RankAlpha logo
Back to Rankings

FSLR

First SolarB
Nasdaq / Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Last Price
Quote time unavailable
View Chart
Documents
74
Stored
Transcripts
1
Recent loaded
Latest report
2026-08-18
Investor release

Document history

Earnings documents stored for FSLR.

12 shown
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-18

Q2 Earnings Outperformers: First Solar (NASDAQ:FSLR) And The Rest Of The Renewable Energy Stocks

StockStory
Earnings results often indicate what direction a company will take in the months ahead. With Q2 behind us, let’s have a look at First Solar (NASDAQ:FSLR) and its peers. Renewable energy companies are buoyed by the secular trend of green energy that is upending traditional power generation. Those who innovate and evolve with this dynamic market can win share while those who continue to rely on legacy technologies can see diminishing demand, which includes headwinds from increasing regulation against “dirty” energy. Additionally, these companies are at the whim of economic cycles, as interest rates can impact the willingness to invest in renewable energy projects. The 15 renewable energy stocks we track reported a satisfactory Q2. As a group, revenues beat analysts’ consensus estimates by 3.1% while next quarter’s revenue guidance was 7.9% below. In light of this news, share prices of the companies have held steady. On average, they are relatively unchanged since the latest earnings results. Headquartered in Arizona, First Solar (NASDAQ:FSLR) specializes in manufacturing solar panels and providing photovoltaic solar energy solutions. First Solar reported revenues of $1.06 billion, down 3.7% year on year. This print fell short of analysts’ expectations by 1%. Overall, it was a mixed quarter for the company with a beat of analysts’ EPS estimates but a significant miss of analysts’ EBITDA estimates. Interestingly, the stock is up 5.9% since reporting and currently trades at $218.23. Is now the time to buy First Solar? Access our full analysis of the earnings results here, it’s free. Working in stealth mode for eight years, Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) designs, manufactures, and markets solid oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation. Bloom Energy reported revenues of $1.07 billion, up 166% year on year, outperforming analysts’ expectations by 27.7%. The business had an incredible quarter with a beat of analysts’ EPS estimates and a solid beat of analysts’ EBITDA estimates. Bloom Energy pulled off the biggest analyst estimate beat, fastest revenue growth, and highest full-year guidance raise of the whole group. The market seems happy with the results as the stock is up 40.6% since reporting. It currently trades at $234.50. Is now the time to buy Bloom Energy? Access our full analysis of the earnings results here, it’s free. Pioneering the use of lithium-ion b…Read full document

Earnings results often indicate what direction a company will take in the months ahead. With Q2 behind us, let’s have a look at First Solar (NASDAQ:FSLR) and its peers. Renewable energy companies are buoyed by the secular trend of green energy that is upending traditional power generation. Those who innovate and evolve with this dynamic market can win share while those who continue to rely on legacy technologies can see diminishing demand, which includes headwinds from increasing regulation against “dirty” energy. Additionally, these companies are at the whim of economic cycles, as interest rates can impact the willingness to invest in renewable energy projects. The 15 renewable energy stocks we track reported a satisfactory Q2. As a group, revenues beat analysts’ consensus estimates by 3.1% while next quarter’s revenue guidance was 7.9% below. In light of this news, share prices of the companies have held steady. On average, they are relatively unchanged since the latest earnings results. Headquartered in Arizona, First Solar (NASDAQ:FSLR) specializes in manufacturing solar panels and providing photovoltaic solar energy solutions. First Solar reported revenues of $1.06 billion, down 3.7% year on year. This print fell short of analysts’ expectations by 1%. Overall, it was a mixed quarter for the company with a beat of analysts’ EPS estimates but a significant miss of analysts’ EBITDA estimates. Interestingly, the stock is up 5.9% since reporting and currently trades at $218.23. Is now the time to buy First Solar? Access our full analysis of the earnings results here, it’s free. Working in stealth mode for eight years, Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) designs, manufactures, and markets solid oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation. Bloom Energy reported revenues of $1.07 billion, up 166% year on year, outperforming analysts’ expectations by 27.7%. The business had an incredible quarter with a beat of analysts’ EPS estimates and a solid beat of analysts’ EBITDA estimates. Bloom Energy pulled off the biggest analyst estimate beat, fastest revenue growth, and highest full-year guidance raise of the whole group. The market seems happy with the results as the stock is up 40.6% since reporting. It currently trades at $234.50. Is now the time to buy Bloom Energy? Access our full analysis of the earnings results here, it’s free. Pioneering the use of lithium-ion batteries for grid storage, Fluence (NASDAQ:FLNC) helps store renewable energy sources with battery systems. Fluence Energy reported revenues of $649.8 million, up 7.9% year on year, falling short of analysts’ expectations by 18.8%. It was a disappointing quarter as it posted full-year revenue guidance missing analysts’ expectations significantly and full-year EBITDA guidance missing analysts’ expectations significantly. Fluence Energy delivered the weakest performance against analyst estimates and weakest full-year guidance update in the group. As expected, the stock is down 10.9% since the results and currently trades at $12.69. Read our full analysis of Fluence Energy’s results here. With its name deriving from a combination of “generating” and “AC”, Generac (NYSE:GNRC) offers generators and other power products for residential, industrial, and commercial use. Generac reported revenues of $1.17 billion, up 10.6% year on year. This print missed analysts’ expectations by 0.5%. Zooming out, it was actually a very strong quarter as it put up a beat of analysts’ EPS estimates and an impressive beat of analysts’ EBITDA estimates. The stock is up 13.1% since reporting and currently trades at $221.23. Read our full, actionable report on Generac here, it’s free. Established in 2006, SolarEdge (NASDAQ: SEDG) creates advanced systems to improve the efficiency of solar panels. SolarEdge reported revenues of $346.2 million, up 19.6% year on year. This number topped analysts’ expectations by 1.2%. More broadly, it was a satisfactory quarter as it also logged a beat of analysts’ EPS estimates but revenue guidance for next quarter missing analysts’ expectations significantly. The stock is down 37% since reporting and currently trades at $30.73. Read our full, actionable report on SolarEdge here, it’s free. Over the past year, investors have been forced to repeatedly answer the same question: what is the market’s biggest risk? The answer has changed several times, and each shift has reshaped market leadership. Late in 2025 and early 2026, artificial intelligence became the market’s primary uncertainty. Investors questioned whether AI would erode software pricing power and weaken competitive moats as AI made it easier to replicate once-differentiated products. By the spring, technology took a back seat to geopolitics. The U.S. conflict with Iran briefly became the market’s dominant narrative, raising concerns about oil prices, inflation, and global growth. But as energy markets remained orderly and fears of a prolonged supply disruption faded, investors quickly turned their focus back to fundamentals. Want to invest in winners with rock-solid fundamentals? Check out our Top 5 Growth Stocks and add them to your watchlist. These companies are poised for growth regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-05

ETFs in Spotlight as First Solar Shares Jump Post Q2 Earnings Beat

Zacks
Shares of First Solar Inc. FSLR gained 2.5% on July 31, 2026, following the release of its second-quarter results after the market closed on July 30. The stock continued its upward momentum over subsequent trading sessions, surging 18.3% since the announcement. The solar panel manufacturer comfortably surpassed Wall Street's earnings expectations, despite narrowly missing revenue estimates. This rally in FSLR’s share price reflects increased investor optimism surrounding its strong profitability. The earnings beat, driven by expanding gross margins and strong operational execution, coupled with reaffirmed full-year guidance, provides confidence in FSLR's near-term momentum and reinforces its position as the largest solar panel manufacturer in the United States. However, direct equity ownership in FSLR carries distinct single-stock concentration risks. As a domestic manufacturer, First Solar’s long-term profitability remains heavily dependent on federal policy incentives as well as favorable trade protections against foreign solar module imports. Against this backdrop, investors looking to capitalize on First Solar's upward momentum while maintaining a diversified approach may want to focus on exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that hold significant exposure to the stock. But before identifying those specific ETFs, it is worth taking a closer look at the key metrics behind First Solar's impressive quarterly beat and the solid contracted backlog that underpins its multi-year outlook. The bottom line surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 1.2%, while revenues missed the consensus mark by 0.4%. A similar trend was visible on a year-over-year basis as well, with its top line declining 4% but bottom line improving 23.3%. The sales decline was on account of lower revenues associated with customer contract terminations. The company reached an important milestone in the second quarter, exceeding 100 gigawatts (GW) of cumulative module sales globally. As of June 30, 2026, FSLR’s contracted backlog totaled 45.1 GW with an aggregate transaction value of $13.6 billion. Its gross margin expanded 1180 basis points (bps) from the second quarter of 2025, driven by net IEEPA tariff-related benefit, higher mix of modules qualifying for Section 45X tax credits and lower logistics costs. Looking ahead, FSLR’s South Carolina facility is expected to provide up to 3.5 GW of finishing…Read full document

Shares of First Solar Inc. FSLR gained 2.5% on July 31, 2026, following the release of its second-quarter results after the market closed on July 30. The stock continued its upward momentum over subsequent trading sessions, surging 18.3% since the announcement. The solar panel manufacturer comfortably surpassed Wall Street's earnings expectations, despite narrowly missing revenue estimates. This rally in FSLR’s share price reflects increased investor optimism surrounding its strong profitability. The earnings beat, driven by expanding gross margins and strong operational execution, coupled with reaffirmed full-year guidance, provides confidence in FSLR's near-term momentum and reinforces its position as the largest solar panel manufacturer in the United States. However, direct equity ownership in FSLR carries distinct single-stock concentration risks. As a domestic manufacturer, First Solar’s long-term profitability remains heavily dependent on federal policy incentives as well as favorable trade protections against foreign solar module imports. Against this backdrop, investors looking to capitalize on First Solar's upward momentum while maintaining a diversified approach may want to focus on exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that hold significant exposure to the stock. But before identifying those specific ETFs, it is worth taking a closer look at the key metrics behind First Solar's impressive quarterly beat and the solid contracted backlog that underpins its multi-year outlook. The bottom line surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 1.2%, while revenues missed the consensus mark by 0.4%. A similar trend was visible on a year-over-year basis as well, with its top line declining 4% but bottom line improving 23.3%. The sales decline was on account of lower revenues associated with customer contract terminations. The company reached an important milestone in the second quarter, exceeding 100 gigawatts (GW) of cumulative module sales globally. As of June 30, 2026, FSLR’s contracted backlog totaled 45.1 GW with an aggregate transaction value of $13.6 billion. Its gross margin expanded 1180 basis points (bps) from the second quarter of 2025, driven by net IEEPA tariff-related benefit, higher mix of modules qualifying for Section 45X tax credits and lower logistics costs. Looking ahead, FSLR’s South Carolina facility is expected to provide up to 3.5 GW of finishing capacity for modules, with the first phase of the finishing facility remaining on track to begin production in the second half of 2026. FSLR expects the second phase of the facility to be completed by mid-2027. The company expects its 2026 results to reflect a net-tariff impact of $60 million to $80 million. Invesco Solar ETF TAN This fund, with a market value worth $1.41 billion, provides exposure to 35 companies from the solar energy industry. Of these, First Solar takes the first spot, holding 10.60% of the fund. TAN has gained 8.7% year to date and charges 70 basis points (bps) in fees. Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF VCLN This fund, with net assets worth $5.6 million, provides exposure to companies involved in clean energy innovation and commercialization across the utility, industrial, technology and energy sectors. First Solar takes the first spot in VCLN's holdings, comprising 8.71% of the fund. VCLN has rallied 12.2% year to date and charges 59 bps in fees. iShares Global Clean Energy ETF ICLN This fund, with net assets worth $2.25 billion, offers exposure to 105 global companies involved in clean energy. Of these, First Solar takes the first spot, holding 8.67% of the fund. ICLN has risen 12.2% year to date and charges 39 bps in fees. Global X CleanTech ETF CTEC This fund, with net assets worth $25.5 million, offers exposure to 40 companies involved in renewable energy production, energy storage, smart grid implementation, residential/commercial energy efficiency, and/or the production and provision of pollution-reducing products and solutions. Of these, First Solar takes the second spot, holding 7.43% of the fund. CTEC has rallied 10.1% year to date and charges 50 bps in fees. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Invesco Solar ETF (TAN): ETF Research Reports iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN): ETF Research Reports Global X ClimateTech ETF (CTEC): ETF Research Reports This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-05

SolarEdge Technologies' Q2 Earnings Top Estimates, Revenues Rise Y/Y

Zacks
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. SEDG reported a second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of 6 cents per share, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 4 cents by 50%. The result marked a sharp improvement from the year-ago loss of 81 cents per share.Barring one-time adjustments, the company incurred a GAAP loss of 50 cents per share compared with a GAAP loss of $2.13 in the year-ago period. Revenues increased 19.6% year over year to $346.2 million and surpassed the consensus estimate of $343 million by 1.3%. Strong European demand and U.S. commercial and industrial activity offset softness in the U.S. residential market. Battery volume reached 426 megawatt-hours. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. Quote Adjusted gross profit rose to $98.7 million from $36.9 million in the prior-year quarter. The adjusted gross margin expanded to 28.6% from 13.1%, representing the sixth consecutive quarter of year-over-year gross margin improvement.The reported margin included a $13.3 million benefit related to tariff matters under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Even with that contribution, the widening margin and stronger revenue base helped SolarEdge return to adjusted operating profitability for the first time since the second quarter of 2023.Adjusted operating expenses were $88.5 million compared with $85.2 million a year earlier. However, the improvement in gross profit more than offset the modest increase in expenses, resulting in adjusted operating income of $10.2 million.SEDG had recorded an adjusted operating loss of $48.3 million in the prior-year period. SEDG recognized revenues from approximately 62,600 inverters during the quarter, up from 50,500 in the first quarter. Optimizer volume increased sequentially to nearly 2.49 million units from roughly 2.44 million.Battery volume climbed to 426 megawatt-hours from 331 megawatt-hours in the preceding quarter. The sharp sequential increase supports the strong battery revenue performance and highlights the product category’s growing importance within SEDG’s sales mix. Cash and cash equivalents reached $527.3 million as of June 30, 2026, up from $455.1 million at the end of 2025.As of the same date, total long-term liabilities were $971.1 million compared with $951.2 million as of Dec. 31, 2025.The net cash provided by operating activities in the…Read full document

SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. SEDG reported a second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of 6 cents per share, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 4 cents by 50%. The result marked a sharp improvement from the year-ago loss of 81 cents per share.Barring one-time adjustments, the company incurred a GAAP loss of 50 cents per share compared with a GAAP loss of $2.13 in the year-ago period. Revenues increased 19.6% year over year to $346.2 million and surpassed the consensus estimate of $343 million by 1.3%. Strong European demand and U.S. commercial and industrial activity offset softness in the U.S. residential market. Battery volume reached 426 megawatt-hours. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. Quote Adjusted gross profit rose to $98.7 million from $36.9 million in the prior-year quarter. The adjusted gross margin expanded to 28.6% from 13.1%, representing the sixth consecutive quarter of year-over-year gross margin improvement.The reported margin included a $13.3 million benefit related to tariff matters under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Even with that contribution, the widening margin and stronger revenue base helped SolarEdge return to adjusted operating profitability for the first time since the second quarter of 2023.Adjusted operating expenses were $88.5 million compared with $85.2 million a year earlier. However, the improvement in gross profit more than offset the modest increase in expenses, resulting in adjusted operating income of $10.2 million.SEDG had recorded an adjusted operating loss of $48.3 million in the prior-year period. SEDG recognized revenues from approximately 62,600 inverters during the quarter, up from 50,500 in the first quarter. Optimizer volume increased sequentially to nearly 2.49 million units from roughly 2.44 million.Battery volume climbed to 426 megawatt-hours from 331 megawatt-hours in the preceding quarter. The sharp sequential increase supports the strong battery revenue performance and highlights the product category’s growing importance within SEDG’s sales mix. Cash and cash equivalents reached $527.3 million as of June 30, 2026, up from $455.1 million at the end of 2025.As of the same date, total long-term liabilities were $971.1 million compared with $951.2 million as of Dec. 31, 2025.The net cash provided by operating activities in the first six months of 2026 amounted to $35.84 million compared with $26.02 million in the year-ago period. For the third quarter of 2026, the company expects revenues to be between $310 million and $340 million. The midpoint of $325 million implies a sequential decline from the second-quarter level. The Zacks Consensus Estimate is pegged at $377.18 million, higher than the company’s guided range.Adjusted gross margin is projected between 22% and 26%, while adjusted operating expenses are expected in the range of $86 million to $91 million. The guidance excludes potential third-quarter tariff refunds and assumes no significant revenue pull-forward. The company currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. First Solar, Inc. FSLR reported second-quarter 2026 earnings of $3.92 per share, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.74 by 43.1%. The bottom line increased 23.3% from $3.18 in the year-ago quarter. FSLR’s net sales of $1.06 billion missed the consensus estimate of $1.061 billion by 0.4% and declined 3.7% year over year.Enphase Energy, Inc. ENPH reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of 46 cents per share, which came in line with the Zacks Consensus Estimate. However, the bottom line declined 33.3% from 69 cents in the prior-year quarter.ENPH’s second-quarter revenues of $291.9 million missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $295 million by 1%. The top line also decreased 19.6% from the prior-year quarter’s reported figure of $363.2 million. Canadian Solar Inc. CSIQ is slated to report second-quarter 2026 results on Aug. 27, before market open. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for CSIQ’s second-quarter loss is pegged at $1.01 per share, indicating a year-over-year decline of 90.6%.The Zacks Consensus Estimate for CSIQ’s second-quarter sales is pegged at $1.17 billion, implying a year-over-year decline of 31.2%. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG) : Free Stock Analysis Report First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) : Free Stock Analysis Report Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-31

First Solar's Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates, Revenues Decrease Y/Y

Zacks
First Solar, Inc. FSLR reported second-quarter 2026 earnings of $3.92 per share, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.74 by 43.1%. The bottom line increased 23.3% from $3.18 in the year-ago quarter, aided by gross-margin expansion and a stronger mix of U.S.-made modules. Net sales of $1.06 billion missed the consensus estimate of $1.061 billion by 0.4% and declined 3.7% year over year.Contracted backlog stood at 45.1 gigawatts, valued at about $13.6 billion, through 2030. First Solar, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | First Solar, Inc. Quote In the second quarter, the company’s gross profit was $605 million, which rose 21% from $499.9 million in the year-ago quarter.Total operating expenses jumped 11.8% year over year to $154.6 million.FSLR reported an operating income of $450.4 million compared with $361.6 million in the year-ago quarter. First Solar had $1.69 billion in cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2026, down from $2.80 billion as of Dec. 31, 2025.The company had no long-term debt as of the same date compared with $282.6 million as of Dec. 31, 2025.Net cash used in operating activities amounted to $359.8 million during the first six months of 2026 compared with $458.4 million in the year-ago period. FSLR still expects its sales to be in the range of $4.9-$5.2 billion. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for sales is pegged at $5.07 billion, which lies above the midpoint of the company’s guided range.First Solar still expects gross profit to be in the band of $2.4-$2.6 billion. Its operating expenses are anticipated to be in the $610-$635 million range.First Solar projects module shipments to be in the band of 17-18.2 gigawatts. The company expects its 2026 capital expenditure to be in the range of $0.8-$1 billion. First Solar currently carries a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell).You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Enphase Energy, Inc. ENPH reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of 46 cents per share, which came in line with the Zacks Consensus Estimate. However, the bottom line declined 33.3% from 69 cents in the prior-year quarter.Enphase Energy’s second-quarter revenues of $291.9 million missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $295 million by 1%. The top line also decreased 19.6% from the prior-year quarter’s reported figure of $363.2 million. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. SEDG is slated to repo…Read full document

First Solar, Inc. FSLR reported second-quarter 2026 earnings of $3.92 per share, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.74 by 43.1%. The bottom line increased 23.3% from $3.18 in the year-ago quarter, aided by gross-margin expansion and a stronger mix of U.S.-made modules. Net sales of $1.06 billion missed the consensus estimate of $1.061 billion by 0.4% and declined 3.7% year over year.Contracted backlog stood at 45.1 gigawatts, valued at about $13.6 billion, through 2030. First Solar, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | First Solar, Inc. Quote In the second quarter, the company’s gross profit was $605 million, which rose 21% from $499.9 million in the year-ago quarter.Total operating expenses jumped 11.8% year over year to $154.6 million.FSLR reported an operating income of $450.4 million compared with $361.6 million in the year-ago quarter. First Solar had $1.69 billion in cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2026, down from $2.80 billion as of Dec. 31, 2025.The company had no long-term debt as of the same date compared with $282.6 million as of Dec. 31, 2025.Net cash used in operating activities amounted to $359.8 million during the first six months of 2026 compared with $458.4 million in the year-ago period. FSLR still expects its sales to be in the range of $4.9-$5.2 billion. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for sales is pegged at $5.07 billion, which lies above the midpoint of the company’s guided range.First Solar still expects gross profit to be in the band of $2.4-$2.6 billion. Its operating expenses are anticipated to be in the $610-$635 million range.First Solar projects module shipments to be in the band of 17-18.2 gigawatts. The company expects its 2026 capital expenditure to be in the range of $0.8-$1 billion. First Solar currently carries a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell).You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Enphase Energy, Inc. ENPH reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of 46 cents per share, which came in line with the Zacks Consensus Estimate. However, the bottom line declined 33.3% from 69 cents in the prior-year quarter.Enphase Energy’s second-quarter revenues of $291.9 million missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $295 million by 1%. The top line also decreased 19.6% from the prior-year quarter’s reported figure of $363.2 million. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. SEDG is slated to report second-quarter 2026 results on Aug. 5, before market open. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for SEDG’s second-quarter earnings is pegged at four cents per share.The Zacks Consensus Estimate for SEDG’s second-quarter sales is pegged at $341.7 million, implying a year-over-year improvement of 18%.Array Technologies ARRY is slated to report second-quarter 2026 results on Aug. 5, after market close. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for ARRY’s second-quarter earnings is pegged at 11 cents per share.The Zacks Consensus Estimate for ARRY’s second-quarter sales is pegged at $323.8 million. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) : Free Stock Analysis Report Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) : Free Stock Analysis Report SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-31

First Solar Inc (FSLR) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Record Sales and 100 GW Milestone ...

GuruFocus.com
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Net Sales: Approximately $1.06 billion in Q2 2026, a decrease of about 4% year-over-year. Gross Margin: Approximately 57%, an increase of about 12 percentage points compared to Q2 2025. Net Income: $423 million, up approximately 24% year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA: $644 million, with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 61%. Operating Expenses: Approximately $155 million, including $76 million of R&D expense. Contracted Backlog: 45.1 gigawatts with an aggregate transaction value of $13.6 billion. US Gross Bookings: Approximately 1.9 gigawatts at an average selling price of approximately $0.36 per watt. India Gross Bookings: Approximately 1.1 gigawatts at an average selling price of approximately $0.20 per watt. Operating Cash Flow: Outflows of $360 million year-to-date, improved from outflows of $458 million in the first half of 2025. Capital Expenditures: $280 million in the first half, primarily supporting the South Carolina finishing facility and technology investments. Net Cash: Approximately $1.7 billion at the end of the quarter. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with FSLR. Is FSLR fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: July 30, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) achieved record second-quarter and first-half sales volume, generating over $1 billion in net sales with a gross margin expansion to approximately 57%. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) surpassed a significant milestone of 100 gigawatts in cumulative module sales globally, reflecting strong customer trust and a durable technology platform. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) maintains a robust contracted backlog of 45.1 gigawatts with deliveries extending through 2030, providing high volume and pricing visibility. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) is making progress with its CuRe technology, with performance exceeding expectations and initiating customer notifications for contractual adjusters, which is expected to enhance future revenue. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) continues to see strong demand from hyperscalers and data center developers, with recent bookings and project announcements supporting this trend. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) ended the quarter with approximately $1.7 billion in net cash, providing substantial…Read full document

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Net Sales: Approximately $1.06 billion in Q2 2026, a decrease of about 4% year-over-year. Gross Margin: Approximately 57%, an increase of about 12 percentage points compared to Q2 2025. Net Income: $423 million, up approximately 24% year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA: $644 million, with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 61%. Operating Expenses: Approximately $155 million, including $76 million of R&D expense. Contracted Backlog: 45.1 gigawatts with an aggregate transaction value of $13.6 billion. US Gross Bookings: Approximately 1.9 gigawatts at an average selling price of approximately $0.36 per watt. India Gross Bookings: Approximately 1.1 gigawatts at an average selling price of approximately $0.20 per watt. Operating Cash Flow: Outflows of $360 million year-to-date, improved from outflows of $458 million in the first half of 2025. Capital Expenditures: $280 million in the first half, primarily supporting the South Carolina finishing facility and technology investments. Net Cash: Approximately $1.7 billion at the end of the quarter. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with FSLR. Is FSLR fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: July 30, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) achieved record second-quarter and first-half sales volume, generating over $1 billion in net sales with a gross margin expansion to approximately 57%. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) surpassed a significant milestone of 100 gigawatts in cumulative module sales globally, reflecting strong customer trust and a durable technology platform. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) maintains a robust contracted backlog of 45.1 gigawatts with deliveries extending through 2030, providing high volume and pricing visibility. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) is making progress with its CuRe technology, with performance exceeding expectations and initiating customer notifications for contractual adjusters, which is expected to enhance future revenue. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) continues to see strong demand from hyperscalers and data center developers, with recent bookings and project announcements supporting this trend. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) ended the quarter with approximately $1.7 billion in net cash, providing substantial balance sheet strength and financial flexibility. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) faces uncertainty and potential negative impacts from the pending Section 232 polysilicon investigation and tariffs, which could affect its international manufacturing operations. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) is experiencing higher over-the-road freight costs due to capacity tightening and diesel price volatility, which are partially offsetting logistics improvements. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) is incurring underutilization costs of approximately $30 million per quarter for its Southeast Asia manufacturing facilities while awaiting policy clarity on Section 232. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) is operating in a challenging rising commodity cost environment, with pressures on steel, aluminum, and electricity prices impacting input costs. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) faces potential delays in the Section 232 decision, which could extend policy uncertainty and keep customers on the sidelines, impacting near-term bookings momentum. First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR) is experiencing higher R&D expenses, including an impairment of certain R&D equipment no longer expected to be used in its technology roadmap. Q: How much of the 1.9 gigawatts in US gross bookings came from the Google-Steel River project, and how are you seeing general interest from the hyperscaler data center community?A: Mark Widmar, CEO, clarified that the Steel River project was already in the contracted backlog and was highlighted as a strategic win. He noted that recent announcements, including projects with Cypress Creek, Terra-Gen, and Panamint, total about 5 gigawatts of capacity, with half directly tied to hyperscalers like Google. He emphasized that hyperscalers prioritize supply certainty and reliability, which positions First Solar's domestic manufacturing and technology as a key advantage, and demand from this segment remains "insatiable." Q: What are your latest thoughts on the timing and potential impact of the Section 232 investigation, and how quickly will you move on your Southeast Asia strategy once you get clarity?A: Mark Widmar, CEO, stated that the policy is still evolving, but the company remains optimistic about a constructive outcome and is in constant contact with USTR and Commerce. He noted that demand is sitting on the sidelines, with ~2 GW booked in July, over 2 GW in contracts subject to CP, and another 2 GW in active conversations. Alex Bradley, CFO, added that the company is holding a decision on the ~1.8 GW of fully finished international capacity in Malaysia and Vietnam pending the 232 outcome, viewing it as an option. Q: If Section 232 waivers or quotas are granted for certain domestic cell producers, could that mute the price upside from the policy?A: Mark Widmar, CEO, acknowledged that any modifications versus a 100% restriction could have a dilutive impact on the strategic incentive. He stated the company is advocating to minimize such impacts and believes waivers would disincentivize domestic investment. Alex Bradley, CFO, cited the Section 201 tariff history, where a technology exemption "gutted" the provision, and argued that carve-outs don't make sense for a national security interest provision. Q: Can you elaborate on the potential permutations and timeline for the remaining Southeast Asia capacity, and would you bring that volume into the US as finished or unfinished products?A: Alex Bradley, CFO, explained that the company could bring fully finished product in, subject to demand and pricing, but it's also dependent on other tariff provisions like Section 301. He noted there is limited incremental capacity (a couple of hundred megawatts) in existing US finishing lines for semi-finished WIP. The key is finding a way to run the international factories at close to full capacity, which could involve selling fully finished product or potentially building another US finishing line, though that is less likely due to site and power availability. Q: How should we think about the Safe Harbor having played into the latest quarter, and how are you thinking about it as a leading indicator for future sales?A: Mark Widmar, CEO, noted that most of the 1.9 GW of US bookings occurred in July, outside the Safe Harbor date. He explained that the recent court ruling on the modular 5% CapEx rule came too late in the quarter to have an impact. He emphasized that Safe Harbor requirements, particularly FEOC restrictions for projects CODing in 2030, position First Solar well to serve demand in '29 and '30, as customers are being conservative to avoid jeopardizing their ITC or PTC. Q: What is your view on the timing of the Section 232 decision, and do you think it could slip past August into the fall?A: Mark Widmar, CEO, said he cannot give a strong view on whether it will be August or September, but the company is patient and engaged. He stated that the administration is signaling decisions are close, but the most important thing is that the implementation achieves the strategic intent and spirit of the policy. He reiterated that the industry needs certainty. Q: Are there opportunities to reduce input costs on US manufacturing, and how is the supply chain evolving on a multiyear basis?A: Mark Widmar, CEO, acknowledged a challenging rising commodity cost environment, with pressure on steel, aluminum, and fuel. He highlighted levers like driving more throughput, automation, and product redesign (e.g., back rails and glass thickness). He noted that CuRe's efficiency gains will help reduce cost per watt. Alex Bradley, CFO, added that the company could use its balance sheet to work with suppliers on expansion funding for forward pricing, and is optimizing domestic transport routes as freight costs are now approaching international shipping economics. Q: Can you explain what you are targeting with your current balance sheet regarding M&A, and where do you see possibilities for First Solar?A: Alex Bradley, CFO, stated that M&A is on the list of uses of cash, but the focus has been on working capital, capacity growth, and R&D. He mentioned the obvious area for expansion is technology-adjacent things, such as companies, teams, or IP that could accelerate the perovskite transition. He emphasized a disciplined focus, leveraging the company's strength in high-volume thin-film manufacturing, while evaluating the competitive landscape, market environment, and policy before moving into adjacent areas. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-31

FSLR Q2 Earnings Call Highlights Domestic Solar Push

Zacks
First Solar, Inc. FSLR highlighted strong demand visibility, domestic manufacturing expansion and policy-driven opportunities during its second-quarter 2026 earnings call, while management maintained a disciplined approach to new bookings. Executives pointed to a record backlog, improving technology execution and U.S. manufacturing advantages as key factors supporting the company’s long-term strategy. CEO Mark Widmar said First Solar delivered record second-quarter and first-half sales volume. The company surpassed 100 gigawatts of cumulative module sales and ended the quarter with 45.1 gigawatts of contracted backlog extending through 2030. The company reported second-quarter revenue of $1.056 billion, down 4% year over year, while EPS reached $3.92. Results exceeded the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.74 EPS, while revenue was slightly below the $1.06 billion estimate. First Solar expanded gross margin to approximately 57%, supported by higher module volumes, Section 45X tax credits, tariff-related benefits and lower logistics costs. Adjusted EBITDA reached $644 million during the quarter. First Solar, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | First Solar, Inc. Quote CFO Alexander Bradley said contracted backlog totaled 45.1 gigawatts with an aggregate transaction value of $13.6 billion, excluding technology adjusters. Deliveries are scheduled through 2030, providing visibility into future demand. The company added approximately 1.9 gigawatts of U.S. gross bookings after the prior earnings call at an average selling price of about $0.36 per watt. Management said domestic capacity remains substantially committed through 2028. First Solar continues to prioritize contract quality, pricing discipline and risk allocation rather than maximizing short-term booking volume. Widmar said customer engagement has increased as the policy environment develops. A major theme during the call was the pending Section 232 polysilicon and derivatives investigation. Management said policy clarity is important for customer decision-making and future capacity allocation. A UBS analyst asked about potential impacts from recent domestic content policies and broader solar installation trends. Widmar said the industry is moving toward more localized supply chains and that First Solar’s existing U.S. manufacturing footprint positions it for this environment. During Q&A, Wells Fargo ask…Read full document

First Solar, Inc. FSLR highlighted strong demand visibility, domestic manufacturing expansion and policy-driven opportunities during its second-quarter 2026 earnings call, while management maintained a disciplined approach to new bookings. Executives pointed to a record backlog, improving technology execution and U.S. manufacturing advantages as key factors supporting the company’s long-term strategy. CEO Mark Widmar said First Solar delivered record second-quarter and first-half sales volume. The company surpassed 100 gigawatts of cumulative module sales and ended the quarter with 45.1 gigawatts of contracted backlog extending through 2030. The company reported second-quarter revenue of $1.056 billion, down 4% year over year, while EPS reached $3.92. Results exceeded the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.74 EPS, while revenue was slightly below the $1.06 billion estimate. First Solar expanded gross margin to approximately 57%, supported by higher module volumes, Section 45X tax credits, tariff-related benefits and lower logistics costs. Adjusted EBITDA reached $644 million during the quarter. First Solar, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | First Solar, Inc. Quote CFO Alexander Bradley said contracted backlog totaled 45.1 gigawatts with an aggregate transaction value of $13.6 billion, excluding technology adjusters. Deliveries are scheduled through 2030, providing visibility into future demand. The company added approximately 1.9 gigawatts of U.S. gross bookings after the prior earnings call at an average selling price of about $0.36 per watt. Management said domestic capacity remains substantially committed through 2028. First Solar continues to prioritize contract quality, pricing discipline and risk allocation rather than maximizing short-term booking volume. Widmar said customer engagement has increased as the policy environment develops. A major theme during the call was the pending Section 232 polysilicon and derivatives investigation. Management said policy clarity is important for customer decision-making and future capacity allocation. A UBS analyst asked about potential impacts from recent domestic content policies and broader solar installation trends. Widmar said the industry is moving toward more localized supply chains and that First Solar’s existing U.S. manufacturing footprint positions it for this environment. During Q&A, Wells Fargo asked whether exemptions or quotas under Section 232 could reduce potential pricing benefits. Widmar said modifications could affect the policy’s impact, but emphasized the importance of creating a durable domestic supply chain. First Solar continues investing in CuRe technology, which management expects to improve module performance and create additional value through higher efficiency and potential pricing benefits. The company began customer notifications related to contractual CuRe adjusters during the quarter. The company is also advancing perovskite development. Widmar said the development line is progressing, while the Series 6 pilot line remains scheduled for operational readiness in the first half of 2027.Management said technology investments remain a key use of capital as the company seeks to extend its thin-film manufacturing advantages and develop future solar platforms. First Solar highlighted increasing demand from hyperscale customers building large-scale energy projects. Widmar referenced several recently announced projects totaling about 5 gigawatts of capacity, with significant volumes tied to corporate energy needs. Management said hyperscaler demand remains strong because customers value supply reliability, delivery certainty and domestic manufacturing capabilities. The company sees these projects as strategic opportunities requiring dependable module supply. A Goldman Sachs analyst asked about hyperscaler demand and booking opportunities. Widmar said additional customer discussions remain active, with several gigawatts of potential opportunities dependent on policy clarity and contractual conditions. First Solar reaffirmed its 2026 guidance, including expected net sales of $4.9 billion to $5.2 billion, adjusted EBITDA of $2.6 billion to $2.8 billion and capital expenditures of $800 million to $1 billion. For the third quarter, management expects module sales of 3.9 gigawatts to 4.5 gigawatts and adjusted EBITDA of $625 million to $775 million.The company ended the quarter with a net cash balance of $1.7 billion. Management said capital allocation remains focused on manufacturing expansion, technology investment and maintaining financial flexibility. First Solar carries Zacks Rank #4 (Sell), indicating that current earnings estimate revision trends are not favorable relative to stocks with stronger rankings. The Zacks Rank focuses on the impact of earnings estimate revisions and is designed to help identify stocks with potential performance differences over the next one to three months.You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. The stock has a Value Score of B, Growth Score of A, Momentum Score of C and VGM Score of A. Zacks Style Scores range from A to F, with higher grades reflecting stronger characteristics within each investment style category. The Zacks Rank can change as analysts update earnings estimates following new company developments. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30

First Solar (FSLR) Beats Q2 Earnings Estimates

Zacks
First Solar (FSLR) came out with quarterly earnings of $3.92 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.74 per share. This compares to earnings of $3.18 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +43.07%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this largest U.S. solar company would post earnings of $2.87 per share when it actually produced earnings of $3.22, delivering a surprise of +12.2%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates two times. First Solar, which belongs to the Zacks Solar industry, posted revenues of $1.06 billion for the quarter ended June 2026, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 0.44%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $1.1 billion. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates just once over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. First Solar shares have lost about 23.7% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 6.9%. While First Solar has underperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for First Solar was unfavorable. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to underperform the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks h…Read full document

First Solar (FSLR) came out with quarterly earnings of $3.92 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.74 per share. This compares to earnings of $3.18 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +43.07%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this largest U.S. solar company would post earnings of $2.87 per share when it actually produced earnings of $3.22, delivering a surprise of +12.2%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates two times. First Solar, which belongs to the Zacks Solar industry, posted revenues of $1.06 billion for the quarter ended June 2026, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 0.44%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $1.1 billion. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates just once over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. First Solar shares have lost about 23.7% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 6.9%. While First Solar has underperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for First Solar was unfavorable. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to underperform the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $5.29 on $1.43 billion in revenues for the coming quarter and $17.54 on $5.1 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year. Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Solar is currently in the top 28% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1. One other stock from the same industry, Canadian Solar (CSIQ), is yet to report results for the quarter ended June 2026. This solar wafers manufacturer is expected to post quarterly loss of $1.01 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of -90.6%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. Canadian Solar's revenues are expected to be $1.17 billion, down 31.2% from the year-ago quarter. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30

First Solar Q2 Earnings Call Highlights

MarketBeat
Interested in First Solar, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. First Solar delivered a strong second quarter: Net sales reached approximately $1.06 billion, net income rose 24% to $423 million, and gross margin expanded to about 57%, helped by tariff-related benefits, Section 45X tax credits, and lower logistics costs. Demand and backlog remained robust: Contracted backlog stood at 45.1 GW valued at $13.6 billion, with deliveries scheduled through 2030. The company also reported new U.S. and India bookings and highlighted roughly 5 GW of hyperscaler-related projects. Full-year 2026 guidance was reaffirmed, while trade policy remains a key uncertainty. First Solar is advancing South Carolina capacity and perovskite technology, but future manufacturing decisions depend partly on the outcome of pending U.S. tariff and domestic-content regulations. Megatrends Still Matter: 3 Growth Stocks for the Next 10 Years First Solar (NASDAQ:FSLR) reported record second-quarter and first-half sales volume for 2026, with quarterly net sales exceeding $1 billion and gross margin expanding to about 57%, as the company continued to prioritize domestic manufacturing and disciplined contracting amid evolving U.S. trade policy. Chief Executive Officer Mark Widmar said the company also surpassed 100 gigawatts of cumulative module sales globally during the quarter. “We view this as a reflection of the trust customers have placed in First Solar,” Widmar said, citing the company’s technology and manufacturing platform. → Why SK hynix Could Be the Best AI Chip Stock to Buy Now If Solar’s Rally Has Legs, These 2 Stocks Could Benefit Most Chief Financial Officer Alex Bradley said second-quarter net sales totaled approximately $1.06 billion, down about 4% from a year earlier. The year-over-year decline primarily reflected lower revenue tied to customer contract terminations recognized in the prior-year period, partly offset by higher module volume sold. Gross margin increased roughly 12 percentage points from the second quarter of 2025 to approximately 57%. Bradley attributed the improvement primarily to an estimated $89 million net benefit related to tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a higher mix of modules eligible for Section 45X tax credits, and lower logistics costs. → 3 Value ETFs to Consider as Growth Stocks Lag Behind As Global Renewables Surpas…Read full document

Interested in First Solar, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. First Solar delivered a strong second quarter: Net sales reached approximately $1.06 billion, net income rose 24% to $423 million, and gross margin expanded to about 57%, helped by tariff-related benefits, Section 45X tax credits, and lower logistics costs. Demand and backlog remained robust: Contracted backlog stood at 45.1 GW valued at $13.6 billion, with deliveries scheduled through 2030. The company also reported new U.S. and India bookings and highlighted roughly 5 GW of hyperscaler-related projects. Full-year 2026 guidance was reaffirmed, while trade policy remains a key uncertainty. First Solar is advancing South Carolina capacity and perovskite technology, but future manufacturing decisions depend partly on the outcome of pending U.S. tariff and domestic-content regulations. Megatrends Still Matter: 3 Growth Stocks for the Next 10 Years First Solar (NASDAQ:FSLR) reported record second-quarter and first-half sales volume for 2026, with quarterly net sales exceeding $1 billion and gross margin expanding to about 57%, as the company continued to prioritize domestic manufacturing and disciplined contracting amid evolving U.S. trade policy. Chief Executive Officer Mark Widmar said the company also surpassed 100 gigawatts of cumulative module sales globally during the quarter. “We view this as a reflection of the trust customers have placed in First Solar,” Widmar said, citing the company’s technology and manufacturing platform. → Why SK hynix Could Be the Best AI Chip Stock to Buy Now If Solar’s Rally Has Legs, These 2 Stocks Could Benefit Most Chief Financial Officer Alex Bradley said second-quarter net sales totaled approximately $1.06 billion, down about 4% from a year earlier. The year-over-year decline primarily reflected lower revenue tied to customer contract terminations recognized in the prior-year period, partly offset by higher module volume sold. Gross margin increased roughly 12 percentage points from the second quarter of 2025 to approximately 57%. Bradley attributed the improvement primarily to an estimated $89 million net benefit related to tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a higher mix of modules eligible for Section 45X tax credits, and lower logistics costs. → 3 Value ETFs to Consider as Growth Stocks Lag Behind As Global Renewables Surpass Coal, This ETF Offers Smart Exposure The tariff-related benefit reflects the company’s estimate of expected recoveries connected to commercial obligations and other tariff considerations, and remains subject to further refinement, Bradley said. Higher duties and tariffs, lower termination-related revenue, and elevated over-the-road freight expenses partly offset those gains. Net income was $423 million, up approximately 24% year over year. Adjusted EBITDA was $644 million, above the high end of the company’s previously communicated quarterly preview range. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 61%. Operating expenses totaled about $155 million, including $76 million in research and development spending. R&D expense rose from the prior year as First Solar continued investing in perovskite technology development and recorded impairment charges for certain R&D equipment no longer expected to be used in its technology roadmap. → 5 AI Stocks Are Pulling Back—Which Growth Catalysts Still Look Strongest? As of June 30, First Solar had contracted backlog of 45.1 GW, representing an aggregate transaction value of $13.6 billion excluding technology adjusters. Scheduled deliveries extend through 2030. The company recorded approximately 1.9 GW of additional U.S. gross bookings since its prior earnings call, at an average selling price of about $0.36 per watt, including applicable technology adjusters. India gross bookings totaled approximately 1.1 GW in the first half, at an average selling price of about $0.20 per watt. Bradley said First Solar’s fully integrated U.S. manufacturing capacity remains substantially committed through 2028, supporting volume and pricing visibility. The company has continued to be selective in considering additional contracts because of limited uncommitted domestic capacity over the next several years. The company highlighted Cypress Creek Energy’s Steel River Energy Center in Arkansas, which uses First Solar modules and was already included in backlog. The initial phase is expected to provide approximately 1.6 GW of solar generation capacity and 1.9 GWh of battery storage to support Google’s energy needs. Widmar pointed to recently announced projects involving Cypress Creek, Terra-Gen and Panamint as evidence of continued demand from hyperscalers and other large corporate customers. He said the projects collectively represent about 5 GW of capacity, with roughly half directly tied to Google. First Solar’s U.S. facilities continued operating at high utilization during the quarter. Phase I of the company’s South Carolina finishing facility remains on track to begin production in the second half of 2026, while Phase II is now expected to be completed in mid-2027. Widmar said the revised Phase II timeline will allow earlier incorporation of the company’s CuRe technology. He said high-volume manufacturing results at the Perrysburg facility and field-deployment performance across several climates have exceeded expectations. When complete, the South Carolina site is expected to provide up to 3.5 GW of finishing capacity for modules initiated at First Solar’s international factories. The facility is intended to provide supply-chain flexibility and help optimize freight, tariff, domestic-content, and Section 45X economics. First Solar is also continuing its perovskite development program. Its Series 6 form-factor pilot line is expected to reach operational readiness in the first half of 2027. Management repeatedly cited pending outcomes from the Section 232 polysilicon and derivatives investigation, final foreign entity of concern regulations, and other tariff matters as important considerations for customer activity and manufacturing decisions. Widmar said First Solar expects a Section 232 outcome to be constructive but declined to predict its timing or final structure. He said the company believes policy clarity is needed for customers and the broader industry to move forward with greater certainty. First Solar has about 1.8 GW of fully finished manufacturing capacity in Malaysia and Vietnam that could potentially be ramped, after accounting for capacity serving the South Carolina finishing line. Bradley said the company is waiting for Section 232 policy clarity before determining the long-term role of that capacity. The company could bring finished international product into the U.S., use a limited amount of existing domestic finishing capacity for semi-finished products, or potentially consider another U.S. finishing line, although Bradley said building another facility was the less likely option. First Solar left its full-year 2026 guidance unchanged. The outlook now assumes a net tariff impact of $60 million to $80 million, including the estimated IEEPA recovery and an assumption that Section 301 tariffs will apply in the second half. For the third quarter, the company expects module volumes sold of 3.9 GW to 4.5 GW and adjusted EBITDA of $625 million to $775 million. Management said its priorities remain disciplined execution, technology advancement, customer service, prudent capital management, and preserving financial flexibility. First Solar, Inc (NASDAQ: FSLR) is a United States–based solar technology company best known for designing and manufacturing thin‑film photovoltaic (PV) modules that use cadmium telluride (CdTe) semiconductor technology. The company supplies PV modules and delivers integrated solar power solutions for utility‑scale projects, positioning itself as a provider of both components and complete solar energy systems rather than solely a parts supplier. First Solar was founded in 1999 and is headquartered in Tempe, Arizona. Beyond module manufacturing, First Solar offers a range of project services including development support, engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) services, and operations and maintenance (O&M) for large-scale solar installations. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "First Solar Q2 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for July 2026.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30

First Solar: Q2 Earnings Snapshot

Associated Press

PHOENIX (AP) — PHOENIX (AP) — First Solar Inc. (FSLR) on Thursday reported second-quarter net income of $422.6 million. On a per-share basis, the Phoenix-based company said it had net income of $3.92. The results surpassed Wall Street expectations. The average estimate of eight analysts surveyed by Zacks Investment Research was for earnings of $2.74 per share. The largest U.S. solar company posted revenue of $1.06 billion in the period, matching Street forecasts. First Solar expects full-year revenue in the range of $4.9 billion to $5.2 billion. _____ This story was generated by Automated Insights (http://automatedinsights.com/ap) using data from Zacks Investment Research. Access a Zacks stock report on FSLR at https://www.zacks.com/ap/FSLR

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30

First Solar Q2 Earnings Rise, Revenue Declines; Keeps Guidance

MT Newswires

First Solar (FSLR) reported Q2 earnings late Thursday of $3.92 per diluted share, up from $3.18 a ye

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30

First Solar, Inc. Announces Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results and Reaffirms Guidance

Business Wire
Net sales of $1.06 billion, a decrease of 4% year-over-year Net income per diluted share of $3.92, an increase of 23% year-over-year Adjusted EBITDA1 of $644 million Gross and net cash balance of $1.7 billion Contracted sales backlog of 45.1 GW as of June 30, 2026 PHOENIX, July 30, 2026--(BUSINESS WIRE)--First Solar, Inc. (Nasdaq: FSLR) (the "Company"), America’s leading PV solar technology and manufacturing company, today announced financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026 and reaffirmed its 2026 guidance. Net sales were $1.06 billion for the second quarter of 2026, a 4% decrease compared to the second quarter of 2025, driven primarily by lower revenue associated with customer contract terminations, partially offset by an increase in the volume of modules sold to third parties. The Company reported second quarter net income of $423 million, or $3.92 per diluted share, compared to $342 million, or $3.18 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2025. Adjusted EBITDA was $644 million compared to $560 million in the second quarter of 2025. Net cash balance decreased to $1.7 billion as of June 30, 2026 from $2.4 billion as of December 31, 2025, driven by seasonal working-capital needs and capital expenditures primarily for our South Carolina finishing facility. "We delivered both record second-quarter and first-half sales volume and improved financial performance relative to the prior year," said Mark Widmar, Chief Executive Officer. "We also surpassed 100 GW of cumulative module sales globally and ended the quarter with approximately 45.1 GW of contracted backlog extending through 2030, demonstrating continued demand for our differentiated technology platform, domestic manufacturing footprint and delivery certainty." Our 2026 guidance remains unchanged and is summarized below: From a third quarter earnings cadence perspective, we anticipate our module sales to be between 3.9 GW and 4.5 GW, including 3.2 GW to 3.7 GW from our U.S. manufacturing operations. These factors are expected to result in forecasted third quarter Adjusted EBITDA between $625 million and $775 million. The guidance figures presented above are forward-looking statements that are subject to a variety of assumptions and estimates, including with respect to the impact of public policies such as tariffs, export controls, or other trade remedies, freight-related costs, and c…Read full document

Net sales of $1.06 billion, a decrease of 4% year-over-year Net income per diluted share of $3.92, an increase of 23% year-over-year Adjusted EBITDA1 of $644 million Gross and net cash balance of $1.7 billion Contracted sales backlog of 45.1 GW as of June 30, 2026 PHOENIX, July 30, 2026--(BUSINESS WIRE)--First Solar, Inc. (Nasdaq: FSLR) (the "Company"), America’s leading PV solar technology and manufacturing company, today announced financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026 and reaffirmed its 2026 guidance. Net sales were $1.06 billion for the second quarter of 2026, a 4% decrease compared to the second quarter of 2025, driven primarily by lower revenue associated with customer contract terminations, partially offset by an increase in the volume of modules sold to third parties. The Company reported second quarter net income of $423 million, or $3.92 per diluted share, compared to $342 million, or $3.18 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2025. Adjusted EBITDA was $644 million compared to $560 million in the second quarter of 2025. Net cash balance decreased to $1.7 billion as of June 30, 2026 from $2.4 billion as of December 31, 2025, driven by seasonal working-capital needs and capital expenditures primarily for our South Carolina finishing facility. "We delivered both record second-quarter and first-half sales volume and improved financial performance relative to the prior year," said Mark Widmar, Chief Executive Officer. "We also surpassed 100 GW of cumulative module sales globally and ended the quarter with approximately 45.1 GW of contracted backlog extending through 2030, demonstrating continued demand for our differentiated technology platform, domestic manufacturing footprint and delivery certainty." Our 2026 guidance remains unchanged and is summarized below: From a third quarter earnings cadence perspective, we anticipate our module sales to be between 3.9 GW and 4.5 GW, including 3.2 GW to 3.7 GW from our U.S. manufacturing operations. These factors are expected to result in forecasted third quarter Adjusted EBITDA between $625 million and $775 million. The guidance figures presented above are forward-looking statements that are subject to a variety of assumptions and estimates, including with respect to the impact of public policies such as tariffs, export controls, or other trade remedies, freight-related costs, and certain factors related to the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the "IRA"), as amended by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025. Our outlook assumes the current U.S. policy environment persists, and in addition, that permitting processes and timelines will remain consistent with historical levels. Investors are encouraged to listen to the conference call and to review the accompanying materials, which contain more information about First Solar’s second quarter 2026 financial results, 2026 guidance, and financial outlook. We are not providing forward-looking guidance for GAAP net income or a quantitative reconciliation of the Adjusted EBITDA guidance range to GAAP net income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, because we are unable to predict with reasonable certainty the potential occurrence, financial impact or recognition period of significant items, such as share-based compensation, Section 45X tax credit discounts, contingencies and certain other gains or losses, as well as related income tax accounting because such items have not occurred, are out of our control, and/or cannot be reasonably predicted without unreasonable effort. These significant items are uncertain, depend on various factors, and could have a material impact on GAAP reported results for the guidance period. See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for more information on Adjusted EBITDA, including identification of significant items that we believe are not indicative of our ongoing operations. Conference Call Details First Solar has scheduled a conference call for today, July 30, 2026, at 4:30 p.m. ET, to discuss this announcement. A live webcast of this conference call and accompanying materials are available at investor.firstsolar.com. A replay of the webcast will also be available on the Investors section of the Company’s website approximately two hours after the conclusion of the call and remain available for 30 days. About First Solar, Inc. First Solar, Inc. is America's leading photovoltaic ("PV") solar technology and manufacturing company. The only U.S.-headquartered company among the world's largest solar manufacturers, First Solar is focused on competitively and reliably enabling power generation needs with our advanced, uniquely American thin film PV technology. Developed at research and development ("R&D") labs in California and Ohio, our technology provides a competitive, high-performance, and responsibly produced alternative to conventional crystalline silicon PV solar modules. Our PV solar modules are produced using a fully integrated, continuous process that does not rely on Chinese crystalline silicon supply chains. For more information, please visit www.firstsolar.com. For First Solar Investors This release contains forward-looking statements which are made pursuant to safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements in this release, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning: demand for solar technology generally and for our technology specifically, including in the U.S. market, and our positioning to serve such demand; new capacity coming online; our expectations regarding the political and trade environment and its impacts; production and delivery of our modules; our financial guidance for 2026, including future financial results, net sales, gross profit, operating expenses, Adjusted EBITDA, net cash balance, capital expenditures, expected earnings cadence, volume sold, bookings, and expected module shipments; products and our business and financial objectives for 2026; the availability of benefits under certain production linked incentive programs; the impact of the IRA as amended by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025, including the Section 45X tax credits; our expectations regarding the sale of our Section 45X tax credits; and the impact of public policies such as tariffs, export controls or other trade remedies. These forward-looking statements are often characterized by the use of words such as "estimate," "expect," "anticipate," "project," "plan," "intend," "seek," "believe," "forecast," "foresee," "likely," "may," "should," "goal," "target," "might," "will," "could," "predict," "continue," "contingent," and the negative or plural of these words and other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and our projections about future events and therefore speak only as of the date of this release. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements for any reason, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to: structural imbalances in global supply and demand for PV solar modules; our competitive position and other key competitive factors; the market for renewable energy, including solar energy; the modification, reduction, elimination, or expiration of government subsidies, economic incentives, tax incentives, renewable energy targets, and other support for on-grid solar electricity applications; the impact of public policies, such as tariffs, export controls, or other trade remedies imposed on solar cells and modules or related raw materials or equipment; interest rate fluctuations and our customers’ ability to secure financing; our ability to execute on our long-term strategic plans, including our ability to secure financing and realize the potential benefits of strategic acquisitions and investments; the loss of any of our large customers, or the inability of our customers and counterparties to perform under their contracts with us, including through terminations by customers of any contract in part or in full; our ability to execute on our solar module technology and cost reduction roadmaps; the performance of our solar modules upon installation; our ability to improve the wattage of our solar modules; our ability to incorporate technology improvements into our manufacturing process, including the implementation of our Copper Replacement ("CuRe") program; our ability to attract new customers and to develop and maintain existing customer and supplier relationships; general economic and business conditions, including those influenced by U.S., international, and geopolitical events and conflicts; environmental responsibility, including with respect to cadmium telluride ("CdTe") and other semiconductor materials; claims under our limited warranty obligations; changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations and environmental, health, and safety requirements; effects arising from and results of pending litigation; future collection and recycling costs for solar modules covered by our module collection and recycling program or otherwise as required by external laws and regulations; supply chain disruptions; our ability to protect or successfully commercialize our intellectual property; our ability to prevent and/or minimize the impact of cybersecurity incidents or information or security breaches; our continued investments in R&D; the supply and price of key raw materials (including CdTe, tellurium, and tellurium compounds), components, and manufacturing equipment; our ability to construct new production facilities to support new product lines; evolving corporate governance and public disclosure regulations and expectations, including with respect to environmental, social, and governance matters; our ability to avoid manufacturing interruptions, including during the ramp of new module manufacturing facilities; our ability to attract, train, retain, and successfully integrate key talent into our team; the severity and duration of public health threats, and the potential impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations; and the matters discussed under the captions "Risk Factors" and "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, as supplemented by our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Non-GAAP Financial Measures This press release includes earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), EBITDA Margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin, non‑GAAP measures, to provide supplemental information to our GAAP results. These non‑GAAP measures are not prepared in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net income and net income margin. Investors should review our financial information in its entirety and not rely on any single financial measure. First Solar’s management uses these non-GAAP financial measures to better understand and compare operating results across periods. Management believes these non-GAAP financial measures reflect First Solar’s ongoing business in a manner that will allow for meaningful period-to-period comparisons and analysis of trends in First Solar’s business. Management also believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to investors and others to understand and evaluate First Solar’s operating results and prospects in the same manner as management. The following are explanations of each of the adjustments that we incorporate into Adjusted EBITDA, as well as the reasons we add back each of these individual items to determine Adjusted EBITDA: Foreign currency (loss), net: Refers to the net effect of gains and losses resulting from holding assets and liabilities and conducting transactions denominated in currencies other than our subsidiaries’ functional currencies. Foreign currency is excluded because the timing of such currency‑related impacts is uncertain and may obscure underlying operating performance and trends. Other expense, net: Primarily comprises miscellaneous items and financing fees, such as gains/losses on investments or other discrete non‑operating items. These amounts are generally driven by market factors, financing and investment decisions, or one‑time transactions rather than core operations and can be volatile across periods. Share‑based compensation: Is a non‑cash charge reflecting the grant‑date fair value of equity awards recognized over vesting periods. We exclude it because it is significantly influenced by equity program design and stock price volatility, limiting comparability across companies and periods. Section 45X tax credit discounts: When we sell Section 45X tax credits, the cash proceeds received may be less than the notional credit amount due to market pricing, counterparty terms, and payment timing. Economically, this shortfall is akin to a financing cost — the cost of converting a future cash benefit into earlier liquidity — rather than a reflection of underlying manufacturing performance. We therefore exclude these transfer discounts from Adjusted EBITDA to improve comparability across periods and to separate core operating results from financing/monetization decisions. Underutilization (unallocated fixed production overhead): If our plant utilization is abnormally low, the portion of our indirect manufacturing costs related to the abnormal utilization level is expensed as incurred rather than absorbed into inventory. We exclude these costs because they are sensitive to timing, production curtailments, and transitory disruptions. Production start‑up: Consists of costs associated with operating a production line before it is qualified for commercial production, including the cost of raw materials for solar modules run through the production line during the qualification phase, employee compensation for individuals supporting production start-up activities, and applicable facility related costs. Production start-up expense also includes costs related to the selection of a new site and implementation costs for manufacturing process improvements to the extent we cannot capitalize these expenditures. We exclude these costs because they are driven by discrete expansion and launch activities and are not reflective of our ordinary operating performance. These costs are typically incurred over a defined ramp‑up period, can vary significantly based on the timing and scale of new expansions, and may not be indicative of our run‑rate cost structure once a facility or initiative reaches normal utilization levels. Management believes adjusting our GAAP results for the items described above to determine Adjusted EBITDA is useful to investors in assessing underlying operating performance and comparing period-to-period results, because these items (i) are largely non‑cash, (ii) can vary significantly based on timing of capacity ramps, start‑ups, and discrete events, or (iii) are not reflective of our ongoing operating cost structure. EBITDA Margin and Adjusted EBITDA Margin are calculated as EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, respectively, divided by net sales. The most directly comparable GAAP measure is net income margin, calculated as net income divided by net sales. Our presentation of EBITDA, EBITDA Margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin should not be construed as an implication that our actual future results will be unaffected by the items contemplated by the adjustments described above. Our presentation of EBITDA, EBITDA Margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin has limitations, including (among others): it does not reflect all of our cash expenditures; it does not reflect changes in our working capital needs; it does not reflect the discount on the sale of our Section 45X credits; it does not reflect the interest expense on our indebtedness; it does not reflect any income tax expenses we may incur or payments we may be required to make; and it does not reflect the impact of capacity ramps, start-ups, and discrete charges resulting from certain matters that we believe may not be indicative of our ongoing operations. Other companies in our industry may calculate EBITDA, EBITDA Margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin differently than we do because they do not have standardized definitions, which limits their usefulness as comparative measures in relation to other companies. View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260730673319/en/ Contacts First Solar Investors [email protected] First Solar Media [email protected]

TranscriptFY2026 Q22026-07-30

FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript

Earnings source - 78 paragraphs
Operator

Good afternoon, welcome to First Solar's second quarter 2026 earnings conference call. This call is being webcast live on the Investors section of firstsolar.com. All participants are in a listen-only mode. Please note that today's call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Byron Jeffers, Head of Investor Relations.

Byron Jeffers

Good afternoon, thank you for joining First Solar's second quarter 2026 earnings call. With me today are Mark Widmar, Chief Executive Officer, and Alex Bradley, Chief Financial Officer. Mark will begin with second quarter highlights, followed by Alex. We'll open the line for questions. Today's discussion contains forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially due to risks and uncertainties as described in our earnings press release and other SEC filings and the earnings material available at investor.firstsolar.com. We undertake no obligation to update these statements due to new information or future events. We will also reference certain Non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are in our earnings press release and presentation. This Non-GAAP financial information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for financial information presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Byron Jeffers

With that, I will turn it over to Mark.

Mark Widmar

Thank you, good afternoon. Beginning on slide four, we delivered both record second quarter and first-half sales volume and improved financial performance relative to the prior year. During the quarter, we generated over $1 billion in net sales, expanded gross margin to approximately 57%, and delivered strong adjusted EBITDA performance. We also surpassed an important milestone for First Solar, exceeding 100 GW of cumulative module sales globally. We view this as a reflection of the trust customers have placed in First Solar over the more than two and a half decades, and the durability of our technology and manufacturing platform. We entered the quarter with approximately 45.1 MW of contract backlog. With deliveries extending through the end of the decade, demonstrating the demand for our differentiated technology platform, domestic manufacturing footprint, and delivery certainty.

Mark Widmar

Turning to manufacturing, our U.S. facilities continued to operate at high utilization rates during the quarter. In South Carolina, the phase I of the finishing facility remains on track to begin production in the second half of 2026, with equipment installations progressing as expected. For the phase II, we now expect completion in mid-2027. While the revised timing reflects a number of factors associated with optimizing the facility's launch, it also enables the earlier incorporation of CuRe technology. We are pleased with the performance of CuRe, with both high-volume manufacturing at our Perrysburg facility and performance data from field deployments across multiple climates exceeding expectations. We believe incorporating the technology closer to the onset of the facility's commercial launch will simplify execution, accelerate value realization, and enhance customer value and the facility's long-term financial performance.

Mark Widmar

Once completed, the South Carolina facility is expected to provide up to 3.5 MW of finishing capacity for modules initiated at our international manufacturing sites, giving us greater flexibility to optimize our supply chain flexibility while also optimizing freight, tariff, domestic content, and Section 45X economics. With respect to our international manufacturing fleet, production planning and utilization levels in Malaysia and Vietnam continued to be influenced by U.S. market demand drivers and economics, including the pending Section 232 polysilicon and derivative investigation and tariffs. We expect greater policy clarity will help inform the long-term operating profile for the approximately 1.8 MW of fully finished international capacity that remains available after accounting for capacity being used to produce semi-finished product destined for our new South Carolina finishing line. A note on manufacturing optimization and allocation. Approximately 41 MW of our 45-GW backlog includes some form of domestic content requirement.

Mark Widmar

These requirements vary significantly and range from requiring exclusive supply from U.S. fully integrated factories to blending U.S.-made supply with both fully integrated domestic factories as well as product from our upcoming South Carolina finishing line to a domestic content points requirement, which is factory-agnostic, allowing blending of product from across our global fleet. We therefore continually balance and refine our module supply and demand allocation across the fleet to meet customer contractual obligations, optimize factory throughput, and optimize gross margin. This typically means that over a period of time, we will seek to maximize production and sales firstly from our fully integrated U.S. factories. Secondly, from our South Carolina finishing line, and thirdly, from our international facilities. As it relates to perovskites, we continue to advance our development program for this potentially significant technology platform.

Mark Widmar

Our previously announced development line continues to progress to process improved efficiency and reliability attributes on smaller form factor modules, while our Series 6 form factor pilot line remains on schedule and is expected to reach operational readiness in the first half of 2027. Our continued progress has given us confidence as we continue to invest substantial capital in our efforts to realize the commercialization of perovskites. Earlier today, we published our latest corporate responsibility report, reinforcing our conviction that how and where solar technology is made matters. The report details how we create enduring value by developing, sourcing, manufacturing, and recycling solar modules domestically, supporting jobs and communities, strengthening industrial capacity, and help ensure the benefits are realized locally. It also highlights our continued focus on responsible manufacturing, supply chain transparency, workforce development, and resource efficiency.

Mark Widmar

The report reflects the effectiveness of a business model where corporate responsibility isn't a construct, but the default. Before turning the call over to Alex, I want to briefly address the market and policy environment and how it is informing our commercial approach. The underlying drivers for utility-scale solar remain intact, including load growth, data center development, electrification, aging generation assets, and the need for affordable, scalable new capacity. The policy landscape continues to evolve, particularly as it relates to pending outcome for the Section 232 polysilicon and derivatives investigation, as well as final FEOC regulations. In this environment, we continue to prioritize pricing, contract quality, appropriate risk allocation, and long-term value over short-term booking volume. Relative to the beginning of the year, we are seeing increased customer engagement, and as policy clarity improves, we believe First Solar remains well-positioned to capitalize on these opportunities.

Mark Widmar

With that, I'll now turn the call over to Alex to discuss our bookings, financial results, and outlook.

Alex Bradley

Thanks, Mark. Beginning on slide five, as of June 30th, 2026, our contracted backlog totals 45.1 GW, with an aggregate transaction value of $13.6 billion, exclusive of technology adjusters, with scheduled deliveries extending through 2030. Early this month, Cypress Creek Energy broke ground on the Steel River Energy Center in Arkansas, a project utilizing First Solar modules and previously included in our contracted backlog. The initial phase is expected to provide approximately 1.6 GW of solar generation capacity and 1.9 GW hours of battery storage to support Google's growing energy needs, with the opportunity for future expansion. Since our last earnings call, we've recorded approximately 1.9 GW of additional U.S. gross bookings at an average selling price of approximately $0.36 per watt, inclusive of applicable technology adjusters.

Alex Bradley

While near-term customer activity continues to be influenced by the current policy environment discussed by Mark, our fully integrated domestic manufacturing fleet remains substantially committed through 2028, providing a high degree of volume and pricing visibility. Given the limited amount of uncommitted domestic capacity available over the next several years, we continue to be disciplined in evaluating incremental contracting opportunities. We also initiated our first customer notifications related to contractual Q.O.R adjusters during the quarter, an important milestone in beginning to translate Q.O.R's performance benefits from potential ASP adjusters into backlog value and future revenue realization. We expect the contribution from these adjusters to increase as Q.O.R deployment expands across our contracted portfolio. As a reminder, we expect limited ASP upside from Q.O.R sales in 2026, largely as a function of contractual notification deadlines relative to the timing of decision to recommence Q.O.R production.

Alex Bradley

Turning to India, our guidance continues to assume production is largely sold domestically in a short cycle book-and-bill market, with the factory operating at a high utilization rate. India gross bookings during the first half of the year totaled approximately 1.1 GW, an average selling price of approximately $0.20 per watt. Given the shorter contracting cycle of the domestic India market, booking economics generally provide a reasonable indicator of near-term revenue realization, subject to normal foreign currency movements. Turning to slide six. Net sales for the second quarter were approximately $1.06 billion, a decrease of approximately 4% year-over-year. Decrease is primarily driven by lower revenue associated with customer contract terminations recognized in the prior year period, partially offset by higher module volume sold. Gross margin was approximately 57%, an increase of approximately 12 percentage points compared to the second quarter of 2025.

Alex Bradley

The increase was primarily driven by an estimated $89 million net IEEPA tariff related benefit, a higher mix of modules qualifying for Section 45X tax credits, and lower logistics costs. The net IEEPA tariff related benefit reflects our current estimate of expected recoveries related to commercial obligations and other tariff related considerations and remains subject to refinement as additional information becomes available. These benefits were partially offset by lower termination-related revenue and higher duties and tariffs. While logistics costs improved year-over-year, the quarter included higher over-the-road freight costs driven by overall capacity tightening and volatility in diesel costs. These impacts were partially offset by higher sales rate recovery. Operating expenses were approximately $155 million, including $76 million of R&D expense.

Alex Bradley

R&D increased year-over-year, primarily affecting continued investment in perovskite development and the impairment of certain R&D equipment that is no longer expected to be used as part of our technology roadmap. Net income was $423 million, up approximately 24% year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA was $644 million, above the high end of our previously communicated Q2 preview range, with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 61%. Moving to slide seven. We ended the quarter with approximately $1.7 billion of net cash, providing substantial balance sheet strength and financial flexibility while remaining within our targeted long-term cash range of $1.5 billion-$2 billion. Operating cash outflows year-to-date were $360 million, reflecting first half working capital dynamics, and improved compared to outflows of $458 million during the first half of 2025. First half capital expenditures were $280 million, primarily supporting our South Carolina finishing facility and technology investments.

Alex Bradley

We completed the full prepayment of our India DFC loan during the quarter. Turning to slide eight. Our full-year 2026 guidance remains unchanged. With that said, our guidance now assumes a net tariff impact of $60 million-$80 million, with updates including the previously mentioned net IEEPA recovery and the assumption of Section 301 tariffs in the second half of the year. We also forecast offsetting updates between production startup expense and R&D expense, as well as incremental freight costs due to certain non-recoverable domestic trade expenses above our previously assumed forecast, largely driven by changes in module delivery locations. Note, in some cases, domestic freight costs are now approaching international shipping economics. For the third quarter, we expect volumes sold between 3.9 GW-4.5 GW, and adjusted EBITDA between $625 million-$775 million.

Alex Bradley

In summary, our first half performance and reaffirmed outlook reflect the strength of our strategy of reshoring and scaling domestic manufacturing, progressing our technology roadmap, and maintaining a selective approach to new bookings in light of key pending trade and policy determinations. As we look ahead, our priorities remain unchanged. We remain focused on disciplined execution, serving our customers, advancing our technology roadmap, managing capital prudently, and maintaining financial flexibility. With that, operator, please open the line for questions.

Operator

We will now begin the question and answer session. Please limit yourself to one question. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press star one again. We ask that you pick up your handset when asking a question to allow for optimum sound quality. If you are muted locally, please remember to unmute your device. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Jon Windham with UBS. Jon, your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Jon Windham

Perfect. Thanks. Hey, congratulations on the result, appreciate you taking the questions. Obviously, the FCC had a ruling about solar inverters a couple of days ago. I think on one side, it goes along to show how serious the government is in promoting domestic content within, especially electrical equipment hardware, which is obviously very good for you given your position in domestic solar modules. Just curious if you have any early thoughts on potential impact on broader solar installations and the ability of the industry to work around that provision. Thank you so much.

Mark Widmar

Yeah. Thanks, Jon. Look, I think it continues the theme of our U.S. government trying to ensure that we don't have any overreliance on adversarial countries, and obviously China being one of them in particular. I think the good thing about this is that the industry has started to get ahead of trying to find domestic supply chains, comprehensive domestic supply chains. We obviously were an early industry leader in that regard of reshoring manufacturing and creating a supply chain here in the U.S. for our U.S. operations. You're seeing this now really across all components of equipment suppliers, all the way up even to trying to find localizations for the battery supply chain as much as you can. I don't see it being a constraint near term.

Mark Widmar

I think the current models that have been shipping into the U.S. will continue to be allowed to be shipped into the U.S. I do think there is a theme or a message there, though, that that scrutiny may be stepped up as we move forward. I think it just sends another great signal to domestic manufacturers of, look, we need to move forward. We need to create domestic supply chains resiliency to enable not only the solar industry to thrive, but really all of the industries, that as we reindustrialize the U.S. economy, right? Again, I think it's a good indicator of a continued theme and message that this administration has, and we fully support it.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Brian Lee with Goldman Sachs & Co. Brian, your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Alex Bradley

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the questions. I guess first, on this Google Steel River project, appreciate you guys

Brian Lee

commenting on that. I might have missed it, but how much of the 1.9 GW in U.S. gross bookings came from that one project in the quarter? How much more bookings potential exists on that project site? Your bigger picture, maybe speak to how you're seeing general interest from that hyperscaler data center community. Second question I have is just the customary latest thoughts, timing, visibility into Section 232, how you're viewing the potential for floor prices in the $0.40 per watt or higher range. How quickly do you move on your booking funnel and Southeast Asia strategy once you get clarity on this, presumably, hopefully, in the next few months? Thanks, guys.

Mark Widmar

All right, Brian, I will try to take kind of the first two, and Alex will talk maybe a little bit about the views of Southeast Asia. Just to make sure it is clear, on the project that we announced with our partner, that we supplied modules to for Cypress Creek, that is already in our bookings. That was just to highlight. It is a great project. If you actually look at some of the more recent announcements that have been made over the last several weeks, I think you kind of see a theme there. You have a very large project with Cypress, the one that we referenced that it will be phase one of kind of call it the 1.6 GW. Then it goes to phase two, which will be about two and a half gigs.

Mark Widmar

That is a very large project, and I think the battery component of that as well is going to be north of 2 GW of megawatt hours from a battery standpoint. Really important strategic project. It is there to support Google. We have two other projects that have been announced over the last couple of weeks. One with Terra-Gen, which was about 1.4 GW. Then we had another one with Panamint, which was another gig plus. Those three projects that have been announced recently are about five gigawatts of capacity. The Panamint part of the Panamint volume was actually announced last quarter. When we did the announcements last quarter around bookings volumes, which I think we had in totals around 1.4, Panamint was actually included in that volume. I think it is a great message that the demand is there.

Mark Widmar

Half of that volume of that 5 GW I referenced is directly communicated and tied to Google as a hyperscaler. The other two and a half gigs, they have not disclosed the counterparties, if you look at the verbiage around the announcements on that, they will reference a very large corporate account, one of the largest companies in the U.S. You can kind of get a sense of the likelihood of who that counterparty is going to be for that project. Strong demand for continued demand for hyperscalers. Really strong relationships and partnerships with First Solar to support those types of strategic projects that really kind of thrive on the importance of certainty. Right? Those projects are strategic. They are important. They obviously include storage as reflected in the Cypress Creek project.

Mark Widmar

As I have always said, the first thing you need to do as you are building out your project to de-risking is that you need to make sure that you have a reliable partner who can make sure those photons become electrons. Without that, the whole project is going to be sit at risk, and we can deliver that certainty and that great technology and that reliability. We are seeing that in the marketplace and continued strong interest driven by, as currently still, somewhat insatiable demand from hyperscalers. As it relates to 232, I will take the pricing piece and then Alex can talk to kind of how we thread that into our views around Southeast Asia. Look, there is still a lot of views out there. I think everybody has a view of how the construct may be with minimum import price and maybe with a tariff on top of that.

Mark Widmar

There's some views of whether there's quotas or not. All I can say is it's still evolving, and we do believe it'll be constructive. I don't want to give kind of our internal read of what we think it potentially could be, because there's still a lot of moving pieces. I can say that we're still in constant contact with the appropriate parties at USTR and Commerce to continue to bring our voice into the conversation. We're still optimistic that the outcome will be constructive. We've used it as a reason to be disciplined, and we'll see what happens once it's finally announced. There's demand that's still sitting there on the sidelines. If you look at our cadence and our momentum around our bookings, just here in the month of July, we booked almost 2 GW in the U.S. at very good prices, as Alex indicated.

Mark Widmar

There's about 2 more GW, north of 2 GW, that's subject to CP. Then I've got another 2 GW of active conversations with customers that there's a high probability we can close through by the end of the year. We'll see how much that gets further catalyzed by a decision around 232.

Alex Bradley

Brian, as it relates to Southeast Asia capacity, we talked on the last couple of calls around looking at this a bit like an option. We're running somewhere around $30 million quarter of underutilization. Say we're running Southeast Asia manufacturing well below its theoretical capacity. About half of that's cash, about half non-cash. Given that we've been holding through the first half of the year, making a decision on the long-term future there pending the outcome of the 232, it makes sense to continue to do that. I'd still view this as we're waiting for the outcome of that policy. Just to frame the amount, if you were to go back and look at the slides we put out in our February call, it shows you nameplate capacity of production.

Alex Bradley

We originally had about 7 GW of total capacity sitting in Malaysia and Vietnam, about half of that is going to be dedicated to production that will feed our new finishing line in South Carolina. There's about 3.5 GW left of that. We did take out some tools, bring them over to the U.S. to reuse in our broad scope work. Ultimately, it leaves us with about 1.8 GW of end-to-end, fully finished capacity that we could ramp up across Malaysia and Vietnam. It's about that 1.8 that we're talking about. We're holding a decision on pending the outcome of the 232.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Praneeth Satish with Wells Fargo. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Praneeth Satish

Thanks. Good evening. Maybe just going back to Section 232, obviously, there's a lot in play and I recognize that. We've heard, and you mentioned the potential for waivers or quotas being allowed for certain domestic cell producers that could exempt them from some of these policy changes. I guess I'm just curious conceptually, from your perspective, if some of these waivers are granted, do you think that could mute some of the price upside from Section 232? Or do you still see a constructive supply-demand setup? Just trying to think conceptually how you think about that.

Mark Widmar

Obviously, any modifications versus 100% restriction will create some potential dilutive impact to the strategic intent of the 232. It also depends on if there is a waiver of some type or a quota of some type, how big is it, and does it scale down over time? Is it something that is implemented initially and then we'll walk down to maybe complete elimination of it? It's hard to give you a great insight to the impact. Clearly, we're advocating to try to minimize any of those impacts, and as well as they should only be a limited duration to the extent that they're enabled or allowed at all. We really want to create a domestic supply chain, and any type of workarounds that you get will disincentivize the investments that need to be made here in the U.S. to scale up those capabilities.

Mark Widmar

I think it's much easier for people to understand the policy environment with certainty versus creating uncertainty by waivers or quotas and those types of things that they can create. We'll have to wait and see. We're firm in our positions that we don't believe that they should be allowed, we'll have to see how the final outcome is.

Alex Bradley

There's some history here, too. If you look back at the Section 201 tariffs, and the exemption was put in place by bifacial technology, it was clear that that exemption effectively gutted that provision. I think the administration has seen how those exemptions can effectively undermine what they're trying to do. If there's a belief that the 232 provides a need around the national security interest, it doesn't make a lot of sense to have a carve-out or a quota piece associated with a national security interest provision.

Praneeth Satish

Got it. That makes sense. If we say that Section 232 goes through, you get some kind of reasonable outcome, a positive outcome. You kind of mentioned that there's four megawatts, it sounds like four megawatts plus of pending deals for the second half. Do you get the sense that there's more demand sitting on the sidelines that's waiting for policy clarity, and once we get clarity, you could see that number move up significantly higher? Just a point of clarification, I guess, again, if Section 232 goes through, you get a good outcome. On the Southeast Asia capacity, would you bring that volume into the U.S. as finished products, or would it come through as unfinished and you would expand your U.S. finishing line?

Mark Widmar

I guess on the 232, and I'll let Alex take the other question around how we think through Southeast Asia and whether it comes in as finished or partially finished, or do we expand capacity for finishing here in the U.S. I'll let Alex take that one. There clearly are customers that are sitting on the sidelines. There is absolutely no doubt about that. Even some of the stuff subject to CP is somewhat tethered to posting of security. One of the challenges that, especially as you get longer dated in terms of contracting some of this volume, and we are really trying to enforce having cash liquid security against new bookings. That's been a priority of ours. In some cases, some of the counterparties can't post the required security now.

Mark Widmar

They're working towards having that available. To the extent that the security is posted then, it kind of closes out on some of the CPs. That's a piece of it. There's clearly people sitting on the sidelines waiting to see what happens. We have a couple of counterparties that are hedging their weight. They know that the risk is that ASPs may go up. At this point in time, they're trying to wait and see how it plays out. Again, just the conversation last time, are there quotas or not? What are the options they have and so forth. That's all being in the mix right now.

Mark Widmar

As we've always said, the best thing for this industry is we just have clarity and certainty and 232, we just really need a decision on that because we can all understand how we move forward.

Alex Bradley

As it relates to what we could do with the Southeast Asia facilities, we could bring fully finished product in subject to demand and pricing in the U.S. It's not only a function of where the 232 sits, it's also a function of where other tariff provisions sit. Right now we have a Section 301 that's just gone into effect, replacing the Section 122 tariffs that were in effect for the first half of this year. Those relate to forced labor. There is still risk around a 301 relating to excess capacity, that investigation is ongoing. Pending the outcome of that, obviously, will determine what the total tariff impact could be to product coming in from Malaysia, Vietnam. We could bring some of it in as semi-finished whip share product and finish it in our existing U.S. facilities.

Alex Bradley

There's a limited amount, probably in the couple of hundred megawatt range of incremental capacity at our finishing lines across existing fleet in Ohio. We could do a little bit of that, but it's not effective to run Malaysia at low throughput, as you're seeing with the underutilization costs we're having this year. Really what we're looking for is an ability to run that factory at close to full capacity. Either it's selling fully finished international product, subject to where tariffs end up, or there is the potential to build another finishing line in the U.S. That's subject, again, to finding available site with power and the time it would take to build that out. I think that's less likely, but it is still an option.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Julien Dumoulin-Smith with Jefferies LLC. Julien, your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Julien Dumoulin-Smith

Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, team. Appreciate the opportunity. Quickly, actually, to follow up on that last line of thinking on bookings, how do you think about the safe harbor having played into the latest quarter here, obviously July 4th being a relevant threshold? Also, again, that being a leading indicator for future sales into the later part of the decade, how are you thinking about that? Obviously, that's a big part of your open book. What are you thinking in terms of having safe harbor to acquire your initial customer conversations? As a follow-up on what you were just alluding to there, can you elaborate a little bit more around the permutations and the timeline for that remaining piece in Southeast Asia?

Julien Dumoulin-Smith

I know it's a little bit of just an extension of the logic you were just delineating there, but can you expand a little bit on the timeline? It sounds like it's not that far off that you'll make a decision. Let me put it more bluntly.

Alex Bradley

Maybe I'll just take that one. On the Southeast Asia, we're really waiting for the outcome of the 232. We would expect to evaluate that and have a view shortly thereafter. It doesn't necessarily mean that we will have an immediate action plan that relates to, say, a shutdown or a full capacity. Once we have a sense of where the policy is, that'll allow us to evaluate it. It will take a little bit of time, though. We want to make sure whatever policy comes through, we understand it, and our customers also have a chance to evaluate it. We can have discussions around whether there's a view of long-term offtake potential from those facilities.

Mark Widmar

Yeah, I just want to make sure a couple of things. The bookings that we're reporting, most of the bookings that we reported in 1.9 in U.S. volume, I think almost all of that was outside of the quarter close. Most of that happened in July, which would also have been outside of the safe harbor date. Most everyone has safe harbored with transformers. There's really no safe harbor. I know there was a, I don't know, it was maybe 10 days left in the quarter where there was a ruling that was made that the decision that came out in August of the prior year where it said that you eliminated the ability to use modular 5% CapEx rule to safe harbor. There was a ruling by one of the courts that came out, I think, I don't know, somewhere like June 20th.

Mark Widmar

There was hardly any time left in the quarter. That theory you could use, assuming that that wasn't challenged, the theory you could use modules to potentially safe harbor projects. But that was really not an opportunity. It just happened way too late. Most people had already safe harbored with the inverters or transformers, excuse me, anyways. But as you go forward, it is an important component, especially for anything that was safe harbored. If you safe harbored the first half of this year with ability to COD out into 2030, there are stricter requirements from a FEOC standpoint at the project level that have to be met that I think positions us well to serve that demand as you get out into '29 and '30 for when those projects most likely could be commissioned.

Mark Widmar

The other thing I would say is we are seeing, there's a lot of rigid interpretations a little bit. There are some people that are interpreting that even if something was safe harbored, let's say in the second half of 2025, that if you do anything with a change order or assuming it was something from a MSA to a PAPO or until a PAPO, First Solar, excuse me, is actually generated, you have to always be mindful of is there a restriction that you could have to comply with from a foreign entity perspective. So there's a lot of very conservative, which is right. People want to be airtight and not taking any risk to jeopardize their either ITC or PTC. I think there's a view towards maybe being overly conservative, advice they're getting from tax counsel and others.

Mark Widmar

I think that's, if I was in their situation, I clearly would do that as well. I don't want to put anything at risk. So there's that safe harbor and those requirements under 40AD as it relates to FEOC's restrictions or requirements, I think will continue to play well for us as we look to book out through the end of this decade.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Philip Shen with ROTH Capital Partners. Phil, your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Philip Shen

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. Just wanted to follow up on the 232, specifically on timing. We've been thinking it's August, but we've seen a bunch of delays. The issue is, if it slips past August, then we go into September, and then that gets closer to the midterms, then there's a chance that decision could push on that. Are they still August? want to contact who's inside commerce CR has shared that from an authorization standpoint-

Mark Widmar

Phil, we're really having a hard time.

Philip Shen

Two minutes.

Mark Widmar

We're having a real hard time. You're breaking up.

Philip Shen

How is it? Is this better?

Mark Widmar

Try it again, because it was really hard to get that.

Philip Shen

Mark?

Mark Widmar

Yes.

Philip Shen

Okay.

Mark Widmar

Yeah, I got it.

Philip Shen

Talking about the three, two is all much better. Okay. Anyway, we've been thinking it's August, but there's a stat the 232 come out in September or beyond. [unintelligible], I have the policy 232 front and center. What's your view, based on the folks that you guys are in touch with, that this should be August? Do you think there's a greater probability that this could slip into the fall, or even beyond? Thanks.

Mark Widmar

Philip, I think I got your question. Look I know there's a lot that's in the mix and what the administration's trying to evaluate when this is implemented, and we also want to make sure they do, and what is implemented achieves the strategic intent and the spirit of what it was set out to do. We are patient. We continue to be engaged. We are anxious as well as you are and others. As I indicated, the industry really needs the certainty of understanding. I can't give you any level of conviction, maybe more than what you have right now. We are still getting signal that decisions will be made. There are meetings that are being had that would indicate they're close to making a decision. We also want to make sure that this is done right.

Mark Widmar

To give you some sense of my level of confidence in August or whether it waits till September, I can't really give you a strong view on that. I can just tell you we want this to be implemented with the achieving the strategic intent and spirit of what it was set out to do. That's the most important thing, and we're going to continue to be engaged with the administration to ensure that that happens.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Colin Rusch with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Colin Rusch

Thanks so much. Guys, are there opportunities for you to reduce input costs on the U.S. manufacturing? Can you talk a little bit about the supply chain and how that's evolving? I know you'd had some discussions with glass makers around a capacity expansion and the capital needs that they have, just curious about how you might be able to look at that trend on a multi-year basis.

Mark Widmar

Yeah. Colin, it's challenging. We're still in this. Especially in the U.S., as you see more reshoring, pressure on commodities, the data centers are being built out, everything, obviously, as you would expect, steel, aluminum, copper. We don't use silver, but obviously our competitors do. There's just a lot of pressure. You can look at fuel costs, and you can look at what's happened in the Middle East. I see that as more of a transitory nature. In theory, once that's resolved, I think we'll have seen much more competitive fuel prices and what have you. The electricity prices, at some of the locations in which we operate, we're dealing with some of those same adverse impacts that others are. We're in a pretty challenging rising commodity cost environment. Now, are we able to do things like drive more throughput through our operations? Absolutely.

Mark Widmar

We're focusing on continuing to do that. Are we finding ways to create further automation and capabilities that can reduce labor costs? There's levers that we're focused on, and there's some redesign of the product that we're looking at on trying to take costs out of the back rails of the frame. We continue to look at glass and thickness and other things that we could do from that standpoint. It's a pretty challenging environment from a commodity cost standpoint. Our ability to get a lot of profit, I think, is probably one of the most challenging times that we've been in. Now, I will say that when you look at it on a cost per watt, not necessarily a cost per module, the great thing about CuRe is that we have the opportunity to drive the efficiency up.

Mark Widmar

As we drive the efficiency up, as we go from where we are right now and add another 10 watts, 15 watts, 20 watts, 30 watts, that'll help the CPW numbers, cost per watt numbers, which is important. We need to drive that number down. The ASP, the value uplift, because of the energy attributes and the higher efficiency of CuRe, that drives to an entitlement for higher ASPs and the like. That's what we're focused on, and we're never going to give up on the input costs. We got to do the best we can to get cost out, but it is a pretty challenging environment right now.

Alex Bradley

I'd also say that the potential to use the balance sheet to work with suppliers who are looking at expansion or needing funding, there's an option there. We could try and leverage our position of financial strength to get forward pricing that makes more sense. That has to be done at the right risk premium, risk profile. The other thing I'd say is outside of just bill of material costs, obviously, we're having a challenging time around period costs going from cost per watt produced over to cost per watt sold. Again, we're seeing freight challenges as it relates to cost of trucking. I think I mentioned in the prepared remarks that we're seeing costs now to deliver product from Perrysburg over to the West Coast of the U.S. are equivalent of delivering product from Asia to the West Coast of the U.S.

Alex Bradley

continue to look how we can optimize our domestic transport routes, freight, and try and optimize between factories so that we can reduce those costs to the greatest extent possible.

Operator

Our final question comes from the line of Corinne Blanchard with Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Corinne Blanchard

Hey, good afternoon. Thank you for taking my question. I actually want to come back on the last question regarding M&A. I think you just added a little bit to it, can you expand a little bit, what are you targeting with the current balance sheet that you have? Kind of felt like you were mentioning that you could use M&A to maybe help manage the input cost, where else do you see maybe an option or a possibility for First Solar?

Alex Bradley

Look, when we talk about uses of cash, M&A is something that's been on the list for us for a long time. Generally, we focus more on the working capital reserve piece then growing capacity and replicating technology. That's where the company's been if you look over the last decade or so. We've also put more money into R&D. I think when you think about M&A, the obvious area for us to expand into would be, do we spend more on technology, and technology-adjacent things? Which could either be companies, it could be buying teams, it could be buying intellectual property. Anything that could accelerate the technology transition we see going forward as we invest a lot into potential perovskite development. I think there's options there.

Alex Bradley

We're also taking a look at things that are adjacent to technology. We want to do it with a disciplined focus around where do we see opportunities where we have a skill set that we can bring. Something where we look at our strengths in high volume, thin film manufacturing, a very high throughput efficiency. How can we leverage that set of skills and take it into an adjacent product, also look at the overall market environment we'll be playing in. We compete in a challenging industry where the vast majority of our competitors are Chinese and tend to play by a different set of rules.

Alex Bradley

As we think about how we could move into adjacent areas across M&A, want to evaluate what does the competitive landscape look like, what does the market that we'll be accessing look like, and what does the policy environment look like. We are starting to look through that. Clearly, given our position in the industry, a lot of stuff comes across our desk and has done over the last 10 years or so. We haven't done a lot on the M&A side. I'd say we are more willing to do that. We're more open to it. We want to make sure we do it with a disciplined focus.

Operator

We have reached the end of the Q&A session. This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may-

As of 2026-08-22 • Updated weeklySource: Earnings sourceIngestion runbook