NP
Neptune InsuranceDDocument history
Transcripts and related coverage stored for NP. Related articles may discuss other companies and are not verified issuer releases.
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-22Neptune Insurance (NRP) Stock Price Slips As Q3 Earnings Flex Margins
Simply Wall St.
Neptune Insurance (NRP) Stock Price Slips As Q3 Earnings Flex Margins
Neptune Insurance came into this Q3 2026 report with a premium valuation and a reputation as a high growth, AI powered flood insurer. The share price has slipped 3.7% since the release, yet the headline number tells a different story. Revenue reached US$59.6m for the quarter and adjusted EBITDA hit US$36.8m, with margins around 62%. That kind of profitability shift sits at the center of today's expectation gap, as a richly priced insurance stock sells off on a day when its strongest positive trend is earnings power rather than pure top line hype. Love Neptune Insurance's rich margins but uneasy about paying a premium for a stock that just sold off on an earnings beat story built on profitability rather than hype? Compare that setup with our 33 high quality undervalued stocks for ideas that pair strong fundamentals with less demanding valuations. - Revenue (Q3 2026 vs. Q3 2025): US$59.567m vs. US$44.365m (higher, reflecting a stronger top line for Neptune Insurance) - Net Income, Excl. Extra Items (Q3 2026 vs. Q3 2025): US$17.256m vs. US$5.493m (higher, showing a much stronger profit result) - Basic EPS (Q3 2026 vs. Q3 2025): US$0.1249 vs. US$0.0588 (higher, indicating improved earnings per share for shareholders) - Adjusted EBITDA Margin (Q3 2026 vs. Q3 2025): approximately 62% vs. approximately 60% (slightly higher margin, pointing to stronger underlying profitability) Skip the headline growth rates. Ask Charlie what Neptune Insurance's AI is really changing. Supporters argue Neptune Insurance is building a self reinforcing AI and distribution engine that can compound earnings without heavy capital. That thesis hinges on AI driven underwriting and broad coverage doing the heavy lifting. "AI driven underwriting and pricing, including the rewritten Triton engine and targeted machine learning models for quote conversion and renewals, can support efficient policy growth while holding headcount and operating costs relatively steady." The latest quarter moves this claim from theory to scoreboard. Revenue rose 34% year on year while adjusted EBITDA climbed 38%, and margin edged higher to roughly 62%. Management reported engineering output at 2.5x with roughly flat staffing and service productivity up 50%. Those are concrete efficiency gains, not just marketing language. That disagreement has a full argument behind it. → Uncover the higher Fair Value this Narrative…Read full documentShow less
Neptune Insurance came into this Q3 2026 report with a premium valuation and a reputation as a high growth, AI powered flood insurer. The share price has slipped 3.7% since the release, yet the headline number tells a different story. Revenue reached US$59.6m for the quarter and adjusted EBITDA hit US$36.8m, with margins around 62%. That kind of profitability shift sits at the center of today's expectation gap, as a richly priced insurance stock sells off on a day when its strongest positive trend is earnings power rather than pure top line hype. Love Neptune Insurance's rich margins but uneasy about paying a premium for a stock that just sold off on an earnings beat story built on profitability rather than hype? Compare that setup with our 33 high quality undervalued stocks for ideas that pair strong fundamentals with less demanding valuations. - Revenue (Q3 2026 vs. Q3 2025): US$59.567m vs. US$44.365m (higher, reflecting a stronger top line for Neptune Insurance) - Net Income, Excl. Extra Items (Q3 2026 vs. Q3 2025): US$17.256m vs. US$5.493m (higher, showing a much stronger profit result) - Basic EPS (Q3 2026 vs. Q3 2025): US$0.1249 vs. US$0.0588 (higher, indicating improved earnings per share for shareholders) - Adjusted EBITDA Margin (Q3 2026 vs. Q3 2025): approximately 62% vs. approximately 60% (slightly higher margin, pointing to stronger underlying profitability) Skip the headline growth rates. Ask Charlie what Neptune Insurance's AI is really changing. Supporters argue Neptune Insurance is building a self reinforcing AI and distribution engine that can compound earnings without heavy capital. That thesis hinges on AI driven underwriting and broad coverage doing the heavy lifting. "AI driven underwriting and pricing, including the rewritten Triton engine and targeted machine learning models for quote conversion and renewals, can support efficient policy growth while holding headcount and operating costs relatively steady." The latest quarter moves this claim from theory to scoreboard. Revenue rose 34% year on year while adjusted EBITDA climbed 38%, and margin edged higher to roughly 62%. Management reported engineering output at 2.5x with roughly flat staffing and service productivity up 50%. Those are concrete efficiency gains, not just marketing language. That disagreement has a full argument behind it. → Uncover the higher Fair Value this Narrative argues for. Critics worry Neptune Insurance will eventually need to spend heavily just to keep its AI and infrastructure current, which could cap profitability even if revenue continues to grow. That concern shows up clearly here. "Although Neptune's AI first underwriting and machine learning models currently support high revenue per employee and a 60% adjusted EBITDA margin, continued investment in public company infrastructure, model development and cloud costs could limit further margin expansion and keep earnings growth closer to revenue growth." This quarter, adjusted EBITDA margin was near 62%, and management raised 2026 and 2027 margin targets to about 61%. The feared margin ceiling is not yet apparent, although it could still emerge as the business matures. Neptune Insurance Holdings recently showed that earnings strength and share price can briefly move in different directions. The real opportunity is finding stocks that could be undervalued before closer scrutiny narrows the gap. - Company 1 - 47% below our estimate - turns record mechanical and electrical project backlog from data center work into higher utilization and improved margins. - Company 2 - 29% below our estimate - converts complex aerospace, medical and industrial design wins into long-running manufacturing programs using disciplined cash cycles. - Company 3 - 46% below our estimate - folds a newly acquired regional lender into a broader branch and digital network to deepen low cost deposits and fee income. Those are three of them. See every one of the 33 undervalued companies on it → This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NP. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email [email protected]
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-21Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc (NP) (Q3 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Record EBITDA, Raised ...
GuruFocus.com
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc (NP) (Q3 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Record EBITDA, Raised ...
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. - Revenue: $59.6 million in Q3, up 34% year over year. - Adjusted EBITDA: Record $36.8 million, up 38% year over year. - Adjusted EBITDA Margin: 62%, an improvement of 147 basis points from a year ago. - Premium in Force: $450 million, up 32% year over year. - Policies in Force: More than 336,000, up 29% year over year. - New Business Premium: Up 51% year over year in Q3. - Revenue Retention Rate: Approximately 89% over the last 12 months. - Operating Cash Flow: $25.9 million in Q3; $69.3 million for the first nine months of the year. - Revenue per Employee: Approximately $3.2 million over the last 12 months. - Adjusted EBITDA per Employee: Approximately $2 million over the last 12 months. - Net Leverage Ratio: Approximately 1.7 times, down from 2.9 times a year ago. - Revolver Outstanding: $215 million at quarter end. - Full-Year 2026 Revenue Guidance: Raised to $204 million (approximately 28% year-over-year growth), with adjusted EBITDA margin above 61%. - Full-Year 2027 Revenue Guidance: Approximately $238 million, with adjusted EBITDA margin of approximately 61%. - Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with BOKF. - Is NP fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: October 20, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. - Revenue grew 34% year over year to $59.6 million, with adjusted EBITDA up 38% to $36.8 million, achieving a 62% margin. - Premium in force increased 32% to $450 million, and policies in force rose 29% to over 336,000. - New business premium surged 51% year over year, demonstrating strong underlying demand despite a soft insurance market and weak housing market. - Atlas Plus AI tool drove 3.5x higher bind rates for quotes involving the platform, enhancing agent productivity and sales effectiveness. - Operating leverage is evident with revenue per employee at $3.2 million and adjusted EBITDA per employee at $2 million, while headcount remained flat at 59 employees. - Revenue retention rate declined to 89% from low 90s a year ago, partly due to pricing strategies that prioritize volume over price increases. - The housing market remains weak and there have been two consecutive years without a major hurricane, creating headwinds for new business demand. - Direct-to-consumer AI agent interactions are…Read full documentShow less
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. - Revenue: $59.6 million in Q3, up 34% year over year. - Adjusted EBITDA: Record $36.8 million, up 38% year over year. - Adjusted EBITDA Margin: 62%, an improvement of 147 basis points from a year ago. - Premium in Force: $450 million, up 32% year over year. - Policies in Force: More than 336,000, up 29% year over year. - New Business Premium: Up 51% year over year in Q3. - Revenue Retention Rate: Approximately 89% over the last 12 months. - Operating Cash Flow: $25.9 million in Q3; $69.3 million for the first nine months of the year. - Revenue per Employee: Approximately $3.2 million over the last 12 months. - Adjusted EBITDA per Employee: Approximately $2 million over the last 12 months. - Net Leverage Ratio: Approximately 1.7 times, down from 2.9 times a year ago. - Revolver Outstanding: $215 million at quarter end. - Full-Year 2026 Revenue Guidance: Raised to $204 million (approximately 28% year-over-year growth), with adjusted EBITDA margin above 61%. - Full-Year 2027 Revenue Guidance: Approximately $238 million, with adjusted EBITDA margin of approximately 61%. - Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with BOKF. - Is NP fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: October 20, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. - Revenue grew 34% year over year to $59.6 million, with adjusted EBITDA up 38% to $36.8 million, achieving a 62% margin. - Premium in force increased 32% to $450 million, and policies in force rose 29% to over 336,000. - New business premium surged 51% year over year, demonstrating strong underlying demand despite a soft insurance market and weak housing market. - Atlas Plus AI tool drove 3.5x higher bind rates for quotes involving the platform, enhancing agent productivity and sales effectiveness. - Operating leverage is evident with revenue per employee at $3.2 million and adjusted EBITDA per employee at $2 million, while headcount remained flat at 59 employees. - Revenue retention rate declined to 89% from low 90s a year ago, partly due to pricing strategies that prioritize volume over price increases. - The housing market remains weak and there have been two consecutive years without a major hurricane, creating headwinds for new business demand. - Direct-to-consumer AI agent interactions are currently immaterial, indicating slow adoption of AI-driven insurance purchases. - Premium per policy grew only 2% year over year, impacted by mix shift toward lower-priced policies. - The company faces potential regulatory changes at FEMA/NFIP that could impact the market, though no immediate changes are expected. Q: With AI potentially lowering distribution costs over time, how beneficial could this be to Neptune's expense levels and margins? A: CEO Trevor Burgess explained that while the transition will be slow, it could be very profitable. He cited the UK market, where 60-70% of homeowners buy policies through comparative raters, paying a one-time fee of about GBP50 versus the average 13% annual commission paid to agents in the US. Since distribution is Neptune's largest expense category, a shift toward AI-driven purchasing would dramatically reduce costs and benefit margins. Q: Can you discuss the drivers behind the raised 2026 guidance and the initial 2027 outlook, particularly regarding new products and inorganic growth? A: CEO Trevor Burgess attributed the outperformance to the distribution team's success in adding and deepening agency relationships, and to technology like Atlas Plus making agents more productive. He noted the 2027 guidance excludes inorganic growth and substantial contributions from new products, but highlighted the upcoming full launch of the earthquake product and ongoing evaluation of M&A opportunities that meet their strict criteria. Q: What competitive advantages does Neptune have that are hardest for new carriers in the flood market to replicate? A: CEO Trevor Burgess stated that competitors' APIs are often just connected to a spreadsheet, lacking Neptune's sophisticated underwriting based on nearly 40 million quotes and extensive claims data. He also emphasized Neptune's deep distribution relationships, noting that some of their largest distributors have actually reduced the number of private flood offerings they use, favoring Neptune. Q: Given the strong Q3 results, is it possible that EBITDA margins could exceed 62% in the not-too-distant future? A: CEO Trevor Burgess noted that Q3's margin was already 61.7%, but pointed out seasonality, as Q1 has the same costs but lower sales. He expressed hope for continued margin growth, driven partly by AI. He mentioned buying AI for customer service to handle a majority of emails, which would improve efficiency over time, making higher margins possible. Q: Can you provide more color on the 38.7 million cumulative quotes and the low conversion to policies in force? A: CEO Trevor Burgess explained that while their API allows large partners to run a flood quote with every homeowner's quote, it doesn't guarantee agents will present it. He noted that top-performing agents who consistently offer the quote have a bind ratio 5-8 times higher than those who don't. The goal of Atlas Plus is to change agent behavior and increase this quote-to-bind ratio over time. Q: What is the rollout plan for the new earthquake product? A: CEO Trevor Burgess outlined a multi-step launch. It began in beta in California via the agent portal. The next step, now underway, is cross-selling, where an earthquake quote is automatically shown when an agent runs a flood quote. This will be followed by API availability for large partners and then a direct-to-consumer portal. The product is expected to be fully launched by the end of the year. Q: How well-positioned is Neptune for a world with more price transparency driven by AI? A: CEO Trevor Burgess sees this as a tremendous opportunity. He believes AI will educate millions of Americans about their flood risk, expanding the market from 4 million to 25 million policies. Furthermore, he noted that 1.7 million NFIP policyholders could save money by switching to Neptune, and Neptune is the only one with the capacity to serve that potential demand. Q: Can you discuss the recent CFO transition and the reasons behind the timing? A: CEO Trevor Burgess explained that after 10 years, the company needs more senior-level help. Jim Steiner is transitioning to a full-time COO role to focus on automating operations with technology. The new CFO, Christian Milege, is a known quantity who previously worked with the team and has a deep understanding of Neptune as the former chair of its audit committee. Jim Steiner added he is comfortable handing over the reins. Q: What is driving the strong new business premium growth of 51% despite a weak housing market and no major hurricanes? A: President and Chief Risk Officer Matt Duffy attributed the growth to expanding the market by selling to homes that have never had flood insurance. He noted that the total addressable market is huge, with 25 million buildings at moderate to severe risk and a very low take-up rate today. The growth is coming from continued penetration into this large, underinsured market. Q: Can you provide an update on the commission income metric and the impact of renewing capacity programs? A: President and Chief Risk Officer Matt Duffy stated that capacity program renewals are spread throughout the year. He noted that a Q4 renewal will remove contingent commissions and include favorable increases in ceding commissions. He believes the current level is a good run rate for the near term, with potential for further upside as they continue to prove out the model with capacity partners. Q: What is the latest on the revenue retention rate, which has dipped from the low 90s to 89%? A: CEO Trevor Burgess explained the trade-off between price and volume. Because of strong underwriting results, Neptune hasn't needed to push prices much, which has helped new business growth. He noted that this approach means they may not push price as much at renewal, leading to small variations in the retention rate as they focus on the lifetime value of a customer. Q: How much did the Palomar agreement contribute to the strong Q3 revenue growth? A: President and Chief Risk Officer Matt Duffy clarified that Q3 revenue growth was 34%, and without the Palomar deal, it would have been 30%. He emphasized that the company is still growing very rapidly outside of that relationship and that it has been a successful use case for both parties. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-21Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. Q3 2026 Earnings Call Summary
Moby
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. Q3 2026 Earnings Call Summary
Our analysts just identified a stock with the potential to be the next Nvidia. Tell us how you invest and we'll show you why it's our #1 pick. Tap here. - Revenue growth of 34% was driven by the expansion of the distribution network and increased agent productivity rather than favorable external market conditions. - Management reported that premium in force grew 32% year-over-year while maintaining exceptional profitability, achieving a Rule of 40 score of 94., where technology allows the firm to scale revenue significantly faster than headcount. - The Atlas+ AI platform has become a critical sales catalyst, with quotes involving the tool binding at 3.5 times the rate of those without AI interaction. - Operational leverage is being realized through extreme automation, evidenced by a 50% year-over-year productivity improvement in the service organization to one representative per 30,000 policies. - Strategic positioning focuses on closing the 'protection gap,' targeting the 21 million high-risk U.S. properties that currently lack flood insurance coverage. - Capacity relationships have strengthened, with recent renewals occurring on improved terms and the elimination of contingent commissions across all active programs. - Initial 2027 revenue guidance of approximately $238 million assumes no recovery in the housing market and a standard hurricane season, reflecting a conservative baseline. - Management expects Adjusted EBITDA margins to remain stable at approximately 61%, balancing high profitability with continued platform investment. - The formal launch of an indemnity earthquake product in Q4 2026 represents a strategic move to apply Neptune's AI-native underwriting to adjacent climate-related perils. - Future margin expansion is expected to be driven by a gradual shift toward direct-to-consumer AI-assisted transactions, which could significantly lower the current 13% annual distribution commission costs. - The company maintains a low Total Net Leverage Ratio of 1.7 times to preserve flexibility for opportunistic share repurchases or strategic M&A that meets strict organic growth hurdles. - A leadership transition is underway where Audit Committee Chair Cristián Melej will join the company in January and succeed Jim Steiner as CFO following the filing of the 10-K., while Steiner remains as COO and Board Member. - Management identified a $2.6 billion annual…Read full documentShow less
Our analysts just identified a stock with the potential to be the next Nvidia. Tell us how you invest and we'll show you why it's our #1 pick. Tap here. - Revenue growth of 34% was driven by the expansion of the distribution network and increased agent productivity rather than favorable external market conditions. - Management reported that premium in force grew 32% year-over-year while maintaining exceptional profitability, achieving a Rule of 40 score of 94., where technology allows the firm to scale revenue significantly faster than headcount. - The Atlas+ AI platform has become a critical sales catalyst, with quotes involving the tool binding at 3.5 times the rate of those without AI interaction. - Operational leverage is being realized through extreme automation, evidenced by a 50% year-over-year productivity improvement in the service organization to one representative per 30,000 policies. - Strategic positioning focuses on closing the 'protection gap,' targeting the 21 million high-risk U.S. properties that currently lack flood insurance coverage. - Capacity relationships have strengthened, with recent renewals occurring on improved terms and the elimination of contingent commissions across all active programs. - Initial 2027 revenue guidance of approximately $238 million assumes no recovery in the housing market and a standard hurricane season, reflecting a conservative baseline. - Management expects Adjusted EBITDA margins to remain stable at approximately 61%, balancing high profitability with continued platform investment. - The formal launch of an indemnity earthquake product in Q4 2026 represents a strategic move to apply Neptune's AI-native underwriting to adjacent climate-related perils. - Future margin expansion is expected to be driven by a gradual shift toward direct-to-consumer AI-assisted transactions, which could significantly lower the current 13% annual distribution commission costs. - The company maintains a low Total Net Leverage Ratio of 1.7 times to preserve flexibility for opportunistic share repurchases or strategic M&A that meets strict organic growth hurdles. - A leadership transition is underway where Audit Committee Chair Cristián Melej will join the company in January and succeed Jim Steiner as CFO following the filing of the 10-K., while Steiner remains as COO and Board Member. - Management identified a $2.6 billion annual subsidy 'burn off' within the NFIP as a long-term tailwind for private market adoption as government policies reach full risk pricing. - The housing market remains a headwind, yet the company has demonstrated the ability to grow premium in force by 32% despite slow turnover and a lack of major weather-driven demand events. - A one-time cash outflow of $14.2 million for employee tax withholding related to RSU vesting will impact Q4 cash flow but avoided further shareholder dilution. One stock. Nvidia-level potential. 30M+ investors trust Moby to find it first. Get the pick. Tap here. - Management noted that while the transition will be slow, shifting toward AI-driven direct sales could replace the current 13% annual agent commission with a lower one-time fee. - The largest expense category for the company would 'dramatically fall' if consumers move toward AI agents like ChatGPT or Muse for insurance fulfillment. - The 12-month revenue retention rate of 89% reflects a strategic trade-off where management prioritized volume and new business growth over aggressive price increases. - The company is 'tinkering' with pricing based on risk data to maximize the lifetime value of customers while maintaining a competitive edge against the NFIP. - Management argues that competitors using simple APIs often lack the sophisticated underwriting models built on Neptune's 40 million historical quotes and claims data. - Large distributors are reportedly consolidating their offerings, favoring Neptune's scale and 50-state capability over smaller private flood providers. - The move is intended to broaden the senior leadership base as the company scales, allowing Jim Steiner to focus exclusively on operational automation as COO. - The incoming CFO is a 'known quantity' who previously worked with the executive team at C1 Bank and already understands Neptune's financials via his board role.
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-20Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) Q3 Earnings: How Key Metrics Compare to Wall Street Estimates
Zacks
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) Q3 Earnings: How Key Metrics Compare to Wall Street Estimates
For the quarter ended September 2026, Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) reported revenue of $59.57 million, up 34.3% over the same period last year. EPS came in at $0.17, compared to $0.11 in the year-ago quarter. The reported revenue compares to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $54.97 million, representing a surprise of +8.37%. The company delivered an EPS surprise of +6.25%, with the consensus EPS estimate being $0.16. While investors closely watch year-over-year changes in headline numbers -- revenue and earnings -- and how they compare to Wall Street expectations to determine their next course of action, some key metrics always provide a better insight into a company's underlying performance. As these metrics influence top- and bottom-line performance, comparing them to the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated helps investors project a stock's price performance more accurately. Here is how Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts: - Average number of employees: 60.8 thousand versus the three-analyst average estimate of 66 thousand. - Revenue per employee: $3.24 billion versus $2.92 billion estimated by three analysts on average. - Revenue- Fee income: $13.65 million versus $12.79 million estimated by four analysts on average. - Revenue- Commission income: $45.91 million compared to the $41.93 million average estimate based on four analysts. View all Key Company Metrics for Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. here>>> Shares of Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. have returned +2.3% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +0.7% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), indicating that it could outperform the broader market in the near term. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-20Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) Q3 Earnings and Revenues Surpass Estimates
Zacks
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) Q3 Earnings and Revenues Surpass Estimates
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.17 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.16 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.11 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +6.25%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this company would post earnings of $0.14 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.15, delivering a surprise of +7.14%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates three times. Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc., which belongs to the Zacks Insurance - Multi line industry, posted revenues of $59.57 million for the quarter ended September 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 8.37%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $44.37 million. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates four times over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. shares have added about 0.5% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 12.4%. While Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. has underperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. was favorable. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to outperform th…Read full documentShow less
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.17 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.16 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.11 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +6.25%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this company would post earnings of $0.14 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.15, delivering a surprise of +7.14%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates three times. Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc., which belongs to the Zacks Insurance - Multi line industry, posted revenues of $59.57 million for the quarter ended September 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 8.37%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $44.37 million. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates four times over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. shares have added about 0.5% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 12.4%. While Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. has underperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. was favorable. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to outperform the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $0.15 on $52.5 million in revenues for the coming quarter and $0.54 on $201.15 million in revenues for the current fiscal year. Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Insurance - Multi line is currently in the bottom 35% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1. One other stock from the same industry, Enact Holdings, Inc. (ACT), is yet to report results for the quarter ended September 2026. The results are expected to be released on November 4. This company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $1.22 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +8.9%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s revenues are expected to be $317.86 million, up 1.1% from the year-ago quarter. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) : Free Stock Analysis Report Enact Holdings, Inc. (ACT) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-20Update: Neptune Insurance Q3 Adjusted Earnings, Revenue Rise; CFO to Step Down
MT Newswires
Update: Neptune Insurance Q3 Adjusted Earnings, Revenue Rise; CFO to Step Down
(Updates with CFO change in the headline and final three paragraphs.) Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) reported Q3 adjusted earnings late Tuesday of $0.17 per diluted share, up from $0.11 a year earlier. Analysts polled by FactSet expected $0.16. Revenue in the three months ended Sept. 30 rose to $59.6 million from $44.4 million a year earlier. Analysts expected $56.6 million. Neptune said in a regulatory filing that Jim Steiner will step down as chief financial officer following the filing of the company's annual report for the year ending Dec. 31. Steiner will remain chief operating officer of the Neptune Flood subsidiary and a member of Neptune's board. Cristian Melej, 49, will succeed Steiner as CFO. He has served as CFO of Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) since 2016 and has been a Neptune board member since April 2025.
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-20Neptune Insurance Q3 Adjusted Earnings, Revenue Rise
MT Newswires
Neptune Insurance Q3 Adjusted Earnings, Revenue Rise
Neptune Insurance (NP) reported Q3 adjusted earnings late Tuesday of $0.17 per diluted share, up from $0.11 a year earlier. Analysts polled by FactSet expected $0.16. Revenue for the three months ended Sept. 30 was $59.6 million, up from $44.4 million a year earlier. Analysts expected $56.6 million.
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-20Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2026 Results
Business Wire
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2026 Results
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla., October 20, 2026--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (the "Company") (NYSE: NP), the parent company of Neptune Flood Incorporated, has released its financial results for the third quarter of 2026 by posting an update on its Investor Relations website. The earnings presentation can be viewed by clicking here or visiting investors.neptuneflood.com. Third Quarter 2026 Highlights - Revenue growth of 34% to a record $59.6 million - Net income increase of 50% to a record $17.3 million - Net income margin of 29% - Adjusted net income* growth of 52% to a record $24.3 million - Adjusted EBITDA* growth of 38% to a record $36.8 million - Adjusted EBITDA margin of 62%, matching our record high to date - Written Premium* growth of 31% to a record $132.7 million - Record new business sales Third Quarter 2026 per share of Class A and Class B common stock | | Basic | | Diluted Net income | | $ | 0.13 | | | $ | 0.12 | Adjusted net income* | | $ | 0.18 | | | $ | 0.17 | Adjusted EBITDA* | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.25 | * See discussion of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Key Performance Indicators below Neptune management will host a live conference call and webcast at 5:00 PM ET on Tuesday, October 20th. When: Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Time: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time Dial-in Number: (800) 715-9871 or (646) 307-1963 (international) Q3 2026 Earnings Presentation: View here Webcast: View here Investor Relations: View here The webcast will be archived on the Company's website following the call. Effectiveness of Information The targets included in our earnings presentation and the statements made during the earnings conference call, each of which is available on the Company's investor relations website at investors.neptuneflood.com (collectively, the "Earnings Materials"), represent the Company's expectations and beliefs as of October 20, 2026. Although these Earnings Materials will remain available on the Company's website through the date of the earnings call for the third quarter of fiscal 2027, their continued availability does not mean that the Company is reaffirming or confirming their continued validity. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future events, or to otherwise update the targets given in the Earnings Materials, except as required by l…Read full documentShow less
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla., October 20, 2026--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (the "Company") (NYSE: NP), the parent company of Neptune Flood Incorporated, has released its financial results for the third quarter of 2026 by posting an update on its Investor Relations website. The earnings presentation can be viewed by clicking here or visiting investors.neptuneflood.com. Third Quarter 2026 Highlights - Revenue growth of 34% to a record $59.6 million - Net income increase of 50% to a record $17.3 million - Net income margin of 29% - Adjusted net income* growth of 52% to a record $24.3 million - Adjusted EBITDA* growth of 38% to a record $36.8 million - Adjusted EBITDA margin of 62%, matching our record high to date - Written Premium* growth of 31% to a record $132.7 million - Record new business sales Third Quarter 2026 per share of Class A and Class B common stock | | Basic | | Diluted Net income | | $ | 0.13 | | | $ | 0.12 | Adjusted net income* | | $ | 0.18 | | | $ | 0.17 | Adjusted EBITDA* | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.25 | * See discussion of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Key Performance Indicators below Neptune management will host a live conference call and webcast at 5:00 PM ET on Tuesday, October 20th. When: Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Time: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time Dial-in Number: (800) 715-9871 or (646) 307-1963 (international) Q3 2026 Earnings Presentation: View here Webcast: View here Investor Relations: View here The webcast will be archived on the Company's website following the call. Effectiveness of Information The targets included in our earnings presentation and the statements made during the earnings conference call, each of which is available on the Company's investor relations website at investors.neptuneflood.com (collectively, the "Earnings Materials"), represent the Company's expectations and beliefs as of October 20, 2026. Although these Earnings Materials will remain available on the Company's website through the date of the earnings call for the third quarter of fiscal 2027, their continued availability does not mean that the Company is reaffirming or confirming their continued validity. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future events, or to otherwise update the targets given in the Earnings Materials, except as required by law. About Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NYSE: NP) is the parent company of Neptune Flood Incorporated ("Neptune"). Neptune is a leading, AI-native managing general agent offering a range of easy-to-purchase residential and commercial insurance products, including primary and excess flood insurance, distributed through a nationwide network of agencies. Leveraging proprietary artificial intelligence and advanced data science, Neptune delivers fast and accessible coverage for residential and commercial properties across the United States. The Company operates without human underwriters, using Triton®, its cutting-edge platform to streamline underwriting, pricing, and policy issuance. Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Key Performance Indicators To supplement our condensed consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP), we use the following non-GAAP financial measures: Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA margin, Adjusted EBITDA per share (basic and diluted), Adjusted net income, Adjusted earnings per share (basic and diluted), organic revenue and organic revenue growth. The presentation of these financial measures is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. Investors are cautioned that there are material limitations associated with the use of non-GAAP financial measures as an analytical tool. In addition, these measures may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies, limiting their usefulness for comparison purposes. We compensate for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from these non-GAAP financial measures. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide investors with useful supplemental information about the financial performance of our business, enable comparison of financial results between periods where certain items may vary independent of business performance, and allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in operating our business. See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below and "Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in our earnings presentation for a reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures. Adjusted EBITDA is net income (the most directly comparable GAAP measure) adjusted to exclude interest expense (net of interest income), income taxes, depreciation, and amortization, and further adjusted for share-based compensation, employer payroll taxes on equity awards and other non-recurring items. Employer payroll taxes on equity awards are cash expenses; we exclude them because their amount and timing depend on our stock price at vesting or exercise and are not driven by our operating performance. By removing these expenses, we believe Adjusted EBITDA provides a clearer representation of operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA margin is a non-GAAP financial measure derived from Adjusted EBITDA divided by revenue. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA margin is a useful measurement of operating profitability for the same reasons we find Adjusted EBITDA useful and also because it provides a period-to-period comparison of our operating performance. Adjusted net income is a non-GAAP financial measure derived from net income (the most directly comparable GAAP measure), adjusted to exclude loss on extinguishment of debt, amortization expense, share-based compensation, employer payroll taxes on equity awards, corporate transaction related expenses, and other one-time expenses, and the related tax effect of those adjustments. By removing these expenses, we believe Adjusted net income provides a clearer representation of operating performance. Adjusted earnings per share (basic and diluted) is Adjusted net income divided by the basic and diluted weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding for the period, respectively, in each case assuming the full conversion of all outstanding Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock into an equivalent number of shares of common stock, which occurred upon the consummation of our IPO in 2025. By implementing the conversion of the redeemable convertible preferred stock, we believe Adjusted earnings (basic and diluted) per share provides a clearer representation of operating performance. The most directly comparable GAAP measures are basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share, respectively. Adjusted EBITDA (Basic and Diluted) per Share is Adjusted EBITDA divided by the basic and diluted weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding for the period, respectively, in each case assuming the full conversion of all outstanding Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock into an equivalent number of shares of common stock, which occurred upon the consummation of our IPO in 2025. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA per share (basic and diluted) is a useful measurement for the same reasons we find Adjusted EBITDA useful and also because, by implementing the conversion of the Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock for periods prior to our IPO, we believe Adjusted EBITDA per share (basic and diluted) provides a clearer representation of operating performance on a per-share and period-over-period basis. The most directly comparable GAAP measures are basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share, respectively. Additionally, we discuss certain key performance indicators, described below, which provide useful information about the Company's business and the operational factors underlying the Company's financial performance. Written Premium is the total premium we placed with insurance programs during a reporting period, less "return premiums" refunded to policyholders due to cancellations, endorsement of policies, or otherwise. We believe written premium is an appropriate measure of operating performance because it is the primary driver of our commission revenue. Revenue per Employee is revenue for the trailing four quarters, determined in accordance with GAAP, divided by the average number of employees during the trailing four quarters. We monitor this as a metric of scaling growth and believe it to be a leading indicator of sustained profitability and efficiency. Adjusted EBITDA per employee is Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP metric, for the trailing four quarters divided by the average number of employees during the trailing four quarters. We monitor this as a metric of scaling growth and believe it to be a leading indicator of sustained profitability and efficiency. For further discussion on our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA, see "Adjusted EBITDA" above. Policy Retention Rate is the percentage of our policyholders who receive renewal offers and who accept the offered renewal term. We monitor the acceptance of renewal offers as an early indicator of price elasticity. Premium Retention Rate is the premium associated with those accepted renewal offers, as a percentage of the total premium from expiring policies for which renewal offers were made. Revenue Retention Rate is the percentage of revenue recognized on policies in a given period that is recognized under the renewal terms of those same policies in the subsequent period. We monitor this metric as a comprehensive indicator of renewal performance and the long-term stability of our revenue base, as it reflects the combined effect of policy retention, premium changes, and policy fee income. Organic revenue and organic revenue growth: We define organic revenue as total revenue determined in accordance with GAAP, adjusted to remove the impact of any acquisitions or divestitures. We define organic revenue growth as the year-over-year growth in our organic revenue. However, as of the date of this press release and our earnings presentation and for the relevant periods presented herein and therein, we have not completed any relevant acquisitions or divestitures, therefore our organic revenue and organic revenue growth reflect our total revenue and total revenue growth, respectively, as determined in accordance with GAAP. Organic revenue and organic revenue growth are also non-GAAP financial measures which are commonly reported by others in the insurance industry. We use "organic revenue" and "organic revenue growth" in this press release and our earnings presentation to facilitate investors' understanding of our operating performance and comparison with our peers. Safe Harbor Statement This press release, our earnings presentation, and the earnings conference call contain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements, other than statements of historical fact included in this release, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance, and business. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as "may," "might," "will," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "outlook," "predicts," "potential," or "continue," the negative of these terms, and other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions about us, include, among others, projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth and business strategies, anticipated trends in our business, capital allocation plans, technology initiatives, and other future events or developments. These statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and projections about future events. There are important factors that could cause our actual results, level of activity, performance, or achievements to differ materially from the results, level of activity, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including those factors discussed under the captions entitled "Risk Factors" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2026, once filed, and the other documents that the Company files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which are available free of charge on the SEC's website at: www.sec.gov and on Neptune's investor relations website at investors.neptuneflood.com. Although we believe the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, level of activity, performance, or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of any of these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise, except as may be required by law. NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin Below is a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (the most directly comparable GAAP measure), as well as our Adjusted EBITDA margin to net income margin (the most directly comparable GAAP measure), for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and for the twelve months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively: | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | (In thousands) | | | 2026 | | | | 2025 | | | Change %/pp | | | 2026 | | | | 2025 | | | Change %/pp Total revenues | | $ | 59,567 | | | $ | 44,365 | | | 34.3 | % | | $ | 153,234 | | | $ | 115,784 | | | 32.3 | % Net income | | | 17,256 | | | | 11,511 | | | 49.9 | % | | | 40,401 | | | | 33,070 | | | 22.2 | % Interest expense (net of interest income) | | | 3,250 | | | | 5,237 | | | (37.9 | %) | | | 9,981 | | | | 13,090 | | | (23.8 | %) Income tax expense | | | 7,459 | | | | 3,952 | | | 88.7 | % | | | 17,575 | | | | 11,457 | | | 53.4 | % Amortization expense | | | 992 | | | | 948 | | | 4.6 | % | | | 3,013 | | | | 2,734 | | | 10.2 | % Share-based compensation | | | 7,009 | | | | 111 | | | NM | | | | 20,832 | | | | 299 | | | NM | Employer payroll taxes on equity awards | | | 622 | | | | — | | | NM | | | | 667 | | | | — | | | NM | Corporate transaction related expenses | | | 172 | | | | 4,966 | | | NM | | | | 239 | | | | 8,440 | | | NM | One-time expenses | | | — | | | | — | | | NM | | | | 74 | | | | — | | | NM | Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 36,760 | | | $ | 26,725 | | | 37.5 | % | | $ | 92,782 | | | $ | 69,090 | | | 34.3 | % Net income margin(1) | | | 29.0 | % | | | 25.9 | % | | 3.1 | | | | 26.4 | % | | | 28.6 | % | | (2.2 | ) Adjusted EBITDA margin(1) | | | 61.7 | % | | | 60.2 | % | | 1.5 | | | | 60.5 | % | | | 59.7 | % | | 0.8 | | | Twelve Months EndedSeptember 30, | | (In thousands) | | | 2026 | | | | 2025 | | | Change %/pp Total revenues | | $ | 197,001 | | | $ | 147,287 | | | 33.8 | % Net income | | | 44,743 | | | | 44,682 | | | 0.1 | % Interest expense (net of interest income) | | | 14,210 | | | | 16,006 | | | (11.2 | )% Income tax expense | | | 22,341 | | | | 15,319 | | | 45.8 | % Amortization expense | | | 3,992 | | | | 3,554 | | | 12.3 | % Share-based compensation | | | 31,954 | | | | 378 | | | NM | Employer payroll taxes on equity awards | | | 667 | | | | — | | | NM | Corporate transaction related expenses | | | 711 | | | | 8,440 | | | NM | One-time expenses | | | 74 | | | | — | | | NM | Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 118,692 | | | $ | 88,379 | | | 34.3 | % Net income margin(1) | | | 22.7 | % | | | 30.3 | % | | (7.6 | ) Adjusted EBITDA margin(1) | | | 60.2 | % | | | 60.0 | % | | 0.2 | NM - not meaningful (1) Year-over-year changes in percentages are reported in percentage points (pp). | | Twelve Months EndedSeptember 30, | | Change (In thousands) | | | 2026 | | | | 2025 | | | Amount | | Percentage Average number of employees | | | 60.8 | | | | 58.0 | | | | 2.8 | | | 4.8 | % Total revenues | | $ | 197,001 | | | $ | 147,287 | | | $ | 49,714 | | | 33.8 | % Revenue per employee | | $ | 3,242 | | | $ | 2,539 | | | $ | 703 | | | 27.7 | % Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 118,692 | | | $ | 88,379 | | | $ | 30,313 | | | 34.3 | % Adjusted EBITDA per employee | | $ | 1,953 | | | $ | 1,524 | | | $ | 429 | | | 28.2 | % Adjusted EBITDA (Basic and Diluted) per Share The table below presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (the most directly comparable GAAP measure), as well as our Adjusted EBITDA per share (basic and diluted) to basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share of common stock, respectively (the most directly comparable GAAP measures), for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively: | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, (In thousands, except share and per share data) | | | 2026 | | | | 2025 | | | Change % | | | 2026 | | | | 2025 | | | Change % | | | | | | | | | | | | Net income | | | 17,256 | | | | 11,511 | | | 49.9 | % | | | 40,401 | | | | 33,070 | | | 22.2 | % Interest expense (net of interest income) | | | 3,250 | | | | 5,237 | | | | | | 9,981 | | | | 13,090 | | | Income tax expense | | | 7,459 | | | | 3,952 | | | | | | 17,575 | | | | 11,457 | | | Amortization expense | | | 992 | | | | 948 | | | | | | 3,013 | | | | 2,734 | | | Share-based compensation | | | 7,009 | | | | 111 | | | | | | 20,832 | | | | 299 | | | Employer payroll taxes on equity awards | | | 622 | | | | — | | | | | | 667 | | | | — | | | Corporate transaction related expenses | | | 172 | | | | 4,966 | | | | | | 239 | | | | 8,440 | | | One-time expenses | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | 74 | | | | — | | | Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 36,760 | | | $ | 26,725 | | | 37.5 | % | | $ | 92,782 | | | $ | 69,090 | | | 34.3 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | Weighted average Common Stock outstanding – Basic | | | 137,272,630 | | | | 93,350,000 | | | | | | 137,768,674 | | | | 93,350,000 | | | Plus: Impact of conversion of redeemable, convertible preferred stock(1) | | | — | | | | 41,850,000 | | | | | | — | | | | 41,850,000 | | | Adjusted Weighted average Common Stock outstanding – Basic | | | 137,272,630 | | | | 135,200,000 | | | | | | 137,768,674 | | | | 135,200,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Basic earnings (loss) per share | | $ | 0.13 | | | $ | 0.06 | | | | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | (0.34 | ) | | Effect of conversion of redeemable, convertible preferred stock and net loss attributable to preferred stock holders(2) | | | — | | | | 0.06 | | | | | | — | | | | 0.68 | | | Other adjustments to earnings (loss) per share(3) | | | 0.14 | | | | 0.08 | | | | | | 0.38 | | | | 0.17 | | | Adjusted basic EBITDA per share(4) | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.20 | | | | | $ | 0.67 | | | $ | 0.51 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Weighted average Common Stock outstanding – Diluted | | | 146,390,991 | | | | 97,262,548 | | | | | | 146,110,446 | | | | 93,350,000 | | | Plus: Impact of dilutive stock options(5) | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | 2,409,232 | | | Plus: Impact of conversion of redeemable, convertible preferred stock(1) | | | — | | | | 41,850,000 | | | | | | — | | | | 41,850,000 | | | Adjusted weighted average Common Stock outstanding – Diluted | | | 146,390,991 | | | | 139,112,548 | | | | | | 146,110,446 | | | | 137,609,232 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Diluted earnings (loss) per share | | $ | 0.12 | | | $ | 0.06 | | | | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | (0.34 | ) | | Effect of conversion of redeemable, convertible preferred stock(2) | | | — | | | | 0.05 | | | | | | — | | | | 0.66 | | | Other adjustments to earnings (loss) per share(3) | | | 0.13 | | | | 0.08 | | | | | | 0.36 | | | | 0.18 | | | Adjusted diluted EBITDA per share(4) | | $ | 0.25 | | | $ | 0.19 | | | | | $ | 0.64 | | | $ | 0.50 | | | (1) | Assumes the conversion of all 41,850,000 shares of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock into an equivalent number of shares of common stock. (2) | Pursuant to the completion of the Company's IPO on October 2, 2025, the redeemable, convertible preferred stock was no longer outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026. For comparability purposes, this calculation reflects net income that would be distributable to holders of common stock, assuming all redeemable preferred shares had been converted and no longer impacted the numerator. For the three months ended September 30, 2025, this includes $3.6 million of accretion adjustments and $2.5 million of allocations to participating preferred stock. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, this includes $54.2 million of cash dividends paid on redeemable preferred stock and $10.4 million of accretion adjustments, totaling $64.6 million. These adjustments were divided by 93,350,000 shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 to calculate the Adjusted EBITDA per share (basic and diluted) amounts. (3) | Other adjustments to earnings (loss) per share represent interest expense (net of interest income), income tax expense, amortization expense, share-based compensation, employer payroll taxes on equity awards, corporate transaction related expenses, and one-time expenses. (4) | Adjusted EBITDA per share (basic and diluted) is calculated as Adjusted EBITDA divided by the applicable adjusted weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding. Individual per-share components above may not sum exactly to the total due to rounding. (5) | Represents the impact of 2,409,232 stock options that were not included in the GAAP diluted weighted-average common stock outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, but are included for purposes of Adjusted diluted EBITDA per share. Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings (Basic and Diluted) Per Share The table below presents a reconciliation of Adjusted net income to net income (the most directly comparable GAAP measure), as well as our Adjusted earnings (basic and diluted) per share to basic earnings and diluted earnings per share of common stock, respectively (the most directly comparable GAAP measures), for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively: | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, (In thousands, except share and per share data) | | | 2026 | | | | 2025 | | | Change % | | | 2026 | | | | 2025 | | | Change % | | | | | | | | | | | | Net income | | | 17,256 | | | | 11,511 | | | 49.9 | % | | | 40,401 | | | | 33,070 | | | 22.2 | % Income tax expense | | | 7,459 | | | | 3,952 | | | | | | 17,575 | | | | 11,457 | | | Amortization expense | | | 992 | | | | 948 | | | | | | 3,013 | | | | 2,734 | | | Share-based compensation | | | 7,009 | | | | 111 | | | | | | 20,832 | | | | 299 | | | Employer payroll taxes on equity awards | | | 622 | | | | — | | | | | | 667 | | | | — | | | Corporate transaction related expenses | | | 172 | | | | 4,966 | | | | | | 239 | | | | 8,440 | | | One-time expenses | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | 74 | | | | — | | | Adjusted income before income tax expense | | $ | 33,510 | | | $ | 21,488 | | | 55.9 | % | | $ | 82,801 | | | $ | 56,000 | | | 47.9 | % Adjusted income taxes (1) | | $ | (9,234 | ) | | $ | (5,492 | ) | | | | $ | (22,511 | ) | | $ | (14,392 | ) | | Adjusted net income | | $ | 24,276 | | | $ | 15,996 | | | 51.8 | % | | $ | 60,290 | | | $ | 41,608 | | | 44.9 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | Weighted average Common Stock outstanding – Basic | | | 137,272,630 | | | | 93,350,000 | | | | | | 137,768,674 | | | | 93,350,000 | | | Plus: Impact of conversion of redeemable, convertible preferred stock(2) | | | — | | | | 41,850,000 | | | | | | — | | | | 41,850,000 | | | Adjusted Weighted average Common Stock outstanding – Basic | | | 137,272,630 | | | | 135,200,000 | | | | | | 137,768,674 | | | | 135,200,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Basic earnings (loss) per share | | $ | 0.13 | | | $ | 0.06 | | | | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | (0.34 | ) | | Effect of conversion of redeemable, convertible preferred stock and net loss attributable to preferred stock holders(3) | | | — | | | | 0.06 | | | | | | — | | | | 0.68 | | | Other adjustments to earnings (loss) per share(4) | | | 0.12 | | | | 0.04 | | | | | | 0.31 | | | | 0.08 | | | Adjusted income taxes per share | | | (0.07 | ) | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | | (0.16 | ) | | | (0.11 | ) | | Adjusted basic earnings per share(5) | | $ | 0.18 | | | $ | 0.12 | | | | | $ | 0.44 | | | $ | 0.31 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Weighted average Common Stock outstanding – Diluted | | | 146,390,991 | | | | 97,262,548 | | | | | | 146,110,446 | | | | 93,350,000 | | | Plus: Impact of dilutive stock options(6) | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | 2,409,232 | | | Plus: Impact of conversion of redeemable, convertible preferred stock(2) | | | — | | | | 41,850,000 | | | | | | — | | | | 41,850,000 | | | Adjusted weighted average Common Stock outstanding – Diluted | | | 146,390,991 | | | | 139,112,548 | | | | | | 146,110,446 | | | | 137,609,232 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Diluted earnings (loss) per share | | $ | 0.12 | | | $ | 0.06 | | | | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | (0.34 | ) | | Effect of conversion of redeemable, convertible preferred stock(3) | | | — | | | | 0.05 | | | | | | — | | | | 0.66 | | | Other adjustments to earnings (loss) per share(4) | | | 0.11 | | | | 0.04 | | | | | | 0.28 | | | | 0.08 | | | Adjusted income taxes per share | | | (0.06 | ) | | | (0.04 | ) | | | | | (0.15 | ) | | | (0.10 | ) | | Adjusted diluted earnings per share(5) | | $ | 0.17 | | | $ | 0.11 | | | | | $ | 0.41 | | | $ | 0.30 | | | (1) | This represents the tax impact using effective tax rates of 27.6% and 25.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and 27.2% and 25.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. These tax rates exclude items that are non-deductible, non-taxable or subject to a specific tax treatment. (2) | Assumes the conversion of all 41,850,000 shares of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock into an equivalent number of shares of common stock. (3) | Pursuant to the completion of the Company's IPO on October 2, 2025, the redeemable, convertible preferred stock was no longer outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026. For comparability purposes, this calculation reflects net income that would be distributable to holders of common stock, assuming all redeemable preferred shares had been converted and no longer impacted the numerator. For the three months ended September 30, 2025, this includes $3.6 million of accretion adjustments and $2.5 million of allocations to participating preferred stock. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, this includes $54.2 million of cash dividends paid on redeemable preferred stock and $10.4 million of accretion adjustments, totaling $64.6 million. These adjustments were divided by 93,350,000 shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 to calculate the Adjusted earnings (basic and diluted) per share amounts. (4) | Other adjustments to earnings (loss) represent income tax expense, amortization expense, share-based compensation, employer payroll taxes on equity awards, corporate transaction related expenses, and one-time expenses. (5) | Adjusted earnings per share is calculated as Adjusted net income divided by the applicable weighted average shares outstanding. Individual per-share components above may not sum exactly to the total due to rounding. (6) | Represents the impact of 2,409,232 stock options that were not included in the GAAP diluted weighted-average common stock outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, but are included for purposes of Adjusted diluted earnings per share. View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20261020665647/en/ Contacts Press Contact [email protected] Investor Relations Contact [email protected]
TranscriptFY2026 Q32026-10-20FY2026 Q3 earnings call transcript
Earnings source - 121 paragraphs
FY2026 Q3 earnings call transcript
I will now hand the call over to Jon Carlon, Director of Corporate Development. Please go ahead.
Thank you, and good afternoon. With me here today is Trevor Burgess, Chairman and CEO, Matt Duffy, President and Chief Risk Officer, and Jim Steiner, CFO and COO. Before we begin, I'd like to remind everyone that today's discussion will include forward-looking statements, including, among others, statements about our expectations for our future financial performance, growth opportunities, business strategy, market trends, and capital allocation plans. These statements are based on our current views and assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. We direct you to our recent SEC filings for a full description of these risks. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law. We will also reference certain non-GAAP financial measures.
These measures should be considered only as supplements to their comparable GAAP measures. Additional information, including reconciliations of the non-GAAP measures to their most comparable GAAP measures, can be found in our earnings release at investors.neptuneflood.com and in our current report on Form 8-K that was publicly filed with the SEC on October 20th, 2026. Now, I'd like to turn the call over to Matt.
Thanks, Jon. It's been a remarkable year for Neptune, and as we mark the first anniversary of our IPO, I want to spend some time today discussing not just the results we're delivering, but what's driving them and what they tell us about the future of the business. One of the things I've come to appreciate about Neptune is that the real strength of our business isn't in any one product, technology, or distribution relationship. It's how those elements work together. Our technology allows us to make better underwriting decisions and create better experiences for our distribution partners. That attracts more agents, more business, more capacity, and helps us close the protection gap. As the business grows, we gain greater insight, improve our technology, and become more efficient. Each of those advantages reinforces the others.
What's particularly exciting today is that we're seeing the benefits of that model become increasingly apparent in our financial and operating results. We're growing revenue substantially faster than our team size. We're making our distribution partners more productive. We're attracting greater demand from risk-taking partners, and we're doing all of that at a time when the broader environment hasn't been helpful. That's important because we're not building a business that depends on favorable market conditions to succeed. The fact that it's a soft insurance market and a slow housing market hasn't impeded our ability to execute or grow. We're building a business with the capabilities to consistently take share, expand the market, and compound our advantages over time.
I want to walk through the evidence of that today, including what we're seeing from our investments in AI, the evolution of our distribution network, the strength of our capacity relationships, and the opportunities we see ahead. First, let me turn to our third quarter results. The third quarter was another record for Neptune. Revenue grew 34% year-over-year to $59.6 million. Adjusted EBITDA grew 38% to $36.8 million. That's a 62% margin, an improvement of 147 basis points from a year ago. Premium in force reached $450 million, up 32%, and we now have more than 336,000 policies in force, up 29%. October 1st marked the anniversary of our first day of trading on the New York Stock Exchange, and it's worth reflecting on how far we've come in that short period.
Our trailing 12-month revenue is now 44% higher than at June 30th, 2025, the figure reported in our S-1. We've achieved that growth while maintaining exceptional profitability with a Rule of 40 of 94, and the growth is broad-based. It's coming from the expansion of our distribution network, increase in productivity among our existing agents, and the continued development of our products and technology. As we get into operations, let me start with distribution, because I know the impact of AI on insurance purchasing is top of mind for many investors. Our view is straightforward. Greater price transparency and easier access to insurance are opportunities for Neptune, not threats. There are more than 100 million buildings in the United States, and approximately 25 million face meaningful flood risk. Yet there are only around 4 million flood insurance policies. The biggest obstacle to selling flood insurance isn't price discovery.
It's that millions of property owners don't know they need it or mistakenly believe they're already covered. AI has the potential to change that by helping consumers understand their exposure and identify coverage gaps, and Neptune is exceptionally well positioned to serve that demand. Whether a consumer purchases through an insurance agent, directly through neptuneflood.com, or eventually through a personal AI assistant, our technology can support the transaction. In the near term, we expect AI to make our existing distribution partners substantially more productive. Over time, as more consumers transact directly, there's also an opportunity to lower our distribution costs, which today represent our largest expense. We're already seeing tangible evidence of the opportunity through Atlas+.
During the third quarter, 7,000 agents used Atlas+, exchanging more than 75,000 messages with the platform. Perhaps most importantly, quotes involving Atlas+ are binding at 3.5 times the rate of quotes without an Atlas+ interaction. That is a powerful indication of the value we're delivering. Let me give you an example of what that looks like in practice. We recently held a call with a large group of insurance agents, and during the discussion, one agent told us they'd just sold their first-ever flood insurance policy. They'd come to Neptune, run a quote, and started a conversation with Atlas+. The tool gave them a sales script, helped them understand the property's flood exposure, and provided the backgrounds they needed to explain the coverage to the customer. They told us that conversation gave them the confidence to present the policy and ultimately close the sale.
I love that story because it gets to the heart of what we're trying to accomplish. There are tens of thousands of insurance agents across the country who have customers exposed to flood risk but who don't routinely sell flood insurance. Often it's because they don't have the expertise or confidence to have that conversation, and Atlas+ changes that. It puts flood insurance expertise in the hands of every agent, regardless of their experience. We recently heard from Garrett Mitchell with Rocket Flood, a HUB International company, who said, and I quote, "Atlas+ is making a real difference in our business. The chatbot on Neptune's quote page is like having an underwriter alongside us through the entire sales process.
With the new Atlas+ cards, in just three weeks, we've bound dozens of endorsements and renewals, generating tens of thousands of dollars of premium." Garrett's comments show that we're not simply making our partners more efficient. We're also helping drive demand for those partners so they can grow their business. More than 65,000 insurance professionals have now created verified Neptune accounts, and over 43,000 of them were active during the quarter, compared to 39,000 in Q2. We're not just adding distribution partners. We're making each relationship more productive and giving agents more reasons to do business with Neptune. The same productivity gains are happening inside our organization. During Q3, our engineering team delivered 2.5 times the amount of work it delivered in the same quarter last year with broadly the same number of people.
Our service organization operated at an average of one human representative for every 30,000 policies in force, a 50% productivity improvement year-over-year, while improving response times and customer satisfaction. These are meaningful improvements, and they demonstrate how we're growing the capabilities of the business considerably faster than its headcount, all while continuing to invest in new products, technology, and underlying infrastructure. I've spent a considerable amount of time with capacity partners over the last several months, and the quality of those conversations reflects how far the business has come. These are sophisticated counterparties with their own models, their own views of risk, and many choices about where to deploy capital. They understand our portfolio, they monitor its performance, and increasingly, they want to participate in its growth.
During the quarter, we renewed another capacity program on improved terms. With that renewal, effective December 1st, none of our active capacity programs will include contingent commissions. When existing partners want to grow alongside Neptune and new partners want to access the business, that's meaningful external validation of what we've built. Let me turn to the external environment and the broader opportunity ahead. The housing market remains weak, and we've now gone through two consecutive years without a major hurricane creating a substantial demand event for flood insurance. Both of those factors have historically supported new business demand, and their absence has created a headwind. Despite that, our premium in force has grown at 32% year-over-year, and our new business premium during Q3 was up 51% year-over-year. That's an important indicator of the underlying strength of the business.
We're growing our distribution, taking market share, and expanding the insured base without relying on an improvement in those external conditions. A recovery in the housing activity would certainly be beneficial, but it isn't required to deliver on our growth expectations. We're also monitoring the potential impact of a strong El Niño this winter. We don't expect it to have a material impact on either overall demand or the underwriting performance of our portfolio. But increased awareness of flood risk is good for the industry. Significant weather events create opportunities to remind property owners of their exposure and of the importance of having flood insurance. We'll continue working closely with our fantastic distribution partners, particularly on the West Coast and in Hawaii, to translate that awareness into greater insurance adoption and helping to close the protection gap. We are often asked about potential changes at FEMA around the NFIP.
While we have no additional information and don't expect significant changes in the immediate term, our latest research highlights the opportunity for growth, showing that nearly half of NFIP policies are still priced below their full risk level, representing approximately $2.6 billion in annual subsidies that will continue to burn off in the coming years. Meaningful reform would accelerate that opportunity, but it isn't a prerequisite for our success. We're also continuing to expand our addressable market through new products. Our indemnity earthquake product is progressing through beta testing, and we anticipate a formal launch in Q4. Let me finish with our outlook. Shortly after our IPO last year, we introduced initial 2026 revenue guidance of $186 million-$189 million. Today, we're raising that guidance for the fourth time to $204 million, which, if achieved, will result in approximately 28% year-over-year growth with an Adjusted EBITDA margin above 61%.
We're also announcing initial guidance for the full year 2027. We expect approximately $238 million in revenue at an Adjusted EBITDA margin of approximately 61%. That outlook assumes neither a recovery in the housing market nor an above-average hurricane season. It also excludes any inorganic growth and any substantial contribution from new product lines. In other words, we expect to continue delivering strong, highly profitable growth without needing the external environment to improve. That brings me back to where I started. The strength of Neptune isn't any single product, technology, or distribution relationship. It's how those advantages work together and become more powerful as the business grows. One year after our IPO, Neptune is materially larger, more productive, and more capable. Our distribution network is expanding. Our technology is improving productivity across the business. Our capacity relationships are stronger than ever.
We're serving 336,000 customers nationwide, and we've demonstrated that those advantages translate into sustained growth and exceptional profitability. That's what gives us confidence in our outlook and in the significant opportunity still ahead of us. With that, I'll hand it over to Jim.
Thanks, Matt. I'll spend a few minutes on the financial results, the underlying economics of the business, and our balance sheet and capital allocation. Starting with the quarter. Revenue was $59.6 million, up about 34% year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA was a record $36.8 million, up about 38%, for an Adjusted EBITDA margin of about 62%. Once again, Adjusted EBITDA grew faster than revenue, and our margin expanded while we kept investing across the business. A few things are driving that. First, the in-force book keeps growing. We ended the quarter with about $450 million of premium in force, and each year the renewal book contributes more of our revenue. Our revenue retention rate over the last 12 months is about 89%. Retention matters a great deal to our financial model. Each year, we start with a larger base of policies already in force.
With strong retention, much of that book keeps earning revenue before we write a single dollar of new business. Second, the operating leverage in the business continues to show through. We don't retain underwriting risks. As premium grows, we don't need to provide additional insurance capital. Much of our infrastructure doesn't need to grow in step with premium. That includes our underwriting platform, our policy administration technology, our data science capabilities, and our corporate functions. Our largest variable expense is distribution commission. Beyond that, as premium and revenue grow, a meaningful share of additional revenue can convert to Adjusted EBITDA while we keep investing in the platform. That's why we believe margins above 60% and continued investment and growth are entirely compatible. You can see the same dynamic in our productivity numbers.
Over the last 12 months, revenue per employee was about $3.2 million, and Adjusted EBITDA per employee was about $2 million. Those figures keep rising because revenue is growing much faster than the organization. Turning to cash flow. During the quarter, we generated $25.9 million of operating cash flow. For the first nine months of the year, operating cash flow was $69.3 million. That cash gives us a lot of flexibility in how we allocate capital. At quarter end, we had $215 million outstanding on the revolver. Our total net leverage ratio, as defined in our credit facility, was about 1.7x, compared with about 2.9x a year ago. Over the last 12 months, we've reduced leverage while also returning capital to shareholders. Our approach to capital allocation remains straightforward. The first call on capital is attractive opportunities to grow Neptune.
Beyond that, we intend to continue our share repurchase program opportunistically and to reduce debt over time. We don't view those as fixed buckets. Our cash generation and capital-light structure give us the flexibility to put capital wherever we see the best expected return. One more item. When RSUs vested on September 30, we withheld some of the shares to cover employee taxes. That avoided additional dilution. After quarter end, we paid about $14.2 million in related taxes. Because that cash went out after the quarter closed, it will show up in our fourth quarter cash flow. With that, I'll turn it over to Trevor for closing remarks.
We recently celebrated the one-year anniversary of our IPO. Over this past year, I'm incredibly proud that we have grown our revenue by 34%, our Adjusted EBITDA by 38%, our premium in force by 32%, our policies in force by 29%, all while our number of employees has actually fallen from 60 to 59. In the last year, we have generated $82 million in operating cash flow and have used $49 million to delever and nearly $32 million to buy back stock. Our leverage ratio has fallen from 2.9x to 1.7x in the last year, giving us incredible flexibility to look at a wide range of strategic opportunities. I will reiterate that absent investment opportunities that will grow our business even more quickly, our bias will be to opportunistically buy back stock. There is a paradox at the center of insurance distribution right now.
The better AI gets at doing an agent's job, the more valuable the human agent becomes. The tools to disrupt how insurance is sold are here. But the typical American homeowner is now about 57 and a half, up more than three years since 2010. And homeowners are aging faster than the country as a whole. That's according to the National Association of Realtors. Even the people buying homes today are older than ever, with a median age of 59. Those homeowners aren't going to walk away from an agent they've trusted for 20 years just because an AI could do the same job. My own mother isn't going to. When advice is cheap and everywhere, trust is the scarce thing. So we don't see AI replacing the agent in the short term. We see AI working through the agent. That's why we built Atlas+.
It puts the speed of AI behind the agent, so the relationship stays with the agent, and the work gets faster, smarter, and more accurate. Now, none of this is permanent. The futurist Roy Amara said, "We overestimate the effect of technology in the short run and underestimate it in the long run." That still holds. The gap between what AI can do and what customers are ready for will close. Today, Neptune wins by powering the agent. As buyers get more comfortable with AI, Neptune wins by serving them directly, too. Either way, we benefit as this change takes place, however quickly it comes. I'd like to close by talking about some exciting changes to our board and our management team. David Noble has joined our board of directors as a new independent director. I've known David for over 25 years, since we worked together at Morgan Stanley.
He has become one of the most celebrated executive coaches of our generation, having repeatedly been a top 50 coach, and the author of the Harvard Business Review-published "Real-Time Leadership." As we grow as a company, having his voice at the table is a privilege and an honor. I am also excited to announce today that our Audit Committee Chair, Cristian Melej, will join the company in January and become our CFO after the filing of the 10-K. Cristian, Matt, Jim, Jon, and I first worked together in the early days of my leading C1 Bank, where Cristian would eventually become our CFO. He is an incredible accountant and thinker, and we are lucky to have him join the team. Jim Steiner, our long-term CFO, will stay on as a board member and as our COO.
Jim has been an incredible business partner, friend, and leader at Neptune, and we appreciate his tireless efforts to build the business we have today, and we look forward to continuing to work together. Thank you to our agents, to our capacity providers, our policyholders, and to our employees for making this quarter possible. Thank you all for joining us, and we will now open the call to questions.
We will now begin the question and answer session. Please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press star one again. We ask that you pick up your handset when asking a question to allow for optimum sound quality. If you are muted locally, please remember to unmute your device. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question is from the line of Elyse Greenspan with Wells Fargo. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Hi. Thanks. Good evening. My first question, when you guys were talking about AI, you were talking about over time just becoming more efficient, and I think you said with lower distribution costs. Can you just give us a sense as you guys are thinking out just how beneficial AI could potentially be on your expense levels, and how we could think about that benefiting your margins over time?
Sure. Thank you for that question. First of all, I would say, I think it's going to take a long time to get there, but we have some good examples in other countries where this transformation has taken place. The U.K. is probably a really good example because there 60% or 70% of homeowners buy their homeowners policies through a comparative rater, which you can think about as being an unsophisticated form of artificial intelligence. There, the carriers who win the policies pay the online raters a one-time fee of GBP 50. That's opposed to an average of 13% every year that we're paying an agent today. Our largest expense category would dramatically fall if consumers decided that they wanted to use AI agents such as Muse or chatbots such as ChatGPT in order to buy their flood insurance.
I think it will be a very slow transition, but it would be a transition that would be very profitable for Neptune, as that is our largest cost.
Okay, thanks. My second question, when you were talking about guidance, you mentioned that you guys it didn't include organic growth or contributions from new product lines. I guess in relation to both, can you just give us a sense of what product lines could potentially be launched over the coming year? Or if inorganic growth could be part of the equation and kind of supplemental to the 2027 guidance you guys laid out today?
Sure. Thank you. We're in a very, very envious position of having a very attractive leverage ratio, access to capital, and tremendous free cash flow. That allows us to think about investing in new perils, such as the earthquake peril, which we have decided we will turn from a beta product to a fully fledged product by the end of the year. That's starting to gain some steam. Still early days, but starting to gain some steam. We will look at other perils that are climate related, that are carefully aligned with the data and the tool set that we have developed at Neptune, and that can be broadly applicable. The demand is really coming from two areas.
One is our risk-taking partners who would like to do more and more with Neptune because our success in underwriting flood, and quite frankly, how we operate as an AI native MGA, where data is incredibly transparent to them in ways that just is not how the industry currently operates. Second, from our distribution partners who are incredibly interested in finding more ways to do business with Neptune because of how simple our system is to access and buy product. We are continuously looking. Earthquake will be the next official product, and we will look at others. Inorganically, we have looked at a large number of opportunities as they have been presented to us or as we have seen them, and there have not been many that have met our screening criteria, just given our organic growth that we are able to achieve.
But if there is one that meets our criteria, we are happy that we have the capital structure to be able to execute upon that, and quite frankly, the experience as a management team to be able to execute upon them.
Thank you.
Your next question is from the line of Mike Zaremski with BMO. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Hey, thanks. Good afternoon. Maybe just poking around in a positive way about the last 12 months revenue retention figure in the very high 80%s, 89%, I believe. I believe it was low 90%s a year ago. Obviously, your results are excellent, but just curious if, given how important that KPI is, if you can talk through what's going on there in terms of the moving parts.
Yeah. A lot of what we're focused on is really about the lifetime value of a customer relative to their risk. We're finding that because of the extraordinary underwriting results that we've been able to deliver, we haven't necessarily needed to push price as much, and we think that that has greatly contributed to the new business growth side of the house. So it's always a trade-off between how much price you push versus volume in the door and understanding that elasticity. Again, we're fundamentally pricing based upon risk, but we're able to use price as a, "Listen, if we can lower prices for consumers and get more new people in the door, then that's something that we're going to try to do." That then obviously then translates when it comes time to renew policies.
You're going to see some small variations there as maybe we don't push price quite as much.
Understood. Okay. Got it. So you're kind of tinkering as you said you would do during the IPO with that.
Yes.
Okay. Maybe just a high level question. As we've tested ChatGPT and some LLMs in recent months, they've gotten a lot better on the consumer side of talking to it and asking, "Do I need flood insurance," et cetera, and being able to bind a policy, and it almost always gives us a Neptune quote very fast. Much better process than just a couple of months ago. Obviously, direct to consumer is still not a big driver of distribution. Curious, since I think we haven't used Atlas+, are there any kind of analogies, or would you say the Atlas+ experience would be something like the experience we're seeing improvement on the consumer side and that agents just really get answers very fast and bind a quote much faster because of the AI underneath it?
Yeah. Atlas+ is really our product to help turn agents into super agents, and we have two portions of Atlas+ live right now. One is on the quote screen, and as Matt mentioned, agents who interact with Atlas+ when they're running a quote bind at 3.5 times the rate of people who don't interact. So we know that it is having a really positive effect. You know, causation, correlation, right? We get it. But still, that's a big difference and we're excited. When we read the questions that they're asking, a lot of it is just helping them get more comfortable selling flood. There are some agents who sell flood every single day, and they already know Neptune, and they know how to breeze through our system, and they don't need Atlas+ because they already know it.
But the vast majority of agents aren't selling flood every single day, or maybe they're selling it once a week. Having the world's smartest underwriter sitting right there helping you answer the questions is a very, very valuable tool, and we see that in the data. Second part of Atlas+ is it's only been out in the wild for about a month now, and probably about 30% or 40% of our agents currently have access to it as we roll it out. We're seeing some really exciting early-stage results. What Atlas+ actions or cards does, it tells the agent what is the next best thing that they can do. That may be running a new quote or looking at an expired quote from last year or sending an email to a customer who's past due on paying for their renewal.
Or it may be sending them an email saying, "Hey, you've got an endorsement available for pool coverage, and that customer we know has a pool, but you didn't sell them the pool coverage." Click this one button to have the AI send an email out to the customer, and they can pay with Apple Pay the $30 to add the pool coverage. We've now had over 130 positive tasks completed by consumers. That's renewals, endorsements paid as a result of this Atlas+ card. So we look forward to, by the end of the year, having enough data to better understand what its impact is going to be.
But beyond the direct impact of getting more consumers to pay the renewals and be properly insured with the right endorsements, it is also acting as a great training tool to agents about what is possible and reminding them of the great things that they can do within the Neptune system. We are very bullish on these investments on the agent side, just as we are investing on the direct-to-consumer side. As you mentioned, and we put out a press release about it, we are fully enabled on ChatGPT. We are fully enabled for AI agents such as Muse. If someone wants to use Muse to run a Neptune quote, they are going to be able to do that.
Thank you.
Your next question is from the line of Andrew Kligerman with TD Cowen. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Hi, and good evening. This question is around carriers. We are seeing more carriers show up in the flood market. Their volumes seem to be immaterial, but as more carriers leverage AI and digital distribution, what competitive advantages at Neptune are hardest for competitors to replicate?
I think there are a couple of things. First of all, we haven't seen any carriers gain any material traction that we're aware of. I know there are always Lloyd's syndicates that make an API available to the marketplace. Those APIs are really just connected to an Excel spreadsheet. It's not a sophisticated pricing tool that's looking at the nearly 40 million quotes that we've run in our history and the thousands of claims data and really understanding the fundamental risk behind this. I think there is a very material difference in the underwriting that's taking place, number one. Then number two is really about distribution. It's easy to make those available on some comparative rater platforms.
But moving into large, sophisticated distributors who want to make sure that you have a history and a track record and are going to be there for a long time and have the ability to do APIs directly into their quoting platforms and run thousands and thousands of quotes a day and write $15 million policies and be in all 50 states plus Washington, D.C. We have in fact seen a bit of the opposite, where some of our largest distributors in recent recontracting that we've done with them have actually shrunk the number of private flood offerings they have, favoring Neptune.
Andrew, I would just add on top of that as well. We quoted the new business premium growth number year-over-year. So we're up over 50% year-over-year in terms of new business premium sales. That is fantastic from a sales standpoint. It's also important to keep in mind that there's 100 million buildings out there that our goal is to get insured, 25 million that are at moderate to severe risk of flooding. So the market is huge. There's a tiny percent of take-up today, and this is Neptune expanding the market. This is us continuing to sell into those homes that have never had flood insurance before. That is where that growth in new business is coming from, and that's what we continue to focus on.
Thank you for that. My follow-up question, and you've given a lot of good color around EBITDA growth. You've taken the guidance EBITDA margin up to above 61% from 60% to 61%. You've talked about generating more and more revenue per employee. Is it possible that in the not too distant future, you could be talking about EBITDA margins above 62%?
If you look at Q3, we were 61.7%, so we're getting damn close, right?
Yeah.
It definitely has some seasonality to it, because as everyone remembers, we've got the same costs in Q1 as we do in Q3. But in Q1, people aren't thinking about flood insurance, so we sell a lot less in the wintertime. But we certainly hope that we can continue to grow margins over time. And we're seeing some amazing things through the use of AI, some of which we build, and some of which we buy. We're buying AI when it's something where there's sophisticated systems that can really do things like customer service, where it's just a cost to us. If the most we can save is a couple hundred thousand dollars, then that's not something I want my team focused on. We want to be focused on things that are centered around our intellectual property and centered around revenue growth.
If I can pay a couple hundred thousand dollars for an AI system that then can be put in front of our incoming customer service emails and successfully service 60%, 70%, 80% of those, we're going to be able to get a lot more efficient over time. I'm excited by what we're seeing with technology, our use of technology, and it's not out of the realm of the possible. But we'll work there over time.
Thank you.
Your next question is from the line of Gregory Peters with Raymond James. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Good afternoon. I was looking at your slide on distribution, I think it's slide 13. At the bottom in one of the charts, you talk about these cumulative Triton quotes reaching 38.7 million. As I look at that number, it's substantially larger than actually the policies in force. Trying to understand what's going on with the 38.7 million, because it sure would be nice if you could convert those all to policies in force. Maybe you have some interpretation. Is it people just getting the same quote over and over again, or maybe you have some color on what do you think is going on there?
Sure. I think the first thing to remember is that part of what makes Neptune very special is the technology we have to integrate with very large distribution partners directly into their quoting platforms. When we do that via an API, that enables them to do things like run a flood quote every time they're running a homeowner's quote. That doesn't necessarily mean that all of those large distribution partners have mandated that their agents then verbalize that quote every single time that it is run. That's what we're working on. How do we change agent behavior over time? That's why we're investing in Atlas+. How do we turn agents into super agents? How do we give them tools to do more of the things we'd like them to do?
What we actually see is with our very best agents, where they do offer it every single time, their quote-to-bind ratios can be 5x, 6x, 7x, 8x, an agency who doesn't have the same mandate. What we are working to do is change the agent behavior over time. If we can do that quote-to-bind ratio will just continue to rise.
Okay. I guess the other question, just more big picture. There's been some small hurricane activity. There's flooding in Texas and New Mexico, and there's some stuff up in the Panhandle of Florida. I'm going to go on the presumption, probably little if no impact on your company, but maybe there has been some impact. Maybe it affects market perception of the demand for flood, or maybe you could just talk about any fallout that you're seeing as a result of those events as it relates to your business.
There certainly have not been any major hurricanes this year that would be the hallmarks of large surges in demand. The incredible results in the third quarter and the results we've had this year have really been because of our operating on all cylinders, growing distribution, working with our distribution partners, selling more, being focused on delivering great value to consumers. How do we roll out Atlas+ to make agents smarter and smarter in how they can sell? The weather has not done us any favors this year. It's done America a favor by not causing a huge amount of damage, but it definitely has not created that fear-based buying cycle that we see with very large hurricanes. The only slight exception would be just El Niño in general is raising awareness around weather patterns, sometimes in unique areas.
Hawaii, not a big state, not going to make a material difference to our business, but they've had a record number of hurricanes that have gone through Hawaii. California, you saw Governor Newsom declared a state of emergency because of El Niño for this winter. We're certainly watching those things, and we'll see if any of that results in some uptick in demand. I would say we've done really well despite there not being any hurricanes and despite there not being a healthy housing market.
Totally. Thanks.
Your next question is from the line of Tommy McJoynt with KBW. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Hey, thanks. Good evening, everyone. A question on the metric, when I look at commission income as a percentage of written premium. I understand there's been some moving pieces with your renewals of terms with different capacity programs. You also mentioned the change in having no contingents in all terms effective on December 1. When you take those different moving pieces, we saw the third quarter, a nice step up in that metric, that commission income metric. Is that a good number to use going forward, do you think, or you think there's still upside from some of the renewed terms playing out?
Yeah. Hey, Tommy. Thanks for the question. The renewal of each of our programs, each of our capacity relationships happen throughout the year. It's not like these all come into effect at the start of Q3 or anything that would cause a particularly large jump at that point. We continue to negotiate changes to those contracts as they come up year-over-year. One renews in Q4 that we talked about on the call, and with that renewal, we remove those contingent commissions and got some favorable increases in the ceding commission there. I think where we're at today is a good run rate for the near term, but we continue to produce fantastic underwriting results for our capacity partners, and we continue to provide fantastic growth from a written premium standpoint into those programs.
As we continue to do so and continue to prove out the model, then as we always say, we continue to have those negotiations.
Got it. That makes sense. You also mentioned your points around the guidance increase throughout the year. When you take the latest 2026 revenue guide versus the initial metric about a year ago, it has increased about 9%. When you step back, what are the two or three largest drivers that you would attribute that outperformance to, especially in the face of what has been a fairly weak housing and a relatively benign weather year?
I will give you two things, then I will ask Matt to play cleanup there. One is Jean-Luc Eckstein, who is our Chief Customer Officer, and his team have done an absolutely fantastic job making sure that agents across this country understand Neptune, its capabilities, and how we can help them grow their books in the face of a challenging and soft market for most brokers. A flood can be an area of great growth and great value to their customer. So a big shout-out to our distribution team for a lot of hard work this year on making sure that agents understand Neptune's value proposition. That is adding new agencies and really importantly, working with existing agencies to do more and deepen those relationships.
The second thing is around technology and Atlas+ providing that agent with an amazing tool sitting right next to them when they are running a quote, helping them to be a super agent and get their questions answered and give them the confidence necessary to sell that policy, is an incredible tool. We have had thousands and thousands of agents interact with that and benefit from that tool. Matt, what else would you add?
I would just add two things. One is from a product standpoint. We continue to modify the product and improve the product. Some of the changes we have made this year with increasing the limits that are available, adding those optional coverages. Every day, we continue to sell more and more higher limit policies, higher premium policies, and just have a better product market fit than we ever have before. I think that continues to be the case in the flood peril. As Trevor mentioned earlier, we are getting more and more confident that is the case in the earthquake peril as well. Then I would also just mention the sort of turmoil that we have seen with the NFIP, with the shutdown at the end of last year.
And then with the issues again during Q1 at the start of this year, I think more and more agents through that process found the ease of use through Neptune, found our system, and continue to like that process and do more and more business with us. I think it's all of these points compounding and combining, which is what allows us to raise the guidance and also set the guidance that we've set for 2027.
Thanks, guys.
Your next question is from the line of Josh Shanker with Bank of America. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Yeah, thank you. Josh Shanker, everyone. How are you all doing tonight?
Hey, Josh.
The weather's not really working for you, and obviously the housing formation's not, but you're doing great anyways. Is there any stats you have around the percentage of homes that are being bound with a new coverage, including flood compared to past years and the percentage of those homes, I guess, that are getting Neptune policy, which is probably a very high percentage. Is there a way to think about the take-up rate, how it's changed over time?
There's not a great way to do that, Josh. There's not a great public data set around it. There's some back-of-the-envelope math. If we look at the size of the NFIP, and we look at the rate at which they are shrinking over time, and they continue to do so. As we sit here today, Neptune is just shy of 10% of the size of the NFIP from a policy standpoint. From five years ago, we were 1%, and we're pushing 10% as we sit here today. We obviously continue to grow from a market share standpoint pretty rapidly as we have rapid growth and the NFIP declines.
I think if we look at a market rate of turnover with the NFIP, we come back into Neptune winning 20%-30% of all new policies that are issued from a standalone flood standpoint here, which continues to increase year-over-year if we do that same equation.
Do you have any thoughts around the percentage of policies that you are writing that are for a new home purchase versus somebody who is being shunted out of the NFIP or just changing from another carrier? Is there any way to think about that?
A little bit. We can look at some data around who is buying us on a mandatory basis, right? We do have some data around the timing of their mortgage and if it is a new purchase. The estimate that we have is that only about 20% of our policies actually came from the NFIP, actually switched from the NFIP, and everybody else is net new. That could be net new existing homeowner or net new because they are buying a home and never even went into the NFIP, right? The breakdown between that, again, the data is not really available and it is not great. That is about the best direction I can give you right now. We are working on some data that may help us to be able to better answer that question in the coming years.
I appreciate it. I am going to ask some more questions offline about this, but thanks for the answers.
Great.
Your next question is from the line of Paul Newsome with Piper Sandler. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Good evening. Was hoping you could give us maybe a little bit of your most recent thoughts on the rollout mechanically of the earthquake business in terms of how it will proceed from the state perspective and agent licensing perspective, et cetera, just to give us a sense of the pace of what might or might happen with the new product.
Yeah. Thanks for the question about the earthquake product. A couple of things. When we launched it in beta, available just in one state, California, and only available via our agent portal. So an agent had to sign in and directly run a unique earthquake quote. What's next in the progression is in the past week, we've begun to be testing cross-sell, which means when someone in California, an agent in California runs a flood quote, they have the opportunity to immediately see what the earthquake quote would be, right? Without having to do any additional work. So we actually sold our first cross-sell policy today, so that was an exciting milestone there. Next on the journey will be API availability, where we will make the earthquake product available via API to our large quoting partners.
Next will be a direct-to-consumer portal for a earthquake, which allows us then to do things like include a new kind of Atlas+ action card, which would be a cross-sell from an existing flood policy to then have an agent be able to click one button and send their consumer a new earthquake quote, and have that consumer fulfill entirely online if that's what they'd like to do. So when we talk about fully launching a product, it means taking full advantage of Neptune's entire suite of technology and all that comes with it. We're now two out of three or four, or five of the steps along the way. So, we hope by the end of the year, all of those steps are completed, and we'll call it a fully launched product at that point. Importantly, this is an E&S product.
It is a technically deductible buy-down product, that fits under the export list. It does not require any unique licensing from the agents, but there are steps that agents have to go through to sell a surplus lines product in California, and our system is sophisticated and builds those systems and processes in.
That is great. Separate question: is there a, now as we are past the IPO, an optimal amount of financial leverage for Neptune in your opinion that over time you would want to be at? Or is it just sort of a we will see as we go kind of process from a financial leverage perspective?
We are at a pretty low level of leverage right now at 1.7x. Obviously this is somewhat dependent upon the interest rates of the moment and other opportunities. I would say, other than month-to-month opportunities to buy back stock, I am not a big fan of adding a ton of leverage to buy back your own stock, right? We will buy back stock with free cash flow, maybe smoothed out using the revolver. But certainly not going to, at this point, lever up to buy back a lot of stock. Really what having a low amount of leverage enables us to do is be very opportunistic if there are inorganic growth opportunities in front of us, right? If there are ways that we can find companies that can really benefit from Neptune's technology, then we will want to take advantage of that.
No set target for leverage, but I am very happy to be in the position we are in as a company.
Your next question is from the line of David Motemaden with Evercore ISI. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Hey guys. Thanks for squeezing me in here. Just a question on the 17% revenue growth for next year that you guys are projecting. It sounds like the commission rate is stable here and could be up, I guess that would be up for the full year in 2027. Maybe you could talk a little bit about what you guys are contemplating, both on the PIF growth side, but also how you're thinking about premium growth and pricing. If some of the good lifetime loss ratio results you guys are thinking of passing that through in lower pricing to drive volume.
Hey, David. Yeah, thanks for the question. I think we continue to be more and more bullish around our ability to grow PIF, to grow distribution, and to drive those new business sales. I think from a pricing standpoint, we have a goal to get as many people covered as possible, right? This is an issue that America has faced for a long time, is the low coverage rates that we have in the country, and so we want to get more and more people insured here. The portfolios need to continue to make sense from a capacity standpoint for our capacity providers, and so that's always sort of the tension that we play with in Neptune.
But we expect to continue to have very good premium and revenue retention figures as we look into next year, as well as strong new business growth quarter-over-quarter as we get through next year. What we're not planning on there is a particularly strong hurricane season, any uptick in the housing market, anything happening with the NFIP, right? Any inorganic growth opportunities or any particular growth in new products that we might put out there, and really including the earthquake product that we have today. I think we continue to become more and more bullish quarter-over-quarter, and I think that's reflected in the revenue growth that we've put out there. It's obviously as we get bigger and bigger and that revenue number gets bigger, it's harder to put up larger growth percentages, but that's what we continue to work on.
Great, thanks. Then maybe just a quick follow-up. The Palomar agreement seems to have been a pretty big success. Is there any sense you could give us, now that that's sunset, how much that has contributed to the growth here? If I just look at it, I think you guys have added, on a quarterly basis, about 20,000 units. Is there any way you could size how much Palomar is within that I guess is now being lapped?
Yeah. If we look at Q3 revenue growth of 34%, outside of the Palomar deal, that growth would've been 30%. We continue, outside of the Palomar deal, to grow very rapidly. But we have a fantastic relationship with Palomar. They're a great team over there. We're very thankful for the relationship, and I think this has been a really, really good scenario, a really good use case from both sides, where Palomar, their portfolio's been able to benefit greatly over the last 12 months, and we've also been able to add nicely to Neptune's growth at the same time.
Awesome. Thanks for that.
Your next question is from the line of Rob Cox with Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Oh, thanks. Yeah, just a question going back to the AI agent discussion, and noting the press release you put out on Muse. I'm just curious if you have good data on how AI agents are interacting with your platform today, and if so, what you think that tells you about how this might develop over time.
I would say it's entirely immaterial at this point, and is a good hobbyist exercise for people at this time. But, if you look at the average age of a homeowner in America, this is not yet a mass market product for buying insurance.
Okay. Got it.
I hope someday it becomes that, but it's not impactful today at all.
Yeah. If I could follow up on maybe just the premium per policy trend, so up 2% year-over-year. I know you guys have increased limits on some products, and you're still getting price increases. So I'm just curious what is sort of dragging down the premium per policy year-over-year, as opposed to what it would be otherwise?
You have to look at mix as well, right? During a government shutdown year, such as last year, you are going to sell a lot of A zone mandatory policies, and as that went off, you may sell a higher percentage of X zone policies, which are on average lower price. So you really have to look at mix as well before just looking at overall premium average.
Perfect. Thanks.
Your next question is from the line of Cave Montazeri with Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Thank you. My first question is on the CFO transition. Things seem to be going pretty well with Jim, so I am just curious to know if you can give us any color on why the transition, and why now?
I'll give you my view, and then if Jim wants to add anything, I'm happy to have him jump in. We've been at this for 10 years now, and it's been an incredible experience. What we're finding is that we need, at least for some period of time, we need more help at the senior levels. Jim has done an incredible job as CFO, but by becoming our full-time COO, is going to be able to help us to automate and transition as many of those things to technology as possible over time. Cristian is someone that we've worked with before. He was the CFO of the bank that we all worked at and ran for years, so he's a known quantity. He, until yesterday, was our chair of our audit committee at Neptune, so he has a deep understanding of Neptune and its financials.
This is a great opportunity to share the workload and broaden the base. Jim, anything you'd add?
Yeah, just to add, given the history that I've had with Cristian, there's really no one else in the world I would feel more comfortable handing the reins over to as my successor in this role. I also would just remind everyone that I'm staying on as the COO. There's plenty of operational things to get done around here for now and the foreseeable future, and will remain on the board in an oversight function, and my eyes will be on the financials just as yours are.
Great. Thank you. A follow-up is on just price transparency in insurance. Here you're loud and clear that older people are less likely to use a personal agent to buy insurance and to bind, but they could be using it to just shop around, educate themselves, and maybe eventually let that trigger a discussion with their broker. So my question is, if that happens, how well-positioned is Neptune to compete in a world where there is more price transparency?
Boy, that would be a tremendous opportunity for Neptune and probably the biggest opportunity for us because two things would happen if everybody used an AI agent to get educated. The first is that 21 million Americans would find out that their house is at high risk of flooding and that they need to buy flood insurance, and they don't have a policy today. That AI is going to tell them the truth about the science, and that would be fantastic. So job number one, please, everyone use an AI agent and get educated about your risk because it'll expand the market from 4 million policies today to 25 million. That would be number one. Then number two is you have to remember that there are currently 1.7 million people who have NFIP policies who could save money by switching to Neptune today.
If they've got the AI agent out there shopping for them, Neptune is the primary beneficiary of that, right? We have the capacity relationships to be able to grow and serve. If those all 1.7 million of them found out tomorrow because of an AI agent that they could save money by switching to Neptune, we're the only one with the capacity to be able to actually effectuate that change. Both of those things would be tremendous outcomes for Neptune. We have the best data. Like a Progressive, if you have the best data, you're going to win in a sophisticated open and transparent marketplace.
Makes sense. Thank you.
There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to Trevor Burgess for closing remarks.
I want to thank everyone for joining the call today. We are thrilled by third quarter's results and the momentum that we have in this business. I think I said this last quarter, but I am going to repeat it. I have never been more excited about Neptune, the prospects, and where we can go with this company. How we are using technology is incredibly innovative. We have a lot of exposure to a lot of different insurance companies, and what we are doing is bleeding edge and is leading the industry and I think will serve us very well as this AI transition continues to take place. Thank you all for your help. Thank you for the questions and look forward to the quarter ahead.
This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-15Can Neptune Insurance Beat Q3 Earnings on Higher Policies in Force?
Zacks
Can Neptune Insurance Beat Q3 Earnings on Higher Policies in Force?
Technology-driven insurance provider Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. NP is set to report third-quarter 2026 results on Oct. 20, after the closing bell. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the to-be-reported quarter's earnings is currently pegged at 16 cents per shareon revenues of $54.97 million. The third-quarter earnings estimate has remained stable over the past 60 days. The bottom-line projection indicates a year-over-year jump of 45.5%. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for quarterly revenues implies year-over-year growth of 23.9%. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research For full-year 2026, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for Neptune's revenues is pegged at $201.15 million, implying an increase of 26.1% year over year. Also, the consensus mark for the current year EPS is pegged at 54 cents, signaling a rise of around 31.7% on a year-over-year basis. NP's earnings beat the consensus estimate in two of the past four quarters, met once and missed on the other occasion, with the average surprise being 2.2%. Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. price-eps-surprise | Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. Quote Our proven model predicts a likely earnings beat for the company this time around. The combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the odds of an earnings beat. That is precisely the case here. Neptune has an Earnings ESP of +1.82% and carries a Zacks Rank #2 at present. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they're reported with our Earnings ESP Filter. Neptune is expected to post solid third-quarter growth, supported by an increase in policies in force, higher revenue per employee and a larger workforce. The Zacks Consensus Estimate projects commission income to rise 23.6% year over year to $41.93 million, while fee income is expected to grow 22.4% to $12.79 million. Growth in policies in force is another positive. The period-end figure is expected to reach 323,300, up 2.3% from the previous quarter. This is likely to lift premium in force to $432.7 million, a 3.3% sequential increase. Neptune is also expected to see better workforce productivity, with revenue per employee projected to increase 15.1% year over year. The average number of employees is expected to grow 13.8% from the year-ago quarter, further supporting business expansion. Together, these trends could help Neptune deliver year-over-yea…Read full documentShow less
Technology-driven insurance provider Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. NP is set to report third-quarter 2026 results on Oct. 20, after the closing bell. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the to-be-reported quarter's earnings is currently pegged at 16 cents per shareon revenues of $54.97 million. The third-quarter earnings estimate has remained stable over the past 60 days. The bottom-line projection indicates a year-over-year jump of 45.5%. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for quarterly revenues implies year-over-year growth of 23.9%. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research For full-year 2026, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for Neptune's revenues is pegged at $201.15 million, implying an increase of 26.1% year over year. Also, the consensus mark for the current year EPS is pegged at 54 cents, signaling a rise of around 31.7% on a year-over-year basis. NP's earnings beat the consensus estimate in two of the past four quarters, met once and missed on the other occasion, with the average surprise being 2.2%. Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. price-eps-surprise | Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. Quote Our proven model predicts a likely earnings beat for the company this time around. The combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the odds of an earnings beat. That is precisely the case here. Neptune has an Earnings ESP of +1.82% and carries a Zacks Rank #2 at present. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they're reported with our Earnings ESP Filter. Neptune is expected to post solid third-quarter growth, supported by an increase in policies in force, higher revenue per employee and a larger workforce. The Zacks Consensus Estimate projects commission income to rise 23.6% year over year to $41.93 million, while fee income is expected to grow 22.4% to $12.79 million. Growth in policies in force is another positive. The period-end figure is expected to reach 323,300, up 2.3% from the previous quarter. This is likely to lift premium in force to $432.7 million, a 3.3% sequential increase. Neptune is also expected to see better workforce productivity, with revenue per employee projected to increase 15.1% year over year. The average number of employees is expected to grow 13.8% from the year-ago quarter, further supporting business expansion. Together, these trends could help Neptune deliver year-over-year growth and beat earnings expectations. However, higher operating expenses, driven by increased commissions and general and administrative costs, could partly offset some of the gains. Here are some other companies worth considering from the broader insurance space, as our model shows that these, too, have the right combination of elements to beat on earnings this time around: MetLife, Inc. MET has an Earnings ESP of +1.90% and a Zacks Rank of 2. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for MetLife's bottom line for the to-be-reported quarter is pegged at $2.65 per share, up 13.3% from a year ago. The consensus estimate for MET's revenues is pegged at $20.07 billion, indicating 12.1% year-over-year growth. Prudential Financial, Inc. PRU has an Earnings ESP of +0.39% and a Zacks Rank of 3. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Prudential Financial's bottom line for the to-be-reported quarter is pegged at $3.47 per share, which witnessed six upward estimate revisions over the past 60 days against one downward movement. The consensus estimate for PRU's revenues is pegged at $14.60 billion. Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company WTW has an Earnings ESP of +0.52% and a Zacks Rank #3. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Willis Towers' bottom line for the to-be-reported quarter is pegged at $3.60 per share, which indicates 17.3% year-over-year growth. The consensus estimate for WTW's revenues is pegged at $2.48 billion, an 8.3% increase from a year ago. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) : Free Stock Analysis Report MetLife, Inc. (MET) : Free Stock Analysis Report Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) : Free Stock Analysis Report Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-13Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) Earnings Expected to Grow: Should You Buy?
Zacks
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) Earnings Expected to Grow: Should You Buy?
The market expects Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) to deliver a year-over-year increase in earnings on higher revenues when it reports results for the quarter ended September 2026. This widely-known consensus outlook is important in assessing the company's earnings picture, but a powerful factor that might influence its near-term stock price is how the actual results compare to these estimates. The stock might move higher if these key numbers top expectations in the upcoming earnings report, which is expected to be released on October 20. On the other hand, if they miss, the stock may move lower. While the sustainability of the immediate price change and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's discussion of business conditions on the earnings call, it's worth handicapping the probability of a positive EPS surprise. This company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $0.16 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +45.5%. Revenues are expected to be $54.97 million, up 23.9% from the year-ago quarter. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has been revised 1.64% higher over the last 30 days to the current level. This is essentially a reflection of how the covering analysts have collectively reassessed their initial estimates over this period. Investors should keep in mind that an aggregate change may not always reflect the direction of estimate revisions by each of the covering analysts. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise Estimate revisions ahead of a company's earnings release offer clues to the business conditions for the period whose results are coming out. This insight is at the core of our proprietary surprise prediction model -- the Zacks Earnings ESP (Expected Surprise Prediction). The Zacks Earnings ESP compares the Most Accurate Estimate to the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the quarter; the Most Accurate Estimate is a more recent version of the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate. The idea here is that analysts revising their estimates right before an earnings release have the latest information, which could potentially be more accurate than what they and others contributing to the consensus had predicted earlier. Thus, a positive or negative Earnings ESP reading theoretically indicates the likely deviation of the actual earnings from the consensus estimate. However, the model's predictive…Read full documentShow less
The market expects Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) to deliver a year-over-year increase in earnings on higher revenues when it reports results for the quarter ended September 2026. This widely-known consensus outlook is important in assessing the company's earnings picture, but a powerful factor that might influence its near-term stock price is how the actual results compare to these estimates. The stock might move higher if these key numbers top expectations in the upcoming earnings report, which is expected to be released on October 20. On the other hand, if they miss, the stock may move lower. While the sustainability of the immediate price change and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's discussion of business conditions on the earnings call, it's worth handicapping the probability of a positive EPS surprise. This company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $0.16 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +45.5%. Revenues are expected to be $54.97 million, up 23.9% from the year-ago quarter. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has been revised 1.64% higher over the last 30 days to the current level. This is essentially a reflection of how the covering analysts have collectively reassessed their initial estimates over this period. Investors should keep in mind that an aggregate change may not always reflect the direction of estimate revisions by each of the covering analysts. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise Estimate revisions ahead of a company's earnings release offer clues to the business conditions for the period whose results are coming out. This insight is at the core of our proprietary surprise prediction model -- the Zacks Earnings ESP (Expected Surprise Prediction). The Zacks Earnings ESP compares the Most Accurate Estimate to the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the quarter; the Most Accurate Estimate is a more recent version of the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate. The idea here is that analysts revising their estimates right before an earnings release have the latest information, which could potentially be more accurate than what they and others contributing to the consensus had predicted earlier. Thus, a positive or negative Earnings ESP reading theoretically indicates the likely deviation of the actual earnings from the consensus estimate. However, the model's predictive power is significant for positive ESP readings only. A positive Earnings ESP is a strong predictor of an earnings beat, particularly when combined with a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold). Our research shows that stocks with this combination produce a positive surprise nearly 70% of the time, and a solid Zacks Rank actually increases the predictive power of Earnings ESP. Please note that a negative Earnings ESP reading is not indicative of an earnings miss. Our research shows that it is difficult to predict an earnings beat with any degree of confidence for stocks with negative Earnings ESP readings and/or Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell) or 5 (Strong Sell). For Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc., the Most Accurate Estimate is higher than the Zacks Consensus Estimate, suggesting that analysts have recently become bullish on the company's earnings prospects. This has resulted in an Earnings ESP of +1.82%. On the other hand, the stock currently carries a Zacks Rank of #2. So, this combination indicates that Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. will most likely beat the consensus EPS estimate. While calculating estimates for a company's future earnings, analysts often consider to what extent it has been able to match past consensus estimates. So, it's worth taking a look at the surprise history for gauging its influence on the upcoming number. For the last reported quarter, it was expected that Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. would post earnings of $0.14 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.15, delivering a surprise of +7.14%. Over the last four quarters, the company has beaten consensus EPS estimates two times. An earnings beat or miss may not be the sole basis for a stock moving higher or lower. Many stocks end up losing ground despite an earnings beat due to other factors that disappoint investors. Similarly, unforeseen catalysts help a number of stocks gain despite an earnings miss. That said, betting on stocks that are expected to beat earnings expectations does increase the odds of success. This is why it's worth checking a company's Earnings ESP and Zacks Rank ahead of its quarterly release. Make sure to utilize our Earnings ESP Filter to uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they've reported. Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. appears a compelling earnings-beat candidate. However, investors should pay attention to other factors too for betting on this stock or staying away from it ahead of its earnings release. Stay on top of upcoming earnings announcements with the Zacks Earnings Calendar. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research
Related articleQuarter not tagged2026-10-09Neptune Insurance Holdings to Announce Third Quarter 2026 Financial Results
Business Wire
Neptune Insurance Holdings to Announce Third Quarter 2026 Financial Results
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla., October 09, 2026--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. ("Neptune" or the "Company") (NYSE: NP), the parent company of Neptune Flood Incorporated, today announced that it will report its financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2026, after the market closes on October 20, 2026. The company plans to host a conference call and webcast to discuss its financial results at 5:00 PM ET on Tuesday, October 20. The dial-in number for the conference call is 1-(833) 461-5787 or 1-(585) 542-9983 (international). The associated meeting ID is 119 805 068. Please dial the number 10 minutes prior to the scheduled start time. A live webcast of the conference call will also be available here as well as on Neptune's investor relations website at investors.neptuneflood.com. A replay of the webcast will be available shortly after the event at the same website. About Neptune Insurance Holdings Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NYSE: NP) is the parent company of Neptune Flood Incorporated. Neptune Flood is a leading, AI-native managing general agent offering a range of easy-to-purchase residential and commercial insurance products, including primary and excess flood insurance, distributed through a nationwide network of agencies. Leveraging proprietary artificial intelligence and advanced data science, Neptune delivers fast and accessible coverage for residential and commercial properties across the United States. The Company operates without human underwriters, using Triton®, its cutting-edge platform to streamline underwriting, pricing, and policy issuance. View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20261009659542/en/ Contacts Investor Relations Contact: Jonathan Carlon Director of Corporate Development Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. Email: [email protected] Phone: 727-387-6467

