PL

Thank you for joining us, welcome to the Planet Labs PBC first quarter of fiscal 2027 earnings call. After today's prepared remarks, we will host a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, please press star one again. I will now hand the conference over to Cleo Palmer-Poroner, Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thanks, operator, and hello everyone. Welcome to Planet's first quarter of fiscal year 2027 earnings call. I'm joined by Will Marshall and Ashley Johnson, who will provide a recap of our results and discuss our current outlook. We encourage everyone to please reference the earnings press release and earnings update presentation for today's call, which are available on our investor relations website. Before we begin, we'd like to remind everyone that we will make forward-looking statements related to future events or our financial outlook. Any forward-looking statements are based on management's current outlook plans, estimates, expectations, and projections. The inclusion of such forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by Planet that future plans, estimates, or expectations will be achieved. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties and assumptions as detailed in our SEC filings, which can be found at www.sec.gov.

Our actual results or performance may differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. We undertake no responsibility to update such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. During the call, we will also discuss historic and forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures. We use these non-GAAP financial measures for financial and operational decision-making and as a means to evaluate period-to-period comparisons. We believe that these measures provide useful information about operating results, enhance the overall understanding of past financial performance and future prospects, and allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in its financial and operational decision-making. For more information on the non-GAAP financial measures, please see the reconciliation tables provided in our press release issued earlier today, which is available on our website at investors.planet.com.

Further, throughout this call, we provide a number of key performance indicators used by management and often used by competitors in our industry. These and other key performance indicators are discussed in more detail in our press release and earnings update presentation, which are intended to accompany our prepared remarks. At this point, I'd now like to turn the call over to Will Marshall, Planet's CEO, Chairperson, and Co-Founder. Over to you, Will.

Thanks, Cleo. Welcome everyone joining us today. Planet had another excellent quarter, delivering record revenue and signing an eight-figure deal with an international customer. We also successfully launched three additional Pelican satellites, including one for Sweden, their first sovereign reconnaissance satellites just four months after contract signing. To briefly summarize the results, we generated a record $94 million in revenue, representing approximately 42% year-over-year growth. Non-GAAP gross margin was 56% for the quarter. For the third sequential quarter, we achieved Rule of 40, which is our revenue growth rate plus adjusted EBITDA margin. End-of-period backlog was approximately $906 million, equating to approximately 72% growth year-on-year. Defense and intelligence continues to be an area of strength for us, underpinned by the geopolitical backdrop. First quarter D&I revenue grew over 65% year-on-year, driven by strong performance in our data subscription solutions and satellite services.

I'd like to highlight a few recent customer wins with the U.S. government. We were awarded a six-month, $7.5 million contract renewal by the U.S. Navy for vessel detection and monitoring over key areas of interest throughout the Pacific. As we announced earlier today, the U.S. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, the NGA, awarded Planet a $21.9 million one-year contract extension for maritime surveillance under the Luno B IDIQ for advanced analytics for maritime operations and reconnaissance. We also received a new award from the NGA for our global monitoring service to support crisis response. These awards reinforce the U.S. government's commitment to integrating commercial AI-enabled geospatial intelligence into its national security architectures. They underscore our position as a vital partner for customers seeking persistent monitoring to accelerate critical decision-making in a complex arena. We're very proud to have received these awards and eager to deliver for this critical customer.

We also continue to see robust international government demand driven by the aforementioned geopolitics. Nations are articulating an urgent imperative to secure sovereign access to space, understand threats in their region, modernize their defense capabilities, and maintain their strategic edge. For example, we signed a new dedicated capacity deal with an international defense and intelligence customer. This eight-figure one-year contract will give the customer immediate access to dedicated capacity from our satellites in orbit, as well as advanced analytical solutions integrated across our Pelican, SkySat, and PlanetScope constellations. Also, we're making excellent progress executing against our previously announced satellite services deals. To highlight one prominent example, last month, we successfully launched the first Pelican for the Swedish Armed Forces. Critically, the launch occurred just four months after we were awarded the contract.

Members of the Swedish delegation attended the launch at Vandenberg. They expressed their excitement and national pride in launching Sweden's first ever sovereign reconnaissance satellite. We're incredibly proud to have delivered it for them and look forward to what we hope is a long and fruitful partnership. We're continuing to focus on execution and delivery for our international customers across the board. We believe our ability to ramp them quickly and address their most urgent needs, whether through immediate dedicated capacity or speedy launch to orbit, continues to be a key differentiator for us. With our reliable track record and agile aerospace approach, we're able to deliver a suite of solutions that meet our customers' critical needs.

Turning to the civil government sector, where first quarter revenue was roughly flat year-over-year, primarily due to the reduction in our contract with NASA. In spite of that headwind, we've seen some strong momentum with our customers in Europe. To share some recent highlights, we were awarded a two-year, seven-figure agreement with the Greek government in support of the country's national satellite space project. Signed through the European Space Agency on behalf of the Hellenic Ministry of Digital Governance and the Hellenic Space Center, this contract will support historical change analysis, trend detection, rapid response during critical events, and the integration of satellite data into national monitoring workflows.

We won a two-year, seven-figure contract to provide satellite imagery and AI-powered analytics to the State Agricultural Intervention Fund of the Czech Republic. This deal will support the countrywide agricultural payments and monitoring system, serving approximately 25,000 agricultural holdings across the Czech Republic.

Last but not least, we onboarded the Scottish Agriculture and Rural Economy Directorate with our partner, Computacenter, following a seven-figure award closed at the end of Q4 for PlanetScope data and advanced analytics to support the agricultural reform route map. Planet's deep archive of data and AI analysis will aid in the country's agricultural transition by rewarding farmers who focus on sustainable food production, biodiversity, and net zero emissions. Shifting to the commercial sector, where revenue grew over 20% year-over-year, reflecting the focus from our teams on landing and expanding in larger opportunities and leveraging AI-enabled solutions. We saw positive trends in the agriculture sector, reflecting our shift in the sector to align our business model with that of our customers, focused on improving yields and decreasing costs. We also had our first maritime domain awareness solution sale in the energy sector.

To highlight a few specific wins in the commercial sector then, in April, Planet was awarded a John Deere Supplier Sustainability Award for 2025. This award highlighted the value of our data in powering next generation precision agricultural technologies, helping to improve on-farm efficiency and positive environmental impact for John Deere. We renewed our customer, Nave Analytics. Since 2022, we have partnered with Nave to incorporate our Planetary Variables, such as our Soil Moisture and Biomass Proxy, into their data fusion framework. Nave's products provide farmers and their trusted advisors with near real-time streams covering all components of the field, water balance, planting and irrigation decision risks, and operational sustainability impacts. We recently signed Watch Duty as a new customer.

Watch Duty is a nonprofit public safety platform that provides real-time wildfire tracking, mapping, and emergency alerts, particularly in remote regions of the U.S., where satellite imagery fills critical gaps in radio traffic and on-the-ground reporting. Watch Duty has begun integrating our imagery and data into their platform for a mutual lighthouse customer in the energy sector. We're excited about this new integration and look forward to building on this foundation. Finally, supported by funding from the Bezos Earth Fund, Planet's Tropical Forest Observatory program is providing 15 environmental and research institutions with 12 months of monthly mosaics and PlanetScope data. These broad area monitoring products are utilized to track changes across the Amazon biome, empowering those institutions to help halt and reverse tropical forest loss. Turning to product updates. Firstly, in AI, one of our key focus areas for the year.

We recently started early customer access to a private beta testing phase of our new AI App, a pioneering tool aimed at making Planet's massive global data archive queryable through natural language. By leveraging Planet's daily data and integrating large language models, it can help non-technical users to search the data through space and time, conduct complex time-series analysis, generate answers, and produce automatic insights and even analytic reports at speed and scale. Although the App is still in early testing, we're excited about how it can help accelerate the expansion of our business into new markets, and it has the potential to significantly lower the barrier to entry for new non-expert users to answer previously unanswerable questions about the world, as well as provide the foundations to build bespoke solutions.

We also launched a new feature called SuperRes, an AI-powered technology to improve the resolution of our PlanetScope data into a 2 m class resolution visual product, providing clarity for human-in-the-loop analysis with speed and frequency. We are constantly improving our data products to be best in class and deliver better results for our customers. Just last year, we leveraged sharpening technology to take the resolution of our daily scan from 3.7 m to 3 m class product. This year, we introduced SuperRes, and as previously announced, our planned Owl constellation will be designed to upgrade our daily monitoring data to a 1 m class resolution product. We recently announced our agreement with our partners, Carbon Mapper and NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, to design a specialized shortwave infrared-only iteration of the Tanager spacecraft. This design would expand the swath width of the instrument approximately fivefold, enabling more imagery area per collect.

This new satellite is aimed at accelerating and building upon the existing Tanager satellite mission by enhancing atmospheric gas detection and supporting commercial use cases like fire fuel monitoring. Earlier this week, Planet announced that the Pelican 11 satellite was shipped to Vandenberg Space Force Base in California ahead of its launch aboard the upcoming Transporter 17 mission with SpaceX. This technology demonstration is the first of the Gen 2 Pelican satellites, which are expected to progress to providing up to 30 cm class imagery. In summary, this quarter, we delivered strong revenue growth and our third consecutive quarter achieving Rule of 40. Our strong performance in defense and intelligence demonstrates the mission-critical nature of our data in a complex geopolitical landscape. We launched three more Pelican satellites, including our first for Sweden. We have many additional launches on deck, including our first Gen 2 Pelican tech demo.

Last but not least, our investments in AI position Planet at the forefront of the industry, making planetary-scale insights accessible and actionable to more users than ever before. I'll turn over to Ashley to discuss our financials. Over to you, Ash.

Thanks, Will. The year is indeed off to a strong start, and it's exciting to see the acceleration across the business. Before I dive into the financials, I want to take a brief moment to reflect on my recent trip to Panama for our Planet on the Road customer conference. It is hard not to start with one of our most impactful programs, the work we've been doing with our long-term partner, SCCON, and the Brazilian government to fight illegal deforestation. This program began in September 2020 and has grown to support over 133,000 registered users and 730 institutions.

According to the updated figures provided by SCCON, as of April 2026, the government's investment of $59 million into the program has generated an estimated $5.3 billion in total impact from fines, seizures, and asset freezes while reducing the amount of illegal deforestation in the Amazon from over 19,000 sq km in 2022 to under 7,500 sq km in 2025, a decrease of over 60% in three years. At our event, we also recognized the Panamanian Ministry of the Environment with Planet's Social Impact Award for its pioneering work in protecting the Darién Gap. Utilizing Planet's proactive early warning systems, the ministry now monitors over 50,000 hectares nationwide, transitioning from reactive monitoring to a near real-time model and successfully improving response times for fires and deforestation from weeks to mere days.

Overall, it was a very successful event with over 150 attendees from industries spanning civil government to finance, logistics, airlines, and education and research. Attendees hailed from 20 different countries, providing a fantastic opportunity to connect directly with our customers and partners, the people who are leveraging our data to help solve some of the planet's most pressing challenges. Turning to our financial results. Revenue for the first quarter came in at a record $94 million, representing approximately 42% year-over-year growth. The outperformance in the quarter was driven primarily by new wins. During the first quarter, our defense and intelligence sector revenue grew more than 65% year-on-year. The commercial sector was up more than 20% year-on-year, and civil government revenue was approximately flat. Turning to our regional revenue breakdown, growth continues to be distributed around the globe.

During the quarter, revenue growth was approximately 25% year-over-year in Asia-Pacific and North America, 86% in EMEA, and 7% in Latin America. Before I turn to our ACV metrics, I want to remind you that our ACV metrics exclude satellite services, which for the purposes of our financial reporting, we define as sovereign satellite ownership, direct access services, and managed operations. Our ACV metrics do include dedicated capacity contracts as they are delivered using Planet-owned satellites and infrastructure, and revenue for these services is recognized ratably. Recurring ACV was 99% of our end-of-period ACV book of business, reflecting our continued focus on selling subscription data contracts and solutions as opposed to one-time professional or engineering services. Approximately 92% of our end-of-period ACV book of business consists of annual or multi-year contracts.

Net dollar retention rate at the end of the first quarter was 113%, and net dollar retention rate with win backs was 114%. Our non-GAAP gross margin for the first quarter was 56%, compared to 59% in the first quarter of fiscal 2026, reflecting investments in support of our satellite services contracts, new satellite launches, and our AI-enabled partner solutions. Our gross margins came in better than expected, driven by the strong bookings and our revenue mix in the quarter. Adjusted EBITDA loss was $1 million for the first quarter, better than expected as the revenue outperformance largely dropped to the bottom line. Capital expenditures in Q1, which include our capitalized software development, were approximately $18 million. This was on the lower end of our guidance range based on timing of procurements.

We expect CapEx to increase in future quarters as we lean into market demand, scale up our manufacturing capacity in San Francisco and Berlin, and build out our next-generation fleets. Turning to the balance sheet, we ended the quarter with approximately $731 million of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments, an increase of over $500 million year-on-year, driven by our issuance of convertible debt, positive trailing 12 months free cash flow, and approximately $108 million in proceeds from exercises of our public warrants. During the quarter, we generated approximately $15 million in net cash from operating activities, while free cash flow was a $-2.5 million.

At the end of Q1, our remaining performance obligations or RPOs were approximately $816 million, up over 80% year-over-year, of which approximately 35% apply to the next 12 months and 66% to the next 24 months. We estimate our backlog, which includes contracts with the termination for convenience clause, to be approximately $906 million, up approximately 72% year-over-year. Approximately 40% of our backlog applies to the next 12 months and 69% to the next 24 months. Let me now turn to our guidance for the second quarter and full fiscal year 2027. In Q2, we're expecting revenue to be between $102 million and $107 million, which represents approximately 42% year-on-year growth at the midpoint, driven by strong bookings growth and delivery on our backlog.

We expect non-GAAP gross margin for the quarter to be between 52% and 55%, a modest step-down from Q1 as a result of our satellite services execution, the mix of deals with AI-enabled partner solutions, and increased depreciation from the recent launches of our Pelicans. Q2 adjusted EBITDA profit is expected to be between breakeven and $5 million, reflecting our investments to drive sustained growth. We are planning for capital expenditures of approximately $21 million-$27 million in the quarter. For the full fiscal year 2027, we are raising our revenue expectations to be between $425 million and $441 million, representing approximately 41% growth at the midpoint. We believe our Q1 performance and backlog provide us with excellent visibility to our revenue projections.

The visibility enables us to shore up our growth expectations for the year and provides us with the confidence to invest behind initiatives to sustain high growth into future years. Our non-GAAP gross margin for the year is expected to be between 52% and 54%, better than our prior expectations. We anticipate margins will expand in subsequent years as we realize returns on our growth investments. We are maintaining our prior expectations for fiscal year 2027 adjusted EBITDA profit to be between breakeven and $10 million, reflecting our desire to drive EBITDA profitability on an annual basis, even as we continue to invest in our space systems capabilities, AI-powered solutions, and our global sales and marketing organization. We also aim to deliver Rule of 40 for this fiscal year, where Rule of 40 is calculated as our revenue growth rate plus adjusted EBITDA margin.

We are planning for approximately $80 million-$95 million in capital expenditures for the year, reflecting the necessary investments in our next-generation satellites to meet accelerating market demand. CapEx recognition can vary quarter to quarter based on the timing of our procurements, launches, and real estate build-outs. Even with these operating and capital expenditures, we expect to be free cash flow positive on an annual basis again in fiscal year 2027. As a reminder, while free cash flow can vary quite significantly quarter to quarter based on the timing of cash collections and capital outlays for procurements, our focus remains on generating sustainable annual free cash flow through efficient growth in revenue from our data solutions and satellite services. In closing, the incredible start to the year is a testament to the growing global demand for high-impact geospatial data and sovereign space capabilities.

With record first quarter revenue and a 42% revenue growth rate, we are demonstrating the ability to scale the business and expand our market while maintaining financial discipline, as evidenced by our Rule of 40 performance and improved full-year guidance. From Brazil to Sweden and around the globe, our work is yielding tangible ROI for both our customers and our Planet. As we lean into a strategic investment cycle for our next-generation satellites and pioneering geospatial AI solutions, we remain steadfast in our commitment to turning daily global change into actionable intelligence. We are well-positioned for a year of delivering durable revenue growth and sustainable annual free cash flow, building our momentum as the indispensable data layer for a changing world. Will and I are once again blown away by the excellent performance and constant innovation of the Global Planet team. Thank you for all that you do.

Operator, that concludes our comments. We can now take questions.

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. Please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, please press star one again. We ask that you pick up your handset when asking a question to allow for optimum sound quality, and if you are muted locally, please remember to unmute your device. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Colin Canfield from Cantor. Your line is now open.

Hey, thank you for the question. Maybe if you could talk about the remaining opportunities, all within the context of if you go back to September's Investor Day slides and call it roughly $3 billion-$4 billion pipeline. Can you maybe rank order the remaining opportunities among intelligence customers and maybe split that out between international and then U.S.? If you can provide any color on kind of how you think about maybe near-term board opportunities and how it splits within that matrix. Thank you.

Do you want to take this, Ashley?

Obviously, Colin, we're not going to give too much color on the specifics of our pipeline. What we'd say is it continues to be robust. We updated last quarter that it had increased since our Analyst Day. We continue to be very well-positioned just with the proof points that we actually already have. As you recall, when we signed the opportunity funded by the German government last summer, we were able to get them their first satellite on the next rocket launch. With Sweden, we similarly just announced that the first satellite for their contract went up on our most recent launch of three Pelicans. We are very well positioned on the basis that we've got great solutions.

We can get these customers up and running on our data and AI-based solutions very quickly, while we also rapidly move them through our pipeline of production or our production line to get their first sovereign satellites into orbit. Strong pipeline continues to be very healthy. It is balanced geographically, and I think Planet's well positioned. Anything you'd add, Will?

No, I think it's just we're seeing really robust demand here. We said last time how that had increased in at least qualitative way, both in size and in number of deals. As Ashley was pointing out, what we have here is that we can execute really fast. Countries really like that. They can get immediate access to our satellites that are in orbit for both the data and the AI-enabled solutions, and quickly get sovereign satellites up in space. The one with Sweden I'd also point out as a great example. They got immediate data services from our satellites, then within four months, the first sovereign satellite in orbit. Basically we're the only ones that can do that. It's really unheard of. Traditional aerospace industry would take years, normally decades, to do that sort of capability.

Here we are offering that just four months after signing a contract. That's unprecedented in the sector. It speaks to our differentiation, and that's why governments are coming to Planet for that kind of solution.

That's great. No, I appreciate the color. Maybe pivoting over to data centers, if you could talk about kind of any color on initial discussions that you and Google are having with the chip suppliers, and then maybe talk about what do you think are the key engineering signposts that investors should look for as Planet on-ramps for orbital compute?

Yeah. Well, it's a very exciting area. Obviously, what we're doing with Google is an early tech demo, and on the chip side, it's all leveraging their TPU architecture, testing those work in space, which is one of the questions. I'm pretty confident about that side of it. We're also testing things like intersatellite links because we'll be formation flying these sort of satellites together, and other technologies, the radiators for the power. That's one of the other core technologies that we have to develop a little bit here. Stepping back a little bit, what I'd say is that it's very clear to me that this is going to make sense fiscally and from an engineering standpoint. Within 10 years, it will definitely be cheaper to do it in space than on the ground.

As to exactly how fast we can do it between now and then, I think that depends on some of these engineering questions that we'll be tackling in these early tech demos. Again, early days, but a really exciting field and you see there's a lot of players going into it, and we think Planet is well positioned because of our history of doing hundreds of satellites before. We're one of the few players that has done that. We've already put fast computers, GPUs, NVIDIA GPUs in space. We already do a lot of stuff with AI, as you're aware. We're well positioned for this sector.

That's great. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you for your question. Your next question comes from the line of Edison Yu from Deutsche Bank. Edison, your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Great. Thank you for taking our questions. I wanted to first follow up on the overall data center. In your kind of early work around the engineering, do you have a sense on what kind of compute density is realistic in the next couple of years? I think the framework that's been thrown around is sort of kilowatts per ton. Any sense on what you guys are seeing there? Is it realistic to be like 80, 100? I'll stop there for now.

Well, thanks for the question, Edison. I'm not going to get into those sort of technical specifics at this stage. Remember, this is really, as Google likes to put it, a moonshot at the present time. It's going to be an iterative project that we iterate the capabilities in space. I will point out that there's several interlaced challenges to do with the compute, the radiators, and the interconnects between all the different satellites as well as the computers on board any one satellite, and there will be multiple. That complex trade space, I think that a lot of people are focused just on the launch costs, but it is a lot to do with the efficiency of your chips, and because the excess energy you have to give up in heat, you have to radiate out.

Efficiency of chips plays a really important part, as well as the networking of those together and the firmware to optimize all of it. It's a very complex trade space, and one of the things Planet is really good at is that sort of thing and doing really good systems engineering to bring down costs for that sort of spacecraft system. Again, early days, but those are the kind of problems we're tackling.

Understood. I wanted to ask you about the essay you put out very recently.

On planetary intelligence.

On planetary.

Yeah.

Yes.

Obviously, I think some very profound and I think thought-provoking ideas. I guess in a more kind of operational sense, what do you think is kind of the next, call it, two or three years? How do we see that sort of manifest either in the business or in the industry? What are some paths you could envision to see that manifest more on a commercial operational basis?

Well, that's very much the first part of what I was talking to in that planetary intelligence essay, which is the merger of Earth imaging data with AI and the large language models that are really unlocking the value latent in Earth imaging data in new ways and lowering the barriers to entry. I think that's what is most exciting. It doesn't depend on the future phases of compute in space or something. I think that that sort of supercharges this when we get to that phase. It's natural that sensing for at a planetary level is done in space. We've done that for years. The compute is going to follow, and they all lead into this sort of new planetary intelligence era. Way before that, right now, Earth imaging data and other sort of space data sets and AI are enabling us to do more real-world models.

More real-world models open up real-world applications on the ground today in farming, in energy, in insurance, and so on. Most of the entities that we serve today are big governments, big enterprise commercial players. This, in principle, can enable that to be lowered. I think that's the most exciting thing now. So that's what we're mostly focused on. It's cool to do the tech demos for compute in space as well, because the long term, that could be very exciting, too.

Thank you very much.

Great. Thanks, Edison.

Your next question comes from the line of Jeff Van Rhee from Craig-Hallum Capital Group. Your line is now open.

Great. Thanks for taking the questions. Will, on the AI side, interesting, exciting. You've got the beta program now up with a natural language query. Can you just talk about the scope of the trial?

Yeah.

How many participants, thoughts on when that goes GA? I'd love to hear is kind of maybe in your mind, what are a couple of more compelling use cases you're seeing people playing with right now?

Well, firstly, it's very early days. Let me just say, we're in a beta testing mode, as I mentioned in the prepared remarks. Again, just like the answer to the prior question, this is about unlocking the latent value in our data more easily and more simply, especially expanding the number of users that could get value out of that really fast. Speed, scale, and simplicity, basically, all in one. It's early days in the testing, so I'm not going to get into specific numbers, but we have a cohort of beta testers just so that we can find where are the best value use cases that we could dive into, and how do we improve that product so that it's better able to serve those use cases.

Very early days, but what's tantalizing about it is that Planet historically has faced this solution gap, that is that our data in principle can answer a lot of questions. In practice, it's difficult. You have to build these solutions. We've been focused on these AI-powered solutions, especially with defense and intelligence, MDA, GMS. In principle, this direction can help a lot of others by enabling people to be able to build bespoke solutions on top of our data, leveraging this kind of technology, which can unlock that for a lot more players. We know that value is there, and AI is ready to help us to get to that quicker, I think. That's the exciting thing, and it's also where Planet is so uniquely positioned, because all of this is because of our daily scan.

Our daily scan is really so unique because no one else in the Earth observation sector really is doing that sort of daily scan, at least not commercially. That is the basis for all these applications across wider areas where you don't have to task a satellite, but it already covers all the land you're interested, whether it's for agriculture, energy, and so on. That's really great for these AI models.

I think it certainly has potential to break open the commercial and civil TAMs for you.

Yeah.

Maybe one last quick one for you. On the Pelican 1's up and ramping nicely, 50 cm. You talked about the tech demo on Pelican 2 going to 30 cm. Just any crew swags on based on prior experience, how long you would expect a tech demo for and broad brush sort of strokes on when you think those Pelican 2 to start going up commercially?

I won't comment on that specifically. We have got a bunch more launches this year. We are ramped and at pace on the Pelican Gen 1s as you're aware. We already launched three of those earlier this year, including that first one for Sweden. We're excited about that Gen 2. It is a tech demo at this stage. A couple of technologies that it has on it's got a bit of a bigger telescope to enable it to get to that 30 cm, and it also has satellite to satellite communications as well as the NVIDIA chips that we're flying with the other ones. That in combination is what enables the more real-time insights going from hours latency for getting analysis of after you take a picture to minutes. That's the biggest improvement.

It's even more important, I would say, than the resolution improvement, although both are important. We'll get back to you once we get that in orbit, start seeing how it performs, but we're ready to scale that fleet, too, and excited about the program.

Yeah, I think it's important just to highlight that across our satellite fleets, as you know, we tend to repurpose a lot of the components. There's a lot of commonalities, even as we iterate on various aspects, whether that's improving latency, improving the payload for resolution. That enables us to have a much faster pace of.

Iteration

Iteration than you might typically see in hardware iterations, especially in space. I would say stay tuned. There's a lot of fun stuff coming.

Great. Thanks so much. Thanks.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from Mike Latimore from Northland Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

All right. Great. Yeah. Thank you. Congrats on the quarter. Over the last several quarters, you've highlighted Europe as being an area of urgency and increasing demand. I guess, is that still kind of the most hot spot within the pipeline, or is the pipeline urgency broadening?

I'd say it's very global. We have strong interest in Asia, U.S. as well, North America. It's strong. I think you're right. Europe is probably our strongest area. EMEA is strong as you saw in the breakdown, very strong growth in that region. Obviously all of the global interest is driven by a lot of this geopolitical trends. It's driving demand because of political uncertainty. In this uncertainty, people want their own sovereign space capabilities, their own access to information about threats in their neighborhood, and we can provide that relatively quickly and affordably. Countries are coming to us. Europe is perhaps most stressed by that kind of situation. Obviously that is driving strong demand there. Of course, we also have a very strong European base. We have hundreds of employees in Europe and a lot of facilities, Mission Control Center in Berlin.

As you're aware, we're now opening a manufacturing site for our most advanced Pelican spacecraft in Berlin as well, approximately doubling our manufacturing capacity. We're really leaning into that market opportunity. Planet's well-positioned there as well.

Great. On the commercial side, nice change in the trajectory there this quarter.

Yes.

Are the drivers of that change sustainable, or was there some one-offs this quarter? How should we think about commercial?

I think it's very sustainable. One of the things about the agriculture partnerships that we mentioned is that we've really turned it around to a point where we've really aligned that business model with the agricultural partners that we're doing with, like the John Deere piece that we announced. As they do well, we do well. We took a reset in that area, but now we're growing it, and so we feel good. I'm very happy about that growth as well. Ashley, anything to add?

Yeah. I would just say the comments that we made earlier, both around the AI solutions that we have, things like GMS or MDA as well as this beta of a new natural language-based interface is really enabling us to engage with customers that haven't historically really thought about how they might integrate GIS into, or GIS data sets into their modeling and analysis. Even in financial services sector, when you think about what things like GMS or MDA can do, it's really unlocking kind of a view into changes in global supply chains and patterns and understanding when a change in pattern could lead to some type of economic indicator of change or market impact. We're excited.

We are early days certainly in the AI application, also even in exploring how the solutions that we've initially explored primarily in defense and intelligence are unlocking opportunities for us in the commercial sector. We remain very optimistic about how the commercial sector can be a major growth vector for us in the years to come.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Kristine Liwag from Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open.

Hi, this is Gaby Knafelman on for Kristine. Thanks for taking the question and congratulations on the quarter. Since last quarter, Planet moved from a 14-day delay in Middle East imagery access to an indefinite restriction for imagery in the conflict region. Have you seen any change in customer behavior as a result? Since the news came out in early April and with recent ceasefire talks, is there any anticipated timeline or framework for restoring satellite imagery access in the Middle East?

Yeah. Thanks for the question, Kristine. Yeah. When there are conflicts around the world, we always have to balance operational security needs for civilians or military personnel in the area with public interest. I just note something that's I think been confused a little bit in media reporting on this, is that all of our core customers continue to have access in that area straight away. It's really about publication that could lead to operational security challenges that folks are worried about legitimately and that we're putting a delay in place for. Most of our core customers continue to have day-to-day access. Of course, the intent is to unwind that as the conflict resolves. Our stakeholders obviously around the board care about this and we do too. I think that the strong demand we've seen in the region is excellent despite that.

Just so you're aware, we do have a managed access program for media clients as well. It's just moved to a push model, which is rather more similar to other folks in the Earth observation sector, where we provide imagery on an as-needed basis, where we can, and where it's not going to hurt security operations in the region. That means that articles continue to happen in the press as well.

Got it. That's super helpful color. Thank you for the clarity. A quick follow-up. Defense and intelligence is clearly becoming a larger portion of revenue and has been the fastest grower for quite some time now. You also highlighted some nice civil government and commercial wins during the quarter. As we look ahead, how should we think about the size and growth of civil and commercial relative to defense and intelligence?

Well, I think that's an excellent question. The way I view it is, long term, I believe the civil and commercial sectors will be bigger than defense intelligence. We're obviously leaning into defense intelligence right now because there is such strong demand, and it makes sense for us to lean in there. We're very needed. As we were just talking about AI, that helps us unlock these other areas. I think that's the right way to think about it. It helps us to accelerate that. Yeah, just the breadth of use cases in commercial, all the sectors we've talked about before, we believe there's many tens of billion dollars of TAM to go after in commercial and civil. We're going to go after those. I think for the immediate focus, defense and intelligence is the best place to focus because there's such strong demand.

Also a very sophisticated customer that provides us with feedback that helps makes our solutions even stronger and we think ultimately much more broadly applicable.

Great. Thanks so much.

Thank you for your question. In the interest of time moving forward, please limit yourself to one question. Your next question comes from the line of John Godyn from Citi. Your line is now open.

Hi, this is Jeremy Jason on for John Godyn. Congrats on the quarter. I just wanted to ask what are the upcoming milestones for the key programs that you're looking forward to, just for clarity's sake? Can you provide any color on the timeline for those?

Which key programs are you referring to?

Involvement in, for example, Owl. You guys mentioned that in the prepared remarks.

Oh, like the tech demos. Yeah. There we're building our first tech demo spacecraft, scheduled for the end of this year. It's a lot of synergy with the Suncatcher, so we're using the same bus as the Suncatcher. That's the project with Google for compute in space. Same bus, different payload, just like we did with Tanager and Pelican, same bus, different payload. We're building that. We're very pleased with how that's progressing. It's still being built right now. It's early days. We'll let you know when there's updates.

Awesome. Thank you so much.

Thank you.

Thank you for your question. Your next question comes from the line of Trevor Walsh from Citizens. Your line is now open.

Great. Hey, all. Thanks for taking the question. Will, and maybe Ashley, if you want to add as well. There was a smaller competitor, but a competitor that announced a win in late April, end of your quarter, of their own satellite sovereign deal. Much smaller than anything you guys have booked, but I was just curious if you're seeing, just based on your own success and that being pretty widely known and publicized, if you're seeing more competition specifically in that space, kind of working for government agencies, international, et cetera. Then kind of relatedly, is there a minimum deal size that you all would entertain as far as structuring more where the sovereign or the entity owns the actual satellite, so something more in a JSAT kind of realm? Thanks.

Yeah, good question. I don't think competitive landscape has changed very much. I don't know which deal you're referring to, but obviously there are other players that can build Earth imaging satellites for countries. Really our differentiator, as I mentioned, is proven track record, having launched hundreds of satellites doing Earth imaging before, and the speed of delivery. The speed of delivery in months rather than years, sometimes decades for these systems. Also cost performance that I would add. Having had that long track record, we've got the cost down of our satellites a lot. Sometimes these things are radically lower cost. We might be launching 10 satellites at the same cost as people were before or companies were before launching just one or more.

All those differentiators make us strong in the market, and we haven't had too many cases where we see others competing with us. We feel pretty strong.

I would just add, we're able to compete on all of the points that Will just made in terms of speed and performance and cost effectiveness. We also are the only ones that can enable these customers to get up and running.

Straight away.

Immediately.

Yeah.

On the network of satellites that we have. A combination of the daily scan and the analytics on top, which help inform them where to look and how to best optimize. The sovereign capabilities as they're building them out, including how they want those in orbit so that they can get the best performance ultimately out of the fleet that we would build for them. We can very cost effectively get them up and running through a dedicated capacity service or tasking credits so that they immediately are getting the eyes that they need to understand what's going on around them. It's not just the ability to be best in class in delivering satellites, which obviously we are, but it's also the fact that we have the network of satellites and capabilities, the daily scan, and the analytic solutions on top of it that bring value on day one.

Got it. Thanks both.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Ryan Koontz from Needham & Company. Your line is now open.

Great, thanks. A question for Ashley on gross margins. Surprised again at the upside here. Can you maybe give us a bridge or unpack what the upside was on mix? Obviously, satellite services deals. Are those lower margins not contributing as much? Maybe help unpack the mix a little bit for us. Thank you.

Yeah. It's my favorite kind of upside. It's sales performance. As you know, we typically, for the purposes of our own planning, assume pretty back half-weighted sales execution. That just gives us headroom on that front. When they bring in something like an eight figure international deal early and that drives data and solutions revenue, that's very high margin upside in the quarter. I really attribute this to the excellent performance of our sales team and the delivery teams that get those customers up and running so that we're going from contract to revenue very quickly. The business model that we have, we're delivering data comes at relatively low marginal cost, means that when we drive upside on revenue, you see that fall to the bottom line and in this case, it definitely stopped by gross margin along the way and drove upside.

Ashley, that was for your deal you signed in this quarter?

That's right.

Great. Thanks.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Steven Wahrhaftig from Wedbush Securities. Your line is now open.

Thanks for taking the question. Congrats on the quarter, everybody. Ashley, just a question for you, because it seems like there's a lot of different focuses for capital investments. You're thinking about the R&D for new AI-enabled solutions. You're thinking about the CapEx ramp. You really do have a strong balance sheet. What would you say is the priority from a capital allocation perspective? If I can add just one more onto that, is the company still looking at M&A opportunities? I know that you haven't shied away from it, but want to get a little more color on that opportunity. Thanks.

Yeah, thank you for the question. We're obviously very proud of our balance sheet, and it's a great asset, especially when we're delivering such a mission-critical service to really important customers there. It gives them a lot of comfort to see that we have both a strong business and a strong balance sheet to go with it. When we think about capital allocation, as you might imagine, we are very innovative company, and we are never short on ideas. We always have the customer at the center of what we do and our understanding what do customers need that can really unlock market opportunity for us. I'd say the investments that we're making are really prioritizing growth and market capture. How can we sustain or even expand our growth rates and then continue to drive high margins?

We gave the Rule of 40 framework, revenue growth rate plus EBITDA margin as one way that we think about making sure that we're balancing making these investments, but also running a good business that generates profits, that generates free cash flow, and always has an eye to how with scale our profit margins and free cash flow margins can expand. A lot of exciting things, incredibly innovative teams, but also really doing it in service of market capture and delivering value to customers.

On the M&A side that you brought up, we're mainly focused on execution and have most of what we need. We will do things like the Bedrock acquisition that we did that enhances our AI-powered solutions in really good ways, and that team's working really well, by the way, and very integrated into our AI-powered solutions, especially in the defense intelligence space. We'll continue to look out for things that could be accretive, especially to the core business product or business synergies. Again, I think we have most of what we need. We're mainly heads down focused on executing on the deals we have.

I got it. Thank you.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Greg Pendy from Clear Street. Greg, your line is now open.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Just a real quick one. As you have so many things that's going on, especially later in this year with the first Owl and then subsequent launches to follow in 2027, are there any stress areas in either the supply chain or launch that could move things around? Thanks.

Yeah, we're seeing launch be a little bit more competitive than it used to be. Planet is used to working with a lot of players. We've launched 40 rockets, I think on 10 different launch vehicles. We know how to do that, and we have a long history and relationship with various launch providers. I would also say, despite a little bit of extra competition for the space right now. There's a lot of new players coming onto the fore right now. We're excited about them. We're excited about what they can offer as well, and increase competitiveness in the launch sector. As for supply chain, nothing material to point out, but one of the things we of course look at is buying down risk in supply chain by buying components.

That's one of the reasons that we're focused more on growth than profitability, where we need to do that to show up risk. Anything to add to that?

No, I'd just say, in some of our prior quarters, we've talked about the fact that we've taken up our CapEx, capital expenditures, specifically to make sure we're looking at those areas where we can buy in advance to de-risk any supply chain, but also get better pricing by buying more upfront. It is something that we keep an eye on and manage, I think, quite successfully. Generally speaking, the team has a very resilient supply chain.

That's very helpful. Thanks a lot.

Thank you.

Thank you. That's all the time we have for questions today. I will now turn the call back to Will Marshall, CEO and Co-Founder, for closing remarks.

Thanks, everyone. We feel like we had an excellent start to the year. A really good momentum. On the financial side, it was great that we got to 42% growth, hitting Rule of 40 for a third consecutive quarter, $900 million in backlog. We feel very solid about the finances. Obviously, it was great on the space side to have our first launch, to send our first Gen 2 tech demo to the launch site, launch Sweden's first sovereign satellite. Lots of progress on the space side and on the AI side and other pieces of the product. We did the Super Resolution, the beta stage of our app, and investing in AI is unlocking a lot of the value latent in our data. Really proud of the work done in this quarter that led us to all these results.

Thank you to the incredible team and all the efforts that they do to enable this today. Thanks a lot for tuning in.

This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.