RankAlpha logo
Back to Rankings

BP

BPC
NYSE / Energy
Last Price
Quote time unavailable
View Chart
Documents
119
Stored
Transcripts
1
Recent loaded
Latest report
2026-08-29
Investor release

Document history

Earnings documents stored for BP.

12 shown
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-29

UK Chancellor Healey eyes cautious budget as fiscal pressures mount

Investing.com
Investing.com -- UK Chancellor John Healey is preparing a cautious first budget to maintain market confidence as the Iran war, higher borrowing costs, and government spending commitments squeeze Britain’s public finances, Bloomberg reported Saturday. Healey is expected to favor relatively modest measures in his Oct. 28 budget as Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s government seeks to avoid unsettling investors or repeating the large tax increases introduced under former Chancellor Rachel Reeves. The chancellor has made fiscal discipline a priority and wants government spending announcements to identify how they will be funded. Britain’s fiscal position has weakened since Burnham took office. Healey inherited £23.6 billion ($31.9 billion) of headroom against the government’s borrowing rule, but higher debt-servicing costs and new spending commitments are estimated to have reduced that buffer by about £9 billion. Long-term government borrowing costs have remained relatively stable since Healey’s appointment. The yield on 30-year UK government debt has risen to around 5.79% from 5.75%. Potential revenue-raising measures under discussion include higher taxes on banks following strong recent profits. Treasury officials have also considered increasing taxes on windfall profits at fossil fuel companies after BP (NYSE:BP) more than doubled its profit between April and June amid elevated oil prices. Healey is separately examining whether Britain’s fiscal rules provide room for increased infrastructure borrowing, although officials are wary of triggering a negative reaction in bond markets. The government faces other major spending pressures, including welfare and defense. Plans to raise defense expenditure to 3.5% of gross domestic product are expected to be addressed in the government’s 2027 spending review rather than the October budget. Healey has yet to commit publicly to spending 3% of GDP on defense by 2030, up from around 2.6% currently. Meeting that level would require at least another £10 billion. The budget will be Healey’s first major fiscal test since becoming chancellor and comes as Labour seeks to preserve its recent recovery in opinion polls. Related articles UK Chancellor Healey eyes cautious budget as fiscal pressures mount JPMorgan outlines ten strategic themes that could shape the outlook for 2026 Wolfe Research outlines eight risks that could spark stoc…Read full document

Investing.com -- UK Chancellor John Healey is preparing a cautious first budget to maintain market confidence as the Iran war, higher borrowing costs, and government spending commitments squeeze Britain’s public finances, Bloomberg reported Saturday. Healey is expected to favor relatively modest measures in his Oct. 28 budget as Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s government seeks to avoid unsettling investors or repeating the large tax increases introduced under former Chancellor Rachel Reeves. The chancellor has made fiscal discipline a priority and wants government spending announcements to identify how they will be funded. Britain’s fiscal position has weakened since Burnham took office. Healey inherited £23.6 billion ($31.9 billion) of headroom against the government’s borrowing rule, but higher debt-servicing costs and new spending commitments are estimated to have reduced that buffer by about £9 billion. Long-term government borrowing costs have remained relatively stable since Healey’s appointment. The yield on 30-year UK government debt has risen to around 5.79% from 5.75%. Potential revenue-raising measures under discussion include higher taxes on banks following strong recent profits. Treasury officials have also considered increasing taxes on windfall profits at fossil fuel companies after BP (NYSE:BP) more than doubled its profit between April and June amid elevated oil prices. Healey is separately examining whether Britain’s fiscal rules provide room for increased infrastructure borrowing, although officials are wary of triggering a negative reaction in bond markets. The government faces other major spending pressures, including welfare and defense. Plans to raise defense expenditure to 3.5% of gross domestic product are expected to be addressed in the government’s 2027 spending review rather than the October budget. Healey has yet to commit publicly to spending 3% of GDP on defense by 2030, up from around 2.6% currently. Meeting that level would require at least another £10 billion. The budget will be Healey’s first major fiscal test since becoming chancellor and comes as Labour seeks to preserve its recent recovery in opinion polls. Related articles UK Chancellor Healey eyes cautious budget as fiscal pressures mount JPMorgan outlines ten strategic themes that could shape the outlook for 2026 Wolfe Research outlines eight risks that could spark stock declines in 2026

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-21

BP (LSE:BP.) Stock Looks Fairly Valued With Strong Returns But Rich Earnings

Simply Wall St.
Get insights on thousands of stocks from the global community of over 7 million individual investors at Simply Wall St. BP stock has delivered a strong 138.7% return over the past 5 years, yet current valuation checks and recent news leave the shares looking closer to fairly priced than clearly cheap. Over 5 years BP has returned 138.7%, which puts current holders in a strong position and raises the bar for new investors assessing further upside. The return to Venezuela through the Loran Phase 2 offshore gas project can support long term cash flow expectations, while political and regulatory risk in markets like Venezuela remains a key swing factor for how much value investors ultimately see. BP scores 3 out of 6 on our valuation checks, which points to a mixed picture rather than a clear bargain or clear overvaluation. For investors, the key question is whether a stock that has already gained strongly and screens as roughly fairly valued still offers enough potential to justify the risks in its project portfolio. BP delivered 38.4% returns over the last year. See how this stacks up to the rest of the Oil and Gas industry. The P/E ratio is a useful starting point for BP because earnings still drive much of how investors look at large integrated oil and gas groups. BP currently trades at about 21.4x earnings, which is well above the Oil and Gas industry average of 13.4x and also above the wider peer group average of 10.2x. That premium suggests the market is willing to pay more for each pound of BP earnings than for many sector peers. The tailored fair P/E ratio for BP is 21.9x, which is very close to where the stock is now. This fair ratio reflects factors such as BP’s scale, risk profile and profitability relative to the sector. Despite the recent attention around BP’s return to Venezuela through the Loran Phase 2 gas project, the current P/E already lines up closely with what this framework implies as a reasonable level for the stock. On the P/E multiple, BP currently looks roughly fairly valued rather than clearly cheap or expensive. See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown. Simply Wall St Narratives pick up where the earlier valuation puzzle for BP leaves off and explain which combinations of future growth, margins and earnings would need to hold for the stock to be worth meaningfully more or less than its current p…Read full document

Get insights on thousands of stocks from the global community of over 7 million individual investors at Simply Wall St. BP stock has delivered a strong 138.7% return over the past 5 years, yet current valuation checks and recent news leave the shares looking closer to fairly priced than clearly cheap. Over 5 years BP has returned 138.7%, which puts current holders in a strong position and raises the bar for new investors assessing further upside. The return to Venezuela through the Loran Phase 2 offshore gas project can support long term cash flow expectations, while political and regulatory risk in markets like Venezuela remains a key swing factor for how much value investors ultimately see. BP scores 3 out of 6 on our valuation checks, which points to a mixed picture rather than a clear bargain or clear overvaluation. For investors, the key question is whether a stock that has already gained strongly and screens as roughly fairly valued still offers enough potential to justify the risks in its project portfolio. BP delivered 38.4% returns over the last year. See how this stacks up to the rest of the Oil and Gas industry. The P/E ratio is a useful starting point for BP because earnings still drive much of how investors look at large integrated oil and gas groups. BP currently trades at about 21.4x earnings, which is well above the Oil and Gas industry average of 13.4x and also above the wider peer group average of 10.2x. That premium suggests the market is willing to pay more for each pound of BP earnings than for many sector peers. The tailored fair P/E ratio for BP is 21.9x, which is very close to where the stock is now. This fair ratio reflects factors such as BP’s scale, risk profile and profitability relative to the sector. Despite the recent attention around BP’s return to Venezuela through the Loran Phase 2 gas project, the current P/E already lines up closely with what this framework implies as a reasonable level for the stock. On the P/E multiple, BP currently looks roughly fairly valued rather than clearly cheap or expensive. See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown. Simply Wall St Narratives pick up where the earlier valuation puzzle for BP leaves off and explain which combinations of future growth, margins and earnings would need to hold for the stock to be worth meaningfully more or less than its current price. Each narrative ties a fair value estimate to a particular storyline about BP's possible catalysts and risks, so you can track over time which version of events appears to be unfolding on the Community page. One of the top community narratives on BP: 7% undervalued Read one of the top narratives on BP Do you think there's more to the story for BP? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying! BP now looks priced about right on its current P/E, so the easy valuation case is no longer on the table. The stock hinges less on multiple expansion and more on whether BP can deliver the earnings and cash flows that keep justifying that premium to sector peers. The central debate is whether projects like the Venezuela gas exposure compensate for their political and regulatory risks, or whether those risks end up capping how much investors are willing to pay from here. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include BP.L. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email [email protected]

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-12

BP (BP) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Motley Fool
Image source: The Motley Fool. Tuesday, Aug. 4, 2026 at 10 a.m. ET Chief Executive Officer - Marguerite O’Neill Chief Financial Officer - Katherine Thomson Operator: Hello, everyone, and thank you for your interest in BP's Second Quarter 2026 Results. Today's video presentation features Meg ONeill, Chief Executive Officer; and Kate Thomson, Chief Financial Officer. The running order for today's prepared remarks is as follows: Meg will begin with her reflection since becoming CEO and the priorities she is setting for BP. Kate will then take you through our second quarter financial performance, and Meg will return to close with her perspective on the path ahead. Let me first draw your attention to our cautionary statement. In this video, we will make forward-looking statements that refer to our estimates, plans and expectations. Actual results and outcomes could differ materially due to the factors we note on this slide and in our U.K. and SEC filings. Please refer to our annual report, stock exchange announcement and SEC filings for more details. These documents are available on our website. And with that, over to you, Meg. Marguerite O’Neill: Thanks, Craig. Just a few weeks ago marked my 100th day as CEO of BP. This has coincided with one of the most volatile periods within global energy markets. When the conflict in the Middle East disrupted global oil and gas supply, the BP team responded, keeping energy flowing across the world safely, reliably and efficiently. I want to start with an update on safety. Over the past 4 months, I've seen a deep commitment to safety across BP. It comes first, always, but performance in the first half of the year has not been where it needs to be. Tragically, a Castrol colleague died following an incident at the Gemlik blending plant in Turkiye in April. Our thoughts remain with their family, friends and colleagues. An investigation is underway to understand what happened, and we will learn and apply those lessons to improve our business. On process safety, we saw an increase of events in the first half of 2026 when compared with the same period in 2025, including an increase in Tier 1 events. Nothing is more important than the safety of our people. Operational excellence is foundational to what we do, and this begins with consistent safe performance. Our safety goal remains to eliminate fatalities, life-changing injuries and…Read full document

Image source: The Motley Fool. Tuesday, Aug. 4, 2026 at 10 a.m. ET Chief Executive Officer - Marguerite O’Neill Chief Financial Officer - Katherine Thomson Operator: Hello, everyone, and thank you for your interest in BP's Second Quarter 2026 Results. Today's video presentation features Meg ONeill, Chief Executive Officer; and Kate Thomson, Chief Financial Officer. The running order for today's prepared remarks is as follows: Meg will begin with her reflection since becoming CEO and the priorities she is setting for BP. Kate will then take you through our second quarter financial performance, and Meg will return to close with her perspective on the path ahead. Let me first draw your attention to our cautionary statement. In this video, we will make forward-looking statements that refer to our estimates, plans and expectations. Actual results and outcomes could differ materially due to the factors we note on this slide and in our U.K. and SEC filings. Please refer to our annual report, stock exchange announcement and SEC filings for more details. These documents are available on our website. And with that, over to you, Meg. Marguerite O’Neill: Thanks, Craig. Just a few weeks ago marked my 100th day as CEO of BP. This has coincided with one of the most volatile periods within global energy markets. When the conflict in the Middle East disrupted global oil and gas supply, the BP team responded, keeping energy flowing across the world safely, reliably and efficiently. I want to start with an update on safety. Over the past 4 months, I've seen a deep commitment to safety across BP. It comes first, always, but performance in the first half of the year has not been where it needs to be. Tragically, a Castrol colleague died following an incident at the Gemlik blending plant in Turkiye in April. Our thoughts remain with their family, friends and colleagues. An investigation is underway to understand what happened, and we will learn and apply those lessons to improve our business. On process safety, we saw an increase of events in the first half of 2026 when compared with the same period in 2025, including an increase in Tier 1 events. Nothing is more important than the safety of our people. Operational excellence is foundational to what we do, and this begins with consistent safe performance. Our safety goal remains to eliminate fatalities, life-changing injuries and Tier 1 process safety events across our operations. Turning to second quarter results. We demonstrated strong financial delivery and progress towards our 2027 targets. But there are also areas where performance has been below where it needs to be. On the headlines, upstream production was 2.2 million barrels of oil equivalent per day. This was 6% lower than the first quarter, driven by scheduled seasonal maintenance, predominantly in the Gulf of America, disruptions in the Middle East and some operational issues in the North Sea and Indonesia. This was partly offset by stronger performance at bpx. Refining throughput was around 1.5 million barrels per day. This was 4% lower than the first quarter due primarily to higher planned turnaround activity and lower refining availability. We delivered $5.7 billion of underlying profit, $2.5 billion higher than the first quarter and $10.9 billion of operating cash flow after a $1 billion working capital build. Financial obligations, including net debt, hybrids and Gulf of America settlement liabilities reduced by around $7 billion compared to the first quarter. Today, we have announced a 4% increase in the dividend per share. Before I hand over to Kate to go into our 2Q results in more detail, I would like to share my reflections of the business and our direction of travel. Alongside working with the leadership team to manage the business, I've spent significant time with BP's teams on the ground. I've also spoken with investors, business partners, governments and other key stakeholders. I came to BP because I believe this company can be extraordinary, and I've seen enough in 4 months to know that's true. When you combine great assets with great people who are ready to step up, you get a company with real potential. I believe our integrated model is a source of competitive advantage. The combination of upstream and downstream supported by trading gives BP an earnings and cash flow profile that is more resilient through the cycle with greater flexibility to capture value across markets. But our performance over the past few years has not met our own expectations nor the expectations of our shareholders. We have not delivered consistently enough across our operations. We have written off too much shareholder value, and we face a challenge of liabilities and costs that means our resilience to a low price environment is insufficient, exacerbated by a portfolio that is too stretched and too complex. To achieve consistently strong performance, we have to challenge ourselves. We must hold up a mirror and be honest about what we see, be proud of our strengths and do the work to identify and address our weaknesses. We must deliver at pace with urgency and with deep accountability for the decisions we make. Going forward, every part of the company needs to earn its place, generating cash, improving returns and strengthening the whole. We need to improve the quality of our earnings and cash generation and unlock more value for shareholders. That is why I am setting 5 priorities to deliver a step change in performance and to grow shareholder value. The first priority is strengthening the balance sheet. We are making progress, but we are not where we need to be. Too much cash is currently being used to service liabilities. I want more of the value proposition to move back to equity holders through growth, distributions or both. As a starting point, that means reducing financial obligations relative to our scale to at least in line with our European competitors. A stronger balance sheet gives us more resilience, more flexibility and greater capacity to create value through the cycle. Second, we will simplify and focus the portfolio. As we high grade, we will do so based on value creation, not sentiment, not history and not legacy attachment. Some assets may have been important to BP in the past. That does not necessarily mean they are the right assets for BP's future. We are in action. We plan to market our U.S. renewable natural gas business, Archaea Energy, and we recently launched a process to market our North Sea business. I'll come back to talk more about portfolio shortly. Third, we will invest with discipline and drive capital efficiency. Every dollar of capital has to compete, and we need to get fit to grow. We need to compete in the weight class we are in, focusing capital on our best opportunities to maximize cash flow and returns. Our decision to exit Bay du Nord shows that discipline in action. Fourth, we need to run our assets safely, reliably and with greater cost efficiency. We have made progress on structural costs, but interventions to date have not delivered sufficient savings to the bottom line. That's what matters, and we have more to do. The opportunity is to use technology, simplification and organizational redesign to build a more competitive BP. Kate will talk more about costs shortly. Finally, we must tackle culture to enable faster, more effective decision-making and greater accountability for results. I want challenge to be welcomed, disagreement surfaced early and decisions to be rigorous, evidence-based and accountable. Reorganizing into upstream and downstream is an important first step on this journey. Portfolio optimization is central to building a simpler, stronger and higher value BP. The data on this slide gives an illustrative view of free cash flow and returns from our assets over the past 3 years. It does not capture the through-cycle value of every business or the additional value created through integration and trading for all assets. As with capital allocation, we consider a broader set of factors, including strategic alignment, optionality and sustainability. But it does show the value lens we are applying across BP. We have assets and businesses that generate attractive returns, material free cash flow and strategic value for the group. But we also have variability with some assets consuming capital, adding complexity or diluting returns without generating enough cash flow. We are taking an objective view asset by asset, business by business, looking at cash generation, returns, capital efficiency and strategic fit. Upstream is anchored by material positions, including in the U.S. and the Middle East, advantaged basins where we have scale, deep technical capability and strong relationships. I'm convinced that BP has the potential to be one of the best upstream businesses in the industry. Major projects sanctioned for start-up between 2028 and 2030 are progressing according to schedule, but sanctioning projects is not the proof point, delivery is. Executing these projects safely, on time and on budget is what investors expect from BP, and it is a core measure of how we will rebuild confidence. Downstream is a strategically important business, bringing scale, diversification and resilience to the group earnings and cash flow. Regional integrated value chains link refining, logistics, trading and customer channels to capture value across the system. During recent volatility, that helps secure supply and keep products flowing to customers. The model varies by market, but the principle is the same. The system is strongest when it works together. Cherry Point on the U.S. West Coast is a good example. Its coastal position gives access to global crude markets, feedstock flexibility, export capability and market optionality. Our customer channels, retail, aviation and B2B, provide stable offtake and a strong return on capital. But there are also areas to improve, including reducing total cash cost relative to gross margin and targeted performance programs in businesses like TravelCenters of America. We will continue to assess and divest assets that do not provide integrated value or dilute our margin profile as we have with the announced sale of Austria mobility & convenience and Gelsenkirchen refinery. Now, the point of optimization is not simply to reduce the number of assets. It is to focus capital on activities that can generate stronger cash flow, better returns and greater value through the cycle and taking action where they do not. Assets matter, but it's our portfolio, combined with a world-class trading organization that provides differentiated value for BP. Supply, trading and shipping connects the system, enabling us to source supply, manage disruption, access demand growth and direct molecules to the highest value markets. We have built deep capability across regions, products and markets over decades and now operate a trading business of significant scale. That scale and diversification matters. We are not dependent on any one region, asset or market condition to create value. Our track record is strong. Over the last 6 years, trading has delivered an average uplift of around 4 percentage points to BP's return on capital employed, of which at least 2 percentage points has come from the base global portfolio, which has demonstrated resilience through the cycle. The breadth of the portfolio gives us the ability to capture upside when market conditions present greater opportunities. We will continue to invest in technology across trading to maintain leadership, improve efficiency and grow, and our merchant strategy will continue to provide access to emerging markets. As we grow, we will maintain cost discipline, growing revenue while maintaining the cost base to improve margins. It is this combination of a high-quality upstream and downstream, supported by distinctive trading capability that makes a world-class global integrated oil and gas company, one that provides energy to our customers while creating value for our shareholders. We're clear on our plan and looking to accelerate delivery. Now let me hand over to Kate to talk in more detail on our second quarter results. Thanks, Kate. Katherine Thomson: Thank you, Meg. So now let me turn to our second quarter financial performance in more detail, starting with profit. Group underlying profit increased by 78% from the first quarter, helped by a broadly strong price environment and higher trading performance. Starting with segment earnings. In Gas and Low Carbon Energy, segment underlying operating profit increased by around $800 million, reflecting higher realizations, including the impact of price lags with gas marketing and trading broadly flat compared with the first quarter. In Oil Production and Operations, segment underlying operating profit increased by around $1.6 billion. This reflected higher liquids realizations, including the impact of price lags, production mix benefit and higher income from equity accounted entities. These positive factors were partly offset by higher exploration write-offs, mainly related to exiting Bay du Nord and lower production due to seasonal maintenance in the Gulf of America. In Customers and Products, segment underlying operating profit increased by around $1.8 billion. Within customers, profit benefited from seasonally higher volumes, higher fuel margins, a stronger Castrol performance and a slightly higher midstream contribution, partly offset by lower earnings from bioenergy. Within products, profit benefited from significantly stronger realized refining margins and a slightly higher oil trading contribution, partly offset by higher planned turnaround and maintenance activity as well as the impacts of the third-party event at Whiting in April. Other businesses and corporate charges were around $70 million higher than the previous quarter, primarily reflecting impacts of the Ventures divestments and one-off corporate items. Taking all these factors together, group underlying replacement cost profit before interest and tax was $10.3 billion compared to $6.3 billion in the previous quarter. Below the operating segments, the underlying tax charge increased by around $1.5 billion, reflecting higher earnings in the quarter. Group underlying replacement cost profit was $5.7 billion. We recorded net adverse adjusting items of around $1.1 billion across the segment, including post-tax net impairments of around $800 million, primarily related to transition businesses in the Gas and Low Carbon Energy segment. After inventory holding losses of around $700 million, our second quarter IFRS profit was $3.9 billion. Moving from earnings to cash flow and the balance sheet. This quarter, stronger earnings converted into stronger cash generation, helping us to reduce financial obligations by around $7 billion. Now rather than follow the cash flow statement line by line, I want to walk through the quarter's sources and uses of cash, showing how cash generated by the business flowed through to net debt and financial obligations. Our total sources of cash in the quarter were $13.5 billion. Underlying cash generation was $12.9 billion. This compares with reported operating cash flow of $10.9 billion, which was after $1 billion of interest payments and around $1 billion build in working capital during the quarter. I'll come back to working capital shortly. We also received around $600 million of divestment proceeds during the quarter. On the uses of cash, the main outflows were CapEx of $3.1 billion, perpetual hybrid bonds of $3.1 billion, including the redemption of $2.9 billion and $1.3 billion of dividends paid. After these cash outflows, net debt reduced by around $3.1 billion, which brought the balance at the end of the quarter to $22.3 billion. I now want to spend a moment on working capital, given its importance to cash generation. During the second quarter, we reported a $1 billion build. This reflected the scheduled $1.1 billion Gulf of America settlement and around $200 million for decommissioning. As a reminder, these items are not expected to reverse because of their accounting treatment. Partly offsetting this, we saw a $700 million release for seasonal effects and pricing, taking our first half working capital build to $7 billion. Subject to the macro environment and prices, we expect $2 billion to $3 billion to unwind from here over the remainder of the year as we move through the peak demand period in customers and products. As I mentioned in the first quarter, the timing of the remaining unwind will depend on how the situation in the Middle East evolves. The expected unwind of working capital is one important source of cash in the second half, together with organic cash generation and the remaining contribution from divestment proceeds this year, including around $6 billion from the announced Castrol transaction, it supports our path to further reducing financial obligations. On the stated price assumptions, we expect to see financial obligations reducing to around $39 billion to $41 billion by the end of 2026. This would mean delivering our $14 billion to $18 billion net debt target ahead of plan, including our plan to repay $1 billion of perpetual hybrid securities in the third quarter. But I want to be clear that at that level, there would still be more to do. We will continue reducing financial obligations beyond 2026 with organic cash generation and further expected divestment proceeds. As Meg said earlier, cost efficiency is a management priority and a key to improving profitability. Since 2024, we've provided greater transparency by reconciling production and manufacturing expenses and distribution and administration expenses into 2 categories: variable costs and underlying operating expenditure. Let me say a few more words on both. Starting with variable costs, the largest components are transport and shipping, environmental and marketing and distribution. These costs are mainly linked to product movement, environmental compliance obligations and customer-facing activity within our ST&S and C&P businesses. The important point is that these costs should be assessed alongside the gross profit they help generate. We're focused on growing and optimizing gross profit, capturing revenue and margin opportunities while managing the variable costs associated with that activity. In the first half this year, variable costs increased year-on-year, but related gross profit increased by more. So we continue to manage these costs carefully with a focus on value creation. Underlying operating expenditure is different in that it represents the structural cost base of the company. Here, we are disappointed that underlying operating expenditure is not coming down quickly enough. Since the start of the program, we have delivered $3.5 billion of structural cost reductions, but the benefits are not yet sufficiently visible in earnings and cash flow. The actions taken so far have not been sufficient to overcome inflation, some acquired costs and the complexity of our cost base. We have identified further opportunities to optimize supply chain costs to simplify organizational structure and use technology to build a more competitive BP. In parallel, the portfolio review, Meg described, has identified businesses where divestment can simplify BP, improve margins and strengthen the quality of cash flows. Gelsenkirchen is a clear example, an asset with a higher cost intensity than the group average. Divestment also reflects our assessment of strategic fit through cycle earnings and integration value. Our announcement to market Archaea Energy is another example. Importantly, cost reduction is an output of these portfolio decisions and not the reason for them. Turning now to outlook and guidance. As we continue to enhance our disclosures, we are now adding production and throughput ranges to our forward-looking guidance. I won't read through all the details, but let me note some items by exception. We now see full year CapEx in the range of $13.5 billion to $14 billion, reflecting our decision to delay asset farm-downs to capture better value. We now expect full year divestment proceeds to be in the range of $8 billion to $9 billion. To reflect the completion of the sale of the Gelsenkirchen German refinery effective 31st July, we have updated our refining indicator margin. Finally, we have updated our full year underlying effective tax rate to be around 35% to 40%. More details can be found in our appendices and supplementary disclosures on bp.com. With that, let me hand back to Meg. Marguerite O’Neill: Thanks, Kate. I'm an operator at heart and pragmatic in decision-making. I'm committed to analytical rigor and an unemotional approach to the decisions to be made, including a full review of the portfolio and cost structure and a relentless focus on performance. As we work through this process, we will be transparent about what needs to be fixed and make the tough decisions to ensure we move at pace to unlock the value that is embedded in BP. I have deep conviction this company can and will be a world-class global integrated oil and gas company. I have confidence in BP's strengths and future potential, and I'm also honest about where we need to improve. We need to convert potential into stronger, more consistent performance. How we do that is to focus, perform and grow. BP has great assets, deep capabilities and people who know how to deliver. We will focus on the assets, businesses and markets where we have the strongest competitive positions and the clearest routes to value creation. That means simplifying the company, strengthening the balance sheet, high-grading the portfolio and allocating capital only where it can deliver competitive returns. Every part of BP has to earn its place. We need to perform more consistently safely, operationally and financially. Safety performance must improve. Costs must come down. Project delivery must be disciplined and accountability must be sharper. We need to get BP fit for the weight class we are in today so we can compete harder and generate more cash. BP has real growth potential, but growth must be earned through a track record of delivering consistent positive returns and cash flow. We need to demonstrate that we can deliver on that commitment and do so quickly and with greater intensity. As we build that track record, we build our capacity, confidence and credibility to invest further. Ultimately, the growth that matters most is shareholder value, growing value per share over the long-term. I and all of us at BP will ultimately be judged by the performance of the business. This is the role that I signed up for, and I'm excited for the challenge. In the first instance, that means delivering on the primary targets that we've laid out to the market. That's what my leadership team is focused on, and I'd like to acknowledge their discipline, accountability and commitment to delivery. I'm confident we're moving in the right direction. We've made progress so far this year and have momentum going into the second half with more to come. The task is to move with urgency, accelerate delivery and build a stronger, more focused, more competitive company, one that performs consistently and delivers stronger outcomes for our shareholders and all those who rely on us. Thank you for your interest in BP. Before you buy stock in BP, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and BP wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut are built for long-term growth and could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $411,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,335,252!* That performance is why people listen. With a track record of beating the S&P 500 by 4x, Stock Advisor offers a distinct advantage. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built for the long haul. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 12, 2026. This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability. The Motley Fool recommends BP. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. BP (BP) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript was originally published by The Motley Fool

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-05

BP Q2 Earnings Call Puts Balance Sheet and Delivery First

Zacks
BP p.l.c. BP used its second-quarter 2026 call to frame a management reset under CEO Marguerite O'Neill, with balance-sheet repair, portfolio simplification and tighter execution placed ahead of growth. Management paired stronger earnings with direct acknowledgments of weak safety and operating consistency. CFO Katherine Thomson outlined a path to lower financial obligations and advance divestments. CEO Marguerite O'Neill set five priorities: strengthen the balance sheet, simplify the portfolio, invest with greater discipline, improve operational excellence and hardwire accountability into the organization. She said every business must justify its place through cash generation, returns and strategic value. The reorganization into upstream and downstream is intended to sharpen decisions and reduce complexity. Underlying replacement cost profit per ADS of $2.22 exceeded the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.98, while revenues of $70.11 billion topped the $67.71 billion consensus mark. BP p.l.c. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | BP p.l.c. Quote CFO Katherine Thomson said total financial obligations fell roughly $7 billion during the quarter. Net debt declined to $22.3 billion from $25.3 billion amid strong cash generation and a hybrid bond redemption. Operating cash flow reached $10.9 billion after a $1 billion working-capital build. Management expects $2 billion to $3 billion of first-half working capital to unwind during the rest of 2026, subject to prices and the Middle East environment. At stated price assumptions, CFO Thomson expects financial obligations of about $39 billion to $41 billion by year-end. That path would deliver BP's $14 billion to $18 billion net debt target ahead of plan, though further reduction would be required. CEO O'Neill described the review as an asset-by-asset assessment of cash generation, returns, capital efficiency and strategic fit. History or legacy attachment will not protect an underperforming business. BP plans to market Archaea Energy and has launched a process for its North Sea business. It also completed the Gelsenkirchen refinery sale, agreed to sell its Austrian retail operation and exited Bay du Nord. Management said divestments are meant to improve portfolio quality rather than simply shrink the company. Capital will be concentrated in businesses that can deliver stronger through-cycle cash flow and integrated value.…Read full document

BP p.l.c. BP used its second-quarter 2026 call to frame a management reset under CEO Marguerite O'Neill, with balance-sheet repair, portfolio simplification and tighter execution placed ahead of growth. Management paired stronger earnings with direct acknowledgments of weak safety and operating consistency. CFO Katherine Thomson outlined a path to lower financial obligations and advance divestments. CEO Marguerite O'Neill set five priorities: strengthen the balance sheet, simplify the portfolio, invest with greater discipline, improve operational excellence and hardwire accountability into the organization. She said every business must justify its place through cash generation, returns and strategic value. The reorganization into upstream and downstream is intended to sharpen decisions and reduce complexity. Underlying replacement cost profit per ADS of $2.22 exceeded the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.98, while revenues of $70.11 billion topped the $67.71 billion consensus mark. BP p.l.c. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | BP p.l.c. Quote CFO Katherine Thomson said total financial obligations fell roughly $7 billion during the quarter. Net debt declined to $22.3 billion from $25.3 billion amid strong cash generation and a hybrid bond redemption. Operating cash flow reached $10.9 billion after a $1 billion working-capital build. Management expects $2 billion to $3 billion of first-half working capital to unwind during the rest of 2026, subject to prices and the Middle East environment. At stated price assumptions, CFO Thomson expects financial obligations of about $39 billion to $41 billion by year-end. That path would deliver BP's $14 billion to $18 billion net debt target ahead of plan, though further reduction would be required. CEO O'Neill described the review as an asset-by-asset assessment of cash generation, returns, capital efficiency and strategic fit. History or legacy attachment will not protect an underperforming business. BP plans to market Archaea Energy and has launched a process for its North Sea business. It also completed the Gelsenkirchen refinery sale, agreed to sell its Austrian retail operation and exited Bay du Nord. Management said divestments are meant to improve portfolio quality rather than simply shrink the company. Capital will be concentrated in businesses that can deliver stronger through-cycle cash flow and integrated value. Upstream production fell 6% sequentially to 2.2 million barrels of oil equivalent per day. Refining throughput declined 4% to about 1.5 million barrels per day because of maintenance, disruptions and operating issues. CEO O'Neill said first-half safety performance was below expectations, including more process-safety events and a fatal incident at Castrol's Gemlik blending plant in Turkiye. She placed safer, more reliable operations at the foundation of the reset. CFO Thomson said BP has delivered $3.5 billion of structural cost reductions, but the benefits are not showing up quickly enough in earnings and cash flow. Supply-chain efficiencies, organizational simplification and technology initiatives represent the company's next key areas of focus. Full-year capital spending is expected to be in the range of $13.5-$14 billion. CFO Thomson attributed the range to delayed asset farm-downs intended to capture better value. BP expects 2026 divestment proceeds of $8 billion to $9 billion. The remaining cash contribution includes about $6 billion from the announced Castrol transaction. Management also updated the full-year underlying effective tax rate to roughly 35% to 40%. Second-half debt reduction depends on organic cash generation, working-capital normalization and transaction execution. CEO O'Neill's closing message centered on focus, performance and growth, with delivery as the prerequisite. Project execution, cost reduction and sharper accountability are the proof points management tied to rebuilding credibility. The direction is toward a simpler integrated oil and gas company with a stronger balance sheet and more selective capital allocation. Management emphasized that its performance should be measured by consistent operational and financial execution rather than portfolio potential alone. BP carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating a neutral stance in the ranking system. Its Value Score of A, Growth Score of B and VGM Score of A are favorable, while the Momentum Score of C is more balanced. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. The Style Scores complement the Zacks Rank, with A and B grades stronger than lower grades. BP's combination highlights attractive value and broad style characteristics, but the Hold rank tempers the signal. The Zacks Rank can change as analysts revise estimates following the results. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report BP p.l.c. (BP) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-05

EQNR Gains 22.2% Over the Past Month While Its Earnings Strengthen

Zacks
Equinor ASA EQNR shares have gained 22.2% in the past month, putting the rally’s durability at center stage. The advance has coincided with a sharp earnings rebound, higher production and stronger trading contributions. The operating recovery is meaningful, but expectations have also risen. A valuation above historical and sub-industry levels, together with lower 2027 consensus estimates, leaves less room for commodity, execution or cash-flow setbacks. Second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings reached $1.33 per share, up 107.8% from 64 cents a year earlier. Revenues increased 40% to $35.18 billion, while adjusted operating income rose 76% to $11.48 billion. The quarter was not flawless. Earnings missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate, although revenues edged past the consensus mark. Higher liquids and European gas prices, production growth and trading performance still provided broad support for the year-over-year improvement. Equity oil and gas production rose 3% to 2,165 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day. Norwegian Continental Shelf output increased 4%, helped by new fields, new wells and better-than-planned performance from Johan Sverdrup. First-half production increased 6%, making Equinor’s roughly 3% full-year growth guidance more dependable. Planned third-quarter turnarounds and the temporary Johan Castberg outage remain offsets, but management retained its 2026 outlook. Marketing, Midstream & Processing generated $777 million in adjusted operating income, up from $337 million a year earlier and well above normal-quarter guidance of about $400 million. Crude trading, shipping optimization, refining and liquefied natural gas trading all contributed. Shell plc SHEL also cited broad operational strength across its businesses in second-quarter 2026. BP p.l.c. BP reported stronger refining and customer results, showing why integrated portfolios can supplement upstream earnings when market conditions shift. EQNR trades at 9.4X forward 12-month earnings, above its five-year median of 7.7X and the Zacks sub-industry’s 9.3X. The premium is modest against the peer group but wider against Equinor’s own trading history. That setup narrows the cushion if commodity prices weaken, trading results normalize or projects slip. The recent share-price move therefore places more weight on continued operating delivery rather than valuation expansion alone. The Zacks Conse…Read full document

Equinor ASA EQNR shares have gained 22.2% in the past month, putting the rally’s durability at center stage. The advance has coincided with a sharp earnings rebound, higher production and stronger trading contributions. The operating recovery is meaningful, but expectations have also risen. A valuation above historical and sub-industry levels, together with lower 2027 consensus estimates, leaves less room for commodity, execution or cash-flow setbacks. Second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings reached $1.33 per share, up 107.8% from 64 cents a year earlier. Revenues increased 40% to $35.18 billion, while adjusted operating income rose 76% to $11.48 billion. The quarter was not flawless. Earnings missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate, although revenues edged past the consensus mark. Higher liquids and European gas prices, production growth and trading performance still provided broad support for the year-over-year improvement. Equity oil and gas production rose 3% to 2,165 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day. Norwegian Continental Shelf output increased 4%, helped by new fields, new wells and better-than-planned performance from Johan Sverdrup. First-half production increased 6%, making Equinor’s roughly 3% full-year growth guidance more dependable. Planned third-quarter turnarounds and the temporary Johan Castberg outage remain offsets, but management retained its 2026 outlook. Marketing, Midstream & Processing generated $777 million in adjusted operating income, up from $337 million a year earlier and well above normal-quarter guidance of about $400 million. Crude trading, shipping optimization, refining and liquefied natural gas trading all contributed. Shell plc SHEL also cited broad operational strength across its businesses in second-quarter 2026. BP p.l.c. BP reported stronger refining and customer results, showing why integrated portfolios can supplement upstream earnings when market conditions shift. EQNR trades at 9.4X forward 12-month earnings, above its five-year median of 7.7X and the Zacks sub-industry’s 9.3X. The premium is modest against the peer group but wider against Equinor’s own trading history. That setup narrows the cushion if commodity prices weaken, trading results normalize or projects slip. The recent share-price move therefore places more weight on continued operating delivery rather than valuation expansion alone. The Zacks Consensus Estimate points to 2027 earnings of $3.75 per share, down from $4.93 in 2026. Consensus sales are projected to decline to $105.13 billion from $120.28 billion. Growth normalization could make safety, tax timing and project execution more influential. Serious incident frequency remained above the 2025 level, Norwegian tax installments can make quarterly cash conversion uneven and the larger project pipeline raises delivery demands. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The bottom line is balanced. Equinor’s earnings, production and trading results support the recent recovery, but valuation and lower 2027 estimates reduce the margin for disappointment after a 22.2% monthly gain. EQNR currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). Its Value Score of A, Growth Score of A, Momentum Score of B and VGM Score of A are favorable, but Style Scores complement the Zacks Rank rather than replace it. The combination supports holding interest more than chasing the rally without further estimate-revision confirmation. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Equinor ASA (EQNR) : Free Stock Analysis Report BP p.l.c. (BP) : Free Stock Analysis Report Shell PLC Unsponsored ADR (SHEL) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-04

BP Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates on Strong Refining Margins & Pricing

Zacks
BP p.l.c. BP reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of $2.22 per American Depositary share (ADS), up 146.7% from 90 cents per ADS a year ago. The bottom line beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.98 per ADS by 12.1%. Total revenues and other income increased 47.1% to $70.11 billion from $47.68 billion a year earlier. The top line surpassed the consensus mark of $64.32 billion by 9%. The strong quarterly results were driven by higher refining margins, improved hydrocarbon price realizations and increased trading. Upstream production declined 4.3% to 2.201 million barrels of oil equivalent per day (MMBoe/d). BP p.l.c. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | BP p.l.c. Quote Underlying replacement-cost profit attributable to shareholders increased to $5.73 billion from $2.35 billion in the year-ago quarter. Underlying replacement-cost profit before interest and tax nearly doubled to $10.31 billion from $5.25 billion. Customers & Products was the main earnings driver. The segment’s underlying replacement-cost profit before interest and tax reached $4.95 billion, up from $1.53 billion a year earlier. The products business benefited from significantly higher realized refining margins, reduced turnaround activity and a stronger oil-trading contribution. Gas and Low Carbon Energy production declined 2.2% to 765 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day (Mboe/d). Its total hydrocarbon realization increased to $52.82 per barrel of oil equivalent from $40.84 per barrel of oil equivalent, supported by higher liquids and natural gas pricing. Oil Production and Operations output fell 5.4% to 1,436 Mboe/d. Total hydrocarbon realizations increased to $62.18 per barrel from $49.03 per barrel. Liquids realizations rose to $84.10 per barrel from $59.74 per barrel, while natural gas realizations declined to $2.16 per thousand cubic feet from $3.66 per thousand cubic feet. The segment’s underlying replacement-cost profit before interest and tax rose to $3.58 billion from $2.26 billion. Higher liquids realizations and increased income from equity-accounted entities more than offset lower production and higher exploration write-offs. BP’s average refining indicator margin increased sharply to $29.60 per barrel from $11.90 per barrel in the prior-year quarter. Refinery throughput rose 13.9% to 1,467 thousand barrels per day, despite declining from 1,527 thousand barrels per…Read full document

BP p.l.c. BP reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of $2.22 per American Depositary share (ADS), up 146.7% from 90 cents per ADS a year ago. The bottom line beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.98 per ADS by 12.1%. Total revenues and other income increased 47.1% to $70.11 billion from $47.68 billion a year earlier. The top line surpassed the consensus mark of $64.32 billion by 9%. The strong quarterly results were driven by higher refining margins, improved hydrocarbon price realizations and increased trading. Upstream production declined 4.3% to 2.201 million barrels of oil equivalent per day (MMBoe/d). BP p.l.c. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | BP p.l.c. Quote Underlying replacement-cost profit attributable to shareholders increased to $5.73 billion from $2.35 billion in the year-ago quarter. Underlying replacement-cost profit before interest and tax nearly doubled to $10.31 billion from $5.25 billion. Customers & Products was the main earnings driver. The segment’s underlying replacement-cost profit before interest and tax reached $4.95 billion, up from $1.53 billion a year earlier. The products business benefited from significantly higher realized refining margins, reduced turnaround activity and a stronger oil-trading contribution. Gas and Low Carbon Energy production declined 2.2% to 765 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day (Mboe/d). Its total hydrocarbon realization increased to $52.82 per barrel of oil equivalent from $40.84 per barrel of oil equivalent, supported by higher liquids and natural gas pricing. Oil Production and Operations output fell 5.4% to 1,436 Mboe/d. Total hydrocarbon realizations increased to $62.18 per barrel from $49.03 per barrel. Liquids realizations rose to $84.10 per barrel from $59.74 per barrel, while natural gas realizations declined to $2.16 per thousand cubic feet from $3.66 per thousand cubic feet. The segment’s underlying replacement-cost profit before interest and tax rose to $3.58 billion from $2.26 billion. Higher liquids realizations and increased income from equity-accounted entities more than offset lower production and higher exploration write-offs. BP’s average refining indicator margin increased sharply to $29.60 per barrel from $11.90 per barrel in the prior-year quarter. Refinery throughput rose 13.9% to 1,467 thousand barrels per day, despite declining from 1,527 thousand barrels per day in the preceding quarter. BP-operated refining availability was 94.7%, down from 96.4% a year ago. Total refined-product sales declined to 3.16 million barrels per day (MMBbl/d) from 3.20 MMBbl/d, although trading and supply volumes increased. The customers' business also delivered stronger results, aided by improved fuels and midstream performance and higher Castrol earnings. These positives were partly offset by lower fuels volumes and a reduced contribution from bioenergy. Operating cash flow increased 73.2% to $10.86 billion, despite a $1.02 billion adjusted working-capital build. Underlying cash generation totaled $12.89 billion during the quarter. Capital expenditure declined to $3.09 billion from $3.36 billion. BP also received $609 million in divestment and other proceeds, compared with $1.36 billion in the prior-year period. Net debt decreased to $22.25 billion at quarter-end from $26.04 billion a year earlier and $25.31 billion at the end of the first quarter. Total financial obligations and instruments, including net debt, hybrid capital, leases and Gulf of America settlement liabilities, declined by $6.9 billion sequentially. BP increased its quarterly dividend by 4% to 8.660 cents per ordinary share. The company expects ADS holders to receive 51.96 cents per ADS. For the third quarter of 2026, BP projects upstream production to be in the range of 2.1-2.25 MMBoe/d. The outlook incorporates continued Middle East disruptions, lower ownership in Latin America and a potential weather impact of about 40 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day in the Gulf of America. BP expects full-year reported upstream production to be between 2.18 MMBoe/d and 2.27 MMBoe/d. Products throughput is forecast in the range of 1.36-1.41 MMBbl/d. The company raised its 2026 capital expenditure outlook to $13.5-$14 billion from the prior $13-$13.5 billion range. Divestment and other proceeds are expected to be between $8 billion and $9 billion, including approximately $6 billion from the planned Castrol transaction. BP currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). Some better-ranked stocks from the energy sector are PBF Energy Inc. PBF, HF Sinclair Corporation DINO and Cactus, Inc. WHD. PBF sports a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), while DINO and WHD carry a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) each, at present. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks Rank #1 stocks here. PBF reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of $6.22 per share, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $4.05 per share. As of June 30, 2026, PBF had total debt of $1.75 billion, and cash and cash equivalents of $894.1 million. HF Sinclair reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of $5.31 per share, topping the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $4.39 per share. As of June 30, 2026, DINO had total debt of $2.77 billion, and cash and cash equivalents of $2.26 billion. Cactus reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of 93 cents per share, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 71 cents per share. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report BP p.l.c. (BP) : Free Stock Analysis Report PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) : Free Stock Analysis Report Cactus, Inc. (WHD) : Free Stock Analysis Report HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-04

Should You Buy ExxonMobil Stock Despite Its Q2 Earnings Miss?

Zacks
Last Friday, ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation XOM announced second-quarter 2026 earnings that missed expectations owing to the conflicts in the Middle East that hurt oil and gas production. However, non-Middle East upstream production achieved its strongest levels in more than two decades. Thus, it is clear that despite the earnings shortfall, ExxonMobil’s core businesses continue to show considerable strength. Also, considering the solid crude pricing environment, the integrated energy giant’s overall business outlook remains solid. Before assessing whether the stock is worth buying, let's first take a closer look at its second-quarter results. ExxonMobil reported earnings per share of $3.52 (excluding identified items), which missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $3.68. The bottom line, however, increased from the year-ago level of $1.64. Total quarterly revenues of $116.01 billion beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $95.8 billion. The top line improved from the year-ago figure of $81.51 billion. For more details, read our article: XOM Q2 Earnings Miss Estimates Despite Record Production Growth. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Chevron Corporation CVX and BP plc BP are two other prominent integrated energy companies. Both CVX and BP have already posted results. West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) crude is trading at more than the $75-per-barrel mark. The high price is being backed by ongoing tensions in the Middle East. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (“EIA”) in its latest short-term energy outlook projected WTI at $76.26 per barrel this year, higher than $65.40 last year. A highly favorable pricing environment for the commodity is likely to continue supporting ExxonMobil's exploration and production activities, which derive the majority of its earnings. The company has a massive footprint in the Permian, the most prolific oil and gas play in the United States, and offshore Guyana. In the Permian, the integrated giant has been employing new drilling techniques and artificial intelligence to boost and optimize production volumes at lower cost structures. In Guyana, XOM has made several oil and gas discoveries, further highlighting its solid production outlook. Robust production from both assets has been aiding its top and bottom lines. In both resources, the breakeven costs are low. Investors should also keep in mind that XOM has a strong bal…Read full document

Last Friday, ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation XOM announced second-quarter 2026 earnings that missed expectations owing to the conflicts in the Middle East that hurt oil and gas production. However, non-Middle East upstream production achieved its strongest levels in more than two decades. Thus, it is clear that despite the earnings shortfall, ExxonMobil’s core businesses continue to show considerable strength. Also, considering the solid crude pricing environment, the integrated energy giant’s overall business outlook remains solid. Before assessing whether the stock is worth buying, let's first take a closer look at its second-quarter results. ExxonMobil reported earnings per share of $3.52 (excluding identified items), which missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $3.68. The bottom line, however, increased from the year-ago level of $1.64. Total quarterly revenues of $116.01 billion beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $95.8 billion. The top line improved from the year-ago figure of $81.51 billion. For more details, read our article: XOM Q2 Earnings Miss Estimates Despite Record Production Growth. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Chevron Corporation CVX and BP plc BP are two other prominent integrated energy companies. Both CVX and BP have already posted results. West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) crude is trading at more than the $75-per-barrel mark. The high price is being backed by ongoing tensions in the Middle East. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (“EIA”) in its latest short-term energy outlook projected WTI at $76.26 per barrel this year, higher than $65.40 last year. A highly favorable pricing environment for the commodity is likely to continue supporting ExxonMobil's exploration and production activities, which derive the majority of its earnings. The company has a massive footprint in the Permian, the most prolific oil and gas play in the United States, and offshore Guyana. In the Permian, the integrated giant has been employing new drilling techniques and artificial intelligence to boost and optimize production volumes at lower cost structures. In Guyana, XOM has made several oil and gas discoveries, further highlighting its solid production outlook. Robust production from both assets has been aiding its top and bottom lines. In both resources, the breakeven costs are low. Investors should also keep in mind that XOM has a strong balance sheet, on which it could rely during an unfavorable business environment. The debt-to-capitalization of ExxonMobil is significantly lower than the industry’s composite stocks. Coming to the integrated energy giant’s dividend commitment story, over the past 43 years, ExxonMobil has been rewarding shareholders with annual dividend hikes at an average rate of 5.8%. The positive developments are getting reflected in the price chart. In the past year, XOM has jumped 44.6%, outpacing the industry’s 41.1% growth. BP and CVX, two other integrated players in the same space, have gained 31.7% and 26.2%, respectively. Price Chart Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Coming to the valuation story, XOM is trading at a premium. On a relative basis, the stock is trading at an 8.67x trailing 12-month Enterprise Value to Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EV/EBITDA), which is a premium compared with the broader industry average of 6.73x. BP and CVX are trading at 3.28x and 7.58x, respectively. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research To conclude, despite the solid business outlook, it wouldn’t be wise to bet on XOM right away, given the stock’s overvaluation. Those who have already invested may hold the stock. Currently, XOM carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM) : Free Stock Analysis Report BP p.l.c. (BP) : Free Stock Analysis Report Chevron Corporation (CVX) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-04

BP PLC (BP) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Profit Surge and Strategic Portfolio Overhaul

GuruFocus.com
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: August 04, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. BP PLC (NYSE:BP) delivered a strong second quarter with underlying profit of $5.7 billion, up 78% from the first quarter, and operating cash flow of $10.9 billion. The company reduced financial obligations by around $7 billion in the quarter, bringing net debt down to $22.3 billion and on track to meet its $14-18 billion net debt target ahead of plan. BP PLC (NYSE:BP) announced a 4% increase in the dividend per share, reflecting confidence in its cash generation and commitment to shareholder returns. The integrated model, supported by a world-class trading organization, delivered an average uplift of around 4 percentage points to return on capital employed over the last six years, demonstrating resilience and value creation. Management is taking decisive action to simplify and high-grade the portfolio, including plans to market Archaea Energy and the North Sea business, and exiting Badenoord, to focus on higher-return assets. The company is making progress on structural cost reductions, having delivered $3.5 billion in savings since the start of the program, with further opportunities identified in supply chain and organizational simplification. BP PLC (NYSE:BP) reported a tragic fatality at its Castrol blending plant in Turkiye, and an increase in process safety events, including Tier 1 events, in the first half of 2026. Upstream production fell 6% quarter-over-quarter to 2.2 million barrels of oil equivalent per day, impacted by seasonal maintenance, Middle East disruptions, and operational issues in the North Sea and Indonesia. Underlying operating expenditure is not declining fast enough, with benefits from cost reductions not yet sufficiently visible in earnings and cash flow due to inflation and complexity. The company recorded net adverse adjusting items of around $1.1 billion, including post-tax impairments of approximately $800 million, primarily related to transition businesses. Working capital built by $1 billion in the quarter, with a first-half build of $7 billion, and the timing of the unwind remains uncertain depending on the Middle East situation. BP PLC (NYSE:BP) acknowledged that past performance has not met expectations, with too much shareholder value written off and a…Read full document

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: August 04, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. BP PLC (NYSE:BP) delivered a strong second quarter with underlying profit of $5.7 billion, up 78% from the first quarter, and operating cash flow of $10.9 billion. The company reduced financial obligations by around $7 billion in the quarter, bringing net debt down to $22.3 billion and on track to meet its $14-18 billion net debt target ahead of plan. BP PLC (NYSE:BP) announced a 4% increase in the dividend per share, reflecting confidence in its cash generation and commitment to shareholder returns. The integrated model, supported by a world-class trading organization, delivered an average uplift of around 4 percentage points to return on capital employed over the last six years, demonstrating resilience and value creation. Management is taking decisive action to simplify and high-grade the portfolio, including plans to market Archaea Energy and the North Sea business, and exiting Badenoord, to focus on higher-return assets. The company is making progress on structural cost reductions, having delivered $3.5 billion in savings since the start of the program, with further opportunities identified in supply chain and organizational simplification. BP PLC (NYSE:BP) reported a tragic fatality at its Castrol blending plant in Turkiye, and an increase in process safety events, including Tier 1 events, in the first half of 2026. Upstream production fell 6% quarter-over-quarter to 2.2 million barrels of oil equivalent per day, impacted by seasonal maintenance, Middle East disruptions, and operational issues in the North Sea and Indonesia. Underlying operating expenditure is not declining fast enough, with benefits from cost reductions not yet sufficiently visible in earnings and cash flow due to inflation and complexity. The company recorded net adverse adjusting items of around $1.1 billion, including post-tax impairments of approximately $800 million, primarily related to transition businesses. Working capital built by $1 billion in the quarter, with a first-half build of $7 billion, and the timing of the unwind remains uncertain depending on the Middle East situation. BP PLC (NYSE:BP) acknowledged that past performance has not met expectations, with too much shareholder value written off and a portfolio that is too stretched and complex, leading to insufficient resilience in low-price environments. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 8 Warning Signs with BP. Is BP fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Q: What are the five priorities CEO Meg O'Neill is setting to deliver a step change in performance and grow shareholder value?A: Meg O'Neill, CEO, outlined five priorities: 1) Strengthening the balance sheet by reducing financial obligations to at least in line with European competitors; 2) Simplifying and focusing the portfolio, including marketing Archaea Energy and the North Sea business; 3) Investing with discipline and driving capital efficiency, exemplified by the exit from Baidu Nord; 4) Running assets safely, reliably, and with greater cost efficiency; and 5) Tackling culture to enable faster, more effective decision-making and greater accountability. Q: How did BP's second quarter 2026 financial performance compare to the first quarter, and what were the key drivers?A: Kate Thomson, CFO, reported group underlying profit increased by 78% to $5.7 billion, driven by a broadly strong price environment and higher trading performance. Operating cash flow was $10.9 billion after a $1 billion working capital build. Financial obligations reduced by around $7 billion. Segment profits rose across the board, with customers and products up $1.8 billion, oil production and operations up $1.6 billion, and gas and low carbon energy up $800 million. Q: What is the company's updated outlook for financial obligations and net debt by the end of 2026?A: Kate Thomson stated that on stated price assumptions, BP expects financial obligations to reduce to around $39-41 billion by the end of 2026. This would deliver the $14-18 billion net debt target ahead of plan, including repaying $1 billion of perpetual hybrid securities in Q3. However, she emphasized there would still be more to do beyond 2026 with organic cash generation and further divestment proceeds. Q: What is BP's strategy regarding its portfolio, and what specific assets are being divested or reviewed?A: Meg O'Neill explained that portfolio optimization is central to building a simpler, stronger, higher-value BP. The company is taking an objective, asset-by-asset view based on cash generation, returns, capital efficiency, and strategic fit. They plan to market Archaea Energy (US renewable natural gas) and the North Sea business, and have announced the sale of Austrian Mobility and Convenience and the Gelsenkirchen Refinery. The goal is to focus capital on activities that generate stronger cash flow and better returns. Q: How is BP addressing its cost structure, and what progress has been made on structural cost reductions?A: Kate Thomson acknowledged disappointment that underlying operating expenditure is not coming down quickly enough. Since the start of the program, BP has delivered $3.5 billion of structural cost reductions, but benefits are not yet sufficiently visible in earnings and cash flow due to inflation, acquired costs, and complexity. Further opportunities have been identified in supply chain optimization, organizational simplification, and technology use. Cost reduction is an output of portfolio decisions, not the reason for them. Q: What is the company's updated guidance for capital expenditure and divestment proceeds for the full year 2026?A: Kate Thomson provided updated guidance: full-year CapEx is now expected to be in the range of $13.5 billion to $14 billion, reflecting a decision to delay asset farmdowns to capture better value. Full-year divestment proceeds are now expected to be in the range of $8 to $9 billion, including around $6 billion from the announced cash roll transaction. Q: How does BP view the role of trading in its integrated model, and what has been its historical contribution?A: Meg O'Neill highlighted that supply trading and shipping connects the system, enabling BP to source supply, manage disruption, and direct molecules to the highest value markets. Over the last six years, trading has delivered an average uplift of around four percentage points to BP's return on capital employed, with at least two percentage points from the base global portfolio demonstrating resilience through the cycle. The company will continue to invest in technology to maintain leadership. Q: What were the main factors impacting upstream production and refining throughput in the second quarter?A: Meg O'Neill reported upstream production was 2.2 million barrels of oil equivalent per day, 6% lower than Q1, driven by scheduled seasonal maintenance in the Gulf of America, disruptions in the Middle East, and operational issues in the North Sea and Indonesia, partly offset by stronger BPX performance. Refining throughput was around 1.5 million barrels per day, 4% lower due to higher planned turnaround activity and lower refining availability. Q: What is BP's perspective on safety performance and operational excellence?A: Meg O'Neill emphasized that safety comes first, always, but acknowledged performance in the first half has not been where it needs to be. A Castrol colleague died following an incident at the Gimlick blending plant in Turkiye in April, and there was an increase in process safety events, including Tier 1 events. The safety goal remains to eliminate fatalities, life-changing injuries, and Tier 1 process safety events across operations. Q: How does BP plan to manage working capital in the second half of 2026?A: Kate Thomson explained that the Q2 working capital build of $1 billion reflected a scheduled $1.1 billion Gulf of America settlement and $200 million for decommissioning, partly offset by a $700 million release. Subject to the macro environment, BP expects $2-3 billion to unwind from here over the remainder of the year as they move through the peak demand period in customers and products. The timing of the remaining unwind will depend on how the Middle East situation evolves. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-04

European Stocks Close Higher Tuesday on Earnings Strength, Hormuz Talks

MT Newswires

European stock markets closed higher Tuesday as investors assess mostly solid earnings and look for

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-04

Big Q2 Earnings Morning, Pre-Markets Up on Iran Hopes

Zacks
Tuesday, August 4th, 2026Another busy day with pre-market futures way up this morning — it’s days like these where you pat yourself on the back for not having taken all of August off. Following triple-digit gains on the major indexes yesterday, we’re up another +559 points on the Dow, +221 on the Nasdaq and +6 on the S&P 500. Spot oil prices dial back further — $77 per barrel (/bbl) on WTI and $81/bbl on Brent crude — on renewed hope that a deal between the U.S. and Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Investors do not afford themselves any “Lucy and the football” cynicism; one of these days, a peace agreement might actually stick — and everyone betting this way will have a big head start. Bond yields cooled a couple basis points from a day ago: +4.66% on the 10-year, +4.21% on the 2-year. The U.S. Trade Balance for June came in at a deficit of -$73.3 billion, slightly worse than the -$72.9 billion projected, but a nice improvement month over month — -$77.6 billion reported for May, and well off the all-time low -$133 billion back in March of 2025. Both Imports and Exports lightened their loads compared to the prior month. Caterpillar CAT shares are up +11.3% at this hour, giving a big boost to the blue-chip Dow index. Earnings of $8.17 per share amounted to a +30.72% earnings beat, as the company continues to benefit from the physical data center buildout trend. The stock is still a ways from the late-June all-time highs above $1000 per share, but a strong showing this morning, nevertheless.McDonald’s MCD outperformed bottom-line estimates in its Q2 this morning by 6 cents to $3.38 per share. Revenues came in slightly below expectations, however, with overall same-store sales coming in-line overall, with some weakness in U.S. sales. Shares are up slightly, but still down double-digits, year to date.BP’s BP Q2 showed a solid bottom-line beat, with earnings of $2.22 per share versus $1.98 forecast, for a +12% earnings surprise. The oil & gas supermajor plans to sell off its North Sea business, and shares are selling off a bit: -1.4% at this hour, but still up more than +25% year to date.Archer Daniels Midland ADM added to its strong 2026 performance with a +29.6% earnings beat: $1.84 per share versus $1.42 in the Zacks consensus. Revenues came in a tad light, but biofuels showed promise. Shares are up +2.6% this morning, adding to its +35% gains year to date.…Read full document

Tuesday, August 4th, 2026Another busy day with pre-market futures way up this morning — it’s days like these where you pat yourself on the back for not having taken all of August off. Following triple-digit gains on the major indexes yesterday, we’re up another +559 points on the Dow, +221 on the Nasdaq and +6 on the S&P 500. Spot oil prices dial back further — $77 per barrel (/bbl) on WTI and $81/bbl on Brent crude — on renewed hope that a deal between the U.S. and Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Investors do not afford themselves any “Lucy and the football” cynicism; one of these days, a peace agreement might actually stick — and everyone betting this way will have a big head start. Bond yields cooled a couple basis points from a day ago: +4.66% on the 10-year, +4.21% on the 2-year. The U.S. Trade Balance for June came in at a deficit of -$73.3 billion, slightly worse than the -$72.9 billion projected, but a nice improvement month over month — -$77.6 billion reported for May, and well off the all-time low -$133 billion back in March of 2025. Both Imports and Exports lightened their loads compared to the prior month. Caterpillar CAT shares are up +11.3% at this hour, giving a big boost to the blue-chip Dow index. Earnings of $8.17 per share amounted to a +30.72% earnings beat, as the company continues to benefit from the physical data center buildout trend. The stock is still a ways from the late-June all-time highs above $1000 per share, but a strong showing this morning, nevertheless.McDonald’s MCD outperformed bottom-line estimates in its Q2 this morning by 6 cents to $3.38 per share. Revenues came in slightly below expectations, however, with overall same-store sales coming in-line overall, with some weakness in U.S. sales. Shares are up slightly, but still down double-digits, year to date.BP’s BP Q2 showed a solid bottom-line beat, with earnings of $2.22 per share versus $1.98 forecast, for a +12% earnings surprise. The oil & gas supermajor plans to sell off its North Sea business, and shares are selling off a bit: -1.4% at this hour, but still up more than +25% year to date.Archer Daniels Midland ADM added to its strong 2026 performance with a +29.6% earnings beat: $1.84 per share versus $1.42 in the Zacks consensus. Revenues came in a tad light, but biofuels showed promise. Shares are up +2.6% this morning, adding to its +35% gains year to date.On the other side, Spotify SPOT disappointed with a -7.34% earnings surprise this morning — $3.03 per share versus $3.27 projected — and shares are down -6.2% in early market trading. This takes down the stock further from its -16% losses since the start of the year.After the closing bell this afternoon, we expect earnings results from chip giant AMD AMD, biopharma major Amgen AMGN and travel platform Booking.com BKNG, among many others. We continue with the busiest week of Q2 earnings season even as many of the marquee names have already reported. The first of the “Jobs Week” data hits the tape after the opening bell today, with the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) for June. Estimates have rolled back slightly to 7.4 million from 7.6 million job openings reported a month ago. Job Quits remain subdued, keeping with the “low hire/low fire” labor market.Factory Orders for June are expected to come in positive again, to +0.3%, after posting a negative -1.3% for May, which was the first down month of 2026. A big drop in non-defense aircraft orders skewed the numbers a bit a month ago. That said, if the headline number disappoints and comes in negative again, it will be the first time we’ve seen back-to-back negative prints since last summer.Questions or comments about this article and/or author? Click here>> Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) : Free Stock Analysis Report BP p.l.c. (BP) : Free Stock Analysis Report Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) : Free Stock Analysis Report Amgen Inc. (AMGN) : Free Stock Analysis Report McDonald's Corporation (MCD) : Free Stock Analysis Report Archer Daniels Midland Company (ADM) : Free Stock Analysis Report Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) : Free Stock Analysis Report Spotify Technology (SPOT) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-04

BP Q2 2026 earnings: Profit doubles amid Iran war as oil prices rise

Quartz
BP reported second-quarter net profit of $3.91 billion on Tuesday, more than double the $1.62 billion it posted in the same period last year, as the U.S.-Iran war drove oil and gas prices sharply higher. A core profit measure that strips out certain items came in at $5.7 billion for the April-to-June period, the company said. Analyst expectations for that figure stood at $5 billion, according to CNBC. Total revenue climbed 47% to $70 billion compared with a year earlier. The results reflect conditions that have upended global energy markets. Fighting between Washington and Tehran has severely disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway that handles around a fifth of the world's oil and natural gas. Together, the five major Western oil companies — BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Shell and TotalEnergies — earned close to $47 billion in combined net profit during the quarter, according to Euronews. BP chief executive Meg O'Neill, who has led the company since April, said in a statement that the quarter occurred during "one of the most disrupted periods in the global energy market." "We are not making the most of our potential," O'Neill added. "Our performance over the past few years has not met our own expectations, let alone those of our shareholders." O'Neill addressed President Donald Trump's criticism of oil companies over high fuel prices. "I understand the pressure that the ordinary household feels when they pull into the service station to fill up and see the prices," O'Neill told CNBC's "Squawk Box Europe." "The reality is we produce a global commodity and the prices for the product we sell hangs off that global commodity price." Trump on Monday called out Exxon Mobil and Chevron for making "too much money" off higher fuel prices. The company reported quarterly operating cash flow of $10.9 billion, while net debt dropped to $22.25 billion by quarter's end, compared with $25.3 billion three months earlier, the company said. BP raised its quarterly dividend by 4% to 8.66 cents per ordinary share. Oil prices posted their biggest monthly gain since March in July, with Brent crude rising roughly 20% as the conflict escalated and disruptions spread across key shipping routes. The International Energy Agency has forecast that global supply will fall by 3.9 million barrels per day in 2026, with the war estimated to have blocked more than 14 mill…Read full document

BP reported second-quarter net profit of $3.91 billion on Tuesday, more than double the $1.62 billion it posted in the same period last year, as the U.S.-Iran war drove oil and gas prices sharply higher. A core profit measure that strips out certain items came in at $5.7 billion for the April-to-June period, the company said. Analyst expectations for that figure stood at $5 billion, according to CNBC. Total revenue climbed 47% to $70 billion compared with a year earlier. The results reflect conditions that have upended global energy markets. Fighting between Washington and Tehran has severely disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway that handles around a fifth of the world's oil and natural gas. Together, the five major Western oil companies — BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Shell and TotalEnergies — earned close to $47 billion in combined net profit during the quarter, according to Euronews. BP chief executive Meg O'Neill, who has led the company since April, said in a statement that the quarter occurred during "one of the most disrupted periods in the global energy market." "We are not making the most of our potential," O'Neill added. "Our performance over the past few years has not met our own expectations, let alone those of our shareholders." O'Neill addressed President Donald Trump's criticism of oil companies over high fuel prices. "I understand the pressure that the ordinary household feels when they pull into the service station to fill up and see the prices," O'Neill told CNBC's "Squawk Box Europe." "The reality is we produce a global commodity and the prices for the product we sell hangs off that global commodity price." Trump on Monday called out Exxon Mobil and Chevron for making "too much money" off higher fuel prices. The company reported quarterly operating cash flow of $10.9 billion, while net debt dropped to $22.25 billion by quarter's end, compared with $25.3 billion three months earlier, the company said. BP raised its quarterly dividend by 4% to 8.66 cents per ordinary share. Oil prices posted their biggest monthly gain since March in July, with Brent crude rising roughly 20% as the conflict escalated and disruptions spread across key shipping routes. The International Energy Agency has forecast that global supply will fall by 3.9 million barrels per day in 2026, with the war estimated to have blocked more than 14 million barrels per day of Middle East output. BP announced Tuesday that it is moving to divest Archaea Energy, a U.S. biogas unit it purchased for $4.1 billion in 2022. The company also said it had completed the sale of its Gelsenkirchen refinery in Germany and plans to sell its North Sea business. BP stock climbed 0.8% on Tuesday.

TranscriptFY2026 Q22026-08-04

FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript

Earnings source - 97 paragraphs
Craig Marshall

Welcome everyone to BP's second quarter 2026 financial results call. I'm joined by Meg O'Neill, Chief Executive Officer, and Kate Thomson, Chief Financial Officer. We'll be focusing today's call on the second quarter performance and the contents of the video that I hope many of you will have seen by now. Before we start with questions, though, let me hand over to Meg for a few opening remarks. Meg.

Meg O'Neill

Thanks, Craig, and thank you to everyone joining the call. I hope everyone will have seen our results today and the video Kate and I recorded. As such, I'll keep my opening remarks brief so we can get to questions. 2Q was another good quarter financially as we continue to build momentum. Strong earnings and good cash conversion supported us with the further strengthening of the balance sheet. Net debt was down $3 billion quarter-on-quarter, and financial obligations are now down around $7 billion since first quarter. You will have seen our outlook for the further significant progress we expect through the end of the year. We have also continued to take deliberate steps to simplify BP and our portfolio, including the announcements on the North Sea and Archaea Energy, and the completion of the Gelsenkirchen transaction.

Meg O'Neill

There are areas where our performance fell short. Operationally, our plants didn't run as well as we expect. I want us focused on driving consistent operational performance. It is the foundation for everything we do, and we know we need to improve. We have more to do to turn cost reductions into bottom-line earnings improvement. BP has strong assets, deep capability, and real growth potential. My focus is on turning that potential into stronger performance and greater shareholder value. That means continuing to strengthen the balance sheet, simplifying and high-grading the portfolio, investing with discipline, taking cost out of the system, and driving much sharper accountability across the company. I call this getting BP Fit to Grow, where every part of BP needs to earn its place, generating cash, improving returns, and strengthening the whole.

Meg O'Neill

I believe BP can and will be a world-class integrated oil and gas company with advantaged upstream positions, a resilient downstream business, and distinctive trading capability. That is what my leadership team and I are focused on, moving at pace, making the tough decisions, and building a more focused, competitive BP that delivers stronger outcomes. Back to you, Craig.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Meg. As everyone knows, as per customary practice, I'm going to ask everybody to poll for one question please per person, so that everyone gets a chance to ask. If we have the time, we can come back to a follow-up question, we are going to aim to wrap up the call in 45 minutes. On that note, I'm going to take the first question from Biraj Borkhataria at RBC. Biraj.

Biraj Borkhataria

Hi. Thanks for taking my question. Thank you for the detail in the slides today. Meg, you've made some comments around getting fitter to grow and building that platform for growth, the other comment was around competing in the right weight class. The question really is, what weight class do you think BP is in? Because if I look at the traditional super major peer group on key metrics, you're the smallest of the bunch, many of them produce multiples of what you produce. Do you want to be in that weight class, and is that a fair assessment of where you want to be? Just some reflections on that would be helpful.

Meg O'Neill

Sure. Thanks, Biraj. Look, I think it's prudent for us not to try to label ourselves as a super major, in fact, that's one of the things that I'm trying to reinforce with the comments around weight class. You look at our numbers, we produce about 2.2 million barrels oil equivalent a day. Our refining capacity is about 1.5 million barrels a day. Sizable on both fronts. The reality is, we need to make sure we're competing with players at our size, we need to make sure in each part of the business, upstream, downstream, trading, that we are competing to win. We want to be in the best basins, we can't be in every basin. We need to make sure we're focused, that we're making good decisions, that we're selective in our choices.

Meg O'Neill

For me, that's what it means when I say that we need to be getting fit, we need to be competing in our weight class.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Biraj. We're going to take the next question from Fergus Neve at Rothschild. Fergus.

Fergus Neve

Yep. Hi, everyone, and thank you very much for taking my question. Just looking at the BPX results and data for 2Q26, it looked like another strong quarter. 1H production looks to have grown close to 20% year-on-year, in spite of sequentially lower gas prices. Could you just comment on some of the work you're doing in the U.S. and perhaps on the plan for that business moving forward, particularly in terms of the new strategic priorities that you laid out today? Thanks.

Meg O'Neill

Yeah, thanks, Fergus. BPX is really an important part of BP Group. Appreciate your attention to detail. In the quarter, production was 545,000 oil equivalent barrels per day. It is continuing to grow quarter-on-quarter. A couple of things that we like about the business. First off, we like the financial metrics. If you think about the portfolio chart we presented, when we look at BPX, it's got the ability to generate competitive returns, competitive cash flow. We've got significant growth potential with the resource base we have there. It is very much an integral part of the group. One thing that differentiates BPX from many of the other assets in our business is the ability to invest in short cycle projects.

Meg O'Neill

If I contrast it to a deep-water development in the Gulf of Mexico, for example, those are the sorts of developments where you take an investment decision in one year, and it's four or five years before you get any revenue, whereas BPX, we're getting revenue very quickly after making those investment decisions. When we look across the group, the fact that we've got a combination of short cycle capital plus the long-dated investment opportunities, really does offer an advantage compared to other companies in our sector.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Fergus.

Fergus Neve

Okay. Thank you.

Craig Marshall

We'll take the next question from Doug Leggate at Wolfe. Doug, good morning.

Doug Leggate

Good morning, everyone. Good morning, Meg. Clearly a very strong message this morning, I wonder if I could just hit the capital structure, the balance sheet, the hybrids, and wrap all that together with one very simple question, which is that the scale of the free cash flow, including disposals, including the working capital reversal, that you could potentially generate, not just in 2026 the second half, but also in 2027, starts to put some fairly big questions over what you do with the capital structure, how low you take it. Dare I tempt Kate to maybe answer this? Why do you need any hybrid bonds and worry about the credit rating? You could theoretically wipe them out. I'm just trying to think out the box.

Doug Leggate

What do you do with the scale of the potential deleveraging capacity that you have going forward? Thanks.

Meg O'Neill

Well, Doug, let me just jump in, and then I'll let Kate weigh in. One of the things that I think is important to think about, and I'll frame for you how I think about the balance sheet question. We need to be thinking about our capital framework with a couple of goals. One simple one is we need to make sure we've got our investment-grade credit rating because that ensures we're able to do much of the business that we need to be able to do. We need to make sure that our balance, in terms of equity and debt, is one where we have more dollars from cash flow that are going to shareholders than going to liability holders.

Meg O'Neill

One of the key areas of concern I have with the structure as it stands today is there's too much cash going to liability holders. The second concern I have with the structure as it stands today is our resilience in a low-price environment. A lot of the focus we have on getting the balance sheet in shape is about making sure that we can get the frame right to return value to shareholders through the cycle and invest in the business through the cycle and be resilient in that low-price scenario. I'll let Kate speak to some of the specific choices we've made.

Kate Thomson

Thanks, Meg. I agree with those comments, by the way. Hi, Doug. Thank you for your question. Yes, we have an opportunity to drive our leverage down materially, certainly through the second half of 2026, as you can see from the sort of $39 billion-$41 billion total financial obligations we're guiding to today in terms of the end of the year. Look, as I think about your specific question on hybrids, we've stated today there's $1 billion of hybrids that will be naturally redeemed in the third quarter. We redeemed $2.9 billion in 2Q just gone, and there's another $1.4 billion that we have already told you we're going to allow to move off the books when they redeem in 2Q next year. The most cost-effective way to remove hybrids is to wait until they mature.

Kate Thomson

Buying them back in advance of that can be a very cost-effective approach and not necessarily the most value accretive for shareholders. Right now, we're clear on the forward trajectory with hybrids. For now, the balance beyond those two points I've mentioned remain part of our capital structure. I think it's important we look holistically across the entirety of our capital structure and make sure it is fit for what it is going to be required to do for BP for the long term. This is about creating the financial resilience of a company to support the growth that we have got in front of us that we want to be able to execute through cycle. That's how we think about it.

Kate Thomson

At some point, when we've got through the delivery of our first target, then we can come back and explain how we holistically think about our financial frame, how we think about rewards to shareholders, how we think about our capital, and how we think about our balance sheet. They all need to sit together cohesively as one frame.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Doug. We'll take the next question from Josh Stone at UBS.

Josh Stone

Thanks, Craig, and good afternoon. Thanks for the new disclosure you provided on the operating cost side, particularly on the variable costs, which I think is helpful. I wonder, have you been able to diagnose why the improvements you have made have not managed to flow through to the bottom line? You made a comment about that in your prepared remarks. When do you think is it reasonable for us to start seeing these operating cost changes actually, and the changes you're making to the organization, actually flow through to the bottom line? Thanks.

Kate Thomson

Thanks, Josh. I'll take that one. Look, the teams are working really hard across the company to drive our cost base down to get us competitive, as competitive as we can be. Frankly, it's not moving fast enough to be able to deliver that outcome all the way to the bottom line. That's what us, that's what our shareholders care about. Structural cost reductions are interesting. When they're really important, they come all the way through to the bottom line. The disclosure that we're giving you today is line of sight to material reduction in our absolute cost base by the end of next year, getting to around $18 billion compared to $22 billion at 2025. There is going to be material improvement in our absolute cost base as we move through the next 18 months.

Kate Thomson

We need to apply a lot of urgency and a lot of focus to continue to push this through in every dimension of the business, because at the moment, what we're delivering is not enough to offset the headwinds that we've experienced in terms of inflation environment, foreign exchange, and activity choices. What really matters, beyond any target on structural cost reductions, is getting that to the bottom line. As we deliver 18 next year, just to be clear, we expect to have delivered $5.8 billion of structural cost reductions compared to the original target of four to five. As I say, what matters is what comes through to the bottom line in terms of earnings and cash flow.

Meg O'Neill

Maybe if I can build. One of the things that has struck me coming in, I do think we have momentum and a lot of the work on getting the organization designed and driving that accountability mindset where we've got business owners who have the tools and capabilities and people they need to drive the business, we are simplifying the structure above that. That is part of the uplift in, or the cost reduction that we're going to see next year. We start to see those come through to the bottom line in 2027.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Josh. We'll take the next question from Jeoffrey Lambujon, TPH.

Jeoffrey Lambujon

Good morning, good afternoon, and thank you for taking my question. Meg, you've been very clear today that every dollar of capital has to compete and that growth has to be earned. I wanted to ask about this in the context of BPX specifically. If you could walk us through how you think about the Haynesville's competitiveness versus the oil basins, whether in the context of returns for the Mac or other factors you might highlight. Given the underlying growth potential from BPX overall, how you think about the Haynesville's contribution to that?

Meg O'Neill

Sure. Thanks, Jeoffrey. Look, the Haynesville is really a significant position for us. I've been really impressed. I've spent quite a bit of time with the teams working BPX, in the work that we've been doing to really drive excellence in our drilling and completions performance. We're really starting to see that come through to the bottom line. Maybe if I give you an example that brings that to life. The first quarter of this year, we set a new basin 24-hour initial production rate record at 81 million scf a day, from a well with a 15,000-foot lateral. The production rates are staying high, which is even better, producing 63 million scf a day for over 80 days. Really accelerating the resource capture that we're able to get from the Haynesville.

Meg O'Neill

One of the things we always need to be mindful of is the cost environment or the price, sorry, the price environment that we're seeing in the Haynesville, and always making trade-offs around where can we most effectively deploy those dollars within BPX. The Haynesville is gas. Eagle Ford has both gas and oil, and Permian is quite oily. It's something that we work closely with the team on to make sure that the decisions about where to deploy rigs are going to deliver the best overall value for BP as a group.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Jeoffrey. We'll take the next question from Matt Lofting at JPMorgan.

Matt Lofting

Thanks, Craig, and hi to everybody. Thanks for taking the questions. Meg, I wanted to ask you about the second of the five priorities that you outlined this morning in terms of simplifying the portfolio. I think you outlined earlier in the year changes, in particular to the organizational structure. I noticed, though, in the prepared remarks, you're still sort of referencing a degree of complexity to BP's business. I wondered if you could share examples of where you see some of the next areas of major focus in terms of that priority set and how that sort of, in your mind, comes together in terms of more comprehensively streamlining BP's business as you look forward. Thank you.

Meg O'Neill

Yeah. Thanks, Matt. Look, one of the reasons we included the portfolio chart in the presentation is to give you a flavor for how we're thinking about those portfolio decisions. As I said in the remarks, we're not thinking about history or legacy attachment or emotion. We're just looking at the numbers, and we're digging into, for each of the assets in our business, what's the track record on delivering free cash flow growth? What's the track record on delivering returns? Do the returns lift the group return on capital employed or pull them down? It's not just the two dimensions shown there. I'll also note that those two dimensions are historic. A business that we were investing in in that time period would score very low on free cash flow, but it doesn't reflect the potential of the business.

Meg O'Neill

We're taking a look at the numbers, and we're using those numbers to unemotionally guide our decisions around portfolio. As we look at the business, we are spread relatively thin. I think we've got too many assets in BP today. When we look across the portfolio, there are assets where we'd say others will see more value and be able to deliver more value, and we can sell those and achieve good value for our shareholders through that sort of transaction. That allows us to continue simplifying, streamlining, and focusing in the organization that is above the asset. Hopefully that helps you understand how we're thinking about things. Nothing is sacred. Nothing is off the table. We're just going to have the same kind of rigorous discipline in looking across the business.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Matt. We'll take the next question from Naisheng Cui at Barclays.

Naisheng Cui

Hi. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. Looking at the first pages of your appendix slides, you had three major FIDs in 2025, but nothing so far in 2026. I wonder if you could provide some color on any major FID expectations for the next 12 to 18 months, please. Could you also give us an update on Bumerangue, please? Thank you.

Meg O'Neill

Thanks for the question, Naisheng. Let me start with your second question first. Bumerangue, I think we've talked about this a bit before, but very significant discovery in 2025. 8 billion barrels, liquids in place. That's always a good starting point. Having a fair amount of oil always gives you kind of one of the core ingredients we need to be successful in our business. We are getting ready to do an appraisal campaign, which will start either late this year or early next year. We'll be getting more data. It's going to be really important, in that appraisal campaign, to get dynamic data. What we have right now is a static characterization of the reservoir, which is all very positive. It's a very thick column. It's got gas condensate, as well as an oil leg.

Meg O'Neill

We need to understand how fluids will flow through this reservoir. That's important data that we'll be gathering early next year. When we look to other FIDs, you're right, this is a quiet year. Last year was certainly a big year. Team is very focused on ensuring we've got competitive opportunities to deploy capital. When I look at the slate today, not expecting anything major to hit FID this year.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Naisheng. We'll take the next question. Actually, I'm going to move online. I know a number of people are already starting their summer vacation. There's a question from Kim Fustier at HSBC. Upstream plant reliability fell to 92.4% due to some operational issues in the North Sea and Indonesia, and refining availability dropped to 94.7%. Can you discuss specifically what went wrong operationally this quarter in both upstream and downstream, and what are you doing to address these issues?

Meg O'Neill

Great question, Kim, it's been a disappointment. After four or five quarters of what I would call really quite strong reliability in both upstream and downstream, we have seen a drop-off. North Sea, it was a couple of different issues, one at the Glen Lyon FPSO that took that facility offline for a couple of months, then some trips in ETAP. Indonesia, we had a turnaround that ended up being extended and had some operational issues when we were trying to restart. In refining, we had a third-party event at the Whiting Refinery that caused a bit of downtime in April. Those are each of the individual events. What I think is important for us to do is to step back from the individual events. We need to, of course, do deep investigations to understand the specifics of what happened.

Meg O'Neill

More importantly, we need to step back and ask ourselves, do we have the right framework for our teams all around the world to deliver strong operational performance? That's what we're doing, making sure we've got our arms around it. There are some areas of improvement that we have identified already, the teams are getting after those, both in the refining space as well as the upstream space.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Meg. I'm going to stay online with the next two questions. I'll maybe take the first one, which comes from Alejandro Vigil. Thank you, team. If possible, a question to Meg about her views about biofuels as part of the portfolio. Is it core? Does it have similar characteristics to biogas, and could it be a potential divestment? I think, Meg, you've probably answered in terms of reflections on how we hold the portfolio choices that we're making. I think equally wouldn't be commenting on any potential divestments down the line. Maybe over to you on that.

Meg O'Neill

Yeah, look, let me maybe frame in a bigger way how we think about some of these bio opportunities. I'll start with some of the successes. We actually do quite a bit of work on biofuels in the U.S. We trade quite a bit of biofuels. We blend biofuels. When you look at the performance of the downstream and trading business, or our customers and products business, particularly the U.S., we've got some real shining examples for how this can be a value uplift for BP. It's a value uplift in a capital-light manner, that's perhaps one of the attributes that differentiates it from the Archaea business, where we've gone in in a capital-intense manner.

Meg O'Neill

Our team still trades quite a bit of biogas in the U.S., the question that we've been asking ourselves and the conclusion we've come to is actually we can access some of those lower carbon molecules in a manner that takes less of BP's capital. There are other companies that are quite interested. I know we announced today the intention to divest Archaea. Part of why we announced that is we've got interest. Again, if there's somebody who sees an opportunity to create additional value, who will invest in that business, who will build on the foundation, because our team has made really good progress in improving the profitability of that business, that will be a good outcome.

Meg O'Neill

As Craig said, other more material divestments, we'll be looking at the portfolio through the lens I described, we'll announce those as the time is appropriate.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Meg. Maybe the last one online, and then we'll come back to the phones. It's from Ahmed Ben Salem at ODDO. Meg, you repeatedly describe BP's goal as becoming a simpler, stronger, and more valuable company. Three years from now, what are the three metrics that would convince you that this transformation has been successful?

Meg O'Neill

Look, there's a couple of things, Ahmed, and thanks for the question. There's some really basics in terms of operational performance. We need to be stronger on the safety fronts, continue to have that strong, consistent, reliable performance in our base assets. At the end of the day, the most important metric for are we more valuable is are we growing total shareholder return? That's through share price appreciation and dividend cash distribution. At the end of the day, we'll be looking at TSR.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Meg. Okay, back to the phones. We'll take the next question from Mark Wilson at Jefferies.

Mark Wilson

Thank you. I'd like to ask Meg regarding the U.K. sale process generated such a lot of commentary, much of which speaks to BP's exit. Your release speaks, obviously, to a process to market, and there's obviously various different models that can come out of a marketing process. My question is whether there are indeed multiple outcomes in that process, including, but not exclusive to, satellite models. I note in connection to that, you show in your slide pack 10 major startups from 2025 to 2027, but seven from equity accounted associates, including Aker BP and Azule. Maybe that tells a story of potential benefits of such models. Thank you.

Meg O'Neill

Well, look, with North Sea, this has been very carefully considered. We've had a number of inbounds, as I've said. That was a bit of the catalyst for launching a process. We've kicked the tires on a variety of models. At the end of the day, we need to ask ourselves, where do we want to focus our precious leadership time? Where do we want to focus our precious dollars? Our intention is to market for a full divestment. Kate, did you want to talk about the projects?

Kate Thomson

I was just trying to do the math to match yours, Mark. I can see three out of the projects that have started up have been in joint ventures. We've had two, I think, in Azule and one in Aker so far. Let us pick that up offline and make sure we're looking at the same data as you.

Meg O'Neill

I think it's that.

Craig Marshall

Mark. Thanks for your question. I think the seven projects we can certainly come back to you on. They are the joint venture projects that sit alongside the 10 BP-operated projects. Let's follow up on that. We'll take the next question from Lucas Herrmann at BNP. Lucas.

Lucas Herrmann

Yeah, thanks very much, Craig, and thanks Kate and Meg for the opportunity. Briefly, just trading in gas. I think we're looking at a market which is relatively high priced in terms of international pricing, where we're seeing good volatility, which tends to favor trading businesses, and where historically you've talked about the ability to redirect cargo and take advantage, and indeed, we saw that very strongly in 2022. I'm not criticizing an average result for the quarter, but I am perhaps surprised that the business, given your competence, has not done better.

Lucas Herrmann

Any comments there, and are there any comments you'd care to make on the outlook as we go into the third quarter on whether you have potentially more flexibility or the market may be more conducive to delivering a return that is above the average we've seen in the last few quarters? Thanks very much.

Kate Thomson

Yeah, thank you, Lucas. Hi, I'll pick that one up. Yeah. Gas average the last two quarters, I think the gas trading business has done pretty well. When you look at the level of volatility comparatively in oil and products versus gas, I would say that gas has been much more benign than oil and products. In 1Q, we saw quite a lot of volatility, certainly in January, that allowed us to capture value. The European stroke international gas price has started to move around more recently. I would've said that sort of the results for the year so far in terms of gas are not out of line. The LNG bench has done a good job of capturing value, trading around physical flows and optimization of those, as you know.

Kate Thomson

The contrast is stark with what's been going on in the products and in the crude markets, where the volatility, I would describe, as pretty wicked, and it's been a very tough environment for our traders to trade through, and I think they've done a good job of capturing value within a carefully managed risk framework. I'm never going to guide forward on trading, as you know. I would just remind you that over six years now, we've added 4% uplift to the group earnings on average capital employed from trading, and that has been through benign and volatile years. Your guess is as good as mine in terms of what volatility from here is going to look like.

Kate Thomson

I suspect we will see more volatility in the space of international and European gas, given where storage and European gas looks like it's at currently compared to five-year averages. I think let's see.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Kate. Thank you, Lucas. We'll take the next question from Chris Kuplent at Bank of America. Chris.

Chris Kuplent

Yeah, thank you very much. Meg, I've got a question for you. Thanks for your laying out the five priorities. I noticed that they're very inward-focused, getting the performance up to speed.

Chris Kuplent

What can you tell us already at this point, and apologies if you think that's unfair, to sort of say to shareholders, "Look, this is the landing point in terms of returns to shareholders." Maybe you want to frame it as CFFO payout or some sort of indication how you're thinking around restarting the buybacks or giving shareholders more than the 4% minimum DPS increase. Thank you.

Meg O'Neill

Yeah. Look, thanks, Chris. Look, it's an important question, and we know it's one that our shareholders are keenly interested in. Kate and I are doing a tremendous amount of work on the financial frame to make sure we've got laser-like clarity on what a good frame for BP at this point in time looks like. Again, we need to make sure the balance sheet is positioned well. We need to understand the financial liabilities that we want to carry. The goal, of course, is for us to be able to invest and reward shareholders through the cycle. We fully understand that shareholders are keen to have increasing TSR, and we're fully committed to that, but we've got work to do on the balance sheet. $40 billion of total liabilities is still too much.

Meg O'Neill

We are still not going to be able to offer that resilience through the cycle that we need to be able to. We've got a bit of work to do. We know the market is very interested in hearing this, as soon as we've got our views ready, we will be communicating with you.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Chris. We'll turn to the U.S. and take the next question from Jason Gabelman at TD Cowen. Jason.

Jason Gabelman

Hey, thanks for taking my questions. Wanted to ask about the increase in capital expenditures for this year. Seems like CapEx move higher, there wasn't any associated increase in production levels or downstream levels or nothing we could really discern. Wondering what you're getting for that higher CapEx and if you think CapEx could trend higher over the next few years as you look to strengthen the earnings potential of the company. Thanks.

Meg O'Neill

Look, that's pretty straightforward, Jason. If you look at the CapEx guidance for the full year, you'll note that the second half run rate is higher than the first half. When we had built the plan last year and when we initially put out guidance, we were assuming a farm down of some of our Palaeogene assets. We've deferred that because we want to make sure we're getting good value for BP shareholders on assets that are going to be part of our portfolio for the next 30 years. We're being extremely disciplined in our divestment processes to get that fair value. That means we're picking up more of the capital onto our books. Net net, it is the right decision for our shareholders.

Kate Thomson

Could I just add one comment as well? I think you also asked Jason on whether we should expect CapEx to trend up going forwards. I think that there's no reason that I can see right now for CapEx to be trending up. It's part of a disciplined approach. Every dollar of capital we spend has to compete, and we want to maintain a really tight control over the capital we're spending in our company. I see no reason for it to go up.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Kate. Thank you, Meg. We'll take the next question from Henry Tarr at Berenberg. Henry.

Henry Tarr

Hi, thanks for taking my questions. The first one was just on the Ginger gas field. As you ramp that up, I guess Shell are also ramping up capacity in the region, how much capacity does Atlantic LNG have for additional volumes? When might utilization there sort of pick up and how material could it be? Just the second question, I think you talked about sort of delaying farm downs, perhaps you alluded to that in the last question. If you could talk maybe more about the environment today for selling some of these assets, in terms of whether the volatility is having an impact, et cetera, that would be great. Thank you.

Craig Marshall

Henry, we'll take your first question because I'm going to be disciplined here, if we have time, we'll come back to your second one or IR can follow up. Maybe the first question on Ginger gas field.

Kate Thomson

That's a gas field that's due to start up, as I believe, in 2027. That's not online today.

Meg O'Neill

No, there's plenty of capacity in the plant for Ginger and plenty of capacity for the other assets that are under development. Look, if we get to a point where ALNG is stretched, I think that'll be a good problem to have, that's not a problem that's confronting us at this point in time.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Henry. You can repoll or we'll come back to you if we have time. I'll take the next question from Maurizio Carulli at Quilter. Maurizio.

Maurizio Carulli

Thank you very much for taking my question. First of all, congratulations for the positive results and for Meg's update on the strategic priorities that BP is implementing. I've read the text this morning with great interest and frankly pleasure as well. I have one question, if I may. Can we have an update on the process for the selection of the new chair? For what you can say, of course, at this very early stage. Thank you.

Meg O'Neill

Yeah. Well, thank you, Maurizio, and glad you found the update constructive as you think about BP. Look, the chair selection process is underway, and I'm not going to provide running commentary. There'll be a point in time where the board will have an announcement to make, yeah, we'll just encourage you all to be patient. Maybe the important point to make, though, Maurizio, is there is no doubt the board is in place. They've been very clear in supporting the strategic priorities that we've laid out in the 2Q. There's tremendous clarity with the 90,000 employees in BP on the direction of travel. We are getting after it.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Maurizio. Appreciate your comments. We'll take the next question from Bertrand Hodee at Kepler Cheuvreux. Bertrand.

Bertrand Hodee

Yes. Hello. Thank you for taking my question. I had a question on the farm down process in the Paleogene in the U.S. I understand from your comments that this is a key in your portfolios, that is an asset you're going to have for the next 30 years, as you mentioned earlier. Have you seen interest first? What has made you deferred the farm down process? Is it just a question of price or choosing the right partner? I wanted to know also if it's just around Kaskida, Tiber, Guadalupe, or the whole Paleogene acreage you are looking for a partner.

Meg O'Neill

Yeah, thanks, Bertrand. Look, maybe to describe how I think about these things. The Paleogene is a very significant asset for BP. The two developments we've sanctioned, Kaskida and Tiber, Guadalupe, will commercialize over 500,000 barrels of oil. We need to be really deliberate in who we bring in. We want to make sure we get the right partner at the right price. Again, if I think about the Gulf of Mexico, the Miocene developments back in the 1990s, those were very material capital investments for BP. They're investments that are paying the bills today. Again, we just need to make sure we're being disciplined and bringing a partner in who can add value to the development, and is willing to pay appropriate consideration up front, and we'll be patient.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Meg. We're going to take the next question from Steve Richardson at Evercore. Good morning, Steve.

Steve Richardson

Hi. Thanks for taking the question. Meg, I was curious, there was a statement in the SEA about writing off too much value. I wonder if you could talk a little bit about that. Ideally, there's really two ways to address it, right? there's making sure that the new projects you're sanctioning are durable at a low price, but you've also got a portfolio review going on, and I suspect that you're testing assets down to lower prices, and you've mentioned that. Could you talk a little bit about how you're evaluating the existing portfolio and your expectation of when you'll be able to confidently say that the portfolio that's under you and the assets that are on the balance sheet are durable at a lower price and we can stop that cycle of writing off?

Meg O'Neill

Yeah, it's a great question, Steve. Look, if we look back over the history, we have had too many impairments. The reality is those are shareholder dollars that were not used effectively, really wasted. We need to start by being upfront and acknowledging that we have made some decisions in the past that did not deliver the outcomes we expected. You have the commitment from Kate and myself and the leadership team to really strengthen decision-making, strengthen how we look at opportunities to make sure that we are protecting shareholder value. Your comment around new projects must be durable, that is absolutely how we're thinking about our future investment decisions. Now, that said, we still have a bit of work to do as we look at the portfolio. A number of transactions have already been announced.

Meg O'Neill

We're in the process of working to complete the Castrol transaction later this year, for example. It's going to take us a bit of time, but I would also assure you that we are moving with pace on the low-hanging fruit. There are clearly some assets that do not form part of our long-term business, and I think are transactable, and I think are transactable at fair value. I think in the hands of new owners, they will continue to generate value. We'll be very focused on maximizing value for our shareholders as we go through this process.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Steve. I think we've got time for probably two more questions. We have one polled, coming back to Biraj at RBC, and then one more for whoever wants to take it.

Biraj Borkhataria

Hi there. Thanks for getting back to me. Just a quick one, which is probably for Kate, and it's on Lightsource. Are you able to say what the sort of total balance sheet obligations are associated with Lightsource at the moment? I saw the comment around $1 billion of hybrids related to a subsidiary. I wasn't sure if that was related to that. I had a figure in mind of about $3 billion of debt related to that business. Is that in the right ballpark? Thank you.

Kate Thomson

Hi, Biraj. If you go back to when we completed the acquisition of the remaining 50% of Lightsource, which was 4Q 2024. At that point, we disclosed that we were acquiring debt of around $3 billion. You'll recall it was Lightsource, but also the completion of bp Bioenergia. Having said that, the majority of it was Lightsource. I think the way to hold this, because I guess what you're pushing at is what is the impact on our financial obligations at the point at which we transact on Lightsource, and I think we just need to wait until we have signed a transaction. Until we get to that point, we don't have full clarity on what is the shape of the transaction, and therefore, what is the impact on our bp financial obligations and debts.

Kate Thomson

I think if you can just be patient, we will update you as we reach that point.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Kate. Thanks, Biraj. I am going to take one last question, even though four have since polled, and at top of the list is back to Fergus Neve, please. Then Mark, Chris, and Nitin, we can come back to you.

Fergus Neve

Brilliant. Thank you very much for coming back to me. I really appreciate that. I just wanted to follow up on one of the earlier comments about asset sales and the extent to which the portfolio has too many assets in it at the moment. I wondered whether that points to potential of going beyond the $20 billion target that you have set by the end of 2027, not necessarily by the end of 2027, but into the future. Just on that, have you got any update on how you are tracking against that target at the moment, particularly considering the slight reduction in the divestment proceeds guidance for the full year this year? Thanks.

Kate Thomson

Let me take that one, Fergus. Thank you. Look, firstly, how are we tracking? We delivered $5.3 billion last year in terms of proceeds. We're guiding on $8 billion to $9 billion this year. What I would say to be really clear is we've never held the $20 billion as a key target of ours. It was put into the market to demonstrate one main lever that we could utilize to drive our deleveraging and increase our financial resilience. I'm far more focused on getting our balance sheet to where it needs to be than the number of divestments we make. Every divestment choice, as you've heard us say today, has to be completely value driven. We're not selling assets at any price to hit a divestment target.

Kate Thomson

I think that makes no sense to our shareholders. That is the way to hold it. We will update on proceeds as we go, what we are totally focused on is getting that balance sheet in shape as opposed to hitting a number on divestments. By the end of this year, we should be at about 16, 15, 16.

Craig Marshall

Thank you, Kate. I'm actually going to correct myself. I am going to take a final question from Nitin Kumar at Mizuho. Nitin, I know you've just initiated coverage on BP. Thank you. We will take that as the final question.

Nitin Kumar

Great. Thank you. I'm still new to the story, Meg, I just wanted to ask you, thanks for laying out the strategic priorities. You've talked a lot about asset divestments and pruning the portfolio, as you have come to know the company from the inside, are there areas that we should expect to see more investment, or are there other businesses where you can play offense given the capabilities of the company?

Meg O'Neill

Outstanding question, Nitin. I'll take you back to the theme of the five priorities, which is about getting fit to grow. We do have growth opportunities. We do have places we can invest capital in a profitable manner that delivers strong, resilient shareholder returns. The U.S. is probably the top country on the list, both with the offshore and the Paleogene and onshore and BPX. I'd be remiss if I didn't also acknowledge that the downstream in the U.S., the downstream and trading business combined, is also quite a profitable business. There are opportunities. We've got the Middle East. The Kirkuk development, for example, is another asset that has growth potential. Then Bumerangue in Brazil. There's a number of quite significant assets, particularly in the upstream, where we have that growth potential.

Meg O'Neill

The focus for us is make sure that we're getting the company in sufficient shape. Again, it's that get fit so that we can deliver that growth over the coming years.

Craig Marshall

Thanks, Meg, and thank you, Nitin. I look forward to talking to you further in the coming months. I think that's us at time for today's call. Thanks so much to everybody for dialing in. Maybe Meg, if I can hand back to you for any final comments before we close.

Meg O'Neill

Excellent. Well, thank you, Craig, and thanks everyone for your questions and for your interest in BP. I look forward to seeing a number of our investors over the coming days and meeting more of you over the second half of the year. We do have a very important second half ahead of us at BP. One that I want to assure you the whole team is focused on delivering. We look forward to updating you as we go. Thank you

As of 2026-09-05 • Updated weeklySource: Earnings sourceIngestion runbook