GLPI
Gaming and Leisure PropertiesBDocument history
Earnings documents stored for GLPI.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-09-01Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. Declares Third Quarter 2026 Cash Dividend of $0.82 Per Share
GlobeNewswire
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. Declares Third Quarter 2026 Cash Dividend of $0.82 Per Share
WYOMISSING, Pa., Sept. 01, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (NASDAQ: GLPI) (“GLPI” or the “Company”), announced today that on August 31, the Company’s Board of Directors declared the third quarter 2026 cash dividend of $0.82 per share of its common stock. The dividend is payable on September 25, 2026 to shareholders of record on September 11, 2026. Based on GLPI’s closing share price of $42.07 on August 31, the current dividend, on an annualized basis, reflects a yield of 7.8%. The third quarter 2025 cash dividend was $0.78 per share of the Company’s common stock. While the Company intends to pay regular quarterly cash dividends for the foreseeable future, all subsequent dividends will be reviewed quarterly and declared by the Board of Directors at its discretion. About Gaming and Leisure Properties GLPI is engaged in the business of acquiring, financing, and owning real estate property to be leased to gaming operators in triple-net lease arrangements, pursuant to which the tenant is responsible for all facility maintenance, insurance required in connection with the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties, taxes levied on or with respect to the leased properties and all utilities and other services necessary or appropriate for the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties. Forward-Looking Statements This press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including our expectations regarding the payment of future cash dividends. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “expects,” “believes,” “estimates,” “intends,” “may,” “will,” “should” or “anticipates” or the negative or other variation of these or similar words, or by discussions of future events, strategies or risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about GLPI and its subsidiaries, including risks related to the following: the potential negative impact of inflation on our tenants' operations; the availability of and the ability to identify suitable and attractive acquisition and development opportunities and the ability to acquire and lease thos…Read full documentShow less
WYOMISSING, Pa., Sept. 01, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (NASDAQ: GLPI) (“GLPI” or the “Company”), announced today that on August 31, the Company’s Board of Directors declared the third quarter 2026 cash dividend of $0.82 per share of its common stock. The dividend is payable on September 25, 2026 to shareholders of record on September 11, 2026. Based on GLPI’s closing share price of $42.07 on August 31, the current dividend, on an annualized basis, reflects a yield of 7.8%. The third quarter 2025 cash dividend was $0.78 per share of the Company’s common stock. While the Company intends to pay regular quarterly cash dividends for the foreseeable future, all subsequent dividends will be reviewed quarterly and declared by the Board of Directors at its discretion. About Gaming and Leisure Properties GLPI is engaged in the business of acquiring, financing, and owning real estate property to be leased to gaming operators in triple-net lease arrangements, pursuant to which the tenant is responsible for all facility maintenance, insurance required in connection with the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties, taxes levied on or with respect to the leased properties and all utilities and other services necessary or appropriate for the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties. Forward-Looking Statements This press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including our expectations regarding the payment of future cash dividends. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “expects,” “believes,” “estimates,” “intends,” “may,” “will,” “should” or “anticipates” or the negative or other variation of these or similar words, or by discussions of future events, strategies or risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about GLPI and its subsidiaries, including risks related to the following: the potential negative impact of inflation on our tenants' operations; the availability of and the ability to identify suitable and attractive acquisition and development opportunities and the ability to acquire and lease those properties on favorable terms; the ability to receive, or delays in obtaining, the regulatory approvals required to own and/or operate its properties, or other delays or impediments to completing acquisitions or projects; the effect of pandemics, such as COVID-19, on GLPI as a result of the impact such pandemics may have on the business operations of GLPI’s tenants and their continued ability to pay rent in a timely manner or at all; GLPI's ability to maintain its status as a REIT; our ability to access capital through debt and equity markets in amounts and at rates and costs acceptable to GLPI; the impact of our substantial indebtedness on our future operations; changes in the U.S. tax law and other state, federal or local laws, whether or not specific to REITs or to the gaming or lodging industries; and other factors described in GLPI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and current Reports on Form 8-K, each as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to GLPI or persons acting on GLPI’s behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this press release. GLPI undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by reference herein, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this press release may not occur as presented or at all.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-31Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc (GLPI) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: AFFO Surges 10% as ...
GuruFocus.com
Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc (GLPI) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: AFFO Surges 10% as ...
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. AFFO Growth: Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO) expanded 10% year-over-year in the second quarter of 2026. Dividend: Increased by 5% to $0.82 per share, bringing three-year dividend growth compounded to 4.4%. Total Income from Real Estate: Exceeded the second quarter of 2025 by over $35 million. Cash Income Growth: Increased by approximately $43 million from acquisitions and escalations. Bally's Acquisitions: Lincoln real estate added $14 million; Chicago lease added $9 million; Bell Development Project added $2.4 million in cash income. Penn Funding: Joliet, Aurora, and M Resort funding collectively added $5.8 million in cash income. Strategic Acquisitions: Highland Park added $3.8 million; Dry Creek, ION, and Cordish Virginia loans added $4 million in cash income. Lease Escalations: Recognition of escalators and percentage rent adjustments added approximately $4 million in cash income. Operating Expenses: Decreased by $54 million, mainly due to non-cash adjustments and provision for credit losses. 2026 Guidance: Between $1.219 billion and $1.225 billion, or $4.10 to $4.12 per diluted share in OP units. Development Funding: Additional funding of approximately $400 million to $450 million expected over the next two quarters, bringing total development spend to $750 million to $800 million. Leverage Ratio: At 4.8 times, slightly below the target level of 5 to 5.5 times. Forward Contract Settlement: Issued 7.6 million shares and raised net proceeds of $351 million. Rent Coverage: Master lease rent coverage ranged from $158 to $246 in the quarter. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with GLPI. Is GLPI fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: July 31, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc (NASDAQ:GLPI) reported a strong second quarter with AFFO expanding 10% year-over-year. The company increased its dividend by 5% to $0.82 per share, reflecting a three-year compounded dividend growth of 4.4%. Management highlighted that the regional gaming market remains strong, with tenants benefiting from good same-store growth and strong returns on investment. The company's balance sheet remains strong with leverage at 4.8 times, below its target range, providing flexibility to finance…Read full documentShow less
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. AFFO Growth: Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO) expanded 10% year-over-year in the second quarter of 2026. Dividend: Increased by 5% to $0.82 per share, bringing three-year dividend growth compounded to 4.4%. Total Income from Real Estate: Exceeded the second quarter of 2025 by over $35 million. Cash Income Growth: Increased by approximately $43 million from acquisitions and escalations. Bally's Acquisitions: Lincoln real estate added $14 million; Chicago lease added $9 million; Bell Development Project added $2.4 million in cash income. Penn Funding: Joliet, Aurora, and M Resort funding collectively added $5.8 million in cash income. Strategic Acquisitions: Highland Park added $3.8 million; Dry Creek, ION, and Cordish Virginia loans added $4 million in cash income. Lease Escalations: Recognition of escalators and percentage rent adjustments added approximately $4 million in cash income. Operating Expenses: Decreased by $54 million, mainly due to non-cash adjustments and provision for credit losses. 2026 Guidance: Between $1.219 billion and $1.225 billion, or $4.10 to $4.12 per diluted share in OP units. Development Funding: Additional funding of approximately $400 million to $450 million expected over the next two quarters, bringing total development spend to $750 million to $800 million. Leverage Ratio: At 4.8 times, slightly below the target level of 5 to 5.5 times. Forward Contract Settlement: Issued 7.6 million shares and raised net proceeds of $351 million. Rent Coverage: Master lease rent coverage ranged from $158 to $246 in the quarter. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with GLPI. Is GLPI fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: July 31, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc (NASDAQ:GLPI) reported a strong second quarter with AFFO expanding 10% year-over-year. The company increased its dividend by 5% to $0.82 per share, reflecting a three-year compounded dividend growth of 4.4%. Management highlighted that the regional gaming market remains strong, with tenants benefiting from good same-store growth and strong returns on investment. The company's balance sheet remains strong with leverage at 4.8 times, below its target range, providing flexibility to finance all announced projects without needing to access the capital markets. Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc (NASDAQ:GLPI) has a robust development pipeline, including projects like Chicago, Ione, Dry Creek, and Virginia, which provide clear visibility into near and medium-term growth. The company's guidance for 2026 does not include the impact of future transactions, limiting upside visibility from potential new deals. Rising interest rates, as indicated by the 10-year Treasury movement, increase borrowing costs for Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc (NASDAQ:GLPI), which could impact the pricing of future transactions. There is uncertainty regarding the impact of potential iGaming legislation in states like Virginia, Maryland, and Indiana, which could pose a long-term risk to brick-and-mortar gaming revenues. The company acknowledged that its stock is trading at a discount to its perceived value, with a high AFFO yield, reflecting a dislocation between market valuation and the actual strength of its assets. Management noted that the potential for M&A activity, such as take-privates of operators, could reduce public market transparency and make it harder to convey the strength of its portfolio to investors. Q: How is GLPI thinking about the recent trend of gaming operators potentially going private, and what impact could this have on the company? A: Carlo Santarelli (SVP, Corporate Strategy & IR) noted that the take-private transactions involving larger operators validate GLPI's long-held belief that gaming operator businesses have been undervalued in the public markets. Steven Ladany (SVP, Chief Development Officer) added that they do not anticipate forced divestitures from these deals, but GLPI remains open to discussions and would be receptive to any opportunities that arise from them. Q: Can you provide more detail on the $400-$450 million in additional development funding included in guidance, and how has the movement in the 10-year Treasury impacted the pipeline? A: Desiree Burke (CFO) confirmed the funding covers the Chicago, Ione, Dry Creek, and Virginia projects, which are all moving forward. Steven Ladany (SVP, Chief Development Officer) explained that while the higher rate environment impacts GLPI's borrowing costs and pricing, it also creates more interest from operators seeking alternative financing routes, acting as a double-edged sword. Q: What is the outlook for the regional gaming market, and what is driving the current strength? A: Peter Carlino (Chairman & CEO) stated emphatically that the regional gaming market remains strong, calling gaming revenues "bulletproof." He attributed the strength to a robust consumer market and noted that operators are seeing excellent returns on investments in new properties and expansions, such as Penn's new projects and hotel investments, which are performing "off the charts." Q: Could you provide an update on the Las Vegas Stadium site and the potential for additional investment there? A: Brandon Moore (President & COO) stated the stadium is ahead of schedule and will be a spectacular venue. He noted that Bally's is nearing a concrete plan for critical infrastructure like access ways and utilities, and there may be an opportunity for GLPI to invest more in that infrastructure. However, he clarified they are not prepared to commit beyond the $125 million at this time. Q: What is GLPI's view on the potential for iGaming legalization in states like Virginia, Maryland, and Indiana? A: Brandon Moore (President & COO) acknowledged momentum for iGaming in those states but noted that most states are proceeding cautiously due to concerns about the social impact of online gaming and sports betting. He suggested that while there is some momentum, the outcome remains unclear, and the broader trend is one of caution. Q: Can you provide an update on the Bally's New York opportunity and GLPI's potential role? A: Brandon Moore (President & COO) said not much has changed, and GLPI remains optimistic about the project's potential for Bally's. However, he noted it doesn't make sense for GLPI to be involved at the front end given its cost of capital. They remain close to Bally's and could play a role later, but it's too early to determine what that might be. Q: What is driving the strength in regional gaming, and is it sustainable? A: Peter Carlino (Chairman & CEO) attributed the strength to a strong economy and consumer market, noting that people prioritize entertainment. Carlo Santarelli (SVP, Corporate Strategy & IR) added that operators are seeing healthy returns on incremental capital, citing examples like Boyd's Treasure Chest and the temporary facility at Live Virginia, which bodes well for the future. Q: What is GLPI's main value proposition for operators considering funding development through GLPI versus raising capital themselves? A: Steven Ladany (SVP, Chief Development Officer) explained that operators benefit from depreciation and the potential to sell improvements back to GLPI at a profit later. Desiree Burke (CFO) added that GLPI provides 35-year funding, which is more akin to equity than debt, and is a significant advantage over the typical 10-year bonds operators can access. Q: Are there more opportunities for barge-to-land projects like the ones Boyd has successfully completed? A: Carlo Santarelli (SVP, Corporate Strategy & IR) confirmed GLPI has a list of such boats and believes the success of recent transitions will encourage more. Steven Ladany (SVP, Chief Development Officer) noted that operators like Penn, Bally's, and Boyd have proven the returns, and they will likely continue to look for similar opportunities, with GLPI open to discussions. Q: How does GLPI view the competitive landscape for acquisitions, particularly with private credit funds and other REITs? A: Steven Ladany (SVP, Chief Development Officer) expects VICI and private credit funds like Blue Owl to be active in processes like Churchill Downs. However, Brandon Moore (President & COO) emphasized that GLPI will not change its underwriting approach or chase deals, and Peter Carlino (Chairman & CEO) reiterated that "there's no deal we have to do." Q: Given the stock's high yield, where do stock buybacks fit into the capital allocation strategy? A: Peter Carlino (Chairman & CEO) called buybacks the "last choice" and a sign of "throwing in the towel." He expressed confidence in finding value-add opportunities through GLPI's unique development capabilities, which allow the company to achieve returns that are different from simply winning an auction. Q: How does the potential for iGaming legalization impact underwriting for new investments? A: Brandon Moore (President & COO) stated that iGaming hasn't impacted rent viability in states like Pennsylvania, where it has been present for years. While GLPI is cautious, it doesn't play a significant role in underwriting, though they would consider it if iGaming became detrimental to bricks-and-mortar investments. Carlo Santarelli (SVP, Corporate Strategy & IR) added that iGaming is considered in the "what could go wrong" category when underwriting 30-50 year leases. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-31Gaming and Leisure Properties Q2 Earnings Call Highlights
MarketBeat
Gaming and Leisure Properties Q2 Earnings Call Highlights
Interested in Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. Second-quarter performance strengthened: GLPI reported a 10% year-over-year increase in AFFO, driven by acquisitions, lease escalators and development funding. The company raised its quarterly dividend 5% to $0.82 per share. 2026 outlook remains positive: GLPI guided to AFFO of $1.219 billion to $1.225 billion, or $4.10 to $4.12 per share, including $400 million to $450 million of expected development funding over the next two quarters. Growth pipeline is active but selective: Management highlighted projects involving Bally’s, Penn Entertainment and other regional gaming operators, while remaining cautious about high-cost financing, early-stage projects and competitive acquisitions. Look To REITs For Reliable Yield Even In Recessionary Environment Gaming and Leisure Properties (NASDAQ:GLPI) reported second-quarter 2026 growth in adjusted funds from operations, or AFFO, as acquisitions, lease escalators and development funding increased cash income. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Peter Carlino said AFFO rose 10% from a year earlier and described the company’s near- and medium-term growth pipeline as highly visible. Carlino said the regional gaming market remained strong despite concerns expressed elsewhere about the sector’s outlook. He said GLPI’s tenants were seeing same-store growth and attractive returns on investments in new properties and expansions. The company also raised its quarterly dividend 5% to $0.82 per share, bringing its three-year compounded dividend growth rate to 4.4%, according to Carlino. → Why SK hynix Could Be the Best AI Chip Stock to Buy Now 3 High-Yield Dividend Stocks That Are Probably Not On Your Radar “We can finance everything that we’ve got announced with what we have available today,” Carlino said, adding that the company did not need to access capital markets if it chose not to do so. Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Desiree Burke said total income from real estate exceeded the prior-year second quarter by more than $35 million. Cash income increased by about $43 million, driven by acquisitions and contractual escalations. → Microsoft Just Flipped the AI Spending Narrative Overnight The 10 Top-Rated Stocks by Wall Street Analysts in August 2021 Among the principal contributors were GLPI’s acquisition of Bally’s Lincoln real esta…Read full documentShow less
Interested in Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. Second-quarter performance strengthened: GLPI reported a 10% year-over-year increase in AFFO, driven by acquisitions, lease escalators and development funding. The company raised its quarterly dividend 5% to $0.82 per share. 2026 outlook remains positive: GLPI guided to AFFO of $1.219 billion to $1.225 billion, or $4.10 to $4.12 per share, including $400 million to $450 million of expected development funding over the next two quarters. Growth pipeline is active but selective: Management highlighted projects involving Bally’s, Penn Entertainment and other regional gaming operators, while remaining cautious about high-cost financing, early-stage projects and competitive acquisitions. Look To REITs For Reliable Yield Even In Recessionary Environment Gaming and Leisure Properties (NASDAQ:GLPI) reported second-quarter 2026 growth in adjusted funds from operations, or AFFO, as acquisitions, lease escalators and development funding increased cash income. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Peter Carlino said AFFO rose 10% from a year earlier and described the company’s near- and medium-term growth pipeline as highly visible. Carlino said the regional gaming market remained strong despite concerns expressed elsewhere about the sector’s outlook. He said GLPI’s tenants were seeing same-store growth and attractive returns on investments in new properties and expansions. The company also raised its quarterly dividend 5% to $0.82 per share, bringing its three-year compounded dividend growth rate to 4.4%, according to Carlino. → Why SK hynix Could Be the Best AI Chip Stock to Buy Now 3 High-Yield Dividend Stocks That Are Probably Not On Your Radar “We can finance everything that we’ve got announced with what we have available today,” Carlino said, adding that the company did not need to access capital markets if it chose not to do so. Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Desiree Burke said total income from real estate exceeded the prior-year second quarter by more than $35 million. Cash income increased by about $43 million, driven by acquisitions and contractual escalations. → Microsoft Just Flipped the AI Spending Narrative Overnight The 10 Top-Rated Stocks by Wall Street Analysts in August 2021 Among the principal contributors were GLPI’s acquisition of Bally’s Lincoln real estate, which added $14 million of cash income; the Bally’s Chicago lease, which contributed $9 million; and the Belle development project, which added $2.4 million. Funding for Penn Entertainment projects in Joliet, Aurora and at M Resort collectively added $5.8 million, while the Sunland Park acquisition contributed $3.8 million. Loans associated with Dry Creek, Ione and Cordish Virginia added $4 million of cash income, Burke said. Lease escalators and percentage-rent adjustments provided an additional approximately $4 million. Non-cash items, including revenue gross-ups, investment and lease adjustments, and straight-line rent adjustments, reduced income by $7.2 million. → Carrier Earnings Could Send the Stock to a New All-Time High Operating expenses declined by $54 million, mainly because of non-cash adjustments and the provision for credit losses, Burke said. GLPI guided to 2026 AFFO of $1.219 billion to $1.225 billion, or $4.10 to $4.12 per diluted share and operating partnership unit. The guidance excludes potential future transactions but includes an estimated $400 million to $450 million of additional development funding expected to be deployed relatively evenly over the next two quarters. That would bring total projected development spending to $750 million to $800 million, unchanged from the prior quarter’s forecast. The company’s leverage ratio stood at 4.8 times, below its stated target range of five to 5.5 times. GLPI also settled a forward contract, issuing 7.6 million shares and generating net proceeds of $351 million. Burke said the development-funding guidance includes Bally’s Chicago, Ione, Dry Creek and Live! Virginia projects. The range reflects uncertainty over the timing of when project sponsors will request funding, rather than changes to the company’s overall commitments. Management said higher borrowing costs can raise GLPI’s own cost of debt and influence the pricing of future transactions. However, Chief Development Officer Steve Ladany said rising financing costs for casino operators may also encourage them to consider alternative capital sources. Regarding the Las Vegas stadium site, President and Chief Operating Officer Brandon Moore said the timing of GLPI’s remaining $125 million commitment remains uncertain. He said the Athletics’ stadium construction was progressing and that Bally’s was developing plans for infrastructure supporting the venue, including accessways, a podium and utility conduits. GLPI may evaluate further investment in that infrastructure but has not committed to fund more than $125 million. Moore said GLPI remains interested in Bally’s New York opportunity but does not believe it makes sense for the REIT to participate in the project’s early financing stages at its current cost of capital. GLPI has a right of first refusal on certain aspects of the project and intends to remain involved as the development and its financing plans advance. Management discussed recent announcements involving potential take-private transactions among gaming operators. Carlo Santarelli, senior vice president of corporate strategy and investor relations, said the developments supported GLPI’s view that gaming operators have been undervalued in public markets. Caesars represents about 7% of GLPI’s cash rent, while GLPI has no relationship with MGM, he said. Ladany said GLPI was not assuming that meaningful divestitures or derivative acquisition opportunities would result from those transactions, but the company would be receptive to discussions. He also said GLPI was aware of Churchill Downs’ process to explore sales of most of its gaming assets and expects to evaluate any broader sale process. Management said its underwriting process for transactions continues to emphasize long-term operating stability, tenant credit quality, competitive conditions, diversification and lease structure. Carlino said the company would not pursue transactions simply to win competitive auctions. GLPI also said it remains engaged in discussions with tribal gaming operators regarding development financing, refinancings and other potential uses of capital. Moore cautioned that tribal transactions can move slowly and that the timing of any potential deals is uncertain, but said the company expects future activity in the sector if it can resolve remaining hurdles. On online gaming legalization, Moore said GLPI sees legislative activity in Virginia, Maryland and Indiana but believes most states remain cautious about expanding internet gaming. He said the presence of online gaming has slowed growth in brick-and-mortar casino operations in Pennsylvania but has not impaired tenants’ ability or willingness to pay rent. Management said capital improvements have produced strong returns in several regional markets. Executives cited Boyd Gaming’s Treasure Chest project, Penn’s recent investments, Live! Virginia’s temporary facility and the Belle redevelopment in Baton Rouge. Carlino said the Belle project transformed two existing properties and expanded demand in what had been considered a stable, established market. Moore said GLPI continues to view its rent-coverage approach as validated by the resilience of regional gaming through changing economic conditions. The company said tenants have increased capital spending in some cases, particularly Penn’s renewed focus on brick-and-mortar investments, and that GLPI receives notice and project information when tenants pursue larger capital improvements. Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc (NASDAQ: GLPI) is a real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in the ownership and management of gaming and entertainment properties. Established in 2013 as a spin-off from Penn National Gaming, the company was designed to acquire and hold real estate assets associated with casinos, racetracks and other gaming facilities, while leasing those assets back to operating partners under long-term, triple-net lease agreements. The company's core activities involve identifying attractive gaming real estate, structuring lease agreements that align tenant incentives with property performance, and actively managing its portfolio to enhance asset value. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "Gaming and Leisure Properties Q2 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for July 2026.
TranscriptFY2026 Q22026-07-31FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript
Earnings source - 150 paragraphs
FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript
Greetings. Welcome to the Gaming and Leisure Properties second quarter 2026 earnings conference call and webcast. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. Please note this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to your host, Joe Jaffoni. Thank you. Please go ahead.
Thank you, Carrie. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining Gaming and Leisure Properties second quarter 2026 earnings call and webcast. The press release distributed yesterday afternoon is available in the investor relations section on our website at www.glpropinc.com. In addition to the second quarter press release, GLPI also posted supplemental earnings presentation which highlights the events of the quarter, recent developments, and future considerations that can also be accessed at www.glpropinc.com.
On today's call, management's prepared remarks and answers to your questions may contain forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements address matters that are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed today. Forward-looking statements may include those related to revenue, operating income, and financial guidance, as well as non-GAAP financial measures such as FFO and AFFO.
As a reminder, forward-looking statements represent management's current estimates. The company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements in the future. We encourage listeners to review the more detailed discussions related to risk factors and forward-looking statements contained in the company's filings with the SEC, including its 10-Q and in the earnings release, as well as the definitions and reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures contained in the company's earnings release.
On this morning's call, we are joined by Peter Carlino, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Gaming and Leisure Properties. Also joining today's call are Brandon Moore, President and Chief Operating Officer, Desiree Burke, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Steve Ladany, Senior Vice President and Chief Development Officer, and Carlo Santarelli, Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Investor Relations. With that, it's now my pleasure to turn the call over to Peter Carlino. Peter, please go ahead.
Thank you, Joe. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us this morning. We're happy to announce another strong quarter that sees our AFFO expanding 10% year-over-year. We anticipate healthy growth in the near and medium term as our pipeline, which you all can see pretty clearly, provides a lot of visibility into the pace of our growth, which continues to remain strong. We believe the environment for continued transaction activity remains healthy, and we're optimistic that this trend will continue through the balance of this year and beyond.
Of importance, and I think critical importance, during the second quarter is that the regional gaming market remains strong. I hear a lot of weeping and gnashing of teeth that suggests that somehow the regional gaming business is weak. It is absolutely not. In fact, there's some lovely numbers being produced by [Silver] tenants with properties existing and new and expanding. The operating environment in the regional world is still very, very strong. Our tenants are benefiting from good same store growth and return on investment where they have opened new properties or expansion of properties.
It's very strong. I have said for many, many years, and I'll stand by it today, despite all the [fretting] in the marketplace, that gaming revenues are bulletproof. You can write that one down. They're bulletproof. Gaming companies just are as stable an investment as exists on the planet. I would also note that, by the way, this quarter, our dividend was increased by 5% to $0.82 per share, bringing our three-year dividend growth compounded to 4.4%. Our balance sheet remains strong, providing flexibility for ongoing projects.
We can finance everything that we've got announced with what we have available today. We have no need to go to the market if we don't feel like it. Given our progress to date, we feel good, by the way, about the second half of 2026. First half has been very, very strong. With that, we're happy and believe that the company remains well-positioned to continue on the path that we've set. That gives me the great opportunity to turn the microphone over to Desiree, who can't wait to get to you.
Thanks, Peter, and good morning. For the second quarter of 2026, our total income from real estate exceeded the second quarter of 2025 by over $35 million. The growth was driven by approximately $43 million in increases in cash income resulting from acquisitions and escalations. For Bally's, the acquisition of the Lincoln real estate increased our cash income by $14 million, the Chicago lease increased cash income by $9 million, and the Belle development project increased our cash income by $2.4 million.
For PENN, the Joliet, Aurora, and M Resort funding increased cash income by a collective $5.8 million. The Sunland Park strategic acquisition increased cash income by $3.8 million, and the Dry Creek, Ione, and Cordish Virginia loans increased cash income by $4 million. The recognition of escalators and percentage rent adjustments on our leases added approximately $4 million of cash income. The combination of our non-cash items from revenue gross-ups, investment and lease adjustments, and straight-line rent adjustments resulted in a decrease of $7.2 million.
Our operating expenses decreased by $54 million, mainly due to the non-cash adjustments and the provision for credit losses. We also included in today's release guidance of between $1.219 billion and $1.225 billion, or $4.10-$4.12 per diluted share and OP unit. The guidance does not include the impact of future transactions. However, it does include additional development funding of approximately $400 million-$450 million, which will be funded relatively evenly over the next two quarters, bringing our total development spend to $750 million-$800 million, the same as what we projected last quarter.
From a balance sheet perspective, Peter mentioned that our leverage ratio is at 4.8x, slightly below our target level of 5x and 5.5x We did settle our forward contract, issuing 7.6 million shares, and raised net proceeds of $351 million. I'll end with a reminder that our significant development projects pay us cash income upon funding, and our rent coverage on our master leases ranged from 1.58x-2.46x this quarter, as of the prior quarter end, that is. With that, I'll turn it back to Peter.
Thanks, Desiree. Look, I hope this highlights that we feel the company's in a terrific position. Scarcely ever been better. We're very positive here as we sit around this table with what we have in front of us. With that, let's get to your questions. Carrie, please go ahead.
Thank you. We will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. Our first question will come from Ronald Kamdem with Morgan Stanley.
Hey, great. Just two quick ones. Obviously, there's been a lot of news about some of the operators potentially going private, and so forth in the industry. Would just love to hear some thoughts just from your perspective, how are you thinking about the impact to GLPI? How do you think about this trend overall for the industry? Any color there would be helpful. Thanks.
Sure. Who wants to take that?
Ron, this is Carlo. Look, obviously, two larger operators that have announced what would be effectively take private transactions. We have no relationship with MGM. Caesars, we do have a relatively small portfolio that's about 7% of our cash rent. I think the biggest thing that it shows is something we've believed all along, which is that the gaming business and the operator business in the public markets has been undervalued. I think from our perspective, that's been pleasant to see that others kind of view similarly. I'll turn it over to Steve to kind of talk about what he thinks it could mean for us from an opportunistic standpoint.
Yeah, that's fine. I don't think there's not a reason to believe that there will be definitive M&A that will fall out of those transactions. In other words, I don't think there are set divestitures that will be required to occur or meaningful divestitures that either of the potential buyers will require to occur. I think from our perspective, we have a phone. We're happy to answer it whenever someone calls. We have dialogue with our tenant there, and we'd be receptive to any discussions if there were certain avenues they were pursuing or things they were interested in discussing. I think as a base case, we are not assuming that there's derivative M&A that comes out of this.
Great. Helpful. If I can ask, just as the second one, just one more specific on the guidance, the $400 million-$450 million. Obviously, it sounds like a big piece of that's going to be Bally's, but is some of that the Live! Virginia project as well? Just any color there. If I could take a step back and just ask a broader question on your pipeline and how that's changed given what we've seen with the tenor movement. Thanks so much.
I'll start with the beginning of your question. Yes, the $400 million-$450 million includes Chicago, Ione Dry Creek and Virginia projects. All four are included in our guidance. They are all moving forward and we expect to put money out during 2026. As for the second part of your project, I will turn it over to Steve.
With respect to the 10-year Treasury, that's what you were asking about?
Yeah. I think
You are asking-
How that's potentially impacting sort of the pipeline and conversations. Thanks so much.
Yeah, no problem. With respect to the existing pipeline, obviously, there's no real impact. We're committed to provide that capital, and we will provide it. With respect to future potential transactions and things we're talking to folks about, I think it's a double-edged sword in that obviously it impacts our cost of debt and our borrowing costs.
That is a factor that weighs into where we could price potential transactions. I think the opposite end of that pendulum is that because borrowing costs are going up, not only for us but also for operators, I think it does create another level of discussion and a little more interest as far as people seeking out alternative financing routes as they move forward with their capitalization.
Great. That's it for me. Thank you.
Our next question will come from Greg McGinniss with Scotiabank.
Hey, good morning. Thank you. I was hoping you could just touch on the Rockford loan extension and what the option for the building improvements would look like in terms of how you would execute on that option, what the amount might be. Thank you.
Yes, Greg, I don't think we're going to get too much into the details on the option piece. Look, that was a $150 million loan. It's good yield for us. The property is ramping nicely. You could all see the GGR results. Obviously, that property has been very well-received. The city of Rockford has announced plans to put a hotel around the site, which should only further help that property ramp. I think just in talking with the partner, and Steve could perhaps opine more on this, it just felt like a good move for us to kind of let that money roll forward, while also kind of cementing that option on the building down the road.
Yeah, I think, obviously, the partner would prefer to not sell the building improvements to us down the line. Obviously, that's an item that we'll see where we land as we get further into the loan term. I think the reality is they're excited about the property. The GGR continues to perform. We're comfortable with the loan. Therefore, it just made sense for us to roll it at that rate.
Okay, thanks. Then, on the financing side and potential acquisitions, leverage is low relative to the range you guys typically target. Cost of equity is a little expensive versus where I'm sure you'd like it to be. Should we expect that any potential acquisitions or investments will just be funded with leverage at this point?
I really think it depends on what the opportunity is. Obviously, we will be pricing in our cost of capital to any opportunity anything we decide to acquire. I wouldn't just assume we're always going to use debt for now. I think we'd have to price in our cost of equity if it was a larger transaction.
Look, our business, of course, is a spread to our costs. Some of the yields that we're able to attain, because of the skills and capabilities that we bring to the table, the development ability and understanding construction, willingness to do some things maybe some others are less well equipped to do. We can command a price that gives us the margin that we need. It's deal by deal. I think Desiree answered it perfectly well. I underscore again, you won't be seeing us doing anything crazy.
Okay. Thank you.
We'll go next to Brad Heffern with RBC.
Hey, everybody. Thanks. There's obviously been this fight over VGTs in Chicago. Can you talk about if you expect that to have a meaningful impact on the Bally's Chicago project one way or another? If it would have affected your underwriting.
Yeah. Thanks, Brad. The VGTs, quite frankly, were in our underwriting. It's Chicago, it's Illinois. It's a very long, obviously, relationship that we will have with that asset. Clearly, you could imagine everything and anything would have been in our underwriting. The thing I will point out is I read something recently. I believe there's about 7,000 sweepstakes machines already in that market. To believe that this type of gaming wasn't already taking place, I think would be naive.
Clearly, Bally's is going through some things right now with the city as it relates to how this impacts some of the agreements that they've previously come to. In our view, the VGT concept was included in our underwriting. Another thing that was included in our underwriting also was Hawthorne, which seems to not be coming to fruition. I would say that the puts and takes there are pretty benign overall.
Okay. Thanks for that, Carlo. On the Las Vegas stadium site, can you give an update there if and when you expect your remaining committed capital to be used? If you have any more thoughts about participating in a larger project there sometime down the line.
Yeah, I can take that one. I think the timing of the $125 million is somewhat uncertain still. The stadium is proceeding quite nicely. I think you would hear from the A's that the stadium's ahead of schedule. We've had the opportunity to visit that stadium, at least Peter and I this year. I think it'll be a spectacular event venue, and that will drive a lot of value to the site. We're keeping an eye on it.
Bally's is coming close, I think, to a more concrete plan for some of the critical infrastructure that needs to support the stadium. By that, I mean access ways, the podium, utility conduits, things like that. There may be an opportunity for us to invest more in that property and some of that key critical infrastructure. We'll take a look at that when that time comes. I don't think we're prepared at the present time to commit to anything over the $125 million, and we'll continue to work with Bally's and see if that makes sense.
Okay. Thank you.
We'll go next to Barry Jonas with Truist Securities.
Hey, guys. Churchill Downs formally announced they're exploring the sale of most of their gaming assets, and I believe they said they're looking to execute in the coming months. Just curious if that's something you're looking at in conjunction with or without specific tenants at this time.
Yes, it's something that we're aware of. I think any broader process that's run, we'll definitely be involved, and we'll definitely take a look. I would assume that most of the processes, you're not supposed to be working with anyone in particular, per your NDA. I can't speak to any discussions that may or may not be happening on those fronts. I can tell you that we're definitely aware of the assets. We've spoken with various folks that are involved in that process. We will see how it proceeds. There are assets there that are quality assets.
There are other assets that are maybe a little more challenging, but at the same time, depending on whether it's an existing tenant that we have a relationship with that finds value in certain assets, or more importantly or equally as important, potential new tenant relationships that might find interest in certain assets, whether it's because of ability to cross-manage and garner synergies or the like. We're willing to have discussions with anybody and see if there's paths forward on various levels.
That's really helpful. Just as a follow-up, I think this week, a large casino operator, they kind of voiced increasing optimism for iGaming legislation to pass this year. They cited Virginia, Maryland, and Indiana. You guys have been certainly vocal with your views on iGaming, but just curious if you share that view on those states or just in general iGaming legalization in the near term. Thank you.
With respect to the three states you mentioned, I agree that there is legislation moving in those states, and there does seem to be some momentum, but whether or not that'll get across the finish line is unclear. I think from a broader level, predictive markets, sports betting, it's all coming under some level of attack in a lot of states, both when it comes to predictive markets, certainly the federal level, and even sports betting on the state level, where people have started to take a closer look at some of the social ills that are occurring in certain demographics from online gaming and sports betting. I think that's garnering a lot of attention in a lot of states.
I think in the three states you mentioned, that's still a hot topic of conversation as to what impact allowing mobile and social type gaming, what impact that's having on certain segments of the population. I know depending on who you talk to, people are either overly optimistic that they can expand iGaming or overly optimistic that they can put an end to iGaming. I think both arguments have some momentum in different areas. In the three states you mentioned, I would agree, some momentum toward iGaming, but on balance, I think you'll see most states are proceeding very cautiously with increased online gaming.
Perfect. Thank you for that.
Our next question will come from Smedes Rose with Citi.
Hi. Thank you. You provided an update on the Las Vegas opportunity, and I was just wondering if there are any updates you can provide on the New York opportunity with Bally's at this juncture.
From our perspective, not much has changed on Bally's New York. We remain optimistic that that's going to be a positive and accretive project for the Bally's team. I don't think it makes a lot of sense for us to be involved with our cost of capital in the front end of that project, and I think that's something Bally's knows and we know.
We remain close to them, and there could be opportunities, Smedes, for us as that continues. We do have a ROFR in New York on certain aspects, but I think it's way too early in that process, and they're pulling together their financing and construction financing, cost of capital and those things for us to really know what kind of role we'll play. We'll stay close to it. I think we remain interested in being a part of New York if it's the right part and it's something we can do at an accretive level.
Okay. I just wanted to ask you, last quarter, you had mentioned a few challenges at the Tropicana in Atlantic City, and it looks like the coverage there ticked down just a tiny bit. I realize it's still strong, but any sort of issues or updates you can provide on that property?
No. I think you did have that one challenging quarter, which would've been the calendar 4Q 2025 coming in at that point. What I saw when you look at it sequentially is stability as you move through the first quarter. Looking at the results from the likes of Caesars and Boyd and even Churchill from their regional properties, in the second quarter, and remember, we're reporting those coverages one quarter in arrears, so we won't see that until we report 3Q.
Looking at the 2Q trends and the performance of each of those tenants that I just mentioned I think that there should be nice tailwind in their operations and certainly things have strengthened for those operators in the regional markets. I think broadly speaking, that's a pretty good leading indicator for us as we look ahead.
Great. Thank you. Appreciate it.
We'll go next to David Katz with Jefferies.
Hi. Good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking my question. To that very same comment you just made, Carlo, we are seeing some real strength out of regional gaming, and I'm curious to get your collective perspective on whether that is economically driven, macroeconomically driven, whether that's a function of some of the smarter operators having put forth some capital into their properties and improved their value proposition, which we've seen pretty broadly, including the one company, Peter, you founded. Right. What is the driver of that, and what gives you that confidence that a year from now, we're still going to be having that same conversation?
My sense is the consumer market generally is still pretty strong, despite all the negativity you see sometimes in the press. The economy is strong. There are areas, of course, of weakness, but by and large, I think people are in the marketplace. You've heard me say many times, David, that people don't give up their entertainments. Food, shelter, and gambling are the priorities in people's lives.
Across the board, we're sensing, because we get numbers when you get them, that demand is extremely strong. I have talked broadly with some of the folks at PENN. Their new projects and their investment of capital in hotels and so forth has been apparently off the charts. I mean, we'll all wait and get the final result quarter-to-quarter, but just a terrific result. We viscerally feel just a lot of enthusiasm out in the marketplace right now, I think it's just a broad look at the economy generally.
David, I'll just add to that. I think, going all the way back to kind of Boyd's spend at Treasure Chest, what you've seen is really healthy returns on incremental capital dollars put in place, including, as Peter just mentioned, Joliet. The early results out of the temporary, at Live! Virginia, have been incredibly positive.
Yeah.
For a temporary facility. I think dollars being put to work, you're seeing very healthy returns on them. I think that bodes well.
Besides the new project, you got a new hotel in Columbus, which I understand is going well. You've got the hotel at M, the expansion there that has also been apparently very strong. This is all good stuff for us.
Understood. Thank you.
Moving on to Daniel Guglielmo with Capital One Securities.
Hi, everyone. Thank you for taking my questions. This is shaping up to be an interesting year across gaming with mergers, asset sales, and development. With so much happening, can you just remind us what you all look for in deals to make sure that they align with the long-term sustainable growth focus?
Yeah. Look, I think when we go through our underwriting process, anybody can add on at the end here, I think we go through our underwriting process on really any transaction, regardless of how big or small it may be. We're going to look for the things you would expect. Stability, long-term performance, the competitive threats or opportunities, the credit quality of the tenant. Do we have a master lease? Is there a way to diversify, not only geographically, but just based across the portfolio and the asset base? We're going to take a lot of factors into account.
I think we would do that whether it was this year or last year or 10 years ago. I don't think our underwriting process has changed. There's obviously, with the expansion of gaming into new jurisdictions over the last few years, I think that definitely changes the way we look at things, it continues to mold the way we think about potential new jurisdictions and whether they would come to fruition and where would the asset that we're looking at be located on a geographic map as it relates to potential future competition. Those are all things we think about. I don't know if anybody else has anything to add.
Well, I think it's important to double back on something Carlo said in the beginning, which is some of the M&A activity in the regional markets, whether it be Bally's, MGM, or Caesars, it is probably being driven by a dislocation between the perceived value of these operations and assets and the actual value of these operations and assets. I think what you're finding is the stock prices get to the point where people say, "This has gotten to the point where we're just going to act on this and take it private and realize the value that the market's not seeing."
Unfortunately for GLPI, I think the same dislocation feeds into our stock. We have very strong tenants that operate in markets that are doing quite well. Despite what some of the reports have been written, we see a lot of strength in our tenants' operations in the regions. I think you're seeing that drive M&A, and I think you're seeing that in some of the M&A activity out there. As long as those dislocations persist, I think you'll continue to see activity there.
Look, the broad-based gaming world has been around for more than 30 years. I commend anyone, go back and just take a look at the track record of properties and performance over the long, long term. This is an incredibly stable industry. Incredibly stable. We love these assets. Getting the market to appreciate the value of what we've got has been really a challenge.
Whether our coverage is 2.5x or 2.3x or 1.8x or 1.6x, these assets are all performing quite well. These are all portfolios and leases that our operators will want to continue to own and pay rent on. While we remain frustrated at times with the equity cost of capital here, we're still very happy with the performance of our overall portfolio.
That's great. I really appreciate all that color and info. A quick follow-up. One of your tenant partners did decide to forgo funding on a smaller project this year. Thinking farther out, what do you all think of as GLPI's main value proposition for current and future operator tenants, where it makes it worth it for them to fund development through you all versus raising capital themselves?
I'll jump in and then Desiree maybe can add something. The reality is there are some benefits that the operator gets with respect to depreciation, the initial onset decision is going to be somewhat dictated by their cost of capital. As we move forward, the only other aspect I think they consider is the ramp they can get from the capital, whether their return on the EBITDA side is great enough that they could then sell the improvements to us later for a value that's larger than the cost to build.
Those are the three things that the operator is probably considering when they make that decision. I don't think it's a matter of will they sell the improvements to us ever. I think it's a matter of when will they sell them to us, because at the end of the day, when the improvement's constructed adjacent to a building we own on land we own, it's probably a foregone conclusion that we'll end up owning it at some point in time.
No, I agree with all that. I also think you have to look at it, I think, as a cross between debt and equity, right? We're giving 35-year funding, which is more akin to equity than it is to debt. Most of the gaming operators typically barely get to a 10-year bond, much less 35 years. Our cost of funding, vis-a-vis their cost of equity, is definitely a plus.
Makes sense. Thank you.
Our next question will come from Chad Beynon with Macquarie.
Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to go back to the funding guide, the $400 million-$450 million. In your slide deck, you display what's left to fund. I think Bally's Chicago is still expected to open in the first quarter of 2027. Obviously, Live! in Petersburg is deeper into 2027. I'd assume most of that $400 million-$450 million between these two larger loans is going to come from Bally's Chicago.
Can you maybe just put a little bit of finer point on that $400 million-$450 million, where the range is coming from? Is that really just kind of a timing thing? Probably more on Bally's Chicago, kind of when they're finishing up, given that Virginia would probably be pretty straightforward, at least at this point in their construction cycle. Thank you.
It's really just our best estimate of the timing of their funding. Look, somebody could pull money in January instead of December, and that's why we have $400 million-$450 million. We are funding all four of those projects during 2026, and they will continue into 2027. The range is just simply, it's just timing as to when they're pulling the funding.
Okay. Thanks, Desiree. Moving on to Boyd announced that they're going to be doing another barge to land project. Carlo, I think you talked about the success in Treasure Chest. Do you think there's more opportunities or any other markets where there could be some of these generation one riverboats kind of moving to land? Are there any other proposals or availability either in [Louisiana] or in other markets that you could see in the future? Thanks.
Chad, I can tell you that we have a list of those boats. What I would also say is I think that the success that we've seen with these transitions over the last several years bodes very well for others, a willingness to make that leap and go forward. To the extent I could identify anything specific at this point that operators have talked about, no. Perhaps maybe Steve could, but I tend to think we have an eye on it. I think the history here has lent itself to promoting more such activity as we look out in the future.
There are things that we've had private discussions on. I don't think that there are many things public at this point. Look, I think if you think about PENN's capital improvements, Bally's has made capital improvements and landside moves. Boyd, the proof's in the pudding. They've each put the capital forward, they've each seen the returns. You could safely assume that they will continue to look for other ways to deploy that type of capital and achieve those types of returns. I think that they've proved it for themselves, and I think they'll continue to look for opportunities, and we've had discussions, and we'll continue to be open to having more discussions.
Yeah.
Thank you very much.
Results have been, as you've seen, results have been stunning. Nothing short of stunning. It's really transformed the opportunity market.
Agree. Thank you.
Moving on to John DeCree with CBRE.
Hi, everyone. Thanks for taking my question. We talked about the two big take privates out in the market, big picture, Peter, everyone, you've worked with both public and private companies, in terms of getting transactions done, development, M&A, sale-leaseback. Curious if you could speak to any differences in working with public-private companies on transactions, any advantages or disadvantages that'd be worth talking about?
I don't see any material difference, just as long as it's the quality of the people and the nature of the deal. We like visibility. Public company visibility is nice to be able to see what's going on, as do you. We have a little less, obviously, with a private group. No, I don't see anything materially different. Steve?
I agree, the public company, nice to have disclosure, can go away the next day when they decide to go private. We've all seen that happen a couple times.
Our leases do require them to report to us on a monthly basis, balance sheets, income statements, information that we request. We do have information on our private tenants, just like we do on the public tenants. From an information perspective, I'm not concerned at all, and quite frankly, kind of understand why the operators are doing what they're doing, right? They're not being rewarded in the market today. If they can find a cheaper cost of capital, they should do that.
I think our bigger problem is not the information we get. The bigger problem is we're unable to convey it to you folks. That's the bigger problem that we have. We'll have continued transparency into what's going on at these properties. Unfortunately, it puts us in a tighter box to be able to discuss those things publicly.
Got it. Maybe a quick follow-up on that. You touched on it a little bit earlier, but in the same topic, the valuation that public markets have been ascribing to your tenants and casino companies. With the private companies, do you see, going forward, a better opportunity to transact with those companies, as they're not maybe beholden to public market valuations?
Do they, at moment, have more flexibility? I guess looking ahead, would you expect to see more activity as more companies are private, more operators are private? We've certainly seen even some of your tenants, the growth, the M&A development coming from private companies. Are they less encumbered, better cost of capital, or what have you expect them to be more active than public companies going forward?
It's a little difficult to answer, John, just because I think there's a wide swath of what it means to be a private gaming operator. There are some family-owned businesses that are kind of small, and their access to capital is probably somewhat limited. Then we're talking about some of the largest gaming companies in the country becoming private. If I kind of think about this on the smaller side of the spectrum, I'd say most of those folks, I'd say their ability to be active in the market is somewhat predicated on their access to capital.
I think, obviously, the Ilitch family just completed a transaction. They have plenty of access to capital. As far as the size of their corporate structure and their team, I think it's going to take some time for them to digest that and to then be able to look for the next thing to hunt. I think there are different nuanced realities that come with each of these private companies that you have to be thoughtful about when you're trying to transact with them. I think, look, at the end of the day, things like greenfield are significantly easier for the private companies to do.
They're not out there publicly reporting their cash flow metrics and their EBITDA impacts when they have none coming from the projects in which they're building. I think that's why we've seen in some states, companies like Rush Street be able to do so many greenfield development projects and be so aggressive in expansion because they haven't had the same analysis and scrutiny from the public markets. I think it will be a trend that will continue, and we'll see it probably more widely spread if we see some other jurisdictions legalize gaming.
Awesome. Thanks, Steve. I really appreciate that color. Thank you, everybody.
Thank you.
Our next question will come from Mitch Germain with Citizens Bank.
Thank you. You guys were previously pretty optimistic about some additional tribal financing transactions. Curious about your enthusiasm about possibly getting some more over the finish line.
I'll start, and then Steve can probably jump in. Look, I think, Mitch, we remain enthusiastic about the opportunity and the opportunities that are out there in the tribal gaming and financing world. As we indicated early on in this process, things move very, very slowly in tribal gaming and in tribal financing. We have had and continue to have a lot of very productive conversations, both on developments, refinancings, and other potential uses of capital on tribal land held in trust.
To handicap whether or not some of those things will come to fruition in 2026 is hard to do. It would be speculative for us to do it, but it's certainly possible. We have a number of things we're discussing at the moment with various tribes. I think whether it's 2026 or 2027, I do think you'll see some future activity out of us with respect to those tribes if we can get over a few humps.
It's been a continual education process and I think there's been growing receptivity, which we're now trying to cultivate and convert into growing adoption. As we do that, I think we're also looking to try to prove out that there are additional use cases beyond just tribal greenfield. We're working on all those fronts, and I agree with everything Brandon said. I don't think timing is known, but efforts are real.
I think, Mitch, just to give you a little more comfort in how we look at this, we continue to look at high levels of coverage and a margin of safety around these tribal transactions. In everything we're looking at currently, we're side by side with some other traditional banking and financing sources. We're not a full solution for anybody at the moment, but trying to fill gaps and create a long-term piece of capital or a long-term piece of debt to complement what these tribes otherwise have with their traditional financing sources.
Thank you.
We'll go next to Robin Farley with UBS.
Great, thanks. Just wanted to ask a little bit about what the competitive landscape looks like, not for the operators in regional markets, but for you in terms of other sources of financing, whether it's private equity or Churchill Downs, that competitive environment may be different than some of the interests in Vegas assets in the past, but just would love to get your take on that. Thanks.
I think with respect to the Churchill Downs competitive process, I would expect obviously, our main publicly traded competitor to be involved in that process, and they said that yesterday on their call. I also think that there's some different funds that have been, I would think you would call them more private credit, like Blue Owl. I would expect that they would be active participants in this process. Beyond the three of us, I'm not sure that it goes much further or much deeper.
As you pointed out, for strip assets, premier strip assets, I think that has brought others to the table, like Blackstone in the past. I think if a premier strip asset were to come to market, I think the same thing would happen yet again. For a regional portfolio of a number of assets across a number of states, I think it's probably a pretty limited scope, most likely those three parties.
I don't think it changes a lot, Robin. The way we look at this is we have a cost of capital, we have an underwriting of these facilities, what we think they'll do, what we think they can do, the competitive threats that they might be under. We come up with a number that we think we're comfortable paying and a construct we're willing to do in a lease. If we're outbid in that, fine. That's okay. I don't think you'll see us chase any transactions just because there's competition. We'll have the same underwriting process and an auction process that we do privately. It may reduce the likelihood of success on our part, but it won't change the way we approach the underwriting.
Yeah, you've heard me say for many years, there's no deal we have to do. It's just not what drives us here. We're perfectly willing to walk away.
Great, thank you.
Have.
Yeah.
Thank you.
Moving on to Todd Thomas with KeyBanc Capital Markets.
Yeah, hi, thanks. Just wanted to ask, Peter, you talked about a couple of important things on this call. You talked about the dividend that's yielding over 7%. You seem very encouraged by the regional gaming landscape. The stock's trading at north of a 9% AFFO yield at the midpoint of your guidance, and nearly 8% implied cap rate on current NOI.
I'm just curious where stock buybacks fit into the equation. I know there are some potential investment opportunities on the horizon, and you have other commitments and uses of capital, but you've been opportunistic, and it seems like you're a little frustrated with where the stock's trading. I'm just curious if you could talk about how you're thinking about buybacks and how that might fit into the equation.
Well, look, that's always the last choice. That's where you throw in the towel and admit the game is kind of over. At some level, sure, I think you'd have to responsibly look at that possibility, but we're not there yet by any means. We honestly think there's opportunity to be had, as I said earlier. We have capabilities that others don't. I wouldn't sell short the development capabilities that we've already demonstrated, that we'll step up and take a project from ground up.
That is most unusual, but we have the skill to do it, and that's where we can add value and get returns that are a little bit different. I've said many, many times that I'm not sure I ever want to be the winner in an auction. I've sometimes said the winner loses. There's certainly some examples of that, where there've been auctions that have, let's say, not quite worked out the way the winner had hoped. We like to find opportunity where we can add value, and that's unique and different so that we're not really competing with others. That's kind of our goal, and that's what we've been doing largely.
Okay. All right. Thank you.
We'll go next to Michael Herring with Green Street Capital.
Hi. Thanks. You guys offered some thoughts on online gaming and the likelihood that there would be legalization in various states. I'm just wondering, how does that impact how you underwrite incremental capital deployment or new casino sale-leasebacks relative to states without any sightline to iGaming?
Look, I think overall, not much. The reality is, in states where iGaming has been prevalent for five or six years, it hasn't had an impact on the viability of our rent. In other words, in a state like Pennsylvania, what we've seen is slower growth in bricks and mortar, not a deterioration in that business, and certainly not something that has gone on to the level of impacting our tenants' ability and desire to pay rent. We keep a close eye on iGaming and the proliferation of iGaming and what it might mean, but I don't think it plays a significant role in how we would underwrite the acquisition of an asset.
That being said, if iGaming came into these states in a way that would be detrimental to the bricks and mortar, in other words, tax rates and things like that could effectively disincentivize an operator to invest in their bricks and mortar property, we'll have to take that into consideration and certainly would. I don't think we see it as the end game to gaming. I think, as Peter has said many times, we feel like people do enjoy the entertainment.
They enjoy going out to do it. It has resulted in a supplemental source of revenue for some of our tenants in states that have it, which has been a benefit to us when we have things like parent guarantees, because it's just created additional revenue to pay our rent. I'd say we're cautious about it, I don't think it has a tremendous impact on anything at the moment.
Yeah. Let me note that Pennsylvania is the poster state for access. A state that at one time had been circumspect about expansive gaming has sort of limited nothing. Yet, in spite of that, the bricks and mortar facilities continue to do, let me say, acceptably well. They've been impacted, but not disastrously.
Michael, I'll just add to that. When you think about our underwriting and you look at our coverages and you look at the longevity of how healthy these coverages have been over a decade plus, when we underwrite things, we're underwriting 30, 40, 50-year leases. Anything and everything is kind of included in the what could go wrong category, and that's how you kind of keep rent coverages where they are and healthy. When we do think about stuff like that, obviously, iGaming is certainly a consideration in those bear and base cases.
Thanks. I appreciate all those thoughts. Maybe just going back to the encouraging regional gaming trends that have been discussed, has that impacted how you've been looking at structuring rent coverage? Then on a similar note, do you have any sightline to your operators underwriting new redevelopments or CapEx into those properties?
I think on the rent coverage piece, it's more validated our model for rent coverage, right? We've always been somewhat cautious around two times rent coverage from the time we spun out in 2013. I think as you've seen those rent coverages bounce around a little bit, they're still very healthy. Here we are 13 years later. I think what you're seeing in these gaming markets is they ebb and flow, and there are different economic cycles that impact gaming just as it impacts other things.
Gaming has been very resilient in the regional markets, as has it been on the Strip, quite frankly. It may have more volatility, but it's still there and people are still investing. I think from my perspective, it sort of validates where we were in our rent coverage thought process initially, and that's why it continues to be healthy today. That's for the other pieces.
What was the other question again? I'm sorry.
It was just considering the strong trends and the success that you've seen from some of the properties that have received additional CapEx.
Oh, the CapEx.
Do you have much sightline to new investments?
Yeah, sorry. On the CapEx front, if in fact one of our tenants was going to pursue a larger capital improvement, there's a notification process. They would come to us, and if they're interested in discussing with us, potentially us funding the capital, they would obviously provide us with additional information. At the times in which they are pursuing those things, yes, we are receiving information, but just more generally speaking, nothing we can share with you.
I think you have seen increased CapEx. PENN in particular, in the last two years, has had a renewed emphasis on putting capital back into the bricks and mortar. You've seen that in some other tenants as well. I think you'll continue to see that as the regional performance supports that CapEx spend.
Yeah, look, Belle is a great illustration in Baton Rouge. Taking those two, dare I say, nondescript, almost, in one case, pretty dreadful properties and converting it into a real asset has been just phenomenal. In a very, very stable and established market, has actually grown the market, which we would have thought would be a long shot, but has actually created more demand. Amazing.
Okay. Appreciate the thought. Thank you.
This now concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the floor back over to Peter Carlino for closing comments.
Well, not much to add that we haven't shared already. We appreciate you dialing in today. Look forward to seeing you again down the road next quarter. See you then. Thank you. Operator, thank you very much. Joe, thanks.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation. This does conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines, and have a wonderful day.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30Gaming and Leisure Properties: Q2 Earnings Snapshot
Associated Press
Gaming and Leisure Properties: Q2 Earnings Snapshot
WYOMISSING, Pa. (AP) — WYOMISSING, Pa. (AP) — Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc. (GLPI) on Thursday reported a key measure of profitability in its second quarter. The results surpassed Wall Street expectations. The Wyomissing, Pennsylvania-based real estate investment trust said it had funds from operations of $304 million, or $1.03 per share, in the period. The average estimate of six analysts surveyed by Zacks Investment Research was for funds from operations of $1.02 per share. Funds from operations is a closely watched measure in the REIT industry. It takes net income and adds back items such as depreciation and amortization. The company said it had net income of $228.4 million, or 80 cents per share. The real estate investment trust, based in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, posted revenue of $430.5 million in the period, also beating Street forecasts. Five analysts surveyed by Zacks expected $427.7 million. _____ This story was generated by Automated Insights (http://automatedinsights.com/ap) using data from Zacks Investment Research. Access a Zacks stock report on GLPI at https://www.zacks.com/ap/GLPI
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30Gaming and Leisure Properties Reports Record Second Quarter Results and Updates 2026 Full Year Guidance
GlobeNewswire
Gaming and Leisure Properties Reports Record Second Quarter Results and Updates 2026 Full Year Guidance
WYOMISSING, Pa., July 30, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (NASDAQ: GLPI) (“GLPI” or the “Company”) today announced financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. Financial Highlights (1) Funds from Operations ("FFO") is net income, excluding (gains) or losses from dispositions of property and real estate depreciation as defined by NAREIT. (2) Adjusted Funds From Operations ("AFFO") is FFO, excluding, as applicable to the particular period, stock-based compensation expense; the amortization of debt issuance costs, bond premiums and original issuance discounts; other depreciation; amortization of land rights; accretion on investment in leases; non-cash adjustments to financing lease liabilities; straight-line rent and deferred rent adjustments; losses on debt extinguishment and other financing costs; severance charges; capitalized interest; and provision (benefit) for credit losses, net, reduced by capital maintenance expenditures. (3) Adjusted EBITDA is net income, excluding, as applicable to the particular period, interest, net; income tax expense; real estate depreciation; other depreciation; (gains) or losses from dispositions of property; stock-based compensation expense; straight-line rent and deferred rent adjustments; amortization of land rights; accretion on investment in leases; non-cash adjustments to financing lease liabilities; losses on debt extinguishment and other financing costs; severance charges; and provision (benefit) for credit losses, net. (4) Metrics are presented assuming full conversion of limited partnership units to common shares and therefore before the effect on net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Peter Carlino, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GLPI, commented, "Our second quarter results marked another period of record revenue, AFFO and Adjusted EBITDA. On an operating basis, second quarter total revenue rose 9.0% to $430.5 million, AFFO grew 10.1% to $304.0 million, and Adjusted EBITDA increased 12.2% to $405.5 million. The record results highlight GLPI’s unmatched ability to structure complex transactions and deliver creative funding solutions for quality tenants, while maintaining structurally strong lease coverage, an output of our disciplined underwriting approach. Recent acquisitions and an expanding base of leading regional gaming operators and tribal relatio…Read full documentShow less
WYOMISSING, Pa., July 30, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (NASDAQ: GLPI) (“GLPI” or the “Company”) today announced financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. Financial Highlights (1) Funds from Operations ("FFO") is net income, excluding (gains) or losses from dispositions of property and real estate depreciation as defined by NAREIT. (2) Adjusted Funds From Operations ("AFFO") is FFO, excluding, as applicable to the particular period, stock-based compensation expense; the amortization of debt issuance costs, bond premiums and original issuance discounts; other depreciation; amortization of land rights; accretion on investment in leases; non-cash adjustments to financing lease liabilities; straight-line rent and deferred rent adjustments; losses on debt extinguishment and other financing costs; severance charges; capitalized interest; and provision (benefit) for credit losses, net, reduced by capital maintenance expenditures. (3) Adjusted EBITDA is net income, excluding, as applicable to the particular period, interest, net; income tax expense; real estate depreciation; other depreciation; (gains) or losses from dispositions of property; stock-based compensation expense; straight-line rent and deferred rent adjustments; amortization of land rights; accretion on investment in leases; non-cash adjustments to financing lease liabilities; losses on debt extinguishment and other financing costs; severance charges; and provision (benefit) for credit losses, net. (4) Metrics are presented assuming full conversion of limited partnership units to common shares and therefore before the effect on net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Peter Carlino, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GLPI, commented, "Our second quarter results marked another period of record revenue, AFFO and Adjusted EBITDA. On an operating basis, second quarter total revenue rose 9.0% to $430.5 million, AFFO grew 10.1% to $304.0 million, and Adjusted EBITDA increased 12.2% to $405.5 million. The record results highlight GLPI’s unmatched ability to structure complex transactions and deliver creative funding solutions for quality tenants, while maintaining structurally strong lease coverage, an output of our disciplined underwriting approach. Recent acquisitions and an expanding base of leading regional gaming operators and tribal relationships are fueling our pipeline, while financial flexibility remains a core tenet of the Company. Reflecting this momentum, we raised the midpoint of our 2026 AFFO per share guidance, as we are now forecasting a range of $4.10 to $4.12. During the quarter, we also raised our quarterly dividend to $0.82 per share, marking a 5.1% increase over the prior $0.78 dividend per share. As of June 30, 2026, our annualized dividend implied yield was 7.4%. “We remain very encouraged by trends across the regional gaming landscape, with same-store operator results showing healthy year over year gains through the mid-point of the calendar year, following a strong second quarter for the regional gaming sector. “Concurrent with strengthening tenant fundamentals, GLPI's 2026 growth has been driven by multiple development projects, investments in tenant facility upgrades, and executed sale-leaseback transactions. During the second quarter, we invested $191 million in tenant developments and completed the $225 million funding commitment for PENN Entertainment's Hollywood Casino Aurora land-based conversion. In the second half of 2026, GLPI anticipates additional development funding of approximately $400 million to $450 million, bringing the 2026 total development spend to a range of $750 million to $800 million, in line with our prior commentary. This activity, coupled with future funding plans, will continue to drive AFFO per share growth through 2027 and into 2028. “As of June 30, GLPI’s leverage stood at 4.8x, below the low end of our target range of 5.0x to 5.5x net debt to adjusted EBITDA. We expect to remain at or near the low end of the target leverage range as we execute on our announced pipeline. Our balance sheet position continues to provide financial flexibility when evaluating new transactions, and, moreover, allows us to drive accretive and accelerating AFFO growth, without the need for additional equity. “Looking at the balance of the year, GLPI remains well positioned for growth, both in the near and long-term, supported by our strong operator relationships, our rights and options to participate in select tenants’ future growth and expansion, a healthy deal pipeline, and our ability to competitively structure and fund innovative transactions. In addition, our solid balance sheet and liquidity position the Company to grow cash flows, support future dividend growth, and build value for shareholders over the medium and long-term.” Recent Developments On June 30, 2026, the Company entered into a second amendment to its loan related to the Hard Rock Casino Rockford, pursuant to which the borrower repaid $16.0 million of principal. The amendment also provides for scheduled future principal repayments on or before March 31, 2028, and March 31, 2029. The maturity date was extended to December 31, 2029, and includes an option for GLPI to acquire the building improvements at Hard Rock Casino Rockford. On June 24, 2026, the Company funded $216.3 million to complete the $225 million commitment on the Aurora landside development project for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (NASDAQ: PENN) ("PENN") at a 7.75% capitalization rate. On June 1, 2026, the Company settled a forward sale agreement pursuant, to which it issued 7,589,487 shares of common stock and raised net proceeds of $351.0 million. On March 4, 2026, the Company issued $800 million of senior notes due on March 1, 2036. The notes were priced at 99.857% of par value, with a coupon of 5.625%. The Company used the net proceeds to repay borrowings outstanding under the Company's term loan credit facility, as well as for working capital and general corporate purposes. On February 11, 2026, GLPI exercised its option to acquire the real property assets of Bally’s Twin River Lincoln Casino Resort for a purchase price of $700 million and additional annual rent of $56.0 million (8.0% cap rate). The Company issued 332,890 OP Units in connection with the transaction, with the balance of the consideration paid in cash. On January 15, 2026, GLPI entered into a development agreement with The Cordish Companies ("Cordish") to fund up to $440 million of real estate construction costs for the Live! Virginia Casino & Hotel and acquired the project land for $27 million, representing a total commitment of $467 million at an 8.0% cap rate. Dividends On May 20, 2026, the Company announced that its Board of Directors declared a second quarter dividend of $0.82 per share on the Company's common stock that was paid on June 26, 2026 to shareholders of record on June 12, 2026. 2026 Guidance Reflecting the current operating and competitive environment, the Company is updating its AFFO guidance for the full year 2026 based on the following assumptions and other factors: The guidance does not include the impact on operating results from any possible future acquisitions or dispositions, future capital markets activity, or other future non-recurring transactions that have yet to be announced. The updated guidance incorporates the additional development fundings of approximately $400 million to $450 million, which will be funded relatively evenly by quarter throughout the remainder of 2026, which will bring total development spending for 2026 to a range of $750 million to $800 million. The guidance assumes there will be no material changes in applicable legislation, regulatory environment, world events, including weather, recent consumer trends, economic conditions, oil prices, competitive landscape or other circumstances beyond our control that may adversely affect the Company's results of operations. The Company estimates AFFO for the year ending December 31, 2026 will be between $1.219 billion and $1.225 billion, or between $4.10 and $4.12 per diluted share and OP/LTIP units. GLPI's prior guidance contemplated AFFO for the year ending December 31, 2026 of between $1.212 billion and $1.223 billion, or between $4.08 and $4.12 per diluted share and OP/LTIP units. The Company does not provide a reconciliation for non-GAAP estimates on a forward-looking basis, including the information above, where it is unable to provide a meaningful or accurate calculation or estimation of reconciling items and the information is not available without unreasonable effort. This is due to the inherent difficulty of forecasting the timing and/or amounts of various items that would impact net income, which is the most directly comparable forward-looking GAAP financial measure. This includes, for example, provision for credit losses, net, and other non-core items that have not yet occurred, are out of the Company’s control and/or cannot be reasonably predicted. For the same reasons, the Company is unable to address the probable significance of the unavailable information. In particular, the Company is unable to predict with reasonable certainty the amount of the change in the provision for credit losses, net, under ASU No. 2016-13 - Financial Instruments - Credit Losses ("ASC 326") in future periods. The non-cash change in the provision for credit losses under ASC 326 with respect to future periods is dependent upon future events that are entirely outside of the Company's control and may not be reliably predicted, including the performance and future outlook of our tenant's operations for our leases that are accounted for as investment in leases, as well as broader macroeconomic factors and future predictions of such factors. As a result, forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures provided without the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures may vary materially from the corresponding GAAP financial measures. Portfolio Update GLPI's primary business consists of acquiring, financing, and owning real estate property to be leased to gaming operators in triple-net lease arrangements. The Company also extends loans that produce fixed or variable returns which may convert into leased rent upon project completion or stabilization. As of June 30, 2026, GLPI's portfolio consisted of interests in 71 gaming and related facilities, including the real property associated with 34 gaming and related facilities operated by PENN, the real property associated with 6 gaming and related facilities operated by Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (NASDAQ: CZR) ("Caesars"), the real property associated with 4 gaming and related facilities operated by Boyd Gaming Corporation (NYSE: BYD) ("Boyd"), the real property associated with 16 gaming and related facilities operated by Bally's Corporation (NYSE: BALY) ("Bally's"), 2 facilities under development; one with Bally's in Chicago, Illinois, and the other for Cordish and Bruce Smith Enterprise in Petersburg, Virginia, the real property associated with 3 gaming and related facilities operated by Cordish, 1 gaming and related facility operated by American Racing & Entertainment LLC ("American Racing"), 4 gaming and related facilities operated by Strategic Gaming Management, LLC ("Strategic") and 1 facility managed by a subsidiary of Hard Rock International ("Hard Rock"). These facilities are geographically diversified across 21 states. Conference Call Details The Company will hold a conference call on July 31, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) to discuss its financial results, current business trends and market conditions. To Participate in the Telephone Conference Call:Dial in at least five minutes before the scheduled start time.Domestic: 1-877/407-0784International: 1-201/689-8560 Conference Call Playback:Domestic: 1-844/512-2921International: 1-412/317-6671Passcode: 13761467The playback can be accessed through Friday, August 7, 2026. WebcastThe conference call will be available in the Investor Relations section of the Company's website at www.glpropinc.com. To listen to a live broadcast, go to the site at least 15 minutes prior to the scheduled start time in order to register, download and install any necessary software. A replay of the call will also be available for 90 days thereafter on the Company’s website. (1) Excludes non-cash interest expense gross ups related to certain ground leases. (1) Cash net operating income is cash rental income and interest on real estate loans less cash property level expenses. Debt Capitalization The Company’s debt structure as of June 30, 2026 was as follows: Rating Agency - Issue Rating Funding Commitments As of June 30, 2026, the Company has entered into various commitments or call rights to finance/acquire future investments in gaming and related facilities for our tenants. These are detailed in the table below. Our tenants retain the option to decline our financing for certain projects and may seek alternative financing solutions. The inclusion of a commitment in this disclosure does not guarantee that the financing will be utilized by the tenant in circumstances where a tenant has the option. (1) The Company has agreed to fund, if requested by PENN in its sole discretion on or before March 31, 2029, construction improvements in an amount not to exceed the greater of (i) the hard costs associated with the project and (ii) $150.0 million at a 7.10% capitalization rate. Property and lease information The Company has disclosed the following key terms of its master leases and single-property leases in the tables below, along with the properties within each lease at June 30, 2026. We believe the following key terms are important for users of our financial statements to understand. The coverage ratio is a defined term in each respective lease agreement with our tenants and represents the ratio of Adjusted EBITDAR to rent expense for the properties contained within each lease. Adjusted EBITDAR is defined in each respective lease but is generally consistent with the Company's definition of Adjusted EBITDA plus rent expense paid to GLPI. Certain leases have a minimum escalator coverage ratio governor as disclosed below. Before a rent escalation of up to 2% on the building base rent component of each lease can occur, the minimum coverage ratio for these leases needs to be 1.8 to 1 for the applicable lease year. The reported coverage ratios below with respect to our tenants' rent coverage over the trailing twelve months were provided by our tenants for the most recently available time period. GLPI has not independently verified the accuracy of the tenants' information and therefore makes no representation as to its accuracy. Rent coverage ratios are not reported for ground leases, leases with development projects or leases that have been in effect for less than twelve months. The Amended PENN Master Lease, the Amended Pinnacle Master Lease, the Boyd Master Lease, and the Belterra Park Lease each include (i) a fixed rent component, a portion of which escalates annually by up to 2% if specified rent coverage thresholds are met, and (ii) a percentage rent component tied to property performance. The percentage rent component is recalculated periodically, every five years for the Amended PENN Master Lease and every two years for the other leases, based on 4% of the average annual net revenues of the applicable facilities in excess of a contractually defined baseline, subject to certain floors. (1) In addition to the annual escalation, a one-time annualized increase of $1.4 million occurs on November 1, 2027. (1) If the tenant's parent's net leverage is greater than 5.5 to 1, then the adjusted revenue to rent coverage for the last two consecutive test periods must be at least 1.35. If the tenant's parent's net leverage is equal to or less than 5.5 to 1, then the ratio shall be reduced to 1.2. (2) If the CPI increase is at least 0.5% for any lease year, then the rent shall increase by the greater of 1% of the rent as of the immediately preceding lease year and the CPI increase capped at 2%. If the CPI is less than 0.5% for such lease year, then the rent shall not increase for such lease year. (3) Coverage ratio for escalation purposes excludes adjusted revenue and rent attributable to the Plainridge Park facility as well as certain other fixed rent amounts. (1) If the tenant's parent's net leverage is greater than 5.5 to 1, then the adjusted revenue to rent coverage for the last two consecutive test periods must be at least 1.35. If the tenant's parent's net leverage is equal to or less than 5.5 to 1, then the ratio shall be reduced to 1.2. For the Casino Queen Master Lease the test begins on the first anniversary after both development projects are completed and open to the public. (2) If the CPI increase is at least 0.5% for any lease year, then the rent shall increase by the greater of 1% of the rent as of the immediately preceding lease year and the CPI increase capped at 2%. If the CPI is less than 0.5% for such lease year, then the rent shall not increase for such lease year. (3) Rent increases by 0.5% for the first six years. Beginning in the seventh lease year through the remainder of the lease term, if the CPI increases by at least 0.25% for any lease year then annual rent shall be increased by 1.25%, and if the CPI is less than 0.25% then rent will remain unchanged for such lease year. (4) Effective July 1, 2025, these properties were transferred to Bally's Master Lease II and the associated annual rental income of $28.9 million was reallocated from the Casino Queen Master Lease to Bally's Master Lease II. The Bally's Master Lease II rent coverage ratio has been restated on a pro forma basis. (5) If a default were to occur under the Casino Queen Master Lease, the Company has the right under the terms of the lease to elect to amend Bally’s Master Lease II and place the assets into it, which carries a corporate guarantee. (6) Coverage ratio above is pro forma for the acquisition of the real estate assets of Bally's Twin River Lincoln Casino Resort which closed on February 11, 2026. (1) Consists of two leases that are cross collateralized and co-terminus with each other. (2) The default adjusted revenue to rent coverage declines to 1.25 if the tenant's adjusted revenues total $75 million or more. Annual rent escalates at 2% beginning in year three of the lease and in year 11 escalates based on the greater of 2% or CPI, capped at 2.5%. (3) Coverage ratio above is pro forma for the acquisition of the real estate assets of Sunland Park which closed on October 15, 2025. (1) For the sixth and seventh lease years, after which time the annual escalation becomes 2% for the remaining term of the lease. (2) If the CPI increase is at least 0.5% for any lease year, the rent for such lease year shall increase by 1.25% of rent as of the immediately preceding lease year, and if the CPI increase is less than 0.5% for such lease year, then the rent shall not increase for such lease year. (1) If the tenant's parent's net leverage is greater than 5.5 to 1, then the adjusted revenue to rent coverage for the last two consecutive test periods must be at least 1.35. If the tenant's parent's net leverage is equal to or less than 5.5 to 1, then the ratio shall be reduced to 1.2. (2) If the CPI increase is at least 0.5% for any lease year, then the rent shall increase by the greater of 1% of the rent as of the immediately preceding lease year and the CPI increase capped at 2%. If the CPI is less than 0.5% for such lease year, then the rent shall not increase for such lease year. (3) Increases by 1.75% beginning with the first anniversary and increases to 2% beginning in year fifteen of the lease through the remainder of the initial lease term. (1) If the tenant's parent's net leverage is greater than 5.5 to 1, then the adjusted revenue to rent coverage for the last two consecutive test periods must be at least 1.35. If the tenant's parent's net leverage is equal to or less than 5.5 to 1, then the ratio shall be reduced to 1.2. (2) If the CPI increase is at least 0.5% for any lease year, then the rent shall increase by the greater of 1% of the rent as of the immediately preceding lease year and the CPI increase capped at 2%. If the CPI is less than 0.5% for such lease year, then the rent shall not increase for such lease year. (3) During the construction period, amounts funded for the Virginia Live! development are accounted for as real estate loans because the lessee controls the underlying asset under construction. Upon completion of construction and when the facility is ready for its intended use, the Company will apply the sale and leaseback guidance to determine the appropriate lease classification. Pursuant to the lease agreement, the initial lease term expires on the last day of the calendar month in which the 39th anniversary of the facility's opening occurs, and annual rent escalations commence on the first anniversary of the facility's opening date. Accordingly, the lease expiration date and rent escalation anniversary date will be determined upon the facility's opening date. Disclosure Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures FFO, FFO per diluted common share and OP/LTIP units, AFFO, AFFO per diluted common share and OP/LTIP units, Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Net Operating Income ("Cash NOI"), which are detailed in the reconciliation tables that accompany this release, are used by the Company as performance measures for benchmarking against the Company’s peers and as internal measures of business operating performance, which is used for a bonus metric. These metrics are presented assuming full conversion of limited partnership units to common shares and therefore before the income statement impact of noncontrolling interests. The Company believes FFO, FFO per diluted common share and OP/LTIP units, AFFO, AFFO per diluted common share and OP/LTIP units, Adjusted EBITDA and Cash NOI provide a meaningful perspective of the underlying operating performance of the Company’s current business. This is especially true since these measures exclude real estate depreciation and we believe that real estate values fluctuate based on market conditions rather than depreciating in value ratably on a straight-line basis over time. Cash NOI is cash rental income and interest on real estate loans, less cash property level expenses. Cash NOI excludes depreciation, the amortization of land rights, real estate general and administrative expenses, other non-routine costs and the impact of certain generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) adjustments to rental revenue, such as straight-line rent and deferred rent adjustments and non-cash ground lease income and expense. It is management's view that Cash NOI is a performance measure used to evaluate the operating performance of the Company’s real estate operations and provides investors relevant and useful information because it reflects only income and operating expense items that are incurred at the property level and presents them on an unleveraged basis. FFO, FFO per diluted common share and OP/LTIP units, AFFO, AFFO per diluted common share and OP/LTIP units, Adjusted EBITDA and Cash NOI are non-GAAP financial measures that are considered supplemental measures for the real estate industry and a supplement to GAAP measures. NAREIT defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding (gains) or losses from dispositions of property and real estate depreciation. We have defined AFFO as FFO excluding, as applicable to the particular period, stock-based compensation expense, the amortization of debt issuance costs, bond premiums and original issuance discounts, other depreciation, the amortization of land rights, accretion on investment in leases, non-cash adjustments to financing lease liabilities, straight-line rent and deferred rent adjustments, losses on debt extinguishment and other financing costs, severance charges, capitalized interest and provision (benefit) for credit losses, net, reduced by capital maintenance expenditures. We have defined Adjusted EBITDA as net income excluding, as applicable to the particular period, interest, net, income tax expense, real estate depreciation, other depreciation, (gains) or losses from dispositions of property, stock-based compensation expense, straight-line rent and deferred rent adjustments, the amortization of land rights, accretion on investment in leases, non-cash adjustments to financing lease liabilities, losses on debt extinguishment and other financing costs, severance charges, and provision (benefit) for credit losses, net. Finally, we have defined Cash NOI as Adjusted EBITDA excluding general and administrative expenses and including stock-based compensation expense and severance charges. FFO, FFO per diluted common share and OP/LTIP units, AFFO, AFFO per diluted common share and OP/LTIP units, Adjusted EBITDA and Cash NOI are not recognized terms under GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures: (i) do not represent cash flow from operations as defined by GAAP; (ii) should not be considered as an alternative to net income as a measure of operating performance or to cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities; and (iii) are not alternatives to cash flow as a measure of liquidity. In addition, these measures should not be viewed as an indication of our ability to fund all of our cash needs, including to make cash distributions to our shareholders, to fund capital improvements, or to make interest payments on our indebtedness. Investors are also cautioned that FFO, FFO per diluted common share and OP/LTIP units, AFFO, AFFO per diluted common share and OP/LTIP units, Adjusted EBITDA and Cash NOI, as presented, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other real estate companies, including REITs, due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definitions. Our presentation of these measures does not replace the presentation of our financial results in accordance with GAAP. About Gaming and Leisure Properties GLPI is engaged in the business of acquiring, financing, and owning real estate property to be leased to gaming operators in triple-net lease arrangements, pursuant to which the tenant is responsible for all facility maintenance, insurance required in connection with the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties, including coverage of the landlord's interests, taxes levied on or with respect to the leased properties and all utilities and other services necessary or appropriate for the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties. The Company also extends loans that produce fixed or variable returns which may convert into leased rent upon project completion or stabilization. Forward-Looking Statements This press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including our expectations regarding our future growth and cash flows in 2026 and beyond, 2026 AFFO guidance, the future issuance of securities and the Company benefiting from recent portfolio additions and completed transactions. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “expects,” “believes,” “estimates,” “intends,” “may,” “will,” “should” or “anticipates” or the negative or other variation of these or similar words, or by discussions of future events, strategies or risks and uncertainties. Such forward looking statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about GLPI and its subsidiaries, including risks related to the following: the ability of GLPI or its partners to successfully complete construction of various casino projects currently under development for which GLPI has agreed to provide construction development funding, including Bally’s Chicago, and the ability and willingness of GLPI’s partners to meet and/or perform their respective obligations under the applicable construction financing and/or development documents; the impact that higher inflation and interest rates and uncertainty with respect to the future state of the economy could have on discretionary consumer spending, including the casino operations of our tenants; unforeseen consequences related to U.S. government economic, monetary or trade policies and stimulus packages on inflation rates, interest rates and economic growth; geopolitical events, including recent conflicts in the Middle East, and their potential impact on U.S. Treasury yields and inflation rates; the ability of GLPI’s tenants to maintain the financial strength and liquidity necessary to satisfy their respective obligations and liabilities to third parties, including, without limitation, to satisfy obligations under their existing credit facilities and other indebtedness; the availability of and the ability to identify suitable and attractive acquisition and development opportunities and the ability to acquire and lease the respective properties on favorable terms; the degree and nature of GLPI's competition; the ability to receive, or delays in obtaining, the regulatory approvals required to own its properties, or other delays or impediments to completing GLPI's planned acquisitions or projects; the potential of a new pandemic or similar national health crisis, including its effect on the ability or desire of people to gather in large groups (including in casinos), which could impact GLPI’s financial results, operations, outlooks, plans, goals, growth, cash flows, liquidity, and stock price; GLPI's ability to maintain its status as a REIT, given the highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for which only limited judicial and administrative authorities exist, where even a technical or inadvertent violation could jeopardize REIT qualification and where requirements may depend in part on the actions of third parties over which GLPI has no control or only limited influence; GLPI's ability to satisfy certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, shareholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis in order for GLPI to maintain its REIT status; the ability and willingness of GLPI’s tenants and other third parties to meet and/or perform their obligations under their respective contractual arrangements with GLPI, including lease and note requirements and in some cases, their obligations to indemnify, defend and hold GLPI harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities; the ability of GLPI’s tenants to comply with laws, rules and regulations in the operation of GLPI’s properties, to deliver high quality services, to attract and retain qualified personnel and to attract customers; GLPI's ability to generate sufficient cash flows to service and comply with financial covenants under GLPI’s outstanding indebtedness; GLPI's ability to access capital through debt and equity markets in amounts and at rates and costs acceptable to GLPI, including for the satisfaction of GLPI's funding commitments to the extent drawn by its partners, acquisitions or refinancings due to maturities; with respect to our tenant funding commitments, the amounts drawn and the timing of these draws may be different than what the Company assumed; adverse changes in GLPI’s credit rating; the availability of qualified personnel and GLPI’s ability to retain its key management personnel; changes in the U.S. tax law and other federal, state or local laws, whether or not specific to real estate, REITs or to the gaming, lodging or hospitality industries; changes in accounting standards; the impact of weather or climate events or conditions, natural disasters, acts of terrorism and other international hostilities, war (including the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine and conflicts in the Middle East) or political instability; the risk that the historical financial statements included herein do not reflect what the business, financial position or results of operations of GLPI may be in the future; other risks inherent in the real estate business, including potential liability relating to environmental matters and illiquidity of real estate investments; and other factors described in GLPI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, each as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to GLPI or persons acting on GLPI’s behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this press release. GLPI undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by reference herein, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this press release may not occur as presented or at all.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-01Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. Schedules Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Release and Conference Call
GlobeNewswire
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. Schedules Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Release and Conference Call
WYOMISSING, Pa., July 01, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (NASDAQ: GLPI) announced today that the Company will release its 2026 second quarter financial results after the market close on Thursday, July 30, 2026. The Company will host a conference call at 10:00 a.m. ET on Friday, July 31, 2026. During the conference call, Peter M. Carlino, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and senior management, will review the quarter’s results and performance, discuss recent events and conduct a question-and-answer period. Webcast:The conference call will be available in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at www.glpropinc.com. To listen to a live broadcast, go to the site at least 15 minutes prior to the scheduled start time in order to register, download and install any necessary audio software. A replay of the call will also be available for 90 days on the Company’s website. To Participate in the Telephone Conference Call: Dial in at least five minutes prior to start time. Domestic: 1-877/407-0784International: 1-201/689-8560 Conference Call Playback:Domestic: 1-844/512-2921International: 1-412/317-6671Passcode: 13761467The playback can be accessed through Friday, August 7, 2026. About Gaming and Leisure PropertiesGLPI is engaged in the business of acquiring, financing, and owning real estate property to be leased to gaming operators in triple-net lease arrangements, pursuant to which the tenant is responsible for all facility maintenance, insurance required in connection with the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties, taxes levied on or with respect to the leased properties and all utilities and other services necessary or appropriate for the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties. Contact:Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. Carlo Santarelli, SVP - Corporate Strategy & Investor [email protected] Investor RelationsJoseph Jaffoni, Christin Armacost at [email protected]
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-05-22Does GLPI’s Higher Quarterly Dividend Signal Durable Income Strength or Reduced Reinvestment Ambition?
Simply Wall St.
Does GLPI’s Higher Quarterly Dividend Signal Durable Income Strength or Reduced Reinvestment Ambition?
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. recently declared its second-quarter 2026 cash dividend of US$0.82 per share, a US$0.04 quarterly increase, payable on June 26, 2026 to shareholders of record as of June 12, 2026. This higher payout underscores the REIT’s emphasis on returning cash to investors through its gaming-focused triple-net lease portfolio. We will now explore how this higher quarterly dividend influences Gaming and Leisure Properties’ investment narrative, especially its income stability profile. AI is about to change healthcare. These 33 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10b in market cap - there's still time to get in early. To own Gaming and Leisure Properties, you need to be comfortable with a gaming focused, triple net lease REIT whose appeal lies in recurring rent and cash distributions. The US$0.04 increase in the quarterly dividend to US$0.82 reinforces the income angle, but does not materially change the near term balance between the key catalyst of steady lease collections and the main risk from concentrated exposure to weaker tenant credits like Bally's. The recent Q1 2026 earnings release, which reported net income of US$231.83 million and basic EPS of US$0.82, is the most relevant backdrop to this higher dividend. It provides context for the payout level and helps frame how much room the company may have to support or adjust future dividends if credit conditions, capital needs for development projects, or tenant specific pressures start to bite. However, investors should also be aware that the combination of higher dividends and sizable commitments to Bally's linked projects could... Read the full narrative on Gaming and Leisure Properties (it's free!) Gaming and Leisure Properties' narrative projects $2.0 billion revenue and $1.1 billion earnings by 2028. This requires 9.0% yearly revenue growth and about a $382 million earnings increase from $717.9 million today. Uncover how Gaming and Leisure Properties' forecasts yield a $54.07 fair value, a 14% upside to its current price. Three members of the Simply Wall St Community currently estimate GLPI’s fair value between US$47.58 and US$96.41, reflecting very different return expectations. When you set those views against GLPI’s tenant concentration risk with Bally's, it underlines how important it is to weigh in…Read full documentShow less
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. recently declared its second-quarter 2026 cash dividend of US$0.82 per share, a US$0.04 quarterly increase, payable on June 26, 2026 to shareholders of record as of June 12, 2026. This higher payout underscores the REIT’s emphasis on returning cash to investors through its gaming-focused triple-net lease portfolio. We will now explore how this higher quarterly dividend influences Gaming and Leisure Properties’ investment narrative, especially its income stability profile. AI is about to change healthcare. These 33 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10b in market cap - there's still time to get in early. To own Gaming and Leisure Properties, you need to be comfortable with a gaming focused, triple net lease REIT whose appeal lies in recurring rent and cash distributions. The US$0.04 increase in the quarterly dividend to US$0.82 reinforces the income angle, but does not materially change the near term balance between the key catalyst of steady lease collections and the main risk from concentrated exposure to weaker tenant credits like Bally's. The recent Q1 2026 earnings release, which reported net income of US$231.83 million and basic EPS of US$0.82, is the most relevant backdrop to this higher dividend. It provides context for the payout level and helps frame how much room the company may have to support or adjust future dividends if credit conditions, capital needs for development projects, or tenant specific pressures start to bite. However, investors should also be aware that the combination of higher dividends and sizable commitments to Bally's linked projects could... Read the full narrative on Gaming and Leisure Properties (it's free!) Gaming and Leisure Properties' narrative projects $2.0 billion revenue and $1.1 billion earnings by 2028. This requires 9.0% yearly revenue growth and about a $382 million earnings increase from $717.9 million today. Uncover how Gaming and Leisure Properties' forecasts yield a $54.07 fair value, a 14% upside to its current price. Three members of the Simply Wall St Community currently estimate GLPI’s fair value between US$47.58 and US$96.41, reflecting very different return expectations. When you set those views against GLPI’s tenant concentration risk with Bally's, it underlines how important it is to weigh income appeal against the potential impact of a weaker tenant on future performance. Explore 3 other fair value estimates on Gaming and Leisure Properties - why the stock might be worth just $47.58! Don't just follow the ticker - dig into the data and build a conviction that's truly your own. A great starting point for your Gaming and Leisure Properties research is our analysis highlighting 4 key rewards and 2 important warning signs that could impact your investment decision. Our free Gaming and Leisure Properties research report provides a comprehensive fundamental analysis summarized in a single visual - the Snowflake - making it easy to evaluate Gaming and Leisure Properties' overall financial health at a glance. Don't miss your shot at the next 10-bagger. Our latest stock picks just dropped: We've uncovered the 10 dividend fortresses yielding 5%+ that don't just survive market storms, but thrive in them. Invest in the nuclear renaissance through our list of 88 elite nuclear energy infrastructure plays powering the global AI revolution. Capitalize on the AI infrastructure supercycle with our selection of the 46 best 'picks and shovels' of the AI gold rush converting record-breaking demand into massive cash flow. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include GLPI. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email [email protected]
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-05-20Gaming and Leisure Properties Increases Quarterly Cash Dividend by 5% and Declares Second Quarter 2026 Cash Dividend of $0.82 Per Share
GlobeNewswire
Gaming and Leisure Properties Increases Quarterly Cash Dividend by 5% and Declares Second Quarter 2026 Cash Dividend of $0.82 Per Share
WYOMISSING, Pa., May 20, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (NASDAQ: GLPI) (“GLPI” or the “Company”), announced today that the Company’s Board of Directors has declared the second quarter 2026 cash dividend of $0.82 per share of its common stock, marking an increase of $.04 per share per quarter from the prior level. The dividend is payable on June 26, 2026 to shareholders of record on June 12, 2026. Based on GLPI’s closing share price of $47.22 on May 20, the current dividend, on an annualized basis, reflects a yield of 6.95%. The second quarter 2025 cash dividend was $0.78 per share of the Company’s common stock. While the Company intends to pay regular quarterly cash dividends for the foreseeable future, all subsequent dividends will be reviewed quarterly and declared by the Board of Directors at its discretion. About Gaming and Leisure PropertiesGLPI is engaged in the business of acquiring, financing, and owning real estate property to be leased to gaming operators in triple-net lease arrangements, pursuant to which the tenant is responsible for all facility maintenance, insurance required in connection with the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties, taxes levied on or with respect to the leased properties and all utilities and other services necessary or appropriate for the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties. Forward-Looking StatementsThis press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including our expectations regarding the payment of future cash dividends. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “expects,” “believes,” “estimates,” “intends,” “may,” “will,” “should” or “anticipates” or the negative or other variation of these or similar words, or by discussions of future events, strategies or risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about GLPI and its subsidiaries, including risks related to the following: the potential negative impact of inflation on our tenants' operations; the availability of and the ability to identify suitable and attractive acquisition and development opportu…Read full documentShow less
WYOMISSING, Pa., May 20, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (NASDAQ: GLPI) (“GLPI” or the “Company”), announced today that the Company’s Board of Directors has declared the second quarter 2026 cash dividend of $0.82 per share of its common stock, marking an increase of $.04 per share per quarter from the prior level. The dividend is payable on June 26, 2026 to shareholders of record on June 12, 2026. Based on GLPI’s closing share price of $47.22 on May 20, the current dividend, on an annualized basis, reflects a yield of 6.95%. The second quarter 2025 cash dividend was $0.78 per share of the Company’s common stock. While the Company intends to pay regular quarterly cash dividends for the foreseeable future, all subsequent dividends will be reviewed quarterly and declared by the Board of Directors at its discretion. About Gaming and Leisure PropertiesGLPI is engaged in the business of acquiring, financing, and owning real estate property to be leased to gaming operators in triple-net lease arrangements, pursuant to which the tenant is responsible for all facility maintenance, insurance required in connection with the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties, taxes levied on or with respect to the leased properties and all utilities and other services necessary or appropriate for the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties. Forward-Looking StatementsThis press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including our expectations regarding the payment of future cash dividends. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “expects,” “believes,” “estimates,” “intends,” “may,” “will,” “should” or “anticipates” or the negative or other variation of these or similar words, or by discussions of future events, strategies or risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about GLPI and its subsidiaries, including risks related to the following: the potential negative impact of inflation on our tenants' operations; the availability of and the ability to identify suitable and attractive acquisition and development opportunities and the ability to acquire and lease those properties on favorable terms; the ability to receive, or delays in obtaining, the regulatory approvals required to own and/or operate its properties, or other delays or impediments to completing acquisitions or projects; the effect of pandemics, such as COVID-19, on GLPI as a result of the impact such pandemics may have on the business operations of GLPI’s tenants and their continued ability to pay rent in a timely manner or at all; GLPI's ability to maintain its status as a REIT; our ability to access capital through debt and equity markets in amounts and at rates and costs acceptable to GLPI; the impact of our substantial indebtedness on our future operations; changes in the U.S. tax law and other state, federal or local laws, whether or not specific to REITs or to the gaming or lodging industries; and other factors described in GLPI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and current Reports on Form 8-K, each as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to GLPI or persons acting on GLPI’s behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this press release. GLPI undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by reference herein, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this press release may not occur as presented or at all.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-05-06Q1 Results Assert Why Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) is a Top REIT Stock
Insider Monkey
Q1 Results Assert Why Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) is a Top REIT Stock
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (NASDAQ:GLPI) is one of the top undervalued REIT stocks to buy now. On April 23, it posted record first-quarter results, confirming growth in its core business. oneinchpunch/Shutterstock.com Total revenue in the quarter was up 6.3% year over year to $420 million, as adjusted Funds From Operations increased 9.2% to $297.1 million. Net income in the quarter increased to $239.4 million from $170.4 million in the same quarter a year ago. Gaming & Leisure Properties delivered an annualized dividend per share of $3.12, up from $3.04 a year ago. During the first quarter, Gaming & Leisure Properties completed two key transactions worth $727 million. It acquired Bally’s Lincoln real estate assets and the land associated with The Cordish Companies Live! Casino & Hotel Virginia. With the acquisitions, the REIT has added premier assets that are accretive to AFFO per share. Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (NASDAQ:GLPI) is a real estate investment trust (REIT) that acquires, owns, and manages gaming and entertainment properties, such as casinos and racetracks. It leases these assets back to operators under long-term, triple-net leases, primarily in regional gaming markets across the U.S. While we acknowledge the potential of GLPI as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 11 Best Japanese Stocks to Buy Right Now and 8 Best Lidar Stocks to Buy According to Analysts. Disclosure: None. Follow Insider Monkey on Google News.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-04-27Gaming and Leisure Properties Q1 Earnings Call Highlights
MarketBeat
Gaming and Leisure Properties Q1 Earnings Call Highlights
Management reiterated mid- to high-single-digit AFFO growth and issued full-year 2026 AFFO guidance of $1.212 billion to $1.223 billion (or $4.08 to $4.12 per diluted share), while signaling a $1.8 billion capital commitment runway expected to be mostly deployed by year-end 2027 that includes $750M–$800M of 2026 development spend and the planned $225 million Aurora acquisition. Q1 total income from real estate rose by more than $24 million year-over-year, driven by about $33 million of cash rent increases from acquisitions and escalators (including Bally’s Lincoln, Chicago, Baton Rouge and others), partially offset by $8 million of non‑cash items and with operating expenses down roughly $49.8 million. Balance-sheet and market backdrop: GLPI ended the quarter at a 5x leverage ratio with $275 million cash, roughly $230 million of annual free cash flow and forward equity settling June 1 to fund the pipeline, and management said cap rates are normalizing to levels it views as accretive (around an “8” in front of the cap rate). Interested in Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. Look To REITs For Reliable Yield Even In Recessionary Environment Gaming and Leisure Properties (NASDAQ:GLPI) reported what management described as a “terrific quarter” in its first-quarter 2026 earnings call, citing mid- to high-single-digit growth in adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) and AFFO per share and pointing to a multi-year development and acquisition pipeline. Chairman and CEO Peter Carlino said the company continues to have “a clear and well-documented line of sight toward a very healthy multi-year AFFO growth” across its acquisition and development pipelines. Carlino said that with the February acquisition of Bally’s Lincoln and progress across development projects, GLPI’s future capital commitments stand at roughly $1.8 billion, “nearly all of which we expect to deploy by year-end 2027.” → Pipelines and Automation: 2 Energy Plays Built for Any Oil Price 3 High-Yield Dividend Stocks That Are Probably Not On Your Radar Carlino also emphasized what he characterized as steady tenant health despite recent regional gaming volatility, noting that “our rent coverage remains strong, with the vast majority of our leases covered at 1.8x or higher.” He added that GLPI remains active in the market, but reiterated a long-standing discipline around de…Read full documentShow less
Management reiterated mid- to high-single-digit AFFO growth and issued full-year 2026 AFFO guidance of $1.212 billion to $1.223 billion (or $4.08 to $4.12 per diluted share), while signaling a $1.8 billion capital commitment runway expected to be mostly deployed by year-end 2027 that includes $750M–$800M of 2026 development spend and the planned $225 million Aurora acquisition. Q1 total income from real estate rose by more than $24 million year-over-year, driven by about $33 million of cash rent increases from acquisitions and escalators (including Bally’s Lincoln, Chicago, Baton Rouge and others), partially offset by $8 million of non‑cash items and with operating expenses down roughly $49.8 million. Balance-sheet and market backdrop: GLPI ended the quarter at a 5x leverage ratio with $275 million cash, roughly $230 million of annual free cash flow and forward equity settling June 1 to fund the pipeline, and management said cap rates are normalizing to levels it views as accretive (around an “8” in front of the cap rate). Interested in Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. Look To REITs For Reliable Yield Even In Recessionary Environment Gaming and Leisure Properties (NASDAQ:GLPI) reported what management described as a “terrific quarter” in its first-quarter 2026 earnings call, citing mid- to high-single-digit growth in adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) and AFFO per share and pointing to a multi-year development and acquisition pipeline. Chairman and CEO Peter Carlino said the company continues to have “a clear and well-documented line of sight toward a very healthy multi-year AFFO growth” across its acquisition and development pipelines. Carlino said that with the February acquisition of Bally’s Lincoln and progress across development projects, GLPI’s future capital commitments stand at roughly $1.8 billion, “nearly all of which we expect to deploy by year-end 2027.” → Pipelines and Automation: 2 Energy Plays Built for Any Oil Price 3 High-Yield Dividend Stocks That Are Probably Not On Your Radar Carlino also emphasized what he characterized as steady tenant health despite recent regional gaming volatility, noting that “our rent coverage remains strong, with the vast majority of our leases covered at 1.8x or higher.” He added that GLPI remains active in the market, but reiterated a long-standing discipline around deal selection: “there is no transaction that we have to do.” Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Desiree Burke said first-quarter 2026 total income from real estate exceeded the first quarter of 2025 by over $24 million. Burke attributed the increase primarily to about $33 million in cash rent increases from acquisitions and escalators, including: Bally’s Lincoln acquisition adding $7.5 million in cash rent Chicago lease increasing cash income by $5.5 million Bally’s Baton Rouge development increasing cash rent by $2.6 million PENN Joliet M funding increasing cash income by $5.4 million Sunland Park increasing cash income by $3.8 million Dry Creek, Ione, and Cordish Virginia loans adding $3.5 million Escalators and percentage rent adjustments contributing approximately $4.6 million → Homebuilder Earnings: D.R. Horton Sticks Out as Pulte & NVR Sales Tank The 10 Top-Rated Stocks by Wall Street Analysts in August 2021 Burke said certain non-cash revenue items partially offset these increases, producing a collective year-over-year decrease of $8 million for those non-cash components. She also noted operating expenses declined by $49.8 million, “mainly due to the non-cash adjustments in the provision for credit losses.” GLPI issued full-year 2026 AFFO guidance of $1.212 billion to $1.223 billion, or $4.08 to $4.12 per diluted share in OP units. Burke said the guidance excludes the impact of future transactions, but includes additional development funding of roughly $590 million to $640 million across the remainder of 2026, bringing total 2026 development spend to $750 million to $800 million. → 3 Stocks Poised to Grow on European Rearmament Spending The company’s guidance also includes the planned $225 million acquisition of PENN’s Aurora facility, which Burke said is expected “late in the second quarter,” and the anticipated settlement of $363 million of forward equity on June 1. Burke said the upward revision to 2026 development spend is “mainly due to our Chicago project,” where GLPI has “greater visibility and a clearer spend cadence” as construction progresses. She said the increased funding guidance reflects timing of spend rather than a change in expected opening dates. Chief Development Officer Steve Ladany added that Chicago is expected to top out both “the podium and the tower next week” and said the project remains “on track for a first half 2027 opening.” Asked about Live! Virginia, Burke confirmed the remaining funding expectations are included in guidance but said the company has not provided month-by-month detail. President and COO Brandon Moore noted that the Cordish structure differs from other projects because “the Cordish equity dollars are all being spent first,” which management said should improve visibility as the project advances. On property performance, Moore highlighted several recent openings and expansions. He said PENN’s Hollywood Joliet has delivered strong early results, referencing PENN’s own recent commentary. Moore also said Live! Petersburg, which opened January 22, has been “incredibly strong,” generating “a little bit over $15 million a month in each of the two months that that’s been open.” He said Bally’s Baton Rouge, which opened in December 2025, has shown a similar pattern with market expansion versus the prior riverboat facility. Carlo Santarelli, SVP of corporate strategy and investor relations, added that GLPI’s first tribal investment with Ione opened in February and had a “very strong opening,” which he said appears to have grown the market. On lease-level dynamics, Burke said the only lease GLPI does not currently expect to receive an escalation on is the Pinnacle lease. She said expected percentage rent adjustments on the Pinnacle lease and a few other leases should represent “a small decrease for 2026,” below $4 million on a full-year basis, with roughly half of that expected to impact 2026. Addressing coverage questions around Caesars, Santarelli said Caesars master lease coverage was 1.59x for the quarter, which he described as “still a very fine, solid coverage.” He attributed some performance pressure to factors including “some hold in Atlantic City” and renovations at a property there, and said GLPI feels it has “our hands around that situation.” On the transaction environment, Ladany said GLPI is in “very active dialogue” on opportunities ranging from large-scale portfolio divestitures to ongoing tribal discussions, though he said the company was not in a position to announce anything. He also said cap rates appear to be “normalizing” at levels “accretive” to GLPI, and suggested that recent 7.5% cap rates are “not indicative” of what he expects going forward. “I think…a regular way down the middle of the fairway transaction is going to go for right now…with an eight in front of it,” he said, while cautioning that each transaction is negotiated and the market can change. Burke said GLPI ended the quarter with a leverage ratio of 5x, “at the low end of our target level.” In response to questions about funding the $1.8 billion pipeline, Burke noted the company has $275 million of cash not yet deployed and free cash flow “in the tune of $230 million or so per year,” as well as forward equity expected to settle June 1. Burke said management expects that after funding the remaining commitments and receiving the associated AFFO contribution, leverage should still be “at the low end of our 5x-5.5x” target range. On longer-term growth visibility, Burke said she can “clearly see through 2027” but said results in 2028 and beyond will depend on future accretive transactions, beyond contractual escalators. Management also addressed several investor topics during Q&A, including potential impacts from Chicago video gaming terminals (VLTs), prediction markets, the status of the Rockford loan (discussions ongoing), and questions about lease durability in the context of media speculation about Caesars. Moore said GLPI’s leases include “qualified or discretionary transferee” provisions, and he indicated that replacement guarantee requirements are among the conditions tied to any tenant transition, while also stating the company does not yet have visibility into transaction structures under discussion publicly. Carlino closed the call by thanking participants and said the company would provide another update next quarter. Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc (NASDAQ: GLPI) is a real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in the ownership and management of gaming and entertainment properties. Established in 2013 as a spin-off from Penn National Gaming, the company was designed to acquire and hold real estate assets associated with casinos, racetracks and other gaming facilities, while leasing those assets back to operating partners under long-term, triple-net lease agreements. The company's core activities involve identifying attractive gaming real estate, structuring lease agreements that align tenant incentives with property performance, and actively managing its portfolio to enhance asset value. The article "Gaming and Leisure Properties Q1 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-04-25Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc (GLPI) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong AFFO Growth ...
GuruFocus.com
Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc (GLPI) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong AFFO Growth ...
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. AFFO Growth: Mid- to high single digits growth in AFFO and AFFO per share for Q1 2026. Future Capital Commitments: Approximately $1.8 billion expected to be deployed by year-end 2027. Rent Coverage: Majority of leases covered at 1.8 times or higher. Total Income from Real Estate: Increased by over $24 million compared to Q1 2025. Cash Rent Increases: $33 million increase driven by acquisitions and transformations. Operating Expenses: Decreased by $49.8 million, mainly due to noncash adjustments. Full Year 2026 AFFO Guidance: Between $1.212 billion and $1.223 billion or $4.08 to $4.12 per diluted share. Development Funding for 2026: Additional $590 million to $640 million, total spend between $750 million to $800 million. Leverage Ratio: At 5 times, at the low end of the target level. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with GLPI. Is GLPI fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: April 24, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc (NASDAQ:GLPI) reported strong AFFO and AFFO per share growth in the mid- to high single digits for the first quarter of 2026. The company has a clear and well-documented pipeline for multiyear AFFO growth, supported by recent acquisitions and development projects. GLPI's rent coverage remains strong, with the majority of leases covered at 1.8 times or higher. The company has a robust balance sheet and is well-positioned to transact in an accretive manner without pressure to make unnecessary deals. GLPI's total income from real estate increased by over $24 million year-over-year, driven by cash rent increases from acquisitions and developments. The Pinnacle lease is not expected to see escalation in 2026, which could impact overall rent growth. There are uncertainties in the market, such as potential impacts from video gambling legislation in Chicago, which could affect rent coverage. The company faces challenges in the regional gaming markets, which were relatively difficult in the previous year. GLPI's guidance does not include the impact of future transactions, which could lead to variability in financial performance. The company is cautious about the potential impact of prediction markets and iGaming on traditional gaming revenues. Q: Can you disc…Read full documentShow less
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. AFFO Growth: Mid- to high single digits growth in AFFO and AFFO per share for Q1 2026. Future Capital Commitments: Approximately $1.8 billion expected to be deployed by year-end 2027. Rent Coverage: Majority of leases covered at 1.8 times or higher. Total Income from Real Estate: Increased by over $24 million compared to Q1 2025. Cash Rent Increases: $33 million increase driven by acquisitions and transformations. Operating Expenses: Decreased by $49.8 million, mainly due to noncash adjustments. Full Year 2026 AFFO Guidance: Between $1.212 billion and $1.223 billion or $4.08 to $4.12 per diluted share. Development Funding for 2026: Additional $590 million to $640 million, total spend between $750 million to $800 million. Leverage Ratio: At 5 times, at the low end of the target level. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with GLPI. Is GLPI fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: April 24, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc (NASDAQ:GLPI) reported strong AFFO and AFFO per share growth in the mid- to high single digits for the first quarter of 2026. The company has a clear and well-documented pipeline for multiyear AFFO growth, supported by recent acquisitions and development projects. GLPI's rent coverage remains strong, with the majority of leases covered at 1.8 times or higher. The company has a robust balance sheet and is well-positioned to transact in an accretive manner without pressure to make unnecessary deals. GLPI's total income from real estate increased by over $24 million year-over-year, driven by cash rent increases from acquisitions and developments. The Pinnacle lease is not expected to see escalation in 2026, which could impact overall rent growth. There are uncertainties in the market, such as potential impacts from video gambling legislation in Chicago, which could affect rent coverage. The company faces challenges in the regional gaming markets, which were relatively difficult in the previous year. GLPI's guidance does not include the impact of future transactions, which could lead to variability in financial performance. The company is cautious about the potential impact of prediction markets and iGaming on traditional gaming revenues. Q: Can you discuss the current investment pipeline and market dynamics, including yields? A: Steven Ladany, Senior Vice President and Chief Development Officer, explained that the investment pipeline is active with discussions on various fronts, including large-scale divestitures and strategic decisions. The market is normalizing, with cap rates moving from 7.5% to around 8%, benefiting GLPI. Q: Which leases might not see rent escalations in 2026 due to coverage issues? A: Desiree Burke, Chief Financial Officer, noted that the Pinnacle lease is the only one not expected to see escalation. Percentage rent adjustments on Pinnacle and other leases will result in a small decrease for 2026, already included in guidance. Q: What drives the increase in 2026 development funding guidance to $750 million to $800 million? A: Desiree Burke stated that the increase is mainly due to the Chicago project, where spending is occurring faster than anticipated. This does not change the expected opening timing but reflects a quicker spend cadence. Q: How do you value the location of real estate compared to free cash flow potential? A: Desiree Burke emphasized that GLPI values properties based on free cash flow, considering competition, drive times, and long-term performance risks, rather than just land and building value. Q: How do you view the impact of prediction markets and iGaming on gaming operations? A: Brandon Moore, President and COO, stated that while GLPI monitors prediction markets, they are not overly concerned due to regulatory challenges. The proliferation of iGaming is not expected to accelerate significantly, which is favorable for GLPI. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

