FRPH
FRPFDocument history
Earnings documents stored for FRPH.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-05FRP Q2 Earnings Call Highlights
MarketBeat
FRP Q2 Earnings Call Highlights
Interested in FRP Holdings, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. FRP’s second-quarter results were broadly in line with expectations, with approximately $9.4 million in pro forma NOI, $4.1 million in FFO, or $0.21 per share, and roughly $130 million of liquidity. Management is prioritizing industrial real estate, expecting its industrial portfolio to expand to about 2.1 million square feet as development projects are completed. Leasing activity improved, but tenant decisions remain slow and Maryland occupancy fell sharply amid departures and a bankruptcy. FRP lowered its full-year NOI outlook to approximately $36.2 million, reflecting delayed industrial lease-up and continued Washington, D.C., multifamily pressures, partly offset by stronger mining results. D.C. properties face new supply, rents on new leases about 10% below prior levels, and tenant delinquency of roughly 8%. FRP (NASDAQ:FRPH) said its second-quarter results were largely in line with management’s expectations as industrial leasing activity improved but lease execution remained uneven, while multifamily operations in Washington, D.C., continued to face supply and delinquency pressures. President and Chief Operating Officer David deVilliers III said the company generated approximately $9.4 million in pro forma net operating income, or NOI, and approximately $4.1 million in funds from operations, or FFO, equal to $0.21 per share, during the quarter. FRP ended the period with about $130 million of liquidity, including approximately $101 million of cash. → SpaceX’s First Earnings Report Could Decide Whether Shorts or Bulls Have Control Management said it is directing most future discretionary growth capital toward industrial real estate, while continuing to operate and maximize the value of its multifamily and mining-royalty businesses. DeVilliers said the company views industrial properties serving logistics, manufacturing, distribution and service users as its most attractive long-term investment opportunity. FRP said its acquisition of Altman Logistics over the past year expanded both the scale of its industrial platform and its operating capabilities. As its current industrial development pipeline is delivered through the first quarter of next year, the company expects its industrial portfolio to grow to about 2.1 million square feet from approximately 800,000 square feet at the end of…Read full documentShow less
Interested in FRP Holdings, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. FRP’s second-quarter results were broadly in line with expectations, with approximately $9.4 million in pro forma NOI, $4.1 million in FFO, or $0.21 per share, and roughly $130 million of liquidity. Management is prioritizing industrial real estate, expecting its industrial portfolio to expand to about 2.1 million square feet as development projects are completed. Leasing activity improved, but tenant decisions remain slow and Maryland occupancy fell sharply amid departures and a bankruptcy. FRP lowered its full-year NOI outlook to approximately $36.2 million, reflecting delayed industrial lease-up and continued Washington, D.C., multifamily pressures, partly offset by stronger mining results. D.C. properties face new supply, rents on new leases about 10% below prior levels, and tenant delinquency of roughly 8%. FRP (NASDAQ:FRPH) said its second-quarter results were largely in line with management’s expectations as industrial leasing activity improved but lease execution remained uneven, while multifamily operations in Washington, D.C., continued to face supply and delinquency pressures. President and Chief Operating Officer David deVilliers III said the company generated approximately $9.4 million in pro forma net operating income, or NOI, and approximately $4.1 million in funds from operations, or FFO, equal to $0.21 per share, during the quarter. FRP ended the period with about $130 million of liquidity, including approximately $101 million of cash. → SpaceX’s First Earnings Report Could Decide Whether Shorts or Bulls Have Control Management said it is directing most future discretionary growth capital toward industrial real estate, while continuing to operate and maximize the value of its multifamily and mining-royalty businesses. DeVilliers said the company views industrial properties serving logistics, manufacturing, distribution and service users as its most attractive long-term investment opportunity. FRP said its acquisition of Altman Logistics over the past year expanded both the scale of its industrial platform and its operating capabilities. As its current industrial development pipeline is delivered through the first quarter of next year, the company expects its industrial portfolio to grow to about 2.1 million square feet from approximately 800,000 square feet at the end of 2025. → 3 Drone Stocks That Should Soar After the Summer Slump The company has signed about 20,700 square feet of industrial leases and has approximately 97,500 square feet in active lease negotiations, according to deVilliers. Chief Investment Officer Mark Levy said FRP has more than 110,000 square feet of renewals and pending new transactions in process. “Tenant decision making remains deliberate and transaction timelines remain longer than historical norms,” Levy said, though he added that activity has increased significantly and tenants generally continue to report solid operating results and strong balance sheets. → The Bitcoin Comeback May Already Be Underway—2 ETFs for Exposure Levy said national industrial construction activity has contracted by roughly 60% from its 2022-2023 peak, while absorption has strengthened. He said FRP expects a more favorable supply-demand environment for projects delivering in the near term, particularly in Florida, New Jersey and Maryland, where regulatory constraints and development restrictions limit new supply. In Maryland, management said occupancy in its same-store industrial portfolio, including Hollander Business Park and Cranberry Business Park, declined to 70.6% from 92% in the first quarter of 2025. DeVilliers attributed the decline to several tenant departures, including government tenants, and one tenant bankruptcy. The company said it is seeing increased activity and negotiations at Cranberry. Levy said the Chelsea industrial project, delivered last year, has faced longer tenant decision cycles and competition from available space and incentives in southern New Jersey. FRP does not currently plan to develop additional speculative space at its Mechanics Valley and Crouse sites, he said, unless market fundamentals become more durable. The company instead plans to market those sites for build-to-suit opportunities and maintain their development readiness. In Florida, Levy characterized Broward County as highly supply constrained. FRP is close to signing a roughly 25,000-square-foot lease at its Davie project at what he described as a strong rental rate. The Davie building has not yet been delivered. Management also cited strong activity at its Lakeland property, though no leases have yet been signed there, and said Camp Lake is positioned to benefit from population growth and demand from local service businesses. Mining generated approximately $4.1 million of NOI in the quarter, up about 12% from a year earlier. DeVilliers said the business provides durable recurring cash flow with little incremental capital requirement and supports FRP’s development strategy and balance-sheet flexibility. The company lowered its full-year NOI outlook to approximately $36.2 million from an original plan of $37.1 million. Management said the approximately $900,000 reduction reflects about $800,000 from delayed industrial lease-up and $1 million of operating headwinds in the Washington, D.C., multifamily portfolio, partly offset by approximately $850,000 of stronger-than-expected mining performance. FRP’s multifamily development pipeline includes 510 units in Greenville, South Carolina, and Estero, Florida, expected to deliver in the first quarter of 2028. The additions would expand the company’s multifamily portfolio to 2,337 units from 1,827 units. Across industrial and multifamily projects, the company cited approximately $506 million of total project costs and approximately $34 million of expected stabilized NOI, of which FRP’s share is approximately $16.6 million. Management said Greenville multifamily operations continue to perform well, while Washington, D.C., remains pressured by new supply, concessions and tenant delinquencies. DeVilliers said renewal rent increases at the company’s D.C. properties were positive and above 1.5% during the quarter, but rents on new leases following tenant departures were approximately 10% below prior tenant levels. He said about 8% of tenants were not paying rent and that eviction timelines in the district can extend 12 to 18 months. FRP’s tenant renewal rate is above 50%, while economic occupancy increased by approximately 75 basis points during the quarter, according to deVilliers. Chief Executive Officer John Baker III said the company’s D.C. delinquency issues have persisted for several years, while increased apartment supply in the Anacostia submarket has more recently pressured trade-outs. Management described the supply issue as cyclical, but said it does not expect delinquency challenges tied to the district’s regulatory environment to improve soon. Several shareholders on the call urged FRP to consider dividends or stock repurchases. Baker said management will generally favor investing capital in projects while development opportunities remain available. He said buybacks in the near term would be conducted opportunistically, while a meaningful repurchase program or dividend could become part of the company’s approach if it reaches a point where cash generation exceeds available projects. On expenses, Baker said general and administrative costs should be considered largely flat at their current run rate because the company has built out its team and does not expect material new hiring. DeVilliers added that first-quarter G&A included more than $500,000 of one-time audit and legal expenses related to a closing that are not expected to recur. FRP reported debt service coverage of approximately 2.82 times and net debt equal to approximately 19% of fair market value. Management said its priorities remain industrial lease-up, stabilizing projects already under development, preserving balance-sheet strength and selectively investing in long-term industrial growth. FRP Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FRPH) is an industrial services holding company that provides asset integrity and life-extension solutions to heavy-industry clients. Through its operating subsidiaries, FRP offers a broad suite of non-destructive testing (NDT), inspection services, mechanical maintenance, protective coatings, thermal spray and surface-preparation services. These offerings help clients maintain and extend the service life of critical equipment and infrastructure across multiple sectors. The company's core activities include ultrasonic, radiographic and magnetic-particle testing, site-based inspections, welding and fabrication support, and specialized coating applications designed to withstand extreme environments. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "FRP Q2 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for August 2026.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-05FRP Holdings Inc (FRPH) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Strategic Expansion Amidst Market ...
GuruFocus.com
FRP Holdings Inc (FRPH) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Strategic Expansion Amidst Market ...
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: August 05, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Leasing activity has significantly increased, with property tours, proposals, and active negotiations up across multiple markets. The industrial development pipeline will expand the portfolio from 800,000 to 2.1 million square feet by Q1 2027. Mining NOI increased 12% year-over-year, providing durable cash flow with minimal capital requirements. The balance sheet remains strong with $130 million in liquidity, a debt service coverage of 2.82x, and net debt at 19% of fair market value. The national industrial construction pipeline has contracted 60% from its peak, improving the supply-demand outlook for new projects. Industrial leasing is taking longer than underwritten, with full-year NOI guidance reduced by $900,000 due to delayed lease-up. Washington DC multifamily portfolio faces elevated supply, higher delinquencies, and a regulatory environment that prolongs evictions. Maryland industrial same-store occupancy dropped from 92% to 70.6% due to tenant losses, including a bankruptcy. FFO is pressured by lease timing, elevated platform costs, and higher interest expenses. Management faces shareholder criticism for not returning capital via buybacks or dividends, with the stock trading at a deep discount to NAV. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with FRPH. Is FRPH fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Q: Can you provide more color on the multi-family performance in DC, which seems to be getting hit harder than peers?A: David Devillier III (President and COO): The issue is widespread across our DC portfolio. While renewal increases are positive (above 1.5%) and renewal rates are above 50%, we are getting hit on trade-outs, with new tenant rates about 10% lower. The biggest headwind is that about 8% of tenants aren't paying rent. Due to DC's regulatory environment and backed-up court systems, it takes 12-18 months to evict non-paying tenants, and some people are taking advantage of this by signing leases with no intention of paying. We are improving our screening process, and economic occupancy ticked up about 75 basis points this quarter, but the delinquency headwind remains significant. Q: What's going on with the Maryland/Baltimore industrial market, s…Read full documentShow less
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Release Date: August 05, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Leasing activity has significantly increased, with property tours, proposals, and active negotiations up across multiple markets. The industrial development pipeline will expand the portfolio from 800,000 to 2.1 million square feet by Q1 2027. Mining NOI increased 12% year-over-year, providing durable cash flow with minimal capital requirements. The balance sheet remains strong with $130 million in liquidity, a debt service coverage of 2.82x, and net debt at 19% of fair market value. The national industrial construction pipeline has contracted 60% from its peak, improving the supply-demand outlook for new projects. Industrial leasing is taking longer than underwritten, with full-year NOI guidance reduced by $900,000 due to delayed lease-up. Washington DC multifamily portfolio faces elevated supply, higher delinquencies, and a regulatory environment that prolongs evictions. Maryland industrial same-store occupancy dropped from 92% to 70.6% due to tenant losses, including a bankruptcy. FFO is pressured by lease timing, elevated platform costs, and higher interest expenses. Management faces shareholder criticism for not returning capital via buybacks or dividends, with the stock trading at a deep discount to NAV. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with FRPH. Is FRPH fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Q: Can you provide more color on the multi-family performance in DC, which seems to be getting hit harder than peers?A: David Devillier III (President and COO): The issue is widespread across our DC portfolio. While renewal increases are positive (above 1.5%) and renewal rates are above 50%, we are getting hit on trade-outs, with new tenant rates about 10% lower. The biggest headwind is that about 8% of tenants aren't paying rent. Due to DC's regulatory environment and backed-up court systems, it takes 12-18 months to evict non-paying tenants, and some people are taking advantage of this by signing leases with no intention of paying. We are improving our screening process, and economic occupancy ticked up about 75 basis points this quarter, but the delinquency headwind remains significant. Q: What's going on with the Maryland/Baltimore industrial market, specifically at Cranberry and Chelsea, which seem to be leasing up slower than expected?A: David Devillier III (President and COO) and Mark Levy (Chief Investment Officer): Our Maryland same-store portfolio (Hollander and Cranberry) dropped from 92% occupied in Q1 2025 to 70.6% currently, due to losing government tenants and one bankruptcy. However, we have tremendous activity at Cranberry now. For Chelsea, the Baltimore north markets are caught between larger logistics markets. Large users are consolidating to centralize distribution, often choosing Pennsylvania or New Jersey, where there is oversupply and economic incentives. The good news is that competitive supply in New Jersey has been absorbed, and there are very few new projects in the pipeline, which should create openings for us. Q: Given the stock trades at a significant discount to NAV, why isn't the company prioritizing share buybacks or dividends over new development?A: John Baker III (CEO): As long as we have projects to put capital into, we will always opt for that over dividends or buybacks. We have a lot on our plate right now, and given economic uncertainty, it makes sense to hold cash to play both defense and offense. We haven't reached a point where we have more cash coming in than projects to fund. Any buybacks would be done opportunistically, but that is not the current plan. Q: What is the leasing outlook for the major industrial projects in Broward County, Davie, and Lakeland?A: Mark Levy (Chief Investment Officer): Broward County is the most supply-constrained submarket in the country with sub-4% vacancy and high barriers to entry. Our Davie site is uniquely located at the intersection of three major highways, near the airport and port. We are close to signing a lease for ~25,000 square feet at a strong rate. In Central Florida, Lakeland is seeing tremendous activity driven by population growth and tenants consolidating operations between Tampa and Orlando. Camp Lake is a localized service business story driven by residential expansion. We are confident in the lease-up of these projects. Q: How should we think about G&A costs going forward, given they've increased significantly in the first half of the year?A: Matt McNulty (CFO): A flat run rate is a good way to think about it. We have built out our team and have no new hires on the horizon. There was more than $0.5 million in one-time costs in Q1 related to audit and legal fees from a closing that won't recur, but the rest is a steady run rate. Q: What are your thoughts on the recent comparable sale across from Bryant Street, and how does Bryant Street compare?A: John Baker III (CEO): That deal (the Trammel Crow Rowan building) closed at a 6% cap rate, which is a good indication of where the DC market is right now. Bryant Street is very similar in terms of location and characteristics. I am always partial to our assets, but it's a good comp for where things are. Q: How much cash is earmarked for future development, and how are you judging future opportunities versus buybacks?A: John Baker III (CEO): Most of our equity capital for current deliveries has already been spent. We have about $8 million going out over the next two quarters for vertical construction at Woven. Our focus now is deploying capital for leasing and entitlements to get sites shovel-ready. We have $100 million in cash and $130 million in total liquidity, which is more than enough. We will always choose investing in projects over buybacks as long as we have opportunities. Q: Is there a plan to develop more office or other uses at the riverfront properties in DC, or is it all multi-family?A: David Devillier III (President and COO): Office is not in the plan. We originally envisioned office and hotel for phases 3 and 4, but we now believe this is a great multi-family area. We own the land at a very low basis and see an opportunity to create a waterfront multi-family portfolio. We are not breaking ground now given market conditions, but in 7-8 years, we will monitor the market, debt markets, and construction costs to make the right decision. Q: How will you communicate the lease absorptions occurring in the Florida warehouses to investors?A: John Baker III (CEO): We will communicate progress through our quarterly earnings releases. Q: Have you moved up the timeframe for developing Brooksville?A: John Baker III (CEO): There was never a set timeframe. It is purely a function of the right developer coming along to take the property down. The calcium mining is a wonderful interim use, and when someone wants to develop the land, they will approach us. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
TranscriptFY2026 Q22026-08-05FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript
Earnings source - 127 paragraphs
FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the FRP Holdings, Inc. Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. All lines have been placed on a listen-only mode, and the call will be open for questions and comments following the management presentation. At this time, it is my pleasure to turn the call over to Matt McNulty.
Thank you, Mike. Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. I'm Matt McNulty, Chief Financial Officer of FRP Holdings, Inc. With me as speakers today are John Baker III, our CEO; David deVilliers III, our President and Chief Operating Officer; and Mark Levy, our Chief Investment Officer. Also joining us on the call are John Baker II, our Chairman; David deVilliers Jr., our Vice Chairman; John Milton, our Executive Vice President; and John Klopfenstein, our Chief Accounting Officer. As a reminder, any statements on the call which relate to the future are, by their nature, subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties are listed in our SEC filings.
Additionally, to supplement the financial results presented in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, FRP presents certain non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G. The non-GAAP financial measures referenced in this call are net operating income or NOI, pro forma NOI, funds from operations or FFO, and FFO per share. We also reference debt service coverage and net debt as a percentage of the fair market value, which are not measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. FRP uses these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze its operations and to monitor, assess, and identify meaningful trends in our operating and financial performance. These measures are not and should not be viewed as a substitute for GAAP financial measures. To reconcile net operating income to GAAP net income, please refer to our most recently filed 10-Q, earnings press release, and our quarterly earnings deck published on our website.
I will now turn the call over to our President and Chief Operating Officer, David deVilliers III, for his report on operations. David.
Thank you, Matt, and good morning, everyone. The second quarter unfolded largely as we expected. Industrial leasing continues to take longer than we originally underwrote, but tenant activity continues to improve. Our balance sheet remains exceptionally strong, and our long-term strategy has not changed. Let me begin with where FRP is headed, because it frames everything we do. At FRP, disciplined capital allocation is at the core of our strategy. We continually evaluate where each incremental dollar can earn the highest long-term risk-adjusted return. That philosophy has created a portfolio and pipeline that includes industrial, multifamily, and mining royalties. Each business generates recurring NOI, creates long-term, shareholder value, and plays an important role in our company. As we look ahead, however, we believe our greatest opportunity is industrial. Industrial real estate includes logistics, manufacturing, distribution, and service-oriented industrial users. This offers the most attractive long-term investment opportunity across our markets.
Accordingly, we expect most of our future discretionary growth capital to be invested in expanding our industrial portfolio. We are not changing who FRP is; we are changing where incremental capital goes. Our objective is to grow industrial into a larger contributor to NOI and FFO over time while continuing to own, operate, develop, and maximize the value of our multifamily and mining businesses. Our riverfront project along the Anacostia River illustrates that philosophy well. It is not simply another multifamily development. It is a legacy land position where years of entitlement, infrastructure investment, and development have created value and returns that would be difficult to replicate by acquiring a comparable site today. Those legacy opportunities remain an important part of FRP's long-term value creation. Together, these three businesses provide recurring NOI, financial strength, and the flexibility to continue investing for the long term.
We are executing that strategy from a position of financial strength. We ended the quarter with approximately $130 million of liquidity, including approximately $101 million of cash, supported by a conservatively leveraged balance sheet. That financial strength gives us the flexibility to lease, stabilize, and selectively invest while maintaining the discipline that has long defined FRP. For the quarter, we generated approximately $9.4 million of pro forma NOI and FFO of approximately $4.1 million, or $0.21 per share. During the past year, the acquisition of the Altman Logistics significantly expanded both the scale of our industrial platform and the operating capabilities needed to execute this strategy. As our current industrial development pipeline delivers through the first quarter of next year, our industrial portfolio will grow from approximately 800,000 square feet at the end of 2025 to approximately 2.1 million square feet. Encouragingly, leasing momentum continues to improve.
Property tours, proposals, tenant discussions, and active negotiations have all increased across multiple markets. We have signed approximately 20,700 square feet and have another approximately 97,500 square feet in active lease negotiations. While lease execution remains uneven, tenant activity today is materially stronger than it was a year ago, giving us greater confidence that occupancy and FFO will improve as more of those discussions convert into signed leases. Mining generated approximately $4.1 million of NOI during the quarter, an increase of approximately 12% year-over-year. It remains a highly efficient business that produces durable recurring cash flow while requiring very little incremental capital and continues to provide important funding and balance sheet flexibility for our development strategy. The multifamily development pipeline will deliver 510 units in Greenville, South Carolina and Estero, Florida in the first quarter of 2028, growing the portfolio from 1,827 units to 2,337 units.
Within multifamily, the operating environment remains mixed. Greenville continues to perform well, while Washington, D.C., continues to be affected by elevated new supply and higher delinquency. We continue to view the supply pressures as cyclical rather than structural, although collections and delinquency remain influenced by the District's regulatory environment. Our focus is straightforward: operate the portfolio well, complete the developments already underway, and continue creating long-term value through disciplined execution. Multifamily remains an important business for FRP, just as mining remains an important business, and together they complement the continued growth of our industrial platform. Together, our industrial and multifamily development pipeline discussed above represents approximately $506 million of total project costs and approximately $34 million of expected stabilized NOI, of which approximately $16.6 million is FRP's share. Our objective is straightforward: deliver these projects, lease them, stabilize them, and maximize the value they create for shareholders.
We now expect full-year NOI of approximately $36.2 million, compared with our original plan of $37.1 million. The roughly $900,000 reduction primarily reflects $800,000 from delayed industrial lease-up and $1 million of operating headwinds in our Washington, D.C., multifamily portfolio. This is partially offset by the $850,000 of stronger than expected mining performance. Near term, FFO will continue to reflect lease-up timing, elevated platform costs, and higher interest expense. Importantly, the investments we have made in people, systems, and technology have established the operating platform needed to support a much larger company and should generate meaningful operating leverage as occupancy improves. Our balance sheet remains one of our greatest competitive advantages, with debt service coverage of approximately 2.82 times and net debt equal to approximately 19% of fair market value and substantial available liquidity.
Our strategy is straightforward: continue leasing our industrial portfolio, deliver and stabilize the developments already underway, maintain one of the strongest balance sheets in the industry, and continue investing in the long-term growth of our industrial platform while maximizing the value of the multifamily and mining businesses we already own. We believe consistent execution against those priorities will create substantial long-term shareholder value. With that, I'll turn the call over to Mark Levy, our Chief Investment Officer.
Thank you, David, and good morning. I'd like to spend a few minutes providing some perspective on our industrial portfolio, what we are seeing in the leasing market today, and how we are positioning the business as the current development cycle continues to evolve. An important place to start is where we are in the life cycle of the portfolio. A significant portion of our development pipeline has either only recently delivered or is still approaching completion. This is against the backdrop of improving leasing fundamentals. Although tenant decision making remains deliberate and transaction timelines remain longer than historical norms, activity overall has significantly increased as tenants across the spectrum continue to have solid operational results and maintain strong corporate balance sheets. Most tenants are focused on the necessary investment to continue growth and increase market share. We are observing a manifestation of this across our portfolio.
We currently have in process more than 110,000 square feet of renewals and pending new transactions, which is significant in the context of our available vacancies and have seen a notable increase in new-to-market leasing activity, particularly at Delray, Davie, and Lakeland, the latter two of which have not yet reached substantial completion. While concessions remain elevated relative to prior cycles, rental rates have remained quite resilient. The supply environment is also becoming increasingly constructive. Nationally, the industrial construction pipeline has contracted roughly 60% from its 2022, 2023 cycle peak. At the same time, absorption is strengthening. We believe this combination should create an increasingly favorable supply-demand environment for projects delivering in the near to immediate term. This dynamic is particularly evident in our core markets of Florida, New Jersey, and Maryland, where regulatory constraints, development restrictions, and community opposition have made bringing new industrial supply to market increasingly difficult.
Last, we have made meaningful changes to how we approach leasing and marketing across the portfolio. We have changed almost all elements of our leasing playbook, anchored by leaning heavily into longstanding relationships with tenants and the brokerage community. Those relationships are an important competitive advantage and differentiator as we work to convert this activity to executed leases. Looking ahead, our priorities are consistent and remain unchanged. We remain focused on incremental improvements in occupancy quarter-over-quarter, while selectively advancing new opportunities in core logistics markets, supported by long-term demand drivers and meaningful barriers to entry. While the near term objectives of leasing are indisputable, it is equally important we seek to build enterprise scale as we transition to a highly focused industrial operating and investment platform. With that, I'll turn the call over to John Baker for his closing remarks.
Thank you, Mark, and good morning to everyone on the call. Overall results for the quarter were down modestly versus a year ago, but largely in line with our expectations, reflecting the occupancy pressures that have affected our D.C. multifamily assets and our Maryland industrial portfolio over the past several quarters. Those headwinds are still with us, but as I said last quarter, we've begun to see increased inquiry and leasing activity across most of our markets. That activity and engagement with potential tenants remains much higher than last year. We just have yet to see that activity and engagement translate into additional signed leases. The optimism I expressed in Q1 remains, albeit a more cautious optimism. As David said, execution is the priority, and we are focused on the things we can control.
We have strengthened our leasing team to bring it in line with our stated focus of getting our industrial and logistics assets leased and stabilized. As I have said before, the single most important lever we have to improve the company's performance is same-store leasing. It has the most immediate impact and requires very little capital relative to development. It remains management's top priority, and while we did not see our efforts translate into tangible results, all of us are of one mind that given our assets and the team behind them, we will. Focusing on process over results is a cliché for a reason; it's true. Operator, let's open the call for questions.
The floor is now open for questions. If you wish to ask a question at this time, please press star one on your keypad to join the queue. We do ask, if listening on speakerphone this morning, that you pick your handset up while asking your question for optimal sound quality. Once again, please press star one on your keypad now to join the queue to ask a question. Please hold a moment while we poll for questions. Our first question comes from Bill with Horizon Partners.
Hey, guys. I'm trying to figure out what's going on in multifamily in D.C. We own Camden, obviously rent and NOI trends are weak everywhere in D.C., in the Sun Belt. It seems like the D.C. assets owned by FRP is getting hit a little bit harder. Could you provide some color on that?
Sure, Bill. Good to hear from you. To get a little granular with D.C., I would say that our renewal increases—we are seeing positive across the board. I would say all of them are above 1.5% in terms of renewal increases for this quarter. Where we're really getting hit is trade-outs. When people leave and we've got to bring new tenants in, the trade-out rates are 10% lower than the previous tenant. There's a focus on keeping tenants, for sure, and our renewal rates on tenants are above 50%. That's the good part. The tough part is about 8% of these tenants aren't paying; that's the real headwind. It's really a product of the district's policies. Right now, the court systems are packed with all of us trying to get these tenants out.
We're looking at 12 months, 18 months to get these tenants out. Once a tenant stops paying, that delinquency stays with us for a long time. That's kind of the landscape down in D.C. right now. I don't see it changing anytime soon. We're getting better at interviewing and preempting delinquencies, which has helped some. I would say that our economic occupancy this quarter has ticked up, probably 75 basis points; we hope to continue to see that trend. We still have a pretty significant delinquency headwind from occupancy to economic occupancy.
I would like to clarify, is that consistent across Marin, Dock79, Bryant Street, and Verge, or is it more heavily weighted towards, say, Bryant Street? I spend a lot of time on the ground there. The Marin and Dock, in my opinion, are one of the more premier assets down there with market-leading rent. Is the issue across the whole portfolio in D.C., or is it just specific to certain properties?
It's across the board. It really is.
Yeah. Unfortunately, it's all related to what David said. It's the district's policies on being able to evict tenants, and it takes so long that people have learned this. There's whole scams out there about it, and they're coming into the building knowing they're never going to pay rent. It doesn't matter what building it is. If they can get past the guard gate and get a lease signed, they don't intend to pay. That's the big problem. It's not everybody, obviously. Most people are good people, and they pay the rent. There's a small portion of people out there that have figured out this problem and are taking advantage of it, and the district's got to do something to fix it.
David, correct me if I'm wrong, but the issue of delinquencies has been something of a constant, and the extent to which it impacts us has sort of ebbed and flowed from quarter to quarter. The real issue that's been hitting us hard lately is the just increased supply in the kind of Anacostia sub-market of D.C., right?
The supply really hurts us on the trade-outs. We're trying to compete with all these new deliveries, and concessions are up. To attract trade-outs, we've got to compete against that. That's a piece of it. Again, as the supply gets filled and that asset kind of moves into a more stabilized position, we're kind of all on a more equal playing field, and we see that coming out. The delinquencies—I don't see that changing anytime soon. That is a big hit for us.
I think to your point, we've been dealing with the delinquency issue for the last few years for sure. I think it's ticked up slightly in the last six to nine months.
Okay. Well, I appreciate the color, I'm just a little bit surprised because Camden is our biggest position, 13% of their NOI is in D.C. I've met with them for the past few years, they told us about this particular issue in Atlanta, it was a big issue for them in Atlanta with the frauds, I have never heard of them mention anything about D.C. being. I'm aware that this is an issue. People are very entrepreneurial, as you could say, if they could get a year of free rent. It's just not an issue that they're dealing with. I don't know if it's better detection, the use of AI, whatever it may be, I'm just a little bit surprised by the delta between what you guys are facing and the degree of delinquency versus what they are.
It's just not even mentioned about whenever I talk with them, we had a face-to-face with them in June. I would encourage the team to.
Camden's located where?
They have-
Atlanta, Georgia?
They have 60,000 units, 13% of their NOI is in the D.C., Northern Virginia area.
Got you.
That's insignificant. They have a 60,000, 13% of that's a lot of units. They definitely have exposure to the area. My suggestion would be, they're clearly doing something where they're not dealing with this level of tenants not paying. I would definitely look into what kind of tools they're implementing because I think the screening process needs to improve here.
Yeah. We agree that the screening, we have been working on that with our property manager for the last 18 months and have implemented some new things, they've been pleased with some of the results of being able to detect fraud in ways they couldn't before. We'll continue to work on it for sure. We know it's an issue.
Yeah. I know a few years ago, we were all real excited about some of the acquisitions that we made in the Maryland area for industrials. Cranberry, for a little while, looked like a really good use of capital. That was very quickly leased up. Then we were a little bit surprised by a lot of tenants leaving there. Then Chelsea, I think that's still really, I mean, that's functionally all vacant right now. Can we just like, help me understand what's going on there. I know that U.S. overall vacancy is higher, again, it's just the degree of delta. I know you guys have a smaller portfolio, so if you get a couple leases that don't come through, it's magnified. Again, what's going on with the Maryland, Baltimore market as it relates to warehouses?
I kind of thought that Chelsea would be a little bit further along on the lease up. I don't know, I can't tell what percent occupied lease Cranberry is these days. If you can provide some color on that'd be helpful.
Sure. I'll start, and I will hand it over to Mark. As relates to, I would call our Maryland same store, which is really the Hollander Business Park in Baltimore City and the Cranberry Business Park in Harford County. That same store portfolio in Maryland was 92% occupied Q1 2025. To your point, over time, currently it sits at 70.6% occupied. We lost a number of tenants, a lot of government tenants. We had one tenant that basically went bankrupt, and we had to throw them out, which was a big, big headwind. We have tremendous activity at Cranberry right now, and we really see that ticking up into next quarter.
We have a number of renewals that we're working on right now, and we've got a number of tenants that we're in lease negotiations with right now, and we hope to see some changes here in the very, very near future. Chelsea, we delivered last year. It's a product of really, really long, long decision cycles for tenants. With that, I'll kind of turn it over to Mark to give additional color on the market and what he's seeing on the ground.
Yeah. Really what we're seeing overall is that Harford County and Cecil County—sort of call it the Baltimore north markets—really, I would describe those markets as being caught between sort of larger logistics markets. What is happening is that a number of larger users, call it north of 250,000 sq ft, have been really looking at consolidation, and figuring out ways that they can centralize their distribution operations to service a much larger region. That is just a part of the overall evolution of sort of the dynamics around sort of supply chain. What is happening is that users are really looking at locations that allow them to essentially get from, call it Richmond to New York City, within kind of a day's drive. Oftentimes, a lot of those decisions lean into markets like Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
There's been a tremendous amount of vacancy in Southern New Jersey, what I would describe as south of Exit 6 on the turnpike. There has been a tremendous opportunity for tenants to take advantage of the oversupply that has existed there. That has frankly captured a lot of the tenant demand that is in the market. That is sort of compounded by the fact that a lot of those sites in New Jersey have economic incentives associated with them, i.e. PILOTs and other job creation incentives, which further create a delta between Chelsea and those opportunities. That's kind of where we've been. The good news is that a lot of that space has really been absorbed.
The amount of supply that remains—competitive supply that remains—is a fraction of what it has been over the last, call it 15 months; there is very few new projects in the pipeline. We are sort of seeing an opening relative to being able to capture some of that demand just based on pure availability. That is kind of what I would sort of describe as the story over the last 15 to 24 months overall. I think relative to Cranberry, look, I think the local tenant pool is not very deep. You're talking about generally smaller tenants that are looking at that project. That tenant pool tends to draft off of larger tenants. There are ancillary businesses that are sort of created or grow based on servicing a larger tenant base.
Given that that market has been slow, there has not been a lot of organic growth within that local tenant pool. Cranberry is not going to attract a tenant from outside of the market. Again, it's very organic in nature. Those are the reasons. I would tell you that optimistically, for the reasons that I just mentioned, I think that we have sort of turned the corner relative to that. We've got a couple build-to-suits that we're looking at that are fairly large, especially in our phase II at Crouse. I do think that there are better days ahead for the market.
Okay. I've been following this company for, I've been a shareholder for 12 years now, I don't know, somewhere in that range, I've seen a lot. You mentioned build-to-suit and you mentioned Crouse. Is the strategy going forward to do any more spec? Crouse is 635,000 square foot. As a shareholder, I'd be very worried about doing a spec on something like Crouse or Mechanics Valley given the size.
Well, I don't think the business plan today is to build or to deliver more spec space into the market unless the fundamentals would dictate otherwise. The build-to-suit market is unique in the sense that there are very specialized operational requirements that tenants have that oftentimes cannot be accommodated in a spec building, at least cost effectively. I think our focus relative to Mechanics Valley and Crouse is to continue to market those sites relative to build-to-suit opportunities. If the fundamentals in the market change, and we see some durability in those fundamentals, then I think we will obviously have a conversation as to whether or not it makes sense to develop a spec project. There is no immediate or near-term plans to do that. I think there are plans, though, to have those sites shovel-ready and to get the entitlements perfected.
If there is an opportunity to execute, that we are in a position to do so quickly.
Okay. Mark, since I've got you here; the projects in Broward County, Camp Lake, Davie, and Lakeland now represents a big chunk of the company's asset. Could you give some color on kind of the leasing outlook or just updates on those properties?
Sure. In Broward County—I think by all measures, Broward County, Florida, is probably the most supply-constrained sub-market in the country, with a sub 4% vacancy rate, and extraordinarily high barriers to entry relative to identifying new development opportunities. Our site in Davie is really at the intersection of two major highway systems—actually three major highway systems; 595, the Florida Turnpike, and I95—and it's very centrally located to both the airport and Port Everglades. So it's a very unique asset in terms of its location. The building is not yet delivered. We are very close to signing a lease at a very strong rental rate for roughly 25,000 square feet, which I think will be a good bellwether for activity in the market.
We feel very confident that we will be highly successful in the lease-up of that project at rental rates that may set sort of new precedent in the market. As it relates to Central Florida, that is really sort of the population growth story in Florida. There has been tremendous migration from inside or within the state of Florida to the I-4 corridor specifically. There's also a number of tenants that are looking to consolidate operations that may exist separately within sort of the Tampa and Orlando markets. Again, similar to what we talked about in the Northeast, there are tenants that are looking at a consolidation play in a central location that allows them to service a larger sort of population base. Ultimately, that is one of the primary drivers of Lakeland. We are seeing really a tremendous amount of activity there.
We have not signed any leases. The building is not complete, but we're seeing very strong activity. Camp Lake is really a population growth story as well. It's more of a localized sort of service-business-type opportunity. Think about home services and contractor requirements, things like that. Based on the large expansion of the residential base in sort of Lake County and the surrounding geography, that is really driving a lot of the demand for Camp Lake, which is very early in the process. I hope that answers your question. Certainly, I'm happy to dive in deeper if you'd like.
No, that's helpful. I don't have any more questions, but I think I just want to share some thoughts as somebody who's been a shareholder for 12 years and who once owned—was probably like a top-5, top-10 shareholder in the company. I just want to say that, given that the 10-year is almost 5% at this point, one thing that I want the management and board to think seriously about is there has to be a strategy to return some capital to shareholder, either in the form of dividends or stock buybacks. I say this as somebody who's owned the stock for 12 years, so I'm not someone here who's looking for some sort of quick catalyst. I've been with this company for a really long time.
We could buy REITs—really high-quality ones that pay 6% dividend yield—that's also going to grow that dividend. In the face of that kind of opportunity, there's a real opportunity cost. I think what's more important is that there has to be some thought into, five years from now, are we going to be still here and saying we're going to go on another round of huge build-out? I think there's a happy medium where the company could set aside a certain amount of cash flow, even if it's a small one, into either share buybacks.—not a share buyback just to offset management stock-based comp, but to buy back shares so that capital could be returned to shareholders.
Also do so accretively or pay a dividend because, as someone who's been with the company for 12 years, I think I've earned the right to speak my mind freely. I think that if there is no thought that goes into any form of capital return, the whole point of owning real estate and hard asset is that we do share in some sort of cash flow at some point. It's been a really long time, and I think that in five years from now, when all these assets stabilize, this company should have a lot of cash flow, a lot more cash flow than it does today.
That is something that I think management team and board really have to think about because if there's no thought on it, then it's just another company that's just going to invest a lot more capital into the ground, into building, to grow a bigger pie, but when are we going to share in some of the cash flow? I just want to speak my mind freely. I know many people on this call many, many years. I think highly of you, but I think that's an area where the company really haven't really done much on. That's it. Thank you for answering my questions today, and thank you for allowing me to express my thoughts.
Absolutely, Bill. We hear you, for sure, we appreciate you expressing your thoughts.
Thank you, Bill.
We now have Steven Ferro with Oppenheimer.
Morning.
Morning, Steven.
Steven.
I just have a quick question. There was a recent deal across from Bryant Street. Do you guys have any comment on that? Or, what are your thoughts?
Steven, if it's the deal that I'm thinking about, it did come up. We are in negotiations of refinancing Bryant Street. One of the major pieces to refinancing is the appraisal, and it did show up there. I think it's a good indication of where that market is right now. I think that's my comment. I think that's a good comp of where things are right now. I believe it was the Trammell Crow, the Rowan building.
The Rowan, yeah, the building.
Yeah. It kind of closed at a 6% cap rate. I think that's a good indication of what people think about D.C. and that market right now.
And-
That's kind of my thought on that.
Just from that, how do you think Bryant Street compares just as a, not only like location, but this as retail. I don't believe that had any retail. Is Bryant Street more attractive just compared to that asset or no? Very similar.
I am always partial to our assets, I'll leave it at that.
With the development pipeline and what we have coming in the next, we'll call it till the end of 2027, I know we have the Opportunity Zone taxes, I think, are in the first quarter next year. How much cash on the balance sheet is right now earmarked for developments and future use?
Steven, most of our capital has already been spent for our, I'll call it, our deliveries that I talked about. The equity capital always goes in upfront, and we've kind of committed all that. As it relates to vertical construction capital, I would say that I think about $8 million is going out over the next two quarters, and that's really going into Woven. Other than that, all of our vertical kind of capital has already been deployed. What we're focused on right now is deploying capital for leasing, and that comes when we have leases and we think that's a good use of capital. We're going to continue to entitle and get shovel-ready our sites. When we see the markets improve, we're ready to attack that and hopefully have an advantage over others.
The capital earmarked is really for leasing and for entitlements, and that's what we have a good stable of cash or liquidity to do. Right now we've got $100 million of cash. We've got a line of credit that kind of gives us $130 million of liquidity. That's more than enough liquidity to deal with entitlements and leasing and opportunities.
How are you judging future opportunities versus a buyback now? Just in a simple term of thinking about it, you've got a $36 million NOI, market cap's about $430 million, which is above an 8% yield for a collection of assets that have a cap rate that's much lower. What's sort of like your overall thought process on buybacks versus future developments?
I think as long as we've got projects to put capital into, we are always going to opt for money into new projects over a dividend or share buybacks. I feel like right now we've got a lot on our plate and I think given kind of the sort of economic uncertainty, it makes sense to hold onto cash to be able to play defense and offense. If we reached a point of where we have more cash coming in than projects to put money into then, a dividend or a meaningful share buyback program would be part of what we do. That's not the case right now, and I think that any share buybacks in the near term will be done just sort of opportunistically. That's sort of where we are with it.
Okay. That's all I have. Thank you.
Thanks, Steven.
Our next questioner is David Foley with Estabrook Capital Management.
Hi, good morning. I just had a quick question on G&A costs that look like they've gone up a lot, especially over the first six months of this year with the prior six months. Should we think about those G&A costs of where they've been in this first six months of this year running at a flat rate for the year, or will they come down some, or what do you see going on with that? Thanks.
Flat rate is a good way to think of it. We've kind of built out our team, and we have no real new hires on the horizon.
I think the only thing in there, David, is there was not $1 million, but more than a half a million of sort of one-time cost in the first quarter in G&A on audit fees and legal fees that were sort of all related to that closing that won't recur, but the rest of it is pretty much a flat run rate.
Okay. Thank you. I also just similar sentiments to the former caller about buybacks or dividends at some point here. Thank you. Y'all have a good day.
Yep.
Thanks, David.
We now have Ted Goans with Soleil.
Good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. To our first questioner, Bill, good to have you on the call. We've all sort of leaned into you asking a lot of the heavier questions. Thank you for doing that over the years. When y'all were talking about the D.C. market and the delinquency issues and the challenges, it doesn't seem like the baseball stadium is enough. I'm wondering, we have two more plats, and we have the bulkhead. Is there a talk or is there a view around developing more of an office-related ecosystem in that area, or are we just dependent on kind of absorption and then we have the low-cost land, so we're the next to build? How do y'all sort of envision that area five, six, seven, eight years from now?
Yeah. I don't think offices. Go ahead, David. Sorry.
No, I agree. At one point when you looked at, I will call it our riverfront properties, which we called at one point phases one, two, three, and four. Phase one is Dock 79, phase two is Marin. At one point, phase three was an office, and phase four was a hotel. Looking at that area and what was going on, we believe that that is a great multifamily area. There is some headwinds right now. It is still the nation's capital. It is still the southern entrance to the nation's capital. It is on the waterfront. We have owned that land for a while. It has a very low basis, and I think there is a great opportunity to, one, maximize the value of the land that we have, and at some point, create a multifamily waterfront portfolio there in phase three and phase four, and even 664A.
That is what we see now. We certainly are not breaking ground right now, given what is going on there. Seven, eight years from now, we will continue to monitor the market, continue to monitor the debt markets and construction costs and where our delinquencies are going. We have got great intel into that area. The data that we have is real. It is in our sandbox, and we will see where it goes and make the right decision.
With regards to the bulkhead for 664, as you describe it, I have this recollection that that lease period was around now?
Correct
Do we have better economics from that in a relatively short period of time?
We are currently in discussions with the tenant that's been there for a very long time.
Yeah.
We expect them to stay there until we're ready to develop, or until it becomes a nuisance to our adjacent properties, which at this point, it's just not. We expect them to be there for a while until we're ready to break ground and develop that site.
Yeah, I suspect that's a tricky one both ways. Good luck with that. Can we talk about the lease absorptions that will occur in the warehouses in Florida? How do you intend to communicate that to your investors? Is that going to be through your quarterly earnings release, or do you intend to sort of issue press releases so we can follow the progress along there?
Quarterly.
Okay. I read an article recently, we probably all read the same articles about demand for real estate in Florida, have y'all moved up a timeframe on Brooksville at all?
Moved up the timeframe for development?
Yes.
Yeah. There was never a timeframe. It's just purely a function of the right developer coming along and wanting to take that property down. The calcium mining is a really wonderful interim use. Someday when somebody wants to develop that land, they'll approach us. There's no timeframe.
Okay. I think I read most regulatory filings reasonably well, but not always. There was a fairly significant, it looked like a purchase in mid-March by our chairman. Am I reading that correctly? That was an outright purchase of shares.
Correct. Yes.
Congratulations on that, and thank you. I don't have any more questions. Thank you.
Thanks, Ted.
We now hear from Morris Propp with Propp Company.
Hi.
Hey, Morris.
I don't think I've been on the call before. I'm your fourth-largest shareholder—outside shareholder. I'm old, and I've come across many developers who love to develop, and they focus on developing. They love it, and they don't make money at it. Many even go bankrupt. You guys are management-heavy, and you're talking about developing. Stop developing. Start managing your properties. The first thing I would do is not do anything more in blue states. We own real estate in blue states that we've been liquidating because it's an anchor. It's a political anchor. Landlords have no power None. You're witnessing that. You're witnessing that in D.C. You can't even enforce your rent. No more blue states, no more money spent in blue states. I would say to you: start putting your properties on the market in blue states.
As far as, you develop stuff, but you don't manage it. Your earlier caller talked about buybacks. What is the matter with you people? You get this beautiful cash flow coming in from your mining revenues, royalties, and you think you can just go piss it all away. I'm really, really disappointed that you are still talking about spending another nickel in a blue state. You don't learn. Get your properties leased or put them on the market. Get out of there. Start buying back your shares, act responsibly, and all of you should take a 20% cut of your salaries. You've not been performing. You have not managed your properties. Stop new developments. I'm your fourth largest shareholder, and I thought maybe it was time for somebody to really get really pissed. Thank you.
Thanks, Morris.
Thanks, Morris.
We have again.
Mike, we're having a hard time hearing you.
Bill? Hello?
Can you hear us?
Yes, I can hear you guys.
Okay.
I wasn't going to talk about buybacks today earlier. Since other callers have brought it up, I just want to express my opinion that it's not every day that you get a company where the NAV is almost $40. You're trading at $21.50. Everybody could do the math. If you buy back shares, you're going to make 80%-90% on that capital. There is no development projects out there that will give you that kind of guaranteed return. I wish I ran a publicly traded company where I get to just buy back as many shares I can at 80%-90% accretion. The math is the math. It's very simple. I would say that I don't care about the trading liquidity. Nobody that owns this company cares about trading liquidity at this point.
Buying back your share will send a signal to the market that the management team here cares that this is trading at a deep discount. I was not going to talk about buyback today. My previous comment was about buyback, returning capital at some point in the future. Since the topic got brought up, the answer given, I thought, I really disagree with it. It's just not the right use of capital. If you could make 80%-90% buying back shares, just do that. That's it. I wouldn't go so far to say that get all your investments out of blue states. I wouldn't go that far. I would say that right now, if there's one thing you could do to show shareholders that you care and that you understand capital allocation, you buy back shares.
If the pushback on that is that you earmark all this capital for all that stuff, I would say that the order of priority would be you set aside the capital for leasing, you set aside the capital for any sorts of debt that you may have to refi. If you got a shovel in the ground, if you're already committed to building something, you're mid-construction, you set aside the capital for that. Any other capital that you have in excess of that should absolutely be earmarked towards buying back shares. This is not a topic that I was going to get into today. Since it was brought up by other shareholders—and also the company's answer to this just got me a little fired up—I think that the fact that this is such simple math, such an easy lever to pull.
I just want to say, we own Camden. Camden sold their California assets and bought back 6% or 7% of their shares in the past year. They did a 1031. They did a $3 billion buying asset 1031, and they bought back shares, bought back 7% of their shares at nearly a 7% cap rate. Fantastic use of capital. We're seeing every single large blue chip REIT that we own. There's another company, AH Realty Trust, in your neck of the wood that just bought back, I think 6% or 7% of the shares just this year alone. Every REIT that we talk to have told us, this is not 2021. This is not 2023. Buybacks is absolutely a part of the capital allocation. This runs from REITs that are half a billion up to $20 billion that we talk to.
I think it's just absolutely tone deaf to just say that if there is an opportunity to go do developments, we're going to do developments. No, you're trading at $21.50. The trading liquidity has always been an issue. I think if you actually bought back $10 million, $20 million, $30 million worth of shares, I think the market will actually care. Thank you.
Thanks, Bill.
Thanks, Bill.
There are no further questions in the queue. We did hear closing remarks from management prior to our Q&A session. This does conclude our conference call for today.
Great. All right. That was something. Thank you all for your continued interest in the company, and this concludes the call.
Thanks.
Okay. You may now disconnect your lines at this time, and have a good day.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-04FRP Holdings: Q2 Earnings Snapshot
Associated Press
FRP Holdings: Q2 Earnings Snapshot
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. (AP) — JACKSONVILLE, Fla. (AP) — FRP Holdings Inc. (FRPH) on Tuesday reported a loss of $259,000 in its second quarter. On a per-share basis, the Jacksonville, Florida-based company said it had a loss of 1 cent. The real estate company posted revenue of $11.1 million in the period. _____ This story was generated by Automated Insights (http://automatedinsights.com/ap) using data from Zacks Investment Research. Access a Zacks stock report on FRPH at https://www.zacks.com/ap/FRPH
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-04FRP Holdings, Inc. Reports Fiscal 2026 Second Quarter Results
ACCESS Newswire
FRP Holdings, Inc. Reports Fiscal 2026 Second Quarter Results
Mining Royalties Revenue up 13% on higher Volume and Pricing; Multifamily and Industrial Occupancy Remain Pressured; Industrial Leasing the Near-Term Priority JACKSONVILLE, FL / ACCESS Newswire / August 4, 2026 / FRP Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:FRPH), a full-service real estate investment and development company with four distinct business segments including Multifamily, Industrial and Commercial, Development, and Mining and Royalty Lands, today reported financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. Key results for the quarter ended 2026 include: Q2 2026 Financial Highlights: The Company reported a net loss of $0.3 million or $(0.01) per share, versus net income of $0.6 million or $0.03 per share in the same quarter last year Pro rata NOI of $9.4 million was slightly down (3%) versus the $9.7 million of NOI in the second quarter last year Multifamily portfolio occupancy of 93.2% across 1,827 units was also slightly down versus 94.1% last year Industrial & Commercial occupancy of 69.9% (ex-Chelsea) was down from 77.9% Mining royalties were up 13% as a result of increases in both volume (up 6.8%) and revenue per ton (up 5.4%) This was our second full quarter following the October 21, 2025, Altman Logistics acquisition "Second quarter results continued to reflect the occupancy pressure we flagged exiting last year across our DC multifamily assets and the Maryland industrial portfolio, alongside higher G&A tied to the Altman integration," said John Baker III, CEO of FRP Holdings. Baker continued, "Mining royalties again posted double-digit NOI growth, and our development pipeline continues to advance, with the Hamilton and Parsippany, New Jersey merchant build projects reaching substantial completion this quarter. Our priorities remain unchanged: lease the Maryland industrial portfolio, stabilize occupancy across the DC multifamily assets, and deliver our active development projects on schedule." Operating Performance Snapshot (dollars in thousands) Q2 Consolidated Results of Operations Pro rata NOI was slightly down to $9.4 million versus $9.7 million in Q2 2025, with the decline driven by lower Multifamily and Industrial NOI, partially offset by higher Mining Royalty NOI Total revenues were $11.1 million, up 2.1%, as a 13% increase in mining royalty revenue and $194,000 of joint venture management fee revenue from the Altman platform helped to offset a 6%…Read full documentShow less
Mining Royalties Revenue up 13% on higher Volume and Pricing; Multifamily and Industrial Occupancy Remain Pressured; Industrial Leasing the Near-Term Priority JACKSONVILLE, FL / ACCESS Newswire / August 4, 2026 / FRP Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:FRPH), a full-service real estate investment and development company with four distinct business segments including Multifamily, Industrial and Commercial, Development, and Mining and Royalty Lands, today reported financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. Key results for the quarter ended 2026 include: Q2 2026 Financial Highlights: The Company reported a net loss of $0.3 million or $(0.01) per share, versus net income of $0.6 million or $0.03 per share in the same quarter last year Pro rata NOI of $9.4 million was slightly down (3%) versus the $9.7 million of NOI in the second quarter last year Multifamily portfolio occupancy of 93.2% across 1,827 units was also slightly down versus 94.1% last year Industrial & Commercial occupancy of 69.9% (ex-Chelsea) was down from 77.9% Mining royalties were up 13% as a result of increases in both volume (up 6.8%) and revenue per ton (up 5.4%) This was our second full quarter following the October 21, 2025, Altman Logistics acquisition "Second quarter results continued to reflect the occupancy pressure we flagged exiting last year across our DC multifamily assets and the Maryland industrial portfolio, alongside higher G&A tied to the Altman integration," said John Baker III, CEO of FRP Holdings. Baker continued, "Mining royalties again posted double-digit NOI growth, and our development pipeline continues to advance, with the Hamilton and Parsippany, New Jersey merchant build projects reaching substantial completion this quarter. Our priorities remain unchanged: lease the Maryland industrial portfolio, stabilize occupancy across the DC multifamily assets, and deliver our active development projects on schedule." Operating Performance Snapshot (dollars in thousands) Q2 Consolidated Results of Operations Pro rata NOI was slightly down to $9.4 million versus $9.7 million in Q2 2025, with the decline driven by lower Multifamily and Industrial NOI, partially offset by higher Mining Royalty NOI Total revenues were $11.1 million, up 2.1%, as a 13% increase in mining royalty revenue and $194,000 of joint venture management fee revenue from the Altman platform helped to offset a 6% decline in lease revenue G&A increased $802,000 versus Q2 2025, driven by higher personnel costs, higher legal fees and integration expenses following the Altman acquisition, partially offset by $328,000 of increased labor capitalization Net investment income decreased $1,111,000 due to lower cash balances and lower interest rates ($619,000) and less lending venture income ($492,000) on a lower loan balance and fewer lot sales Multifamily Segment Pro rata NOI in this segment was $4.3 million, down $421,000 or 9% versus Q2 2025 as occupancy was down ~1% from a year ago The decline was predominantly concentrated in our DC assets: Dock 79 NOI was down $139,000 with occupancy declining 220 bps to 93.3%; The Maren's NOI was down $54,000 despite occupancy improving 90 bps to 94.5%; The Verge's NOI was down $112,000 with occupancy declining 320 bps to 90.1%; and Bryant Street's NOI was down $128,000 with occupancy declining 240 bps to 92.2% Our Greenville assets remained steady with average overall occupancy above 95% Renewal rate increases in our DC assets averaged 2.3%; while those in our Greenville assets averaged 1.0% Industrial and Commercial Segment This segment's NOI was $616,000, down $394,000 or 39% versus Q2 2025 due to the vacancy in our Maryland assets Excluding Chelsea, occupancy in our 10 existing in-service buildings was 69.9% versus 77.9% in Q2 2025, with the decline driven by non-renewing lease expirations Our operating loss before G&A was $3,000, versus an operating profit of $443,000 in Q2 2025, reflecting lower occupancy and higher operating costs tied to a real estate tax appeal and legal fees tied to leasing activity Leasing up the Maryland portfolio remains the primary near-term NOI driver for the Company with approximately 408,000 square feet of space available for immediate lease Mining Royalty Segment This segment's revenue was $4.1 million, up $457,000 or 13% versus Q2 2025 driven both by royalty tons (up 6.8%) and higher revenue per ton (up 5.4%) NOI was up 12% year-over-year, continuing the double-digit underlying growth trend from Q1, with both volume and pricing trending favorably Operating profit before G&A was $3.7 million, up $339,000 with an operating margin above 90% Development and Active Pipeline At our Harford County residential lending venture we sold 20 lots versus 27 lot sales in Q2 2025 (and have now sold 248 of the 344 lots and booked $7.4 million of interest and profit to date) We expect both our Lakeland, FL warehouse and our Broward County, FL warehouse to be substantially complete in the third quarter of 2026 The Woven project in Greenville, SC (214 units with 13,500 sf of ground floor retail) is under construction with substantial completion expected late 2027 Estero Phase 1 in the Naples/Ft. Myers, FL market is also under construction (296 multifamily units and 28,745 sq ft of retail) with substantial completion also expected late 2027 Our two building (377,892 sq ft) Camp Lake industrial project just outside Orlando, FL is well into construction with substantial completion of the first warehouse expected Q1 2027 Altman Logistics Platform This was the second full quarter following the October 21, 2025, closing of the Altman Logistics Property acquisition The Development segment recognized $195,000 of joint venture management fee revenue in Q2 from the three minority-interest warehouse projects acquired in this transaction The acquired projects include warehouses in Delray Beach, FL (199,476 sq ft completed Q1 2026; additional 392,976 sq ft of land for two warehouses); Hamilton, NJ (170,800 sq ft, completed Q2 2026); Parsippany, NJ (140,031 sq ft, substantial completion Q2 2026); and Southwest Ranches, FL (335,617 sq ft land acquired July 2026) Several high-level Altman employees joined FRP as part of the transaction, providing in-house origination capability across the platform Year-to-Date ResultsSix Months Ended June 30, 2026 Six-Month 2026 Financial Highlights: The Company reported a net loss of $0.9 million or $(0.05) per share, versus net income of $2.3 million or $0.12 per share in the same period last year Pro rata NOI was $18.2 million versus $19.1 million in the same period last year (down 4%) Multifamily portfolio occupancy was 92.6% versus 94.1% in the first six months of last year Industrial & Commercial NOI was $1.4 million, down 36% due to a tenant eviction and non-renewing lease expirations Mining royalties were up 14% over the same period last year(volume up 7.3%, revenue per ton up 5.9%) G&A was up $2.3 million, driven primarily by Altman-related personnel and integration costs Operating Performance Snapshot (dollars in thousands) Six-Month Consolidated Results of Operations The Company reported a net loss of $946,000 or $(0.05) per share, versus net income of $2,288,000 or $0.12 per share in the first six months of 2025 Pro rata NOI was down 4% to $18.2 million versus $19.1 million in the first six months of 2025, with the decline driven by lower Multifamily and Industrial and Commercial segment NOI, partially offset by higher Mining Royalty and Development segment NOI Total revenues were $21.7 million, up 2.5%, as a 14% increase in mining royalty revenue and $358,000 of joint venture management fee revenue from the Altman platform helped to offset a 5% decline in lease revenue G&A increased $2,310,000 versus the first six months of 2025, driven by higher personnel costs, higher audit fees, higher legal fees and integration expenses following the Altman acquisition, partially offset by $602,000 of increased labor capitalization Net investment income decreased $1,984,000 due to lower cash balances and lower interest rates ($1,269,000) and less lending venture income ($715,000) on a lower loan balance and fewer lot sales Multifamily Segment - Six Months Pro rata NOI in this segment was $8.4 million, down $967,000 or 10% versus the first six months of 2025, as portfolio-wide average occupancy declined to 92.6% from 94.1% The decline was predominantly concentrated in our DC assets: Bryant Street's NOI was down $323,000 to $2,758,000 with occupancy declining 130 bps to 92.2%; The Verge's NOI was down $260,000 to $1,226,000 with occupancy declining 340 bps to 90.0%; Dock 79's NOI was down $243,000 to $1,657,000 with occupancy declining 430 bps to 91.3%; and The Maren's NOI was down $150,000 to $1,595,000 with occupancy declining 70 bps to 93.0% Our Greenville assets remained steady with average occupancy above 95% Renewal rate increases in our DC assets averaged 2.7%; while those in our Greenville assets averaged 1.7% Industrial and Commercial Segment - Six Months This segment's NOI was $1,374,000, down $775,000 or 36% versus the first six months of 2025 due to vacancy in our Maryland assets Total revenues were $2,183,000, down $538,000 or 20%, with the decline driven by a tenant eviction and non-renewing lease expirations Our operating profit before G&A was $178,000, down $908,000 or 84%, including $298,000 of Chelsea spec warehouse depreciation and carrying costs Leasing up the Maryland portfolio remains the primary near-term NOI driver for the Company Mining Royalty Segment - Six Months This segment's revenue was $7.8 million, up $940,000 or 14% versus the first six months of 2025, driven both by royalty tons (up 7.3%) and higher revenue per ton (up 5.9%) NOI was $7.9 million, up $951,000 or 14% year-over-year, with both volume and pricing trending favorably Operating profit before G&A of $7.1 million, up $771,000 with an operating margin above 90% Development Segment - Six Months Operating profit before G&A was $454,000, up $1,067,000 versus an operating loss of $613,000 in the first six months of 2025 The improvement was driven by $358,000 of joint venture management fee revenue from the Altman platform and the prior year including $713,000 of Altman acquisition expenses, partially offset by $130,000 less capitalized real estate taxes "Same-store leasing is the single most important lever we have to improve the company's performance - it has the most immediate impact and requires very little capital relative to development. To say it is management's top priority understates the extent to which our day-to-day revolves around it" said Baker, III. Baker continued, "The activity and engagement with potential tenants remains high especially compared to last year. While that did not translate into signed leases this quarter, we believe that if we focus on what we can control and execute, the results we are looking for will come." Conference Call The Company will host a conference call on Wednesday, August 5, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. (ET). Analysts, stockholders and other interested parties may access the teleconference live by calling 1-888-506-0062 (passcode 417930) within the United States or by joining the webcast at https://www.webcaster5.com/Webcast/Page/3158/54289. International callers may dial 1-973-528-0011 (passcode 417930). Audio replay will be available until August 5, 2027, by accessing it at the same link. The webcast replay will also be available on the Company's investor relations page (https://www.frpdev.com/investor-relations/) following the call. Additional Information Our investor relations website is https://investors.frpdev.com and we encourage investors to use it as a way of easily finding information about us. We promptly make available on this website, free of charge, the reports that we file or furnish with the SEC, press releases, quarterly earnings presentations, investor presentations, and corporate governance information, and you may subscribe to Email Alerts to be notified of new information posted to this site. Investors are cautioned that any statements in this press release which relate to the future are, by their nature, subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. These include, but are not limited to: the possibility that we may be unable to find appropriate investment opportunities; levels of construction activity in the markets served by our mining properties; demand for flexible warehouse/office facilities in our markets; multifamily demand in Washington D.C. and Greenville, South Carolina; our ability to obtain zoning and entitlements necessary for property development; the impact of lending and capital market conditions on our liquidity; our ability to finance projects or repay our debt; general real estate investment and development risks; vacancies in our properties; risks associated with developing and managing properties in partnership with others; competition; our ability to renew leases or re-lease spaces as leases expire; illiquidity of real estate investments; bankruptcy or defaults of tenants; the impact of restrictions imposed by our credit facility; the level and volatility of interest rates; environmental liabilities; inflation risks; cybersecurity risks; and construction costs; as well as other risks listed from time to time in our SEC filings, including but not limited to our annual and quarterly reports. We have no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, other than as imposed by law, as a result of future events or new information. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. FRP Holdings, Inc. is a holding company engaged in the real estate business, namely (i) leasing and management of commercial properties owned by the Company, (ii) leasing and management of mining royalty land owned by the Company, (iii) real property acquisition, entitlement, development and construction primarily for apartment, retail, warehouse, and office, and (iv) leasing and management of residential apartment buildings. Investor & Media Contacts Robert Winters or Abe [email protected] Comparative Results of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 Consolidated Results Multifamily Segment (Pro rata consolidated and pro rata unconsolidated) Multifamily Segment (Consolidated - Dock 79 & The Maren) Multifamily Segment (Pro rata unconsolidated) Our Multifamily Segment has four unconsolidated joint ventures (Bryant Street, The Verge, Riverside, and .408 Jackson). Riverside was moved from the Development segment to the Multifamily segment in 2022, Bryant Street and .408 Jackson moved as of the beginning of 2024 and The Verge moved effective July 1, 2024, each upon reaching lease up stabilization. Industrial and Commercial Segment Mining Royalty Lands Segment Results Development Segment Results Comparative Results of Operations for the Six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 Consolidated Results Multifamily Segment (Pro rata consolidated and pro rata unconsolidated) Multifamily Segment (Consolidated - Dock 79 and The Maren) Multifamily Segment (Pro rata unconsolidated) Our Multifamily Segment has four unconsolidated joint ventures (Bryant Street, The Verge, Riverside, and .408 Jackson). Riverside was moved from the Development segment to the Multifamily segment in 2022, Bryant Street and .408 Jackson moved as of the beginning of 2024 and The Verge moved effective July 1, 2024, each upon reaching lease up stabilization. Industrial and Commercial Segment Mining Royalty Lands Segment Results Development Segment Results CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - As of June 30 (In thousands, except share data) Non-GAAP Financial Measures. To supplement the financial results presented in accordance with GAAP, FRP presents certain non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. We believe these non-GAAP measures provide useful information to our Board of Directors, management and investors regarding certain trends relating to our financial condition and results of operations. Our management uses these non-GAAP measures to compare our performance to that of prior periods for trend analyses, purposes of determining management incentive compensation and budgeting, forecasting and planning purposes. We provide operating profit before G&A and Pro rata net operating income (NOI) because we believe they assist investors and analysts in estimating our economic interest in our consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships, when read in conjunction with our reported results under GAAP. These measures are not, and should not be viewed as, a substitute for GAAP financial measures. SOURCE: FRP Holdings, Inc. View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-22FRP Holdings, Inc. Announces Release Date for Its 2026 Second Quarter Earnings and Details for the Earnings Conference Call
ACCESS Newswire
FRP Holdings, Inc. Announces Release Date for Its 2026 Second Quarter Earnings and Details for the Earnings Conference Call
JACKSONVILLE, FL / ACCESS Newswire / July 22, 2026 / FRP Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:FRPH), a full-service real estate investment and development company with four distinct business segments including Multifamily, Industrial and Commercial, Development, and Mining and Royalty Lands, anticipates issuing its second quarter earnings results on Tuesday, August 4, 2026 after the market close. The Company will host a conference call on Wednesday, August 5, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. (ET). Analysts, stockholders and other interested parties may access the teleconference live by calling 1-888-506-0062 (passcode 417930) within the United States or by joining the webcast here. International callers may dial 1-973-528-0011 (passcode 417930). Webcast replay will be available until August 5, 2027, by accessing it here. The webcast replay will also be available on the Company's investor relations page (https://www.frpdev.com/investor-relations/) following the call. Additional Information Our investor relations website is https://investors.frpdev.com and we encourage investors to use it as a way of easily finding information about us. We promptly make available on this website, free of charge, the reports that we file or furnish with the SEC, press releases, quarterly earnings presentations, investor presentations, and corporate governance information, and you may subscribe to Email Alerts to be notified of new information posted to this site. About FRP Holdings, Inc. FRP Holdings, Inc. is a holding company engaged in the real estate business, namely (i) leasing and management of commercial properties owned by the Company, (ii) leasing and management of mining royalty land owned by the Company, (iii) real property acquisition, entitlement, development and construction primarily for apartment, retail, warehouse, and office, (iv) leasing and management of residential apartment buildings. Investor & Media Contacts: Robert Winters or Nathan [email protected] SOURCE: FRP Holdings, Inc. View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-06-02Frp (FRPH) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Motley Fool
Frp (FRPH) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript
Image source: The Motley Fool. Friday, April 10, 2026 at 4:30 p.m. ET Chief Executive Officer — John Baker III Chairman — John Baker II President and Chief Operating Officer — David deVilliers III Chief Financial Officer — Matthew McNulty Chief Investment Officer — Mark Levy Chief Accounting Officer — John Klopfenstein Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email [email protected] Matthew McNulty: Thank you. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us on this call today. I am Matt McNulty, Chief Financial Officer of FRP Holdings, Inc. And with me today are John Baker II, our Chairman; John Baker III, our CEO; David deVilliers III, our President and Chief Operating Officer; Mark Levy, our Chief Investment Officer; and John Klopfenstein, our Chief Accounting Officer. First, let me run through a brief disclosure regarding forward-looking statements and non-GAAP measures used by the company. As a reminder, any statements on this call, which relate to the future are, by their nature, subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties are listed in our SEC filings. To supplement the financial results presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, FRP presents certain non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G. The non-GAAP financial measures referenced in this call are net operating income, or NOI, and pro rata NOI. In this quarter, we provided an adjusted net income to adjust for the impact of onetime expenses of the Altman Logistics acquisition, which is a material business combination unlike our historical real estate acquisitions or joint ventures where expenses are capitalized. We also provided adjusted net operating income to adjust for the impact of the onetime material royalty payment in the third quarter of 2024 to better depict the comparable results year-to-date. Management believes these adjustments provide a more accurate comparison of our ongoing business operation and results over time due to the nonrecurring material and unusual nature of these 2 specific items. FRP uses these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze its operations and to monitor, assess and identify meaningful trends in our operating and financial performance. These measures are not and should not be viewe…Read full documentShow less
Image source: The Motley Fool. Friday, April 10, 2026 at 4:30 p.m. ET Chief Executive Officer — John Baker III Chairman — John Baker II President and Chief Operating Officer — David deVilliers III Chief Financial Officer — Matthew McNulty Chief Investment Officer — Mark Levy Chief Accounting Officer — John Klopfenstein Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email [email protected] Matthew McNulty: Thank you. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us on this call today. I am Matt McNulty, Chief Financial Officer of FRP Holdings, Inc. And with me today are John Baker II, our Chairman; John Baker III, our CEO; David deVilliers III, our President and Chief Operating Officer; Mark Levy, our Chief Investment Officer; and John Klopfenstein, our Chief Accounting Officer. First, let me run through a brief disclosure regarding forward-looking statements and non-GAAP measures used by the company. As a reminder, any statements on this call, which relate to the future are, by their nature, subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties are listed in our SEC filings. To supplement the financial results presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, FRP presents certain non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G. The non-GAAP financial measures referenced in this call are net operating income, or NOI, and pro rata NOI. In this quarter, we provided an adjusted net income to adjust for the impact of onetime expenses of the Altman Logistics acquisition, which is a material business combination unlike our historical real estate acquisitions or joint ventures where expenses are capitalized. We also provided adjusted net operating income to adjust for the impact of the onetime material royalty payment in the third quarter of 2024 to better depict the comparable results year-to-date. Management believes these adjustments provide a more accurate comparison of our ongoing business operation and results over time due to the nonrecurring material and unusual nature of these 2 specific items. FRP uses these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze its operations and to monitor, assess and identify meaningful trends in our operating and financial performance. These measures are not and should not be viewed as a substitute for GAAP financial measures. To reconcile adjusted net income, net operating income and adjusted net operating income to GAAP net income, please refer to our most recently filed 10-K. I will now turn the call over to our President and Chief Operating Officer, David deVilliers III, for his report on company and segment financials as well as operations. David? David deVilliers: Thank you, Matt, and good afternoon, everyone. I'll begin with a review of our fourth quarter and full year 2025 results and then discuss our operating priorities as we move into 2026 and beyond. 2025 was a transition year operationally, but more importantly, it was a year where we significantly expanded the scale, capabilities and long-term earnings potential of our platform. As we enter 2026, our focus is shifting from repositioning and investment toward execution and the conversion of embedded value into cash flow. For the year, we generated approximately $37.9 million of NOI and $22.1 million of FFO or $1.16 per share and ended the year with approximately $144 million of liquidity. These results were generally in line with our expectations and position us well for the next phase of growth. Late in the fourth quarter, we completed the Altman Industrial acquisition for approximately $33.5 million, adding roughly 1.6 million square feet of industrial development pipeline. While not included in our original budget, this acquisition significantly expands our platform and strengthens our presence in high conviction logistics markets. Turning to commercial and industrial. The portfolio totals approximately 807,000 square feet and ended the year approximately 47.5% occupied or 69.9%, excluding our new Chelsea building compared to 95.6% last year. Segment NOI was approximately $875,000 in Q4 and $3.9 million for the year, representing declines of 11.8% and 13.6%, respectively. The primary dynamic in 2025, which we anticipated entering the year was lease rollover timing. While occupancy declined as expected, leasing velocity was somewhat slower than anticipated as tenant decision cycles lengthened. Importantly, we view this as timing within the leasing cycle rather than a change in underlying demand. We currently have approximately 423,000 square feet available for lease-up, representing roughly 52% of the segment. At stabilization, this represents approximately $3.3 million of incremental annual NOI, representing a clear and visible earnings opportunity over the next 24 months. Execution will be focused on leasing velocity, pricing discipline and progressing occupancy towards approximately 70% by year-end, with a path to stabilization in the low 90% range over the following 18 to 24 months. Turning to Mining and Royalties. This segment generated approximately $3.9 million of NOI in Q4 and $14.6 million for the year, representing increases of 11.5% and 1.5%, respectively, with strong margins. The business continues to provide durable, high-margin cash flow with minimal incremental capital requirements and remains an important stabilizing component of our overall earnings and profile. While quarterly results may fluctuate due to timing or nonrecurring items, underlying performance remains consistent and supports balance sheet flexibility. Moving to Multifamily. The portfolio includes approximately 1,827 units across Washington, D.C. and Greenville, South Carolina. NOI totaled approximately $4.2 million in Q4 and $18.1 million for the year, representing modest declines of 2.6% and 0.4%, respectively, with average occupancy around 93% and economic occupancy, which reflects concessions and delinquencies of approximately 88%. Fourth quarter results were somewhat below expectations, primarily driven by: one, retail revenue softness of approximately $127,000 NOI impact; two, lower occupancy at Maren, averaging approximately 89%; and three, continued operating expense pressures. From a regional perspective, South Carolina remains stable with economic occupancy around 92%. Washington, D.C. remains more competitive due to supply pressure with economic occupancy around 87%. Our focus remains on resident retention, disciplined pricing, expense control and improving retail occupancy where possible. Development remains a primary driver of incremental value creation. Our current pipeline represents approximately $441 million in total project costs with expected stabilized incremental NOI of approximately $30 million over time. The Altman acquisition expands our footprint in Florida and New Jersey, adds experienced development talent and enhances our relationship with institutional capital partners. We continue to underwrite conservatively, target yields on cost of approximately 6.7% or greater, market cap rates of approximately 5.25% or lower, target IRRs in the 15% to 20% range. Development value is realized over time through lease-up and our pacing remains disciplined and aligned with market conditions. Stepping back, we operate a capital-efficient logistics platform designed to compound long-term per share value. This model combines development, selective ownership and partners to generate multiple sources of return, including development gains, durable cash flow and fee income. Our approach allows us to recycle capital, scale beyond our balance sheet and dynamically allocate capital across opportunities based on risk-adjusted returns. Importantly, this model allows us to generate value through development, convert that value into durable earnings and scale through partnerships, creating a more capital efficient and higher return platform over time. Our estimated NAV per share is approximately $37.60, increasing to over $40 per share over the next 3 years compared to a current share price that has recently traded between $20 and $24. Closing this gap remains a central focus of management, and we believe execution across leasing, development stabilization and disciplined capital allocation will be the primary drivers of narrowing that discount over time. Looking ahead, we view 2026 as an investment year. We expect NOI to be approximately $37.1 million to $37.7 million, with G&A increasing to approximately $15 million to $16 million as we integrate the Altman platform and continue investing in the infrastructure required to support a larger, more scalable operating platform. Importantly, this increase reflects intentional investment ahead of NOI growth, including the addition of the development, asset management and operational capabilities necessary to execute on our expanded pipeline. As a result, G&A as a percentage of NOI is expected to be elevated in 2026, potentially in the low 40% range before declining meaningfully as leasing activity accelerates, development stabilizes and incremental NOI is realized. Over time, as the platform scales, we expect operating leverage to emerge with G&A trending toward a more normalized range in the low 20% area. We believe this is the right trade-off, investing today to unlock a significantly larger and more valuable earnings base over the next several years. Balance sheet discipline remains foundational. We ended the year with approximately $144 million of liquidity, net debt to enterprise value of approximately 21% and a weighted average interest rate of approximately 5.24%. This liquidity provides flexibility to fund development, support lease-up and navigate market cycles without reliance on asset sales. To close, the next 12 to 24 months are about execution and value realization, leasing the industrial portfolio, stabilizing development and converting embedded NAV into durable cash flow are the key drivers of near-term performance. We are seeing early signs of stabilization across our markets and fundamentals for well-located logistics assets remain constructive. In fact, we recently signed a lease for 15,000 square feet at Cranberry Business Park in Maryland with a face rent 38% higher than the previous tenant and in the final stages of a lease for over 26,000 square feet at Davie in South Florida with a face rate above underwriting. We believe the work completed in 2025 has positioned us to drive meaningful growth in both NAV per share and durable earnings over the next several years. With that, I'll turn the call over to Mark Levy, our Chief Investment Officer, to provide additional perspective on leasing strategy, capital deployment and market positioning. Mark? Mark Levy: Thank you, David. Good afternoon, everybody. So as we enter 2026, our priorities are straightforward: convert vacant square footage into durable cash flow and institutionalize a capital deployment model that is scalable, repeatable and risk aware. Leasing is the fulcrum of value creation in our industrial strategy. Over the last several quarters, we have formalized our leasing process across markets, tightening broker coverage, implementing structured outreach cadence, refining competitive intelligence and aligning leasing and asset management under a single execution framework. The objective is to eliminate variability in process while allowing flexibility and market response. In Maryland, where leasing absorption lagged our initial expectations, we have adjusted. We recalibrated rent positioning where appropriate, expanded brokerage engagement and integrated additional leasing resources following the Altman transaction. We are underwriting to today's strike rents and protecting long-term basis rather than forcing velocity at the expense of asset value. In Central and Northern New Jersey, we are seeing improving tour activity and proposal volume, particularly from e-commerce and third-party logistics users recalibrating inventory strategies. In Florida, demand remains structurally supported by population growth and the migration towards Florida-centric logistics networks rather than reliance on Southeast regional hubs. Decision cycles remain longer than during peak years, but underlying utilization and supply dynamics are stabilizing into what I would characterize as normal post-COVID environment. On the supply side, development starts were materially curtailed in 2025 and entitlement friction, particularly in coastal infill corridors continues to limit new inventory. That dynamic should benefit well-located projects delivering into 2026 and 2027. Our capital allocation framework this year centers on 3 initiatives: first, complete and stabilize the current pipeline, including capitalizing and advancing a 24-acre site in Southwest Broward County expected to deliver approximately 335,000 square feet of Class A logistics product. We are sizing leverage conservatively and underwriting lease-up assumptions that reflect current market velocity rather than peak cycle absorption. Second, formalize a deployment model where basis discipline drive returns. We are targeting infill land positions along the East Coast where entitlement complexity and infrastructure adjacency create structural barriers to entry. Importantly, exit decisions will be made at stabilization, not inception. That preserves optionality, whether merchant realization to crystallize development spread or transition to longer-term hold where compounding cash flow and rent growth justify retention. Third, continue diversifying return channels. That includes selective net lease build-to-suit opportunities, leveraging established occupier relationships, targeted value-add acquisitions where operational efficiencies and mark-to-market leasing can drive NOI growth and capital partnerships that allow us to scale without overextending the balance sheet. Promote economics and fee generation will supplement core NOI over time. Capital markets are incrementally improving. Bank execution is more active, spreads have compressed modestly and equity capital is reengaging in development. We are not underwriting to peak leverage or assuming exit cap rate compression. Our posture remains conservative, protecting downside first, then optimizing upside. Across all industrial strategies, our filters are consistent, infill locations proximate to highways, ports and airports, deep labor pools, limited competing entitled land and basis that provides margin for error. Industrial real estate rewards disciplined operators over full cycles. Our focus in 2026 is to institutionalize that discipline in leasing, in underwriting and in capital structure so the growth is durable and the balance sheet risk is measured. With that, I'll turn the call over to John Baker for his closing remarks. John Baker: Thank you, Mark, and good afternoon to all those on the call. The financial results of 2025, while in line with expectations, don't tell the full story of everything we did this year. It can't be overstated what the acquisition of the Altman Logistics platform and its team opens up for the company in terms of where we develop, how we develop and with whom. This acquisition has refined and augmented a platform and pipeline that management expects will drive earnings and earnings growth, operational cash flow and net asset value. In the short term, that growth will come through improvements in same-store industrial occupancy. Getting our industrial portfolio back to the occupancy levels we have historically enjoyed remains a priority. As David mentioned, fully occupied at current market rents, the vacancies in our current assets represent approximately $3.3 million in NOI growth. That's growth we can achieve with minimal capital expenditures, and it has the most immediate financial impact. In the long run, we will continue to create value through our development segment. In terms of growing NOI, our top priority in this segment is developing and stabilizing our 3 industrial assets in Florida that are currently in development. We anticipate stabilization of these buildings totaling 762,000 square feet in 2028, which represents approximately $9.6 million in net operating income. These same-store development goals are achievable and measurable, and we have provided in Slide 12 of our quarterly supplemental presentation of results, a way for investors to measure and track the value these assets represent when fully leased. This is the yardstick by which we intend to measure our progress, and we intend -- we encourage investors to do the same. I think we can open it up for questions. Operator: [Operator Instructions] Your first question is coming from Stephen Farrell from Oppenheimer. Stephen Farrell: I just want to start with some quick questions on the D.C. market. I know there was a lot of supply that came on this year. And how is it absorbing that? And do you have any comments on a big drop in vacancy pretty much across the board from Q3 to Q4 at Dock, Maren, Bryant Street and the Verge was essentially flat. Any comments on that? David deVilliers: So in terms of D.C., I would say Dock and Maren and Verge are next to some large-scale multifamily that has come online, and they are offering, I would say, significant rental concessions, 2, 3 months. And that's something that we have to compete against, and we're trying to balance that. At the end of the day, it's a competitor. It's right next door, and it's going to put pressure on our occupancy. And that's something that we are experiencing at Dock, Maren, and Verge. Stephen Farrell: And something like how many units came on from that development? David deVilliers: It's probably 2,000 units. Stephen Farrell: 2,000. Okay. And then have you guys offered concessions as well or raised your concession? David deVilliers: No. I mean, in areas where we see and just if we have a number of, let's just say, studio apartments that are all vacant and they've been vacant for a while, we are giving some concessions out, but we're trying to keep them limited. We've seen pretty good renewal success kind of in 2025, we kind of saw renewals, let's just say, 60% across the board with renewal increases of anywhere from 2% to 4%, which was good. But again, as you noted, occupancy at Dock and Maren if you just look at average 2024 against average 2025, it's down. And we're still dealing with delinquencies in the D.C. market as well. Matthew McNulty: And I think, David, you know the answer to this. David deVilliers: I was just going to say, I think the last time we checked on the absorption of those, call it, roughly 2,000 units, it was pretty deep into it, right? Unknown Executive: The pace is good. They are absorbing units. And we've seen that. The velocity is there. Concessions and rental growth seem to be intense. Stephen Farrell: Yes. And then what was the case at Bryant Street because that's a different area of town? David deVilliers: Different area. Average occupancy in 2024 was, let's just call it, 91% and average occupancy in 2025 is 92%. So we saw a little push. At Bryant Street, renewal success, probably just below 60%, 59% with renewals 2.7%. There, we're definitely dealing with delinquency. And it's just tough to kind of push rents with the same pace that we're seeing operating expenses. So that's pushing NOI down at that particular asset that we have in D.C. Stephen Farrell: And what percentage of the vacancy is delinquencies? And is it still tough to get an eviction and get them moving and out of the unit? David deVilliers: It is. It just -- it takes time. It takes time. Bryant Street continues to improve overall, kind of, I'll call it, 2025 NOI compared to '24 NOI was up 5% at Bryant Street, which is great. And we hope to continue that trend. Matthew McNulty: I think, Stephen, you had asked to what percentage of the delinquency is vacancy or we don't -- the delinquency would sort of get added on top of vacancy. And I want to say it's probably in the 5% range. I can't be exactly right. So if you just added another 5% to our vacancy, that would kind of get you to our economic occupancy. There has been some legal changes in D.C. within the last 6 to 9 months, basically a Rental Reform Act that was put in place really to help landlords with a lot of these issues that we're facing on the eviction cycle. We've heard that it's starting to help, but it's going to take some time to really see anything go from what's taken us 15 months, maybe now taken us 13, but it needs to be like 3. So we'll see. Stephen Farrell: You have a lot of projects going on that are getting delivered this year. I just kind of want to run through them. The Altman JVs, how much construction there has been done? I think we're expecting the summer for it to be ready. How much capital do you still need to put into that? David deVilliers: I mean, just high level, all of our Florida assets are delivering this summer. And I would say that is around, let's just say, 600,000 square feet that's delivering this summer in terms of equity, all of our equity is in. All the additional capital is really being funded with our construction loans that we have. And all those projects are well underway. I mean we're very, very close to getting shell finals. And at this stage, focus is on marketing and leasing and the dollars that we're going to be spending are leasing dollars to get those things stabilized. Our 2 projects in New Jersey are very, very close as well, looking to be shell completion final this summer. Stephen Farrell: The Central Florida industrial, that's going to be delivered this summer too? Is that [indiscernible]. Mark Levy: Yes, the answer is yes. Matthew McNulty: Yes. So it's a little later in the year on Camp Lake. Mark Levy: On Camp Lake, that's right. That's a little later in the year, yes. Matthew McNulty: So Stephen, just to clarify, so when we said Florida projects, he's right, they're all delivering. But Camp Lake, Lakeland and Davie, basically, we own either 100% or in the case of Camp Lake, we own 95%. Those are long-term hold assets. And then the other project in Florida that came with the Altman acquisition is Delray, which is already delivered. We are a 10% partner in that. And the same with Hamilton and Parsippany, roughly 10% partner. And those are the merchant build and sell assets. Stephen Farrell: Okay. Got you. And just at Cranberry, is the Cranberry where we had the vacancy last year? Unknown Executive: Yes. Stephen Farrell: Did I miss that you signed the lease there? David deVilliers: We did. We signed a lease for 15,000 square feet, which is good news. We couldn't share that news in 2025, but... Stephen Farrell: And I'm sorry, I missed this part. What was the rate? David deVilliers: I didn't disclose the rate, but I can tell you that the former tenant compared to the new deal that we had, the new deal, the base rent, the year 1 rate is 38% higher than the previous tenant. John Baker: Yes. I think that's the most exciting part about that. It indicates, one, where our rents were before and where they're headed. Stephen Farrell: And do you have any concern over the length of tenants taking to get someone in there? I know that you're dealing with an eviction and then any CapEx that you need to put into it to attract a new tenant. Does that give you any concern though? David deVilliers: It doesn't. Again, I just -- as we enter 2026, and we're kind of through, I'll call it, Q1, we've just seen increased activity, more tours, more proposals, better engagement across our markets. We're just seeing a combination of improving market activity. And as Mark pointed out, I think we have much better internal execution. And that gives us a lot more confidence in leasing velocity through 2026. Mark Levy: Yes. I would just add that we're really -- it's really not sort of a lack of demand. I just think that overall, it's a much more deliberate demand environment. So the process, the decision-making process typically is taking a little bit longer. There is more, for instance, in a -- for a larger, let's say, publicly traded company, there's more internal sign-offs that are now required. And there's just a higher level of focus being paid on things like labor adjacency and things like transportation costs, things like that. And so obviously, with some of the macroeconomic factors around price of oil, things like that, that sometimes drives into the discussion around transportation costs and how that factors into sort of their total sort of cost of occupancy, if you will. So there's just a variety of different elements that sort of fade in and fade out at different points. But overall, holistically, tenant demand is much stronger and much more deliberate than it was in 2025. Stephen Farrell: And do you think that has any implications or effects on the Harford County development? Mark Levy: Well, one of the things that we have seen is that there is -- for occupiers that are requiring a much larger space, call it, spaces larger than 500,000 square feet, there are very few entitled land options remaining really along the entire Eastern Seaboard. I think nationally, there's something under 60 entitled sites that can accommodate buildings of 1 million square feet or larger. So ultimately, larger tenants who are now reactivating into the market after sort of being on the sidelines for the last, call it, 24 months are finding really a dearth of options. So I think our positions in Harford County really will allow us to potentially entertain some of these larger requirements. Both of our positions are located in markets that have very good labor pools that can draw even from as far south as Baltimore City and Prince George's County. So ultimately, we've got a very -- I think, a very strong positioning in the market. The sites are on the way to being fully entitled. And we've had some early constructive dialogue with a number of tenants regarding both our Kraus Phase 2 and our Mechanics Valley site. Stephen Farrell: Okay. That's good to know. And just last one here, Woven and Estero, are those all fully funded? Or do you need to and put up more capital for the developments? David deVilliers: Woven and Estero are both in different stages. Woven, we actually are a lender in that. So we do have additional capital through a bridge loan with them, but equity is -- all the equity is in for woven. Estero, we have probably another $3 million of equity that we would put into that. And then after that, the construction debt is there, it's ready to go. So very, very minimal cash required for each of those. Operator: [Operator Instructions] That concludes our Q&A session. I will now hand the conference back to Chief Executive Officer, John Baker, for closing remarks. Please go ahead. John Baker: I just want to close by saying how excited we are about what the future holds for this company. What the Altman acquisition has done for this company in terms of expanding the options we have and how we choose to develop our pipeline and future assets. It's the most exciting thing I've experienced since working here. When you couple that with the leasing activity we've seen this year, it's really heady cocktail. I really appreciate everyone on the call taking the time to be with us on a Friday afternoon and as always, for your continued interest in the company. This concludes the call. Before you buy stock in Frp, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Frp wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut are built for long-term growth and could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $462,983!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,375,447!* That performance is why people listen. With a track record of beating the S&P 500 by nearly 5x, Stock Advisor offers a distinct advantage. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built for the long haul. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2026. This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Frp (FRPH) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript was originally published by The Motley Fool
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-05-14FRP Holdings Inc (FRPH) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Occupancy Challenges and ...
GuruFocus.com
FRP Holdings Inc (FRPH) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Occupancy Challenges and ...
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Net Operating Income (NOI): Approximately $8.9 million for the quarter. Funds From Operations (FFO): $3.6 million, or $0.19 per share. Liquidity: Approximately $130 million between cash and line availability. Commercial and Industrial Occupancy: 47.5% occupied, down from 85% last year. Commercial and Industrial Segment NOI: $758,000, compared to $1,139,000 last year. Mining and Royalties NOI: $3.8 million, up 15% year-over-year. Multifamily NOI: $4.1 million for the quarter. Development Pipeline Costs: Approximately $441 million with expected stabilized incremental NOI of $30 million. General and Administrative Expenses (G&A): Expected to be approximately $15 million to $16 million for 2026. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Sign with FRPH. Is FRPH fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: May 13, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. FRP Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:FRPH) generated approximately $8.9 million of net operating income (NOI) and $3.6 million of funds from operations (FFO) in the first quarter of 2026. The company completed the Altman Industrial acquisition, adding 1.6 million square feet to its industrial development pipeline, expanding its presence in Florida and New Jersey. Mining and royalties segment showed strong performance with a 15% year-over-year increase in NOI, providing durable, high-margin cash flow. Leasing activity has improved with 53,000 square feet signed or under letters of intent, representing $1 million in future annualized NOI. FRP Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:FRPH) maintains a strong balance sheet with approximately $130 million of liquidity, providing substantial flexibility for future operations. Commercial and industrial portfolio occupancy decreased to 47.5% from 85% last year, impacting segment NOI. First quarter results in the multifamily segment were below expectations due to lower occupancy and higher operating costs, particularly in Washington, D.C. The company faces near-term pressure on FFO due to lease-up timing, elevated platform costs, and higher interest expenses. Washington, D.C. multifamily market remains competitive with continued supply pressure affecting occupancy and concessions. Development starts have declined, and high construction costs and yield on cost requireme…Read full documentShow less
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Net Operating Income (NOI): Approximately $8.9 million for the quarter. Funds From Operations (FFO): $3.6 million, or $0.19 per share. Liquidity: Approximately $130 million between cash and line availability. Commercial and Industrial Occupancy: 47.5% occupied, down from 85% last year. Commercial and Industrial Segment NOI: $758,000, compared to $1,139,000 last year. Mining and Royalties NOI: $3.8 million, up 15% year-over-year. Multifamily NOI: $4.1 million for the quarter. Development Pipeline Costs: Approximately $441 million with expected stabilized incremental NOI of $30 million. General and Administrative Expenses (G&A): Expected to be approximately $15 million to $16 million for 2026. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Sign with FRPH. Is FRPH fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: May 13, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. FRP Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:FRPH) generated approximately $8.9 million of net operating income (NOI) and $3.6 million of funds from operations (FFO) in the first quarter of 2026. The company completed the Altman Industrial acquisition, adding 1.6 million square feet to its industrial development pipeline, expanding its presence in Florida and New Jersey. Mining and royalties segment showed strong performance with a 15% year-over-year increase in NOI, providing durable, high-margin cash flow. Leasing activity has improved with 53,000 square feet signed or under letters of intent, representing $1 million in future annualized NOI. FRP Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:FRPH) maintains a strong balance sheet with approximately $130 million of liquidity, providing substantial flexibility for future operations. Commercial and industrial portfolio occupancy decreased to 47.5% from 85% last year, impacting segment NOI. First quarter results in the multifamily segment were below expectations due to lower occupancy and higher operating costs, particularly in Washington, D.C. The company faces near-term pressure on FFO due to lease-up timing, elevated platform costs, and higher interest expenses. Washington, D.C. multifamily market remains competitive with continued supply pressure affecting occupancy and concessions. Development starts have declined, and high construction costs and yield on cost requirements continue to challenge future supply. Q: Can you provide an overview of FRP Holdings' financial performance for the first quarter of 2026? A: David H. deVilliers III, Chief Operating Officer, reported that FRP Holdings generated approximately $8.9 million of net operating income (NOI) and $3.6 million of funds from operations (FFO), or $0.19 per share. The company ended the quarter with around $130 million in liquidity, including cash and line availability. Q: What are the current occupancy rates and challenges in the commercial and industrial segments? A: David H. deVilliers III noted that the commercial and industrial portfolio, totaling approximately 807,000 square feet, ended the quarter with about 47.5% occupancy, down from 85% last year. This decline is attributed to anticipated lease rollover timing, slower tenant decision cycles, and the addition of the Chelsea Building. The segment's NOI was approximately $758,000, compared to $1,139,000 last year. Q: How is the mining and royalties segment performing? A: The mining and royalties segment generated approximately $3.8 million of NOI during the quarter, marking a 15% year-over-year increase. This growth is attributed to favorable trends in both volume and pricing, providing durable, high-margin cash flow with minimal incremental capital requirements. Q: What are the key priorities for FRP Holdings in 2026? A: David H. deVilliers III emphasized that the focus for 2026 is on leasing vacancy, stabilizing the development pipeline, and converting embedded NOI into dependable recurring cash flow. The company aims to maintain balance sheet discipline while working through lease-up and stabilization. Q: How is FRP Holdings addressing the challenges in the multifamily segment? A: The multifamily portfolio, which includes approximately 1,827 units, faced lower occupancy and economic occupancy in Washington, D.C., due to supply pressure. However, South Carolina remains stable. The company views the challenges as a localized supply issue rather than a broader deterioration across the multifamily platform. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-05-13FRP Holdings Reports Q1 2026 Results: Full Earnings Call Transcript
Benzinga
FRP Holdings Reports Q1 2026 Results: Full Earnings Call Transcript
FRP Holdings (NASDAQ:FRPH) reported first-quarter financial results on Wednesday. The transcript from the company's first-quarter earnings call has been provided below. This transcript is brought to you by Benzinga APIs. For real-time access to our entire catalog, please visit https://www.benzinga.com/apis/ for a consultation. View the webcast at https://www.webcaster5.com/Webcast/Page/3158/54012 FRP Holdings Inc reported first quarter 2026 results with a net operating income (NOI) of $8.9 million and funds from operations (FFO) of $3.6 million or $0.19 per share, ending the quarter with $130 million in liquidity. The company completed the Altman Industrial acquisition, adding 1.6 million square feet of industrial development, and expanded operations in Florida and New Jersey, although occupancy in the commercial portfolio dropped due to lease rollover timing and new segment additions. Mining and royalties segment showed strong performance with a 15% year-over-year NOI increase, while the multifamily portfolio faced challenges in Washington, D.C. due to supply issues, impacting overall occupancy and performance. FRP Holdings Inc aims to stabilize its development pipeline and improve lease-up activities, expecting stable NOI and pressured FFO in 2026, with future growth dependent on leasing and development efforts. Management expressed optimism about improved leasing activity and market conditions, particularly in industrial spaces, and highlighted strategic focus on disciplined growth and capital deployment. OPERATOR Good day everyone. Welcome to the FRP Holdings Inc. First Quarter 2026 Conference Call. At this time, all participants have been placed on a listen only mode and the floor will be open for questions and comments after the presentation. It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to your host, Matt McNulty, CFO of FRP Holdings. The floor is yours. Matt McNulty (Chief Financial Officer) Great. Thank you. Good morning and thank you for joining us on this call today. I am Matt McNulty, Chief Financial Officer of FRP Holdings Inc. And with me today are John Baker II, our chairman John Baker III, our CEO David de Villier III, our president and chief operating officer, David de Villier Jr. Our vice chairman, John Milton, our Executive Vice President, Mark Levy, Chief Investment Officer and John Kloppenstein, our Chief Accounting Officer. First, let me…Read full documentShow less
FRP Holdings (NASDAQ:FRPH) reported first-quarter financial results on Wednesday. The transcript from the company's first-quarter earnings call has been provided below. This transcript is brought to you by Benzinga APIs. For real-time access to our entire catalog, please visit https://www.benzinga.com/apis/ for a consultation. View the webcast at https://www.webcaster5.com/Webcast/Page/3158/54012 FRP Holdings Inc reported first quarter 2026 results with a net operating income (NOI) of $8.9 million and funds from operations (FFO) of $3.6 million or $0.19 per share, ending the quarter with $130 million in liquidity. The company completed the Altman Industrial acquisition, adding 1.6 million square feet of industrial development, and expanded operations in Florida and New Jersey, although occupancy in the commercial portfolio dropped due to lease rollover timing and new segment additions. Mining and royalties segment showed strong performance with a 15% year-over-year NOI increase, while the multifamily portfolio faced challenges in Washington, D.C. due to supply issues, impacting overall occupancy and performance. FRP Holdings Inc aims to stabilize its development pipeline and improve lease-up activities, expecting stable NOI and pressured FFO in 2026, with future growth dependent on leasing and development efforts. Management expressed optimism about improved leasing activity and market conditions, particularly in industrial spaces, and highlighted strategic focus on disciplined growth and capital deployment. OPERATOR Good day everyone. Welcome to the FRP Holdings Inc. First Quarter 2026 Conference Call. At this time, all participants have been placed on a listen only mode and the floor will be open for questions and comments after the presentation. It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to your host, Matt McNulty, CFO of FRP Holdings. The floor is yours. Matt McNulty (Chief Financial Officer) Great. Thank you. Good morning and thank you for joining us on this call today. I am Matt McNulty, Chief Financial Officer of FRP Holdings Inc. And with me today are John Baker II, our chairman John Baker III, our CEO David de Villier III, our president and chief operating officer, David de Villier Jr. Our vice chairman, John Milton, our Executive Vice President, Mark Levy, Chief Investment Officer and John Kloppenstein, our Chief Accounting Officer. First, let me run you through a brief disclosure regarding forward looking statements and non-GAAP measures used by the company. As a reminder, any statements on this call which relate to the future are by their nature subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those indicated in such forward looking statements. These risks and uncertainties are listed in our SEC filings to supplement the financial results presented in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and FRP presents certain non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G. The non-GAAP financial measures referenced in this call are net operating income or NOI and pro rata NOI. FRP uses these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze its operations and to monitor, assess and identify meaningful trends in our operating and financial performance. These measures are not and should not be viewed as a substitute for GAAP financial financial measures. To reconcile adjusted net income,, net operating income and adjusted net operating income to GAAP net income,, please refer to our Most recently filed 10-Q. I will now turn the call over to our President and Chief Operating Officer David Evillier III for his report on operations. David de Villier III (President and Chief Operating Officer) Thank you, Matt and good morning everyone. I will begin with a review of our first quarter 2026 results and then discuss our operating priorities for the balance of the year and beyond. 2025 was a year where we significantly expanded the scale and long term earnings potential of the platform. As we move through 2026, the focus shifts towards execution. Simply put, we need to fill buildings, stabilize projects and turn that embedded value into dependable recurring cash flow over time. For the quarter we generated approximately 8.9 million of NOI and 3.6 million of FFO or $0.19 per share and ended the quarter with approximately 130 million of liquidity between cash and line availability. Late in the fourth quarter of 2025 we completed the Altman Industrial acquisition for approximately 33.5 million, adding roughly 1.6 million square feet of industrial development pipeline and expanding our presence in Florida and New Jersey. Turning to commercial and industrial, the Portfolio totals approximately 807,000 square feet and ended the quarter approximately 47.5% occupied compared to approximately 85% last year, primarily due to anticipated lease rollover timing, slower tenant decision cycles and the addition of the Chelsea Building segment. NOI totaled approximately 758,000 during the quarter compared to 1,139,000 last year. We continue to believe this is more a timing issue than a demand issue. Today we have approximately 423,000 square feet available for lease up, representing roughly 3.3 million of incremental annual NOI. Opportunity at stabilization Execution now comes down to leasing velocity, pricing discipline and occupancy growth over the next several quarters. Operationally activity feels materially different today than what we experienced in 2025. We are seeing more tours, more proposals, more tenant dialogue and improving leasing activity across multiple markets. Through Q1, we have now signed or LOI'd approximately 53,000 square feet representing roughly $1 million of future annualized NOI. As those leases commencement and convert to occupancy, we still have substantial work ahead of us, remain focused on filling our buildings and believe the platform is moving in the right direction. Turning to Mining and royalties, this Segment generated approximately 3.8 million of NOI during the quarter up 498,000 or 15% year over year. The second consecutive quarter of double digit underlying growth. With both volume and pricing trending favorably, mining continues to provide durable high margin cash flow with minimal incremental capital requirements. Mining royalties remain an important stabilizing component of the company's overall earnings profile and balance sheet flexibility. Moving to multifamily, the Portfolio includes approximately 1,827 units across Washington, D.C. and Greenville, S.C. NOI totaled approximately 4.1 million during the quarter. First quarter results were below expectations primarily due to lower occupancy and economic occupancy in our Washington, D.C. assets, higher operating costs and some softness in ground floor retail. From a market standpoint, South Carolina remains relatively stable with economic occupancy remaining in the low 90% range. Washington D.C. remains more competitive due to continued supply pressure, particularly from Vermeer in the stacks which impacted occupancy and concessions across DOC 79, Marin, and Verge. With economic occupancy remaining in the high 80% range during the quarter. Importantly, we view this primarily as a localized supply issue rather than a broader deterioration across the multifamily Platform development remains the company's largest long term NOI growth opportunity. The Altman acquisition which I mentioned earlier, was critical for two reasons. It expanded our pipeline and geographic footprint and it gave us the management capacity to execute on it. Current pipeline represents approximately 441 million of total project costs with expected stabilized incremental NOI of approximately 30 million over time. This opportunity represents a significant increase in NOI and earnings. Our pacing remains disciplined and the focus is on execution, lease up, stabilization and converting these projects into recurring cash flow over time and not simply growing to grow. Turning to the full year outlook for 2026, we expect NOI to remain relatively stable in the approximately $37 million range while lease up timing, elevated platform costs and higher interest expense continue to pressure near term ffo. We expect FFO to remain pressured in the near term with meaningful improvement tied to industrial lease up and development stabilization, both of which are underway. Important 2026 GNA is expected to be approximately 15 to 16 million and reflects the investment in people, systems and infrastructure needed to operate at scale. Balance sheet discipline remains foundational. We ended the quarter with approximately $130 million of liquidity and conservative asset level leverage. Importantly, while reported leverage metrics appear elevated on an EBITDA basis, asset level leverage remains conservative and liquidity remains strong. The balance sheet continues to provide substantial flexibility while we work through lease up and stabilization to close. 2025 was about building the platform. The next several quarters are about proving it. The near term priorities are clear. Lease the vacancy, stabilize the development pipeline and convert that embedded NOI, into dependable recurring cash flow. We have the balance sheet, liquidity and now the operational infrastructure to execute. We believe the pieces are in place for a meaningfully different earnings profile. Mining continues to perform, the DC multifamily supply overhang will clear and the industrial portfolio has the leasing activity to support it. With that, I'll turn the call over to Mark Levy,, our Chief Investment Officer to provide additional perspective on leasing activity, market conditions and capital deployment. Mark Mark Levy (Chief Investment Officer) thank you David and good morning. As we conclude the first quarter of 2026, we continue to be laser focused on driving leasing execution, converting vacancy into recurring cash flow, and continue building a scalable and disciplined industrial platform. Over the past several quarters we conducted a comprehensive review of our leasing and operating processes. As a result, we have made targeted refinements which will enable us to accelerate decision making, gather better market intelligence and improve alignment between our leasing, development and asset management teams. The changes we have made will create greater consistency, accountability and execution visibility across the platform. Importantly, we are beginning to see measurable progress from those initiatives. As David mentioned, we have signed leases or LOIs totaling 53,000 square feet representing $1,000,000 in annualized NOI. Furthermore, proposal activity, tenant engagement, tours and active negotiations have all increased meaningfully relative to prior periods. Our focus now is converting that activity into executed leases and recurring NOI growth. The the drivers behind this are occupiers seeking greater space efficiencies, closer access to labor and better proximity to transportation infrastructure. In Maryland, where lease up activity lagged our initial expectations in 2025, we recalibrated rent positioning where appropriate, expanded brokerage engagement and added additional leasing resources. Following the Alban transaction, we remain focused on balancing lease up velocity with long term value preservation and basis discipline. In New Jersey and Florida, we continue to see encouraging tenant activity, particularly from logistics, e commerce and third party distribution users. While decision making timelines remain longer than during peak post pandemic environment, overall market conditions across many of our target submarkets continue to stabilize. From a broader market perspective, development starts to climb materially during 2025 and into Q1 2026 while entitlement constraints and land scarcity will continue to limit future supply. In many infill coastal markets, we are seeing the lowest level of starts since 2010 and the number of future starts continues to be hampered by high construction costs and yield on cost requirements. This represents an opportunity for us as we have delivered or are delivering into submarkets marked by low vacancy and more limited competitive supply. From a capital allocation standpoint, our priorities remain focused on three key stabilizing the current development pipeline, selectively advancing new development opportunities in high barrier infill markets, and expanding capital relationships that support disciplined platform growth while maintaining balance sheet flexibility. We are also using technology to build better market data sets and test our assumptions more comprehensively. Furthermore, we are also continuing to diversify revenue channels through selective build to suit opportunities, targeted value add acquisitions, and institutional capital partnerships that can support future growth and recurring revenue generation over time. We are also making progress on that front, especially in the build to suit arena. Last discussions with prominent institutional investors and capital partners remain constructive. The feedback we continue to receive centers on confidence in the quality of our markets, operating platform development capabilities and long term industrial strategy. Additionally, from a capital markets perspective, financing conditions have improved modestly relative to the prior 12 to 18 months. Although we continue to maintain a conservative underwriting posture and remain focused on downside protection and disciplined basis management. Overall, FRP continues to make incremental but meaningful progress towards our goals. We believe FRP remains well positioned operationally, strategically and financially as we continue executing on our industrial growth strategy and and building a stronger and more scalable platform over time. I will now turn the call over to John Baker for his closing remarks. John Baker III (Chief Executive Officer) Thank you Mark, and good morning to all those on the call this quarter. Last year we had better results than we expected and I felt obliged to soften any enthusiasm they might inspire because of what we saw coming down the pipe for the rest of the year. I find myself in almost the exact opposite position relative to the first quarter of this year. Results this first quarter are worse than 2025. The headwinds we experienced last year are still with us, and yet I'm far more optimistic looking forward to the rest of the year and beyond. Leasing activity in our industrial space has completely flipped compared to last year, which is fortunate given that it remains our core focus for the foreseeable future. Same store leasing in particular is the most important way for us to improve the company's performance because it has the most immediate impact and involves so little in capex compared to development. The 50,000 square feet of leases signed or an LOI form, that David and Mark referred to is the tip of the iceberg in terms of phone calls, tours and paper traded. The volume that produced that number is diametrically opposed to what was more what more or less amounted to silence in that space last year. I don't think we are seeing a return to the industrial boom of the COVID years, but even a return to a more normalized leasing environment is comforting after the uncertainty of 2025. Given our focus on leasing, I can't tell you how heartening that is. As I mentioned so recently on our fourth quarter call, the yardstick by which we measure success will be the performance of our same store assets and the value created by our development segment, specifically our three industrial assets under development in Florida. We have included a table in our quarterly supplemental materials for investors to track our progress in these areas. As David said, we have a long way to go in order to achieve our goals, but the path forward is markedly clearer than it has been for some time. I think we'll open it up to questions, certainly. OPERATOR The floor is now open for questions. If you have any questions or comments, please press Star one on your phone at this time. We ask that while posing your question, you please pick up your handset if listening on a speakerphone to provide optimum sound quality. Please hold for just a few moments while we poll for any questions. Once again, if you do have any questions or comments, Please press star 1. There appear to be no questions in queue at this time. I would now like to turn the floor back to John Baker for any closing remarks. John Baker III (Chief Executive Officer) I really appreciate everyone on the call taking the time to be with us, and, as always, for your continued interest in the company. This concludes the call. OPERATOR Thank you, everyone. This does conclude today's conference call. You may disconnect your phone lines at this time and have a wonderful day. Thank you for your participation. Disclaimer: This transcript is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, there may be errors or omissions in this automated transcription. For official company statements and financial information, please refer to the company's SEC filings and official press releases. Corporate participants' and analysts' statements reflect their views as of the date of this call and are subject to change without notice. UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga: FRP HOLDINGS (FRPH): Free Stock Analysis Report This article FRP Holdings Reports Q1 2026 Results: Full Earnings Call Transcript originally appeared on Benzinga.com ᄅ 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-05-13FRP Holdings, Inc. Reports Fiscal 2026 First Quarter Results
ACCESS Newswire
FRP Holdings, Inc. Reports Fiscal 2026 First Quarter Results
Mining Royalties Volume Up 7.9% and Revenue Per Ton Up 6.5% Multifamily and Industrial Occupancy Pressured; Re-Leasing the Near-Term Priority JACKSONVILLE, FL / ACCESS Newswire / May 12, 2026 / FRP Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:FRPH), a full-service real estate investment and development company with four distinct business segments including Multifamily, Industrial and Commercial, Development, and Mining and Royalty Lands, today reported financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. Key results for the quarter ended 2026 include (compared with the first quarter 2025): Q1 2026 Financial Highlights: Net loss of $0.7 million or $(0.04) per share, versus net income of $1.7 million or $0.09 per share Pro rata NOI of $8.9 million versus $9.4 million, down 5% Multifamily portfolio occupancy of 92.1% across 1,827 units versus 94.0% Industrial & Commercial occupancy of 69.9% ex-Chelsea, down from 85.2% Mining royalties: volume up 7.9%, revenue per ton up 6.5% Closed Altman Logistics acquisition October 21, 2025; first full quarter of platform integration "Our first quarter results reflect the headwinds we flagged exiting last year, including occupancy pressure across our DC multifamily assets, industrial vacancies in Maryland that we are working to re-lease, and elevated G&A from the integration costs related to the Altman acquisition," said John Baker III, CEO of FRP Holdings. Baker continued, "Mining royalties continue to be a bright spot, with volume and pricing both moving favorably for the second consecutive quarter. We have more capital deployed in active development today than at any point in recent history, and over the next two years, lease-up of that pipeline will reshape our earnings profile. Near-term, our focus is straightforward: re-lease the Maryland industrial portfolio, stabilize occupancy in the DC multifamily assets, and deliver our active development projects on schedule." Operating Performance Snapshot (dollars in thousands) Q1 Consolidated Results of Operations Net loss of $687,000 or $(0.04) per share, versus net income of $1,710,000 or $0.09 per share in Q1 2025 Pro rata NOI of $8.9 million versus $9.4 million in Q1 2025, with the decline driven by lower Multifamily and Industrial NOI partially offset by higher Mining Royalty NOI Total revenues of $10.6 million, up 2.8%, as a 15% increase in mining royalty revenue and $164,000 of joint vent…Read full documentShow less
Mining Royalties Volume Up 7.9% and Revenue Per Ton Up 6.5% Multifamily and Industrial Occupancy Pressured; Re-Leasing the Near-Term Priority JACKSONVILLE, FL / ACCESS Newswire / May 12, 2026 / FRP Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:FRPH), a full-service real estate investment and development company with four distinct business segments including Multifamily, Industrial and Commercial, Development, and Mining and Royalty Lands, today reported financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. Key results for the quarter ended 2026 include (compared with the first quarter 2025): Q1 2026 Financial Highlights: Net loss of $0.7 million or $(0.04) per share, versus net income of $1.7 million or $0.09 per share Pro rata NOI of $8.9 million versus $9.4 million, down 5% Multifamily portfolio occupancy of 92.1% across 1,827 units versus 94.0% Industrial & Commercial occupancy of 69.9% ex-Chelsea, down from 85.2% Mining royalties: volume up 7.9%, revenue per ton up 6.5% Closed Altman Logistics acquisition October 21, 2025; first full quarter of platform integration "Our first quarter results reflect the headwinds we flagged exiting last year, including occupancy pressure across our DC multifamily assets, industrial vacancies in Maryland that we are working to re-lease, and elevated G&A from the integration costs related to the Altman acquisition," said John Baker III, CEO of FRP Holdings. Baker continued, "Mining royalties continue to be a bright spot, with volume and pricing both moving favorably for the second consecutive quarter. We have more capital deployed in active development today than at any point in recent history, and over the next two years, lease-up of that pipeline will reshape our earnings profile. Near-term, our focus is straightforward: re-lease the Maryland industrial portfolio, stabilize occupancy in the DC multifamily assets, and deliver our active development projects on schedule." Operating Performance Snapshot (dollars in thousands) Q1 Consolidated Results of Operations Net loss of $687,000 or $(0.04) per share, versus net income of $1,710,000 or $0.09 per share in Q1 2025 Pro rata NOI of $8.9 million versus $9.4 million in Q1 2025, with the decline driven by lower Multifamily and Industrial NOI partially offset by higher Mining Royalty NOI Total revenues of $10.6 million, up 2.8%, as a 15% increase in mining royalty revenue and $164,000 of joint venture management fee revenue from the Altman platform offset a 5% decline in lease revenue G&A of $4.1 million, up $1.5 million versus Q1 2025, driven by $311,000 higher audit fees, $173,000 of valuation and accounting consulting fees, $110,000 of IT consulting and higher wages all primarily related to the Altman acquisition Net investment income decreased $873,000, reflecting reduced earnings on cash equivalents on lower balances and rates ($650,000) and lower lending venture income ($223,000) on smaller loan balances Equity in loss of joint ventures was an unfavorable $584,000, driven by lower revenues and higher expenses Multifamily Segment Pro rata NOI of $4.1 million, down $546,000 or 12% versus Q1 2025; portfolio-wide occupancy of 92.1% across 1,827 units, down from 94.0% a year ago Decline concentrated in DC assets: Dock 79 NOI down $104,000 with occupancy declining 630 bps to 89.3%; The Maren NOI down $96,000 with occupancy declining 230 bps to 91.6%; The Verge NOI down $148,000 with occupancy declining 370 bps to 89.8%; Bryant Street NOI down $195,000 on higher operating costs Greenville assets flat with Riverside NOI up $12,000 and occupancy up 410 bps to 97.0%; .408 Jackson NOI down modestly with occupancy at 95.3% Renewal rate increases ranged from 0.6% to 6.1% across the portfolio Industrial and Commercial Segment NOI of $758,000, down $381,000 or 33% versus Q1 2025 Ten buildings in service totaling 773,356 sq ft of industrial and 33,708 sq ft of office; blended occupancy of 47.5%, reflecting the 258,279 sq ft Chelsea Road spec warehouse currently 100% vacant and in lease-up Excluding Chelsea, occupancy was 69.9% versus 85.2% in Q1 2025, with the further decline driven by additional non-renewing leases on top of the prior tenant eviction Chelsea contributed $218,000 of depreciation and $80,000 of operating costs in the quarter with no offsetting revenue Re-leasing the Maryland portfolio remains the primary near-term NOI driver for this segment Mining Royalty Segment Revenue of $3.7 million, up $483,000 or 15% versus Q1 2025; royalty tons up 7.9%, revenue per ton up 6.5% Operating profit before G&A of $3.4 million, up $432,000; operating margins above 91% NOI of $3.8 million, up $498,000 or 15% year-over-year, the second consecutive quarter of double-digit underlying growth, with both volume and pricing trending favorably Development and Active Pipeline Harford County residential lots: 228 of 344 lots sold (vs. 195 at Q4 2025); $30.0 million of $31.1 million commitment returned, $7.1 million recorded as profit to date Lakeland, FL warehouse and Broward County, FL warehouse: substantial completion expected Q2 2026 Woven, Greenville, SC: under construction, substantial completion expected late 2027 Estero Phase 1, Naples/Ft. Myers, FL: under construction, substantial completion expected late 2027 Lake County, FL warehouses (SREP JV): substantial completion of first warehouse expected Q1 2027 Riverfront Phase III/IV received second-stage PUD approval October 10, 2025; Phase III not currently in development, with property taxes now expensed rather than capitalized. Phase IV under entitlement. Altman Logistics Platform First full quarter following the October 21, 2025, closing of the Altman Logistics Property acquisition Development segment recognized $163,000 of joint venture management fee revenue from the three minority-interest warehouse projects acquired in the Altman transaction Acquired projects include warehouses in Delray Beach, FL (199,476 sq ft completed Q1 2026; additional 392,976 sq ft of land for two warehouses); Hamilton, NJ (170,800 sq ft substantial completion Q1 2026); Parsippany, NJ (140,031 sq ft, substantial completion Q2 2026); and Southwest Ranches, FL (335,617 sq ft land acquisition contracted for 2026) Several former Altman employees joined FRP as part of the transaction, providing in-house origination capability across Florida and New Jersey Conference Call The Company will host a conference call on Wednesday, May 13, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. (ET). Analysts, stockholders and other interested parties may access the teleconference live by calling 1-877-545-0320 (passcode 784509) within the United States or by joining the webcast at https://www.webcaster5.com/Webcast/Page/3158/54012. International callers may dial 1-973-528-0002 (passcode 784509). Audio replay will be available until May 13, 2027, by accessing it at the same link. The webcast replay will also be available on the Company's investor relations page (https://investors.frpdev.com/) following the call. Additional Information Our investor relations website is https://investors.frpdev.com and we encourage investors to use it as a way of easily finding information about us. We promptly make available on this website, free of charge, the reports that we file or furnish with the SEC, press releases, quarterly earnings presentations, investor presentations, and corporate governance information, and you may subscribe to Email Alerts to be notified of new information posted to this site. Investors are cautioned that any statements in this press release which relate to the future are, by their nature, subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. These include, but are not limited to: the possibility that we may be unable to find appropriate investment opportunities; levels of construction activity in the markets served by our mining properties; demand for flexible warehouse/office facilities in our markets; multifamily demand in Washington D.C. and Greenville, South Carolina; our ability to obtain zoning and entitlements necessary for property development; the impact of lending and capital market conditions on our liquidity; our ability to finance projects or repay our debt; general real estate investment and development risks; vacancies in our properties; risks associated with developing and managing properties in partnership with others; competition; our ability to renew leases or re-lease spaces as leases expire; illiquidity of real estate investments; bankruptcy or defaults of tenants; the impact of restrictions imposed by our credit facility; the level and volatility of interest rates; environmental liabilities; inflation risks; cybersecurity risks; and construction costs; as well as other risks listed from time to time in our SEC filings; including but not limited to; our annual and quarterly reports. We have no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, other than as imposed by law, as a result of future events or new information. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. FRP Holdings, Inc. is a holding company engaged in the real estate business, namely (i) leasing and management of commercial properties owned by the Company, (ii) leasing and management of mining royalty land owned by the Company, (iii) real property acquisition, entitlement, development and construction primarily for apartment, retail, warehouse, and office, and (iv) leasing and management of residential apartment buildings. Investor & Media Contacts: Robert Winters or Abe Plimpton [email protected] 312-445-2870 Comparative Results of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 Consolidated Results Multifamily Segment (Pro rata consolidated and pro rata unconsolidated) Multifamily Segment (Consolidated - Dock 79 & The Maren) Multifamily Segment (Pro rata unconsolidated) Our Multifamily Segment has four unconsolidated joint ventures (Bryant Street, The Verge, Riverside, and .408 Jackson). Riverside was moved from the Development segment to the Multifamily segment in 2022, Bryant Street and .408 Jackson moved as of the beginning of 2024 and The Verge moved effective July 1, 2024, each upon reaching lease up stabilization. Industrial and Commercial Segment Mining Royalty Lands Segment Results Development Segment Results CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - As of December 31 (In thousands, except share data) Non-GAAP Financial Measures. To supplement the financial results presented in accordance with GAAP, FRP presents certain non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. We believe these non-GAAP measures provide useful information to our Board of Directors, management and investors regarding certain trends relating to our financial condition and results of operations. Our management uses these non-GAAP measures to compare our performance to that of prior periods for trend analyses, purposes of determining management incentive compensation and budgeting, forecasting and planning purposes. These measures are not, and should not be viewed as, a substitute for GAAP financial measures. SOURCE: FRP Holdings, Inc. View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-05-13FRP Holdings: Q1 Earnings Snapshot
Associated Press
FRP Holdings: Q1 Earnings Snapshot
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. (AP) — JACKSONVILLE, Fla. (AP) — FRP Holdings Inc. (FRPH) on Tuesday reported a loss of $687,000 in its first quarter. The Jacksonville, Florida-based company said it had a loss of 4 cents per share. The real estate company posted revenue of $10.6 million in the period. _____ This story was generated by Automated Insights (http://automatedinsights.com/ap) using data from Zacks Investment Research. Access a Zacks stock report on FRPH at https://www.zacks.com/ap/FRPH
TranscriptFY2026 Q12026-05-13FY2026 Q1 earnings call transcript
Earnings source - 22 paragraphs
FY2026 Q1 earnings call transcript
Good day, everyone. Welcome to the FRP Holdings, Inc. First Quarter 2026 Conference Call. At this time, all participants have been placed on a listen-only mode, and the floor will be open for questions and comments after the presentation. It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to your host, Matt McNulty, CFO of FRP Holdings. The floor is yours.
Great. Thank you. Good morning, and thank you for joining us on this call today. I am Matt McNulty, Chief Financial Officer of FRP Holdings, Inc. With me today are John D. Baker II, our Chairman, John D. Baker III, our CEO, David H. deVilliers III, our President and Chief Operating Officer, David H. deVilliers, Jr., our Vice Chairman, John D. Milton, our Executive Vice President, Mark Levy, Chief Investment Officer, and John Klopfenstein, our Chief Accounting Officer. First, let me run you through a brief disclosure regarding forward-looking statements and non-GAAP measures used by the company. As a reminder, any statements on this call which relate to the future are, by their nature, subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties are listed in our SEC filings.
To supplement the financial results presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, FRP presents certain non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G. The non-GAAP financial measures referenced in this call are net operating income, or NOI, and pro rata NOI. FRP uses these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze its operations and to monitor, assess, and identify meaningful trends in our operating and financial performance. These measures are not and should not be viewed as a substitute for GAAP financial measures. To reconcile adjusted net income, net operating income, and adjusted net operating income to GAAP net income, please refer to our most recently filed 10-Q. I will now turn the call over to our President and Chief Operating Officer, David deVilliers III, for his report on operations. David.
Thank you, Matt, and good morning, everyone. I will begin with a review of our first quarter 2026 results and then discuss our operating priorities for the balance of the year and beyond. 2025 was a year where we significantly expanded the scale and long-term earnings potential of the platform. As we move through 2026, the focus shifts towards execution. Simply put, we need to fill buildings, stabilize projects, and turn that embedded value into dependable recurring cash flow over time. For the quarter, we generated approximately $8.9 million of NOI and $3.6 million of FFO, or $0.19 per share, and ended the quarter with approximately $130 million of liquidity between cash and line availability.
Late in the fourth quarter of 2025, we completed the Altman Industrial acquisition for approximately $33.5 million, adding roughly 1.6 million sq ft of industrial development pipeline and expanding our presence in Florida and New Jersey. Turning to commercial and industrial, the portfolio totals approximately 807,000 sq ft and ended the quarter approximately 47.5% occupied compared to approximately 85% last year, primarily due to anticipated lease rollover timing, slower tenant decision cycles, and the addition of the Chelsea building. Segment NOI totaled approximately $758,000 during the quarter, compared to $1,139,000 last year. We continue to believe this is more a timing issue than a demand issue.
Today, we have approximately 423,000 sq ft available for lease up, representing roughly $3.3 million of incremental annual NOI opportunity at stabilization. Execution now comes down to leasing velocity, pricing discipline, and occupancy growth over the next several quarters. Operationally, activity feels materially different today than what we experienced in 2025. We are seeing more tours, more proposals, more tenant dialogue, and improving leasing activity across multiple markets. Through Q1, we have now signed or LOI'd approximately 53,000 sq ft, representing roughly $1 million of future annualized NOI as those leases commence and convert to occupancy. We still have substantial work ahead of us, remain focused on filling our buildings, and believe the platform is moving in the right direction.
Turning to Mining and Royalties, this segment generated approximately $3.8 million of NOI during the quarter, up $498,000 or 15% year-over-year, the second consecutive quarter of double-digit underlying growth with both volume and pricing trending favorably. Mining continues to provide durable, high margin cash flow with minimal incremental capital requirements. Mining royalties remain an important stabilizing component of the company's overall earnings profile and balance sheet flexibility. Moving to Multifamily, the portfolio includes approximately 1,827 units across Washington, D.C., and Greenville, South Carolina. NOI totaled approximately $4.1 million during the quarter. First quarter results were below expectations, primarily due to lower occupancy and economic occupancy in our Washington, D.C. assets, higher operating costs, and some softness in ground floor retail.
From a market standpoint, South Carolina remains relatively stable, with economic occupancy remaining in the low 90% range. Washington, D.C. remains more competitive due to continued supply pressure, particularly from Vermeer and The Stacks, which impacted occupancy and concessions across Dock 79, The Maren and The Verge, with economic occupancy remaining in the high 80% range during the quarter. Importantly, we view this primarily as a localized supply issue rather than a broader deterioration across the multifamily platform. Development remains the company's largest long-term NOI growth opportunity. The Altman acquisition, which I mentioned earlier, was critical for two reasons. It expanded our pipeline and geographic footprint, and it gave us the management capacity to execute on it. Current pipeline represents approximately $441 million of total project costs, with expected stabilized incremental NOI of approximately $30 million over time.
This opportunity represents a significant increase in NOI and earnings. Our pacing remains disciplined, and the focus is on execution, lease up, stabilization, and converting these projects into recurring cash flow over time and not simply growing to grow. Turning to the full year outlook for 2026, we expect NOI to remain relatively stable in the approximately $37 million range, while lease up timing, elevated platform costs, and higher interest expense continue to pressure near term FFO. We expect FFO to remain pressured in the near term with meaningful improvement tied to industrial lease up and development stabilization, both of which are underway. Importantly, 2026 G&A is expected to be approximately $15 million-$16 million and reflects the investment in people, systems, and infrastructure needed to operate at scale. Balance sheet discipline remains foundational.
We ended the quarter with approximately $130 million of liquidity and conservative asset-level leverage. Importantly, while leverage metrics appear elevated on an EBITDA basis, asset-level leverage remains conservative and liquidity remains strong. The balance sheet continues to provide substantial flexibility while we work through lease-up and stabilization. To close, 2025 was about building the platform. The next several quarters are about proving it. The near-term priorities are clear. Lease the vacancy, stabilize the development pipeline, and convert that embedded NOI into dependable recurring cash flow. We have the balance sheet, liquidity, and now the operational infrastructure to execute. We believe the pieces are in place for a meaningfully different earnings profile. Mining continues to perform. The D.C. multifamily supply overhang will clear, and the industrial portfolio has the leasing activity to support it.
With that, I'll turn the call over to Mark Levy, our Chief Investment Officer, to provide additional perspective on leasing activity, market conditions, and capital deployment. Mark.
Thank you, David, and good morning. As we conclude the 1st quarter of 2026, we continue to be laser focused on driving leasing execution, converting vacancy into recurring cash flow, and continue building a scalable and disciplined industrial platform. Over the past several quarters, we conducted a comprehensive review of our leasing and operating processes. As a result, we have made targeted refinements which will enable us to accelerate decision making, gather better market intelligence, and improve alignment between our leasing, development, and asset management teams. The changes we have made will create greater consistency, accountability, and execution visibility across the platform. Importantly, we are beginning to see measurable progress from those initiatives. As David mentioned, we have signed leases or LOIs totaling 53,000 square feet, representing $1 million in annualized NOI.
Furthermore, proposal activity, tenant engagement, tours, and active negotiations have all increased meaningfully relative to prior periods. Our focus now is converting that activity into executed leases and recurring NOI growth. The drivers behind this are occupiers seeking greater space efficiencies, closer access to labor, and better proximity to transportation infrastructure. In Maryland, where lease up activity lagged our initial expectations in 2025, we recalibrated rent positioning where appropriate, expanded brokerage engagement, and added additional leasing resources following the Altman transaction. We remain focused on balancing lease up velocity with long term value preservation and basis discipline. In New Jersey and Florida, we continue to see encouraging tenant activity, particularly from logistics, e-commerce, and third party distribution users.
While decision making timelines remain longer than during peak post-pandemic environment, overall market conditions across many of our target submarkets continue to stabilize. From a broader market perspective, development starts to climb materially during 2025 and into Q1 2026, while entitlement constraints and land scarcity will continue to limit future supply in many infill coastal markets. We are seeing the lowest level of starts since 2010, and the number of future starts continues to be hampered by high construction costs and yield on cost requirements. This represents an opportunity for us as we have delivered or are delivering into submarkets marked by low vacancy and more limited competitive supply.
From a capital allocation standpoint, our priorities remain focused on three key initiatives: stabilizing the current development pipeline, selectively advancing new development opportunities in high barrier infill markets, and expanding capital relationships that support disciplined platform growth while maintaining balance sheet flexibility. We are also using technology to build better market data sets and test our assumptions more comprehensively. We are also continuing to diversify revenue channels through selective build-to-suit opportunities, targeted value add acquisitions, and institutional capital partnerships that can support future growth and recurring revenue generation over time. We are also making progress on that front, especially in the build-to-suit arena. Discussions with prominent institutional investors and capital partners remain constructive. The feedback we continue to receive centers on confidence in the quality of our markets, operating platform, development capabilities, and long-term industrial strategy.
Additionally, from a capital markets perspective, financing conditions have improved modestly relative to the prior 12-18 months. Although we continue to maintain a conservative underwriting posture and remain focused on downside protection and disciplined basis management. Overall, FRP continues to make incremental but meaningful progress towards our goals. We believe FRP remains well positioned operationally, strategically, and financially as we continue executing on our industrial growth strategy and building a stronger and more scalable platform over time. I will now turn the call over to John Baker for his closing remarks.
Thank you, Mark, and good morning to all those on the call. This quarter last year, we had better results than we expected, and I felt obliged to soften any enthusiasm they might inspire because of what we saw coming down the pipe for the rest of the year. I find myself in almost the exact opposite position relative to the first quarter of this year. Results this first quarter are worse than 2025. The headwinds we experienced last year are still with us, and yet I'm far more optimistic looking forward to the rest of the year and beyond. Leasing activity in our industrial space has completely flipped compared to last year, which is fortunate given that it remains our core focus for the foreseeable future.
Same-store leasing, in particular, is the most important way for us to improve the company's performance because it has the most immediate impact and involves so little in CapEx compared to development. The 50,000 sq ft of leases signed or in LOI form that David and Mark referred to is the tip of the iceberg in terms of phone calls, tours, and paper traded. The volume that produced that number is diametrically opposed to what more or less amounted to silence in that space last year. I don't think we are seeing a return to the industrial boom of the Covid years, but even a return to a more normalized leasing environment is comforting after the uncertainty of 2025. Given our focus on leasing, I can't tell you how heartening that is.
As I mentioned so recently on our fourth quarter call, the yardstick by which we measure success will be the performance of our same store assets and the value created by our development segment, specifically our three industrial assets under development in Florida. We have included a table in our quarterly supplemental materials for investors to track our progress in these areas. As David said, we have a long way to go in order to achieve our goals, but the path forward is markedly clearer than it has been for some time. I think we'll open it up to questions.
Certainly. The floor is now open for questions. If you have any questions or comments, please press star one on your phone at this time. We ask that while posing your question, you please pick up your handset if listening on a speakerphone to provide optimum sound quality. Please hold for just a few moments while we poll for any questions. Once again, if you do have any questions or comments, please press star one. There appear to be no questions in queue at this time. I would now like to turn the floor back to John Baker for any closing remarks.
I really appreciate everyone on the call taking the time to be with us and, as always, for your continued interest in the company. This concludes the call.
Thank you, everyone. This does conclude today's conference call. You may disconnect your phone lines at this time and have a wonderful day. Thank you for your participation.

