RankAlpha logo
Back to Rankings

MAA

Mid-America Apartment CommunitiesD
NYSE / Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
Last Price
Quote time unavailable
View Chart
Documents
69
Stored
Transcripts
1
Recent loaded
Latest report
2026-08-28
Investor release

Document history

Earnings documents stored for MAA.

12 shown
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-28

Mid-America Apartment Communities (MAA) Down 3.4% Since Last Earnings Report: Can It Rebound?

Zacks
A month has gone by since the last earnings report for Mid-America Apartment Communities (MAA). Shares have lost about 3.4% in that time frame, underperforming the S&P 500. But investors have to be wondering, will the recent negative trend continue leading up to its next earnings release, or is Mid-America Apartment Communities due for a breakout? Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important drivers. Mid-America Apartment reported second-quarter 2026 core FFO per share of $2.08, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.10. The metric declined 3.3% from the year-ago quarter. Rental and other property revenues increased 1% year over year to $555.13 million but missed the consensus mark of $555.97 million. Same-store NOI fell 1%, though blended lease-rate growth improved to 0.7% amid steady demand. Same-store revenues declined 0.3% year over year, while property operating expenses increased 0.8%. The combination drove a 1% decrease in same-store NOI. Same-store NOI totaled $316.22 million, down from $319.50 million a year earlier. Average effective rent per unit slipped 0.2% to $1,688. Average physical occupancy was 95.3%, reflecting continued pressure from elevated apartment deliveries across several of MAA’s Sunbelt markets. Leasing indicators showed sequential improvement despite the decline in property-level earnings. Effective blended lease-rate growth reached 0.7%, improving 20 basis points year over year and 100 basis points from the first quarter. Effective new-lease pricing declined 5.3%, but that marked a 170-basis-point sequential improvement. Renewal lease rates increased 5.2%, helping offset weaker pricing on new leases. Resident turnover remained historically low at 39.6%. Move-outs associated with residents purchasing single-family homes represented only 10.9% during the quarter, supporting occupancy and renewal demand. MAA ended the quarter with six development projects totaling 1,749 units. Expected development costs were $597.50 million, of which $360.36 million had been funded, leaving $237.14 million of expected spending. The company completed MAA Plaza Midwood in Charlotte, NC, and began construction of a 263-unit community in Kansas City, MO. It also completed the initial lease-up of MAA Cathedral Arts in…Read full document

A month has gone by since the last earnings report for Mid-America Apartment Communities (MAA). Shares have lost about 3.4% in that time frame, underperforming the S&P 500. But investors have to be wondering, will the recent negative trend continue leading up to its next earnings release, or is Mid-America Apartment Communities due for a breakout? Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important drivers. Mid-America Apartment reported second-quarter 2026 core FFO per share of $2.08, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.10. The metric declined 3.3% from the year-ago quarter. Rental and other property revenues increased 1% year over year to $555.13 million but missed the consensus mark of $555.97 million. Same-store NOI fell 1%, though blended lease-rate growth improved to 0.7% amid steady demand. Same-store revenues declined 0.3% year over year, while property operating expenses increased 0.8%. The combination drove a 1% decrease in same-store NOI. Same-store NOI totaled $316.22 million, down from $319.50 million a year earlier. Average effective rent per unit slipped 0.2% to $1,688. Average physical occupancy was 95.3%, reflecting continued pressure from elevated apartment deliveries across several of MAA’s Sunbelt markets. Leasing indicators showed sequential improvement despite the decline in property-level earnings. Effective blended lease-rate growth reached 0.7%, improving 20 basis points year over year and 100 basis points from the first quarter. Effective new-lease pricing declined 5.3%, but that marked a 170-basis-point sequential improvement. Renewal lease rates increased 5.2%, helping offset weaker pricing on new leases. Resident turnover remained historically low at 39.6%. Move-outs associated with residents purchasing single-family homes represented only 10.9% during the quarter, supporting occupancy and renewal demand. MAA ended the quarter with six development projects totaling 1,749 units. Expected development costs were $597.50 million, of which $360.36 million had been funded, leaving $237.14 million of expected spending. The company completed MAA Plaza Midwood in Charlotte, NC, and began construction of a 263-unit community in Kansas City, MO. It also completed the initial lease-up of MAA Cathedral Arts in Dallas. Five lease-up projects contained 1,759 units and were 74.4% occupied at quarter-end. Costs incurred on those communities totaled $623.74 million. Management expects four projects to stabilize during the second half of 2026. MAA ended June with $882.8 million of combined cash and available borrowing capacity. Total debt was $5.69 billion, with an average effective interest rate of 3.9% and an average maturity of six years. Fixed-rate borrowings represented 86.6% of total debt. Net debt to adjusted EBITDAre was 4.5X compared with 4.3X at the end of 2025. During the quarter, MAA repurchased 0.4 million shares for $50 million. The company also entered into a delayed-draw term loan with commitments of up to $350 million and had $100 million outstanding at quarter-end. MAA narrowed its full-year core FFO guidance range to $8.41-$8.65 per share from $8.37-$8.69. The midpoint remained unchanged at $8.53. The company reduced its same-store revenue growth outlook to a range of negative 0.2% to positive 0.4%, with a midpoint of 0.1%. Its same-store operating expense growth range was lowered to 1.25%-2.25%, while projected NOI growth was revised to negative 1.7% to negative 0.1%. For the third quarter, MAA expects core FFO per share of $2.04-$2.16. The $2.10 midpoint reflects anticipated contributions from same-store and non-same-store NOI, partly offset by higher interest expense. In the past month, investors have witnessed a upward trend in estimates review. Currently, Mid-America Apartment Communities has a poor Growth Score of F, however its Momentum Score is doing a lot better with a B. Charting a somewhat similar path, the stock was allocated a score of C on the value side, putting it in the middle 20% for value investors. Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of D. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in. Estimates have been broadly trending upward for the stock, and the magnitude of these revisions looks promising. Notably, Mid-America Apartment Communities has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). We expect an in-line return from the stock in the next few months. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. (MAA) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-05

National Healthcare Properties Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results

GlobeNewswire
SHOP Same Store Cash NOI increased 20.1% on a year-over-year basis  $400 million of 2026 SHOP acquisitions completed or under definitive agreement Secured an additional $650 million of credit facility commitments at improved spreads and terms  Transformed net leverage profile with successful IPO  Appointed Albert M. Campbell to Board of Directors, including its audit committee NEW YORK, Aug. 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- National Healthcare Properties, Inc. (Nasdaq: NHP) (the “Company”), a self-managed real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, owning and investing in a diversified portfolio of healthcare real estate, with an emphasis on providing senior housing to serve a growing elderly population in the United States, today announced results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. Michael Anderson, Chief Executive Officer and President, commented, “The second quarter marked an important inflection point for the Company as we completed our transition to the public markets. Since then, we have executed decisively on the outlined agenda. We closed 19 acquisitions, delivered solid organic growth across our SHOP portfolio and also made meaningful progress towards building a balance sheet consistent with an investment-grade, unsecured issuer. We are pleased to strengthen our Board with the addition of Al Campbell, reinforcing our commitment to strong governance as we scale. Together, these results reflect disciplined capital allocation which the Company expects will drive sustained value creation for our shareholders.” Financial Performance and Recent Highlights Net loss attributable to common stockholders of $(0.13) per basic and diluted share. Nareit defined Funds From Operations (“FFO”) of $0.19 per diluted share and Normalized Funds From Operations (“Normalized FFO”) of $0.18 per diluted share. Second quarter portfolio Same Store Cash Net Operating Income (“NOI”) growth was 6.8% year-over-year. Senior Housing Operating Portfolio (“SHOP”) Segment: Same Store Cash NOI growth was 20.1% on a year-over-year basis. Same Store average occupancy totaled 84.1%, an increase of 1.4% on a year-over-year basis. Same Store RevPOR increased 5.9% on a year-over-year basis. Same Store Cash NOI Margin of 22.4%, an expansion of 2.3% on a year-over-year basis. Outpatient Medical Facility (“OMF”) Segment: Same Store Cash NOI decreased by (0.4)% on a year-over-year basis. Sa…Read full document

SHOP Same Store Cash NOI increased 20.1% on a year-over-year basis  $400 million of 2026 SHOP acquisitions completed or under definitive agreement Secured an additional $650 million of credit facility commitments at improved spreads and terms  Transformed net leverage profile with successful IPO  Appointed Albert M. Campbell to Board of Directors, including its audit committee NEW YORK, Aug. 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- National Healthcare Properties, Inc. (Nasdaq: NHP) (the “Company”), a self-managed real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, owning and investing in a diversified portfolio of healthcare real estate, with an emphasis on providing senior housing to serve a growing elderly population in the United States, today announced results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. Michael Anderson, Chief Executive Officer and President, commented, “The second quarter marked an important inflection point for the Company as we completed our transition to the public markets. Since then, we have executed decisively on the outlined agenda. We closed 19 acquisitions, delivered solid organic growth across our SHOP portfolio and also made meaningful progress towards building a balance sheet consistent with an investment-grade, unsecured issuer. We are pleased to strengthen our Board with the addition of Al Campbell, reinforcing our commitment to strong governance as we scale. Together, these results reflect disciplined capital allocation which the Company expects will drive sustained value creation for our shareholders.” Financial Performance and Recent Highlights Net loss attributable to common stockholders of $(0.13) per basic and diluted share. Nareit defined Funds From Operations (“FFO”) of $0.19 per diluted share and Normalized Funds From Operations (“Normalized FFO”) of $0.18 per diluted share. Second quarter portfolio Same Store Cash Net Operating Income (“NOI”) growth was 6.8% year-over-year. Senior Housing Operating Portfolio (“SHOP”) Segment: Same Store Cash NOI growth was 20.1% on a year-over-year basis. Same Store average occupancy totaled 84.1%, an increase of 1.4% on a year-over-year basis. Same Store RevPOR increased 5.9% on a year-over-year basis. Same Store Cash NOI Margin of 22.4%, an expansion of 2.3% on a year-over-year basis. Outpatient Medical Facility (“OMF”) Segment: Same Store Cash NOI decreased by (0.4)% on a year-over-year basis. Same Store ending occupancy totaled 94.3%, an increase of 0.2% on a year-over-year basis. Transactional Activity Acquisitions and Pipeline In late June 2026, the Company acquired two SHOP communities located in the Midwest with 211 total units for a purchase price of $98 million. The communities will be managed by Senior Lifestyle Corporation. In early July 2026, the Company acquired 16 SHOP communities comprised of 916 total units and located across several Midwestern, Southern, Mid-Atlantic and Pacific Northwest states for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $166 million. The communities will be managed by the Company's existing operating partners. Thirteen of these communities were acquired through a joint venture with Discovery Senior Living. The Company owns approximately 98.5% of the joint venture and, as part of this transaction, holds a right of first refusal and purchase option on an additional 13 senior living communities managed by Discovery Senior Living. In late July 2026, the Company acquired one SHOP community located in Iowa with 87 total units for a purchase price of approximately $16 million. The community will be managed by one of the Company's existing operating partners. In late June 2026, the Company entered into a definitive purchase and sale agreement to acquire three SHOP communities located in Illinois with 178 total units for a purchase price of approximately $30 million. This transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2026, subject to closing conditions and applicable regulatory approvals as specified in the purchase and sale agreement. In July 2026, the Company entered into a definitive purchase and sale agreement to acquire two SHOP communities located in Florida with 200 total units for a purchase price of $90 million. The transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2026, subject to closing conditions and applicable regulatory approvals as specified in the purchase and sale agreement. Non-Core SHOP Disposition In May 2026, the Company entered into a definitive purchase and sale agreement to sell one non-core SHOP community in California for approximately $42 million, equating to a 1.7% trailing twelve-month yield. Balance Sheet and Capital As of June 30, 2026, total debt outstanding (net of discounts and unamortized debt issuance costs) was approximately $0.8 billion with a weighted average economic interest rate of 5.69% (when giving effect to interest rate hedges and caps) and an average remaining term of 3.6 years. Net Leverage (Net Debt as of June 30, 2026 to Annualized Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter ended June 30, 2026) improved 4.3x to 4.9x as of June 30, 2026 from 9.2x as of June 30, 2025. In April 2026, the Company repaid in full the $186 million of indebtedness under its revolving facility with proceeds from its initial public offering. In August 2026, the Company recast its senior unsecured credit facilities, which provide for, among other things, (i) an increase in total lender commitments from $550 million to $1.2 billion, with the revolving facility increasing from $400 million to $750 million, the term loan increasing from $150 million to $300 million and a new $150 million delayed draw term loan facility being added, (ii) an extension of the maturity of the revolving facility and the term loan (including the delayed draw term loan) to August 2030 and August 2029, respectively, and (iii) a reduction in the applicable pricing for interest rates based on the Company's corporate leverage ratio. In connection with the credit facilities recast, the Company repaid the $332 million outstanding under its Fannie Mae secured debt due to mature in November 2026. Common and Preferred Stock Common Stock In April 2026, the Company completed its public offering (the “Offering”) and issued an aggregate of 44.3 million shares of Class A common stock, $0.01 par value per share (“Class A common stock”), for aggregate gross offering proceeds of approximately $531.3 million. In connection with the Offering, the Class A common stock became listed on The Nasdaq Global Market (“Nasdaq”) under the symbol “NHP” and began trading on April 22, 2026. On July 1, 2026, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.075 per share of its common stock (including its Class A Common Stock). The dividend was paid in cash on July 30, 2026 to holders of record as of the close of business on July 15, 2026. Preferred Stock On June 22, 2026, the Board of Directors declared dividends on the Company's outstanding preferred stock as follows: A dividend of $0.4609375 per share on its 7.375% Series A Preferred Stock to holders of record at the close of business on July 2, 2026. The dividend was paid on July 15, 2026. A dividend of $0.4453125 per share on its 7.125% Series B Preferred Stock to holders of record at the close of business on July 2, 2026. The dividend was paid on July 15, 2026. During the three months ended June 30, 2026, the Company completed its tender offer of previously outstanding preferred stock with an aggregate liquidation preference of approximately $28.1 million at a weighted average yield of 8.1%, representing a $2.50 discount to the liquidation preference of $25.00 per share and resulting in dividend savings of $2.0 million annually. Appointment of Albert M. Campbell to the Board of Directors On August 4, 2026, the Board of Directors elected Albert M. Campbell to serve as a member of the Board and its audit committee, effective August 10, 2026. Mr. Campbell is a seasoned financial executive with a 35-year career spanning various financial and accounting leadership roles. From 1998 to 2024, he worked with Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. (NYSE: MAA), a large publicly traded multifamily REIT, where Mr. Campbell held various financial positions, including Treasurer and Director of Financial Planning, before becoming Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in January 2010. As Chief Financial Officer, he had responsibilities in the areas of corporate finance, treasury, investor relations, accounting, information technology, and strategic planning. He led key areas of company growth, including balance sheet restructuring, corporate mergers, systems integrations, and team building. Mr. Campbell began his career as a Certified Public Accountant with Arthur Andersen & Company before serving in various finance and accounting roles with Thomas & Betts Corporation, a former publicly held electrical parts manufacturer and distributor. He currently serves on the Board of Directors and Strategy Committee of Orgill, Inc., a large privately held distributor of hardware products, as well as on the Advisory Board of Middleburg, a large privately held developer of multifamily communities. He is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive status) and graduated magna cum laude with a Bachelor of Professional Accountancy from Mississippi State University. Revised Full Year 2026 Guidance For the full year 2026, the Company is revising certain guidance ranges as follows: Full Year 2026 Guidance Commentary The revision in the Company’s guidance is primarily the result of SHOP segment outperformance through the current quarter as well as expectations for the remainder of the year, the expected disposition of a non-core SHOP asset, and an anticipated increase in equity-based compensation related to ongoing refreshment of our Board of Directors. Note: The Company’s 2026 guidance contains forward-looking statements and is based on a number of assumptions and estimates, including those identified later in this press release. These assumptions and estimates are based on existing market conditions, transaction timing and other assumptions for the year ending December 31, 2026; actual results may differ materially. Supplemental Information Additional information regarding these results can be found in the Company’s supplemental financial package that will be available on the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at nhpreit.com. About National Healthcare Properties National Healthcare Properties, Inc. (Nasdaq: NHP) is a self-managed real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, owning and investing in a diversified portfolio of healthcare real estate, with an emphasis on providing senior housing to serve a growing elderly population in the United States. Additional information about the Company can be found on its website at nhpreit.com. Investor & Media Contact Email: [email protected] Forward-Looking Statements This press release may contain “forward-looking” statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements (other than statements of historical fact) in this press release regarding the Company's prospects, expectations, intentions, plans, financial position, guidance and business strategy may constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of terminology such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “seek,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” “continue” or the negatives of these terms or variations of them or similar expressions. Risks and uncertainties, the occurrence of which could adversely affect the Company's business and cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements, include, but are not limited to, the following: changes in economic cycles generally and in the real estate and healthcare markets specifically; the success of the Company's growth strategy, including its ability to successfully identify, complete and integrate new acquisitions; the Company’s ability to complete acquisitions or dispositions on the terms and timing the Company expects, or at all; changes to inflation and interest rates; competition in the real estate and healthcare markets; the Company's ability to retain certain key personnel; legislative and regulatory changes in the healthcare and real estate industries; reductions or changes in reimbursement from third-party payors, including Medicare and Medicaid; discovery of previously undetected environmentally hazardous conditions; the Company's ability to pay down, refinance, restructure or extend its indebtedness as it becomes due; system failures, cyber incidents or deficiencies in the Company's cybersecurity systems; the availability of capital on favorable terms, or at all; the Company's ability to remain qualified as a real estate investment trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes; and other risks and uncertainties described in the section titled Risk Factors of the Company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and all other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Finally, the Company assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in any forward-looking statements. Financial Statements and Definitions This press release includes certain non-GAAP financial measures, including Nareit FFO, Normalized FFO, Net Debt, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, NOI, Cash NOI and Same Store Cash NOI. While the Company believes that non-GAAP financial measures are helpful in evaluating its operating performance, the use of non-GAAP financial measures in this press release should not be considered in isolation from, or as an alternative for, a measure of financial or operating performance as defined by GAAP. There are inherent limitations associated with the use of each of these supplemental non-GAAP financial measures as an analytical tool. Additionally, the Company’s computation of non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to those reported by other REITs. Definitions of these non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations to their most directly comparable GAAP measures are provided below. Nareit FFO​ and Normalized FFO The Company calculates FFO consistent with the standards established over time by Nareit. Nareit defines FFO as net income or loss (computed in accordance with GAAP), adjusted for (i) real estate-related depreciation and amortization, (ii) impairment charges on depreciable real property, (iii) gains or losses from sales of depreciable real property and (iv) similar adjustments for non-controlling interests and unconsolidated entities. The Company calculates Normalized FFO by further adjusting FFO to reflect the performance of its portfolio for items it believes are not directly attributable to its operations. The Company's adjustments to FFO to arrive at Normalized FFO include removing the impacts of (i) acquisition and transaction related costs; (ii) termination fees to related parties; (iii) severance and other related costs; (iv) mark-to-market gains and losses on non-designated derivatives and amortization related to terminated derivatives; (v) casualty-related charges, net relating to significantly disruptive events that are infrequent in nature; (vi) gains and losses on extinguishment of debt; (vii) similar adjustments for non-controlling interests; and (viii) certain other items set forth in the Normalized FFO reconciliation included therein. The Company considers FFO and Normalized FFO to be useful supplemental measures for reviewing comparative operating and financial performance because, by excluding the applicable items listed above, FFO and Normalized FFO can help investors compare the Company's operating performance between periods or to other companies (though other companies may calculate these measures differently than the Company does and the value of any such comparison may be limited). While FFO and Normalized FFO are relevant and widely used measures of operating performance of REITs, they do not represent, nor are they meant to replace, cash flows from operations and net income or loss as defined by GAAP, and should not be considered alternatives to those measures in evaluating the Company's liquidity or operating performance. Rather, FFO and Normalized FFO should be reviewed in conjunction with these and other GAAP measurements as an indication of the Company's operational performance and are not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund the Company's future cash requirements, including the Company's ability to pay dividends and other distributions to the Company's stockholders. Additionally, the Company's computation of FFO and Normalized FFO may not be comparable to FFO and Normalized FFO reported by other REITs that do not define FFO in accordance with the current National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition or define Normalized FFO differently than the Company does. Adjusted EBITDAThe Company defines Adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, excluding (i) acquisition and transaction related costs; (ii) termination fees to related parties; (iii) impairment charges; (iv) casualty-related charges; (v) gains and losses on sale of real estate investments; (vi) gains and losses on extinguishment of debt; (vii) gains and losses on our derivatives; and (viii) non-cash items such as amortization of intangibles and equity-based compensation. Annualized Adjusted EBITDA means Adjusted EBITDA for the specified quarter, multiplied by four. Cash NOI and NOICash NOI is defined as NOI excluding non-cash items such as straight-line rent adjustments and amortization of above and below market lease and lease intangibles that are included in GAAP revenue from tenants and property operating and maintenance. Cash NOI Margin​For the SHOP segment, Cash NOI divided by revenue from tenants or residents excluding net amortization of above- and below-market lease and lease intangibles. Net Debt​Net debt means total debt, net of deferred financing costs, mortgage discounts and premiums less cash and cash equivalents. Net Debt to Annualized Adjusted EBITDA or Net Leverage​Net Debt to Annualized Adjusted EBITDA or Net Leverage means Net Debt divided by Annualized Adjusted EBITDA. Non-Core Properties​Non-Core properties are assets that have been deemed not essential to generating future economic benefit or value to our day-to-day operations and/or are scheduled to be sold with closing conditions substantially fulfilled. Leased % or Ending occupancyLeased % or Ending occupancy for the OMF segment is presented as of the end of the period shown. Recurring Capital ExpendituresRecurring Capital Expenditures means capital expenditures incurred to maintain the properties in current market condition and which are generally recurring in nature. Same Store​Same Store means operational properties owned by the Company for the full duration of the applicable comparative periods and that are not otherwise excluded. Properties are excluded from “same store” if they are (i) Non-Core Properties, (ii) sold, classified as held for sale, or classified as discontinued operations in accordance with GAAP, (iii) impacted by materially disruptive events, or (iv) undergoing, or intended to undergo, significant redevelopment. Redeveloped properties in our OMF segment will be included in Same Store once substantial completion of work has occurred for the full period in the periods presented. Same Store Cash NOISame Store Cash NOI is defined as Cash NOI for our Same Store properties. (1) Potential common shares are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) when a net loss exists as the effect would be an antidilutive per share amount. (1) Certain 2025 amounts have been reclassified from general and administrative to property operating and maintenance to align with the current period presentation. (1) For Q2 2026, includes $1.5 million of amortization reclassified from OCI to earnings (reduced interest expense) from a swap termination.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-31

Mid-America Apartment Communities Q2 Earnings Call Highlights

MarketBeat
Interested in Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. Second-quarter Core FFO exceeded guidance by $0.02 at $2.08 per diluted share, as lower property expenses and contributions from non-same-store properties offset softer same-store revenue. MAA maintained its full-year Core FFO midpoint of $8.53 per share. Leasing trends improved sequentially, with new lease growth up 170 basis points and blended lease pricing up 100 basis points. However, management said cautious consumers and elevated apartment supply are slowing the recovery in new lease pricing, despite resilient demand and rising inbound migration. MAA continued investing in growth, funding an $598 million development pipeline and completing 2,118 unit renovations during the quarter. Renovated units generated an average $110 rent premium and an estimated 25% cash-on-cash return, while expense controls and lower insurance costs supported the outlook. As Home Prices Hit Highs, These Apartment REITs Offer Growth Mid-America Apartment Communities (NYSE:MAA) reported second-quarter Core FFO of $2.08 per diluted share, exceeding its guidance by $0.02, as lower-than-expected property operating expenses and contributions from its non-same-store portfolio offset slightly softer same-store revenue. Chief Executive Officer Brad Hill said new resident and blended lease-over-lease rates improved sequentially, although the recovery in new lease pricing has been slower than the company expected because of cautious consumer sentiment and elevated, though moderating, apartment supply in several major markets. → Why SK hynix Could Be the Best AI Chip Stock to Buy Now “As demand remains resilient and new deliveries continue to decline, we expect the recovery to expand and accelerate,” Hill said. He cited job growth, household formation, population and wage growth, along with an increase in inbound migration to MAA properties during the second quarter. Inbound migration rose to about 13% in the second quarter from roughly 10% in the first quarter, the largest quarterly increase MAA has recorded since it began tracking the metric, according to Hill. Chief Strategy and Analysis Officer Tim Argo said new lease growth improved by 170 basis points sequentially from the first quarter, exceeding the pace of improvement seen from the first to second quarter of 2025 by 20 basis points. Blende…Read full document

Interested in Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. Second-quarter Core FFO exceeded guidance by $0.02 at $2.08 per diluted share, as lower property expenses and contributions from non-same-store properties offset softer same-store revenue. MAA maintained its full-year Core FFO midpoint of $8.53 per share. Leasing trends improved sequentially, with new lease growth up 170 basis points and blended lease pricing up 100 basis points. However, management said cautious consumers and elevated apartment supply are slowing the recovery in new lease pricing, despite resilient demand and rising inbound migration. MAA continued investing in growth, funding an $598 million development pipeline and completing 2,118 unit renovations during the quarter. Renovated units generated an average $110 rent premium and an estimated 25% cash-on-cash return, while expense controls and lower insurance costs supported the outlook. As Home Prices Hit Highs, These Apartment REITs Offer Growth Mid-America Apartment Communities (NYSE:MAA) reported second-quarter Core FFO of $2.08 per diluted share, exceeding its guidance by $0.02, as lower-than-expected property operating expenses and contributions from its non-same-store portfolio offset slightly softer same-store revenue. Chief Executive Officer Brad Hill said new resident and blended lease-over-lease rates improved sequentially, although the recovery in new lease pricing has been slower than the company expected because of cautious consumer sentiment and elevated, though moderating, apartment supply in several major markets. → Why SK hynix Could Be the Best AI Chip Stock to Buy Now “As demand remains resilient and new deliveries continue to decline, we expect the recovery to expand and accelerate,” Hill said. He cited job growth, household formation, population and wage growth, along with an increase in inbound migration to MAA properties during the second quarter. Inbound migration rose to about 13% in the second quarter from roughly 10% in the first quarter, the largest quarterly increase MAA has recorded since it began tracking the metric, according to Hill. Chief Strategy and Analysis Officer Tim Argo said new lease growth improved by 170 basis points sequentially from the first quarter, exceeding the pace of improvement seen from the first to second quarter of 2025 by 20 basis points. Blended lease-over-lease pricing increased 100 basis points from the first quarter and was 20 basis points above the second-quarter 2025 level. → Microsoft Just Flipped the AI Spending Narrative Overnight Renewal performance remained a source of support. Turnover declined to 39.6%, while renewal lease rates were 5.2% for the quarter. MAA’s rent-to-income ratio improved to 18%, and net delinquency was 0.3% of billed rents, consistent with recent quarters. Virginia, South Carolina and the Washington, D.C., area continued to outperform the broader portfolio on pricing, including Norfolk, Richmond, Charleston and Greenville. MAA’s two largest concentration markets, Atlanta and Dallas, also outperformed the portfolio on blended pricing in the second quarter. → Carrier Earnings Could Send the Stock to a New All-Time High Austin remained an underperforming market but showed improvement, with blended pricing 300 basis points better and occupancy 40 basis points higher than in the second quarter of 2025. Orlando’s blended pricing improved 130 basis points year over year. Phoenix, Charlotte, Raleigh and Savannah continued to face pressure from heavy new supply. For the third quarter, Argo said MAA expects blended pricing to improve from the second quarter, which would be unusual given that third-quarter blended pricing has typically trailed the second quarter during the past four years. The company expects July pricing to be similar to the second quarter, but cited stronger pre-leasing trends for August and September, higher renewal retention and increased lead and visit volume. MAA expects July occupancy to finish at approximately 95.4%. Management said third-quarter renewal retention is above both the second quarter of 2026 and the third quarter of 2025, with renewal rates continuing in the 5%-plus range. The company funded approximately $81 million in development and pre-development costs during the quarter. Its development pipeline totaled $598 million at June 30, with $237 million of remaining funding commitments over the next three years. Including two projects expected to begin in the third quarter, MAA expects the pipeline to reach about $804 million. MAA began construction on a Kansas City project in the second quarter and started a Nashville development in July. It also expects to start a Northern Virginia project next month and one additional project later in the year, putting it on track for four development starts in 2026. Hill said the company continues to view development as a priority capital-allocation opportunity, citing expected yields of roughly 6% to 6.5% for new projects under conservative underwriting. The current lease-up portfolio is projected to generate average cash yields of about 6%, although Hill said yields are currently closer to 5% because of concessions. MAA completed 2,118 interior unit upgrades during the second quarter, bringing its first-half total to 3,504 units, up 30% from the first half of 2025. Renovated units generated average rent increases of $110 over non-upgraded units. With average spending of $5,134 per unit, the program produced an estimated 25% cash-on-cash return, above the company’s 19% expectation. The company also continued to expand its community-wide Wi-Fi initiative. Revenue from the initial 28 live properties rose to $850,000 in the second quarter from $500,000 in the first quarter, and MAA plans to add another 38 properties this year. MAA maintained its full-year Core FFO guidance midpoint of $8.53 per diluted share. However, it reduced its expectations for effective rent growth and average occupancy, saying the recovery in new lease pricing has progressed more slowly than assumed in its prior guidance. Those revenue revisions were offset by expense controls, lower expected real estate taxes, favorable insurance costs and contribution from non-same-store properties. The company expects more than $25 million of incremental year-over-year NOI in 2026 from its non-same-store portfolio. Same-store operating expense growth was 80 basis points year over year in the second quarter. Chief Financial Officer Clay Holder said repair and maintenance and personnel costs were key contributors to favorable expense performance. MAA renewed its insurance coverage on July 1, with total premiums declining more than 12%; it expects insurance costs to decline by more than 6% year over year for 2026. At quarter-end, MAA had more than $880 million of combined cash and borrowing capacity under its revolving credit facility. Net debt to EBITDA was 4.5 times, while outstanding debt had an average maturity of six years and an effective rate of 3.9%. During the quarter, the company repurchased 383,000 common shares for $50 million, at a weighted average price of $130.66 per share. MAA also entered an unsecured delayed term loan with $350 million of committed principal, including $100 million outstanding at quarter-end. The company sold a 30-year-old, high-capital-expenditure property in Raleigh during the second quarter and expects to close on two additional dispositions in the second half, including a 42-year-old Dallas property and its sole property in Washington, D.C. Management said those sales are expected to complete its planned 2026 disposition activity. Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc (NYSE: MAA) is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in the acquisition, development, redevelopment and operation of multifamily residential properties. The company focuses on high-barrier-to-entry apartment communities, offering a mix of one-, two- and three-bedroom homes designed to meet the needs of diverse renter demographics. Its integrated business model encompasses property management, leasing, maintenance and customer service, providing residents with a comprehensive living experience under one ownership platform. MAA's portfolio comprises more than 100 communities and over 40,000 apartment homes across key Sun Belt markets. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "Mid-America Apartment Communities Q2 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for July 2026.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30

Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. Q2 2026 Earnings Call Summary

Moby
Our analysts just identified a stock with the potential to be the next Nvidia. Tell us how you invest and we'll show you why it's our #1 pick. Tap here. Core FFO exceeded expectations due to strong expense control and sequential improvements in lease rates that outpaced prior-year trends. Management reported the strongest quarterly increase in inbound migration since tracking began, with Q2 absorption levels reaching 1.8 times new deliveries. New resident lease rates are recovering slower than anticipated due to cautious consumer sentiment and unprecedented supply levels in high-concentration markets. Operational scale and centralization efforts drove significant expense favorability, with same-store operating expenses growing only 80 basis points year-over-year. The portfolio is benefiting from single-family affordability challenges, which sustain demand for high-quality rental housing among a financially stable resident base. Strategic diversification is providing a buffer, as mid-tier markets with lower supply pressure are currently outperforming larger, more supplied markets. Record-low turnover and a 50-basis-point improvement in renewal rate growth reflect successful resident loyalty and customer service initiatives. Management expects an extended prime leasing season, with August and September pricing trends projected to exceed July performance. Third quarter blended pricing is anticipated to be better than the second quarter, a reversal of the typical seasonal trailing trend seen over the last four years. The company aims to sustain a development pipeline of approximately $1 billion, viewing current supply-demand dynamics as an attractive window for disciplined investment. Full-year guidance assumes a 50-basis-point blended lease growth, supported by easier year-over-year comparisons in the fourth quarter. Incremental NOI from the non-same-store portfolio is projected to contribute over $25 million in year-over-year growth for 2026. Portfolio recycling efforts are nearly complete for 2026, including the sale of a high-CapEx property in Raleigh and the planned exit from the District of Columbia. Insurance costs declined by over 12% following a successful July renewal, marking the third consecutive year of premium reductions. Supply pressure remains acute in Charlotte and Austin, with concessions in the Charlotte lease-up portfolio reaching eight to 10…Read full document

Our analysts just identified a stock with the potential to be the next Nvidia. Tell us how you invest and we'll show you why it's our #1 pick. Tap here. Core FFO exceeded expectations due to strong expense control and sequential improvements in lease rates that outpaced prior-year trends. Management reported the strongest quarterly increase in inbound migration since tracking began, with Q2 absorption levels reaching 1.8 times new deliveries. New resident lease rates are recovering slower than anticipated due to cautious consumer sentiment and unprecedented supply levels in high-concentration markets. Operational scale and centralization efforts drove significant expense favorability, with same-store operating expenses growing only 80 basis points year-over-year. The portfolio is benefiting from single-family affordability challenges, which sustain demand for high-quality rental housing among a financially stable resident base. Strategic diversification is providing a buffer, as mid-tier markets with lower supply pressure are currently outperforming larger, more supplied markets. Record-low turnover and a 50-basis-point improvement in renewal rate growth reflect successful resident loyalty and customer service initiatives. Management expects an extended prime leasing season, with August and September pricing trends projected to exceed July performance. Third quarter blended pricing is anticipated to be better than the second quarter, a reversal of the typical seasonal trailing trend seen over the last four years. The company aims to sustain a development pipeline of approximately $1 billion, viewing current supply-demand dynamics as an attractive window for disciplined investment. Full-year guidance assumes a 50-basis-point blended lease growth, supported by easier year-over-year comparisons in the fourth quarter. Incremental NOI from the non-same-store portfolio is projected to contribute over $25 million in year-over-year growth for 2026. Portfolio recycling efforts are nearly complete for 2026, including the sale of a high-CapEx property in Raleigh and the planned exit from the District of Columbia. Insurance costs declined by over 12% following a successful July renewal, marking the third consecutive year of premium reductions. Supply pressure remains acute in Charlotte and Austin, with concessions in the Charlotte lease-up portfolio reaching eight to 10 weeks on specific floor plans. The company entered a $350 million unsecured delayed-draw term loan to manage upcoming debt maturities and support the development pipeline. One stock. Nvidia-level potential. 30M+ investors trust Moby to find it first. Get the pick. Tap here. Management clarified that while the recovery trajectory remains positive, the pace of new lease pricing recovery was slower than initially modeled. The reduction reflects a more conservative view on effective rent growth and occupancy for the remainder of the year to align with current market speed. Current lease-up yields are approximately 5% due to high concessions but are expected to reach underwritten 6% levels as concessions burn off. New development starts are being underwritten at 6.25% to 6.5% yields, utilizing conservative rent trending that sits 2% to 4% below submarket expectations. Expense favorability is driven by structural improvements, including better personnel staffing and higher resident retention reducing turn costs. Management expects these efficiencies to persist, though growth rates may normalize slightly from the current low levels. Development remains the primary priority due to higher long-term Total Shareholder Return (TSR) potential and the ability to deliver into a low-supply window in 2027-2028. Share repurchases are viewed as a balanced tool to manage capital without introducing the earnings volatility associated with aggressive acquisition of low-cap-rate assets.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30

Mid America Apartment Communities (MAA) Stock Looks Below Fair Value With Cash Flow But Above Fair Value On Earnings

Simply Wall St.
Find your next quality investment with Simply Wall St's easy and powerful screener, trusted by over 7 million individual investors worldwide. Mid-America Apartment Communities stock sits at a crossroads, with a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) intrinsic value estimate pointing to meaningful upside while traditional market multiples indicate the shares are not cheap, all against a five year price decline of about 12.9%. Over the past five years, Mid-America Apartment Communities has delivered a share price decline of about 12.9%, which may leave long term holders questioning whether the current price reflects the underlying portfolio of properties. The key support for the current valuation can come from the reliability and timing of rental cash flows. A major risk is any sustained pressure on occupancy or rent growth that would weigh on future cash generation. The company scores only 2 out of 6 on the broader valuation checks. This leans more toward Mid-America Apartment Communities not screening as a clear bargain overall, even though one model suggests upside. The issue now is whether investors should treat the DCF based intrinsic value signal or the richer market multiples as the more reliable guide to where Mid-America Apartment Communities stock stands today. Find out why Mid-America Apartment Communities' -3.3% return over the last year is lagging behind its peers. The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) approach here values Mid-America Apartment Communities by projecting its future cash generation and discounting it back to today. The model is built on Adjusted Funds From Operations, which is a common way to look at cash flow for residential REITs. Mid-America Apartment Communities generated about $913.0 million of free cash flow over the latest twelve months, and the model assumes those cash flows keep growing rather than contracting. On that basis, the 2 stage DCF framework points to an estimated intrinsic value of about $194 per share, which sits above the current market price. That gap equates to an implied discount of roughly 29.3%, so the cash flow outlook suggests the stock is not pricing in the full value of the existing portfolio and its projected rental income. On this DCF view, Mid-America Apartment Communities stock currently appears undervalued on a cash flow basis. Our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis suggests Mid-America Apartment Communities is und…Read full document

Find your next quality investment with Simply Wall St's easy and powerful screener, trusted by over 7 million individual investors worldwide. Mid-America Apartment Communities stock sits at a crossroads, with a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) intrinsic value estimate pointing to meaningful upside while traditional market multiples indicate the shares are not cheap, all against a five year price decline of about 12.9%. Over the past five years, Mid-America Apartment Communities has delivered a share price decline of about 12.9%, which may leave long term holders questioning whether the current price reflects the underlying portfolio of properties. The key support for the current valuation can come from the reliability and timing of rental cash flows. A major risk is any sustained pressure on occupancy or rent growth that would weigh on future cash generation. The company scores only 2 out of 6 on the broader valuation checks. This leans more toward Mid-America Apartment Communities not screening as a clear bargain overall, even though one model suggests upside. The issue now is whether investors should treat the DCF based intrinsic value signal or the richer market multiples as the more reliable guide to where Mid-America Apartment Communities stock stands today. Find out why Mid-America Apartment Communities' -3.3% return over the last year is lagging behind its peers. The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) approach here values Mid-America Apartment Communities by projecting its future cash generation and discounting it back to today. The model is built on Adjusted Funds From Operations, which is a common way to look at cash flow for residential REITs. Mid-America Apartment Communities generated about $913.0 million of free cash flow over the latest twelve months, and the model assumes those cash flows keep growing rather than contracting. On that basis, the 2 stage DCF framework points to an estimated intrinsic value of about $194 per share, which sits above the current market price. That gap equates to an implied discount of roughly 29.3%, so the cash flow outlook suggests the stock is not pricing in the full value of the existing portfolio and its projected rental income. On this DCF view, Mid-America Apartment Communities stock currently appears undervalued on a cash flow basis. Our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis suggests Mid-America Apartment Communities is undervalued by 29.3%. Track this in your watchlist or portfolio, or discover 49 more high quality undervalued stocks. Head to the Valuation section of our Company Report for more details on how we arrive at this Fair Value for Mid-America Apartment Communities. P/E is a useful cross check for Mid-America Apartment Communities because earnings already factor in interest costs and depreciation, which matter for a capital intensive REIT. The stock currently trades at about 41.5x earnings, which is above both the Residential REITs industry average of roughly 22.2x and the peer group average of about 29.6x. A tailored fair P/E multiple for Mid-America Apartment Communities, which reflects its size, risk profile and sector, comes out at about 31.0x. The current 41.5x level therefore sits meaningfully above this fair ratio and implies investors are paying a premium vs what this framework suggests for the earnings stream. This indicates a market price that already reflects a relatively full view of the company’s prospects compared with sector benchmarks. On this P/E basis, Mid-America Apartment Communities stock appears overvalued relative to both its tailored fair multiple and its Residential REIT peers. See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown. Simply Wall St Narratives build on this valuation split for Mid-America Apartment Communities' stock and outline what kind of future growth, margins and earnings path would need to occur for the current price to appear either too low or too high. Each narrative links its figure to a clear view on how growth, profitability and key risks might develop, which you can revisit over time as new information appears on the Community page. You can add your voice to the Mid-America Apartment Communities story by sharing a data backed Narrative on where its growth, margins and execution go from here. Put your case on record in the Simply Wall St community and see how it stacks up as new results come through. Do you think there's more to the story for Mid-America Apartment Communities? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying! Mid-America Apartment Communities sits between an intrinsic value view that points to upside on Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) and market multiples that signal the stock is already overvalued. The split mainly comes down to how much weight you put on long term rental cash flow versus what investors are currently willing to pay for its earnings compared with Residential REIT peers. Broader valuation checks are weak, so the DCF signal stands somewhat on its own. The key question from here is whether rental cash flows and occupancy remain resilient enough to close that gap, or whether the market multiple moves closer to sector norms. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include MAA. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email [email protected]

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30

Mid-America Apartment Communities Inc (MAA) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Demand ...

GuruFocus.com
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: July 30, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Core FFO results exceeded expectations due to strong expense management and sequential improvement in lease rates. Demand remains robust, with second-quarter absorption outpacing new deliveries by 1.8 times and inbound migration hitting a record high. Resident health is strong, with a rent-to-income ratio improving to 18% and net delinquency remaining low at 0.3% of billed rents. Interior renovation and repositioning programs are delivering high returns, with a 25% cash-on-cash return on unit upgrades, well above the 19% target. Expense control is excellent, with same-store operating expense growth of only 80 basis points year-over-year in the second quarter. The recovery in new resident lease rates is slower than expected due to cautious consumer sentiment and elevated new supply in key markets. Same-store revenue guidance was slightly reduced due to a slower-than-anticipated pace of recovery in new lease pricing. Markets like Charlotte, Raleigh, and Phoenix continue to face significant challenges from heavy supply pressure despite strong demand. Consumer sentiment remains cautious, leading prospects to shop around longer and delay leasing decisions, which impacts pricing momentum. The acquisition market remains slow with high cap rates for desired assets, limiting external growth opportunities through purchases. Here are the key highlights from the Mid-America Apartment Communities Inc (NYSE:MAA) Q2 2026 earnings call, presented as Q&A pairs. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with MAA. Is MAA fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Q: Can you discuss your guidance for blended rent growth in the second half of the year and confirm if you expect August and September blends to increase from July?A: Tim Argo, Chief Operating Officer: Yes, we expect August and September pricing to improve from July due to higher renewal rates and retention. For the full year, we are tracking a blended rate of around 0.6% for the back half, which would make Q3 slightly better than Q2 and Q4 slightly better than Q1. This is driven by strong demand, moderating supply, and less of a seasonal drop-off than we saw last year. Q: What gives you confidence that the revenue recovery w…Read full document

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: July 30, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Core FFO results exceeded expectations due to strong expense management and sequential improvement in lease rates. Demand remains robust, with second-quarter absorption outpacing new deliveries by 1.8 times and inbound migration hitting a record high. Resident health is strong, with a rent-to-income ratio improving to 18% and net delinquency remaining low at 0.3% of billed rents. Interior renovation and repositioning programs are delivering high returns, with a 25% cash-on-cash return on unit upgrades, well above the 19% target. Expense control is excellent, with same-store operating expense growth of only 80 basis points year-over-year in the second quarter. The recovery in new resident lease rates is slower than expected due to cautious consumer sentiment and elevated new supply in key markets. Same-store revenue guidance was slightly reduced due to a slower-than-anticipated pace of recovery in new lease pricing. Markets like Charlotte, Raleigh, and Phoenix continue to face significant challenges from heavy supply pressure despite strong demand. Consumer sentiment remains cautious, leading prospects to shop around longer and delay leasing decisions, which impacts pricing momentum. The acquisition market remains slow with high cap rates for desired assets, limiting external growth opportunities through purchases. Here are the key highlights from the Mid-America Apartment Communities Inc (NYSE:MAA) Q2 2026 earnings call, presented as Q&A pairs. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with MAA. Is MAA fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Q: Can you discuss your guidance for blended rent growth in the second half of the year and confirm if you expect August and September blends to increase from July?A: Tim Argo, Chief Operating Officer: Yes, we expect August and September pricing to improve from July due to higher renewal rates and retention. For the full year, we are tracking a blended rate of around 0.6% for the back half, which would make Q3 slightly better than Q2 and Q4 slightly better than Q1. This is driven by strong demand, moderating supply, and less of a seasonal drop-off than we saw last year. Q: What gives you confidence that the revenue recovery will continue and that you won't need to cut guidance again in the third or fourth quarter?A: Tim Argo, Chief Operating Officer: Our optimism is based on strong forward-looking trends. For Q3, we have locked in renewal rates in the 5%-plus range with retention rates well above last year. On the new lease side, pre-leasing for August is running 70-80 basis points better than last year, and September is even higher. Lead volume is up 15% and visit volume is up 10% year-over-year, suggesting an extended prime leasing season. Q: Why are you allocating capital to development and dispositions rather than buying back more stock, given the slow recovery and cap rates below 5% for acquisitions?A: Brad Hill, CEO: Our capital allocation is balanced. The 4.5% to 5% cap rates are for new, high-quality assets, while we are selling older, higher-CapEx properties at cap rates in the high 5% to low 6% range. We continue to believe development is the best long-term use of capital, with expected yields of 6% to 6.5% and NOI growth that outperforms our portfolio by 50-100 basis points. We are also investing in highly accretive interior renovation and Wi-Fi initiatives. Q: Can you provide more color on the "cautious consumer" comment and what is driving the slower recovery in new lease pricing?A: Brad Hill, CEO: Our residents remain very healthy, with rent-to-income ratios at a record low of 18% and strong collections. However, in markets with a lot of supply options, prospects are shopping around more and taking longer to make decisions. This has led to more last-minute, immediate move-ins, which are the most volatile part of the new lease pricing curve. We are seeing this change in Q3 with more pre-leasing activity. Q: You mentioned that second-quarter in-migration was the strongest quarterly increase you have ever tracked. Can you provide any numbers or additional color?A: Brad Hill, CEO: We saw in-migration increase from about 10% in the first quarter to 13% in the second quarter. This was not driven by any single market but was a broad-based increase across our portfolio. While absolute levels of in-migration have been higher, we have never seen a quarterly increase of this magnitude, which is a positive incremental demand signal. Q: What is driving the better-than-expected performance from your lease-up properties, and what is the overall concession activity in your markets?A: Tim Argo, Chief Operating Officer: The lease-up portfolio is benefiting from moderating supply pressure and strong demand. For example, MAA Val Vista gained over 20% occupancy in the quarter. The two Charlotte assets are the most challenged due to the local supply pipeline. Overall, concessions are stable at 4-5 weeks across most markets, with improvement in Orlando and Charleston, while Charlotte and Austin remain the highest. Q: The expense growth has been a bright spot. Are there any one-time items or factors that won't repeat in 2027?A: Clay Holder, CFO: The expense control is a result of our continued operational focus, not one-time items. We are seeing benefits from full staffing, which lowers turnover costs, and from our centralization efforts. We also had a very successful insurance renewal on July 1st, with premiums declining over 12%, marking our third consecutive year of reduction. Property taxes are also benefiting from lower NOI in some markets. We expect 2027 expense growth to look similar to this year. Q: Are you seeing any signs that developers are getting more comfortable and ramping up new starts again?A: Brad Hill, CEO: No, we are not seeing an uptick in starts. While permits may ebb and flow, the developers we work with are still struggling to find equity capital for new projects. New starts have been below long-term averages for 13 consecutive quarters, and we expect that trend to continue for the foreseeable future. Q: Can you discuss the true net effective cash yield on your current lease-up pipeline, considering the impact of concessions?A: Brad Hill, CEO: Our projected NOI cash yields on the current lease-up pipeline are around 6%. Due to higher concessions, they are currently delivering closer to a 5% yield. However, we are getting 9% to 10% lease-over-lease increases on renewals at these properties, which is burning off concessions and giving us confidence we will hit our underwritten 6% yields. For new projects we are underwriting today, we are targeting 6.25% to 6.5% yields. Q: Have any of your markets changed structurally in your view, for example, due to a tougher regulatory environment?A: Brad Hill, CEO: Broadly, no. We have seen the most regulatory change in Nevada, but we only have two non-core properties there. We are selling our one property in the District of Columbia, which has a lot of regulatory activity. Denver is a market where supply is coming down rapidly, so we expect performance to turn around. Overall, our markets continue to have strong demand drivers, with 11 of the 18 markets with >1% job growth being in our footprint. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

TranscriptFY2026 Q22026-07-30

FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript

Earnings source - 101 paragraphs
Operator

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the MAA second quarter 2026 earnings conference call. During the presentation, all participants will be in listen-only mode. Afterward, the company will conduct a question and answer session. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded today, July 30th, 2026, and in consideration of time, we have a one-question limit. I will now turn the call over to Andrew Schaeffer, Senior Vice President, Treasurer, and Director of Capital Markets at MAA for opening comments.

Andrew Schaeffer

Thank you, Regina, and good morning, everyone. This is Andrew Schaeffer, Treasurer and Director of Capital Markets for MAA. Members of the management team participating on the call this morning are Brad Hill, Tim Argo, Clay Holder, and Rob DelPriore. Before we begin with prepared comments this morning, I want to point out that as part of this discussion, company management will be making forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from our projections. We encourage you to refer to the forward-looking statements section in yesterday's earnings release and our '34 Act filings with the SEC, which describe risk factors that may impact future results. During this call, we will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. A presentation of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, as well as reconciliations of the differences between non-GAAP and comparable GAAP measures, can be found in our earnings release and supplemental financial data.

Andrew Schaeffer

Our earnings release and supplement are currently available on the For Investors page of our website at www.maac.com. A copy of our prepared comments and an audio recording of this call will be available on our website later today. After some brief prepared comments, the management team will be available to answer questions. When we get to Q&A, please be respectful of everyone's time. In an attempt to complete our call within one hour due to other earnings calls today, we will limit questions to one per analyst. We ask that you rejoin the queue if you have any follow-up questions or additional items to discuss. I will now turn the call over to Brad.

Brad Hill

Well, thanks, Andrew, and good morning, everyone. Core FFO results were ahead of our expectations with the sequential improvement in new resident and blended lease-over-lease rates exceeding the prior year sequential improvement. While recovery in new resident lease rates is showing improvement, the pace is slower than we would like given cautious consumer sentiment as we continue to work through the unprecedented high levels of new supply deliveries over the past couple of years in a few of our high concentration markets. We are seeing solid demand, including job growth, household formation, and population, and wage growth, and the increase in inbound migration to our properties in the second quarter was the strongest quarterly increase we have seen since we began tracking the metric, reflecting the broad appeal of our high-demand markets. As a result, units absorbed in the first half of the year significantly outpaced new units delivered.

Brad Hill

As demand remains resilient and new deliveries continue to decline, we expect the recovery to expand and accelerate. Additionally, we're benefiting from our scale and operating discipline. We continue to focus on expense control, and with second quarter year-over-year same-store operating expense growth of just 80 basis points, the teams are excelling in this area. At the same time, the persistent single-family affordability and availability challenges are supporting resident demand for affordable and high-quality rental housing, two areas where MAA excels. Our customer service focus continues to differentiate the MAA experience, driving increased resident loyalty and contributing to our record low turnover and strong renewal rate growth, improving 50 basis points year-over-year.

Brad Hill

We continue to invest in strategic areas of the business to drive future earnings growth, including various new technology initiatives to support our centralization and specialization efforts that will further strengthen our customer service and drive future margin expansion. As Tim will talk about, we are expanding our interior renovation and repositioning programs, which are supported by the new deliveries in our market stabilizing, where on average, the effective monthly rent per unit for a new community is over 30% higher than our existing rents, giving us substantial room to expand these highly accretive initiatives. Our property-wide Wi-Fi initiative is in high demand from our residents and is performing well. On the external growth front, the improving demand supply dynamic, combined with the decreased availability of capital for new projects, makes disciplined investing in new developments an attractive capital allocation option.

Brad Hill

In addition to the Kansas City project we started construction on in the second quarter, we started construction on a project in Nashville, Tennessee, in July. Next month, we expect to start construction on a project on the land we recently purchased in Northern Virginia. With one more start later in the year, we are on track to hit our four development starts for the year. The acquisition market remains slow, with Cap rates in the mid to upper 4% range for high-quality communities that fit our profile. Should more compelling opportunities materialize, we have the balance sheet capacity to support growth in this area. Together, these initiatives reflect a disciplined approach to deploying capital across multiple growth opportunities while maintaining flexibility as market conditions evolve.

Brad Hill

This same discipline is also evident in our ongoing portfolio recycling efforts, which remain focused on enhancing portfolio quality and supporting long-term earnings growth. In the second quarter, we sold a high CapEx 30-year-old property in Raleigh and have two additional properties that should close in the back half of the year, a 42-year-old property in Dallas and our one property in the District of Columbia. These transactions will wrap up our planned dispositions for 2026. With a track record of successfully navigating economic cycles for over 30 years, we remain confident in our ability to emerge from this recovery period with a stronger, more efficient, and higher growth operating platform.

Brad Hill

We believe our focus on high demand and high growth markets will continue to lead to higher earnings and lower volatility over the full cycle, while our investments in accretive growth initiatives are well positioned to deliver increasing value and earnings contribution as the demand-supply balance improves. We are encouraged by the building blocks in place, resilient demand, strong absorption, potentially growing migration trends, and a financially strong resident base, all with the backdrop of decreasing supply pressure. As we wrap up July and head into August and September, we see the opportunity for growing momentum and remain confident in our ability to deliver compounding revenue and earnings performance as the recovery continues to accelerate. To all associates across our properties and in our corporate offices, thank you for your continued dedication and focus during this pivotal leasing season. With that, I'll turn it over to Tim.

Tim Argo

Thanks, Brad, and good morning, everyone. For the second quarter, same store NOI beat our expectations with continued lower than projected property operating expenses, more than offsetting slightly lower average daily occupancy. From a pricing standpoint, new lease, sublease growth improved 170 basis points sequentially from the first quarter, 20 basis points ahead of the acceleration achieved from the first quarter to second quarter of 2025. As Brad mentioned, new lease rates have been slower to recover due to lower consumer sentiment and still elevated but moderating new supply in some markets. We are encouraged by forward-looking trends. Renewal retention rates and lease rates remain strong. Turnover once again moved lower to 39.6%, and renewal lease and release rates were 5.2% for the quarter.

Tim Argo

As a result, blended lease and release rates were up 100 basis points from the first quarter and up 20 basis points from the blended rates of the second quarter of 2025. Our resident health remained strong, as reflected in an improvement in our rent-to-income ratio to 18% and continued strong performance in collections, with net delinquency representing just 0.3% of bill grants, consistent with what we achieved in the last several quarters. Broadly, our stronger performing markets remain relatively consistent with the last few quarters, and we are starting to see some pockets of momentum in other markets. We continue to see strong performance in Virginia and South Carolina with Norfolk, Richmond, Charleston, Greenville, and the D.C. area markets continuing to outperform the broader portfolio from a pricing standpoint.

Tim Argo

As with last quarter, our two largest concentration markets, Atlanta and Dallas, outperformed the portfolio in the second quarter in terms of blended lease or release pricing. Austin, though still an underperforming market, showed good momentum and achieved blended lease or release pricing that was 300 basis points better and occupancy that was 40 basis points better than the second quarter of 2025. Orlando is another improving market with blended pricing up 130 basis points from the second quarter of 2025. Phoenix, Charlotte, Raleigh, and Savannah are high concentration markets for us that are still facing challenges in the wake of heavy supply pressures despite continued strong demand. During the quarter, MAA Cathedral Arts in Dallas stabilized and MAA Plaza Midwood in Charlotte completed construction and moved into our lease-up portfolio.

Tim Argo

MAA Val Vista will officially stabilize in the third quarter, though it achieved over 90% occupancy during the second quarter. We moved up the stabilization date of MAA Breakwater in Tampa by two quarters due to strong leasing velocity and rents well ahead of our pro forma expectations. We have an additional two properties under construction that are actively leasing. Given the supply pressure in Charlotte, our two lease-ups in this market remain the most challenged in the near term, with concessions running up to 8-10 weeks on certain floor plans. With the overall lease-up portfolio, we expect to achieve our underwritten yields as markets continue to improve, retaining the expected long-term value creation opportunity. NOI contributions from this group will continue to build through the rest of this year and into 2027.

Tim Argo

As Brad mentioned, we continue to accelerate and exceed expected returns on our various targeted redevelopment and repositioning initiatives. During the second quarter of 2026, we completed 2,118 interior unit upgrades, bringing our year-to-date total to 3,504 units, 30% higher than the number of units renovated in the first half of 2025. With year-to-date rent increases of $110 above non-upgraded units, an average per unit spend of $5,134, the average cash-on-cash return is approximately 25% versus expected returns of 19%. These units continue to lease faster than non-renovated units when adjusted for the additional turn time, averaging about 10 days quicker. We would expect to further accelerate this program in 2027.

Tim Argo

For our common area and amenity repositioning program, we have six properties that are wrapping up the repricing phase, five properties that are just starting the repricing phase, and six additional that are in the early construction phase and will begin the repricing phase in the spring of 2027. The first group is 98% repriced with average cash-on-cash returns of 13%. We expect similar returns from the remaining active projects, and we look to expand our scope of this initiative in 2027. Our community-wide Wi-Fi initiative that began in 2024 continues to expand. We have 28 live properties where the service is rolling out to residents as leases are signed, and we are further expanding the initiative this year to an additional 38 properties.

Tim Argo

Resident adoption at the first 28 properties is accelerating, with revenues quickly increasing from $500,000 in the first quarter to $850,000 in the second quarter and will continue to grow from here. Looking forward to the third quarter, we are encouraged by the early momentum we see in pricing and occupancy and early signs of potentially later seasonal peak. Our strategic decision to push new lease pricing where possible in late second quarter and into July has allowed us to maintain momentum in renewal pricing and new lease pricing. Combined with declining supply pressure, strong demand, and the broad market level absorption that occurred in the first and second quarters, our approach sets us up to capture momentum in new lease and release pricing later in the season and achieve renewal rates consistent with the second quarter and well above what we achieved in the third quarter of last year.

Tim Argo

With an assumed backdrop of steady demand, fewer units in lease-up, and current pricing trends continuing, we expect third quarter blended pricing to be better than the second quarter, a trend not seen in the last four years since third quarter blended pricing typically trails the second quarter. That's all I have in the way of prepared comments. I'll turn the call over to Clay.

Clay Holder

Thank you, Tim, and good morning, everyone. We reported Core FFO for the quarter of $2.08 per diluted share, which was $0.02 ahead of our second quarter guidance. The outperformance was driven primarily by continued strength in expense management, with same store expenses coming in $0.015 favorable to our expectations and NOI from our non-same store portfolio contributing an additional $0.01, partially offset by same store revenues that were slightly below our expectations. As Brad and Tim highlighted, our teams continue to demonstrate an ability to control cost while maintaining strong resident retention and high resident satisfaction. That consistent execution remains a key strength of our operating platform and contributing meaningfully to our second quarter outperformance. Repair and maintenance and personnel costs were the primary drivers of our expense favorability during the quarter.

Clay Holder

We funded approximately $81 million in development and pre-development costs during the quarter. At June 30th, our development pipeline totaled $598 million, leaving $237 million of remaining funding commitments over the next three years. Combined with the two projects that Brad referenced as starting in the third quarter, our development pipeline will total approximately $804 million. Looking ahead, we expect to add additional projects to the pipeline during the balance of the year and into early 2027, supporting our objective of building and sustaining a development pipeline of approximately $1 billion and reinforcing development as an important driver of long-term earnings growth. Our balance sheet is solid and is set to support our development pipeline, any acquisitions that may emerge, along with the other growth initiatives Tim discussed.

Clay Holder

At the end of the quarter, we had over $880 million in combined cash and borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility, and our net debt to EBITDA ratio was 4.5 times. At June 30th, our outstanding debt had an average maturity of six years at an effective rate of 3.9%. During the quarter, we continued our measured approach to share repurchases and repurchased 383,000 shares of our common stock at a weighted average share price of $130.66 for a total of $50 million. In June, we entered into an unsecured delayed term loan with a committed principal amount of $350 million, with $100 million outstanding under the loan at quarter end.

Clay Holder

Turning to our outlook for the year, we have maintained our Core FFO guidance and have updated our same store revenue and expense guidance to reflect our current view of leasing conditions for the balance of the year. While underlying demand remains healthy, the pace of recovery in new lease pricing has been somewhat slower than assumed in our prior guidance. We continue to prioritize long-term revenue performance through disciplined pricing decisions, which we believe support renewal performance and position us well to capture the coming new lease pricing momentum. As a result, we have slightly reduced our expectations for both effective rent growth and average occupancy for the year. As we updated our revenue assumptions for the balance of the year, we also recognized favorable trends developing in other areas of the business.

Clay Holder

Expense performance has remained strong, driven by continued discipline across our operating platform, lower projected real estate taxes, and favorable anticipated insurance costs given our recent coverage renewal. Additionally, our non-same store portfolio continues to perform well with lease-up communities performing in line with, and in some cases, slightly ahead of our expectations in contributing incremental earning support. In 2026, we project over $25 million in incremental year-over-year NOI from the properties represented in this portfolio. Collectively, these favorable trends offset the revisions for our revenue outlook and support our maintained full year Core FFO midpoint of $8.53 per diluted share. That is all that we have in the way of prepared comments. Regina, we will now turn the call back to you for questions.

Operator

We will now open the call up for questions. If you'd like to ask a question, please press star then one on your touch tone phone. If you'd like to withdraw your question, press star one again. Our first question will come from the line of Jamie Feldman with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Jamie Feldman

Great. Thanks for taking the question. Just comparing some of your comments on July and thoughts on the third quarter versus what you delivered in the second quarter, the revenue cut. Can you give us some comfort or maybe talk us through how you decided to cut now, how much you decided to cut the revenue guide now, and what gives you comfort that this won't be the same situation third quarter, fourth quarter in terms of needing to pull back?

Tim Argo

Jamie, this is Tim. I'll talk a little bit about what we're seeing in July and Q3. I think that's really what is driving our optimism as we are starting to see some momentum as we look out into Q3. July itself, we expect will be pretty similar in terms of pricing to what we saw in Q2 with occupancy building as we have moved through July and ending in a good spot with July occupancy. Where we see the optimism and where we think we've made the right decisions is what we're seeing for August, September. First, if we look at renewals for the entire Q3, we have retention rates well above what we saw this time last year, well above what we saw in Q2, and we're continuing to see renewal rates in that 5-plus range.

Tim Argo

We have visibility pretty much into all of Q3 at this point. Probably 98% of our renewals we have locked in at this point. When we look at where we stand with new lease pricing and what we've done on the pre-lease side, obviously still more to come in the rest of the quarter. We probably still have about 40% of our new leases or so will still come over the next two months. When we look at the pre-leasing for August, we're running 70, 80 basis points better than we were this time last year. We look out to September, even running higher than that. We think with this continued demand, what we're seeing, lead volume is up 10%-15% this time compared to this time last year. Visit volume's up close to 10%.

Tim Argo

We do think all these factors lead to what potentially could be a little bit of an extended prime leasing season.

Clay Holder

Jamie, I'll just touch on the guide change. The one thing that, to Tim's point, we're still seeing very strong acceleration as we work into the back half of the year. What I would say it's just not quite at the same pace as what we had initially expected coming into the year. Still seeing the trajectory move in the direction we expected, just not quite to the same pace that we had synced in.

Brad Hill

Jamie, not to be left out here, I'm going to add a couple of comments to this one as well. This is Brad. What the guys have said here a little bit. I think it really starts with what we're seeing on the demand side in terms of our view for the back half of the year. Across the board, we're seeing really good demand really across our markets. In the markets where we do have heavier supply, you think of a Phoenix, a Charlotte, a Raleigh, Savannah, Nashville. Those markets are a little bit more difficult for us right now. We have a bigger hole that we have to dig out of for those, but we are showing progress. If you look at our entire portfolio for the second quarter, almost 80% of our markets posted positive blends in the second quarter.

Brad Hill

You can see the recovery is pretty broad-based. Two-thirds of our markets are showing blends above our portfolio average. If you look at what is below average for us, a third of our portfolio, those are predominantly some of these higher supply markets. Again, we have a bigger hole that we have to dig out for those, but we're doing it. On the demand piece, you look at absorption the first half of the year that Tim talked about, second quarter absorption across our markets was 1.8 times new delivery. We're seeing really strong demand. As we continue through the balance of this year, we certainly believe that more of our markets start to show some of that stronger pricing power, particularly as we look at the blended rates in the third and fourth quarter.

Operator

Our next question will come from the line of Eric Wolfe with Citi. Please go ahead.

Eric Wolfe

Hey, good morning. Maybe just to follow up on Jamie's question. Can you just discuss your guidance in the second half from a blended rent growth perspective? What you're forecasting in the second half specifically, and just to make sure I understood sort of the components of what you're seeing right now. You expect your August and September blends to increase from July because renewals are higher and your retention is higher. I just wanted to make sure I heard that correctly.

Tim Argo

This is Tim. To confirm on your second point, we would expect August, September pricing to get a little bit better from what we had in July for all the reasons we just talked about and the trends we are seeing so far. If you think about our full year blended in kind of the back half and how we hit our guidance, we are at positive 0.3 blended year to date through June, and our full year forecast is somewhere in the 50 basis point range blended for the full year. With a little more of our leases skewed to the back half of the year, somewhere around 0.6% blended is what we are tracking for the back half of the year.

Tim Argo

To maybe put that in a little bit perspective, what that would look like from a blended standpoint is our Q3 blended performance to be a little bit better than what our Q2 performance was. Our Q4 performance to look a little bit better than what our Q1 performance was. That is kind of a way to think about it is the expectation that August, September show the strength that we are seeing right now. You see a little bit less of a moderation in Q4 based on, again, the demand, the moderating supply, and everything we are seeing, and not experience the same level of drop-offs that we saw in Q4 of last year.

Operator

Our next question will come from the line of Nicholas Yulico with Scotiabank. Please go ahead.

Nicholas Yulico

Thanks. Good morning. I just wanted to go back to some of the commentary that you guys gave on the pricing for assets. I think, Brad, you were saying cap rates below 5%, you are still seeing in your markets. I guess my question is, if that is the case, we are still dealing with a sort of a slow recovery in certain markets, why not buy back more stock, sell assets, rather than put more money into the development pipeline right now?

Brad Hill

Well, thanks, Nick. I think first of all, what you have to consider, those four and a half to call it upper four cap rate range, are from the types of assets that we want to buy. Those are brand new assets in some of our higher growth markets. On average, what we've purchased the last few years has been a one-year-old, a lot of times in lease-up. That's a little bit different type of product than what we generally are looking to sell. The assets that we have sold this year, the property that we sold, as I mentioned in my opening comments, in the second quarter was an older asset, had a lot of CapEx needs. The cap rates that we're getting for those, market cap rates, are probably in the mid to upper six range on average.

Brad Hill

I would say we've got four properties that we're selling this year. Those will be in the high fives to low sixes in terms of cap rates. There's a little different math on what we're selling. In terms of share buybacks, we've talked about this a lot. Our overall focus is about driving long-term TSR performance without introducing a lot of earnings volatility. It's very balanced. You've seen that in terms of what we've repurchased. We continue to believe in the merits of putting capital into the development market, into the properties that we are developing. The average yield expectation of those with conservative underwriting is still in the 6%-6.5% range. The NOI margins we've been able to Excuse me, NOI growth we've been able to generate from those, on average, exceeds what our overall portfolio delivers by 50 to 100 basis points.

Brad Hill

Especially given the fact that supply continues to be lower than long-term averages this year, and projected to be that way for the next three years at least. We'll be delivering into a pretty strong operating fundamental market. We continue to believe that's the way that we want to allocate capital for long-term TSR performance at the moment.

Operator

Our next question will come from the line of Jana Galan with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Jana Galan

Thank you. Good morning. I was hoping you could talk a little bit about the better than expected performance from the lease-up properties. Has there been any shift in strategy on pricing, concession usage, or job growth in those markets? Maybe if you could just talk to concession activity overall in your markets.

Tim Argo

This is Tim. I'll touch on that. On the lease-up portfolio, not really any change in strategy. We're starting to see some momentum. We're starting to see some good demand. If you look at some of the properties in our lease-up portfolio, MAA Nixie gained over 20% of occupancy over the last quarter. MAA Liberty Row over 30%. MAA Plaza Midwood over 20%. I think as we're seeing with the broader portfolio, the number of units in lease-up and the pressure on supply is starting to moderate, and we're starting to see that with the lease-up portfolio. The two Charlotte assets, as I mentioned, are the ones that are still a little bit behind on in terms of where Charlotte is in the supply pipeline. Those are the ones that we're watching, but we've seen really good momentum with the lease-up portfolio, as you mentioned.

Tim Argo

On the broader concession market, not a lot of change from what we talked about last quarter. If you think about our overall portfolio, broadly 4 to 5 weeks is pretty consistent across most of our markets. We are seeing some improving concession activity in Orlando and Charleston are two markets I would point to that we're seeing concessions down. Charlotte, Austin are still where, not necessarily up from where they've been, but probably the broadest usage of what we're seeing is still in Charlotte and Austin. Overall, pretty consistent picture from what we've seen in the last few months.

Operator

Our next question will come from the line of Brad Heffern with RBC. Please go ahead.

Brad Heffern

Yeah. Hey, everybody. Thanks. You mentioned in the prepared comments that second quarter in-migration was, I think you said the strongest ever, or strongest since you started tracking it. Are there any numbers that you can put around that or additional color?

Brad Hill

Yeah. The numbers that we could put around that, we saw in-migration go from, call it 10% in the first quarter to about 13% in the second quarter. It's not really one market that we can point to that's really driving that. It was generally an overall increase just in general. We have seen absolute levels of in-migration that's been higher than that, but we've never seen a quarterly increase that's matched that in the past. Certainly one quarter doesn't make a long-term trend. I certainly think in terms of incremental demand components for the business, that's something that we're continuing to watch as we go forward.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Austin Wurschmidt with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Austin Wurschmidt

Thanks. Good morning, everyone. Tim, I just wanted to clarify, is the expectation for blended rate growth in the third quarter, specifically from the lower turnover and stable renewal rate growth, or is you also seeing new lease rate growth improve? I know you had talked about the easier comps earlier in the year being a benefit. Can you also share what new lease rate growth and occupancy were for July? Thanks.

Tim Argo

Austin, to answer the first part of your question, it's a little bit of both. Obviously, the renewals are a huge part, and we're seeing, as I mentioned, the retention rates be higher in Q3 than it was both in Q2 of this year and Q3 of last year. Obviously more of those blending in, and we're running 5%+, whereas Q3 of last year we were in the 4.5% range. That obviously played a big part. We are seeing, as mentioned, the momentum on the new lease side as well. With everything we've seen on demand and what we've seen with pre-leasing, the August, September new lease pricing looks better than it did at the same time last year. Your point about the comps as well, we really saw pricing drop off pretty significantly around this time last year.

Tim Argo

Last year, July to August, new leads pricing dropped about 70 basis points, August to September dropped 140 basis points. We don't expect that to recur this year for all of the things we mentioned. For July, I expect we'll end July around 95.4 in terms of occupancy. I think the new lease employment pricing probably looks pretty similar to what we reported for Q2.

Operator

Our next question will come from the line of Adam Kramer with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Adam Kramer

Hey, thanks for the time. Just wanted to ask on the capital allocation side, it sounds like dispositions may be wrapped up for the year. Seems like acquisitions for the type of stuff you guys want to buy, probably shouldn't expect much here for the next little while at least. Just wondering, should we expect sort of more share repurchases? Maybe just an update sort of on the debt side. I know there's some moving pieces there. I guess just more generally, sort of what is capital allocation priorities here sort of for the next little bit?

Brad Hill

Hey, Adam, this is Brad. I can certainly kick that off. As I mentioned a moment ago, our approach is to have a pretty balanced approach about taking advantage of near-term opportunities as well as taking advantage of long-term opportunities. To your point, our disposition plans for the year are close to being wrapped up. We have sold 2 properties. We've got 2 more that should sell by the end of the year. That puts our proceeds. By the way, one of those properties is in a JV, the one that's in the D.C. market. The proceeds we'll get from those will be pretty similar to what we've used so far to repurchase shares. Very balanced in terms of how we're looking to allocate capital there. Our priority continues to be development.

Brad Hill

That's number 1, as Tim talked about, continuing to invest in our Wi-Fi initiative, which is highly accretive use of capital for us. We're growing our redevelopment and repositioning to drive earnings performance over the next year or so. That initiative continues to perform better as the new supply coming into the market stabilizes with rents that are over $500 a unit higher than our rents on average. That program continues to perform quite well. You'll see us continue to lean into that as well. Our property reposition continues to be an area of focus for us. That's kind of the prioritization that we have in terms of capital allocation. Clay, I don't know if there's anything you want to add on the debt piece you mentioned.

Clay Holder

This is Clay. As we've talked about in the past, we do have a maturity that's coming due in September of this year for $300 million. We've got plenty of capacity with this term loan in place and some of these other dispositions that Brad had alluded to, that'll help cover that maturity. That's our plan for the financing needs. Good chance that we come back into the market at some point late this year, potentially early next year, as we continue pushing our development pipeline. That's what we see right now for the next few months.

Operator

Our next question will come from the line of Haendel St. Juste with Mizuho Securities. Please go ahead.

Haendel St. Juste

Hey, guys. Good morning. Thanks for taking the question. I wanted to go back to the markets that were underperforming. You outlined Charlotte, Raleigh, Nashville, where supply still seems to be a factor. Contrast that with some of the Sun Belt markets where you're seeing some improvement. You mentioned Austin a few times. I think you mentioned Orlando. I guess I'm curious if that's down to sub-market locations. Is it something else? Also maybe some color on the, you mentioned the top two-thirds of the portfolio blends are better than the bottom third. Maybe some color on the top two-third blends versus the bottom. Thank you.

Tim Argo

Yeah, Haendel, this is Tim. I'll touch on the first part of that. For the markets that are performing pretty well, it's generally pretty broad-based. We've talked a lot about the stronger markets here for several quarters. I would say it's those continue to be broad-based in most of the sub-markets. I think where we're starting to see some momentum and some green shoots is some of these improving markets where it's popping up in sub-markets. In Austin is a perfect example of that, where in some of the near south sub-markets, we've seen some momentum over the last couple of quarters.

Tim Argo

I would say even into the second quarter. Some of the Round Rock and even some of the northern assets started to show some momentum where you had some of those properties that were mid to high teens negative new lease pricing just a couple quarters ago that are now at the mid negative single digits. 1,000 basis point types of improvement in new lease pricing, and that's where the opportunity lies in a lot of these highly supplied sub-markets, as those concessions burn off. That's where you start to see some pretty quick momentum. Still seeing broadly in our larger markets, more of the urban sub-markets do well, particularly the Dallas and Atlanta, even in a Tampa that's been a little bit weaker. We're seeing some good performance there. On the weaker markets, it's more broad based.

Tim Argo

The Charlotte and the Raleigh, some of those as they were a little further along in the supply or a little bit later in the supply pipeline and get an extreme amount of supply. Those are ones where, if you have a market that's overall underperforming, it's because we're seeing it more broadly across a lot of sub-markets. I think those become more of a story as we head into next year.

Brad Hill

Dale, this is Brad. I'll just add one comment there on your question about the top two third versus the bottom. I think in general, what you see playing out there is an indication of our overall diversification strategy where we are allocating capital between large markets as well as mid-tier markets. Generally, what you'll see on the top portion of that graph, so to speak, are a lot of our mid-tier markets. A higher proportion of those certainly are above the portfolio average. Generally, that's what you would expect right now as they face less supply pressure than some of these other markets, some of the larger markets that you mentioned and we've mentioned. The demand-supply balance weighs more to the demand. We're seeing strong demand in those markets, so you see obviously stronger performance out of those right now.

Brad Hill

That's what we would expect to occur as demand continues, absorption continues in some of these more supplied markets like a Charlotte, a Phoenix, a Raleigh as that new supply continues to get absorbed. That's what I would say characterizes that breakdown to some degree.

Operator

Our next question will come from the line of Alexander Goldfarb with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.

Alexander Goldfarb

Hey, morning down there. Just a sort of question on markets overall. Clearly Sunbelt has a long history of strong growth over time. The amount of oversupply is clearly a lot to deal with for anyone. The lack of supply just nationally, how is that affecting your thoughts on other markets? We've seen the Midwest become more popular from some of the coastal guys. Just as you guys look to allocate capital, are there other markets that maybe previous cycles you would've said no, but now you're increasingly interested in? Or is it sort of the basic reality that there's just a lack of supply of product on the market, and therefore, even markets that you'd like to enter, it's just hard to see a path to establishing a presence that's economic?

Brad Hill

Well, thanks, Alex. This is Brad. We've talked about it in the past. We do continue to look at new markets and evaluate new markets. I think certainly, excuse me, the key component of that is we want to maintain what our overall strategy is, and that's allocating capital markets that have high demand. If you look across our portfolio, our markets generally have that, particularly when you're comparing to other markets. I don't think we want to go into a market just because it's a low supply market. That's only a benefit to the extent that you have demand. We do think over time, the demand fundamental is what has the highest impact, and it has a higher correlation to overall performance, long-term performance. We'll continue to focus on the highest demand markets that we have.

Brad Hill

There are markets that we're looking at that have similar dynamics. Columbus, Ohio, we've talked about that before as a market that we've considered given some of the dynamics there. We want certainly a business-friendly environment, and low taxes continues to be part of that. I think it's also important to remember, if you look at the demand drivers really across our markets, I think it was in the second quarter, 18 markets across the country showed greater than 1% job growth. 11 of those markets were in our footprint. Only five markets showed greater than 2% job growth, and four of those were in our markets. If you look at population growth, whether you're looking at one year, five year, 10 year, 14 of the top 15 markets are MAA markets.

Brad Hill

I think we continue to be in the right markets and continue to allocate capital to the right markets for long-term performance. As the comment we were making about our markets and the number of markets that are performing above average and are showing positive blended lease rates being so broad, the recovery is coming. As the new supply continues to get absorbed in some of these other markets, this high demand that we continue to see will pay off, and we'll continue to see the long-term performance dynamics, I think that we've seen historically that you mentioned at the beginning of your question.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Ami Probandt with UBS. Please go ahead.

Ami Probandt

Hi, thanks. The U.S. Census Bureau data has shown an uptick in permits across a handful of Sun Belt markets. Recognizing that some of these might not be directly competitive to your portfolio, I'm still wondering, is this a sign that developers are starting to get more comfortable with the trajectory of rent growth moving forward and getting back in and ramping up starts again?

Brad Hill

Well, I definitely think developers want to develop. From the developers that we talk to as part of our pre-purchase platform, where we have relationships with the top developers in the country, I would say broadly, we're not seeing an uptick in starts coming. In fact, we continue to find opportunities to partner with those developers on additional projects because their equity partners have backed out of projects. I think the ability to find capital, equity capital in particular for new developments continues to be challenged. We're not seeing that really change at the moment. I think to your point, permits kind of ebb and flow a bit, and the relationship between permits and construction starts can ebb and flow. We're not seeing from the folks we're talking to, and the data we're looking at, we're certainly not seeing an uptick.

Brad Hill

If you go back and you look at new starts for the last 13 quarters have trended below long-term averages. We see that trend continue as we look out over the foreseeable future. We don't see a material pickup from this point right now.

Operator

Our next question will come from the line of Anthony Paolone with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Speaker 15

Good morning, guys. I'm on for Tony. Thanks for taking my question. Going back a little bit, I think Brad, in your prepared remarks, you mentioned the cautious consumer. Was there anything, I guess you guys were seeing specifically from a consumer perspective point of view that caused a slowdown in new lease pricing? I guess, were you seeing tenants shop around a bit more? Just curious on any color you could give as to what's driving that shift.

Brad Hill

This is Brad. I can start. Tim can give any other details. I think what we've seen is a very healthy resident, a very healthy prospect. Our rent-to-income ratios continue to be the decline. They're the best that we've seen in a long, long time at 18%. Our collections continue to be really strong. I think in markets where there are a lot of options, there is a lot of supply. We do see folks shopping around a bit more, looking at all their options in the market, and taking a little bit longer to make decisions. We have seen that.

Brad Hill

I think the good news is, even to the point that Tim was mentioning earlier about the momentum we have in August and September, I think in part that does indicate a little bit more optimism from the prospect's perspective as they look out over the next couple of months. There is a level of, I think, optimism that we're seeing as we sign those pre-leases out for the next couple of months. Tim, anything you'd add to that?

Tim Argo

I think just to your point about the impact on new lease pricing. I think for Q2, we did see people just taking longer, shopping more. As Brad mentioned, our pre-leasing was down a little bit in Q2 relative to last year. That's more of an indication of people that are making decisions and feeling confident where they are. I think with people shopping around longer, they're making their decisions later. They're doing more immediate type of move-ins, and that is kind of the most volatile part of the new lease pricing curve. I think that plays into it. To Brad's point, we're seeing that change a little bit in Q3, and we're seeing a little more pre-leasing and a little more momentum, I guess, this confidence for the rest of the year.

Operator

Our next question will come from the line of Steve Sakwa with Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.

Steve Sakwa

Yeah, thanks. I just wanted to touch on expenses, which has obviously been a bright spot for the company this year. Are there things that we should be thinking about as we think about 2027 expense growth, any kind of one-timers or things that may not repeat that helped this year that may not be there next year?

Clay Holder

I see. This is Clay. I'll touch on that for a second. I think what you're seeing here this year is just our continued focus, as you alluded to, our continued focus on controlling expenses. We've shown a long history of that, and it continued to show that even in the current environment. As we look forward to next year, I don't see anything on the horizon at this point that would make me think that there are some one-time savings or any one-time large items coming our direction. I would expect next year to look somewhat similar. It could be a little bit higher growth rate just given where we are today. I would expect generally it would look not too far different than what we're seeing at the moment.

Operator

Our next question will come from the line of Michael Gorman with BTIG. Please go ahead.

Michael Gorman

Thanks. Good morning. Maybe going back to Alex's question on markets for a second, take the flip side of it. As you've gone through this cycle, looking at any of your market exposure, maybe especially some of the smaller exposures, are there any markets that have changed structurally in your view or operated in such a way that your view of either expansion or even existing in those markets to begin with has changed? I'm thinking maybe even specifically like a Denver where the regulatory environment's gotten tougher. Any commentary there would be helpful. Thanks.

Brad Hill

This is Brad. I would say broadly, not really. I would say you mentioned the one market that we've seen the most change from a regulatory perspective. We've seen it in Nevada, we only have two properties there, which aren't core for us long term.

Brad Hill

There's been certainly some talk in Virginia. I think some of that got pushed off another year or so. The District of Columbia, a lot of things going on in that market. With us selling our one property in the District, shouldn't be exposed to that. Not a lot of change from a just overall portfolio perspective. We still have some markets where we'd have one asset or two assets, which from a long-term perspective, aren't properties that we want to hold. I would say those markets also continue to do quite well. Another market that we'll have to consider long term that continues to perform very well from a demand perspective. It can get some supply, demand continues to be really strong is Dallas, it's also one of our largest markets.

Brad Hill

That's a market that we could potentially look at adding to and certainly recycling capital out of longer term. For the most part, we're not seeing big changes in any market broadly. The Denver component that you talked about, the impact of that is supply in Denver is coming down very rapidly. I think performance will turn around in that market as a result of that.

Operator

Our next question will come from the line of Alex Kim with Zelman & Associates. Please go ahead.

Alex Kim

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to drill a little further into the same store expense growth guide to reduce by 90 basis points at the midpoint. I'm curious how much of the improvement reflects sustainable operating efficiencies versus timing items, and was wondering if you could discuss the outlook for some of the cost buckets, specifically insurance as well with the, I believe the repricing occurring in July at some point.

Clay Holder

Alex, this is Clay. As we're guiding to for the, as you mentioned, the total expense growth for the year for our same store portfolio is a little around 1.75%. Excuse me. What we're seeing there, where we're seeing some good benefits there is really across the board. We talked a little bit about repair and maintenance costs, personnel costs that we saw in the second quarter, that we're expecting that to continue out through the back half of the year. The teams have done a really good job of controlling those expenses. We've got a full staff, which in turn typically leads to lower costs whenever we need to turn a unit. You've got the increased retention rates, which are clearly moving in our favor. That's helping provide some benefit there as well.

Clay Holder

I'll go back to the personnel costs real quick. We continue to pop some properties, so we are continuing to see some benefit there, and I expect that benefit to continue on over the course of the year and potentially even into next year as we look to do more of that. You mentioned insurance costs. We did have a renewal on July the 1st. It was a very successful renewal. We had premiums that in a total declined by over 12%. As you kind of layer that through what the impact is for this year, for the back half of the year, for the full year, we're expecting a little over a 6% decline in insurance costs year-over-year. That marks our third year of a reduction in premium and insurance costs. Continuing to see really good performance from that standpoint.

Clay Holder

The last one I'll call out is property taxes. Given just the environment that we're operating in, the NOI decline that we've seen and others have seen in our markets obviously having an impact on real estate valuations. We are getting a little bit of benefit there. We continue to focus a lot on that area. It is the largest expense line in our stack there. We spend a lot of time focusing on that, making sure that the valuations that are assigned to us are appropriate and pushing back when we need to. We'll continue doing that to manage that aspect of it.

Operator

Our next question will come from the line of John Pawlowski with Green Street. Please go ahead.

John Pawlowski

Hey, good morning. Thanks for the time. My question's on understanding the development economics for your pipeline right now in an environment where there's a potentially pretty big widespread between yields when you quote and others quote kind of gross yields based off of base rents and then net yields once you factor in concessions. Let's just take the lease-up pipeline. When these four or five projects actually stabilize second half of this year, early next year, what's like the true net effective cash yield on this vintage of deliveries, assuming no change in market rents? Just today, net effective rents, what kind of yields are we looking at?

Brad Hill

Got it. Hey, John, this is Brad. I think Clay's looking up some information now. I'll tell you, for our current lease-up pipeline, on average, the projected NOI yields, cash yields on those is a 6%. I would say today, what are those delivering? Probably close to a 5% yield because of the higher concessions that we have. I would say the good news about that is on our renewals for really across the board of all of our lease-up properties, we're getting about 9%-10% lease over lease increases on all those lease-up renewals. The concessions are burning off, which that's what gives us confidence in our ability to hit those yields that we originally underwrote, which were, call it about a 6%.

Brad Hill

If you look at a new underwriting that we're doing today for a new project, we think the yields are somewhere in the 6.25%-6.5%. That will include about 4% or so contingency on construction costs. Today, we're delivering projects 2%-3% below cost of what our expectations are. That also does include some trending. Generally, what we do is we'll trend rents from today until we use today's market rents. We'll trend those to the stabilization period, which is three to four years, somewhere, call it in the 2% or so range a year. If you go and look at where we're trending rents versus sub-market expectations, we're normally 2%, 3%, 4% below market expectations in terms of rent growth over that period of time.

Brad Hill

That gives you a little bit of a sense of where our revenues need to be or where we're expecting revenues to be versus where the market is expecting revenues to be. I certainly don't think that it's unrealistic to think that from today's market level rents, that they would increase a couple of % over the next four years.

Operator

Our next question will come from the line of John Kim with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

John Kim

Thank you. I know you talked about this a bit, but I think there's still some confusion on your assumption that the rents will accelerate in August and September because July, you mentioned, is similar to the second quarter. Can you just clarify what momentum you saw in June and July, and what gives you confidence that it will accelerate towards the end of the quarter, given in a normal seasonal year, rents typically peak in August?

Tim Argo

Hey, John, this is Tim. Yeah. What we're seeing is, one, the demand side, as we talked about, on the ground, lead volume, visit volume is significantly higher this year compared to this time last year. With some of the strategic decisions we made late Q2, that was really geared towards maximizing pricing as we could in Q3. I think where we're seeing that play out first is on the renewal side, as we talked about, where again, retention is higher, and the actual renewal rates that we're getting are significantly higher than what we got in Q3 of last year. Then we spent a lot of time just looking at what our leasing velocity is and what are the leases on the books that we have for Q3 so far.

Tim Argo

Obviously, still a lot of time to go with new move-ins over the next couple of months. When we compare where we are this time compared to the same time last year, the rates we're getting in the August, September new lease rates are pretty significantly better than, again, the same time last year. You combine that with moderating supply, the absorption that we saw in the first half of the year, but frankly, with a little bit easier comps at this time last year. All those factors play into what we're seeing and the momentum that we're seeing, and that we expect to play out over the back half of the year.

Operator

We have no further questions. I'll turn the call back to MAA for closing comments.

Brad Hill

All right. Well, no other comments from us. Certainly, if you guys have any follow-up questions, feel free to reach out. Thanks for joining us today.

Operator

This concludes today's program. Thank you for joining. You may disconnect at any time.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-29

MAA REPORTS SECOND QUARTER 2026 RESULTS

PR Newswire
GERMANTOWN, Tenn., July 29, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc., or MAA (NYSE: MAA), today announced operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026. Brad Hill, President and Chief Executive Officer, said, "Second quarter Core FFO results exceeded our expectations due to steady demand and continued disciplined expense management. Our focus on new lease pricing resulted in an acceleration in our new lease sequential pricing trends, supported our consistently strong renewal results and delivered blended lease-over-lease pricing that was 20 basis points better year-over-year. As steady demand increasingly outweighs the declining pressure from new deliveries more broadly across our footprint, the improved pricing and operating fundamentals we see in a number of our markets should become more broad-based, supporting an accelerating recovery. Our pricing momentum, operating discipline, and growing contribution from our new developments, position MAA to deliver attractive future earnings growth." During the second quarter of 2026, MAA's Same Store effective blended lease rate growth was 0.7%, a 20 basis point improvement over the same period in the prior year as well as a 100 basis point improvement on a sequential basis, driven by a 170 basis point improvement in new lease pricing from the first quarter of 2026. As of June 30, 2026, resident turnover in the Same Store Portfolio remained historically low at 39.6% with a low level of move-outs associated with buying single-family homes of 10.9% for the quarter. During the second quarter of 2026, MAA completed the initial lease-up of MAA Cathedral Arts in Dallas, Texas, completed the development of MAA Plaza Midwood located in Charlotte, North Carolina and began construction of a multifamily apartment community in the Kansas City market. During the second quarter of 2026, Mid-America Apartments, L.P. (MAALP), MAA's operating partnership, entered into a unsecured delayed draw term loan (referred to in this release as the DDTL Facility) in the aggregate committed principal amount of up to $350.0 million. The DDTL Facility is scheduled to mature in November 2030. As of June 30, 2026, there was $100.0 million outstanding under the DDTL Facility. During the second quarter of 2026, MAA repurchased 0.4 million shares of its common stock at a weighted average share price of $130.66…Read full document

GERMANTOWN, Tenn., July 29, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc., or MAA (NYSE: MAA), today announced operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026. Brad Hill, President and Chief Executive Officer, said, "Second quarter Core FFO results exceeded our expectations due to steady demand and continued disciplined expense management. Our focus on new lease pricing resulted in an acceleration in our new lease sequential pricing trends, supported our consistently strong renewal results and delivered blended lease-over-lease pricing that was 20 basis points better year-over-year. As steady demand increasingly outweighs the declining pressure from new deliveries more broadly across our footprint, the improved pricing and operating fundamentals we see in a number of our markets should become more broad-based, supporting an accelerating recovery. Our pricing momentum, operating discipline, and growing contribution from our new developments, position MAA to deliver attractive future earnings growth." During the second quarter of 2026, MAA's Same Store effective blended lease rate growth was 0.7%, a 20 basis point improvement over the same period in the prior year as well as a 100 basis point improvement on a sequential basis, driven by a 170 basis point improvement in new lease pricing from the first quarter of 2026. As of June 30, 2026, resident turnover in the Same Store Portfolio remained historically low at 39.6% with a low level of move-outs associated with buying single-family homes of 10.9% for the quarter. During the second quarter of 2026, MAA completed the initial lease-up of MAA Cathedral Arts in Dallas, Texas, completed the development of MAA Plaza Midwood located in Charlotte, North Carolina and began construction of a multifamily apartment community in the Kansas City market. During the second quarter of 2026, Mid-America Apartments, L.P. (MAALP), MAA's operating partnership, entered into a unsecured delayed draw term loan (referred to in this release as the DDTL Facility) in the aggregate committed principal amount of up to $350.0 million. The DDTL Facility is scheduled to mature in November 2030. As of June 30, 2026, there was $100.0 million outstanding under the DDTL Facility. During the second quarter of 2026, MAA repurchased 0.4 million shares of its common stock at a weighted average share price of $130.66 for total consideration of $50 million. Same Store Operating ResultsSame Store results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the same periods in the prior year are summarized below: Same Store operating statistics for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 are summarized below: Same Store net effective lease pricing statistics for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 are summarized below: Acquisition and Disposition ActivityIn April 2026, MAA closed on the acquisition of a land parcel located in the Nashville market through its pre-purchase development program, and MAA began construction of a 312-unit multifamily apartment community at the property in July 2026. In July 2026, MAA closed on the acquisition of a land parcel located in the Northern Virginia market through its pre-purchase development program and plans future development of a 306-unit multifamily apartment community at the property starting in the third quarter of 2026. In May 2026, MAA closed on the disposition of a 194-unit multifamily apartment community located in the Raleigh, North Carolina market for net proceeds of approximately $40 million, resulting in a gain on the sale of depreciable real estate assets of approximately $35 million. Development and Lease-up ActivityA summary of MAA's development communities under construction as of the end of the second quarter of 2026 is set forth below (dollars in thousands): During the second quarter of 2026, MAA completed the development of MAA Plaza Midwood located in Charlotte, North Carolina and began construction on a 263-unit multifamily apartment community in the Kansas City market. MAA funded approximately $81 million of costs for current and planned development projects, including predevelopment activities, during the second quarter of 2026. A summary of the total units, physical occupancy and cost of MAA's lease-up communities as of the end of the second quarter of 2026 is set forth below (dollars in thousands): During the second quarter of 2026, MAA completed the lease-up of MAA Cathedral Arts located in Dallas, Texas. Balance Sheet and Financing ActivitiesAs of June 30, 2026, MAA had $882.8 million of combined cash and available capacity under MAALP's unsecured revolving credit facility. In June 2026, MAALP entered into the DDTL Facility in the aggregate committed principal amount of up to $350.0 million. Advances of loans under the DDTL Facility may be requested by MAALP in one or more draws (subject to a maximum of five draws) and will be available until December 21, 2026. The DDTL Facility is scheduled to mature in November 2030. Amounts borrowed under the DDTL Facility will bear interest at a variable rate, at MAALP's election, either (1) based upon the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.675% to 1.550% based upon MAALP's credit rating or (2) a base rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.00% to 0.55% based upon MAALP's credit rating. The DDTL Facility also contains an uncommitted accordion feature that allows MAALP to increase the total amount of unsecured indebtedness under the DDTL Facility to $550.0 million until December 21, 2026. As of June 30, 2026, there was $100.0 million outstanding under the DDTL Facility. MAALP intends to use the loan proceeds for general corporate purposes, including repayment of other debt. During the second quarter of 2026, MAA repurchased 0.4 million shares of its common stock at a weighted average share price of $130.66 for total consideration of $50 million. Dividends and distributions paid on shares of common stock and noncontrolling interests during the second quarter of 2026 were $182.5 million, as compared to $181.8 million for the same period in the prior year. Balance sheet highlights as of June 30, 2026 are summarized below (dollars in billions): 130th Consecutive Quarterly Common Dividend DeclaredMAA declared its 130th consecutive quarterly common dividend, which will be paid on July 31, 2026 to holders of record on July 15, 2026. The current annual dividend rate is $6.12 per common share. The timing and amount of future dividends will depend on actual cash flows from operations, MAA's financial condition, capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and other factors as MAA's Board of Directors deems relevant. MAA's Board of Directors may modify the dividend policy from time to time. 2026 Earnings and Same Store Guidance MAA is updating its prior 2026 guidance for Earnings per diluted common share, Core FFO per diluted Share, Core AFFO per diluted Share and Same Store performance. MAA expects to provide updates to its 2026 Earnings per diluted common share, Core FFO per diluted Share and Core AFFO per diluted Share guidance on a quarterly basis. FFO, Core FFO and Core AFFO are non-GAAP financial measures. Acquisition and disposition activity materially affects depreciation and capital gains or losses, which combined, generally represent the majority of the difference between Net income available for common shareholders and FFO. As discussed in the definitions of non-GAAP financial measures found later in this release, MAA's definition of FFO is in accordance with the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts', or NAREIT's, definition, and Core FFO represents FFO as adjusted for items that are not considered part of MAA's core business operations. MAA believes that Core FFO is helpful in understanding operating performance in that Core FFO excludes not only depreciation expense of real estate assets and certain other non-routine items, but it also excludes certain items that by their nature are not comparable over periods and therefore tend to obscure actual operating performance. MAA expects Core FFO for the third quarter of 2026 to be in the range of $2.04 to $2.16 per diluted Share, or $2.10 per diluted Share at the midpoint. The projected difference from Core FFO per diluted Share for the second quarter of 2026 to the midpoint of MAA's guidance for the third quarter of 2026 is summarized below: MAA does not forecast Earnings per diluted common share on a quarterly basis as MAA generally cannot predict the timing of forecasted acquisition and disposition activity within a particular quarter (rather than during the course of the full year). Additional details and guidance items are provided in the Supplemental Data to this release. Supplemental Material and Conference CallSupplemental Data to this release can be found on the "For Investors" page of the MAA website at www.maac.com. MAA will host a conference call to further discuss second quarter results on July 30, 2026, at 9:00 AM Central Time. The conference call-in number is (888) 596-4144. You may also join the live webcast of the conference call by accessing the "For Investors" page of the MAA website at www.maac.com. MAA's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are filed under the registrant names of Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. and Mid-America Apartments, L.P. About MAAMAA, an S&P 500 company, is a real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on delivering full-cycle and superior investment performance for shareholders through the ownership, management, acquisition, development and redevelopment of quality apartment communities primarily in the Southeast, Southwest and Mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. As of June 30, 2026, MAA had ownership interest in 104,698 apartment units, including communities in development, across 16 states and the District of Columbia. For further details, please visit the MAA website at www.maac.com or contact Investor Relations at [email protected], or via mail at MAA, 6815 Poplar Ave., Suite 500, Germantown, TN 38138, Attn: Investor Relations. Forward-Looking StatementsThis release (as well as the Supplemental Data to this release) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements do not discuss historical fact, but instead are statements related to expectations, projections, intentions, assumptions and beliefs regarding the future. Words such as "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," "forecasts," "projects," "assumes," "will," "may," "could," "should," "budget," "target," "outlook," "proforma," "opportunity," "guidance" and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding quarterly and full year 2026 guidance (including earnings guidance, Same Store Portfolio guidance and other related projections and assumptions), development costs for our development communities, timelines for occupancy, completion and stabilization of our development communities, and timelines for stabilization of our lease-up communities. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, as described below, which may cause our actual results, performance, achievements or outcomes to be materially different from the future results, performance, achievements or outcomes expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in these forward-looking statements, the inclusion of such statements should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the results, performance, achievements or outcomes described in such statements will be achieved. The following factors, among others, could cause our actual results, performance, achievements or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements: adverse effects on occupancy levels and rental revenues due to unfavorable market and economic conditions; adverse changes in real estate markets, including changes in supply and/or demand for multifamily housing or increased competition from alternative housing options; failure of development communities to be completed within budget and on a timely basis, if at all, to lease-up as anticipated or to achieve anticipated results; unexpected capital needs; material changes in operating costs, including real estate taxes, utilities and insurance costs, due to inflation and other factors; losses due to uninsured risks, deductibles and self-insured retentions, or losses from catastrophes in excess of coverage limits; ability to obtain financing at favorable rates, if at all, or refinance existing debt as it matures; level and volatility of interest or capitalization rates or capital market conditions; changes in the legal requirements we are subject to, or the imposition of new legal requirements, that adversely affect our operations; extreme weather and natural disasters; disease outbreaks and other public health events and measures that are taken by federal, state, and local governmental authorities in response to such outbreaks and events; legal proceedings or class action lawsuits; and other risks identified in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the SEC on February 6, 2026, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, other reports we file with the SEC and in other documents that we publicly disseminate. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements contained in this release to reflect events, circumstances or changes in expectations after the date of this release. NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES Adjusted EBITDAreFor purposes of calculations in this release, Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Income Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization for real estate, or Adjusted EBITDAre, represents EBITDAre further adjusted for items that are not considered part of MAA's core operations such as adjustments related to the fair value of the embedded derivative in the MAA Series I preferred shares, gain or loss on sale of non-depreciable assets, gain or loss on investments, casualty related charges and (recoveries), net, gain or loss on debt extinguishment and legal costs, settlements and (recoveries), net. As an owner and operator of real estate, MAA considers Adjusted EBITDAre to be an important measure of performance from core operations because Adjusted EBITDAre excludes various income and expense items that are not indicative of operating performance. MAA's computation of Adjusted EBITDAre may differ from the methodology utilized by other companies to calculate Adjusted EBITDAre. Adjusted EBITDAre should not be considered as an alternative to Net income as an indicator of operating performance. Core Adjusted Funds from Operations (Core AFFO)Core AFFO is composed of Core FFO less recurring capital expenditures. Because net income attributable to noncontrolling interests is added back, Core AFFO, when used in this release, represents Core AFFO attributable to common shareholders and unitholders. Core AFFO should not be considered as an alternative to Net income available for MAA common shareholders as an indicator of operating performance. As an owner and operator of real estate, MAA considers Core AFFO to be an important measure of performance from operations because Core AFFO measures the ability to control revenues, expenses and recurring capital expenditures. Core Funds from Operations (Core FFO)Core FFO represents FFO as adjusted for items that are not considered part of MAA's core business operations such as adjustments related to the fair value of the embedded derivative in the MAA Series I preferred shares; gain or loss on sale of non-depreciable assets; gain or loss on investments, net of tax; casualty related charges and (recoveries), net; gain or loss on debt extinguishment; legal costs, settlements and (recoveries), net, and mark-to-market debt adjustments. Because net income attributable to noncontrolling interests is added back, Core FFO, when used in this release, represents Core FFO attributable to common shareholders and unitholders. While MAA's definition of Core FFO may be similar to others in the industry, MAA's methodology for calculating Core FFO may differ from that utilized by other REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other REITs. Core FFO should not be considered as an alternative to Net income available for MAA common shareholders as an indicator of operating performance. MAA believes that Core FFO is helpful in understanding its core operating performance between periods in that it removes certain items that by their nature are not comparable over periods and therefore tend to obscure actual operating performance. EBITDAFor purposes of calculations in this release, Earnings Before Interest, Income Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization, or EBITDA, is composed of net income plus depreciation and amortization, interest expense, and income taxes. As an owner and operator of real estate, MAA considers EBITDA to be an important measure of performance from core operations because EBITDA excludes various expense items that are not indicative of operating performance. EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to Net income as an indicator of operating performance. EBITDAreFor purposes of calculations in this release, Earnings Before Interest, Income Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization for real estate, or EBITDAre, is composed of EBITDA further adjusted for the gain or loss on sale of depreciable assets, gain on consolidation of third-party development and adjustments to reflect MAA's share of EBITDAre of an unconsolidated affiliate. As an owner and operator of real estate, MAA considers EBITDAre to be an important measure of performance from core operations because EBITDAre excludes various expense items that are not indicative of operating performance. While MAA's definition of EBITDAre is in accordance with NAREIT's definition, it may differ from the methodology utilized by other companies to calculate EBITDAre. EBITDAre should not be considered as an alternative to Net income as an indicator of operating performance. Funds Available for Distribution (FAD)FAD is composed of Core FFO less total capital expenditures, excluding development spending, property acquisitions, capital expenditures relating to significant casualty losses that management expects to be reimbursed by insurance proceeds and corporate related capital expenditures. Because net income attributable to noncontrolling interests is added back, FAD, when used in this release, represents FAD attributable to common shareholders and unitholders. FAD should not be considered as an alternative to Net income available for MAA common shareholders as an indicator of operating performance. As an owner and operator of real estate, MAA considers FAD to be an important measure of performance from core operations because FAD measures the ability to control revenues, expenses and capital expenditures. Funds From Operations (FFO)FFO represents net income available for MAA common shareholders (calculated in accordance with GAAP) excluding gain or loss on disposition of operating properties, asset impairment and gain on consolidation of third-party development, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and adjustments for joint ventures. Because net income attributable to noncontrolling interests is added back, FFO, when used in this release, represents FFO attributable to common shareholders and unitholders. While MAA's definition of FFO is in accordance with NAREIT's definition, it may differ from the methodology for calculating FFO utilized by other companies and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other companies. FFO should not be considered as an alternative to Net income available for MAA common shareholders as an indicator of operating performance. MAA believes that FFO is helpful in understanding operating performance in that FFO excludes depreciation and amortization of real estate assets. MAA believes that GAAP historical cost depreciation of real estate assets is generally not correlated with changes in the value of those assets, whose value does not diminish predictably over time, as historical cost depreciation implies. Gross AssetsGross Assets represents Total assets plus Accumulated depreciation and Accumulated depreciation for Assets held for sale. MAA believes that Gross Assets can be used as a helpful tool in evaluating its balance sheet positions. MAA believes that GAAP historical cost depreciation of real estate assets is generally not correlated with changes in the value of those assets, whose value does not diminish predictably over time, as historical cost depreciation implies. Gross Real Estate AssetsGross Real Estate Assets represents Real estate assets, net plus Accumulated depreciation, Assets held for sale, net, Accumulated depreciation for Assets held for sale, Cash and cash equivalents and 1031(b) exchange proceeds included in Restricted cash. MAA believes that Gross Real Estate Assets can be used as a helpful tool in evaluating its balance sheet positions. MAA believes that GAAP historical cost depreciation of real estate assets is generally not correlated with changes in the value of those assets, whose value does not diminish predictably over time, as historical cost depreciation implies. Net DebtNet Debt represents Unsecured notes payable,net and Secured notes payable,net less Cash and cash equivalents and 1031(b) exchange proceeds included in Restricted cash. MAA believes Net Debt is a helpful tool in evaluating its debt position. NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES (Continued) Net Operating Income (NOI)Net Operating Income represents Rental and other property revenues less Total property operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization, for all properties held during the period, regardless of their status as held for sale. NOI should not be considered as an alternative to Net income available for MAA common shareholders. MAA believes NOI is a helpful tool in evaluating operating performance because it measures the core operations of property performance by excluding corporate level expenses and other items not related to property operating performance. Non-Same Store and Other NOINon-Same Store and Other NOI represents Rental and other property revenues less Total property operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization, for all properties classified within the Non-Same Store and Other Portfolio during the period. Non-Same Store and Other NOI includes storm-related expenses related to severe weather events, including hurricanes and winter storms. Non-Same Store and Other NOI should not be considered as an alternative to Net income available for MAA common shareholders. MAA believes Non-Same Store and Other NOI is a helpful tool in evaluating operating performance because it measures the core operations of property performance by excluding corporate level expenses and other items not related to property operating performance. Same Store NOISame Store NOI represents Rental and other property revenues less Total property operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization, for all properties classified within the Same Store Portfolio during the period. Same Store NOI excludes storm-related expenses related to severe weather events, including hurricanes and winter storms. Same Store NOI should not be considered as an alternative to Net income available for MAA common shareholders. MAA believes Same Store NOI is a helpful tool in evaluating operating performance because it measures the core operations of property performance by excluding corporate level expenses and other items not related to property operating performance. OTHER KEY DEFINITIONS Average Effective Rent per UnitAverage Effective Rent per Unit represents the average of gross rent amounts after the effect of leasing concessions for occupied units plus prevalent market rates asked for unoccupied units, divided by the total number of units. Leasing concessions represent discounts to the current market rate. MAA believes average effective rent is a helpful measurement in evaluating average pricing. It does not represent actual rental revenue collected per unit. Average Physical OccupancyAverage Physical Occupancy represents the average of the daily physical occupancy for an applicable period. Development CommunitiesCommunities remain identified as development until certificates of occupancy are obtained for all units under development. Once all units are delivered and available for occupancy, the community moves into the Lease-up Communities portfolio. Effective Blended Lease Rate GrowthEffective Blended Lease Rate Growth represents the combined weighted average of Effective New Lease Rate Growth and Effective Renewal Lease Rate Growth from our Same Store Portfolio for the applicable period. Effective New Lease Rate GrowthEffective New Lease Rate Growth represents the growth in gross rent amounts after the effect of leasing concessions for new leases from our Same Store Portfolio that were effective during the applicable period as compared to the prior lease. Effective Renewal Lease Rate GrowthEffective Renewal Lease Rate Growth represents the growth in gross rent amounts after the effect of leasing concessions for renewal leases from our Same Store Portfolio that were effective during the applicable period as compared to the prior lease. Lease-up CommunitiesNew acquisitions acquired during lease-up and newly developed communities remain in the Lease-up Communities portfolio until stabilized. Communities are considered stabilized when achieving 90% average physical occupancy for 90 days. Non-Same Store and Other PortfolioNon-Same Store and Other Portfolio includes recently acquired communities, communities in development or lease-up, communities that have been disposed of or identified for disposition, communities that have experienced a significant casualty loss, stabilized communities that do not meet the requirements defined by the Same Store Portfolio, retail properties and commercial properties. Resident TurnoverResident turnover represents resident move outs excluding transfers within the Same Store Portfolio as a percentage of expiring leases on a trailing twelve month basis as of the end of the reported quarter. Same Store Portfolio (or Same Store)MAA reviews its Same Store Portfolio at the beginning of each calendar year, or as significant transactions or events warrant. Communities are generally added into the Same Store Portfolio if they were owned and stabilized at the beginning of the previous year. Communities are considered stabilized when achieving 90% average physical occupancy for 90 days. Communities that have been approved by MAA's Board of Directors for disposition are excluded from the Same Store Portfolio. Communities that have experienced a significant casualty loss are also excluded from the Same Store Portfolio. View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/maa-reports-second-quarter-2026-results-302838251.html

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-29

Mid-America Apartment Communities: Q2 Earnings Snapshot

Associated Press

GERMANTOWN, Tenn. (AP) — GERMANTOWN, Tenn. (AP) — Mid-America Apartment Communities Inc. (MAA) on Wednesday reported a key measure of profitability in its second quarter. The results matched Wall Street expectations. The real estate investment trust, based in Germantown, Tennessee, said it had funds from operations of $247.5 million, or $2.08 per share, in the period. The average estimate of eight analysts surveyed by Zacks Investment Research was for funds from operations of $2.08 per share. Funds from operations is a closely watched measure in the REIT industry. It takes net income and adds back items such as depreciation and amortization. The company said it had net income of $120.8 million, or $1.04 per share. The real estate investment trust, based in Germantown, Tennessee, posted revenue of $555.1 million in the period, falling short of Street forecasts. Seven analysts surveyed by Zacks expected $557.3 million. Mid-America Apartment Communities expects full-year funds from operations in the range of $8.41 to $8.65 per share. _____ This story was generated by Automated Insights (http://automatedinsights.com/ap) using data from Zacks Investment Research. Access a Zacks stock report on MAA at https://www.zacks.com/ap/MAA

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-24

Mid-America Apartment to Post Q2 Earnings: Is MAA a Must-Have Stock?

Zacks
Mid-America Apartment Communities MAA — commonly known as MAA — is a real estate investment trust (REIT) that focuses on owning, operating and acquiring apartment communities throughout the Southeast, Southwest and Mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. The company is slated to report second-quarter 2026 results on July 29, after market close. In the last reported quarter, this Germantown, TN-based residential REIT reported core FFO per share of $2.13, delivering a surprise of 0.47%. Results reflected same-store effective blended lease rate growth year over year. Over the trailing four quarters, MAA surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate on three occasions and missed on the other, the average beat being 0.23%. This is depicted in the chart below: Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. price-eps-surprise | Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. Quote Let’s see how things have shaped up before this announcement. The U.S. multifamily market entered the second half of 2026 with a clearer recovery taking shape, as strong renter demand and a rapidly shrinking supply pipeline began translating into lower vacancy and improving rent growth. According to a Cushman & Wakefield report, net absorption reached roughly 124,600 units, up from 83,500 units in the first quarter and 8% above the prior year, making it the fifth-strongest quarter in nearly 25 years. The supply picture also became more favorable. Approximately 88,000 units were delivered during the quarter, down 27% year over year. Around 475,000 units remained under construction at quarter-end, equal to just 3.5% of existing inventory. Improving demand and slowing supply pushed the national vacancy rate down 35 basis points quarter over quarter to 8.9%, its first move below 9% since 2024. On a trailing four-quarter basis, absorption of approximately 362,000 units exceeded deliveries of about 358,000 units for the first time since early 2022, indicating vacancy is likely to have passed its cyclical peak. The recovery was particularly pronounced in previously overbuilt markets: Austin; Charleston, SC; Savannah, GA; Huntsville, AL; Salt Lake City, UT, and Colorado Springs recorded some of the largest quarterly vacancy declines. Rent growth remains modest but is beginning to improve. National asking rents reached approximately $1,945 per month, up 1.5% year over year, compared with 1.1% growth in the first qua…Read full document

Mid-America Apartment Communities MAA — commonly known as MAA — is a real estate investment trust (REIT) that focuses on owning, operating and acquiring apartment communities throughout the Southeast, Southwest and Mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. The company is slated to report second-quarter 2026 results on July 29, after market close. In the last reported quarter, this Germantown, TN-based residential REIT reported core FFO per share of $2.13, delivering a surprise of 0.47%. Results reflected same-store effective blended lease rate growth year over year. Over the trailing four quarters, MAA surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate on three occasions and missed on the other, the average beat being 0.23%. This is depicted in the chart below: Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. price-eps-surprise | Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. Quote Let’s see how things have shaped up before this announcement. The U.S. multifamily market entered the second half of 2026 with a clearer recovery taking shape, as strong renter demand and a rapidly shrinking supply pipeline began translating into lower vacancy and improving rent growth. According to a Cushman & Wakefield report, net absorption reached roughly 124,600 units, up from 83,500 units in the first quarter and 8% above the prior year, making it the fifth-strongest quarter in nearly 25 years. The supply picture also became more favorable. Approximately 88,000 units were delivered during the quarter, down 27% year over year. Around 475,000 units remained under construction at quarter-end, equal to just 3.5% of existing inventory. Improving demand and slowing supply pushed the national vacancy rate down 35 basis points quarter over quarter to 8.9%, its first move below 9% since 2024. On a trailing four-quarter basis, absorption of approximately 362,000 units exceeded deliveries of about 358,000 units for the first time since early 2022, indicating vacancy is likely to have passed its cyclical peak. The recovery was particularly pronounced in previously overbuilt markets: Austin; Charleston, SC; Savannah, GA; Huntsville, AL; Salt Lake City, UT, and Colorado Springs recorded some of the largest quarterly vacancy declines. Rent growth remains modest but is beginning to improve. National asking rents reached approximately $1,945 per month, up 1.5% year over year, compared with 1.1% growth in the first quarter. The Bay Area led the recovery, with San Francisco rents rising 13%, San Jose 7% and the East Bay 4.8%. Norfolk, VA; Toledo, OH; Reno, NV; and Boise, ID, also posted strong gains. High-supply markets remained softer, with rents still declining in Austin and Sarasota, FL, although the pace of those declines moderated as excess supply was absorbed. Overall, the market appears to be shifting from stabilization into an occupancy-led recovery, with broader rent growth likely as the construction pipeline continues to shrink. MAA’s second-quarter 2026 results should reflect continued operating stability, with renewals, occupancy and moderating supply pressure supporting performance. Management said renewal growth remained above 5% entering the quarter, while April physical occupancy held at 95.5% and 60-day exposure improved 20 basis points from a year earlier. The company expects blended lease growth to accelerate from the first quarter’s negative 0.3%, helped by steady renewals and a more normal seasonal improvement in new lease pricing through July. New lease rates will likely remain the main swing factor. Management noted improving momentum in March and April and expects May and June to perform better than last year, supported by strong lead volume, positive absorption and fewer deliveries. Atlanta and Dallas are showing better pricing and occupancy trends, while Austin, Charlotte and Savannah, GA, remain pressured by elevated concessions and supply. For the quarter, MAA guided core FFO to $2.00-$2.12 per share, with a midpoint of $2.06. Higher seasonal maintenance costs and increased interest expense are likely to have limited the upside, although property dispositions and disciplined expense control may have partly offset those pressures. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for quarterly revenues is pegged at $557.28 million. This suggests a 1.34% rise from the year-ago quarter’s reported figure. For the second quarter, we project an average physical occupancy of 95.6%. However, we expect same-store property net operating income to fall 1.3% year over year. Our estimate indicates a 16.5% increase in the company’s interest expenses. Before the second-quarter earnings release, the company’s activities were not adequate to gain analysts’ confidence. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the quarterly core FFO per share has remained unchanged at $2.08 for more than two months. This also suggests a year-over-year decline of 3.26%. Our proven model does not conclusively predict a surprise in terms of FFO per share for MAA this season. The combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the chances of an FFO beat, which is not the case here. MAA currently carries a Zacks Rank of 3 and has an Earnings ESP of -0.20%. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they’re reported with our Earnings ESP Filter. Here are two stocks from the broader REIT sector — Extra Space Storage EXR and Cousins Properties CUZ— you may want to consider, as our model shows that these have the right combination of elements to report an FFO beat this quarter. Extra Space Storage is slated to report quarterly numbers on July 28. EXR has an Earnings ESP of +0.39% and a Zacks Rank of 3 at present. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. Cousins is slated to report quarterly numbers on July 30. CUZ has an Earnings ESP of +0.45% and a Zacks Rank of 3 at present. Note: Anything related to earnings presented in this write-up represents funds from operations (FFO), a widely used metric to gauge the performance of REITs. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. (MAA) : Free Stock Analysis Report Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) : Free Stock Analysis Report Extra Space Storage Inc (EXR) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-06

Earnings Preview: What To Expect From Mid-America Apartment Communities' Report

Barchart
With a market cap of $16.5 billion, Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. (MAA) owns, manages, acquires, develops, and redevelops high-quality apartment communities across the Southeast, Southwest, and Mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. As of March 31, 2026, the company held ownership interests in 104,629 apartment units, including communities under development, spanning 16 states and the District of Columbia. MAA is expected to release its fiscal Q2 2026 results after the market closes on Wednesday, Jul. 29. Ahead of this event, analysts project the REIT to report a core FFO of $2.08 per share, a 3.3% decrease from $2.15 per share in the year-ago quarter. It has exceeded Wall Street’s core FFO expectations in three of the past four quarters while missing on another occasion. Sentiment Could Be Turning Sour on Nvidia. Here’s Where 1 Analyst Thinks NVDA Stock Is Headed Next. Dear Netflix Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for July 16 Google Just Launched 2 New AI Models. What That Means for GOOGL Stock. Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! For fiscal 2026, analysts forecast the Germantown, United States-based company to post a core FFO of $8.50 per share, a 2.8% decline from $8.74 per share in fiscal 2025. However, core FFO is anticipated to rise 2% year-over-year to $8.67 per share in fiscal 2026. Shares of Mid-America Apartment Communities have dropped 6% over the past 52 weeks, underperforming the broader S&P 500 Index's ($SPX) 19.7% increase and the State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR ETF's (XLRE) 6.3% return over the same time frame. Shares of MAA fell marginally following its Q1 2026 results on Apr. 29 despite reporting core FFO of $2.13 per share, which slightly beat the consensus estimate, as investors focused on weaker operating fundamentals, including rental and other property revenues of $553.7 million, which missed expectations. Sentiment was further pressured by declining same-store performance, with same-store revenues down 0.4%, same-store NOI down 1.3%, average effective rent per unit falling to $1,685, and same-store physical occupancy slipping 10 bps year-over-year to 95.5%, alongside a 13.8% increase in interest expense. Analysts' consensus view on MAA stock is cautiously optimistic,…Read full document

With a market cap of $16.5 billion, Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. (MAA) owns, manages, acquires, develops, and redevelops high-quality apartment communities across the Southeast, Southwest, and Mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. As of March 31, 2026, the company held ownership interests in 104,629 apartment units, including communities under development, spanning 16 states and the District of Columbia. MAA is expected to release its fiscal Q2 2026 results after the market closes on Wednesday, Jul. 29. Ahead of this event, analysts project the REIT to report a core FFO of $2.08 per share, a 3.3% decrease from $2.15 per share in the year-ago quarter. It has exceeded Wall Street’s core FFO expectations in three of the past four quarters while missing on another occasion. Sentiment Could Be Turning Sour on Nvidia. Here’s Where 1 Analyst Thinks NVDA Stock Is Headed Next. Dear Netflix Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for July 16 Google Just Launched 2 New AI Models. What That Means for GOOGL Stock. Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! For fiscal 2026, analysts forecast the Germantown, United States-based company to post a core FFO of $8.50 per share, a 2.8% decline from $8.74 per share in fiscal 2025. However, core FFO is anticipated to rise 2% year-over-year to $8.67 per share in fiscal 2026. Shares of Mid-America Apartment Communities have dropped 6% over the past 52 weeks, underperforming the broader S&P 500 Index's ($SPX) 19.7% increase and the State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR ETF's (XLRE) 6.3% return over the same time frame. Shares of MAA fell marginally following its Q1 2026 results on Apr. 29 despite reporting core FFO of $2.13 per share, which slightly beat the consensus estimate, as investors focused on weaker operating fundamentals, including rental and other property revenues of $553.7 million, which missed expectations. Sentiment was further pressured by declining same-store performance, with same-store revenues down 0.4%, same-store NOI down 1.3%, average effective rent per unit falling to $1,685, and same-store physical occupancy slipping 10 bps year-over-year to 95.5%, alongside a 13.8% increase in interest expense. Analysts' consensus view on MAA stock is cautiously optimistic, with an overall "Moderate Buy" rating. Among 26 analysts covering the stock, nine suggest a "Strong Buy," one gives a "Moderate Buy," 13 recommend a "Hold," and three advise "Strong Sell." The average analyst price target of $141.76, indicating a marginal potential upside from the current levels. On the date of publication, Sohini Mondal did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Barchart.com

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-01

MAA Announces Date of Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Release, Conference Call

PR Newswire

GERMANTOWN, Tenn., July 1, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- MAA (NYSE: MAA) announced today that the Company expects to release its second quarter 2026 results on Wednesday, July 29, 2026, after market close and will hold a conference call on Thursday, July 30, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time. During the conference call, company officers will review second quarter performance and conduct a question-and-answer session. The conference call-in number is (888) 596-4144 (Domestic) or +1 (646) 968-2525 (International). The Conference ID is 9650596. A replay of the conference call will be available from July 30, 2026 through August 13, 2026 by dialing (800) 770-2030 (Domestic) or +1 (609) 800-9909 (International). A live webcast of the conference call will be available on the "For Investors" page of the Company's website at www.maac.com and an audio archive of the call will be posted on the Company's website following the call's conclusion. About MAAMAA, an S&P 500 company, is a self-administered real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on delivering strong, full-cycle investment performance for shareholders through the ownership, management, acquisition, development and redevelopment of apartment communities primarily in the Southeast, Southwest and Mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. For further details, please refer to www.maac.com or contact Investor Relations at [email protected]. View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/maa-announces-date-of-second-quarter-2026-earnings-release-conference-call-302816348.html

As of 2026-08-29 • Updated weeklySource: Earnings sourceIngestion runbook