RankAlpha logo
Back to Rankings

NNE

Nano Nuclear EnergyF
Nasdaq / Capital Goods
Last Price
Quote time unavailable
View Chart
Documents
39
Stored
Transcripts
1
Recent loaded
Latest report
2026-08-19
Investor release

Document history

Earnings documents stored for NNE.

12 shown
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-19

NNE Q3 Earnings Call Maps NRC Path and Data Center Framework

Zacks
NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. NNE used its third-quarter earnings call to focus on two execution tracks: advancing KRONOS through formal NRC review and converting its commercial pipeline into more structured customer commitments. Management also emphasized fuel-cycle integration, capital discipline and staffing as it prepares for construction and broader commercialization. CEO and interim head of Reactor Development James Walker said the NRC expects to complete its environmental assessment in the first quarter of 2027 and its safety evaluation in the third quarter. Walker said those milestones remain consistent with NANO Nuclear's expectation to begin initial construction at the University of Illinois in the second half of 2027, with first power targeted around 2030. An H.C. Wainwright analyst asked about long-lead equipment. Walker said initial work centers on excavation, concrete and the reactor citadel, while vendor negotiations for reactor components are already underway. Walker said NNE is advancing a framework with a large infrastructure developer whose data center campuses could use KRONOS systems. The partner would bring financing, sites and power infrastructure, while NANO Nuclear would supply reactors, fuel, licensing support and operating capabilities. A Texas Capital Securities analyst pressed for details. Walker said the structure under discussion could include equity grants and warrants for the partner, along with milestone-based investments ranging from tens of millions of dollars to as much as $100 million. Director of Investor Relations Matthew Barry said management is close to an initial preferred-provider framework. A ROTH Capital Partners analyst asked about faster DOD approvals, but Walker said conventional licensing work still needs to be completed and saw limited scope for major fast-tracking. Walker framed the Secured Transportation Systems acquisition as both a commercialization safeguard and a standalone growth platform. STS gives NANO Nuclear in-house nuclear logistics capabilities and experience across government and commercial missions. An Alliance Global Partners analyst asked whether STS should be viewed mainly as strategic infrastructure. Walker said the business serves both purposes and could expand substantially as NNE pursues adjacent transportation capabilities. Management is also evaluating conversion, deconversion and fuel-fa…Read full document

NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. NNE used its third-quarter earnings call to focus on two execution tracks: advancing KRONOS through formal NRC review and converting its commercial pipeline into more structured customer commitments. Management also emphasized fuel-cycle integration, capital discipline and staffing as it prepares for construction and broader commercialization. CEO and interim head of Reactor Development James Walker said the NRC expects to complete its environmental assessment in the first quarter of 2027 and its safety evaluation in the third quarter. Walker said those milestones remain consistent with NANO Nuclear's expectation to begin initial construction at the University of Illinois in the second half of 2027, with first power targeted around 2030. An H.C. Wainwright analyst asked about long-lead equipment. Walker said initial work centers on excavation, concrete and the reactor citadel, while vendor negotiations for reactor components are already underway. Walker said NNE is advancing a framework with a large infrastructure developer whose data center campuses could use KRONOS systems. The partner would bring financing, sites and power infrastructure, while NANO Nuclear would supply reactors, fuel, licensing support and operating capabilities. A Texas Capital Securities analyst pressed for details. Walker said the structure under discussion could include equity grants and warrants for the partner, along with milestone-based investments ranging from tens of millions of dollars to as much as $100 million. Director of Investor Relations Matthew Barry said management is close to an initial preferred-provider framework. A ROTH Capital Partners analyst asked about faster DOD approvals, but Walker said conventional licensing work still needs to be completed and saw limited scope for major fast-tracking. Walker framed the Secured Transportation Systems acquisition as both a commercialization safeguard and a standalone growth platform. STS gives NANO Nuclear in-house nuclear logistics capabilities and experience across government and commercial missions. An Alliance Global Partners analyst asked whether STS should be viewed mainly as strategic infrastructure. Walker said the business serves both purposes and could expand substantially as NNE pursues adjacent transportation capabilities. Management is also evaluating conversion, deconversion and fuel-facility opportunities. Founder, executive chairman, president, secretary and treasurer Jiang Yu said a separate fuel-related proposal remains under review, while Walker stressed that acquisitions are intended to support reactor deployment rather than create large capital outlays. A Texas Capital Securities analyst focused on enrichment and TRISO fabrication. Walker said KRONOS can use commercially available low-enriched uranium and that NNE has begun discussions with enrichment providers including Urenco. Walker also said the company is speaking with several TRISO fabricators and is working to secure long-term arrangements. He said existing fabrication capacity can support the first-of-a-kind reactor timeline. A BTIG analyst later asked about switching from LEU+ to HALEU. Barry said the KRONOS design would not require a redesign for that change, giving NANO Nuclear flexibility to adopt HALEU when it becomes available and economically viable. Chief financial officer Jaisun Garcha said quarter-end liquidity was about $580 million after roughly $26 million of net ATM proceeds. Operating expenses were $15.9 million as engineering, licensing and fuel-cycle work expanded. The company reported a loss of $0.19 per share, narrower than the Zacks Consensus Estimate of a loss of $0.28. Revenues of $0.21 million missed the $1 million consensus estimate. Nano Nuclear Energy Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | Nano Nuclear Energy Inc. Quote On M&A, Walker told an H.C. Wainwright analyst that NNE is not targeting large acquisitions requiring hundreds of millions of dollars. Barry added that management is evaluating government and other funding mechanisms to reduce capital needs for larger opportunities. Management's tone remained focused on converting regulatory progress into construction readiness while tightening the commercial structure around prospective deployments. The call also made clear that NNE expects its organization to keep expanding. Walker said technical hiring should accelerate over the coming months, while management continues building fuel-cycle capabilities alongside reactor development. NNE currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). Its Momentum Score is B, while its Value, Growth and VGM Scores are F. Zacks methodology views A or B Style Scores as the strongest complements to top Zacks Ranks. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. That mix pairs a favorable Rank with weaker scores across several style dimensions. The Zacks Rank can change as analyst estimates are revised following the just-reported results. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Nano Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-13

Nano Nuclear Energy Q3 Earnings Call Highlights

MarketBeat
Interested in Nano Nuclear Energy Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. Kronos licensing advanced: The NRC accepted Nano Nuclear’s construction permit application for review, with environmental and safety evaluations expected in 2027 and initial construction potentially beginning in the second half of that year. Commercial and government opportunities expanded: The company is pursuing potential Kronos deployments for data centers, industrial users and Air Force applications, including collaborations with Supermicro and a Phase I AFWERX award. Fuel-cycle capabilities and liquidity remain key priorities: Nano Nuclear completed its STS acquisition to strengthen nuclear transportation and logistics, ended the quarter with approximately $580 million in liquidity, and reported a third-quarter net loss of $10.1 million. Nano Nuclear’s Air Force Contract Puts Its Short-Squeeze Setup in Focus Nano Nuclear Energy (NASDAQ:NNE) said its third-quarter progress centered on advancing the licensing and engineering of its Kronos microreactor, expanding its nuclear fuel-cycle capabilities through acquisitions, and pursuing potential commercial deployments for data centers, industrial users and government customers. The company said the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission formally accepted for review in May the construction permit application for a full-scale Kronos micro modular reactor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Chief Executive Officer James Walker said the NRC expects to complete its environmental assessment in the first quarter of 2027 and its safety evaluation in the third quarter of 2027. → SoundHound AI Sends a Loud Signal After Its Q2 Earnings Beat MarketBeat Week in Review – 06/29 - 07/03 Those milestones are consistent with Nano Nuclear's expectation that the review process could conclude in 2027, allowing initial construction activity to begin in the second half of that year, Walker said. Initial work would focus on excavation and construction of the underground structure that will house the reactor, while certain non-nuclear portions of the broader energy system could be built without waiting for NRC approval, he added. Founder, Chairman and President Jay Yu said Kronos is based on high-temperature gas-cooled reactor technology and is designed to use TRISO fuel. The reactor is intended to use low-enriched uranium, or LEU-plus fuel, that the…Read full document

Interested in Nano Nuclear Energy Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. Kronos licensing advanced: The NRC accepted Nano Nuclear’s construction permit application for review, with environmental and safety evaluations expected in 2027 and initial construction potentially beginning in the second half of that year. Commercial and government opportunities expanded: The company is pursuing potential Kronos deployments for data centers, industrial users and Air Force applications, including collaborations with Supermicro and a Phase I AFWERX award. Fuel-cycle capabilities and liquidity remain key priorities: Nano Nuclear completed its STS acquisition to strengthen nuclear transportation and logistics, ended the quarter with approximately $580 million in liquidity, and reported a third-quarter net loss of $10.1 million. Nano Nuclear’s Air Force Contract Puts Its Short-Squeeze Setup in Focus Nano Nuclear Energy (NASDAQ:NNE) said its third-quarter progress centered on advancing the licensing and engineering of its Kronos microreactor, expanding its nuclear fuel-cycle capabilities through acquisitions, and pursuing potential commercial deployments for data centers, industrial users and government customers. The company said the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission formally accepted for review in May the construction permit application for a full-scale Kronos micro modular reactor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Chief Executive Officer James Walker said the NRC expects to complete its environmental assessment in the first quarter of 2027 and its safety evaluation in the third quarter of 2027. → SoundHound AI Sends a Loud Signal After Its Q2 Earnings Beat MarketBeat Week in Review – 06/29 - 07/03 Those milestones are consistent with Nano Nuclear's expectation that the review process could conclude in 2027, allowing initial construction activity to begin in the second half of that year, Walker said. Initial work would focus on excavation and construction of the underground structure that will house the reactor, while certain non-nuclear portions of the broader energy system could be built without waiting for NRC approval, he added. Founder, Chairman and President Jay Yu said Kronos is based on high-temperature gas-cooled reactor technology and is designed to use TRISO fuel. The reactor is intended to use low-enriched uranium, or LEU-plus fuel, that the company said is commercially available today, while retaining the ability to use high-assay low-enriched uranium, or HALEU, later without redesigning the reactor. → AST SpaceMobile Earnings Just Reminded Investors How Risky Space Can Be SMRs Spark a Chain Reaction for Nano Nuclear Walker said Nano Nuclear has begun discussions with enrichment providers, including Urenco, regarding fuel needs for broader deployment, while the company is also speaking with potential TRISO fuel fabricators. He said the company believes capacity exists to fabricate fuel for the University of Illinois project, though its longer-term strategy may include greater participation in fuel manufacturing or joint ventures as reactor deployments expand. The company also reported engineering progress on critical reactor systems. Nano Nuclear is working with Fortil on Kronos’ fuel-handling and storage system, while a separate engineering collaboration with another gas-cooled reactor-experienced firm has entered detailed design for the reactor’s primary helium circulator. → First Solar’s Profit Engine Faces a New Policy Test in Washington Nano Nuclear completed a feasibility study with BaRupOn evaluating a phased deployment of up to 1 gigawatt of Kronos capacity. The company said it is continuing discussions with BaRupOn regarding potential initiation of the NRC licensing process, though it did not provide a timeline for an application. The company is also progressing discussions with a potential strategic collaborator and customer developing multi-gigawatt data-center projects in the U.S. and internationally. Walker said a potential framework could make Nano Nuclear the preferred nuclear technology provider for the developer’s campuses. Under the framework under discussion, the partner could provide financing, power infrastructure and data-center campus development, while Nano Nuclear would provide reactors, fuel, licensing support and operational capabilities. The company said a potential arrangement could include equity grants or warrants as well as investments in Nano Nuclear tied to development and reactor-purchase milestones. Terms remain under discussion. Nano Nuclear also signed a memorandum of understanding with Supermicro to evaluate integrating Kronos with AI server and data-center infrastructure platforms, including potential off-grid applications and joint go-to-market opportunities. In the government market, the company said it received an SBIR Phase I award from AFWERX, the Department of the Air Force’s innovation arm, to advance Kronos for Air Force applications. Nano Nuclear also said its previously announced direct Phase II SBIR award for Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling remains on schedule, with four remaining contract deliverables expected over the next 12 to 18 months. In May, Nano Nuclear completed its acquisition of Secured Transportation Services, or STS, a nuclear logistics, transportation and services business. The company said STS has more than 20 years of experience transporting radioactive and nuclear materials and has a history of profitability. Walker said STS has recently supported Department of Energy and National Nuclear Security Administration missions, including transporting HALEU from Japan to the U.S. and removing highly enriched uranium from Venezuela. Nano Nuclear believes bringing those capabilities in-house can reduce its dependence on third-party providers and help de-risk future reactor deployments. The company is evaluating additional acquisitions and partnerships across the fuel cycle, including another transportation business and nuclear fuel-facility assets. Walker said management does not intend to pursue large acquisitions requiring hundreds of millions of dollars in upfront spending, though a potential fuel-facility investment could be structured through investments needed to complete the facility. Chief Financial Officer Jaisun Garcha said STS generated approximately $3.9 million of unaudited revenue during the first six months of calendar 2026, including $200,000 from the May 22 acquisition closing through June 30. Third-quarter operating expenses totaled $15.9 million, reflecting higher general and administrative and research and development spending. Net loss was $10.1 million, compared with a $7.6 million loss in the prior-year quarter. Year-to-date net loss was $25.8 million, improving from $32 million in the prior-year period, aided by higher interest income and lower equity-based compensation. Year-to-date operating cash usage was $18.7 million. Year-to-date investing cash usage was $297.6 million, including approximately $281 million in short-term investments, about $10 million in property and equipment additions, and about $6 million related to the STS acquisition. Nano Nuclear ended the quarter with approximately $580 million in liquidity, up roughly $11 million sequentially. The increase reflected approximately $26 million in net proceeds from its at-the-market equity program, partially offset by spending on Kronos development, licensing and fuel-cycle initiatives. Management said it is evaluating non-dilutive funding opportunities for the University of Illinois project, including potential investment tax credits, Department of Energy programs and support from the university or the state of Illinois. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc is a microreactor and nuclear technology company, which provides supply energy services. Its products in technical development are ZEUS, a solid core battery reactor, and ODIN, a low-pressure coolant reactor. The company is founded by Jiang Yu in February, 2022 and is headquartered in New York, NY. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "Nano Nuclear Energy Q3 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for August 2026.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-13

Nano Nuclear Energy Inc (NNE) (Q3 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Strategic Progress and ...

GuruFocus.com
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: August 12, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. NRC formally accepted the construction permit application for the Kronos MMR at the University of Illinois, with a clear path to construction start in 2H 2027. Completed acquisition of STS, a profitable nuclear logistics company, enhancing vertical integration and de-risking fuel cycle operations. Strong balance sheet with approximately $580 million in liquidity, among the strongest in the advanced nuclear sector. Expanding commercial pipeline, including a feasibility study for up to 1 GW with BaRupon and advanced discussions with a strategic data center partner for multi-gigawatt deployments. Fuel flexibility: Kronos can use commercially available LEU+ fuel today, with the ability to switch to HALEU without redesign, reducing near-term fuel supply risk. Net loss widened to $10.1 million in Q3 2026 from $7.6 million in the prior year quarter, driven by higher operating expenses. Operating expenses increased significantly as the company scales engineering, regulatory, and fuel cycle workstreams, with no near-term revenue from reactor sales. STS contributed only $200,000 in revenue for the period from May 22 to June 30, indicating limited immediate financial impact from the acquisition. The company faces execution risks in advancing multiple M&A and partnership opportunities, with no guaranteed closing or revenue contribution. Regulatory timelines, while on track, are subject to potential delays, and the company acknowledges that fast-tracking licensing for military or other projects is minimal. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with LMRI. Is NNE fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Q: Can you provide insight into the structure of the framework agreement with the strategic collaborator for a multi-gigawatt data center pipeline, what it could unlock commercially, and what attracted the customer to Nano?A: CEO James Walker explained that the framework is designed to avoid the deficiencies of typical PPA agreements, which often lack customer investment. The partner, a global infrastructure investment and development firm, would receive equity grants and warrants in Nano and have the ability to invest tens of millions, potentially up to $100 million, upon…Read full document

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: August 12, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. NRC formally accepted the construction permit application for the Kronos MMR at the University of Illinois, with a clear path to construction start in 2H 2027. Completed acquisition of STS, a profitable nuclear logistics company, enhancing vertical integration and de-risking fuel cycle operations. Strong balance sheet with approximately $580 million in liquidity, among the strongest in the advanced nuclear sector. Expanding commercial pipeline, including a feasibility study for up to 1 GW with BaRupon and advanced discussions with a strategic data center partner for multi-gigawatt deployments. Fuel flexibility: Kronos can use commercially available LEU+ fuel today, with the ability to switch to HALEU without redesign, reducing near-term fuel supply risk. Net loss widened to $10.1 million in Q3 2026 from $7.6 million in the prior year quarter, driven by higher operating expenses. Operating expenses increased significantly as the company scales engineering, regulatory, and fuel cycle workstreams, with no near-term revenue from reactor sales. STS contributed only $200,000 in revenue for the period from May 22 to June 30, indicating limited immediate financial impact from the acquisition. The company faces execution risks in advancing multiple M&A and partnership opportunities, with no guaranteed closing or revenue contribution. Regulatory timelines, while on track, are subject to potential delays, and the company acknowledges that fast-tracking licensing for military or other projects is minimal. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with LMRI. Is NNE fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Q: Can you provide insight into the structure of the framework agreement with the strategic collaborator for a multi-gigawatt data center pipeline, what it could unlock commercially, and what attracted the customer to Nano?A: CEO James Walker explained that the framework is designed to avoid the deficiencies of typical PPA agreements, which often lack customer investment. The partner, a global infrastructure investment and development firm, would receive equity grants and warrants in Nano and have the ability to invest tens of millions, potentially up to $100 million, upon achieving development and reactor purchase milestones. This co-investment model de-risks both sides and could allow Nano to also take an equity position in the nuclear data center projects, creating a synergistic partnership with multiple revenue streams. CFO Jason Garcha added that the partner's experience in building, owning, and operating large-scale infrastructure projects globally makes them a credible validator of Nano's technology and could accelerate commercialization. Q: Are there any long-lead items that need to be ordered now to start construction at the University of Illinois in the second half of 2027?A: CEO James Walker clarified that initial construction focuses on non-nuclear components like the subterranean concrete "citadel" structure, ground excavation, and concrete pouring, which do not require reactor components. While vendor negotiations for reactor parts are underway, the initial construction phase isn't waiting on them. Furthermore, non-nuclear systems like the thermal energy storage (solar salt) and the adjacent power conversion plant use standard, off-the-shelf components that don't even need to wait for NRC approval, allowing for significant progress to be made immediately. Q: Have you allocated a specific budget for acquisitions in 2026, or will you be more opportunistic?A: CEO James Walker stated there is no ceiling on acquisition spending, but the company is very capital-conscious and focuses on small-scale acquisitions that bring in-house capabilities to facilitate reactor rollout, rather than large, expensive deals. He noted the initial payment for STS was only around $7 million. The only potential exception is a fuel facility, where the equity position would be earned through investment in completing the facility rather than an upfront acquisition cost. CFO Jason Garcha added that any larger outlays would be spread over several years and potentially reduced through government programs. Q: Can you expand on the relationship with Ameresco and whether their DoD projects could expedite the licensing pathway for nuclear power?A: CEO James Walker explained that initial conversations with Ameresco were focused on EPC (engineering, procurement, and construction) work for coordinating reactor deployments. While Ameresco has enhanced use leases with the Navy, the DoD still needs to go through feasibility studies and defer to the NRC for new reactor systems, so their projects wouldn't significantly expedite the licensing process. However, they benefit from seeing the UIUC project progress through NRC review, which provides reassurance. Chairman Jay Yu added that they are in active talks with Ameresco, who has a robust nuclear group, and are exploring various synergistic strategies. Q: Can you provide an update on the proposed $230 million investment in Deoxitech?A: Chairman Jay Yu stated that the proposal is currently under review and they hope to have an update in the coming months, but declined to comment further at this time. He reiterated that the investment would be a significant achievement for their vertical integration strategy, but it remains under review. Q: Can you talk about your hiring plans over the next year and whether the employee growth rate will continue?A: CEO James Walker acknowledged the company has transitioned from a small to a medium-sized company, requiring a reorganization. The technical team still needs significant expansion to carry a reactor project from design to operation, and a big upscaling in technical staff is expected in the coming months and years. He emphasized the importance of being sensible in hiring to avoid overemployment and ensure proper reporting lines, but acknowledged the pressure to upscale as quickly as possible to support the mission. Q: Can you provide an update on conversations with commercial enrichment providers and Triso fabricators, and what fuel availability looks like for your commercialization timelines?A: CEO James Walker highlighted that Nano's ability to use commercially available LEU+ fuel is a major advantage. They are in conversations with enrichment companies like Urenco for mass rollout needs. On the fabrication side, they are speaking with emerging players like B2XT, Standard Nuclear (with Framatome), and TrisoX (X Energy subsidiary) to negotiate long-term contracts. The capacity to fabricate fuel for the first-of-a-kind reactor already exists, so timelines are not at risk. For the long term, they may consider bringing some fuel manufacturing elements in-house or establishing joint ventures to de-risk mass production. Q: How important is the higher temperature output of HTGRs versus metallic fueled fast reactors for industrial applications?A: CEO James Walker provided a technical defense of HTGRs, noting that while past HTGRs had low capacity factors, Nano's design uses a solar salt thermal energy storage loop to handle fluctuating demand. He argued that fast reactors have never been commercially deployed and require highly enriched fuel (HALEU) or plutonium blends, which are not commercially available or legally feasible. He also noted that fast reactors are more efficient at larger scales, limiting their flexibility and modularity compared to HTGRs, making the case for HTGRs stronger for small, portable, and industrial applications. Q: Is there a geographic distinction in your business model where you might be more likely to provide services versus retain ownership internationally?A: CEO James Walker noted that interest from countries like South Korea is driven by a need for industrial heat to de-risk heavy industry. While some international customers may prefer to own the reactor systems to avoid long-term payments, the majority still prefer to pay a contractual price for power and have the responsibility of operation sit with Nano. Even heavy industries that are willing to invest capital ultimately want the operational responsibility to remain with the technology provider. Q: Can you provide color on how to think about STS's revenue heading into 2027 and whether you plan to scale the business?A: CEO James Walker explained that STS is both a de-risking operation for reactor deployments and a significant growth business. The nuclear fuel cycle requires specialized transportation at every step, and with few players in the space, STS is well-positioned to grow substantially. They are looking at acquisitions at the front end of the fuel cycle to complement STS's back-end expertise, creating a more holistic business that can generate significant revenue this decade, even before reactors are deployed. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-12

Nano Nuclear Energy Fiscal Q3 Loss Unchanged, Revenue Rises

MT Newswires

Nano Nuclear Energy (NNE) reported a fiscal Q3 loss late Wednesday of $0.19 per diluted share, uncha

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-12

NANO Nuclear Reports Q3 FY 2026 Financial Results and Provides Business Update

GlobeNewswire
Figure 1 Management to hold webcast today at 5:00 pm Eastern New York, N.Y., Aug. 12, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NNE) (“NANO Nuclear” or “the Company”), a leading advanced nuclear micro modular reactor and technology company focused on developing clean energy solutions, today reported its third quarter fiscal year 2026 financial results and provided a business update. Figure 1 - NANO Nuclear Reports Q3 FY 2026 Financial Results and Provides Business Update During its third fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2026 and subsequently, NANO Nuclear made tangible progress as a leading North-American microreactor developer. Key achievements included: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) accepted for review the Construction Permit Application (CPA) for deployment of the KRONOS MMRTM Energy System at the University of Illinois (U. of I.), initiating formal review activities Completed the acquisition of Secured Transportation Systems (STS), a U.S.-based, globally operating nuclear logistics, transportation and services company with more than 20 years of experience supporting the movement of radioactive and nuclear materials, adding a revenue generating business and advancing its vertical integration strategy. Completed 1 gigawatt (GW) feasibility study for BaRupOn’s data center & manufacturing campus, advanced discussions with a potential strategic collaborator developing GW-scale data centers in the U.S. and internationally, advancing discussions with a nuclear power project developer and AI-infrastructure company for a collaboration on several commercial opportunities, and earlier stage discussions with potential data center, defense, mining, and industrial customers, providing visibility into multiple GW of potential future commercial deployments Strong progress in advancing several synergistic acquisition and partnership opportunities across the nuclear fuel cycle to further enhance vertical integration, including additional transportation assets and nuclear fuel facility assets Advanced several critical engineering workstreams, including progress with a collaboration with Fortil for KRONOS’ fuel handling and storage system, as well as a separate collaboration with another globally recognized engineering organization for KRONOS’ helium circulator Robust quarter end cash, cash equivalents and short-term investment balance of approx…Read full document

Figure 1 Management to hold webcast today at 5:00 pm Eastern New York, N.Y., Aug. 12, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NNE) (“NANO Nuclear” or “the Company”), a leading advanced nuclear micro modular reactor and technology company focused on developing clean energy solutions, today reported its third quarter fiscal year 2026 financial results and provided a business update. Figure 1 - NANO Nuclear Reports Q3 FY 2026 Financial Results and Provides Business Update During its third fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2026 and subsequently, NANO Nuclear made tangible progress as a leading North-American microreactor developer. Key achievements included: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) accepted for review the Construction Permit Application (CPA) for deployment of the KRONOS MMRTM Energy System at the University of Illinois (U. of I.), initiating formal review activities Completed the acquisition of Secured Transportation Systems (STS), a U.S.-based, globally operating nuclear logistics, transportation and services company with more than 20 years of experience supporting the movement of radioactive and nuclear materials, adding a revenue generating business and advancing its vertical integration strategy. Completed 1 gigawatt (GW) feasibility study for BaRupOn’s data center & manufacturing campus, advanced discussions with a potential strategic collaborator developing GW-scale data centers in the U.S. and internationally, advancing discussions with a nuclear power project developer and AI-infrastructure company for a collaboration on several commercial opportunities, and earlier stage discussions with potential data center, defense, mining, and industrial customers, providing visibility into multiple GW of potential future commercial deployments Strong progress in advancing several synergistic acquisition and partnership opportunities across the nuclear fuel cycle to further enhance vertical integration, including additional transportation assets and nuclear fuel facility assets Advanced several critical engineering workstreams, including progress with a collaboration with Fortil for KRONOS’ fuel handling and storage system, as well as a separate collaboration with another globally recognized engineering organization for KRONOS’ helium circulator Robust quarter end cash, cash equivalents and short-term investment balance of approximately $580 million dollars, positioning NANO Nuclear with substantial liquidity and financial flexibility Significantly expanded headcount to 85 employees and contractors as of June 30, 2026, from 31 one year prior, with expectations for significant further increases to enable the company’s growth strategy “We continued to execute across our core priorities during the third quarter and more recently, highlighted by the advancement of the KRONOS MMR™ Energy System into formal NRC licensing for our first deployment at the University of Illinois. We also expanded our vertical integration with the acquisition of STS to strengthen our fuel-cycle capabilities, making NANO Nuclear a revenue generating microreactor developer. Moreover, we experienced significant growth in our pipeline of commercial opportunities, with visibility into multiple gigawatts of potential commercial deployments,” said Jay Yu, Founder and Chairman of NANO Nuclear. “We’re confident KRONOS’ high-TRL modular HTGR design, enhanced safety profile, and ability to use commercially available fuel will be key advantages as we advance toward construction, licensing, and commercial deployments in the coming years. Moreover, we expect our robust financial position, highly experienced team, and significant growth in headcount to enable our future execution. Equally as important, we continue to evaluate additional M&A and partnership opportunities to expand vertical integration and de-risk future KRONOS deployments. We believe this combination of technology, strategy, financial strength, and industry experience has built one of the industry's strongest foundations for long-term value creation.” Financial Results for Nine Months Ended June 30, 2026 Cash and Cash Equivalents NANO Nuclear had cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments totaling $580 million as of June 30, 2026, an increase from the prior quarter ended March 30, 2026 from approximately $26 million in net proceeds through its At-the-Market (ATM) program, partially offset by operating expenses related to the advancement of the KRONOS MMRTM Energy System and related fuel cycle initiatives. Operating Activities $18.7 million used in operating activities during the nine months ended June 30, 2026, an approximate $4.0 million increase from the prior year comparable period, primarily reflecting an increase in operating expenses to advance development of the KRONOS MMRTM Energy System and adjacent fuel cycle initiatives, partially offset by a significant increase in interest income and a reduction in equity-based compensation. Investing Activities $297.6 million used in investing activities during the nine months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $284.7 million versus the prior year comparable period, primarily driven by a $281.2 million dollar increase in short-term investments to earn a higher yield on the Company’s cash balance. Financing Activities $411.5 million in net cash provided by financing activities during the nine months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $202.2 million versus the prior year comparable period, primarily from $378.5 million in net proceeds from an October 2025 private placement and $25.6 million in net proceeds from the Company’s ATM program during the third quarter. Q3 2026 Key Highlights and Recent Developments KRONOS MMR™ Begins Formal NRC Licensing & Advances Toward Construction In May of 2026, the NRC docketed the CPA for the deployment of the KRONOS MMR™ at the U. of I., initiating formal review activities Progress with engineering partners demonstrates maturation of key reactor subsystems Growing Pipeline Provides Visibility into Multiple Gigawatts of Commercial Opportunities Completed feasibility study to evaluate 1 GW of power provided by the Company’s KRONOS MMR™ Energy System for BaRupOn’s AI data center and manufacturing campus under development in Texas, advancing discussions toward initiation of the licensing process Advancing discussions toward an initial framework with a potential strategic collaborator and customer to support their planned multi-GW pipeline of data-center projects in the U.S. and select international markets as their preferred nuclear technology partner Signed an MOU with Supermicro to evaluate the integration of the KRONOS MMR™ Energy System with their AI server and data-center infrastructure platforms Selected by AFWERX for an SBIR Phase I Award, and continued advancing Direct to Phase II Award for a separate opportunity at Joint Base Anacostia Bolling Advanced discussions with a nuclear power project developer and AI-infrastructure company for a collaboration on several commercial opportunities Tangible Progress in Enhancing Vertical Integration Across Nuclear Fuel Supply Chain Acquired STS, bringing in house a revenue generating, globally operating nuclear logistics, transportation and services company with a history of profitability Strong progress in advancing several synergistic acquisition and partnership opportunities across the nuclear fuel cycle, with potential for more than one announcement in the coming months Well-Positioned to Execute Strategy with Robust Liquidity Ended the quarter with approximately $580 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments Strong balance sheet a significant strategic advantage, placing the Company in a strong position to execute its growth strategy “During the third quarter, we continued to execute across our core priorities and converted our strategic foundation into tangible progress. The NRC’s formal acceptance of our Construction Permit Application for the KRONOS MMR™ Energy System marks one of the most important milestones in our development program and reflects the maturity of the technology as we advance toward construction readiness,” said James Walker, Chief Executive Officer of NANO Nuclear. “At the same time, our acquisition of Secured Transportation Services materially strengthens our vertical integration, bringing highly specialized nuclear logistics capabilities in-house and further de-risking future KRONOS deployments. Commercially, we are making meaningful headway, particularly through advanced discussions with a prospective strategic collaborator and customer developing a multi-gigawatt pipeline of U.S. data-center projects, which we believe could position NANO Nuclear as their preferred nuclear technology provider. Moreover, our robust liquidity position, ending the quarter with approximately $580 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, continues to be a significant strategic advantage, providing us the financial flexibility to advance KRONOS, pursue synergistic acquisitions, and accelerate commercialization across several high-value end markets.” NANO Nuclear management will hold a webcast today at 5:00 pm Eastern to discuss the Company’s results and future plans. A replay of the webcast will be made available on NANO Nuclear’s website beginning shortly after the call this evening. About NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NNE) is a North American advanced technology-driven nuclear energy company seeking to become a commercially focused, diversified, and vertically integrated company across five business lines: (i) cutting edge portable and other microreactor technologies, (ii) nuclear fuel supply chain, (iii) nuclear fuel transportation, (iv) nuclear applications for space and (v) nuclear industry consulting services. Led by a world-class nuclear engineering team, NANO Nuclear’s reactor products in development include the proprietary KRONOS MMR™ Energy System, a stationary high-temperature gas-cooled reactor that is in construction permit pre-application engagement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in collaboration with University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, “ZEUS”, a portable solid core battery reactor, and the space focused, portable LOKI MMR™, each representing advanced developments in clean energy solutions that are portable, on-demand capable, advanced nuclear microreactors. Advanced Fuel Transportation Inc. (AFT), a NANO Nuclear subsidiary, bolstered by the May 2026 acquisition of Secured Transportation Services (STS), is led by former executives from the largest transportation company in the world and provides nuclear engineering and materials transport services in the U.S. and globally. Through NANO Nuclear, AFT is the exclusive licensee of a patented high-capacity HALEU fuel transportation basket developed by three major U.S. national nuclear laboratories and funded by the Department of Energy. HALEU Energy Fuel Inc. (HEF), a NANO Nuclear subsidiary, is focusing on the future development of a domestic source for a High-Assay, Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) fuel fabrication pipeline for NANO Nuclear’s own microreactors as well as the broader advanced nuclear reactor industry. NANO Nuclear Space Inc. (NNS), a NANO Nuclear subsidiary, is exploring the potential commercial applications of NANO Nuclear’s developing micronuclear reactor technology in space. NNS is focusing on applications such as the LOKI MMR™ system and other power systems for extraterrestrial projects and human sustaining environments, and potentially propulsion technology for long haul space missions. NNS’ initial focus will be on cis-lunar applications, referring to uses in the space region extending from Earth to the area surrounding the Moon's surface. For more corporate information please visit: https://NanoNuclearEnergy.com/ For further NANO Nuclear information, please contact: Email: [email protected] Tel: (212) 634-9206 PLEASE FOLLOW OUR SOCIAL MEDIA PAGES HERE: NANO Nuclear Energy LINKEDINNANO Nuclear Energy YOUTUBENANO Nuclear Energy X PLATFORM Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements This news release, the webcast described herein and statements of NANO Nuclear’s management in connection with this news release contain or may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In this context, forward-looking statements mean statements related to future events, which may impact our expected future business and financial performance, and often contain words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “explore,” “plans”, “aim,” “goal,” “believes”, “potential”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “would” or “may” or derivations of these words and other words of similar meaning, although forward-looking statements may be denoted by other terms. In this press release, forward-looking statements include those regarding the Company’s development and regulatory (regarding its KRONOS microreactor) and commercial (including customer acquisition) plans. These and other forward-looking statements are based on information available to us as of the date of this news release and represent management's current views and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, events or results and involve significant known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may be beyond our control. For NANO Nuclear, particular risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual future results to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements include but are not limited to the following: (i) risks related to our U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”), Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (“CNSC”) or related state or other U.S. or non-U.S nuclear licensing submissions, (ii) risks related the development of new or advanced technology and the acquisition of complementary technology or businesses, including difficulties with design and testing, cost overruns, regulatory delays, integration issues and the development of competitive technology, (iii) our ability to obtain key vendor, technology and customer contracts and the significant funding necessary to execute on our business plan, (iv) risks related to uncertainty regarding our ability to technologically develop and commercially deploy a competitive advanced nuclear reactor or other technology in the timelines we anticipate, if ever, (v) risks related to the impact of U.S. and non-U.S. government regulation, policies and licensing requirements, including by the DOE, and the NRC, including those associated with the recently enacted ADVANCE Act and the May 23, 2025 Executive Orders seeking to streamline nuclear regulation, and (vi) similar risks and uncertainties associated with the operating a developing business a highly regulated, competitive and rapidly evolving industry, including that our plans may change and we may use our cash on hand faster or in different ways than anticipated as our business requires. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this news release. These factors may not constitute all factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in any forward-looking statement, and NANO Nuclear therefore encourages investors to review other factors that may affect future results in its filings with the SEC, which are available for review at www.sec.gov and at https://ir.nanonuclearenergy.com/financial-information/sec-filings. Accordingly, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a predictor of actual results. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this news release, except as required by law. Attachment Figure 1

TranscriptFY2026 Q32026-08-12

FY2026 Q3 earnings call transcript

Earnings source - 131 paragraphs
Operator

Please note this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to Matthew Barry.

Matthew Barry

Thank you, and good afternoon, everyone. Joining me on the call today are Jay Yu, NANO Nuclear's Founder, Chairman, and President, James Walker, our CEO, and Jaisun Garcha, our CFO. Please note that today's press release and slide presentation to accompany this webcast are available on our website. Before moving ahead, I'll quickly address forward-looking statements made on this call. As reflected in more detail on slide two, today's presentation contains forward-looking statements about NANO's future that are made under the safe harbor provisions of the applicable federal securities laws. We caution that actual results, including without limitation the results of NANO's microreactor development activities, our plans for vertical integration, customer acquisition, and other strategies and plans, timelines for achieving goals, and other matters relating to our future operations, may differ materially and adversely from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

Matthew Barry

Important risks and other factors that could cause actual results to differ from those in our forward-looking statements are contained in our filings with the SEC, including our annual report on Form 10-K filed this past December, which you're encouraged to review. The forward-looking information provided today is accurate only as of today, and NANO disclaims any obligation to update any information provided except as required by law. With that, I'll turn the call over to Jay Yu, NANO's founder, chairman, and president.

Jay Yu

Thank you, Matt, and thank you to everyone joining the call today. I'd like to begin the call by reminding investors what differentiates NANO Nuclear and why we believe we're well-positioned to capture value in the advanced nuclear industry. We've intentionally built our strategy around six factors we believe will determine commercial success at scale. First is our technology. Kronos is built upon high-temperature gas-cooled reactor technology, which has been demonstrated through decades of global deployments. The TRISO fuel used by Kronos also benefits from extensive qualification work under the U.S. DOE's AGR program, contributing to our confidence in building upon mature advanced reactor technology. At the same time, Kronos' enhanced safety profile using helium as coolant and TRISO fuel positions it well for applications requiring co-location with customers, including AI data centers, industrial applications, military installations, and remote mining operations. The second is design maturity and fuel flexibility.

Jay Yu

Kronos's high TRL is backed by substantial historic investment over a decade of development. Our confidence in Kronos's design maturity is supported by the NRC's formal acceptance of the University of Illinois's Construction Permit Application for review, making NANO Nuclear the first commercially ready microreactor developer building a full-scale unit and one of only a handful of Generation IV reactor developers to reach this stage. Our reactor is also designed to utilize LEU plus fuel that's commercially available today while maintaining the flexibility to utilize HALEU in the future without redesign once HALEU is available and economically viable. Next is scalability. We believe success will be measured by the ability to manufacture a standardized design economically and at scale. Kronos's small modular architect is intended to support standardized manufacturing and repeatable deployment.

Jay Yu

We expect this approach to provide one of the clearest pathways to benefit from new expedited licensing pathways, including Part 53 and proposed Part 57, shortened deployment schedules, and economies of scale. Fourth is commercialization. Our first full-scale prototype development at the University of Illinois is advancing through formal NRC licensing with a clear pathway towards first power around 2030. Our commercial pipeline also continues to grow. We recently completed a feasibility study assessing the potential to deploy up to 1 GW of power with BaRupOn. At the same time, we are advancing discussions with potential strategic collaborator and customer advancing planned gigawatt scale data centers in the U.S. and internationally. These discussions continue to progress, and we see a potential to soon reach an initial framework identifying NANO Nuclear as their preferred nuclear technology provider.

Jay Yu

In parallel, we're exploring strategic alignment mechanisms, which could include milestone-based investments tied to defined commercial and project development milestones we believe would drive meaningful value for shareholders. This proposed structure is designed to align long-term interests and incentivize our joint success. Separately, we are advancing discussions with nuclear power project developer and an AI infrastructure company to jointly evaluate several projects. Lastly, we're also seeing strong interest from earlier-stage discussions with potential defense, mining, and industrial customers. We believe these opportunities provide visibility into multiple gigawatts of potential commercial deployments. Next is vertical integration. We believe one of the greatest challenges facing the advanced nuclear industry over the coming decade will be execution across a broader nuclear fuel cycle, which is why we're strategically focused on expanding our capabilities in that area.

Jay Yu

Our recently announced acquisition of Secured Transportation Services, or STS, has accelerated our progress by providing the ability to transport nuclear fuel and spent fuel. Our team has already identified opportunities to leverage STS's specialized expertise to de-risk Kronos' advancement and our expansion across the fuel cycle. Equally as important, STS has demonstrated a history of profitability. Our team is excited for several significant opportunities to grow the business organically, as well as through an additional M&A opportunity currently under evaluation. We also continue to advance M&A and partnership discussions targeting fuel facility assets to further de-risk the nuclear fuel cycle. Lastly, execution requires both capital and the right team. We ended the quarter with approximately $580 million of liquidity, providing what we believe is one of the strongest balance sheets among advanced reactor developers.

Jay Yu

Our strong financial position provides the financial flexibility to advance our first deployment, while also pursuing strategic acquisitions and partnerships across the nuclear fuel cycle. Equally as important, we have assembled an experienced team from the DOE, the NRC, U.S. National Labs, the U.S. military, and advanced reactor developers. Our team has grown significantly over the past year, with our headcount increasing to 85 employees and contractors as of the end of our third quarter, from 31 one year prior, and we have expectations for significant growth. We believe this combination of technology, financial strength, and industry experience has built one of the industry's strongest foundations for long-term value creation. Our team looks forward to additional progress and remains excited for both short and long-term opportunities to create further value for shareholders.

Jay Yu

With that, I will turn over the call to our CEO, James Walker, who will provide additional details on our progress and recent developments.

James Walker

Thank you, Jay. NANO Nuclear has established a strong foundation within the advanced nuclear industry, and we continued converting that foundation into tangible execution during the third quarter. In May, the NRC formally accepted for review the Construction Permit Application for the deployment of the Kronos MMR at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, initiating formal review activities. The NRC subsequently announced its expectation to complete its environmental assessment in Q1 2027 and its safety evaluation in Q3 2027. These projected milestones remain consistent with our expectation for the review process to complete in 2027, providing the opportunity to begin initial construction activities in the second half of 2027. In parallel, we are advancing several critical engineering work streams. We recently announced progress with an engineering collaboration with Fortil, an internationally recognized engineering and consulting firm, to advance Kronos' fuel handling and storage system.

James Walker

This system is an important element of both our first deployment and our broader commercialization of the platform. We are also advancing an engineering collaboration with another globally recognized engineering firm to advance Kronos' primary helium circulator. This firm has decades of experience supporting gas-cooled nuclear reactor programs, and this collaboration has now advanced into the detailed design phase. Together, these advancements reflect progress across several critical path work streams. They are helping us mature key reactor subsystems, reduce first-of-a-kind execution risk, and establish repeatable designs for future standardized commercial deployments. Another significant area of progress during the quarter was the continued expansion of our vertically integrated nuclear platform. As Jay highlighted, we completed the acquisition of STS in May. STS is a globally operating nuclear logistics, transportation, and services company with a history of profitability.

James Walker

With more than 20 years of experience supporting the movement of radioactive and nuclear materials, STS supports both commercial nuclear customers and critical missions for the U.S. DOE and NNSA. By bringing these capabilities in-house, we can reduce reliance on third-party providers, accelerate our expansion across several aspects of the fuel cycle, and accelerate future reactor deployments. At the same time, we have made strong progress advancing several synergistic acquisition and partnership opportunities across the nuclear fuel cycle. These include an additional fuel transportation business and nuclear fuel facility assets. We see potential for more than one announcement in the coming months, subject to further diligence and closing conditions, with one position to contribute revenue upon closing, and another offering more meaningful revenue potential in or around the 2030 timeframe. The third key area of progress came from the expansion of Kronos' commercial pipeline.

James Walker

During the quarter, we continued progressing our deployment opportunity with BaRupOn by completing the previously announced feasibility study, which evaluated a phased deployment of up to 1 GW of Kronos MMR capacity. We view this as an important milestone, and we are advancing discussions towards initiation of the NRC licensing process. We are concurrently advancing discussions towards an initial framework with a potential strategic collaborator and customer to support their planned multi-gigawatt pipeline of data center projects. If finalized, the framework could position NANO Nuclear as the preferred nuclear technology provider. While terms remain under discussion, we believe this framework and future collaboration could significantly strengthen our path towards commercialization by aligning NANO Nuclear with an experienced infrastructure developer with a strong track record of developing, financing, and executing large-scale projects.

James Walker

We are also evaluating mechanisms to align interests through future investment in NANO Nuclear Energy tied to defined commercial milestones we believe could drive substantial value for shareholders. Moreover, we believe this collaboration could be a meaningful validator of our technology and our commercialization strategy, while also providing visibility into a multi-gigawatt deployment pipeline, which could help accelerate Kronos' commercialization. We also signed an MOU with Supermicro to evaluate the integration of Kronos with Supermicro's AI server and data center infrastructure platforms, as well as potential joint go-to-market opportunities and off-grid deployments for next generation AI infrastructure. By engaging early, we can jointly evaluate how future nuclear-powered data centers may be designed as integrated systems, rather than treating the power source and computing infrastructure as separate development decisions.

James Walker

Moreover, we continue to advance several opportunities within and outside of the data center market, further demonstrating the breadth and scale of the market opportunity for Kronos. To this end, we were recently selected for an SBIR Phase I award by AFWERX, the innovation arm of the Department of the Air Force, to advance the Kronos MMR for the U.S. Air Force. The latest award further expands our opportunity set with the Department of the Air Force following the company's previously announced direct Phase II SBIR award for Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling, which continues to progress on schedule. We recently submitted our fourth contract line item deliverable, with the remaining four deliverables expected to be completed over the next 12-18 months. Lastly, we further enhanced our strong balance sheet by raising approximately $26 million in net proceeds from our at-the-market or ATM facility.

James Walker

At quarter end, we held approximately $580 million in liquidity. Overall, the quarter included substantial progress across each of our principal strategic priorities.

James Walker

I would now like to provide additional color on our recent acquisitions of STS, the progress we have made since completing the transaction, and the opportunities we see to create long-term shareholder value. Our acquisition of STS represents more than a fuel transportation business. Beyond its established operating business, regulatory clearances, experienced personnel, and long-standing customer relationships, STS provides a strategic platform to expand our capabilities across the nuclear fuel cycle, helping to further de-risk Kronos's deployments. Since joining NANO Nuclear, STS has continued demonstrating the strength of its platform by supporting several important DOE and NNSA missions, including the successful transport of HALEU from Japan to the United States, the removal of highly enriched uranium from Venezuela, and additional domestic transportation campaigns supporting the U.S. nuclear industry.

James Walker

We believe these missions reflect both the highly specialized nature of STS's capabilities and the confidence key government agencies place in the organization. Looking ahead, we believe STS is exceptionally well-positioned to benefit from the continued growth of the nuclear industry. Increasing reactor deployments are expected to drive demand for fuel transportation and related fuel cycle services, and STS is one of the established leaders in this specialized market. Under the NANO Nuclear umbrella, STS is already advancing initiatives to broaden its capabilities in anticipation of that growth. STS also strengthens NANO Nuclear beyond transportation and logistics. The team includes personnel with decades of experience supporting the industry. We believe this expertise can support future reactor operations while further strengthening our relationships with key government organizations.

James Walker

We have also been encouraged by the feedback we have received from prospective customers, several of whom view our ability to offer a more integrated solution as a meaningful differentiator compared with other reactor developers. STS provides a successful standalone operating business we expect will continue generating a solid base of revenue while offering multiple avenues for significant organic growth. At the same time, we are already evaluating a complementary acquisition we believe could meaningfully expand STS's capabilities, geographic footprint, and revenue base. We look forward to sharing updates on our progress in the coming quarters. With that, I will hand over the call to our CFO, Jaisun, to discuss the financial highlights.

Jaisun Garcha

Thank you, James. I will now provide a brief overview of our financial performance for the third quarter and the year-to-date period. Our acquisition of STS provides NANO Nuclear with a revenue-generating fuel transportation business with a demonstrated history of profitability. STS generated approximately $3.9 million of unaudited revenue during the first six months of calendar year 2026, including $200,000 from the May 22nd closing of the transaction through June 30th. Operating expenses totaled $15.9 million, driven by higher G&A and R&D expenses as we continue to advance Kronos development, progress Kronos through the formal NRC licensing process, advance activities at the University of Illinois, and expand capabilities across the nuclear fuel cycle. As expected, operating expenses increased versus the prior year period as we scale our engineering, regulatory, commercial, and fuel cycle workstreams. Our Q3 net loss was $10.1 million, compared to $7.6 million in the prior year quarter.

Jaisun Garcha

The increase reflects higher OpEx, partially offset by higher interest income, driven by our larger liquidity position. Year-to-date net loss totaled $25.8 million, an improvement versus the $32 million in the prior year period, benefiting from substantially higher interest income and lower equity-based compensation. Year-to-date net cash used in operating activities was $18.7 million, primarily reflecting the year-to-date net loss, partially offset by non-cash equity-based compensation. Year-to-date net cash used in investing activities was $297.6 million, driven by our approximate $281 million purchase of short-term investments, approximately $10 million in plant, property, and equipment additions, and approximately $6 million related to the STS acquisition. At quarter end, we held $580 million in liquidity, an increase of roughly $11 million from the prior quarter.

Jaisun Garcha

This increase reflects approximately $26 million in net proceeds from our ATM program, partially offset by capital deployed to advance Kronos development, NRC licensing activities, and broader fuel cycle initiatives. We believe our balance sheet is among the strongest in the advanced nuclear energy sector, providing a clear competitive advantage as we progress toward our first-of-kind deployment. Our strong financial position could be further enhanced by several non-dilutive funding opportunities for the University of Illinois project, which we believe could meaningfully reduce the capital required. Taken together, this liquidity profile not only positions us well to advance our first-of-kind prototype, but also provides the flexibility to pursue value-accretive acquisitions across the fuel cycle while continuing to advance Kronos towards commercialization.

Jaisun Garcha

We will continue to deploy capital strategically to de-risk Kronos development and commercialization, and prudently in line with prior successful value-accretive investments such as the acquisition of the Kronos MMR assets and STS. Overall, we remain confident that our financial strength positions us exceptionally well to execute on our growth strategy. With that, I'll turn the call over to the operator for Q&A.

Operator

Thank you. We will now be conducting a Q&A session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. We ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. Thank you. One moment while we poll for questions. Our first question comes from Sameer Joshi with H.C. Wainwright. Please proceed with your question.

Sameer Joshi

Hey, good afternoon, James, Jay, Jaisun, and Matt. Congratulations on the progress. The CPA acceptance was a real achievement, and the STS acquisition also fits nicely in your strategy. My first question is about just as the regulatory process goes through with the safety evaluation and environmental assessment, on the other side, you said you're working with Fortil and another engineering firm. Are there any long lead items that you might need to order now to start construction in the second half of 2027?

James Walker

The initial construction fortunately focuses more on things like the installation of the citadel. If you think about a big subterranean concrete structure for which the reactor will sit in, for instance, technically right at the start of the construction period, we don't need any reactor-related components. That doesn't mean we haven't started sourcing them already, and we're into vendor negotiations with regard to costs and delivery schedules and all that. But the initial construction isn't waiting on those. Once we get the approval and the turnaround from the NRC, the federal regulator, we'll proceed straight away with the ground excavation, followed by concrete pouring and steel installation for that portion of the project that will house the nuclear reactor. The other parts of the actual system, the Kronos system overall, include the thermal energy storage system, which is the solar salt.

James Walker

The thing that acts as like a battery and the adjacent plant, which converts that thermal output to electric. None of that is nuclear at all. A lot of those components are very standard. You're thinking turbine systems, solar salt, those don't even need to wait for NRC approval. We can get constructing on those straight away, and those are more off-the-shelf components. There's a lot we can do even before we procure components. But we do want to, by the time we get the approval next year, be in a position where we know where everything is coming from, the cost of everything, and we have everything lined out in terms of the pathway to the full build-out of the reactor system.

Sameer Joshi

That is reassuring and good to know. My next question is about the acquisitions you spoke about. Of course, STS is in the bag. You spoke about adjacent acquisition and maybe another one. Have you allocated any budget, particular amount, dollar amount that you want to spend during 2026? Or you are more likely to be opportunistic and strategic about this?

James Walker

It is not that there is a ceiling on the limit to which we are about to spend on acquisitions, but we are very capital conscious. I think that is important because we do not want to go after big acquisitions that are in the order of hundreds of millions of dollars, even if it was to acquire big revenue-generating businesses for NANO Nuclear Energy internally.

James Walker

The focus has always largely been on acquisitions that provide us that in-house capability that will facilitate the rollout of our reactor systems. A lot of the time, all that means is acquiring small companies. For instance, even with STS, I think the initial payments as part of that acquisition were only in the region of about $7 million, with some future payments for retention allowances factored in. But that is kind of emblematic of the other acquisitions that we are considering at the moment.

James Walker

They are small scale. It is to bring in-house capabilities to us. The only contradiction to that might be a fuel facility that we are looking at. But again, that fuel facility, there is no acquisition cost exactly. Our equity position in that would be earned through investment into the completion of that facility. So it does need to all be very strategic. All of these acquisitions are, of course, to facilitate the mass rollout of the reactor systems. But we do not want to spend big money on acquisitions. The revenue is obviously beneficial, and it does de-risk the company to some degree, but it is in-house capabilities. It is partially also to take advantage of the massively expanding nuclear market.

James Walker

That STS acquisition, already, we are looking at all sorts of contracts that are way in excess of contracts that STS has been able to solicit for before because it needed more capital backing, which we can now give it. So there is the expansion potential that exists for these small entities. But succinctly to the question, no, we are not looking to have big outlays for big acquisitions.

Matthew Barry

Sameer-

James Walker

Thank you.

Matthew Barry

I would-

James Walker

Go ahead.

Matthew Barry

I would also just add as well that if there are acquisitions that have a bigger outlay relative to some of the acquisitions we've executed upon thus far, we're very conscious of that, as James highlighted, in terms of the capital outlay. We also are ideally evaluating several different funding mechanisms to reduce that, whether it's government programs or other mechanisms to reduce that capital outlay. Also, if there were other larger type acquisitions, it would be safe to say that those capital outlays would occur over a number of years rather than all up front.

Sameer Joshi

Understood. Thanks for that color, and thanks. I will step back in queue.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Craig Irwin with ROTH Capital Partners. Please proceed with your question.

Craig Irwin

Good evening, and thank you for taking my questions. I wanted to ask about the project outlook. Your prepared remarks make it very clear, the UIUC project is on track, construction start by the end of next year. You have announced a particularly interesting relationship with Ameresco that I do not think is appreciated appropriately by the market. Ameresco has eight enhanced use leases from the Navy, and they are actually bidding for leases right now from the Army, where this gives them land and access to easy permitting or much faster permitting than commercial or non-military land, for power projects to support data centers that would be used both by hyperscalers and by the military itself. They have talked publicly about a $10 billion near-term pipeline.

Craig Irwin

The $1.5 billion in bookings they had this last quarter, a very large chunk of that actually came from data center. I understand the actual number is mid-20s is the medium term. $20 billion is the medium-term power opportunity they are looking down. Given that they can move faster and they probably have access to DOE and Department of Defense licensing pathways for nuclear power, this could be one of the most interesting customers in the market. Can you maybe expand on your relationship with Ameresco? Have you been in discussions with them about potentially using these alternative pathways for construction approval, for plan approval, given that these would be Department of Defense projects? They have talked about 70% funded by third-party debt, and I think there are names that are big names that are lined up and competing for those slots.

Craig Irwin

Anything you can share about your conversations with that company that can help people understand the real value there?

James Walker

Sure. I am happy to give some background and color on that. The challenge for NANO is that we are a technology company. We have got a great reactor system. When we start commercially deploying the reactors, we are going to be looking at dozens of different sites and many different reactors that will be deploying all around the place. That means a lot of the components coming from a lot of different sources and going to one place. It is going to require a lot of EPC work. The initial conversations with Ameresco were based around that engineering procurement and construction work, the coordination of that, because it is a big operation in and of itself, especially considering the size of the potential scale of some of these operations that we are looking at. Ameresco, I think they are clean energy projects.

James Walker

When they are looking at things like DoD, it is almost similar to how we are dealing with the Air Force and our Air Force contracts. They are also, the DoD, pushing in the direction of trying to get these systems online so they can have that energy sovereignty. But even for the DoD, these are new endeavors. They have a lot of familiarity with naval reactor systems, aircraft carriers reactor systems. But even this is a bit new territory for them. So it is also, whether it is through Ameresco's projects or it is through the Air Force, we still need to go through that feasibility study analysis similar to how we are going through with the Air Force.

James Walker

I would not say that Ameresco's projects could expedite us hugely, just given our existing experience of what we are having to go through at the moment in terms of providing the necessary information for the military to get comfortable with the installation of reactors at their sites. They do need to defer to the NRC on some things, just given these are new reactor systems. I think even for Ameresco's projects, where they will be looking at the introduction of nuclear reactors onto their sites, it is still, no matter how you slice it, a new endeavor for the DoD that they will need NRC assistance and partial, they do benefit from projects like the UIUC project, the University of Illinois construction project, because they can see it being constructed, they can see the NRC working through the process, and it does provide more reassurance.

James Walker

They are in that phase now where they are trying to analyze the real players in this, because there are really only a few handful on that sort of commercial path. They are distilling that down as they get more expert now at understanding this sort of advanced reactor industry in total. Not to convolute the answer, but effectively it is really a factor of-

Jay Yu

Yeah.

James Walker

conventional licensing frameworks that need to be worked through for reassurance, and the ability to fast-track them is rather minimal.

Jay Yu

Yeah.

Craig Irwin

Understood.

Jay Yu

I just wanted to add, with Ameresco, we are in active talks with them. They do have a robust nuclear kind of a group there, so we are working with them actively, and we are looking at different strategies with them. Just to reinforce what you said, they are looking at different areas and one of the areas is nuclear and there are synergies there, as you mentioned. We are ongoing and talking with them about these possibilities.

Craig Irwin

Thank you for that. My second question is about Dioxitek, right? There has been public coverage out there that NANO Nuclear proposed a $230 million investment structured in two phases. I think it is fairly obvious that that did not come from you, but it is out there in the public domain, so maybe that increases the bandwidth or the opportunity for you to maybe discuss this potential investment. I know it was a proposal and that there is a negotiation going on and that you do not necessarily, like there could be other parties that might win the bid in this process. Can you maybe just give us a little bit of color from your perspective where things stand at the moment, and how this could be a strategic fit for NANO over the next couple of years?

James Walker

Sure. So yeah, that-

Jay Yu

Well, I could quickly answer that. Our proposal is currently under review, and we hope to have an update in the coming months, but we cannot really touch on that right now. But we are looking to be vertically integrated, obviously. So this would be a big kind of achievement for us. But right now it is still under review, so we do not really have too much comment on that.

Craig Irwin

Understood. Completely understood. My last question, if I may. It is not easy to hire people with nuclear expertise, right? NANO Nuclear Energy has done a fantastic job bringing on experienced executives, bureaucrats, engineers from the industry, people with decades of experience, many of them. Can you talk about your hiring plans over the next year? Would you expect the growth in employees to continue at the similar rate that it has been materializing over the course of the last year? Do we need to see a double in the total number of employees in the medium to longer term to have the capabilities that you foresee and that you are planning for the broader NANO Nuclear Energy capacity and execution potential?

James Walker

It is a good question, actually, because NANO Nuclear Energy has obviously transitioned from a small company to a medium-sized company. What came with that was a big reorganization of how we actually run things and integrate the departments. The technical team does still need further expansion, and we need to do that essentially to have that in-house infrastructure to carry a reactor project forward from advanced design all the way through to an actual physical operating reactor system. Already, I am calling from the University of Illinois today. Even the conversations today with the chancellors and the deans involve significant amount of personnel and technical work being required. Even over the next few months, you will probably see a big upscaling in technical staff as we bring on more people. Over the next couple of years, that will expand even further.

James Walker

That expansion is very necessary, and that is only specific to the reactor system. There are additional acquisitions that will bring in additional people in other departments of the nuclear industry as well, including transportation. The other areas that we have alluded to already around fuel supply chain, that we are also making additional recruitment in those areas as well. NANO is expanding very quickly. I think the most important part, though, is to be very sensible in the hiring process, because over-employing and not having the organization in place with the correct reporting lines can quite quickly result in personnel that are not allocated properly and do not have designated tasks that are specific to NANO's mission. We are trying to do it as carefully as we can, but the pressure is on us to upscale as quickly as we can.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Nate Pendleton with Texas Capital Bank. Please proceed with your question.

Nate Pendleton

Good afternoon, and thanks for taking my questions. In your prepared remarks, you talked about advancing discussions toward a framework with a strategic collaborator and customer for a multi-gigawatt pipeline. Can you provide some insight into what that kind of structure would look like, what it could unlock from a commercialization perspective for you, and maybe what attracted the customer to NANO specifically?

James Walker

Sure. We have not publicly released a huge amount of information yet, but I can speak in sort of high levels to the sort of the framework that is been put in place, that is being put in place at the moment with this big partner. They establish a lot of data center campuses. They are looking to integrate NANO systems into these data center campuses over time. They would provide things like finance for campuses, power infrastructure, and NANO would provide things like the reactors, fuel, licensing support, and operational capabilities. The way we have structured this is that we have looked at how other companies have structured PPA agreements. The reason why a lot of these are deficient is that they do not require investment from the potential customer that they are going to be servicing.

James Walker

That can create some level of weakness because any agreement that is non-binding that says if you build a reactor system and it costs this much money for power, sure, we will buy it. If it does not meet this requirement, we have no obligation. That is an insufficient model, I think, for how reactor companies are going to successfully market and deploy their reactor systems.

James Walker

The way we are structuring this is that the partner in this question will have an ability to receive equity grants and warrants in NANO Nuclear Energy, but also give them the ability to invest tens of millions, if not $100 million into NANO Nuclear Energy, as development and reactor purchase milestones are achieved. So it is a very incentivizing arrangement where even NANO Nuclear Energy, for instance, could invest in the nuclear data center project itself. So we could have equity in that position.

James Walker

It could lead towards additional revenue being generated for the company once nuclear construction actually begins. But this way, we are more bound up with the technology partner, and that co-level of investment de-risks both sides and provides a way for us both to double-dip almost into an ability to raise revenue on both sides. But that synergistic partnership is essentially what we are aiming for with this new framework that we are deploying for Kronos in collaboration with the data center partner.

Matthew Barry

Also, if I could just jump in and just add some additional color as well. So this potential partner is a global infrastructure investment and development firm, has experience building, owning, and operating large infrastructure projects globally, which they expect will translate well to some of their ambitious plans for some gigawatt scale AI industrial campuses in the U.S. and also internationally. So I would say, as James highlighted, close to finalizing an initial framework, where NANO Nuclear Energy could be their preferred nuclear technology provider. This would be structured. Obviously, James talked about seeing some of the challenges with types of agreements, whether it is PPA agreements or other. This would be potentially structured a little bit differently as this company would look to purchase NANO Nuclear Energy's reactor.

Matthew Barry

Given their experience with some of these large-scale infrastructure projects, experience identifying land, procuring power, and sort of executing on these, they are very adept and also financing them as well. They are very adept at all of that, which would be very complementary to us, and so they would purchase our reactors in what we envision. But as James highlighted, there would be an opportunity for things like options to potentially have equity interest in some of that nuclear company that would be selling the power, which is really interesting.

Matthew Barry

Lastly, as James highlighted, I think the potential to have an arrangement where there is a level of investment in NANO not only signifies additional capital potentially in the future, but also signifies a level of seriousness to this and a level of, I'd say, belief and confidence in NANO Nuclear and how strongly positioned we are in terms of being the first microreactor developer building a full-scale prototype to enter formal NRC licensing and obviously being able to procure fuel that's commercially available today and having a design that has had significant investment. I think it also signifies confidence in NANO as a company.

Matthew Barry

I think also important is that given the potential planned pipeline, potential multi-gigawatt opportunity for NANO, I think it would really accelerate potentially our commercialization as well, and obviously it being with a credible partner, I think also makes it really important. Hopefully all that kind of helps.

Nate Pendleton

Absolutely. Sounds really exciting. I'll stay tuned on the specifics. Then maybe for my follow-up, going back to your prepared remarks on the supply chain, fuel availability tends to be a key critical path item that a lot are focused on right now. Can you provide an update on how your conversations with commercial enrichment providers and TRISO fabricators are progressing? What does that availability look like based on your commercialization timelines at UIUC and beyond?

James Walker

This is, I think, an intrinsically important question for every reactor company at the moment. Look, the conversations with enrichment and fabricators are very different conversations. On the enrichment front, I think the big advantage we have over most of our competitors is the fact that we can use low enriched uranium, so fuel that can actually be manufactured today. Companies like Urenco, we've already started conversations with them about them being able to provide us the enrichment that we would need for the mass rollout of systems. That's obviously different from the University of Illinois project, where we're obviously sourcing the fuel that's necessary for that first of a kind initial reactor system. There are a number of fabricators on that side that I'll discuss in just a second, but the enrichment part fortunately plays into our favor.

James Walker

Now, when HALEU is available, there are a number of companies that we are already speaking with, groups like Centrus, that do intend to make HALEU fuel. We will take that fuel, and we will be able to refuel our reactors without modification. With that HALEU fuel, that will allow for longer periods between refueling. The advantage is we want to get to market soon. We want to get to market sooner, and the ability to actually utilize enrichment companies that don't need any site amendment, license amendment to make our fuel is a big one. Those conversations, thankfully, they've been very positive. The capacity exists to do that, and the other reactor companies are looking at utilizing HALEU. They're not having those conversations with existing enrichment companies because they would not be able to source their type of fuel from them.

James Walker

Now, on the fabrication side of things, the interesting part of this is that there are emerging players in this market. Everyone's probably familiar with BWXT. They've already been manufacturing TRISO for many years. They are looking now for a commercial arm of that venture where they would establish a Category II site, principally because their Category I site creates far too many overheads to make a competitive product. Then there are groups like Standard Nuclear partnered with Framatome and even TRISO-X with the subsidiary of X-energy. The nice part is that as there are more and more players involved in this space, we are in a nice position to negotiate and find the best prices. With everybody that I've mentioned, we are speaking to all of them at the moment, and we are trying to lock down long-term contracts.

James Walker

The ability to fabricate the fuel that we need for the first of a kind reactor system already exists. We aren't worried about getting that fabrication done and meeting our timelines because that capacity and that capability is already there. Now, the long-term strategy could look a bit different as we look at bigger bulk loads, with escalating production of reactors over time. There still might have to be some element of NANO that we would bring online in the future to manufacture certain elements of the fuel, like the SCM that's necessary for our fuel. It could be that we want to be more involved in that and we establish joint ventures in that department for long-term de-risking. The important part is those are considerations, I think, for the future as we want to de-risk the mass rollout of reactor systems.

James Walker

First of a kind is fine, both on enrichment and fabrication. I think already we've turned our focus towards 2030 and beyond, where we want to be in a position where we hit that timeline and we can mass manufacture reactors with mass-fabricated fuel.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Craig Shere with Tuohy Brothers. Please proceed with your question.

Craig Shere

Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions. In a pure SMR industry earnings call, an argument was made that most deployment opportunities that take advantage of both the power and thermal applications can utilize 400-450 degrees fast reactor technology as readily as high temperature gas cooled reactors, and that HTGRs are only uniquely optimally suited for perhaps niche applications. We've kind of made a bigger deal about the HTGR differentiation, though, noting X-energy's most advanced deployments with Dow and that NANO Nuclear Energy in particular has a great many opportunities, from Korea to the Middle East, to those remote off-grid cold weather Canadian markets, whether they be communities or mining operations. Can you chime in on just how important that higher temperature run rate, even versus metallic fueled fast reactors may actually be?

James Walker

Sure. As a bit of technical background, and thankfully, I've got a nuclear engineering background to speak to this somewhat. The background to what was said about high temperature gas reactors is that they have been previously deployed in the past. There's been many deployed internationally around the world, and people are very familiar with their operating profile. The only criticism really of them is that the capacity factors were low because the time to ramp up power and ramp down power could be fairly long. For industrial applications where you might have fluctuating demand, it could be ill-suited. In the advanced reactor systems like ours, the solar salt loop acts as an energy storage. The reactor can actually just maintain constant output, and it's the thermal energy storage system that you can take up and take down and fluctuate demand enormously.

James Walker

That's been specifically designed around that operating history that's given us that information. The problem with fast reactors, though, if you are comparing the two, is that they've never been deployed commercially. In order to, if I'm just going off the top of my head, to actually deploy a fast reactor, you would need a very enriched central core of fuel, which would either have to be some sort of HALEU fuel or some sort of blend of plutonium. The problem with both of those is, one, HALEU is not available, and it might not be available for a long time. A commercial company being allowed to handle some plutonium is also not allowed, it would also require legal changes.

James Walker

If you had to choose from the two of them, you would choose a high-temperature gas reactor over a fast reactor any day of the week at the moment, especially given the fact that it lacks operating history and commercial deployment. The reason why high-temperature gas reactors would be better as well for industrial applications, given the thermal energy storage system, is that they do produce a high thermal output, which would be ideal for foundries, but it doesn't require fuel that is just not available, and it's available now. The other part is that if you make a fast reactor, the bigger the better. The reason why is that you have a lot of neutron flux, and you're not moderating it. It's called a fast reactor because the fast fission that takes place as a result of the fission incident.

James Walker

You are compacting your core with things like uranium-238, which isn't that fissile, but with enough neutron flux, you can create that fission reaction. But on a small scale, it's difficult, so you need a big reactor system. If you're making a massive reactor system to cater towards the efficiencies of fast reactor, you're already limiting the flexibility of your deployment because you cannot make them as small and as mobile and as portable and as modular as you can a high-temperature gas reactor. Very different strategies. I would say if you put me into a fast reactor company today, one, I would have to look at the fuel straight away and try and come up with a solution. Two, I would be targeting bigger, going bigger almost straight away.

James Walker

I think you would be being very selective with your information if you said fast reactors had an advantage over high-temperature gas reactors when it came to thermal output for industry. Very difficult to make that case unless you're being very carefully selective.

Craig Shere

Very helpful. My second question, some of this has already been touched on when you were responding to questions about the potential strategic developer partner relationship and the fee-based versus some retained equity ownership potential. But I'm interested in kind of the tension between those two across your entire business prospects. We've got kind of like on the one end, the Oklo ownership PPA model, and then a few others, X-energy, Newcleo, Terrestrial Energy, with more of a fee-based or fuel sales model. Now, I realize you're open to both, and that probably the fee-based approach may ultimately comprise the lion's share of deployments. But is there a geographic distinction where you may be, for example, more likely to provide services versus retain ownership internationally?

James Walker

That's a very interesting question. Actually, funnily enough, it kind of ties into your first question because we have a lot of interest coming from countries like South Korea, and a lot of their interest is around industrial heat for manufacturing operations because they don't have access to the same level of gas or coal or oil that the U.S. might have or other countries. The long-term de-risking of their own heavy industry is they're looking at nuclear as being a solution. Because they are looking at nuclear as being a solution, there is more of an interest, I think, there of being able to mass deploy these reactor systems. There is a bit of a mix there between wanting ownership of those systems, so you don't have to worry about the long-term payments of those reactors.

James Walker

You would just have to pay for servicing, maintenance, and refueling. I would still say that is a minority, even compared to just paying a monthly or quarterly agreed contractual price for the power, because a lot of these industries, even though they are heavy industries trying to de-risk their long-term security, they still are not as interested in owning and operating a reactor and being responsible for it. They are still happy to put in capital investment into these projects, but they ultimately want the responsibility to sit with somebody else, but they just want that long-term de-risking power to come in.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Jake Sekelsky with Alliance Global Partners. Please proceed with your question.

Jake Sekelsky

Hi guys. Thanks for taking my questions. Just circling back to STS and the $7 million or so in revenue last year, can you provide any color on how we should think about this, heading into 2027? I'm just wondering if you have plans to scale the business in the near term here, or is it better viewed as a complementary business to secure fuel transport?

James Walker

It is both. We were always very commercially focused as a company. Even from inception, we were looking at how we really get reactors out there. It became very clear that it is a very specialized industry. The ability to move yellowcake to a conversion facility, uranium hexafluoride to enrichment, enriched uranium hexafluoride to deconversion, deconverted fuel to fabricators fuel to a reactor, every single component of that requires some level of transportation capability. When we realized that there were very few players in this space, and that as the advanced reactors advanced towards deployment of the reactor systems, that would be squeezed substantially, we realized we had to go after a transportation capability to have that ability in-house so we did not get stuck at that juncture.

James Walker

Now, the advantage here is that because it is going to be a big growth area, we can grow that business very substantially. STS is incredibly expert company, but they have more experience in the back end of the fuel cycle. We are looking at acquisitions at the front end of the fuel cycle to complement what they do and give us a more holistic business that can do everything in the nuclear industry. One, for us internally, but two, also it just taps into that ability to grow that business very substantially this decade before the reactors are actually even out. But yes, it did begin as a de-risking operation for the deployment of reactor systems, but we see the massive potential for business to be generated through the growth of that industry.

Jake Sekelsky

Okay. That is helpful. Just to follow up on M&A opportunities. Realizing you cannot speak to specifics, but can you maybe just touch in broad strokes on some of the areas of the supply chain you are honing in on and seeing the most opportunity from a vertical integration standpoint?

James Walker

Yep, absolutely. I think Jay and I, when we were building the company up, we realized at a very early stage the fuel supply chain was going to be a major issue just because of lack of investment over the previous decades into bolstering that. With more reactors coming online, that being squeezed even more. Because of that, we have made very strategic investments into things like, Sayless Technologies as an example, is a related transaction company. It does specialize in enrichment. It was old Cameco Tech, with very decent results in the 1990s that also got mothballed just because cheap Russian material was available. Having that partnership is a great call option if they are successful in their ventures for the only enrichment side. Either side of that, we are looking at both conversion and deconversion projects at the moment.

James Walker

One was referred to earlier on in this call today, but we want to solidify that and get those contracts into place and get that in-house capability to control certain parts of the fuel supply chain. Not just to de-risk our reactors, but it also is going to be massive growth area for our own business over the coming years. Everyone's going to need fuel. No matter what kind of reactor you're going to put in place, everyone's going to need that fuel supply. Whether you're a fast reactor, a molten salt, or a high temperature gas reactor, it's going to be very crucial to have some level of control over that fuel supply chain to ensure that you can mass manufacture reactors. A lot of the acquisitions and investments we're making at the moment are centered around those particular areas to de-risk.

James Walker

Not mining so much, I would say, but the yellowcake industry exists to a certain extent that we are comfortable with, we can source the material as we need it, but beyond that, heavy industry, heavy infrastructure is going to be necessary.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Jeff Grampp with Northland Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.

Jeff Grampp

Yes. In the prepared remarks, you mentioned some potential non-dilutive funding opportunities to potentially help finance the University of Illinois deployment. I was just hoping to get a little bit more detail on what kind of opportunities, if there's any kind of ranges of quantum of capital that could be out there to help fund this. Thanks.

James Walker

Sure.

Matthew Barry

Hey, Jeff.

James Walker

Oh, go ahead.

Matthew Barry

Oh, sure. Hey, Jeff, I can just chime in really quick. I think there's a couple of different opportunities we're evaluating. Things like investment tax credits. I think the University of Illinois project is a pretty unique project in that we're building our first unit next to the Abbott Power Plant there. There is potential not only for a base 30% ITC for that project, but also potentially an extra 10%. Energy community bonus is things that we're evaluating. I think that's number one. Also obviously evaluating DOE programs to potentially pay for portions of the fuel, as well as opportunities, whether it's with our partner in this endeavor, the University of Illinois or the State of Illinois, to potentially support us. Obviously, given that this is a research reactor, we are saving on the NRC licensing fee.

Matthew Barry

I think that's something we've been very proud of, that we've been very mindful about capital allocation here. But yeah, we're very excited about some of these other funding opportunities as well to potentially significantly reduce the capital cost of the project.

Jeff Grampp

Got it. Thanks for that. For my follow-up with BaRupOn, can you guys update us on just the project a bit more? I know you can't speak too specifically for them, but you mentioned a potential licensing application. Any preliminary estimates of when that could be, and what are the main drivers there that dictate the timing of maturing that project a bit further?

Matthew Barry

Hey, I'm sorry, Jeff. Can you repeat that? I apologize. Something got broke off.

Jeff Grampp

Yeah, sure. The question was on BaRupOn and the potential licensing application that you guys referenced. Just wondering if there's any preliminary estimates of the timing of when that project could be in a position to submit a licensing application, and what are the factors that dictate that potential timing.

Matthew Barry

Sure. James actually just he got cut off, so I could quickly answer this. I'd say, obviously, we completed the feasibility study there. We're excited about the opportunity with BaRupOn and continuing to engage in discussions with them. As we said in the prepared remarks, evaluating the beginning of the licensing process, evaluating project timelines, working towards early-stage product development activities. At this point in time, we don't want to put a definitive timeline on any of this because discussions are ongoing, but we are obviously discussing initiation of the licensing process. I think, obviously, given where we are with the University of Illinois project, we still have a few years and time is on our side. But obviously, we would look to move as quickly as possible. Hopefully in the coming quarters, we'll have additional updates there.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Adam Kelsey with Titan Partners. Please proceed with your question.

Adam Kelsey

Great. Thank you. Plenty asked and answered already, so just two quick ones for me. I know you already touched on the NRC process, but it is obviously a major near-term driver for the stock. I am curious if there are any upcoming visible signals or checkpoints between the major milestones that would demonstrate NRC process or that process remains on schedule.

Matthew Barry

Hey, Adam. Yes. I think there are a couple of different milestones we are evaluating. As the NRC publicly put out, there is an environmental assessment in, I think, February 2027, is based on their public timeline, and then obviously a safety analysis slated for September of 2027. Obviously, those are not the only two big milestones. When we think about this review, it is an iterative process. We are going through audit questions as we speak, receiving questions from them, providing answers, to address areas where the NRC is looking to have more completeness and a better understanding. I think the two big milestones I just touched upon are two of the big ones. But, obviously, this is, like I said, an iterative process, and we are obviously going to keep engaging with them.

Matthew Barry

I think ultimately, as we mentioned in our prepared remarks, the timeline that the NRC put out is in line with our expectation to begin construction in the second half of this year. As seen in some other Construction Permit Applications with some other public peers or private peers, hopefully, there is an opportunity to maybe even compress that licensing timeline from what the NRC has publicly slated.

Adam Kelsey

Great. Thanks. Any additional insight on where you sit in terms of their staff's bandwidth or prioritization?

Matthew Barry

Just based on conversations we've had internally with our NRC licensing team, we have not heard any issues regarding staffing. I think we continue to engage with them quite frequently. I don't think we have yet to see any instances where staffing has prevented continued engagement with them. We've been engaging with them pretty actively since June, as I mentioned earlier, answering some of their audit questions and things like that. We've actually been having ongoing weekly meetings with them, and supplementing that with additional interactions as necessary to close any gaps that are identified. So, yeah, I think it's been pretty constructive dialogue with them thus far.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Sherif Elmaghrabi with BTIG. Please proceed with your question.

Sherif Elmaghrabi

Hey, thanks, and good afternoon. First question. STS gels pretty nicely with some of the work you're already doing in fuel, and you've touched on how you might look to grow your fuel footprint. When it comes to M&A and Kronos, how are you thinking about strategic opportunities that might help get Kronos built and commercialized?

Matthew Barry

Sure. Sherif, obviously, when we think about commercialization of Kronos, there are many different aspects to that. I would say the acquisition of STS, I think really importantly adds a couple of key things. The team has decades of experience supporting the industry. They even have people who have experience operating reactors. When we think about having those capabilities in-house and even think about some projects that we have at this point, and we are looking to build reduced scaled mock-ups of Kronos in our Oak Brook demonstration facility and are actually advancing plans there. Having this expertise in-house can support us in some of these endeavors, whether it is obviously their experience operating, but some of these other endeavors. Then also, obviously fuel is integral to deploying future commercial units, but obviously even our first of a kind unit and obviously evaluating DOE programs.

Matthew Barry

I would say STS has great relationships with not only national labs, but the DOE and the NNSA. We think some of those relationships as well could potentially benefit us. Lastly, obviously STS has experience not only handling spent fuel, but also transporting fuel across the cycle. I think all of this experience can not only help us with future commercial deployments, but even just advancing development of Kronos, having this additional expertise in-house can enable us in each of these areas, to support us in each of these areas.

Sherif Elmaghrabi

Thanks, Matt. Then a process question that would be helpful for my understanding, which might make it a James question. If I start a Kronos reactor on conventional fuel and later switch to HALEU, is there any power plant retooling associated with that, or is that just a matter of dropping in the new fuel?

Matthew Barry

Unfortunately, James got kicked off the call, but our understanding is based on conversations with the technical team that we really could just plug and play and remove the LEU plus fuel and replace it with HALEU fuel.

Sherif Elmaghrabi

Okay. Super helpful. Thanks, Matt.

Matthew Barry

We would not need a redesign, I think that's like of the Kronos MMR design. I think that's really important is that we can do that without redesign, and really provides us the flexibility to not only use fuel that's commercially available today, but once HALEU is available and economically viable to use, we could basically plug and play.

Sherif Elmaghrabi

Yeah, it's good to hear. Thanks again.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Christopher Souther with Truist. Please proceed with your question.

Christopher Souther

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my questions here. Great to hear some of the advanced discussions with the project developer and AI infrastructure company. Is that something you think we might be getting more clarity on this year? I am just wanting to kind of level set, I guess how intense the conversations are, and where we see those kind of evolving from here in the near term.

Matthew Barry

Yeah. Appreciate the question, Chris. I think there is two elements to this. Obviously, there is the opportunity with the potential strategic partner and data center developer for their planned multi-gigawatt pipeline. I would say we are excited about the potential to and we have been advancing discussions with them. I would say near term, the things to look out for would be, and obviously there is no way to guarantee timelines on any of this, but I would say a near term potential framework agreement that outlines the potential relationship that we discussed. That would obviously include potential things like milestone investment opportunities tied to key value-creating commercial milestones.

Matthew Barry

So that would be like initially I would look out for a framework agreement, and then obviously from there we would look to obviously make a great deal more progress on more definitive agreements, whether that is things like joint development agreements for specific sites.

Matthew Barry

I think there is a number of the way we have envisioned this at this point in time. There is a number of development milestones, but ahead of potential milestones relating to actual firm commercial purchase orders. So I think there is a number of development milestones potentially, whether it is, like I said, joint development agreements, securing site, initiating the NRC licensing process, doing things like site characterization and drilling that can clearly demonstrate that there is a strong partnership and progress being made ahead of firm purchase commitments and more definitive agreements. So I think that is the way to look at that one. Separately, as we highlighted in our prepared remarks, we are evaluating potential opportunities with an AI infrastructure company as well as another nuclear project developer.

Matthew Barry

This potentially could be us evaluating amongst the three parties joint opportunities, which I think given that these two companies are pretty credible and have each bring their own unique experience in the space, it is something that is pretty exciting. So I would say keep out in the near term potentially for things like an LOI or things like that there, assuming we can continue to advance discussions.

Christopher Souther

Got it. That is super helpful. Maybe just how should we think about you guys entering the NRC process, and upcoming construction as catalysts for customers as they are looking for proof of execution and de-risking of future commercial developments. Are you seeing increased inbound or credibility on your end around being able to enter that process with a real project here that you are going to be starting construction basically a year from now?

Matthew Barry

Yeah, Chris, I could tell you the answer is absolutely. We have gotten direct feedback after we submitted the Construction Permit Application and it was accepted for review. We have gotten direct feedback from several potential customers for several opportunities that we are working on, that they view NANO as being very credible, just given by the fact that we are really the first, as we said earlier, microreactor developer building a full-scale commercial unit. Well, it is technically a research reactor, but it will be a full-scale 15-MW electric unit. Just by that alone, given where we are in the licensing process, is viewed very favorably. We have gotten that feedback.

Matthew Barry

Complementary to that, we have also gotten direct feedback regarding the acquisition of STS and having the in-house capabilities not only to transport the fuel, but also have a clear plan for spent fuel and having people in-house who also have those capabilities.

Matthew Barry

So yeah, it is something we are very excited about. We have already seen, I would say, growing interest, whether it is from mining companies or even military-related opportunities. There has been specific mentioning of the fact that we are in formal NRC licensing, and there appears to be clearly a direct path to a commercial license relating to that a commercial license will be very easily achievable once the University of Illinois project, we receive that operating license. So, yeah, I think we are very excited about our progress and some of these opportunities.

Operator

Thank you. This now concludes our Q&A session. I would like to turn the floor back over to Jay for closing comments.

Jay Yu

I want to thank everyone again for joining us on today's call. We are very grateful for your continued support, and we have never been more excited for NANO Nuclear's future. We look forward to additional progress and updates in the coming quarters. Have a great evening.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation. This does conclude today's teleconference. Please disconnect your lines and have a wonderful day.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-10

NANO Nuclear to Report Q3 Earnings: Buy, Hold or Sell the Stock?

Zacks
NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. NNE is scheduled to release fiscal third-quarter results on Aug. 12, after market close. The Zacks Consensus Estimate is currently pegged at a loss of 28 cents per share. Fiscal third-quarter earnings estimates have improved 6.67% over the past 60 days. However, the bottom-line projection indicates a decrease of 47.37% from the year-ago number. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research NANO Nuclear Energy’s earnings beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate in each of the trailing four quarters, resulting in the average positive surprise of 43.8%. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Our proven model does not predict an earnings beat for NANO Nuclear Energy this time around. The combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy), or 3 (Hold) increases the chances of an earnings beat. That is not the case here, as you can see below.You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they are reported with our Earnings ESP Filter.NNE’s Earnings ESP: NANO Nuclear Energy has an Earnings ESP of 0.00%.Zacks Rank of NNE: The company currently carries a Zacks Rank #3. Some companies in the same industry with the right combination of the two factors for an earnings surprise in the coming season are FuelCell Energy FCEL, Ameresco AMRC and Gevo Inc. GEVO. FCEL, AMRC and GEVO have an Earnings ESP of +17.95%, +6.51% and +200.00%, respectively. All three currently carry a Zacks Rank #2. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. During the quarter, NANO Nuclear Energy announced that its subsidiary STS completed several DOE and NNSA-related nuclear logistics missions, including HALEU shipments from Japan and within the U.S., spent fuel transportation, and HEU removal support from Venezuela. The missions highlight STS’ capabilities in secure and compliant nuclear material transportation and are likely to have boosted fiscal third-quarter earnings.During the quarter, NANO Nuclear Energy said the NRC accepted the Construction Permit Application for its KRONOS MMR project at the University of Illinois, moving the microreactor into formal regulatory review. The company expects the review to conclude in 2027, potentially allowing construction to begin later that year and advancing the project toward commercial deployment.Uranium plays a vital role in the successful operation of nuclear power plants. NANO…Read full document

NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. NNE is scheduled to release fiscal third-quarter results on Aug. 12, after market close. The Zacks Consensus Estimate is currently pegged at a loss of 28 cents per share. Fiscal third-quarter earnings estimates have improved 6.67% over the past 60 days. However, the bottom-line projection indicates a decrease of 47.37% from the year-ago number. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research NANO Nuclear Energy’s earnings beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate in each of the trailing four quarters, resulting in the average positive surprise of 43.8%. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Our proven model does not predict an earnings beat for NANO Nuclear Energy this time around. The combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy), or 3 (Hold) increases the chances of an earnings beat. That is not the case here, as you can see below.You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they are reported with our Earnings ESP Filter.NNE’s Earnings ESP: NANO Nuclear Energy has an Earnings ESP of 0.00%.Zacks Rank of NNE: The company currently carries a Zacks Rank #3. Some companies in the same industry with the right combination of the two factors for an earnings surprise in the coming season are FuelCell Energy FCEL, Ameresco AMRC and Gevo Inc. GEVO. FCEL, AMRC and GEVO have an Earnings ESP of +17.95%, +6.51% and +200.00%, respectively. All three currently carry a Zacks Rank #2. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. During the quarter, NANO Nuclear Energy announced that its subsidiary STS completed several DOE and NNSA-related nuclear logistics missions, including HALEU shipments from Japan and within the U.S., spent fuel transportation, and HEU removal support from Venezuela. The missions highlight STS’ capabilities in secure and compliant nuclear material transportation and are likely to have boosted fiscal third-quarter earnings.During the quarter, NANO Nuclear Energy said the NRC accepted the Construction Permit Application for its KRONOS MMR project at the University of Illinois, moving the microreactor into formal regulatory review. The company expects the review to conclude in 2027, potentially allowing construction to begin later that year and advancing the project toward commercial deployment.Uranium plays a vital role in the successful operation of nuclear power plants. NANO Nuclear Energy continues to advance vertical integration across the nuclear fuel cycle through acquisitions and partnerships focused on fuel facilities and transportation, helping address key supply-chain constraints. NNE’s shares have gained 4.6% in the past month against the Zacks Alternative Energy – Other industry’s decline of 2.7%. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research NANO Nuclear Energy is currently trading at a discounted valuation compared with its industry, with the price-to-book (P/B) TTM at 1.65X. The industry is currently trading at 3.42X. NANO Nuclear Energy’s advanced microreactor technology has strong potential to support the growing need for clean and reliable power. Its microreactor projects are progressing through various development stages and are expected to move toward commercial readiness around 2030, subject to successful testing and regulatory approvals.The company continues to advance its reactor programs through partnerships aimed at securing nuclear fuel supply, supporting testing and licensing, and ultimately enabling commercialization. Rising clean energy demand, along with constraints in expanding transmission and distribution infrastructure, could also increase the need for NANO Nuclear Energy’s portable microreactor solutions. NANO Nuclear Energy made several meaningful advances during the quarter that should help position it for future commercial reactor operations. It is also well placed to benefit from growing demand for dependable, clean energy, supported by AI data center expansion, increased electric vehicle adoption and rising power needs in remote locations.Considering NNE’s discounted valuation and strong share price performance, investors may want to consider adding the stock to their portfolios. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Nano Nuclear Energy Inc. (NNE) : Free Stock Analysis Report FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL) : Free Stock Analysis Report Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) : Free Stock Analysis Report Gevo, Inc. (GEVO) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-05

NANO Nuclear to Hold Third Quarter Business Update Webcast on August 12, 2026

GlobeNewswire
New York, N.Y., Aug. 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NNE) (“NANO Nuclear” or “the Company”), a leading advanced nuclear micro modular reactor and technology company focused on developing clean energy solutions, today announced it will host its third quarter fiscal 2026 business update webcast on Wednesday, August 12, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. ET. The webcast will follow the anticipated filing of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. Additional details will be available in the Investor Relations section of NANO Nuclear’s website at https://ir.nanonuclearenergy.com/. A replay of the webcast will be made available on NANO Nuclear’s website beginning shortly after the call that evening. About NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NNE) is a North American advanced technology-driven nuclear energy company seeking to become a commercially focused, diversified, and vertically integrated company across five business lines: (i) cutting edge portable and other microreactor technologies, (ii) nuclear fuel supply chain, (iii) nuclear fuel transportation, (iv) nuclear applications for space and (v) nuclear industry consulting services. Led by a world-class nuclear engineering team, NANO Nuclear’s reactor products in development include the proprietary KRONOS MMR™ Energy System, a stationary high-temperature gas-cooled reactor that is in construction permit pre-application engagement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in collaboration with University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, “ZEUS”, a portable solid core battery reactor, and the space focused, portable LOKI MMR™, each representing advanced developments in clean energy solutions that are portable, on-demand capable, advanced nuclear microreactors. Advanced Fuel Transportation Inc. (AFT), a NANO Nuclear subsidiary, bolstered by the May 2026 acquisition of Secured Transportation Services (STS), is led by former executives from the largest transportation company in the world and provides nuclear engineering and materials transport services in the U.S. and globally. Through NANO Nuclear, AFT is the exclusive licensee of a patented high-capacity HALEU fuel transportation basket developed by three major U.S. national nuclear laboratories and funded by the Department of Energy. HALEU Energy Fuel Inc. (HEF), a NANO Nuclear subsidiary…Read full document

New York, N.Y., Aug. 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NNE) (“NANO Nuclear” or “the Company”), a leading advanced nuclear micro modular reactor and technology company focused on developing clean energy solutions, today announced it will host its third quarter fiscal 2026 business update webcast on Wednesday, August 12, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. ET. The webcast will follow the anticipated filing of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. Additional details will be available in the Investor Relations section of NANO Nuclear’s website at https://ir.nanonuclearenergy.com/. A replay of the webcast will be made available on NANO Nuclear’s website beginning shortly after the call that evening. About NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NNE) is a North American advanced technology-driven nuclear energy company seeking to become a commercially focused, diversified, and vertically integrated company across five business lines: (i) cutting edge portable and other microreactor technologies, (ii) nuclear fuel supply chain, (iii) nuclear fuel transportation, (iv) nuclear applications for space and (v) nuclear industry consulting services. Led by a world-class nuclear engineering team, NANO Nuclear’s reactor products in development include the proprietary KRONOS MMR™ Energy System, a stationary high-temperature gas-cooled reactor that is in construction permit pre-application engagement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in collaboration with University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, “ZEUS”, a portable solid core battery reactor, and the space focused, portable LOKI MMR™, each representing advanced developments in clean energy solutions that are portable, on-demand capable, advanced nuclear microreactors. Advanced Fuel Transportation Inc. (AFT), a NANO Nuclear subsidiary, bolstered by the May 2026 acquisition of Secured Transportation Services (STS), is led by former executives from the largest transportation company in the world and provides nuclear engineering and materials transport services in the U.S. and globally. Through NANO Nuclear, AFT is the exclusive licensee of a patented high-capacity HALEU fuel transportation basket developed by three major U.S. national nuclear laboratories and funded by the Department of Energy. HALEU Energy Fuel Inc. (HEF), a NANO Nuclear subsidiary, is focusing on the future development of a domestic source for a High-Assay, Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) fuel fabrication pipeline for NANO Nuclear’s own microreactors as well as the broader advanced nuclear reactor industry. NANO Nuclear Space Inc. (NNS), a NANO Nuclear subsidiary, is exploring the potential commercial applications of NANO Nuclear’s developing micronuclear reactor technology in space. NNS is focusing on applications such as the LOKI MMR™ system and other power systems for extraterrestrial projects and human sustaining environments, and potentially propulsion technology for long haul space missions. NNS’ initial focus will be on cis-lunar applications, referring to uses in the space region extending from Earth to the area surrounding the Moon's surface. For more corporate information please visit: https://NanoNuclearEnergy.com/ For further NANO Nuclear information, please contact: Email: [email protected] Tel: (212) 634-9206 PLEASE FOLLOW OUR SOCIAL MEDIA PAGES HERE: NANO Nuclear Energy LINKEDINNANO Nuclear Energy YOUTUBENANO Nuclear Energy X PLATFORM Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements This news release, the webcast described herein and statements of NANO Nuclear’s management in connection with this news release contain or may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In this context, forward-looking statements mean statements related to future events, which may impact our expected future business and financial performance, and often contain words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “explore,” “plans”, “aim,” “goal,” “believes”, “potential”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “would” or “may” or derivations of these words and other words of similar meaning about the future. These and other forward-looking statements are based on information available to us as of the date of this news release and represent management's current views and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, events or results and involve significant known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may be beyond our control. For NANO Nuclear, particular risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual future results to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements include but are not limited to the following: (i) risks related to our U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”), Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (“CNSC”) or related state or other U.S. or non-U.S nuclear licensing submissions, (ii) risks related the development of new or advanced technology and the acquisition of complementary technology or businesses, including difficulties with design and testing, cost overruns, regulatory delays, integration issues and the development of competitive technology, (iii) our ability to obtain contracts and funding to be able to continue operations, (iv) risks related to uncertainty regarding our ability to technologically develop and commercially deploy a competitive advanced nuclear reactor or other technology in the timelines we anticipate, if ever, (v) risks related to the impact of U.S. and non-U.S. government regulation, policies and licensing requirements, including by the DOE, and the NRC, including those associated with the recently enacted ADVANCE Act and the May 23, 2025 Executive Orders seeking to streamline nuclear regulation, and (vi) similar risks and uncertainties associated with the operating a developing business a highly regulated, competitive and rapidly evolving industry, including that our plans may change and we may use our cash on hand faster or in different ways than anticipated as our business requires. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this news release. These factors may not constitute all factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in any forward-looking statement, and NANO Nuclear therefore encourages investors to review other factors that may affect future results in its filings with the SEC, which are available for review at www.sec.gov and at https://ir.nanonuclearenergy.com/financial-information/sec-filings. Accordingly, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a predictor of actual results. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this news release, except as required by law.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-03

Ameresco Q2 Earnings Call Highlights

MarketBeat
Interested in Ameresco, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. Ameresco reported strong Q2 growth, with revenue up 9% year over year to $515 million, adjusted EBITDA up 12% to $62.8 million, and non-GAAP EPS of $0.20. The company raised its 2026 non-GAAP EPS outlook to $1.15–$1.35 while reaffirming broader full-year guidance. New project awards reached a record $1.8 billion, driven by $1.2 billion in data center-related power infrastructure. Awarded backlog climbed 65% to $4.4 billion, while total project backlog rose 32% to $6.7 billion. Ameresco’s data center pipeline includes five awarded projects representing more than 1 gigawatt of power generation, but meaningful revenue is not expected until 2028–2030. The company also expanded its operating energy asset base to 822 MW and maintained leverage below its covenant at 3.2 times. NANO Nuclear Energy: Short-Squeeze or Rapid Meltdown Ahead Ameresco (NYSE:AMRC) reported second-quarter 2026 revenue of $515 million, up 9% from a year earlier, while highlighting a record $1.8 billion in new project awards led by data center-related power infrastructure projects. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer George Sakellaris described the quarter as “transformational,” citing $1.2 billion of data center awards and $600 million of awards across the company’s other markets. The company also completed its Neogenyx joint venture with HASI, brought major battery storage and solar projects online, and reorganized around two market pillars: Power Infrastructure and Buildings & Public Infrastructure. → Lost in Space: Why Aerospace Valuations Are Plummeting Right Now Ameresco said awarded project backlog rose 65% year over year to a record $4.4 billion, contributing to a 32% increase in total project backlog to $6.7 billion. Chief Financial Officer Mark Chiplock said the company expects to convert that backlog over the next three to four years, although timing will depend on commercial, permitting, procurement, financing and execution milestones. The company added three data center projects to awarded backlog during the quarter, bringing the total to five projects, excluding the Lemoore Data Center in its energy assets portfolio. The projects expanded Ameresco’s data center footprint into Texas and Arizona and collectively represent more than 1 gigawatt of power generation, according to Co-President Nicole Bulgarino. → Market…Read full document

Interested in Ameresco, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. Ameresco reported strong Q2 growth, with revenue up 9% year over year to $515 million, adjusted EBITDA up 12% to $62.8 million, and non-GAAP EPS of $0.20. The company raised its 2026 non-GAAP EPS outlook to $1.15–$1.35 while reaffirming broader full-year guidance. New project awards reached a record $1.8 billion, driven by $1.2 billion in data center-related power infrastructure. Awarded backlog climbed 65% to $4.4 billion, while total project backlog rose 32% to $6.7 billion. Ameresco’s data center pipeline includes five awarded projects representing more than 1 gigawatt of power generation, but meaningful revenue is not expected until 2028–2030. The company also expanded its operating energy asset base to 822 MW and maintained leverage below its covenant at 3.2 times. NANO Nuclear Energy: Short-Squeeze or Rapid Meltdown Ahead Ameresco (NYSE:AMRC) reported second-quarter 2026 revenue of $515 million, up 9% from a year earlier, while highlighting a record $1.8 billion in new project awards led by data center-related power infrastructure projects. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer George Sakellaris described the quarter as “transformational,” citing $1.2 billion of data center awards and $600 million of awards across the company’s other markets. The company also completed its Neogenyx joint venture with HASI, brought major battery storage and solar projects online, and reorganized around two market pillars: Power Infrastructure and Buildings & Public Infrastructure. → Lost in Space: Why Aerospace Valuations Are Plummeting Right Now Ameresco said awarded project backlog rose 65% year over year to a record $4.4 billion, contributing to a 32% increase in total project backlog to $6.7 billion. Chief Financial Officer Mark Chiplock said the company expects to convert that backlog over the next three to four years, although timing will depend on commercial, permitting, procurement, financing and execution milestones. The company added three data center projects to awarded backlog during the quarter, bringing the total to five projects, excluding the Lemoore Data Center in its energy assets portfolio. The projects expanded Ameresco’s data center footprint into Texas and Arizona and collectively represent more than 1 gigawatt of power generation, according to Co-President Nicole Bulgarino. → MarketBeat Week in Review – 07/27- 07/31 The company’s proposed solutions include reciprocating engines, gas turbines, fuel cells, battery energy storage systems and integrated microgrids. Bulgarino said Ameresco is concentrating on on-site power solutions and working with developers, operators, hyperscalers, capital providers and other participants in the data center ecosystem. During the question-and-answer session, Sakellaris said the projects currently included in awards represent only part of the potential scope. He said the current awards could grow to roughly $2 billion as development progresses and additional phases are defined. The company is also evaluating at least as many additional data center opportunities as the five currently in awarded backlog, he said. → GE HealthCare Stock Climbs on Vital Diagnostics Demand Ameresco said data center awards generally could move from the awarded category into contracted backlog within six to 24 months. Sakellaris said the company does not expect a major revenue contribution from the data center projects until 2028 through 2030, though there could be a smaller impact in 2027. Once contracted, large and complex projects may require up to three years of implementation, particularly where a data center campus is developed in multiple phases. Chief Investment Officer Josh Baribeau said revenue from the data center work is expected to be recognized under the company’s normal engineering, procurement and construction, or EPC, revenue model rather than through asset sales. Sakellaris said margins on the projects are expected to be similar to Ameresco’s federal EPC work, in the high teens. Project revenue increased 6% to $381 million in the quarter, supported by federal and North American activity as well as the company’s European joint venture. Energy asset revenue rose 21% to $76 million, while operations and maintenance revenue increased 29%. Ameresco placed an additional 32 megawatts into operation during the quarter. Its operating energy asset base reached 822 MW, with another 513 MW in development for construction. Those figures reflect Ameresco’s 70% ownership interest in the Neogenyx joint venture. The company said it now provides operations and maintenance services for more than 2.5 gigawatts of third-party solar and battery storage assets. Long-term operations and maintenance backlog exceeded $1.5 billion. Gross margin was 17.7%, improving both sequentially and from a year earlier. Net income attributable to common shareholders was $9.7 million, or $0.18 per diluted share. Non-GAAP earnings per share were $0.20. Adjusted EBITDA increased 12% to $62.8 million. Chiplock said earnings per share reflected higher depreciation and interest expense related to growth in the energy asset portfolio, as well as a lower tax benefit and the non-controlling interest effect of the Neogenyx transaction. Ameresco ended the quarter with $138 million in unrestricted cash and $385 million of total corporate debt. Corporate leverage was 3.2 times, below its 3.5-times covenant, Chiplock said. The company secured $471 million of new financing commitments during the quarter, including $400 million associated with Neogenyx. Sakellaris said the partnership with HASI has provided capital flexibility and has also generated additional development and potential project acquisition opportunities. Ameresco said it may consider another capital vehicle similar to Neogenyx to support large data center opportunities if the right partner and economics emerge, but it did not announce a specific transaction. The company reaffirmed its full-year 2026 guidance across its metrics and raised its non-GAAP earnings-per-share outlook to a range of $1.15 to $1.35. Chiplock said the increase reflects an expected tax benefit rate of 25% to 40%, supported by a planned second-half transition to a new accounting policy for transferable tax credits. Under the new approach, Ameresco expects to recognize investment tax credit benefits in the period in which they are generated rather than spreading the benefit across the life of related assets. Prior-period results will be recast once the policy is adopted. For the second half, Ameresco expects its typical seasonal pattern, with activity weighted somewhat more heavily toward the fourth quarter. The company said continued project execution, backlog conversion, cash conversion efforts and cost management will support its outlook. Ameresco, Inc is a leading independent provider of comprehensive energy efficiency and renewable energy solutions for businesses and governments across North America, Europe and other select markets. Its integrated services portfolio includes energy efficiency retrofits, infrastructure upgrades, distributed generation systems and facility-scale renewable projects. Leveraging performance-based contracting models, Ameresco designs, finances, installs and maintains energy improvements intended to reduce operational costs, mitigate environmental impact and enhance resiliency for its clients. Founded in 2000 and headquartered in Framingham, Massachusetts, Ameresco has completed thousands of projects spanning solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, landfill gas‐to‐energy, energy storage and microgrid installations. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "Ameresco Q2 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for August 2026.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-05-18

Terrestrial Energy: Projects Progress & DOE Programs Strengthen Commercialization – Quarterly Update Report

Exec Edge
Download the Complete Report Here Key Takeaways: 1Q26 showed progress across IMSR’s key commercialization vectors, with regulatory, DOE program, supply-chain, commercial pipeline, and liquidity milestones collectively advancing the de-risking narrative. IMSR continues to execute against a milestone-driven roadmap that is more appropriately measured by regulatory progress, project pipeline development, fuel readiness, supply-chain qualification, and cash runway than by near-term revenue. The quarter advanced all three of management’s stated pillars: IMSR engineering and regulatory programs, including DOE-backed TETRA and TEFLA projects; supply-chain development, including materials testing and supplier execution; and commercial pipeline expansion, led by the Riot Platforms collaboration. The company reported a 1Q26 net loss of $10.5 million, ended the quarter with $289.9 million of cash and investments, and reported quarterly cash burn of $7.9 million, while expanding its commercial pipeline to ~10 IMSR Plant projects representing 7.8GW of indicative power capacity. NRC approval of the PIE Topical Report adds another foundational element to IMSR’s licensing basis. In May, the NRC issued its Safety Evaluation Report approving IMSR’s Postulated Initiating Events methodology, following acceptance of the company’s final submission in April 2026. The approval validates IMSR’s framework for identifying and evaluating events that could challenge safe plant operation, making it a core safety-analysis milestone rather than a process update. Importantly, approved Topical Reports can be referenced in future operating license applications without repetitive re-evaluation, reducing review scope and supporting standardized outcomes across multiple IMSR deployments. The PIE approval builds on the NRC’s September 2025 approval of IMSR’s Principal Design Criteria, which addressed foundational safety and design requirements, including inherent safety, reactor power control, and load-following capability. The regulatory pathway is increasingly defined around operating-license readiness and repeat deployment. Construction permits enable large-scale plant construction and address major environmental requirements, while operating-license preparedness determines whether the nuclear systems satisfy safety standards for commercial operation. IMSR’s Topical Reports are most relevant t…Read full document

Download the Complete Report Here Key Takeaways: 1Q26 showed progress across IMSR’s key commercialization vectors, with regulatory, DOE program, supply-chain, commercial pipeline, and liquidity milestones collectively advancing the de-risking narrative. IMSR continues to execute against a milestone-driven roadmap that is more appropriately measured by regulatory progress, project pipeline development, fuel readiness, supply-chain qualification, and cash runway than by near-term revenue. The quarter advanced all three of management’s stated pillars: IMSR engineering and regulatory programs, including DOE-backed TETRA and TEFLA projects; supply-chain development, including materials testing and supplier execution; and commercial pipeline expansion, led by the Riot Platforms collaboration. The company reported a 1Q26 net loss of $10.5 million, ended the quarter with $289.9 million of cash and investments, and reported quarterly cash burn of $7.9 million, while expanding its commercial pipeline to ~10 IMSR Plant projects representing 7.8GW of indicative power capacity. NRC approval of the PIE Topical Report adds another foundational element to IMSR’s licensing basis. In May, the NRC issued its Safety Evaluation Report approving IMSR’s Postulated Initiating Events methodology, following acceptance of the company’s final submission in April 2026. The approval validates IMSR’s framework for identifying and evaluating events that could challenge safe plant operation, making it a core safety-analysis milestone rather than a process update. Importantly, approved Topical Reports can be referenced in future operating license applications without repetitive re-evaluation, reducing review scope and supporting standardized outcomes across multiple IMSR deployments. The PIE approval builds on the NRC’s September 2025 approval of IMSR’s Principal Design Criteria, which addressed foundational safety and design requirements, including inherent safety, reactor power control, and load-following capability. The regulatory pathway is increasingly defined around operating-license readiness and repeat deployment. Construction permits enable large-scale plant construction and address major environmental requirements, while operating-license preparedness determines whether the nuclear systems satisfy safety standards for commercial operation. IMSR’s Topical Reports are most relevant to the latter because they resolve foundational safety analyses that can be reused in future applications. The company remains primarily focused on NRC Part 53 as the more practical pathway for initial IMSR deployment and fleet-scale licensing, while Part 57 appears more relevant to microreactors, with only limited potential applicability around waste-related provisions. DOE-backed TETRA and TEFLA advance two critical workstreams: reactor validation and fuel readiness. During the quarter, IMSR completed OTA contracts with the U.S. Department of Energy for Project TETRA, its reactor pilot project, and Project TEFLA, its fuel line pilot project. TETRA supports engineering and regulatory work for future IMSR Plant commercial operation, while TEFLA supports the infrastructure needed for IMSR fuel supply. Together, the programs address two gating items for advanced nuclear commercialization: licensing-quality reactor data and scalable fuel production capability. While traction is still programmatic rather than revenue-generating, successful execution should reduce schedule risk, strengthen NRC engagement, improve customer confidence, and support future fleet economics. Riot partnership creates a scalable data-center channel and expands IMSR’s commercial pipeline. In May, Terrestrial Energy and Riot Platforms announced a collaboration to develop co-located IMSR nuclear plants and hyperscale data centers for AI and high-performance compute applications. The partnership contemplates multiple 390MW IMSR Plants representing up to 4GW of nuclear capacity across U.S. candidate sites, including existing Riot facilities in Texas and Kentucky. The structure combines Riot’s hyperscale data-center development, operations, marketing, and leasing expertise with IMSR’s reactor design and licensing capabilities, creating a repeatable nuclear-plus-data-center template rather than a single-site project. IMSR’s physically separated non-nuclear energy conversion systems also enable hybrid configurations, including natural gas as a bridge fuel, which could accelerate commercial power availability and improve resiliency during project development. Collectively, 1Q26 strengthened the case that IMSR is moving from technology validation toward commercial deployment. The quarter connected regulatory progress, DOE-backed reactor and fuel programs, supply-chain qualification, and commercial origination into a clearer execution path. This matters because demand for clean, firm power continues to rise from AI infrastructure, reshoring, manufacturing electrification, and energy security needs. IMSR’s differentiated design directly addresses those use cases: the plant is roughly one-sixth the size of a conventional nuclear plant, uses turbines operating at nearly 50% greater efficiency than light-water-reactor-driven turbines, operates at low pressure, and relies on standard-assay uranium enriched to less than 5% U-235 rather than HALEU. These attributes support the core customer and financing proposition: lower deployment complexity, stronger fuel availability, improved affordability, and a more scalable path to repeat deployment. Additional IMSR project announcements remain an important 2026 commercialization catalyst. IMSR reaffirmed its expectation to announce 1-3 additional IMSR projects during 2026, with the Riot MOU representing progress against that target. Further site or strategic partner disclosures would help validate demand beyond a single data-center channel, increase visibility into pipeline quality, and provide investors with clearer evidence that IMSR’s commercial origination efforts are moving from broad market interest toward specific deployment opportunities. Fuel strategy remains a core IMSR differentiator, with TEFLA converting standard-fuel availability into a practical commercial supply pathway. IMSR uses standard-assay LEU enriched to less than 5% U-235, avoiding the HALEU enrichment levels of 15–20% required by many Generation IV peers and reducing exposure to commercial-scale HALEU supply constraints. TEFLA is therefore strategically important because enrichment is only the first step in IMSR’s fuel chain; the final reactor feed is IMSR fuel salt, requiring deconversion into uranium tetrafluoride and additional chemical production steps to meet licensed purity requirements. By developing this fuel-line process at pilot scale, TEFLA supports first-plant readiness, reduces fuel-supply execution risk, and strengthens the long-term recurring revenue opportunity tied to fuel supply and Core-unit services. Financial performance reflected planned execution spending, with sequential comparisons more useful given IMSR’s 2025 business transformation. IMSR reported a 1Q26 net loss of $10.5 million, compared with a $6.2 million net loss in 4Q25, as the company continued scaling fuel development, graphite testing, public-company infrastructure, and commercialization resources. On a sequential basis, R&D increased by $1.0 million, driven by fuel development and graphite testing programs, while G&A increased by $4.6 million, primarily reflecting headcount and stock-based compensation as IMSR builds out its public-company team. On a y/y basis, R&D increased by $3.2 million and G&A increased by $4.0 million, while other income and expense improved by $2.8 million due to lower interest expense and higher interest and dividend income. The spending ramp appears intentional and milestone-linked rather than reflective of operating inefficiency, with incremental investment directed toward the workstreams that matter most for commercialization: NRC engagement, fuel development, graphite testing, supplier qualification, and project origination. Cash burn remained controlled, and the balance sheet provides runway for milestone execution. IMSR ended 1Q26 with $289.9 million of cash and short-term investments, compared with $297.8 million at year-end, implying quarterly cash burn of $7.9 million. Burn increased $1.8 million sequentially after adjusting for one-time merger-related transaction costs, driven by a $0.6 million discretionary bonus payment, a $1.0 million accounts payable paydown to vendors offering extended credit terms, and $0.2 million of higher R&D payments. Share count increased by only ~100,000 shares from stock option exercises, leaving dilution minimal, while the balance sheet remains clean with limited liabilities, modest lease obligations, and no debt. Long-term unit economics remain compelling despite IMSR’s current pre-revenue stage. Management estimates that each IMSR Plant represents approximately $2.1 billion of cumulative revenue opportunity over a 60+ year plant life, including pre-construction services ($75 million), construction services and component procurement ($486 million), IMSR Core-unit supply and services ($1.148 billion), and IMSR fuel supply and services ($389 million). The model generates $774 million during the approximately four-year construction and commissioning phase, followed by $1.324 billion during the 56-year operating life, creating both upfront project revenue and long-duration recurring revenue after commercial operation begins. Revenue mix supports an annuity-like model anchored in Core-unit and fuel services. Management estimates a blended gross margin of approximately 22%, with pre-construction engineering services at 31%, construction services and component procurement at 27%, and Core-unit supply and fuel services each at 20%. Core-unit and fuel services together represent 74% of total plant-life revenue, or approximately $1.537 billion, with $1.324 billion generated over the operating life. This shifts IMSR’s model from episodic construction revenue toward recurring, multi-decade cash flows tied to fuel supply and Core-unit replacement cycles. IMSR’s current valuation reflects limited pricing of long-term commercialization potential relative to its business combination with HCM II Acquisition Corp. The following analysis is illustrative and not intended as a price target or investment recommendation but highlights the disconnect between current valuation and potential value creation as key milestones are achieved. IMSR currently trades at a material discount to the valuation implied at the time of its October 2025 business combination. At closing, the transaction implied a pro forma equity value of approximately $1.06 billion, based on ~105.8 million shares outstanding at $10.00 per share. As of May 15, 2026, IMSR’s equity market capitalization stands at approximately $772 million, representing a ~27% discount from the transaction reference value. Enterprise value provides a more appropriate basis for valuation at this stage of development. Adjusting for ~$290 million of cash and short-term investments, IMSR’s current enterprise value is approximately $482 million. In effect, the market is attributing less than $500 million of value to IMSR’s operating platform, intellectual property, regulatory progress, fuel strategy, and project pipeline, despite more than a decade of development and recent progress across NRC approval of the PIE Topical Report, completed DOE OTA contracts for TETRA and TEFLA, and the Riot data-center collaboration. Current valuation reflects execution and timeline risk despite a capital-light model supporting more efficient long-term value creation. This valuation primarily reflects a discount for time-to-commercialization and execution risk rather than a reassessment of the long-term addressable opportunity. IMSR’s capital-light model, focused on design, component supply, and fuel provision rather than plant ownership, should enable more efficient capital deployment than traditional nuclear developers. IMSR remains pre-revenue, with first commercial plant operations targeted for 2034, and near-term financials are expected to reflect elevated R&D and public company costs. However, the company has differentiated itself within the Generation IV nuclear landscape through commercially available SALEU fuel, completion of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission’s Vendor Design Review, advancing NRC engagement, and DOE-supported programs addressing licensing, reactor validation, and fuel readiness. Relative valuation comparisons underscore this dynamic. Established Generation III nuclear operators trade at significantly higher enterprise values supported by operating fleets and stable cash flows, while Generation IV developers trade at materially lower valuations reflecting pre-revenue status and development risk. As advanced nuclear technologies progress toward commercialization, valuation outcomes are likely to increasingly differentiate based on regulatory readiness, fuel availability, and execution credibility. In this context, IMSR’s valuation can be viewed as a long-duration option on regulatory and project execution, supported by a substantial cash balance providing multi-year runway. Bottomline: At $482 million of enterprise value, IMSR reflects significant execution and timeline risk while offering asymmetric upside to regulatory and commercialization milestones, supported by a multi-year cash runway. 2026 remains milestone-driven, with progress across NRC licensing, TETRA, TEFLA, fuel readiness, Riot/data-center origination, and flagship project development as key drivers of potential re-rating. Download the Complete Report Here Read Exec Edge’s Initiation on Terrestrial Energy Here Subscribe to our Weekly Newsletter to Receive All Research Contact: Executives-Edge.com [email protected]

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-05-15

Nano Nuclear Energy Inc (NNE) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Highlights: Strategic Advances Amid ...

GuruFocus.com
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: May 14, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Nano Nuclear Energy Inc (NASDAQ:NNE) has submitted a construction permit application for its Kronos MMR to the U.S. NRC, marking a significant milestone in its development process. The company has a strong financial position with approximately $569 million in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments. NNE is advancing strategic partnerships, including a collaboration with Supermicro and a joint venture with EHC Investment, to enhance commercialization and deployment opportunities. The Kronos MMR design benefits from a superior safety profile, using helium and inert gas as coolant and TRISO fuel, which enhances its deployment potential. NNE is focusing on vertical integration across the nuclear fuel cycle, which is expected to provide competitive advantages and enhance long-term reactor economics. The company faces potential delays in the licensing process, as the acceptance of the construction permit application by the NRC is still pending. NNE's net loss increased to $9.2 million in Q2, reflecting higher expenses associated with advancing the Kronos MMR development. The company anticipates higher expenses in the future as it scales its team and initiates procurement for long lead items. There are uncertainties around the timing and success of securing non-dilutive funding opportunities to support its projects. The transportation of nuclear fuel and materials is identified as a potential bottleneck, requiring further development of in-house capabilities and partnerships. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with GENK. Is NNE fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Q: Regarding the Barupon feasibility study, can you provide more detail around the potential timing of that one gigawatt of capacity and what the next steps look like from here? A: James Walker, CEO: We've completed the feasibility study and are now discussing the next stage, which involves examining the licensing requirements. This will include drilling and gathering geotechnical work for a construction permit application at the Barupon site. Once the construction permit is approved, we can start site preparation, with the process dependent on the licensing at UIUC. Q: Can you provide more…Read full document

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: May 14, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Nano Nuclear Energy Inc (NASDAQ:NNE) has submitted a construction permit application for its Kronos MMR to the U.S. NRC, marking a significant milestone in its development process. The company has a strong financial position with approximately $569 million in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments. NNE is advancing strategic partnerships, including a collaboration with Supermicro and a joint venture with EHC Investment, to enhance commercialization and deployment opportunities. The Kronos MMR design benefits from a superior safety profile, using helium and inert gas as coolant and TRISO fuel, which enhances its deployment potential. NNE is focusing on vertical integration across the nuclear fuel cycle, which is expected to provide competitive advantages and enhance long-term reactor economics. The company faces potential delays in the licensing process, as the acceptance of the construction permit application by the NRC is still pending. NNE's net loss increased to $9.2 million in Q2, reflecting higher expenses associated with advancing the Kronos MMR development. The company anticipates higher expenses in the future as it scales its team and initiates procurement for long lead items. There are uncertainties around the timing and success of securing non-dilutive funding opportunities to support its projects. The transportation of nuclear fuel and materials is identified as a potential bottleneck, requiring further development of in-house capabilities and partnerships. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with GENK. Is NNE fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Q: Regarding the Barupon feasibility study, can you provide more detail around the potential timing of that one gigawatt of capacity and what the next steps look like from here? A: James Walker, CEO: We've completed the feasibility study and are now discussing the next stage, which involves examining the licensing requirements. This will include drilling and gathering geotechnical work for a construction permit application at the Barupon site. Once the construction permit is approved, we can start site preparation, with the process dependent on the licensing at UIUC. Q: Can you provide more details about the non-dilutive funding opportunities you are evaluating? A: Jason Garcha, CFO: We are looking at government programs or incentives such as DOE fuel under project qualifications, ITCs, and potential avenues with the state and universities. While we haven't quantified the exact amounts, these opportunities could provide additional financial flexibility. Q: The new regulatory pathways for the NRC, Parts 53 and 57, is that something that could expedite UIUC or is it more of a commercial opportunity? A: James Walker, CEO: Part 57 is particularly important commercially as it focuses on fleet deployment of microreactors, aligning construction and licensing processes. While it may not expedite UIUC, it is crucial for future mass deployment of reactor systems. Q: Any idea on when the CPA will be accepted and does the 12-month timeline start from acceptance? A: James Walker, CEO: The formal acceptance of the CPA is expected imminently, possibly from today to early next week. The 12-month review period for construction permission will start once it is formally accepted. Q: Are you looking at transportation partners specifically for transferring nuclear fuel? A: James Walker, CEO: We are in late-stage discussions for acquisitions to enhance our in-house capabilities for nuclear material transportation, which is crucial for reactor deployment and refueling. Announcements on this are expected soon. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-05-15

Nano Nuclear Energy Q2 Earnings Call Highlights

MarketBeat
Interested in Nano Nuclear Energy Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. Kronos micro modular reactor development advanced as Nano Nuclear said the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign submitted a construction permit application to the NRC, marking a key step toward construction and commercialization. The company expects an approximate 12-month review once accepted, with initial construction potentially starting in mid-to-late 2027. The company highlighted growing commercial opportunities for Kronos, including a feasibility study with BaRupOn for up to 1 GW of AI data center power in Texas and partnerships with Supermicro, EHC Investment, and DS Dansuk to support AI infrastructure, Gulf-region expansion, and South Korea deployment efforts. Nano Nuclear ended the quarter with about $569 million in cash and short-term investments, giving it flexibility to fund development even as second-quarter net loss widened to $9.2 million. Management said spending will likely rise as the company expands headcount, procurement, and engineering activity. NANO Nuclear Energy: Short-Squeeze or Rapid Meltdown Ahead Nano Nuclear Energy (NASDAQ:NNE) said it continues to advance its Kronos micro modular reactor program, highlighting a recent construction permit application tied to a planned deployment at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, a strong cash position and expanding commercial discussions across data centers, international markets and the nuclear fuel cycle. Founder, Chairman and President Jay Jiang Yu said the company remains focused on vertical integration across key parts of the nuclear fuel cycle while advancing Kronos toward construction, licensing and commercialization. He described Kronos as a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor design supported by prior development work and operating history for similar reactor technologies. → Micron Investors Face a High-Stakes Moment After the Latest Rally 2 Under-the-Radar Energy Stocks to Watch for AI Demand in 2026 Yu said the University of Illinois’ formal submission of a construction permit application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission under Part 50 marked a significant milestone for the company. He said the filing followed years of pre-licensing activity, thousands of pages of technical documentation and months of engagement with the NRC. Chief Executive Officer James Walker said the construction…Read full document

Interested in Nano Nuclear Energy Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. Kronos micro modular reactor development advanced as Nano Nuclear said the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign submitted a construction permit application to the NRC, marking a key step toward construction and commercialization. The company expects an approximate 12-month review once accepted, with initial construction potentially starting in mid-to-late 2027. The company highlighted growing commercial opportunities for Kronos, including a feasibility study with BaRupOn for up to 1 GW of AI data center power in Texas and partnerships with Supermicro, EHC Investment, and DS Dansuk to support AI infrastructure, Gulf-region expansion, and South Korea deployment efforts. Nano Nuclear ended the quarter with about $569 million in cash and short-term investments, giving it flexibility to fund development even as second-quarter net loss widened to $9.2 million. Management said spending will likely rise as the company expands headcount, procurement, and engineering activity. NANO Nuclear Energy: Short-Squeeze or Rapid Meltdown Ahead Nano Nuclear Energy (NASDAQ:NNE) said it continues to advance its Kronos micro modular reactor program, highlighting a recent construction permit application tied to a planned deployment at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, a strong cash position and expanding commercial discussions across data centers, international markets and the nuclear fuel cycle. Founder, Chairman and President Jay Jiang Yu said the company remains focused on vertical integration across key parts of the nuclear fuel cycle while advancing Kronos toward construction, licensing and commercialization. He described Kronos as a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor design supported by prior development work and operating history for similar reactor technologies. → Micron Investors Face a High-Stakes Moment After the Latest Rally 2 Under-the-Radar Energy Stocks to Watch for AI Demand in 2026 Yu said the University of Illinois’ formal submission of a construction permit application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission under Part 50 marked a significant milestone for the company. He said the filing followed years of pre-licensing activity, thousands of pages of technical documentation and months of engagement with the NRC. Chief Executive Officer James Walker said the construction permit application for the company’s first full-scale Kronos MMR prototype represented a transition from engineering design toward construction planning at the University of Illinois campus. → How Bad Could Tesla’s Cybertruck Recall Be for Shares? Who Won and Who Lost in Nuclear Energy’s Q2 Earnings Walker said Nano Nuclear expects an approximately 12-month review period after formal acceptance of the application. In response to an analyst question, he said formal acceptance was expected “imminently,” while noting that the company could not speak for the NRC. If accepted and reviewed on the expected timeline, the company said initial construction activities could begin in mid-to-late 2027. Walker said the company’s technical team has shifted its attention to supply chain work after completing the permit application. That includes discussions around reactor vessels, graphite, fuel fabrication, helium circulators and non-nuclear components such as turbine systems and mechanical systems. → Reading the Stripes: Is The Industrial Recession Over? Asked about cost estimates for the University of Illinois project, Walker said the company’s prior estimate of $300 million to $350 million for the first-of-a-kind full-scale reactor system remained accurate based on current discussions. He cautioned that the figure would not represent the cost of later “Nth-of-a-kind” units, because the initial reactor includes bespoke elements. The company also discussed its previously announced work with BaRupOn on a feasibility study evaluating up to 1 gigawatt of power generation using the Kronos MMR platform for an AI data center and manufacturing campus in Texas. Yu said the feasibility study confirmed that Kronos could be designed to reach BaRupOn’s desired 1 GW power needs in stages over time. Walker said the parties are now discussing the next phase, including licensing requirements and site-specific work such as drilling and geotechnical studies that would support a construction permit application for the site. Walker said the University of Illinois deployment is expected to produce a licensed commercial reactor product that could then be used in future deployments, while individual sites would still require their own licensing and site approval processes. He said future applications could potentially benefit from a more efficient review once the reactor is a known quantity with the NRC. In response to a question about BaRupOn’s tenant pipeline, Walker said BaRupOn was in due diligence with two major hyperscalers. He added that BaRupOn has other potential sites beyond Texas and said Nano Nuclear is “earmarked” to provide nuclear power for those potential developments as well. Executives highlighted several recent memorandums of understanding intended to support commercialization and deployment opportunities. Supermicro: Walker said the company’s MOU with Supermicro focuses on exploring the integration of Kronos with AI server and data center platforms, joint go-to-market strategies and off-grid deployment opportunities for AI infrastructure. EHC Investment: Walker said the Abu Dhabi-based investment holding company could support a potential joint venture in the Gulf region, including market entry evaluation, localized supply chain development, host site identification and stakeholder engagement. DS Dansuk: Yu said the collaboration is aimed at supporting deployment and localization efforts in South Korea, including the potential development of reactor core manufacturing and component production capabilities. Yu said the company is also advancing discussions around M&A and partnerships tied to the nuclear fuel supply chain, including nuclear fuel transportation and fuel supply chain facilities. Walker said the company is in late-stage discussions regarding transportation-related capabilities, describing transportation of nuclear materials and fuel as a potential bottleneck for broader industry deployment. Walker said proposed and emerging NRC licensing pathways, including Part 53 and Part 57, could be important for the broader advanced nuclear industry. He said Part 57 is particularly relevant for microreactors because it is focused on fleet deployment and could support the commercialization of standardized reactor systems at scale. However, Walker said Nano Nuclear does not expect those newer pathways to materially change the University of Illinois project because the company was already far along under its existing Part 50 process. He said the commercial benefit would be more meaningful for future deployment of multiple reactor systems. In its financial update, the company said it ended the quarter with approximately $569 million in cash equivalents and short-term investments, down slightly from the prior quarter as it continued funding Kronos development and related fuel cycle initiatives. The company said its previously filed $900 million shelf registration statement became effective during the quarter, including a $400 million at-the-market facility. Management said it has not used the shelf or ATM and does not view them as reflecting immediate financing needs, but said they provide flexibility to access capital opportunistically. Second-quarter net loss totaled $9.2 million, up about $3 million from the prior quarter. The company said the increase primarily reflected higher headcount and related expenses as it advanced Kronos development and licensing, while also pursuing strategic growth opportunities. Compared with the prior-year period, net loss declined by about $12 million, which the company attributed primarily to higher interest income and lower equity-based compensation. Management said expenses are expected to trend higher as Nano Nuclear scales its team and begins procurement of long-lead items and testing equipment tied to its engineering and demonstration facility. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc is a microreactor and nuclear technology company, which provides supply energy services. Its products in technical development are ZEUS, a solid core battery reactor, and ODIN, a low-pressure coolant reactor. The company is founded by Jiang Yu in February, 2022 and is headquartered in New York, NY. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "Nano Nuclear Energy Q2 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for May 2026.

As of 2026-08-22 • Updated weeklySource: Earnings sourceIngestion runbook