RankAlpha logo
Back to Rankings

DQ

Daqo New EnergyB
NYSE / Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Last Price
Quote time unavailable
View Chart
Documents
54
Stored
Transcripts
2
Recent loaded
Latest report
2026-08-21
Investor release

Document history

Earnings documents stored for DQ.

12 shown
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-21

Daqo New Energy Corp (DQ) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Polysilicon Price ...

GuruFocus.com
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Revenue: $62.7 million in Q2 2026, up from $26.7 million in Q1 2026 and down from $75 million in Q2 2025. Gross Loss: $82.7 million, compared to a gross loss of $39 million in Q1 2026 and $81.4 million in Q2 2025. Gross Margin: Negative, improved sequentially from negative 520% in Q1 2026 to negative 108% in Q2 2025. Operating Loss: $98 million, compared to an operating loss of $50.8 million in Q1 2026 and $12 million in Q2 2025. Operating Margin: Negative 156%, compared to negative 60% in Q1 2026 and negative 152% in Q2 2025. Net Loss: Attributable to Daqo shareholders was $81 million, compared to $88 million in Q1 2026 and $76.5 million in Q2 2025. Loss per ADS: Basic loss was $1.20, compared to $1.31 in Q1 2026 and $14 in Q2 2025. Adjusted Net Loss: Excluding noncash share-based compensation, was $81 million, compared to $88.4 million in Q1 2026 and $67.9 million in Q2 2025. Adjusted Loss per ADS: $1.20, compared to $1.31 in Q1 2026 and $0.86 in Q2 2025. EBITDA: Negative $29 million, compared to negative $83 million in Q1 2026 and negative $48 million in Q2 2025. EBITDA Margin: Negative 46.8%, compared to negative 31% in Q1 2026 and negative 64% in Q2 2025. G&A Expenses: $13.8 million, up from $12.2 million in Q1 2026 and down from $32 million in Q2 2025. R&D Expenses: $1.6 million, up from $0.8 million in Q1 2026 and Q2 2025. Cash and Cash Equivalents: $555 million as of June 30, 2026, compared to $559.4 million as of March 31, 2026. Short-term Investments: $215 million as of June 30, 2026, compared to $88 million as of March 31, 2026. Notes Receivable: $71.7 million as of June 30, 2026, compared to $20.8 million as of March 31, 2026. Held-to-Maturity Investments: $51 million as of June 30, 2026, compared to $50.3 million as of March 31, 2026. Fixed-term Deposits (within 1 year): $928.9 million as of June 30, 2026, compared to $1 billion as of March 31, 2026. Operating Cash Flow: Net cash used in operating activities was $276 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $105 million in the same period of 2025. Production Volume: Total polysilicon production volume was 43,675 metric tonnes in Q2 2026, exceeding guidance of 35,000 to 40,000 metric tonnes. Sales Volume: Increased from 4,400 metric tonnes in Q1 2026 to 151 metric tonnes in Q2 2026. Average Selling Price: Fell to $4.04 per kilogram in Q…Read full document

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Revenue: $62.7 million in Q2 2026, up from $26.7 million in Q1 2026 and down from $75 million in Q2 2025. Gross Loss: $82.7 million, compared to a gross loss of $39 million in Q1 2026 and $81.4 million in Q2 2025. Gross Margin: Negative, improved sequentially from negative 520% in Q1 2026 to negative 108% in Q2 2025. Operating Loss: $98 million, compared to an operating loss of $50.8 million in Q1 2026 and $12 million in Q2 2025. Operating Margin: Negative 156%, compared to negative 60% in Q1 2026 and negative 152% in Q2 2025. Net Loss: Attributable to Daqo shareholders was $81 million, compared to $88 million in Q1 2026 and $76.5 million in Q2 2025. Loss per ADS: Basic loss was $1.20, compared to $1.31 in Q1 2026 and $14 in Q2 2025. Adjusted Net Loss: Excluding noncash share-based compensation, was $81 million, compared to $88.4 million in Q1 2026 and $67.9 million in Q2 2025. Adjusted Loss per ADS: $1.20, compared to $1.31 in Q1 2026 and $0.86 in Q2 2025. EBITDA: Negative $29 million, compared to negative $83 million in Q1 2026 and negative $48 million in Q2 2025. EBITDA Margin: Negative 46.8%, compared to negative 31% in Q1 2026 and negative 64% in Q2 2025. G&A Expenses: $13.8 million, up from $12.2 million in Q1 2026 and down from $32 million in Q2 2025. R&D Expenses: $1.6 million, up from $0.8 million in Q1 2026 and Q2 2025. Cash and Cash Equivalents: $555 million as of June 30, 2026, compared to $559.4 million as of March 31, 2026. Short-term Investments: $215 million as of June 30, 2026, compared to $88 million as of March 31, 2026. Notes Receivable: $71.7 million as of June 30, 2026, compared to $20.8 million as of March 31, 2026. Held-to-Maturity Investments: $51 million as of June 30, 2026, compared to $50.3 million as of March 31, 2026. Fixed-term Deposits (within 1 year): $928.9 million as of June 30, 2026, compared to $1 billion as of March 31, 2026. Operating Cash Flow: Net cash used in operating activities was $276 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $105 million in the same period of 2025. Production Volume: Total polysilicon production volume was 43,675 metric tonnes in Q2 2026, exceeding guidance of 35,000 to 40,000 metric tonnes. Sales Volume: Increased from 4,400 metric tonnes in Q1 2026 to 151 metric tonnes in Q2 2026. Average Selling Price: Fell to $4.04 per kilogram in Q2 2026. Production Cost: Polysilicon production costs remained flat sequentially at $0.95 per kilogram. Capacity Utilization Rate: Approximately 57% during Q2 2026. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with DQ. Is DQ fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: August 20, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Daqo New Energy Corp (NYSE:DQ) maintained a robust balance sheet with zero debt and ample liquidity of USD1.9 billion in convertible assets as of June 30, 2026. Production volume exceeded guidance, reaching 43,675 metric tons in Q2 2026, above the 35,000-40,000 metric ton range. The company is diversifying into the high-growth AI data center power infrastructure market, with a prototype expected by year-end and sales targeted for 2027. New government regulations and industry self-discipline initiatives are expected to phase out inefficient capacity and end below-cost sales, benefiting low-cost producers like Daqo New Energy Corp (NYSE:DQ). Daqo New Energy Corp (NYSE:DQ) is optimistic about its semiconductor polysilicon business, citing a significant market demand-supply gap (75,000 tons demand vs. 57,000 tons production). Daqo New Energy Corp (NYSE:DQ) reported a net loss attributable to shareholders of $81 million in Q2 2026, though narrower than the previous quarter. Gross margin remained deeply negative at -132% in Q2 2026, reflecting polysilicon prices below production costs. The company's capacity utilization rate was low at approximately 57% during the quarter, indicating ongoing operational challenges. Industry-wide polysilicon inventory remains high at 500,000-600,000 tons, which could delay price recovery and prolong market weakness. The company's sales volume was significantly reduced in the first half due to adherence to self-discipline guidelines, impacting revenue and market share. Q: How would you characterize the central government's stance on supply rationalization, and are you anticipating any incremental regulatory support that could help establish a sustainable polysilicon price in the near term?A: (CEO Xiang Xu, via interpreter) On August 6, led by the China Photovoltaic Industry Association, there is a strong initiative for self-discipline. Based on the CPIA cost model, the industry average production cost is estimated to be around RMB50,000 per ton. However, due to low demand and approximately 500,000 to 600,000 tons of industry-wide inventory, price recovery might take longer than anticipated. There is a strong consensus within the industry, urged by the government, that it is no longer viable to sell below cost. Quotations for polysilicon from different manufacturers have already exceeded RMB40 per kilogram, and we are optimistic about current policy development. Q: What makes this new self-discipline framework structurally distinct from past attempts, and what is your estimate of total industry capacity that could be phased out due to energy consumption requirements?A: (CEO Xiang Xu, via interpreter) The current round of anti-dumping policy is led by the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) and is based on each manufacturer's individual production costs and efficiencies, rather than coordinated pricing or allocation. This makes it more sustainable and supported by the government. The new energy quota policy, which sets different energy usage requirements, will lead to the exit of a significant amount of capacity with higher energy usage. We expect this to happen soon, along with voluntary production reductions. Additionally, many manufacturers running at low utilization lack the employees and training to restart shut-down capacity, so effective capacity is likely to decrease further from the current less than 2 million tons. Q: Given high industry inventory and weak end demand, when would you expect the first batch of transactions at a higher price to happen, as data has halted in the past 2 weeks?A: (CEO Xiang Xu, via interpreter) We are seeing some transactions happening at roughly RMB40,000 per ton (RMB40 per kilogram), although at a very low volume. Some wafer producers with very low or no inventory are procuring for production. Some manufacturers are testing the market at approximately RMB40 per kilogram, even though the full cost model would stipulate around RMB50 per kilogram. Since it has been about 2 weeks since the announcement, we expect to see more transactions at this new price range going forward. Q: If prices rise to RMB40-50 per kilogram, what do you think the end game of this round of initiatives is? Will some capacities be shut down due to higher energy consumption requirements?A: (CEO Xiang Xu, via interpreter) The recent energy quota policy will lead to the exit of a significant amount of capacity with higher energy usage. Combined with industry self-discipline and commitments to reduce production and avoid selling below cost, we expect these changes to happen in the second half of this year. Many producers lack the capability to restart capacity due to low utilization and a lack of trained employees. While the industry's built capacity is close to 3 million tons, the effective capacity is already less than 2 million tons and is likely to go lower. Q: Can you provide an update on the AIDC (AI Data Center) power infrastructure initiative as a second growth driver, including backlog, progress, and market share plans?A: (CEO Xiang Xu, via interpreter) We see the AIDC-related power infrastructure and equipment market as a very viable and significant growth driver. Dako Group brings over 40 years of experience in power equipment, and we see strong demand, especially in AI data center-related power equipment. We are targeting the solid-state transformer and solid-state circuit breaker market, with the industry starting in 2027 and significant growth expected from 2028 to 2030. We have built an R&D team in Shanghai, expect an initial product ready by year-end, and aim to achieve sales starting in 2027. Our goal is to become an industry leader and Tier 1 player in this sector. Q: What is your poly business operation strategy going forward? Will you uphold pricing to a higher level or balance between price and shipments?A: (CEO Xiang Xu, via interpreter) Selling and shipping our product is not an issue due to our superior quality. The question is price. In the first half, we adhered to self-discipline and did not sell as much as our normal market share. We believe we can achieve approximately 15% market share within the industry. Our target is to sell at an appropriate price, fully complying with government guidance. We expect forced or market-based exits of high-cost manufacturers in the next 6 to 18 months. With our strong balance sheet, high product quality, and low cost, we expect to do well, especially in 2027, and we plan to lower our inventory to relatively low levels. Q: Can you share more details on the CapEx timeline, source of capital, expected payback duration, and normalized profitability for the AIDC business?A: (CFO Ming Yang) The total project anticipated investment is RMB6 billion, but we are only committing to the first phase of about RMB3 billion, which covers solid-state transformers, solid-state circuit breakers, e-house total solutions, and energy storage. The remaining RMB3 billion is not committed as of today. We expect to spend only about USD30 million to USD40 million this year, with the remainder over the next 2 years. We are focusing on R&D and building manufacturing facilities, with a prototype ready by year-end. 2026 and 2027 are preparation and market introduction periods, with significant revenue ramp-up expected from 2028 to 2030. Q: Can you provide an update on the semiconductor polysilicon business?A: (CEO Xiang Xu, via interpreter) We have spent a total investment of about RMB1.2 billion, including land and equipment, on the semiconductor polysilicon business. We are in product trial production and customer qualification, which has taken longer than anticipated. We are optimistic about significant market demand, as the demand for semiconductor polysilicon is roughly 75,000 tons per year, while current industry production is only about 57,000 tons per year. This represents a very significant growth opportunity for this market sector. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-20

DAQO New Energy Q2 Earnings Call Highlights

MarketBeat
Interested in DAQO New Energy Corp.? Here are five stocks we like better. Second-quarter results improved sequentially as revenue rose to $62.7 million and the net loss narrowed to $81 million, supported by resumed polysilicon sales and higher volume. However, the average selling price of $4.04 per kilogram remained below the $5.95 per kilogram production cost. Industry oversupply continues to pressure prices: polysilicon inventories were estimated at 500,000–600,000 tons, although Chinese policies targeting below-cost sales and inefficient capacity could improve pricing discipline. Daqo expects a stronger market environment in 2027. Daqo maintained substantial liquidity with no debt and approximately $1.8 billion in cash, investments and deposits. It is also investing in AIDC power infrastructure and semiconductor-grade polysilicon, with potential AIDC revenue growth expected from 2028 to 2030. Daqo New Energy: Solar Monopoly Launches $100M Buyback DAQO New Energy (NYSE:DQ) reported a narrower second-quarter loss as it resumed normal polysilicon sales in June, though pricing remained below production costs amid weak solar demand and elevated industry inventories. Revenue for the second quarter of 2026 was $62.7 million, up from $26.7 million in the first quarter, primarily reflecting higher sales volume. Revenue was down from $75 million in the year-ago period. Net loss attributable to shareholders narrowed sequentially to $81 million, or $1.20 per basic ADS, from $88 million, or $1.31 per ADS, in the first quarter. The company reported a net loss of $76.5 million, or $1.14 per ADS, in the second quarter of 2025. → Datavault AI Locks Down CyberCatch in $94M Security Rollup The Solar Stock Battle: Is Daqo or JinkoSolar Your Next Big Win? Chairman and CEO Xiang Xu, whose remarks were translated by Deputy CEO Anita Zhu, said cautious sentiment across the solar photovoltaic industry persisted during the quarter because of soft domestic demand and high inventories. Those conditions pushed prices lower throughout the solar supply chain. Daqo resumed sales in June after initially avoiding below-cost transactions under Chinese industry self-regulation guidelines. The company changed to a more market-oriented sales and pricing approach after what management described as an extended period without clear policy updates. → Michael Burry Is Betting Against Palantir Agai…Read full document

Interested in DAQO New Energy Corp.? Here are five stocks we like better. Second-quarter results improved sequentially as revenue rose to $62.7 million and the net loss narrowed to $81 million, supported by resumed polysilicon sales and higher volume. However, the average selling price of $4.04 per kilogram remained below the $5.95 per kilogram production cost. Industry oversupply continues to pressure prices: polysilicon inventories were estimated at 500,000–600,000 tons, although Chinese policies targeting below-cost sales and inefficient capacity could improve pricing discipline. Daqo expects a stronger market environment in 2027. Daqo maintained substantial liquidity with no debt and approximately $1.8 billion in cash, investments and deposits. It is also investing in AIDC power infrastructure and semiconductor-grade polysilicon, with potential AIDC revenue growth expected from 2028 to 2030. Daqo New Energy: Solar Monopoly Launches $100M Buyback DAQO New Energy (NYSE:DQ) reported a narrower second-quarter loss as it resumed normal polysilicon sales in June, though pricing remained below production costs amid weak solar demand and elevated industry inventories. Revenue for the second quarter of 2026 was $62.7 million, up from $26.7 million in the first quarter, primarily reflecting higher sales volume. Revenue was down from $75 million in the year-ago period. Net loss attributable to shareholders narrowed sequentially to $81 million, or $1.20 per basic ADS, from $88 million, or $1.31 per ADS, in the first quarter. The company reported a net loss of $76.5 million, or $1.14 per ADS, in the second quarter of 2025. → Datavault AI Locks Down CyberCatch in $94M Security Rollup The Solar Stock Battle: Is Daqo or JinkoSolar Your Next Big Win? Chairman and CEO Xiang Xu, whose remarks were translated by Deputy CEO Anita Zhu, said cautious sentiment across the solar photovoltaic industry persisted during the quarter because of soft domestic demand and high inventories. Those conditions pushed prices lower throughout the solar supply chain. Daqo resumed sales in June after initially avoiding below-cost transactions under Chinese industry self-regulation guidelines. The company changed to a more market-oriented sales and pricing approach after what management described as an extended period without clear policy updates. → Michael Burry Is Betting Against Palantir Again—Should Investors Care? Wall Street Believes in First Solar Stock’s Bull Cycle Polysilicon sales volume rose to 15,190 metric tons from 4,482 metric tons in the prior quarter. However, the average selling price declined to $4.04 per kilogram, below the company’s reported production cost of $5.95 per kilogram. Cash cost edged down 0.4% sequentially to $4.57 per kilogram. Second-quarter polysilicon production totaled 43,675 metric tons, exceeding the company’s guidance range of 35,000 to 40,000 metric tons. Nameplate capacity utilization was approximately 57% across its two polysilicon facilities. → Home Depot Analysts See a Path to $375 and Beyond The company projected third-quarter polysilicon production of 40,000 to 45,000 metric tons and full-year output of 160,000 to 180,000 metric tons. CFO Ming Yang said gross loss was $82.7 million, compared with a gross loss of $139 million in the first quarter. Gross margin improved to negative 132% from negative 520% sequentially, aided by lower inventory impairment provisions. Inventory impairment provisions were $55.7 million during the second quarter, down from $98.9 million in the prior quarter. Operating loss narrowed to $98 million from $160.8 million, while EBITDA improved to a negative $29 million from a negative $83 million. Research and development expense increased to $1.6 million from $800,000 in the first quarter, which Yang said was primarily related to the development of next-generation energy solutions for artificial intelligence data center, or AIDC, power infrastructure. As of June 30, the company reported $555 million in cash and cash equivalents, $215 million in short-term investments, $71.7 million in notes receivable, $51 million in held-to-maturity investments and $928.9 million in fixed-term deposits within one year. Management emphasized that the company maintained zero debt and substantial liquidity during the downturn. Management said polysilicon prices fell from roughly RMB35 to RMB37 per kilogram at the end of the first quarter to RMB31 to RMB34 per kilogram at the end of the second quarter. Xu said the industry held an estimated 500,000 to 600,000 tons of polysilicon inventory, which could delay a broader recovery. Still, executives pointed to Chinese measures intended to curb low-price competition and remove inefficient capacity. New energy-consumption standards for polysilicon will take effect Jan. 1, 2027, requiring manufacturers exceeding 6.3 kilograms of coal equivalent per kilogram of output to complete corrective improvements or risk shutdowns. Daqo and seven other polysilicon manufacturers signed an Aug. 6 initiative to eliminate below-cost sales and comply with energy-consumption standards. Management said spot prices had stabilized and forward prices had risen more than 10% from recent lows. During the question-and-answer session, Yang said some low-volume transactions were occurring around RMB40 per kilogram, while the industry’s average production cost under a China Photovoltaic Industry Association model was estimated near RMB50 per kilogram. Xu said Daqo’s priority is to avoid selling below cost while seeking reasonable sales prices. He said the company expects higher-cost producers and companies with weaker cash positions to face pressure over the next six to 18 months, and management expects a better market environment in 2027. Daqo is also pursuing AIDC power infrastructure as a second growth area beyond solar polysilicon. The company announced an investment agreement in June for a manufacturing base focused on energy storage systems, solid-state transformers and solid-state circuit breakers, including equipment supporting high-voltage direct-current architectures such as 800V DC systems. Management said the project contemplates RMB6 billion of total investment, but only the first RMB2 billion phase is currently committed. The company expects to spend roughly $30 million to $40 million this year, with the remaining first-phase investment occurring over the following two years. Executives said an R&D team has been established in Shanghai and that an initial product prototype is expected by year-end. Management characterized 2026 and 2027 as preparation and market-introduction years, with a potential revenue ramp from 2028 through 2030. Xu also provided an update on the company’s semiconductor polysilicon initiative, for which it has invested approximately RMB1.2 billion including land, equipment and facilities. Customer qualification has taken longer than expected, management said, but the company remains engaged in trial production and qualification efforts. DAQO New Energy Corp. operates as a leading manufacturer of high-purity polysilicon and monocrystalline silicon wafers for the global solar photovoltaic industry. The company focuses on serving module makers and integrated solar producers with critical upstream materials, applying proprietary technologies and optimized processes to achieve high product purity and consistently low production costs. Its core offerings include solar-grade polysilicon—used in the ingot casting and wafer slicing stages—and premium mono-silicon wafers, which are a key input for high-efficiency solar cell production. Founded in the late 2000s and listed on the New York Stock Exchange in 2010, DAQO New Energy established its first polysilicon facility in China's Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "DAQO New Energy Q2 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for August 2026.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-20

Daqo New Energy Announces Unaudited Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results

PR Newswire
SHANGHAI, Aug. 20, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Daqo New Energy Corp. (NYSE: DQ) ("Daqo New Energy" the "Company" or "we"), a leading manufacturer of high-purity polysilicon for the global solar PV industry, today announced its unaudited financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026. Second Quarter 2026 Financial and Operating Highlights Aggregate of cash, short-term investments, bank notes receivable, held-to-maturity investments and fixed term bank deposit balance was $1.92 billion at the end of Q2 2026, compared to $2.00 billion at the end of Q1 2026 Polysilicon production volume was 43,675 MT in Q2 2026, compared to 43,402 MT in Q1 2026 Polysilicon sales volume was 15,190 MT in Q2 2026, compared to 4,482 MT in Q1 2026 Polysilicon average total production cost(1) was $5.95/kg in Q2 2026, compared to $5.95/kg in Q1 2026 Polysilicon average cash cost(1) was $4.57/kg in Q2 2026, compared to $4.59/kg in Q1 2026 Polysilicon average selling price (ASP) was $4.04/kg in Q2 2026, compared to $5.96/kg in Q1 2026 Revenue was $62.7 million in Q2 2026, compared to $26.7 million in Q1 2026 Gross loss was $82.7 million in Q2 2026, compared to $139.4 million in Q1 2026; gross margin was negative 132.0% in Q2 2026, compared to negative 521.5% in Q1 2026 Net loss attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders was $81.2 million in Q2 2026, compared to $88.4 million in Q1 2026; loss per basic American Depositary Share (ADS)(3) was $1.20 in Q2 2026, compared to $1.31 in Q1 2026 Adjusted net loss (non-GAAP)(2) attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders was $81.2 million in Q2 2026, compared to $88.4 million in Q1 Adjusted loss per basic ADS(3) (non-GAAP)(2) was $1.20 in Q2 2026, compared to adjusted loss per basic ADS(3) (non-GAAP)(2) of $1.31 in Q1 2026; EBITDA (non-GAAP)(2) was negative $29.3 million in Q2 2026, compared to negative $83.1 million in Q1 2026; EBITDA margin (non-GAAP)(2) was negative 46.8% in Q2 2026, compared to negative 311.1% in Q1 2026 Management Remarks Mr. Xiang Xu, CEO of Daqo New Energy, commented, "In the second quarter of 2026, market sentiment across the solar PV industry remained cautious amid weak domestic demand and elevated inventory levels, which drove prices lower across the solar value chain. Despite these headwinds, we resumed sales in June, delivering a sequential increase in revenue and a narrowing of our quarterly ope…Read full document

SHANGHAI, Aug. 20, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Daqo New Energy Corp. (NYSE: DQ) ("Daqo New Energy" the "Company" or "we"), a leading manufacturer of high-purity polysilicon for the global solar PV industry, today announced its unaudited financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026. Second Quarter 2026 Financial and Operating Highlights Aggregate of cash, short-term investments, bank notes receivable, held-to-maturity investments and fixed term bank deposit balance was $1.92 billion at the end of Q2 2026, compared to $2.00 billion at the end of Q1 2026 Polysilicon production volume was 43,675 MT in Q2 2026, compared to 43,402 MT in Q1 2026 Polysilicon sales volume was 15,190 MT in Q2 2026, compared to 4,482 MT in Q1 2026 Polysilicon average total production cost(1) was $5.95/kg in Q2 2026, compared to $5.95/kg in Q1 2026 Polysilicon average cash cost(1) was $4.57/kg in Q2 2026, compared to $4.59/kg in Q1 2026 Polysilicon average selling price (ASP) was $4.04/kg in Q2 2026, compared to $5.96/kg in Q1 2026 Revenue was $62.7 million in Q2 2026, compared to $26.7 million in Q1 2026 Gross loss was $82.7 million in Q2 2026, compared to $139.4 million in Q1 2026; gross margin was negative 132.0% in Q2 2026, compared to negative 521.5% in Q1 2026 Net loss attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders was $81.2 million in Q2 2026, compared to $88.4 million in Q1 2026; loss per basic American Depositary Share (ADS)(3) was $1.20 in Q2 2026, compared to $1.31 in Q1 2026 Adjusted net loss (non-GAAP)(2) attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders was $81.2 million in Q2 2026, compared to $88.4 million in Q1 Adjusted loss per basic ADS(3) (non-GAAP)(2) was $1.20 in Q2 2026, compared to adjusted loss per basic ADS(3) (non-GAAP)(2) of $1.31 in Q1 2026; EBITDA (non-GAAP)(2) was negative $29.3 million in Q2 2026, compared to negative $83.1 million in Q1 2026; EBITDA margin (non-GAAP)(2) was negative 46.8% in Q2 2026, compared to negative 311.1% in Q1 2026 Management Remarks Mr. Xiang Xu, CEO of Daqo New Energy, commented, "In the second quarter of 2026, market sentiment across the solar PV industry remained cautious amid weak domestic demand and elevated inventory levels, which drove prices lower across the solar value chain. Despite these headwinds, we resumed sales in June, delivering a sequential increase in revenue and a narrowing of our quarterly operating and net losses. Throughout this period, we continued to maintain a robust and healthy balance sheet with zero debt. As of June 30, 2026, we held a cash balance of $555.3 million, short-term investments of $250.0 million, bank notes receivables of $71.7 million, held-to-maturity investments of $51.0 million, and a fixed term bank deposit balance of $994.8 million. Together, these readily convertible assets totaled $1.9 billion, providing us with ample liquidity, confidence, and strategic flexibility to navigate the current market downturn." "On the operational front, we continued to take proactive measures to navigate challenging market conditions, with our nameplate capacity utilization rate operating at approximately 57% during the period. Total production volume at our two polysilicon facilities was 43,675 MT for the quarter, exceeding our guidance range of 35,000 MT to 40,000 MT. With polysilicon market prices remaining below production costs since the first quarter of 2026, we initially refrained from engaging in below-cost sales in line with Chinese self-regulation guidelines, and adopted a disciplined, wait-and-see approach pending further implementation of the national anti-involution policies. However, after an extended period without clear policy updates, we adjusted our sales and pricing strategies toward a more market-oriented approach in June. As a result, our sales volume increased from 4,482 MT last quarter to 15,190 MT, with average selling price falling to $4.04/kg. Our polysilicon transaction and shipment volumes have continued to pick up in the third quarter, reflecting increased confidence in the quality and an ongoing preference for our products from customers. On the cost side, total production cost remained flat sequentially at $5.95/kg, with cash cost edging down by 0.4% to $4.57/kg and manufacturing costs in RMB terms declining slightly." "In light of the current market dynamics, we expect total polysilicon production volume in the third quarter of 2026 to be approximately 40,000 MT to 45,000 MT. For the full year of 2026, we expect production volume to be in the range of 160,000 MT to 180,000 MT." "Polysilicon market prices came under further downward pressure during the second quarter, with N-type polysilicon prices falling from RMB 35-37/kg at the end of the first quarter to RMB 31-34/kg at the end of the second quarter. Amid subdued demand, depressed pricing and accumulating industry-wide inventories, polysilicon producers operated at low utilization rates, with aggregate output of 538,000 MT in the first half of 2026, representing a 9.8% year-on-year decrease. As we make our way through the third quarter, the continued roll-out of anti-involution measures is gaining momentum. In July, a series of mandatory national standards were issued for energy consumption and product efficiency across the solar PV value chain, including the final official version of a new standard setting energy consumption limits per unit of polysilicon output, which will take effect on January 1, 2027. Polysilicon manufacturers whose unit energy consumption exceeds 6.3 kgce/kg must complete corrective improvements by that date or face the risk of plant shutdown. Notably, this threshold of 6.3 kgce/kg is stricter than the 6.4 kgce/kg proposed in the draft, signaling regulators' commitment to accelerating the phase-out of inefficient capacity. On July 27, the China Photovoltaic Industry Association (CPIA) issued the General Principles for Cost Accounting Models in the Photovoltaic Industry, an initiative to regulate market competition and advance standardized industry governance that lays the foundation for price regulation enforcement. On July 31, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) issued price compliance guidance for the solar PV sector, promoting a structural shift from price competition to value-driven differentiation. The SAMR emphasized that solar PV companies must conduct price-compliance self-reviews and curb irrational low-price competition, and that the CPIA should strengthen industry self-regulation, promote the General Principles, and guide companies away from illegal pricing practices such as below-cost dumping. The SAMR also indicated that it will take enforcement action against non-compliant entities. Together with seven other polysilicon manufacturers, we jointly signed an initiative to eliminate below-cost sales and fully comply with energy consumption standards on August 6. As a result of these collective measures, polysilicon prices are beginning to show signs of a recovery, with spot prices stabilizing and forward prices rebounding by more than 10% from their recent low. " "We are also diversifying beyond our core polysilicon business to hedge against solar PV cyclicality, targeting the fast-growing AI data center (AIDC) power infrastructure market. On June 3, 2026, we announced the signing of an investment agreement to establish a manufacturing base focused on the R&D, manufacturing and sale of next-generation energy solutions and related equipment for AIDCs. This includes energy storage systems, solid-state transformers, and solid-state circuit breakers. These technologies support the industry's transition to high-voltage direct current architecture, such as the 800V DC standard advanced by Nvidia and other leading AI infrastructure providers. The platform is anchored by Daqo Group, our affiliated entity under common beneficial ownership with Daqo New Energy Corp., which brings over 40 years of power equipment manufacturing expertise, established technology, and deep talent and customer relationships to accelerate our entry into this segment. We view AIDC power infrastructure as a structural growth opportunity that complements our core business and broadens our earnings base. Consistent with our strong track record having navigated several polysilicon cycles, we intend to pursue this expansion in a disciplined manner that preserves our balance sheet strength." "Despite a challenging environment, the solar PV industry continues to exhibit compelling long-term growth prospects. Growing vulnerabilities in global energy markets have sparked widespread concerns about national energy security, in which the solar PV and renewable energy sectors can play a crucial role. As one of the world's lowest-cost producers of the highest-quality N-type polysilicon, backed by a robust balance sheet and zero debt, we remain optimistic about the sector and are well positioned to capitalize on the anticipated market recovery and long-term growth opportunities. We will continue to strengthen our competitive edge through advancements in high-efficiency N-type technology and cost optimization via digital transformation and AI adoption. As the world accelerates its transition to clean energy, we are confident in our ability to play a leading role in shaping that future." Outlook and guidance The Company expects to produce approximately 40,000 MT to 45,000 MT of polysilicon during the third quarter of 2026. The Company expects to produce approximately 160,000 MT to 180,000 MT of polysilicon for the full year of 2026, inclusive of the impact of the Company's annual facility maintenance. This outlook reflects Daqo New Energy's current and preliminary view as of the date of this press release and may be subject to changes. The Company's ability to achieve these projections is subject to risks and uncertainties. See "Safe Harbor Statement" at the end of this press release. Second Quarter 2026 Results Revenues Revenues were $62.7 million, compared to $26.7 million in the first quarter of 2026 and $75.2 million in the second quarter of 2025. The increase in revenues compared to the first quarter of 2026 was primarily driven by higher sales volumes, as the Company resumed normal sales activities starting in June following a prolonged period with no new policy developments. Gross loss Gross loss was $82.7 million, compared to $139.4 million in the first quarter of 2026 and $81.4 million in the second quarter of 2025. Gross margin was negative 132.0%, compared to negative 521.5% in the first quarter of 2026 and negative 108.3% in the second quarter of 2025. The sequential improvement in gross margin was primarily due to a decrease in provisions for inventory impairment, which was $55.7 million in the second quarter of 2026, compared to $98.9 million in the first quarter of 2026. Selling, general and administrative expenses Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses were $15.8 million, compared to $12.2 million in the first quarter of 2026 and $32.1 million in the second quarter of 2025. The sequential increase was primarily due to higher sales volume in the second quarter of 2026. The year-over-year decrease was also because the Company recognized $18.6 million in non-cash share-based compensation related to its share incentive plans in the second quarter of 2025. Research and development expenses Research and development (R&D) expenses were $1.6 million, compared to $0.8 million in the first quarter of 2026 and $0.8 million in the second quarter of 2025. The increase is primarily due to R&D of next-generation energy solutions for AIDCs. R&D expenses can vary from period to period and reflect R&D activities that take place during the quarter. Loss from operations and operating margin As a result of the foregoing, loss from operations was $98.1 million, compared to $150.8 million in the first quarter of 2026 and $115.0 million in the second quarter of 2025. Operating margin was negative 156.5%, compared to negative 564.4% in the first quarter of 2026 and negative 152.9% in the second quarter of 2025. Net loss attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders and loss per ADS As a result of the foregoing, net loss attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders was $81.2 million, compared to $88.4 million in the first quarter of 2026 and $76.5 million in the second quarter of 2025. Loss per basic ADS was $1.20, compared to $1.31 in the first quarter of 2026 and $1.14 in the second quarter of 2025. Adjusted net loss (non-GAAP) attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders and adjusted loss per ADS (non-GAAP) Adjusted net loss (non-GAAP) attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders, excluding non-cash share-based compensation costs, was $81.2 million, compared to $88.4 million in the first quarter of 2026 and $57.9 million in the second quarter of 2025. Adjusted loss per basic ADS was $1.20, compared to $1.31 in the first quarter of 2026 and $0.86 in the second quarter of 2025. EBITDA EBITDA (non-GAAP) was negative $29.3 million, compared to negative $83.1 million in the first quarter of 2026 and negative $48.2 million in the second quarter of 2025. EBITDA margin (non-GAAP) was negative 46.8%, compared to negative 311.1% in the first quarter of 2026 and negative 64.0% in the second quarter of 2025. Financial Condition As of June 30, 2026, the Company had $555.3 million in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, compared to $559.4 million as of March 31, 2026 and $598.6 million as of June 30, 2025. As of June 30, 2026, short-term investment was $250.0 million, compared to $288.3 million as of March 31, 2026 and $418.8 million as of June 30, 2025. As of June 30, 2026, notes receivable balance was $71.7 million, compared to $20.8 million as of March 31, 2026 and $49.0 million as of June 30, 2025. Notes receivable represents bank notes with maturity within six months. As of June 30, 2026, held-to-maturity investment was $51.0 million, compared to $50.3 million as of March 31, 2026 and nil as of June 30, 2025. As of June 30, 2026, the balance of fixed term deposit within one year was $928.9 million, compared to $1.0 billion as of March 31, 2026 and $960.7 million as of June 30, 2025. Cash Flows For the six months ended June 30, 2026, net cash used in operating activities was $276.2 million, compared to $105.4 million in the same period of 2025. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, net cash used in investing activities was $159.6 million, compared to $342.7 million in the same period of 2025. The net cash used in investing activities in 2026 was primarily related to the purchase of short-term investments and fixed term deposits. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, net cash used in financing activities was $7.8 million, compared to $32.0 thousand in the same period of 2025. The net cash used in financing activities in 2026 was primarily related to $7.8 million in stock repurchases made by the Company's subsidiary, Xinjiang Daqo, from its minority shareholders. Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures To supplement Daqo New Energy's consolidated financial results presented in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("US GAAP"), the Company uses certain non-GAAP financial measures that are adjusted for certain items from the most directly comparable GAAP measures including earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") and EBITDA margin; adjusted net income attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders and adjusted earnings per basic and diluted ADS. Our management believes that each of these non-GAAP measures is useful to investors, enabling them to better assess changes in key elements of the Company's results of operations across different reporting periods on a consistent basis, independent of certain items as described below. Thus, our management believes that, used in conjunction with US GAAP financial measures, these non-GAAP financial measures provide investors with meaningful supplemental information to assess the Company's operating results in a manner that is focused on its ongoing, core operating performance. Our management uses these non-GAAP measures internally to assess the business, its financial performance, current and historical results, as well as for strategic decision-making and forecasting future results. Given our management's use of these non-GAAP measures, the Company believes these measures are important to investors in understanding the Company's operating results as seen through the eyes of our management. These non-GAAP measures are not prepared in accordance with US GAAP or intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with US GAAP; the non-GAAP measures should be reviewed together with the US GAAP measures, and may be different from non-GAAP measures used by other companies. The Company uses EBITDA, which represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and EBITDA margin, which represents the proportion of EBITDA in revenues. Adjusted net income attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders and adjusted earnings per basic and diluted ADS exclude costs related to share-based compensation. Share-based compensation is a non-cash expense that varies from period to period. As a result, our management excludes this item from our internal operating forecasts and models. Our management believes that this adjustment for share-based compensation provides investors with a basis to measure the Company's core performance, including compared with the performance of other companies, without the period-to-period variability created by share-based compensation. A reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to comparable US GAAP measures is presented later in this document. Conference Call The Company will hold a conference call to discuss the financial results at 8:00 AM U.S. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 20, 2026 (8:00 PM Beijing / Hong Kong time on the same day). Dial-in details for the earnings conference call are as follows: Participant dial in (U.S./Canada toll free): +1-888-346-8982 Participant international dial in: +1-412-902-4272 China mainland toll free: 4001-201203 Hong Kong toll free: 800-905945 Please dial in 10 minutes before the call is scheduled to begin and ask to join the Daqo New Energy call. Webcast link: https://app.webinar.net/2NXKalz98Rz A replay of the call will be available 1 hour after the conclusion of the conference call through August 27, 2026. Dial in details for the replay are as follows: U.S./Canada toll free: +1-855-669-9658 International toll: +1-412-317-0088 Replay access code: 6672616 To access the replay through an international dial-in number, please visit the link below. https://services.choruscall.com/ccforms/replay.html Participants will be asked to provide their name and company name upon joining the call. About Daqo New Energy Corp. Daqo New Energy Corp. (NYSE: DQ) ("Daqo" or the "Company") is a leading manufacturer of high-purity polysilicon for the global solar PV industry. Founded in 2007, the Company manufactures and sells high-purity polysilicon to photovoltaic product manufacturers, who further process the polysilicon into ingots, wafers, cells and modules for solar power solutions. The Company has a total polysilicon nameplate capacity of 305,000 metric tons and is one of the world's lowest cost producers of high-purity polysilicon. Safe Harbor Statement This announcement contains forward-looking statements. These statements are made under the "safe harbor" provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "will," "expects," "anticipates," "future," "intends," "plans," "believes," "estimates," "guidance" and similar statements. Among other things, the outlook for the third quarter and the full year of 2026 and quotations from management in these announcements, as well as Daqo New Energy's strategic and operational plans, contain forward-looking statements. The Company may also make written or oral forward-looking statements in its reports filed or furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, in its annual reports to shareholders, in press releases and other written materials and in oral statements made by its officers, directors or employees to third parties. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about the Company's beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond the Company's control. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement, including but not limited to the following: the demand for photovoltaic products and the development of photovoltaic technologies; global supply and demand for polysilicon; alternative technologies in cell manufacturing; the Company's ability to significantly expand its polysilicon production capacity and output; the reduction in or elimination of government subsidies and economic incentives for solar energy applications; the Company's ability to lower its production costs; and changes in political and regulatory environment. Further information regarding these and other risks is included in the reports or documents the Company has filed with, or furnished to, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. All information provided in this press release is as of the date hereof, and the Company undertakes no duty to update such information or any forward-looking statement, except as required under applicable law. View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/daqo-new-energy-announces-unaudited-second-quarter-2026-financial-results-302856319.html

TranscriptFY2026 Q22026-08-20

FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript

Earnings source - 98 paragraphs
Operator

Welcome to the Daqo New Energy second quarter 2026 results conference call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's prepared remarks, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, please press star then one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jessie Zhao, Investor Relations Director. Please go ahead.

Jessie Zhao

Hello everyone. I am Jessie Zhao, the Investor Relations Director of Daqo New Energy. Thank you for joining our conference call today. Daqo New Energy just issued its financial results for the second quarter of 2026, which can be found on our website at www.daqosolar.com. Today attending the conference call, we have our Chairman and CEO, Mr. Xiang Xu, our Deputy CEO, Ms. Anita Zhu, our CFO, Mr. Ming Yang, and myself. Today's call will begin with an update from Mr. Xu on market conditions and company operations, followed by a translation from Ms. Zhu for Mr. Xu, and then Mr. Yang will discuss the company's financial performance for the quarter. After that, we will open the floor to Q&A from the audience.

Jessie Zhao

Before we begin the formal remarks, I want to remind you that certain statements on today's call, including expected future operational and financial performance and industry growth, are forward-looking statements that are made under the Safe Harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Further information regarding these and other risks is included in the reports or documents we have filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. These statements only reflect our current and preliminary view as of today and may be subject to change. Our ability to achieve these projections is subject to risks and uncertainties.

Jessie Zhao

All information provided in today's call is as of today, and we undertake no duty to update such information, except as required under applicable law. Also, during the call, we will occasionally reference monetary amounts in U.S. dollar terms. Please keep in mind that our functional currency is the Chinese RMB. We will offer these translations into U.S. dollars solely for the convenience of the audience. Now I will turn the call to our Chairman and CEO, Mr. Xiang Xu. Mr. Xu, please go ahead.

Xiang Xu

[Non-English content]

Anita Zhu

Hello everyone. This is Anita, and I'll now translate our Chairman, Mr. Xu's remarks. In the second quarter of 2026, market sentiment across the solar PV industry remained cautious amid weak domestic demand and elevated inventory levels, which drove prices lower across the solar value chain. Despite these headwinds, we resumed sales in June, delivering a sequential increase in revenue and a narrowing of our quarterly operating and net losses. Throughout this period, we continued to maintain a robust and healthy balance sheet with zero debt. As of June 30, 2026, we held a cash balance of $555.3 million, short-term investments of $250 million, bank deposits and vaults of $71.7 million, held-to-maturity investments of $51 million, and fixed-term bank deposit balance of $994.8 million. Together, these readily convertible assets totaled $1.9 billion, providing us with ample liquidity, confidence, and strategic flexibility to navigate the current market downturn.

Anita Zhu

On the operational front, we continued to take proactive measures to navigate challenging market conditions with our nameplate capacity utilization rate operating at approximately 57% during the period. Total production volume at our two polysilicon facilities was 43,675 metric tons for the quarter, exceeding our guidance range of 35,000 metric tons-40,000 metric tons. Polysilicon market prices remaining below production costs since the first quarter of 2026. We initially refrained from engaging in below-cost sales in line with Chinese self-regulation guidelines and adopted a disciplined wait-and-see approach pending further implementation of the national anti-involution policies. However, after an extended period without clear policy updates, we adjusted our sales and pricing strategies toward a more market-oriented approach in June. As a result, our sales volume increased from 4,482 metric tons last quarter to 15,190 metric tons, with average selling price falling to $4.04 per kg.

Anita Zhu

Our polysilicon transaction and shipment volumes have continued to pick up in the third quarter, reflecting increased confidence in the quality and an ongoing preference for product from customers. On the cost side, solar production costs remained flat sequentially at $5.95 per kg, with cash costs edging down by 0.4% to $4.57 per kg, and manufacturing costs in R&D terms declining slightly. In light of the current market dynamics, we expect total polysilicon production volume third quarter 2026 to be approximately 40,000 metric tons to 45,000 metric tons. For the full year of 2026, we expect production volume to be in the range of 160,000 metric tons-180,000 metric tons.

Anita Zhu

Polysilicon market prices came under further downward pressure during the second quarter, with untied polysilicon prices falling from CNY 35-CNY 37 per kg at the end of the first quarter to CNY 31 -CNY 34 per kilogram at the end of the second quarter. Amid subdued demand, depressed pricing, and accumulating industry-wide inventories, polysilicon producers operated at low utilization rates, with aggregate outputs of 5,308 thousand metric tons in the first half of 2026, representing a 9.8% year-on-year decrease. As we make our way through the third quarter, the continued roll-out of anti-involution measures is gaining momentum. In July, a series of mandatory national standards were issued for energy consumption and product efficiency across the solar PV value chain, including the final official version of a new standard setting energy consumption limits per unit of polysilicon output, which will take effect on January 1, 2027.

Anita Zhu

Polysilicon manufacturers whose unit energy consumption exceeds 6.3 kg of coal equivalent per kilogram must complete a corrective improvement by that date or face the risk of plant shutdown. Notably, the threshold of 6.3 per kg is stricter than the 6.4 kg proposed in the draft, signaling regulators' commitment to accelerating the phase-out of inefficient capacity. On July 27th, the China Photovoltaic Industry Association issued the General Principles for Cost Accounting Models in the Photovoltaic Industry, an initiative to regulate market competition and advance standardized industry governance to lay the foundation for price regulation enforcement. On July 31st, the State Administration for Market Regulation issued price compliance guidance for the solar PV sector, promoting a structural shift from price competition to value-driven differentiation.

Anita Zhu

The SAMR emphasized that solar PV companies must conduct price compliance self-reviews and curb irrational low-price competition, and that CPIA should strengthen industry self-regulation, promote the General Principles, and guide companies away from illegal pricing practices such as below-cost dumping. The SAMR also indicated that it will take enforcement action against non-compliant entities. Together with seven other polysilicon manufacturers, we jointly signed an initiative to eliminate below-cost sales and fully comply with energy consumption standards on August 6th. As a result of these selective measures, polysilicon prices are beginning to show signs of recovery, with spot prices stabilizing and forward prices rebounding by more than 10% from their recent lows. We are also diversifying beyond our core polysilicon business to hedge against solar PV cyclicality, targeting the fast-growing AIDC power infrastructure market.

Anita Zhu

On June 3rd, 2026, we announced the signing of an investment agreement to establish a manufacturing base focused on the R&D, manufacturing, and sale of next-generation energy solutions and related equipment for AIDCs. This includes energy storage systems, solid-state transformers, and solid-state circuit breakers. These technologies support the industry's transition to high-voltage direct current architecture, such as the 800 V DC standard advanced by NVIDIA and other leading AI infrastructure providers. The platform is anchored by Daqo Group, our affiliated entity under common beneficial ownership with Daqo New Energy, which brings over 40 years of power equipment manufacturing expertise, established technology, deep talent, and customer relationships to accelerate our entry into the segment. We view AIDC power infrastructure as a structural growth opportunity that complements our core business and broadens our earnings base.

Anita Zhu

Consistent with our strong track record, having navigated several polysilicon cycles, we intend to pursue this expansion in a disciplined manner that preserves our balance sheet strength. Despite a challenging environment, the solar PV industry continues to exhibit compelling long-term growth prospects. Growing vulnerabilities in global energy markets have sparked widespread concerns about national energy security, in which the solar PV and renewable energy sectors can play a crucial role. As one of the world's lowest-cost producers of the highest quality N-type polysilicon, backed by a robust balance sheet and zero debt, we remain optimistic about the sector and are well-positioned to capitalize on anticipated market recovery and long-term growth opportunities.

Anita Zhu

We'll continue to strengthen our competitive edge through advancements in high-efficiency N-type technology and cost optimization via digital transformation and AI adoption. As the world accelerates its transition to clean energy, we're confident in our ability to play a leading role in shaping that future. Now I'll turn the call to our CFO, Mr. Ming Yang, who will discuss the company's financial performance for the quarter. Ming, please go ahead.

Ming Yang

Thank you, Anita, and hello, everyone. This is Ming Yang, CFO of Daqo New Energy. We appreciate you joining on our new conference call today. I will now go over the company's second quarter 2026 financial performance. Revenues were $62.7 million, compared to $26.7 million in the first quarter of 2026 and $75 million in the second quarter of 2025. The increase in revenue compared to the first quarter of 2026 was primarily driven by higher sales volume. The company resumed normal sales activities starting in June, following a prolonged period with no new policy developments. Gross loss was $82.7 million, compared to $139 million in the first quarter of 2026 and $81.4 million in the second quarter of 2025. Gross margin was -132%, compared to -520% in the first quarter of 2026 and -108% in the second quarter of 2025.

Ming Yang

The sequential improvement in group gross margin was primarily due to a decrease in provisions for inventory impairment, which was $55.7 million in the second quarter of 2026, compared to $98.9 million in the first quarter of 2026. The SG&A expenses were $13.8 million, compared to $12.2 million in the first quarter of 2026 and $32 million in the second quarter of 2025. The sequential increase was primarily due to higher sales volume in the second quarter of 2026. The year-over-year decrease was also due to the companies recognizing $18.6 million in non-cash share-based compensation costs related to its share incentive plan in the second quarter of 2025. R&D expenses were $1.6 million, compared to $0.8 million in the first quarter of 2026 and $0.8 million in the second quarter of 2025. The increase is primarily due to R&D of next-generation energy solutions for AIDC power infrastructure.

Ming Yang

R&D expenses can vary from period to period and reflect R&D activities that take place during the quarter. Loss from operations was $98 million, compared to $160.8 million in the first quarter of 2026 and $115 million in the second quarter of 2025. Operating margin was -156%, compared to -560% in the first quarter of 2026 and -152% in the second quarter of 2025. Net loss attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp shareholders was $81 million, compared to $88 million in the first quarter of 2026 and $76.5 million in the second quarter of 2025. Loss per basic ADS was $1.20, compared to $1.31 in the first quarter of 2026 and $1.14 in the second quarter of 2025.

Ming Yang

Adjusted net loss attributable to Daqo New Energy shareholders, excluding non-cash share-based compensation cost, was $81 million, compared to $88.4 million in the first quarter of 2026 and $67.9 million in the second quarter of 2025. Adjusted loss per basic ADS was $1.20, compared to $1.31 in the first quarter of 2026 and $0.86 in the second quarter of 2025. EBITDA was $-29 million, compared to $-83 million in the first quarter of 2026 and negative $48 million in the second quarter of 2025. EBITDA margin was -46.8%, compared to -311% in the first quarter of 2026, and -64% in the second quarter of 2025. Now on the company's financial condition. As of June 30, 2026, the company had $555 million in cash and cash equivalents, compared to $559.4 million as of March 31, 2026, and $598.6 million as of June 30, 2025.

Ming Yang

As of June 30, 2026, short-term investment was $215 million, compared to $288 million as of March 31st, 2026, and $118 million as of June 30th, 2025. As of June 30th, 2026, note receivable balance was $71.7 million, compared to $20.8 million as of March 31st, 2026, and $49 million as of June 30th, 2025. Note receivable balance, which represent bank notes with maturity within six months. As of June 30th, 2026, held-to-maturity investment was $51 million, compared to $50.3 million as of March 31st, 2026, and zero as of June 30th, 2025. As of June 30th, 2026, the balance of fixed-term deposits within one year was $928.9 million, compared to $1 billion as of March 31st, 2026, and $960.7 million as of June 30, 2025. Now on the company's cash flows.

Ming Yang

For the six months ended June 30, 2026, net cash used in operating activities was $276 million, compared to $105 million in the same period of 2025. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, net cash used in investing activities was $169.6 million compared to $342.7 million in the same period of 2025. Net cash used in investing activities in 2026 was primarily related to the purchase of short-term investments and fixed-term deposits. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, net cash used in financing activities was $7.8 million, compared to $32,000 in the same period of 2025. Net cash used in financing activities in 2026 was primarily related to $7.8 million in stock purchases made by the company's subsidiary, Xinjiang Daqo, from its minority shareholders. That concludes our prepared remarks. We will now open the call to Q&A from the audience. Operator, please begin.

Operator

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. Our first question comes from Philip Shen with ROTH Capital Partners. Please go ahead.

Oscar Chen

Hi, this is Oscar Chen for Phil. Can you hear me okay?

Ming Yang

Yes, you're loud and clear.

Oscar Chen

Okay. I have two questions. First question is on government support on poly pricing. Even with the recent 10% rebound in forward prices, poly ASP remained below industry production costs since late Q1. How would you characterize the central government stance on supply rationalization? Are you anticipating any incremental regulatory support that could help establish a sustainable price floor in the near term? I have a follow-up.

Ming Yang

Okay. We're going to translate your question.

Xiang Xu

[Non-English content]

Ming Yang

I will translate for our CEO, Mr. Xu. On August 6th, led by the China Photovoltaic Industry Association, there is a strong initiative for self-discipline. Based on the CPIA cost model, the industry average production cost is estimated to be around RMB 50,000 per ton, so about RMB 50 per kg. Due to the current market environment where demand activity is relatively low and there's still approximately 500,000 tons-600,000 tons of poly inventory in the industry. We think this price recovery might take a little bit longer than anticipated. There is strong consensus within the industry for self-discipline and also with the urging of the government and the related departments that the industry consensus is that it's no longer viable to sell below cost.

Ming Yang

What we are seeing in the market is that the quotations for polysilicon pricing from different manufacturers have already exceeded about RMB 40 per kg. We are optimistic about the current policy development, and we are waiting to see how the policies may be enforced going forward.

Xiang Xu

[Non-English content]

Ming Yang

Let me translate for Mr. Xu. Right now, the industry in terms of the value chain between the buyers and sellers of polysilicon. Some of the buyers are still observing the market and the policy development. They are taking a wait-and-see approach. But in terms of the polysilicon manufacturers are expecting a reasonable price where they would not be selling at a loss or below their cost. There is still some, you can call it a wait-and-see between the polysilicon manufacturers and the downstream. But we do believe that the past industry practice of selling below cost, especially in the first 6 months of this year, is likely to end, where the government is very adamant about preventing dumping of the products and selling below cost.

Ming Yang

Within the law framework for price laws and for the anti-involution, our expectation is that this is likely to move forward optimistically over the next several months. We know that over the past few years, the polysilicon manufacturers or the whole industry in general have seen significant losses, and we do not think that this is long-term sustainable. In fact, it is very unsustainable, and this is likely to lead to the industry in trouble. If we look at DQ, especially in December of last year, when the anti-involution policy was more successful, right? DQ had no cash loss in Q4 of 2025. We were able to achieve a positive operating cash flow during that period. We think that that is a more sustainable timing or framework going forward.

Oscar Chen

Thank you for the color, Mr. Xu and Mr. Yang. My second question is on the self-discipline agreement signed in August. Previous rounds of sale regulation kind of struggled to maintain compliance once prices fluctuated. Just wondering what makes this framework structurally distinct from past attempts? Regarding the energy consumption requirements, what is your estimate of total industry capacity that could be phased out?

Operator

Our next question comes from Alan Lau with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Ming Yang

We are still answering, not translating. Hold on. Okay. Give us a minute.

Operator

All right. We have Philip Shen back on the podium. My apologies.

Xiang Xu

[Non-English content]

Ming Yang

Right.

Xiang Xu

[Non-English content]

Ming Yang

[Non-English content]

Xiang Xu

[Non-English content]

Ming Yang

[Non-English content]

Xiang Xu

[Non-English content]

Ming Yang

Mm-hmm.

Xiang Xu

[Non-English content]

Ming Yang

Okay. Let me translate for Mr. Xu. Okay. We believe that the current round of anti-involution policy and with the price law enforcement is likely to sustain. What we saw in the previous round was that there was this proposal for the industry consolidation platform to accelerate the exit of excess capacity. But the State Administration for Market Regulation stepped in because they were very worried about anti-monopoly practices between the leading manufacturers. So they were worried that this would bring non-market activities or behaviors by the main manufacturers. But this time, the current effort is led by the State Administration for Market Regulation, and this is bringing self-discipline forward. Also, there is no coordination between the manufacturers on pricing or allocation of sales volume, for example.

Ming Yang

This time it is really based on each individual manufacturer's own production costs, in terms of their manufacturing efficiencies, and for them to sell products based on their ability to produce product at a lower cost. We think that this time it is actually much more sustainable and is being supported by the government. We think that through these two efforts, one is by being one of the lowest cost producers within the industry, as well as with the regulations on energy usage. We think that this time it will promote a more market-oriented approach to both capacity exits and to the selling of products at reasonable price. This is all under the current legal framework brought forward by the government. Hello?

Oscar Chen

Yeah. That is all my question. Thank you. Thank you, Yang.

Ming Yang

Good. Thank you.

Operator

Our next question comes from Alan Lau with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Alan Lau

Thanks management for taking my question. My first question is a follow-up on the overall initiative to avoid selling below cost. My understanding is that current inventory in the industry is at quite a high level, and the end demand is also quite weak at the same time. When would you expect the polysilicon price, for example, you mentioned their price quotes at above RMB 40 per kilogram. But given that their inventory at the wafer players and demand is not that strong, when would you expect the first batch of transaction at a higher price to happen? Because in the past 2 weeks all the data have halted. I would like to know when we would expect the real transaction is coming out.

Ming Yang

Okay. Let me translate for Mr. Xu.

Alan Lau

Yeah. Thanks.

Ming Yang

Give us a minute.

Alan Lau

Okay.

Xiang Xu

[Non-English content]

Ming Yang

Okay, let me translate for Mr. Xu. Okay. I think he's seeing in the market that there is some transactions happening at roughly RMB 40,000 per ton or about RMB 40 per kg, although there's a very low volume of transactions right now. Even though the overall demand is relatively weak, there are some wafer producers in the industry that have a very low to no inventory where they are procuring to production. And so right now, we are seeing some transactions, although not very high. What we're seeing is some manufacturers are testing the market. Although the full cost model would stipulate around RMB 50 per kg, some producers are right now testing the market and selling at approximately RMB 40 per kg right now. And so it's been about two weeks since the announcement of the manufacturers and the guidance from the government.

Ming Yang

We do think that going forward, we are likely to see more and more transactions happen at this new price range.

Alan Lau

Understood. Strictly based on the production cost, probably polysilicon price would be higher than that. Given that in this round of the anti-involution initiative, there is not an acquisition plan afterwards. If prices goes up to CNY 40 or maybe CNY 45 or CNY 50 per kg, what do you think would happen? Because effectively this will reach to the cost level of more players. Who would be able to sell their products? What do you think the end game of this round of initiative? If there are some capacities will be shut down because of the higher energy consumption requirement or how do you see this?

Ming Yang

Let me translate for Mr. Xu first. Just a minute.

Xiang Xu

[Non-English content]

Ming Yang

Let me translate for Mr. Xu. He thinks that the recent energy quota policy from the government, where there is different energy usage requirements for the industry, he thinks this will lead to a forced exit of a significant amount of capacity that have a significant or higher energy usage. We are likely to see that happen pretty soon. Also the industry self-discipline, there is a commitment from the various manufacturers that there should be a voluntary reduction of capacity or production.

Ming Yang

Also there is a commitment that manufacturers should not be selling at below production cost. We think that both of these are likely to happen starting the second half of this year. There is also the issue that not that many producers actually have the capability to produce, especially now that the industry is running at a fairly low utilization level. A lot of manufacturers have let go significant number of people. There is actually a lack of employees and also lack of training and time. A lot of capacity that have been shut down is unlikely to restart going forward. Even now, we think that, for example, the effective capacity within the industry, even though close to 3 million tons have been built, the effective capacity is already less than 2 million tons right now, and likely to go lower as well.

Alan Lau

Thank you. My last question is about AIDC initiative as a second growth driver of the company. I wonder if there is all the backlog or progress to share on this new business? Thank you.

Ming Yang

Let me translate. Okay, hold on.

Xiang Xu

[Non-English content]

Ming Yang

Let me translate for Mr. Xu. We do see that the AIDC related power infrastructure and equipment market is actually a very viable sector where it is going to be a significant growth driver for the company, and it is the second sector that the company is entering into. I think most investors are probably aware that we do think that the growth for the polysilicon market going forward is likely to be relatively low in terms of volume demand as well as for solar. The company is actively looking for other areas of growth. Because Daqo Group has more than 40 years of experience in the power equipment sector, and being one of the leading manufacturer and supplier of high and low voltage power equipment such as transformer and circuit breakers.

Ming Yang

Daqo Group is seeing a very strong demand, especially in AI data center related power equipment demand. We do think this is a very significant and real opportunity for the company. Daqo Group brings many years of experience and advantage in manufacturing, in R&D, in technology capability. In terms of products as well, with the growing AI power demand, and especially for the next generation power infrastructure for IDC, where led by NVIDIA, there is this future development of a new next generation of equipment under the 800V DC infrastructure. We are targeting initially in the solid-state transformer and solid-state circuit breaker market. The industry is starting in 2027, next year, and then we expect to see very significant growth from 2028-2030 with power demand from these new AI data centers based on a new 800V DC technology.

Ming Yang

With Daqo Group, it brings significant experience and advantage, at the same time matching with Daqo New Energy's strong balance sheet and capital position, to capture this growth driver. Now we have built an R&D team in Shanghai, and we expect to have an initial product ready by year-end. Then with prototypes and then by achieving sales starting in 2027, and then capturing the growth opportunity 2028-2030, and our goal to become an industry leader within this IDC power equipment sector by being a tier 1, both in terms of product and the team. That is our current end goal right now.

Alan Lau

Yeah. Thanks a lot for management. Good explanation. I will pass on. Thank you.

Ming Yang

Great. Thank you, Alan.

Operator

Our next question comes from Mengwen Wang with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Mengwen Wang

Sure. Thanks management for taking that question. I have two questions. One is related to the poly business and another to the AIDC business. First, in terms of the poly business, I think you just mentioned currently the industry upstream and downstream players is kind of wait and see, and given the downstream inventory is at a relatively higher level. I am not sure what is the outcome do you expect for after the wait and see period? Particularly, we had this kind of self-display in first half, like we uphold our pricing and then we record a lower shipment. I am wondering, do you have any shipment guidance then towards the end of the year? What is our priority going forward? Will we uphold the pricing to the higher level, like CNY 50,000 per ton? Or, we are kind of want to reach the balance between price or shipments.

Mengwen Wang

Want to hear more about the poly business operations strategy. Thank you.

Ming Yang

Okay. Thank you, Mengwen. Let me translate your question for Mr. Xu, and then he will respond. Just a minute.

Xiang Xu

[Non-English content]

Ming Yang

Let me translate for Mr. Xu. In the second half, what we believe is that because Daqo New Energy, we have a superior quality of product in the market. Selling and shipping our product is really not an issue. I think the question is really price. In the first half, because we adhere to self-discipline, we did not sell as much products as our normal market share. Because our competitors were engaged in low-cost sales practices. But if we look at our market share in the past, we believe that we can achieve approximately 15% market share within the industry, and we continue to expect that going forward. Our target is to sell at an appropriate price or a reasonable price, be fully compliant with the government guidance and the price law.

Ming Yang

What we expect is that, say, in the next six to 18 months, we are likely to see a forced exit or a market-based exit of manufacturers with high production costs or manufacturers with poor cash positions or poor cash flow. Companies with not a good balance sheet are likely to continue to struggle going forward. While Daqo New Energy with our cash position and our strong balance sheet, also our high product quality and low cost, we expect that we are likely to do better and to do well in the market. Especially in 2027, where we expect to see a much improved and better market environment. Then we expect to continue to lower our inventory going forward to relatively low inventory levels. That is our target.

Mengwen Wang

Okay, thank you. Can I conclude that we will hold up the price in your turn, and we will wait the rest of the marginal players to exit, and then at that time, we will see fast inventory depletion and the recovery of the shipment is likely to occur in the next six to 18 months?

Ming Yang

I think in terms of pricing, we cannot sell below cost. We're going to adhere to that. At the same time, we'll look for opportunities to sell at a reasonable price. Then wait for the market to have additional capacity exits. Yes.

Xiang Xu

[Non-English content]

Mengwen Wang

Okay, that's super clear. My second question about AIDC, I think we have put out announcements like we have CNY 6 billion total investment, CNY 2 billion in the first phase. You just mentioned we will have sales volume reported in next year. Just wondering, can you share a bit more about the plan for the AIDC business, specifically like our CapEx timeline and the source of capital for this CNY 6 billion or CNY 2 billion investments? What's our expected payback duration for the first phase of the production phase? What's the normalized profitability from this business do we expect we'll achieve? Also for other operating metrics, will we have more other sources allocated for this new business development or we can use some of the synergies from our Daqo Group, the aligned company?

Mengwen Wang

So, a lot of details about can you share a bit more regarding to these metrics. Thank you so much.

Ming Yang

Okay. Let me translate your question first quickly. Okay, hold on.

Xiang Xu

[Non-English content]

Ming Yang

Let me translate for Mr. Xu. I think first of all, let me just clarify on the investments involved. Even though the total project anticipated investment is RMB 6 billion, we are only committing the first phase right now, which is about RMB 2 billion, which will cover all of solid-state transformer, solid-state circuit breaker, and also our E-House total solution for AI power infrastructure and also some related to energy storage. The remaining RMB 4 billion is not committed as of today, and will be planned sometime in the future. Then in terms of our strategy, we are focusing on AIDC-related power infrastructure or equipment. Then we expect to have three primary products.

Ming Yang

One is a total solution or a package solution which is going to be a plug-and-play kind of solution for AI power infrastructure, which has all the related power equipment. Then also our solid-state transformers and solid-state circuit breakers, and so it includes the related software and control. There is very significant synergy with Daqo Group because of Daqo Group's experience and know-how and also their position within the market, we think that actually we can receive significant orders from customers. We are now in the phase of doing R&D and also the building of related manufacturing facilities. The R&D team is now in place, and we continue to expect to have our prototype ready by year-end and getting these products. In terms of 2026 and 2027 is really a preparation period and introduction of the products into the market.

Ming Yang

We think that the market will see a high growth phase from 2028-2030, and where we do expect a significant ramp-up of revenue during this period for these related products and business. Okay. Thank you, Mengwen.

Mengwen Wang

Hi, Ming. Just one last very small question. For the RMB 2 billion committed investment, we will extend in 2026, right?

Ming Yang

Over the next two years. This year is only about, I think, it is only maybe $30 million-$40 million this year. The remaining will be over the next two years, actually. Yeah.

Mengwen Wang

Okay. Thank you so much.

Ming Yang

Sure.

Mengwen Wang

That is all from me. Thank you.

Ming Yang

Thank you. Our CEO will make additional comment.

Xiang Xu

[Non-English content]

Ming Yang

Mr. Xu will provide an update on our semiconductor polysilicon business, where the company has spent a total investment, including land and related equipment facility of about 1.2 billion RMB into the business. We have been doing product trial production and also in terms of qualification with our customers. The qualification cycle has been much longer than we anticipated, but we are continuing to do this. He is very optimistic that he is looking at very significant market demand, where the expected demand for semiconductor poly is roughly 75,000 tons per year, while right now the current industry production for semiconductor poly is only about 57,000 tons per year. He is expecting a very significant growth for this product, this market sector. We are going to wrap up and reinvigorate our activities for this. Okay.

Operator

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Jessie Zhao for any closing remarks.

Jessie Zhao

Thank you everyone again for participating in today's conference call. Should you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to contact us. Thank you and have an awesome day. Goodbye.

Operator

The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-13

Golar LNG (GLNG) Q2 Earnings and Revenues Beat Estimates

Zacks
Golar LNG (GLNG) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.68 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.3 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.26 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +126.67%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this operator of carriers for natural gas shipping would post earnings of $0.31 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.49, delivering a surprise of +58.06%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates two times. Golar LNG, which belongs to the Zacks Oil and Gas - Integrated - International industry, posted revenues of $130.48 million for the quarter ended June 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 4.36%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $75.67 million. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates four times over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. Golar LNG shares have added about 37.3% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 13.2%. While Golar LNG has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Golar LNG was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the compl…Read full document

Golar LNG (GLNG) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.68 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.3 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.26 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +126.67%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this operator of carriers for natural gas shipping would post earnings of $0.31 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.49, delivering a surprise of +58.06%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates two times. Golar LNG, which belongs to the Zacks Oil and Gas - Integrated - International industry, posted revenues of $130.48 million for the quarter ended June 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 4.36%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $75.67 million. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates four times over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. Golar LNG shares have added about 37.3% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 13.2%. While Golar LNG has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Golar LNG was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is -$0.03 on $67.63 million in revenues for the coming quarter and $1.05 on $397.83 million in revenues for the current fiscal year. Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Oil and Gas - Integrated - International is currently in the bottom 8% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1. Daqo New Energy (DQ), another stock in the broader Zacks Oils-Energy sector, has yet to report results for the quarter ended June 2026. This solar panel parts maker is expected to post quarterly loss of $0.28 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +75.4%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. Daqo New Energy's revenues are expected to be $59.2 million, down 21.3% from the year-ago quarter. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) : Free Stock Analysis Report DAQO New Energy Corp. (DQ) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-06

Daqo New Energy to Announce Unaudited Financial Results for the Second Quarter of 2026 on August 20, 2026

PR Newswire

SHANGHAI, Aug. 6, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Daqo New Energy Corp. (NYSE: DQ) ("Daqo New Energy" or the "Company"), a leading manufacturer of high-purity polysilicon for the global solar PV industry, today announced it will release its unaudited financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026, before U.S. markets open on Thursday, August 20, 2026. The Company will hold a conference call to discuss the financial results at 8:00 AM U.S. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 20, 2026 (8:00 PM Beijing / Hong Kong time on the same day). Dial-in details for the earnings conference call are as follows: Participant dial in (U.S./Canada toll free): +1-888-346-8982 Participant international dial in: +1-412-902-4272 China mainland toll free: 4001-201203 Hong Kong toll free: 800-905945 Please dial in 10 minutes before the call is scheduled to begin and ask to join the Daqo New Energy call. Webcast link:https://app.webinar.net/2NXKalz98Rz A replay of the call will be available 1 hour after the conclusion of the conference call through August 27, 2026. Dial in details for the replay are as follows: U.S./Canada toll free: +1-855-669-9658 International toll: +1-412-317-0088 Replay access code: 6672616 To access the replay through an international dial-in number, please visit the link below. https://services.choruscall.com/ccforms/replay.html Participants will be asked to provide their name and company name upon joining the call. About Daqo New Energy Corp.Daqo New Energy Corp. (NYSE: DQ) ("Daqo New Energy") is a leading manufacturer of high-purity polysilicon for the global solar PV industry. Founded in 2007, the Company manufactures and sells high-purity polysilicon to photovoltaic product manufacturers, who further process the polysilicon into ingots, wafers, cells and modules for solar power solutions. The Company has a total polysilicon nameplate capacity of 305,000 metric tons and is one of the world's lowest cost producers of high-purity polysilicon. For more information, please visit www.dqsolar.com View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/daqo-new-energy-to-announce-unaudited-financial-results-for-the-second-quarter-of-2026-on-august-20-2026-302844576.html

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-05

Sunrun (RUN) Q2 Earnings and Revenues Beat Estimates

Zacks
Sunrun (RUN) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.42 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.08 per share. This compares to earnings of $1.07 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +425.00%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this solar energy products distributor would post a loss of $0.05 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.62, delivering a surprise of +1340%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates four times. Sunrun, which belongs to the Zacks Solar industry, posted revenues of $869.99 million for the quarter ended June 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 20.35%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $569.34 million. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates four times over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. Sunrun shares have lost about 40.1% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 13%. While Sunrun has underperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Sunrun was unfavorable. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to underperform the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. It wi…Read full document

Sunrun (RUN) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.42 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.08 per share. This compares to earnings of $1.07 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +425.00%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this solar energy products distributor would post a loss of $0.05 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.62, delivering a surprise of +1340%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates four times. Sunrun, which belongs to the Zacks Solar industry, posted revenues of $869.99 million for the quarter ended June 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 20.35%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $569.34 million. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates four times over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. Sunrun shares have lost about 40.1% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 13%. While Sunrun has underperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Sunrun was unfavorable. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to underperform the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $0.22 on $810.44 million in revenues for the coming quarter and $1.01 on $3.08 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year. Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Solar is currently in the top 30% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1. Daqo New Energy (DQ), another stock in the same industry, has yet to report results for the quarter ended June 2026. This solar panel parts maker is expected to post quarterly loss of $0.28 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +75.4%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. Daqo New Energy's revenues are expected to be $59.2 million, down 21.3% from the year-ago quarter. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Sunrun Inc. (RUN) : Free Stock Analysis Report DAQO New Energy Corp. (DQ) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-04-30

DAQO New Energy Q1 Earnings Call Highlights

MarketBeat
Severe Q1 hit: Revenue plunged to RMB 26.7 million with a gross loss of RMB 139.4 million and net loss of RMB 88.4 million, driven by a RMB 98.4 million inventory-impairment as the company curtailed sales when market prices fell below production cost. Production vs. sales and liquidity: Daqo produced 43,402 MT (above guidance) while selling only 4,482 MT and ran ~57% utilization, but it retains a strong liquidity buffer of about $2.0 billion and zero debt, allowing a disciplined pause on below-cost selling. Regulatory pivot could change pricing: Chinese authorities are preparing a new cost model and potential price guidance expected around June, which management says could lift cash prices from roughly RMB 35–40/kg to RMB 40–45+/kg and materially affect Daqo’s utilization and market-share strategy. Interested in DAQO New Energy Corp.? Here are five stocks we like better. Daqo New Energy: Solar Monopoly Launches $100M Buyback DAQO New Energy (NYSE:DQ) reported first-quarter 2026 results amid what management described as continued industry weakness, with seasonal softness, high inventory levels, and sustained overcapacity pressuring polysilicon pricing. Deputy CEO Anita Zhu said sentiment across the solar PV industry “remained cautious” in the first quarter due to seasonal factors and elevated inventories, and was “further exacerbated by rising module prices” linked to higher silver, aluminum and glass costs. She added that geopolitical tensions in the Middle East also weighed on demand in that region. → Palantir Is Down 30%: Noise? Or a Signal to Accumulate? The Solar Stock Battle: Is Daqo or JinkoSolar Your Next Big Win? Zhu said persistent industry overcapacity continued to push polysilicon prices lower, contributing to quarterly operating and net losses. She noted that Daqo maintained “a robust and healthy balance sheet with zero debt.” Zhu highlighted the company’s liquidity position as of March 31, 2026, including cash, investments and deposits that she said totaled about $2.0 billion in assets convertible to cash. She listed the components as: cash balance of $559.4 million, short-term investments of $288.3 million, bank notes receivable of $20.8 million, held-to-maturity investments of $50.3 million, and fixed-term bank deposits of $1.1 billion. → Corning Beats Q1 Estimates but Drops 9% on Guidance Miss Wall Street Believes in First Solar Stock’s Bull…Read full document

Severe Q1 hit: Revenue plunged to RMB 26.7 million with a gross loss of RMB 139.4 million and net loss of RMB 88.4 million, driven by a RMB 98.4 million inventory-impairment as the company curtailed sales when market prices fell below production cost. Production vs. sales and liquidity: Daqo produced 43,402 MT (above guidance) while selling only 4,482 MT and ran ~57% utilization, but it retains a strong liquidity buffer of about $2.0 billion and zero debt, allowing a disciplined pause on below-cost selling. Regulatory pivot could change pricing: Chinese authorities are preparing a new cost model and potential price guidance expected around June, which management says could lift cash prices from roughly RMB 35–40/kg to RMB 40–45+/kg and materially affect Daqo’s utilization and market-share strategy. Interested in DAQO New Energy Corp.? Here are five stocks we like better. Daqo New Energy: Solar Monopoly Launches $100M Buyback DAQO New Energy (NYSE:DQ) reported first-quarter 2026 results amid what management described as continued industry weakness, with seasonal softness, high inventory levels, and sustained overcapacity pressuring polysilicon pricing. Deputy CEO Anita Zhu said sentiment across the solar PV industry “remained cautious” in the first quarter due to seasonal factors and elevated inventories, and was “further exacerbated by rising module prices” linked to higher silver, aluminum and glass costs. She added that geopolitical tensions in the Middle East also weighed on demand in that region. → Palantir Is Down 30%: Noise? Or a Signal to Accumulate? The Solar Stock Battle: Is Daqo or JinkoSolar Your Next Big Win? Zhu said persistent industry overcapacity continued to push polysilicon prices lower, contributing to quarterly operating and net losses. She noted that Daqo maintained “a robust and healthy balance sheet with zero debt.” Zhu highlighted the company’s liquidity position as of March 31, 2026, including cash, investments and deposits that she said totaled about $2.0 billion in assets convertible to cash. She listed the components as: cash balance of $559.4 million, short-term investments of $288.3 million, bank notes receivable of $20.8 million, held-to-maturity investments of $50.3 million, and fixed-term bank deposits of $1.1 billion. → Corning Beats Q1 Estimates but Drops 9% on Guidance Miss Wall Street Believes in First Solar Stock’s Bull Cycle Operationally, Zhu said Daqo ran its main capacity utilization rate at approximately 57% during the quarter. Total production from its two polysilicon facilities was 43,402 metric tons, above the company’s guidance range of 35,000 to 40,000 metric tons. With market prices falling below production cost, Zhu said the company followed Chinese authority self-regulation guidelines and “declin[ed] to engage in below-cost sales,” taking a “disciplined wait-and-see approach” while awaiting further implementation of national anti-monopoly policies previously discussed. → Did Qualcomm Just Put Apple in Check? As a result, sales volume fell to 4,482 metric tons, while average selling price increased 2.3% sequentially to $5.96 per kilogram, according to Zhu. Zhu said N-type polysilicon prices fell from RMB 48–RMB 55 per kilogram at the end of 2025 to RMB 35–RMB 37 per kilogram by the end of the first quarter. She added that prices entering the second quarter were showing signs of “bottoming out,” with weekly declines easing. She also pointed to April 17, when multiple Chinese agencies—including the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the National Development and Reform Commission, the State Administration for Market Regulation, and the National Energy Administration—held a symposium focused on regulating competition in the solar PV sector. Zhu said the meeting reinforced the need to address “irrational competition” and curb “destructive involution,” and that authorities were required to deploy measures spanning capacity regulation, standards guidance, innovation-driven development, price law enforcement, quality supervision, M&A, and intellectual property protection. During Q&A, CFO Ming Yang said the government was working on a new cost model “consistent across all the manufacturers,” covering inputs such as materials, depreciation, and labor. He said the company’s understanding was that a new round of cost determination could come out “in the next two months or so,” and later added, “Our understanding, it should be around June.” Yang said an updated price guidance could follow once the cost determination is completed. Asked what enforcement could look like, Yang said penalties could be “fairly significant,” and added that in a worst-case scenario authorities “could revoke your manufacturing license, or shut down your electricity,” though he emphasized the company had not yet seen enforcement actions take place. Yang also discussed potential price scenarios. Without enforcement, he said the cash price range could be RMB 35–RMB 40 per kilogram, while with price guidance it “should be in the range of RMB 40–RMB 45 or maybe even higher,” noting those figures were inclusive of VAT. CFO Ming Yang reported revenue of RMB 26.7 million, down from RMB 221.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and RMB 124.0 million in the first quarter of 2025. He attributed the sequential decline primarily to lower sales volume as the company reduced sales “in light of the relatively low selling prices.” Gross loss was RMB 139.4 million, compared with gross profit of RMB 15.4 million in the prior quarter and gross loss of RMB 81.5 million a year earlier. Gross margin was -521%, compared with 7% in the fourth quarter of 2025 and -65.8% in the first quarter of 2025. Yang said the sequential decline was mainly due to a higher provision for inventory impairment. Cost of revenue included RMB 98.4 million of inventory impairment provisions, which Yang said was driven by end-of-quarter market polysilicon pricing below production cost. SG&A: RMB 12.2 million, down from RMB 18.7 million in Q4 2025 and RMB 35.0 million in Q1 2025. Yang said the year-over-year decline reflected, in part, RMB 18.6 million of non-cash share-based compensation recorded in Q1 2025. R&D: RMB 0.8 million, compared with RMB 0.7 million in Q4 2025 and RMB 0.5 million in Q1 2025. Operating loss: RMB 150.8 million, versus RMB 20.9 million in Q4 2025 and RMB 114.0 million in Q1 2025. Net loss attributable to shareholders: RMB 88.4 million, versus RMB 7.3 million in Q4 2025 and RMB 71.8 million in Q1 2025. Loss per basic ADS: RMB 1.31, versus RMB 0.11 in Q4 2025 and RMB 1.07 in Q1 2025. EBITDA: RMB -83.0 million, compared with RMB 52.5 million in Q4 2025 and RMB -48.0 million in Q1 2025. For the second quarter of 2026, Zhu said the company expects total polysilicon production of approximately 35,000 to 40,000 metric tons. For full-year 2026, she said Daqo expects production volume to remain in the range of 140,000 to 170,000 metric tons. On utilization, Yang told analysts the company planned to operate at roughly 50% to 55% in the near term, saying Daqo was maintaining utilization because it was running at a relatively optimal operating condition for quality and cost. However, he said the approach could change depending on whether authorities enforce the price law. In a scenario where policy enforcement does not materialize and manufacturers continue selling below cost, Yang said Daqo would lower utilization and “start to sell at close to market pricing,” adding that the company’s balance sheet position could allow it to endure a prolonged downturn. Conversely, if government enforcement leads manufacturers to sell above cost, he said Daqo would be positioned to maintain utilization and regain market share. On costs, Yang said the company expected cash costs in the second quarter to be in line in renminbi terms and “trending slightly lower over the next quarters,” describing a “fairly steady cost structure.” DAQO New Energy Corp. operates as a leading manufacturer of high-purity polysilicon and monocrystalline silicon wafers for the global solar photovoltaic industry. The company focuses on serving module makers and integrated solar producers with critical upstream materials, applying proprietary technologies and optimized processes to achieve high product purity and consistently low production costs. Its core offerings include solar-grade polysilicon—used in the ingot casting and wafer slicing stages—and premium mono-silicon wafers, which are a key input for high-efficiency solar cell production. Founded in the late 2000s and listed on the New York Stock Exchange in 2010, DAQO New Energy established its first polysilicon facility in China's Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. The article "DAQO New Energy Q1 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-04-29

Daqo New Energy Announces Unaudited First Quarter 2026 Financial Results

PR Newswire
SHANGHAI, April 29, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Daqo New Energy Corp. (NYSE: DQ) ("Daqo New Energy" the "Company" or "we"), a leading manufacturer of high-purity polysilicon for the global solar PV industry, today announced its unaudited financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026. First Quarter 2026 Financial and Operating Highlights Aggregate of cash, short-term investments, bank notes receivable, held-to-maturity investments and fixed term bank deposit balance was $2.00 billion at the end of Q1 2026, compared to $2.27 billion at the end of Q4 2025 Polysilicon production volume was 43,402 MT in Q1 2026, compared to 42,181 MT in Q4 2025 Polysilicon sales volume was 4,482 MT in Q1 2026, compared to 38,167 MT in Q4 2025 Polysilicon average total production cost(1) was $5.95/kg in Q1 2026, compared to $5.83/kg in Q4 2025 Polysilicon average cash cost(1) was $4.59/kg in Q1 2026, compared to $4.46/kg in Q4 2025 Polysilicon average selling price (ASP) was $5.96/kg in Q1 2026, compared to $5.83/kg in Q4 2025 Revenue was $26.7 million in Q1 2026, compared to $221.7 million in Q4 2025 Gross loss was $139.4 million in Q1 2026, compared to gross profit of $15.4 million in Q4 2025; gross margin was negative 521.5% in Q1 2026, compared to 7.0% in Q4 2025 Net loss attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders was $88.4 million in Q1 2026, compared to $7.3 million in Q4 2025; loss per basic American Depositary Share (ADS)(3) was $1.31 in Q1 2026, compared to $0.11 in Q4 2025 Adjusted net loss (non-GAAP)(2) attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders was $88.4 million in Q1 2026, compared to $7.3 million in Q4 2025 Adjusted loss per basic ADS(3) (non-GAAP)(2) was $1.31 in Q1 2026, compared to adjusted loss per basic ADS(3) (non-GAAP)(2) of $0.11 in Q4 2025; EBITDA (non-GAAP)(2) was negative $83.1 million in Q1 2026, compared to $52.5 million in Q4 2025; EBITDA margin (non-GAAP)(2) was negative 311.1% in Q1 2026, compared to 23.7% in Q4 2025 Management Remarks Mr. Xiang Xu, CEO of Daqo New Energy, commented, "In the first quarter of 2026, market sentiment across the solar PV industry remained cautious amid seasonal softness and elevated inventory levels. It was further exacerbated by rising module prices, driven by higher silver, aluminum, and glass costs, which led to a market slowdown in China. Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East also weighed o…Read full document

SHANGHAI, April 29, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Daqo New Energy Corp. (NYSE: DQ) ("Daqo New Energy" the "Company" or "we"), a leading manufacturer of high-purity polysilicon for the global solar PV industry, today announced its unaudited financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026. First Quarter 2026 Financial and Operating Highlights Aggregate of cash, short-term investments, bank notes receivable, held-to-maturity investments and fixed term bank deposit balance was $2.00 billion at the end of Q1 2026, compared to $2.27 billion at the end of Q4 2025 Polysilicon production volume was 43,402 MT in Q1 2026, compared to 42,181 MT in Q4 2025 Polysilicon sales volume was 4,482 MT in Q1 2026, compared to 38,167 MT in Q4 2025 Polysilicon average total production cost(1) was $5.95/kg in Q1 2026, compared to $5.83/kg in Q4 2025 Polysilicon average cash cost(1) was $4.59/kg in Q1 2026, compared to $4.46/kg in Q4 2025 Polysilicon average selling price (ASP) was $5.96/kg in Q1 2026, compared to $5.83/kg in Q4 2025 Revenue was $26.7 million in Q1 2026, compared to $221.7 million in Q4 2025 Gross loss was $139.4 million in Q1 2026, compared to gross profit of $15.4 million in Q4 2025; gross margin was negative 521.5% in Q1 2026, compared to 7.0% in Q4 2025 Net loss attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders was $88.4 million in Q1 2026, compared to $7.3 million in Q4 2025; loss per basic American Depositary Share (ADS)(3) was $1.31 in Q1 2026, compared to $0.11 in Q4 2025 Adjusted net loss (non-GAAP)(2) attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders was $88.4 million in Q1 2026, compared to $7.3 million in Q4 2025 Adjusted loss per basic ADS(3) (non-GAAP)(2) was $1.31 in Q1 2026, compared to adjusted loss per basic ADS(3) (non-GAAP)(2) of $0.11 in Q4 2025; EBITDA (non-GAAP)(2) was negative $83.1 million in Q1 2026, compared to $52.5 million in Q4 2025; EBITDA margin (non-GAAP)(2) was negative 311.1% in Q1 2026, compared to 23.7% in Q4 2025 Management Remarks Mr. Xiang Xu, CEO of Daqo New Energy, commented, "In the first quarter of 2026, market sentiment across the solar PV industry remained cautious amid seasonal softness and elevated inventory levels. It was further exacerbated by rising module prices, driven by higher silver, aluminum, and glass costs, which led to a market slowdown in China. Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East also weighed on end-market demand in the region. Against this backdrop, persistent industry overcapacity continued to exert downward pressure on polysilicon prices, resulting in quarterly operating and net losses. Notwithstanding these headwinds, we continued to maintain a robust and healthy balance sheet with zero debt. As of March 31, 2026, we held a cash balance of $559.4 million, short-term investments of $288.3 million, bank notes receivables of $20.8 million, held-to-maturity investments of $50.3 million, and a fixed term bank deposit balance of $1.1 billion. In total, these assets that can be converted into cash stood at $2.0 billion, providing us with ample liquidity. This solid financial position gives us the confidence and strategic flexibility to navigate the current market downturn." "On the operational front, we continued to take proactive measures to navigate challenging market conditions and weak selling prices, with nameplate capacity utilization rate operating at approximately 57%. Total production volume at our two polysilicon facilities was 43,402 MT for the quarter, exceeding our guidance range of 35,000 MT to 40,000 MT. With market prices for polysilicon experiencing a notable decline to be below production costs during the quarter, we adhered to the Chinese authorities' self-regulation guidelines by declining to engage in below-cost sales. We adopted a disciplined, wait-and-see approach pending further implementation of the national anti-involution policies we highlighted last quarter. As a result, our sales volume dropped to 4,482 MT, while our average selling price increased 2.3% sequentially to $5.96/kg. On the cost side, total production and cash costs increased marginally by 2% and 3%, respectively, on a sequential basis, primarily driven by exchange rate movements. However, despite higher silicon metal costs, manufacturing costs in RMB terms actually declined slightly on a sequential basis, reflecting our continued improvements in manufacturing efficiency." "In light of the current market dynamics, we expect total polysilicon production volume in the second quarter of 2026 to be approximately 35,000 MT to 40,000 MT. For the full year of 2026, we expect production volume to remain in the range of 140,000 MT to 170,000 MT." "With the solar market impacted by seasonality surrounding the Chinese New Year holidays and the absence of concrete updates on capacity rationalization policies, polysilicon transactions and shipment volumes remained low during the quarter. N-type polysilicon prices dropped from RMB 48-55/kg at the end of 2025 to RMB 35-37/kg by the end of the first quarter. However, polysilicon prices heading into the second quarter are showing signs of bottoming out, with weekly declines gradually easing. While producers awaited clear guidelines from authorities to tackle overcapacity, a weak demand outlook, industry inventory build-up, and financial pressure forced several peers to adjust their production and pricing strategies toward a more market-oriented approach. As a result, industry-level monthly polysilicon supply fell to approximately 93,000 MT during the quarter, representing an industry average utilization rate of just 39%. Looking ahead, we expect government authorities to strengthen the anti-involution policies necessary to address these industry-wide overcapacity issues. As an encouraging move, on April 17, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the National Development and Reform Commission, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the National Energy Administration, and other key national departments jointly held a symposium on regulating market competition within the solar PV sector, reinforcing the urgent need to address irrational competition and curb destructive involution. Additionally, all relevant authorities are now required to deploy concerted measures to strengthen industry governance and promote the high-quality development of the solar PV industry, including in respect of capacity regulation, standards guidance, innovation-driven development, price law enforcement, quality supervision, mergers and acquisitions, and intellectual property rights protection." "More broadly, the solar PV industry continues to exhibit compelling long-term growth prospects. Growing vulnerabilities in global energy markets have sparked widespread concerns about national energy security, in which the solar PV and renewable energy sectors can play a crucial role. As one of the world's lowest-cost producers of the highest-quality N-type polysilicon, backed by a robust balance sheet and zero debt, we remain optimistic about the sector and are well positioned to capitalize on the anticipated market recovery and long-term growth opportunities. We will continue to strengthen our competitive edge through advancements in high-efficiency N-type technology and cost optimization via digital transformation and AI adoption. As the world accelerates its transition to clean energy, we are confident in our ability to play a leading role in shaping that future." Outlook and guidance The Company expects to produce approximately 35,000 MT to 40,000 MT of polysilicon during the second quarter of 2026. The Company expects to produce approximately 140,000 MT to 170,000 MT of polysilicon for the full year of 2026, inclusive of the impact of the Company's annual facility maintenance. This outlook reflects Daqo New Energy's current and preliminary view as of the date of this press release and may be subject to changes. The Company's ability to achieve these projections is subject to risks and uncertainties. See "Safe Harbor Statement" at the end of this press release. First Quarter 2026 Results Revenues Revenues were $26.7 million, compared to $221.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and $123.9 million in the first quarter of 2025. The decrease in revenues compared to the fourth quarter of 2025 was primarily due to a decrease in sales volume, as the Company reduced sales in light of the relative low selling prices. Gross (loss)/profit and margin Gross loss was $139.4 million, compared to gross profit of $15.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and gross loss of $81.5 million in the first quarter of 2025. Gross margin was negative 521.5%, compared to 7.0% in the fourth quarter of 2025 and negative 65.8% in the first quarter of 2025. The decrease in gross margin compared to the fourth quarter of 2025 was primarily due to an increase in provisions for inventory impairment. Selling, general and administrative expenses Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses were $12.2 million, compared to $18.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and $35.1 million in the first quarter of 2025. The sequential decrease was primarily due to lower sales volume in the first quarter of 2026. The year-over-year decrease was also because the Company recognized $18.6 million in non-cash share-based compensation related to its share incentive plans in the first quarter of 2025. Research and development expenses Research and development (R&D) expenses were $0.8 million, compared to $0.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2025. R&D expenses can vary from period to period and reflect R&D activities that take place during the quarter. Loss from operations and operating margin As a result of the foregoing, loss from operations was $150.8 million, compared to $20.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and $114.1 million in the first quarter of 2025. Operating margin was negative 564.4%, compared to negative 9.4% in the fourth quarter of 2025 and negative 92.0% in the first quarter of 2025. Net loss attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders and loss per ADS As a result of the foregoing, net loss attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders was $88.4 million, compared to $7.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and $71.8 million in the first quarter of 2025. Loss per basic ADS was $1.31, compared to $0.11 in the fourth quarter of 2025 and $1.07 in the first quarter of 2025. Adjusted net loss (non-GAAP) attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders and adjusted loss per ADS (non-GAAP) Adjusted net loss (non-GAAP) attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders, excluding non-cash share-based compensation costs, was $88.4 million, compared to $7.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and $53.2 million in the first quarter of 2025. Adjusted loss per basic ADS was $1.31, compared to $0.11 in the fourth quarter of 2025 and $0.80 in the first quarter of 2025. EBITDA EBITDA (non-GAAP) was negative $83.1 million, compared to $52.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and negative $48.4 million in the first quarter of 2025. EBITDA margin (non-GAAP) was negative 311.1%, compared to 23.7% in the fourth quarter of 2025 and negative 39.1% in the first quarter of 2025. Financial Condition As of March 31, 2026, the Company had $559.4 million in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, compared to $980.3 million as of December 31, 2025 and $791.9 million as of March 31, 2025. As of March 31, 2026, short-term investment was $288.3 million, compared to $114.0 million as of December 31, 2025 and $168.2 million as of March 31, 2025. As of March 31, 2026, the notes receivable balance was $20.8 million, compared to $135.5 million as of December 31, 2025 and $62.7 million as of March 31, 2025. Notes receivable represents bank notes with maturity within six months. As of March 31, 2026, held-to-maturity investment was $50.3 million, compared to nil as of December 31, 2025 and nil as of March 31, 2025. As of March 31, 2026, the balance of fixed term deposit within one year was $1.0 billion, compared to $972.4 million as of December 31, 2025 and $1.1 billion as of March 31, 2025. Cash Flows For the three months ended March 31, 2026, net cash used in operating activities was $147.5 million, compared to $38.9 million in the same period of 2025. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, net cash used in investing activities was $275.8 million, compared to $211.0 million in the same period of 2025. The net cash used in investing activities in 2026 was primarily related to the purchase of short-term investments and fixed term deposits. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, net cash used in financing activities was $7.8 million, compared to nil in the same period of 2025. The net cash used in financing activities in 2026 was primarily related to $7.8 million in stock repurchases made by the Company's subsidiary, Xinjiang Daqo, from its minority shareholders. Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures To supplement Daqo New Energy's consolidated financial results presented in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("US GAAP"), the Company uses certain non-GAAP financial measures that are adjusted for certain items from the most directly comparable GAAP measures including earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") and EBITDA margin; adjusted net income attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders and adjusted earnings per basic and diluted ADS. Our management believes that each of these non-GAAP measures is useful to investors, enabling them to better assess changes in key element of the Company's results of operations across different reporting periods on a consistent basis, independent of certain items as described below. Thus, our management believes that, used in conjunction with US GAAP financial measures, these non-GAAP financial measures provide investors with meaningful supplemental information to assess the Company's operating results in a manner that is focused on its ongoing, core operating performance. Our management uses these non-GAAP measures internally to assess the business, its financial performance, current and historical results, as well as for strategic decision-making and forecasting future results. Given our management's use of these non-GAAP measures, the Company believes these measures are important to investors in understanding the Company's operating results as seen through the eyes of our management. These non-GAAP measures are not prepared in accordance with US GAAP or intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with US GAAP; the non-GAAP measures should be reviewed together with the US GAAP measures, and may be different from non-GAAP measures used by other companies. The Company uses EBITDA, which represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and EBITDA margin, which represents the proportion of EBITDA in revenues. Adjusted net income attributable to Daqo New Energy Corp. shareholders and adjusted earnings per basic and diluted ADS exclude costs related to share-based compensation. Share-based compensation is a non-cash expense that varies from period to period. As a result, our management excludes this item from our internal operating forecasts and models. Our management believes that this adjustment for share-based compensation provides investors with a basis to measure the Company's core performance, including compared with the performance of other companies, without the period-to-period variability created by share-based compensation. A reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to comparable US GAAP measures is presented later in this document. Conference Call The Company has scheduled a conference call to discuss the results at 8:00 AM U.S. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 29, 2026 (8:00 PM Beijing / Hong Kong time on the same day). The dial-in details for the earnings conference call are as follows: Participant dial in (U.S. toll free): +1-888-346-8982 Participant international dial in: +1-412-902-4272 China mainland toll free: 4001-201203 Hong Kong toll free: 800-905945 Hong Kong local toll: +852-301-84992 Please dial in 10 minutes before the call is scheduled to begin and ask to join the Daqo New Energy Corp. call. Webcast link: https://event.choruscall.com/mediaframe/webcast.html?webcastid=iLpvzzAF A replay of the call will be available 1 hour after the conclusion of the conference call through May 6, 2026. The dial-in details for the conference call replay are as follows: U.S. toll free: +1-877-344-7529 International toll: +1-412-317-0088 Canada toll free: 855-669-9658 Replay access code: 7616875 To access the replay through an international dial-in number, please select the link below. https://services.choruscall.com/ccforms/replay.html Participants will be asked to provide their name and company name upon entering the call. About Daqo New Energy Corp. Daqo New Energy Corp. (NYSE: DQ) ("Daqo" or the "Company") is a leading manufacturer of high-purity polysilicon for the global solar PV industry. Founded in 2007, the Company manufactures and sells high-purity polysilicon to photovoltaic product manufacturers, who further process the polysilicon into ingots, wafers, cells and modules for solar power solutions. The Company has a total polysilicon nameplate capacity of 305,000 metric tons and is one of the world's lowest cost producers of high-purity polysilicon. Safe Harbor Statement This announcement contains forward-looking statements. These statements are made under the "safe harbor" provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "will," "expects," "anticipates," "future," "intends," "plans," "believes," "estimates," "guidance" and similar statements. Among other things, the outlook for the second quarter and the full year of 2026 and quotations from management in these announcements, as well as Daqo New Energy's strategic and operational plans, contain forward-looking statements. The Company may also make written or oral forward-looking statements in its reports filed or furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, in its annual reports to shareholders, in press releases and other written materials and in oral statements made by its officers, directors or employees to third parties. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about the Company's beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond the Company's control. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement, including but not limited to the following: the demand for photovoltaic products and the development of photovoltaic technologies; global supply and demand for polysilicon; alternative technologies in cell manufacturing; the Company's ability to significantly expand its polysilicon production capacity and output; the reduction in or elimination of government subsidies and economic incentives for solar energy applications; the Company's ability to lower its production costs; and changes in political and regulatory environment. Further information regarding these and other risks is included in the reports or documents the Company has filed with, or furnished to, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. All information provided in this press release is as of the date hereof, and the Company undertakes no duty to update such information or any forward-looking statement, except as required under applicable law. View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/daqo-new-energy-announces-unaudited-first-quarter-2026-financial-results-302757014.html

TranscriptFY2026 Q12026-04-29

FY2026 Q1 earnings call transcript

Earnings source - 110 paragraphs
Operator

Good day, and welcome to the Daqo New Energy First quarter 2026 Results Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on a touch-tone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jessie Zhao, Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Jessie Zhao

Hello, everyone. I'm Jessie Zhao, the Investor Relations Director of Daqo New Energy. Thank you for joining our conference call today. Daqo New Energy just issued its financial results for the first quarter of 2026, which can be found on our website at www.dqsolar.com. Today, attending the conference call, we have our Deputy CEO, Ms. Anita Zhu, our CFO, Mr. Ming Yang, and myself. Our Chairman and CEO, Mr. Xiang Xu, is on a business trip now. Ms. Anita Zhu will deliver our management remarks on behalf of Mr. Xiang Xu. Today's call will begin with an update from Ms. Zhu on market conditions and company operations. Mr. Yang will discuss the company's financial performance for the quarter. After that, we will open the floor to Q&A from the audience.

Jessie Zhao

Before we begin the formal remarks, I want to remind you that certain statements on today's call, including expected future operational and financial performance and industry growth, are forward-looking statements that are made under the Safe Harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Further information regarding this and other risks is included in the reports or documents we have filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. These statements only reflect our current and preliminary view as of today and may be subject to change. Our ability to achieve these projections is subject to risks and uncertainties.

Jessie Zhao

All information provided in today's call is as of today, and we undertake no duty to update such information except as required under applicable law. Also, during the call, we will occasionally reference monetary amounts in U.S. dollar terms. Please keep in mind that our functional currency is the Chinese Renminbi. We offer these translations into U.S. dollars solely for the convenience of the audience. Now I will turn the call to our Deputy CEO, Ms. Anita Zhu. Ms. Zhu, please go ahead.

Anita Zhu

Thank you, Jessie. Hello, everyone. This is Anita. I'll now deliver our management remarks on behalf of our CEO, Mr. Xu. In the first quarter of 2026, market sentiment across the solar PV industry remained cautious amid seasonal softness and elevated inventory levels. It was further exacerbated by rising module prices driven by higher silver, aluminum, and glass costs, which led to a market slowdown in China. Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East also weighed on end market demand in the region. Against this backdrop, persistent industry overcapacity continued to exert downward pressure on polysilicon prices, resulting in quarterly operating and net losses. Notwithstanding these headwinds, we continue to maintain a robust and healthy balance sheet with zero debt.

Anita Zhu

As of March 31st, 2026, we held a cash balance of $559.4 million, short-term investments of $288.3 million, bank notes receivable as of $20.8 million, out to maturity investment of $50.3 million, and a fixed-term bank deposit balance of $1.1 billion. In total, these assets that can be converted to cash stood at $2 billion, providing us with ample liquidity. This solid financial position gives us the confidence and strategic flexibility to navigate the current market downturn. On the operational front, we continue to take proactive measures to navigate challenging market conditions and weak selling prices, with main capacity utilization rate operating at approximately 57%.

Anita Zhu

Total production volume at our two polysilicon facilities was 43,402 metric tons for the quarter, exceeding our guidance range of 35,000 metric tons-40,000 metric tons. With market prices for polysilicon experiencing a notable decline to be below production cost during the quarter, we adhered to the Chinese authority self-regulation guidelines by declining to engage in below-cost sales. We adopted a disciplined wait-and-see approach pending further implementation of the national anti-monopoly policies we highlighted last quarter. As a result, our sales volume dropped to 4,482 metric tons, while our average selling price increased 2.3% sequentially to $5.96 per kilogram. On the cost side, total production and cash costs increased marginally by 2% and 3% respectively on a sequential basis, primarily driven by exchange rate movements.

Anita Zhu

However, despite higher silicon metal costs, manufacturing costs in Renminbi terms actually declined slightly on a sequential basis, reflecting our continued improvements in manufacturing efficiency. In light of the current market dynamics, we expect total polysilicon production volume in the second quarter of 2026 to be approximately 35,000 metric tons-40,000 metric tons. For the full year of 2026, we expect production volume to remain in the range of 140,000 metric tons-170,000 metric tons. With the solar market impacted by seasonality surrounding the Chinese New Year holiday and the absence of concrete updates, capacity rationalization policies, polysilicon transactions and shipment volumes remain low during the quarter. N-type polysilicon prices dropped from RMB 48- RMB 55 per kilogram at the end of 2025 to RMB 35-RMB 37 per kilogram by the end of the first quarter.

Anita Zhu

However, polysilicon prices heading into the second quarter are showing signs of bottoming out, with weekly declines gradually easing. While producers awaited clear guidance, guidelines from authorities to tackle overcapacity, a weak demand outlook, industry inventory build-up and financial pressure forced several peers to adjust their production pricing strategy toward a more market-oriented approach. As a result, industry-level polysilicon, monthly supply fell to approximately 93,000 metric ton during the quarter, representing an industry average utilization rate of just 39%. Looking ahead, we expect government authorities to strengthen the anti-involution policies necessary to address these industry-wide overcapacity issues.

Anita Zhu

As an encouraging move, on April 17th, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the National Development and Reform Commission, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the National Energy Administration, and other key national departments jointly held a symposium on regulating market competition within the solar PV sector, reinforcing the urgent need to address irrational competition and curb destructive involution. Additionally, all relevant authorities are now required to deploy concerted measures to strengthen industry governance and promote the high-quality development of the solar PV industry, including in respect of capacity regulation, standards guidelines.

Operator

Pardon me, ladies and gentlemen. It's appeared we've lost connection to our speakers. Please stand by while we reconnect. Pardon me, this is the Operator. We have reconnected the speakers and will continue. Please proceed.

Anita Zhu

Okay. Okay, thank you. Sorry, apologies. My line got disconnected. Continuing with the April 17th symposium. All relevant authorities are now required to deploy concerted measures to strengthen industry governance and promote the high-quality development of the solar PV industry, including in respect of capacity regulation, standards guidance, innovation-driven development, price law enforcement, quality supervision, mergers and acquisitions, and intellectual property rights protection. More broadly, the solar PV industry continues to exhibit compelling long-term growth prospects. Growing vulnerabilities in global energy markets have sparked widespread concerns about national energy security, in which the solar PV and renewable energy sectors can play a crucial role.

Anita Zhu

As one of the world's lowest cost producers of the highest quality N-type polysilicon, backed by a robust balance sheet and zero debt. We remain optimistic about the sector and are well positioned to capitalize on the anticipated market recovery and long-term growth opportunities. We'll continue to strengthen our competitive edge through advancements in high efficiency N-type technologies and cost optimization via digital transformation AI adoption. As the world accelerates its transition to clean energy, we are confident in our ability to play a leading role in shaping that future. Now I'll turn the call to our CFO, Mr. Ming Yang, who will discuss the company's financial performance for the quarter. Ming, please go ahead.

Ming Yang

Thank you, Anita, and hello, everyone. This is Ming Yang, CFO of Daqo New Energy. We appreciate you joining our earnings conference call today. I will now go over the company's first quarter 2026 financial performance. Revenues were RMB 26.7 million compared to RMB 221.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and RMB 124 million in the first quarter of 2025. The decrease in revenue compared to the fourth quarter of 2025 was primarily due to a decrease in sales volume as the company reduced sales in light of the relatively low selling prices. Gross loss was RMB 139.4 million, compared to a gross profit of RMB 15.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and gross loss of RMB 81.5 million in the first quarter of 2025.

Ming Yang

Gross margin was -521% compared to 7% in the fourth quarter of 2025 and -65.8% in the first quarter of 2025. The decrease in gross margin compared to the fourth quarter of 2025 was primarily due to an increase in provision for inventory impairment. Cost of revenue for the first quarter of 2026 includes RMB 98.4 million of provisions for inventory impairment due to end-of-quarter market polysilicon pricing that is below production cost. Selling, general, and administrative expenses were RMB 12.2 million compared to RMB 18.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and RMB 35 million in the first quarter of 2025. The sequential decrease of SG&A was primarily due to lower sales volume in the first quarter of 2026.

Ming Yang

The year-over-year decrease was also due to the company recognizing RMB 18.6 million in non-cash share-based compensation costs related to the company's share incentive plan in the first quarter of 2025. R&D expenses were RMB 0.8 million compared to RMB 0.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and RMB 0.5 million in the first quarter of 2025. R&D expenses can vary from period to period and reflect R&D activities that take place during the quarter. Loss from operations was RMB 150.8 million compared to RMB 20.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and RMB 114 million in the first quarter of 2025. Operating margin was -564% compared to -9.4% in the fourth quarter of 2025 and -92% in the first quarter of 2025.

Ming Yang

Net loss attributable to Daqo New Energy shareholders was RMB 88.4 million compared to RMB 7.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and RMB 71.8 million in the first quarter of 2025. Loss per basic ADS was RMB 1.31 compared to RMB 0.11 in the fourth quarter of 2025 and RMB 1.07 in the first quarter of 2025. Adjusted net loss attributable to Daqo New Energy shareholders, excluding non-cash share-based compensation costs, was RMB 88.4 million compared to RMB 7.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and RMB 53.2 million in the first quarter of 2025.

Ming Yang

Adjusted loss per basic ADS was RMB 1.31 compared to RMB 0.11 in the fourth quarter of 2025 and RMB 0.80 in the first quarter of 2025. EBITDA was a RMB -83 million compared to RMB 52.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 and RMB -48 million in the first quarter of 2025. EBITDA margin was -311% compared to 23.7% in the fourth quarter of 2025 and -39% in the first quarter of 2025. Now on the company's financial condition. As of March 31st, 2026, the company had RMB 559.4 million in cash equivalent, and restricted cash compared to RMB 980 million as of December 31st, 2025, and RMB 792 million as of March 31st, 2025.

Ming Yang

As of March 31st, 2026, short-term investments was RMB 288 million compared to RMB 114 million as of December 31st, 2025, and RMB 168 million as of March 31st, 2025. As of March 31st, 2026, the notes receivable balance was RMB 20.8 million compared to RMB 135.5 million as of December 31st, 2025, and RMB 52.7 million as of March 31st, 2025. Note receivables represent bank notes with maturity within six months. As of March 31st, 2026, held-to-maturity investment was RMB 50.3 million compared to nil as of December 31st, 2025, and nil as of March 31st, 2025.

Ming Yang

As of March 31st, 2026, the balance of fixed term deposit within one year was RMB 1 billion. Compared to RMB 972 million as of December 31st, 2025 to RMB 1.1 billion as of March 31st, 2025. Now the company's cash flow. For three months ended March 31st, 2026, net cash used in operating activities was RMB 147.5 million compared to RMB 38.9 million in the same period of 2025. For three months ended March 31st, 2026, net cash used in investing activities was RMB 275.8 million compared to RMB 211 million in the same period of 2025. Net cash used in investing activities in 2026 was primarily due to the purchase of short-term investments and fixed term deposits.

Ming Yang

For the three months ended March 31st, 2026, net cash used in financing activities was RMB 7.8 million. Share purchases made by the company's subsidiary, Xinjiang Daqo, from its minority shareholders. That concludes our prepared remarks. We will now open the call to Q&A from the audience. Operator, please begin.

Operator

We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touchtone phone. If you're using a speaker phone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you would want to withdraw the question, please press star then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. Our first question comes from Philip Shen with Roth Capital Partners. Please go ahead.

Philip Shen

Thanks for taking my questions. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. First one is on the State Administration for Market Regulation. You know, tier one manufacturers submitted formal correction proposals. Can you walk us through how these specific proposals are practically shifting or may practically shift competitive dynamics on the ground today? Ultimately, do these commitments accelerate or delay the necessary industry consolidation needed to stabilize ASPs? Thanks, guys.

Ming Yang

Sorry, you're kind of breaking up on our end. Can you repeat your question?

Philip Shen

Yeah, sure. Hey, Ming.

Ming Yang

Okay.

Philip Shen

Just want to understand what the submissions to the State Administration for Market Regulation, those, you know, those proposals, how could they practically improve the competitive dynamics to accelerate or delay, you know, the, you know, necessary industry consolidation needed to stabilize ASPs?

Ming Yang

Anita, do you wanna start first, and I can add to that? Okay. Let me just start, well, our understanding is, I think that the government, especially at the most recent industry meeting, with the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and NDRC and NEA, and then the market regulation agency, basically there is consensus from the government that at the minimum, while maintaining some market competition, there's a need to enforce the price law. Now, there is some details to be determined in terms of, for example, of how to measure cost for all the different manufacturers. Our understanding is they're doing a new round of price determination.

Ming Yang

This should come out, let's say, in the next two months or so. Our understanding is around mid-year. Once that new cost determination is being done, and then there will be a renewed guidance on where the minimum price would be. At the same time, we're still monitoring in terms of how the enforcement can be done. There may be some enforcement actions that's being discussed, but that hasn't taken place yet. At least for us, right, we're in observation mode in terms of how whether enforcement happens. I mean, if there's no enforcement, then we maybe need to, you know, sell at wherever the market is, right?

Ming Yang

I mean, at least right now we're enforcing the price on these in our sales efforts, right? Obviously that's having a negative impact on our sales volume, right? We're waiting for that to happen. Our expectation is that once the new cost determination comes out and manufacturers are now required to sell above production costs, the market price should recover.

Philip Shen

Okay.

Ming Yang

At least our. Yeah.

Philip Shen

Okay, thanks, Ming. You know, in terms of enforcement actions, you know, what could that look like? What kind of timing could that be? Do you think the probability of enforcement action is higher or lower or like greater than 50% or less than 50%? Thanks.

Ming Yang

Okay. Our understanding is, rather than depending on the company's own reported cost, right? The government is trying to have a cost model that is consistent across all the manufacturers that were in terms of like material cost, depreciation, labor, and things like that, right? Once that is done, then we don't know if it's gonna be one general price or there could be different price for manufacturers. That has to be determined. Once that is done, then I think there will be enforcement or at least they will communicate how enforcement will be done.

Ming Yang

Previously, right, this would be in the form of, a fairly significant penalty or, in terms of, in the worst case scenario, they could revoke your manufacturing license, or shut down your electricity. There are many ways that the government could enforce, but we're yet to see that right now.

Philip Shen

Okay, got it. Final question for me. Given all that, and with, you know, the reality is you guys still need to operate and participate in the market. What do you think is a practical outlook for ASPs for, you know, Q2, Q3? What do you think your utilization rate might be in those quarters?

Ming Yang

I mean, for Q2, it will be optimistic, right? I mean, cash price is kind of in the RMB 35-RMB 37 range. I think some producers, if they're, they have cash issues, they might sell a little bit discount to that. There are opportunities in the futures market, for example, where you might be able to sell a little bit higher, maybe in the RMB 38-RMB 41 per range, depending on the contract period. We're looking at that as well. Let's say if there's no price guidance enforcement action, I think the price range is maybe RMB 35-RMB 40.

Ming Yang

If, understanding if price guidance does come out, it should be in the range of RMB 40-RMB 45 or maybe even higher. These are inclusive of VATs.

Philip Shen

Okay.

Ming Yang

Yeah.

Philip Shen

Great.

Ming Yang

Yeah. Okay. Thank you.

Philip Shen

The utilization rate, do you have a sense for Q2 and Q3 yet? Thanks.

Ming Yang

For us or for the industry?

Philip Shen

For you.

Ming Yang

Okay. For us. It will be at roughly 50%-55%. We're maintaining utilization for now because we're kind of at a fairly optimal operating condition in terms of both quality and cost and production volume. Our experience is we'll bring short-term volatility to both quality and cost. At least we're in the short term, and we're maintaining the current production level. Obviously, if the new price guidance or production or enforcement, if it stays below expectations, below what we would expect and price remain low, then we would make further adjustments in the second half, and they're subject to demand environment as well. Q1, which is really fairly negative demand environment overall, I would say.

Philip Shen

Okay, Ming. Thanks very much. I'll pass it on.

Ming Yang

Great. Thank you.

Operator

Our next question comes from Alan Lau with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Alan Lau

Yeah. Thanks for taking my question. I think in terms of the sales volume and the revenue in first quarter is a bit of a surprise. Would like to know if I do the math and back the ASP in first quarter seems to be at around RMB 41 or RMB 42, so ex VAT. Does it mean that the company didn't sell anything maybe after February?

Ming Yang

I think that is the right way to look at this in terms of, yeah, we did sell a volume in January, you know, at the high RMB 40s, inclusive VAT, right? I think 'cause actually our Q1 recognized ASP is higher than Q4, while if you look at market ASP is actually on average is much lower than Q4.

Ming Yang

I think the big change is really around Chinese New Year, especially after Chinese New Year, where with, you know, the new policy from the State Administration for Market Regulation was that, you know, the anti-involution policy that was counted on previously, you know, to reduce capacity and enforce price was kind of disrupted, right? That's when we started to see price to come down fairly quickly and significantly, right? Once price fell below production cost, then we stopped selling to the market. The market generally in the first quarter was really, you can characterized by fairly high uncertainty, right? You have a number of things happening, the war in the Middle East, you know, high silver prices, right?

Ming Yang

That led to a lot of uncertainty for the downstream. Actually, you know, they were seeing fairly significant increase in their production costs. At the same time, it was difficult for them to pass through all that increase while that's having a fairly negative impact to the Chinese end market as well. These combined really led to a fairly low industry transaction volume for polysilicon in the first quarter.

Alan Lau

Understood. I recall before March.

Anita Zhu

Let me add a little.

Alan Lau

Sorry.

Ming Yang

Okay, Anita, go ahead.

Anita Zhu

Oh, no, I was just gonna say, let me add a little bit more to that. In terms of the industry level inventory, it has accumulated to a relatively high level. I would say, in the first quarter has been above 500,000 metric tons, and it's now nearly 600,000 metric tons. I would say tier one manufacturers held roughly at least three months of stock. That's why that led to a wait-and-see attitude from the downstream buyers. For us, especially, we wanted to adhere to the Chinese authority self-regulation guidelines. We were relatively reluctant to engage in below-cost sales. We took the wait-and-see approach to see further implementation from the national policies level.

Alan Lau

Understood. sorry, how much did the tier one producers are holding in terms of inventory? Is it 500,000?

Anita Zhu

Like in total?

Alan Lau

Total is 500,000.

Anita Zhu

Yeah. Around that.

Alan Lau

How much is in tier one?

Anita Zhu

Yeah, including the downstreams as well.

Alan Lau

Oh, including wafer players. Okay.

Ming Yang

Total inventory of silicon wafers.

Alan Lau

I recall actually in January and February, actually demand was quite good because downstream players are having a rush export because to catch the VAT deadline. Wonder if why the company didn't sell more in January or February, maybe, right? 4,000 tons seems to be just 10% of the production, right?

Ming Yang

Okay. I think let me add more color and then maybe Anita can feel free to add more. I think what happened was that there's fairly strong demand for the modules, especially for the European market. What happened was these integrated manufacturers especially were selling mostly their existing inventory of modules. They were also producing, but primarily I would call it using their own inventory, right? They had some inventory of poly and materials. I think the uncertainty in cost actually, especially after Chinese New Year led them to really hold off or delay their procurement of polysilicon. I think because of especially uncertainty related to demand after April 1st, right?

Ming Yang

Then with the war that made the even a little bit worse. I would say the market probably had reasonable amount of transactions in January, but really February and March it was lower. You have, you know, this expectation of falling prices, especially for polysilicon because of the points in inventory issues. That made it even worse or a little bit worse in terms of, you know, the customers, right, they buy when prices are rising, but they delay purchase when prices are falling.

Alan Lau

Understood. In terms of the price outlook, I think I just wanna have a follow-up on Phil's question. Like approximately when you think there will be a guideline coming from the authority? Like when you think or like is it within a month or a quarter that price will start to rebound? What is the timeline there? Is there regular meetings with the authority to discuss the details on the enforcement? What is the status now?

Ming Yang

Our understanding, it should be around June. Right now they're redoing their the cost model for all the different producers, and then trying to make an alignment. Once that cost determine is done, and then the next step will be an updated price guidance.

Alan Lau

Understood. Tto my understanding, that will be more like an enforcement of the price law, which means-

Ming Yang

Yes.

Alan Lau

... everyone should sell above their cost. The previous acquisition incentives are, is it basically rejected or it's still alive? Like, what's the update on that?

Ming Yang

There's no update to that as of now. There's no new guidance from the government. Yeah. I mean, they don't say you can't do it.

Anita Zhu

I think we're open to different, yeah, I would say we're open to different kinds of proposals, but we're not 100% sure how that might unfold. We're engaging in conversations now to discover or to test different sorts of solutions. Anything that would benefit the industry as a whole and for manufacturers as well, we're willing to try it out or at least try to come to a solution, like concerted efforts towards that.

Ming Yang

I would say that the general policy is the government is positive and promoting mergers and acquisition to call it for more consolidation, right? In terms of how that might lead to actual policies or actions, that's still yet to be seen.

Alan Lau

Understood. I wonder if you are seeing any uptick of demand recently because demand I think was quite poor in past couple of months. I was wondering if you are seeing any recovery in demand.

Ming Yang

I would say on the module front, the end markets only right now Q2 is actually trending to look better than Q1. We shall see. Definitely I think, downstream inventory is coming down. That's also a good sign.

Alan Lau

Understood. Yeah, poly price is also bottoming too. Would like to know if the company, like, because the sales was very low at first quarter, not sure if the strategy is the same in second quarter. If that's the case, we'd like to know if the company considered maintaining a even lower utilization rate? Like, because the company was also running at, like, more than 50%. I recall company used to be running at 30%. Any consideration behind that, like running the utilization rate at a relatively high level?

Ming Yang

I would say that the general framework for the company is, we're monitoring the developments of the price law especially. If the companies do follow the price law and all are required to sell above production cost, and we're fairly confident on where we are in terms of industry positioning, right? Then we should regain market share. It'll be a function of demand as well. If that's the case, then we might maintain the current utilization level. Let's say if it turns out to be more negative in terms of, especially if prices remain where it is right now, right, then we would consider a lower utilization rate.

Alan Lau

Okay. Understood. Yeah, I'll stop and pass on.

Ming Yang

Okay.

Alan Lau

Thank you. Thank you for taking my question.

Ming Yang

Okay. Okay. Okay. Thanks, Alan.

Operator

Our next question comes from Mengwen Wang with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Mengwen Wang

Yeah. Hello. Thanks for taking my question. My question is about utilization as well. My understanding now is that our current strategy is to maintain over 50% utilization and stop selling to external customers at below cost pricing, right? This is based on the assumption of potential further regulation to drive poly price higher to RMB 40 per kilo and above. Is that correct?

Ming Yang

That's the generally the right thinking. Yeah. It's kind of a scenario, right? There are two major scenarios where if the government does what it says, right? Enforce price law, right? Penalties and all that, and then have the manufacturers sell above cost, then we would maintain at the current utilization. On the other hand, if unfortunately, price law isn't being enforced for whatever reason, right, and the manufacturers continue to sell below cost, then we will lower our utilization.

Mengwen Wang

If we assume a scenario like no policy kicking and the pricing is likely to stay at current level, then what's our sales strategy and production scheduling 2Q and in second half? Is there any guidance on the utilization rate in this scenario? On top of the utilization guidance, will we follow the rest of the industry to sell product at below cost pricing, or we will continue to stop selling at the lower pricing level and continue to pile up the inventory and then wait for the sector turnaround?

Ming Yang

Okay. right. I mean, if we assume, right, the government, despite all their rhetoric, nothing happens, right? I think that's unlikely because, I mean, there's a lot of pressure on MIIT right now as well. Anyway, let's assume that happens. Obviously we would lower utilization and then start to sell at close to market pricing, right? Whatever it takes to move volume. I mean, then we would, you know, compete with our peers, right? Obviously we have a strong balance sheet, so I mean, we expect we would be one of the last survivors, if not the last survivor, right?

Ming Yang

We would actually in, say, two or three years, we will see fairly significant exit of the industry, where then we have a market-based, you can call it capacity exit or consolidation right there, and then the company will do fairly well after that. Yeah. It's a trade-off. Yeah.

Mengwen Wang

That's clear. I recall you just mentioned, like you expect the policy will kick in in June, and that's the month where we would expect a potential price hike. If to reconcile your expectations, can we assume, like we will keep utilization at 50% above till June and then start selling at close to market pricing if no policy kick in?

Ming Yang

Exactly. I think that's the right assumption, yes. If there's no policy, right, if price remain low, then we would be able to reduce utilization. If the government does enforce a price law, right, and then we would maintain at least the current utilization.

Mengwen Wang

June is the month we are waiting for any policy to kick in, right?

Ming Yang

Uh-

Mengwen Wang

And if not-

Ming Yang

As they will-

Mengwen Wang

Switch our strategy.

Ming Yang

As in terms of communication.

Mengwen Wang

I think that's it.

Ming Yang

With the government. Yeah. Go ahead, Anita.

Anita Zhu

Oh, no worries. No, no, it's fine.

Ming Yang

Yeah. I understand June is the timeline of the new government policy.

Mengwen Wang

Sure. That's clear. My final question is about cash costs. Is there any guidance about our cash costs in second quarter and in the second half of 2006?

Ming Yang

I think based on our current, you call utilization, production level and the current silicon metal cost and material cost. For example, we're expecting our cash costs to be in line with Q2 in terms of Renminbi terms and trending slightly lower over the next quarters. A fairly steady cost structure.

Mengwen Wang

Sure. Thanks. That's all from me. I will pass it on. Thank you.

Ming Yang

Okay. Thank you.

Operator

This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Jessie Zhao for any closing remarks.

Jessie Zhao

Thank you everyone again for participating in today's conference call. Should you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to contact us. Thank you and have a awesome day. Goodbye.

Operator

The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-04-20

Daqo New Energy Files Annual Report on Form 20-F for Fiscal Year 2025

PR Newswire

SHANGHAI, April 20, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Daqo New Energy Corp. (NYSE: DQ) ("Daqo New Energy," the "Company" or "we"), a leading manufacturer of high-purity polysilicon for the global solar PV industry, today announced that it filed its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, which contains the Company's audited consolidated financial statements, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on April 20, 2026. The annual report on Form 20-F can be accessed and downloaded from the SEC's website at www.sec.gov or through the investor relations section of the Company's website at https://www.dqsolar.com/. Holders of the Company's securities may request a hard copy of the Company's annual report free of charge by contacting the Company by mail at: Daqo New Energy Corp. Investor Relations Unit 29, Huadu Building, 838 Zhangyang Road Pudong District, Shanghai, China, 200122 About Daqo New Energy Corp. Daqo New Energy Corp. (NYSE: DQ) ("Daqo" or the "Company") is a leading manufacturer of high-purity polysilicon for the global solar PV industry. Founded in 2007, the Company manufactures and sells high-purity polysilicon to photovoltaic product manufacturers, who further process the polysilicon into ingots, wafers, cells and modules for solar power solutions. The Company has a total polysilicon nameplate capacity of 305,000 metric tons and is one of the world's lowest cost producers of high-purity polysilicon. View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/daqo-new-energy-files-annual-report-on-form-20-f-for-fiscal-year-2025-302747110.html

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-04-15

Daqo New Energy to Announce Unaudited Financial Results for the First Quarter of 2026 on April 29, 2026

PR Newswire

SHANGHAI, April 15, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Daqo New Energy Corp. (NYSE: DQ) ("Daqo New Energy" or the "Company"), a leading manufacturer of high-purity polysilicon for the global solar PV industry, today announced it will release its unaudited financial results for first quarter ended March 31, 2026, before U.S. markets open on Wednesday, April 29, 2026. The Company will hold a conference call to discuss the financial results at 8:00 AM U.S. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 29, 2026 (8:00 PM Beijing / Hong Kong time on the same day). The dial-in details for the earnings conference call are as follows: Participant dial in (U.S. toll free): +1-888-346-8982 Participant international dial in: +1-412-902-4272 China mainland toll free: 4001-201203 Hong Kong toll free: 800-905945 Hong Kong local toll: +852-301-84992 Please dial in 10 minutes before the call is scheduled to begin and ask to join the Daqo New Energy call. Webcast link: https://event.choruscall.com/mediaframe/webcast.html?webcastid=iLpvzzAF A replay of the call will be available 1 hour after the conclusion of the conference call through May 6, 2026. The dial in details for the conference call replay are as follows: U.S. toll free: +1-877-344-7529 International toll: +1-412-317-0088 Canada toll free: 855-669-9658 Replay access code: 7616875 To access the replay through an international dial-in number, please select the link below. https://services.choruscall.com/ccforms/replay.html Participants will be asked to provide their name and company name upon entering the call. About Daqo New Energy Corp. Daqo New Energy Corp. (NYSE: DQ) ("Daqo New Energy") is a leading manufacturer of high-purity polysilicon for the global solar PV industry. Founded in 2007, the Company manufactures and sells high-purity polysilicon to photovoltaic product manufacturers, who further process the polysilicon into ingots, wafers, cells and modules for solar power solutions. The Company has a total polysilicon nameplate capacity of 305,000 metric tons and is one of the world's lowest cost producers of high-purity polysilicon. For more information, please visit www.dqsolar.com View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/daqo-new-energy-to-announce-unaudited-financial-results-for-the-first-quarter-of-2026-on-april-29-2026-302742517.html

As of 2026-08-22 • Updated weeklySource: Earnings sourceIngestion runbook