% increase year-over-year. Cash and Highly-Liquid Marketable Securities of $66.7 million, a 87% increase year-over-year2. Working Capital of $63.7 million, a 38% increase year-over-year. Average Realized Price per Ounce of Silver Equivalent Sold of $39.00, a 36% increase year-over-year. AISC per Silver Equivalent Ounce Sold of $30.81, a 18% increase year-over-year. Realized Margin per Silver Equivalent Ounce Sold of $8.19, a 209% increase year-over-year. 1. Net Income for the period of FY 2024 includes a significant non-recurring, non-cash gain arising from the restructuring of the Company's prior agreement with Glencore in connection with the acquisition of the Bolivian assets. 2. Cash includes $44.3 million and Highly-Liquid Marketable Securities includes $22.5 million, consisting of US treasury notes and bills, of which $15.8 million serves as collateral for short-term borrowings. Arturo Pr←stamo, Executive Chairman and CEO of Santacruz, commented: "Last year was a milestone year for Santacruz, highlighted by our full debt repayment to Glencore, materially strengthened balance sheet, and growing treasury position, while continuing to strengthen our presence as a leading silver producer in Latin America. Strong silver prices throughout the year, supported by robust demand, contributed to a revenue increase of 15%. Additionally, the margin between the average realized price of silver and AISC improved by 209% due to operational efficiencies and cost optimization initiatives across our operations. While total production was down 11% due to Boliv…Read full documentShow less
Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - March 31, 2026) - Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (NASDAQ: SCZM) (TSXV: SCZ) ("Santacruz" or the "Company") reports its financial and operating results for the year ended December 31, 2025 ("FY 2025"). The full version of the audited consolidated financial statements for FY 2025 (the "Financial Statements") and accompanying Management's Discussion and Analysis (the "MD&A") can be viewed on the Company's website at www.santacruzsilver.com or on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. All amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated. FY 2025 Highlights Revenues of $326.4 million, a 15% increase year-over-year. Gross Profit of $109.4 million, a 91% increase year-over-year. Net Income of $42.2 million, a 74% decrease year-over-year1. Adjusted EBITDA of $104.6 million, a 99% increase year-over-year. Cash and Highly-Liquid Marketable Securities of $66.7 million, a 87% increase year-over-year2. Working Capital of $63.7 million, a 38% increase year-over-year. Average Realized Price per Ounce of Silver Equivalent Sold of $39.00, a 36% increase year-over-year. AISC per Silver Equivalent Ounce Sold of $30.81, a 18% increase year-over-year. Realized Margin per Silver Equivalent Ounce Sold of $8.19, a 209% increase year-over-year. 1. Net Income for the period of FY 2024 includes a significant non-recurring, non-cash gain arising from the restructuring of the Company's prior agreement with Glencore in connection with the acquisition of the Bolivian assets. 2. Cash includes $44.3 million and Highly-Liquid Marketable Securities includes $22.5 million, consisting of US treasury notes and bills, of which $15.8 million serves as collateral for short-term borrowings. Arturo Pr←stamo, Executive Chairman and CEO of Santacruz, commented: "Last year was a milestone year for Santacruz, highlighted by our full debt repayment to Glencore, materially strengthened balance sheet, and growing treasury position, while continuing to strengthen our presence as a leading silver producer in Latin America. Strong silver prices throughout the year, supported by robust demand, contributed to a revenue increase of 15%. Additionally, the margin between the average realized price of silver and AISC improved by 209% due to operational efficiencies and cost optimization initiatives across our operations. While total production was down 11% due to Bolivar's May 2025 flooding event, the strength and diversification of our multi-asset operating portfolio helped offset the impact, with operations remaining cash-generative and profitable. We continue to expect Bolivar's full recovery by Q4 2026, with the dewatering program progressing ahead of plan and driving consistent quarter-over-quarter improvements throughout the year." Mr. Pr←stamo continued: "Looking at our priorities for 2026, in Bolivia, we remain focused on operational strength, cost discipline and processing plant efficiencies at our three producing mines and ore feed sourcing company, while advancing Soracaya towards production. In Mexico, we are improving metallurgical recoveries and concentrate quality at Zimapan, which is our highest-volume operation. With key capital already invested in Zimapan, these initiatives are expected to support continued operating improvements this year. Across all of our processing plants, our strategy continues to focus on lowering mining costs, improving recovery rates, and maintaining the flexibility of our integrated operations to support long-term value for our shareholders." Selected consolidated financial and operating information for FY 2025 and the financial year ended December 31, 2024 ("FY 2024") is presented below. All financial information is prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"), and all dollar amounts are expressed in thousands of US dollars, except per unit amounts, unless otherwise indicated. 2025 Annual Highlights 2025 Annual Production Summary - By Mine Notes for both tables above: (1) Silver Equivalent Produced (ounces) have been calculated using prices of $31.41/oz, $2,775.53/t, $2,085.90/t and $9,762.69/t for silver, zinc, lead and copper respectively applied to the metal production divided by the silver price as stated here. (2) Silver Equivalent Sold (payable ounces) have been calculated using the Average Realized Price per Ounce of Silver Equivalent Sold stated in the table above, applied to the payable metal content of the concentrates sold from Bolivar, Porco, the Caballo Blanco Group, San Lucas Group and Zimapan. (3) The Company reports non-GAAP measures, which include Cash Cost of Production per Tonne, Cash Cost per Silver Equivalent Ounce Sold, All-in Sustaining Cash Cost per Silver Equivalent Ounce Sold, Average Realized Price per Ounce of Silver Equivalent Sold, and Adjusted EBITDA. These measures are widely used in the mining industry as a benchmark for performance but do not have a standardized meaning and may differ from methods used by other companies with similar descriptions. See ''Non-GAAP Measures'' section below for definitions. (4) Average Realized Price per Ounce of Silver Equivalent Sold is prior to all treatment, smelting and refining charges. (5) Bolivar and Porco are presented at 100% whereas the Company records 45% of revenues and expenses in its consolidated financial statements. Production Results For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company processed 1,945,261 tonnes of ore, producing 14,399,019 silver equivalent (AgEq) ounces. This total includes 5,598,680 ounces of silver and 87,295 tonnes of zinc. In the fourth quarter of 2025, the Company reported 3,739,019 silver equivalent ounces produced. The complete annual and Q4 2025 production results were released in a news release dated January 26, 2026. 2025 YTD vs 2024 YTD For the year ended December 31, 2025, Santacruz processed 1,945,261 tonnes of ore, broadly in line with 2024, while silver equivalent production decreased 11% to 14.4 million ounces. The reduction was driven primarily by the mid-May 2025 water inflow at Bolivar, which restricted access to the Pomabamba and Nan← higher-silver-grade areas for a significant portion of the year, materially reducing consolidated silver output. As a result, silver production declined 17% year over year, while zinc production decreased 8%. Outside of Bolivar, the portfolio remained comparatively stable and continued to demonstrate the benefit of the Company's diversified operating base. San Lucas increased tonnes processed by 14% and continued to support plant utilization and fixed-cost absorption across the group, while Zimapan increased silver equivalent production by 5% on higher zinc output. Caballo Blanco remained a consistent contributor, although year-over-year comparability is affected by the 2024 reclassification of Reserva ore to San Lucas. Overall, the strength of the broader portfolio moderated, but did not fully offset, the impact of the disruption at Bolivar. The Company expects a gradual quarter-over-quarter recovery in the affected areas through 2026, with a return to full production anticipated in Q4 2026, consistent with the mine plan and based on progress achieved to date. Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025 In Q4 2025, Santacruz processed 506,040 tonnes of ore, 4% more than in Q3 2025, and produced 3,739,019 silver equivalent ounces, up 9% quarter over quarter. The improvement was led by Bolivar, where throughput increased 22%, and silver equivalent production increased 34% as access and operating conditions improved in the affected areas. The quarter was also supported by higher silver equivalent production from San Lucas (+11%), Caballo Blanco (+3%), Zimapan (+3%), and Porco (+4%). Consolidated silver production increased 8% quarter over quarter, zinc production increased 10%, and lead production increased 15%. Cash Cost and All-in Sustaining Cost per Silver Equivalent Ounce Sold FY 2025 vs FY 2024 For the year ended December 31, 2025, consolidated cash cost per silver equivalent ounce sold increased from $21.90 in FY 2024 to $24.93 in FY 2025, and the consolidated all in sustaining cost ("AISC") increased from $26.09 in FY 2024 to $30.81 in FY 2025. The year-over-year increase was driven primarily by less silver-equivalent ounces sold in the year due to the operating disruption at Bolivar following the May 2025 water inflow, and higher ore purchase costs at San Lucas under its margin-based sourcing model as metal prices increased. The cash cost of production per tonne significantly favourably decreased from $101.35 to $95.80 in FY 2025, which demonstrates that the principal driver of the increase in the per-ounce cost came from the production mix and the decrease in AgEq ounces sold due to a lower conversion ratio applied to by-product revenues as opposed to being caused by actual increases in site operating costs per tonne. From an economic perspective, higher realized prices more than offset the increase in AISC per ounce. Average realized price per ounce of silver equivalent sold increased to $39.00 in FY 2025 from $28.74 in FY 2024, compared against an AISC of $30.81 per ounce, which implies a margin of $8.19 per AgEq ounce sold as compared to $2.65/AgEq ounce sold in FY 2024. Reported AISC is presented on a silver-equivalent ounce sold basis and is sensitive to the changes in metal prices that would affect the AgEq conversion ratio when silver price changes disproportionately relative to the by-product metal prices. Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025 In Q4 2025, consolidated cash cost per silver equivalent ounce sold increased from $28.62 in Q3 2025 to $36.92 in Q4 2025, and consolidated AISC increased from $35.62 in Q3 2025 to $46.42 in Q4 2025. The increase occurred despite higher production, as silver equivalent ounces sold decreased 3% quarter over quarter and several operations reported higher unit costs. San Lucas and Zimapan were the main contributors to the increase: at San Lucas, ore purchase costs rose in line with higher silver and zinc prices under its margin-based sourcing model, while at Zimapan, both cash cost and AISC increased as the operation continued mine development and plant improvement work focused on improving recoveries and concentrate quality. Porco and Caballo Blanco also reported a higher cost per ounce as less ounces were sold and the operating mix outweighed otherwise stable production. The Bolivar operation's costs had favourable results, cash cost per silver equivalent ounce sold decreased by 9% and AISC decreased 6% due to improved throughput, grades and recoveries quarter over quarter. Even with the higher consolidated cost profile, Q4 2025 remained economically better than in Q3 2025 as the average realized price per ounce of silver equivalent sold increased to $55.19, compared with AISC of $46.42, implying an average margin of $8.77 per silver equivalent ounce sold versus $4.51 in Q3 2025. Webinar Details CEO Arturo Pr←stamo and CFO Andr←s Bedregal will present at a webinar hosted by Adelaide Capital on Tuesday, April 7th at 3:00 pm ET. Investors and shareholders are invited to participate in the webinar. Registration Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_huyhKk5NQVGlMUzqbZw3lQ. The webinar will also be live-streamed on the Adelaide Capital YouTube Channel, where a replay will be available after the event: https://bit.ly/adcap-youtube. Questions can be submitted during the session or in advance to [email protected]. Non-GAAP Measures The financial results in this news release include references to non-GAAP measures, which include Cash Cost of Production per Tonne, Cash Cost per Silver Equivalent Ounce Sold, All-in Sustaining Cash Cost per Silver Equivalent Ounce Sold, Average Realized Price per Ounce of Silver Equivalent Sold, and Adjusted EBITDA. These measures are widely used in the mining industry as a benchmark for performance, but do not have a standardized meaning and may differ from methods used by other companies with similar descriptions. The data is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. For a reconciliation of non-GAAP and GAAP measures, please refer to the "Non-GAAP Measures" section in the Company's FY 2025 Management Discussion and Analysis, which is available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. Qualified Person Garth Kirkham P.Geo., an independent consultant to the Company, is a qualified person under NI 43-101 and has approved the scientific and technical information contained within this news release. About Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. Santacruz Silver is engaged in the operation, acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties across Latin America. In Bolivia, the Company operates the Bolivar, Porco, and Caballo Blanco mining complexes, with Caballo Blanco comprising the Tres Amigos and Colquechaquita mines. The Reserva mine, whose production is provided to the San Lucas ore sourcing and trading business, is also located in Bolivia. Additionally, the Company oversees the Soracaya exploration project. In Mexico, Santacruz operates the Zimapan mine. 'signed' Arturo Pr←stamo Elizondo, Executive Chairman and CEO For further information, please contact: Arturo Pr←stamo Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. Email: [email protected] Telephone: +52 81 83 785707 Andr←s Bedregal Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. Email: [email protected] Telephone: +591 22444849 Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) nor the Nasdaq Capital Market LLC accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein. Forward-Looking Information This news release includes certain statements and information that may constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or future performance reflect the expectations or beliefs of the management of the Company regarding future events. Generally, forward-looking statements and information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "intends", "expects" or "anticipates", or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "should", "would" or will "potentially" or "likely" occur. This information and these statements, referred to herein as "forward-looking statements", are not historical facts, are made as of the date of this news release. These forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties and actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, risks related to changes in general economic, business and political conditions, including changes in the financial markets, changes in applicable laws, and compliance with extensive government regulation, as well as those risk factors discussed or referred to in the Company's disclosure documents filed with the securities regulatory authorities in certain provinces of Canada and available at SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca). There can be no assurance that any forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, the reader should not place any undue reliance on forward-looking information or statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information or statements, other than as required by applicable law. To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/290815

