SLG

Thank you everybody for joining us, welcome to SL Green Realty Corp's Q2 2026 Earnings Results Conference Call. This conference call is being recorded. At this time, the company would like to remind listeners that during the call, management may make forward-looking statements. You should not rely on forward-looking statements as predictions of future events, as actual results and events may differ from any forward-looking statements that management may make today. All forward-looking statements made by management on this call are based on their assumptions and beliefs as of today. Additional information regarding the risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause such differences to appear are set forth in the Risk Factors and MD&A sections of the company's latest Form 10-K and other subsequent reports filed by the company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Also, during today's conference call, the company may discuss non-GAAP financial measures as defined by Regulation G under the Securities Act. The GAAP financial measure most directly comparable to each non-GAAP financial measure discussed, and the reconciliation of the differences between each non-GAAP financial measure and the comparable GAAP financial measure can be found on both the company's website at www.slgreen.com by selecting the press release regarding the company's Q2 2026 earnings, and in our supplemental information included in our current report on Form 8-K relating to our Q2 2026 earnings. Before turning the call over to Marc Holliday, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of SL Green Realty Corp, I ask that those of you participating in the Q&A portion of the call to please limit your questions to two per person. Thank you. I will now turn the call over to Marc Holliday. Please go ahead, Marc.

Thank you very much. Good afternoon, thank you all for joining us. It may be the dead of summer, but our team is, of course, hard at work. This is truly when we shine the brightest, completely dialed in on our business plan and outworking the market. That hustle really showed up this quarter. Much of what we predicted at our investor conference in December is now playing out in ways that directly drive earnings and improves cash flow. We forecasted that the leasing progress we've made over the past two and a half extraordinary years would become apparent in our economic occupancy, and it certainly did this quarter, up a remarkable 300 basis points as concessions continue to burn off and overall vacancy dwindles.

At the same time, we're putting the significant leasing costs associated with the lease up behind us, leverage and coverage ratios are improving, which we also saw in this Q2. On the leasing front, the story remains the same. A growing scarcity of premier space in desirable Midtown districts has turned the tables in our favor. We now know that we'll exceed our leasing goals again this year. It's just a question of whether it will be by a wide margin or a really wide margin. We don't have that visibility yet, it's too soon to reforecast, the trend continues to move in the right direction. We are also seeing very positive momentum at SUMMIT, both here at One Vanderbilt and on our projects around the world.

Even with reduced overall tourism in the city this year, we enjoyed the highest attendance amongst all of our competitors and introduced a number of new ticketed experiences that we expect will continue to drive revenue. We are on track to open Paris next summer in 2027 and in Tokyo in 2030 as we continue to see enormous growth potential for this business. Most importantly, the backdrop to our performance this quarter and moving forward is the extraordinary and prolonged surge in business activity in New York City. Our economy is in a league of its own compared to any other CBD in the country or indeed, even the world, driven by financial services sector performing as well as I've ever seen it.

Wall Street profits hit $21 billion in the Q1 alone, the second highest Q1 that has ever been recorded in approximately 40+ years of tracking this metric. Q2 profits are up a whopping 50% year-over-year, and that's coming off a very strong year. Office using jobs are up by 12,000 year-to-date, according to the city's OMB. A strong showing for only six months of the year, with further growth projected for the balance of the year. We've also seen tech growth driven by AI. We're obviously getting more than our fair share of those leases, including the lease we announced last night for 100,000 sq ft at 11 Madison. It's not just the financial services and tech.

It's truly a broad-based growth and demand momentum that we see here in the city. As just one example, the healthcare sector continues to grow and added 20,000 jobs year-to-date, many of which do land in office space like MSK at 885 Third and the Hospital for Special Surgery at 1520 First. NYU Medical has a significant footprint at One Park. New York City based companies raised $10.8 billion in venture capital funding in Q2 alone. That brings it to $21.1 billion year-to-date. Both of those metrics are double the same respective amounts in the measurement periods in 2025. The city is, I think, experiencing one of the largest resurgences I've seen. The tax receipts are very good. The city just

Passed its budget in June. It's another balanced budget with rainy day reserves. I feel like we're in very good standing. This is what all adds up to about 50 million sq ft of office space leased in the past four quarters. That has to be a record. It was a very strong quarter. I'm incredibly proud of our team. I remain very optimistic about the direction of the city and the economic activity that supports our performance. Finally, before we open it up for questions, I want to address our big guidance revision for this quarter. The revision is great news and certainly represents the culmination of efforts, not just over the past three months, but over the many years leading up to this.

We've executed a deliberate strategy to invest what was needed to move our occupancy back toward 95%. We're now reaching a positive inflection point. This should not be a big surprise since we forecasted this positive momentum back in December. Maybe the magnitude is even more than we expected, but it's obviously a pleasant result. Matt, if you would, please elaborate on the underpinnings of this significant guidance revision.

Thanks, Marc. It is clear we have had a fantastic first six months of 2026, exceeding our expectations on several fronts, including our Q2 reported results. We are excited to be able to translate these successes into a significant upward FFO guidance revision of $1.20 a share, more than 26%, the vast majority of which is recurring. In the Manhattan office portfolio, revenues benefit from strong leasing, particularly early renewals and the lease of a free build space, both of which have immediate earnings benefit, along with a conscious effort to accelerate GAAP revenue recognition by delivering space to tenants more rapidly. Which is coupled with phenomenal expense containment as always by our operations team to drive $0.20 a share of incremental FFO in 2026 from the real estate portfolio, $0.10 of which we recognized in the Q2.

While visibility into the execution of the remainder of our 2026 business plan over the next six months also provides us the opportunity to generate additional fee and other income, which we expect to contribute an additional $0.20 a share of FFO. If we had simply increased FFO guidance by $0.40 a share for these operational successes, we would have been thrilled. That equates to about a 9% increase at the midpoint. Because we built one of the most successful, and more importantly, profitable buildings in the country here at One Vanderbilt, we're able to add another $0.80 of recurring, not one time, FFO to our guidance revision. This property has generated so much cash flow that we repatriated all of our invested equity long ago.

That cash flow, in excess of our share of GAAP net income at the property, caused the carrying value of our investment to go negative. GAAP allows you to carry a negative basis, but only up to the value of any known or potential tenant obligation. At the end of the Q1, our negative basis reached the maximum allowed under GAAP. Starting in the Q2, One Vanderbilt's incremental FFO contribution is calculated based on the sum of two things. First, amortization of the negative carrying value over the term of the related tenant obligations. This amortization component alone is approximately $21 million a year through the early part of 2031, plus the difference between cash distributions we receive from One Vanderbilt and our share of GAAP net income.

Going forward, every dollar of cash distribution out of One Vanderbilt that's in excess of GAAP net income is incremental FFO to us. The total of these two components contributes an additional $0.80 a share of FFO in 2026, $0.35 of which we recorded in the Q2, and based on current projections, is expected to contribute as much or more to FFO next year. The way I look at it, this essentially flowing deferred cash profits from the project through earnings and further evidence of the incredible success of One Vanderbilt. More importantly, a testament to the hard work of the best employees in New York real estate that work here. With that, operator, we can open it up for questions.

Certainly. As a reminder, to ask a question, please press *11 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press *11 again. Our first question will be coming from the line of Nicholas Yulico of Scotiabank. Your line is open, Nicholas.

Great. Thanks. Hi, everyone. Maybe if we could start on the leasing side. The mark to market, again, this quarter was strong, above guidance. Can you just talk about if there's specific buildings driving that activity, submarkets, or if it is actually just sort of a broad-based improvement?

Well, let's start with it's a broad-based improvement, within the portfolio, there's some particularly notable transactions and buildings that are really seeing rent appreciation. Anything on Park Avenue, we've raised rents dramatically. Sixth Avenue, for instance, 1185 Sixth, rents are up dramatically. Across the portfolio, we've been consistently raising asking rents throughout the year. 245 Park Avenue, where we've done a lot of leasing this year. We've got some deals pending to replace some tenants that at OVA, rents are going to be up dramatically. I think, what we saw this quarter, we're going to see it again next quarter.

Okay, thanks. Second question is just going back to One Vanderbilt, 100% leased. As we think about it, I know you've said before there's a significant mark-to-market embedded in that asset. Is there any opportunity to perhaps move an existing tenant to 346 Madison, your new development project, and unlock some of that mark-to-market in One Vanderbilt through that process?

Well, it's a little early to talk about 346 Madison since it's five years away. There are opportunities that we're pursuing for tenants that have either outgrown their space, and we're recapturing some of those spaces and then accommodating tenants that need expansion space in the building. We've got several pending transactions, and you'll see those leases, I expect, to sign this quarter, and the rents will be up to really, I think, illuminate the fact that the building's in-place rents are well below current market.

Okay. Thanks, guys.

Our next question will be coming from the line of Alexander Goldfarb of Piper Sandler. Your line is open.

Hey, good afternoon down there. Two questions. Marc or Steve, the pace of this office recovery, it's incredible. It's like what the dot-com was, maybe even better. Is it solely just the lack of supply, or what do you think is causing companies to clamor for so much space so quickly? It's just, as I say, we haven't seen this in decades, and just trying to understand if it's lack of supply or something else.

Four things. One, the economy in New York City is doing extremely well. Profits drive growth drives demand for space. It's broad-based, as I mentioned earlier. There's no sign of abatement right now, because things are really just firing on all cylinders across almost all sectors. That is kind of like the tip of the spear, if you will. Second, we just are in a situation where there's almost no addition to the space to speak of in a 400 million sq ft market. That's really looking out over the next five years or so. That's because a lot of projects during 2020 and 2024 either got delayed or shelved or changed or whatever. As a result, you just can't flip a switch and produce that space.

It takes a lot of time and effort and money and foresight to be able to open up the inventory. This isn't like one of those borderless markets that are out in other CBDs around the country where you have constant new product replacing old. Here, it's much more delicate, especially in a fully built-out Midtown. Scarcity, I'd say, is the second major issue. Thirdly, you had companies that were just sitting on the sidelines, uncertain as to what direction they were headed, and we had some very lean years back in 2020 through 2023.

Now we've been the beneficiary, especially in 2025 and 2026, of just companies that have plans for the future that are so ambitious and so affirmative that the issue we face right now is not just delivering space, it's giving tenants confidence that once they lease space, we'll have more growth options for them, either within those buildings or surrounding buildings to satisfy their future growth needs. It kind of feeds on each other, and it's turned into smart businesses wanting to put away their long-term space plans for 10, 15, 20 years now and not have to deal with the unknown down the road. I would say, fourth major point is conversions. You heard me on this back in 2024.

This was something I identified as what I thought was going to be one of the most significant trends in favor of diminishing office supply and sort of a winnowing of secondary and tertiary office space being converted into primary and very attractive residential space and much needed rental apartments. As a result, you have an inventory that's actually dropping and is bringing up the middle and bottom of the market into rates that become economic for the business. That's why Steve said earlier, we're experiencing rental growth across all facets of the business.

I think that taken together really should not be surprising because we've been on these themes for months and months, maybe years and years. I think what you're just seeing is that playing itself out in a very predictable way. As long as the economy stays robust as it is, we don't see this abating anytime soon.

Marc, just on that point on the office to resi conversions, do you see most of that pipeline continuing on, or is your view that we'll suddenly get a bunch of buildings that were planned to be converted come back to office, and maybe that's competition?

That's an interesting question that we'll have to see play out. I'd say right now, for the projects that have been what I'll call lit and/or have been permitted or are about to be permitted, I think you're going to see them all go through as conversions. Because before I would say the economics were in favor of residential, I'd say office at that segment of the market is closing the gap. Maybe it's getting closer to a push, but you have to remember, aside from just the pure economics of rental value and cost to convert, you still get a pretty strong financing edge with residential, where spreads are tighter than office, and a stronger cap rate environment to sell into or JV into, as you saw on 7 Dey Street, where I think the cap rate was about a 5% or 5.1%.

I think some projects will command better than that, depending on location. I think the gap is narrowing, but still tilts in favor of conversion for a number of these buildings. That could change in a year or two, and you may hit an equilibrium.

Thank you.

Our next call and question will be coming from the line of Steve Sakwa of Evercore ISI. Steve, your line is open.

Thanks. I know you guys had an ambitious debt refinancing and capital markets transaction program for 2026. Could you maybe just kind of give us an update, kind of where you are on refinancing and asset sales for the year?

Yeah, sure. Just talking about the capital markets more broadly, I would say the shifting macro landscape since the start of the year and the resulting benchmark rate widening, they've tried to interfere with the natural trajectory of the market. These are moments where New York City shines. Marc always says New York City is the AAA investment of our sector. Despite not having the wind at our back, we continue to see what I would call unending domestic and international demand for quality Midtown Manhattan product. Just this morning, we saw a report that was issued and published in Crain's about how Manhattan's investment sales market jumped 50% annually in the first half of the year, which marked the strongest first half of the year since 2022, when interest rates were just starting to rise.

If we look at transactions over this past quarter, the development sector, we completed our partnership with Mori Building at 346 Madison. This is our third transaction with Mori Building. Mori is a remarkable partner. They're incredible developers and visionaries, and we're proud to be able to launch this project with them. We shook hands on our partnership within only a few months of us closing on our acquisition. I think that really speaks volumes to the quality of what we'll be building and the trust between our two organizations.

In the core office sector, we entered into contract to sell 10 East 53rd Street. That cap rate was approximately 5.7% for a side street building. That sale will complete a successful transaction for SL Green, and notably, it's about a three and a half times multiple on the acquisition of our partner's interest in 2024. Another example is our good friends' purchase of Park Avenue Plaza, which was a highly competitive process, and that's on the heels of their purchase of 623 Fifth. In portfolio deals, I assume everyone's seen the rumors in the press regarding a potential transaction for the Hudson Square portfolio.

I would say most interestingly, much of this quarter's demand was driven by domestic and long-term investors in our sector. Most of those groups were on the sidelines for quite some time. Between availability of debt capital, the strong fundamental performance that you've been hearing on this call, and the diversity of investor base that we saw this past quarter, I would say this is one of the better investment sales backdrops we've seen in quite some time.

With respect to our program, more specifically, we've completed or in contract on four of the 11 deals in the plan. I expect we will be announcing two additional deals soon, and then we're going to get started on the remaining five deals that are in the plan. As most of you know, our disposition plan this year was weighted to the second half as we strategically launch sales throughout the year, and the team is gearing up to launch on those remaining transactions. We can talk more about the debt capital markets, but I would say specifically to our plan, the next one up in the queue is 245 Park. That one is in advanced stages right now, and I expect that we'll have more to announce and discuss in the coming months.

Great. Thanks. Marc, I don't know if you could maybe just comment on 1515 Broadway. I know you were disappointed with the casino outcome, but have you guys kind of given more thought to sort of the long-term plans for that building? If so, when do you think that kind of takes more shape?

Yeah. Look, we shook off the disappointment back, I guess it was last September, I want to say. Amazing how time goes so quickly. It's a shame because I think we would've been close to open when we all would be walking into the casino. Since then, we've had the opportunity to assess a lot of plans. What I've come to appreciate even more is that we're in a very good spot, I think, with 1515. One, Paramount, after being acquired by Skydance, and now having an agreement to merge in with or acquire Warner Bros. to create, I think, one of the most powerful and largest media companies in the world. Hold it. We good? Okay.

One of the most powerful media companies in the world, puts 1515 squarely back in the mix for longer term use by that combined entity. I'll call it Skydance for the moment. I don't know that they have their plans all sorted out yet. My guess is not from the conversations we had, and also given that that merger is not yet closed. Certainly, the combined entity is going to employ, I think, more than 4,000 people. I think a lot of those jobs can and will stay, hopefully, in New York City, and we would expect to be a net beneficiary of that.

With all that said, you have to remember that the debt is on rapid amortization over there. At the expiration of the Paramount lease, we have very low debt outstanding on that particular mortgage, which again, gives us flexibility to consider other types of conversion options to maximize entertainment uses, which I think is really highest and best for Times Square and for that asset. Signage opportunities far in a way above what currently exists, and really make it a mixed-use destination, entertainment, theater, live theater, live music, media office capital of Times Square.

I think there's going to be a lot more to say on that. Time-wise, Steve, I think is next year, because I think, like I said, until things are clearer with our primary tenant over in that building, or sole tenant in that building, there won't be a lot to do. I think as soon as that transaction's culminated, we could be very active over there. I'm very positive on that particular property right now.

Great. Thank you.

Our next question will be coming from the line of Tom Catherwood of BTIG. Your line is open, Tom.

Thank you. Good afternoon, everybody. Marc, I want to go back to something you said in your prepared remarks when you were talking about the step function and economic occupancy in Q2. Maybe view it from a different angle. We think of vacancy leasing and how it eventually drives economic occupancy, but there's a good portion of your portfolio that are leases that were signed 2020 to 2023 when tenants were focused on shorter-term renewals. Do you have a sense of, for that portion of COVID vintage loans or leases, what's the embedded mark to market on that? That maybe it's not reflected in economic occupancy right now, but in the next year, two years, three years, really starts to roll into the numbers.

Yeah. Look, I don't have that number, I'm looking at Steve and Matt, and they're not giving me the high sign here that they have it. I'm going to give you a little bit more gut and instinct. I would say I'm going to give you a broad range between 10% and 20%. I think just given based off of our increases in our asking and taking rents that Steve referred to earlier. I have a better sense building by building how we've moved rents up sort of incrementally over the past two and a half years. I think typically the range of increase is minimally 10%, probably as much as 15% or 20%. I don't know, a building like One Vanderbilt more than that, but we're fully leased here.

I would say a safe bet is 15%-ish on when those, what you call COVID-era leases, come up for renewal. I'm giving you that more touch and feel than I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I don't think it's less than that. Steve, do you have anything there?

I think there's a couple of thoughts with regards to it. A lot of the deals that we did during COVID were even shorter term. We're five, six years past COVID at this point. A lot of those deals we were doing at that point in time were three, four, five years, one. Secondly is, if you'll recall, the net effectives may have dropped more than the face rents. Face rents were probably down about 10% from where they were at the beginning of 2020. Since that time, face rents have dramatically increased throughout the portfolio, and certainly as our portfolio, the complexion of our portfolio, has changed over the years. You're seeing much bigger rent appreciation on parts of the portfolio, particularly Park and 6th Avenue buildings.

With the stabilization of concessions over the past year and a half, the net effectives, not only are the face rents going up, but the net effectives are going up as well. I think we're probably past the moment in time where those kick-the-can deals, those leases have probably already come back and we've attended to them as part of our leasing over the last couple of years. Particularly if you look at our rollover schedule over the next couple of years, we don't have any big chunky expirations. Certainly nothing of consequence this year that's not already being attended to. Our largest lease next year is like 150,000 sq ft, and that's one lease.

Yeah, with that said, we're going to be mining opportunities that are non-contractual.

In a big way.

Where I think you're going to see the growth come from is really four things. One, nominal face rent increases. Steve and I just spoke about that. Two, stabilized lease concessions for new deals, maybe even slightly contracting. Three, a much higher prevalence of renewal to new.

Early renewal.

Well, renewal to new, as we go forth, which we're saving considerable. That's where your net effective rents are going to be far higher than 15%-20%, because you're getting that kick on face rent, then you're getting a compounded effect on reduced TI and free rent. Lastly, we're mining the portfolio for every expiration between now and 2032. We are out there like five, six years forward, hitting every tenant right now, trying to do blend and extend deals, early renewals, trying to get blend in rental uptick and defer out some capital costs. I think you're going to see in the second half of the year, we're going to get some good traction there. All of that is what we are busy at work on. You got to hit the market when the market's there, and we recognize that.

We're not just focused on the next year or two, we're focused on the next five or six, and with an intense eye on saving capital dollars and trying to max out face rents.

Got it. Got to appreciate that color. Last one from me, maybe Harry, just want to touch on the debt fund. You've had success deploying capital there. How do you see that opportunity set potentially evolving as the New York market continues to improve and traditional lenders start to get more comfortable with office? Do you have to focus on a different part of the cap stack or kind of shift strategy in any way?

We've done approximately $600 million of deployment through call yesterday. We have a handful of opportunities in the pipeline today that we're working through. I think these are moments where our team shines. We had, obviously, a lot of opportunity in front of us last year into the beginning of this year as the capital stacks start to tighten. For us, this is now about financial engineering and working with senior lenders, trying to get the tightest senior financing, much like the execution you saw us do on our balance sheet years ago at 550 Madison. This is where we go out, work with our relationships. There's a deal we just closed in the debt fund.

We're not disclosing transactions in the debt fund, there's a deal we just did, where we went out, originated the entire stack, syndicated out a senior, syndicated out a subordinate mezz, and we're able to get to our yield requirements. For us, this is where our team focuses on our relationships and builds capital stacks to get to our yields.

Got it. Appreciate the thoughts. Thanks, everyone.

Our next question will be coming from the line of John Kim of BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Thank you. I wanted to follow up on what drove the $0.20 of operational uplift this year and what surprised you. You didn't raise same-store occupancy guidance. I'm assuming a lot of this is timing and the economic occupancy is moving up, but is it purely just a better renewal rate in terms of retention of your tenants and more leasing of pre-built space? I'm just trying to understand why such a big uplift relative to expectations.

Sure. Yeah, I thought I hit that in the opening comments, but you reiterated the biggest ones. Steve and Marc highlighted that as a catalyst to what we're seeing. Renewals and early renewals. If you're looking at NOI, everybody's very focused on GAAP revenue recognition and economic occupancy. Renewals and early renewals are instant gratification when it comes to GAAP revenue recognition. We're doing more of those. We've also made a conscious effort because we talk about turning on GAAP revenue recognition is triggered by the turnover of space to tenants. We are working with our tenants and our own team is hustling to try and turn over space even faster so we can turn that earnings spigot on. Then just from an expense perspective, we budget very conservatively. We're ahead on expenses.

The combination of those things, that $0.10 of the $0.20 we already recognized in the Q2. That was $0.10 ahead of our expectations just in Q2. You have $0.10 left for the balance of the year, which is a combination of those handful of items.

Okay. I also wanted to follow up on the refinancing plan for the year, and in particular, 245 Park. The leasing has been very strong. The redevelopment is underway. Now with the 10-year moving up above the asset's mortgage rate, how does that impact either the timing of some of the refinancing or sales, and the valuation of the asset?

Sure. I spoke earlier about equity capital markets and a bit on 245, but let me just talk about the credit markets more generally. We continue to be encouraged by the strength of what we're seeing in the credit markets. We've seen approximately $11 billion of CMBS originations year-to-date. That figure, same period last year, was about $8.5 billion. The two biggest deals that got done this past quarter was the $1.9 billion financing of 2 Manhattan West. The $1.8 billion financing of 9 West 57th Street. I think one of the best data points that we've seen out there is really this tightening of the AAA spreads. We're now seeing AAAs tight in sub 100. Overall spreads on the deals that are getting done are in the mid-to-high 100s, depending on last dollar LTV.

I would say, interestingly, when you compare it across all asset classes, spreads on single borrower CMBS AAAs for trophy office are now trading in line, and in some cases inside of, what we're seeing for spreads on industrial, multifamily and self-storage. I think the bond market is starting to appreciate what we're seeing in the trophy office asset class. We're going to be big beneficiaries of that on 245 Park financing. That's in process now, and I think you'll see a lot more illumination on that as we launch to the rating agencies and data becomes public. I would say from a spread perspective, we're very confident in the execution that we're seeing.

Of course, the benchmark, as you noted, is not cooperating with us. That's obviously outside of our control. Matt can speak to some of the hedging that we're putting in place, to ensure that we have the proper protections at the right times in the market.

Yeah. As has been customary for the last few years in this rate environment, we are maintaining a very cautious stance when it comes to rates. We're hedging out well ahead of time financings like 245 to protect against rising rates. The bulk of our debt remains hedged as well. We were at one point 70/30 fixed to float. We remain more like 90/10. Hedging existing and hedging forward for the foreseeable future.

Great. Thank you.

Our next question will be coming from the line of Blaine Heck of Wells Fargo. Your line is open.

Great, thanks. Sorry if I missed this, just on the leasing pipeline, I think it stood at 900,000 sq ft last quarter. Can you give us an update there, the mix between new and renewal and how much of the renewal activity is pull forward renewals?

Well, there's a 900,000 square foot pipeline. It's roughly 50% new, 50% renewal. Of that 900,000 sq ft, 400,000 sq ft of it are leases that are in active negotiation and essentially very far advanced negotiation, I'll say. The balance are term sheets, which we expect to convert over to leases. As far as the renewals, most of the renewals are I don't have a perfect answer to it, they're near-term renewals. They're not early renewals for the majority of that square footage.

Great. Thanks, Steve. Then second question, just a follow-up for Harry or Marc. Can you just walk us through the thought process you all went through kind of on 346 Madison? Was there any consideration of either selling a smaller stake or waiting for some leasing activity to potentially push the valuation a little higher? Did you just see this as something you wanted to do for timing or relationship reasons?

Well, we did it first and foremost for business reasons. I love fully capitalized deals, development deals. You never want to take for granted a moment in the market. We do have very special relationships with many of our JV partners, Mori Building on 346 Madison, certainly among them. We've gotten to a point with many of our co-investors where it's a symbiotic relationship where we count on their partnership, and they count on our delivery of opportunities in this city, which the good ones are few and far between. We were able to get our standard package, if you will, of JV enhancements, for being the ones to source, and execute the deal.

In the case of Mori Building, they're also a really good co-developer. These are folks that have built as much as anybody in Tokyo, Azabudai Hills, Toranomon Hills, Roppongi Hills. These are fabulous investments. I think there'll be opportunities for us each ways, both opportunities for us and for them. We had their commitment early on. There's a lot of planning that needs to happen and happen early, having a good partner like Mori together with us at the early stage makes the entire development go much easier. We reserved enough that we plan in the future to probably syndicate equity further down the line. Maybe when we sign our first leases or maybe when the project's completed or maybe when it's recapitalized. That'll be for a later date.

The combination of de-risking through capitalization, day one, getting the kind of economic deal we set out for, and then some, point 2, and the solidification of relationship, point 3. On we go to the next one. We are a volume shop, and while developments are bespoke and long-term, and they get a lot of our senior level attention, there's lots more deals for this company to do in this market, both long-term and opportunistic. We want to be flush with capital to take advantage of this market. I think we've proven our ability to do so over our decades in the business, but certainly over, I would say, the past three to five years. We're happy with how it turned out.

Yep. That all makes sense. Thanks, Marc.

Our next question will be coming from the line of Peter Abramowitz of Deutsche Bank. Your line is open, Peter.

Hi. Thank you for taking the questions. First one is just in relation to the guidance raise, and this kind of expected ramp in NOI and fee income, maybe faster than you were expecting at the beginning of the year. Just wanted to ask, how does that sort of impact when you think you'll start to see an inflection in FAD? I think previously you've kind of messaged that the expectation would be end of 2027 or early 2028. Just curious for any updated thoughts on that in relation to the guidance raise.

Yeah. I would say the trajectory that we're on is slightly ahead. 2027 into 2028, with the breakeven point in 2028 is still the path that we are on at this point.

Okay. Thanks, Matt. Then a second one, just on SUMMIT. I think, Marc, you had some commentary around tourism maybe being a little bit weaker in the city this year. Just on SUMMIT, I'm kind of curious, was there any noticeable impact from World Cup travelers in the Q2 and into the third? Sort of how are you thinking about that impact as it relates to the full-year results?

Well, look, the FIFA games, there were eight of them, including the much-watched finals. There was definitely a bump that I think all hospitality got from those events. It's hard for me to parse how much of that was FIFA driven versus we're in the heat of the summer right now, and SUMMIT typically does very well June, July, August. Certainly, I look at the numbers daily, and the past, I would say, four weeks in particular have been very strong. Daily ticket sales exceeding 400,000 and some odd a day is fairly typical. Those are end-of-year holiday numbers, so I'm happy with that. People love SUMMIT. It's all ages, all walks of life, domestic tourism, tri-state residents, foreign tourism. People love going. They repeat, they go back.

I think our year-over-year attendance numbers are down a few points, really modest because most of that was in the more challenging beginning of this year when we were up against weather and other issues. I would say since May, numbers have been sort of right back to where we had them. I'm hoping and expecting that through the ability to manage variable operating expense and also have a big second half a year, that we'll finish up right on our numbers, which are market leading. They're well ahead of the other observatory attractions, both in terms of average ticket price and attendance. It is a very special experience that I'm now excited to be bringing to major cities like Paris and Tokyo, and more to come.

We've got a lot in the queue, maybe more on that in December, I always like to hold something back for December. We're hard at work trying to bring SUMMIT to everyone around the world for people who can't get here. I think it'll just, the momentum will build, and the experience will get even better. The team is very excited about the future.

All right. Appreciate the color. Thank you for the time.

Our next question will come from the line of Anthony Paolone of JPMorgan. Your line is open, Anthony.

Thanks. Good afternoon. Can you maybe give us a sense of cap rates and what to expect on your dispositions over the balance of the year? Maybe even bucket them depending on whether it's things like maybe a 245 Park stake or resi, or something like that.

Look, for competitive purposes, obviously, we wouldn't want cap rates on any specific transactions out there. I think the best data points to look at right now are what we completed. We just announced 10 East 53rd Street. That's a core office building on a side street. That got done at a 5.7% cap rate. We announced 7 Dey Street. That's a core residential asset. Residential and retail, forgive me. That got done at a 5.0%. I think you'll continue to see assets trade in those types of ranges. I don't think we'll go along any specific number or tie to any specific asset at this point.

Okay. Just my other question. On 750 Third and 346 Madison, you obviously had the incident with the other conversion close by on 750 Third, there's some press on 346 Madison that maybe a neighboring property's delaying you or something. Can you comment on just the progress on those two deals and whether anything gets interrupted on either of those in terms of timeline or plans?

Okay. Let me just make sure. The question is 750-

346 litigation that's been

That's two questions. Okay. 346 what?

The litigation.

Oh, okay. 750. I want to make sure I got the question. I've got with me Bob, who has a question about what are we doing over at our building to ensure integrity of the execution, or what happened over at Fox?

Do we see any interruption on our project at 750?

Okay. No. There's no interruption on the project, debt or equity capital, from what took place at a property on 42nd Street, which I assume many of you are aware of what happened there, was basically, as far as we know, and it's not yet official, human error. Something that has 0 extrapolation to our project and therefore our debt and equity is not impacted by that in any way. We expect to have that transaction closed in the Q3, both debt and equity. We're on a path. I feel great about the project. I think it will be the top rental project in that, let's call it, Midtown. I don't know which way-

Submarket.

In that particular Third Avenue Midtown submarket, as expanded all the way over to Second and to First. The design is extraordinary. The amenity package we have for that building is like none other. We're having a lot of fun with it, and we're able to do it in a way with domestically sourced products to keep it within our original budget, which I think was around total cost $800 million, plus or minus. I've got my head of construction here making his debut after 122 conference calls that we've done since 1997. Robert DeWitt, the man behind the curtain who shepherds under Edward Piccinich's watchful eyes, our developments at One Vanderbilt, One Madison, now 346, certainly the conversion on 750.

Bob, a little bit, just a minute on what controls we have in place at 750 to ensure structural integrity, which on a project like 750 is actually, I'm going to say, a fairly easy lift for us relative to the kinds of things we've done at One Madison, elsewhere. I think it could be illuminating if you would share that.

Sure. Thanks, Marc. Thanks for the intro. We have numerous layers of oversight, review, inspection, and approvals before any structural demolition or overbuild is authorized to proceed. We've got a world-class design team, independent and major New York City construction manager, third-party special inspectors, as well as our own dedicated staff overseeing the day-to-day execution of the project. We have extensive procedures in place to track the execution of the structural reinforcement of columns and beams at all levels of the project. Ultimately, each location is tracked with detailed photographs and logged electronically in our online tracking software by our construction manager and design team.

Once the reinforcement is confirmed complete by the subcontractor and the construction managers, an independent third-party special inspector performs their inspection and confirms the work is complete per the plans and specifications before any further work can continue. Finally, no structural additions, demolition, or overbuild activities are permitted to commence until all required structural reinforcement has been completed, all inspections have been approved, all tracking documentation is in place and verified, and all structural stability requirements have been satisfied and confirmed in a pre-transfer and pre-overbuild conference that includes all members of the design team and development team. This process is not only standard for our 750 project, but any project we complete across the portfolio that involves structural overbuild or structural work.

Thank you, sir. You're a rock star. That is where we stand on 750. As to, I think the question was on 346, the litigation you're referring to is for some access across the adjoining building. That's fairly I hate to say routine in New York City development. There should be a lot of neighborly love and access, but you often have to make a visit downtown to lay out the parameters of exactly what level of access, monitoring, building protection, et cetera. We did it on OVA, we've done it on other buildings, we did it here. When people build next to us, we're on the other side of that, and I think that'll all be sorted out next month in August. Ahead of our demolition, we anticipate no adverse outcome and no adverse impact on timeline.

Okay, great. Thanks.

Our next question will come from the line of Seth Bergey at Citi. Your line is open, Seth.

Hi, thanks. To take my question. I guess just the first one, you did a $14 million of buyback activity in the quarter, and I know the dispositions are kind of back half weighted. I guess just thinking about the use of those proceeds, how do additional buybacks compare to your goals of debt paydown? On a relative basis.

Yeah. Our goal is to make the most with what we have. That takes different forms at different times. Development, opportunistic investment, buybacks, debt paydown. We had said, I think, for a while now, when we felt we were in a position either with deals done, deals in contract, or deals within our sites, that we have incremental liquidity, that we would use that incremental liquidity for buybacks. We were in that position towards the end of the Q2. We did dip into the market at a point in time that we felt the price was not nearly reflective of the underlying value of this platform. I think with the intense focus of the analysts and shareholder community on earnings, and I understand that because we focus on that too, there's also an intense lift on valuation.

Our assets, which are already premier assets, are becoming more valuable with each passing day, with every bit we lease up and with every bit we improve. Winnow some of the low-growth assets and redeploy into high-growth assets. We feel not just really good about leasing, we feel not just good about where our earnings and cash flow is headed, but we feel good about underlying valuation. We saw what we consider to be a structural disconnect in the Q2. We put some money to deploy, and what I often consider to be the best and most obvious way to invest in yourselves, because we believe in ourselves. I think we'll be rewarded over the long term for those investments, which we may or may not do more of as time goes forward.

We'll just see what the landscape is at that time. The great thing is we've got so many different levers to push at any moment in time to try and optimize return for shareholders, that even though our focus is in one market, it's a pretty damn big market, and there's lots of opportunity and lots of ways for us to deploy capital and make money.

Thanks. That's helpful. Then, with just the $0.80 of FFO kind of related to some of the basis accounting and then having some component of kind of maybe fair value adjustments on derivatives, have you put any thought into disclosing either a core or a real estate FFO metric to kind of give the investor community a better sense of the underlying earnings performance of the business?

No. I don't believe in violating what NAREIT says is FFO and creating your own. We do it as reported, as everybody should, and that's the best way to compare across companies.

Thanks.

Our next question will come from the line of Vikram Malhotra of Mizuho. Your line is open.

Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the call and congrats on a strong print. Just two clarifications. I guess, you referenced FAD and break even. I was just wondering if you can clarify what do you mean by break even? Matt, could you, at least for 2026, give us a sense of how the CapEx should trend in the back half relative to the first half?

Sure, yeah. CapEx tends to be a little back-ended, just because we get budgets approved and then you got to get to spending. That's our spend and reimbursement to tenants. Historically, capital spend is higher in the back half than the first, but since that's largely out of our control, we can't say for certain how that plays out. The commentary on 2028 is the same thing we said back on our Q1 call. With FAD steadily improving 2026 into 2027, by 2028 you are break even as against coverage of your dividend.

Dividend, okay. That makes sense. I guess just now given what you talked about in terms of more interest, the capital markets opening even wider, is there a way you can share with us, like as of today, you sold East 53rd, I think it was a 5%-7%, but how should we think about the range of cap rates for, say, like newer build core asset versus maybe a older needs CapEx or just a lease-up opportunity? How should we think about Manhattan and the range of cap rates, older versus new product?

Vikram, cap rates, I subscribe, are really driven by two things: embedded growth, expected growth within the asset, and a view on rates. You can get a low cap rate with an old building, a high cap rate with a newer building. It is not really new versus old. When cap rates compress is when the market believes you are going to have above-average earnings momentum and growth. If that growth in NOI projection over three, five, seven, 10 years outstrips your view of where rates are headed, then you are going to have a compressed cap rate, and it could often be below your financing cost. It is not uncommon to have cap rates strip lower than your financing costs when you have embedded growth.

Right now, when we see nominal rents and net effective rents increasing at these kind of rates, as long as interest rates are roughly stable, and that is a caveat. I think you will see cap rates compress, notwithstanding it is a higher than historical interest rate environment, because people are investing for growth. They want to borrow in $2026 and repay in $2036 and have a lot of nominal growth along the way. When you have that circumstance, you can have premier growth assets, sub five. I think the bulk of what we own is between five and six, and there is really not much in our portfolio that trades north of six, in my opinion. I am not giving you market cap rates, I am giving you cap rates for our portfolio.

The way I look at our assets, I do not think we have much of an appetite to trade in the six and a half to seven range, even if that were the market, which I do not think it is for our assets. I think it is decidedly between five and six. Certain assets are sub five. Very few might be a touch over six. That is kind of a broad range of how we view. The tighter I think occupancy in the city and our portfolio gets, and the more net effective rents improve, I think the more you may see those cap rates dip. Then if you get a little interest rate relief, then it is all bets off.

We have seen that. We have seen how fast it can go in your direction or five years ago, go against your direction. I think right now we are in the place we want to be, and I think that is why you saw us dip into the buyback market again, which we have not done in many years. I think that is a fair assessment of cap rates.

Okay, thank you. That was helpful. Just one last one, Matt. You have a fair amount of debt coming due next year, and I guess concurrently, also a bunch of swaps expiring. You talked about asset sales, but just maybe can you give us an update, specifically the plan for 2027?

Yes, I plan to do that in December. Thanks for your third question.

Any early preview?

No.

Thanks so much.

Yes.

Our next question will be coming from the line of Ronald Kamdem of Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Hey, great. Just two quick ones. My first one, I know we talked about sort of the leased occupancy target of 95 and potentially exceeding that, but any sort of color where the commenced occupancy ends the year? The reason I ask is at the investor day, I think you guys caught a lot of attention on the same store NOI for 2027 over 10%, potentially, just would love to understand where the commenced occupancy ends and if that's still sort of a good target or realistic. Thanks.

Yeah, it's a good question. We are trending ahead of our same store NOI projections for 2026, which is great, then it calls into question, well, that's increasing your benchmarks. What does it mean for 2027? The trajectory into 2027 is such that we still expect to be in excess of 10% same store NOI, cash NOI growth in 2027 as well, even though 2026 is outperforming. As to occupancy, you're talking about commenced occupancy. I think the more relevant is probably economic occupancy. That's what flows through earnings. Commenced is more of a legal term. Economic occupancy, we expected to close the gap to leased occupancy by at least half of what it was at the end of 2025, by the end of 2026, we are on that trajectory.

Great. Then my follow-up is on the alternative strategy portfolio. Just any updates on 2 Herald Square? I see 650 Fifth, Worldwide Plaza, just any traction there? Any movement on those assets? Thanks.

Ron, Harry had to leave for 3:00. We hung in there as long as we could. He had a hard stop at 3:00. He really is the one to hit those questions. I will have him call you on those.

Okay. We'll follow up. No issue.

In terms of what I can say sort of broadly, is that they're good assets that for different reasons, need to be recapitalized. I think that's obvious. Worldwide Plaza, it was the move out of the main tenant, Cravath. In the case of 2 Herald, there was the Amazon/WeWork lease expiration, I guess it will be. 650, that one, I think that's still yet to be played out. Needs to be recapped, and will be recapped, but that's a good piece of real estate on Fifth Ave, leased to a great tenant. I look at all of those as assets that have some challenges, not fundamental real estate challenges, but capitalization challenges.

I think we've proven time and time again in that ASP portfolio and otherwise, an ability to get in and work with the various stakeholders to try to get to a solution for everybody that's the optimal solution on the table. We're committed to trying to make it work on each of those assets, but each one needs to be restructured, and either we'll be successful or we won't. Just to reiterate, those are assets that

Contribute little in the way of earnings and really nothing in the way of NAV as we perceive it. We have no recourse to speak of on those assets, and I look at them as just three opportunities that we are giving attention to. We're not committing a lot of capital to, and probably won't, but we might, under the right set of circumstances, commit some. Yet to be played out, but we're hanging in there. I think the stakeholders recognize we've done all we could do in those circumstances, and I think we're kind of in the batter's box, if you will, to be the ones to help put those assets back on safe footing. If we do, we may get a surprise to the upside.

Helpful. Thank you.

Our next question will come from the line of Brendan Lynch of Barclays. As a friendly reminder, please limit yourself to two questions.

Sure. I'll limit myself to one question. On the concession environment, one of your peers has argued it's hard to get free rent down below a month per year of lease term, which you guys were able to do this quarter. The argument being that if you need the time to build out the space, the clients kind of resist having double cash rent during the build-out period, and they'd rather have higher face rents. The question is, how low do you anticipate you can get free rent going forward?

You got to differentiate between new tenants coming into the portfolio versus renewal leases. I think Marc made the point earlier that the net effectives rise and the concessions tighten when we're doing renewal deals. Assuming that it's a typical five-year renewal, when the market is at its peak, generally its free rent is maybe 2-3 months. Today, we're kind of in the 3-4 months, three probably being the average on a typical kind of five-year renewal for most of these small to mid-size deals. New transactions, if it's a 10-year lease, I think that generally I would not be surprised to see free rent ultimately get down to kind of the 10-month free rent for a 10-year transaction.

Okay. Very good. Thank you.

Yep.

Our next question will come from the line of Caitlin Burrows of Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Hi, everyone. Sorry it's so late. Just a quick one on the One Vanderbilt's $0.80 of additional income. I guess it seems like something that you guys would have had some visibility into. I guess why wait until now to talk about the boost to FFO? Then more importantly, what will cause fluctuations over each quarter going forward? Like if the Q2 contribution was $0.35, why isn't Q2 to Q4 total like over $1?

The first answer is, if we have visibility into it and we get affirmation of the treatment, we would include it. We didn't have that until we included it this quarter and vetted it all the way through all of the rules, auditors, NAREIT, and everybody else involved. When that was vetted through, and we had eclipsed the threshold only after the end of the Q1, it wouldn't apply till the Q2, and that's when we employed it, and we'll use it going forward. What impacts it going forward is most importantly distributions. As I went through the math earlier, there's what I'll call a fixed component of the calc and a variable component of the calc. The variable component is cash distributions as compared to what would conventionally be GAAP equity pickup.

As cash distributions increase or decrease, so does the FFO contribution. It's almost equivalent to a cash basis of accounting. As we look forward, we look carefully at distributions. If we need cash for something, we'll hold it back. If we don't, we'll distribute more, and those distributions will impact quarter-to-quarter FFO recognition.

Okay. Thank you. Just on SUMMIT One Vanderbilt, you guys were talking about how well it's doing. I know last year, Ascent was offline for part of Q2, but I believe it was online for all of Q2 2026. I was just wondering if the Q2 2026 expectations were in line with your expectations, and if there's any changes to the full-year 2026 expectations.

No. Caitlin, as I said earlier, I think that I started seeing the turn in numbers late May, June. The latter part of Q2. I think Q3, you're going to see some good numbers. The downs I referenced were really January through May, or January through part of May. It's not really Ascent driven. We had to reintroduce Descent because we had it down for maintenance for a while. It's back up, it's running, it's great. Very popular, and that'll be a part of what you'll see in Q3 is the multiple effect of Ascent at full throttle, plus ticket sales back to many days where we're selling out. Weather's been great, et cetera. I'm very optimistic for SUMMIT in what is a challenging market.

I think if you look around at some of the other objects where foreign tourism particularly has been substandard for the year. It's made up a little bit by domestic tourism, but it's still down overall. I think some of our competitors have had to resort to discounting tickets. We've been able to keep our rents high. We don't participate in the Pass program, probably the only object I know that doesn't participate in that program, which generally discounts the tickets, just because we have a great following, and it serves as a great attraction both for new attendees and repeat attendees. I think we're going to have a very good second half of the year. Whatever we experienced in the first half, we were able to somewhat mitigate through management of variable expenses.

I think the team did a great job there.

Okay. Got it. Thanks.

Our next question will come from the line of Michael Lewis of Truist Securities. Your line is open.

Thank you for running long here. The AI leasing is obviously very strong, I know some of those tenants are large players, some of the largest companies in the world, but some of them are not. Kind of similar to when the early days of the internet, the internet worked, but not all the companies did, there's a lot of AI companies. I'm just wondering, from an office landlord's perspective, what are you seeing in terms of credit quality, and are there AI tenants where you say, "Oh, I'm going to pass on that one. It worries me a little." Alternatively, are there ones where you say, "Wow, the growth could be really explosive there. That one might be worth a shot." I'm just wondering what you kind of see the breadth of the AI demand.

I think there's a couple things to point out to you. The good news is, broadly speaking, the technology industry is back in a big way leasing space in Manhattan. There's 9.5 million square feet of active tech searches going on right now. Of that, 2.5 million sq ft are AI tenants. Important to differentiate so that people don't believe that just because it's tech, therefore it must be AI. That's not the case. That's one. Two, during the dot-com days, we were very conscious about not being overexposed to that industry, and we were very limiting as to the deals and the size of deals that we did. There's a big difference between what we saw with dot-com tenants during that market period versus the AI tenants that we're seeing today.

Most of the tenants that of any consequence that have come through our doors are firms that are well-capitalized. They have big revenue versus the dot-com tenants, which many of them had no revenue. A lot of these tenants have big revenue in place. Having said that, there will be winners and losers, no doubt about it, and we've consciously limited our exposure to the AI industry to somewhere between 1%-2% of the portfolio. Most of that industry is Midtown South, as far as where the tech and AI tenants like to locate themselves. Our buildings in that part of town, at this moment in time, and for the foreseeable future, are 100% leased.

Okay. Great. My last question. Somebody earlier asked about an alternative FFO metric. I'd prefer not to have another FFO metric to worry about, I might propose something to all the office companies as far as net effective rent comparison. This 18% cash spread is great. I've done this on your call, and I've done this on other office calls, right? I pulled up your Q2 2016 stuff and your Q2 2021 stuff, and I look at the rent, the free rent divided by the term, the TI divided by the term. Whenever I look over it seems like net effective rent goes up like 2.5%, 3% a year.

I don't know if it keeps up with OpEx, I guess my question is, when you look at that 18% cash rent spread, which tells us a lot, what would it be if you looked at the annual rents on a net effective basis, right? You talked about those are spiking up. I could never see it in the number. Does that make sense?

I guess we're trying to interpret your question, Mike. You're asking what?

Yeah. I guess I'm asking if net effective rents are really going up that much because I can't see it.

Okay. The question. What is net effective rent growth? 18% is the face rent. What's net effective rent?

What's net effective rent growth? Let's just go this way. If concessions have been stable for the past, God, at least a year and a half, if the face rents are up materially, net effectives are up materially.

I think a measure of it would be. You have to look over a two, three-year period. If you have FFO growth and AFFO growth that exceeds the FFO growth, that differential largely would be or at least partially driven by leasing cost savings now on first gen at least, right?

Yeah.

We don't track, what do you call it? Net effective growth because it's very hard. I'll give you an example. The question becomes, do you amortize all the TI over the period of the lease to calculate net effective, or do you assume some salvage value? Some leases yes, some no. TI is one of the biggest components. To just assume that all TI is written off over a 10-year lease term.

I don't think is accurate, or it's sort of dependent on the quality of the tenant's installation. It's just not that simple. I'm striving for as high a renewal probability as possible, 75%+, and keeping the concessions down to three to six months on a renewal, and TIs of paint and carpet. That's the ultimate, in which case, even if rents are flat, replacement rents, your net effectives will be up by almost 100%. In order to drive the rental rates, it's not just leasing concessions. You have to invest in your buildings, and you have to invest in amenities and lobbies, roofs and everything. That's why what may seem like, jeez, I should be looking at 50% net effective growth. Yeah, we spend a lot of capital on the buildings themselves in order to drive nominal rents.

It's not just about direct leasing costs. I think that we're managing to try and get FFO growth at a consistent level, I think 3%-5% a year nominal growth, anything above that is gravy, and that or more on cash flow growth. You should see that in our numbers, as 2026 compares to 2025, and then when we get to 2027 and 2028, I think you'll see it. To give you an exact percentage increase in net effective, we don't have that number.

Thank you.

All right. Thank you for the calls, everyone. Have a great rest of your summers. We will be heading right back into the pit and start to plant the seeds for a great Q3. We'll speak to you all in October.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.