RankAlpha logo
Back to Rankings

ICLR

ICONF
Nasdaq / Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences
Last Price
Quote time unavailable
View Chart
Documents
62
Stored
Transcripts
1
Recent loaded
Latest report
2026-08-14
Investor release

Document history

Earnings documents stored for ICLR.

12 shown
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-14

Glenn Greenberg's Top Second Quarter 2026 Move: TD Synnex Corp at a -6.73% Portfolio Impact

GuruFocus.com
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Glenn Greenberg (Trades, Portfolio), co-founder of Chieftain Capital Management in 1984 alongside John Shapiro, has long championed a concentrated investment approach. Under his leadership, Chieftain compounded accounts at 22.5% annually (before fees) from 1984 through 2004, versus 12.9% for the S&P 500. After the firm split, Greenberg established Brave Warrior Advisors, maintaining a portfolio he describes as a "defense against ignorance." His philosophy centers on owning fewer companies to know each deeply, focusing on businesses with little competition and strong returns on invested capital. The recently filed 13F for the second quarter of 2026 reveals significant repositioning, most notably a substantial reduction in TD Synnex Corp. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with ICLR. Is ICLR fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Glenn Greenberg (Trades, Portfolio) added a total of 7 stocks to his portfolio during the quarter. The most significant addition was Arthur J. Gallagher & Co (NYSE:AJG), with 1,285,022 shares, accounting for 6.43% of the portfolio and a total value of $295 million. The second largest addition was Analog Devices Inc (NASDAQ:ADI), consisting of 612 shares, representing approximately 0.01% of the portfolio, with a total value of $243,070. The third largest addition was Nu Holdings Ltd (NYSE:NU), with 40,000 shares, accounting for 0.01% of the portfolio and a total value of $534,400. Greenberg also increased stakes in a total of 6 stocks during the quarter. The most notable increase was Ryanair Holdings PLC (NASDAQ:RYAAY), with an additional 919,308 shares, bringing the total to 3,958,684 shares. This adjustment represents a significant 30.25% increase in share count, a 1.3% impact on the current portfolio, and a total value of $256,324,790. The second largest increase was Icon PLC (NASDAQ:ICLR), with an additional 156,497 shares, bringing the total to 3,153,308. This adjustment represents a 5.22% increase in share count and a total value of $547,761,130. Glenn Greenberg (Trades, Portfolio) completely exited 3 holdings in the second quarter of 2026, as detailed below: Apollo Global Management Inc (NYSE:APO): Greenberg sold all 4,500 shares, resulting in a -0.01% impact on the portfolio. Ares Management Corp (NYSE:ARES): Greenberg liquidated all 5,000 shares, caus…Read full document

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Glenn Greenberg (Trades, Portfolio), co-founder of Chieftain Capital Management in 1984 alongside John Shapiro, has long championed a concentrated investment approach. Under his leadership, Chieftain compounded accounts at 22.5% annually (before fees) from 1984 through 2004, versus 12.9% for the S&P 500. After the firm split, Greenberg established Brave Warrior Advisors, maintaining a portfolio he describes as a "defense against ignorance." His philosophy centers on owning fewer companies to know each deeply, focusing on businesses with little competition and strong returns on invested capital. The recently filed 13F for the second quarter of 2026 reveals significant repositioning, most notably a substantial reduction in TD Synnex Corp. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with ICLR. Is ICLR fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Glenn Greenberg (Trades, Portfolio) added a total of 7 stocks to his portfolio during the quarter. The most significant addition was Arthur J. Gallagher & Co (NYSE:AJG), with 1,285,022 shares, accounting for 6.43% of the portfolio and a total value of $295 million. The second largest addition was Analog Devices Inc (NASDAQ:ADI), consisting of 612 shares, representing approximately 0.01% of the portfolio, with a total value of $243,070. The third largest addition was Nu Holdings Ltd (NYSE:NU), with 40,000 shares, accounting for 0.01% of the portfolio and a total value of $534,400. Greenberg also increased stakes in a total of 6 stocks during the quarter. The most notable increase was Ryanair Holdings PLC (NASDAQ:RYAAY), with an additional 919,308 shares, bringing the total to 3,958,684 shares. This adjustment represents a significant 30.25% increase in share count, a 1.3% impact on the current portfolio, and a total value of $256,324,790. The second largest increase was Icon PLC (NASDAQ:ICLR), with an additional 156,497 shares, bringing the total to 3,153,308. This adjustment represents a 5.22% increase in share count and a total value of $547,761,130. Glenn Greenberg (Trades, Portfolio) completely exited 3 holdings in the second quarter of 2026, as detailed below: Apollo Global Management Inc (NYSE:APO): Greenberg sold all 4,500 shares, resulting in a -0.01% impact on the portfolio. Ares Management Corp (NYSE:ARES): Greenberg liquidated all 5,000 shares, causing a -0.01% impact on the portfolio. Greenberg also reduced positions in 15 stocks. The most significant changes include: Reduced TD Synnex Corp (NYSE:SNX) by 1,612,014 shares, resulting in a -52.79% decrease in shares and a -6.73% impact on the portfolio. The stock traded at an average price of $239.75 during the quarter and has returned 10.62% over the past 3 months and 73.53% year-to-date. Reduced F&G Annuities & Life Inc (NYSE:FG) by 2,870,724 shares, resulting in a -53.63% reduction in shares and a -1.8% impact on the portfolio. The stock traded at an average price of $27.32 during the quarter and has returned -3.25% over the past 3 months and -9.31% year-to-date. At the end of the second quarter of 2026, Glenn Greenberg (Trades, Portfolio)'s portfolio included 41 stocks. The top holdings included 11.94% in Icon PLC (NASDAQ:ICLR), 10.08% in OneMain Holdings Inc (NYSE:OMF), 8.4% in TD Synnex Corp (NYSE:SNX), 8.23% in Elevance Health Inc (NYSE:ELV), and 7.56% in SLM Corp (NASDAQ:SLM). The holdings are mainly concentrated in 8 of all 11 industries: Financial Services, Healthcare, Consumer Cyclical, Industrials, Technology, Energy, Real Estate, and Communication Services. The significant reduction in TD Synnex Corp stands out as the quarter's most impactful move, reflecting Greenberg's disciplined approach to trimming positions that have appreciated substantially. With a year-to-date return of 73.53%, the stock's valuation may have reached levels that no longer align with his criteria for high return on invested capital and competitive moats. This strategic rebalancing, alongside new positions in Arthur J. Gallagher and increased stakes in Ryanair and Icon PLC, underscores his commitment to maintaining a focused portfolio of high-quality businesses. Investors tracking Greenberg's moves may find value in monitoring how these adjustments play out in the coming quarters, particularly given his historical track record of outperformance.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-06

Is ICON a Buy as Valuation Improves but Earnings Risks Still Persist?

Zacks
ICON Public Limited Company ICLR presents a mixed investment case. The stock trades below several key benchmarks, while new business awards and backlog point to healthier commercial demand. That opportunity is tempered by weaker earnings expectations, lower margins and unfinished control remediation. The current setup favors patience rather than an aggressive entry. ICLR trades at about 15.4X forward earnings, below the 16.2X multiple for its sub-industry and roughly 20.6X for both the broader medical sector and the S&P 500. The discount is also meaningful against ICON’s five-year median multiple of 17.9X. That relative valuation may create room for upside if earnings stabilize. Still, a lower multiple alone does not make the stock inexpensive because current estimates continue to move lower. IQVIA Holdings Inc. IQV and Fortrea Holdings Inc. FTRE provide useful industry context as clinical research peers serving pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical-device customers through broad development-service platforms. Commercial indicators are more encouraging. ICON reported a 1.51X book-to-bill ratio and a $23.4 billion backlog, giving the company a sizable base of contracted work that could support future revenues. Awards were diversified across large pharmaceutical companies, midsized customers and biotechnology firms. Broader cross-selling and functional-service programs could expand the opportunity set by deepening relationships across multiple services rather than relying only on isolated project wins. In the past year, ICLR shares have risen 3.6% compared with the industry’s 18.4% growth. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The near-term earnings outlook remains the main reason not to chase the valuation discount. ICON expects 2026 revenues of $7.85 billion to $8.15 billion and adjusted earnings of $10 to $11 per share, both below 2025 results. The projected 15.3% decline in first-year earnings reinforces that pressure. The annual earnings estimate has also fallen 18.1% over the past 12 weeks, indicating that analysts have become more cautious about the pace of recovery. Adjusted EBITDA margin declined to 15.9% from 20.5%. Higher pass-through revenues, which generally carry lower margins, diluted the reported margin profile and limited the benefit from improving demand indicators. Recovery now depends on execution. Cost actions, workforce adjustments…Read full document

ICON Public Limited Company ICLR presents a mixed investment case. The stock trades below several key benchmarks, while new business awards and backlog point to healthier commercial demand. That opportunity is tempered by weaker earnings expectations, lower margins and unfinished control remediation. The current setup favors patience rather than an aggressive entry. ICLR trades at about 15.4X forward earnings, below the 16.2X multiple for its sub-industry and roughly 20.6X for both the broader medical sector and the S&P 500. The discount is also meaningful against ICON’s five-year median multiple of 17.9X. That relative valuation may create room for upside if earnings stabilize. Still, a lower multiple alone does not make the stock inexpensive because current estimates continue to move lower. IQVIA Holdings Inc. IQV and Fortrea Holdings Inc. FTRE provide useful industry context as clinical research peers serving pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical-device customers through broad development-service platforms. Commercial indicators are more encouraging. ICON reported a 1.51X book-to-bill ratio and a $23.4 billion backlog, giving the company a sizable base of contracted work that could support future revenues. Awards were diversified across large pharmaceutical companies, midsized customers and biotechnology firms. Broader cross-selling and functional-service programs could expand the opportunity set by deepening relationships across multiple services rather than relying only on isolated project wins. In the past year, ICLR shares have risen 3.6% compared with the industry’s 18.4% growth. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The near-term earnings outlook remains the main reason not to chase the valuation discount. ICON expects 2026 revenues of $7.85 billion to $8.15 billion and adjusted earnings of $10 to $11 per share, both below 2025 results. The projected 15.3% decline in first-year earnings reinforces that pressure. The annual earnings estimate has also fallen 18.1% over the past 12 weeks, indicating that analysts have become more cautious about the pace of recovery. Adjusted EBITDA margin declined to 15.9% from 20.5%. Higher pass-through revenues, which generally carry lower margins, diluted the reported margin profile and limited the benefit from improving demand indicators. Recovery now depends on execution. Cost actions, workforce adjustments and a more favorable business mix must produce measurable improvement. A broad rebound in direct-fee revenues has not yet developed, so margin expansion cannot be assumed from backlog growth alone. Based on short-term price targets offered by 14 analysts, the average price target for Icon comes to $184.86. The average price target represents an increase of 17.86% from the last closing. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The bottom line is that ICLR offers a more attractive valuation and better pipeline signals, but earnings and margin risks remain unresolved. Investors may find the stock worth monitoring, though the evidence does not yet support chasing the discount. ICLR currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) and a VGM Score of B. Its Value Score of B and Momentum Score of A offer support, while the Growth Score of C reflects a less favorable expansion profile. Zacks Style Scores are designed to complement the Zacks Rank. A Hold-rated stock can remain appropriate to own, but the rank does not provide the same buying signal as a Zacks Rank #1 or #2. Until estimates stabilize and margins show more durable improvement, a measured hold-or-wait stance fits the current risk-reward balance. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report ICON PLC (ICLR) : Free Stock Analysis Report IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) : Free Stock Analysis Report Fortrea Holdings Inc. (FTRE) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-31

ICON Announces Results of Annual General Meeting

Business Wire
DUBLIN, July 31, 2026--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ICON plc (NASDAQ: ICLR), a world-leading clinical research organization, today announced that all resolutions at the Annual General Meeting of the company (AGM) held on July 31, 2026 were duly passed by shareholders. These resolutions were set out in the Notice of the AGM sent to shareholders dated June 26, 2026 and are available on the ICON plc website. The final results of the voting are as follows: ** Special Resolution. All resolutions are ordinary resolutions unless otherwise stated. About ICON plc ICON plc is a world-leading clinical research organization. Offering deep operational and medical expertise we accelerate innovation, driving emerging therapies forward to improve patient outcomes. From molecule to medicine, we deliver integrated consulting, clinical development, commercialization and post-marketing solutions to pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, government and public health organizations worldwide. With headquarters in Dublin, Ireland, ICON employed approximately 40,200 employees in 99 locations in 55 countries as at June 30, 2026. For further information about ICON, visit: www.iconplc.com. Statements included herein which are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the following: contracted revenue; the repayment of indebtedness; the company's expectations regarding business momentum, market opportunity, demand trends, growth, and commercial performance; and the company's expectations with respect to its long-term value creation and competitive positioning. You can identify many forward-looking statements by words such as "aims," "anticipates," "believes," "continues," "could," "estimates," "expects," "focused," "guidance," "intends," "look," "may," "opportunities," "plans," "positions," "potential," "predicts," "projects," "seeks," "should," "will," "would" and other similar expressions and the negatives of such expressions. However, not all forward-looking statements contain these words. These statements are based on management's current expectations and information currently available, including current economic and industry conditions. The fo…Read full document

DUBLIN, July 31, 2026--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ICON plc (NASDAQ: ICLR), a world-leading clinical research organization, today announced that all resolutions at the Annual General Meeting of the company (AGM) held on July 31, 2026 were duly passed by shareholders. These resolutions were set out in the Notice of the AGM sent to shareholders dated June 26, 2026 and are available on the ICON plc website. The final results of the voting are as follows: ** Special Resolution. All resolutions are ordinary resolutions unless otherwise stated. About ICON plc ICON plc is a world-leading clinical research organization. Offering deep operational and medical expertise we accelerate innovation, driving emerging therapies forward to improve patient outcomes. From molecule to medicine, we deliver integrated consulting, clinical development, commercialization and post-marketing solutions to pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, government and public health organizations worldwide. With headquarters in Dublin, Ireland, ICON employed approximately 40,200 employees in 99 locations in 55 countries as at June 30, 2026. For further information about ICON, visit: www.iconplc.com. Statements included herein which are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the following: contracted revenue; the repayment of indebtedness; the company's expectations regarding business momentum, market opportunity, demand trends, growth, and commercial performance; and the company's expectations with respect to its long-term value creation and competitive positioning. You can identify many forward-looking statements by words such as "aims," "anticipates," "believes," "continues," "could," "estimates," "expects," "focused," "guidance," "intends," "look," "may," "opportunities," "plans," "positions," "potential," "predicts," "projects," "seeks," "should," "will," "would" and other similar expressions and the negatives of such expressions. However, not all forward-looking statements contain these words. These statements are based on management's current expectations and information currently available, including current economic and industry conditions. The forward looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties and are subject to change at any time. In the event such risks or uncertainties materialize, our results could be materially adversely affected. The risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, dependence on the pharmaceutical industry and certain clients, the need to regularly win projects and then to execute them efficiently and correctly, the challenges presented by rapid growth, competition and the continuing consolidation of the industry, the impact of market conditions on demand for the company's services, risks related to the company's ability to execute on its commercial strategy and maintain relationships with large pharmaceutical customers, and risks relating to the company's strategic partnerships, the dependence on certain key executives, changes in the regulatory environment, exchange rate fluctuations, inflation and rising labor costs. Please also refer to the section entitled "Risk Factors" of our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2025 for a discussion of some of the principal risks that could adversely affect our business, operations and financial results. The company’s forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this document or as of the date they are made, and the company undertakes no obligation to update its forward-looking statements. ICON/ICLR-F View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260731057128/en/ Contacts Investor Relations +1 888 381 7923Nigel Clerkin Chief Financial Officer +353 1 291 2000Kate Haven Vice President Investor Relations +1 888 381 7923All at ICON

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30

Icon Q2 Earnings Call Highlights

MarketBeat
Interested in Icon Plc? Here are five stocks we like better. Icon’s Q2 revenue rose 1.2% year over year to $2.1 billion, while adjusted EBITDA increased to $327.2 million and adjusted EPS reached $2.56. Management reaffirmed full-year 2026 guidance and expects sequential EBITDA-dollar improvement in the second half. Bookings strengthened significantly, with gross business wins up 24% year over year to $3.7 billion, net bookings of $3.1 billion and an overall net book-to-bill ratio of 1.51x. Direct-fee bookings produced a solid 1.2x net book-to-bill ratio. Higher pass-through activity pressured reported margins, reducing adjusted EBITDA margin to 15.9% from 20.5% a year earlier. Icon generated $238.9 million in free cash flow and plans to resume share repurchases while investing in China expansion and AI-enabled clinical-trial operations. 3 Healthcare Pathbreakers With Long-Term Tailwinds Icon (NASDAQ:ICLR) reported second-quarter 2026 revenue growth and strong bookings as higher pass-through activity supported the top line, while the company continued to manage business-mix pressures affecting reported margins. Chief Executive Officer Barry Balfe said the contract research organization’s results reflected a “positive demand environment, strong bookings, and disciplined cost management.” Revenue rose 1.2% year over year and 1.4% sequentially to $2.1 billion. Adjusted EBITDA increased 3% from the first quarter to $327.2 million, while adjusted diluted earnings per share totaled $2.56. → Why SK hynix Could Be the Best AI Chip Stock to Buy Now Should You Bring The Luck Of The Irish To Your Investmets? The company reaffirmed its full-year 2026 financial guidance. Management said higher pass-through activity could influence where Icon lands within its revenue range and affect reported margin percentages, while its focus remains on sequential improvement in EBITDA dollars. Second-quarter gross business wins were $3.7 billion, up 24% from a year earlier and 13% from the prior quarter. Cancellations totaled $562 million, resulting in net bookings of $3.1 billion and an overall net book-to-bill ratio of 1.51x. → 3 Value ETFs to Consider as Growth Stocks Lag Behind Direct-fee bookings remained strong, producing a direct-fee net book-to-bill ratio of 1.2x. Chief Financial Officer Nigel Clerkin said the direct-fee book-to-bill ratios were 1.3x in the first quarter and 1.…Read full document

Interested in Icon Plc? Here are five stocks we like better. Icon’s Q2 revenue rose 1.2% year over year to $2.1 billion, while adjusted EBITDA increased to $327.2 million and adjusted EPS reached $2.56. Management reaffirmed full-year 2026 guidance and expects sequential EBITDA-dollar improvement in the second half. Bookings strengthened significantly, with gross business wins up 24% year over year to $3.7 billion, net bookings of $3.1 billion and an overall net book-to-bill ratio of 1.51x. Direct-fee bookings produced a solid 1.2x net book-to-bill ratio. Higher pass-through activity pressured reported margins, reducing adjusted EBITDA margin to 15.9% from 20.5% a year earlier. Icon generated $238.9 million in free cash flow and plans to resume share repurchases while investing in China expansion and AI-enabled clinical-trial operations. 3 Healthcare Pathbreakers With Long-Term Tailwinds Icon (NASDAQ:ICLR) reported second-quarter 2026 revenue growth and strong bookings as higher pass-through activity supported the top line, while the company continued to manage business-mix pressures affecting reported margins. Chief Executive Officer Barry Balfe said the contract research organization’s results reflected a “positive demand environment, strong bookings, and disciplined cost management.” Revenue rose 1.2% year over year and 1.4% sequentially to $2.1 billion. Adjusted EBITDA increased 3% from the first quarter to $327.2 million, while adjusted diluted earnings per share totaled $2.56. → Why SK hynix Could Be the Best AI Chip Stock to Buy Now Should You Bring The Luck Of The Irish To Your Investmets? The company reaffirmed its full-year 2026 financial guidance. Management said higher pass-through activity could influence where Icon lands within its revenue range and affect reported margin percentages, while its focus remains on sequential improvement in EBITDA dollars. Second-quarter gross business wins were $3.7 billion, up 24% from a year earlier and 13% from the prior quarter. Cancellations totaled $562 million, resulting in net bookings of $3.1 billion and an overall net book-to-bill ratio of 1.51x. → 3 Value ETFs to Consider as Growth Stocks Lag Behind Direct-fee bookings remained strong, producing a direct-fee net book-to-bill ratio of 1.2x. Chief Financial Officer Nigel Clerkin said the direct-fee book-to-bill ratios were 1.3x in the first quarter and 1.2x in the second quarter, or roughly 1.25x for the first half. Balfe said awards were broad-based across customer categories. Mid-sized pharmaceutical and biotech companies accounted for eight of Icon’s 10 largest customers by awards during the quarter. The company’s 13 largest individual wins each exceeded $50 million and came from 11 customers spanning large pharmaceutical, mid-sized pharmaceutical and biotech companies. → 5 AI Stocks Are Pulling Back—Which Growth Catalysts Still Look Strongest? Request-for-proposal flow increased 22% sequentially and 16% on a trailing-12-month basis. While large-pharma RFP activity moderated after two particularly strong quarters, Balfe said biotech RFP flow increased markedly. He characterized the biotech increase as consistent with Icon’s strategy to expand its presence in that market, though it included a higher share of preliminary “ballpark” proposals that historically convert at lower rates. Phase III opportunities represented about 50% of total opportunity volume during the quarter, compared with roughly 40% a year earlier. Balfe said that trend indicated more customer assets were moving into later-stage development and contributed to rising average proposal values across the full-service portfolio. Clerkin said revenue benefited from pass-through activity that was higher than Icon had anticipated. Such activity can increase reported revenue but reduce reported margin percentages because pass-through costs are included in the revenue base. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 15.9% in the second quarter, up 30 basis points from the first quarter but below the 20.5% reported in the year-ago period. Adjusted gross margin was 23.8%, compared with 29.1% in the second quarter of 2025. Management attributed elevated pass-through levels largely to therapeutic and geographic mix, including studies in areas such as oncology, obesity, diabetes and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. Balfe also cited health-care inflation in the U.S., including rising procedure costs, and customer incentives to conduct a greater share of trials in the country. Adjusted selling, general and administrative expense was $164.5 million, or 8% of revenue, compared with $174.8 million, or 8.6% of revenue, a year earlier. Clerkin said the second-quarter SG&A result benefited from items including research-and-development tax credits that are not expected to recur in the second half. He said first-quarter SG&A was a better run-rate measure for the remainder of the year. For the full year, management previously indicated that the midpoint of its guidance implied an adjusted EBITDA margin of about 16.5%. Clerkin said that if pass-throughs cause revenue to reach the upper end of the company’s range while earnings remain around the midpoint, the implied margin could be closer to the low-16% area. Icon expects margin and EBITDA-dollar improvement in the second half through cost actions and improving mix effects. Icon generated $281.3 million in cash from operations during the quarter and $238.9 million in free cash flow after $42.4 million of capital expenditures. At June 30, the company held $928.4 million in cash and had $3.4 billion of debt, for net debt of $2.5 billion. Its leverage ratio was 1.8 times net debt to adjusted trailing-12-month EBITDA. Balfe and Clerkin said Icon intends to resume share repurchases after having been out of the market for several quarters. Balfe said the company has plans for buybacks in the third quarter and the second half, while continuing to invest in technology and strategic growth opportunities. The company also highlighted growth investments in Asia-Pacific, including expanded laboratory capabilities in China and a prior investment in Singapore. Icon added specialty biomarker testing and pathology capacity in China during the quarter and signed a partnership with a Chinese biotech company covering global development programs, laboratories and imaging. Balfe said China remains a relatively modest contributor to Icon’s revenue, but revenue from the country could rise as much as 20% from full-year 2025 to full-year 2026. Icon has more than 1,500 employees in China and is pursuing opportunities with Western companies conducting trials there, Chinese companies operating globally, and Chinese biotechs seeking global development partners. Management also discussed its artificial-intelligence strategy, including a newly announced multiyear collaboration with Anthropic and an existing partnership with Microsoft. Balfe said the company is focused on embedding AI capabilities into clinical-trial workflows rather than broadly deploying generic applications. The Anthropic collaboration is intended to strengthen the intelligence layer behind Icon’s Orbis agentic AI platform and support domain-specific agents used in clinical trial management. One example is Meridian, a multi-agent clinical-monitoring platform intended to help monitoring teams assess trial status, identify risks, prepare documentation and support site interactions. Balfe said Icon sees AI as a tool for improving trial planning, protocol development, execution, patient and site engagement, and administrative productivity. He cautioned that AI-driven advances in drug discovery may take time to translate into a meaningful increase in clinical-development capacity, but said the company is concentrating on operational applications that can create value in the nearer term. Icon plc (NASDAQ: ICLR) is a global provider of outsourced drug development and clinical research services to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device industries. The company partners with clients at all stages of the product life cycle, offering expertise in protocol design, trial execution and regulatory compliance across a broad range of therapeutic areas. Icon's service portfolio encompasses clinical trial management, data management and biostatistics, medical imaging, pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring, laboratory sciences and specialized analytical solutions. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "Icon Q2 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for July 2026.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30

Icon PLC (ICLR) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Bookings Surge Amid Margin Pressures

GuruFocus.com
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Revenue: $2.1 billion, up 1.2% year-over-year and 1.4% sequentially. Adjusted EBITDA: $327 million, with a margin of 15.9%. Adjusted EPS: $2.56. Adjusted Gross Margin: 23.8%, compared to 29.1% in Q2 2025. Adjusted SG&A Expense: $164.5 million, or 8% of revenue. Net Book-to-Bill Ratio: 1.51 times; direct fee net book-to-bill ratio of 1.2 times. Gross Business Wins: $3.7 billion, up 24% year-over-year and 13% sequentially. Net Bookings: $3.1 billion. Cash from Operating Activities: $281.3 million. Free Cash Flow: $238.9 million. Net Debt: $2.5 billion, with a leverage ratio of 1.8 times net debt to adjusted trailing 12-month EBITDA. Adjusted Net Income: $198.4 million. U.S. GAAP Net Income: $72.6 million, or $0.94 per diluted share. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Sign with ICLR. Is ICLR fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: July 30, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Strong bookings performance with Q2 gross business wins of $3.7 billion, up 24% year-over-year and 13% sequentially, and a net book-to-bill ratio of 1.51 times. Direct fee net book-to-bill ratio of 1.2 times, indicating robust underlying demand for core services. Broad-based demand across customer groups, with eight of the top 10 customers by awards coming from mid-sized and biotech sectors. Improving pipeline quality with Phase 3 opportunities representing approximately 50% of total opportunity volume, up from 40% a year ago. Strategic investments in AI (e.g., Anthropic collaboration) and expansion in China, including lab capabilities, to strengthen competitive position and long-term growth. Elevated pass-through activity negatively impacted reported margins, with adjusted gross margin falling to 23.8% from 29.1% year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA margin declined to 15.9% from 20.5% in the prior year quarter, pressured by business mix and higher pass-throughs. Large pharma RFP flow moderated in Q2, introducing some uncertainty in demand from this key segment. Higher proportion of ballpark proposals in biotech, which typically have lower conversion rates, may temper future bookings growth. SG&A expense benefited from non-recurring items (e.g., R&D tax credits) in Q2, which are not expected to repeat in the second half, potentially pressuring…Read full document

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Revenue: $2.1 billion, up 1.2% year-over-year and 1.4% sequentially. Adjusted EBITDA: $327 million, with a margin of 15.9%. Adjusted EPS: $2.56. Adjusted Gross Margin: 23.8%, compared to 29.1% in Q2 2025. Adjusted SG&A Expense: $164.5 million, or 8% of revenue. Net Book-to-Bill Ratio: 1.51 times; direct fee net book-to-bill ratio of 1.2 times. Gross Business Wins: $3.7 billion, up 24% year-over-year and 13% sequentially. Net Bookings: $3.1 billion. Cash from Operating Activities: $281.3 million. Free Cash Flow: $238.9 million. Net Debt: $2.5 billion, with a leverage ratio of 1.8 times net debt to adjusted trailing 12-month EBITDA. Adjusted Net Income: $198.4 million. U.S. GAAP Net Income: $72.6 million, or $0.94 per diluted share. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Sign with ICLR. Is ICLR fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: July 30, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Strong bookings performance with Q2 gross business wins of $3.7 billion, up 24% year-over-year and 13% sequentially, and a net book-to-bill ratio of 1.51 times. Direct fee net book-to-bill ratio of 1.2 times, indicating robust underlying demand for core services. Broad-based demand across customer groups, with eight of the top 10 customers by awards coming from mid-sized and biotech sectors. Improving pipeline quality with Phase 3 opportunities representing approximately 50% of total opportunity volume, up from 40% a year ago. Strategic investments in AI (e.g., Anthropic collaboration) and expansion in China, including lab capabilities, to strengthen competitive position and long-term growth. Elevated pass-through activity negatively impacted reported margins, with adjusted gross margin falling to 23.8% from 29.1% year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA margin declined to 15.9% from 20.5% in the prior year quarter, pressured by business mix and higher pass-throughs. Large pharma RFP flow moderated in Q2, introducing some uncertainty in demand from this key segment. Higher proportion of ballpark proposals in biotech, which typically have lower conversion rates, may temper future bookings growth. SG&A expense benefited from non-recurring items (e.g., R&D tax credits) in Q2, which are not expected to repeat in the second half, potentially pressuring margins. Here are the key highlights from the ICON PLC (NASDAQ:ICLR) Q2 2026 earnings call, focusing on the most significant Q&A exchanges. Q: The demand environment seems to be improving, but a meaningful part of the strong book-to-bill is driven by high pass-throughs. Is the heavier pass-through activity pushing revenue above the guidance range, and why are you not raising guidance? A: (Barry Balfe, CEO) The demand environment is healthy, but the 1.5x book-to-bill is indeed driven by particularly high pass-throughs, a function of therapeutic mix and geographic footprint. While RFP flow in biotech accelerated, large pharma moderated. We are encouraged by the quality of the pipeline and win rates. (Nigel Clerkin, CFO) Our guidance assumed pass-through activity would be broadly flat year-over-year. Since Q2 saw higher pass-throughs, it is possible we could land at the higher end of the revenue range, but this would also dampen the reported margin percentage. We are focused on EBITDA dollar progression. Q: On the last call, you expected to land in the mid-16% EBITDA margin range. Given the higher pass-throughs, is there a new range? Also, can you remind us of the back-half loaded cost actions? A: (Nigel Clerkin, CFO) At the midpoint of our guidance, we were targeting an EBITDA margin of approximately 16.5% for the full year. If pass-throughs run faster and we hit the top end of revenue but the midpoint of EPS, that would lower the margin to closer to the low 16% range. The cost actions we have taken are part of the EBITDA progression we anticipate in the second half and are built into the guidance range. Q: You delivered impressive SG&A performance in Q2. Is that sustainable given the mixed dynamics? A: (Nigel Clerkin, CFO) The lower SG&A in Q2 was due to the timing of certain items, like R&D tax credits, that will not recur in H2. Therefore, the Q1 SG&A number is a better run rate for the rest of the year. The margin progression in the second half will be driven more by the gross margin line as we see the benefits of mix effects and cost actions. Q: You mentioned a bigger proportion of Phase III trials in the RFP flow. How should we think about burn rates from the backlog heading into the back half and next year? A: (Barry Balfe, CEO) The uptick in Phase III opportunities is encouraging as it indicates more assets are moving into later development phases, which have higher survival rates. This is also driving average deal sizes up. In terms of business mix, direct fee FSP is growing ahead of FSO, but the strong book-to-bills are driven by FSO outperformance. Therapeutically, oncology and cardiometabolic are now broadly comparable in size for ICON. Q: Pass-throughs have remained elevated. Do you expect a further acceleration in pass-through revenue into 2027? A: (Barry Balfe, CEO) It would not be unexpected to see sustained strength in pass-throughs for some time, given market trends towards oncology and large-scale metabolic disease. However, it is difficult to predict. Our focus is on our ability to win and deliver studies profitably. We will provide as much color as possible, but our net book-to-bill is industry-leading, and we are comfortable with that. Q: Can you provide the direct fee book-to-bill for the first half of the year? And should we expect a similar sequential step-up in EBITDA dollars in Q3 as we saw in Q2? A: (Nigel Clerkin, CFO) The direct fee book-to-bill was 1.3x in Q1 and 1.2x in Q2, so roughly 1.25x for H1. Regarding EBITDA, we are focused on sequential improvement throughout the year, so we expect to continue the progression we saw from Q1 to Q2. Q: You mentioned cross-selling initiatives. Which areas are you seeing the most tangible traction? A: (Barry Balfe, CEO) The most impactful cross-selling is in biotech, where customers are less likely to have locked-in partnerships for ancillary services. We have seen a significant uptick in the proportion of biotech proposals that include our lab services, moving from the high 50% range to the mid-70% range over the past year. This shows the organization is working holistically to bring the right capabilities under one roof. Q: You noted RFP flow moderated in large pharma. Can you elaborate on that and the outlook for large pharma? Also, can you frame the opportunity in China? A: (Barry Balfe, CEO) The moderation in large pharma RFP flow is not a cause for concern; it is inherently volatile quarter-over-quarter. It simply moderated after two very strong quarters, while biotech activity increased substantially. In China, we have seen a notable uptick in opportunity. Our headcount is up 5% year-over-year, and revenue in China could be up as much as 20% for the full year. We are building on our 1,500-person footprint to partner with Western companies in China, Chinese companies going global, and Chinese companies running global trials. Q: The 1.51x book-to-bill is optically a very high number. Besides therapeutic mix, what else is driving the elevated pass-throughs? And can you discuss the new multi-year collaboration with Anthropic? A: (Barry Balfe, CEO) Beyond therapeutic mix, healthcare inflation in the US is a significant driver. The cost of procedures at major academic institutions is rising rapidly, especially for complex therapeutics. The Anthropic partnership is part of a broader AI strategy to embed frontier capabilities within our workflows. It is not about generic adoption but about building a better intelligence layer for our platform, Orbis. This will power domain-specific agents, like our Meridian platform for clinical monitors, to improve productivity, speed, and decision-making for our customers. Q: How should we think about burn rates in the second half after three strong quarters of bookings? A: (Nigel Clerkin, CFO) Burn rates will likely tick down a little given the strong commercial performance in H1. The ultimate trajectory will depend on the book-to-bill in H2. We have reiterated For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

TranscriptFY2026 Q22026-07-30

FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript

Earnings source - 94 paragraphs
Operator

Good day. Thank you for standing by. Welcome to the ICON plc Q2 2026 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there'll be a question-and-answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star one and one on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press star one and one again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Kate Haven. Please go ahead.

Kate Haven

Hello. Thank you for joining us today. I'm joined on the call by our CEO, Barry Balfe, and our CFO, Nigel Clerkin. I would like to note that this call is webcast and that there are slides available to download on our website to accompany today's call. Certain statements in today's call will be forward-looking statements. These statements are based on management's current expectations and information currently available, including current economic and industry conditions. Actual results may differ materially from those stated or implied by forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties associated with the company's business. Listeners are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Forward-looking statements are only as of the date they are made. We do not undertake any obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statement, either as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Kate Haven

More information about the risks and uncertainties relating to these forward-looking statements may be found in the most recently filed annual report on Form 20-F. This presentation includes selected non-GAAP financial measures, which Barry and Nigel will be referencing in their prepared remarks. For a presentation of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, please refer to the section of the press release dated July 29th, 2026, titled Consolidated Statements of Operations. While non-GAAP financial measures are not superior to or substitute for the comparable GAAP measures, we believe certain non-GAAP information is more useful to investors for historical comparison purposes. Included in the press release in the earnings slides, you will note a reconciliation of non-GAAP measures.

Kate Haven

Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income, and adjusted diluted earnings per share exclude amortization, stock-based compensation, foreign currency gains and losses, restructuring, transaction integration related and other adjustments, transaction-related financing costs, fair value movement on investments in equity, goodwill impairment, loss on disposal of subsidiary undertakings, impairment of non-financial assets, and their related taxation effect. In the interest of time, we ask participants to keep their questions to one each. I would like to now hand over the call to our CEO, Barry Balfe.

Barry Balfe

Thanks, Kate. Thanks, everybody, for joining. ICON delivered solid second quarter results characterized by a positive demand environment, strong bookings, and disciplined cost management as we navigated the business mix headwinds discussed on our last call. While pass-through activity continued to benefit reported revenue and net bookings, underlying business performance delivered further sequential earnings progression during the quarter. Direct fee bookings also remained strong, resulting in a direct fee net book-to-bill ratio of 1.2x. Overall, our second quarter results were consistent with the trends we have highlighted in recent quarters, with measured progress supported by sustained evidence of an improving demand environment. We remain focused on delivering for our customers, executing with discipline, and investing in capabilities that strengthen our competitive position. Turning to bookings performance, Q2 gross business wins were $3.7 billion, an increase of 24% year-over-year and 13% sequentially, with strong performance across the portfolio.

Barry Balfe

Cancellations totaled $562 million, broadly in line with expectations, resulting in net bookings of $3.1 billion and a net book-to-bill ratio of 1.51x. Awards were broad-based across customer groups and were supported by further improvement of win rates in large pharma, where we also saw the addition of some meaningful FSP programs to existing relationships. We also saw strong performance elsewhere. Mid-size and biotech companies representing eight of our top 10 customers by awards in the quarter. I was also encouraged by the scale and diversity of awards secured during quarter two, with our largest 13 individual business wins, each exceeding $50 million in value, sourced from 11 different customers spanning large, mid-sized, and biotech sectors. Against this backdrop, the overall customer demand environment remains generally constructive, notwithstanding expected seasonal impact over the summer months.

Barry Balfe

In quarter two, RFP flow increased 22% sequentially and 16% on a trailing 12-month basis. Following two quarters of particularly strong activity, large pharma RFP flow moderated somewhat in the second quarter. We saw a marked increase in biotech during the same period. This is consistent with our strategic objective of addressing more of this important market, albeit that came with a higher proportion of ballpark proposals and a reversion to historical win rates in biotech as we engaged with certain customers for the first time. Staying with pipeline quality, average proposal values continued to increase across the full service portfolio, while phase III opportunities represented approximately 50% of total opportunity volume in the quarter compared with an average of roughly 40% a year ago, a sign that customers are increasingly bringing assets into the later phases of development.

Barry Balfe

Taken together, these data provide further evidence that our focused commercial strategy is delivering results. We continue to focus on three clear priorities. Expanding opportunity flow in biotech, diversifying our sales channels within large pharma, and increasing our market share with mid-size pharmaceutical customers. While these efforts will take time to impact the P&L directly, we are seeing tangible progress across all three areas as our scale, capabilities, and differentiated innovation strategies continue to resonate with customers. Turning to financial results for the quarter, revenue increased 1.2% year-over-year and 1.4% sequentially to $2.1 billion, benefiting from higher pass-through activity. Adjusted EBITDA of $327 million, with adjusted EPS of $2.56, was in line with our expectations for modest sequential progression and reflected strong cost control across the business.

Barry Balfe

Elevated pass-through contribution impacted margins during the quarter and may continue to do so in the back half of the year as therapeutic mix and site location dynamics increase the volume of pass-through dollars that we expect to burn on certain studies. Based on our year-to-date performance, we are reaffirming our full-year 2026 financial guidance, reflecting both the results delivered in the first half of the year and a balanced view of the opportunities and risks that remain in the second half. While our near-term focus remains on execution, on margin progression, and on delivery against our financial commitments, we continue to invest in strategic initiatives that support our long-term growth, differentiation, and competitive position. AI has become a foundational element of how we operate, how we deliver clinical trials, and how we create value for customers. Our investment strategy is different from others.

Barry Balfe

We don't see value in going all in on chips or on enterprise licensing of generic applications. Rather, we are focused on advancing domain expertise through targeted investments in architecture and frontier models that enhance our capabilities, accelerate our trials, and help us to monetize our existing data assets. In that respect, the multi-year collaboration with Anthropic announced this week represents an important milestone for ICON. Combined with our partnership with Microsoft, this collaboration strengthens the technology architecture underpinning our clinical trial delivery platform and supports three core priorities. Enhancing the intelligence layer powering Orbis, our agentic AI platform, deploying advanced AI capabilities to improve productivity, and developing domain-specific agents embedded directly within ICON's clinical trial management workflows.

Barry Balfe

For customers, these capabilities have the potential to streamline study design and planning, to accelerate protocol development and trial execution, to enhance patient and site engagement, and to reduce administrative burden throughout the clinical development process. These development projects are increasingly moving from the planning to the execution phase. One example being Meridian, our multi-agent clinical monitoring platform, which brings AI-enabled tools directly into the day-to-day workflows of our global monitoring organization. Leveraging ICON's proprietary data assets, domain expertise, and delivery experience, these purpose-built agents make us better, giving teams greater insight into trial status and enabling rapid decision-making in the field. Standing back from the detail, these initiatives reflect our core approach to AI. That is to say we're combining leading technology partnerships with ICON's domain expertise, proprietary assets, and clinical delivery capabilities to create meaningful value for customers, strengthen our competitive position over time, and recognize value accordingly.

Barry Balfe

Alongside AI, we continue to invest in targeted growth opportunities across the business with an emphasis on expanded capabilities and accelerated growth. In China, for example, we've seen notable improvement in demand over the last 12 months, and we continue to expand our capabilities there, including significant laboratory expansion that adds specialty biomarker testing and pathology. This builds on the investment in Singapore highlighted last quarter and reflects our commitment to further strengthening our lab footprint across the Asia-Pacific region. These investments were rewarded during the quarter with the addition of a new partnership with a leading Chinese biotech company supporting global development programs across a broad range of full-service capabilities, including laboratories and imaging. These outcomes reinforce the value of continuing to invest in attractive growth opportunities while maintaining a disciplined approach to capital deployment.

Barry Balfe

Our strong cash generation in the quarter further strengthened our financial position and supported our balanced capital allocation framework. We remain focused on investing in the business, pursuing strategic growth opportunities, and particularly returning capital to shareholders. In closing, I'm satisfied with the steady progress that we're making across the business. Strong bookings, a constructive demand environment, and disciplined execution provide a solid base as we move through and beyond some underlying challenges in the business mix and navigate the dynamic pharma sourcing trends of recent times. We remain focused on what we can control, delivering for customers, executing with discipline, and investing in the capabilities that will strengthen our competitive position and support sustainable long-term growth. These factors underpin our confidence in ICON's ability to continue taking share, deepening customer partnerships, and capturing the significant opportunities that lie in front of us.

Barry Balfe

Finally, I would like to thank all of my ICON colleagues for their continued commitment, energy, and focus on delivering for customers as we partner with them to bring forward new options for the millions of patients who need them. Now, I'll hand over to Nigel to take a more detailed look at the financials.

Nigel Clerkin

Thanks, Barry. Revenue in quarter two was $2.1 billion, representing a year-on-year increase of 1.2%, or an increase of 0.4% on a constant currency basis. Compared to the first quarter of 2026, revenue increased by 1.4%, while our adjusted EBITDA expanded by 3% to $327 million, resulting in an adjusted EBITDA margin expansion of 30 basis points to 15.9%. While these results were broadly in line with our overall expectations, we did see higher pass-through activity than anticipated, with a consequent positive impact on revenue and dampening effect on margin relative to our previous expectations. Based on year-to-date activity, there is an increased potential that pass-through activity levels may exceed our prior assumption of being approximately flat year-over-year. As we saw in Q2, this can benefit revenue while impacting reported margin percentages.

Nigel Clerkin

Our focus remains on delivering EBITDA dollars and driving sequential improvement in both EBITDA dollars and margin in the second half, with the actual reported margin percentage ultimately dependent on pass-through mix. Overall customer concentration in our top 25 customers was aligned with quarter one 2026. Our top five customers represented 24% of revenue, our top 10 represented 40%, while our top 25 represented 65%. Adjusted gross margin for the quarter was 23.8%, compared to 29.1% in quarter two of 2025. Adjusted SG&A expense was $164.5 million in quarter two, or 8% of revenue, compared to $174.8 million in quarter two 2025, or 8.6% of revenue. Adjusted SG&A expense in the quarter did benefit from certain items, including R&D tax credits, which we do not expect to recur in the second half of the year. As I've already mentioned, adjusted EBITDA was $327.2 million for the quarter, or 15.9% of revenue.

Nigel Clerkin

This compares to $417.8 million in quarter two 2025, or 20.5% of revenue. Adjusted net interest expense was $43.4 million for quarter two. In the comparable period last year, net interest expense was $46.6 million. The effective tax rate was 18.4% for the quarter. We continue to expect the full-year-2026 adjusted effective tax rate to be approximately 17%. Adjusted net income for the quarter was $198.4 million, equating to adjusted earnings per share of $2.56. U.S. GAAP income from operations amounted to $137.8 million, or 6.7% of quarter-two revenue. U.S. GAAP net income in quarter two was $72.6 million, or $0.94 per diluted share. From a cash perspective, quarter two had cash from operating activities of $281.3 million. Capital expenditure was $42.4 million, resulting in free cash flow in the quarter of $238.9 million.

Nigel Clerkin

At June 30, 2026, cash totaled $928.4 million, and debt totaled $3.4 billion, leaving a net debt position of $2.5 billion. This was a decrease in net debt of $2.6 billion at March 31, 2026, and $3 billion at June 30, 2025. We ended the quarter with a leverage ratio of 1.8x net debt to adjusted trailing 12-month EBITDA. Our balance sheet position remains strong and was further supported by solid cash generation in quarter two. We remain committed to returning capital to shareholders through share repurchases, while continuing to invest in capabilities, technology, and solutions that reinforce our market-leading position. And with that, I believe we are ready to open it up for questions.

Operator

Thank you. To ask a question, you will need to press star one and one on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star one and one again. We will now go to the first question. One moment, please. Your first question today comes from the line of David Windley from Jefferies. Please go ahead.

David Windley

Hi. Thanks. Good morning. Good afternoon to you all. Appreciate you taking my questions. Barry, the demand environment seems to continue to improve. Appreciate the detail that you're providing there. Seems like a meaningful part of it is pass-throughs. I wanted to understand, I guess, on both sides, the kind of progression of your customer cohorts. Large pharma sounds like it advanced a little bit. Biotech maybe stepped back a tad in the quarter. On the direct fee side of that and how that's advancing. Then on the pass-through side, understand the mix is maybe running a little hotter on pass-through. Is that also helping the revenue to run higher overall? I note that you didn't raise revenue guidance; it would seem like the heavier pass-through could maybe push revenue above the range. Thanks.

Barry Balfe

Thanks, David. There's a bit in there, so maybe I'll start and I'll ask Nigel to expand a little bit. To start with your question on the demand environment, the demand is pretty healthy across the business. That is sure. The reason we've given the color we've given is I think it's important. While 1.5 is an exceptional book-to-bill, it is driven by particularly high pass-throughs. That's been a trend of late, right? We've seen some high pass-throughs in the revenue line. We've seen some high pass-throughs in the bookings line. I think that's really just a function of the therapeutic mix, very honestly. That's certainly how I interpret it and somewhat to do with the geographic footprint and where our customers seek to deploy trials and where we're advising them they can get those trials done.

Barry Balfe

Maybe I misunderstood, but I wouldn't have said demand stepped back in biotech in the quarter. It actually accelerated pretty markedly in the quarter. After two very strong quarters of RFP flow in pharma, that stepped back a little bit and moderated somewhat over the quarter. Nothing unusual there, but it was a notable uptick in biotech demand. When you're trying to branch out into different parts of a very large market where you haven't been before, what do you want to see? You want to see that you're generating opportunity flow. I'm happy to see that. Frankly, we probably expect a higher proportion of ballpark or water testing proposals while we do that, and we certainly saw that in quarter two. There was an uptick in the volume of ballparks.

Barry Balfe

It's not to say they don't have inherent value, but the rate at which they convert is certainly different. That's as a population, true and always has been. I think the demand is pretty healthy, but it is volatile quarter-over-quarter. Like I said, you see some bouncing around on what's FSO, what's FSP, what's biotech, and what's pharma. What I'm heartened by is the quality of that pipeline. The work that we're bidding on, the rate at which we're being successful in competitive RFP bidding processes, and the solidity of the pipeline are somewhat encouraging. We know there's a lag on these things, but I'm generally encouraged broadly by the demand environment. You do see a few little aberrations in there.

Barry Balfe

You'll see some ups and downs in areas like the early phase, and that can be somewhat problematic as you step around the corner on whether it's canceled or whether it's an RFP or whatever. By and large, very encouraging. Nigel, you might want to pick up the ball.

Nigel Clerkin

Dave, yeah, to your question on pass-throughs and the impact on the revenue guide for the year. Look, obviously, we published our guidance on revenue and EPS for the year two months ago now. We've reaffirmed it this morning. Look, both of them are a range, so let's see where we land within the range ultimately. We did talk before about, if you look at that range, one of the factors anchoring it was an assumption that pass-through activity would be broadly stable, broadly flat year-over-year. We have seen that be a little bit more pronounced in Q2, as we've mentioned, and obviously you've seen the impact on our top line and bottom line. To your point, we are tracking that to see how that evolves over the rest of the year.

Nigel Clerkin

It is possible that if pass-throughs continue to run stronger, yes, that would obviously impact where we would land within that revenue range and with a consequent impact likewise on the margin evolution as we go through the year. Just to reiterate, as I said earlier, what we are focused on is progression in EBITDA dollars as we go through the year. Again, pleased to see that in the second quarter that we tracked where we anticipated we would. Again, to your point, yes, if pass-throughs continue to run stronger, that could obviously impact us in terms of where we land within the range. The other thing to remember when you look at that range for the full year is, do recall, do remember, please, that we did divest Symphony in the middle of the second quarter.

Nigel Clerkin

That will be a drag on revenue year-over-year in H2 that wasn't there in H1 to the same degree.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question today comes from the line of Ann Hynes from Mizuho. Please go ahead.

Ann Hynes

Great. Thank you so much for all the detail. I know on the last call, getting to the margin question, you thought you would land, I think, in the mid-16% range. Now, given the higher pass-through, is there a new range that you would like models to go to? Secondly, I know that a lot of the cost actions you're taking are back half- loaded. Can you remind us of the amount of that and how that's tracking? Thank you.

Nigel Clerkin

Hey, Ann, it's Nigel. I'll take both of those. To your point, yes, we talked about that the last time out. When you look at the guidance range that we put out for the year at the midpoint of the top line and bottom line, just to take that for modeling discussions, that would get you to approximately an EBITDA margin of 16.5% for the full year. To your point, if were the case that pass-throughs ran faster through the balance of the year, and let's say we ended up at the higher end of the range, well, again, mathematically, if you're at the top end of the revenue range, but the midpoint of the EPS range, if that's where we landed, that would lower that 16.5% down to something closer to the low 16%.

Nigel Clerkin

Obviously it would impact the exit rate potentially as we head into next year for the same reason. Again, we're focused more on the dollars than the margin percent, but just mechanically, that would be the case. Your point on the cost impacts, et cetera. Look, again, that's part of how we operate as a company, constantly adjusting our resourcing. We've obviously continued that in H1 as well. That is part of the EBITDA progression that we anticipate seeing in the second half that is built into that guidance range for the year.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Michael Cherny from Leerink Partners. Please go ahead.

Michael Cherny

Good morning. Thanks for taking the question. If I can dive in a bit, Nigel, on your EBITDA dollars, focus. I appreciate that as well. I'm just trying to reconcile the components to make sure we have it correct. You had a step-down sequentially in gross margin, which we know about; gross margin dollars obviously were impacted as well. You delivered with SG&A performance that seemed quite impressive. As you think about, going to Ann's question as well, the sustainability of those SG&A dollars, how do you view that relative to what you've put up in this quarter against the backdrop as well of the mix dynamics that obviously, as you've noted, are somewhat out of your control?

Nigel Clerkin

Yeah, Mike, I'll take that one again. A good question. Yes, the SG&A, you're right, was lower in Q2 due to the timing of some things that won't recur in H2, as I think I commented on earlier. To be frank, I would think our Q1 SG&A number is a better run rate to think about for the rest of the year rather than Q2. The implication of that, of course, being where do we see the margin progression as we go through the balance of the year will be more on the gross margin line as we see the benefits of that mix effect as we talked about, as well as obviously the cost actions that we have taken.

Nigel Clerkin

Continuing still to expect EBITDA dollar progression as we go through the year, it's going to be more on the gross margin line than the SG&A line.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Elizabeth Anderson from Evercore. Please go ahead.

Elizabeth Anderson

Hi, guys. Thank you so much. I guess if we had to think about it, you said pass-throughs potentially running a little bit above flat year-over-year, which is your prior assumption on the full-year expectations. I guess, can you help us maybe narrow that down? Are you thinking up a couple of percent? If you could help with that a little bit. Could you also please confirm your sort of share repo plans now that you are caught up with reporting?

Barry Balfe

Elizabeth, I'll take both of those. I guess the whole point about pass-throughs is we gave you a range, and we're acknowledging some volatility in the underlying landscape. For me to pick a number higher, lower, or about the same would be somewhat tricky. I'm going to say we're sticking with the range for the obvious reasons. When you see some strength on the pass-through line, it is obviously possible that we might see some pull-through on that, but I don't have an updated model for you on that one. On buybacks, no change. I think I mentioned in my prepared remarks that we were keen to get back into the market, having been out of the market for a number of quarters. That remains the plan.

Barry Balfe

I look forward to updating you guys on that when we next speak, but we certainly have some plans for Q3 in the back half of the year in general.

Nigel Clerkin

Elizabeth, maybe I might just add on to your first question. Maybe a way to think about it, if it's helpful, is you'll remember last time we talked about Q1, our margin was 15.6%, and we anticipated seeing that rise by approximately half a percent to approximately 16%. For Q2, we obviously did see it rise to approximately 16%, but we came in a little below rather than a little above. Just to kind of frame it for you in context, you're probably talking about a 20- to 30-basis- point impact on the quarter relative to previous expectations.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Sean Dodge from BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Sean Dodge

Yeah, thanks. You're coming off three really strong quarters of bookings now. In terms of composition, Barry, you called out before a bigger proportion of phase III trials in Q1. I think you said also that you'd expected that to step up even further in Q2. I guess we kind of consider that, and then maybe any other directional cues you can give us on the therapeutic mix and FSO versus FSP, how that skews. If we take all of that, how should we be thinking about maybe burn rates from backlog heading into the back half of the year and into next year?

Barry Balfe

Yeah. There's a bit in there, Sean. Let me start. Look, there are more phase II trials out there than anything else if you look at global data. Where I was talking about an uptick in the proportion of phase III's was in the RFP flow. I think it's indicative of what we talked about, which is more assets coming into the later phases of development. That's a good thing. That's good for patients, that's good for pharma, and that's good for CROs simply because the survival rates of compounds get higher the further you go into the development cycle. We think that's an encouraging thing. It's also driving average deal size up. There are some ancillary benefits there. In terms of the business mix, nothing major to report.

Barry Balfe

We said before that direct fee in FSP is growing ahead of direct fee in FSO, and that's just part of the underlying business mix dynamics that we've talked about. I don't see any major departure from that other than to say, as I mentioned on our last call, these very strong book-to-bill numbers we've been looking at are driven by outperformance in FSO rather than FSP, where the numbers tend to correlate much more with revenue growth. There is some encouragement there. I don't think there's anything dramatic in the sector. In terms of TA, honestly, no major change. Oncology remains the single largest part of the book in terms of revenue, albeit when you look at recent opportunity flow and recent awards, certainly cardiometabolic for ICON at least, is broadly comparable. They're both very large sections of the book at the minute.

Barry Balfe

We're fortunate to have a real depth of experience in that domain; we tend to win the significant majority of what we touch. It's also interesting to note the proportion of cardiometabolic research that's ticking up in biotech. That wouldn't necessarily always have been the case, but there's obviously a lot of attraction to obesity and obesity-adjacent areas in recent times. Broadly, in terms of the diversity, I mentioned eight of our top 10 customers by awards in the quarter were either mid-size or biotech. I find that encouraging, not because we're doing less in pharma, but because we determined we wanted to do more in those sectors. That's good. In large pharma, as I mentioned, we've made a priority out of diversifying our sales channels. That is, don't sell them one thing or the other; sell them both.

Barry Balfe

We did add a number of partnership strands to existing partnerships in large pharma with a couple of notable program additions in FSP, which is broadly encouraging as well. Nothing really to add beyond that, Sean. I think it's iterative quarter development rather than anything transformational in Q2.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question today comes from the line of Jay Lewis from Baird. Please go ahead.

Jay Lewis

Hi. Thanks for the question. You've been talking a lot about the pass-throughs that have remained elevated so far this year and potentially could in the back half, we've seen the book-to-bills in the first quarter and second quarters run higher on the pass-through side than the direct fee side. Usually, you talk about the bookings taking quite a while to translate into revenue given the initial award. Do you think that we should be expecting a further acceleration in pass-through revenue as we're starting to move into 2027? Could you give any color around that and how these bookings could end up phasing into revenue? Thanks.

Barry Balfe

It's a dangerous game predicting the shape of awards you don't already have, Jay, but it certainly wouldn't be unexpected if we saw some sustained strength in that relationship for some time. Not to repeat the answer I gave to Elizabeth, it's not unusual to see pass-through book-to-bill run ahead of direct fee book-to-bill in an environment where the market is trending towards things like oncology and large-scale metabolic disease. I don't think that's unusual. I certainly wouldn't forecast it, but I would reiterate our commitment to come back to the market and give as much color as we can as these things progress, because it's relevant.

Barry Balfe

I've said a million times, I don't particularly mind whether the pass-through carries on a study that doubles or halves. I care a great deal about our ability to find that study, bid on that study, win that study, and then deliver that study in a profitable and sustainable fashion.

Barry Balfe

We do need to give due regard to the pass-through carry because, for you guys and for investors more broadly, it does affect how you look at the difference between top-line, bottom-line, and margin percent versus EBITDA dollar, for example. We'll give as much color as we can. I think it would be a very brave person who sought to define it. I tend to look at it in two different respects. Are we seeing and converting as much of that market, and how are we comparing to others in the space? This is at least the third consecutive quarter where our book-to-bills are industry-leading. I think our net book-to-bill on a 605 basis is probably as good as anyone else's on a 606; I'll take that in the short term.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question today comes from the line of Justin Bowers from DB. Please go ahead.

Justin Bowers

Hi. Good morning, everyone. If you will, are you able to provide us with a book-to-bill call for the first half of the year on a 605 basis? On EBITDA dollars, should we be thinking about the sequential step-up in Q3 similar to what we saw in Q2 over Q1?

Nigel Clerkin

Justin, yeah. Q1, the direct fee book-to-bill was 1.3x, and obviously 1.2x in Q2, so roughly about 1.25x for H1. I don't have the number right in front of me, but it would be somewhere in that order of magnitude. Obviously, in terms of the EBITDA dollar step-up as we go through the balance of the year, again, we've obviously laid out a range. I'm not going to give you a point number, but just to reiterate, we are focused on sequential improvement as we go through the year. You obviously saw a reasonable uptick from Q1 to Q2, and we're focused on continuing that progression as we go through the rest of the year.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Jailendra Singh from Truist. Please go ahead.

Jailendra Singh

Thank you, and thanks for taking my questions. I want to follow up on your comments around cross-selling initiatives. I think you called out in your presentation. Which areas are you seeing the most tangible traction? Is it on central labs, specialty labs, like FSP, or FSO expansion? Just see if you can explain a little bit more about these cross-selling initiatives you're focused on.

Barry Balfe

I think it's a really good question, Jailendra, because it can be interpreted a number of different ways. On the one hand, you could argue when I talk about opening up the sales channels in large pharma to sell more than one service, that's a version of cross-selling for sure. Perhaps the most impactful, though, is the latter inference you'd make in biotech, where customers are less likely to have locked-in partnerships for certain ancillary services like central labs, like bioanalytical, like medical imaging, like cardiac safety, and like patient support. One of the things I've talked about over the last 18 months was making sure that we were giving the best holistic offer to those biotech customers to make sure we were upselling as many of our capabilities as made sense for the customer.

Barry Balfe

Not to say we're pushing capabilities at them that they don't want, to make sure that we're effectively working across our own organization to join the dots. That's seen a significant uptick in the proportion of biotech proposals, for example, that include labs, just to take your example. That was probably running in the high-50s a little over a year ago. It's now somewhere in the mid-70s. That's, I think, indicative of the organization working holistically across internal departments to bring the right capabilities to these customers under one roof.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Charles Rhyee from TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Charles Rhyee

Thanks for taking the question. I know people ask about your expectations on pass-throughs within the guide. Maybe can you give us a sense of what your assumption is for direct fee revenue progression, maybe through the rest of the year relative to what we've seen so far in the first half? Nigel, I think you said earlier that SG&A should step back up from Q2, and EBITDA dollar progression is driven by gross profit growth. I understand that Q2 is impacted by pass-throughs, what are sort of the other things driving the improvement in, I would imagine, gross profit dollar growth sequentially? Maybe help us understand what's going to drive that given the fact that you're talking about a higher pass-through environment on the top line. Thanks.

Nigel Clerkin

Yeah, Charles, happy to take those. Just to bring you back as a reminder, the full-year guide, when we set that, we talked about, again, just for modeling purposes, if you take the midpoint of the range gave on revenue, that essentially reflects an underlying direct fee decline year-over-year organically of around 2%, if you recall that conversation. We also then have an inorganic drag from the divestment of Symphony. We had currency movements on the assumption at the time that pass-throughs would be roughly flat. The direct fee component of the overall movement was about a 2% decline year-over-year. That's still, again, the guidance that we've reconfirmed this morning. When you look at H2, where do we see the margin progression?

Nigel Clerkin

It is from, again, as we spoke about before, as we go through H2, some of those mix effects that we talked about that are impacting the margin year-over-year compared to last year mitigate somewhat as you go through the second half of the year. Then, of course, we've also spoken about the cost actions that we've taken as well that will kick in a much greater degree in the second half. It's that operating discipline around cost control as well as, again, improving the mix effect as we go through the rest of the year that will drive the gross margin expansion that we're expecting to see.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Jack Meehan from Nephron Research. Please go ahead.

Jack Meehan

Thank you. Hello, everyone. I wanted to ask about the guidance range through the lens of EPS. If you look at years 2024 and earlier, the range was always a lot tighter. I understand the pass-throughs can have these dynamics on the top line and margins, but just where we sit today, just any comments around where you think you're trending within the EPS range? That's one question. The second is you have this cash hoard growing on the balance sheet. Sorry if I missed it earlier, but just timing for getting back to buyback. Thanks.

Barry Balfe

Thanks, Jack. That second thing on buyback, we did touch that earlier on. It remains our intention to get back in the markets, as we had outlined previously. The strong cash collection of the quarter improved the financial position, and we'll be pleased to do that. Returning capital to shareholders is a priority. I think your point on the EPS guide is well made. The pass-through question obviously drives significantly more volatility on the top line than it does on the bottom line. To Nigel's earlier point, we do choose our ranges very carefully. In reiterating them, we're mindful of the same considerations. While I wouldn't point to specific numbers, what I would say is for modeling purposes, the ranges we gave you are the ranges we're giving you again, and we put a lot of thought into it before doing that.

Barry Balfe

As always in this business, there's a lot of work to do. We've talked about stepwise progression, quarter-over-quarter, one foot in front of the other. The bookings on the top line are encouraging. The conversion into revenue. Somebody asked me about burn rate a minute ago, and maybe I didn't touch on it. The burn rate itself is naturally just mathematically suppressed a little bit by the strong book-to-bills we've been posting. I'm concerned with the underlying burn rate. How effectively are we burning those studies that are running such that we're generating revenue? Obviously very careful management of our costs to ensure we do that incrementally more profitably than previously. Nothing new to give you on the EPS guide. I appreciate it is a reasonably wide range at this point in time.

Barry Balfe

It's also just about two months since we issued the guide. I think I would set that expectation with you guys that we're probably not going to rush back and revisit the guide every 10 minutes. Albeit I do appreciate having only issued it relatively late in the year. It is a somewhat extraordinary period, and I'm comfortable reiterating it to you and comfortable with the steady progress we're making in undertaking the actions we need to deliver on those expectations.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Casey Woodring from J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead.

Casey Woodring

Great. Thank you for taking my questions. I wanted to go back to the comment about RFP flow moderating in large pharma in the quarter. Barry, I think you said there was nothing unusual there. Just curious if you could elaborate on that piece and the outlook for large pharma in the back half. As a follow-up, you guys mentioned investing more in China and talked about the partnership you signed in the quarter with the Chinese biotech for your expanded lab capabilities in the region. Can you maybe just frame up the opportunity in China here, more broadly speaking? Is the lab business an area that you think you can win in that region? Thank you.

Barry Balfe

Yeah, two good questions, Casey. I guess I raised the moderation of pharma proposals in the context of saying I tend not to look at minor movements in intra-sector RFP flow quarter-over-quarter. It's inherently volatile. It's not so much that I would point you to an empirical conclusion, but rather that I would talk you away from one. We did see some fairly sustained, very large value RFP flow in the last couple of quarters. It's down a little bit this quarter. Certainly not out of historical ranges and certainly not a cause for concern. It just so happens that the biotech comparable numbers are up substantially in the quarter.

Barry Balfe

Just given the quantum, I felt it was important to qualify that I think that is indicative of underlying demand, but it's also indicative of a pretty thoughtful strategy about seeing more of that market, meeting that market where it is, going through the motions of some early bidding, and continuing to grow our footprint, not just of what we're bidding on, but of what we're closing. I think that's nothing earth-shattering in RFP, but I hope that's clear. China, I hope I didn't create the impression that that deal we talked about was just a lab deal. It's not. It's a full-service deal, plus labs and imaging. The bigger point on China, I suppose, is it's obvious to all the significance of the surge in Chinese innovation for governments in the West and for biotechs and pharma in the West.

Barry Balfe

It's not necessarily as obvious what that means for CROs in the West, given that a molecule born in China that gets developed out of Boston or the Bay Area doesn't particularly matter where the molecule was born. However, year-over-year, indeed quarter-over-quarter, whether we look at H1 over H1 or Q2 over Q1, there was a notable uptick in opportunity in China. Really quite significant uptick there. Our head count is probably up five points, I think, year-over-year. On a full-year basis, whilst China remains a relatively modest part of our revenues, revenue in China might be up as much as 20% from full-year 2025 to full-year 2026. We think it's an important market anyway. Still trying to understand where we think that market goes in terms of critical mass.

Barry Balfe

For us, it's less important that we understand the end state in 2035, and more important that we build on the very solid footprint we have there, over 1,500 people in country, and that we're able to partner in any one of three ways. Western companies seeking to run global trials in China, Chinese companies seeking to run global trials in China, or, like the example I gave you, Chinese companies going global who require a global partner to bring them beyond their own borders and into the global drug development market. And I'm pretty pleased with the progress we're making in that regard.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Michael Ryskin from Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Michael Ryskin

Great. Thanks for squeezing me in. A quick one, back to pass-throughs, just sort of a high-level one. You talked a number of times about how elevated they are and why you think they're elevated. I want to go back to that therapeutic mix component. Is there anything else that you think could be driving this, or is it really just the therapeutic mix of where the studies are coming in? I know it's outside of your control, but just the 1.51 number is just sort of optically a crazy high number throughout the entire history of the industry and what we're seeing from peers. Just wondering if there's anything else besides the therapeutic mix in terms of how studies are structured or just sort of like what's behind that, just to put context on, again, why the pass-throughs are so elevated.

Michael Ryskin

For my follow-up, I want to pivot a little bit back to your announcement from Tuesday, the multi-year collaboration with Anthropic. You touched on that a little bit in your prepared remarks, but I would just love to hear more from you on what you think the fruits of that would be, when we could see that, how that could impact the business and the model over time. Just sort of walk us through what you think that'll look like in a number of years. Thanks.

Barry Balfe

Happy to, Mike. That's the kind of peer comparison that doesn't keep me awake at night. That's the kind of peer comparison I spend all day trying to have, so I'm okay with it. I think the drivers, though, are beyond TA mix, which is significant. A couple of things we talked about maybe two calls ago. When you look at the rate of inflation in the cost of running clinical trials, it's not so much CRO cost. It's much more driven by healthcare inflation, and particularly healthcare inflation in the U.S. We're living in a time where companies are being heavily incentivized to run a greater proportion of their trials in the U.S., which is not just an expensive market; it's also a market where expense is growing quite rapidly.

Barry Balfe

When we think about the cost of procedures, what it costs now to get an MRI versus what it cost five years ago, in an environment where a lot of sites, particularly major academic institutions, are saturated with requests for clinical trials to run, there is something of an inflationary cycle taking place. I think that's certainly a part of it, particularly around some of the more cutting-edge research and complex therapeutics where we are very heavily represented. It's not everybody who can run those trials. I think we are going to see some of those. The TA mix is significant. If you just look at the patient carry and the investigator grant carry on obesity, on diabetes, and on MASH, these are expensive programs to run, and they will drive up those costs fairly rapidly. The Anthropic piece—happy to talk about it.

Barry Balfe

I think it needs to be spoken about, though, not in isolation. This forms part of a broader AI strategy. An AI strategy isn't about announcing a partnership or managing by press release or counting widgets. This is about a strategy to disrupt the clinical trial lifecycle by embedding frontier capabilities within superior workflows. We have to keep our eye on the prize here. How do we generate shareholder return? We do it by creating value for customers. How do we do that? We do it by generating better insights faster, driving speed and quality of decision-making, taking costs out, and driving predictability up. That's what we're about. When you think about AI, I tend to break it down into four key buckets. There's machine learning that helps us predict better. There's generative AI that helps us create and draft documents better.

Barry Balfe

There are the large language models that are the engine of that generative AI. Then there are the agents, to whom we can delegate whole processes, things that act on our behalf. When you think about the Anthropic and Microsoft partnerships in that regard, they're not adjacent to what we've been doing before. It's not about what's new; it's about what's next. These are building on top of infrastructure we've already built. I would put it to you that the Microsoft partnership is a lot about the platform. There are other productivity tools and Copilot and all that good stuff, but it's about creating the data lakes, having the unified ontology, and having the data mastered such that you can then drive insights from structured data using these frontier AI models. That's really a lot of what the Microsoft partnership is about. It's the foundation.

Barry Balfe

The Anthropic partnership is about building a better intelligence layer. Claude will be the frontier model that is embedded in those workflows. This is a key point. We try and differentiate not just from our competitors but also from our customers. I don't think once an adoption of generic technology is rolled out to 40,000 people is the way to go. You've heard a lot of competitors, including a lot of pharma companies, say they're burning way too many tokens and demonstrating way too little value. What we're about is using these models to embed the back end of work processes. Take Meridian, I've talked with you about before, Mike, the CRA agent.

Barry Balfe

Having a CRA doing tons and tons of paperwork before they go to site, or being able to log on to a customized homepage who knows who they are, what their workload is, what documents they have access to, and point at risks, help them draft documents, help them streamline their interactions with the site, help them have better insights on how long they need to go for, whether they need someone to come with them or what risks they need to bottom out when they get there. That's what we're doing here. That's just one example, right? We're digitizing protocols that help us automate the creation of documents and databases around the company. We're upgrading things like OneSearch, which are predictive models that tell us which sites are best suited to which programs.

Barry Balfe

SmartDraft will now have a Claude back end that helps us build on the progress we've already made, taking 30% out of the time of negotiating clinical trial contracts, as well as a range of functions in the back office, which are really more directly related to productivity than capability. As I say, it's not about what's new; it's about what's next. It's targeted, it's embedded, it's customer-centric, and ultimately it's better. That's really what we're shooting for.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Ryan Halsted from RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Ryan Halsted

Hi, thanks for taking my question. Maybe just to follow up on that last point about a broader AI strategy and realizing that AI is being deployed throughout the value chain, beginning with your pharma partners in the drug discovery cycle. Just curious if you are having dialogue with your customers about this potential increased flow and need for increased capacity to handle what could be a deluge of new molecules and new drug targets. Just curious if that's something that you're seeing happening or having dialogue now and/or if you see that having an impact over the near term. Thank you.

Barry Balfe

There's a lot in there, Ryan. The first thing I would say is I'll repeat what I've said for some time, which is I think the impact of AI in drug development may be most evident in discovery in the long term. I think it would be a very naive person who misread this landscape to suggest that there will be a deluge of capacity-determining responses from advances in discovery, which take years to get in the clinic anyway. I think that distracts from the reality of these targeted investments around what AI means now, and frankly, in the years immediately following now. This isn't about having to have a transformational overnight upending of the spectrum. I don't think it's realistic, and I don't know anybody credible who believes it. It's also not about the number of things you are using.

Barry Balfe

We don't measure success by the number of systems we use. We measure it by how few, not how many, if anything. We don't measure success by how many times our customers have to click a button to get an insight. We measure it by how few. This is about power. This is about insights we can generate today, and the interoperability question with customers actually involves sitting at the nexus of work they do themselves, work we do for them within their environment, and work we do for them within our environment, and helping data and data insights flow into the hands of people who need them. I think that's central to understanding the power of AI in the near and indeed in the medium term.

Barry Balfe

Discovery is a very exciting space, but I think it'll be a while before we see transformational changes in the development operations landscape from things that have yet to be proven in discovery.

Operator

Thank you. We will now take our final question for today. The final question comes from Luke Sergott from Barclays. Please go ahead.

Anna Kruszenski

Hi, guys. Thank you for squeezing us in here. This is Anna Kruszenski on for Luke. If we could just go back to burn rates and what is embedded in your guidance for the rest of the year after the past three quarters of such strong bookings. Can you talk about how we should directionally be thinking about burn rates in the second half relative to the 9% in Q2? Thanks again.

Nigel Clerkin

Hey, Anna. It's Nigel. Look, I think, obviously, we've reiterated the guidance range this morning. The burn rates—they likely will take down a little bit just given what we've seen in terms of the commercial performance in H1, which obviously has already been impacted. It'll fundamentally depend on what we do in terms of book-to-bills in H2. I would say it's probably the bigger impact. I wouldn't want to give you any specific numbers on that, but it's going to be driven by that probably more than anything.

Operator

Thank you. This concludes the Q&A. I will now hand it back to Barry.

Barry Balfe

Thank you, Sharon, and thank you, everybody, for joining today. We appreciate your continued support and the questions today. It remains a process of incremental transformation both on the strategic side and also good quarter-over-quarter diligence and discipline as we continue to close out on the plans that we've discussed today and described today. We look forward to coming back to you in due course and updating you on the next steps. Thanks, everybody.

Operator

Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. Thanks for participating. You may now disconnect.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-29

ICON Q2 Non-GAAP Earnings Fall, Revenue Rises; Maintains 2026 Outlook

MT Newswires

ICON (ICLR) reported Q2 non-GAAP net income late Wednesday of $2.56 per diluted share, down from $3.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-29

ICON Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results

Business Wire
Highlights Quarter two revenue of $2,063.5 million, an increase of 1.4% on quarter one 2026. Quarter two adjusted EBITDA of $327.2 million or 15.9% of revenue, an increase of 3.0% on quarter one 2026. GAAP net income for the quarter of $72.6 million or $0.94 diluted earnings per share. Quarter two adjusted net income of $198.4 million or $2.56 adjusted diluted earnings per share, an increase of 2.4% on quarter one 2026 adjusted diluted earnings per share. Net business wins in the quarter of $3,120 million; a net book-to-bill of 1.51, an increase of 8.3% on quarter one 2026 net business wins. Closing backlog of $23.4 billion, an increase of 3.0% on quarter one 2026. Net debt of $2.5 billion at June 30, 2026 with a net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio of 1.8x. Reaffirming 2026 full-year financial guidance issued with revenue expected in the range of $7,850 - $8,150 million and adjusted diluted earnings per share* expected in the range of $10.00 - $11.00. DUBLIN, July 29, 2026--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ICON plc (NASDAQ: ICLR), a world-leading clinical research organization, today reported its financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026. CEO, Mr. Barry Balfe commented, "ICON's second quarter results reflect measured progress, as disciplined cost management offset anticipated operational headwinds. While revenue and net bookings benefited from higher pass-through activity, strong strategic wins and new customer acquisition supported a direct fee book-to-bill ratio of 1.2x, underscoring the strength of our focused commercial strategy and diversified, scaled platform. We are reaffirming our 2026 financial outlook, which reflects both opportunities and risks over the balance of the year. While second-half performance remains subject to variability in factors such as pass-through activity, the underlying fundamentals of our business remain solid, supported by our diversified portfolio, operational agility and disciplined cost management. Strong cash generation continues to support our capital allocation priorities, including investing in strategic growth opportunities and returning capital to shareholders." Second Quarter 2026 Results In quarter two 2026, gross bookings were $3,681 million, an increase of 24.1% on quarter two 2025, with cancellations of $562 million. This resulted in net business wins of $3,120 million and a book-to-bill of 1.51. Backlog as at…Read full document

Highlights Quarter two revenue of $2,063.5 million, an increase of 1.4% on quarter one 2026. Quarter two adjusted EBITDA of $327.2 million or 15.9% of revenue, an increase of 3.0% on quarter one 2026. GAAP net income for the quarter of $72.6 million or $0.94 diluted earnings per share. Quarter two adjusted net income of $198.4 million or $2.56 adjusted diluted earnings per share, an increase of 2.4% on quarter one 2026 adjusted diluted earnings per share. Net business wins in the quarter of $3,120 million; a net book-to-bill of 1.51, an increase of 8.3% on quarter one 2026 net business wins. Closing backlog of $23.4 billion, an increase of 3.0% on quarter one 2026. Net debt of $2.5 billion at June 30, 2026 with a net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio of 1.8x. Reaffirming 2026 full-year financial guidance issued with revenue expected in the range of $7,850 - $8,150 million and adjusted diluted earnings per share* expected in the range of $10.00 - $11.00. DUBLIN, July 29, 2026--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ICON plc (NASDAQ: ICLR), a world-leading clinical research organization, today reported its financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026. CEO, Mr. Barry Balfe commented, "ICON's second quarter results reflect measured progress, as disciplined cost management offset anticipated operational headwinds. While revenue and net bookings benefited from higher pass-through activity, strong strategic wins and new customer acquisition supported a direct fee book-to-bill ratio of 1.2x, underscoring the strength of our focused commercial strategy and diversified, scaled platform. We are reaffirming our 2026 financial outlook, which reflects both opportunities and risks over the balance of the year. While second-half performance remains subject to variability in factors such as pass-through activity, the underlying fundamentals of our business remain solid, supported by our diversified portfolio, operational agility and disciplined cost management. Strong cash generation continues to support our capital allocation priorities, including investing in strategic growth opportunities and returning capital to shareholders." Second Quarter 2026 Results In quarter two 2026, gross bookings were $3,681 million, an increase of 24.1% on quarter two 2025, with cancellations of $562 million. This resulted in net business wins of $3,120 million and a book-to-bill of 1.51. Backlog as at June 30, 2026 was $23.4 billion. Revenue for the second quarter was $2,063.5 million. This represents an increase of 1.2% on quarter two 2025, an increase of 0.4% on a constant currency basis. GAAP net income was $72.6 million, resulting in diluted earnings per share of $0.94 in quarter two 2026, compared to diluted earnings per share of $2.56 in quarter two 2025. Adjusted net income for the quarter was $198.4 million, resulting in adjusted diluted earnings per share of $2.56 compared to $3.52 per share in quarter two 2025. Adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter was $327.2 million or 15.9% of revenue, a decrease of 21.7% on quarter two 2025. The effective tax rate on adjusted net income in quarter two 2026 was 18.4%. Free cash flow was $238.9 million in the quarter. Cash generated from operating activities for the quarter was $281.3 million. During the quarter, $42.4 million was spent on capital expenditure. $7.4 million of Term Loan B payments were made during the quarter and there were net cash outflows on the disposal of a subsidiary undertaking of $55.5 million. At June 30, 2026, the Group had cash and cash equivalents of $928.4 million, compared to cash and cash equivalents of $765.2 million at March 31, 2026 and $390.4 million at June 30, 2025. Net debt as at June 30, 2026 was $2.5 billion. Year to date 2026 Results Gross business wins year to date were $6,944 million and cancellations were $945 million. This resulted in net business wins of $5,999 million and a book-to-bill of 1.46. Revenue year to date was $4,097.5 million. This represents a year on year increase of 1.1% or a decrease of 0.8% on a constant currency basis. GAAP net income year to date was $177.3 million, resulting in $2.29 diluted earnings per share. Year to date adjusted net income was $391.3 million, resulting in an adjusted diluted earnings per share of $5.06 compared to $6.79 per share for the equivalent prior year period. Adjusted EBITDA year to date was $645.0 million or 15.7% of revenue, a year on year decrease of 20.9%. The effective tax rate on adjusted net income year to date was 17.8%. Conference Call Details ICON will hold a conference call on July 30, 2026 at 08:00 EDT [13:00 Ireland & UK]. This call and linked slide presentation can be accessed live from our website at http://investor.iconplc.com. A recording will also be available on the website for 90 days following the call. In addition, a calendar of company events, including upcoming conference presentations, is available on our website, under "Investors". This calendar will be updated regularly. Other Information Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements Statements included herein which are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the following: anticipated financial results for 2026; contracted revenue; the Company's expectations regarding business momentum, market opportunity, demand trends, growth, and commercial performance; and the Company's expectations with respect to its long-term value creation and competitive positioning. You can identify many forward-looking statements by words such as "aims," "anticipates," "believes," "continues," "could," "estimates," "expects," "focused," "guidance," "intends," "look," "may," "opportunities," "plans," "positions," "potential," "predicts," "projects," "seeks," "should," "will," "would" and other similar expressions and the negatives of such expressions. However, not all forward-looking statements contain these words. These statements are based on management's current expectations and information currently available, including current economic and industry conditions. The forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties and are subject to change at any time. In the event such risks or uncertainties materialize, our results could be materially adversely affected. The risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, dependence on the pharmaceutical industry and certain clients, the need to regularly win projects and then to execute them efficiently and correctly, the challenges presented by rapid growth, competition and the continuing consolidation of the industry, the impact of market conditions on demand for the Company's services, risks related to the Company's ability to execute on its commercial strategy and maintain relationships with large pharmaceutical customers, and risks relating to the Company's strategic partnerships, the dependence on certain key executives, changes in the regulatory environment, exchange rate fluctuations, inflation and rising labor costs. Please also refer to the section entitled "Risk Factors" of our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2025 filed on May 27, 2026 for a discussion of some of the principal risks that could adversely affect our business, operations and financial results. The Company’s forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report or as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update its forward-looking statements. Non-GAAP Financial Measures In addition to the financial measures prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), this press release contains certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income and adjusted diluted earnings per share and free cash flow. Adjusted EBITDA excludes stock-based compensation, foreign currency gains and losses, restructuring, transaction, integration related and other adjustments, fair value movement on investments in equity, loss of disposal of subsidiary undertaking, goodwill impairment and impairment of non-financial assets. Adjusted net income and adjusted diluted earnings per share exclude amortization, stock-based compensation, foreign currency gains and losses, restructuring, transaction, integration related and other adjustments, transaction-related financing costs, fair value movement on investments in equity, goodwill impairment, impairment of non-financial assets, loss of disposal of subsidiary undertaking and their related taxation effect. Free cash flow reflects cash generated from operating activities less capital expenditure. While non-GAAP financial measures are not superior to or a substitute for the comparable GAAP measures, ICON believes certain non-GAAP information is useful to investors for historical comparison purposes. *Adjusted diluted earnings per share to exclude amortization, stock-based compensation, foreign currency gains and losses, restructuring, transaction, integration related and other adjustments, transaction-related financing costs, fair value movement on investments in equity, goodwill impairment, impairment of non-financial assets, loss on disposal of subsidiary undertaking and their related taxation effect. Our full-year 2026 guidance adjusted diluted earnings per share measures are provided on a non-GAAP basis without a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure because the Company is unable to predict with a reasonable degree of certainty certain items contained in the measures without unreasonable efforts. For the same reasons, the Company is unable to address the probable significance of the unavailable information. ICON plc is a world-leading clinical research organization. Offering deep operational and medical expertise we accelerate innovation, driving emerging therapies forward to improve patient outcomes. From molecule to medicine, we deliver integrated consulting, clinical development, commercialization and post-marketing solutions to pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, government and public health organizations worldwide. With headquarters in Dublin, Ireland, ICON employed approximately 40,200 employees in 99 locations in 55 countries as at June 30, 2026. For further information about ICON, visit: www.iconplc.com. ICON/ICLR-F View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260729518057/en/ Contacts Investor Relations +1 888 381 7923Nigel Clerkin Chief Financial Officer +353 1 291 2000Kate Haven Vice President Investor Relations +1 888 381 7923All at ICONhttp://www.iconplc.com

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-23

Icon PLC (ICLR) Up 5.8% Since Last Earnings Report: Can It Continue?

Zacks

It has been about a month since the last earnings report for Icon PLC (ICLR). Shares have added about 5.8% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. Will the recent positive trend continue leading up to its next earnings release, or is Icon PLC due for a pullback? Well, first let's take a quick look at the latest earnings report in order to get a better handle on the recent catalysts for ICON PLC before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late. ICON posted first-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings per share of $2.50, down 23.5% from the year-ago period’s reported figure. However, the metric surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 1.6%. The company reported GAAP EPS of $1.36 compared with $1.99 a year ago. Total revenues increased 0.9% year over year to $2.03 billion. The figure was down 1.9% on a constant-currency (CER) basis. The metric surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 1.4%. The company reiterated full-year financial guidance for 2026 with revenues expected in the range of $7.85-$8.15 billion. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the metric is currently pegged at $8.01 billion. Adjusted EPS is expected to be in the range of $10.00-$11.00. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for ICON’s earnings is pegged at $10.59 per share. It turns out, fresh estimates have trended upward during the past month. Currently, Icon PLC has a poor Growth Score of F, however its Momentum Score is doing a lot better with an A. However, the stock was allocated a score of C on the value side, putting it in the middle 20% for value investors. Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of D. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in. Estimates have been trending upward for the stock, and the magnitude of these revisions looks promising. Interestingly, Icon PLC has a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell). We expect a below average return from the stock in the next few months. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report ICON PLC (ICLR) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-22

ICON Schedules Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call

Business Wire
DUBLIN, July 22, 2026--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ICON plc, (NASDAQ: ICLR) a world-leading clinical research organization, today announced that it will release its financial results for the second quarter 2026 after the market closes on Wednesday, July 29, 2026. The company will hold a conference call and webcast to discuss its financial results and performance on Thursday, July 30, 2026, at 8:00am ET. Any changes to these events and links to the live webcasts (where available) will be posted on the Investor section of our website under "Events". A webcast replay of the conference call will be available approximately one hour following the conclusion of the call. About ICON plc ICON plc is a world-leading clinical research organization. Offering deep operational and medical expertise we accelerate innovation, driving emerging therapies forward to improve patient outcomes. From molecule to medicine, we deliver integrated consulting, clinical development, commercialization and post-marketing solutions to pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, government and public health organizations worldwide. With headquarters in Dublin, Ireland, ICON employed approximately 40,350 employees in 97 locations in 55 countries as at March 31, 2026. For further information about ICON, visit: www.iconplc.com. Statements included herein which are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the following: contracted revenue; the repayment of indebtedness; the company's expectations regarding business momentum, market opportunity, demand trends, growth, and commercial performance; and the company's expectations with respect to its long-term value creation and competitive positioning. You can identify many forward-looking statements by words such as "aims," "anticipates," "believes," "continues," "could," "estimates," "expects," "focused," "guidance," "intends," "look," "may," "opportunities," "plans," "positions," "potential," "predicts," "projects," "seeks," "should," "will," "would" and other similar expressions and the negatives of such expressions. However, not all forward-looking statements contain these words. These statements are based on…Read full document

DUBLIN, July 22, 2026--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ICON plc, (NASDAQ: ICLR) a world-leading clinical research organization, today announced that it will release its financial results for the second quarter 2026 after the market closes on Wednesday, July 29, 2026. The company will hold a conference call and webcast to discuss its financial results and performance on Thursday, July 30, 2026, at 8:00am ET. Any changes to these events and links to the live webcasts (where available) will be posted on the Investor section of our website under "Events". A webcast replay of the conference call will be available approximately one hour following the conclusion of the call. About ICON plc ICON plc is a world-leading clinical research organization. Offering deep operational and medical expertise we accelerate innovation, driving emerging therapies forward to improve patient outcomes. From molecule to medicine, we deliver integrated consulting, clinical development, commercialization and post-marketing solutions to pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, government and public health organizations worldwide. With headquarters in Dublin, Ireland, ICON employed approximately 40,350 employees in 97 locations in 55 countries as at March 31, 2026. For further information about ICON, visit: www.iconplc.com. Statements included herein which are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the following: contracted revenue; the repayment of indebtedness; the company's expectations regarding business momentum, market opportunity, demand trends, growth, and commercial performance; and the company's expectations with respect to its long-term value creation and competitive positioning. You can identify many forward-looking statements by words such as "aims," "anticipates," "believes," "continues," "could," "estimates," "expects," "focused," "guidance," "intends," "look," "may," "opportunities," "plans," "positions," "potential," "predicts," "projects," "seeks," "should," "will," "would" and other similar expressions and the negatives of such expressions. However, not all forward-looking statements contain these words. These statements are based on management's current expectations and information currently available, including current economic and industry conditions. The forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties and are subject to change at any time. In the event such risks or uncertainties materialize, our results could be materially adversely affected. The risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, dependence on the pharmaceutical industry and certain clients, the need to regularly win projects and then to execute them efficiently and correctly, the challenges presented by rapid growth, competition and the continuing consolidation of the industry, the impact of market conditions on demand for the company's services, risks related to the company's ability to execute on its commercial strategy and maintain relationships with large pharmaceutical customers, and risks relating to the company's strategic partnerships, the dependence on certain key executives, changes in the regulatory environment, exchange rate fluctuations, inflation and rising labor costs. Please also refer to the section entitled "Risk Factors" of our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2025, for a discussion of some of the principal risks that could adversely affect our business, operations and financial results. The company’s forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this document or as of the date they are made, and the company undertakes no obligation to update its forward-looking statements. ICON/ICLR-G View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260722268923/en/ Contacts Kate Haven Vice President Investor Relations +1 888 381 7923

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-09

ICON (ICLR) Stock May Be 33% Undervalued After Earnings Review Uncertainty

Simply Wall St.
Find winning stocks in any market cycle. Join 7 million investors using Simply Wall St's investing ideas for FREE. ICON stock sits at an unusual valuation crossroads, with a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) intrinsic value estimate pointing to a 33.2% discount while earnings-based multiples indicate the shares look expensive relative to fundamentals, all against a three-year share price record that is still in decline. ICON shareholders have seen the stock decline 31.9% over the past three years, which keeps recent gains in context and may explain why some investors are focused on whether current pricing offers enough long-term upside. On the one hand, recent commentary about a renewed path to growth in the coming years can support higher intrinsic value estimates. On the other hand, the earlier delay in financial results and internal revenue recognition review underlines that perceived accounting and reporting risks can weigh on what investors are willing to pay. ICON scores 3 out of 6 on Simply Wall St's valuation checks, which is a mixed picture rather than a clear bargain or clear overvaluation, and you can see the detail of that score here. The issue now is whether ICON's current share price better reflects the more cautious multiples view or the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) estimate that suggests the stock trades at a sizable discount to intrinsic value. Find out why ICON's 9.9% return over the last year is lagging behind its peers. The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model estimates what ICON is worth based on the cash it is expected to generate for shareholders. For ICON, the latest twelve-month free cash flow is about $771.4m, and the model assumes those cash flows keep growing rather than shrinking over time. Feeding those projections into a 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity framework gives an estimated intrinsic value of about $247.85 per share. Compared with the current share price, this DCF output implies ICON screens around 33.2% undervalued. The earlier delay in financial results tied to an internal revenue recognition review helps explain why the market is pricing the stock below what the cash flows alone would suggest. On this Discounted Cash Flow view, ICON stock currently appears undervalued relative to the cash it is expected to generate. Our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis suggests ICON is undervalued by 33.2%. Track this in your watchlist or port…Read full document

Find winning stocks in any market cycle. Join 7 million investors using Simply Wall St's investing ideas for FREE. ICON stock sits at an unusual valuation crossroads, with a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) intrinsic value estimate pointing to a 33.2% discount while earnings-based multiples indicate the shares look expensive relative to fundamentals, all against a three-year share price record that is still in decline. ICON shareholders have seen the stock decline 31.9% over the past three years, which keeps recent gains in context and may explain why some investors are focused on whether current pricing offers enough long-term upside. On the one hand, recent commentary about a renewed path to growth in the coming years can support higher intrinsic value estimates. On the other hand, the earlier delay in financial results and internal revenue recognition review underlines that perceived accounting and reporting risks can weigh on what investors are willing to pay. ICON scores 3 out of 6 on Simply Wall St's valuation checks, which is a mixed picture rather than a clear bargain or clear overvaluation, and you can see the detail of that score here. The issue now is whether ICON's current share price better reflects the more cautious multiples view or the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) estimate that suggests the stock trades at a sizable discount to intrinsic value. Find out why ICON's 9.9% return over the last year is lagging behind its peers. The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model estimates what ICON is worth based on the cash it is expected to generate for shareholders. For ICON, the latest twelve-month free cash flow is about $771.4m, and the model assumes those cash flows keep growing rather than shrinking over time. Feeding those projections into a 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity framework gives an estimated intrinsic value of about $247.85 per share. Compared with the current share price, this DCF output implies ICON screens around 33.2% undervalued. The earlier delay in financial results tied to an internal revenue recognition review helps explain why the market is pricing the stock below what the cash flows alone would suggest. On this Discounted Cash Flow view, ICON stock currently appears undervalued relative to the cash it is expected to generate. Our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis suggests ICON is undervalued by 33.2%. Track this in your watchlist or portfolio, or discover 44 more high quality undervalued stocks. Head to the Valuation section of our Company Report for more details on how we arrive at this Fair Value for ICON. The P/E ratio is a useful lens for ICON because earnings are a core driver of how investors typically value established contract research companies. ICON currently trades on a P/E of about 73.1x, compared with a Life Sciences industry average of roughly 37.5x and a peer group average of around 80.6x. The tailored fair P/E ratio for ICON is estimated at about 29.9x, which is well below the current multiple. That gap suggests investors are paying a high price for each dollar of ICON’s earnings relative to what this model sees as reasonable once factors such as growth profile, margins, scale and risk are taken into account. Even though ICON does not look as expensive as some peers, the stock still appears richly valued against both the industry and this more customised benchmark. On this earnings multiple view, ICON stock appears overvalued compared with what the fair P/E and sector benchmarks would suggest. See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown. Simply Wall St Narratives for ICON pick up exactly where this valuation puzzle leaves off. They spell out which paths for ICON's growth, margins and earnings would need to play out for the stock to be worth materially more or less than today's price on the market. Rather than relying on a single multiple or model output, each Narrative lays out its own set of valuation assumptions so you can compare those inputs with ICON's reported results over time on the Community page. One of the top community narratives on ICON: 10% overvalued Read one of the top narratives on ICON Do you think there's more to the story for ICON? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying! ICON sits between an intrinsic value view, where the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) estimate points to a sizeable discount, and a market multiples view that screens as overvalued on earnings. That split mostly comes down to how you weigh long term cash generation against today’s high P/E and sector expectations. With broader checks sitting in the middle, the key question is whether ICON can deliver the growth and margins implied by its current multiple. For now, the crux is whether the apparent discount to intrinsic value reflects an opportunity or simply ongoing caution around accounting, reporting and execution risk. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include ICLR. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email [email protected]

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-08

ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) Fell Due to Uncertainty Surrounding Reported Earnings

Insider Monkey
Artisan Partners, an investment management firm, issued its first-quarter 2026 investor letter for the “Artisan Mid Cap Value Fund”. A copy of this letter is available for download here. In Q1 2026, the portfolio underperformed the benchmark Russell Midcap Value Index as the market favored momentum-driven stocks over quality factors. Some holdings faced company-specific setbacks and negative sentiment. The Fund’s Investor Class: ARTQX returned -4.93%, Advisor Class: APDQX declined by -4.90%, and Institutional Class: APHQX fell by -4.97%, all trailing the Index’s 3.68% gain. The equity market in the quarter was mixed, with mid- and small-cap indices showing resilience despite lagging large-cap growth stocks. Volatility increased, initially fueled by interest in AI and private credit, but escalated after the outbreak of war in Iran, leading to rising oil prices. Sector performance varied, with energy leading the gains. The Fund continues to seek companies capable of value growth during market dislocations at attractive entry points. Also, review the Fund’s top five holdings to see its best picks for 2026. In its first-quarter 2026 investor letter, Artisan Mid Cap Value Fund highlighted ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR). ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) is a clinical research organization that provides outsourced development and commercialization services to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries. On July 7, 2026, ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) stock closed at $168.72 per share. One-month return of ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) was 16.69%, and its shares gained 12.08% over the past 52 weeks. ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) has a market capitalization of about $12.92 billion. Artisan Mid Cap Value Fund stated the following regarding ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) in its Q1 2026 investor letter: ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) is not on our list of 40 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds Heading Into 2026. According to our database, 49 hedge fund portfolios held ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) at the end of the first quarter, up from 41 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're l…Read full document

Artisan Partners, an investment management firm, issued its first-quarter 2026 investor letter for the “Artisan Mid Cap Value Fund”. A copy of this letter is available for download here. In Q1 2026, the portfolio underperformed the benchmark Russell Midcap Value Index as the market favored momentum-driven stocks over quality factors. Some holdings faced company-specific setbacks and negative sentiment. The Fund’s Investor Class: ARTQX returned -4.93%, Advisor Class: APDQX declined by -4.90%, and Institutional Class: APHQX fell by -4.97%, all trailing the Index’s 3.68% gain. The equity market in the quarter was mixed, with mid- and small-cap indices showing resilience despite lagging large-cap growth stocks. Volatility increased, initially fueled by interest in AI and private credit, but escalated after the outbreak of war in Iran, leading to rising oil prices. Sector performance varied, with energy leading the gains. The Fund continues to seek companies capable of value growth during market dislocations at attractive entry points. Also, review the Fund’s top five holdings to see its best picks for 2026. In its first-quarter 2026 investor letter, Artisan Mid Cap Value Fund highlighted ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR). ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) is a clinical research organization that provides outsourced development and commercialization services to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries. On July 7, 2026, ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) stock closed at $168.72 per share. One-month return of ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) was 16.69%, and its shares gained 12.08% over the past 52 weeks. ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) has a market capitalization of about $12.92 billion. Artisan Mid Cap Value Fund stated the following regarding ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) in its Q1 2026 investor letter: ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) is not on our list of 40 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds Heading Into 2026. According to our database, 49 hedge fund portfolios held ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) at the end of the first quarter, up from 41 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. In another article, we covered ICON Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:ICLR) and shared Greenskeeper Asset Management's views on the company. In addition, please check out our hedge fund investor letters Q1 2026 page for more investor letters from hedge funds and other leading investors. READ NEXT: 33 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 15 Stocks That Will Make You Rich in 10 Years. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.

As of 2026-08-15 • Updated weeklySource: Earnings sourceIngestion runbook