FCN

Never miss an important update on your stock portfolio and cut through the noise. Over 7 million investors trust Simply Wall St to stay informed where it matters for FREE. FTI Consulting (FCN) has been drawing investor attention after commentary highlighting annual sales growth of only 3% and a 5.1% annual decline in earnings per share over the past two years. See our latest analysis for FTI Consulting. Over the past year FTI Consulting's share price return has fallen 12.02% year to date and its 1 year total shareholder return is down 10.74%. This suggests recent earnings pressure is weighing more heavily on sentiment than earlier years, when the 5 year total shareholder return is 5.80%. If FTI Consulting's recent weakness has you reassessing your options, this could be a good moment to broaden your watchlist and uncover 21 top founder-led companies FTI Consulting now trades at a sizeable discount to both analyst targets and an estimated intrinsic value. After this pullback, is the market being prudently cautious, or is it mispricing the business advisory specialist? Based on the most followed narrative, FTI Consulting's fair value of $174.50 sits meaningfully above the last close at $149.82, which puts the current pullback in a different light for valuation focused investors. In order for you to agree with the analysts, you'd need to believe that by 2029, revenues will be $4.6 billion, earnings will come to $365.1 million, and it would be trading on a PE ratio of 14.3x, assuming you use a discount rate of 7.8%. Read the complete narrative. Want to see what sits behind that valuation gap for FTI Consulting? The narrative leans heavily on steady revenue compounding, firmer margins and a future earnings multiple that is lower than many peers. Curious which assumptions carry the most weight in that fair value and how sensitive they are to slower growth or lower profitability. Result: Fair Value of $174.50 (UNDERVALUED) Have a read of the narrative in full and understand what's behind the forecasts. However, for FTI Consulting, this narrative can quickly be tested if AI driven automation pressures high touch advisory work or if heavier technology investment compresses margins. Find out about the key risks to this FTI Consulting narrative. With sentiment on FTI Consulting clearly mixed, this is a good time to move quickly, review the full picture, and shape your own view using the 4 key rewards and 1 important warning sign. If FTI Consulting has sharpened your thinking, do not stop there. Broaden your opportunity set now with focused stock ideas built from clear, data driven criteria. Target dependable cash generators with strong finances by reviewing companies in the solid balance sheet and fundamentals stocks screener (50 results). Hunt for potential value opportunities that pair quality fundamentals with attractive pricing through the 53 high quality undervalued stocks. Spot potential future leaders before they gain wider attention by scanning the screener containing 19 high quality undiscovered gems. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include FCN. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email [email protected]

Find winning stocks in any market cycle. Join 7 million investors using Simply Wall St's investing ideas for FREE. FTI Consulting stock has delivered a decline of about 18.7% over the past three years, yet the valuation checks still lean toward the shares looking cheap rather than expensive on current fundamentals. Over the last three years, holders have seen the share price fall about 18.7%, which raises the question of whether recent weakness has already priced in a lot of caution. The key support for valuation can come from the company’s ability to keep converting its advisory work into resilient cash flows. However, any slowdown in client spending or pressure on fees may weigh on how much investors are willing to pay for those earnings. On Simply Wall St’s broader set of checks, FTI Consulting screens as undervalued in 5 of 6 tests, which indicates the stock looks cheap on most measures even after applying conservative assumptions in the value score of 5. The issue now is whether that apparent discount is justified by the risks in the business or whether the recent share price weakness has pushed FTI Consulting below what its fundamentals support. FTI Consulting delivered -10.7% returns over the last year. See how this stacks up to the rest of the Professional Services industry. The P/E ratio is a useful lens for FTI Consulting because advisory companies are often judged on the earnings they can produce from their fee income. On this measure, FTI Consulting trades on a P/E of about 16.0x, which is below both the Professional Services industry average of roughly 21.6x and the peer group average of about 21.5x. The modelled fair P/E for FTI Consulting is 19.5x. This reflects information about the company’s margins, size, sector and risk profile rather than relying only on simple industry averages. Compared with that fair ratio, the current 16.0x reading indicates that the market is applying a discount to the earnings stream that the model does not fully support based on the available inputs. On the P/E multiple, FTI Consulting stock appears undervalued relative to both tailored fair value estimates and typical industry levels. See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown. Simply Wall St Narratives pick up where the valuation questions around FTI Consulting leave off and spell out what assumptions on future growth, margins and earnings would need to hold for the stock to be worth meaningfully more or less than today's price. Each Narrative ties a specific set of catalysts and risks to an implied fair value for FTI Consulting's shares so you can track over time which version of the story is closest to how the business actually develops on the Community page. You can add your voice to the Simply Wall St community by sharing a Narrative on FTI Consulting that sets out a clear, number driven view on where its growth, margins and execution go from here. Put your thesis on record and see how it stacks up as new information arrives. Do you think there's more to the story for FTI Consulting? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying! For FTI Consulting, the current set of valuation checks points to a stock that still screens as undervalued on earnings against both tailored fair value multiples and sector peers. That potential discount only matters if the company can keep turning its advisory work into solid, repeatable cash generation without a material squeeze on pricing or demand. The key question from here is whether the current multiple reflects excessive caution or whether it is a fair response to the risk that client spending or fee pressure erodes the earnings base investors are counting on. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include FCN. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email [email protected]

FTI Consulting, Inc. FCN reported second-quarter 2026 results with adjusted earnings of $2.16 per share, topping the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.09 by 3.4%. Earnings increased 1.4% year over year, aided by a lower tax rate and fewer outstanding shares, while revenues rose 5.3% year over year. FTI Consulting, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | FTI Consulting, Inc. Quote Lower pass-through revenues partly offset growth in Corporate Finance, Technology and Forensic and Litigation Consulting. Billable headcount increased 3.2%. However, the results did not impress the market as the stock has declined 4.1% since the earnings release on July 30. FCN shares have depreciated 6.4% over the past year compared with the industry’s 30.2% decline. The Zacks S&P 500 composite has risen 22.9% over the same time frame. Net income declined 19.4% year over year to $57.8 million. GAAP earnings were $1.99 per share, down 6.6%, and included $0.17 in extraordinary litigation-related expenses. Adjusted EBITDA fell 6.4% to $104.5 million as higher direct costs and selling, general and administrative expenses more than offset revenue growth. The adjusted EBITDA margin contracted 130 basis points to 10.5%. Direct costs reflected continued investments in senior talent and supporting teams across Corporate Finance, Forensic and Litigation Consulting and Strategic Communications. Selling, General & Administrative (SG&A) expenses increased to $230.7 million from $202.2 million due to higher compensation, travel and entertainment, and legal costs. Corporate Finance revenues increased 8.5% year over year to $411.4 million. Higher realized bill rates across transactions, transformation, and turnaround and restructuring services, along with increased transformation demand and higher success fees, supported growth. Transformation revenues advanced 26%, while transactions revenues increased 10%. Turnaround and restructuring revenues declined 2%, reflecting a softer market, although management said the company continued to gain share in large and complex restructuring matters. Adjusted segment EBITDA rose 5.3% to $86 million. However, the margin declined to 20.9% from 21.5% as higher compensation, including the impact of a 7.8% rise in billable headcount and increased SG&A expenses, partly offset revenue gains. Technology revenues increased 18.4% to $99 million, driven by stronger demand for merger-related second-request services. This was partly offset by lower demand for investigations services. Adjusted segment EBITDA jumped 71.3% to $9.1 million, while the margin expanded to 9.1% from 6.3%. Higher revenues more than offset increased compensation, including higher as-needed consultant costs, and SG&A expenses. Forensic and Litigation Consulting revenues grew 4.1% to $194.3 million. Higher realized bill rates and demand for risk and investigations services offset weaker demand for dispute advisory services. Adjusted segment EBITDA edged up 0.5% to $31.4 million. Economic Consulting revenues declined 1.5% year over year to $188.8 million. Lower demand for non-merger & acquisitions (M&A)-related antitrust and international arbitration services was partly offset by stronger M&A-related antitrust demand and higher realized bill rates in financial economics. The segment improved sharply compared with the first quarter, with revenues rising 7.5% sequentially. Adjusted segment EBITDA improved to $8.8 million from a loss of $5.9 million, reflecting higher revenues and lower compensation expenses. Strategic Communications revenues decreased 2.6% to $100 million due to a $7.4 million decline in pass-through revenues. Excluding pass-through revenues, sales increased 5.4%, driven primarily by higher demand for corporate reputation services. Net cash provided by operating activities increased to $152.3 million from $55.7 million a year earlier. Free cash flow totaled $141 million, compared with $38.3 million in the prior-year quarter. FTI Consulting repurchased 2.6 million shares at an average price of $150.84, spending $390.9 million. The company had approximately $344 million remaining under its repurchase authorization at quarter-end. Cash and cash equivalents were $163.7 million as of June 30, 2026, compared with $198.3 million at the end of the preceding quarter. Total debt reached $1.02 billion, primarily reflecting capital deployed for share repurchases. The company reaffirmed its 2026 revenue guidance of $3.94-$4.10 billion, with the midpoint of $4.02 billion being higher than the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $3.98 billion. It lowered GAAP earnings guidance to $8.70-$9.30 per share from $8.90-$9.60, reflecting extraordinary litigation-related expenses. Adjusted earnings are projected between $9.10 and $9.70 per share, with the midpoint of $9.40 per share being higher than the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $9.25 per share. Management expects Economic Consulting to generate year-over-year revenues and adjusted segment EBITDA growth during the second half. The effective tax rate is expected to be between 21% and 23%, down from the previous 22-24% range. SG&A expenses are projected to be roughly $70 million higher than in 2025, compared with the earlier expectation of a $60 million increase. Currently, FTI Consulting carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Trane Technologies plc TT reported impressive second-quarter 2026 results. TT’s adjusted earnings of $4.31 per share outpaced the consensus mark by 0.9% and rose 11.1% from the year-ago quarter’s actual. TT’s total revenues of $6.35 billion surpassed the consensus mark by 2.9% and increased 6.4% year over year. Clean Harbors, Inc. CLH posted better-than-expected second-quarter 2026 results. CLH’s adjusted earnings of $3.22 per share beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 17.5% and rose 36.4% year over year. Total revenues of $1.74 billion surpassed the consensus estimate by 6.8% and increased 12% from the year-ago quarter. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) : Free Stock Analysis Report Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) : Free Stock Analysis Report Trane Technologies plc (TT) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Image source: The Motley Fool. Thursday, July 30, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. ET Head of Investor Relations - Mollie Hawkes Chief Executive Officer and Chairman - Steven Gunby Chief Financial Officer - Angela Nam Chief Strategy and Transformation Officer - Paul Linton Operator: Welcome to the FTI Consulting second quarter 2026 earnings conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad, and to withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note, today's event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mollie Hawkes, head of investor relations. Please go ahead. Mollie Hawkes: Good morning. Welcome to the FTI Consulting conference call to discuss the company's second quarter 2026 earnings results, as reported this morning. Management will begin with formal remarks, after which they will take your questions. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that this conference call may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, including the company's outlook and expectations for the full year 2026 based on management's current beliefs and expectations. These forward-looking statements involve many risks and uncertainties, assumptions and estimates, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. For a discussion of risks and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ from those contemplated by forward-looking statements, investors should review the safe harbor statement in the earnings press release issued this morning, a copy of which is available on our website at www.fticonsulting.com, as well as other disclosures under the headings of Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Information in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31st, 2025, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and other filings with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date of this earnings call and will not be updated. FTI assumes no obligation toupdate these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. During the call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. A discussion of any non-GAAP financial measures addressed on this call and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in the press release and the accompanying financial tables that we issued this morning and were also posted to the investor relations section of our website. Lastly, there are two additional items that have been posted to the investor relations section of our website for your reference. These include a quarterly earnings presentation and an Excel and PDF of our historical, financial, and operating data, which have been updated to include our second quarter 2026 results. With these formalities out of the way, I'm joined today by Steven Gunby, CEO and Chairman, Angela Nam, our Chief Financial Officer, and Paul Linton, our Chief Strategy and Transformation Officer. At this time, I will turn the call over to our CEO and Chairman, Steven Gunby. Steven Gunby: Thank you, Mollie. Good morning, everyone, and thank you all for joining us. As you may have seen this morning, we reported revenues for the second quarter that were, once again, a record. At the same time, our bottom-line performance was somewhat below our expectations for reasons that I'd like to go into in a bit more detail. Specifically, we thought it might be useful if we highlight which of those reasons we believe are temporary in nature and which may be more durable, and therefore highlight what we think all of this might mean for the rest of the year. With that, let me dive in. One major reason for the bottom-line performance was that our SG&A ran higher than expected this quarter. Angela will talk about the SG&A in more detail, and important, she will talk about why we do not expect that to recur going forward. Let me leave that discussion to you, Angela. Let me spend a bit more time, perhaps, on the other reasons, which have to do with the fact that despite record revenues, we actually expected revenues to be even stronger, particularly in a number of the international markets where we've been able to add terrific senior talent and great numbers of that senior talent over the last while. Most notably, let me highlight that phenomenon in EMEA. As I will mention a couple times in this talk, EMEA did continue to grow, and some businesses in EMEA, for example, our Spain and German businesses, had terrific quarters. They exceeded our expectations. We did have challenges in the quarter, both in the Middle East and in the U.K. Challenges which appear to have different bases, and therefore different potential durability. With respect to the U.K., our sense is the issues here are short-term in nature, the normal sorts of zigs and zags that affect different businesses at different points in time. As I hope everyone on this call knows, we have great businesses in the U.K. almost across the board. As we all know, sometimes even with the greatest businesses we have, businesses like our restructuring business or our Econ business in the U.K., they can happen to have some cases end at a particular point in time and some delays and new major cases beginning. When you have those sorts of gaps in those quarters, of course, it flows through to the bottom line. In this case, the timing of that gap between cases ending and starting was far from ideal because given the timing of client vacations in EMEA in the summer, it's typically hard to have a rebound start immediately in the middle of the summer over there. Important, I wanted to underscore, we do not believe the revenue shortfall in the U.K. versus expectations is more than a short-term issue. With respect to the Middle East, however, it's obviously a more complicated question, as I'm sure everyone on this call knows. The Middle East has serious geopolitical disruption, and I think the world as a whole is having trouble predicting just how long that geopolitical disruption is going to last. We do have a great team there, and typically over any extended period of time, my experience is the quality of the team that determines success, not market forces or even geopolitical disruptions. In the Middle East, we clearly do not yet have any definitive sense of when that business will turn. Let me step back for a minute from specific markets. I did want to underscore that even with revenue below some of our aspirations in some of these markets, our overseas markets in general, and EMEA in particular, are growing on the top line in Q2. They're just growing on the top line slower than our aspirations. Let me see if I can explain that a little bit more. As I hope many people on this call know, we have been the beneficiary of a terrific set of hires over the last while. Yes, in the U.S., but particularly overseas, as well as some terrific promotions there. With those aspirations and with those additions has come conviction, belief, and associated aspiration for revenue growth that is considerably higher than mid-digits, single digit. Important, we still have that conviction and those aspirations and those expectations. We are powerfully excited about the people we've added and the people we are continuing to add and the people we're promoting. Unfortunately, when the revenue in a given quarter happens to not quite meet those aspirations and is up only mid to high single digits, the shortfall versus expectations ends up going through to the bottom line. Given that we continue to see strong underlying demand many places and believe most of the Q2 pressures were timing related, we are not changing our revenue guidance for the year, nor our internal forecast for the bottom line for the second half of the year. As Angela will talk about, given the fact that the bottom line year to date is below our expectations, we are adjusting our EPS guidance. If I turn to look at the world by segment, the story is much the same as we've seen in many quarters, which is we've had some businesses and sub-businesses that have performed terrifically well and a few businesses that have either had more challenging markets or have had to run off of some big jobs. In CorpFin, as I hope you will look at the data and see the results overall are terrific. Which I find once again, powerful and heartening, given that the restructuring market is not universally hot right now, and the broader M&A environment remains somewhat uneven. Our sense is that we continue to benefit from the strength of our platform and the fact that now for years, talented people have continued to join us across each of the three service lines. In FLC, our sense is that our experts continue to be called into the most complex, high-stakes matters in the market in areas like cybersecurity, international trade, sanctions issues, or complex anti-money laundering investigations. We believe we continue to gain share. Having said that, the amount of regulatory scrutiny going on globally is feeling less intense than in the past. Even though we are strong this year, we are not expecting to replicate the sort of the bottom-line growth that we've seen so vividly over the last few years. In Econ, the quarter actually came in above our expectations. As we've talked about, it will take multiple years to get Econ back to anywhere near historical levels of profitability. As we've also discussed, we continue to have the leading experts, and they continue to be involved in some of the most important antitrust, international arbitration, securities, litigation matters. One can see the results of those capabilities in the strong sequential improvement in Econ this quarter. Though we have a long way to go, we do expect that in the second half of this year, the business will no longer be a year-on-year drag on revenue or on adjusted segment EBITDA. Tech and StratCom both had solid quarters, particularly StratCom when you look at the year-to-date. Both of these businesses face competitive environments, with Tech in particular, facing a very intense environment. Both businesses continue to make good progress and both see strong opportunities going forward. What does that mean for us overall? Look, we always have, as we see frequently, the chance for short-term air pockets like we've had the last few months in the U.K. Of course, the world is a complicated place, geopolitical issues do happen like they've happened in the Middle East. You can have high aspirations in a given quarter based on the addition of terrific talent, which don't quite get met in that quarter. You can have results that are affected by SG&A that happens to hit in that quarter. Those things can happen in any given quarter. Our experience is that over any multi-quarter period. The relevancy, the power of one's offering is what tends to win out. In that connection, I would note that even in the face of what I've talked about today, year-to-date, we are up 7% on the top line. Up 10% if you normalize for the Econ issues we're working through. Which may raise in your mind the question that we were talking about, which is how did we actually hit 10% growth even with certain places not meeting the full breadth of our aspirations? Let me highlight two reasons, because they're important in themselves, but because both of them undergird why I, why we, are so confident in this business going forward and over the medium term. One is that we continue to win in the traditional markets that we have won in for a long time, markets that continue to show themselves powerfully relevant today. The second is that, if anything, AI is further feeding that growth. Let me take a minute on each of those. In terms of our traditional markets, the world of bankruptcy hasn't gone away, nor has the world of antitrust, of transactions, of investigations, of disputes, of litigation, of reputational issues. What we are seeing evermore is when the stakes are high, clients want the best experts. A phenomenon that we believe has been benefiting us for seven or eight years now, and we believe will continue for a while. Our current view is that AI, if anything, is reinforcing those phenomena. At one level, we're finding that the companies involved in AI are facing and calling us for their own set of high-stakes challenges, whether it's litigation, regulatory concerns, transactions, or disputes. More generally, AI itself is this type of disruptive force that tends to lead to the sorts of things that we are the lead experts at, whether it's bankruptcies, investigations, disputes, or crisis. You can talk about that conceptually. You can see some of that in the headlines. You can also start to see that vividly in our client engagements. For example, in Econ, as you may have seen, one of our new affiliates recently served as the lead expert in supporting in that high-profile OpenAI bus case, which, as you may know, was a victory for our client, OpenAI. More generally, we're being asked to advise on AI-related matters involving intellectual property issues or disputes around misinformation or antitrust claims involving major companies. In Tech, we're finding that the leadership position that they are creating in AI is allowing them to do types of works that I don't think even they could fathom doing a few months ago, let alone a few years ago. Sophie talks about a case recently where we had to look not at 45,000 emails in a day or two days, but 45,000 images and videos and mobile data in an incredibly short period of time to help our client decide its litigation strategy. That wasn't possible just a few months or years ago, and the leadership position we have established in those sorts of work is helping us extend and reinforce our position as the leaders for the most complicated, expert-driven work. Those are just a couple of examples. Would I have preferred that the bottom line this quarter fully meet my expectations? Of course, I would. For the reasons that you all know, but also because I'm so excited about the talent we've added around the world. We believe in the bets we're making and the power of that talent, and it's frustrating anytime you have short-term factors that you feel are obscuring the success that those people are driving. Of course, more generally, I am concerned about the Middle East, not just for our business, but for our people and, of course, for the world. Important, none of what we've talked about today leaves me any fundamentally less optimistic about the fabulous teams of experts we have assembled and are continuing to assemble. The leading positions we have created, the resulting ability we now have so many places to deliver the most critical work for our clients. The effect of that work on building our brands in the market, which in turn continues to augment our position in the virtuous group of professional services, where you deliver great work for your clients, and because great people are motivated to participate in that and do that leads to you being able to attract and develop great people, which in turn reinforce and builds the business and shows over time builds a better platform for our people, makes difference for our clients, and ultimately creates a business that is ever more powerful for you, our shareholders. With that, I want to turn this over to Angela, but before I actually let her talk, let me reiterate, Angela, just how happy I am that you are here. Let me tell to all of you just how impressed I am, how quickly she's gotten up to speed, and how impressed I am in the credibility she's established so quickly within our leadership team. Angela, over to you. Angela Nam: Thank you for the welcome, Steve. Good morning, everyone. I am pleased to be here. I want to thank the entire FTI team for the warm welcome and support I've experienced during my transition. Although I've only been with FTI for three months, I've had the opportunity to spend time getting to know our experts around the world. What has stood out the most to me is our collaborative culture, the exceptional quality of my colleagues, and the impactful work they deliver for our clients. As a former client of FTI, I experienced the talent and expertise that our teams bring to clients firsthand, which was a big part of what attracted me to this company. It's been especially rewarding to see the business from a different perspective, and gain a deeper appreciation for the value FTI delivers and just how broad and deep our platform is, which is what makes FTI so distinctive in the market. With that, I'll review our second quarter financial performance before discussing our balance sheet, cash flow, and guidance. Turning to our results, we delivered record second quarter revenues up 5.3% year-over-year, led by growth in our CorpFin, Tech, and FLC segments. Excluding pass-through revenues increased 6.5%. Notably, as Steve said, we also saw strong sequential improvement in Econ. Despite the revenue growth, adjusted EBITDA declined year-over-year because of higher direct costs and SG&A expenses. Higher direct costs primarily reflected investments in our CorpFin, FLC, and StratCom businesses as we continued to add senior talent and build out teams behind them. SG&A of $230.7 million compared to $202.2 million in the prior year quarter. The increase in SG&A expenses reflects higher compensation, T&E, and legal expenses. The increase in compensation was driven primarily by higher salaries and benefits, which included some one-time compensation expenses in the quarter that will not recur. The increase in T&E was primarily due to our all-SMD meeting held in April, as we did not hold a meeting last year. Higher legal expenses were primarily driven by higher litigation costs. This increase included $6.6 million of extraordinary litigation-related expenses recorded in unallocated corporate SG&A. The second quarter marked an inflection point in the company's litigation against a former employee, originally filed in 2023, which fundamentally changed the scope of the litigation. In May, the court allowed a third amended complaint, which expanded the case to include additional defendants, including a competing firm and new claims. Of the magnitude, complexity, and expansion of this litigation, we believe our shareholders will benefit from visibility into the true underlying operating performance of our business and transparency into the cost associated with protecting the company. Adjusted EBITDA of $104.5 million or 10.5% of revenues compared to $111.6 million or 11.8% of revenues in the prior year quarter. Adjusted EBITDA, which excludes the extraordinary litigation-related expenses, declined year-over-year as the increase in revenues was more than offset by higher direct costs and SG&A expenses. Billable headcount increased 3.2% year-over-year. As Steve mentioned, we continue to find and invest in great senior talent, reflecting billable headcount growth of 5% at the SMD and MD levels as our expert model is increasingly relevant in the market. Our Q2 effective tax rate of 20.8% compared to 22% in the prior year quarter. The decrease was primarily due to tax benefits related to a tax equity investment in renewable energy. This benefit was partially offset by an unfavorable tax adjustment for share-based compensation compared to the prior year quarter. Weighted average shares outstanding or WASO of 29 million shares compared to 33.6 million shares in the prior year quarter. Q2 GAAP EPS was $1.99 and adjusted EPS was $2.16. The variance between GAAP and adjusted EPS was due to the extraordinary litigation-related expenses, which reduced GAAP EPS by $0.17. Turning to the segment level performance. CorpFin had another strong quarter, delivering 8.5% revenue growth year-over-year. CorpFin's top-line performance was driven by higher realized bill rates across the business and higher success fees. In the second quarter, turnaround and restructuring represented 44%, transactions represented 26%, and transformation represented 30% of segment revenues. The transformation practice exceeded our expectations this quarter, growing 26% year-over-year as we support end-to-end cost takeout, supply chain, and operational efficiency mandates. Key industries supported in the quarter included telecommunications, technology, and healthcare. In transactions, revenues grew 10% year-over-year as we supported marquee deals such as Skyworks' acquisition of Qorvo and Hogan Lovells' merger with Cadwalader. Of note, the turnaround and restructuring saw a 2% revenue decline year-over-year. We continue to support some of the largest bankruptcies globally, including Dish Network, Spirit Airlines, First Brands, and Marelli in the U.S., Prax Lindsey Oil Refinery in the U.K., Raízen, the largest out-of-court restructuring in Brazilian history, and in Asia, we're supporting the lenders in the restructuring of a number of well-known Chinese property developers. Importantly, we continue to make investments in CorpFin. In fact, almost 50% of our year-on-year headcount growth can be tied back to investments, such as building out our transactions and transformation businesses in the MEA and our healthcare and mining businesses in Australia as we've added junior headcount to support investments we've made over the last two years. In FLC, our North America business continues to perform well, primarily driven by our financial services and cybersecurity businesses where demand is being driven by shifting regulations and a more complex threat environment. As Steve said, AI is the type of disruptive force that tends to lead to demand for expert services. Our clients turn to us when AI gets complicated, risky, or broken. In financial services, clients are being challenged with how to deploy AI responsibly and are questioning whether AI tools are being used appropriately, or if AI processes are creating regulatory, legal, or operational risks. Cybersecurity, the adoption of AI introduces new risks, including exposing their data and AI-generated content, or automation contributing to fraud or misconduct, among other challenges. Clients are equally concerned about the AI risk introduced by third parties and the ability of AI to enable cyberattacks. While demand for our expertise is being driven in part by AI in these areas, the business overall saw lower volume due to continued pullback in regulatory enforcement. Nonetheless, our ability to be the firm our clients call on for their most complex cases means our higher realized bill rates allowed us to deliver year-over-year top-line growth. Our market positioning is strongest where clients need independent judgment, credibility, and deep expertise. In this vein, we also continue to make investments in senior headcount in FLC, with more than 40% of our year-over-year headcount growth being at the SMD and MD levels. As Steve mentioned, this quarter's Econ performance exceeded our expectations. Econ revenues increased $13.2 million and adjusted EBITDA increased $14.7 million sequentially due to strength in Compass Lexecon in both EMEA and North America. In EMEA, growth was led by our M&A-related antitrust business, supported by mergers such as Anglo American's sale of its Brazilian nickel assets to Hong Kong-listed MMG and Amadeus' plan to acquire French biometrics company, IDEMIA Public Security, among others. In North America, growth was driven by Compass Lexecon's financial economics and antitrust businesses, supported by headline cases such as the OpenAI engagement Steve mentioned. The sequential increase in adjusted segment EBITDA was due to higher revenues and lower compensation, as we had some 1Q compensation items that did not recur. Technology 18.4% revenue growth year-over-year was driven by increased demand for M&A-related second request services. As you might remember, Q2 of 2025 was an unusually slow quarter for M&A-related second requests, with a number of paused or canceled engagements resulting from the change in the U.S. administration. Strat Comm also delivered a solid quarter. Excluding pass-through revenues, Strat Comm's revenues increased 5.4%, primarily due to higher demand for corporate reputation services. Worth noting, Strat Comm's results reflect the strength of our multi-year investments to build out our higher-margin event-driven offering such areas as crisis, cyber, M&A, and activism, including working with CorpFin on restructurings for Wolfspeed and Spirit Airlines and the mega mergers of McCormick and Unilever, and Skyworks and Qorvo, as well as high-profile activism work such as Lululemon. Turning to key cash flow and balance sheet items. Net cash provided by operating activities of $152.3 million, compared to $55.7 million in Q2 of 2025. The increase was primarily due to higher cash collections and lower forgivable loan issuances and income tax payments, which was partially offset by higher operating expenses and compensation payments. During the quarter, we repurchased 2.6 million shares at an average price per share of $150.84, for a total cost of $390.9 million. We made those purchases based on our assessment of long-term value and available balance sheet capacity while continuing to fund investments in talent. As of June 30, 2026, approximately $344 million remained available for share repurchases under our share repurchases program. Turning to our full year 2026 guidance. Year to date, our revenues are up 7% year-over-year or 10% if you exclude Econ. As such, we are reaffirming our guidance for revenues of between $3.94 billion and $4.1 billion. While we're maintaining our revenue guidance, we are lowering our GAAP EPS guidance to between $8.70 and $9.30, which compares to the prior range of between $8.90 and $9.60. We expect adjusted EPS to be between $9.10 and $9.70. While the first quarter also included litigation-related expenses, the $0.40 difference between GAAP and adjusted EPS reflects our second quarter extraordinary litigation-related expenses of $0.17 and our current estimate for these expenses in the second half of the year. Our updated guidance incorporates the following key assumptions. First, Econ exceeded our expectations in Q2. The sequential improvement demonstrated by our Compass Lexecon business was meaningful and broad-based. As discussed last quarter, the cost structure is already in the P&L. While we don't expect another sequential step-up, we do expect year-over-year growth in revenue and adjusted segment EBITDA in the second half of 2026. Second, we are an event-driven business and therefore our results can be lumpy due to factors such as jobs rolling off and new jobs rolling on, which can be exacerbated by seasonality as well as market activity in key areas such as restructuring, M&A, and regulatory activity. Although there are geographical differences around the world, the restructuring market has been softer year to date. Despite the weaker market backdrop, our global restructuring revenues increased 8% compared to the first half of 2025 as we continued to increase our market share, especially in large company size matters. This is once again evidenced by our leading positions in league tables as we remain well-positioned to win the most complex matters globally. For M&A, the current U.S. administration's more deal-friendly posture has boosted mega deal volume, driving higher demand for our second request services in tech and M&A-related antitrust services in e-com. Faster clearances, more negotiated remedies, and fewer litigated challenges may reduce the duration and intensity of our engagements. In Corp, Fin and Strat Comms, we believe we are taking share as we continue to bring more of our services to our clients across the deal lifecycle. For FLC, which also benefits from high levels of regulatory scrutiny, we have seen slower markets under the current U.S. administration. We have won our share of engagements or more on the largest, most complex cases, and our teams have been quick to pivot to support areas of evolving client needs. Third, we're differentiated by our low-leverage, expert-based model, and we continue to see strong opportunities to invest in great talent. We've announced 45 SMD and affiliate hires year to date in key businesses such as transactions, transformation, corporate reputation, disputes, cybersecurity, and risk and investigations. Additionally, we're poised to welcome more than 270 graduates in the third quarter as part of our annual class of hires. Fourth, we expect SG&A expenses for 2026 to be approximately $70 million higher than 2025, which compares to our previous expectation of $60 million higher. The increase is primarily due to an expectation for higher legal expenses, which include extraordinary litigation-related expenses. Sequentially, we expect SG&A in Q3 to be approximately $12 million lower than Q2. Lastly, we now expect our full year effective tax rate to be between 21% and 23%, which compares to a prior range of between 22% and 24%. Our record revenues this quarter reflect the powerful platform and the unique set of offerings that we have, as well as how relevant our people are in an increasingly complex, evolving landscape. While this business experiences its share of volatility or zigs and zags, as Steve said, I am energized by the strong fundamentals supporting our long-term growth trajectory. That confidence is reinforced by a very strong balance sheet, a differentiator that's uncommon in our industry. I am excited about our opportunities ahead with the continued focus on transparent engagement with our shareholders and creating sustainable value over time. With that, we'll open the call up for your questions. Operator: Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, we ask that you please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Today's first question comes from James Yaro at Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. James Yaro: Good morning, and thanks for taking the questions. Steve, I was hoping you might be able to expand a bit more on your comments around the Middle East impacts on the business. Specifically, what I think would be helpful might just be a little bit more granularity on how the geopolitical disruptions are weighing on the business in the region. Then I guess as we look ahead, could that at some point flip to a tailwind for your businesses, and why? Steven Gunby: It's a good question. Eventually, could it be a tailwind in our business? Of course. We believe our business is currently functioning well below the capacity of the team we have there, and it's a terrific team. The real question is, when the heck does that happen? I think it's really difficult to foresee. The manifestations of the geopolitical conflict are different, right? For some period of time, you had people exiting for fear of safety, then they came back. You have sometimes some of the buyers are suspending purchases at this point in time, and then they authorize the purchases, but then they suspend the start of assignments. You get reports that change weekly on a weekly basis. Of course, we get reports from our political leaders that suggest that different weekly forecasts of the end of a geopolitical conflict. I think it's incredibly hard to forecast this. It's not that we don't believe that there would be a long-term tailwind. My general experience over a million years now in professional services over any extended period of time, if you have the best team, you win because there is a need in those markets. Forecasting when is hard. I think we are being very cautious about saying we don't see a turn anytime near term. I hope we're wrong, James, for the world, not just for us. James Yaro: Thanks, Steve. That's really helpful. Just turning quickly to restructuring, obviously robust in the quarter again. We are seeing a growing list of macro and geopolitical considerations that I would expect could impact restructuring, whether it's private credit, the global conflict, as well as software issues. Could you just give us the mark to market on what that means for the restructuring outlook from here and whether this has started to improve? Steven Gunby: Since my crystal ball always fails, I'm going to let Angela try out her crystal ball. Let me just agree with your more macro points. We believe the macro forces out there are incredibly favorable towards this business over the next while. We believe that the macro forces out there have been favorable to this business for the last while, and there's been a lot of liability management exercises that have postponed potential restructurings but not always solved the problem. We believe the position we've created is obviously generating good results, but there's real upside. The question of when is where the crystal ball comes in, and I've never been that good at-- Is your crystal ball better, Angela? Angela Nam: I hope so. We'll see. To echo what Steve was saying, while we wouldn't characterize the environment as a broad-based restructuring boom currently, we are seeing deep pockets of activity, and we're encouraged by the quality and the size of opportunities in the market. As we've covered, even though the overall restructuring activity remains uneven and it's a little softer year to date, our global restructuring revenues grew 8% in the first year versus the prior year, and we do continue to win some of the largest and the most complex matters. That gives us confidence in our market position to continue to win those larger cases. James Yaro: That's very clear. Just one last one for me. Just wanted to touch a little bit on the repurchase activity. You, once again, had strong repurchase activity in the quarter. Could you just update us on your capital deployment priorities from here if the stock price stays at this level, let's say? Maybe you could weigh that up against your appetite to add leverage from here. Angela Nam: Sure. Steven Gunby: Yeah. No, Angela, go ahead. Angela Nam: Yeah, sure. As we've been in the past, we've always been opportunistic with our share buybacks, and we don't have a specific purchase target, short term or long term. In 2025 and the second quarter this year, we saw opportunities to purchase. As Steve said in the past, when we believe the market has misunderstood or is misunderstanding or mispricing the potential of our business, we'll invest pretty heavily. As we've seen with our buybacks in 2017 and in 2020, we've had a pretty good outcome so far. Asking about our capital allocation strategy, I think it has not changed. We are committed to our current disciplined capital allocation strategy, which goes in the order of cash to fund operations and investments for organic growth, then looking at M&A opportunities when available. We'll continue to repurchase shares on an opportunistic basis. We always have the option of paying down our debt. From a leverage perspective, we did upsize our revolver this quarter, as you've seen, from $900 million to $1.5 billion. We view that as a position of strength, and it wasn't a necessity. Just to remind you, our revolver was due to become current later this year, and when I joined, it was a priority for me to get that refinanced. When we had an opportunity to extend the maturity by five years, increase the size, all that improves economics, we thought it was a positive outcome to improve our financial position and increase flexibility. Given that we generate substantial EBITDA and free cash flow, we see that as prudent financial management as we can control the timing of our debt repayments as well. James Yaro: Very comprehensive and helpful. Thank you. Steven Gunby: Nice talking with you, James. Operator: Thank you. Our next question today comes from Andrew Nicholas with William Blair. Please go ahead. Andrew Nicholas: Hi. I appreciate you taking my question. I wanted to first touch on some of the prepared remarks around kind of legislative changes within merger reviews. I think the DOJ recently announced some changes there to accelerate the reviews and potentially reduce information requests. I'm wondering if you could speak a little bit more to the puts and takes on that development to Economic Consulting and maybe any additional color you could provide on what impact you've seen from that to date. Steven Gunby: Yeah. Look, as of now, we haven't seen any major impact of that on our business to date. We'll be monitoring this as we always monitor legislative changes. These sorts of changes happen with some frequency, and there are lots of other phenomena going on as well that can affect the business. As of now, we're not seeing any major impact. Andrew Nicholas: Understood. Thank you. Then for my follow-up, just on guidance, I think in past years when you've made adjustments after the second quarter, you've narrowed the revenue range a little bit. Obviously, with reaffirming the outlook this quarter, you're not doing that in 2026. Can you just kind of speak to why it's a little bit wider range of second half outcomes than is typical? I suspect some of that's Middle East and Steve, you talked about just the fact that it's an event-driven business having some variability, but wondering if there's anything else you could add there or make any comments on segment-level variability or where maybe the range of outcomes is especially wide at that level. Thank you. Steven Gunby: Yeah, I think you've hit the nail on the head, Andrew. Look, I'd love to just even think about the U.K. and the Middle East, right? The Middle East, we have in there not a huge revenue recovery in the second half of the year. Hopefully, the world turns out to be better, and that's a possibility. With the U.K., which we talked about, we have confidence in the business. I hope my European colleagues won't be mad at me, but it's hard to get immediate rebounds in Europe when all your clients are on vacation. That's an exaggeration, all your clients aren't on vacation, but there's a lot of vacations in July and August, and that means if you start the summer slow, it's hard to get an immediate rebound. Then you say the rebound happens in the fall. Well, when in the fall? Does it happen in the end of August or September? Does it happen in September or October? There's a lot of uncertainty in general, and then there's more now. We just decided it was not worth narrowing that range. We feel really well-positioned and for example, as Angela was saying, we feel really well-positioned against some potential very big jobs in Corporate Finance. When do they start? Do they settle? All those sorts of things are still out there, we just didn't think it was prudent to narrow that range at this point, Andrew. I think that's just reaffirming what you were surmising. Yes? Andrew Nicholas: Yes. Thank you very much. Operator: Thank you. Our next question today comes from Tobey Sommer with Truist. Please go ahead. Tobey Sommer: Thank you. I wanted to ask a question about the guidance from a back half perspective in EBITDA and for the year for EBITDA. EBITDA is down, of course, you're growing EPS mostly from share repurchase and I understand the litigation expense. What does it imply for EBITDA in the back half? Maybe what are the biggest levers for you to start growing that as we aim into next year and beyond? Thanks. Steven Gunby: I'll give you a quick start on that and then see if Angela wants to grab. Look, obviously in EPS, we are benefited from WASO in the second half of the year, although net interest, of course, is higher, and there are some other corporate things like tax rate differences. Also some of it has to do with the fact that we had a lot of SG&A in the first half of the year that we don't expect to recur in the second half. The SG&A obviously shows up in EBITDA. Then some of it has to do with certain businesses doing better in the second half than the first half. It's not all WASO type stuff. Angela, I don't know how much you want to elaborate beyond that. Angela Nam: Yeah. I think as Steve said, we did have some SG&A expenses in the first half of the year that we don't expect to incur in the second half, which included higher T&E in our all-SMD meeting in April. We had some lower Workday implementation spend and some one-time compensation items. We also noted lower legal expenses compared to the first half of the year. As we noted, we did have legal expenses also in Q1, but we'll start beginning to disclose our extraordinary litigation expenses in Q2, and we expect those costs to be lower in the second half of the year. That also is supplemented by. We expect second half business performance improvement, primarily driven by Econ and Tech. Those, along with the share repurchases, the WASO impact, and our lower effective tax rate for the full year, we do believe we'll have a strong pickup in earnings in the second half. Steven Gunby: Does that help, Tobey? Tobey Sommer: It does on the mechanical side in terms of EPS, but I was really trying to get to the EBITDA. Shifting gears, what is your expectation for MD headcount growth? You can pick your time frame over the next one or two years. I am wondering what the trajectory would be, either sequentially or year-over-year, as we use that as an input to inform our models. Thanks. Steven Gunby: Let me just come back to the EBITDA thing. One thing I think we got to remember here, Tobey, is we have been working through the impact of Econ on our EBITDA. Right, between 2017 and 2024, we were a real growth company not only on top line, but also on EBITDA, on EPS. With all the zigzags and all that sort of stuff, we were a powerful double-digit growth on everything. The last couple of years, we are making some of it work and grow, but we are working through a major impact on our EBITDA from the Econ issues, right? I think what we have been trying to do is to get to a place where we can think that the drag from it is behind us, and that is where we think we are. The drag is behind us. If you are going to look at why is not EBITDA growing and all this other stuff, I think you just got to normalize for what impact and what kick in the teeth we have had in the Econ business, which is the basis for the litigation. Then, what we have done now to try to get beyond the year-on-year drag. Okay? I think that is a helpful thing. I think your question on senior headcount growth is a great one for going forward. I think even year-to-date, I think our SMD growth year-on-year is north of 6%. It is between 6% and 7%, which is more overseas than it is in the U.S. I think our MD is probably comparable to that. Our junior headcount has grown a little bit less quickly, but we are growing that. We are still believing, we are still finding lots of people wanting to join us. We are finding powerful brand propositions, and we are finding good price realization when we need it. We are expecting that to show up. It is starting to show up in the top-line growth as you saw this quarter, but we expect that eventually, once you get through the drag that we have been working through for the last couple of years to start to show up. Any given quarter can be funky, but go up in any medium term in our EBITDA lines and as well as our EPS lines. Does that help, Tobey? Tobey Sommer: Yeah, it does. Last question from me is that I'd love to get your perspective on nominal bill rate increases and expectations for that as well as net realized bill rate increases. If you could as part of your answer, beyond just the whole firm comment on Economic Consulting, that'd be great. Steven Gunby: Yeah. I don't know if we give out the specifics. If we do, I'll let Angela do that. What I would say is that there's been a conscious focus that for a couple of years we didn't grow our rates as much as we should have in an inflationary environment. We need to recapture that. We have the ability to recapture that because of the size and importance of our jobs. That is a message that the executive team embraces and we have been working on, and you see it particular success over a couple of years in FLC in a number of places, but everybody is focused on that. I'm not sure we give out specific numbers on that, but it's something we are committed to and we believe we will continue to have progress on. Tobey Sommer: If I could just follow up on that. If you feel like you hadn't been raising rates enough, is it fair to say that over the medium term here, you might have an opportunity to grow bill rates more quickly than over the last little bit? Steven Gunby: Yeah, I think we've been starting to try to recapture that. I think that during the inflationary periods of like 2019 to 2024, we just were slow to raise our rates at the rate we should have. In the last couple of years, we started to make progress, but we continue to expect to continue to make progress is the way I would say it, Tobey. Does that help? Tobey Sommer: Okay, thanks. Steven Gunby: Any other questions? Operator: We have no further questions at this time, sir. Steven Gunby: Well, thank you very much for your time and attention. We hope everybody's having a great summer. We look forward to being back with you in a few months. Welcome again, Angela. Thank you all. Operator: Thanks everyone. That does conclude today's conference call. We thank you all for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines and have a wonderful day. Before you buy stock in FTI Consulting, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and FTI Consulting wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut are built for long-term growth and could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $386,727!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,232,139!* That performance is why people listen. With a track record of beating the S&P 500 by 4x, Stock Advisor offers a distinct advantage. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built for the long haul. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 3, 2026. This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends FTI Consulting. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. FTI Consulting (FCN) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript was originally published by The Motley Fool

Image source: The Motley Fool. Thursday, July 30, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. ET Head of Investor Relations - Mollie Hawkes Chief Executive Officer and Chairman - Steven Gunby Chief Financial Officer - Angela Nam Chief Strategy and Transformation Officer - Paul Linton Operator: Welcome to the FTI Consulting second quarter 2026 earnings conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad, and to withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note, today's event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mollie Hawkes, head of investor relations. Please go ahead. Mollie Hawkes: Good morning. Welcome to the FTI Consulting conference call to discuss the company's second quarter 2026 earnings results, as reported this morning. Management will begin with formal remarks, after which they will take your questions. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that this conference call may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, including the company's outlook and expectations for the full year 2026 based on management's current beliefs and expectations. These forward-looking statements involve many risks and uncertainties, assumptions and estimates, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. For a discussion of risks and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ from those contemplated by forward-looking statements, investors should review the safe harbor statement in the earnings press release issued this morning, a copy of which is available on our website at www.fticonsulting.com, as well as other disclosures under the headings of Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Information in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31st, 2025, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and other filings with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date of this earnings call and will not be updated. FTI assumes no obligation toupdate these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. During the call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. A discussion of any non-GAAP financial measures addressed on this call and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in the press release and the accompanying financial tables that we issued this morning and were also posted to the investor relations section of our website. Lastly, there are two additional items that have been posted to the investor relations section of our website for your reference. These include a quarterly earnings presentation and an Excel and PDF of our historical, financial, and operating data, which have been updated to include our second quarter 2026 results. With these formalities out of the way, I'm joined today by Steven Gunby, CEO and Chairman, Angela Nam, our Chief Financial Officer, and Paul Linton, our Chief Strategy and Transformation Officer. At this time, I will turn the call over to our CEO and Chairman, Steven Gunby. Steven Gunby: Thank you, Mollie. Good morning, everyone, and thank you all for joining us. As you may have seen this morning, we reported revenues for the second quarter that were, once again, a record. At the same time, our bottom-line performance was somewhat below our expectations for reasons that I'd like to go into in a bit more detail. Specifically, we thought it might be useful if we highlight which of those reasons we believe are temporary in nature and which may be more durable, and therefore highlight what we think all of this might mean for the rest of the year. With that, let me dive in. One major reason for the bottom-line performance was that our SG&A ran higher than expected this quarter. Angela will talk about the SG&A in more detail, and important, she will talk about why we do not expect that to recur going forward. Let me leave that discussion to you, Angela. Let me spend a bit more time, perhaps, on the other reasons, which have to do with the fact that despite record revenues, we actually expected revenues to be even stronger, particularly in a number of the international markets where we've been able to add terrific senior talent and great numbers of that senior talent over the last while. Most notably, let me highlight that phenomenon in EMEA. As I will mention a couple times in this talk, EMEA did continue to grow, and some businesses in EMEA, for example, our Spain and German businesses, had terrific quarters. They exceeded our expectations. We did have challenges in the quarter, both in the Middle East and in the U.K. Challenges which appear to have different bases, and therefore different potential durability. With respect to the U.K., our sense is the issues here are short-term in nature, the normal sorts of zigs and zags that affect different businesses at different points in time. As I hope everyone on this call knows, we have great businesses in the U.K. almost across the board. As we all know, sometimes even with the greatest businesses we have, businesses like our restructuring business or our Econ business in the U.K., they can happen to have some cases end at a particular point in time and some delays and new major cases beginning. When you have those sorts of gaps in those quarters, of course, it flows through to the bottom line. In this case, the timing of that gap between cases ending and starting was far from ideal because given the timing of client vacations in EMEA in the summer, it's typically hard to have a rebound start immediately in the middle of the summer over there. Important, I wanted to underscore, we do not believe the revenue shortfall in the U.K. versus expectations is more than a short-term issue. With respect to the Middle East, however, it's obviously a more complicated question, as I'm sure everyone on this call knows. The Middle East has serious geopolitical disruption, and I think the world as a whole is having trouble predicting just how long that geopolitical disruption is going to last. We do have a great team there, and typically over any extended period of time, my experience is the quality of the team that determines success, not market forces or even geopolitical disruptions. In the Middle East, we clearly do not yet have any definitive sense of when that business will turn. Let me step back for a minute from specific markets. I did want to underscore that even with revenue below some of our aspirations in some of these markets, our overseas markets in general, and EMEA in particular, are growing on the top line in Q2. They're just growing on the top line slower than our aspirations. Let me see if I can explain that a little bit more. As I hope many people on this call know, we have been the beneficiary of a terrific set of hires over the last while. Yes, in the U.S., but particularly overseas, as well as some terrific promotions there. With those aspirations and with those additions has come conviction, belief, and associated aspiration for revenue growth that is considerably higher than mid-digits, single digit. Important, we still have that conviction and those aspirations and those expectations. We are powerfully excited about the people we've added and the people we are continuing to add and the people we're promoting. Unfortunately, when the revenue in a given quarter happens to not quite meet those aspirations and is up only mid to high single digits, the shortfall versus expectations ends up going through to the bottom line. Given that we continue to see strong underlying demand many places and believe most of the Q2 pressures were timing related, we are not changing our revenue guidance for the year, nor our internal forecast for the bottom line for the second half of the year. As Angela will talk about, given the fact that the bottom line year to date is below our expectations, we are adjusting our EPS guidance. If I turn to look at the world by segment, the story is much the same as we've seen in many quarters, which is we've had some businesses and sub-businesses that have performed terrifically well and a few businesses that have either had more challenging markets or have had to run off of some big jobs. In CorpFin, as I hope you will look at the data and see the results overall are terrific. Which I find once again, powerful and heartening, given that the restructuring market is not universally hot right now, and the broader M&A environment remains somewhat uneven. Our sense is that we continue to benefit from the strength of our platform and the fact that now for years, talented people have continued to join us across each of the three service lines. In FLC, our sense is that our experts continue to be called into the most complex, high-stakes matters in the market in areas like cybersecurity, international trade, sanctions issues, or complex anti-money laundering investigations. We believe we continue to gain share. Having said that, the amount of regulatory scrutiny going on globally is feeling less intense than in the past. Even though we are strong this year, we are not expecting to replicate the sort of the bottom-line growth that we've seen so vividly over the last few years. In Econ, the quarter actually came in above our expectations. As we've talked about, it will take multiple years to get Econ back to anywhere near historical levels of profitability. As we've also discussed, we continue to have the leading experts, and they continue to be involved in some of the most important antitrust, international arbitration, securities, litigation matters. One can see the results of those capabilities in the strong sequential improvement in Econ this quarter. Though we have a long way to go, we do expect that in the second half of this year, the business will no longer be a year-on-year drag on revenue or on adjusted segment EBITDA. Tech and StratCom both had solid quarters, particularly StratCom when you look at the year-to-date. Both of these businesses face competitive environments, with Tech in particular, facing a very intense environment. Both businesses continue to make good progress and both see strong opportunities going forward. What does that mean for us overall? Look, we always have, as we see frequently, the chance for short-term air pockets like we've had the last few months in the U.K. Of course, the world is a complicated place, geopolitical issues do happen like they've happened in the Middle East. You can have high aspirations in a given quarter based on the addition of terrific talent, which don't quite get met in that quarter. You can have results that are affected by SG&A that happens to hit in that quarter. Those things can happen in any given quarter. Our experience is that over any multi-quarter period. The relevancy, the power of one's offering is what tends to win out. In that connection, I would note that even in the face of what I've talked about today, year-to-date, we are up 7% on the top line. Up 10% if you normalize for the Econ issues we're working through. Which may raise in your mind the question that we were talking about, which is how did we actually hit 10% growth even with certain places not meeting the full breadth of our aspirations? Let me highlight two reasons, because they're important in themselves, but because both of them undergird why I, why we, are so confident in this business going forward and over the medium term. One is that we continue to win in the traditional markets that we have won in for a long time, markets that continue to show themselves powerfully relevant today. The second is that, if anything, AI is further feeding that growth. Let me take a minute on each of those. In terms of our traditional markets, the world of bankruptcy hasn't gone away, nor has the world of antitrust, of transactions, of investigations, of disputes, of litigation, of reputational issues. What we are seeing evermore is when the stakes are high, clients want the best experts. A phenomenon that we believe has been benefiting us for seven or eight years now, and we believe will continue for a while. Our current view is that AI, if anything, is reinforcing those phenomena. At one level, we're finding that the companies involved in AI are facing and calling us for their own set of high-stakes challenges, whether it's litigation, regulatory concerns, transactions, or disputes. More generally, AI itself is this type of disruptive force that tends to lead to the sorts of things that we are the lead experts at, whether it's bankruptcies, investigations, disputes, or crisis. You can talk about that conceptually. You can see some of that in the headlines. You can also start to see that vividly in our client engagements. For example, in Econ, as you may have seen, one of our new affiliates recently served as the lead expert in supporting in that high-profile OpenAI bus case, which, as you may know, was a victory for our client, OpenAI. More generally, we're being asked to advise on AI-related matters involving intellectual property issues or disputes around misinformation or antitrust claims involving major companies. In Tech, we're finding that the leadership position that they are creating in AI is allowing them to do types of works that I don't think even they could fathom doing a few months ago, let alone a few years ago. Sophie talks about a case recently where we had to look not at 45,000 emails in a day or two days, but 45,000 images and videos and mobile data in an incredibly short period of time to help our client decide its litigation strategy. That wasn't possible just a few months or years ago, and the leadership position we have established in those sorts of work is helping us extend and reinforce our position as the leaders for the most complicated, expert-driven work. Those are just a couple of examples. Would I have preferred that the bottom line this quarter fully meet my expectations? Of course, I would. For the reasons that you all know, but also because I'm so excited about the talent we've added around the world. We believe in the bets we're making and the power of that talent, and it's frustrating anytime you have short-term factors that you feel are obscuring the success that those people are driving. Of course, more generally, I am concerned about the Middle East, not just for our business, but for our people and, of course, for the world. Important, none of what we've talked about today leaves me any fundamentally less optimistic about the fabulous teams of experts we have assembled and are continuing to assemble. The leading positions we have created, the resulting ability we now have so many places to deliver the most critical work for our clients. The effect of that work on building our brands in the market, which in turn continues to augment our position in the virtuous group of professional services, where you deliver great work for your clients, and because great people are motivated to participate in that and do that leads to you being able to attract and develop great people, which in turn reinforce and builds the business and shows over time builds a better platform for our people, makes difference for our clients, and ultimately creates a business that is ever more powerful for you, our shareholders. With that, I want to turn this over to Angela, but before I actually let her talk, let me reiterate, Angela, just how happy I am that you are here. Let me tell to all of you just how impressed I am, how quickly she's gotten up to speed, and how impressed I am in the credibility she's established so quickly within our leadership team. Angela, over to you. Angela Nam: Thank you for the welcome, Steve. Good morning, everyone. I am pleased to be here. I want to thank the entire FTI team for the warm welcome and support I've experienced during my transition. Although I've only been with FTI for three months, I've had the opportunity to spend time getting to know our experts around the world. What has stood out the most to me is our collaborative culture, the exceptional quality of my colleagues, and the impactful work they deliver for our clients. As a former client of FTI, I experienced the talent and expertise that our teams bring to clients firsthand, which was a big part of what attracted me to this company. It's been especially rewarding to see the business from a different perspective, and gain a deeper appreciation for the value FTI delivers and just how broad and deep our platform is, which is what makes FTI so distinctive in the market. With that, I'll review our second quarter financial performance before discussing our balance sheet, cash flow, and guidance. Turning to our results, we delivered record second quarter revenues up 5.3% year-over-year, led by growth in our CorpFin, Tech, and FLC segments. Excluding pass-through revenues increased 6.5%. Notably, as Steve said, we also saw strong sequential improvement in Econ. Despite the revenue growth, adjusted EBITDA declined year-over-year because of higher direct costs and SG&A expenses. Higher direct costs primarily reflected investments in our CorpFin, FLC, and StratCom businesses as we continued to add senior talent and build out teams behind them. SG&A of $230.7 million compared to $202.2 million in the prior year quarter. The increase in SG&A expenses reflects higher compensation, T&E, and legal expenses. The increase in compensation was driven primarily by higher salaries and benefits, which included some one-time compensation expenses in the quarter that will not recur. The increase in T&E was primarily due to our all-SMD meeting held in April, as we did not hold a meeting last year. Higher legal expenses were primarily driven by higher litigation costs. This increase included $6.6 million of extraordinary litigation-related expenses recorded in unallocated corporate SG&A. The second quarter marked an inflection point in the company's litigation against a former employee, originally filed in 2023, which fundamentally changed the scope of the litigation. In May, the court allowed a third amended complaint, which expanded the case to include additional defendants, including a competing firm and new claims. Of the magnitude, complexity, and expansion of this litigation, we believe our shareholders will benefit from visibility into the true underlying operating performance of our business and transparency into the cost associated with protecting the company. Adjusted EBITDA of $104.5 million or 10.5% of revenues compared to $111.6 million or 11.8% of revenues in the prior year quarter. Adjusted EBITDA, which excludes the extraordinary litigation-related expenses, declined year-over-year as the increase in revenues was more than offset by higher direct costs and SG&A expenses. Billable headcount increased 3.2% year-over-year. As Steve mentioned, we continue to find and invest in great senior talent, reflecting billable headcount growth of 5% at the SMD and MD levels as our expert model is increasingly relevant in the market. Our Q2 effective tax rate of 20.8% compared to 22% in the prior year quarter. The decrease was primarily due to tax benefits related to a tax equity investment in renewable energy. This benefit was partially offset by an unfavorable tax adjustment for share-based compensation compared to the prior year quarter. Weighted average shares outstanding or WASO of 29 million shares compared to 33.6 million shares in the prior year quarter. Q2 GAAP EPS was $1.99 and adjusted EPS was $2.16. The variance between GAAP and adjusted EPS was due to the extraordinary litigation-related expenses, which reduced GAAP EPS by $0.17. Turning to the segment level performance. CorpFin had another strong quarter, delivering 8.5% revenue growth year-over-year. CorpFin's top-line performance was driven by higher realized bill rates across the business and higher success fees. In the second quarter, turnaround and restructuring represented 44%, transactions represented 26%, and transformation represented 30% of segment revenues. The transformation practice exceeded our expectations this quarter, growing 26% year-over-year as we support end-to-end cost takeout, supply chain, and operational efficiency mandates. Key industries supported in the quarter included telecommunications, technology, and healthcare. In transactions, revenues grew 10% year-over-year as we supported marquee deals such as Skyworks' acquisition of Qorvo and Hogan Lovells' merger with Cadwalader. Of note, the turnaround and restructuring saw a 2% revenue decline year-over-year. We continue to support some of the largest bankruptcies globally, including Dish Network, Spirit Airlines, First Brands, and Marelli in the U.S., Prax Lindsey Oil Refinery in the U.K., Raízen, the largest out-of-court restructuring in Brazilian history, and in Asia, we're supporting the lenders in the restructuring of a number of well-known Chinese property developers. Importantly, we continue to make investments in CorpFin. In fact, almost 50% of our year-on-year headcount growth can be tied back to investments, such as building out our transactions and transformation businesses in the MEA and our healthcare and mining businesses in Australia as we've added junior headcount to support investments we've made over the last two years. In FLC, our North America business continues to perform well, primarily driven by our financial services and cybersecurity businesses where demand is being driven by shifting regulations and a more complex threat environment. As Steve said, AI is the type of disruptive force that tends to lead to demand for expert services. Our clients turn to us when AI gets complicated, risky, or broken. In financial services, clients are being challenged with how to deploy AI responsibly and are questioning whether AI tools are being used appropriately, or if AI processes are creating regulatory, legal, or operational risks. Cybersecurity, the adoption of AI introduces new risks, including exposing their data and AI-generated content, or automation contributing to fraud or misconduct, among other challenges. Clients are equally concerned about the AI risk introduced by third parties and the ability of AI to enable cyberattacks. While demand for our expertise is being driven in part by AI in these areas, the business overall saw lower volume due to continued pullback in regulatory enforcement. Nonetheless, our ability to be the firm our clients call on for their most complex cases means our higher realized bill rates allowed us to deliver year-over-year top-line growth. Our market positioning is strongest where clients need independent judgment, credibility, and deep expertise. In this vein, we also continue to make investments in senior headcount in FLC, with more than 40% of our year-over-year headcount growth being at the SMD and MD levels. As Steve mentioned, this quarter's Econ performance exceeded our expectations. Econ revenues increased $13.2 million and adjusted EBITDA increased $14.7 million sequentially due to strength in Compass Lexecon in both EMEA and North America. In EMEA, growth was led by our M&A-related antitrust business, supported by mergers such as Anglo American's sale of its Brazilian nickel assets to Hong Kong-listed MMG and Amadeus' plan to acquire French biometrics company, IDEMIA Public Security, among others. In North America, growth was driven by Compass Lexecon's financial economics and antitrust businesses, supported by headline cases such as the OpenAI engagement Steve mentioned. The sequential increase in adjusted segment EBITDA was due to higher revenues and lower compensation, as we had some 1Q compensation items that did not recur. Technology 18.4% revenue growth year-over-year was driven by increased demand for M&A-related second request services. As you might remember, Q2 of 2025 was an unusually slow quarter for M&A-related second requests, with a number of paused or canceled engagements resulting from the change in the U.S. administration. Strat Comm also delivered a solid quarter. Excluding pass-through revenues, Strat Comm's revenues increased 5.4%, primarily due to higher demand for corporate reputation services. Worth noting, Strat Comm's results reflect the strength of our multi-year investments to build out our higher-margin event-driven offering such areas as crisis, cyber, M&A, and activism, including working with CorpFin on restructurings for Wolfspeed and Spirit Airlines and the mega mergers of McCormick and Unilever, and Skyworks and Qorvo, as well as high-profile activism work such as Lululemon. Turning to key cash flow and balance sheet items. Net cash provided by operating activities of $152.3 million, compared to $55.7 million in Q2 of 2025. The increase was primarily due to higher cash collections and lower forgivable loan issuances and income tax payments, which was partially offset by higher operating expenses and compensation payments. During the quarter, we repurchased 2.6 million shares at an average price per share of $150.84, for a total cost of $390.9 million. We made those purchases based on our assessment of long-term value and available balance sheet capacity while continuing to fund investments in talent. As of June 30, 2026, approximately $344 million remained available for share repurchases under our share repurchases program. Turning to our full year 2026 guidance. Year to date, our revenues are up 7% year-over-year or 10% if you exclude Econ. As such, we are reaffirming our guidance for revenues of between $3.94 billion and $4.1 billion. While we're maintaining our revenue guidance, we are lowering our GAAP EPS guidance to between $8.70 and $9.30, which compares to the prior range of between $8.90 and $9.60. We expect adjusted EPS to be between $9.10 and $9.70. While the first quarter also included litigation-related expenses, the $0.40 difference between GAAP and adjusted EPS reflects our second quarter extraordinary litigation-related expenses of $0.17 and our current estimate for these expenses in the second half of the year. Our updated guidance incorporates the following key assumptions. First, Econ exceeded our expectations in Q2. The sequential improvement demonstrated by our Compass Lexecon business was meaningful and broad-based. As discussed last quarter, the cost structure is already in the P&L. While we don't expect another sequential step-up, we do expect year-over-year growth in revenue and adjusted segment EBITDA in the second half of 2026. Second, we are an event-driven business and therefore our results can be lumpy due to factors such as jobs rolling off and new jobs rolling on, which can be exacerbated by seasonality as well as market activity in key areas such as restructuring, M&A, and regulatory activity. Although there are geographical differences around the world, the restructuring market has been softer year to date. Despite the weaker market backdrop, our global restructuring revenues increased 8% compared to the first half of 2025 as we continued to increase our market share, especially in large company size matters. This is once again evidenced by our leading positions in league tables as we remain well-positioned to win the most complex matters globally. For M&A, the current U.S. administration's more deal-friendly posture has boosted mega deal volume, driving higher demand for our second request services in tech and M&A-related antitrust services in e-com. Faster clearances, more negotiated remedies, and fewer litigated challenges may reduce the duration and intensity of our engagements. In Corp, Fin and Strat Comms, we believe we are taking share as we continue to bring more of our services to our clients across the deal lifecycle. For FLC, which also benefits from high levels of regulatory scrutiny, we have seen slower markets under the current U.S. administration. We have won our share of engagements or more on the largest, most complex cases, and our teams have been quick to pivot to support areas of evolving client needs. Third, we're differentiated by our low-leverage, expert-based model, and we continue to see strong opportunities to invest in great talent. We've announced 45 SMD and affiliate hires year to date in key businesses such as transactions, transformation, corporate reputation, disputes, cybersecurity, and risk and investigations. Additionally, we're poised to welcome more than 270 graduates in the third quarter as part of our annual class of hires. Fourth, we expect SG&A expenses for 2026 to be approximately $70 million higher than 2025, which compares to our previous expectation of $60 million higher. The increase is primarily due to an expectation for higher legal expenses, which include extraordinary litigation-related expenses. Sequentially, we expect SG&A in Q3 to be approximately $12 million lower than Q2. Lastly, we now expect our full year effective tax rate to be between 21% and 23%, which compares to a prior range of between 22% and 24%. Our record revenues this quarter reflect the powerful platform and the unique set of offerings that we have, as well as how relevant our people are in an increasingly complex, evolving landscape. While this business experiences its share of volatility or zigs and zags, as Steve said, I am energized by the strong fundamentals supporting our long-term growth trajectory. That confidence is reinforced by a very strong balance sheet, a differentiator that's uncommon in our industry. I am excited about our opportunities ahead with the continued focus on transparent engagement with our shareholders and creating sustainable value over time. With that, we'll open the call up for your questions. Operator: Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, we ask that you please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Today's first question comes from James Yaro at Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. James Yaro: Good morning, and thanks for taking the questions. Steve, I was hoping you might be able to expand a bit more on your comments around the Middle East impacts on the business. Specifically, what I think would be helpful might just be a little bit more granularity on how the geopolitical disruptions are weighing on the business in the region. Then I guess as we look ahead, could that at some point flip to a tailwind for your businesses, and why? Steven Gunby: It's a good question. Eventually, could it be a tailwind in our business? Of course. We believe our business is currently functioning well below the capacity of the team we have there, and it's a terrific team. The real question is, when the heck does that happen? I think it's really difficult to foresee. The manifestations of the geopolitical conflict are different, right? For some period of time, you had people exiting for fear of safety, then they came back. You have sometimes some of the buyers are suspending purchases at this point in time, and then they authorize the purchases, but then they suspend the start of assignments. You get reports that change weekly on a weekly basis. Of course, we get reports from our political leaders that suggest that different weekly forecasts of the end of a geopolitical conflict. I think it's incredibly hard to forecast this. It's not that we don't believe that there would be a long-term tailwind. My general experience over a million years now in professional services over any extended period of time, if you have the best team, you win because there is a need in those markets. Forecasting when is hard. I think we are being very cautious about saying we don't see a turn anytime near term. I hope we're wrong, James, for the world, not just for us. James Yaro: Thanks, Steve. That's really helpful. Just turning quickly to restructuring, obviously robust in the quarter again. We are seeing a growing list of macro and geopolitical considerations that I would expect could impact restructuring, whether it's private credit, the global conflict, as well as software issues. Could you just give us the mark to market on what that means for the restructuring outlook from here and whether this has started to improve? Steven Gunby: Since my crystal ball always fails, I'm going to let Angela try out her crystal ball. Let me just agree with your more macro points. We believe the macro forces out there are incredibly favorable towards this business over the next while. We believe that the macro forces out there have been favorable to this business for the last while, and there's been a lot of liability management exercises that have postponed potential restructurings but not always solved the problem. We believe the position we've created is obviously generating good results, but there's real upside. The question of when is where the crystal ball comes in, and I've never been that good at-- Is your crystal ball better, Angela? Angela Nam: I hope so. We'll see. To echo what Steve was saying, while we wouldn't characterize the environment as a broad-based restructuring boom currently, we are seeing deep pockets of activity, and we're encouraged by the quality and the size of opportunities in the market. As we've covered, even though the overall restructuring activity remains uneven and it's a little softer year to date, our global restructuring revenues grew 8% in the first year versus the prior year, and we do continue to win some of the largest and the most complex matters. That gives us confidence in our market position to continue to win those larger cases. James Yaro: That's very clear. Just one last one for me. Just wanted to touch a little bit on the repurchase activity. You, once again, had strong repurchase activity in the quarter. Could you just update us on your capital deployment priorities from here if the stock price stays at this level, let's say? Maybe you could weigh that up against your appetite to add leverage from here. Angela Nam: Sure. Steven Gunby: Yeah. No, Angela, go ahead. Angela Nam: Yeah, sure. As we've been in the past, we've always been opportunistic with our share buybacks, and we don't have a specific purchase target, short term or long term. In 2025 and the second quarter this year, we saw opportunities to purchase. As Steve said in the past, when we believe the market has misunderstood or is misunderstanding or mispricing the potential of our business, we'll invest pretty heavily. As we've seen with our buybacks in 2017 and in 2020, we've had a pretty good outcome so far. Asking about our capital allocation strategy, I think it has not changed. We are committed to our current disciplined capital allocation strategy, which goes in the order of cash to fund operations and investments for organic growth, then looking at M&A opportunities when available. We'll continue to repurchase shares on an opportunistic basis. We always have the option of paying down our debt. From a leverage perspective, we did upsize our revolver this quarter, as you've seen, from $900 million to $1.5 billion. We view that as a position of strength, and it wasn't a necessity. Just to remind you, our revolver was due to become current later this year, and when I joined, it was a priority for me to get that refinanced. When we had an opportunity to extend the maturity by five years, increase the size, all that improves economics, we thought it was a positive outcome to improve our financial position and increase flexibility. Given that we generate substantial EBITDA and free cash flow, we see that as prudent financial management as we can control the timing of our debt repayments as well. James Yaro: Very comprehensive and helpful. Thank you. Steven Gunby: Nice talking with you, James. Operator: Thank you. Our next question today comes from Andrew Nicholas with William Blair. Please go ahead. Andrew Nicholas: Hi. I appreciate you taking my question. I wanted to first touch on some of the prepared remarks around kind of legislative changes within merger reviews. I think the DOJ recently announced some changes there to accelerate the reviews and potentially reduce information requests. I'm wondering if you could speak a little bit more to the puts and takes on that development to Economic Consulting and maybe any additional color you could provide on what impact you've seen from that to date. Steven Gunby: Yeah. Look, as of now, we haven't seen any major impact of that on our business to date. We'll be monitoring this as we always monitor legislative changes. These sorts of changes happen with some frequency, and there are lots of other phenomena going on as well that can affect the business. As of now, we're not seeing any major impact. Andrew Nicholas: Understood. Thank you. Then for my follow-up, just on guidance, I think in past years when you've made adjustments after the second quarter, you've narrowed the revenue range a little bit. Obviously, with reaffirming the outlook this quarter, you're not doing that in 2026. Can you just kind of speak to why it's a little bit wider range of second half outcomes than is typical? I suspect some of that's Middle East and Steve, you talked about just the fact that it's an event-driven business having some variability, but wondering if there's anything else you could add there or make any comments on segment-level variability or where maybe the range of outcomes is especially wide at that level. Thank you. Steven Gunby: Yeah, I think you've hit the nail on the head, Andrew. Look, I'd love to just even think about the U.K. and the Middle East, right? The Middle East, we have in there not a huge revenue recovery in the second half of the year. Hopefully, the world turns out to be better, and that's a possibility. With the U.K., which we talked about, we have confidence in the business. I hope my European colleagues won't be mad at me, but it's hard to get immediate rebounds in Europe when all your clients are on vacation. That's an exaggeration, all your clients aren't on vacation, but there's a lot of vacations in July and August, and that means if you start the summer slow, it's hard to get an immediate rebound. Then you say the rebound happens in the fall. Well, when in the fall? Does it happen in the end of August or September? Does it happen in September or October? There's a lot of uncertainty in general, and then there's more now. We just decided it was not worth narrowing that range. We feel really well-positioned and for example, as Angela was saying, we feel really well-positioned against some potential very big jobs in Corporate Finance. When do they start? Do they settle? All those sorts of things are still out there, we just didn't think it was prudent to narrow that range at this point, Andrew. I think that's just reaffirming what you were surmising. Yes? Andrew Nicholas: Yes. Thank you very much. Operator: Thank you. Our next question today comes from Tobey Sommer with Truist. Please go ahead. Tobey Sommer: Thank you. I wanted to ask a question about the guidance from a back half perspective in EBITDA and for the year for EBITDA. EBITDA is down, of course, you're growing EPS mostly from share repurchase and I understand the litigation expense. What does it imply for EBITDA in the back half? Maybe what are the biggest levers for you to start growing that as we aim into next year and beyond? Thanks. Steven Gunby: I'll give you a quick start on that and then see if Angela wants to grab. Look, obviously in EPS, we are benefited from WASO in the second half of the year, although net interest, of course, is higher, and there are some other corporate things like tax rate differences. Also some of it has to do with the fact that we had a lot of SG&A in the first half of the year that we don't expect to recur in the second half. The SG&A obviously shows up in EBITDA. Then some of it has to do with certain businesses doing better in the second half than the first half. It's not all WASO type stuff. Angela, I don't know how much you want to elaborate beyond that. Angela Nam: Yeah. I think as Steve said, we did have some SG&A expenses in the first half of the year that we don't expect to incur in the second half, which included higher T&E in our all-SMD meeting in April. We had some lower Workday implementation spend and some one-time compensation items. We also noted lower legal expenses compared to the first half of the year. As we noted, we did have legal expenses also in Q1, but we'll start beginning to disclose our extraordinary litigation expenses in Q2, and we expect those costs to be lower in the second half of the year. That also is supplemented by. We expect second half business performance improvement, primarily driven by Econ and Tech. Those, along with the share repurchases, the WASO impact, and our lower effective tax rate for the full year, we do believe we'll have a strong pickup in earnings in the second half. Steven Gunby: Does that help, Tobey? Tobey Sommer: It does on the mechanical side in terms of EPS, but I was really trying to get to the EBITDA. Shifting gears, what is your expectation for MD headcount growth? You can pick your time frame over the next one or two years. I am wondering what the trajectory would be, either sequentially or year-over-year, as we use that as an input to inform our models. Thanks. Steven Gunby: Let me just come back to the EBITDA thing. One thing I think we got to remember here, Tobey, is we have been working through the impact of Econ on our EBITDA. Right, between 2017 and 2024, we were a real growth company not only on top line, but also on EBITDA, on EPS. With all the zigzags and all that sort of stuff, we were a powerful double-digit growth on everything. The last couple of years, we are making some of it work and grow, but we are working through a major impact on our EBITDA from the Econ issues, right? I think what we have been trying to do is to get to a place where we can think that the drag from it is behind us, and that is where we think we are. The drag is behind us. If you are going to look at why is not EBITDA growing and all this other stuff, I think you just got to normalize for what impact and what kick in the teeth we have had in the Econ business, which is the basis for the litigation. Then, what we have done now to try to get beyond the year-on-year drag. Okay? I think that is a helpful thing. I think your question on senior headcount growth is a great one for going forward. I think even year-to-date, I think our SMD growth year-on-year is north of 6%. It is between 6% and 7%, which is more overseas than it is in the U.S. I think our MD is probably comparable to that. Our junior headcount has grown a little bit less quickly, but we are growing that. We are still believing, we are still finding lots of people wanting to join us. We are finding powerful brand propositions, and we are finding good price realization when we need it. We are expecting that to show up. It is starting to show up in the top-line growth as you saw this quarter, but we expect that eventually, once you get through the drag that we have been working through for the last couple of years to start to show up. Any given quarter can be funky, but go up in any medium term in our EBITDA lines and as well as our EPS lines. Does that help, Tobey? Tobey Sommer: Yeah, it does. Last question from me is that I'd love to get your perspective on nominal bill rate increases and expectations for that as well as net realized bill rate increases. If you could as part of your answer, beyond just the whole firm comment on Economic Consulting, that'd be great. Steven Gunby: Yeah. I don't know if we give out the specifics. If we do, I'll let Angela do that. What I would say is that there's been a conscious focus that for a couple of years we didn't grow our rates as much as we should have in an inflationary environment. We need to recapture that. We have the ability to recapture that because of the size and importance of our jobs. That is a message that the executive team embraces and we have been working on, and you see it particular success over a couple of years in FLC in a number of places, but everybody is focused on that. I'm not sure we give out specific numbers on that, but it's something we are committed to and we believe we will continue to have progress on. Tobey Sommer: If I could just follow up on that. If you feel like you hadn't been raising rates enough, is it fair to say that over the medium term here, you might have an opportunity to grow bill rates more quickly than over the last little bit? Steven Gunby: Yeah, I think we've been starting to try to recapture that. I think that during the inflationary periods of like 2019 to 2024, we just were slow to raise our rates at the rate we should have. In the last couple of years, we started to make progress, but we continue to expect to continue to make progress is the way I would say it, Tobey. Does that help? Tobey Sommer: Okay, thanks. Steven Gunby: Any other questions? Operator: We have no further questions at this time, sir. Steven Gunby: Well, thank you very much for your time and attention. We hope everybody's having a great summer. We look forward to being back with you in a few months. Welcome again, Angela. Thank you all. Operator: Thanks everyone. That does conclude today's conference call. We thank you all for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines and have a wonderful day. Before you buy stock in FTI Consulting, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and FTI Consulting wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $397,081!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,166,221!* Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 889% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 203% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 30, 2026. This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends FTI Consulting. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. FTI Consulting (FCN) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript was originally published by The Motley Fool

Interested in FTI Consulting, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. Record Q2 revenue rose 5.3% year over year, led by Corporate Finance & Restructuring, Technology, and Forensic and Litigation Consulting, but adjusted EBITDA fell to $104.5 million as direct costs and SG&A increased. FTI maintained its full-year revenue outlook of $3.94 billion to $4.1 billion but lowered GAAP EPS guidance to $8.70–$9.30, citing litigation-related expenses and first-half profitability pressures. Management also expects third-quarter SG&A to decline by about $12 million from Q2 levels. Growth opportunities include AI-related advisory demand, stronger Economic Consulting performance, continued hiring, and share repurchases; however, management cited uncertain timing in the U.K. and geopolitical risks in the Middle East as ongoing headwinds. FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) reported record second-quarter revenue for 2026, but adjusted EBITDA declined from a year earlier as higher direct costs and selling, general and administrative expenses outweighed top-line growth. The company maintained its full-year revenue outlook while lowering its GAAP earnings-per-share guidance, citing litigation-related costs and first-half profitability pressures. Second-quarter revenue increased 5.3% year over year, while revenue excluding pass-through expenses rose 6.5%, Chief Financial Officer Angela Nam said. Growth was led by the Corporate Finance & Restructuring, Technology and Forensic and Litigation Consulting segments. Adjusted EBITDA was $104.5 million, or 10.5% of revenue, compared with $111.6 million, or 11.8% of revenue, in the prior-year period. → Why SK hynix Could Be the Best AI Chip Stock to Buy Now GAAP EPS was $1.99 and adjusted EPS was $2.16. The difference reflected $6.6 million in extraordinary litigation-related expenses, which reduced GAAP EPS by $0.17, Nam said. SG&A expense rose to $230.7 million from $202.2 million a year earlier. Nam attributed the increase to higher compensation, travel and entertainment expenses, and legal costs. Compensation included one-time items that the company does not expect to recur, while travel costs reflected an all-senior managing director meeting held in April that was not held in the prior year. → Microsoft Just Flipped the AI Spending Narrative Overnight The company also incurred increased litigation expenses related to a lawsuit against a former employee that was originally filed in 2023. Nam said a court decision in May allowing a third amended complaint expanded the case to include additional defendants, including a competing firm, as well as new claims. FTI expects third-quarter SG&A to be about $12 million lower than second-quarter levels. For the full year, it now expects SG&A to be about $70 million higher than in 2025, compared with its earlier expectation of a $60 million increase, largely because of higher legal costs. → Carrier Earnings Could Send the Stock to a New All-Time High Chief Executive Officer and Chairman Steven Gunby said revenue was below the company’s expectations in some international markets, particularly in the United Kingdom and the Middle East, even as overseas operations continued to grow. Gunby characterized the U.K. shortfall as a short-term timing issue involving engagements ending and delays in new major matters starting. He said the seasonal vacation period in Europe can make it difficult for a business to rebound quickly during the summer. The Middle East outlook was less certain because of geopolitical disruption. Gunby said the company has a “terrific team” in the region and believes the business is operating below its capacity, but he said it is difficult to forecast when conditions may improve. “We are being very cautious about saying we don’t see a turn anytime near term,” Gunby said in response to an analyst question. Despite those pressures, management maintained its full-year revenue guidance of $3.94 billion to $4.1 billion. The company lowered its GAAP EPS outlook to a range of $8.70 to $9.30 from a prior range of $8.90 to $9.60. Adjusted EPS is expected to be between $9.10 and $9.70. Corporate Finance & Restructuring revenue increased 8.5% year over year, driven by higher realized bill rates and higher success fees. The transformation practice grew 26%, supported by cost-reduction, supply-chain and operational-efficiency mandates. Transactions revenue grew 10%. Turnaround and restructuring revenue declined 2% year over year in the quarter, though Nam said global restructuring revenue increased 8% in the first half. The company cited work on restructuring matters including Dish Network, Spirit Airlines, First Brands and Marelli in the U.S.; Prax Lindsey Oil Refinery in the U.K.; Raízen in Brazil; and Chinese property developers in Asia. Management said the overall restructuring market remains uneven, but the company continues to win large and complex assignments. Gunby said macroeconomic conditions appear favorable for restructuring activity over time, though he declined to forecast the timing of a broader recovery. Economic Consulting exceeded management’s expectations, with revenue increasing $13.2 million sequentially and adjusted segment EBITDA rising $14.7 million from the first quarter. The improvement reflected strength at Compass Lexecon in both North America and Europe, including M&A-related antitrust work and financial economics engagements. Management expects the segment to produce year-over-year growth in revenue and adjusted segment EBITDA during the second half, though it does not anticipate another comparable sequential step-up. Technology revenue increased 18.4% year over year, driven by demand for M&A-related second-request services. Strategic Communications revenue, excluding pass-through expenses, rose 5.4%, led by corporate reputation services and event-driven offerings including crisis, cyber, M&A and activism work. Gunby and Nam said artificial intelligence is contributing to demand across the firm’s businesses. FTI is advising clients on AI-related matters involving litigation, regulation, intellectual property, misinformation, antitrust, cybersecurity and operational risk. Gunby cited an engagement in which the firm reviewed 45,000 images, videos and mobile-data items over a short period to support a client’s litigation strategy. The company continued to invest in senior talent, with billable headcount up 3.2% year over year and SMD and managing director headcount up 5%. FTI announced 45 SMD and affiliate hires year to date and expects to welcome more than 270 graduates in the third quarter. Operating cash flow totaled $152.3 million, compared with $55.7 million in the second quarter of 2025, primarily reflecting higher collections, lower forgivable loan issuances and lower income-tax payments. During the quarter, FTI repurchased 2.6 million shares for $390.9 million, at an average price of $150.84 per share. About $344 million remained under the company’s repurchase authorization as of June 30. Nam said the company remains opportunistic on buybacks while prioritizing funding operations and organic growth investments, pursuing M&A opportunities when available, and retaining the option to reduce debt. FTI also increased its revolving credit facility to $1.5 billion from $900 million and extended its maturity by five years. FTI Consulting, Inc is a global business advisory firm providing multidisciplinary solutions designed to address complex challenges and strategic opportunities. The company's primary service offerings encompass corporate finance & restructuring, economic consulting, forensic & litigation consulting, strategic communications, and technology. These capabilities enable clients to manage financial distress, navigate regulatory environments, resolve disputes, build trust with stakeholders, and leverage data-driven insights. In its corporate finance & restructuring practice, FTI delivers restructuring, interim management, and transaction advisory services to companies facing operational or financial pressures. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "FTI Consulting Q2 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for July 2026.

Our analysts just identified a stock with the potential to be the next Nvidia. Tell us how you invest and we'll show you why it's our #1 pick. Tap here. Record revenues were driven by strong underlying demand in traditional high-stakes markets like bankruptcy, antitrust, and investigations, though bottom-line results fell short due to timing gaps in the U.K. and geopolitical disruptions in the Middle East. The U.K. shortfall is viewed as a temporary 'air pocket' caused by the conclusion of major cases coinciding with the European summer vacation season, delaying the start of new engagements. Middle East operations face more durable uncertainty as geopolitical instability has led to client purchase suspensions and project start delays, despite a high-quality team being in place. Management remains committed to aggressive senior talent acquisition, particularly in EMEA, noting that while current revenue growth is in the mid-to-high single digits, the infrastructure is built for higher aspirations. AI is emerging as a significant growth catalyst, both by creating new high-stakes litigation and regulatory challenges for AI companies and by enabling FTI to handle massive data volumes that were previously unmanageable. Economic Consulting (Econ) has reached a performance inflection point, with sequential improvements suggesting the business will no longer be a year-over-year drag on revenue or EBITDA in the second half of 2026. Corporate Finance continues to benefit from platform strength and diversification into transformation and transaction services, offsetting an uneven global M&A environment and a 'softer' restructuring market. Reaffirmed full-year revenue guidance of $3.94 billion to $4.1 billion assumes a second-half rebound in the U.K. and continued sequential stability in the Econ and Tech segments. Lowered GAAP EPS guidance to $8.70-$9.30 incorporates a $0.40 difference from adjusted EPS, reflecting extraordinary litigation-related expenses from the second quarter and estimated expenses for the second half of the year. The second-half outlook assumes a significant reduction in SG&A expenses, specifically a $12 million sequential drop in Q3 as one-time compensation and meeting costs do not recur. Management expects to continue opportunistic share repurchases, supported by a newly upsized $1.5 billion revolving credit facility intended to provide maximum financial flexibility. The firm anticipates welcoming over 270 graduates in Q3, maintaining a long-term investment strategy in human capital despite short-term margin volatility. Recorded $6.6 million in extraordinary litigation-related expenses in Q2 stemming from a 2023 lawsuit against a former employee that has expanded to include a competing firm. SG&A was impacted by a one-time all-Senior Managing Director meeting in April, a cost that was not present in the prior year's comparable quarter. The effective tax rate was lowered to 21%-23% for the full year, primarily due to tax benefits realized from a tax equity investment in renewable energy. Geopolitical risk in the Middle East remains a primary headwind, with management explicitly stating they lack a definitive sense of when that specific market will turn. One stock. Nvidia-level potential. 30M+ investors trust Moby to find it first. Get the pick. Tap here. Management noted that disruptions manifest as buyers suspending purchases or delaying the start of authorized assignments, often on a week-to-week basis. While the team is operating below capacity, FTI believes the long-term need for their expertise in the region remains high once stability returns. Despite a 'softer' overall market, FTI's restructuring revenue grew 8% in the first half of 2026, driven by market share gains in large, complex matters. Management believes macro forces like private credit and liability management exercises are merely postponing restructurings rather than solving underlying corporate issues. The firm remains committed to an 'opportunistic' buyback strategy, particularly when they believe the market is mispricing the long-term potential of the business. The $1.5 billion revolver upsize was a proactive move to extend maturity and improve economics rather than a necessity for immediate liquidity. Management admitted they were slow to raise rates during the 2019-2024 inflationary period and are now focused on 'recapturing' that value. There is a firm-wide commitment to improving price realization, particularly in high-stakes segments like Forensic and Litigation Consulting (FLC).

Record Second Quarter 2026 Revenues of $993.5 Million, Up 5.3% Compared to $943.7 Million in Prior Year Quarter Second Quarter 2026 EPS of $1.99 and Adjusted EPS of $2.16, Compared to EPS and Adjusted EPS of $2.13 in Prior Year Quarter Company Reaffirms Revenue Guidance, Updates EPS Guidance Range to Between $8.70 and $9.30 and Introduces Adjusted EPS Guidance Range of Between $9.10 and $9.70 WASHINGTON, July 30, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- FTI Consulting, Inc. (NYSE: FCN) today released financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026. Second quarter 2026 record revenues of $993.5 million increased $49.8 million, or 5.3%, compared to revenues of $943.7 million in the prior year quarter. The increase was primarily driven by revenue growth in the Corporate Finance, Technology and Forensic and Litigation Consulting segments, which was partially offset by a $9.2 million decline in pass-through revenues. Net income of $57.8 million compared to $71.7 million in the prior year quarter. The decrease in net income was primarily due to higher direct costs, selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses and interest expense, which was partially offset by the increase in revenues and a lower income tax provision. Adjusted EBITDA of $104.5 million, or 10.5% of revenues, compared to $111.6 million, or 11.8% of revenues, in the prior year quarter. Second quarter 2026 Adjusted EBITDA excludes $6.6 million of Extraordinary Litigation-Related Expenses.1 Second quarter 2026 EPS of $1.99 compared to $2.13 in the prior year quarter. Second quarter 2026 EPS included the aforementioned Extraordinary Litigation-Related Expenses, which reduced EPS by $0.17. Second quarter Adjusted EPS of $2.16 compared to $2.13 in the prior year quarter. Steven H. Gunby, CEO and Chairman of FTI Consulting, commented, “Our performance this quarter demonstrates, once again, the underlying power of this institution and the resilience created by our sustained, multiyear investments in great talent. As clients face ever more complicated and disrupted environments, the depth and breadth of our capabilities across our global platform are increasingly relevant. Though the event-driven nature of our business means we will always have zigs and zags someplace around the world, we continue to feel confident and excited about our multiyear trajectory.” Cash Position and Capital Allocation Net cash provided by operating activities of $152.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 compared to $55.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. The year-over-year increase in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to higher cash collections and a decrease in forgivable loan issuances and income tax payments, which was partially offset by an increase in operating expense and compensation payments. On June 3, 2026, FTI Consulting’s Board of Directors authorized the additional amount of $370.0 million to repurchase its outstanding shares of common stock under its stock repurchase program. During the quarter ended June 30, 2026, the Company repurchased 2,591,133 shares of its common stock at an average price per share of $150.84 for a total cost of $390.9 million. As of June 30, 2026, approximately $344.0 million remained available for common stock repurchases under the Company’s stock repurchase program. Cash and cash equivalents of $163.7 million at June 30, 2026 compared to $152.8 million at June 30, 2025 and $198.3 million at March 31, 2026. Total debt, net of cash, of $856.3 million at June 30, 2026 compared to $317.2 million at June 30, 2025 and $556.7 million at March 31, 2026. The sequential increase in total debt, net of cash, was primarily due to share repurchases. Second Quarter 2026 Segment Results Corporate FinanceRevenues in the Corporate Finance segment increased $32.2 million, or 8.5%, to $411.4 million in the quarter compared to $379.2 million in the prior year quarter. The increase in revenues was primarily due to higher realized bill rates for transactions, transformation and turnaround & restructuring services, an increase in demand for transformation services, and higher success fees, which was partially offset by lower demand for turnaround & restructuring services. Segment operating income of $82.5 million compared to $78.1 million in the prior year quarter. Adjusted Segment EBITDA of $86.0 million, or 20.9% of segment revenues, compared to $81.7 million, or 21.5% of segment revenues, in the prior year quarter. The increase in Adjusted Segment EBITDA was primarily due to higher revenues, which was partially offset by an increase in compensation, which includes the impact of a 7.8% increase in billable headcount, and higher SG&A expenses. Forensic and Litigation ConsultingRevenues in the Forensic and Litigation Consulting segment increased $7.7 million, or 4.1%, to $194.3 million in the quarter compared to $186.5 million in the prior year quarter. The increase in revenues was primarily due to higher realized bill rates and demand for risk & investigations services, which was partially offset by lower demand for dispute advisory services. Segment operating income of $29.2 million compared to $29.1 million in the prior year quarter. Adjusted Segment EBITDA of $31.4 million, or 16.1% of segment revenues, compared to $31.2 million, or 16.7% of segment revenues, in the prior year quarter. The increase in Adjusted Segment EBITDA was primarily due to higher revenues, which was nearly offset by an increase in compensation, which includes the impact of a 3.0% increase in billable headcount, and higher SG&A expenses. Economic ConsultingRevenues in the Economic Consulting segment decreased $2.8 million, or 1.5%, to $188.8 million in the quarter compared to $191.7 million in the prior year quarter. The decrease in revenues was primarily due to lower demand for non-merger and acquisition (“M&A”)-related antitrust and international arbitration services, which was partially offset by higher demand for M&A-related antitrust services and higher realized bill rates for financial economics services. Segment operating income of $7.4 million compared to $12.8 million in the prior year quarter. Adjusted Segment EBITDA of $8.8 million, or 4.7% of segment revenues, compared to $14.2 million, or 7.4% of segment revenues, in the prior year quarter. The decrease in Adjusted Segment EBITDA was primarily due to lower revenues and higher compensation. TechnologyRevenues in the Technology segment increased $15.4 million, or 18.4%, to $99.0 million in the quarter compared to $83.6 million in the prior year quarter. The increase in revenues was primarily due to higher demand for M&A-related “second request” services, which was partially offset by lower demand for investigations services. Segment operating income of $4.8 million compared to $1.6 million in the prior year quarter. Adjusted Segment EBITDA of $9.1 million, or 9.1% of segment revenues, compared to $5.3 million, or 6.3% of segment revenues, in the prior year quarter. The increase in Adjusted Segment EBITDA was primarily due to higher revenues, which was partially offset by an increase in compensation, which includes higher as-needed consultant costs, and higher SG&A expenses. Strategic CommunicationsRevenues in the Strategic Communications segment decreased $2.7 million, or 2.6%, to $100.0 million in the quarter compared to $102.7 million in the prior year quarter. The decrease in revenues was primarily due to a $7.4 million decline in pass-through revenues. Excluding pass-through revenues, revenues increased $4.7 million, or 5.4%, primarily due to higher demand for corporate reputation services. Segment operating income of $17.4 million compared to $17.5 million in the prior year quarter. Adjusted Segment EBITDA of $18.5 million, or 18.5% of segment revenues, compared to $18.5 million, or 18.0% of segment revenues, in the prior year quarter. 2026 GuidanceThe Company is reaffirming its full year 2026 revenue guidance range of between $3.940 billion and $4.100 billion. The Company now estimates EPS for full year 2026 will range between $8.70 and $9.30, which compares to the prior range of between $8.90 and $9.60. The Company estimates Adjusted EPS will range between $9.10 and $9.70. The variance between EPS and Adjusted EPS guidance for full year 2026 includes an estimated $0.40 of Extraordinary Litigation-Related Expenses. Second Quarter 2026 Conference CallFTI Consulting will host a conference call for analysts and investors to discuss second quarter 2026 financial results at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 30, 2026. The call can be accessed live and will be available for replay over the internet for 90 days by logging onto the Company’s investor relations website here. About FTI ConsultingFTI Consulting, Inc. is a leading global expert firm for organizations facing crisis and transformation, with more than 8,100 employees located in 32 countries and territories as of June 30, 2026. In certain jurisdictions, FTI Consulting’s services are provided through distinct legal entities that are separately capitalized and independently managed. The Company generated $3.8 billion in revenues during fiscal year 2025. More information can be found at www.fticonsulting.com. Non-GAAP Financial MeasuresIn the accompanying analysis of financial information, we sometimes use information derived from consolidated and segment financial information that may not be presented in our financial statements or prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP"). Certain of these financial measures are considered not in conformity with GAAP ("non-GAAP financial measures") under the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") rules. Specifically, we have referred to the following non-GAAP financial measures: Adjusted Segment EBITDA Adjusted EBITDA Adjusted EBITDA Margin Adjusted Net Income Adjusted Earnings per Diluted Share We have included the definition of Segment Operating Income, which is a GAAP financial measure, below in order to more fully define the components of certain non-GAAP financial measures in the accompanying analysis of financial information. We define Segment Operating Income as a segment’s share of consolidated operating income. We use Segment Operating Income for the purpose of calculating Adjusted Segment EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. We define Adjusted Segment EBITDA as Segment Operating Income before depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, remeasurement of acquisition-related contingent consideration, special charges and goodwill impairment charges. We use Adjusted Segment EBITDA as a basis to internally evaluate the financial performance of our segments because we believe it reflects core operating performance and provides an indicator of the segment’s ability to generate cash. We define Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, as consolidated net income before income tax provision, other non-operating income (expense), depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, remeasurement of acquisition-related contingent consideration, special charges, goodwill impairment charges, gain or loss on sale of a business, losses on early extinguishment of debt and Extraordinary Litigation-Related Expenses (as defined below). We define Adjusted EBITDA Margin, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, as Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of total revenues. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures, when considered together with our GAAP financial results and GAAP financial measures, provide management and investors with a more complete understanding of our operating results, including underlying trends. Many of our competitors use alternative measures of operating performance. Non-GAAP financial measures are used by investors, financial analysts, rating agencies and others to value and compare the financial performance of companies in our industry. Therefore, we also believe that our non-GAAP financial measures, considered along with corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide management and investors with useful supplemental information. We define Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings per Diluted Share ("Adjusted EPS"), which are non-GAAP financial measures, as net income and EPS, respectively, excluding the impact of remeasurement of acquisition-related contingent consideration, special charges, goodwill impairment charges, the gain or loss on sale of a business, losses on early extinguishment of debt and Extraordinary Litigation-Related Expenses (as defined below). We use Adjusted Net Income for the purpose of calculating Adjusted EPS. Management uses Adjusted EPS to assess total Company operating performance on a consistent basis. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures, when considered together with our GAAP financial results and GAAP financial measures, provide management and investors with useful supplemental information on our business operating results, including underlying trends. “Extraordinary Litigation-Related Expenses” represent expenses related to the Company’s litigation in the case captioned FTI Consulting, Inc. et al., v. Jonathan M. Orszag et al., 8:23-cv-03200-BAH-AAQ (D.Md.) (together with ancillary proceedings, “FTI vs. Orszag, et al”). In May 2026, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland (the “Court”) allowed the Company to file a third amended complaint to an existing proceeding against Jonathan Orszag, adding Econic Partners LLC, a competitor of the Company, and Dr. Mark Israel, a former Company employee, as defendants. The third amended complaint also added additional claims, including for theft of Company trade secrets and conspiracy to unlawfully compete. This litigation was originally filed in November 2023 against Mr. Orszag, a former Company employee, to enforce the terms of his employment agreement. As a result of the Court’s allowance of the third amended complaint, in the Company’s judgment, beginning in the second quarter of 2026, FTI vs Orszag, et al became non-recurring and outside of the ordinary course of business based on the following considerations: (i) the magnitude of the proceedings, (ii) the complexity of the proceedings, (iii) the counterparties involved and (iv) the Company’s overall litigation strategy. No non-GAAP financial measures for prior periods presented have been adjusted for litigation expenses related to FTI vs. Orszag, et al because the proceedings did not become extraordinary until the second quarter of 2026. Non-GAAP financial measures are not defined in the same manner by all companies and may not be comparable with other similarly titled measures of other companies. Non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for or superior to, the information contained in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are included in the financial tables accompanying this press release. Safe Harbor Statement This press release includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including among other things, statements about future events, anticipated growth, industry prospects, business trends, our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy and plans, future revenues or performance, financing needs, and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements often contain words such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “estimates,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “projects,” “plans,” “intends,” “believes,” “commits,” “aspires,” “forecasts,” “future,” “goal,” “seeks” and variations of such words or similar expressions. There are a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results or outcomes, and the timing of our results or outcomes, to differ materially from the forward-looking statements expressed or implied by this press release. Although we believe that the expectations and assumptions reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can provide no assurance that these expectations and assumptions will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements relate to future events, results and outcomes and are inherently uncertain. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment, and new risks emerge from time to time. It is not possible for our management to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results or outcomes, and the timing of our results and outcomes, to differ materially from the forward-looking statements we make in this press release include those set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 filed with the SEC on February 26, 2026 as well as in other information that we file with the SEC from time to time. All forward-looking statements are presented as of the date of this press release and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included herein. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement for any reason. Investor & Media Contact:Mollie [email protected] FINANCIAL TABLES FOLLOW 1 Refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in this Press Release for the definition of “Extraordinary Litigation-Related Expenses.”