PR
Permian ResourcesCDocument history
Earnings documents stored for PR.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-17Northern Oil and Gas Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates, Decline Y/Y
Zacks
Northern Oil and Gas Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates, Decline Y/Y
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. NOG reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings per share of $1.13, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.02. The outperformance reflects strong natural gas production. However, the bottom line declined from the year-ago adjusted profit of $1.37 due to weaker natural gas prices. The Minnetonka, MN-based oil and gas exploration and production company reported oil and gas sales of $671 million, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $546 million. Moreover, the top line increased from the year-ago figure of $574 million, driven by higher oil price realization. Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. Quote On June 1, the company closed the Duvernay Light Oil Joint Development for total consideration of $262.1 million. During the quarter, NOG completed 30 ground game transactions, adding over 2,300 net acres and an additional 6.2 net wells for $44.7 million, which was inclusive of associated development costs. During the second quarter, Northern Oil and Gas repurchased 2.95 million shares of common stock at an average price of $20.37, including commissions and increased the share repurchase authorization program to about $243 million. The second-quarter production increased 9% year over year to 145,659 barrels of oil equivalent per day (Boe/d). Additionally, the figure beat our estimate of 143,105 Boe/d. While oil volume totaled 68,275 Bopd (an 11% decrease year over year), natural gas (and natural gas liquids) amounted to 464,330 thousand cubic feet per day (a 35% increase). Our model estimate for oil volume and natural gas production was pegged at 71,300 Bopd and 415,800 thousand cubic feet per day, respectively. The average sales price for crude was $90.02 per barrel, indicating a 54% increase from the prior-year quarter’s level of $58.37. Moreover, the figure beat our expectation of $69.40 per barrel. The average realized natural gas price was $2.64 per thousand cubic feet compared with $2.89 in the year-earlier period. Our model estimate for the same was pinned at $2.32 per thousand cubic feet. Total operating expenses in the quarter decreased to $392.7 million from $530.6 million in the year-ago period. This was mainly on account of a reduction in production expenses, legal settlement expense, depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion expenses, impairment of…Read full documentShow less
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. NOG reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings per share of $1.13, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.02. The outperformance reflects strong natural gas production. However, the bottom line declined from the year-ago adjusted profit of $1.37 due to weaker natural gas prices. The Minnetonka, MN-based oil and gas exploration and production company reported oil and gas sales of $671 million, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $546 million. Moreover, the top line increased from the year-ago figure of $574 million, driven by higher oil price realization. Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. Quote On June 1, the company closed the Duvernay Light Oil Joint Development for total consideration of $262.1 million. During the quarter, NOG completed 30 ground game transactions, adding over 2,300 net acres and an additional 6.2 net wells for $44.7 million, which was inclusive of associated development costs. During the second quarter, Northern Oil and Gas repurchased 2.95 million shares of common stock at an average price of $20.37, including commissions and increased the share repurchase authorization program to about $243 million. The second-quarter production increased 9% year over year to 145,659 barrels of oil equivalent per day (Boe/d). Additionally, the figure beat our estimate of 143,105 Boe/d. While oil volume totaled 68,275 Bopd (an 11% decrease year over year), natural gas (and natural gas liquids) amounted to 464,330 thousand cubic feet per day (a 35% increase). Our model estimate for oil volume and natural gas production was pegged at 71,300 Bopd and 415,800 thousand cubic feet per day, respectively. The average sales price for crude was $90.02 per barrel, indicating a 54% increase from the prior-year quarter’s level of $58.37. Moreover, the figure beat our expectation of $69.40 per barrel. The average realized natural gas price was $2.64 per thousand cubic feet compared with $2.89 in the year-earlier period. Our model estimate for the same was pinned at $2.32 per thousand cubic feet. Total operating expenses in the quarter decreased to $392.7 million from $530.6 million in the year-ago period. This was mainly on account of a reduction in production expenses, legal settlement expense, depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion expenses, impairment of oil and gas assets expenses, and other expenses. The metric was below our estimate of $400.1 million. The company reported capital expenditures of $195.8 million for the second quarter, excluding non-budgeted acquisitions and other unplanned items. Of this total, $151 million was dedicated to drilling and completion activities on organic assets, while $44.7 million was allocated to Ground Game efforts, including associated development costs. During the second quarter, NOG placed 12.7 net wells into production. This Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) company’s free cash flow for the quarter totaled $159 million. As of June 30, 2026, Northern Oil and Gas had $47.6 million in cash and cash equivalents. The company had a long-term debt of $2.7 billion, with a debt-to-capitalization of 57.7%. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. While we have discussed NOG’s second-quarter results in detail, let us take a look at three other key reports in the energy space. U.S. energy operator APA Corporation APA reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of $1.89 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.85. The bottom line rose from the year-ago adjusted profit of 87 cents. The outperformance was primarily driven by higher realized oil prices and lower year-over-year expenses. Revenues of $2.4 billion were down 8.2% from the year-ago quarter’s sales and missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 1.5%, caused by a decrease in natural gas revenues. As of June 30, APA had $444 million in cash and cash equivalents and $3.7 billion in long-term debt, representing a debt-to-capitalization of 34.8%. Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation MGY reported a second-quarter 2026 net profit of 99 cents per share, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 90 cents. The bottom line more than doubled from the year-ago quarter’s 43 cents. This outperformance can be attributed to higher oil and NGL prices and growth in overall production volumes. The oil and gas exploration and production company’s total revenues were $479 million, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $440 million. The top line also increased 50.2% from $319 million recorded in the year-ago period, driven by higher revenues from oil and natural gas liquids (NGL). As of June 30, 2026, Magnolia had cash and cash equivalents of $295.9 million. The company had long-term debt of $393.6 million, reflecting a debt-to-capitalization of 15.5%. Permian Resources Corporation PR reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of 69 cents per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 56 cents by 23.2%. The bottom line also increased significantly from the year-ago quarter’s adjusted earnings of 27 cents. This outperformance was primarily driven by higher oil and NGL price realizations. The company’s oil and gas sales of $1.86 billion beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.64 billion by 13.3%. Revenues also increased from the year-ago quarter’s $1.2 billion, aided by a higher year-over-year contribution from oil sales, NGL sales and purchased gas sales during the quarter. As of June 30, 2026, PR had $131.7 million in cash and cash equivalents. The company had a long-term debt of approximately $3 billion, reflecting a debt-to-capitalization of 20%. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) : Free Stock Analysis Report APA Corporation (APA) : Free Stock Analysis Report Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp (MGY) : Free Stock Analysis Report Permian Resources Corporation (PR) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-17U.S. Shale E&P Stocks Q2 Results: Benchmarking Permian Resources (NYSE:PR)
StockStory
U.S. Shale E&P Stocks Q2 Results: Benchmarking Permian Resources (NYSE:PR)
The end of an earnings season can be a great time to discover new stocks and assess how companies are handling the current business environment. Let’s take a look at how Permian Resources (NYSE:PR) and the rest of the u.s. shale e&p stocks fared in Q2. US shale oil producers extract crude from tight rock formations using horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing (fracking) techniques, primarily in basins like the Permian, Bakken, and Eagle Ford. Tailwinds include short-cycle investment flexibility allowing rapid production adjustments, technological improvements enhancing well productivity, and proximity to refining and export infrastructure. Capital discipline has improved financial returns. Headwinds include commodity price sensitivity affecting drilling economics, accelerating well decline rates requiring continuous capital investment, and increasing regulatory and ESG scrutiny. Water usage, induced seismicity concerns, and evolving environmental regulations present ongoing operational challenges. The 11 U.S shale E&P stocks we track reported an exceptional Q2. As a group, revenues beat analysts’ consensus estimates by 10.6%. Thankfully, share prices of the companies have been resilient as they are up 6.4% on average since the latest earnings results. Controlling roughly 450,000 net acres in America's most productive oil patch, Permian Resources (NYSE:PR) is an oil and natural gas producer that drills wells and extracts hydrocarbons from underground reservoirs in West Texas and New Mexico. Permian Resources reported revenues of $1.86 billion, up 55.1% year on year. This print exceeded analysts’ expectations by 10.7%. Overall, it was a stunning quarter for the company with a beat of analysts’ EPS estimates. Interestingly, the stock is up 6.8% since reporting and currently trades at $21.15. Read why we think that Permian Resources is one of the best u.s. shale e&p stocks, our full report is free. Operating in the oil-rich northeastern corner of the Midland Basin where Howard and Borden counties meet, HighPeak Energy (NASDAQ:HPK) explores for, develops, and produces crude oil, natural gas liquids, and natural gas. HighPeak Energy reported revenues of $272.4 million, up 25.8% year on year, outperforming analysts’ expectations by 8.7%. The business had an incredible quarter with a beat of analysts’ EPS estimates. Although it had a fine quarter compared to i…Read full documentShow less
The end of an earnings season can be a great time to discover new stocks and assess how companies are handling the current business environment. Let’s take a look at how Permian Resources (NYSE:PR) and the rest of the u.s. shale e&p stocks fared in Q2. US shale oil producers extract crude from tight rock formations using horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing (fracking) techniques, primarily in basins like the Permian, Bakken, and Eagle Ford. Tailwinds include short-cycle investment flexibility allowing rapid production adjustments, technological improvements enhancing well productivity, and proximity to refining and export infrastructure. Capital discipline has improved financial returns. Headwinds include commodity price sensitivity affecting drilling economics, accelerating well decline rates requiring continuous capital investment, and increasing regulatory and ESG scrutiny. Water usage, induced seismicity concerns, and evolving environmental regulations present ongoing operational challenges. The 11 U.S shale E&P stocks we track reported an exceptional Q2. As a group, revenues beat analysts’ consensus estimates by 10.6%. Thankfully, share prices of the companies have been resilient as they are up 6.4% on average since the latest earnings results. Controlling roughly 450,000 net acres in America's most productive oil patch, Permian Resources (NYSE:PR) is an oil and natural gas producer that drills wells and extracts hydrocarbons from underground reservoirs in West Texas and New Mexico. Permian Resources reported revenues of $1.86 billion, up 55.1% year on year. This print exceeded analysts’ expectations by 10.7%. Overall, it was a stunning quarter for the company with a beat of analysts’ EPS estimates. Interestingly, the stock is up 6.8% since reporting and currently trades at $21.15. Read why we think that Permian Resources is one of the best u.s. shale e&p stocks, our full report is free. Operating in the oil-rich northeastern corner of the Midland Basin where Howard and Borden counties meet, HighPeak Energy (NASDAQ:HPK) explores for, develops, and produces crude oil, natural gas liquids, and natural gas. HighPeak Energy reported revenues of $272.4 million, up 25.8% year on year, outperforming analysts’ expectations by 8.7%. The business had an incredible quarter with a beat of analysts’ EPS estimates. Although it had a fine quarter compared to its peers, the market seems unhappy with the results as the stock is down 5.2% since reporting. It currently trades at $7.51. Is now the time to buy HighPeak Energy? Access our full analysis of the earnings results here, it’s free. One of America's largest private landowners with roughly 868,000 acres in the Permian Basin, Texas Pacific Land (NYSE:TPL) owns land in West Texas and earns revenue from oil and gas royalties, water services, and land leases. Texas Pacific Land reported revenues of $246.1 million, up 31.2% year on year, falling short of analysts’ expectations by 1.4%. It was a mixed quarter as it posted a decent beat of analysts’ EBITDA estimates. Texas Pacific Land delivered the weakest performance against analyst estimates in the group. As expected, the stock is down 9.3% since the results and currently trades at $346.52. Read our full analysis of Texas Pacific Land’s results here. Operating in counties where legacy oil fields have been producing since the early 1900s, Riley Exploration Permian (NYSE:REPX) drills for and produces oil and natural gas from horizontal wells in the Permian Basin of West Texas and New Mexico. Riley Exploration Permian reported revenues of $165.9 million, up 94.2% year on year. This print surpassed analysts’ expectations by 11.8%. All in all, it was a strong quarter for the company. The stock is up 7.6% since reporting and currently trades at $35.51. Read our full, actionable report on Riley Exploration Permian here, it’s free. Operating primarily in the Delaware Basin where multiple oil-bearing layers lie stacked thousands of feet deep, Matador Resources (NYSE:MTDR) explores for, drills, and produces oil and natural gas from underground rock formations in New Mexico and Texas. Matador Resources reported revenues of $1.19 billion, up 32.5% year on year. This number beat analysts’ expectations by 13.7%. Overall, it was an incredible quarter as it also put up a beat of analysts’ EPS estimates and a solid beat of analysts’ EBITDA estimates. The stock is up 9.7% since reporting and currently trades at $51.60. Read our full, actionable report on Matador Resources here, it’s free. Over the past year, investors have been forced to repeatedly answer the same question: what is the market’s biggest risk? The answer has changed several times, and each shift has reshaped market leadership. Late in 2025 and early 2026, artificial intelligence became the market’s primary uncertainty. Investors questioned whether AI would erode software pricing power and weaken competitive moats as AI made it easier to replicate once-differentiated products. By the spring, technology took a back seat to geopolitics. The U.S. conflict with Iran briefly became the market’s dominant narrative, raising concerns about oil prices, inflation, and global growth. But as energy markets remained orderly and fears of a prolonged supply disruption faded, investors quickly turned their focus back to fundamentals. Want to invest in winners with rock-solid fundamentals? Check out our 9 Best Market-Beating Stocks and add them to your watchlist. These companies are poised for growth regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-17Helmerich & Payne Q3 Earnings Miss Estimates, Revenues Beat
Zacks
Helmerich & Payne Q3 Earnings Miss Estimates, Revenues Beat
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. HP reported a third-quarter fiscal 2026 adjusted net loss of 11 cents per share, in sharp contrast with the Zacks Consensus Estimate of adjusted net income of 11 cents. Moreover, the bottom line decreased considerably from the year-ago quarter’s reported profit of 22 cents. This was primarily due to an adjustment made for a gain of $115 million related to the sale of Utica Square and lower-than-expected performance of the company's North America Solutions segment. Operating revenues of $1 billion beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $988 million. Sales from Drilling Services beat the consensus mark by 4.4%. However, the figure decreased by $6 million from the year-ago quarter’s level. This was primarily caused by lower year-over-year revenues from the North America Solutions and International Solutions segments. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Quote The company distributed approximately $25 million to its shareholders as part of its ongoing dividend program. North America Solutions: Operating revenues of $562.9 million were down 5% year over year, with 142 average active rigs. The top line beat our model projection of $546.1 million. Operating profit totaled $140.3 million compared with $157.6 million in the prior-year period. The reported figure also beat our model estimate of $113.1 million. International Solutions: Operating revenues of $250.1 million decreased 5.9% from the year-ago quarter’s level of $265.8 million. However, the top line beat our projection of $234.9 million. Operating loss reached $54.4 million, compared with the prior-year period loss of $166.5 million. The figure was below our projected loss of $93 million. Offshore Solutions: Revenues of $174.4 million increased 7.8% from the year-ago quarter’s level of $161.8 million. The top line beat our projection of $157.5 million. Operating profit totaled $16.8 million compared with $8.8 million in the year-ago quarter. The figure beat our estimate of $11 million. HP’s Financial Position As of June 30, 2026, this Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) company spent $200.2 million on capital programs. HP had $204.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, while the long-term debt totaled $1.8 billion (debt-to-capitalization of 41%). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Helmerich & Payne’s fourth…Read full documentShow less
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. HP reported a third-quarter fiscal 2026 adjusted net loss of 11 cents per share, in sharp contrast with the Zacks Consensus Estimate of adjusted net income of 11 cents. Moreover, the bottom line decreased considerably from the year-ago quarter’s reported profit of 22 cents. This was primarily due to an adjustment made for a gain of $115 million related to the sale of Utica Square and lower-than-expected performance of the company's North America Solutions segment. Operating revenues of $1 billion beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $988 million. Sales from Drilling Services beat the consensus mark by 4.4%. However, the figure decreased by $6 million from the year-ago quarter’s level. This was primarily caused by lower year-over-year revenues from the North America Solutions and International Solutions segments. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Quote The company distributed approximately $25 million to its shareholders as part of its ongoing dividend program. North America Solutions: Operating revenues of $562.9 million were down 5% year over year, with 142 average active rigs. The top line beat our model projection of $546.1 million. Operating profit totaled $140.3 million compared with $157.6 million in the prior-year period. The reported figure also beat our model estimate of $113.1 million. International Solutions: Operating revenues of $250.1 million decreased 5.9% from the year-ago quarter’s level of $265.8 million. However, the top line beat our projection of $234.9 million. Operating loss reached $54.4 million, compared with the prior-year period loss of $166.5 million. The figure was below our projected loss of $93 million. Offshore Solutions: Revenues of $174.4 million increased 7.8% from the year-ago quarter’s level of $161.8 million. The top line beat our projection of $157.5 million. Operating profit totaled $16.8 million compared with $8.8 million in the year-ago quarter. The figure beat our estimate of $11 million. HP’s Financial Position As of June 30, 2026, this Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) company spent $200.2 million on capital programs. HP had $204.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, while the long-term debt totaled $1.8 billion (debt-to-capitalization of 41%). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Helmerich & Payne’s fourth-quarter fiscal 2026 outlook points to continued strength in North America, more variable international performance and stable offshore operations. For North America Solutions, the company expects direct margin of $245 million to $255 million, with an average of 145 to 151 active rigs, compared with a fiscal-year average rig range of 140 to 144. International Solutions is expected to generate direct margin of $25 million to $45 million on 60 to 70 average rigs, compared with a fiscal-year average rig range of 60 to 66. Offshore Solutions is projected to deliver direct margin of $26 million to $30 million in the fiscal fourth quarter, while full-year direct margin is expected at $113 million to $117 million, supported by 30 to 35 average rigs/management contracts. The “Other” segment is expected to contribute up to $5 million of direct margin. For the full fiscal 2026, HP expects gross capital expenditures of $270 million to $310 million, depreciation of approximately $700 million, research and development expense of about $28 million, Selling, general & administrative expenses of $265 million to $285 million, cash taxes of $150 million to $180 million, and interest expense of roughly $100 million. Overall, the outlook implies a relatively constructive finish to fiscal 2026, led by higher North American activity and margins. While we have discussed HP’s fiscal third-quarter results in detail, let us take a look at three other key reports in this space. U.S. energy operator APA Corporation APA reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of $1.89 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.85. The bottom line rose from the year-ago adjusted profit of 87 cents. The outperformance was primarily driven by higher realized oil prices and lower year-over-year expenses. Revenues of $2.4 billion were down 8.2% from the year-ago quarter’s sales and missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 1.5%, caused by a decrease in natural gas revenues. As of June 30, APA had $444 million in cash and cash equivalents and $3.7 billion in long-term debt, representing a debt-to-capitalization of 34.8%. Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation MGY reported a second-quarter 2026 net profit of 99 cents per share, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 90 cents. The bottom line more than doubled from the year-ago quarter’s 43 cents. This outperformance can be attributed to higher oil and NGL prices and growth in overall production volumes. The oil and gas exploration and production company’s total revenues were $479 million, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $440 million. The top line also increased 50.2% from $319 million recorded in the year-ago period, driven by higher revenues from oil and natural gas liquids (NGL). As of June 30, 2026, Magnolia had cash and cash equivalents of $295.9 million. The company had long-term debt of $393.6 million, reflecting a debt-to-capitalization of 15.5%. Permian Resources Corporation PR reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of 69 cents per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 56 cents by 23.2%. The bottom line also increased significantly from the year-ago quarter’s adjusted earnings of 27 cents. This outperformance was primarily driven by higher oil and NGL price realizations. The company’s oil and gas sales of $1.86 billion beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.64 billion by 13.3%. Revenues also increased from the year-ago quarter’s $1.2 billion, aided by a higher year-over-year contribution from oil sales, NGL sales and purchased gas sales during the quarter. As of June 30, 2026, PR had $131.7 million in cash and cash equivalents. The company had a long-term debt of approximately $3 billion, reflecting a debt-to-capitalization of 20%. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP) : Free Stock Analysis Report APA Corporation (APA) : Free Stock Analysis Report Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp (MGY) : Free Stock Analysis Report Permian Resources Corporation (PR) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-16Permian Resources (PR) On Q2 Earnings And Higher Guidance Looks Cheap But Is It Priced In
Simply Wall St.
Permian Resources (PR) On Q2 Earnings And Higher Guidance Looks Cheap But Is It Priced In
Never miss an important update on your stock portfolio and cut through the noise. Over 7 million investors trust Simply Wall St to stay informed where it matters for FREE. Permian Resources (PR) is drawing attention after reporting Q2 2026 net income of US$792.46 million, sharply higher than a year earlier, alongside updated production guidance and a reaffirmed cash dividend. See our latest analysis for Permian Resources. The strong Q2 report and higher full year production guidance come after a period of firm momentum, with Permian Resources posting a year to date share price return of 49.31% and a 1 year total shareholder return of 66.34%. If earnings driven moves in energy stocks have your attention, this can be a good moment to widen your watchlist and check out 30 elite gold producer stocks After a 49.31% year to date rise, Permian Resources still trades about 19% below the current analyst price target and at a steep modelled intrinsic discount. Is the market applying healthy caution, or leaving too much on the table? At a last close of $21.50, the most followed narrative for Permian Resources points to a fair value of $32.00, which suggests a sizeable valuation gap that hinges on how durable its cost and balance sheet advantages prove to be. Read the complete narrative. Low lifting costs. Falling well costs. A balance sheet that has shifted gears. Curious which production, pricing and margin paths support a $32.00 narrative fair value. Result: Fair Value of $32.00 (UNDERVALUED) Have a read of the narrative in full and understand what's behind the forecasts. However, the Permian Resources bull case still leans heavily on oil prices holding up and on successful integration of recent acquisitions without eroding its low cost edge. Find out about the key risks to this Permian Resources narrative. With sentiment on Permian Resources split between optimism and caution, this may be a useful time to act promptly and assess the full picture yourself. To see both sides in one place, start with the 3 key rewards and 2 important warning signs. If Permian Resources has sharpened your focus, do not stop here. The right mix of quality, value and resilience can shape your next investing move. Spot potential bargains early by checking out 50 high quality undervalued stocks that currently offer a mix of quality fundamentals and attractive pricing. Prioritise strength an…Read full documentShow less
Never miss an important update on your stock portfolio and cut through the noise. Over 7 million investors trust Simply Wall St to stay informed where it matters for FREE. Permian Resources (PR) is drawing attention after reporting Q2 2026 net income of US$792.46 million, sharply higher than a year earlier, alongside updated production guidance and a reaffirmed cash dividend. See our latest analysis for Permian Resources. The strong Q2 report and higher full year production guidance come after a period of firm momentum, with Permian Resources posting a year to date share price return of 49.31% and a 1 year total shareholder return of 66.34%. If earnings driven moves in energy stocks have your attention, this can be a good moment to widen your watchlist and check out 30 elite gold producer stocks After a 49.31% year to date rise, Permian Resources still trades about 19% below the current analyst price target and at a steep modelled intrinsic discount. Is the market applying healthy caution, or leaving too much on the table? At a last close of $21.50, the most followed narrative for Permian Resources points to a fair value of $32.00, which suggests a sizeable valuation gap that hinges on how durable its cost and balance sheet advantages prove to be. Read the complete narrative. Low lifting costs. Falling well costs. A balance sheet that has shifted gears. Curious which production, pricing and margin paths support a $32.00 narrative fair value. Result: Fair Value of $32.00 (UNDERVALUED) Have a read of the narrative in full and understand what's behind the forecasts. However, the Permian Resources bull case still leans heavily on oil prices holding up and on successful integration of recent acquisitions without eroding its low cost edge. Find out about the key risks to this Permian Resources narrative. With sentiment on Permian Resources split between optimism and caution, this may be a useful time to act promptly and assess the full picture yourself. To see both sides in one place, start with the 3 key rewards and 2 important warning signs. If Permian Resources has sharpened your focus, do not stop here. The right mix of quality, value and resilience can shape your next investing move. Spot potential bargains early by checking out 50 high quality undervalued stocks that currently offer a mix of quality fundamentals and attractive pricing. Prioritise strength and stability with the solid balance sheet and fundamentals stocks screener (50 results) so you are focusing on companies that appear built to handle tougher conditions. Hunt for fresh opportunities using the screener containing 18 high quality undiscovered gems before the wider market starts paying closer attention. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include PR. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email [email protected]
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-15Permian Resources (PR) Stock Still Looks Cheap On Earnings While Broader Checks Stay Mixed
Simply Wall St.
Permian Resources (PR) Stock Still Looks Cheap On Earnings While Broader Checks Stay Mixed
Find your next quality investment with Simply Wall St's easy and powerful screener, trusted by over 7 million individual investors worldwide. Permian Resources has delivered a very large 5 year return, yet its current checks on valuation offer a more measured read, with the stock screening as undervalued on earnings multiples but only earning a mixed overall value score. Over the past 5 years, Permian Resources has returned very close to 5x an initial investment, which makes the current price level especially important for anyone thinking about upside from here. Expected cash generation from Permian's acreage and development pipeline can support the present valuation, while ongoing capital needs for drilling and acquisitions may limit how much of that cash ultimately reaches shareholders. On Simply Wall St's framework Permian Resources scores 4 out of 6 valuation checks, which points to a stock that looks cheap on some measures but not like an across the board bargain. The issue now is whether Permian Resources' recent share price around US$21.50 still offers an attractive entry point after such a strong multi year run. Permian Resources delivered 66.3% returns over the last year. See how this stacks up to the rest of the Oil and Gas industry. The P/E ratio is a useful yardstick for Permian Resources because earnings remain a key anchor for how investors assess an oil and gas producer. At a current P/E of about 14.6x, Permian Resources trades above the sector average of roughly 12.5x for other oil and gas stocks, yet still sits well below the peer group average near 50.9x. Simply Wall St's fair P/E ratio for Permian Resources is about 19.0x, which is higher than where the stock currently trades. That indicates the market is pricing Permian Resources below the level implied by its earnings profile, industry, size and risk factors. While investors are not paying a rock-bottom multiple, the gap between the current P/E and this fair ratio points to a stock that still screens on the cheaper side on earnings. On the P/E multiple alone, Permian Resources appears undervalued relative to the earnings-based fair value estimate. See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown. Simply Wall St Narratives for Permian Resources pick up where the P/E discussion leaves off. They spell out which paths for future growth, margins and earnings wou…Read full documentShow less
Find your next quality investment with Simply Wall St's easy and powerful screener, trusted by over 7 million individual investors worldwide. Permian Resources has delivered a very large 5 year return, yet its current checks on valuation offer a more measured read, with the stock screening as undervalued on earnings multiples but only earning a mixed overall value score. Over the past 5 years, Permian Resources has returned very close to 5x an initial investment, which makes the current price level especially important for anyone thinking about upside from here. Expected cash generation from Permian's acreage and development pipeline can support the present valuation, while ongoing capital needs for drilling and acquisitions may limit how much of that cash ultimately reaches shareholders. On Simply Wall St's framework Permian Resources scores 4 out of 6 valuation checks, which points to a stock that looks cheap on some measures but not like an across the board bargain. The issue now is whether Permian Resources' recent share price around US$21.50 still offers an attractive entry point after such a strong multi year run. Permian Resources delivered 66.3% returns over the last year. See how this stacks up to the rest of the Oil and Gas industry. The P/E ratio is a useful yardstick for Permian Resources because earnings remain a key anchor for how investors assess an oil and gas producer. At a current P/E of about 14.6x, Permian Resources trades above the sector average of roughly 12.5x for other oil and gas stocks, yet still sits well below the peer group average near 50.9x. Simply Wall St's fair P/E ratio for Permian Resources is about 19.0x, which is higher than where the stock currently trades. That indicates the market is pricing Permian Resources below the level implied by its earnings profile, industry, size and risk factors. While investors are not paying a rock-bottom multiple, the gap between the current P/E and this fair ratio points to a stock that still screens on the cheaper side on earnings. On the P/E multiple alone, Permian Resources appears undervalued relative to the earnings-based fair value estimate. See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown. Simply Wall St Narratives for Permian Resources pick up where the P/E discussion leaves off. They spell out which paths for future growth, margins and earnings would need to play out for the stock to be worth materially more or less than today’s price on the Community page. Instead of a single number from a ratio or model, they lay out the underlying future it depends on so you can see whether those assumptions actually hold over time. One of the top community narratives on Permian Resources: 33% undervalued Read one of the top narratives on Permian Resources Do you think there's more to the story for Permian Resources? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying! Permian Resources still screens as undervalued on earnings multiples, although the broader valuation checks are only mixed rather than overwhelmingly supportive. The very large recent share price move means expectations are higher, so the current discount on the P/E ratio is not a clear-cut margin of safety. For many investors the key question now is whether Permian Resources can keep converting its acreage and development pipeline into durable earnings without capital demands eroding that perceived value advantage. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include PR. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email [email protected]
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-14The 5 Most Interesting Analyst Questions From Permian Resources’s Q2 Earnings Call
StockStory
The 5 Most Interesting Analyst Questions From Permian Resources’s Q2 Earnings Call
Permian Resources posted a strong second quarter, outperforming Wall Street’s expectations on both revenue and adjusted earnings, which was met with a positive market reaction. Management attributed these results to a mix of increased oil production, effective capital allocation, and swift operational responses to commodity price volatility. Co-CEO William Hickey highlighted the company’s ability to quickly scale up workover activity to capture higher oil prices, as well as successful efforts to increase working interest in completed wells. The team’s focus on operational efficiency, particularly in water recycling and drilling, was also emphasized as a driver of improved margins. Is now the time to buy PR? Find out in our full research report (it’s free). Revenue: $1.86 billion vs analyst estimates of $1.68 billion (55.1% year-on-year growth, 10.7% beat) Adjusted EPS: $0.69 vs analyst estimates of $0.59 (16.9% beat) Operating Margin: 50%, up from 24.8% in the same quarter last year Oil production: up 12.2% year on year Market Capitalization: $17.97 billion While we enjoy listening to the management’s commentary, our favorite part of earnings calls is the analyst questions. Those are unscripted and can often highlight topics that management teams would rather avoid or topics where the answer is complicated. Here is what has caught our attention. Scott Hanold (RBC Capital Markets) asked about the sustainability of Permian Resources’ ground game M&A and whether larger asset packages are being considered. Co-CEO James Walter explained that while disciplined on larger deals, the company is confident in continuing smaller, accretive acquisitions, saying, “The opportunity set in front of us looks as good as it ever has.” Neal Dingmann (William Blair) questioned whether recent bolt-on activity in Eddy County signals a move northward in New Mexico. Walter responded that while there is potential for expansion, most activity will remain focused on optimizing existing positions, with strong well performance seen in new areas. Neil Mehta (Goldman Sachs) sought details on operational initiatives to stay ahead of expectations. Co-CEO William Hickey cited progress in water recycling and new drilling technologies, noting these have helped offset rising diesel and casing costs and improved operational efficiency. John Freeman (Raymond James) inquired about changes to capital…Read full documentShow less
Permian Resources posted a strong second quarter, outperforming Wall Street’s expectations on both revenue and adjusted earnings, which was met with a positive market reaction. Management attributed these results to a mix of increased oil production, effective capital allocation, and swift operational responses to commodity price volatility. Co-CEO William Hickey highlighted the company’s ability to quickly scale up workover activity to capture higher oil prices, as well as successful efforts to increase working interest in completed wells. The team’s focus on operational efficiency, particularly in water recycling and drilling, was also emphasized as a driver of improved margins. Is now the time to buy PR? Find out in our full research report (it’s free). Revenue: $1.86 billion vs analyst estimates of $1.68 billion (55.1% year-on-year growth, 10.7% beat) Adjusted EPS: $0.69 vs analyst estimates of $0.59 (16.9% beat) Operating Margin: 50%, up from 24.8% in the same quarter last year Oil production: up 12.2% year on year Market Capitalization: $17.97 billion While we enjoy listening to the management’s commentary, our favorite part of earnings calls is the analyst questions. Those are unscripted and can often highlight topics that management teams would rather avoid or topics where the answer is complicated. Here is what has caught our attention. Scott Hanold (RBC Capital Markets) asked about the sustainability of Permian Resources’ ground game M&A and whether larger asset packages are being considered. Co-CEO James Walter explained that while disciplined on larger deals, the company is confident in continuing smaller, accretive acquisitions, saying, “The opportunity set in front of us looks as good as it ever has.” Neal Dingmann (William Blair) questioned whether recent bolt-on activity in Eddy County signals a move northward in New Mexico. Walter responded that while there is potential for expansion, most activity will remain focused on optimizing existing positions, with strong well performance seen in new areas. Neil Mehta (Goldman Sachs) sought details on operational initiatives to stay ahead of expectations. Co-CEO William Hickey cited progress in water recycling and new drilling technologies, noting these have helped offset rising diesel and casing costs and improved operational efficiency. John Freeman (Raymond James) inquired about changes to capital allocation given strong cash generation. Walter confirmed that the priority remains consistent dividend growth and that current cash allocation between acquisitions, debt repayment, and shareholder returns is expected to continue. Kevin MacCurdy (Pickering Energy Partners) asked for clarity on the bridge between old and new production and capital guidance. CFO Guy Oliphint explained that higher working interest, minimal acquired production, and accelerated workovers were the main contributors to increased production guidance, while cost discipline kept capital requirements efficient. Looking ahead, the StockStory team will be monitoring (1) the execution and integration of recently acquired acreage, (2) ongoing progress in operational efficiency initiatives such as water recycling and drilling innovation, and (3) the sustainability of disciplined capital allocation amid volatile commodity prices. Additional attention will be paid to results from surfactant trials and the success of further bolt-on acquisitions. Permian Resources currently trades at $21.26, up from $19.79 just before the earnings. In the wake of this quarter, is it a buy or sell? The answer lies in our full research report (it’s free for active Edge members). WHILE YOU’RE HERE: Top 9 Market-Beating Stocks. The best stocks don’t just beat the market once. They do it again. And again. Robust revenue growth, rising free cash flow, returns on capital that leave their competition in the dust. The market has already rewarded these businesses. But our AI platform says the party isn’t over. Find out which 9 stocks made the cut this week — FREE. Get Our Top 9 Market-Beating Stocks for Free HERE. Stocks that have made our list include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,460% between June 2020 and June 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-small-cap company Comfort Systems (+1,154% between June 2020 and June 2025). Find your next big winner with StockStory today.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-12Permian Resources Beats Q2 Earnings on Strong Price Realizations
Zacks
Permian Resources Beats Q2 Earnings on Strong Price Realizations
Permian Resources Corporation PR reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of 69 cents per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 56 cents by 23.2%. The bottom line also increased significantly from the year-ago quarter’s adjusted earnings of 27 cents. This outperformance was primarily driven by higher oil and NGL price realizations. The company’s oil and gas sales of $1.86 billion beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.64 billion by 13.3%. Revenues also increased from the year-ago quarter’s $1.2 billion, aided by a higher year-over-year contribution from oil sales, NGL sales and purchased gas sales during the quarter. Permian Resources Corporation price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | Permian Resources Corporation Quote On Aug. 5, 2026, the Midland, TX-based exploration and production company declared a quarterly base dividend of 16 cents per Class A common share, translating to an annualized dividend of 64 cents. The payout is scheduled for Sept. 30 for its shareholders on record as of Sept. 16. Permian Resources reported total average production of 376.4 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day (MBoe/d), comprising 53% oil and 76% liquids, in the second quarter, down from 385.1 MBoe/d in the year-ago period. The figure missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 395,272 Boe/d. Crude oil production averaged 198.1 thousand barrels per day (MBbls/d), up from 176.5 MBbls/d in the prior-year quarter. The figure beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 194.8 MBbls/d. Oil production increased, driven primarily by successful ground-game initiatives, which boosted the average working interest in second-quarter completions by 7% above the company’s initial expectations. Production also benefited from a more than 50% quarter-over-quarter increase in high-return workover projects. NGL production came in at 86.2 MBbls/d, down 11.9% year over year. It also missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 11.2%. Meanwhile, natural gas production totaled 552.9 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d), down 16.8% year over year, and missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 11.1%. Permian Resources’ average realized oil price was $97.81 per barrel in the second quarter, compared with $62.71 in the year-ago quarter. Moreover, the figure beat the consensus mark of $94 per barrel. The realized NGL price was $23.28 per barrel, up from $17.75 a year ago, and beat the consensus mark of $22…Read full documentShow less
Permian Resources Corporation PR reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of 69 cents per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 56 cents by 23.2%. The bottom line also increased significantly from the year-ago quarter’s adjusted earnings of 27 cents. This outperformance was primarily driven by higher oil and NGL price realizations. The company’s oil and gas sales of $1.86 billion beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.64 billion by 13.3%. Revenues also increased from the year-ago quarter’s $1.2 billion, aided by a higher year-over-year contribution from oil sales, NGL sales and purchased gas sales during the quarter. Permian Resources Corporation price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | Permian Resources Corporation Quote On Aug. 5, 2026, the Midland, TX-based exploration and production company declared a quarterly base dividend of 16 cents per Class A common share, translating to an annualized dividend of 64 cents. The payout is scheduled for Sept. 30 for its shareholders on record as of Sept. 16. Permian Resources reported total average production of 376.4 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day (MBoe/d), comprising 53% oil and 76% liquids, in the second quarter, down from 385.1 MBoe/d in the year-ago period. The figure missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 395,272 Boe/d. Crude oil production averaged 198.1 thousand barrels per day (MBbls/d), up from 176.5 MBbls/d in the prior-year quarter. The figure beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 194.8 MBbls/d. Oil production increased, driven primarily by successful ground-game initiatives, which boosted the average working interest in second-quarter completions by 7% above the company’s initial expectations. Production also benefited from a more than 50% quarter-over-quarter increase in high-return workover projects. NGL production came in at 86.2 MBbls/d, down 11.9% year over year. It also missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 11.2%. Meanwhile, natural gas production totaled 552.9 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d), down 16.8% year over year, and missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 11.1%. Permian Resources’ average realized oil price was $97.81 per barrel in the second quarter, compared with $62.71 in the year-ago quarter. Moreover, the figure beat the consensus mark of $94 per barrel. The realized NGL price was $23.28 per barrel, up from $17.75 a year ago, and beat the consensus mark of $22.16 per barrel. The company’s realized natural gas price was negative $2.40 per Mcf, in contrast to a positive 50 cents in the prior-year quarter. The consensus mark for the same was pegged at a negative of $2.41 per Mcf. Including hedges and purchased gas sales, the realized natural gas price was 38 cents per Mcf, compared with 76 cents a year ago. Total operating expenses in the quarter rose to $929.9 million from $900.1 million in the year-ago quarter. Lease operating expenses totaled $189.9 million, up from $187.9 million in the year-ago quarter. Severance and ad valorem taxes rose to $143.7 million from $94.9 million a year earlier and the Exploration and other expenses also rose to $9.8 million from $5.1 million in the year-ago quarter. On a per-unit basis, Lease operating expenses increased to $5.55 per Boe from $5.36 a year ago. PR generated $1.5 billion of net cash provided by operating activities in the second quarter, compared with $1 billion in the year-ago quarter. Adjusted operating cash flow totaled $1.3 billion, while adjusted free cash flow came in at $750.7 million. Cash capital expenditures were $521.4 million, up from the prior-year period’s capital expenditures of $505 million. The company’s capital-efficient operating model supported strong free cash flow generation despite continued investment in development and bolt-on acquisitions. As of June 30, 2026, PR had $131.7 million in cash and cash equivalents. The company had a long-term debt of approximately $3 billion, reflecting a debt-to-capitalization of 20%. Permian Resources has raised its 2026 oil production target to 199 MBbls/d, up 10 MBbls/d from its initial February guidance. The increase reflects higher working interest from successful ground-game activities, greater workover activity and production from the Ward County bolt-on acquisition. The company expects average working interest to exceed 80% for the full year, while second-half oil production is projected to exceed 200 MBbls/d. To support the higher production outlook, Permian Resources increased its 2026 cash capital expenditure guidance to $1.9-$2 billion, including about $25 million related to the Ward County acquisition. The revised full-year plan calls for total production of 400,000-430,000 Boe/d, oil production of 197,000-201,000 Bbls/d and approximately 250 gross operated TILs, with average lateral lengths of about 11,000 feet. Controllable cash costs are expected at $7.15-$8.15 per Boe, including lease operating expenses of about $5.45, gathering, processing and transportation costs of approximately $1.40, and cash G&A of around 80 cents per Boe. Overall, this Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) company’s updated plan reflects higher production and capital spending while maintaining a focus on capital efficiency and operational growth. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. While we have discussed PR’s second-quarter results in detail, let us take a look at three other key reports in this space. Expand Energy Corporation EXE reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings per share of $1.33, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.22. The company’s bottom line increased from the year-ago adjusted profit of $1.10 per share, fueled by strong production and lower operating expenses. Expand Energy’s ‘natural gas, oil and NGL’ revenues of $1.8 billion missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2 billion. The top line was also below the year-ago figure of $2 billion. As of June 30, 2026, the company had $663 million in cash and cash equivalents. Expand Energy had a long-term debt of $3.7 billion, reflecting a debt-to-capitalization of 16%. NOV Inc. NOV reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of 31 cents per share, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 16 cents. The bottom line also increased 6.9% from the year-ago quarter’s 29 cents, driven by outperformance of the Energy Equipment segment. The oil and gas equipment and services company’s total revenues of $2.1 billion beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by $39 million. However, NOV’s revenues fell 2.5% from the year-ago quarter’s figure of $2.2 billion due to lower year-over-year revenues from the Energy Products and Services segment. As of June 30, 2026, the company had cash and cash equivalents of $1.2 billion and long-term debt of $1.7 billion with a debt-to-capitalization of 21.3%. The Williams Companies, Inc. WMB reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings per share of 50 cents, which missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 52 cents. However, the bottom line increased from the year-ago period’s level of 46 cents, driven by better-than-expected performance of its Transmission, Power & Gulf, Northeast G&P and West segments. The Tulsa, OK-based oil and gas storage and transportation company’s revenues of $3 billion missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by $2 million. The figure increased by 9.8% from the year-ago quarter’s reported revenues. This can be attributed to higher service revenues and increased product sales. As of June 30, 2026, the company had cash and cash equivalents of $203 million and long-term debt of $28.1 billion, with a debt-to-capitalization of 64.7%. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Permian Resources Corporation (PR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Williams Companies, Inc. (The) (WMB) : Free Stock Analysis Report NOV Inc. (NOV) : Free Stock Analysis Report Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-09Permian Resources Q2 Earnings Call Highlights
MarketBeat
Permian Resources Q2 Earnings Call Highlights
Interested in Permian Resources Corporation? Here are five stocks we like better. Record free cash flow: Permian Resources generated $751 million, or $0.88 per share, in second-quarter free cash flow—nearly 50% above the prior quarter—driven by higher oil output, increased working interests and faster workovers. Production and guidance increased: Second-quarter oil production rose 3% sequentially to about 198,000 barrels per day, while full-year 2026 oil-production guidance was raised to 199,000 barrels per day with capital spending guided at $1.95 billion. Delaware Basin expansion: The company acquired roughly 55,000 net acres year to date for approximately $1.05 billion, adding about 330 drilling locations and strengthening its operated inventory through strategic acreage acquisitions and trades. If There's a Domestic Manufacturing Boom, These 3 Stocks Could Win Permian Resources (NYSE:PR) reported record second-quarter free cash flow of $751 million, or $0.88 per share, as higher oil production, increased working interests in completed wells and a rapid response to commodity-price movements supported results. Co-Chief Executive Officer Will Hickey said free cash flow increased nearly 50% from the prior quarter and exceeded the company’s total free cash flow generated during 2023. He said the company expects full-year 2026 free cash flow to be nearly double its 2024 result. → Sandisk Just Delivered a Blowout Quarter—Here's Why the Stock Is Falling High Yield Revival: 3 Cash-Rich Dividend Payers on Sale Oil production averaged about 198,000 barrels per day during the second quarter, up 3% sequentially. Hickey said the company increased its workover-rig count by 50% after oil prices moved higher, improving well runtimes and accelerating incremental production. The company also raised its working interest in completed wells to about 82%, compared with its original expectation of 75%. Those factors, along with well performance, drove approximately 6,000 barrels per day of quarter-over-quarter oil growth for cash capital expenditures of $521 million, according to Hickey. → 4 Oil and Gas ETF Plays as Prices Stay Sky-High Plastic Surgery: Winners and Losers of the Proposed 10% Interest Cap Permian Resources curtailed natural-gas production from high gas-oil-ratio wells exposed to Waha pricing during the quarter, when Waha natural gas averaged negative $3.14 per M…Read full documentShow less
Interested in Permian Resources Corporation? Here are five stocks we like better. Record free cash flow: Permian Resources generated $751 million, or $0.88 per share, in second-quarter free cash flow—nearly 50% above the prior quarter—driven by higher oil output, increased working interests and faster workovers. Production and guidance increased: Second-quarter oil production rose 3% sequentially to about 198,000 barrels per day, while full-year 2026 oil-production guidance was raised to 199,000 barrels per day with capital spending guided at $1.95 billion. Delaware Basin expansion: The company acquired roughly 55,000 net acres year to date for approximately $1.05 billion, adding about 330 drilling locations and strengthening its operated inventory through strategic acreage acquisitions and trades. If There's a Domestic Manufacturing Boom, These 3 Stocks Could Win Permian Resources (NYSE:PR) reported record second-quarter free cash flow of $751 million, or $0.88 per share, as higher oil production, increased working interests in completed wells and a rapid response to commodity-price movements supported results. Co-Chief Executive Officer Will Hickey said free cash flow increased nearly 50% from the prior quarter and exceeded the company’s total free cash flow generated during 2023. He said the company expects full-year 2026 free cash flow to be nearly double its 2024 result. → Sandisk Just Delivered a Blowout Quarter—Here's Why the Stock Is Falling High Yield Revival: 3 Cash-Rich Dividend Payers on Sale Oil production averaged about 198,000 barrels per day during the second quarter, up 3% sequentially. Hickey said the company increased its workover-rig count by 50% after oil prices moved higher, improving well runtimes and accelerating incremental production. The company also raised its working interest in completed wells to about 82%, compared with its original expectation of 75%. Those factors, along with well performance, drove approximately 6,000 barrels per day of quarter-over-quarter oil growth for cash capital expenditures of $521 million, according to Hickey. → 4 Oil and Gas ETF Plays as Prices Stay Sky-High Plastic Surgery: Winners and Losers of the Proposed 10% Interest Cap Permian Resources curtailed natural-gas production from high gas-oil-ratio wells exposed to Waha pricing during the quarter, when Waha natural gas averaged negative $3.14 per Mcf and traded as low as negative $9.52 per Mcf. The curtailments reduced the company’s natural-gas production by about 20% from the prior quarter. Hickey said firm transportation agreements, hedging and the production curtailments enabled Permian Resources to realize $0.38 per Mcf for its gas during the period, providing more than $75 million of revenue uplift on natural-gas sales. → No Hangover: Revisiting Microsoft One Week After Earnings The company returned all previously curtailed wells to production in late June as Waha pricing improved, Chief Financial Officer Guy Oliphint said. He added that third- and fourth-quarter gas volumes should look more normal and that the company has transportation capacity expected to cover roughly all of its net gas volumes in 2027. James Walter, co-CEO, said the company has not seen a meaningful change in basin activity due to improved gas egress. However, he said new pipelines coming online appear able to handle restored volumes and incremental growth, while the company feels more confident about crude and natural-gas takeaway capacity over the next several years. Permian Resources said it has acquired about 55,000 net acres in the core Delaware Basin year to date through roughly 190 separate transactions, for total consideration of approximately $1.05 billion. The transactions added about 330 high-confidence, high-net-revenue-interest drilling locations, the company said. The company closed a $520 million acquisition in Ward County covering approximately 2,000 net acres and 5,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day. The acreage is adjacent to its existing position and is fully held by production, Walter said. Following that acquisition, Permian Resources entered an acreage trade agreement with an offset operator that is expected to close in the third quarter. The trade is designed to address the acquired property’s non-operated, low-working-interest and scattered-acreage characteristics. Walter said it is expected to increase operated net locations from 50 to 120 and extend average lateral lengths by 20%. The company also assembled an approximately 15,000-net-acre contiguous position in Eddy County, New Mexico, called the Parkway bolt-on project. The acreage has two-mile lateral lengths and an 82.5% net revenue interest, Walter said. Management characterized the acquisition strategy as focused on off-market and smaller transactions where the company believes it has commercial, technical or operational advantages. Walter said Permian Resources evaluates larger marketed packages as well, but remains disciplined on purchase prices and full-cycle return targets. Permian Resources raised its full-year 2026 oil-production guidance to 199,000 barrels per day, representing 10% growth from 2025. Its capital-expenditure midpoint is now $1.95 billion, about 1% below 2025 spending, according to management. Oliphint said the revised production outlook increased from 192,500 barrels per day after the first quarter. Of the 6,500-barrel-per-day increase, about 1,000 barrels per day reflects the annualized contribution from the Ward County acquisition. Most of the remaining increase comes from higher working interests in 2026 projects, supplemented by accelerated workovers. Capital guidance increased by $100 million. Oliphint said approximately $25 million relates to Ward County takeover costs, including bringing equipment to the company’s operating standards, while the remainder reflects higher working interests in wells turned in line. He said the increase should not be doubled to estimate an annualized 2027 impact because most of the spending occurred in the second quarter. At its current $1.95 billion to $2 billion spending range, Oliphint said the company would continue to grow production, while maintenance capital would be below that level. Management said future growth versus maintenance decisions will depend on commodity prices and service costs. Hickey said Permian Resources is working to offset inflationary pressure from diesel and casing costs through longer laterals, water recycling, water-based mud in areas prone to drilling-fluid losses, slimmer wellbore designs and completion improvements. The company’s average lateral length has increased to roughly 11,000 feet, and it drilled its first four-mile lateral during the second quarter. Hickey said the company expects lateral lengths to continue rising gradually, rather than through a sharp year-over-year change. Permian Resources also began surfactant trials in completion and production operations. Hickey said two completion trials have been conducted, with one pad online and another yet to begin production. In late-life production applications, the company has seen results ranging from negligible impact to more than 100 barrels per day of uplift, though management said it is too early to determine the ultimate scale of the program. The company ended the quarter with leverage of approximately 0.5 times and expects to remain at about that level at year-end. Hickey said the company intends to continue increasing its base dividend over time, while maintaining its existing overall capital-allocation approach. Permian Resources (NYSE: PR) is an independent exploration and production company focused on the acquisition, development and optimization of oil and natural gas assets in the Permian Basin. The company’s operations encompass all phases of upstream activity, including geological and geophysical analysis, drilling, completion and production. By employing horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing technologies, Permian Resources aims to efficiently unlock hydrocarbon reserves and deliver consistent production growth. Headquartered in Oklahoma City, Permian Resources concentrates its asset portfolio in the Delaware and Midland sub-basins of West Texas and southeastern New Mexico. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "Permian Resources Q2 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for August 2026.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-06Permian Resources Corp (PR) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Record Free Cash Flow and ...
GuruFocus.com
Permian Resources Corp (PR) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Record Free Cash Flow and ...
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: August 06, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Record free cash flow of $751 million in Q2 2026, up nearly 50% quarter-over-quarter, and record free cash flow per share of $0.88. Oil production grew 3% quarter-over-quarter to approximately 198,000 barrels per day, driven by increased workover activity and higher working interest in completed wells (82% vs. 75% expected). Proactive natural gas curtailments during negative Waha prices resulted in a realized gas price of $0.38/MCF and an uplift of over $75 million in revenue. Successful ground game acquisitions added approximately 55,000 net acres and 330 high-confidence locations at attractive valuations ($13,000 per net acre, $2.5 million per net location). Improved capital efficiency: 2026 production guidance raised 10% year-over-year while CapEx midpoint is 1% lower than 2025, with continued operational gains from longer laterals, water recycling, and slim-hole designs. Strong balance sheet with leverage at 0.5 times, allowing for continued acquisitions and capital returns. Successful acreage trade in Ward County increased operated net locations from 50% to 120% and improved lateral lengths by 20%. Early surfactant trials show encouraging results, with potential for improved recoveries and cost savings. Company generated more free cash flow in Q2 2026 than in all of 2023, and expects full-year 2026 free cash flow to nearly double 2024 levels. Differentiated acquisition strategy with a strong pipeline of off-market deals, leveraging proprietary data and Midland relationships. Waha natural gas prices averaged negative $3.14/MCF during Q2, forcing proactive curtailments and reducing natural gas production by 20% quarter-over-quarter. Inflationary pressures from rising diesel and casing prices are partially offsetting efficiency gains, with potential for further cost increases in the back half of the year. The Ward County acquisition was initially challenged by being majority non-operated, low working interest, and scattered, requiring a subsequent trade to improve. Management is hesitant to forecast gas prices, and the back-half cash flow uplift from improved Waha pricing is uncertain. The company's ability to continue acquiring high-quality assets at attractive prices is not guaranteed…Read full documentShow less
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: August 06, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Record free cash flow of $751 million in Q2 2026, up nearly 50% quarter-over-quarter, and record free cash flow per share of $0.88. Oil production grew 3% quarter-over-quarter to approximately 198,000 barrels per day, driven by increased workover activity and higher working interest in completed wells (82% vs. 75% expected). Proactive natural gas curtailments during negative Waha prices resulted in a realized gas price of $0.38/MCF and an uplift of over $75 million in revenue. Successful ground game acquisitions added approximately 55,000 net acres and 330 high-confidence locations at attractive valuations ($13,000 per net acre, $2.5 million per net location). Improved capital efficiency: 2026 production guidance raised 10% year-over-year while CapEx midpoint is 1% lower than 2025, with continued operational gains from longer laterals, water recycling, and slim-hole designs. Strong balance sheet with leverage at 0.5 times, allowing for continued acquisitions and capital returns. Successful acreage trade in Ward County increased operated net locations from 50% to 120% and improved lateral lengths by 20%. Early surfactant trials show encouraging results, with potential for improved recoveries and cost savings. Company generated more free cash flow in Q2 2026 than in all of 2023, and expects full-year 2026 free cash flow to nearly double 2024 levels. Differentiated acquisition strategy with a strong pipeline of off-market deals, leveraging proprietary data and Midland relationships. Waha natural gas prices averaged negative $3.14/MCF during Q2, forcing proactive curtailments and reducing natural gas production by 20% quarter-over-quarter. Inflationary pressures from rising diesel and casing prices are partially offsetting efficiency gains, with potential for further cost increases in the back half of the year. The Ward County acquisition was initially challenged by being majority non-operated, low working interest, and scattered, requiring a subsequent trade to improve. Management is hesitant to forecast gas prices, and the back-half cash flow uplift from improved Waha pricing is uncertain. The company's ability to continue acquiring high-quality assets at attractive prices is not guaranteed, and the pace of ground game deals may ebb and flow. Surfactant trials are still early, and results are mixed, with some wells showing no uplift, making it difficult to predict the program's full impact. The company is not planning to increase its base dividend significantly, focusing instead on acquisitions and debt repayment, which may not satisfy income-focused investors. Potential for oil takeaway capacity constraints in the Permian in the coming years, though management is confident in current capacity. The company's growth strategy is dependent on volatile commodity prices, and management may shift to maintenance mode if prices decline. The Parkway bolt-on includes some upside zones that are not yet proven, requiring further appraisal to fully realize potential. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Sign with PR. Is PR fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Q: Can you bridge the old production guidance to the new production guidance and do the same on CapEx, breaking out the contribution from higher working interest, acquired production, and any pull-forward or outperformance? A: Guy Oliphant, CFO: On the production side, we were at 192,500 barrels a day at Q1 and are at 199 today. The only production acquired with the $1 billion of acquisitions was 2,500 barrels a day at the time we closed the Ward County Bolt-On a week ago, which adds 1,000 barrels to the 6,500-barrel increase. The significant majority of the remainder is higher working interest in our 2026 projects, with a little contribution from accelerated workovers. On the capital side, we're up $100 million, with $25 million of that being takeover costs for Ward County and the remainder from higher working interest in the 2026 wells, as we took our working interest guidance from 75% to over 80%. Q: What is your perspective on the M&A landscape moving forward, and how do you compare your ground game activity to larger, more competitive marketed deals? A: James Walter, Co-CEO: The ground game effort has been building consistently for 11 years, and the opportunity set looks as good as it ever has. We look at everything in the Delaware and are in the mix for quality packages, but we remain disciplined on purchase price. While some transacted assets are ones we'd like to own, we couldn't achieve our targeted full-cycle returns at those prices. Our focus remains on full-cycle returns and long-term value creation, and we'll be patient if bigger packages don't meet our thresholds. Q: With new gas egress coming online, how do you see activity pace from offset operators, and do you expect oil takeaway capacity to become a constraint in the next couple of years? A: James Walter, Co-CEO: We feel really good about oil takeaway capacity for the next few years, and we're hopeful the industry has learned a lesson on gas. We haven't seen a meaningful reaction in activity levels from the new pipelines, which are able to handle the gas we brought back online. We're entering a new era in Waha gas, with a new eagerness to build pipelines and exciting downstream demand. We feel a lot better about both crude and gas than we have in recent months. Q: Does the Parkway bolt-on suggest you have more confidence moving northwest in Eddy County, and would you consider moving further north in New Mexico? A: James Walter, Co-CEO: The Eddy County area has been a tremendous asset since our first deal in 2016, and we've seen it continue to work as we push modestly west and north. We've been surprised by how strong well performance is in that area and see a lot of white space, both moving north and west and in and amongst our existing position. Most bolt-on activity is now in between our existing assets, but we still see a lot to do in the Parkway area and are excited about the well results and what could be coming. Q: Do you believe production growth is appropriate given the commodity backdrop, and if not, is the plan to keep building cash? A: James Walter, Co-CEO: We don't like to forecast next year's plan, but for 2026, we believed it made sense to invest a little more capital and grow production more than the flattish expectations coming into the year. Growth from here or next year will depend on the returns environment. With high oil prices and low service costs, you'll likely see us in growth mode; with lower oil prices and higher service costs, we'll be back to maintenance mode. We're proving we can react quickly when the time comes. Q: Can you talk about some of the things you're deploying in the field to stay ahead of operational expectations? A: Will Hickey, Co-CEO: Water recycling had another tick up in Q2, the highest quarter in PR history, and we're a big beneficiary of our partner's integrated system in New Mexico. On the drilling side, we've started introducing water-based mud in areas where we take losses, saving $5-$7 a foot. We've also transitioned to a slimmer hole design in New Mexico, running 5 1/2-inch casing inside 8 5/8 instead of 9 5/8, saving on steel, time, and cement. These gains offset inflationary pressures from diesel and casing. Q: With the bolt-ons, how long can you get your laterals, and what does that mean from a P&L perspective? A: Will Hickey, Co-CEO: Lateral length is the most effective way to reduce D&C per foot. We've ticked up every year, moving from just under two miles to now right at 11,000 feet. We drilled our first four-mile lateral in Q2, which was a big success. The combination of our willingness to drill longer, ability to drill U-turns, and the blockiness of our position means you'll continue to see lateral length pick up, likely 500-plus feet longer each year, rather than a step change. Q: With leverage at the bottom end of your target range, will there be any change in cash priorities across acquisitions, balance sheet, buybacks, or growing the dividend? A: James Walter, Co-CEO: Growing the base dividend consistently over time is a priority and will continue. Other than that, we don't have plans to change our capital allocation program. The business is generating a lot of cash, allowing us to pay down debt and do acquisitions while delevering to 0.5 times. Our strategy is working, and you'll see us hold the course. Q: Do the recent acquisitions necessitate any infrastructure investments in the upcoming years? A: James Walter, Co-CEO: Nothing outside of what's baked into our plan and budget for the year. These areas are right next to existing PR operations, so it's easy. We have the right midstream partners, and everything we're doing is a mile or two away from existing ops. Will Hickey added that the only exception is the Ward County bolt-on, which will have minimal incremental CapEx of about $25 million for taking over a new asset. Q: Is your gas production back online now that Waha prices are better, and can you give a sense of the cash flow uplift for the back half of the year? AFor the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-06Permian Resources (PR) Q2 Earnings and Revenues Beat Estimates
Zacks
Permian Resources (PR) Q2 Earnings and Revenues Beat Estimates
Permian Resources (PR) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.69 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.56 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.27 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +23.21%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this company would post earnings of $0.38 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.39, delivering a surprise of +2.63%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates four times. Permian Resources, which belongs to the Zacks Oil and Gas - Exploration and Production - United States industry, posted revenues of $1.86 billion for the quarter ended June 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 13.25%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $1.2 billion. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates just once over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. Permian Resources shares have added about 46.1% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 13%. While Permian Resources has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Permian Resources was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see…Read full documentShow less
Permian Resources (PR) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.69 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.56 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.27 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +23.21%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this company would post earnings of $0.38 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.39, delivering a surprise of +2.63%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates four times. Permian Resources, which belongs to the Zacks Oil and Gas - Exploration and Production - United States industry, posted revenues of $1.86 billion for the quarter ended June 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 13.25%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $1.2 billion. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates just once over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. Permian Resources shares have added about 46.1% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 13%. While Permian Resources has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Permian Resources was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $0.47 on $1.58 billion in revenues for the coming quarter and $1.94 on $6.17 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year. Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Oil and Gas - Exploration and Production - United States is currently in the bottom 13% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1. Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI), another stock in the same industry, has yet to report results for the quarter ended June 2026. The results are expected to be released on August 13. This company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $0.21 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +162.5%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. Kolibri Global Energy Inc.'s revenues are expected to be $20.86 million, up 87.8% from the year-ago quarter. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Permian Resources Corporation (PR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-06Permian Resources Corporation Q2 2026 Earnings Call Summary
Moby
Permian Resources Corporation Q2 2026 Earnings Call Summary
Our analysts just identified a stock with the potential to be the next Nvidia. Tell us how you invest and we'll show you why it's our #1 pick. Tap here. Achieved record free cash flow of $751 million in Q2, driven by a 50% increase in workover rigs and a successful 'ground game' that raised working interest in completed wells to 82%. Proactively curtailed natural gas production on high-GOR wells during a period of negative WAHA pricing, resulting in a $75 million revenue uplift through firm transportation and hedging. Differentiated acquisition strategy focused on off-market, 'Midland-born' deals and trades that core up acreage and increase working interest ahead of development. Offset inflationary pressures in diesel and casing through operational efficiencies, including longer laterals, water-based mud deployment, and slim-hole wellbore designs. Maintained a basin-leading cost structure with LOE pushing toward $5 per Boe, supported by increased water recycling and microgrid power optimization in New Mexico. Strategic positioning remains focused on the Delaware Basin, utilizing proprietary data and local relationships to identify value in harder, less obvious transactions. Updated 2026 production guidance to 199,000 barrels of oil per day, representing 10% year-over-year growth while maintaining a flat rig count and completion crew cadence. Capital expenditure guidance increased to $1.95 billion, primarily reflecting higher working interests in 2026 projects and takeover costs for the Ward County acquisition. The company anticipates growing free cash flow over time, supported by improved natural gas transportation and pricing expectations for 2027 compared to current headwinds. Future activity levels remain flexible; management indicated a shift to maintenance mode if oil prices decline or service costs rise significantly. Ongoing evaluation of surfactant trials in completion and production operations could provide future upside to recovery rates and capital efficiency. Closed a $520 million acquisition in Ward County, subsequently executing an acreage trade that increased operated net locations from 50 to 120 and lateral lengths by 20%. Assembled a 15,000 net acre position in the Parkway area of Eddy County through approximately 190 separate transactions at an average cost of $13,000 per net acre. Identified potential inflationary risks in casing and steel…Read full documentShow less
Our analysts just identified a stock with the potential to be the next Nvidia. Tell us how you invest and we'll show you why it's our #1 pick. Tap here. Achieved record free cash flow of $751 million in Q2, driven by a 50% increase in workover rigs and a successful 'ground game' that raised working interest in completed wells to 82%. Proactively curtailed natural gas production on high-GOR wells during a period of negative WAHA pricing, resulting in a $75 million revenue uplift through firm transportation and hedging. Differentiated acquisition strategy focused on off-market, 'Midland-born' deals and trades that core up acreage and increase working interest ahead of development. Offset inflationary pressures in diesel and casing through operational efficiencies, including longer laterals, water-based mud deployment, and slim-hole wellbore designs. Maintained a basin-leading cost structure with LOE pushing toward $5 per Boe, supported by increased water recycling and microgrid power optimization in New Mexico. Strategic positioning remains focused on the Delaware Basin, utilizing proprietary data and local relationships to identify value in harder, less obvious transactions. Updated 2026 production guidance to 199,000 barrels of oil per day, representing 10% year-over-year growth while maintaining a flat rig count and completion crew cadence. Capital expenditure guidance increased to $1.95 billion, primarily reflecting higher working interests in 2026 projects and takeover costs for the Ward County acquisition. The company anticipates growing free cash flow over time, supported by improved natural gas transportation and pricing expectations for 2027 compared to current headwinds. Future activity levels remain flexible; management indicated a shift to maintenance mode if oil prices decline or service costs rise significantly. Ongoing evaluation of surfactant trials in completion and production operations could provide future upside to recovery rates and capital efficiency. Closed a $520 million acquisition in Ward County, subsequently executing an acreage trade that increased operated net locations from 50 to 120 and lateral lengths by 20%. Assembled a 15,000 net acre position in the Parkway area of Eddy County through approximately 190 separate transactions at an average cost of $13,000 per net acre. Identified potential inflationary risks in casing and steel prices for the second half of 2026, though management expects to mitigate these through continued drilling speed gains. Maintained a fortress balance sheet with leverage at 0.5x, providing the financial flexibility to execute accretive M&A without compromising capital allocation priorities. One stock. Nvidia-level potential. 30M+ investors trust Moby to find it first. Get the pick. Tap here. Management remains disciplined on purchase prices for large marketed deals, noting they have passed on high-quality assets that did not meet their full-cycle return thresholds. The 'ground game' remains a consistent, long-term effort that provides more predictable value than lumpy, competitive auctions. Transitioning to 8 5/8-inch intermediate casing from 9 5/8-inch saves approximately one day of drilling time per well and reduces steel and cement costs. Water-based mud is being used strategically in areas with high fluid loss to save $5 to $7 per foot compared to oil-based mud. Management expressed confidence that new pipeline capacity coming online will handle incremental Permian growth and reduce the frequency of price dislocations. Firm transportation agreements for 2027 are expected to cover nearly all net gas volumes, significantly improving price realizations. Successful delineation of the Avalon and deeper Wolfcamp zones in Lea and Eddy Counties is effectively moving proven state-line benches further north. While monitoring the Woodford and Brushy Canyon, these are not currently part of the core 2027 development plan.
TranscriptFY2026 Q22026-08-06FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript
Earnings source - 130 paragraphs
FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript
Good morning, welcome to Permian Resources' conference call to discuss its second quarter 2026 earnings. Today's call is being recorded. A replay of the call will be available by visiting the company's website at www.permianres.com. At this time, I will now turn the call over to Hays Mabry, Permian Resources Vice President of Investor Relations, for some opening remarks. Please go ahead.
Thanks, Eldie. Thank you all for joining us. On the call today are Will Hickey and James Walter, our Co-Chief Executive Officers, and Guy Oliphint, our Chief Financial Officer. Many of the comments during this call are forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties that could affect our actual results and are discussed in more detail in our filings with the SEC. We may also refer to non-GAAP financial measures. For any non-GAAP measure we use, a reconciliation to the nearest corresponding GAAP measure can be found in our earnings release or presentation. With that, I will turn the call over to Will Hickey, Co-CEO.
Thanks, Hays. Q2 is a standout quarter for Permian Resources. We delivered record free cash flow of $751 million, an increase of almost 50% quarter-over-quarter, and record free cash flow per share of $0.88. These results reflect our team's ability to respond quickly and decisively to a volatile commodity environment. Our activities this quarter are a reminder of the uniqueness of PR's business model. We can respond quickly to market conditions, we have a differentiated approach to sourcing and executing acquisitions, and we are relentlessly improving the capital efficiency of our business on a go-forward basis. All of these characteristics support the goal we are all aligned on, increasing free cash flow per share over the long term to create shareholder value. Turning to the quarter, oil production came in at approximately 198,000 bbl per day, up 3% quarter-over-quarter.
Slide four shows the key drivers that drove that oil production growth. When oil prices moved higher, our team in the field responded immediately. We increased the number of workover rigs by 50%, which improved runtimes and quickly accelerated incremental barrels. At the same time, our successful ground game drove working interest in completed wells to approximately 82% for the quarter, up materially from our original expectations of 75%. Combined with strong well performance, these actions generated 6,000 bbl per day of oil growth quarter-over-quarter for cash CapEx of $521 million. One thing I'd highlight is our continued success increasing working interest ahead of development. This has always been part of the PR playbook, but our BD and land team have executed at an exceptionally high level this year.
We view these acquisitions as some of the highest rate of return deals that we do, given that their near-term impact, as evidenced from our higher working interest, not only in Q2 but also for the remainder of the year. Incremental workovers and ground game transactions are exactly the types of investments we want to make in a volatile market. Both generate incremental oil production and cash flow almost immediately, allowing us to recycle capital quickly and de-risk returns through shorter payback periods. Turning to natural gas, our team demonstrated their relentless focus on maximizing free cash flow as they navigated a severely depressed Waha market during the quarter. As many of you are aware, Waha natural gas prices averaged negative $3.14 per Mcf during Q2 and traded as low as negative $9.52 per Mcf.
Rather than selling natural gas at negative prices, we proactively curtailed production on high GOR wells with Waha exposure, reducing natural gas production by approximately 20% quarter-over-quarter. The curtailments, combined with our firm transportation and hedging, allowed us to realize a natural gas price of $0.38 per Mcf for the quarter and an uplift of over $75 million of revenue on our natural gas sales. When Waha pricing improved in late June, we returned all previously curtailed wells to production without any operational issues. I want to give a big shout-out to the field team for putting in the hard work to make this possible during the quarter. On the D&C side, we offset inflationary pressures from rising diesel prices with continued operational efficiency gains through longer laterals, increased water recycling, deployment of water-based mud, and new wellbore designs.
We've also begun surfactant trials on completion and production operations. We're still early in evaluating surfactants, but we're encouraged by the initial results. Between continued operational efficiency gains and the potential to improve recoveries, there are a lot of ways for us to continue our path of increasing capital efficiency. As you can see from today's results, the quality of our assets, combined with our basin leading cost structure, has driven a step change improvement to our business over the last several years. As a result, we achieved record free cash flow in Q2 of $751 million. This is more than we generated in all of 2023, and we expect full-year 2026 free cash flow to be nearly double what we generated in 2024. With that, I'll turn it over to James.
Thanks, Will. Before we start talking about what's been a great start to our 2026 BD effort, we want to discuss how Permian Resources approaches acquisitions and how that fits with our value creation story. When we founded Colgate in 2015, we moved to Midland with exactly zero acres, zero production, and Will and I sharing a single 200 square foot office. Our goal at the beginning was to buy high quality assets, operate them efficiently, and underwrite them conservatively so their invested capital would generate real cash on cash, unlevered equity returns.
From those humble beginnings, we grew Colgate Energy from an idea to the business it is today, with over 500,000 net acres and over 200,000 bbl of oil per day. Our focus was never to build the large-scale business that Permian Resources is now, but rather to maximize the return of every dollar we invested in the business. How did we get here? Because we've honored the same strategy and philosophy in how we underwrite and how we operate, while working relentlessly to find deals that meet our very high underwriting standards and targeted full-cycle returns. We use it time and time again. Small deals add up, you create value for shareholders, and the business naturally gets bigger. With that, I'm excited to talk about what we've done in 2026 today.
Starting with the largest deal on slide eight, we closed on an acquisition of approximately 2,000 net acres and 5,000 BOE a day in Ward County for $520 million. This acreage directly offsets our existing asset base, is 100% held by production, and provides an extended runway of high return inventory. Shortly after we closed on the Ward County asset in July, we signed a trade agreement with an offset operator, utilizing a combination of the recently acquired bolt-on acreage, the legacy PR acreage, and some other acres that we had. This acreage helps address some of the challenges with the standalone Ward County acquisition, namely it being majority non-operated, low working interest, and somewhat scattered. The trade also increases the number of operated net locations from 50 to 120 while increasing the average lateral length by 20%.
We view this trade as a true win-win for PR and our counterparties, who is a valued industry partner, as it helps them to further core up their acreage position and increase their working interest in their own operated units. We expect the trade to close during Q3. Finally, the Parkway bolt-on project in Eddy County is a great example of how our proprietary data and Midland relationships create opportunities others simply do not see. Following the success of a delineation well we drilled in late 2025, we quietly assembled a contiguous position of approximately 15,000 net acres with two-mile lateral lengths and an 82.5% NRI. Our partner in this deal, Tascosa Energy Partners, actually brought this deal to us over drinks in Midland. We've been fortunate to know this team for a long time and bought a big deal from them a couple years back.
I think more importantly, this deal is a scaled example of the Midland-born deals that we do with our friends and partners on a regular basis, and that we think provides a real competitive advantage to Permian Resources. In total, year to date, we've acquired approximately 55,000 net acres in the core of the Delaware Basin for total consideration of approximately $1.05 billion, executed through roughly 190 separate transactions. These acquisitions added approximately 330 high-confidence, high-NRI locations that immediately compete for capital in our portfolio. Ultimately, we think the valuation metrics for the deals we have done so far this year speak to the strength of our approach. 13,000 per net acre, 8,000 per net royalty acre, and 2.5 million per net location. Slide 11 summarizes why we believe our acquisition strategy is truly differentiated.
Our focus has been on buying high-quality assets, pursuing accretive transactions where PR has a commercial, technical, or operational advantage. We continuously hunt for off-market deals and look for areas where we have distinct advantages or can create an edge that allows PR to underwrite higher full-cycle returns. The edge can come from our leading cost structure, proprietary service information, or simply access to a deal that isn't widely marketed. While this is not easy and requires a ton of work, we pride ourselves on being creative and not afraid of leaning into harder, less obvious deals. We are confident we will be able to continue this successful track record for years to come. Our financial discipline allows us to execute meaningful transactions like we have announced today while retaining a fortress balance sheet, with Q2 leverage of approximately 0.5x and expected year-end leverage of approximately 0.5x.
All this leads us to our updated and improved plan for 2026. As we mentioned in our prepared remarks, the success of our ground game has allowed us to significantly increase our working interest for full year 2026. This will allow us to meaningfully grow production while maintaining the same completion crews, rig count, and operating efficiencies we have achieved this year. Our updated production guidance of 199,000 bbl of oil a day for full year 2026 is 10% higher than 2025, while our CapEx midpoint of $1.95 billion is approximately 1% lower than the capital we spent last year. This all highlights the strides that our team is making to continue to improve the capital efficiency of our business and to grow free cash flow per share every year.
Concluding with slide 14, our focus on full-cycle returns has allowed the company to generate outsized value creation for our investors. A dollar invested in Colgate in 2015 would be worth nearly $50 today, representing a greater than 50% compounded annual return. We've continued that same philosophy and performance at scale with Permian Resources, nearly tripling our total shareholder return since formation in 2022. Most importantly, our business model has not changed. We are confident the combination of our high-quality asset base, peer-leading cost structure, and differentiated approach to acquisitions will continue our track record of long-term value creation. We live in an industry that in some ways has been defined by consolidation and scale, we'd like to be defined by prudent investment of capital, free cash flow per share growth, and ultimately leading total shareholder returns for our investors.
Thank you for tuning in today, now we will turn it back to the operator for Q&A.
We will now begin the question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, press star one again. Please pick up your handset when asking a question. If you're muted locally, please remember to unmute your device. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Scott Hanold with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Thanks. Good morning, all. Obviously, the ground game M&A has been a staple of y'all for the last number of years. It looks like you've had a pretty successful run here in the last couple of months. Can you give us a sense of what you see moving forward on the M&A landscape, and also how do you compare and contrast the activity you've been doing versus looking at some of the larger packages that are a little bit more, I guess, competitive, like the federal lease sale or marketed deals?
Yeah. Thanks, Scott. I think on the ground game side, I think that's an effort that's been building and consistent for the whole 11 years we've been running this business. We've got pretty much the same team, the same people that are operating extremely high level. That may ebb and flow a little bit from quarter to quarter, but I think over years, we are really confident we can continue to execute and grow that part of our business. I think the opportunity set in front of us looks as good as it ever has. We're excited and confident that we can continue that. Look, it may not be the same every single quarter, but we really do believe in the long-term viability of that part of our business. In terms of larger packages, look, we look at everything in the Delaware.
I think you should assume we are in the mix and evaluating any package of quality that is out there on the publicly marketed side. I think what we've seen in some of these deals and some of these federal lease sales or state lease sales is that they're great assets. There's been some really good stuff that transacted this year, I think our focus on full cycle returns and generating outsized equity returns for investors, I think has us being really disciplined on purchase price. Are some of those transacted assets we'd like to own? Absolutely. Were we able to get to those purchase prices and still achieve our targeted returns? The answer was no.
I think for us, it's all about focusing on full cycle and long-term value creation, and if there's bigger packages that meet those return thresholds and standards, then we'll be excited to do them. If not, we'll continue to be patient.
Got it. Thanks for that. My follow-up question is more Permian, I guess, macro related. Certainly with new egress coming on for pipelines, you're seeing probably a next surge of gas coming, including your production that was offline. How do you see activity pace from a lot of offset operators, any kind of non-operated activity with improved egress, and do you expect a surge of production? I'm just curious on oil takeaway capacity, if you think that becomes a constraint in the next couple of years or so.
Yeah.
Go ahead.
I think hitting the last part for us, we feel really good about oil takeaway capacity for the next few years. I think we're also hopeful that we've all learned a good lesson on the gas situation we've been in the past 12 months, that you got to get out there years ahead. We're fortunate on the oil side, we've got a lot of capacity today and expect that to be the case. We continue to grow for years to come in the Permian, which I think is not guaranteed, but certainly possible. I'd say at this point, we're confident our midstream partners will be working with people like us to get further ahead of that. On the gas side, we haven't seen any meaningful reaction from an activity level.
I think it seems like the pipelines that are coming online this quarter are able to handle the new gas that we brought back online, any incremental growth today. I think we're hopeful that we're entering a new era in Waha gas, where you get past this period of dislocations and we have pipeline capacity that's now going to be able to keep up with Permian growth. I'd certainly say the environment and the attitude has changed. I think there's a new eagerness and desire to build pipelines coming out of the basin because I think people do believe this basin's going to grow its gas volumes for a long time, and there's a lot of exciting downstream demand things. I think we feel a lot better about both crude and gas than we have gas the last few months.
Thank you.
Your next question is from the line of Neal Dingmann with William Blair. Please go ahead.
How are you guys? Thanks for the time. James, maybe staying in the same vein, my first question just around M&A specifically. Is it fair to say that the Parkway bolt-on suggests you all continue to have more confidence as you move northwest to Eddy County, and just wondering either there or again, further in Lee, would you all continue considering moving just further north in New Mexico overall?
I think that Eddy County area where this Parkway bolt-on has been, that's been a tremendous asset for Permian Resources since we bought our first deal there back in summer of 2016. I think we've seen it continue to work as you push modestly west and modestly north. I'd say we've been surprised by how strong the well performance is, for example, in the area that you're referencing today, I think we see a lot of white space. I also think the white space may be moving north and may be moving west, there's also still a lot to do in and amongst our existing position. There's a lot of white space on the map between our existing assets, I'd say, honestly, most of the bolt-on activity that's active now is more in between the yellow on the map, if you will.
We still see a lot to do in what we call the Parkway area of Eddy County and are certainly excited about the well results we've seen and excited about what we think could be coming.
Perfect. Then my follow-up just on capital allocation, maybe for you or Guy or Will. Just specifically, we've seen at least a couple of your peers, if not more now, recently boost activity, I guess, in the last few months. Do you all believe production growth in this environment is appropriate given the commodity backdrop? Maybe if not, is the plan just to keep building cash?
Look, we don't like to forecast our plan for next year or anything like that. I'd say with regards to 2026 and what oil prices did at the beginning of this year, I think we were strong believers that this is an environment where it makes sense to invest a little more capital in growth production more than the kind of flattish expectations we had coming into the year. Like we'll talk about in prepared remarks, we're proud of our team, how quickly we could respond, and how quickly we could bring those barrels.
As far as growth from here or growth next year, I think that's just really going to depend on the returns environment. We've always talked about growth in a returns-driven framework. We have high oil prices, low service costs. You'll probably see us in growth mode. Inversely if we have lower oil prices and higher service costs, I think you'll see us back to maintenance mode. I think, it's just going to depend on how the macro settles out. I think today, it's probably too early to tell what next year looks like. We'll keep watching it and we've proven we can react quickly when the time comes.
Perfect. Thank you.
Thanks, Neal.
Your next question is from Neil Mehta with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Thanks, guys. Just continued operational momentum as we think about your production. James and Will, I'd love you just to talk a little bit about some of the things that you're deploying out in the field to stay ahead of expectations operations.
Yeah, I mentioned a few in the prepared remarks. I'd say one that I feel like I hit on every quarter, which is really, really important to both the production and the completion cost of business is water recycling. We had another tick up on percentage water recycled in Q2. I think it's the highest quarter we've had in PR history. We are continuing to make progress on incremental water recycling. We've got a great relationship with a big water company in New Mexico, and as they continue to build out an integrated system, I'd say we are a big beneficiary of that.
On the drilling side, which is, I think if you think back to my Q1 comments, were I thought there was some low-hanging fruit, or maybe not low anymore, but the next level of a step up would be on the drilling side. We're making a few changes there. I'd say, one, we've started to introduce water-based mud in areas where we take losses typically. With oil at high prices, I'd say the payback on taking a little bit of loss of water-based is pretty meaningful. Call it five, six, seven bucks a foot of savings on those wells. The last one would be we've transitioned to a slimmer hole design in New Mexico. Same long string, still run five and a half inch all the way back to surface, but running it inside eight and five-eighths instead of nine and five-eighths.
That's savings in steel, especially as casing prices are projected to run up in the back half of the year. Savings in time, just smaller holes drill faster, savings in cement. I think that if you think about looking forward, obviously, we are willing to take the increased diesel prices with the increased oil revenue, but we do have some inflationary pressures with respect to diesel and casing, and to date, have been able to offset that through gains like what I just talked through.
That's helpful. Just your perspective on lateral lengths, too. I would imagine with these bolt-ons, you'll be able to extend these laterals through, given you're able to block up the acreage a little bit more. Give us a sense as you think about the portfolio, how long you can get these laterals to, and what does that mean from a P&L perspective?
Lateral length is the most effective way to reduce D&C per foot. I think we've slightly ticked up every year for the last two or three years, moving from just under 2 mi to now right at 11,000 ft. We mentioned in the deck that we drilled our first four-mile lateral in Q2, that was a big success. I think what it really means is the combination of our willingness to drill longer, our ability to drill U-turns when needed, and the blockiness of the position that you'll continue to see lateral length tick up over time. I don't think that we are in a place where you're going to see some step change where we go from 11,000 to 15 year-over-year. I do think the kind of 500 plus or minus feet longer each year is probably typical of what you should expect going forward.
Great. Guys, thank you so much.
Thank you.
Your next question is from John Freeman with Raymond James. Please go ahead.
Good morning. Thanks. In the slide deck, you all sort of showed the capital allocation strategy and at least the first half of the year, it's been pretty skewed to these really nice accretive acquisitions along with debt repayment. You've got leverage now at the bottom end of your leverage target range. Just thinking, I guess going forward, if there's any sort of maybe change in the way you all think about your cash priorities across acquisitions, balance sheet, buybacks, maybe even growing the dividend?
Yeah. I think growing the base dividend consistently over time is a priority and always has been a priority. I think that's something you'll continue to see for us in the future. I'd say other than that, we don't have any plans to change our capital allocation program. I think what we have is working really well today. Obviously, the business is generating a lot of cash. We've been able to both pay down considerable amounts of debt over the past two years and do a lot of acquisition activity, all while de-levering the business to the 0.5x it is today. I think now into the foreseeable future, I think our capital allocation strategy is working, and you'll see us hold the course.
Okay. On the back of all the accretive acquisitions. Obviously, most of these have been just the perfect deal where you're just increasing working interest in fields you're already there. There are some examples of you all doing some transactions, continuing to push the boundaries further out on your acreage footprint. Does that necessitate any sort of infrastructure investments that we should be Kind of thinking about in the upcoming years?
No, nothing outside of what's already baked in our plan and our budget for the year. I think these areas that we're more active in are still right next to existing PR or offset operations today. I think it probably is pretty easy. We've got the right partners where we need on the midterm side, and frankly, all the stuff we're doing really is a mile or two away from existing PR ops. Nothing out of the ordinary there. I think the only exception that would be the Ward County bolt-on. There'll be a minimal, call it like $25 million of incremental CapEx associated with just taking over a new asset.
Got it. Thanks, guys.
Your next question is from the line of Kevin MacCurdy with Pickering Energy Partners. Please go ahead.
Hey, good morning, guys, and thanks for taking my question. I guess for the first one, can you guys bridge the old production guidance to the new production guidance and do the same thing on CapEx? Maybe breaking out the contribution from the higher working interest, the production you bought, and then any pull forward or outperformance.
Hey, Kevin, it's Guy. On production side, we were at 192,500 bbl a day at Q1. Our guidance after Q1 are at 199 today. The only production we acquired with this $1 billion of acquisitions was 2,500 bbl a day of production at the time we closed the Ward County bolt-on a week ago. When you take that over a year, that's 1,000 bbl of the 6,500 barrel a day increase. The significant majority of the remainder is just higher working interest in our 2026 projects, as we talked about, with a little bit of contribution from accelerated workovers. On the capital side, we're up $100 million. $25 million of that is just some of the takeover costs associated with the Ward County bolt-on, just putting in equipment that's our standards and things like that, and the remainder is also just higher working interest in the 26 TILs.
We took our guidance from 75% to 80%, to over 80% working interest in 2026 TILs. I think when you put all that together, it's really capital efficient. You can see that in the increase in capital relative to the increase in production.
I appreciate that detail, Guy. Then maybe for the follow-up, is your gas production back online now that Waha prices are better? Can you give us any kind of sense of the cash flow uplift you're seeing for the back half of the year just from better gas prices?
All the wells are back online. We brought them online at the very end of June, right when Waha rebounded. We've had all the wells online since. Q3 and Q4 will be much more normal looking with respect to gas. Hey, Kevin, on cash flow uplift, I think we're probably hesitant to forecast gas prices in the back half, but we produce over $750 million a day net. Regardless of where we end up, given where Waha is today, above $52 and HSC and TexOk higher, it'll contribute in the back half of 2026. That's why we put the commentary in there about 2027. As we think about growing free cash flow over time, we've done that with the real headwind of realizing almost nothing from our dry gas stream.
I think both the curves and our transportation in 2027 set us up for a much better answer year-over-year.
Great, appreciate that. Totally understandable. You wouldn't want to predict gas prices in this market.
Your next question is from the line of John Abbott with Wolfe Research. Please go ahead.
Hey, good morning, and thank you for taking our questions. The question is really on CapEx and recognizing that you don't want to talk too much about 2027.
Right.
For 2026, from the increased working interest and also from some carryover from Ward, you've increased full year guidance by about $100 million on the midpoint. If you annualize that, it's maybe $200 mil. Is that a reasonable step up as one sort of thinks about 2027 if you were going to maintain flat production? Are there other factors that need to be taken into account as you think about CapEx next year?
I think one thing just to correct is the majority of that $100 million increase happened in Q2. I don't think you can double it to annualize it. I think that is the annualized increase. If you want to think about this year, we came into it, we were going to spend $1.85 billion and grow production minimal, and now we're going to spend $1.95 billion and grow production by 10,000 bbl a day. It is a very meaningful increase in production, and that $100 million is annualized. I think if you look going forward, I guess if the question is, where is maintenance CapEx? I think if we continue to spend at, call it the $1.95 billion-$2 billion range, we would continue to grow production. Maintenance is south of there. There it is.
That's a growth case, and I think where we stand in 2027 between do we want to grow or do we want to be in a maintenance case is obviously very much subject to what the markets look like when we get there. I mean, that $1.95 billion grew production 10%. I think that's a pretty substantial growth rate, and I'd say as we think about the world, that's highly capital efficient. I'd say if you think about our business today, that's 17,000 bbl per day year-over-year growth in 10%. I think that's a pretty cool capital efficiency story.
Extremely helpful. Just, you had the step up in activity on the workover activity in 2Q. How does workover activity sort of trend for the remainder of the year?
It'll normalize. The step up in Q2 basically chewed through our entire backlog of workovers. We are back at normal course, just kind of fixing wells as they come offline, and that'll be with a rig cadence that's more like what we've done in Q1 in the past.
Appreciate it. Thank you very much for taking our questions.
Thank you.
Your next question is from Phillip Jungwirth with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Yeah, thanks. Good morning. Can you provide some background information just on what you did here in Ward County with the bolt-on and subsequent acreage swap? It looks like you executed acreage trades between two or more parties that gave you a larger operated position. Just wondering if there's similar opportunities where you have large operators with legacy checkerboard acreage positions, and just how much of a discount you typically see for non-op acreage.
Yeah, sure. No, that was a really cool deal. I think kind of a lot of things came together, our team, great collaboration with, as you mentioned, multiple counterparties on the trades in the Ward County bolt-on. Yeah, I think we love it when you can find opportunities like that are win-wins and make your position better. I think actually that's an interesting question. I'd say honestly this year we haven't talked a lot about it and maybe we should in our next release, but this has been a really busy year for us on the trade front. I think we're finding more opportunities to net up our own working interest, trade out of non-op and into operated positions like you see here. Yeah, I don't know if we'll see any that are as big as this in the back half of the year.
We've certainly done some big ones to start the year, and it's something that we're always working on.
Okay, great. Can you talk about some of the productivity initiatives such as surfactants, completion design changes, just how many wells you're looking to deploy surfactants on this year. You mentioned you're encouraged by early time results, just any color here or expectations for incremental costs.
Sure. On the completion side, we've pumped two surfactant trials on two different pads with kind of tests for control wells and test wells. One of those is online. One is, we've pumped the fracs, but the wells are not yet online. That's probably where we'll stop for this year. We'll look at that data, kind of see what we see early time with water oil ratios and see what we see kind of over the 60, 90, and 180-day period. As we head into next year, should be in a good place to have a feel for how big of the program that could be. I'd say on that side, it's just too early to tell. On the production side, there's two or three pads across both basins that we have pumped surfactant more in late life, kind of typically around an ESP failure.
I've seen, I'd say uplifts up to north of 100 bbl a day and some that are kind of de minimis. On the average, that program has been very economic, kind of call it sub one year payouts on the aggregate inclusive of the wells that we saw basically no uplift. That's where we're very encouraged is that even with the dispersion of results from really, really effective to less effective, that the program on average has been very economic. I'd say what the team's working on now is how do we do more of the 100 bbl a day uplift and less of the zero, or what could we do differently on the wells that we didn't see an uplift?
I think that's going to be something that probably is a real part of the program to go forward, is just kind of, we got to figure out exactly how much and exactly where we're going to do it before we can roll it out as part of the go forward plan.
Very helpful. Thank you.
Your next question is from Oliver Huang with TPH Research. Please go ahead.
Good morning, James, Will, Guy, and team. Thanks for taking our questions. Kind of looking at what you all picked up on the New Mexico side. One of the things that goes overlooked sometimes is how this is fairly virgin rock you're picking up. You all referenced the Tascosa well in that Northwest Parkway area being a bit more of a step out. Are you all 100% confident at this point with carrying out your development program there, or are you going to need to do a bit more appraisal work up there to feel comfortable with the entirety of that block?
That's a good question. We're really comfortable in the primary zones. That's a great kind of nuanced question that we didn't address in our script. I'd say our base case underwriting, kind of the deals that the locations that we actually paid for, we are highly confident in. As you get to some upside zones potential, whether that's two or three productive zones or four or five productive zones is still TBD. We'll continue to learn about the Parkway area and that kind of Tascosa acquisition specifically over time, but have a really high degree of confidence in what we're calling proven locations that go into that 330 locations that were underwritten. Over time, hopeful and would expect to see some of those upside locations proven up and coming into the money.
Perfect. Maybe for a follow-up, on the op side, could you maybe provide a bit more detail in terms of, you all call out well bore design improvement, which Will spoke to earlier, but optimization of the power supply and compression fleet as well. How much of that is already flowing through the financials today, and how much more running room do you see on both of those fronts?
There's a decent amount flowing through the financials today. We've run, at this point, seven or eight microgrids across New Mexico in areas where we historically have been on generator power. If you want to think about run room of that going forward, there's definitely more to do. It's really going to be New Mexico centric as we are on line power in the Texas Delaware. Same thing on the compression side. As we're optimizing that, it's going to be in areas where what we've seen is where we end up with better run times across the board if we're on microgrid as opposed to one-off generators. Think about flipping a light switch, like cycling it on and off is not good for runtime of equipment like ESPs and things like that.
Really, all this just comes together to, I think we've seen a tremendous ability for us to hold LOE flat or even reduce it over time, which is, I think, not normal and not what you'd expect. I feel like we've always been a 550 BOE, LOE company. If you look at where we were in Q1 and even where we were in Q2 with a meaningful amount of our BOE shut in due to gas curtailment, we're still pushing closer to five dollars per BOE. I think that's a testament to what we've done in the short term. There is still stuff to do.
I feel like beating a dead horse. The water recycling side is a big needle mover. Water disposal is our largest LOE cost, the more we can recycle, the more we defer and ultimately save on the LOE side. Those are the initiatives that we're working on real time. I think all of them matter, if you can do them all together, that's when you really move the needle.
Okay, awesome. Thanks for the time.
Yep.
Your next question is from Josh Silverstein with UBS. Please go ahead.
Good morning, guys. Just want to see if we can get a bit more detail on the royalty acquisitions versus the leasehold acquisitions here. Were these done as separate transactions, done together where you have both the leasehold and the royalty? I guess maybe along the same lines, we typically think of the royalty value as a bit higher. You guys are having a lower price paid for the royalty acreage versus the leasehold. Just a little bit more detail there would be great.
I'd say the royalties historically and in this first half of the year come as a mix of straight minerals and royalties acquisitions versus high IRR with leasehold. I'd say for us, it's tended to be more weighted towards higher IRR leasehold. I think the minerals and royalties on a standalone basis can get really expensive, and frankly, we've struggled to be able to buy very much at our return thresholds. I think going forward, I think we will continue to target both. I think it's probably safe to expect more of our royalty acquisitions to come paired with leasehold because I think we can bring the full suite of PR competitive advantages to bear on the cost-bearing interest combined with the royalty.
In terms of prices, I think what you're seeing on low dollar per net royalty acre values, it's just the output of us acquiring these deals at attractive prices. I think we talk a lot about the creative things that we've done, those creative things allow us to buy both, I'd say, the leasehold and the royalty interest at what we view as really attractive and you may view as lower prices. I think that's a really good thing and something we're hopeful to continue to be able to do.
Thanks for that detail there. Maybe just along the same lines, I was curious to see if there's any shift in development plans, given the leasehold and royalty acres that you've acquired. Do you now have a bit more capital going towards the Texas assets? Do you still favor New Mexico? I guess the goal is to try to keep your working interest now at higher levels. Any update there would be great. Thanks.
I think it's going to be basically the exact same as it's always been. It'll be, call it 70% of the development, maybe a little north of that on the New Mexico assets and the rest in Texas. That's consistent with where we've been the last two or three years.
Got it. Thanks, guys.
Your next question is from the line of Gabe Daoud with Truist. Please go ahead.
Hey. Thanks, operator. Morning, everyone. I know it's hard to nail down these opportunities, was curious, guys, if you could maybe frame what the spend on land could be the rest of the year. You've done $1 billion or so year to date. Just curious if you maybe have any kind of framework around additional spend from here.
No, we don't. We're always looking, we're always on the hunt, and we're going to continue to buy things when we can find high-quality assets at prices that make sense for generating attractive full-cycle returns. No, I think we've got good momentum. I think the ground game continues to chug along, and we're having a lot of success there. I think in terms of trying to predict exactly what it looks like over the next 12 months, I think that's hard to do.
Okay. No, that's fair. I guess just a quick follow-up for me. You talked about the surfactants and productivity potentially improving from here. Just curious, maybe can you quantify or talk about what else you're doing on the productivity side? If we should still expect flat productivity from PR year-over-year, particularly with all the new assets. Thanks, guys.
I'd say, look, there's a long list of things we're doing. The hot topic today is surfactants. If you want to think back, six months ago it was on lightweight proppant, and in the middle, there's been a bunch of tweaks of cluster spacing, completion design strategies, et cetera. I think the right kind of approach that you all should think about PR is that we are testing, trialing, and studying all of it. I think we're better suited to speak to exactly which ones are the big winners kind of once we get there. Really, what's it mean for well productivity? I'd say not driven by step changes in oil recovery percentages, but really just by the duration and depth of the inventory. I think your expectation is that rest of 2026 and 2027 productivity will be the same as it's been in 2024, 2025, 2026.
We are still kind of marching across our position in both New Mexico and Texas, drilling the same benches in the same way and expect the same productivity as we've seen in the past.
Your next question is from the line of Leo Mariani with ROTH. Please go ahead.
Hi, I was hoping you could provide a little bit more detail on kind of where cost per foot may be headed here in the second half. You mentioned some inflationary pressures. I think in some of your prepared materials, you kind of said well cost per foot are pretty flat in Q2 versus 1Q. Do you expect those to go up at all with inflation in the second half? Do you think efficiencies can basically counteract all that? I think you had talked about a $675 per foot target at one point. Just want to get a sense, are we there at this point, or is that something you're hoping to get to later this year?
Yeah, I'd say, obviously the run-up in crude and kind of demands on steel and et cetera associated with the war has put some pressure on where we were targeting for the year. We've done a really good job offsetting that. I mentioned some of the efficiencies we've picked up on the drilling side, on the water recycling side. We've had some small wins on the sand side. It's not all inflationary pressures. We've had some kind of big wins on the efficiency side to get here to date. I think a lot of that shows up just with the incremental. Now we're just north of 80% working interest in the back half of the year, and we're still able to keep CapEx sub $1 billion. Kind of speaks to are we going to achieve $675?
I'd say that feels like a longer putt than it was when we came into the year, we're still very much on target as far as where we came into the year at and at least holding the line flat or maybe slightly improving. It's really a hard answer to give, Leo, just given, like, fuel is such a big component of our spending, and I just have no idea where fuel and crude prices are going to be between now and year-end. I think that if oil prices dip and fuel resets back to where we came into the year, I think $675 is absolutely in our sights. If oil runs, I think it's probably less likely, we'll take it on the revenue side.
Right. Okay. Makes sense. I know it's really difficult to forecast your success on the M&A front. Maybe you can just talk about the deal pipeline. It sounds like it's very robust right now. Certainly, you executed a lot of deals in the first half. Is the deal pipeline just as robust today as it was in the past handful of months? Are you getting a lot of looks here?
I'd say we've spent $1 billion in the last two years, 2024 full year and 2025 full year. We've already achieved that same pace halfway through or a little over halfway through 2026. I think it's probably safe to say we will exceed the last two years' average this year. The ground game, we're seeing a lot of stuff. I think that, like we've said in the past, that's pretty consistent every month in, every month out, where we're finding opportunities on the ground game side. The bigger stuff can be lumpier. I'd say we're getting a lot of looks. I think we'll reference it. I feel like there were a ton of deals coming to market at the beginning of the year.
I think we've seen maybe half of those run their course. There's still some out there that could be interesting. I think for us, definitely nothing big imminent. There's some ground game stuff that's always getting done day in, day out. For us, it's just taking it as it comes and making sure we do the right opportunities at the right price. Passing the deals that don't make sense for us. We've done a really good job of that. We've got a ton of confidence it'll keep working going forward.
Okay, thanks.
Your next question is from Paul Diamond with Citi. Please go ahead.
Thank you. Good morning, all. Thanks for taking the call. I just want to discussion about emerging benches across the Mid-Permian and Delaware. I guess, how do you guys see that developing on your footprint? I guess any updates from the last time you spoke about it?
Last time we spoke about this, I'd say I mentioned kind of the success of the Avalon and kind of some of the deeper Wolfcamps in moving north in Lee County. I'd say that is happening, and happening extremely well, and very quickly, so to speak. I mean, we had drilled a few Avalons up that far north as of the call last quarter. I'd say since then, like, full development, stacking Avalon, it's been some of the most productive wells we've drilled. Those type of emerging benches, think of it as benches that have been developed historically on the state line area, moving up north into our Lee County and our Eddy County position is very much happening. We're seeing the same thing on our Eddy County position with some of, like, the deeper Wolfcamp.
Typically, we've drilled first sand, second sand, third sand, and XY on the North Eddy, and we're starting to see deeper Wolfcamp move that direction. As far as, like, the total new benches, which are where I think you were alluding, Woodford, Brushy, things like that We own it on some of our assets and other assets we don't. I'd say it's something that we're keeping our eye on, but it's not a core bench. It's not something that's going to be a big part of our development plan or really any part of our development plan in 2027. I think that we've seen some of the most prolific wells in the basin drilled in the Woodford and some of the biggest dogs. We're just going to watch and see and, hopefully, let serendipity come our way to the extent it does.
Got it. Understood. I guess over the course of the last year or so, you guys have worked pretty diligently to right-size the realization expectations around nat gas. Are you guys happy at the current level on the go-forward basis, or should we expect a bit more movements in kind of those, whether it's FT or hedging or just how you think about walking that, the ball twice again?
Hey, Paul, it's Guy. I think we feel great about the deals we did. We identified this as an issue a couple of years ago, I think not just the long haul that we are kicking in kind of late this year and early next year, but the interim agreements we had with some of those partners this year have served us really well. I think the capacity we have going into 2027 covers roughly all of our net volume. We're always thinking about what else should we do to optimize the portfolio, how do we handle growth and gas volumes that could occur as we continue to grow oil production and grow through acquisition. I think on the hedging front, we're just going to be opportunistic like we have.
I think that we spend a lot of time thinking about appropriate basis and where we want to sell gas. I view that more as optimization rather than something we have to do.
Got it. Appreciate the clarity on it there.
Your next question is from the line of Sean Mitchell with Daniel Energy Partners. Please go ahead.
Good morning, guys. Thanks for working me in here. Will, you talked a little bit in the commentary about offsetting some rising costs by using water-based mud versus oil-based mud in the drilling. Are you seeing anything in terms of drill time that is interesting, or is it coming down with water-based versus oil-based?
No. I don't think water-based would be a time savings versus oil-based.
Oh.
We've got some areas where you'll take some losses, and if you can run water-based instead of oil-based in areas you take losses, you save money really, really quick.
Okay. It's more on cost savings than drill time.
Yeah, that's right. Our drill time wins have been in this slim hole design. Obviously, when you go to 8 5/8 intermediate as opposed to 9 5/8, you can drill a smaller hole and everything goes faster. If you want to think about the savings associated with slim hole, it's been like 50% of the savings is on drill times. We save almost a day a well.
Okay. All right, that's it. Thank you.
Thanks, Sean.
Your last question is from the line of John Annis with Texas Capital. Please go ahead.
Hey, John. John, do you have your mute on? We can't hear you. Okay. Operator, I think we can hand it back.
We can close the question and answer session. Absolutely. There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to James Walter for closing remarks. Please go ahead.
Thank you. As you can tell from this morning's results, the business is performing at the highest level in PR's history. We delivered record free cash flow this quarter, responded quickly and decisively to a volatile commodity environment, and add high-quality inventory at attractive valuations, all while maintaining an investment-grade balance sheet in the lowest cost structure in the Delaware Basin. We believe we are exceptionally well-positioned to continue compounding free cash flow per share and delivering outsized returns for investors going forward. Thanks to everyone who joined the call today and for following the Permian Resources story.
This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending, and you may now disconnect.

