RankAlpha logo
Back to Rankings

ROIV

Roivant SciencesF
Nasdaq / Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences
Last Price
Quote time unavailable
View Chart
Documents
60
Stored
Transcripts
1
Recent loaded
Latest report
2026-08-09
Investor release

Document history

Earnings documents stored for ROIV.

12 shown
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-09

Is Roivant Sciences (ROIV) Overvalued On First Quarter Results?

Simply Wall St.
Get insights on thousands of stocks from the global community of over 7 million individual investors at Simply Wall St. Roivant Sciences (NasdaqGS:ROIV) is in focus after reporting first quarter results for the period ended June 30, 2026. Sales were US$1.44 million, while the company reported a net loss of US$189.84 million. The loss from continuing operations translated into a basic loss per share of US$0.26. Investors are now weighing how these figures, together with the updated loss profile, fit into the broader story for this clinical stage biopharmaceutical company. See our latest analysis for Roivant Sciences. Roivant Sciences shares have been strong over 2026, with a year to date share price return of 65.71% and a 1 year total shareholder return of 216.28%. This points to building momentum around the company following its first quarter update. If Roivant Sciences has you looking more closely at healthcare and drug development, it can be useful to see what else is moving in this space. You can broaden your watchlist by checking a screener focused on other healthcare focused AI opportunities such as 43 healthcare AI stocks After such a strong run in Roivant Sciences over the past year, the key tension now is simple: Is most of the upside already in the rear-view mirror, or does the current valuation still leave meaningful room ahead? The latest narrative fair value for Roivant Sciences sits at $10.00 per share, well below the last close of $36.34, which creates a wide valuation gap according to this view. The "Roivant Compounding Fantasy" relies on a lazy sum-of-the-parts calculation, treating binary litigation windfalls and a crowded autoimmune pipeline as a bulletproof thesis. Here is why the market is mispricing the structural friction inside Roivant's hub-and-spoke model: 1. The IP Litigation Trap: Relying on the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA lawsuit for near-term re-rating is highly speculative. Modern’s settlement was a tactical win, but a full-scale global docket against Pfizer can drag out for years with brutal appellate friction. Courts historically discount retroactive royalty damages far more than retail bulls realize. Read the complete narrative. This narrative leans on a detailed revenue build, assumed margin lift and a future earnings multiple that treats Roivant Sciences more like a mature platform than a typical clinical-stage biotech. Curious wh…Read full document

Get insights on thousands of stocks from the global community of over 7 million individual investors at Simply Wall St. Roivant Sciences (NasdaqGS:ROIV) is in focus after reporting first quarter results for the period ended June 30, 2026. Sales were US$1.44 million, while the company reported a net loss of US$189.84 million. The loss from continuing operations translated into a basic loss per share of US$0.26. Investors are now weighing how these figures, together with the updated loss profile, fit into the broader story for this clinical stage biopharmaceutical company. See our latest analysis for Roivant Sciences. Roivant Sciences shares have been strong over 2026, with a year to date share price return of 65.71% and a 1 year total shareholder return of 216.28%. This points to building momentum around the company following its first quarter update. If Roivant Sciences has you looking more closely at healthcare and drug development, it can be useful to see what else is moving in this space. You can broaden your watchlist by checking a screener focused on other healthcare focused AI opportunities such as 43 healthcare AI stocks After such a strong run in Roivant Sciences over the past year, the key tension now is simple: Is most of the upside already in the rear-view mirror, or does the current valuation still leave meaningful room ahead? The latest narrative fair value for Roivant Sciences sits at $10.00 per share, well below the last close of $36.34, which creates a wide valuation gap according to this view. The "Roivant Compounding Fantasy" relies on a lazy sum-of-the-parts calculation, treating binary litigation windfalls and a crowded autoimmune pipeline as a bulletproof thesis. Here is why the market is mispricing the structural friction inside Roivant's hub-and-spoke model: 1. The IP Litigation Trap: Relying on the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA lawsuit for near-term re-rating is highly speculative. Modern’s settlement was a tactical win, but a full-scale global docket against Pfizer can drag out for years with brutal appellate friction. Courts historically discount retroactive royalty damages far more than retail bulls realize. Read the complete narrative. This narrative leans on a detailed revenue build, assumed margin lift and a future earnings multiple that treats Roivant Sciences more like a mature platform than a typical clinical-stage biotech. Curious which specific growth path and profitability profile are doing the heavy lifting in that $10.00 figure. Result: Fair Value of $10.00 (OVERVALUED) Have a read of the narrative in full and understand what's behind the forecasts. However, Roivant Sciences could still surprise investors if key drug candidates progress smoothly through trials or if cash on hand is deployed more efficiently than expected. Find out about the key risks to this Roivant Sciences narrative. With sentiment mixed and Roivant Sciences attracting strong opinions on both sides, it makes sense to move quickly and test the numbers yourself before taking a stance. To see exactly what investors are optimistic about, review the 2 key rewards If Roivant Sciences has sharpened your focus, do not stop here. The next worthwhile opportunity could be sitting in plain sight on a focused stock screener. Target dependable income by checking companies that appear in the 8 dividend fortresses for investors who care about yield and stability working together. Spot potential bargains early by scanning the screener containing 21 high quality undiscovered gems where solid fundamentals have not yet attracted broad attention. Prioritise resilience by reviewing stocks highlighted in the 83 resilient stocks with low risk scores so you are not the last to notice stronger risk profiles. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include ROIV. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email [email protected]

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-07

Roivant Sciences Ltd. Q1 2026 Earnings Call Summary

Moby
Our analysts just identified a stock with the potential to be the next Nvidia. Tell us how you invest and we'll show you why it's our #1 pick. Tap here. Management characterizes the current period as a 'calm before the storm,' with the next 6-12 months expected to be busier than the prior year due to multiple pivotal readouts and a commercial launch. The company has successfully initiated the Phase III study for brepocitinib in cutaneous sarcoidosis, citing a 20-point benefit in Phase II against a clinical meaningfulness goal of 5 points. Strategic focus for brepocitinib is shifting toward a 'slow and steady' commercial approach to build a foundation for a multi-indication franchise rather than maximizing immediate week-one volume. The Moderna settlement has provided significant non-dilutive capital, with $950 million received upfront, enabling aggressive share repurchases and funding for the expanding R&D pipeline. Management attributes the rapid enrollment in the lichen planopilaris (LPP) study to high unmet need and physician enthusiasm for a targeted therapy in a space with few options. The D2T RA program is undergoing a strategic review following open-label data, with plans to use randomized withdrawal results to inform a definitive regulatory path with the FDA. Anticipated imminent FDA approval and launch of brepocitinib in dermatomyositis (DM) by the end of September, marking the company's first targeted therapy launch in this indication. Top-line data readouts are expected in the second half of 2026 for brepocitinib in non-infectious uveitis (NIU) and mosliciguat in PH-ILD. Management expects a jam-packed second half of the year, with even more milestones coming in 2027 and beyond., targeting 9 or more pivotal study readouts and at least 3 commercial launches by the end of calendar 2028. Future pipeline expansion assumes that all current molecules are eligible for new indication initiations within the next year, with active work ongoing for undisclosed programs. Guidance for the PH-ILD program assumes that effective vasodilation will drive clinical benefit, though the Phase II study is not specifically powered for 6-minute walk distance. Received $772 million as Roivant's portion of the Moderna settlement, bolstering a cash position that was already just under $4 billion at quarter-end. Executed approximately $200 million in share repurchases during…Read full document

Our analysts just identified a stock with the potential to be the next Nvidia. Tell us how you invest and we'll show you why it's our #1 pick. Tap here. Management characterizes the current period as a 'calm before the storm,' with the next 6-12 months expected to be busier than the prior year due to multiple pivotal readouts and a commercial launch. The company has successfully initiated the Phase III study for brepocitinib in cutaneous sarcoidosis, citing a 20-point benefit in Phase II against a clinical meaningfulness goal of 5 points. Strategic focus for brepocitinib is shifting toward a 'slow and steady' commercial approach to build a foundation for a multi-indication franchise rather than maximizing immediate week-one volume. The Moderna settlement has provided significant non-dilutive capital, with $950 million received upfront, enabling aggressive share repurchases and funding for the expanding R&D pipeline. Management attributes the rapid enrollment in the lichen planopilaris (LPP) study to high unmet need and physician enthusiasm for a targeted therapy in a space with few options. The D2T RA program is undergoing a strategic review following open-label data, with plans to use randomized withdrawal results to inform a definitive regulatory path with the FDA. Anticipated imminent FDA approval and launch of brepocitinib in dermatomyositis (DM) by the end of September, marking the company's first targeted therapy launch in this indication. Top-line data readouts are expected in the second half of 2026 for brepocitinib in non-infectious uveitis (NIU) and mosliciguat in PH-ILD. Management expects a jam-packed second half of the year, with even more milestones coming in 2027 and beyond., targeting 9 or more pivotal study readouts and at least 3 commercial launches by the end of calendar 2028. Future pipeline expansion assumes that all current molecules are eligible for new indication initiations within the next year, with active work ongoing for undisclosed programs. Guidance for the PH-ILD program assumes that effective vasodilation will drive clinical benefit, though the Phase II study is not specifically powered for 6-minute walk distance. Received $772 million as Roivant's portion of the Moderna settlement, bolstering a cash position that was already just under $4 billion at quarter-end. Executed approximately $200 million in share repurchases during the quarter, continuing a strategy to return capital following the Moderna settlement announcement. Ongoing litigation against Pfizer and BioNTech has expanded with three international lawsuits filed in Canada and the Unified Patent Court (UPC) in July. Potential for an additional $1.3 billion in capital contingent on a favorable outcome in the 1498 appellate ruling currently in the Federal Circuit. One stock. Nvidia-level potential. 30M+ investors trust Moby to find it first. Get the pick. Tap here. Management declined to provide specific early-launch metrics, stating they will focus on internal dynamics and physician engagement first. Confirmed that while the label will likely include standard JAK class black box warnings, the high morbidity of DM makes safety concerns less of a barrier to adoption compared to other indications. Management acknowledged the primary risk is the translation from PAH to PH-ILD, but noted that inhaled vasodilation should theoretically deliver drug to healthy lung tissue effectively. Clarified that monotherapy data will be released first, as the combination study started later and is intended primarily for safety and incremental efficacy insights. Management believes the Graves' market is large enough for multiple mechanisms and that being first-to-market will allow them to influence treatment paradigms. Argued that the 'first-mover advantage' seen by competitors in MG and CIDP is a moat they intend to replicate in Graves' and D2T RA. Acknowledged that placebo variability is a standard risk in immunology, but noted that Graves' patients do not typically remit spontaneously, making the endpoint manageable. For NIU, management is relying on the strength of Phase II data to mitigate concerns regarding geographic variation in patient populations.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-07

Roivant Sciences Q1 Earnings Call Highlights

MarketBeat
Interested in Roivant Sciences Ltd.? Here are five stocks we like better. Roivant expects a busy second half of 2026, highlighted by a potential FDA approval and launch of brepocitinib for dermatomyositis by the end of September, plus clinical readouts in noninfectious uveitis, PH-ILD and cutaneous lupus. Brepocitinib development is expanding, with Phase III trials underway in cutaneous sarcoidosis and lichen planopilaris. Roivant also plans further updates on Immunovant’s IMVT-1402 programs in rheumatoid arthritis and Graves’ disease. Roivant reported nearly $4 billion in cash before receiving about $772 million from its Moderna settlement, repurchased roughly $200 million of stock during the quarter and said it will continue buybacks while funding its pipeline. Trump Index: 6 Companies Linked to Trump’s Cabinet Worth Watching Roivant Sciences (NASDAQ:ROIV) said it expects a busy second half of 2026, with a potential launch of brepocitinib in dermatomyositis, several clinical readouts and additional regulatory discussions across its pipeline. Chief Executive Officer Matt Gline characterized the quarter as relatively quiet but said the company has advanced several priorities outlined at its investor day. Those include the anticipated brepocitinib launch, development work at Immunovant, progress in litigation-related matters and continued capital returns. → Meta’s Earnings Drop Shows Wall Street Wants More Than Ad Growth “The next 6-12 months are in many ways busier than the prior 6-12 months for us,” Gline said on the company’s first-quarter earnings call. Roivant said brepocitinib, which is under priority FDA review for dermatomyositis, is expected to launch by the end of September if it receives approval. Gline said the commercial and patient-support teams at Priovant have been built, trained and are ready for a potential launch. → 4 Oil and Gas ETF Plays as Prices Stay Sky-High Management reiterated that it intends to pursue a “slow and steady” launch rather than focus on near-term sales metrics. Gline said the company is seeking to establish access, patient-support, institutional and physician-engagement infrastructure that can support brepocitinib across multiple potential indications beyond dermatomyositis. Gline said physicians and patients have expressed enthusiasm for new treatment options in dermatomyositis, a condition in which patients often use…Read full document

Interested in Roivant Sciences Ltd.? Here are five stocks we like better. Roivant expects a busy second half of 2026, highlighted by a potential FDA approval and launch of brepocitinib for dermatomyositis by the end of September, plus clinical readouts in noninfectious uveitis, PH-ILD and cutaneous lupus. Brepocitinib development is expanding, with Phase III trials underway in cutaneous sarcoidosis and lichen planopilaris. Roivant also plans further updates on Immunovant’s IMVT-1402 programs in rheumatoid arthritis and Graves’ disease. Roivant reported nearly $4 billion in cash before receiving about $772 million from its Moderna settlement, repurchased roughly $200 million of stock during the quarter and said it will continue buybacks while funding its pipeline. Trump Index: 6 Companies Linked to Trump’s Cabinet Worth Watching Roivant Sciences (NASDAQ:ROIV) said it expects a busy second half of 2026, with a potential launch of brepocitinib in dermatomyositis, several clinical readouts and additional regulatory discussions across its pipeline. Chief Executive Officer Matt Gline characterized the quarter as relatively quiet but said the company has advanced several priorities outlined at its investor day. Those include the anticipated brepocitinib launch, development work at Immunovant, progress in litigation-related matters and continued capital returns. → Meta’s Earnings Drop Shows Wall Street Wants More Than Ad Growth “The next 6-12 months are in many ways busier than the prior 6-12 months for us,” Gline said on the company’s first-quarter earnings call. Roivant said brepocitinib, which is under priority FDA review for dermatomyositis, is expected to launch by the end of September if it receives approval. Gline said the commercial and patient-support teams at Priovant have been built, trained and are ready for a potential launch. → 4 Oil and Gas ETF Plays as Prices Stay Sky-High Management reiterated that it intends to pursue a “slow and steady” launch rather than focus on near-term sales metrics. Gline said the company is seeking to establish access, patient-support, institutional and physician-engagement infrastructure that can support brepocitinib across multiple potential indications beyond dermatomyositis. Gline said physicians and patients have expressed enthusiasm for new treatment options in dermatomyositis, a condition in which patients often use multiple therapies and remain dissatisfied with available treatments. He also said Roivant expects brepocitinib’s label to include the boxed warnings associated with other JAK inhibitors, but management believes physicians will weigh those considerations against the severity of dermatomyositis and risks associated with treatments such as high-dose steroids and immunosuppressants. → Sandisk Just Delivered a Blowout Quarter—Here's Why the Stock Is Falling The company also began enrolling patients in a Phase III trial of brepocitinib for cutaneous sarcoidosis. The 140-patient study will compare 45 milligrams of brepocitinib with placebo over 16 weeks and uses a primary endpoint of at least a 50% response on the Cutaneous Sarcoidosis Activity and Morphology Instrument, or CSAMI. Participants will undergo a mandatory steroid taper from week two through week eight. Roivant expects top-line data from that study in 2028. Gline said the company estimates there are approximately 40,000 U.S. patients with cutaneous sarcoidosis and pointed to potential overlap with ocular and pulmonary manifestations of sarcoidosis. Roivant also said its registrational study of brepocitinib in lichen planopilaris is enrolling “extremely well,” according to Gline. The company added lichen planopilaris as a fourth brepocitinib indication earlier this year. Roivant expects several important data events during the second half of 2026. These include top-line data from a Phase III study of brepocitinib in noninfectious uveitis, which Gline said could represent an opportunity comparable in size to dermatomyositis. The company also expects top-line data from the Phase II FOCUS study of mosliciguat in pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease, or PH-ILD. Management said it is looking for a clear signal in pulmonary vascular resistance, or PVR, while noting that the trial is not powered to provide a definitive assessment of six-minute walk distance. Gline said Roivant believes inhaled vasodilation could benefit PH-ILD patients, though the Phase II study is intended to assess whether results seen in pulmonary arterial hypertension translate to the PH-ILD population. He said the company designed the study with limits on emphysema to support broad enrollment while seeking to maximize the therapy’s potential benefit. For mosliciguat, Roivant said monotherapy data will be released before data from an open-label combination study, which began later and remains in enrollment. Management said the combination trial is intended to add safety experience and provide information that may help inform Phase III trial design. Roivant also expects a proof-of-concept readout in cutaneous lupus erythematosus, or CLE, during the second half. The first disclosure will include 12-week data comparing a 600-milligram dose with placebo. Gline described the trial as a small fact-finding study intended to help the company assess treatment benefit and determine whether to advance the program. Roivant plans to provide a fuller update later this year on Immunovant’s IMVT-1402 program in difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis. That update could include results from the randomized-withdrawal portion of the study, feedback from an anticipated FDA discussion and potential next steps for registrational development. The company is also advancing IMVT-1402 in Graves’ disease. Gline said Roivant views the condition as a market with substantial unmet need, rather than one defined primarily by competition among emerging mechanisms. He said the company expects to be the first to bring an advanced therapy to the market if its program succeeds. Separately, Roivant received the initial payment from its settlement with Moderna. Gline said the $950 million payment included approximately $770 million for Genevant and the remainder for Arbutus. He said litigation under Section 1498 remains under review at the Federal Circuit and could result in an additional $1.3 billion with a favorable outcome. Roivant also filed international lawsuits against Pfizer and BioNTech, including actions in Canada and the Unified Patent Court, during July. Roivant reported approximately $200 million in research-and-development expense for the quarter. Non-GAAP adjusted general and administrative expense was just under $100 million, while GAAP general and administrative expense was $166 million. The company reported cash of just under $4 billion before receipt of approximately $772 million associated with the Moderna settlement payment. Roivant repurchased about $200 million of stock during the quarter, with additional repurchases in March, after accelerating its buyback activity following the Moderna settlement announcement. Gline said the company will continue repurchasing shares under its existing authorizations while preparing for a catalyst-rich period that could include multiple clinical readouts, regulatory filings and commercial launches through the end of 2028. Roivant Sciences is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of innovative therapies through a network of subsidiary businesses known as “Vants.” Founded in 2014, Roivant acquires or in-licenses clinical-stage assets that have progressed beyond proof of concept and seeks to advance them efficiently toward regulatory approval. By organizing each program into a dedicated subsidiary, the company aims to streamline decision-making, allocate resources more effectively, and accelerate development timelines. The core activities of Roivant involve identifying promising drug candidates across a range of therapeutic areas, including neurology, rare diseases, immunology, oncology, and women's health. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "Roivant Sciences Q1 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for August 2026.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-06

Roivant Sciences' Fiscal Q1 Net Loss Narrows, Revenue Declines

MT Newswires

Roivant Sciences (ROIV) reported a fiscal Q1 net loss Thursday of $0.26 per diluted share, narrowing

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-06

Roivant Sciences Ltd (ROIV) (Q1 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Strategic Advances and Strong ...

GuruFocus.com
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. R&D Expense: Approximately $200 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2026. G&A Expense: Just under $100 million on a non-GAAP adjusted basis, or $166 million on a GAAP basis. Cash Position: Just under $4 billion, reported before the receipt of the $772 million settlement payment from Moderna. Share Repurchases: Approximately $200 million in the quarter, with an average buyback price in the high $20s since March. Moderna Settlement Payment: Received the initial $950 million upfront payment, with approximately $770 million allocated to Genevant and the remainder to Arbutus. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with ROIV. Is ROIV fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: August 06, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Roivant Sciences Ltd (NASDAQ:ROIV) has initiated the Phase 3 study in cutaneous sarcoidosis for brepocitinib ahead of schedule, following strong Phase 2 data showing a >20-point benefit on the CSAMI scale versus placebo. The company is on track for the potential launch of brepocitinib in dermatomyositis by the end of September, with priority review and a fully built commercial team ready to deploy. Roivant Sciences Ltd (NASDAQ:ROIV) received the initial $950 million payment from the Moderna settlement, with $772 million going to Genevant, strengthening its cash position to nearly $4 billion. The company has filed international lawsuits against Pfizer and BioNTech in Canada and the UPC, advancing its litigation strategy for additional potential recoveries. Roivant Sciences Ltd (NASDAQ:ROIV) continues to execute on its share repurchase program, buying back shares at an average price in the high $20s since March, returning capital to shareholders. The pipeline is advancing with multiple upcoming catalysts, including top-line data from the NIU study, the Mosley Phase 3 study in PH-ILD, and the D2T RA program at Immunovant, all expected in the second half of 2026. Roivant Sciences Ltd (NASDAQ:ROIV) expects a 'slow and steady' launch for brepocitinib in dermatomyositis, which may not meet investor expectations for rapid revenue growth. The company faces uncertainty in the PH-ILD program, with the Phase 3 study not powered for six-minute walk distance, and the potential for unexpected results in tr…Read full document

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. R&D Expense: Approximately $200 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2026. G&A Expense: Just under $100 million on a non-GAAP adjusted basis, or $166 million on a GAAP basis. Cash Position: Just under $4 billion, reported before the receipt of the $772 million settlement payment from Moderna. Share Repurchases: Approximately $200 million in the quarter, with an average buyback price in the high $20s since March. Moderna Settlement Payment: Received the initial $950 million upfront payment, with approximately $770 million allocated to Genevant and the remainder to Arbutus. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with ROIV. Is ROIV fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: August 06, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Roivant Sciences Ltd (NASDAQ:ROIV) has initiated the Phase 3 study in cutaneous sarcoidosis for brepocitinib ahead of schedule, following strong Phase 2 data showing a >20-point benefit on the CSAMI scale versus placebo. The company is on track for the potential launch of brepocitinib in dermatomyositis by the end of September, with priority review and a fully built commercial team ready to deploy. Roivant Sciences Ltd (NASDAQ:ROIV) received the initial $950 million payment from the Moderna settlement, with $772 million going to Genevant, strengthening its cash position to nearly $4 billion. The company has filed international lawsuits against Pfizer and BioNTech in Canada and the UPC, advancing its litigation strategy for additional potential recoveries. Roivant Sciences Ltd (NASDAQ:ROIV) continues to execute on its share repurchase program, buying back shares at an average price in the high $20s since March, returning capital to shareholders. The pipeline is advancing with multiple upcoming catalysts, including top-line data from the NIU study, the Mosley Phase 3 study in PH-ILD, and the D2T RA program at Immunovant, all expected in the second half of 2026. Roivant Sciences Ltd (NASDAQ:ROIV) expects a 'slow and steady' launch for brepocitinib in dermatomyositis, which may not meet investor expectations for rapid revenue growth. The company faces uncertainty in the PH-ILD program, with the Phase 3 study not powered for six-minute walk distance, and the potential for unexpected results in translating PVR reductions from PAH to PH-ILD. There is a risk of high placebo response rates in the NIU Phase 3 study, which could impact the trial's ability to show a statistically significant benefit. Roivant Sciences Ltd (NASDAQ:ROIV) has not provided specific metrics or guidance for tracking the DM launch, leaving investors without clear benchmarks to assess early performance. The company's R&D expenses remain high at approximately $200 million for the quarter, with significant ongoing investment in multiple programs, which could pressure near-term profitability. The D2T RA program faces a higher bar for success in the randomized withdrawal phase due to strong open-label response rates, and the company is still awaiting FDA feedback to finalize the pivotal study design. Q: Regarding the upcoming brepocitinib launch in dermatomyositis (DM), what metrics will the company provide to track the initial launch, and what are the implications of baseline characteristics in the PH-ILD (PHocus) study on the bar for success?A: CEO Matt Gline stated that beyond a "slow and steady" launch, top-line metrics will be visible in quarterly financials, but the company will not provide a ton of early detail. For PH-ILD, he noted the study was designed with care around emphysema allowances to maximize benefit. He expects a clearer signal on PVR, but does not expect much clarity on six-minute walk distance, which is not essential for the go/no-go decision. Q: For the Mosley (PH-ILD) program, what type of six-minute walk distance would be relevant to clinicians and patients if a large trial were run?A: Gline explained that PH-ILD patients are very sick with few options, and the focus should be on having an approvable therapy rather than a specific numerical bar. He emphasized that six-minute walk is a noisy clinical artifice, and if the drug effectively vasodilates and improves PVR, patients will see significant benefit in daily life. Q: Could you discuss the cadence of formulary reviews for rare disease drugs, given that P&T committees often wait six months for mass-market drugs?A: Gline said the company is having normal engagement with the payer community and is focused on ensuring physician and patient access. He noted that while formulary processes are similar across diseases, the company has a dedicated team at Priovant to handle medical exception procedures so patients and physicians don't have to worry about coverage delays. Q: Beyond the listed programs, what pipeline and product opportunities could see new study initiations over the next year?A: Gline stated that every program in the pipeline, including potentially undisclosed ones, could announce new trials or indications in the next year. He confirmed the company has specific ideas and is actively preparing to initiate programs, with real progress being made across all molecules. Q: How translatable are PVR reductions from PAH patients to the PH-ILD population in the PHocus study, and could disease aspects influence the magnitude of PVR reduction?A: Gline acknowledged that translation from PAH to PH-ILD is the fundamental question being answered. While Phase 1 data in PAH patients looks good on PVR, the lungs of PH-ILD patients differ, potentially affecting pharmacodynamics. However, he believes inhaled vasodilators should deliver drug to healthy lung tissue and be effective, though the study will ultimately provide the answer. Q: Given JAK class safety concerns, how are physicians receiving brepocitinib for DM, especially since DM patients have higher underlying cancer risk?A: Gline noted that dermatomyositis is a "poster child" for JAK use because patients have no other options. He emphasized that current therapies like high-dose steroids carry worse safety risks than JAK inhibitors. Physicians are comfortable using these agents, and while the label will include black box warnings, doctors expect this and are not overly concerned given the severity of the disease. Q: What percentage of DM patients are on off-label JAKs, and would they rapidly switch to brepocitinib? Also, what is the biggest risk for the Phase 3 NIU trial?A: Gline said low-to-mid single-digit percentages of DM patients have JAK experience, and some physicians using off-label JAKs expect to switch patients. For NIU, the biggest risk is variability in placebo response rates, which is common in immunology trials. He acknowledged geographic variation as a feature of such studies but remains optimistic given the compelling Phase 2 data. Q: What launch analogs are you assessing for brepocitinib in DM, either patient or market share curves?A: Gline stated there has never been a targeted therapy launch in dermatomyositis, so there is no good analog. He emphasized the company is focused on the DM opportunity itselfthe doctors, patients, and benefitsrather than comparing to other launches, as being a pioneering indication requires charting its own course. Q: For the difficult-to-treat RA program (1402), what is the strategy? Would one or two more studies be needed, and what should be expected from the randomized withdrawal phase?A: Gline said the company will provide a full update later this year, including randomized withdrawal data and an FDA conversation planned for the fall. The results will inform whether the study can serve as one of two pivotal studies. He noted the high response rates in the open-label period set a higher bar for hitting a P-value in the randomized withdrawal section. Q: For the Graves' disease program, how is the company thinking about the competitive landscape, and what is the approach to future studies for 1402?A: Gline dismissed competition concerns, noting Graves' disease has had no novel therapy since the 1950s-60s, leaving massive unmet need. He stated 1402 will be first to market, allowing the company to influence treatment paradigms. He emphasized building the market rather than beating competitors, and the company will leverage learnings from studies and physician engagement for future development. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-06

Immunovant Provides Corporate Updates and Reports Financial Results for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2026

GlobeNewswire
All IMVT-1402 clinical development timelines remain on track, including ongoing studies in Graves’ disease (GD), myasthenia gravis (MG), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA), Sjögren’s disease (SjD) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) Current cash balance provides runway to the potential launch of IMVT-1402 in GD Roivant will host a live conference call and webcast at 8:00 a.m. ET on Thursday, August 6, 2026 DURHAM, N.C., Aug. 06, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Immunovant (Nasdaq: IMVT), a clinical-stage immunology company dedicated to enabling normal lives for people with autoimmune diseases, today reported corporate updates and financial results for its first fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2026. Recent Highlights and Upcoming Milestones: Immunovant’s development plans for IMVT-1402 remain on track across all six announced indications. The Company expects to provide further updates on its potentially registrational IMVT-1402 D2T RA program and report topline data from the proof-of-concept trial of IMVT-1402 in CLE in the second half of calendar year 2026. In calendar year 2027, topline data are anticipated for the potentially registrational trials evaluating IMVT-1402 in GD and MG. Topline data are expected to follow in calendar year 2028 for the potentially registrational trials of IMVT-1402 in CIDP and SjD. Financial Highlights for Fiscal First Quarter Ended June 30, 2026: Cash Position: As of June 30, 2026, Immunovant’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $797.8 million, providing runway to the potential commercial launch of IMVT-1402 in GD, based on our current operating plan. Research and Development Expenses: Research and development (R&D) expenses were $142.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $101.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to activities related to our clinical trials of IMVT-1402, including contract manufacturing costs, partially offset by lower overall costs as we wind-down our batoclimab clinical trials. Non-GAAP R&D expenses were $135.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $93.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. General and Administrative Expenses: General and administrative (G&A) expenses were $17.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared t…Read full document

All IMVT-1402 clinical development timelines remain on track, including ongoing studies in Graves’ disease (GD), myasthenia gravis (MG), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA), Sjögren’s disease (SjD) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) Current cash balance provides runway to the potential launch of IMVT-1402 in GD Roivant will host a live conference call and webcast at 8:00 a.m. ET on Thursday, August 6, 2026 DURHAM, N.C., Aug. 06, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Immunovant (Nasdaq: IMVT), a clinical-stage immunology company dedicated to enabling normal lives for people with autoimmune diseases, today reported corporate updates and financial results for its first fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2026. Recent Highlights and Upcoming Milestones: Immunovant’s development plans for IMVT-1402 remain on track across all six announced indications. The Company expects to provide further updates on its potentially registrational IMVT-1402 D2T RA program and report topline data from the proof-of-concept trial of IMVT-1402 in CLE in the second half of calendar year 2026. In calendar year 2027, topline data are anticipated for the potentially registrational trials evaluating IMVT-1402 in GD and MG. Topline data are expected to follow in calendar year 2028 for the potentially registrational trials of IMVT-1402 in CIDP and SjD. Financial Highlights for Fiscal First Quarter Ended June 30, 2026: Cash Position: As of June 30, 2026, Immunovant’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $797.8 million, providing runway to the potential commercial launch of IMVT-1402 in GD, based on our current operating plan. Research and Development Expenses: Research and development (R&D) expenses were $142.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $101.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to activities related to our clinical trials of IMVT-1402, including contract manufacturing costs, partially offset by lower overall costs as we wind-down our batoclimab clinical trials. Non-GAAP R&D expenses were $135.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $93.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. General and Administrative Expenses: General and administrative (G&A) expenses were $17.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $26.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily due to lower personnel-related expenses, professional fees, market research costs and information technology costs. Non-GAAP G&A expenses were $11.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $15.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Net Loss: Net loss was $153.2 million ($0.75 per common share) for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $120.6 million ($0.71 per common share) for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2025 included $13.8 million and $18.5 million, respectively, related to non-cash stock-based compensation expense. Non-GAAP net loss was $139.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $102.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Common Stock: As of June 30, 2026, there were 206,264,878 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Non-GAAP Financial Measures: In addition to reporting the financial results in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), Immunovant reports certain financial results that differ from what is reported under GAAP. Immunovant believes these non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors and others because they allow for additional information with respect to financial measures used by management in its financial and operational decision-making and they may be used by institutional investors and the analyst community to help them analyze the health of Immunovant’s business. However, there are a number of limitations related to the use of non-GAAP financial measures, and these non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for or in isolation from, Immunovant’s financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP. Other companies, including companies in Immunovant’s industry, may calculate these non-GAAP financial measures differently or not at all, which reduces their usefulness as comparative measures. About Immunovant, Inc. Immunovant, Inc. is a clinical-stage immunology company dedicated to enabling normal lives for people with autoimmune diseases and is a majority-owned subsidiary of Roivant (Nasdaq: ROIV). As a trailblazer in anti-FcRn technology, the Company is developing innovative, targeted therapies to meet the complex and variable needs of people with autoimmune diseases. For additional information on the Company, please visit immunovant.com. Investor Conference Call Information Roivant will host a live conference call and webcast at 8:00 a.m. ET on Thursday, August 6, 2026. To access the conference call by phone, please register online using this Registrational link. The presentation and webcast details will also be available under “Events & Presentations” in the Investors section of the Immunovant website at https://www.immunovant.com/investors/news-events/ir-calendar. The archived webcast will be available on Immunovant’s website after the conference call. Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements for the purposes of the safe harbor provisions under The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. The use of words such as “can,” “may,” “might,” “will,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “design,” “plan,” “intend,” and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward looking statements include statements regarding Immunovant’s progress towards developing IMVT-1402 across a broad range of indications; Immunovant’s expectations regarding the availability of results of clinical trials of IMVT-1402 and whether those results may be adequate to support registration; and the Company’s beliefs regarding the potential sufficiency of its cash runway. All forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions by Immunovant’s management that, although Immunovant believes to be reasonable, are inherently uncertain. All forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those that Immunovant expected. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others: Immunovant may not be able to protect or enforce its intellectual property rights; initial results or other preliminary analyses or results of early clinical trials may not be predictive final trial results or of the results of later clinical trials; the timing and availability of data from clinical trials; the timing of discussions with regulatory agencies, as well as regulatory submissions and potential approvals; the continued development of Immunovant’s product candidates, including the number and timing of the commencement of additional clinical trials; Immunovant’s scientific approach, clinical trial design, indication selection, regulatory strategy, and general development progress; future clinical trials may not confirm any safety, potency, or other product characteristics described or assumed in this press release; any product candidate that Immunovant develops may not progress through clinical development or receive required regulatory approvals within expected timelines or at all; Immunovant’s product candidates may not be beneficial to patients, or even if approved by regulatory authorities, successfully commercialized; the potential impact of global factors, such as international trade tariffs, geopolitical tensions, and adverse macroeconomic conditions on Immunovant’s business operations and supply chain, including its clinical development plans and timelines; Immunovant’s business is heavily dependent on the successful development, regulatory approval, and commercialization of IMVT-1402; Immunovant is at various stages of clinical development for IMVT-1402; and Immunovant will require additional capital to fund its operations and advance IMVT-1402 through clinical development. These and other risks and uncertainties are more fully described in Immunovant’s periodic and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including in the section titled “Risk Factors” in Immunovant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on May 20, 2026, and Immunovant’s subsequent filings with the SEC. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it was made. Immunovant undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. (1) Represents non-cash stock-based compensation expense Contacts:InvestorsKeyur [email protected] MediaStephanie [email protected]

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-06

Roivant Reports Financial Results for the First Quarter Ended June 30, 2026, and Provides Business Update

GlobeNewswire
Commercial preparations for brepocitinib in dermatomyositis (DM) are progressing well and on track for launch by the end of September 2026; topline data from Phase 3 study in non-infectious uveitis (NIU) expected in the second half of calendar year 2026 First patients enrolled in the Phase 3 study of brepocitinib in cutaneous sarcoidosis (CS), with topline data expected in calendar year 2028; enrollment in Part 1 of the Phase 2b/3 study in lichen planopilaris (LPP) is progressing well IMVT-1402 proof-of-concept trial in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) topline data expected in the second half of calendar year 2026; all clinical development timelines remain on track for IMVT-1402 Mosliciguat Phase 2 study in pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD) remains on track, with topline data expected in the second half of calendar year 2026 Genevant and Arbutus received $950 million from Moderna in July 2026 under $2.25 billion settlement, with additional $1.3 billion contingent on favorable resolution of Moderna’s § 1498 appeal; filed new international lawsuits against Pfizer and BioNTech covering 21 jurisdictions Roivant reported consolidated cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities of $3.9 billion as of June 30, 2026, excluding the cash payment received from Moderna in July, supporting cash runway into profitability Roivant will host a live conference call and webcast at 8:00 a.m. ET on Thursday, August 6, 2026, to report its financial results for the first quarter ended June 30, 2026, and provide a business update BASEL, Switzerland and LONDON and NEW YORK, Aug. 06, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Roivant (Nasdaq: ROIV) today reported its financial results for the first quarter ended June 30, 2026, and provided a business update. “This quarter has been a moment of relative quiet between our incredibly busy last twelve months and our even busier year ahead,” said Matt Gline, CEO of Roivant. “Our teams are deep in preparation for the potential launch of brepocitinib in dermatomyositis, we have enrolled the first patients in a new Phase 3 trial in cutaneous sarcoidosis, and we expect topline readouts from our NIU, PH-ILD and CLE studies before year end. We remain focused on delivering for patients across each of these programs, and if we are successful across even some of these endeavors, we will look radically d…Read full document

Commercial preparations for brepocitinib in dermatomyositis (DM) are progressing well and on track for launch by the end of September 2026; topline data from Phase 3 study in non-infectious uveitis (NIU) expected in the second half of calendar year 2026 First patients enrolled in the Phase 3 study of brepocitinib in cutaneous sarcoidosis (CS), with topline data expected in calendar year 2028; enrollment in Part 1 of the Phase 2b/3 study in lichen planopilaris (LPP) is progressing well IMVT-1402 proof-of-concept trial in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) topline data expected in the second half of calendar year 2026; all clinical development timelines remain on track for IMVT-1402 Mosliciguat Phase 2 study in pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD) remains on track, with topline data expected in the second half of calendar year 2026 Genevant and Arbutus received $950 million from Moderna in July 2026 under $2.25 billion settlement, with additional $1.3 billion contingent on favorable resolution of Moderna’s § 1498 appeal; filed new international lawsuits against Pfizer and BioNTech covering 21 jurisdictions Roivant reported consolidated cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities of $3.9 billion as of June 30, 2026, excluding the cash payment received from Moderna in July, supporting cash runway into profitability Roivant will host a live conference call and webcast at 8:00 a.m. ET on Thursday, August 6, 2026, to report its financial results for the first quarter ended June 30, 2026, and provide a business update BASEL, Switzerland and LONDON and NEW YORK, Aug. 06, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Roivant (Nasdaq: ROIV) today reported its financial results for the first quarter ended June 30, 2026, and provided a business update. “This quarter has been a moment of relative quiet between our incredibly busy last twelve months and our even busier year ahead,” said Matt Gline, CEO of Roivant. “Our teams are deep in preparation for the potential launch of brepocitinib in dermatomyositis, we have enrolled the first patients in a new Phase 3 trial in cutaneous sarcoidosis, and we expect topline readouts from our NIU, PH-ILD and CLE studies before year end. We remain focused on delivering for patients across each of these programs, and if we are successful across even some of these endeavors, we will look radically different on the other side.” Recent Developments Priovant: Commercial preparations for brepocitinib in dermatomyositis (DM) are progressing well and on track for launch by the end of September 2026. The first patients have been enrolled in the Phase 3 study of brepocitinib in cutaneous sarcoidosis (CS). This follows brepocitinib’s Phase 2 study, the first positive placebo-controlled study in CS, which led to FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation.The Phase 3 study (BEACON+) will be conducted as a Part B to the positive Phase 2 BEACON trial. BEACON+ will enroll approximately 140 patients with CS across approximately 70 sites globally. Patients will be randomized 3:2 between brepocitinib 45mg once daily and placebo. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving a 50% or greater reduction in the Cutaneous Sarcoidosis Activity and Morphology Instrument – Activity Score (CSAMI-A) at Week 16. In Phase 2, 77% of brepocitinib 45mg patients achieved this endpoint compared to 0% of placebo patients.CS is an inflammatory granulomatous skin disease affecting approximately 40,000 adults in the United States. The condition disproportionately impacts Black Americans. Unlike many inflammatory skin diseases, inadequately treated cutaneous sarcoidosis can rapidly cause permanent scarring and destruction of bone, cartilage and hair follicles. Despite this significant unmet therapeutic need, there are currently no FDA-approved therapies for CS.Additionally, enrollment in Part 1 of the Phase 2b/3 study in lichen planopilaris (LPP) is progressing well. Immunovant: All clinical development timelines remain on track for IMVT-1402 across announced indications, including potentially registrational trials in Graves’ disease (GD), myasthenia gravis (MG), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA) and Sjögren’s disease (SjD), and a proof-of-concept trial in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). Pulmovant: Phase 2 study of mosliciguat in pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD) remains on track. Genevant: In July 2026, Genevant Sciences GmbH (Genevant) and Arbutus received $950 million from Moderna, the initial payment under the global $2.25 billion patent infringement settlement, and filed new international lawsuits against Pfizer and BioNTech. Roivant: Roivant reported consolidated cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities of $3.9 billion as of June 30, 2026, excluding the cash payment received from Moderna in July, supporting cash runway into profitability. For the three months ended June 30, 2026, Roivant repurchased 7.3 million common shares for an aggregate repurchase price of approximately $208.7 million. Major Upcoming Milestones Priovant expects the commercial launch of brepocitinib in DM by the end of September 2026 and topline data from the Phase 3 study in NIU and Phase 3 study in CS in the second half of calendar year 2026 and calendar year 2028, respectively. Roivant continues to actively explore other indications for brepocitinib. Immunovant expects to report topline data from the proof-of-concept trial of IMVT-1402 in CLE and provide an update on the potentially registrational program of IMVT-1402 in D2T RA in the second half of calendar year 2026. In calendar year 2027, topline data are expected across potentially registrational trials of IMVT-1402 in GD and MG. In calendar year 2028, topline data are expected across potentially registrational trials of IMVT-1402 in CIDP and SjD. Pulmovant expects to report topline data from the ongoing Phase 2 trial of mosliciguat in PH-ILD in the second half of calendar year 2026. Genevant LNP litigation continues to progress. An additional $1.3 billion payment under the Moderna settlement is contingent upon a resolution of Moderna's Section 1498 appeal favorable to Genevant and Arbutus. Separately, in July 2026 they filed three international lawsuits against Pfizer and BioNTech — one in Canada and two before the UPC — seeking to enforce patents protecting their innovative lipid nanoparticle technology. The actions seek relief across 20 European countries (including France, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands) which, together with the Canadian action, cover 21 jurisdictions in total. The discovery phase of the U.S. Pfizer/BioNTech case is ongoing. First Quarter Ended June 30, 2026 Financial Summary Cash Position and Marketable Securities As of June 30, 2026, the Company had consolidated cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities of $3.9 billion. Research and Development Expenses Research and development (R&D) expenses increased by $49.1 million to $202.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $152.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in program-specific costs of $49.4 million and personnel-related expenses of $3.8 million. The increase of $49.4 million in program-specific costs was primarily driven by increases of $44.8 million related to the anti-FcRn franchise and $4.7 million related to mosliciguat, reflecting the progression of our programs. The increase of $3.8 million in personnel-related expenses was primarily driven by $4.1 million in employee bonuses related to the global settlement reached with Moderna in March 2026. The majority of share-based compensation and personnel-related expenses, which are unallocated internal costs, were related to the anti-FcRn franchise activities at Immunovant during the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025. Non-GAAP R&D expenses were $192.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $141.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. General and Administrative Expenses General and administrative (G&A) expenses increased by $31.5 million to $165.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $134.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was primarily due to an increase in personnel-related expense of $26.1 million, largely resulting from $18.8 million in employee bonuses related to the global settlement reached with Moderna in March 2026 and $6.3 million of employer payroll taxes associated with equity award activity. Non-GAAP G&A expenses were $90.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $62.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Net Loss Net loss was $290.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $273.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. On a per common share basis, net loss was $0.26 and $0.33, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025. Non-GAAP net loss was $243.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $170.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Notes to non-GAAP financial measures: (1)   Represents non-cash share-based compensation expense. (2)   Represents non-cash depreciation and amortization expense. (3)   As a result of the global settlement with Moderna entered in March 2026, the Company recognized a gain for Genevant’s expected portion of a non-contingent, non-creditable and non-refundable payment to be made by Moderna to Genevant and Arbutus during the year ended March 31, 2026. The Company recognized an additional gain during the three months ended June 30, 2026, reflecting the final allocation to Genevant once litigation costs incurred were finalized. (4)   Represents the unrealized (gain) loss on equity investments in unconsolidated entities that are accounted for at fair value with changes in value reported in earnings. (5)   Represents the change in fair value of liability instruments, which is non-cash and primarily includes the loss relating to the measurement and recognition of fair value on a recurring basis of certain liabilities. (6)   Represents the estimated tax effect of the adjustments. Investor Conference Call Information Roivant will host a live conference call and webcast at 8:00 a.m. ET on Thursday, August 6, 2026, to report its financial results for the first quarter ended June 30, 2026, and provide a business update. To access the conference call by phone, please register online using this registration link. The presentation and webcast details will also be available under “Events & Presentations” in the Investors section of the Roivant website at https://investor.roivant.com/news-events/events. The archived webcast will be available on Roivant’s website after the conference call. About Roivant Roivant (Nasdaq: ROIV) is a biopharmaceutical company that aims to improve the lives of patients by accelerating the development and commercialization of medicines that matter. Roivant’s pipeline includes brepocitinib, a potent small molecule inhibitor of JAK1 and TYK2 currently under review at the FDA for the treatment of dermatomyositis and also in late stage development for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis, cutaneous sarcoidosis and lichen planopilaris; IMVT-1402, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting FcRn in development across several IgG-mediated autoimmune indications; and mosliciguat, an inhaled sGC activator in development for pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease. We advance our pipeline by creating nimble subsidiaries or “Vants” to develop and commercialize our medicines and technologies. For more information, visit www.roivant.com. Roivant Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements. Statements in this press release may include statements that are not historical facts and are considered forward-looking within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which are usually identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intends,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “would” and variations of such words or similar expressions. The words may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. We intend these forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our or our management team’s expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future, and statements that are not historical facts, including statements about the clinical and therapeutic potential of our product candidates, the availability and success of topline results from our ongoing clinical trials, any commercial potential of our product candidates following applicable regulatory approvals and the outcome of any pending litigation. In addition, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events, results or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated in these statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors. Although we believe that our plans, intentions, expectations and strategies as reflected in or suggested by those forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that the plans, intentions, expectations or strategies will be attained or achieved. Furthermore, actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including, but not limited to, those risks set forth in the Risk Factors section of our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment in which new risks emerge from time to time. These forward-looking statements are based upon the current expectations and beliefs of our management as of the date of this press release, and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Except as required by applicable law, we assume no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Contacts: InvestorsKeyur [email protected] MediaStephanie [email protected]

TranscriptFY2027 Q12026-08-06

FY2027 Q1 earnings call transcript

Earnings source - 105 paragraphs
Operator

Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to Roivant's first quarter 2026 earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in the listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you need to press star one and one on your telephone. Please be advised that today's call is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Stephanie Lee. Thank you. Please go ahead.

Stephanie Lee Griffin

Good morning, and thanks for joining today's call to review Roivant's financial results for the first quarter ended June 30, 2026. I'm Stephanie Lee with Roivant. Presenting today, we have Matt Gline, CEO of Roivant. For those dialing in via conference call, you can find the slides being presented today, as well as the press release announcing these updates on our IR website at www.investor.roivant.com. We'll also be providing the current slide numbers as we present to help you follow along. I'd like to remind you that we'll be making certain forward-looking statements during today's presentation. We strongly encourage you to review the information that we have filed with the SEC for more information regarding these forward-looking statements and related risks and uncertainties. With that, I'll turn it over to Matt.

Matt Gline

Thank you, Steph, and good morning, everybody, and thank you for joining. This is a little bit of a calm before the storm moment for us, a pretty quiet quarter, maybe not the most interesting of our earnings calls in recent memory. Nonetheless, a lot of great progress in the business. Certainly, we're expecting a jam-packed second half, as I'll get to in a moment. I'll be relatively brief in my remarks, then we'll go to Q&A. I just want to start on slide four. This is a slide we took from our own prior deck. This is from the investor day that we did in December of last year, this was a list of our priorities for the year. We're sitting here a little bit more than halfway through the year.

Matt Gline

Just wanted to highlight that it's gone well for us, that we feel really good about the setup. On slide five, looking across the list here, we've got brepocitinib expected to launch by the end of September. Obviously, we got priority review and our PDUFA date, as we said, is this quarter. We had great data from IMVT-1402 in the D2T RA study that we presented on our last quarterly call. Probably the most notable update for today, the top center of this slide, is that we've now enrolled patients in the phase III study in cutaneous sarcoidosis for brepocitinib, which follows on the positive results that we had in our phase II data, which I think we announced on our first quarterly call of this year, earlier in the calendar year.

Matt Gline

We've now received the initial payment from Moderna in the settlement, and the sort of second part of that, the Section 1498 part of that case is progressing as we filed international proceedings against Pfizer and BioNTech in that case. Finally, earlier this year, we added LPP as a fourth brepocitinib indication. As I'll remind people later today, that study is continuing to enroll really well. As I mentioned at the top of the call here on slide six, I'll just say this is a quiet quarter and this is a quiet day. I don't know exactly how the following statement could be true, but I think it is. The next 6-12 months are in many ways busier than the prior 6-12 months for us, and so we just have an enormous amount coming up.

Matt Gline

Starting, as I mentioned, with the upcoming potential brepocitinib launch in DM, which should happen imminently, assuming everything goes as we hope and expect it will with FDA. We've got top-line data in brepo from the NIU study, an indication that could easily be as large as dermatomyositis. That data is coming in the second half of this year. We also have top-line data coming shortly in the second half from mosli, the phase II study in PH-ILD. I know that's being closely watched and we're looking forward to getting that data and presenting it.

Matt Gline

We will provide further updates on the D2T RA program at Immunovant in the second half of this year, including hopefully a download on a conversation we hope to have with FDA about that program, as well as the results from the second part of the study and a little bit more about our plans going forward. Finally, probably the smallest of these, we're expecting top-line data from the PoC study in CLE also in the second half of this year. I'm looking forward to finding out what we've got there when that comes in as well. Just a jam-packed second half and even more coming in 2027 with the Graves' data and beyond. Just a lot in the here. I'll just hit a couple of highlights in terms of the pipeline updates in a little more detail here before, again, before we go on to Q&A.

Matt Gline

Starting on slide eight with a reminder, because it's been a few months since we've talked about it. The initiation of this cutaneous sarcoidosis phase III study is a pretty exciting event. It's a little bit ahead of schedule in terms of what we've been able to do here. This is a disease that we're just privileged to be able to work in here. It's a high morbidity, very difficult disease with a high urgency to treat. You can see on slide eight some of the photos we've shared before, but these are patients who are really sick and have very few treatment options. On slide nine, as a reminder of the data that we generated in our phase II study, we had set for ourselves a goal of a sort of five-point benefit on the CSAMI scale for clinical meaningfulness.

Matt Gline

In the study on the top left of this chart, we showed a greater than 20-point benefit compared to roughly nothing on placebo. Just a huge benefit to those patients in the phase II study, and really excited to carry that forward into the pivotal program. As a reminder on slide 10, we think this is a pretty decent-sized indication, again, with high unmet need, probably about 40,000 patients in the U.S., and reasonable overlap with some other organ systems, including optical sarcoidosis or eye sarcoidosis, where that overlaps with NIU.

Matt Gline

That is one of the types of NIU that we're studying, as well as pulmonary sarcoidosis, which is a big potential indication as well, and where we hope to be able to treat some of those patients via either their ocular sarcoidosis or CS. The phase III study that we've now begun, the design is laid out on slide 11. I know there were some questions after the phase II about what exactly this study would look like. It is designed to take all of the learnings from the phase II study that was successful. It is a 16-week study with the primary endpoint of CSAMI greater than or equal to 50% response rate.

Matt Gline

It's a 140-patient study across about 70 sites, 3:2 randomized with patients either on 45 milligrams of brepocitinib or placebo, and with a mandatory steroid taper going from week two to week eight down to zero, which is roughly consistent with what we did in the phase II, and generally consistent with what we think is appropriate for patients in this indication. That study, as I said, has already begun enrolling patients, and we expect top-line data in 2028, which just adds to the list of potential registrational indications for brepocitinib coming up. I'll reiterate on slide 12, the other ongoing registrational program is the brepocitinib study in lichen planopilaris, LPP, that we announced earlier this year. That study is enrolling, I'll say, extremely well. There's a lot of enthusiasm from physicians and patients for that.

Matt Gline

Speaks to the high unmet need on the indication, speaks to the quality of the work being done by Ben and the Priovant team. I'm looking forward to sharing more about that as soon as we've got it. That's also moving along nicely. Look, finally, I'm sure there will be questions about this in Q&A and lots of opportunity to talk about it, hopefully with a potential approval and beyond. Obviously, one of the major events in the near term here is the potential launch of repasitinib in dermatomyositis. Obviously, I think we're in a phenomenal position here in terms of what we've got and in terms of what we hope to be able to do.

Matt Gline

Starting with the quality of our clinical data, which as you know from the multiple times we've talked about it from the publications, including in The New England Journal and so on. Just phenomenal data, stats significant across all 10 endpoints, big clinical benefit, a lot of enthusiasm from the doc community. This is a really tough disease. A large addressable population, most of them on sort of polypharmacy, trying a lot of different things, and frankly, most of them still dissatisfied with the available treatments. We feel like we have an opportunity to do something big and different for this patient population. Our team has been out spending a lot of time with the physician and the patient communities on overall education.

Matt Gline

I think the enthusiasm for a new therapy is coming out loud and clear, including with all the academic presentations that have been done and so on. Commercial launches, there's not much to say today other than that it's on track. We're ready to launch on time, having received priority review. The sort of commercial and patient support teams are built out, trained, ready to deploy. We feel really great about the hires we've made there, really great about the organizations we've built there. We think we're doing this in a way that is both capitalizing on all of the learnings from successful launches at other companies in recent years and doing it in a Roivant, Priovant way.

Matt Gline

There's nobody in the world that'd be more excited to oversee this than the team we've got at Priovant with Ben and Daniel and others, I think we're going to be fully ready. Everything's on schedule. We'll have much more to say about that with the potential approval and after, but looking forward to it. I'll say one more thing about the commercial franchise overall of repasitinib on slide 14. We get a lot of enthusiastic questions from investors around pace of launch, and we've been pretty consistent that our answer to that question is sort of slow and steady is what we're looking to build there. I think there's a bunch of reasons for that. Obviously, some of them are DM is a new indication, and no one's launched a novel therapy basically ever, or at least a targeted therapy basically ever.

Matt Gline

It's just hard to know exactly what work will need to be done to get everyone comfortable and excited and on drug. Although I think we're fully prepared. Also, to me, it's because repasitinib is a lot more than just dermatomyositis. To me, what we're really doing here is not just trying to make that launch as fast as possible. We're trying to lay the groundwork for the overall opportunity, which goes beyond DM into first NIU and then CS and LPP with the data coming thereafter.

Matt Gline

I think as you think about that layering, to me, it is much less about what week one or month one or quarter one look like, and much more about making sure that the foundation around access, the foundation around patient support, the foundation around the institutional activities, the foundation around our communication with the scientific and physician community, and our communication with patients are all set up to deliver the maximum opportunity for brepocitinib across all of these indications. I think slow and steady isn't just about sort of guidance. Slow and steady is about the approach that we are taking with the program to make sure we have maximum reach across everything that we are doing there, including indications that we are excited about beyond the ones we have already announced. A lot to come, as I said, on track for that launch.

Matt Gline

You all hear the same thing we do, which is a ton of enthusiasm from the patients and physician community for new options in all of these indications and looking forward to sharing more when we know about it. Our guidance is going to continue to be slow and steady because that is what we think we are building. Final business update here is we got the upfront payment in the settlement with Moderna.

Matt Gline

That $950 million has come in, $770-ish million of it to Genevant and the rest to Arbutus. That is done. There will be progress in terms of return of capital, et cetera, of that via Arbutus and so on. Section 1498 sort of appellate ruling is that process is ongoing at the Federal Circuit. That would be another $1.3 billion if we got a favorable outcome there. We continue to advance our litigation against Pfizer and BioNTech.

Matt Gline

We filed three international lawsuits, notably in Canada and the UPC in July, just last month, and continue to progress that case as fast as we can. Not all of it in our control, but equally enthusiastic about the potential there in terms of what we could get. I will wrap up just with our usual financial update on slide 17. Look, I think overall, most importantly, we are spending in areas that we are excited to be spending. We are excited about all of our R&D programs, about $200 million of R&D expense for the quarter of just under $100 million of non-GAAP adjusted G&A, or $166 million of GAAP G&A expense. Cash just under $4 billion, and that is before the receipt of the $772 million. Notably, pretty significant share repurchase activity, about $200 million in the quarter, a bit more than that when you include March.

Matt Gline

What we did there was we accelerated our share repurchase program upon the announcement of the Moderna settlement, so that we could get those shares in and the shares that. As a reminder, the shares that we bought back kind of the first round of this, the 1.5 billion that we had bought back sort of up through mid last year, we bought back at around $10 a share. I think the average price at which we have been able to buy back stock since we kicked off the second round of this in earnest in March has been in the high $20s. Feeling good overall about retiring those shares and getting that capital back to shareholders. I am going to continue doing that according to our authorizations for now.

Matt Gline

All of it ahead of, on slide 19, a really rich catalyst calendar ahead with a lot coming. Looking forward to all of that with just an incredibly busy stretch ahead. On slide 20, again, a little bit incredulous for the people around Roivant who are doing all of this work or incredible for the people around Roivant who have to do this work. By the end of calendar 2028, we'll have had hopefully three or more commercial launches, nine or more clinical study readouts, four plus NDA or BLA filings, a number of proof of concept studies, just a ton coming up in the near term. With that, I'm going to wrap up my prepared remarks for the day. I will hand it back over to the operator for Q&A in just a moment.

Matt Gline

Thank you again for listening this morning. Looking forward to taking your questions.

Operator

Thank you.

Matt Gline

Operator, over to you.

Operator

Certainly. We will now begin the question and answer session. As a reminder, to ask a question, please press star one and one on your telephone. If you'd like to cancel your request, you can also press star one and one again. Our first question comes from the line of Brian Cheng of JPMorgan. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Brian Cheng

Hey, guys. Good morning. Thanks for taking our questions. Just thinking through the DM launch, Matt, can you give us a quick sense of what metrics we could be receiving right out of the gate to help us better track the initial launch? Secondly, on PH-ILD, as we think about the baseline characteristics here in FOCUS, it seems that more patients are on nintedanib. We're curious if there's any implication in terms of the fibrosis versus emphysema ratio in the populations, and then further down the line, whether there's any implication towards the bar for success for both six-minute walk and also PVR. Thank you.

Matt Gline

Perfect. Thanks. I appreciate both questions. Look, on DM a thing I've gotten fond of saying as I've watched other companies with commercial launches is that you all don't deserve our guidance, which isn't quite fair. Look, I think other than sort of a slow and steady launch and obviously the sort of top-line metrics will be plainly visible in our financials each quarter, I don't know that we're going to provide a ton of detail in the early days. I think it's important for us mostly to spend our time focused on understanding those dynamics ourselves, getting out, talking to patients, talking to physicians, doing the work we need to do. We'll give a little more color on what that's going to look like on a call with potential approval, and then we'll start to flesh out the package that we share with each successive quarter.

Matt Gline

I don't have a lot to say right now about metrics. I'll say I think typical with these launches, I'm not sure a ton is going to be visible in the early days, just given how the commercial apparatus is set up for actual purposes. We'll provide more guidance on that as it gets closer and is here. On PH-ILD I guess first of all, we've obviously been watching for example the treprostinil data in IPF and trying to understand a little bit better what's been going on with these PH-ILD patients in treatment of PH-ILD for fibrosis and for lung disease.

Matt Gline

It's been a view of ours for a while that one of the things to look out for in treatment of PH-ILD with vasodilators is emphysema. The study was designed with care around the amount of emphysema allowed in the study overall, and that was an important part of the guiding philosophy of the study to make sure that we can serve the patient population broadly, but also while maximizing the potential benefit of the therapy. That was considered from the beginning. Those are, I think, things we're keeping an eye on. I know there is a vocal cohort that believes that treprostinil has antifibrotic benefit. I think our view is if you treat PH-ILD patients well for their pulmonary hypertension, you may well deliver a benefit overall on their lung disease.

Matt Gline

I think our view is probably that vasodilation is driving a lot of the activity there. We also have some evidence from non-clinical models of antifibrotic activity for mosliciguat. Overall, on six-minute walk and PVR, I'm sure I'll get versions of this question more today. I think it's consistent with what we said before. We're hoping to see a clear signal on PVR. We expect if the drug is at all active, we will. We don't expect to see very much with clarity on six-minute walk. The study's not powered for six-minute walk. It would be nice to see some separation, but I don't think that's essential for our sort of go, no-go decision from here. We'll know what we've got once we get a closer look at it, including the full balance of that data. Thanks, Brian.

Brian Cheng

Thank you, Matt.

Operator

Thank you for the good questions. Next question comes from the line of Dave Risinger from Leerink Partners. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Dave Risinger

Thanks very much, and thanks for all the updates, Matt. I have three questions. Rather than rattling them all off right now, maybe if it's okay, I'll go one by one. First, on mosli, you commented just now on six-minute walk distance. If you were to run a large trial, what type of six-minute walk distance would you be hoping for? I.e., what would be relevant to the clinicians and to the patients? That's my first question.

Matt Gline

Thanks, Dave. I think obviously we'll have a slightly better answer to these questions overall once we have a sense of what we saw in phase II. The truth is that PH-ILD patients are really sick. There are not a lot of options for these patients. As we saw in group 1 in PAH, when you have more treatment options, first of all, patients go on multiple options, multiple lines of therapy. Second of all, most importantly, the actual, not from a clinical trial perspective, but from a real-world evidence perspective, survival and mortality rates go down as new classes of drugs are introduced in PAH over time. I think it's less about a number on six-minute walk and more about having an approvable therapy. Remember, these are patients that are trying to walk to the car. They're trying to walk to the bathroom.

Matt Gline

They're trying to live their daily lives. I don't know that I think it's correct scientifically to describe a specific numerical bar that matters versus just being able to get a new therapy. Some of that's frankly because six-minute walk in clinical settings is an artifice that is complicated and noisy and a little bit difficult to translate into daily lives. Whereas if these drugs really effectively vasodilate and improve lung function and improve PVR, I think you wind up seeing a lot of benefit for these patients. I don't know that we're going to articulate or have a specific numerical bar versus a successful study. Obviously, we will be judged, especially by the investor community, based on competitor data, but I don't think we even need to be per se better than any other mechanism in order to have a big benefit to patients. Thanks, Dave.

Dave Risinger

Great. That's very helpful. Regarding the forthcoming brepo DM launch, could you discuss the cadence of formulary reviews for rare disease drugs? I ask because for mass-market drugs, P&T committees often wait until six months after launch before putting drugs on formulary.

Matt Gline

Yes. Thanks. Look, I don't have a ton to say about that right now other than we're having all of the normal engagement with the payer community that you'd expect us to have at this stage. Also, I think this is a critical point about all of these launches, we are super focused on making sure that the physicians who want to write this drug and patients who want to get on this drug are going to have access. I think that's going to be really important for our engagement with the community for access generally. I think in terms of literal formulary, it's probably not so different. It's not like there's a separate committee for different kinds of diseases, but there's lots of medical exception procedures and other things that you can do to get patients covered.

Matt Gline

We have a whole team of people built out of Priovant that's dedicated to making sure whether the formulary work has happened yet, whether the P&T committee has happened yet, is not something that our patients and physicians have to spend a lot of time thinking about as they're deciding how to use the drug.

Dave Risinger

Excellent. That's really helpful context. Then finally, beyond the list of programs on slide 19, could you remind us about pipeline and product opportunities for your portfolio, including specific products that you could announce initiation of new studies for over the next year or so?

Matt Gline

I think every single one of the programs that the world is aware of in our pipeline, as well as potentially ones that the world is not yet aware of in our pipeline, in all of those cases, we could announce new trials, new indications in the next year. I think every one of those are eligible, all of our molecules could be put into indications beyond the ones we've talked about. I think it's fair to say in each case, we have specific ideas of indications we're excited about. We've done active work and are, in fact, preparing to initiate programs to varying degrees, depending on how busy those teams are today versus next month or the month after, but real progress.

Matt Gline

I think the answer is we are actively working on that, all of our products are, as you called them, pipeline into products, and we're excited to share more indications as we start those studies.

Dave Risinger

Excellent. Thanks so much.

Matt Gline

Thanks.

Dave Risinger

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you for the questions. The next questions comes from the line of Samantha Semenkow from Citi. Please go ahead.

Samantha Semenkow

Hi. Good morning. Thanks very much for taking the questions. I also have two, one on mosli, one on brepo. For mosli, I'm wondering if you could just talk about the translatability of PVR reductions in patients with PAH to those with the PH-ILD population that you enrolled in FOCUS. Are there any aspects of either disease that could influence the magnitude of PVR that you could see in the mosli data? I have a follow-up.

Matt Gline

Yeah. Thanks for the question. I appreciate it. I think the translation from PAH to PH-ILD is the fundamental question being answered by our study. The first unfortunate answer to that question is we're just going to have to see what we see. It is the risk of the program at some level that we find something. Again, the phase I data, including in PAH patients, looks very good on a PVR basis. One of the main "risks" of this program is that there's something, I would call it unexpected, in the PH-ILD translation. I use the word unexpected because I think scientifically it seems relatively straightforward that inhaled vasodilation is an effective mechanism in PH-ILD, we'll find out. The lungs of PH-ILD patients are different than the lungs of PAH patients.

Matt Gline

You might expect some difference in sort of the pharmacodynamics of the drug in those patients. Overall, it seems pretty clear that when you take an inhaled vasodilator in a PH-ILD patient, you get drug to the healthy lung tissue and it matters. That's what I'd say.

Samantha Semenkow

Got it. Thank you. That's very helpful. Just on brepo and DM, in your conversations that you've been having with physicians for education, I'm wondering if you could just talk about the reception to brepo given the JAK class safety concerns. The safety profile on VALOR was quite favorable, from a class perspective, it would just be helpful to hear how the physicians are thinking about safety, particularly since DM patients already tend to have a higher underlying risk for cancer. Thanks very much.

Matt Gline

When we first in-licensed brepocitinib, we didn't exactly know what the reception to JAK inhibitors was going to be following the addition of black box warnings. Our whole view was to choose indications where the safety profile of JAKs was going to be much less of a focus. I think dermatomyositis is a poster child for this in that while JAK inhibitors are at this point extremely widely used in diseases with much less morbidity, many more alternative therapies. In dermatomyositis there's really no other options available, I don't think physicians therefore are going to be particularly focused on this question. Remember, these patients are often. First of all, I think you sort of alluded to the profile in the trial.

Matt Gline

Dermatomyositis patients are inherently at risk of many of these concerns, malignancies, cardiometabolic events, and treating them well makes them healthier and reduces those risks. Then on top of that, the therapies that they are currently on for dermatomyositis are things like high-dose steroids, which in themselves add meaningfully, in fact, in many cases, much worse than JAK inhibitors to those very same risks. Yeah, I think in general, physicians are not going to spend a lot of time worrying about this, especially when reminded of the inherent risks of steroids and immunosuppressants that they're on anyway. It's clear from our conversations with docs across different prescriber bases that they're just very comfortable using these agents, including prescriber bases, as we said, for patients with significantly less severe disease.

Matt Gline

As a reminder, we fully expect that our label is going to look like the labels for other JAK inhibitors, that it's going to have the black box warnings. It's going to talk about experience with JAK inhibitors and other indications. Like I said, I think docs expect that and I think are not going to be too concerned about it because these patients are, A, very sick, and B, on other drugs with, in many cases, significantly worse safety concerns.

Samantha Semenkow

Thanks, Matt. Very helpful.

Operator

Thank you for your questions. Our next questions will come from the line of Prakhar Agrawal from Cantor Fitzgerald. Your line is now open.

Prakhar Agrawal

Hi. Thank you so much for taking my questions and congrats on the continued execution. Maybe a couple of questions from my side as well. Firstly, on brepo and DM, could you remind us what percentage of DM patients are on off-label JAKs based on your latest primary or secondary research? Would you expect rapid switches from these patients who are on off-label JAKs to brepo? If not, why is that the case? Secondly, for brepo in NIU trial, what do you see as the biggest risk for phase III given the phase II was really strong? Is this geographic variation, which has been a key risk for this trial, which could drive some of the baseline variability that has been flagged as one of the risk factors by some of the KOL checks that we have done? Thank you. Really appreciate it.

Matt Gline

Great. Thank you. In terms of your first question on brepo and DM around who's on off-label JAKs and what does that look like? Look, I think first of all, there's just variability in physician practice, and some physicians use more JAKs and some physicians use less JAKs. That has more to do, I think, with the docs in many cases than with any specific subcategory of patient. I think what we've said publicly is a low single-digit % or mid-single-digit % of dermatomyositis patients have experience with these things. Some of the docs who are involved. Some of that's some docs don't use off-label drugs full stop.

Matt Gline

I think some of the docs who use off-label JAKs have said they expect to switch patients over and I hope they do and obviously we'll be working to help them where that's appropriate facilitate those switches. I think it's just going to be down to the preference and practice of each individual doc. I think one of the things that our team is finding in talking to physicians is that different docs have different sort of ideals in mind for who their sort of first patients might be, and I think it just varies based on the patient experience, the physician. Obviously we'll be able to have much more of these conversations pending a potential approval. I think medically we'll see a wide variety of different phenotypes. On NIU, what is the biggest risk in phase III?

Matt Gline

It feels funny to call placebo a risk in these trials. That's not quite exactly what I mean, but I think the variability in placebo response rates in immunology trials is significant. If you're asking me what keeps me up at night, it's that we don't know exactly what placebo response rates will be in that study. That just makes it hard to know exactly what the trial is going to look like on outcome. Obviously, the phase II data was quite compelling, and the level of drug activity seems good. I'm pretty optimistic about the study. This is biotech, so you can lose sleep over anything. Is geography a risk?

Matt Gline

I think there may be geographic variation, just as there is in many other indications, and some of that's literally driven by geography, and some of it's driven by physician practice, and some of it's just noise. I don't know that it's a risk in the sense that it's unanticipated or whatever. It's just a feature of running immunology studies. Overall, I think the team is doing a great job with the study, and I hope it's going to come out well. Thank you.

Prakhar Agrawal

Thank you.

Operator

Thankyou for the questions. Our next question comes from the line of Andy Chen of Wolfe Research. Your line is now open.

Andy Chen

Hey, thank you for taking the question. I don't think this has been talked about yet, but for the brepo launch, can you maybe talk about a few launch analogs that you're assessing right now, either patient curve or market share curve? What are the historical products with the most resemblance to brepo in DM? Thank you.

Matt Gline

Well, thanks. It's a good question. The truth is there has never been a launch of a targeted therapy in dermatomyositis before. There is no good "analog" in the sense that you can point to lots of other launches of lots of other kinds. Some have been faster. Some have been slower. Some have been slow and steady. Some have been just like different versions of different things. I think it's hard to say. There have been successful products with all kinds of different launch phases. I think the short answer is I don't have a specific analog for another drug that we're watching as evidence of our own penetration. I think what we're really focused on here is the dermatomyositis opportunity itself, these docs, these patients.

Matt Gline

The benefit and the cost of being a pioneer in an indication is that you don't get to look at others. You have to chart your own course. I don't have an analog to point to. Thanks, Andy.

Operator

Thank you for the questions. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Yatin Suneja from Guggenheim. Please go ahead.

Yatin Suneja

Hey, guys. Thank you for taking my questions. Just a quick one on difficult to treat RA. Could you maybe talk about the strategy there? Would you need one more study, two more studies? How are you thinking about that? What should be our expectations for the randomized withdrawal phase that we're going to get data on? Thank you.

Matt Gline

Thanks. Great question. On study designs, we're going to come back later this year with a full update on that program, and that includes we don't yet have the randomized withdrawal period data yet, so I can't speak to what's in it or how it will or will not inform strategy from here. I think at some level, the results of that study may inform whether it is usable or not as one of our pivotal studies, et cetera. I think we designed it to serve potentially as one of two, but obviously it's got to hit for that to work. As we said when we announced the data, the quality of the response rates in the open label period have set a somewhat higher bar for hitting a p-value on the randomized withdrawal section.

Matt Gline

I think we've got to sort of see all that, take in an aggregate look at the patient-level data, understand what's going on. We are planning for an FDA conversation this fall that will inform both the exact design of that study as well as help us answer those questions. I don't have a specific guidance to give on exactly what those studies are going to look like now because we don't know. I'll say the team's working on it hard. The data was obviously exciting. It has gotten noticed. We've got a lot of enthusiastic reception, including from the doc community on it. We're excited to finalize those plans and bring them back to you later this year. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you for the questions. Our next question comes from Yaron Werber from TD Cowen. Your line is now open.

Yaron Werber

Great. Thanks so much. I have a couple of questions. The first one with mosli, once you release the data this year, would you release both the mono and the combo data at the same time? Secondly, for CS, the trial design is super interesting and makes obviously a lot of sense. The primary endpoint is CSAMI more than a 50% response. Can you maybe translate the phase II data into the same context? Because I think the phase II looked at CSAMI over 10 points and the change from baseline. I'm just trying to get a sense of apples to apples, kind of what to expect. Thank you.

Matt Gline

Great. On mosli, I think the short answer to your question is we will not release the monotherapy data and the combo data at the same time because the combo study started much later and is enrolling now, whereas the monotherapy study obviously will read out pretty soon in the second half. I think the answer is they won't come out at the same time. We'll put out the combo data when we've got it. The combo study, remember, it's an open label study. The truth is I think a lot of the information that we could want will come out of the monotherapy study anyway, such that the combo study won't provide that much incremental.

Matt Gline

I think it was designed in part to give us really good Safety experience in the combination as well as a little bit of information about incremental efficacy, just so that we could get a sense for inclusion criteria and management in the phase III. I'm not sure it's going to be a super informative outcome. Yes. That's what I'll say on mosli. I think data are going to come at separate times. On CS, I don't have to give right now the exact delta, but I'll say we saw meaningfully higher rates of greater than 50% CSAMI in the treatment arm than in placebo. The delta was wide.

Matt Gline

I think in the press release that may have gone out around the initiation of the CS study, it all said well north of 50% of the patients in the treatment arm of the phase II had a CSAMI response rate of greater than 50% compared to, I think it was zero on placebo. It should be a good bar to set for us in terms of the endpoint. I don't know that we're going to replicate exactly what we saw in the phase II, but I think the point is it's well powered for probability of success given what we saw in the phase II.

Yaron Werber

Right. If I can maybe just sneak in the phase III NIU, do you have a sense, is the percent HUMIRA experience going to be the same as the phase II, given that the data looked pretty good overall? It must have been pretty good in that segment too. Thank you.

Matt Gline

I don't think we've said, thank you, what the percentage of patients in the phase III have HUMIRA experience. I don't have that number on the top of my head, so I'll have to check into it, but I think the answer is there's no reason to expect it to be very different than what we've seen. There are a meaningful number of HUMIRA-experienced patients in the phase III, which matters in terms of ability to go into all of those patients. I think the short answer to your question is I wouldn't expect it to be a major driver and I wouldn't expect anything markedly different about the patient population from the phase II. Thanks, Yaron.

Operator

Our next question comes from Thomas Smith from Leerink Partners. Your line is now open.

Thomas Smith

Hey, good morning. Thanks so much for the updates and for taking our questions. On the IMVT-1402 difficult to treat RA program, I just wanted to clarify how you're approaching the disclosure in the second half of the year. Should we expect to see the part two randomized withdrawal data prior to your meeting with FDA? Are you planning to share the data and the regulatory feedback and next steps simultaneously? Then on Graves', just wanted to get your thoughts on the competitive landscape. Obviously, you're the first advanced therapy there with really stellar phase II data, and you'll have the first pivotal readout next year with IMVT-1402. There are a number of different approaches targeting various segments of the Graves' patient population. Just wondering if you could comment on the competitive landscape.

Thomas Smith

As you see some of the approaches some of these competitors are taking with respect to the patient population, wondering how you're thinking about potential future studies for IMVT-1402 in Graves'. Thanks so much.

Matt Gline

Yeah, perfect. Those are both really great questions. On the first one, I think what we said when we put the data out still holds. I think my dream, our dream for the second half of this year is that we can come back with everything tied as nicely into a bow as possible, which is to say the period two data, the FDA conversation, maybe some further analysis of patient experience through both periods in the RA study, all shared at the same time. Obviously, until we have the part two data in hand, we can't sort of specifically know whether there's anything in there that requires earlier disclosure. In general, I think the answer is our hope and expectation would be to give a fulsome update later this year on everything all at once for D2T RA.

Matt Gline

On Graves', look, I think first of all, I cannot say enough times that discussion of competition in Graves' disease among therapeutic categories is just misplaced in the sense that you've got so many patients with unmet need that have had no option. The last time a novel therapy was developed in Graves' disease was like the 1950s or 1960s. There's so many patients who have need of novel therapy that it's not about outrunning the bear. It's not about beating some specific competitor. It's about changing doc behavior in an indication that badly needs new options. IMVT-1402 will have been studied in lots of patients. It's a safe and well-tolerated drug. Graves' is going to have room for lots of mechanisms and lots of products.

Matt Gline

Among the other mechanisms, some will have specific either safety liabilities or they'll mimic a thyroidectomy and they'll require treatment with SYNTHROID or there's just lots of different approaches and those drugs may be appropriate for later line patients or a different subset of the patient population. Over time, I'm sure that segmenting will occur. First of all, we're going to be first out in the marketplace there long before anybody else. We're going to get to have some influence over the treatment paradigms and also just get an option out to patients and physicians before some of those other choices are available. Second of all, I think it's mostly about building the market, not about any specific alternative and so on.

Matt Gline

Look, we're tremendously excited to be in our position in Graves' to be first to be able to offer hopefully a new option here. The only other thing I will say is you learn a lot running these studies. You learn a lot engaging with this physician community. I do think there is nuance to the patient population and I think there is nuance to the prescriber behavior. I think there's a lot of heterogeneity in terms of how these patients are managed around the world and around the U.S. I think one of the things that we're going to be able to do is to take advantage of those learnings in future studies, in these studies, in commercial prep. I think that will be a big benefit to us in being in the first place here. Thank you

Operator

Questions. Our next question comes from Yasmeen Rahimi of Piper Sandler. Your line is now open.

Shannon Duffy

Hi, this is Shannon on for Yas Rahimi. Congrats on the great quarter. Maybe just one more from us about clarity with the readout in second half 2026. Could you give us just maybe what you might be thinking about narrowing guidance if you expect to do that, then sort of how you're thinking about the bar for success? Then timing post-data, would you expect to file an sNDA, and sort of what would be the cadence on that? Thanks.

Matt Gline

Thanks. Look, I doubt that we're going to provide more specific timing guidance at this point than we have. We announced, I think, when the study was fully enrolled, I think we're just going to read the study out when it's done and we have the data clean. The truth is, NIU is another one of these diseases where there's a lot of unmet need. HUMIRA leaves a lot of room on the table, and frankly, a lot of patients aren't even getting it. I think the truth is that the bar for success is successful studies that would support registration, and I think if we get that, we will have a big opportunity to help lots of patients who need it. I don't think there's a numerical bar.

Matt Gline

Obviously, better data is better, and the more we look like our phase II, the happier I'll be about that. Our phase II was really great data. Overall, I think as long as we have a successful clinical trial, a successful outcome, we're going to get what we need, and we have a lot of patients we can reach. I don't want to put Ben on the spot right now on exactly when that sNDA goes in, but we got the DM 1 in nice and quickly. I know the team is enthusiastic for NIU as an indication, so if that study's positive, you got to believe that team's going to be working really quickly to get that sNDA in as fast as possible.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Douglas Tsao from H.C. Wainwright. Please go ahead. Douglas, your line is open. You can unmute locally. In that case, we'll move on to our next questions. One moment, please. The next question comes from Sam Slutsky from LifeSci Capital. Please go ahead.

Sam Slutsky

Hey, thanks for taking the questions. Two quick ones from me. I guess for the proof of concept readout in CLE, there's a few parts to that study, so just remind me of what we'll be getting in that initial release this year. Then for the initial launch in dermatomyositis, remind me how many clinics you're targeting and the concentration of patients at those clinics. Thanks.

Matt Gline

Yeah, thanks. On CLE, again, I think we've said this before in other settings, it bears mentioning. I think CLE is an interesting indication. This is a small study. It's really a fact-finding proof of concept study. We've been watching the competitive landscape in CLE closely. There's a lot of other exciting therapies in development as well. Early data from a couple of patients that we have dosed was encouraging. We're really sort of overall just looking to understand what our treatment benefit looks like, how we could conceptually stack up in the future treatment landscape, and I think that will all be super informative to what we do from here and whether we go forward. I think the primary, as a reminder, is 12 weeks 600 versus placebo. Then in period two, all patients go out 600 at 52 weeks.

Matt Gline

The thing that we'll be reporting first is that 12 weeks for 600 versus placebo. That's what we'll see. Obviously a bunch of other data beyond just the specific primary endpoint. On the DM launch, I'm not going to share today exactly what our sort of targeting strategy is, but as a reminder, there's about 200 myositis referral centers that treat approximately half of the U.S. patient population. Obviously those clinics are, those docs, those centers are an important part of the overall picture, but there are other important physicians as well. I think Ben and the team have done a really great job overall engaging with the physician community. I'm excited about what we've done there, excited about the sort of medical publication strategy. Obviously, The New England Journal publication was a great outcome.

Matt Gline

Feeling good overall about that plan, we're going to talk to as many docs and get out there as much as we can pending a potential approval. Thank you. Great questions.

Operator

For the questions. We will now take the last questions from Alex Thompson of Stifel. Please go ahead.

Alex Thompson

Hey, great. Thanks for taking our question. Maybe two more on IMVT-1402. Going back to the questions around placebo responses. How are you thinking about managing placebo response in the Graves' studies, particularly in the backdrop of ATD down titration and the potential for waxing and waning of disease in that context over longer periods of time? Secondly, what's your current thinking on sort of where IMVT-1402 could fit within MG and CIDP as that landscape continues to evolve? Thanks.

Matt Gline

Yeah. Thank you. Great questions. Appreciate it. Look, on Graves', I think the short answer to this question is if you set the bar high enough on the endpoints, these are just not patients who are spontaneously remitting. If you're looking at patients who are getting to proper thyroid hormone levels and off ATDs, I think the simple truth is placebo should be pretty manageable here without saying much more about exactly how the AT titration works and so on, and different of the studies being run by different companies are taking slightly different approaches there. I'm not going to say too much about exactly what we're up to. Overall, I think this is something that is likely manageable.

Matt Gline

I think as far as MG and CIDP are concerned, I'll say First of all, it's pretty rare that you have a great drug where you can run a clinical trial and be just very confident that the trial is going to work. FcRns have been studied many times in MG at this point. IMVT-1402 really should work in MG. The data that we generated in bato, although I know there was plenty of debate over the deeper is better question, we think showed a real treatment benefit, especially on things like MSD and sort of clinical remission that other FcRNs, in our view, have not been quite as compelling on. I think we have an opportunity to deliver really great data, and I think that data will translate to adoption. I'll say two other things.

Matt Gline

One is that the MG market has just shown itself to be extremely large. There's room for lots of different classes, there's room for multiple FcRNs, there's a little bit of cycling going on, there's differences in dosing paradigm and so on. I think no matter what share we take, even a relatively modest share of a market that size is a big opportunity. I think argenx has done a really great job establishing that market, establishing themselves in that market, becoming the drug of choice that people reach to for a next-generation therapy. I think they may very well remain the class leader there. I think we will find lots of operating room around them with hopefully incremental, meaningful benefit to patients beyond what they can deliver and just with another option, with different route of administration and so on.

Matt Gline

I think in MG, we'll be out there. I think we'll have a big opportunity just given the size of the overall market exactly what our share is and where we fit in will depend on the clinical data that we generate in the study. CIDP, my one comment is, I think the Well, I'll make at the end on other indications. I think in CIDP, class leadership has been less concretely established at this point. It's a more recent launch. I think there's probably a little bit more room for improvement on treatment paradigm. I think what we showed with bato in the CIDP study was pretty encouraging. I hope we're able to do something similar with IMVT-1402. I think there will be a lot of enthusiasm if we can for our role there.

Matt Gline

I think we have an opportunity to be a major driver in that market. Overall, I think the level of success that argenx has had with things like MG and CIDP makes me tremendously excited about Graves and about [Digoxin] and the other indications where we are first, in that the first-mover advantage that argenx has been able to develop in their indications are significant, and I expect to build a similar moat for ourselves. I think ultimately these docs are going to be sensitive to clinical data, focused on clinical data. I think if our data is phenomenal, we'll be able to lead in every indication where we have that kind of data. Great docs are going to follow the quality of the evidence.

Alex Thompson

Great. Thanks, Matt.

Matt Gline

Appreciate the question. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you for the questions. With that, I'd like to hand the call back to management for closing.

Matt Gline

Great. Okay. Thank you everybody again. Thank you for the thoughtful questions. I appreciate how much work it is to come up with good questions in a quiet quarter. I promise there'll be lots coming in the coming weeks and months to give you more substrate in the future. In the meantime, we appreciate it. We appreciate everyone for listening. As always, I'm super appreciative of everybody who works for Roivant in our advance, who are working just super hard on all of these programs to move them forward. I've been very proud of our execution and pleased with the quality of progress we've made. Then I want to thank the physicians and investigators and patients in our studies who trust us with their care. I couldn't be more excited for the 12 months ahead.

Matt Gline

One way or another, this is the last boring quarter we're going to have for a while. Looking forward to the more exciting ones ahead and losing sleep over them until we get there. Thank you, everybody. Have a good day.

Operator

That does conclude today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your line.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-29

Fortrea Holdings Inc. (FTRE) Surpasses Q2 Earnings and Revenue Estimates

Zacks
Fortrea Holdings Inc. (FTRE) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.23 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.18 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.19 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +27.78%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this company would post earnings of $0.03 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.16, delivering a surprise of +433.33%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates two times. Fortrea Holdings Inc., which belongs to the Zacks Medical - Biomedical and Genetics industry, posted revenues of $678.2 million for the quarter ended June 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 4.62%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $710.3 million. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates two times over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. Fortrea Holdings Inc. shares have added about 20% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 8.5%. While Fortrea Holdings Inc. has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Fortrea Holdings Inc. was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can se…Read full document

Fortrea Holdings Inc. (FTRE) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.23 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.18 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.19 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +27.78%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this company would post earnings of $0.03 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.16, delivering a surprise of +433.33%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates two times. Fortrea Holdings Inc., which belongs to the Zacks Medical - Biomedical and Genetics industry, posted revenues of $678.2 million for the quarter ended June 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 4.62%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $710.3 million. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates two times over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. Fortrea Holdings Inc. shares have added about 20% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 8.5%. While Fortrea Holdings Inc. has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Fortrea Holdings Inc. was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $0.23 on $661.06 million in revenues for the coming quarter and $0.80 on $2.61 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year. Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Medical - Biomedical and Genetics is currently in the top 38% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1. One other stock from the same industry, Roivant Sciences Ltd. (ROIV), is yet to report results for the quarter ended June 2026. The results are expected to be released on August 6. This company is expected to post quarterly loss of $0.33 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of -83.3%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. Roivant Sciences Ltd.'s revenues are expected to be $2.24 million, up 3% from the year-ago quarter. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Fortrea Holdings Inc. (FTRE) : Free Stock Analysis Report Roivant Sciences Ltd. (ROIV) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-23

Immunovant to Report Financial Results for the First Quarter Ended June 30, 2026, and Provide Business Update on Thursday, August 6, 2026

GlobeNewswire

DURHAM, N.C., July 23, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Immunovant, Inc. (Nasdaq: IMVT) today announced that it will report its financial results for the first quarter ended June 30, 2026 on Thursday, August 6, 2026 before the market opens. Roivant Sciences Ltd. (ROIV), Immunovant’s majority stockholder, will host a live conference call and webcast at 8:00 a.m. ET that same day, which will include a business update for Immunovant. To access the Roivant (Nasdaq: ROIV) conference call by phone, please register online using this registration link. The presentation and webcast details will also be available under “News & Events” in the Investors section of the Immunovant website at https://www.immunovant.com/investors/news-events/ir-calendar. The archived webcast will be available on Immunovant’s website after the conference call. About Immunovant Immunovant, Inc. is a clinical-stage immunology company dedicated to enabling normal lives for people with autoimmune diseases and is a majority-owned subsidiary of Roivant (Nasdaq: ROIV). As a trailblazer in anti-FcRn technology, the Company is developing innovative, targeted therapies to meet the complex and variable needs of people with autoimmune diseases. For additional information on the Company, please visit immunovant.com. Contacts: Investors Keyur Parekh [email protected] Media Stephanie Lee [email protected]

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-23

Roivant to Report Financial Results for the First Quarter Ended June 30, 2026, and Provide Business Update on Thursday, August 6, 2026

GlobeNewswire
BASEL, Switzerland and LONDON and NEW YORK, July 23, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Roivant (Nasdaq: ROIV) today announced that it will host a live conference call and webcast at 8:00 a.m. ET on Thursday, August 6, 2026, to report its financial results for the first quarter ended June 30, 2026, and provide a business update. To access the conference call by phone, please register online using this registration link. The presentation and webcast details will also be available under “Events & Presentations” in the Investors section of the Roivant website at https://investor.roivant.com/news-events/events. The archived webcast will be available on Roivant’s website after the conference call. About Roivant Roivant (Nasdaq: ROIV) is a biopharmaceutical company that aims to improve the lives of patients by accelerating the development and commercialization of medicines that matter. Roivant’s pipeline includes brepocitinib, a potent small molecule inhibitor of JAK1 and TYK2 currently under review at the FDA for the treatment of dermatomyositis and also in late stage development for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis, cutaneous sarcoidosis and lichen planopilaris; IMVT-1402, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting FcRn in development across several IgG-mediated autoimmune indications; and mosliciguat, an inhaled sGC activator in development for pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease. We advance our pipeline by creating nimble subsidiaries or “Vants” to develop and commercialize our medicines and technologies. For more information, visit www.roivant.com. Roivant Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements. Statements in this press release may include statements that are not historical facts and are considered forward-looking within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which are usually identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intends,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “would” and variations of such words or similar expressions. The words may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not…Read full document

BASEL, Switzerland and LONDON and NEW YORK, July 23, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Roivant (Nasdaq: ROIV) today announced that it will host a live conference call and webcast at 8:00 a.m. ET on Thursday, August 6, 2026, to report its financial results for the first quarter ended June 30, 2026, and provide a business update. To access the conference call by phone, please register online using this registration link. The presentation and webcast details will also be available under “Events & Presentations” in the Investors section of the Roivant website at https://investor.roivant.com/news-events/events. The archived webcast will be available on Roivant’s website after the conference call. About Roivant Roivant (Nasdaq: ROIV) is a biopharmaceutical company that aims to improve the lives of patients by accelerating the development and commercialization of medicines that matter. Roivant’s pipeline includes brepocitinib, a potent small molecule inhibitor of JAK1 and TYK2 currently under review at the FDA for the treatment of dermatomyositis and also in late stage development for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis, cutaneous sarcoidosis and lichen planopilaris; IMVT-1402, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting FcRn in development across several IgG-mediated autoimmune indications; and mosliciguat, an inhaled sGC activator in development for pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease. We advance our pipeline by creating nimble subsidiaries or “Vants” to develop and commercialize our medicines and technologies. For more information, visit www.roivant.com. Roivant Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements. Statements in this press release may include statements that are not historical facts and are considered forward-looking within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which are usually identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intends,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “would” and variations of such words or similar expressions. The words may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. We intend these forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our or our management team’s expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future, and statements that are not historical facts, including statements about the clinical and therapeutic potential of our product candidates, the availability and success of topline results from our ongoing clinical trials and any commercial potential of our product candidates following applicable regulatory approvals. In addition, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events, results or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated in these statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors. Although we believe that our plans, intentions, expectations and strategies as reflected in or suggested by those forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that the plans, intentions, expectations or strategies will be attained or achieved. Furthermore, actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including, but not limited to, those risks set forth in the Risk Factors section of our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment in which new risks emerge from time to time. These forward-looking statements are based upon the current expectations and beliefs of our management as of the date of this press release, and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Except as required by applicable law, we assume no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Contacts:InvestorsKeyur [email protected] MediaStephanie [email protected]

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-05-20

Roivant Sciences Ltd (ROIV) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strategic Settlements and ...

GuruFocus.com
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Cash and Cash Equivalents: $4.3 billion as of March 31, 2026, before the Moderna settlement. Debt: No debt reported. Moderna Settlement: $2.25 billion settlement with $950 million upfront expected in July. R&D Expenses: Increased due to the expansion of program scope. Share Repurchase: Active share repurchase program ongoing. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with ROIV. Is ROIV fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: May 20, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Roivant Sciences Ltd (NASDAQ:ROIV) reported strong clinical data from its 1,402 study, showing high ACR response rates, with 73% of patients achieving ACR20, over half achieving ACR50, and over a third achieving ACR70. The company received breakthrough therapy designation for PrEP/Sitnib for retinue sarcoidosis, highlighting its potential impact on patient treatment. Roivant Sciences Ltd (NASDAQ:ROIV) announced a $2.25 billion settlement with Moderna, with $950 million expected upfront in July, strengthening its financial position. The company is on track to launch brevacitinib for dermatomyositis by the end of September, pending FDA approval, indicating strong commercial preparation. Roivant Sciences Ltd (NASDAQ:ROIV) has a robust pipeline with multiple upcoming data readouts, including Phase 3 NIU data and Moseley PNHLD Phase 2B top-line data, suggesting continued growth and innovation. The failure of the betokumab studies in TED was announced, although hyperthyroid patients showed normalization, indicating mixed results in ongoing studies. The Phase 2 study for Mosley is not powered to achieve a p-value on the six-minute walk test, which may limit the immediate impact of the results. There is uncertainty regarding the period two data of the 1,402 study, as the primary endpoint is losing an ACR-20 response, which may not fully capture the drug's efficacy. Roivant Sciences Ltd (NASDAQ:ROIV) faces a competitive landscape in the CLE market, requiring strong data to support its program amidst emerging mechanisms. The company is still analyzing detailed patient-level data and has not yet finalized its path forward with the FDA, indicating potential regulatory hurdles. Q: Can you contextualize the ACR responses seen at 16 weeks, and how might thes…Read full document

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Cash and Cash Equivalents: $4.3 billion as of March 31, 2026, before the Moderna settlement. Debt: No debt reported. Moderna Settlement: $2.25 billion settlement with $950 million upfront expected in July. R&D Expenses: Increased due to the expansion of program scope. Share Repurchase: Active share repurchase program ongoing. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with ROIV. Is ROIV fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: May 20, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Roivant Sciences Ltd (NASDAQ:ROIV) reported strong clinical data from its 1,402 study, showing high ACR response rates, with 73% of patients achieving ACR20, over half achieving ACR50, and over a third achieving ACR70. The company received breakthrough therapy designation for PrEP/Sitnib for retinue sarcoidosis, highlighting its potential impact on patient treatment. Roivant Sciences Ltd (NASDAQ:ROIV) announced a $2.25 billion settlement with Moderna, with $950 million expected upfront in July, strengthening its financial position. The company is on track to launch brevacitinib for dermatomyositis by the end of September, pending FDA approval, indicating strong commercial preparation. Roivant Sciences Ltd (NASDAQ:ROIV) has a robust pipeline with multiple upcoming data readouts, including Phase 3 NIU data and Moseley PNHLD Phase 2B top-line data, suggesting continued growth and innovation. The failure of the betokumab studies in TED was announced, although hyperthyroid patients showed normalization, indicating mixed results in ongoing studies. The Phase 2 study for Mosley is not powered to achieve a p-value on the six-minute walk test, which may limit the immediate impact of the results. There is uncertainty regarding the period two data of the 1,402 study, as the primary endpoint is losing an ACR-20 response, which may not fully capture the drug's efficacy. Roivant Sciences Ltd (NASDAQ:ROIV) faces a competitive landscape in the CLE market, requiring strong data to support its program amidst emerging mechanisms. The company is still analyzing detailed patient-level data and has not yet finalized its path forward with the FDA, indicating potential regulatory hurdles. Q: Can you contextualize the ACR responses seen at 16 weeks, and how might these responses trend with more time on therapy? A: Matthew Gline, CEO: We don't know for sure as this is the first time this patient population has been studied in detail. Sicker patients generally need more time to improve, and while there's potential for continued improvement beyond 16 weeks, we'll need to observe the patient population further to understand the trends. Q: Have you been able to assess whether your assumptions for standard deviation in PVR and six-minute walk are aligning with what you're seeing? A: Matthew Gline, CEO: We are largely blinded to that data, so it's difficult to say. However, given the patient population enrolled, we feel confident about the study's direction and the drug's efficacy. Q: Other FCRN drugs haven't achieved this level of efficacy in RA. Do you have ACPA antibody reduction data, and will it be available before unblinding period two data? A: Matthew Gline, CEO: We don't have that data now. IMDK-1402 suppresses IgG deeply, which might contribute to our clinical data. We will provide more information when we're ready to discuss the program's future. Q: If the Phase 2 focus study shows a statistically significant benefit on six-minute walk, could it represent a pivotal study? A: Matthew Gline, CEO: It's hard to say until we see the data. If the data supports a productive conversation with the FDA, we might consider it. However, the study isn't powered to show a benefit on a six-minute walk, so we'll see what the data reveals. Q: Is there any chance to amend the protocol to avoid the step-down issue in period two? A: Matthew Gline, CEO: There are many possibilities, but given the quality of the data, we might not gain much from extending the study. We'll analyze the data, have discussions with the FDA, and plan the path forward. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

As of 2026-08-15 • Updated weeklySource: Earnings sourceIngestion runbook