CACI
CACI InternationalDDocument history
Transcripts and related coverage stored for CACI. Related articles may discuss other companies and are not verified issuer releases.
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-22CACI International Inc (CACI) (Q1 2027) Earnings Call Highlights: Record $4. ...
GuruFocus.com
CACI International Inc (CACI) (Q1 2027) Earnings Call Highlights: Record $4. ...
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. - Revenue: $2.5 billion in Q1 FY27, up 8.2% year-over-year; organic growth of 2.1%. - EBITDA Margin: 13.3% in Q1, up 160 basis points year-over-year, driven by strong program execution and favorable mix of higher-margin work. - Adjusted Diluted EPS: $7.66 in Q1, up 11.8% year-over-year. - Free Cash Flow: $133 million in Q1, reflecting higher cash outflows typical in the first quarter. - Awards: $4.8 billion in Q1, producing a 2-times book-to-bill; weighted average duration just under 4.5 years. - Backlog: Total backlog of $34 billion; funded backlog up 15% year-over-year (seventh double-digit growth in last eight quarters). - Leverage: Pro forma leverage of 3.5 times at end of Q1; expected to return to low-3s by March quarter 2027, two quarters earlier than anticipated. - Revenue Guidance (FY27): Raised $50 million to $10.7 billion$10.9 billion; assumes approximately $450 million of acquired revenue. - EBITDA Margin Guidance (FY27): Reaffirmed in the high 12% range. - Adjusted Net Income Guidance (FY27): Raised $5 million to $740 million$760 million. - Adjusted Diluted EPS Guidance (FY27): Raised to $33.18$34.08. - Free Cash Flow Guidance (FY27): Reaffirmed at least $900 million. - Revenue Mix (Forward Indicators): 94% from existing programs, 3% from recompetes, 3% from new business (up from 83% existing business last quarter). - Bids Under Evaluation: $4.7 billion, about 85% for new business; another $14.7 billion in bids expected over next two quarters, more than 60% new business. - Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with CACI. - Is CACI fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: October 22, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. - Revenue grew 8% year-over-year to $2.5 billion, with EBITDA margin expanding 160 basis points to 13.3% and adjusted EPS up 12%. - The company secured $4.8 billion in awards, achieving a 2-times book-to-bill ratio and a funded backlog increase of 15% year-over-year. - CACI International Inc (NYSE:CACI) raised its fiscal year 2027 revenue and earnings guidance, reflecting strong operational performance and reduced risk. - The company is investing in manufacturing centers of excellence to scale production of defense electronics, supporting future growth and margin expansion. - CA…Read full documentShow less
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. - Revenue: $2.5 billion in Q1 FY27, up 8.2% year-over-year; organic growth of 2.1%. - EBITDA Margin: 13.3% in Q1, up 160 basis points year-over-year, driven by strong program execution and favorable mix of higher-margin work. - Adjusted Diluted EPS: $7.66 in Q1, up 11.8% year-over-year. - Free Cash Flow: $133 million in Q1, reflecting higher cash outflows typical in the first quarter. - Awards: $4.8 billion in Q1, producing a 2-times book-to-bill; weighted average duration just under 4.5 years. - Backlog: Total backlog of $34 billion; funded backlog up 15% year-over-year (seventh double-digit growth in last eight quarters). - Leverage: Pro forma leverage of 3.5 times at end of Q1; expected to return to low-3s by March quarter 2027, two quarters earlier than anticipated. - Revenue Guidance (FY27): Raised $50 million to $10.7 billion$10.9 billion; assumes approximately $450 million of acquired revenue. - EBITDA Margin Guidance (FY27): Reaffirmed in the high 12% range. - Adjusted Net Income Guidance (FY27): Raised $5 million to $740 million$760 million. - Adjusted Diluted EPS Guidance (FY27): Raised to $33.18$34.08. - Free Cash Flow Guidance (FY27): Reaffirmed at least $900 million. - Revenue Mix (Forward Indicators): 94% from existing programs, 3% from recompetes, 3% from new business (up from 83% existing business last quarter). - Bids Under Evaluation: $4.7 billion, about 85% for new business; another $14.7 billion in bids expected over next two quarters, more than 60% new business. - Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with CACI. - Is CACI fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: October 22, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. - Revenue grew 8% year-over-year to $2.5 billion, with EBITDA margin expanding 160 basis points to 13.3% and adjusted EPS up 12%. - The company secured $4.8 billion in awards, achieving a 2-times book-to-bill ratio and a funded backlog increase of 15% year-over-year. - CACI International Inc (NYSE:CACI) raised its fiscal year 2027 revenue and earnings guidance, reflecting strong operational performance and reduced risk. - The company is investing in manufacturing centers of excellence to scale production of defense electronics, supporting future growth and margin expansion. - CACI International Inc (NYSE:CACI) maintains a strong pipeline with $4.7 billion of bids under evaluation and plans to submit $14.7 billion in bids over the next two quarters. - Organic growth was only 2.1% in the quarter, with expectations for stronger growth in the second half, creating execution risk. - The pace of award decisions remains sluggish, which could delay revenue recognition and impact growth. - Supply chain constraints, including memory semiconductors and rare earth materials, are causing inflation and elongated lead times, affecting guidance. - The company faces a continuing resolution environment until December 11, which could create budget uncertainty and delay new program starts. - Integration of recent acquisitions, such as ARKA, involves timing shifts in revenue recognition, with some space program activities pushed beyond the first 12 months. Q: Sheila Kahyaoglu (Jefferies) asked what the secret is to CACI consistently being in the right place at the right time on funding needs and how the company outperforms peers.A: CEO John Mengucci credited a clear, consistent strategy, intentional leadership, and disciplined execution built over a decade. He noted CACI invests ahead of customer need, focuses on enduring national security priorities with narrow funding streams, and recreated itself years ago as a FAR Part 15/Part 12 commercial-style companyanticipating the shift toward OTAs and CSOs, which accounted for $0.5 billion of bookings last year. Q: Sheila Kahyaoglu (Jefferies) followed up on organic growth visibility, noting Q1 organic growth of 2% and implied low-double-digit growth in the second half against tough comps.A: Mengucci said confidence stems from funded backlog growth (up 15% year-over-year), recent large non-protested awards hitting their growth stride after Q2, long-duration contracts, and technology deliveries. CFO Jeff MacLauchlan added that CACI manages roughly 1,900 active programs with wide margin variability (single-digit to low-30s EBIT margins), managing the mix for the full year. Mengucci noted 94% of revenue is already in-house with only 3% in recompetes. Q: Gavin Parsons (UBS) asked about payback periods on technology investments, using SkyValor as a frame of reference.A: Mengucci said CACI invests for the next decade, not the next quarter, and has never had to tell investors that investment needs would hurt financials. He cited decades of counter-UAS investment, the shift from fixed-site to mobile solutions, and 1,400 forward-deployed personnel providing superior operational data that informs where and how much to investwhile remaining a consistent free cash flow compounder. Q: Gavin Parsons (UBS) asked for clarification on ARKA, confirming there was no change to full-year ARKA revenue expectationsjust timing.A: Mengucci confirmed ARKA is performing as expected and called it potentially one of CACI's greatest acquisitions, citing its leading sensing and sense-making capabilities and high barriers to entry. The $50 million shift moves revenue from the first 12 months post-close (March 2026) to after March 9 but before June 30, 2027. MacLauchlan clarified the two $50 millions are independent: a $50 million guidance raise and a $50 million inorganic-to-organic revenue shift. Q: John Godyn (Citi) asked about the growth-versus-margin trade-off, whether margins are topping out, and whether CACI has found a new lever to push margins higher.A: MacLauchlan said CACI manages the business for free cash flow, balancing investment and growth, and that margin variability across ~1,900 programs affects quarterly results. He said CACI continues to see opportunities for continued modest margin improvement while maintaining the growth vector"having our cake and eat it too." On whether back-half margin step-up guidance embeds conservatism, he declined to predict future investment decisions but noted CACI has been open about the levers it manages. Q: Matthew Marottolo (Melius Research) asked how CACI is managing memory semiconductor, rare earth, and other supply chain inflation and lead-time constraints.A: Mengucci said CACI is seeing these pressures and managing them, aided by new EVP of Manufacturing Chris Menoski as the company scales. These items are reflected in guidance and factor into the low versus high end of the range. CACI works designs around shortages and is willing to spend cash earlier on long-lead itemse.g., spending $30 million in Q2 to capture $60 million more over the year. MacLauchlan added that CACI's business model allows frequent repricing (rarely more than 1218 months out), a risk mitigator versus long-term platform programs. Q: Peter Arment (Baird) asked about exposure and risks around OTA contract structures, given some competitors' OTAs are easier to cancel.A: Mengucci said success with OTAs and CSOs starts months to years before signing, driven by deep mission knowledge from 1,400 co-located personnel and investment in proven skill sets. CACI targets areas where a 5060% solution is valuable rather than over-engineering, keeping risk balanced with the customer. Key enablers are willing customers, software-based technology for rapid changes, and an industry-leading window between Phase 1 design and productionas demonstrated by TLS Manpack and $0.5 billion in OTAs. MacLauchlan added that partnerships like GitLab provide commercial tools as a discriminator. Q: Peter Arment (Baird) asked whether the Space Force budget being mostly in the base budget (with only $12 billion tied to the reconciliation bill) supports confidence in ARKA's booking visibility.A: Mengucci agreed, noting ARKA brings about $2 billion of work over three to five years in space-based payloads within the base budget that is not yet in backlog. He said the acquisition timing was intentional to capture base-budget programs, and that ARKA's capabilities are crucial to Golden Dome, with reconciliation funding spanning multiple years. MacLauchlan added CACI was opportunistic in its debt market timing. Q: Tobey Sommer (Truist) asked which parts of the current product portfolio will generate the most revenue and profit in three to five years.A: Mengucci pointed to a mix of electronic warfare and space, both in early innings. He said CACI's EW offerings span the spectrum and are software-based, enabling continuous updates and faster time to production than competitors, with a commercial-like model for solutions and investment that should drive larger free cash flow over time. Q: Colin Canfield (Cantor) asked how CACI weighs investment requirements against growth opportunities across ARKA, space-based EW, commercial EO, space situational constellations, and classified prime work.A: MacLauchlan said CACI applies the same disciplineinvesting where it grows free cash flow dollarsand pointed to an appendix slide breaking out unusual free cash flow items. Mengucci said "all of the above" will drive cash flow, citing ARKA's exquisite small-payload capability (a competitive win with high TRL), optical communications terminals where ARKA's producibility expertise helped get through SDA Tranche 1, and future EST terminalsall with a first eye For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-22What CACI International (CACI) Said on Its Q1 Earnings Call
MarketBeat
What CACI International (CACI) Said on Its Q1 Earnings Call
- Interested in CACI International, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. - CACI raised its fiscal 2027 outlook, increasing revenue guidance to $10.7 billion–$10.9 billion and adjusted diluted EPS guidance to $33.18–$34.08, following 8.2% first-quarter revenue growth and stronger margins. - Strong contract awards drove a 2.0 book-to-bill ratio, $34 billion in total backlog and 15% year-over-year funded-backlog growth. Management expects 94% of fiscal-year revenue to come from existing programs. - Demand remains robust for CACI's technology-focused national-security offerings, including electronic warfare, counter-drone systems, space payloads, artificial intelligence and mission networks, while the company continues reducing leverage after its ARKA acquisition. CACI International (NYSE:CACI) reported first-quarter fiscal 2027 revenue growth of 8.2% and raised its full-year revenue and earnings outlook, citing strong awards activity, expanding funded backlog and demand for its technology-focused national security offerings. Revenue totaled $2.5 billion for the quarter, with organic growth of 2.1%, while adjusted diluted earnings per share increased 11.8% year over year to $7.66. EBITDA margin rose 160 basis points from the prior-year period to 13.3%, which Chief Financial Officer Jeff MacLauchlan attributed to program execution and a more favorable mix of higher-margin work. → Aurora Rejects Curaleaf's Higher Bid, But the Takeover Fight Isn't Over The company generated $133 million in free cash flow during the quarter. MacLauchlan said the first quarter typically includes higher cash outflows and reaffirmed CACI's fiscal-year free-cash-flow outlook of at least $900 million. CACI raised its fiscal 2027 revenue guidance by $50 million to a range of $10.7 billion to $10.9 billion. It also increased adjusted net income guidance by $5 million to between $740 million and $760 million, resulting in adjusted diluted EPS guidance of $33.18 to $34.08. → Could Quantinuum's Breakthrough Make Its Sell-Off a Bargain? The company reaffirmed its expectation for EBITDA margin in the high 12% range. MacLauchlan said CACI expects stronger organic growth and EBITDA margins in the second half than in the first half, although the expected margin increase is now more gradual following the strong first-quarter performance. First-quarter awards totaled $4.8 billion, producing a…Read full documentShow less
- Interested in CACI International, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. - CACI raised its fiscal 2027 outlook, increasing revenue guidance to $10.7 billion–$10.9 billion and adjusted diluted EPS guidance to $33.18–$34.08, following 8.2% first-quarter revenue growth and stronger margins. - Strong contract awards drove a 2.0 book-to-bill ratio, $34 billion in total backlog and 15% year-over-year funded-backlog growth. Management expects 94% of fiscal-year revenue to come from existing programs. - Demand remains robust for CACI's technology-focused national-security offerings, including electronic warfare, counter-drone systems, space payloads, artificial intelligence and mission networks, while the company continues reducing leverage after its ARKA acquisition. CACI International (NYSE:CACI) reported first-quarter fiscal 2027 revenue growth of 8.2% and raised its full-year revenue and earnings outlook, citing strong awards activity, expanding funded backlog and demand for its technology-focused national security offerings. Revenue totaled $2.5 billion for the quarter, with organic growth of 2.1%, while adjusted diluted earnings per share increased 11.8% year over year to $7.66. EBITDA margin rose 160 basis points from the prior-year period to 13.3%, which Chief Financial Officer Jeff MacLauchlan attributed to program execution and a more favorable mix of higher-margin work. → Aurora Rejects Curaleaf's Higher Bid, But the Takeover Fight Isn't Over The company generated $133 million in free cash flow during the quarter. MacLauchlan said the first quarter typically includes higher cash outflows and reaffirmed CACI's fiscal-year free-cash-flow outlook of at least $900 million. CACI raised its fiscal 2027 revenue guidance by $50 million to a range of $10.7 billion to $10.9 billion. It also increased adjusted net income guidance by $5 million to between $740 million and $760 million, resulting in adjusted diluted EPS guidance of $33.18 to $34.08. → Could Quantinuum's Breakthrough Make Its Sell-Off a Bargain? The company reaffirmed its expectation for EBITDA margin in the high 12% range. MacLauchlan said CACI expects stronger organic growth and EBITDA margins in the second half than in the first half, although the expected margin increase is now more gradual following the strong first-quarter performance. First-quarter awards totaled $4.8 billion, producing a book-to-bill ratio of 2 times. Total backlog reached $34 billion, while funded backlog increased 15% from a year earlier. The quarter marked the seventh time in the past eight quarters that funded backlog grew at a double-digit year-over-year rate. → IonQ's Bold Expansion Could Leave Shareholders Paying the Price MacLauchlan said CACI now expects 94% of fiscal 2027 revenue to come from existing programs, compared with 83% cited in the prior quarter. Recompetes and new business are each expected to account for 3% of revenue. The company had $4.7 billion of bids under evaluation, approximately 85% of which were for new work, and expects to submit another $14.7 billion in bids over the next two quarters. President and Chief Executive Officer John Mengucci said CACI's strategy centers on serving enduring national security priorities, applying mission knowledge to customer needs, investing ahead of demand and delivering software-defined technology. Among the quarter's awards, Mengucci highlighted the Apollo contract, under which CACI will support U.S. Central Command intelligence and information warfare missions, and SOFETOPS 2, a five-year follow-on contract supporting the Army's Special Operations Command. The company also cited demand for electronic warfare and counter-unmanned aircraft systems. Its $500 million Domestic Shield award from JIATF-401 included an initial funded task order, while Mengucci said the company is seeing demand from U.S. and international customers for its BEAM manpackable counter-UAS systems. CACI's SkyValor system is designed to provide detection at ranges of up to 75 kilometers, according to the company. In space, CACI said its ARKA business was selected by satellite intelligence provider Vantor to supply optical imaging payloads for the Pulse satellite fleet. The company expects to complete Space Development Agency Tranche 1 deliveries later in the calendar year and begin Tranche 2 work. CACI was also one of three companies selected for Phase III of the Space Force's Enterprise Space Terminal program. Mengucci said modernization demand remains healthy for mission networks and digital applications, including customer priorities involving artificial intelligence, border security and financial accountability. He said CACI is using AI-based software and agile delivery practices on programs including BEAGLE, ITAS and NASA NCAPS. CACI has opened a 61,000-square-foot manufacturing center of excellence for defense electronics in Rochester, New York. The facility expands capacity to develop, test, assemble and deliver products including TLS Manpack and BEAM systems. Mengucci said the company also plans to open manufacturing centers focused on space and integrated systems. The company continues to reduce leverage following its ARKA acquisition. Pro forma leverage was 3.5 times at the end of the first quarter, and CACI now expects to return to leverage in the low 3-times range in the March 2027 quarter, two quarters earlier than previously expected. MacLauchlan said ARKA continues to perform in line with CACI's full-year expectations. Some space-program activity, however, is now expected to produce revenue beyond the first 12 months following the acquisition's closing date. He said this timing shift is distinct from the $50 million increase in CACI's overall revenue guidance. Management said fixed-price work represented 33% of revenue, up from 27%, with about half of that increase attributable to ARKA and the remainder driven by organic fixed-price activity. Mengucci said the company remains selective about fixed-price contracts and focuses on work where technical risk is understood. CACI plans to transition to a calendar fiscal year beginning Jan. 1, 2027. The company said it will provide guidance for the new fiscal year when it reports December-quarter results in February. It also plans to host an investor day in early 2027 at its Melbourne, Florida, facilities, where it expects to discuss strategy, reporting changes and new three-year financial targets. Mengucci said a continuing resolution was in place through Dec. 11 but maintained that such funding measures historically have not had a material effect on CACI due to its backlog, longer-duration awards and critical customer programs. He said awards activity has improved, though decision-making remains sluggish in some areas. "Our large and growing backlog, strong customer demand signals, and ability to deliver give us confidence in our outlook," Mengucci said. CACI International Inc is a professional services and information technology company that provides mission-critical solutions to government customers, primarily in the United States. The company supports defense, intelligence, homeland security, and federal civilian agencies with expertise in areas such as enterprise IT, data analytics, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and software development. CACI also delivers capabilities for command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR), electronic warfare, signals intelligence, and other national security missions. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "What CACI International (CACI) Said on Its Q1 Earnings Call" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for October 2026.
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-22CACI (CACI) Q1 2027 Earnings Call Transcript
Motley Fool
CACI (CACI) Q1 2027 Earnings Call Transcript
Image source: The Motley Fool. Thursday, Oct. 22, 2026 - Senior Vice President of Investor Relations - George A. Price Jr. - President and Chief Executive Officer - John S. Mengucci - Chief Financial Officer - Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the CACI International First Quarter Fiscal Year 27 Earnings Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded. At this time, all lines are in a listen only mode. Peter, we will announce the opportunity for questions and instructions will be given at that time. If you should need any assistance during the call, please press zero, and someone will help you. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to George Price, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations for CACI International. Please go ahead, sir. George A. Price Jr.: Thanks, Morgan, and good morning, everyone. I am George Price. Senior vice president of investor relations for CACI International. Thank you for joining us this morning. We are providing presentation slides, so let's move to Slide 2. There will be-- excuse me. There will be statements in this call that do not address historical fact and as such constitute forward looking statements under current law. These statements reflect our views as of today and are subject to important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from anticipated. Those factors are listed at the bottom of last night's press release and are described in the company's SEC filings. Our Safe Harbor statement is included on this exhibit should be incorporated as part of any transcript of this call. I would also like to point out that our presentation will include discussion of non GAAP financial measures. These should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Let's turn to Slide 3, please. To open our discussion this morning, here's John S. Mengucci, president and chief executive officer of CACI International. John. John S. Mengucci: Thanks, George, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us to discuss our first quarter fiscal year 2027 results. With me this morning is Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan, our Chief Financial Officer. Slide 4, please. Before turning to our results, I want to remind you that CACI is a technology first national security company executing a clear and c…Read full documentShow less
Image source: The Motley Fool. Thursday, Oct. 22, 2026 - Senior Vice President of Investor Relations - George A. Price Jr. - President and Chief Executive Officer - John S. Mengucci - Chief Financial Officer - Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the CACI International First Quarter Fiscal Year 27 Earnings Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded. At this time, all lines are in a listen only mode. Peter, we will announce the opportunity for questions and instructions will be given at that time. If you should need any assistance during the call, please press zero, and someone will help you. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to George Price, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations for CACI International. Please go ahead, sir. George A. Price Jr.: Thanks, Morgan, and good morning, everyone. I am George Price. Senior vice president of investor relations for CACI International. Thank you for joining us this morning. We are providing presentation slides, so let's move to Slide 2. There will be-- excuse me. There will be statements in this call that do not address historical fact and as such constitute forward looking statements under current law. These statements reflect our views as of today and are subject to important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from anticipated. Those factors are listed at the bottom of last night's press release and are described in the company's SEC filings. Our Safe Harbor statement is included on this exhibit should be incorporated as part of any transcript of this call. I would also like to point out that our presentation will include discussion of non GAAP financial measures. These should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Let's turn to Slide 3, please. To open our discussion this morning, here's John S. Mengucci, president and chief executive officer of CACI International. John. John S. Mengucci: Thanks, George, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us to discuss our first quarter fiscal year 2027 results. With me this morning is Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan, our Chief Financial Officer. Slide 4, please. Before turning to our results, I want to remind you that CACI is a technology first national security company executing a clear and consistent strategy. The key elements of that strategy are, first, focused on enduring national security priorities and narrow deep funding streams, Second, we utilize our deep mission knowledge in the markets we serve to truly understand what our customers need. Third, invest ahead of customer need, informed by that deep mission knowledge. Fourth, we deliver software defined technology to address critical needs with the speed, agility, and efficiency our customers demand And finally, deploy capital in a flexible and opportunistic manner to create value for our customers and our shareholders. This strategy is the driving force behind our strong and consistent results. Slide 5, please. We had an excellent start to fiscal year 27, First quarter revenue grew 8%, EBITDA margin reached 13.3%, Adjusted diluted EPS increased 12%, and we generated $133 million in free cash flow. We also won $4.8 billion in awards, producing a 2x book to bill for the quarter. We have a large and growing backlog and our funded backlog grew double digit year over year for the seventh time in the last 8 quarters. Our margin performance stands out. It reflects superior execution, and a higher mix of differentiated technology we delivered this quarter. We are raising our revenue and earnings guidance for the year and Jeffrey will share additional details shortly. Our results, awards, backlog and pipeline give us a strong foundation for the fiscal year and support our increased guidance. Slide 6, please. Let me discuss in more detail some highlights from the quarter and the demand that we are seeing, that are driving our results and position us for continued success. I will start with 2 fantastic awards for technology enabled operational support, that exemplify our enduring commitment to national security. First, our Apollo Award, where CCI will enable CENTCOM to carry out critical intelligence and information warfare missions. Our success in winning this new work for CACI stems from our deep mission knowledge, our exceptional business development, and our superior ability to utilize and combat AI in the information domain. The second award is SOF-TOPS II. A 5 year follow on contract supporting the army's special operations command. It reflects the trust we have built through years of work with this customer extends our role helping special operators plan for and respond to evolving threats using our technology first approach. Our electronic warfare portfolio continues to see strong demand. That is certainly true with the counter UAS market significant and growing opportunity for CACI. Beyond protecting our warfighters, the growing threat to military facilities, critical infrastructure is driving demand for precision nonkinetic counter-UAS capabilities like SkyValor. SkyValor leverages nearly 2 decades of proven counter-UAS deployments, industry-leading cellular detect and defeat capabilities and enables detection up to 75 km so operators have more time to make critical decisions. Our prospective counter-UAS customer base is expanding across the US government and internationally. A great example is our $500 million domestic shield award from JIATF-401, which also included an initial funded task order. We are also seeing increased demand for our BEAM manpackable counter-UAS systems, from US customers and allies across Europe, and the Pacific theater. Beam is the most technically capable system of its kind on the market, with over a decade of proven performance and an important discriminator for prospective customers. In the critical space domain, we are capitalizing on increasing demand as a leading merchant supplier of optical imaging, and optical communications payloads. CACI was recently selected by Vantor, a commercial provider of satellite based intelligence to supply advanced optical imaging payloads for their pulse satellite fleet. This work is an example of taking ARKA's exquisite sensor capabilities developed for national security missions and applying them to a more proliferated commercial market which is exactly what the US national security strategy calls for. ARKA has a number of other sensitive opportunities in the national security space domain. that are moving forward and are expected to contribute financially in fiscal year 27. We are also making progress in optical communications. We expect to complete SDA Tranche 1 deliveries later this calendar year and begin work on Tranche 2. CACI was also 1 of 3 companies selected to advance to phase 3 of the Space Force's enterprise space terminal program. Where we are developing the next generation optical communication terminal to support critical multi orbit initiatives like the space data network. Consistent with our merchant supplier strategy, multiple primes bidding on the SDN have selected our EST technology for their solution. We also continue to win and execute other classified optical communications programs And our successful contribution to the Artemis 2 mission has helped demonstrate the capability of our technology for future human spaceflight. Finally, demand remains healthy for modernization of mission networks and digital applications. Many critical customer priorities including AI adoption, border security, and financial accountability are dependent on modern, secure, integrated networks and applications for success. CACI is a leader in modernization because we do it differently. Differentiating through speed of delivery, use of outcome based models, and demonstrated success deploying AI based software. Programs such as Beagle, ITAS, and NASA NCAPPS are real world examples of where we are applying AI agile delivery methods to drive customer modernization faster and more efficiently. Leveraging AI translates into reduced cost for customers, and better margins for us. And we consistently see customers reinvest cost savings in additional scope to CACI. Across all areas of our business, our technology first approach is directly contributing to our financial performance, by driving on contract growth, and new business wins from customers who are committed to transforming at the speed of mission. Slide 7, please. In order to meet strong demand we are seeing for our software-defined technology, we are actively investing to scale our production capacity. Our first step was to open our manufacturing center of excellence for defense electronics in Rochester, New York. The additional 61 thousand-square-foot facility significantly increases our manufacturing space, and expands our capacity to develop, test, assemble, and deliver defense electronics, such as TLS Manpack, BEAM, and others. We plan to open additional manufacturing centers of excellence for space and for integrated systems and we will share more about these initiatives in the coming months. These investments will enable us to deliver advanced technology faster, at greater scale and more efficiently. Supporting continued revenue growth and additional margin expansion. Slide 8, please. Turning to the macro environment, budgets, and funding remain healthy and are key areas of focus. With 90% of our revenue coming from national security customers, The priorities we focus on are well funded, and continue to exhibit strong demand signals because they are needs that must be addressed. A continuing resolution, or CR,, is currently in place until December 11th. Regardless of how this dynamic plays out, it is an environment we have navigated successfully for many years. As we demonstrated year in and year out, CRs do not have a material impact on our business given our large backlog, longer duration awards and the critical capabilities that our customers depend on us to deliver. From an awards perspective, our strong book-to-bill, show some improvement in award activity, though the pace of decision making is not fully normalized and is still sluggish in some areas. As our customers continue to evolve their relationships with industry, through nontraditional procurement methods, our key differentiators of investing ahead of customer need, software-defined capabilities, outcome based pricing are all resonating extremely well because they drive increased speed, efficiency, and lethality. Slide 9, please. Before turning the call over to Jeffrey, I wanted to discuss a few other updates. First, we announced we will move to a calendar fiscal year beginning January 1, 2027. We believe this reporting cycle will enhance comparability for investors and better align our business with the government's fiscal year. We plan to provide guidance for our new fiscal year when we report December quarter results in February. Second, we plan to host an investor day in early 27 at our Melbourne, Florida facilities. At this event, we intend to provide additional information about the new fiscal year, other contemplated reporting changes, discuss our strategy and capabilities, provide an opportunity to meet with the CACI management team, including additional executive leadership we recently announced, and provide new 3-year financial targets. We look forward to sharing more information with you in the near future. With that, I will turn the call over to Jeffrey. Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan: Thank you, John. Good morning, everyone. Please turn to Slide 10. We are pleased with our first quarter performance in which we delivered revenue growth in line with our expectations. Revenue was $2.5 billion for the first quarter up 8.2% year over year, organic growth of 2.1%, in line with our previously communicated low single digit organic growth. EBITDA margin in the quarter was an impressive 13.3%, 160 basis points higher than the prior year's first quarter driven by strong program execution and a more favorable mix of higher margin work. First quarter adjusted diluted earnings per share of $7.66, were 11.8% higher than a year ago. Driven by this excellent operational performance. Finally, free cash flow of $133 million for the quarter reflects higher cash outflows typical of the first quarter of the year. Slide 11, please. Turning our attention to the balance sheet and capital structure, we continue to make progress reducing our leverage following the ARKA acquisition. Pro-forma leverage at the end of the first quarter was 3.5 times and we now expect to return to leverage in the low threes in the March quarter of 27. 2 quarters earlier than we had initially anticipated. As we have discussed, this is consistent with our track record of successfully deleveraging after major acquisitions. Driven by our profitability and strong free cash flow generation, our moderating leverage is quickly putting us back in a posture of having increased optionality for additional flexible and opportunistic capital deployment. Slide 12, please. Turning to our outlook for fiscal 27, we are raising guidance for revenue, adjusted net income and adjusted EPS and reaffirming our guidance for other metrics. I note that while we made a particularly strong initial guide to begin the year, a strong awards quarter and operational developments have retired additional risk relative to our expected range of outcomes. We are raising our fiscal 2027 revenue guidance by $50 million to between $10.7 billion and $10.9 billion Our fiscal 2027 revenue now assumes approximately $450 million of acquired revenue. While ARKA continues to perform in line with our expectations for the full fiscal year, some space program activities are now expected to contribute to revenue beyond the first 12 months after closing the acquisition. We are reaffirming our fiscal 27 guidance for EBITDA margin in the high 12% range. This and higher revenue has a consequent impact to increase our adjusted net income by $5 million to between $740 million and $760 million which translates into increased adjusted diluted earnings per share guidance between $33.18 and $34.08. We are reaffirming our guidance for free cash flow of at least $900 million Finally, to assist with your modeling, I would remind you of our prior comments that we expect stronger organic growth and EBITDA margin in the second half of the fiscal year versus the first half. Though I note the second half margin ramp is now more gradual given our strong first quarter performance. I would also note our view that second quarter consensus estimates for organic growth and EBITDA margin are reasonable. Slide 13, please. Turning to our forward indicators, we now expect 94% of our revenue to come from existing programs. With 3% coming from recompetes and 3% from new business. This significant increase in existing business content which was 83% just last quarter, reflects our successful business development and operational performance and provides increased confidence in our updated guidance, as I mentioned earlier. In fact, this is the highest level of existing business at this point in the year in the last 7 years. First quarter awards were $4.8 billion representing a healthy mix of new work and strong re-compete performance. The weighted average duration of these awards was just under 4.5 years which reflects the higher mix of sole source extensions we have seen recently as well as normal variance in award duration. Our long award duration continues to provide good visibility into the strength and cash generation capacity of our business. Total backlog was $34 billion and funded backlog increased by 15% year over year. This represents the seventh time in the last 8 quarters we have delivered double digit year over year growth in funded backlog. Underscoring the critical national security priorities we address and the support of our customers. We continue to see a healthy pipeline of new opportunities with $4.7 billion of bids under evaluation, with about 85% of these being for new business. Bids under evaluation also reflect a significant level of awards in the quarter. We expect to submit another $14.7 billion in bids over the next 2 quarters with more than 60% coming from new business. In summary, our first quarter was a great start to the year. Our consistent performance, substantial backlog and strong market position give us confidence in our increased guidance and our ability to drive growth in free cash flow per share and additional shareholder value. And with that, I will turn the call back over to John. John S. Mengucci: Thank you, Jeffrey. Let's go to Slide 14, please. In conclusion, we delivered strong first quarter results, and raised our revenue and earnings guidance for the year. Our large and growing backlog, strong customer demand signals, and ability to deliver gives us confidence in our outlook. Regardless of CRs, elections, government shutdowns or other dynamics, we have delivered consistent results. it is worth repeating. CACI has a clear, consistent strategy and our financial results once again demonstrate that our strategy is working. You have heard us say consistently that we view free cash flow per share as the ultimate value creation metric. CACI has a long and consistent track record of generating strong cash flow. This level of cash generation enables us to continue investing ahead of customer need deploying capital in a flexible and opportunistic manner. Both of which then enable us to generate additional cash flow over time. You have seen us do exactly that as we deploy new technology capabilities and made strategic acquisitions like Azure Summit, and Arca. These actions allow us to turn the strong demand we see into results for our customers and lasting value for our shareholders. As is always the case, our success is driven by our 27 thousand employees who are ever-vigilant in expanding the limits of national security. To everyone on the CACI team, I am proud of what you do every day for our company, and for our nation. And to our shareholders, I thank you for your continued support of CACI. With that, Morgan, let's open the call for questions. Operator: Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, press star then the number 1 on your telephone keypad to raise your hand simply press 1 again. Your first question comes from Sheila Karin Kahyaoglu with Jefferies. Your line is open. Sheila Karin Kahyaoglu: Thanks so much. Good morning, John, Jeffrey and George. Maybe just on your closing remarks, you have consistently been in the right place at the right time in terms of future funding needs, I guess what is the secret, and how do you think about where the growth goes from here? I know you will have a Marcie Analyst Day or a first-half analyst day where you will talk about that. But how have you been able to outperform your peers here? John S. Mengucci: Yeah. Sheila, thanks. And I really appreciate the question. Look, I think simply, first off, it is because we are a very different company than others in our current sector. We have been doing our best to outperform others in the larger spaces well. And it is really down to something that we have shared over the last decade. Is just having a clear strategy intentional leadership and disciplined execution over many, many years. We have invested ahead of need and have decades of deep mission knowledge And we are in areas of enduring need. We like to talk about neural funding streams. But the way we look at it internally, these are all things that are not the first, the tenth, or the hundredth thing that customers are going to want to turn off. We take a lot of purposeful discriminating actions. I can tell you internally, that we measure the time between vision or strategy and action in weeks. And we have been very honest upfront, very transparent, and very thoughtful around capital deployment to truly build shareholder value. So a lot of transparency, a lot of results, that lead to a lot of credit credibility, frankly. The other thing that I would mention is something that we do not talk a lot about, but it is very important. Is that we truly did recreate this company 10, 12 years back to be a to be a FAR Part 15 and a FAR Part 12 truly commercial company. And, you know, we did not get lucky. We actually did study where the market was going to go and where the customer sets were-- the customers were going to be changing how they buy. I think it is, you know, true as today that $500 million of our bookings last year were done through OTAs and CSOs. that is something that we are called very, very right many, many years back. You do not just turn that thing on overnight. So strategy is placed where we where we come from. We have an outstanding leadership team that actually drives the strategy forward. And a whole slew of PMs and finance leads and the like that are making sure that we frankly, deliver excellence because customers buy from people that they trust and customers buy from people who always deliver, and I think our results show that. Sheila Karin Kahyaoglu: No. that is great. Thank you. Maybe just a follow-up on that. As we look at the organic growth, for first quarter up 2%, second quarter up 7% implies second half grows low double digits in the face of pretty tough comps, Can you give us some color on what is driving your organic growth visibility and your confidence in the guide there? John S. Mengucci: Yes. I mean, it really points ourselves towards, you know, how do we get through a back-half risk model, and we have been getting that question a lot. I think we navigate our way not only through the questions, through the performance last year. You know, look. Risk is something that we work through all the time. it is just the nature of our business. You know, when our revenue starts from a new win, it is really based on timing of award, the program start date, funding type of contract, etc. This year, it is true. We have a number of late last year and early this year awards. To hit their first notch in their growth stride after the second quarter. And I am very much aware that is the same exact time that the, current CR ends. So what gives us confidence? We have taken a long look at the growth of our backlog. I think you should all look at the level of funded backlog growth. The fact that we have got a lot of non-protested recent large awards. We have a customer base that frankly really needs to move forward quickly. And that just happens to align with our current third quarter, I guess, in other quarter, it will be our newest first quarter, right? And so we won those jobs, and that is sort of how the revenue profiles stack on top of each other. We have always talked about long duration awards. Right? So what else gives us a lot of confidence, the first or second ramp or the third and fourth quarter ramp is that we stack a number of awards with longer durations over a long, period of time. So we see the awards. Our funded our funded backlog is there. Our technology deliveries will also be there, and I think everything is greatly aligned. Fit on top of that reduces the risk of a high second-quarter profile, CRs shutdowns, budget woes, midterms, anything else you could throw in there. So, Jeffrey, anything you want to add? Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan: Yeah. I think there are 2 things Sheila, that are a little bit different about our portfolio from some others. 1 is that we have a great number of small programs, smaller programs. So we are managing, kind of 1.9 thousand or so active pieces of the portfolio and managing that for the year. The other thing that is different, I think, about our portfolio is that, we have a great deal of margin volatility. Not volatility, variability. And because of that, we have programs with single digit EBIT margins, and we have programs with you know, EBIT margins in the low thirties. And so managing that mix, and we do manage for the year, which I am sure you are tired of, hearing us say, but managing across that mix is a is a constant challenge. As you would imagine. it is a very different management experience in my experience, from working in an enterprise that has 15 or 20 large programs. John S. Mengucci: The last thing I am gonna add is the metrics that we have shared. The fact that we are at the end of the first quarter, we are looking at 94% of our revenue already in house. And only 3, 3% due and 3% recompete left, that is an outstanding position for us to be and even better than where we were last year, and you all know how last year turned out. You know, record revenue, record earn. Earnings, record free cash flow. Thanks, Sheila. Sheila Karin Kahyaoglu: Awesome. Thank you. Operator: Your next question comes from Gavin Parsons with UBS Financial. Your line is open. Gavin Parsons: Thank you. Good morning. John S. Mengucci: I mean, I am clearly seeing the investments you have made in technology already, reflected in the margins, but I want to ask how you think about payback period. And, obviously, without asking about any specific programs, but maybe if you could use SkyValor as frame of reference. Yes. Sure. Look, we have invested in a lot of software based tech over the last decade. And I truly believe that our shareholders have been greatly rewarded, and they will continue to be rewarded for the results. And we can talk about counter-UAS. We can talk about ARKA, talk about space, talk about OCTs. there is a lot of examples here But, you know, at the end of the day, strategy is a place where we come from. So these are not, these are not high risk invest ahead of customer need operations. I mean, we run this company as a full throated company. And it is why we always talk about we are not gonna invest for the next quarter. We are gonna invest for the next decade. So as hard as some of this stuff is that we do, You know, we do not. We have never come back to our investors and said, because we had to invest more, these financials are not gonna look the way they look. Okay? We are a, you know, consistent free cash flow compounder and a consistent company that is out there buying the right capabilities to go ahead and continue to drive this company forward. So whether it is counter UAS where we have been investing for well over a couple of decades, we have invested we sort of moved from a fixed site solution to a mobile solution. You know, things like BEAM are not in high demand because we got lucky. They are in high demand because we are good, and it is-- and it is good. So whether it is SkyValor giving commanders larger range. You know, we understand how to do all of that because we have 1.4 thousand people formerly deployed and a lot of people embedded. And that kind of operational support gives us just absolute better data than everybody else gets. Back to Sheila's earlier question. And allows us to, invest in the right manner in the right levels, in a manner that we are not coming to our shareholders after the quarter is done saying, wish we had not invested in all that because now we cannot make revenue or we cannot make earnings. We are doing it all. Gavin Parsons: Got it. Thanks for that. And then maybe just a quick clarifier on ARKA to make sure I heard correctly: no change to the expected ARKA revenue for the full fiscal year. it is just timing. John S. Mengucci: Yes. Let me talk a little bit about ARKA because I think it is been, probably at least here or 2 for us, probably 1 of the greatest acquisitions that we have done because it sets us up for so many things. it is a great business. it is performing as expected. Their leading provider of sensing and sense-making capabilities. I like to say they have they have been doing large aperture solutions since what we think was a minnow. They are 1 of 1.5 companies that do what they do, so it is a very strong barrier to entry. And now as you heard from the Vantor award, we are now moving to smaller form factors without sacrificing, purity and we are also building those in higher, quantity. So specific to your to your question, yes. The $50 million moves a quarter to the right, we did not take the full year or their guidance down. We actually raised full year and shifted theirs. So at the end of the day, this $50 million is different than the $50 million raised guide. This is really about moving that from next 12 months based on a March closure date to the current first fiscal year. So all of this attention is really moving revenue to after March 9 but before June 30. So we do not see. it is not about missed numbers. it is just timing. Like the majority of the rest of our business. Jeffrey, anything else you want to add? Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan: I think you covered it, but I would say maybe slightly different way that might land with some people differently. The $250 million numbers you are hearing are unrelated. Completely independent. there is a $50 million growth in the total revenue, and there is $50 million of movement in the ARKA revenue from inorganic to organic based on being after the anniversary date. So they are different fifties. Gavin Parsons: Very clear. Thank you. John S. Mengucci: Next time, we will raise it by 51. Operator: Your next question comes from John Godin with Citi. Your line is open. John Godin: Hey, Thanks for taking my question. Good morning, I wanted to just hopefully unpack margins a little bit. If I rewind to maybe a year or so ago, there was sort of a conversation about the growth versus margin trade off. And how margins might be topping out. The margin performance and execution has been great. We also have ARKA in there, so it is kind of hard to unpack that perfectly. But maybe you could just talk about growth versus margins in the core business versus ARKA? Are we at a point where we are finding a new sort of lever to get margins higher? Operator: Look, we have said a couple things pretty consistently, and I am going to come back and answer your question more directly. Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan: But we have said a couple things pretty consistently. 1 is that we manage the business for free cash flow. And so we are continually making decisions, investment and growth. The other thing that may be clouding this up a little bit is a condition I mentioned earlier, which is the margin variability. And what we see as we manage our way through this, particularly in the internal quarters of the year, as we manage across the 1.9 thousand programs that I mentioned earlier. So those conditions are both what they are and no 1 should be surprised. We have talked about these with multiple forums for a long time. To get to your more specific question, I think, we do continue to see opportunities for continued modest margin improvement. And that is taking into a account the 2 conditions I just mentioned. But it is an extremely opportunity rich environment. And we see plenty of opportunities to invest and plenty of opportunities for growth which really put us in the posture I think, in some ways of being able to kinda have our cake and eat it too. So I think we do see continued modest margin improvement even while we are maintaining the growth vector. John Godin: Okay. that is good to know. And if I could just ask a kind of related follow-up on margins this year. In the prepared remarks, you mentioned that margins in the back half would step up, but perhaps less so now that you had good early year margin performance. I just wanted to revisit that It sounds like the margin improvement engine is firing on all cylinders. As you said, you have a kind of target-rich backdrop. Is there some conservatism in that view? Could we maybe see an even higher step up in the back half that is a loaded question. Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan: Look, we continue to do what I have been describing that we do. And if it shakes out that way, it is impossible for me at this point to necessarily predict an investment decision that we might make or not make next April. But, you know, we have we have tried to be pretty open with you sharing the levers and the knobs that we are managing and how we solve for them, you know? And I think I probably should leave it at that. John Godin: Yeah. Okay. Fair enough, guys. Thanks a lot. Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan: Thank you. Operator: Your next question comes from Scott Mikus with Melius Research. Your line is open. Matt Martolo: Hi. Good morning. This is Matt Martolo on for Scott. Yeah. Good morning. We have heard we have heard from aerospace companies that memory, semiconductors, rare earths are seeing very high levels of inflation and elongated lead times. Are you managing around those constraints? Are there any other pinch points you would call out in the supply chain? John S. Mengucci: Yeah. Look, thanks. Yeah. We are seeing some of that as well, and we are managing it accordingly. that is a key focus. Why we brought Chris Monoski in. who is our new EVP of manufacturing. And it is as we really scale to combat things like that. I can tell you that those types of items are reflected in our guidance. it is really 1 of the factors that create the low end of our range and our high end of our range. The administration is aware of this as well, and they are making, the right kinds of investments, which we fully support. Know, the other thing that we are pretty good at is making certain that we are eyeballing those types of shortages before they present themselves and really work designs around some of those items. The last thing from a from a shareholder margin cash flow point of view is really getting our hands around what are those, long lead high risk items that we have to invest in. Meaning, you know, do we spend some of our, cash flow earlier than we would like, but it actually supports much longer term. Growth. So do we spend $30 million of cash in the second quarter to end up picking up 60 million more over the entire year? The answer is gonna be yes. that is why we talk about being a full year company versus a, a quarterly company. Jeffrey, anything you want to add? Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan: Yeah. I would. I would only add. You did not explicitly ask this, but I think it was sort of in the undertone of your question. We also have a business model, where we have more pricing opportunity frequency. So the nature of much of the. Of what we sell it gets repriced, you know, each time there is an order. So unlike a large you know, 6 or 8 year platform program, where the pricing is committed far in advance, we rarely are more than a year or 18 months or so from, you know, being able to price the next increment. So that is also, I think, a risk mitigator that may not be fully appreciated. Compared to some of the others in your question. Matt Martolo: Great. Thanks for taking the question, guys. I will stick with 1. John S. Mengucci: You bet. Thank you. Operator: Your next question comes from Peter Arment with Baird. Your line is open. Peter Arment: Thanks. Good morning, John and Jeffrey. Nice results. John S. Mengucci: Good morning, Peter. Thanks. Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan: Thanks, Peter. Peter Arment: Hey, it is John. You know, you mentioned OTA-kind of contract structures early on in your kind of opening comments. When you guys have some, I guess, through TLS Manpack and maybe ARKA has a little bit Could you kind of describe kind of the exposure or, I guess, risks around OTAs We have seen some other competitors for OTAs are easy to cancel or easier to cancel and just how you are thinking about the exposure with, CACI and, you know, the use of those contracts structures when you think about your business? John S. Mengucci: Yeah. Thank you. Yeah. Look. You just kinda know what you are getting into when you are getting into them. And this really ties back to our invest ahead of customer need thesis that we have been on for just short of a decade. The reason why our OTAs and our CSOs are successful is because it starts months and years ahead of when that OTA is actually signed. it is really about understanding the areas that we as a company believe we have unique skill sets in that we have proven we have the unique skill sets in and the fact that our 1.4 thousand people who were colocated in commands tell us that those are dire technology needs that our customer requires. So we are not putting hundreds of millions of dollars down. We are actually putting hundreds of person years of knowledge into an OTA where we are working with folks on the bleeding edge of the mission on the customer side And places where the customers have nothing today a 50% or 60% solution looks awesome. So we are also not making the mistake of trying to develop the 100% pure solution under an OTA. Because that means that there is far more risk on us than the risk equation between us and customer gets on. Unbalanced. So what makes ours successful far more times than not is a willing customer, a common understanding of what the mission needs, software based tech, so that we can make really quick changes during that OTA cycle, And our window between the design development, which is the phase 1 of the OTA and production is most likely industry leading. that is what drove our TLS Manpack that is what is driven a lot of the other $500 million of different OTAs that we are involved in today. So understanding the threat, understanding what the investment needs to be, get involved in low risk areas, And then when we get to the production side, building these centers of excellence, so we do not let that customer down even though we may be building a 60% solution. And then also being able to modify that solution because it is software based. Got it. Peter Arment: Appreciate the color. Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan: You could add the commercial tools that we, that we apply to those problems as well. So the mission familiarity is important our partnership with GitLab, and some other commercial entities lets us react in a way you know, that is that is a discriminator. Got it. I appreciate that color. Peter Arment: And just a quick follow-up on ARCA. The Space Force budget is the majority of it is in the base budget. it is only $12 billion tied up in the original $350 billion reconciliation bill. So is that giving you the confidence around that the majority of the Space Force budget is in base and that the booking visibility for ARCA continues to be robust. Just some additional color just given all the budget dynamics. John S. Mengucci: Yeah, Peter, you are absolutely right. And I would also tell you that ARCA also brings about $2 billion worth of work that is over the next 3 to 5 years. Whose future is in space based payloads that are in the base budget. But they have not been put into our backlog yet, as Jeffrey explained. So, yeah, it is it is it is comforting that it is there. It is comforting that we did the acquisition when we did. It was very intentional and to make certain we could get our hands on things that are in the base budget. I would also say in the reconciliation side, you look at Golden Dome, what Arca delivers is extremely crucial to that mission, and we all know that the reconciliation funding is not just single year funding. Some areas, it is 4 to 5 years of the of the year. In other areas, you know, 2 to 3 years. All of that helps support the ARCA business case. Peter Arment: Appreciate it. Thank you. Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan: Add In terms of timing, I think we were also pretty opportunistic in terms of time that we were able to enter the debt market. You know, times have looked pretty good a year later. Yeah. Yeah. Peter Arment: Thanks again, guys. Appreciate the color. Yep. Thanks, Peter. Operator: Your next question comes from Tobey Sommer with Truist. Your line is open. John S. Mengucci: Tobey, you there? Tobey Sommer: Yes. I am. I wanted to ask you a medium- to long-term project question about your product portfolio. You know, in 3 or 5 years, of what you have currently, what is do you think is gonna be generating the most revenue and profit for the firm? John S. Mengucci: Yeah. If I had opened my crystal ball up on an open investor line, I would probably say it is a good mix between what we do in the EW area and then supported by what we are doing in space. You know, we are we are just so early. We are in the infancy stage of both of these markets. You know, if you think about EW, we have got things that across the entire spectrum that will help the customer drive their mission forward. The fact that they are all software based means that we can continually make changes So if you look at the potential margins going out, not as a future guide, but the fact that things are software-based, we are going to the production bench much less times than others are because we are able to provide additional features like the phone you all carry in your jackets. So it has the right mix of commerciality to it. Both the solutions and how we drive investments. And, frankly, that is what is gonna continue to drive, larger and larger free cash flow as we go forward. Appreciate that, John. Tobey Sommer: Thank you. John S. Mengucci: Yeah. Thanks, Tobey. Operator: Your next question comes from Colin Canfield with Cantor. Your line is open. Colin Canfield: Hey, thanks for the question. If we could talk about cash flow progression If you could talk about how you think about essentially the combined base based capability portfolio-- so ARKA, OCT, and then space-based EW. How do you think about the investment requirements relative to the scale of opportunities? And then maybe if you could parse that out on how you kind of view the fastest growing swim lanes between commercial EO providers and what you have won with the Vantor base situational awareness constellations like what we are seeing with True Anomaly, And then participation in SpaceX's Star Shield program. So those 3 particular programs. And if there is a fourth lane of, you know, really fast growing prime classified work as well. Just how you think about kind of the investment requirement versus those program growth? Or that program growth? Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan: Yes. So John will probably want to add to this, and he will have some insight on some of the specific programs and places that you mentioned. But, basically, Colin, I mean, the cash. I am gonna come back to cash flow. I mean, we apply the same tools in the context of your question that we do others. If we see an opportunity to invest in a way that grows free cash flow dollars, that is the decision that we make. I would also point out because we have had a little bit of noise in our free cash flow forecast over the last couple of years, I would also call attention to a slide that we provide from time to time that sort of lays out some of the unusual items that are in free cash flow so that you can sort of do your analysis and kinda tease out what is sort of recurring free cash flow, I will call it, versus what are some unusual cash items. And that chart is in the appendix here. But you will see you will see in there a nice progression in free cash flow as we as we make those investment decisions and trade offs that you that you asked about. John S. Mengucci: Yeah. Colin, and I was writing as frantically as I could, but on some of the different programs that you mentioned. You know, I will start by answering all of the above is what is going to continue to drive for free cash flow. But look, let's let's talk about, you know, Vantor and what ARKA has done in that area. Look, they have found a way to put exquisite results into a smaller payload And, you know, Why did we enter ventures like this, frankly, I mean, without bragging, we were the best solution. I went to a competitive evaluation. We had high TRL. We took the family of systems of approach, a really strong design and history of supporting you know, cutting edge capabilities in space. So for them, that was a value added proposition as well as it is for us. So there is a case where we balance investment and a lot of that investment happened before we took over ownership. Because we have got a group of folks in Danbury, Connecticut who have been doing this for you know, almost 7 decades, they understand the investments they need to make. And they are all very much free cash flow and cost conscious. If you look at OCTs, that is gonna be another area that is going to continue to grow. We put the right, investment dollars into tranche 1, We openly shared that we were going to struggle through the produceability side of that. You know, enter ARCA. That understands how to build in that environment really well. So you know, from the current CACI work into the new ARCA work, They brought some great helping hands to make sure we could get through tranche 1, and then we have got EST terminals everything else later. So, you know, in both of those examples, the ones that I can talk about on this line, If we look at space based EO/IR as well as OCTs, both of those are really good strong business cases, and, as Jeffrey mentioned, as we go forward, gonna have other areas, both in space and in EW. As well as in our digital network tech area. We will have to look at the level of investments we are looking to make but all with an absolute first eye on generating more free cash flow. Got it. Colin Canfield: And as you think about M and A strategy, maybe if you could talk about kind of the balance of cash flow growth versus price that you are seeing out of the PE-backed assets versus sponsor-backed assets? And maybe just talk about kind of which buckets of assets are you seeing as more attractive at the moment? Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan: Yes. Colin, it is hard to make a general comment about that. You will not be surprised to learn that every 1 of those sort of has its own story: the length of the hold, the prospects, the market position, You know, we continue to curate our pipeline pretty carefully. You know that we focus on gaps. We are not buying volume or, bulk. We continue to look You know, there is some price valuation I will call it correction or adjustment, kind of in the air. We are mindful of that and watching it Personally, I do not think it is done. But that is certainly part of how we think about and evaluate opportunities And again, it is very hard to generalize every story, every opportunity sort of has its own set of facts and circumstances. Fair enough. Colin Canfield: Thank you. Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan: Yeah. John S. Mengucci: Thanks, Colin. Operator: Your next question comes from Gautam Khanna with TD Cowen. Your line is open. Gautam Khanna: Yes, thanks. Good morning, guys. Good morning. Was wondering if you could maybe just calibrate us on recompetes this year. You know, have any been extended? So if you could just talk about the exposure there. And then also, given the outstanding bids and the submissions to come, if you could characterize what you expect in terms of bookings in the December quarter, which normally is soft, but it seems like you might be able to do better than what is typical seasonality. If you could just talk about cadence of bookings through the fiscal year as well. Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan: Yes. John will certainly want to add to this, but we have had a number of sole source extensions, which you know, sort of short circuit or delay. I will say they do not they do not do away with it. But delay recompete processes. We have seen that on Beagle in a number of classified areas. We have seen areas where you know, we have got year or 2 kind of extensions. Which is also. Although you did not ask it, is also part of the award duration statistic that you saw because, obviously, you put those in at 1 or 2 years, it lowers the average. But it is also a significant risk mitigator beyond the statistic. So those are areas where, obviously, we have satisfied customers that are in a position that they can justify an extension, we are obviously always happy for that to happen. So the recompetes, you saw a step down in this quarter Beagle was a big part of that and a couple of other classified things, as I said. And there are not any single large meaningful re-competes-- significant re-competes. There are a handful of smaller things for the balance of the year, but that 3% of remaining re-compete content is probably 6 or 8 smaller programs. John S. Mengucci: Yeah. And I think the other half of your question, yeah, on the. You know, let's see. Jeffrey talked about the duration of contracts put into our backlog this quarter. Hey. Look. I am always happy to take the millions of dollars I have to spend today on our recompete. And add all those millions up and go after there and start bidding even more new work. So it is a real positive measure for us. On the booking side, I think in my prepared remarks, I talked about you know, we are, we are very, very pleased, and we start to see some positive signs of the award announcement rate picked up. But it is also still sluggish. So what I-- what I-- what Jeff with the rest of the company focuses on is that is why you focus on your backlog and your funded backlog and why program performance is so important. Because when the customers have a discretionary dollar at the end of a fiscal year, and as they have done 7 of our last 8 quarters, they put the additional funding to be really certain that the contracts that we are delivering are funded. So will it still be sluggish? Yes. I think it is gonna still be sluggish over the next couple of quarters. But, you know, we are not we are not winning work in the first quarter to support our financials of the second quarter. We actually win work in the first quarter to, you know, continue to grow this business over the next 7 to 8 to 9 quarters. So at the end of the day, we are winning the business at the right rate to continue to grow this business. And we have also proven the last couple of years with sluggish rewards. That we continually come back to you all and our shareholders and talk about, you know, another full year of fantastic growth and great free cash flow. Thanks, Gautam. Gautam Khanna: Thank you. Operator: Your next question comes from Seth Seifman with JPMorgan. Your line is open. Rocco J Barbero: Hi, good morning. This is Rocco on for Seth. I am looking at the contract mix type. Fixed price work has increased to the low to mid thirties as a percentage of revenue over the last few quarters. How much of that was driven by ARCA versus the overall government push towards fixed-price work? And where should we think about that percentage going in the future? John S. Mengucci: Yeah. Look, it is it is, it is far beyond Arca. I do not remember what the actual metric was between first or second quarter. I am sure Jeffrey's gonna add to this. But I am just sort of focused on, you know, fixed price and look, we are very comfortable with it. They are improving margins where a technical risk is understood. I think I might have shared the last couple of quarters that we have had some good deep discussions inside this company. Around if we are gonna be asked to bend the laws of physics, we probably will not take that fixed price. But if it is software based, we understand what it is we are out there delivering. there is no reason why we should not. We got a great track record of strong performance over time. And you know, we are. Our customers are increasingly asking us different task orders under different fixed price arrangements. You know? Whatever money we are saving them, they come back to us with additional work. So we are very disciplined in the kind of fixed price work that we take. And it absolutely has contributed to margins far beyond the, book of business that ARKA brings. Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan: Yeah. And maybe a little more specifically, if you look at that increase from 27% to 33% about half of those. Of that 6 points is attributable to the inclusion of ARCA. So the other half of it, you ought to think about in the latter category John where we just have sort of native organic increased fixed price activity. Rocco J Barbero: Alright. That makes sense. And then last quarter, Kathy announced the hiring of several different tech hardware executives. How have they kind of integrated into the firm as a whole, and how should we think about these individuals kind of helping to drive growth in technology? John S. Mengucci: Yeah. So, David, Chris, and, Tom, I will start with Tom. Tom's a prior CACI alumni. he is running our electronic warfare business, doing an outstanding job. Bringing a lot of great new creative ideas to us and things that are gonna continually grow that business area. David has come in as our COO. Done a fantastic job. You know, really, really focused on cross company initiatives, everything from being able to drive better more predictable produceability between engineering design and production. As well as, you know, David has a lot of experience in the space realm. And he is and he is been running different-sized businesses. Latest business, about $77 billion. Which is, you know, only a few-- 3 or 4 billion dollars short of our company. So I like what he is been able to bring. And then Chris clearly, you know, Chris has all of the. All of our focus as well as all of our support to really building out these centers of excellence. You know? And this is another example of investing ahead of need. Okay? We know what our next few years will look like. We talked about giving you a new 3-year guide. I do not think that is gonna disappoint anybody out there. But for us to be able to achieve that continued growth, we need to make certain that we put a longer term look at how we are doing the production items within this company. So Chris is gonna bring a lot of expertise there. Fact that we are a growing company and we are a different kind of company and 1 that is very well respected in a very different part of the market. That makes it easier and easier for us to find world class talent that is more than happy to come here to continue what it is we built and to push us even further. So I appreciate the question. Great. Rocco J Barbero: Thank you. John S. Mengucci: Yep. Operator: Our last question comes from David Strauss with Wells Fargo. Your line is open. Joshua Korn: Hi, good morning. This is Joshua Korn on for David. Good morning. Hi. Just wanted to follow-up on the organic growth outlook. You had a strong bookings quarter, almost $5 billion in awards. I guess, how should we think about the way those bookings in the quarter convert to revenue this year and beyond? And then if there is specific programs you would want to highlight driving growth. Now in the next couple of quarters? Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan: it is really, Joshua, pretty broad-based across the portfolio. I would not call out any 1 specific program. A couple of the bigger awards that we talked about you will notice our 5 year programs. And we will, you know, we will we will see those ramp up in sort of the normal way and there will be a little bit of contribution this year. But it. it is really pretty broad based. Really, there is no part of the portfolio where, happily, we are seeing any kind of contraction. I mean, the business is hitting on all cylinders. John S. Mengucci: Yeah. Joshua, I would also add a little bit about the Apollo win. Because it really is a unique-- it is the latest example of using technology first solutions for us to win more and more work And as Jeffrey mentioned, that is going to drive a lot of top line growth over the next couple of years before that levels off. it is a 5-year program. We are really using bleeding edge AI to, analyze and create inputs in the area of information warfare, something we cannot dig into on this kind of a call, but just recognize usually important and really, really hard. We sort of have a habit of doing hard. But it is expected to be in its higher ramp in Q3. So back to the very first questions, it is 1 of those drivers for us to go drive growth. And then we have got things like JTMS and other programs out there that are going to, continue to make sure we are set up for another really successful year. Joshua Korn: Okay. Thanks. I will stick to 1. Thank you. John S. Mengucci: Thanks. Operator: That concludes our Q&A session. I will now turn the conference back over to John S. Mengucci for any closing remarks. John S. Mengucci: Well, thanks, Morgan, and thank you for your help on today's call. We would like to thank everyone who dialed in or listened to the webcast for their participation. We know that many of you will have follow-up questions, and Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan, George Price, Lisa Parkinson are available after today's call. Please stay healthy. All my best to you and your families. This concludes our call. Thank you, and have a great day. Operator: This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect, and have a wonderful rest of your day. Before you buy stock in CACI International, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and CACI International wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $350,756!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,363,905!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 922% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 213% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of October 22, 2026. This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends CACI International. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. CACI (CACI) Q1 2027 Earnings Call Transcript was originally published by The Motley Fool
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-22CACI International Inc Q1 2027 Earnings Call Summary
Moby
CACI International Inc Q1 2027 Earnings Call Summary
Our analysts just identified a stock with the potential to be the next Nvidia. Tell us how you invest and we'll show you why it's our #1 pick. Tap here. - Performance was driven by a higher mix of differentiated, software-defined technology and superior program execution, leading to a 13.3% EBITDA margin. - The company achieved a 2x book-to-bill ratio, fueled by major awards like Apollo for CENTCOM and SOF-TOPS II, reflecting deep mission knowledge and AI capabilities. - Management attributes success to a decade-long pivot toward 'investing ahead of need' and adopting commercial-style procurement methods like OTAs and CSOs. - Electronic warfare and counter-UAS demand remains robust, with the SkyValor and BEAM systems expanding into international and critical infrastructure markets. - The ARKA acquisition is performing as expected, serving as a merchant supplier for optical payloads in both national security and proliferated commercial space markets. - Operational efficiency is being scaled through new Manufacturing Centers of Excellence to accelerate the delivery of defense electronics and space systems. - Revenue growth is supported by a record 94% of fiscal year revenue already being 'in house' from existing programs, the highest level in seven years. - Fiscal 2027 revenue guidance was raised by $50 million, assuming approximately $450 million in acquired revenue despite some space program timing shifts. - Organic growth is expected to accelerate in the second half of the fiscal year as recent large awards reach their full operational stride. - Management expects to return to a leverage ratio in the low threes by the March 2027 quarter, two quarters earlier than previously anticipated. - The company will transition to a calendar fiscal year starting January 1, 2027, to better align with government cycles and enhance investor comparability. - Future margin expansion is expected to be modest but steady, driven by the reinvestment of customer cost savings into additional high-margin CACI scope. - A $50 million shift in ARKA revenue timing occurred as certain space program activities moved beyond the initial 12-month post-acquisition window. - Continuing Resolutions (CRs) are not expected to materially impact the business due to the long duration of awards and the critical nature of the missions supported. - Supply chain constraints in semiconductors and rare…Read full documentShow less
Our analysts just identified a stock with the potential to be the next Nvidia. Tell us how you invest and we'll show you why it's our #1 pick. Tap here. - Performance was driven by a higher mix of differentiated, software-defined technology and superior program execution, leading to a 13.3% EBITDA margin. - The company achieved a 2x book-to-bill ratio, fueled by major awards like Apollo for CENTCOM and SOF-TOPS II, reflecting deep mission knowledge and AI capabilities. - Management attributes success to a decade-long pivot toward 'investing ahead of need' and adopting commercial-style procurement methods like OTAs and CSOs. - Electronic warfare and counter-UAS demand remains robust, with the SkyValor and BEAM systems expanding into international and critical infrastructure markets. - The ARKA acquisition is performing as expected, serving as a merchant supplier for optical payloads in both national security and proliferated commercial space markets. - Operational efficiency is being scaled through new Manufacturing Centers of Excellence to accelerate the delivery of defense electronics and space systems. - Revenue growth is supported by a record 94% of fiscal year revenue already being 'in house' from existing programs, the highest level in seven years. - Fiscal 2027 revenue guidance was raised by $50 million, assuming approximately $450 million in acquired revenue despite some space program timing shifts. - Organic growth is expected to accelerate in the second half of the fiscal year as recent large awards reach their full operational stride. - Management expects to return to a leverage ratio in the low threes by the March 2027 quarter, two quarters earlier than previously anticipated. - The company will transition to a calendar fiscal year starting January 1, 2027, to better align with government cycles and enhance investor comparability. - Future margin expansion is expected to be modest but steady, driven by the reinvestment of customer cost savings into additional high-margin CACI scope. - A $50 million shift in ARKA revenue timing occurred as certain space program activities moved beyond the initial 12-month post-acquisition window. - Continuing Resolutions (CRs) are not expected to materially impact the business due to the long duration of awards and the critical nature of the missions supported. - Supply chain constraints in semiconductors and rare earths are being managed through early cash investments in long-lead items and design-around strategies. - The company is actively scaling production capacity with a new 61,000-square-foot facility in Rochester to meet surging demand for defense electronics. - Confidence stems from a high level of non-protested awards and funded backlog growth that aligns with a third-quarter ramp-up. - Management noted that 94% of revenue is already under contract, significantly reducing the risk of missing back-half targets. One stock. Nvidia-level potential. 30M+ investors trust Moby to find it first. Get the pick. Tap here. - Management manages for free cash flow rather than just margins, but sees room for 'modest margin improvement' even while maintaining growth. - The portfolio's high margin variability (ranging from single digits to low thirties) allows for strategic mix management across 1,900 active programs. - CACI views OTAs as a competitive advantage because their software-based solutions allow for rapid prototyping and 60% solutions that meet urgent needs. - Success in OTAs is driven by investing ahead of the contract, ensuring the company isn't 'bending the laws of physics' on a fixed-price basis. - The $50 million adjustment for ARKA is purely a timing issue related to the anniversary of the deal, not a reflection of underperformance. - Space Force funding remains stable as the majority of ARKA's work resides in the base budget rather than volatile reconciliation bills. - CACI mitigates inflation by spending cash early (e.g., $30 million) to secure long-lead components that support much larger full-year revenue goals. - The business model allows for frequent repricing of increments, providing a natural hedge against long-term inflationary pressure compared to fixed-platform peers.
TranscriptFY2027 Q12026-10-22FY2027 Q1 earnings call transcript
Earnings source - 145 paragraphs
FY2027 Q1 earnings call transcript
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the CACI International First Quarter Fiscal Year 2027 earnings conference call. Today's call is being recorded. At this time, all lines are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will announce the opportunity for questions, and instructions will be given at that time. If you should need any assistance during the call, please press star zero and someone will help you. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to George Price, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations for CACI International. Please go ahead, sir.
Thanks, Morgan, and good morning, everyone. I'm George Price, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations for CACI International. Thank you for joining us this morning. We are providing presentation slides, so let's move to slide 2. There will be statements in this call that do not address historical fact, and as such, constitute forward-looking statements under current law. These statements reflect our views as of today and are subject to important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from anticipated.
Those factors are listed at the bottom of last night's press release and are described in the company's SEC filings. Our Safe Harbor statement is included on this exhibit and should be incorporated as part of any transcript of this call. I would also like to point out that our presentation will include discussion of non-GAAP financial measures. These should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Let's turn to slide 3, please. To open our discussion this morning, here's John Mengucci, President and Chief Executive Officer of CACI International. John.
Thanks, George, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us to discuss our first-quarter fiscal year 2027 results. With me this morning is Jeff MacLauchlan, our Chief Financial Officer. Slide 4, please. Before turning to our results, I want to remind you that CACI is a technology-first national security company executing a clear and consistent strategy. The key elements of that strategy are, first, focus on enduring national security priorities with narrow, deep funding streams. Second, utilize our deep mission knowledge in the markets we serve to truly understand what our customers need. Third, invest ahead of customer need, informed by that deep mission knowledge. Fourth, deliver software-defined technology to address critical needs with the speed, agility, and efficiency our customers demand. Finally, deploy capital in a flexible and opportunistic manner to create value for our customers and our shareholders.
This strategy is the driving force behind our strong and consistent results. Slide 5, please. We had an excellent start to fiscal year 2027. First-quarter revenue grew 8%, EBITDA margin reached 13.3%, adjusted diluted EPS increased 12%, and we generated $133 million in free cash flow. We also won $4.8 billion in awards, producing a 2 times book to bill for the quarter. We have a large and growing backlog, and our funded backlog grew double digit year-over-year for the seventh time in the last eight quarters. Our margin performance stands out. It reflects superior execution and a higher mix of differentiated technology we delivered this quarter. We are raising our revenue and earnings guidance for the year, and Jeff MacLauchlan will share our additional details shortly. Our results, awards, backlog, and pipeline give us a strong foundation for the fiscal year and support our increased guidance. Slide 6, please.
Let me discuss some more details, some highlights from the quarter, and the demand that we are seeing that are driving our results and position us for continued success. I will start with two fantastic awards for technology-enabled operational support that exemplify our enduring commitment to national security. First, our Apollo award, where CACI will enable CENTCOM to carry out critical intelligence and information warfare missions. Our success in winning this new work for CACI stems from our deep mission knowledge, our exceptional business development, and our superior ability to utilize and combat AI in the information domain. The second award is SOFETOPS 2, a five-year follow-on contract supporting the Army's Special Operations Command. It reflects the trust we have built through years of work with this customer and extends our role helping special operators plan for and respond to evolving threats using our technology-first approach.
Our electronic warfare portfolio continues to see strong demand. That is certainly true in the counter-UAS market, a significant and growing opportunity for CACI. Beyond protecting our war fighters, the growing threat to military facilities and critical infrastructure is driving demand for precision non-kinetic counter-UAS capabilities like SkyValor. SkyValor leverages nearly two decades of proven counter-UAS deployments, industry-leading cellular detect and defeat capabilities, and enables detection up to 75 kilometers so operators have more time to make critical decisions. Our prospective counter-UAS customer base is expanding across the U.S. government and internationally. A great example is our $500 million domestic shield award from JIATF-401, which also included an initial funded task order. We are also seeing increased demand for our BEAM manpackable counter-UAS systems from U.S. customers and allies across Europe and the Pacific Theater.
BEAM is the most technically capable system of its kind on the market with over a decade of proven performance and important discriminator for prospective customers. In the critical space domain, we are capitalizing on increasing demand as a leading merchant supplier of optical imaging and optical communications payloads. CACI was recently selected by Vantor, a commercial provider of satellite-based intelligence, to supply advanced optical imaging payloads for their Pulse satellite fleet. That work is an example of taking ARKA's exquisite sensor capabilities developed for national security missions and applying them to a more proliferated commercial market, which is exactly what the U.S. National Security Strategy calls for. ARKA has a number of other sensitive opportunities in the national security space domain that are moving forward and are expected to contribute financially in fiscal year 2027. We are also making progress in optical communications.
We expect to complete SDA Tranche 1 deliveries later this calendar year and begin work on Tranche 2. CACI was also one of three companies selected to advance to phase III of the Space Force's Enterprise Space Terminal program, where we are developing the next generation optical communication terminal to support critical multi-orbit initiatives like the Space Data Network. Consistent with our merchant supplier strategy, multiple primes bidding on the SDN have selected our EST technology for their solution. We also continue to win and execute other classified optical communications programs, and our successful contribution to the Artemis II mission has helped demonstrate the capability of our technology for future human spaceflight. Finally, demand remains healthy for modernization of mission networks and digital applications. Many critical customer priorities, including AI adoption, border security, and financial accountability, are dependent on modern, secure, integrated networks and applications for success.
CACI is a leader in modernization because we do it differently, differentiating through speed of delivery, use of outcome-based models, and demonstrated success deploying AI-based software. Programs such as BEAGLE, ITAS, and NASA NCAPS are real-world examples of where we are applying AI and agile delivery methods to drive customer modernization faster and more efficiently. Leveraging AI translates into reduced costs for customers and better margins for us, and we consistently see customers reinvest cost savings and additional scope to CACI. Across all areas of our business, our technology-first approach is directly contributing to our financial performance by driving on-contract growth and new business wins from customers who are committed to transforming at the speed of mission. Slide seven, please. In order to meet strong demand we're seeing for our software-defined technology, we are actively investing to scale our production capacity.
Our first step was to open our manufacturing center of excellence for defense electronics in Rochester, New York. The additional 61,000 square foot facility significantly increases our manufacturing space and expands our capacity to develop, test, assemble, and deliver defense electronics such as TLS Manpack, BEAM, and others. We plan to open additional manufacturing centers of excellence for space and for integrated systems, and we'll share more about these initiatives in the coming months. These investments will enable us to deliver advanced technology faster, at greater scale, and more efficiently, supporting continued revenue growth and additional margin expansion. Slide eight, please. Turning to the macro environment, budgets and funding remain healthy in our key areas of focus. With 90% of our revenue coming from national security customers, the priorities we focus on are well-funded and continue to exhibit strong demand signals because they are needs that must be addressed.
A continuing resolution, or CR, is currently in place until December 11th. Regardless of how this dynamic plays out, it's an environment we've navigated successfully for many years. As we've demonstrated year in and year out, CRs do not have a material impact on our business, given our large backlog, longer duration awards, and the critical capabilities that our customers depend on us to deliver. From an awards perspective, our strong book to bill shows some improvement in award activity, though the pace of decision-making is not fully normalized and is still sluggish in some areas. As our customers continue to evolve their relationships with industry through non-traditional procurement methods, our key differentiators of investing ahead of customer need, software-defined capabilities, and outcome-based pricing are all resonating extremely well because they drive increased speed, efficiency, and lethality. Slide nine, please.
Before turning the call over to Jeff, I wanted to discuss a few other updates. First, we announced we will move to a calendar fiscal year beginning January 1, 2027. We believe this reporting cycle will enhance comparability for investors and better align our business with the government's fiscal year. We plan to provide guidance for our new fiscal year when we report December quarter results in February. Second, we plan to host an investor day in early 2027 at our Melbourne, Florida facilities.
At this event, we intend to provide additional information about the new fiscal year, other contemplated reporting changes, discuss our strategy and capabilities, provide an opportunity to meet with the CACI management team, including additional executive leadership we recently announced, and provide new three-year financial targets. We look forward to sharing more information with you in the near future. With that, I'll turn the call over to Jeff.
Thank you, John. Good morning, everyone. Please turn to slide 10. We're pleased with our first quarter performance, in which we delivered revenue growth in line with our expectations. Revenue was $2.5 billion for the first quarter, up 8.2% year-over-year, with organic growth of 2.1%, in line with our previously communicated low single-digit organic growth. EBITDA margin in the quarter was an impressive 13.3%, 160 basis points higher than the prior year's first quarter, driven by strong program execution and a more favorable mix of higher-margin work. First quarter adjusted diluted earnings per share of $7.66 were 11.8% higher than a year ago, driven by this excellent operational performance. Finally, free cash flow of $133 million for the quarter reflects higher cash outflows typical of the first quarter of the year. Slide 11, please.
Turning our attention to the balance sheet and capital structure, we continue to make progress reducing our leverage following the ARKA acquisition. Pro forma leverage at the end of the first quarter was 3.5 times, and we now expect to return to leverage in the low threes in the March quarter of 2027, two quarters earlier than we had initially anticipated. As we have discussed, this is consistent with our track record of successfully de-leveraging after major acquisitions. Driven by our profitability and strong free cash flow generation, our moderating leverage is quickly putting us back in a posture of having increased optionality for additional flexible and opportunistic capital deployment. Slide 12, please. Turning to our outlook for FY 2027, we're raising guidance for revenue, adjusted net income, and adjusted EPS, and reaffirming guidance for other metrics.
I note that while we made a particularly strong initial guide to begin the year, a strong awards quarter and operational developments have retired additional risk relative to our expected range of outcomes. We are raising fiscal 2027 revenue guidance $50 million to between $10.7 billion and $10.9 billion. Our fiscal 2027 revenue now assumes approximately $450 million of acquired revenue. While ARKA continues to perform in line with our expectations for the full fiscal year, some space program activities are now expected to contribute to revenue beyond the first 12 months after closing the acquisition. We are reaffirming fiscal 2027 guidance for EBITDA margin in the high 12% range. This and higher revenue has a consequent impact to increase adjusted net income by $5 million to between $740 million and $760 million, which translates into increased adjusted diluted earnings per share guidance between $33.18 and $34.08.
We are reaffirming guidance for free cash flow of at least $900 million. Finally, to assist with your modeling, I would remind you of our prior comments that we expect stronger organic growth and EBITDA margin in the second half of the fiscal year versus the first half. Though I note the second half margin ramp is now more gradual given our strong Q1 performance. I would also note our view that second quarter consensus estimates for organic growth and EBITDA margin are reasonable. Slide 13, please. Turning to our forward indicators, we now expect 94% of our revenue to come from existing programs, with 3% coming from recompetes and 3% from new business. This significant increase in existing business content, which was 83% just last quarter, reflects our successful business development and operational performance and provides increased confidence in our updated guidance, as I mentioned earlier.
In fact, this is the highest level of existing business at this point in the year in the last seven years. First quarter awards were $4.8 billion, representing a healthy mix of new work and strong recompete performance. The weighted average duration of these awards was just under 4.5 years, which reflects the higher mix of sole source extensions we have seen recently, as well as normal variance in award duration. Our long award duration continues to provide good visibility into the strength and cash generation capacity of our business. Total backlog was $34 billion, and funded backlog increased by 15% year-over-year. This represents the seventh time in the last eight quarters we have delivered double-digit year-over-year growth in funded backlog, underscoring the critical national security priorities we address and the support of our customers.
We continue to see a healthy pipeline of new opportunities with $4.7 billion of bids under evaluation, about 85% of these being for new business. Bids under evaluation also reflect significant level of awards in the quarter. We expect to submit another $14.7 billion in bids over the next two quarters, with more than 60% coming from new business. In summary, our first quarter was a great start to the year. Our consistent performance, substantial backlog, and strong market position give us confidence in our increased guidance and our ability to drive growth in free cash flow per share and additional shareholder value. With that, I will turn the call back over to John.
Thank you, Jeff. Let's go to slide 14, please. In conclusion, we delivered strong first-quarter results and raised our revenue and earnings guidance for the year. Our large and growing backlog, strong customer demand signals, and ability to deliver give us confidence in our outlook. Regardless of CRs, elections, government shutdowns, or other dynamics, we have delivered consistent results. It's worth repeating. CACI has a clear, consistent strategy, and our financial results once again demonstrate that our strategy is working. You've heard us say consistently that we view free cash flow per share as the ultimate value creation metric. CACI has a long and consistent track record of generating strong cash flow. This level of cash generation enables us to continue investing ahead of customer need and deploying capital in a flexible and opportunistic manner, both of which then enable us to generate additional cash flow over time.
You've seen us do exactly that as we deploy new technology capabilities and make strategic acquisitions like Azure Summit and ARKA. These actions allow us to turn the strong demand we see into results for our customers and lasting value for our shareholders. As is always the case, our success is driven by our 27,000 employees who are ever vigilant in expanding the limits of national security. To everyone on the CACI team, I am proud of what you do every day for our company and for our nation. To our shareholders, I thank you for your continued support of CACI. With that, Morgan, let's open the call for questions.
Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, press star, then the number 1 on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and join the queue. If you would like to withdraw your question, simply press star 1 again. Your first question comes from Sheila Kahyaoglu with Jefferies. Your line is open.
Thanks so much. Good morning, John, Jeff, and George.
Morning.
John, maybe just on your closing remarks. You've consistently been in the right place at the right time in terms of future funding needs. I guess, what's the secret, and how do you think about where the growth goes from here? I know you'll have a March analyst day or a first half analyst day where you'll talk about that, but how have you been able to outperform your peers here?
Sheila, thanks, and really appreciate the question. Look, I think simply, first off, it's because we're a very different company than others in our current sector. We've been doing our best to outperform others in the larger spaces well. It's really down to something that we've shared over probably the last decade, is just having a clear strategy, intentional leadership, and disciplined execution over many, many years. We've invested ahead of need, and have decades of deep mission knowledge. We're in areas of enduring need. We like to talk about narrow funding streams, but the way we look at it internally, these are all things that are not the first, the 10th, or the 100th thing that customers are going to want to turn off. We take a lot of purposeful discriminating actions.
I can tell you internally that we measure the time between vision or strategy and action in weeks. We've been very honest upfront, very transparent, and very thoughtful around capital deployment that truly builds shareholder value. So a lot of transparency, a lot of results, that lead to a lot of credibility, frankly. The other thing that I would mention is something that we don't talk a lot about, but it's very important, is that we truly did recreate this company 10, 12 years back to be a FAR Part 15 and a FAR Part 12 truly commercial company. We didn't get lucky. We actually did study where the market was going to go and how the customers were going to be changing how they buy. I think it's true as today that $500 million of our bookings last year were done through OTAs and CSOs.
That's something that we called very right many years back. You don't just turn that thing on overnight. Strategy is a place where we come from, have an outstanding leadership team that actually drives the strategy forward, and a whole slew of PMs and finance leads and the like that are making sure that we frankly deliver excellence because customers buy from people that they trust, and customers buy from people who always deliver, and I think our results show that.
No, that's great. Thank you. Maybe just to follow up on that. As we look at the organic growth for Q1 up 2%, Q2 up 7% implies second half grows low double digits in the base of pretty tough comps. Can you give us some color on what's driving your organic growth visibility and your confidence guide there?
Yeah. It really points ourselves towards how do we get through a back half risk model, and we've been getting that question a lot, and I think we navigate our way not only through the questions, but through the performance last year. Look, risk is something that we work through all the time. It's just the nature of our business. When our revenue starts from a new win, it's really based on timing of the award, the program start date, funding, type of contract, et cetera. This year, it's true, we have a number of late last year and early this year awards. They hit their first notch in their growth stride after the second quarter. I'm very much aware that that's at the same exact time that the current CR ends.
So what gives us confidence? We've taken a long look at the growth of our backlog. I think you should all look at the level of funded backlog growth. The fact that we've got a lot of non-protested recent large award. We have a customer base that frankly really needs to move forward quickly, and that just happens to align with our current Q3. I guess another quarter will be our newest Q, Q1.
Right.
We won those jobs, and that's sort of how their revenue profiles stack on top of each other. We've always talked about long-duration awards, right? So what also gives us a lot of confidence, whether the first or second ramp or the third and fourth quarter ramp, is that we've stacked a number of awards with longer durations over a long period of time. So we see the awards are funded, our funded backlog is there. Our technology deliveries will also be there, and I think everything is greatly aligned. On top of that, reduces the risk of a high second quarter profile, CRs, shutdowns, budget woes, midterms, anything else you can throw in there. Jeff, anything you want to add?
Yeah, I think there are two things, Sheila, that are a little bit different about our portfolio from some others. One is that we have a great number of small programs, smaller programs. So we are managing kind of 1,900 or so active pieces of the portfolio and managing that for the year. The other thing that is different, I think, about our portfolio is that we have a great deal of margin volatility. Not volatility, variability.
Because of that, we have programs with single-digit EBIT margins, and we have programs with EBIT margins in the low 30s. So managing that mix, and we do manage for the year, which I am sure you are tired of hearing us say, but managing across that mix is a constant challenge, as you would imagine. It is a very different management experience, in my experience, from working in an enterprise that has 15 or 20 large programs.
The last thing I am going to add is the metrics that we shared. The fact that we are at the end of the first quarter, we are looking at 94% of our revenue already announced and only 3% re-compete left. That is an outstanding position for us to be in, even better than where we were last year, and you all know how last year turned out. Record revenue, record earnings, record free cash flow. Thanks, Sheila.
Awesome. Thank you.
Your next question comes from Gavin Parsons with UBS Financial. Your line is open.
Thank you. Morning.
Morning, Gavin.
I mean, clearly seeing the investments you've made in technology already reflected in the margins, but I want to ask how you think about payback period, and obviously without asking about any specific programs, but maybe if you could use SkyValor as a frame of reference.
Yeah, sure. Look, we've invested in a lot of software-based tech over the last decade. I truly believe that our shareholders have been greatly rewarded, and they will continue to be rewarded for the results. We can talk about counter-UAS, we can talk about ARKA, we can talk about space, talk about OCTs. There's a lot of examples here. But at the end of the day, strategy is a place where we come from. These are not high-risk, invest ahead of customer need operations. I mean, we run this company as a full-throated company, and it's why we always talk about we're not going to invest for the next quarter. We're going to invest for the next decade.
As hard as some of this stuff is that we do, we've never come back to our investors and said, "Because we had to invest more, these financials are not going to look the way they look." Okay? We are a consistent free cash flow compounder and a consistent company that's out there buying the right capabilities to go ahead and continue to drive this company forward. So whether it's counter-UAS, where we've been investing for well over a couple of decades. We've invested, and we sort of moved from a fixed site solution to a mobile solution. Things like BEAM are not in high demand because we got lucky. They're in high demand because we're good, and it's good. So whether it's SkyValor giving commanders larger range, we understand how to do all of that because we have 1,400 people formerly deployed and a lot of people embedded.
That kind of operational support gives us just absolute better data than everybody else gets, back to Sheila's earlier question, and allows us to invest in the right manner, in the right levels, in a manner that we're not coming to our shareholders after the quarter's done saying, "I wish we hadn't invested in all that because now we can't make revenue, or we can't make earnings." We're doing it all.
Got it. Thanks for that. Then maybe just a quick clarifier on ARKA to make sure I heard. No change to the expected ARKA revenue for the full fiscal year. It's just timing?
Yeah. Let me talk a little bit about ARKA because I think it's been probably, at least here, 2024 is probably one of the greatest acquisitions that we've done because it sets us up for so many things. It's great business. It's performing as expected. They're a leading provider of sensing and sense-making capabilities. I like to say they've been doing large aperture solutions since Moby-Dick was a minnow. They're one of one and a half companies that do what they do, so it's a very strong barrier to entry. Now, as you heard from the Vantor award, we're now moving to smaller form factors without sacrificing purity, and we're also building those in higher quantities. So specific to your question, yes, the $50 million moves a quarter to the right. But we didn't take the full year or their guidance down.
We actually raised full year and shifted theirs. So at the end of the day, this $50 million, different than the $50 million raise guide. This is really about moving it from next 12 months based on a March closure date to the current first fiscal year. So all of this attention is really moving revenue to after March 9th, but before June 30th. So it's not about missed numbers, it's just timing, like the majority of the rest of our business. Jeff, anything else you want to add?
Yeah, no, I think you covered it, but I would say maybe slightly different way that might land with some people differently. The two $50 million numbers you're hearing are unrelated, completely independent. There's a $50 million growth in the total revenue, and there is $50 million of movement in the ARKA revenue from inorganic to organic based on being after the anniversary date. So they're different 50s.
Very clear. Thank you.
Next time we raise guide by 51.
Yeah.
Your next question comes from John Godyn with Citi. Your line is open.
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question.
Sure.
I wanted to just hopefully unpack margins a little bit. If I rewind to maybe a year or so ago, there was sort of a conversation about the growth versus margin trade-off and how margins might be topping out. The margin performance and execution has been great. We also have ARKA in there, so it is kind of hard to unpack that perfectly. But maybe you could just talk about growth versus margins in the core business versus ARKA, and are we at a point where we are finding a new sort of lever to get margins higher?
Look, we have said a couple things pretty consistently, and I am going to come back and answer your question more directly. We have said a couple things pretty consistently. One is that we manage the business for free cash flow, and so we are continually making decisions balancing investment and growth. The other thing that may be clouding this up a little bit is a condition I mentioned earlier, which is the margin variability, and what we see as we manage our way through this, particularly in the internal quarters of the year, as we manage across the 1,900 programs that I mentioned earlier.
So those conditions are both what they are, and no one should be surprised. We have talked about these in multiple forums for a long time. To get to your more specific question, I think, we do continue to see opportunities for continued modest margin improvement. That is taking into account the two conditions I just mentioned. It is an extremely opportunity-rich environment, and we see plenty of opportunities to invest and plenty of opportunities for growth, which really put us in the posture, I think, in some ways, of being able to kind of have our cake and eat it, too. So, I think we do see continued modest margin improvement even while we are maintaining the growth vector.
Okay. That is good to know. If I could just ask kind of a related follow-up on margins this year. In the prepared remarks, you mentioned that margins in the back half would step up, but perhaps less so now that you had good early year margin performance. I just wanted to revisit that. It sounds like the margin improvement engine is firing on all cylinders. As you said, you have kind of a target-rich backdrop. Is there some conservatism in that view? Could we maybe see even a higher step up in the back half?
Well, that is a loaded question. Look, we continue to do what I have been describing that we do. If it shakes out that way, it is impossible for me, at this point, to necessarily predict an investment decision that we might make or not make next April. But we have tried to be pretty open with you, sharing the levers and the knobs that we are managing and how we solve for them. I think I probably should leave it at that.
Okay. Fair enough, guys. Thanks a lot.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Your next question comes from Scott Mikus with Melius Research. Your line is open.
Hi. Good morning. This is Matt Marottolo on for Scott.
Yeah, morning.
We've heard from aerospace companies that memory semiconductors, rare earths are seeing very high levels of inflation and elongated lead times. How are you managing around those constraints? Are there any other pinch points you would call out in the supply chain?
Yeah. Look, thanks. We are seeing some of that as well, and we're managing it accordingly. That's a key focus, why we brought Chris Monoski in, who's our new EVP of Manufacturing. As we really scale to combat things like that, I can tell you that those types of items are reflected in our guidance. It's really one of the factors that create the low end of our range and then our high end of our range. The administration is aware of this as well, and they're making the right kinds of investments, which we fully support. The other thing that we're pretty good at is making certain that we're eyeballing those types of shortages before they present themselves and really work designs around some of those items.
The last thing from a shareholder margin cash flow point of view is really getting our hands around what are those long lead, high-risk items that we have to invest in. Meaning, do we spend some of our cash flow earlier than we would like, but it actually supports much longer term growth. Do we spend $30 million of cash in the second quarter to end up picking up $60 million more over the entire year? The answer is going to be yes. That's why we talk about being a full year company versus a quarterly company. Jeff, anything you want to add?
Yeah, I'd only add, you didn't explicitly ask this, but I think it was sort of in the tone of your question. We also have a business model, where we have more pricing opportunity frequency. The nature of much of what we sell, it gets repriced each time there's an order. Unlike a large six or eight-year platform program where the pricing is committed far in advance, we rarely are more than a year or 18 months or so from being able to price the next increment. That's also, I think, a risk mitigator that may not be fully appreciated compared to some of the others in your question.
Great. Thanks for taking the question, guys. I'll stick with one.
You bet. Thank you.
Your next question comes from Peter Arment with Baird. Your line is open.
Hey, thanks. Good morning, John and Jeff. Nice results.
Morning, Peter. Thanks.
Thanks, Peter.
Hey, John. You mentioned OTA kind of contract structures early on in your kind of opening comments. You guys have some, I guess, through TLS Manpack, and maybe ARKA has a little, but could you kind of describe the exposure or, I guess, risks around OTAs? We have seen some other competitors where OTAs are easy to cancel or easier to cancel. Just how you are thinking about the exposure with CACI and the use of those contract structures when you think about your business.
Yeah, thank you. Look, you kind of know what you are getting into when you are getting into them. This really ties back to our invest ahead of customer need thesis that we have been on for just short of a decade. The reason why our OTAs and our CSOs are successful is because it starts months and years ahead of when that OTA is actually signed. It is really about understanding the areas that we, as a company, believe we have unique skill sets in, that we have proven we have the unique skill sets in, and the fact that our 1,400 people who are co-located in combatant commands tell us that those are dire technology needs that our customer requires. We are not putting hundreds of millions of dollars down.
We are actually putting hundreds of person years of knowledge into an OTA where we are working with folks on the bleeding edge of the mission on the customer side. In places where the customers have nothing today, a 50% or 60% solution looks awesome. We are also not making the mistake of trying to develop the 100% pure solution under an OTA, because that means that there is far more risk on us, and the risk equation between us and customer gets unbalanced. What makes ours successful, far more times than not, is a willing customer, a common understanding of what the mission needs, software-based tech so that we can make really quick changes during that OTA cycle, and our window between the design development, which is the phase one of the OTA and reproduction, is most likely industry-leading. That is what drove TLS Manpack.
That is what has driven a lot of the other half a billion dollars of different OTAs that we are involved in today. Understanding the threat, understanding what the investment needs to be, getting involved in low risk areas, and then when we get to the production side, building these centers of excellence so we do not let that customer down, even though we may be building a 60% solution, and then also being able to modify that solution because it is software based.
Got it. I appreciate that color.
You could add the commercial tools that we apply to those problems as well. The mission familiarity is important, but our partnership with GitLab and some other commercial entities lets us react in a way that is a discriminator.
Got it. I appreciate that color. Just a quick follow-up on ARKA. The Space Force budget, the majority of it is in the base budget. It's only $ 12 billion tied up in the original $250 billion reconciliation bill. Is that giving you the confidence around that the majority of the Space Force budget is in base, and that the booking visibility for ARKA continues to be robust? Just some additional color, just given all the budget dynamics.
Yeah, Peter, absolutely right. I'd also tell you that ARKA also brings about $2 billion worth of work that's over the next three to five years, whose future is in space-based payloads that are in the base budget, but they haven't been put into our backlog yet, as Jeff explained. So yeah, it's comforting that it's there. It is comforting that we did the acquisition when we did. It was very intentional and make certain we can get our hands on things that are in the base budget. I'd also say the reconciliation side, as you look at Golden Dome, what ARKA delivers is extremely crucial to that mission, and we all know that the reconciliation funding is not just single-year funding. Some areas it's four to five years, other areas two to three years. All of that helps support the ARKA business case.
Appreciate it. Thanks, guys.
I would also add in terms of timing, I think we were also pretty opportunistic in terms of the time that we were able to enter the debt market. Times have looked pretty good a year later.
Yeah. Thanks again, guys. Appreciate the color.
Yeah. Thanks, Peter.
Your next question comes from Tobey Sommer with Truist. Your line is open.
Tobey, you there?
Yes, I am. I wanted to ask you a medium to long-term project, question about your product portfolio. In three or five years of what you have currently, what do you think is going to be generating the most revenue and profit for the firm?
Yeah. If I had opened my crystal ball up on an open investor line, I would probably say it's a good mix between what we do in the EW area, and then supported by what we're doing in space. We're just so early. We're in the infancy stage of both of these markets. If you think about EW, we've got things across the entire spectrum that will help the customer drive their mission forward. The fact that they're all software-based means that we can continually make changes.
So if you look at the potential margins going out, not as a future guide, but the fact things are software-based, we're going to the production bench much less times than others are because we're able to provide additional features like the phone you all carry in your jackets. So it has the right mix of commerciality to it, both the solutions and how we drive investments. Frankly, that's what's going to continue to drive larger and larger free cash flow as we go forward.
Appreciate that, John. Thank you.
Yeah. Thanks, Tobey.
Your next question comes from Colin Canfield with Cantor. Your line is open.
Hey, thanks for the question. Maybe if we could talk about cash flow progression. If you could talk about how you think about essentially the combined base space capability portfolio, so ARKA, OCT, and then space-based EW. How do you think about the investment requirements relative to the scale of opportunities? Then maybe if you could parse that out on how you view the fastest-growing swim lanes between commercial EO providers and what you've won with Vantor, space-based situational constellations like what we're seeing with True Anomaly, and then participation in SpaceX's Starshield program. So those three particular programs, and if there's a fourth lane of really fast-growing prime classified work as well, just how you think about the investment requirement versus those program growth or that program growth.
Yeah. So, John will probably want to add to this, and he'll have some insight on some of the specific programs and places that you mentioned. But basically, Colin, I'm going to come back to cash flow. We apply the same tools in the context of your question that we do others. If we see an opportunity to invest in a way that grows free cash flow dollars, that's the decision that we make.
I would also point out, because we've had a little bit of noise in our free cash flow forecast over the last couple of years, I'd also call attention to a slide that we provide from time to time that sort of lays out some of the unusual items that are in free cash flow so that you can do your analysis and tease out what is recurring free cash flow, I'll call it, versus what are some unusual cash items. That chart is in the appendix here. But you'll see in there a nice progression in free cash flow as we make those investment decisions and trade-offs that you asked about.
Yeah, Colin, and I was writing as frantically as I could, but on some of the different programs that you mentioned. I'll start by answering all of the above is what's going to continue to drive free cash flow. But look, let's talk about Vantor and what ARKA has done in that area. Look, they have found a way to put exquisite results into a smaller payload. Why did Vantor like us? Frankly, without bragging, we were the best solution. It went to a competitive evaluation. We had high TRL. We took the family of systems approach, a really strong design and history of supporting cutting-edge capabilities in space. So for them, that was a value-added proposition as well as it is for us.
There's a case where we balance investment, and a lot of that investment happened before we took over ownership, because we've got a group of folks in Danbury, Connecticut, who've been doing this for almost seven decades. They understand the investments they need to make. They're all very much free cash flowing and cost-conscious. If you look at OCTs, that's going to be another area that's going to continue to grow. We put the right investment dollars into Tranche 1. We openly shared we were going to struggle through the producibility side of that. Enter ARKA, that understands how to build in that environment really well. From the current CACI work into the new ARKA work, they brought some great helping hands to make sure we could get through Tranche 1, and then we've got EST terminals and everything else later.
In both of those examples, the ones that I can talk to and talk to on this line, if we look at space-based EOIR as well as OCTs, both of those are really good, strong business cases. As Jeff mentioned, as we go forward, we're going to have other areas, both in space and in EW, as well as in our digital network tech area. We'll have to look at the level of investments we're looking to make, but all with an absolute first eye on generating more free cash flow.
Got it. As you think about M&A strategy, maybe if you could talk about the balance of cash flow growth versus price that you're seeing out of VC-backed assets versus sponsor-backed assets, and maybe just talk about which buckets of assets are you seeing as more attractive at the moment?
Yeah, Colin, it's hard to make a general comment about that. You won't be surprised to learn that every one of those sort of has its own story. The length of the hold, the prospects, the market position. We continue to curate our pipeline pretty carefully. You know that we focus on gaps. We're not buying volume or bulk. We continue to look. There is some price valuation, I'll call it correction or adjustment kind of in the air. We're mindful of that and watching it. Personally, I don't think it's done. That's certainly part of how we think about and evaluate opportunities. Again, it's very hard to generalize every story. Every opportunity sort of has its own set of facts and circumstances.
Fair enough. Thank you.
Yeah. Thanks, Colin.
Your next question comes from Gautam Khanna with TD Cowen. Your line is open.
Yeah, thanks. Good morning, guys.
Good morning.
Good morning.
I was wondering if you could maybe just calibrate us on recompetes this year. Have any been extended? If you could just talk about the exposure there. And also, given the outstanding bids and the submissions to come, if you could characterize what you expect in terms of bookings in the December quarter, which normally is soft, but it seems like you might be able to do better than what is typical seasonality. If you could just talk about cadence of bookings through the fiscal year as well. Thanks.
Yeah. John Mengucci will certainly want to add to this, but we have had a number of sole source extensions which sort of short-circuit or delay, I will say. They do not do away with it, but delay recompete processes. We have seen that on BEAGLE in a number of classified areas. We have seen areas where we have got a year or two kind of extensions. Which is also, although you did not ask it, is also part of the award duration statistic that you saw.
Because obviously, you put those in at one or two years, it lowers the average, but is also a significant risk mitigator beyond the statistic. So those are areas where obviously we have satisfied customers that are in a position that they can justify an extension. We are obviously always happy for that to happen. So the recompetes, you saw a step down in this quarter. BEAGLE was a big part of that and a couple of other classified things, as I said. There aren't any single large, meaningful, significant recompetes. There are a handful of smaller things for the balance of the year. That 3% of remaining recompete content is probably six or eight smaller programs.
Yeah. I think the other half of your question. Let's see, Jeff talked about the duration of contracts put into our backlog this quarter. Hey, look, I'm always happy to take the millions of dollars I have to spend today on a recompete and add all those millions up and go after there and start bidding even more new work. So it's a real positive measure for us. On the booking side, I think in my prepared remarks, I talked about we're very, very pleased, and we start to see some positive signs of the award announcement rate picked up, but it's also still sluggish.
What I, what Jeff, what the rest of the company focuses on is that's why you focus on your backlog and your funded backlog, and why program performance is so important, because when the customers have a discretionary dollar at the end of a fiscal year, and as they have done seven of our last eight quarters, they put the additional funding to be really certain contracts that we're delivering are funded. Will it still be sluggish? Yes, I think it's going to still be sluggish over the next couple of quarters. But we're not winning work in the first quarter to support our financials of the second quarter. We actually win work in the first quarter to continue to grow this business over the next seven to eight to nine quarters.
At the end of the day, we're winning the business at the right rate to continue to grow this business. We've also proven the last couple of years with sluggish awards that we continually come back to you all and our shareholders and talk about another full year of fantastic growth and great free cash flow.
Thanks, Gautam.
Thank you.
Yeah.
Your next question comes from Seth Seifman with JPMorgan. Your line is open.
Hi, good morning. This is Rocco on for Seth.
Hey, Rocco.
Looking at the contract mix type, fixed price work has increased to the low to mid-30s as a percentage of revenue over the last few quarters. How much of that was driven by ARKA versus the overall government push towards fixed price work, and where should we think about that percentage going in the future?
Yeah, look, it's far beyond ARKA. I don't remember what the actual metric was between first or second quarter. I'm sure Jeff's going to add to this. I'm just sort of focused on fixed price and look, we're very comfortable with it. They are improving margins where a technical risk is understood. I think I might have shared last couple of quarters that we've had some good, deep discussions inside this company around if we're going to be asked to bend the laws of physics, we probably won't take that fixed price. But if it's software-based, we understand what it is we're out there delivering, there's no reason why we shouldn't. We got a great track record of strong performance over time. Our customers are increasingly asking us that for the task orders under different fixed price arrangements.
Whatever money we're saving them, they come back to us with additional work. We're very disciplined in the kind of fixed price work that we take, and it absolutely has contributed to margins far beyond the book of business that ARKA brings.
Yeah. Maybe a little more specifically, if you look at that increase from 27% to 33%, about half of that 6 points is attributable to the inclusion of ARKA. The other half of it, you ought to think about in the latter category John mentioned, where we just have sort of native organic increased fixed price activity.
Right, that makes sense. Last quarter, CACI announced the hiring of several distinct tech hardware executives. How have they integrated into the firm as a whole, and how should we think about these individuals helping to drive growth in technology?
Yeah. Dave, Chris, and Tom. I'll start with Tom. Tom's a prior CACI alumni. He's running our electronic warfare business, doing an outstanding job, bringing a lot of great new creative ideas to us and things that are going to continually grow that business area. Dave has come in as our COO, done a fantastic job. Really focused on cross-company initiatives, everything from being able to drive better, more predictable producibility between engineering, design, and production. As well as Dave's got a lot of experience in the space realm. He's been running different size businesses. Latest business, about $7.7 billion, which is only 3 to 4 billion dollars short of our company. I like what he's been able to bring in.
Chris, clearly, Chris has got all of our focus as well as all of our support to really building out these centers of excellence. This is another example of investing ahead of need. Okay? We know what our next few years look like. We talked about giving you a new three-year guide. I don't think that's going to disappoint anybody out there. For us to be able to achieve that continued growth, we need to make certain that we put a longer-term look at how we're doing the production items within this company. Chris is going to bring a lot of expertise there.
The fact that we are a growing company and we are a different kind of company and one that is very well respected in a very different part of the market, that makes it easier and easier for us to find world-class talent that is more than happy to come here to continue what it is we built and to push us even further. So, appreciate the question.
Great. Thank you.
Yep.
Our last question comes from David Strauss with Wells Fargo. Your line is open.
Hi, good morning. This is Josh Korn on for David.
Hey, Josh. Good morning.
Just wanted to follow up on the organic growth outlook. You had a strong bookings quarter, almost $5 billion in awards. I guess, how should we think about the way those bookings in the quarter convert to revenue this year and beyond? If there's any specific programs you would want to highlight driving growth now in the next couple quarters. Thanks.
It's really, Josh, pretty broad-based across the portfolio. I wouldn't call out any one specific program. A couple of the bigger awards that we talked about, you'll notice are five-year programs, and we'll see those ramp up in sort of the normal way. There'll be a little bit of contribution this year. But it's really pretty broad-based. Really, there is no part of the portfolio where, happily, we're seeing any kind of contraction. The business is hitting on all cylinders.
Yeah, Josh, I'd also add a little bit about the Apollo win because it really is a unique. It's the latest example of using technology-first solutions for us to win more and more work. As Jeff mentioned, that's going to drive a lot of top-line growth over the next couple of years before that levels off. It's a five-year program. We're really using bleeding-edge AI to analyze and create inputs in the area of information warfare, something we can't dig into on this kind of a call, but just recognize it's usually important and really hard. We sort of have a habit of doing hard.
But it's expected to be in its higher ramp in Q3. So back to the very first questions, it's one of those drivers for us to go drive growth. We have things like JTMS and other programs out there that are going to continue to make sure we are set up for another really successful year.
Okay, thanks. I will stick to one.
Thank you.
Thanks.
That concludes our Q&A session. I will now turn the conference back over to John Mengucci for any closing remarks.
Well, thanks, Morgan, and thank you for your help on today's call. We would like to thank everyone who dialed in or listened to the webcast for their participation. We know that many of you will have follow-up questions, and Jeff MacLauchlan, George Price, and Lisa Parkinson are available after today's call. Please stay healthy. All my best to you and your families. This concludes our call. Thank you and have a great day.
This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect and have a wonderful rest of your day.
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-21CACI Reports Results for Its Fiscal 2027 First Quarter
PR Newswire
CACI Reports Results for Its Fiscal 2027 First Quarter
Revenues of $2.5 billion, up 8.2% YoY Net income of $130.4 million; Diluted EPS of $5.84, up 3.7% YoY Adjusted net income of $171.0 million; Adjusted diluted EPS of $7.66, up 11.8% YoY EBITDA of $328.8 million and EBITDA margin of 13.3% Contract awards of $4.8 billion and book-to-bill of 2.0x Raising fiscal year 2027 guidance for Revenue, Adjusted net income, and Adjusted EPS; reaffirming guidance for other financial metrics RESTON, Va., Oct. 21, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- CACI International Inc (NYSE: CACI) announced results today for its fiscal first quarter ended September 30, 2026. "Our first quarter results represent a strong start to fiscal year 2027, highlighted by revenue and EBITDA growth, strong EBITDA margin, and healthy free cash flow. We also delivered a 2.0x book-to-bill and another quarter of double-digit funded backlog growth. Our mission proximity, software-defined approach, ability to invest ahead of customer need, and superior execution continue to differentiate CACI and drive our performance," said John Mengucci, CACI President and Chief Executive Officer. "Based on our results, large and growing backlog, and healthy pipeline, we are raising our fiscal year 2027 revenue and earnings profit outlook while reaffirming guidance for other financial metrics. We remain confident in our ability to drive long-term growth in free cash flow per share and deliver exceptional value for our customers and shareholders." First Quarter Results | Three months ended (in millions, except earnings per share and DSO) | 9/30/2026 | | 9/30/2025 | | % Change1 Revenues | $ 2,474.6 | | $ 2,287.6 | | 8.2 % Income from operations | $ 247.5 | | $ 212.3 | | 16.6 % Net income | $ 130.4 | | $ 124.8 | | 4.5 % Adjusted net income, a non-GAAP measure2 | $ 171.0 | | $ 151.7 | | 12.7 % Diluted earnings per share | $ 5.84 | | $ 5.63 | | 3.7 % Adjusted diluted earnings per share, a non-GAAP measure2 | $ 7.66 | | $ 6.85 | | 11.8 % Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), a non-GAAP measure2 | $ 328.8 | | $ 268.6 | | 22.4 % Net cash provided by operating activities excluding MARPA, a non-GAAP measure2 | $ 144.8 | | $ 160.0 | | (9.5) % Free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure2 | $ 133.5 | | $ 143.0 | | (6.6) % Days sales outstanding (DSO)3 | 59 | | 56 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |…Read full documentShow less
Revenues of $2.5 billion, up 8.2% YoY Net income of $130.4 million; Diluted EPS of $5.84, up 3.7% YoY Adjusted net income of $171.0 million; Adjusted diluted EPS of $7.66, up 11.8% YoY EBITDA of $328.8 million and EBITDA margin of 13.3% Contract awards of $4.8 billion and book-to-bill of 2.0x Raising fiscal year 2027 guidance for Revenue, Adjusted net income, and Adjusted EPS; reaffirming guidance for other financial metrics RESTON, Va., Oct. 21, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- CACI International Inc (NYSE: CACI) announced results today for its fiscal first quarter ended September 30, 2026. "Our first quarter results represent a strong start to fiscal year 2027, highlighted by revenue and EBITDA growth, strong EBITDA margin, and healthy free cash flow. We also delivered a 2.0x book-to-bill and another quarter of double-digit funded backlog growth. Our mission proximity, software-defined approach, ability to invest ahead of customer need, and superior execution continue to differentiate CACI and drive our performance," said John Mengucci, CACI President and Chief Executive Officer. "Based on our results, large and growing backlog, and healthy pipeline, we are raising our fiscal year 2027 revenue and earnings profit outlook while reaffirming guidance for other financial metrics. We remain confident in our ability to drive long-term growth in free cash flow per share and deliver exceptional value for our customers and shareholders." First Quarter Results | Three months ended (in millions, except earnings per share and DSO) | 9/30/2026 | | 9/30/2025 | | % Change1 Revenues | $ 2,474.6 | | $ 2,287.6 | | 8.2 % Income from operations | $ 247.5 | | $ 212.3 | | 16.6 % Net income | $ 130.4 | | $ 124.8 | | 4.5 % Adjusted net income, a non-GAAP measure2 | $ 171.0 | | $ 151.7 | | 12.7 % Diluted earnings per share | $ 5.84 | | $ 5.63 | | 3.7 % Adjusted diluted earnings per share, a non-GAAP measure2 | $ 7.66 | | $ 6.85 | | 11.8 % Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), a non-GAAP measure2 | $ 328.8 | | $ 268.6 | | 22.4 % Net cash provided by operating activities excluding MARPA, a non-GAAP measure2 | $ 144.8 | | $ 160.0 | | (9.5) % Free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure2 | $ 133.5 | | $ 143.0 | | (6.6) % Days sales outstanding (DSO)3 | 59 | | 56 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1) | Percentages are calculated using the underlying whole dollar amounts. Some percentages may vary slightly due to rounding. (2) | This non-GAAP measure should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. For additional informationregarding this non-GAAP measure, see the related explanation and reconciliation to the GAAP measure included below in this release. (3) | The DSO calculations for three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025 exclude the impact of the Company's Master Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement(MARPA), which was 7 days for both periods. Revenues in the first quarter of fiscal year 2027 increased 8.2% year-over-year, including 2.1% organic growth. The increase in income from operations was driven by higher revenues and gross profit. Growth in diluted earnings per share and adjusted diluted earnings per share were driven by higher income from operations, partially offset by higher interest expense and a higher tax provision. The decrease in cash from operations, excluding MARPA, was driven primarily by higher working capital. First Quarter Contract Awards Contract awards in the first quarter totaled $4.8 billion, with approximately 61% for new business to CACI. Awards exclude ceiling values of multi-award, indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contracts. Some notable awards during the quarter were: - CACI was awarded a one-year plus four option periods award to support U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) and its mission partners across a demanding and rapidly changing mission environment. The award has a ceiling of $1.5 billion, of which CACI recognized $1.2 billion of award and backlog value based on current requirements in the first quarter of fiscal year 2027. Through Apollo, CACI will help USCENTCOM make faster decisions and coordinate more effectively across commands and partners. The company's capabilities will enhance planning, analysis, information integration, and mission execution across the command's area of responsibility. CACI will help commanders turn information into actionable insight and operate with greater confidence in contested or denied territories, allowing warfighters to out-compete adversaries in the information environment. - CACI was awarded a five-year, $1.6 billion task order to continue to help the U.S. Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) stay ahead of emerging threats across every domain. CACI recognized $1.2 billion of award and backlog value based on current requirements in the first quarter of fiscal year 2027. Through the Special Operations Forces Emerging Threats, Operations, and Planning Support 2 (SOFETOPS 2) program, CACI will continue providing critical operational planning and support that strengthens USASOC's ability to act decisively and work seamlessly with its strategic partners wherever the mission requires. - CACI was awarded a five-year task order valued at up to $281 million by the U.S. Navy's Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) Crane to support in strengthening and advancing next-generation electromagnetic warfare capabilities across the Department of War (DoW). - CACI was awarded a 12-month extension to provide information technology system development, sustainment, and modernization to a government customer. - CACI was awarded a five-year task order valued at up to $185 million to support the U.S. Army's Program Manager Expeditionary Energy and Sustainment Systems (PM E2S2). CACI will develop and integrate technologies that help soldiers sustain operations in contested and austere environments. - CACI was awarded a task order ceiling increase valued at up to $153 million to continue providing unmanned systems support to the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM) – Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C5ISR) Center to enable warfighter rapid response to current and emerging threats. - CACI was awarded a five-year task order to modernize financial management systems for a federal customer. - CACI was awarded a three and a half-year contract to provide communications sustainment and modernization for a government customer. - CACI was awarded a four-year task order valued at up to $146 million to support the Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division (NSWCCD) in advancing next-generation maritime capabilities for the U.S. Navy. - CACI was awarded a five-year contract to sustain and modernize financial management systems for a Department of War customer. Total backlog as of September 30, 2026, was $34.0 billion compared with $33.9 billion a year ago, an increase of 0.3%. Funded backlog as of September 30, 2026, was $6.2 billion compared with $5.4 billion a year ago, an increase of 14.8%. Additional Highlights - CACI was selected as one of 15 awardees to deliver technology that will defend U.S. interests against adversarial threats for the U.S. Space Force. Under the National Space Test and Training Complex (NSTTC) Innovative Technology & Engineering – Space Test and Range (NITE‑STAR) contract, CACI will deliver critical technology advancements that strengthen and modernize the test and training architectures required for realistic operations. - CACI officially opened the CACI Manufacturing Center of Excellence for Defense Electronics in the Greater Rochester, New York, area, marking the next chapter in the company's long-term investment in the region and continued transformation into a technology-first national security company. The additional 61,000-square-foot facility increases CACI's manufacturing space by more than 300% and will serve as a hub for the development, test, assembly, and delivery of advanced electronic warfare technologies that give U.S. forces a decisive advantage in contested environments. - CACI announced that Marcie Small has been appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer. Small succeeds Angie Combs, who retired from the company after more than seven years of service. With more than 25 years of leadership experience in human capital management, Small has a proven track record of modernizing talent strategies, developing leaders, and building high-performing workforces. - CACI announced the launch of Good Dogs for Great Americans, the company's signature philanthropy program dedicated to helping veterans regain independence through specially trained service dogs. In partnership with the Washington Capitals and America's VetDogs, the program turns defense on the ice into life-changing support for those who defended our nation. Fiscal Year 2027 Guidance The table below summarizes our fiscal year 2027 guidance and represents our views as of October 21, 2026. (in millions, except earnings per share) | Fiscal Year 2027 | Current guidance | Prior guidance | Revenues | $10,700 - $10,900 | | $10,650 - $10,850 | Adjusted net income, a non-GAAP measure1 | $740 - $760 | | $735 - $755 | Adjusted diluted earnings per share, a non-GAAP measure1 | $33.18 - $34.08 | | $32.96 - $33.86 | Diluted weighted average shares | 22.3 | | 22.3 | Free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure2 | At least $900 | | At least $900 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1) | Adjusted net income and adjusted diluted earnings per share are defined as GAAP net income and GAAP diluted EPS, respectively, excludingintangible amortization expense and the related tax impact. This non-GAAP measure should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute formeasures prepared in accordance with GAAP. For additional information regarding this non-GAAP measure, see the related explanation andreconciliation to the GAAP measure included below in this release. (2) | Free cash flow is defined as net cash provided by operating activities excluding MARPA, less payments for capital expenditures. This non-GAAPmeasure should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Conference Call Information We have scheduled a conference call for 8:00 a.m. Eastern time Thursday, October 22, 2026, during which members of our senior management will be making a brief presentation focusing on first quarter results and operating trends, followed by a question-and-answer session. You can listen to the webcast and view additional information provided in the accompanying slide exhibits on CACI's investor relations website at http://investor.caci.com/events/default.aspx at the scheduled time. A replay of the call will also be available on CACI's investor relations website at http://investor.caci.com/. About CACI CACI International Inc (NYSE: CACI) is a technology-first national security company that expands the limits of national security through innovation, discipline, and operational excellence. We deliver advanced technologies that help our customers move faster, operate more efficiently, and anticipate and defeat evolving threats. Our 27,000 talented employees and strong culture drive our success and have earned CACI recognition as a Fortune World's Most Admired Company. CACI is a member of the Fortune 500™, the Russell 1000 Index, and the S&P MidCap 400 Index. For more information, visit caci.com. There are statements made herein that do not address historical facts and, therefore, could be interpreted to be forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to risk factors that could cause actual results to be materially different from anticipated results. These risk factors include, but are not limited to, the following: our reliance on U.S. government contracts, which includes general risk around the government contract procurement process (such as bid protest, small business set asides, loss of work due to organizational conflicts of interest, etc.) and termination risks; significant delays or reductions in appropriations for our programs and broader changes in U.S. government funding and spending patterns; legislation that amends or changes discretionary spending levels or budget priorities, such as for homeland security or to address global pandemics; legal, regulatory, and political change from successive presidential administrations that could result in economic uncertainty; changes in U.S. federal agencies, current agreements with other nations, foreign events, or any other events which may affect the global economy, including the impact of global pandemics; the results of government audits and reviews conducted by the Defense Contract Audit Agency, the Defense Contract Management Agency, or other governmental entities with cognizant oversight; competitive factors such as pricing pressures and/or competition to hire and retain employees (particularly those with security clearances); failure to achieve contract awards in connection with re-competes for present business and/or competition for new business; regional and national economic conditions in the United States and globally, including but not limited to: terrorist activities or war, changes in interest rates, currency fluctuations, significant fluctuations in the equity markets, and market speculation regarding our continued independence; our ability to meet contractual performance obligations, including technologically complex obligations dependent on factors not wholly within our control; limited access to certain facilities required for us to perform our work, including during a global pandemic; changes in tax law, the interpretation of associated rules and regulations, or any other events impacting our effective tax rate; changes in technology; the potential impact of the announcement or consummation of a proposed transaction and our ability to successfully integrate the operations of our recent and any future acquisitions; our ability to achieve the objectives of near term or long-term business plans; the effects of health epidemics, pandemics and similar outbreaks may have material adverse effects on our business, financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows; and other risks described in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings. Corporate Communications and Media: | | Investor Relations: Gino Bona, Executive Vice President, Corporate Communications | | George Price, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations (571) 597-2787, [email protected] | | (703) 841-7818, [email protected] CACI International IncConsolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)(in thousands, except per share data) | Three months ended | 9/30/2026 | | 9/30/2025 | | % Change Revenues | $ 2,474,597 | | $ 2,287,623 | | 8.2 % Costs of revenues: | | | | | Direct costs | 1,597,689 | | 1,547,194 | | 3.3 Indirect costs and selling expenses | 550,113 | | 473,856 | | 16.1 Depreciation and amortization | 79,267 | | 54,298 | | 46.0 Total costs of revenues | 2,227,069 | | 2,075,348 | | 7.3 Income from operations | 247,528 | | 212,275 | | 16.6 Interest expense and other, net | 73,240 | | 46,173 | | 58.6 Income before income taxes | 174,288 | | 166,102 | | 4.9 Income taxes | 43,921 | | 41,292 | | 6.4 Net income | $ 130,367 | | $ 124,810 | | 4.5 % | | | | | Basic earnings per share | $ 5.90 | | $ 5.67 | | 4.1 % Diluted earnings per share | $ 5.84 | | $ 5.63 | | 3.7 % Weighted-average basic shares outstanding | 22,100 | | 21,994 | | 0.5 % Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding | 22,316 | | 22,166 | | 0.7 % CACI International IncConsolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)(in thousands) | 9/30/2026 | | 6/30/2026 ASSETS | | | Current assets: | | | Cash and cash equivalents | $ 279,389 | | $ 191,756 Accounts receivable, net | 1,722,873 | | 1,705,087 Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 428,943 | | 364,502 Total current assets | 2,431,205 | | 2,261,345 | | | Goodwill | 6,486,111 | | 6,484,456 Intangible assets, net | 2,018,764 | | 2,072,991 Property, plant, and equipment, net | 386,547 | | 397,161 Operating lease right-of-use assets | 390,617 | | 381,980 Supplemental retirement savings plan assets | 103,874 | | 104,878 Other assets | 130,417 | | 116,833 Total assets | $ 11,947,535 | | $ 11,819,644 | | | LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | Current liabilities: | | | Current portion of long-term debt | $ 46,750 | | $ 46,750 Accounts payable | 463,031 | | 521,669 Accrued compensation and benefits | 263,877 | | 284,602 Other accrued expenses and current liabilities | 732,931 | | 670,911 Total current liabilities | 1,506,589 | | 1,523,932 | | | Long-term debt, net of current portion | 4,789,313 | | 4,854,759 Supplemental retirement savings plan obligations, net of current portion | 118,734 | | 119,233 Deferred income taxes | 407,454 | | 376,580 Operating lease liabilities | 447,236 | | 431,769 Other liabilities | 51,518 | | 50,674 Total liabilities | 7,320,844 | | 7,356,947 | | | Total shareholders' equity | 4,626,691 | | 4,462,697 Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ 11,947,535 | | $ 11,819,644 CACI International IncConsolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)(in thousands) | Three months ended | 9/30/2026 | | 9/30/2025 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | Net income | $ 130,367 | | $ 124,810 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | Depreciation and amortization | 79,267 | | 54,298 Amortization of deferred financing costs | 1,241 | | 1,196 Stock-based compensation expense | 21,711 | | 14,691 Deferred income taxes | 26,445 | | 22,273 Other | 3,077 | | — Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of business acquisitions: | | | Accounts receivable, net | (17,797) | | (15,967) Prepaid expenses and other assets | (67,263) | | (41,587) Accounts payable and other accrued expenses | 10,698 | | 63,747 Accrued compensation and benefits | (20,346) | | (41,443) Income taxes | 4,648 | | (11,456) Operating lease liabilities, net | (9,725) | | (1,418) Long-term liabilities | (1,009) | | 1,921 Net cash provided by operating activities | 161,314 | | 171,065 CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | Capital expenditures | (11,359) | | (17,014) Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired | 5,000 | | 15,800 Net cash used in investing activities | (6,359) | | (1,214) CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | Proceeds from borrowings | 1,211,500 | | 541,000 Principal payments on borrowings | (1,278,188) | | (682,688) Proceeds from employee stock purchase plans | 4,031 | | 3,796 Repurchases of common stock | (4,406) | | (4,085) Payment of taxes for equity transactions | (71) | | (261) Net cash used in financing activities | (67,134) | | (142,238) Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (188) | | (774) Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 87,633 | | 26,839 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 191,756 | | 106,181 Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ 279,389 | | $ 133,020 | | Revenues by Customer Type (Unaudited) | Three months ended (in thousands) | 9/30/2026 | | 9/30/2025 | | $ Change | | % Change Department of War | $ 1,354,257 | | 54.8 % | | $ 1,179,626 | | 51.5 % | | $ 174,631 | | 14.8 % Intelligence Community | 611,977 | | 24.7 | | 596,429 | | 26.1 | | 15,548 | | 2.6 Federal civilian agencies | 396,398 | | 16.0 | | 411,730 | | 18.0 | | (15,332) | | (3.7) Commercial and other | 111,965 | | 4.5 | | 99,838 | | 4.4 | | 12,127 | | 12.1 Total | $ 2,474,597 | | 100.0 % | | $ 2,287,623 | | 100.0 % | | $ 186,974 | | 8.2 % | | Revenues by Contract Type (Unaudited) | Three months ended (in thousands) | 9/30/2026 | | 9/30/2025 | | $ Change | | % Change Cost-plus-fee | $ 1,306,307 | | 52.8 % | | $ 1,382,630 | | 60.5 % | | $ (76,323) | | (5.5) % Fixed-price | 821,826 | | 33.2 | | 611,493 | | 26.7 | | 210,333 | | 34.4 Time-and-materials | 346,464 | | 14.0 | | 293,500 | | 12.8 | | 52,964 | | 18.0 Total | $ 2,474,597 | | 100.0 % | | $ 2,287,623 | | 100.0 % | | $ 186,974 | | 8.2 % | | Revenues by Prime or Subcontractor (Unaudited) | Three months ended (in thousands) | 9/30/2026 | | 9/30/2025 | | $ Change | | % Change Prime Contractor | $ 2,209,244 | | 89.3 % | | $ 2,076,899 | | 90.8 % | | $ 132,345 | | 6.4 % Subcontractor | 265,353 | | 10.7 | | 210,724 | | 9.2 | | 54,629 | | 25.9 Total | $ 2,474,597 | | 100.0 % | | $ 2,287,623 | | 100.0 % | | $ 186,974 | | 8.2 % | | Revenues by Technology or Expertise (Unaudited) | Three months ended (in thousands) | 9/30/2026 | | 9/30/2025 | | $ Change | | % Change Technology | $ 1,449,336 | | 58.6 % | | $ 1,300,732 | | 56.9 % | | $ 148,604 | | 11.4 % Expertise | 1,025,261 | | 41.4 | | 986,891 | | 43.1 | | 38,370 | | 3.9 Total | $ 2,474,597 | | 100.0 % | | $ 2,287,623 | | 100.0 % | | $ 186,974 | | 8.2 % | | Contract Awards (Unaudited) | Three months ended (in thousands) | 9/30/2026 | | 9/30/2025 | | $ Change | | % Change Contract awards | $ 4,828,329 | | $ 4,998,684 | | $ (170,355) | | (3.4) % Note: Some percentages may vary slightly due to rounding. Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted Net Income and Diluted EPS to Adjusted Diluted EPS (Unaudited) Adjusted net income and adjusted diluted EPS are non-GAAP performance measures. We define adjusted net income and adjusted diluted EPS as GAAP net income and GAAP diluted EPS, respectively, excluding intangible amortization expense and the related tax impact as we do not consider intangible amortization expense to be indicative of our operating performance. We believe that these performance measures provide management and investors with useful information in assessing trends in our ongoing operating performance, provide greater visibility in understanding the long-term financial performance of the Company, and allow investors to more easily compare our results to results of our peers. These non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. | | | | | | | | | Three months ended | | (in thousands, except per share data) | 9/30/2026 | | 9/30/2025 | | % Change | | Net income, as reported | $ 130,367 | | $ 124,810 | | 4.5 % | | Intangible amortization expense | 54,313 | | 36,033 | | 50.7 | | Tax effect of intangible amortization1 | (13,723) | | (9,104) | | 50.7 | | Adjusted net income | $ 170,957 | | $ 151,739 | | 12.7 % | | | | | | | | | | Three months ended | | | 9/30/2026 | | 9/30/2025 | | % Change | | Diluted EPS, as reported | $ 5.84 | | $ 5.63 | | 3.7 % | | Intangible amortization expense | 2.43 | | 1.63 | | 49.1 | | Tax effect of intangible amortization1 | (0.61) | | (0.41) | | 48.8 | | Adjusted diluted EPS | $ 7.66 | | $ 6.85 | | 11.8 % | | | | | | | | | | FY27 guidance range | | (in millions, except per share data) | Low end | | | | High end | | Net income | $ 579 | | --- | | $ 599 | | Intangible amortization expense | 215 | | --- | | 215 | | Tax effect of intangible amortization1 | (54) | | --- | | (54) | | Adjusted net income | $ 740 | | --- | | $ 760 | | | | | | | | | | FY27 guidance range | | | Low end | | | | High end | | Diluted EPS | $ 25.96 | | --- | | $ 26.86 | | Intangible amortization expense | 9.64 | | --- | | 9.64 | | Tax effect of intangible amortization1 | (2.42) | | --- | | (2.42) | | Adjusted diluted EPS | $ 33.18 | | --- | | $ 34.08 | | | | | | | | (1) Calculation uses an assumed full year statutory tax rate of 25.3% on non-GAAP tax deductible adjustments forSeptember 30, 2026 and 2025. Note: Numbers may not sum due to rounding. Reconciliation of Net Income to Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) (Unaudited) The Company views EBITDA and EBITDA margin, both of which are defined as non-GAAP measures, as important indicators of performance, consistent with the manner in which management measures and forecasts the Company's performance. EBITDA is a commonly used non-GAAP measure when comparing our results with those of other companies. We define EBITDA as GAAP net income plus net interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization expense (including depreciation within direct costs). We consider EBITDA to be a useful metric for management and investors to evaluate and compare the ongoing operating performance of our business on a consistent basis across reporting periods, as it eliminates the effect of non-cash items such as depreciation of tangible assets and amortization of intangible assets primarily recognized in business combinations, which we do not believe are indicative of our operating performance. EBITDA margin is EBITDA divided by revenue. These non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. | | | | | | | | | Three months ended | | (in thousands) | 9/30/2026 | | 9/30/2025 | | % Change | | Net income, as reported | $ 130,367 | | $ 124,810 | | 4.5 % | | Plus: | | | | | | | Income taxes | 43,921 | | 41,292 | | 6.4 | | Interest income and expense, net | 73,240 | | 46,173 | | 58.6 | | Depreciation and amortization expense, including amounts within direct costs | 81,300 | | 56,338 | | 44.3 | | EBITDA | $ 328,828 | | $ 268,613 | | 22.4 % | | | | | | | | | | Three months ended | | (in thousands) | 9/30/2026 | | 9/30/2025 | | % Change | | Revenues, as reported | $ 2,474,597 | | $ 2,287,623 | | 8.2 % | | EBITDA | 328,828 | | 268,613 | | 22.4 | | EBITDA margin | 13.3 % | | 11.7 % | | | | | | | | | | Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities Excluding MARPA and to Free Cash Flow (Unaudited) The Company defines net cash provided by operating activities excluding MARPA, a non-GAAP measure, as net cash provided by operating activities calculated in accordance with GAAP, adjusted to exclude cash flows from CACI's MARPA for the sale of certain designated eligible U.S. government receivables up to a maximum amount of $350.0 million. Free cash flow is a non-GAAP liquidity measure and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. The Company defines free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities excluding MARPA, less payments for capital expenditures. The Company uses these non-GAAP measures to assess our ability to generate cash from our business operations and plan for future operating and capital actions. We believe these measures allow investors to more easily compare current period results to prior period results and to results of our peers. Free cash flow does not represent residual cash flows available for discretionary purposes and should not be used as a substitute for cash flow measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. | | | | | | | Three months ended | | (in thousands) | 9/30/2026 | | 9/30/2025 | | Net cash provided by operating activities, as reported | $ 161,314 | | $ 171,065 | | Cash provided by MARPA | (16,466) | | (11,091) | | Net cash provided by operating activities excluding MARPA | 144,848 | | 159,974 | | Capital expenditures | (11,359) | | (17,014) | | Free cash flow | $ 133,489 | | $ 142,960 | | | | | | | | FY27 guidance | | (in millions) | Current | | Prior | | Net cash provided by operating activities | $ 1,015 | | $ 1,015 | | Cash provided by MARPA | — | | — | | Net cash provided by operating activities excluding MARPA | 1,015 | | 1,015 | | Capital expenditures | (115) | | (115) | | Free cash flow | $ 900 | | $ 900 | | | | | | View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/caci-reports-results-for-its-fiscal-2027-first-quarter-302915933.html
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-21Compared to Estimates, CACI International (CACI) Q1 Earnings: A Look at Key Metrics
Zacks
Compared to Estimates, CACI International (CACI) Q1 Earnings: A Look at Key Metrics
For the quarter ended September 2026, CACI International (CACI) reported revenue of $2.47 billion, up 8.2% over the same period last year. EPS came in at $7.66, compared to $6.85 in the year-ago quarter. The reported revenue represents a surprise of -0.92% over the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.5 billion. With the consensus EPS estimate being $6.45, the EPS surprise was +18.76%. While investors closely watch year-over-year changes in headline numbers -- revenue and earnings -- and how they compare to Wall Street expectations to determine their next course of action, some key metrics always provide a better insight into a company's underlying performance. Since these metrics play a crucial role in driving the top- and bottom-line numbers, comparing them with the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated about them helps investors better project a stock's price performance. Here is how CACI International performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts: - Total Revenue - Organic Growth (YOY): 2.1% versus the three-analyst average estimate of 1.9%. - Revenues by Expertise or Technology- Expertise: $1.03 billion versus the two-analyst average estimate of $978.43 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +3.9%. - Revenues by Customer Group- Federal Civilian Agencies: $396.4 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of $427.55 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of -3.7%. - Revenues by Customer Group- Department of Defense: $1.35 billion versus $1.3 billion estimated by two analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +14.8% change. - Revenues by Expertise or Technology- Technology: $1.45 billion versus $1.53 billion estimated by two analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +11.4% change. View all Key Company Metrics for CACI International here>>> Shares of CACI International have returned -0.9% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +1% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), indicating that it could outperform the broader market in the near term. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report CACI International, Inc.…Read full documentShow less
For the quarter ended September 2026, CACI International (CACI) reported revenue of $2.47 billion, up 8.2% over the same period last year. EPS came in at $7.66, compared to $6.85 in the year-ago quarter. The reported revenue represents a surprise of -0.92% over the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.5 billion. With the consensus EPS estimate being $6.45, the EPS surprise was +18.76%. While investors closely watch year-over-year changes in headline numbers -- revenue and earnings -- and how they compare to Wall Street expectations to determine their next course of action, some key metrics always provide a better insight into a company's underlying performance. Since these metrics play a crucial role in driving the top- and bottom-line numbers, comparing them with the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated about them helps investors better project a stock's price performance. Here is how CACI International performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts: - Total Revenue - Organic Growth (YOY): 2.1% versus the three-analyst average estimate of 1.9%. - Revenues by Expertise or Technology- Expertise: $1.03 billion versus the two-analyst average estimate of $978.43 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +3.9%. - Revenues by Customer Group- Federal Civilian Agencies: $396.4 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of $427.55 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of -3.7%. - Revenues by Customer Group- Department of Defense: $1.35 billion versus $1.3 billion estimated by two analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +14.8% change. - Revenues by Expertise or Technology- Technology: $1.45 billion versus $1.53 billion estimated by two analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +11.4% change. View all Key Company Metrics for CACI International here>>> Shares of CACI International have returned -0.9% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +1% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), indicating that it could outperform the broader market in the near term. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report CACI International, Inc. (CACI) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-21CACI International (CACI) Tops Q1 Earnings Estimates
Zacks
CACI International (CACI) Tops Q1 Earnings Estimates
CACI International (CACI) came out with quarterly earnings of $7.66 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $6.45 per share. This compares to earnings of $6.85 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +18.76%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this defense contractor would post earnings of $7.26 per share when it actually produced earnings of $8.91, delivering a surprise of +22.73%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates four times. CACI International, which belongs to the Zacks Computer - Services industry, posted revenues of $2.47 billion for the quarter ended September 2026, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 0.92%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $2.29 billion. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates two times over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. CACI International shares have added about 14.1% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 12.7%. While CACI International has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for CACI International was favorable. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to outperform the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of…Read full documentShow less
CACI International (CACI) came out with quarterly earnings of $7.66 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $6.45 per share. This compares to earnings of $6.85 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +18.76%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this defense contractor would post earnings of $7.26 per share when it actually produced earnings of $8.91, delivering a surprise of +22.73%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates four times. CACI International, which belongs to the Zacks Computer - Services industry, posted revenues of $2.47 billion for the quarter ended September 2026, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 0.92%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $2.29 billion. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates two times over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. CACI International shares have added about 14.1% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 12.7%. While CACI International has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for CACI International was favorable. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to outperform the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $7.37 on $2.54 billion in revenues for the coming quarter and $32.24 on $10.76 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year. Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Computer - Services is currently in the top 42% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1. Another stock from the same industry, PDF Solutions (PDFS), has yet to report results for the quarter ended September 2026. The results are expected to be released on November 5. This provider of software and services for semiconductor makers is expected to post quarterly earnings of $0.34 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +36%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. PDF Solutions' revenues are expected to be $68.76 million, up 20.4% from the year-ago quarter. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report CACI International, Inc. (CACI) : Free Stock Analysis Report PDF Solutions, Inc. (PDFS) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-21CACI International Fiscal Q1 Adjusted Earnings, Revenue Rise; FY Guidance Increases
MT Newswires
CACI International Fiscal Q1 Adjusted Earnings, Revenue Rise; FY Guidance Increases
CACI International (CACI) reported fiscal Q1 adjusted earnings late Wednesday of $7.66 per diluted share, up from $6.85 a year earlier. Analysts polled by FactSet expected $6.57. Revenue in the three months ended Sept. 30 rose to $2.47 billion from $2.29 billion a year earlier. Analysts projected $2.51 billion. The company boosted full-year guidance to adjusted EPS of $33.18 to $34.08 on revenue of $10.7 billion to $10.9 billion. Its previous forecast was EPS of $32.96 to $33.86 on revenue of $10.65 billion to $10.85 billion. Analysts expect EPS of $33.23 on revenue of $10.77 billion.
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-21CACI International: Fiscal Q1 Earnings Snapshot
Associated Press
CACI International: Fiscal Q1 Earnings Snapshot
RESTON, Va. (AP) — RESTON, Va. (AP) — CACI International Inc. (CACI) on Wednesday reported fiscal first-quarter profit of $130.4 million. On a per-share basis, the Reston, Virginia-based company said it had net income of $5.84. Earnings, adjusted for one-time gains and costs, were $7.66 per share. The results topped Wall Street expectations. The average estimate of five analysts surveyed by Zacks Investment Research was for earnings of $6.45 per share. The defense contractor posted revenue of $2.47 billion in the period, missing Street forecasts. Five analysts surveyed by Zacks expected $2.5 billion. CACI International expects full-year earnings in the range of $33.18 to $34.08 per share. CACI International shares have risen 17% since the beginning of the year. In the final minutes of trading on Wednesday, shares hit $623.38, an increase of 17% in the last 12 months. _____ This story was generated by Automated Insights (http://automatedinsights.com/ap) using data from Zacks Investment Research. Access a Zacks stock report on CACI at https://www.zacks.com/ap/CACI
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-20CACI (CACI) To Report Earnings Tomorrow: Here Is What To Expect
StockStory
CACI (CACI) To Report Earnings Tomorrow: Here Is What To Expect
Defense, intelligence, and IT solutions provider CACI International (NYSE:CACI) will be reporting results this Wednesday after market close. Here's what investors should know. CACI beat analysts' revenue expectations last quarter, reporting revenues of $2.71 billion, up 17.6% year on year. It was an exceptional quarter for the company, with a solid beat of analysts' EBITDA estimates and full-year EPS guidance exceeding analysts' expectations. Is CACI a buy or sell going into earnings? Read our full analysis here, it's free for active Edge members. This quarter, the market is expecting CACI's revenue to grow 9.8% year on year, slowing from the 11.2% increase it recorded in the same quarter last year. Analysts covering the company have generally reconfirmed their estimates over the last 30 days, suggesting they anticipate the business will stay the course heading into earnings. CACI has missed Wall Street's revenue estimates multiple times over the last two years. Looking at CACI's peers in the aerospace and defense segment, some have already reported their Q3 results, giving us a hint as to what we can expect. AAR delivered year-on-year revenue growth of 24.1%, beating analysts' expectations by 4.3%, and Byrna reported a revenue decline of 45.7%, falling short of estimates by 5.3%. AAR traded down 7.2% following the results while Byrna was up 11.6%. Read our full analysis of AAR's results here and Byrna's results here. Over the past year, investors have repeatedly shifted their focus from one macro narrative to another (AI disruption and AI capex spending to geopolitics, interest rates, and the broader health of the economy). While some of the aerospace and defense stocks have shown solid performance in this choppy environment, the group has generally underperformed, with share prices down 5.9% on average over the last month. CACI is down 2.6% during the same time and is heading into earnings with an average analyst price target of $732.60 (compared to the current share price of $616.43). ONE MORE THING: The $21 AI Application Stock Wall Street Forgot. While Wall Street obsesses over who's building AI, one company is already using it to print money. And nobody's paying attention. AI chip stocks trade at ridiculous valuations. This company processes a trillion consumer signals monthly using AI and trades at a third of the price. The gap won't last. The institu…Read full documentShow less
Defense, intelligence, and IT solutions provider CACI International (NYSE:CACI) will be reporting results this Wednesday after market close. Here's what investors should know. CACI beat analysts' revenue expectations last quarter, reporting revenues of $2.71 billion, up 17.6% year on year. It was an exceptional quarter for the company, with a solid beat of analysts' EBITDA estimates and full-year EPS guidance exceeding analysts' expectations. Is CACI a buy or sell going into earnings? Read our full analysis here, it's free for active Edge members. This quarter, the market is expecting CACI's revenue to grow 9.8% year on year, slowing from the 11.2% increase it recorded in the same quarter last year. Analysts covering the company have generally reconfirmed their estimates over the last 30 days, suggesting they anticipate the business will stay the course heading into earnings. CACI has missed Wall Street's revenue estimates multiple times over the last two years. Looking at CACI's peers in the aerospace and defense segment, some have already reported their Q3 results, giving us a hint as to what we can expect. AAR delivered year-on-year revenue growth of 24.1%, beating analysts' expectations by 4.3%, and Byrna reported a revenue decline of 45.7%, falling short of estimates by 5.3%. AAR traded down 7.2% following the results while Byrna was up 11.6%. Read our full analysis of AAR's results here and Byrna's results here. Over the past year, investors have repeatedly shifted their focus from one macro narrative to another (AI disruption and AI capex spending to geopolitics, interest rates, and the broader health of the economy). While some of the aerospace and defense stocks have shown solid performance in this choppy environment, the group has generally underperformed, with share prices down 5.9% on average over the last month. CACI is down 2.6% during the same time and is heading into earnings with an average analyst price target of $732.60 (compared to the current share price of $616.43). ONE MORE THING: The $21 AI Application Stock Wall Street Forgot. While Wall Street obsesses over who's building AI, one company is already using it to print money. And nobody's paying attention. AI chip stocks trade at ridiculous valuations. This company processes a trillion consumer signals monthly using AI and trades at a third of the price. The gap won't last. The institutions will figure it out. You need to see this first. Read the FREE Report Before They Notice.
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-09-04Why Is CACI International (CACI) Up 0.2% Since Last Earnings Report?
Zacks
Why Is CACI International (CACI) Up 0.2% Since Last Earnings Report?
A month has gone by since the last earnings report for CACI International (CACI). Shares have added about 0.2% in that time frame, underperforming the S&P 500. But investors have to be wondering, will the recent positive trend continue leading up to its next earnings release, or is CACI International due for a pullback? Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its latest earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important catalysts. CACI reported fourth-quarter fiscal 2026 adjusted earnings of $8.91 per share, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $7.26 by 22.7%. Adjusted EPS increased 6.1% year over year. However, GAAP diluted EPS declined 1.3% to $7.05, as higher operating income was offset by increased interest expense related to the ARKA acquisition and a higher tax provision. Quarterly revenues increased 17.6% year over year to $2.71 billion, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 0.36%. Organic revenue growth was 11.6%, while revenues also increased 15.2% sequentially. During the quarter, contract awards totaled $1.6 billion, with approximately 40% representing new business. Total backlog increased 1.9% year over year to $32 billion, while funded backlog rose 28.6% to $5.4 billion, providing solid revenue visibility. Profitability improved meaningfully during the quarter. EBITDA margin expanded to 13%, up 150 basis points year over year, supported by stronger execution, favorable business mix and a small gain from a U.K. divestiture. EBITDA increased 33.5% year over year to $353.1 million, while income from operations climbed 31.7% to $272.2 million. Management highlighted several notable contract wins during the quarter, including deployment of its SkyValor counter-drone system for the Department of War, a technology modernization contract with the Department of Veterans Affairs worth up to $308 million, classified national security awards exceeding $236 million, and multiple defense modernization and cloud transformation programs. For fiscal 2026, revenues increased 10.9% to $9.57 billion, driven by 7.2% organic growth. Adjusted EPS rose 12.7% to $29.83, while EBITDA margin expanded to 12.3%. Annual contract awards totaled $10.2 billion, resulting in a 1.1x book-to-bill ratio. CACI continued to generate strong cash flows during the quarter. Net cash provided by operating…Read full documentShow less
A month has gone by since the last earnings report for CACI International (CACI). Shares have added about 0.2% in that time frame, underperforming the S&P 500. But investors have to be wondering, will the recent positive trend continue leading up to its next earnings release, or is CACI International due for a pullback? Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its latest earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important catalysts. CACI reported fourth-quarter fiscal 2026 adjusted earnings of $8.91 per share, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $7.26 by 22.7%. Adjusted EPS increased 6.1% year over year. However, GAAP diluted EPS declined 1.3% to $7.05, as higher operating income was offset by increased interest expense related to the ARKA acquisition and a higher tax provision. Quarterly revenues increased 17.6% year over year to $2.71 billion, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 0.36%. Organic revenue growth was 11.6%, while revenues also increased 15.2% sequentially. During the quarter, contract awards totaled $1.6 billion, with approximately 40% representing new business. Total backlog increased 1.9% year over year to $32 billion, while funded backlog rose 28.6% to $5.4 billion, providing solid revenue visibility. Profitability improved meaningfully during the quarter. EBITDA margin expanded to 13%, up 150 basis points year over year, supported by stronger execution, favorable business mix and a small gain from a U.K. divestiture. EBITDA increased 33.5% year over year to $353.1 million, while income from operations climbed 31.7% to $272.2 million. Management highlighted several notable contract wins during the quarter, including deployment of its SkyValor counter-drone system for the Department of War, a technology modernization contract with the Department of Veterans Affairs worth up to $308 million, classified national security awards exceeding $236 million, and multiple defense modernization and cloud transformation programs. For fiscal 2026, revenues increased 10.9% to $9.57 billion, driven by 7.2% organic growth. Adjusted EPS rose 12.7% to $29.83, while EBITDA margin expanded to 12.3%. Annual contract awards totaled $10.2 billion, resulting in a 1.1x book-to-bill ratio. CACI continued to generate strong cash flows during the quarter. Net cash provided by operating activities, excluding MARPA, increased 67.4% year over year to $279.7 million, while free cash flow rose 67.4% to $232.9 million, supported by disciplined working capital management. Days sales outstanding improved to 55 days from 56 days a year earlier. The company expects leverage to decline more rapidly than previously anticipated. Pro forma net leverage stood at approximately 3.7x following the ARKA acquisition, and management now expects leverage to return to the low-3x range by June 2027, one quarter earlier than previously projected, supported by consistent cash generation. For fiscal 2027, CACI expects revenues between $10.65 billion and $10.85 billion, suggesting growth of 11.3-13.4%, including 6.1-8.2% organic growth. Adjusted net income is projected in the range of $735-$755 million, while adjusted EPS is expected between $32.96 and $33.86. The company projects an EBITDA margin in the high-12% range and expects free cash flow of at least $900 million, supported by continued revenue growth, margin expansion and efficient working capital management. Capital expenditures are expected to be approximately $115 million, while net interest expense is projected at roughly $288 million. In the past month, investors have witnessed a downward trend in fresh estimates. The consensus estimate has shifted -11.07% due to these changes. At this time, CACI International has a nice Growth Score of B, though it is lagging a bit on the Momentum Score front with a C. Charting a somewhat similar path, the stock has a grade of B on the value side, putting it in the second quintile for value investors. Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of A. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in. Estimates have been broadly trending downward for the stock, and the magnitude of these revisions indicates a downward shift. Notably, CACI International has a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). We expect an above average return from the stock in the next few months. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report CACI International, Inc. (CACI) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

