EXR
Extra Space StorageCDocument history
Earnings documents stored for EXR.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-27Why Is Extra Space Storage (EXR) Down 5.7% Since Last Earnings Report?
Zacks
Why Is Extra Space Storage (EXR) Down 5.7% Since Last Earnings Report?
A month has gone by since the last earnings report for Extra Space Storage (EXR). Shares have lost about 5.7% in that time frame, underperforming the S&P 500. Will the recent negative trend continue leading up to its next earnings release, or is Extra Space Storage due for a breakout? Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its latest earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important drivers. Extra Space Storage reported second-quarter 2026 core FFO per share of $2.15, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.06 by 4.4%. Core FFO per share increased 4.9% year over year from $2.05. Quarterly revenues of $874.2 million surpassed the consensus estimate of $867.4 million by 0.8% and rose 3.9% year over year. Results benefited from higher same-store revenues and lower same-store operating expenses, which drove 3.5% growth in same-store NOI. Property rental revenues increased 3.5% year over year to $746.2 million. Tenant reinsurance revenues rose 5.1% to $93.1 million, while management fees and other income advanced 8.9% to $34.9 million. Total expenses increased 3.3% to $482 million. Property operations expenses rose 1.8% to $231.7 million, tenant reinsurance expenses climbed 2.2% to $17.3 million and general and administrative expenses increased 5.3% to $47.3 million. Depreciation and amortization expenses grew 4.7% to $185.6 million. Same-store revenues increased 2.4% year over year to $690.2 million. Net rental income rose 2.5% to $664.9 million, while other income declined 1.5% to $25.3 million. Same-store operating expenses decreased 0.5% to $194.1 million, supporting NOI of $496.1 million. Payroll and benefits, marketing, property operating expenses and repairs and maintenance declined during the second quarter. Ending same-store occupancy was 94.2%, down from 94.4% a year earlier, while average same-store occupancy edged down to 94% from 94.1%. During the second quarter, Extra Space Storage purchased 17 operating stores and acquired its joint venture partner's ownership interest in one consolidated joint venture for a total cost of $90.7 million. Extra Space Storage originated $140.6 million in mortgage and mezzanine bridge loans during the reported quarter. Outstanding bridge-loan balances were approximately $1.5 billion at quarter-end, with another $86.3 million closed after the…Read full documentShow less
A month has gone by since the last earnings report for Extra Space Storage (EXR). Shares have lost about 5.7% in that time frame, underperforming the S&P 500. Will the recent negative trend continue leading up to its next earnings release, or is Extra Space Storage due for a breakout? Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its latest earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important drivers. Extra Space Storage reported second-quarter 2026 core FFO per share of $2.15, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.06 by 4.4%. Core FFO per share increased 4.9% year over year from $2.05. Quarterly revenues of $874.2 million surpassed the consensus estimate of $867.4 million by 0.8% and rose 3.9% year over year. Results benefited from higher same-store revenues and lower same-store operating expenses, which drove 3.5% growth in same-store NOI. Property rental revenues increased 3.5% year over year to $746.2 million. Tenant reinsurance revenues rose 5.1% to $93.1 million, while management fees and other income advanced 8.9% to $34.9 million. Total expenses increased 3.3% to $482 million. Property operations expenses rose 1.8% to $231.7 million, tenant reinsurance expenses climbed 2.2% to $17.3 million and general and administrative expenses increased 5.3% to $47.3 million. Depreciation and amortization expenses grew 4.7% to $185.6 million. Same-store revenues increased 2.4% year over year to $690.2 million. Net rental income rose 2.5% to $664.9 million, while other income declined 1.5% to $25.3 million. Same-store operating expenses decreased 0.5% to $194.1 million, supporting NOI of $496.1 million. Payroll and benefits, marketing, property operating expenses and repairs and maintenance declined during the second quarter. Ending same-store occupancy was 94.2%, down from 94.4% a year earlier, while average same-store occupancy edged down to 94% from 94.1%. During the second quarter, Extra Space Storage purchased 17 operating stores and acquired its joint venture partner's ownership interest in one consolidated joint venture for a total cost of $90.7 million. Extra Space Storage originated $140.6 million in mortgage and mezzanine bridge loans during the reported quarter. Outstanding bridge-loan balances were approximately $1.5 billion at quarter-end, with another $86.3 million closed after the quarter or under agreement to close in 2026. Extra Space Storage added 67 stores or 48 stores on a net basis to its third-party management platform during the second quarter. As of June 30, 2026, it managed 1,964 stores for third-party owners and 409 stores in unconsolidated joint ventures. The company owned or operated 4,410 self-storage stores across 42 states and Washington, D.C. Its stores comprised approximately 3 million units and 341 million square feet of rentable space. Extra Space ended the second quarter with $695.2 million in cash and cash equivalents, up from $139 million in the prior quarter. Its percentage of fixed-rate debt to total debt was 78.5%. After accounting for variable-rate receivables, the effective fixed-rate debt to total debt was 88.4%. The combined weighted average interest rate was 4.3%, with a weighted average maturity of approximately four years. In June, Extra Space Storage priced a public bond offering, issuing $550 million of 4.9% unsecured senior notes due in 2032. The company had $850 million outstanding under its $1 billion commercial paper program. Management raised its 2026 core FFO guidance to $8.25-$8.40 per share from the prior range of $8.05-$8.35. The updated outlook assumes same-store revenue growth of 1-2% compared with the previous projection of negative 0.5% to positive 1.5%. The company now expects same-store expense growth of 1-2%, down from 2-3.5% and same-store NOI growth of 0.5-2.5%, up from the earlier range of negative 2.25% to positive 1.25%. Its acquisition assumption was increased to $300 million from $200 million. Since the earnings release, investors have witnessed a flat trend in estimates revision. Currently, Extra Space Storage has a subpar Growth Score of D, however its Momentum Score is doing a lot better with a B. However, the stock was allocated a grade of D on the value side, putting it in the bottom 40% for this investment strategy. Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of D. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in. Extra Space Storage has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). We expect an in-line return from the stock in the next few months. Extra Space Storage is part of the Zacks REIT and Equity Trust - Other industry. Over the past month, SL Green (SLG), a stock from the same industry, has gained 9%. The company reported its results for the quarter ended June 2026 more than a month ago. SL Green reported revenues of $171.85 million in the last reported quarter, representing a year-over-year change of +16.5%. EPS of -$0.38 for the same period compares with $1.63 a year ago. SL Green is expected to post earnings of $1.42 per share for the current quarter, representing a year-over-year change of -10.1%. Over the last 30 days, the Zacks Consensus Estimate has changed +12.9%. The overall direction and magnitude of estimate revisions translate into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for SL Green. Also, the stock has a VGM Score of F. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Extra Space Storage Inc (EXR) : Free Stock Analysis Report SL Green Realty Corporation (SLG) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-20Extra Space Storage (EXR) Stock Could Be Undervalued On Cash Flow Yet Full On Earnings
Simply Wall St.
Extra Space Storage (EXR) Stock Could Be Undervalued On Cash Flow Yet Full On Earnings
Find winning stocks in any market cycle. Join 7 million investors using Simply Wall St's investing ideas for FREE. Extra Space Storage has delivered a 31.4% total return over the past three years, while the latest intrinsic value estimate from a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model points to the shares trading at about an 11.1% discount to that estimate. Traditional market multiples suggest the stock is priced roughly in line with peers. A 31.4% three year return signals that shareholders have already seen meaningful gains, which can reduce the margin of safety for new buyers if the market has already priced in much of the good news. Future cash flow from the storage portfolio and the company’s ability to manage debt and funding needs can support or weaken the case that the current price still leaves room for value to be realised. Extra Space Storage screens as undervalued on 3 of 6 valuation checks, which is a mixed picture rather than a clear bargain or clear overvaluation. You can see the breakdown at 3/6 valuation checks. The issue now is whether the market price already reflects the key cash flow and risk assumptions behind that Discounted Cash Flow intrinsic value estimate, or if there is still a reasonable gap for investors in Extra Space Storage. Extra Space Storage delivered 10.9% returns over the last year. See how this stacks up to the rest of the Specialized REITs industry. The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model uses Extra Space Storage’s projected cash generation to estimate what the stock could be worth today. For this company, the model is built on adjusted funds from operations and uses a 2 stage Free Cash Flow to Equity approach. Extra Space Storage produced around $1.75b of free cash flow over the last twelve months, and the DCF model assumes that free cash flow continues to grow from this base rather than rely on aggressive jump shifts. On these assumptions, the intrinsic value comes out at about $166 per share in dollar terms. Compared with the current market price, that implies the stock trades at roughly an 11.1% discount. On this discounted cash flow view, Extra Space Storage stock currently appears undervalued relative to its estimated intrinsic value. Our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis suggests Extra Space Storage is undervalued by 11.1%. Track this in your watchlist or portfolio, or discover 52 more high quality undervalued stocks. H…Read full documentShow less
Find winning stocks in any market cycle. Join 7 million investors using Simply Wall St's investing ideas for FREE. Extra Space Storage has delivered a 31.4% total return over the past three years, while the latest intrinsic value estimate from a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model points to the shares trading at about an 11.1% discount to that estimate. Traditional market multiples suggest the stock is priced roughly in line with peers. A 31.4% three year return signals that shareholders have already seen meaningful gains, which can reduce the margin of safety for new buyers if the market has already priced in much of the good news. Future cash flow from the storage portfolio and the company’s ability to manage debt and funding needs can support or weaken the case that the current price still leaves room for value to be realised. Extra Space Storage screens as undervalued on 3 of 6 valuation checks, which is a mixed picture rather than a clear bargain or clear overvaluation. You can see the breakdown at 3/6 valuation checks. The issue now is whether the market price already reflects the key cash flow and risk assumptions behind that Discounted Cash Flow intrinsic value estimate, or if there is still a reasonable gap for investors in Extra Space Storage. Extra Space Storage delivered 10.9% returns over the last year. See how this stacks up to the rest of the Specialized REITs industry. The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model uses Extra Space Storage’s projected cash generation to estimate what the stock could be worth today. For this company, the model is built on adjusted funds from operations and uses a 2 stage Free Cash Flow to Equity approach. Extra Space Storage produced around $1.75b of free cash flow over the last twelve months, and the DCF model assumes that free cash flow continues to grow from this base rather than rely on aggressive jump shifts. On these assumptions, the intrinsic value comes out at about $166 per share in dollar terms. Compared with the current market price, that implies the stock trades at roughly an 11.1% discount. On this discounted cash flow view, Extra Space Storage stock currently appears undervalued relative to its estimated intrinsic value. Our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis suggests Extra Space Storage is undervalued by 11.1%. Track this in your watchlist or portfolio, or discover 52 more high quality undervalued stocks. Head to the Valuation section of our Company Report for more details on how we arrive at this Fair Value for Extra Space Storage. The P/E ratio is a useful way to compare Extra Space Storage with other listed storage REITs that also report steady earnings. On this measure, Extra Space Storage trades on about 32.7x earnings, which is higher than the Specialized REITs industry average of around 16.6x. It is, however, below the broader peer group average of roughly 53.9x. A more tailored “fair” P/E for Extra Space Storage that accounts for its size, sector and risk profile comes out at about 34.3x. That is only slightly above the current 32.7x multiple, which suggests the stock is priced close to what this framework would expect rather than at a clear discount or premium. On the P/E multiple, Extra Space Storage stock appears roughly fairly valued compared with both peers and the modelled fair ratio. See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown. Simply Wall St Narratives pick up where the valuation work on Extra Space Storage leaves off by spelling out which assumptions on growth, margins and earnings would need to hold for the stock to be worth materially more or less than today’s price. Each one sets out Extra Space Storage's fair value as a thesis about the business that you can track over time, and they live on Simply Wall St's Community page. You can add your voice to the Simply Wall St community by sharing a Narrative on Extra Space Storage that sets out your numbers based view on where its growth, margins and execution go from here. Put a clear thesis on record and see how it holds up as new results emerge. Do you think there's more to the story for Extra Space Storage? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying! For Extra Space Storage, the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) work points to an intrinsic value above the current share price, while the P/E and other checks suggest the stock is roughly in line with peers rather than a clear bargain. That mixed picture means the stock does not screen as obviously cheap or clearly expensive. What matters most from here is whether the company can sustain the cash generation that underpins the DCF estimate without stretching its balance sheet, since that will decide whether the current valuation reflects a cautious market or a fair read on the risks. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include EXR. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email [email protected]
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-01Self-Storage REITs Show Mixed NOI in Q2 2026 Earnings
CRE Daily
Self-Storage REITs Show Mixed NOI in Q2 2026 Earnings
This story was originally published on CRE Daily. Join 70,000+ commercial real estate professionals getting daily news, market insights, and industry analysis delivered straight to their inbox with the free CRE Daily newsletter. The top three US self-storage REITs released Q2 2026 results signaling steady fundamentals with some divergence in NOI growth and expense trends. CubeSmart, Extra Space, and Public Storage reported varied same-store metrics, with Extra Space outperforming in NOI while Public Storage closed a major $10.5B acquisition. Operators are signaling ongoing appetite for property expansion and management platforms, despite rising operating costs and some revenue headwinds. CubeSmart, Extra Space Storage, and Public Storage reported Q2 2026 earnings, according to Inside Self-Storage. Results showed steady occupancy, firmer move-in pricing, and continued efficiency efforts. Public Storage also closed its $10.5B NSA deal after the quarter ended, reshaping the competitive landscape. Steady rental demand supported high occupancy across the sector. However, rising expenses continued to pressure margins. Operators still expanded through acquisitions and third-party management despite uneven revenue growth. CubeSmart reported adjusted FFO of $0.63 per diluted share. Same-store NOI fell 0.7% year over year. Revenue declined 0.8%, while expenses rose 4.4%. Average occupancy reached 90.4%, ending the quarter at 91%. The REIT owns or manages 1,534 facilities. Extra Space increased same-store revenue 2.4% and same-store NOI 3.5%. Expenses fell 0.5%, while occupancy reached 94.2%. The company expanded its third-party management platform to 2,373 properties. It also acquired $90.7M of facilities. Public Storage posted a 74.2% same-store NOI margin. Revenue fell 0.6%, while operating costs rose 4.4%. Occupancy improved to 92.5% as move-in rents recovered from Q1. The company acquired 20 properties for $222.5M. It also announced the $10.5B NSA acquisition and a $1.2B purchase of Public Storage Canada. Operators continue balancing rising costs with expansion. CubeSmart’s property expenses increased by $7M during Q2. Higher payroll and property taxes drove the increase. Still, the company added 25 stores to its management platform. Extra Space stood apart by lowering same-store expenses while expanding operations. Meanwhile, Public Storage doubled down on scale.…Read full documentShow less
This story was originally published on CRE Daily. Join 70,000+ commercial real estate professionals getting daily news, market insights, and industry analysis delivered straight to their inbox with the free CRE Daily newsletter. The top three US self-storage REITs released Q2 2026 results signaling steady fundamentals with some divergence in NOI growth and expense trends. CubeSmart, Extra Space, and Public Storage reported varied same-store metrics, with Extra Space outperforming in NOI while Public Storage closed a major $10.5B acquisition. Operators are signaling ongoing appetite for property expansion and management platforms, despite rising operating costs and some revenue headwinds. CubeSmart, Extra Space Storage, and Public Storage reported Q2 2026 earnings, according to Inside Self-Storage. Results showed steady occupancy, firmer move-in pricing, and continued efficiency efforts. Public Storage also closed its $10.5B NSA deal after the quarter ended, reshaping the competitive landscape. Steady rental demand supported high occupancy across the sector. However, rising expenses continued to pressure margins. Operators still expanded through acquisitions and third-party management despite uneven revenue growth. CubeSmart reported adjusted FFO of $0.63 per diluted share. Same-store NOI fell 0.7% year over year. Revenue declined 0.8%, while expenses rose 4.4%. Average occupancy reached 90.4%, ending the quarter at 91%. The REIT owns or manages 1,534 facilities. Extra Space increased same-store revenue 2.4% and same-store NOI 3.5%. Expenses fell 0.5%, while occupancy reached 94.2%. The company expanded its third-party management platform to 2,373 properties. It also acquired $90.7M of facilities. Public Storage posted a 74.2% same-store NOI margin. Revenue fell 0.6%, while operating costs rose 4.4%. Occupancy improved to 92.5% as move-in rents recovered from Q1. The company acquired 20 properties for $222.5M. It also announced the $10.5B NSA acquisition and a $1.2B purchase of Public Storage Canada. Operators continue balancing rising costs with expansion. CubeSmart’s property expenses increased by $7M during Q2. Higher payroll and property taxes drove the increase. Still, the company added 25 stores to its management platform. Extra Space stood apart by lowering same-store expenses while expanding operations. Meanwhile, Public Storage doubled down on scale. Its NSA acquisition expands its US footprint. The biggest operators also face tougher competition for customers in major markets, making portfolio scale increasingly valuable. Its Canadian acquisition adds 68 properties. Planned development and expansion projects could add another 4M SF. Across the sector, operators rely on acquisitions and management growth to offset rising operating costs. These earnings highlight the balancing act facing self-storage REITs in 2026. Companies continue pursuing growth while managing higher operating costs. Occupancy remained healthy across the sector. Public Storage ended Q2 at 92.5%, Extra Space at 94.2%, and CubeSmart at 91%. Revenue trends, however, diverged. Extra Space outperformed peers in same-store NOI through disciplined cost control. CubeSmart and Public Storage both faced 4.4% annual expense growth. Public Storage also reported a 0.6% revenue decline despite higher occupancy. Lower annual rent per occupied SF weighed on results. Public Storage’s NSA acquisition also reflects accelerating industry consolidation. Larger deals strengthen market leaders but increase integration risks. These results set new benchmarks for efficiency, scale, and disciplined execution. All three REITs plan to keep expanding management platforms, pursuing acquisitions, and developing new facilities. Public Storage leads with 2.8M SF under development and a strong acquisition pipeline. Extra Space and CubeSmart also entered Q3 with larger third-party management portfolios. Investors will watch expense inflation, property taxes, and rental pricing through the rest of 2026. Slower rent growth or weaker occupancy could pressure margins further. For now, sector stability depends on scale, disciplined cost control, and careful portfolio expansion. Dallas-Fort Worth Rents Dip as Apartment Supply Grows Austin Multifamily Rents Edge Up as Supply Pressures Build Texas Multifamily Supply Dips as Investors Move Ahead of Rents
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30Extra Space Storage Inc (EXR) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Core FFO Beats Expectations, ...
GuruFocus.com
Extra Space Storage Inc (EXR) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Core FFO Beats Expectations, ...
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Core FFO per Share: $2.15, representing 4.9% year-over-year growth. Same-Store Revenue Growth: 2.4% in the second quarter, accelerating from the first quarter. Same-Store NOI Growth: 3.5% year-over-year, accelerating 230 basis points from the first quarter. Same-Store Expenses: Decreased modestly year-over-year. Occupancy: Ended the quarter at 94.2%. Acquisitions: Closed 18 stores for $91 million. Bridge Loan Program: Originated $141 million in new loans; ended the quarter with approximately $1.5 billion in outstanding balances. Third-Party Management: Added 67 stores during the quarter with net growth of 48 stores; total managed portfolio of 1,964 stores. Bond Offering: Priced a $550 million bond offering at 4.9%. Full Year 2026 Core FFO Guidance: Raised to a range of $8.25 to $8.40 per share. Full Year 2026 Same-Store Revenue Guidance: Raised to a range of 1% to 2%. Full Year 2026 Same-Store NOI Guidance: Raised to a range of positive 0.5% to 2.5%. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 9 Warning Signs with EXR. Is EXR fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: July 29, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Core FFO per share grew 4.9% year-over-year to $2.15, exceeding internal projections. Same-store revenue growth accelerated to 2.4% in Q2, driven by effective pricing and occupancy management. Same-store NOI increased 3.5% year-over-year, with expenses declining modestly due to operational efficiencies. External growth channels performed well, including $91 million in acquisitions and $141 million in bridge loan originations. Third-party management added 67 stores in Q2, with net growth of 48 stores, expanding the managed portfolio to 1,964 stores. Guidance implies potential deceleration in same-store revenue growth in the second half due to difficult comps and macro risks. Customer demand remains steady but has not improved, with no pickup in housing market or organic demand catalysts. Asset pricing in the acquisition market remains elevated, limiting attractive brokerage deals and pushing focus to proprietary pipelines. Some Sunbelt markets like Houston, Tampa, and Phoenix continue to face challenges with negative move-in rate trends. The New York City settlement and upcoming licensing requirements introduce regulator…Read full documentShow less
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Core FFO per Share: $2.15, representing 4.9% year-over-year growth. Same-Store Revenue Growth: 2.4% in the second quarter, accelerating from the first quarter. Same-Store NOI Growth: 3.5% year-over-year, accelerating 230 basis points from the first quarter. Same-Store Expenses: Decreased modestly year-over-year. Occupancy: Ended the quarter at 94.2%. Acquisitions: Closed 18 stores for $91 million. Bridge Loan Program: Originated $141 million in new loans; ended the quarter with approximately $1.5 billion in outstanding balances. Third-Party Management: Added 67 stores during the quarter with net growth of 48 stores; total managed portfolio of 1,964 stores. Bond Offering: Priced a $550 million bond offering at 4.9%. Full Year 2026 Core FFO Guidance: Raised to a range of $8.25 to $8.40 per share. Full Year 2026 Same-Store Revenue Guidance: Raised to a range of 1% to 2%. Full Year 2026 Same-Store NOI Guidance: Raised to a range of positive 0.5% to 2.5%. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 9 Warning Signs with EXR. Is EXR fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: July 29, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Core FFO per share grew 4.9% year-over-year to $2.15, exceeding internal projections. Same-store revenue growth accelerated to 2.4% in Q2, driven by effective pricing and occupancy management. Same-store NOI increased 3.5% year-over-year, with expenses declining modestly due to operational efficiencies. External growth channels performed well, including $91 million in acquisitions and $141 million in bridge loan originations. Third-party management added 67 stores in Q2, with net growth of 48 stores, expanding the managed portfolio to 1,964 stores. Guidance implies potential deceleration in same-store revenue growth in the second half due to difficult comps and macro risks. Customer demand remains steady but has not improved, with no pickup in housing market or organic demand catalysts. Asset pricing in the acquisition market remains elevated, limiting attractive brokerage deals and pushing focus to proprietary pipelines. Some Sunbelt markets like Houston, Tampa, and Phoenix continue to face challenges with negative move-in rate trends. The New York City settlement and upcoming licensing requirements introduce regulatory costs and operational adjustments. Here are the key highlights from Extra Space Storage Inc (NYSE:EXR)'s Q2 2026 earnings call. Q: The same-store revenue growth in the first half of 2% is equal to the high end of your updated 2026 guidance, implying a deceleration in the back half. What would drive this deceleration, and did you change any assumptions for the back half outside of updating for LA?A: (Jeff Norman, CFO) You are correct. The high end of the range implies similar growth to the first half, while the low end implies some deceleration. This is due to more difficult year-over-year comparisons in the second half. Additionally, while we haven't seen any change in customer health, we are factoring in macro risks related to consumer confidence and inflation. We feel these risks are appropriate to include in the range, but if they don't materialize, it presents an opportunity to outperform guidance. Q: Can you provide an update on what you are seeing so far in July?A: (Joseph Margolis, CEO) July was a good month. In June, we were slightly ahead in rate year-over-year but slightly behind in occupancy. In July, the system flipped that; we are now slightly ahead in occupancy and slightly behind in rate. This is a great example of our systems using different levers to optimize performance. The net result is that we are slightly ahead of our budget for July so far. Q: Can you expand on the customer demand side of the equation? Has the top of funnel improved, or is the acceleration in fundamentals mostly driven by a moderating supply picture?A: (Joseph Margolis, CEO) Our view is that customer demand is steady. We haven't seen any pickup in the housing market or indications of more customers. However, our systems are able to capture more than our share of customers and better-quality customers. The short answer is demand is steady, performance is improving due to the continued reduction in supply, and our systems are optimizing what's available in the market. Q: Can you give us a sense of the cap rates or unlevered IRRs on the deals you closed this quarter and the competition you are seeing for institutional-quality product?A: (Noah Springer, President) The market continues to be a little expensive. Cap rates on broker deals push us towards our proprietary pipelines, such as relationship deals, managed deals, and joint ventures. The majority of the stores we closed this quarter came from a relationship deal. We are happy with the accretion from those stores and will continue to look toward our proprietary pipelines as the brokerage market remains more expensive than we prefer. Q: Do you see potential for move-in rents to move ahead year-over-year again in the back half of the year?A: (Joseph Margolis, CEO) There are many factors that can lead to revenue growth beyond just rate and occupancy, such as ECRI (existing customer rate increases) and unit mix optimization. These other tools can provide positive revenue growth even with periods of flat rate growth. Q: What are your thoughts on the New York City settlement and the new licensing and registration requirements for operators in NYC?A: (Joseph Margolis, CEO) Regarding the settlement, we vigorously disputed the claims but chose to settle for $1.7 million to avoid lengthy litigation and remove uncertainty. This matter is now behind us. On the licensing requirements, all operators will need a license by August 24th. We are prepared to file and get licensed. The requirements will apply to everyone, creating an even playing field, and we will comply with the law. Q: In the past, when the macro environment deteriorated, how quickly did you see that in actual customer behavior and impact same-store NOI?A: (Jeff Norman, CFO) It depends on the type of economic stress. In general, demand has held steady and sometimes accelerated because life transitions give rise to storage. We have not seen elevated vacate activity; in fact, our length of stay is about 1.5 months longer than last year. We haven't felt the macro risks in our customer behavior year-to-date, so if that continues, our guidance assumption could prove conservative. Q: How much further do you think you can go in terms of improving the average customer's behavior, like length of stay and churn?A: (Joseph Margolis, CEO) That's a hard question. We don't have a specific goal for length of stay, but our scale and data allow us to continually test ways to optimize performance. We continually try to improve across all these metrics and have a good track record, but I don't know how far we have to go. Q: On the expense side, what more opportunities do you have for savings, and is there a scenario where expense growth can be lower than inflation?A: (Jeff Norman, CFO) We are pleased with our expense performance. The run rates we have imply we will stay in sub-inflationary ranges for the year. Long-term, our scale advantage and efficiencies will continue to be an operational advantage. One specific example is our mid-year insurance renewal, which was very favorable and will continue to benefit results through the rest of this year and into 2027. Q: Do you think you have the mathematical ability to get back to a 3% same-store revenue number without a substantial lift in street rates in a flat occupancy world?A: (Joseph Margolis, CEO) To get to 3% without improvement in occupancy or rate would be difficult. However, we believe if supply continues to decrease and there is no significant change in customer demand, we can get back to historical levels of revenue growth between 3% and 4%. Our guidance doesn't suggest it will happen this year, but we are in the recovery stage of the storage cycle. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-30Extra Space Storage Q2 Earnings Call Highlights
MarketBeat
Extra Space Storage Q2 Earnings Call Highlights
Interested in Extra Space Storage Inc? Here are five stocks we like better. Extra Space Storage reported strong second-quarter results: Core FFO rose 4.9% year over year to $2.15 per share, while same-store revenue growth accelerated to 2.4% and NOI growth reached 3.5%. Lower expenses, favorable insurance costs and stronger tenant-insurance income supported the outperformance. Management raised its 2026 outlook for core FFO to $8.25–$8.40 per share, same-store revenue growth to 1%–2% and same-store NOI growth to 0.5%–2.5%. The company cited stronger pricing power, customer retention and moderating new supply, while warning of tougher comparisons and macroeconomic risks in the second half. The company continued expanding through selective acquisitions, lending and management: It acquired 18 stores for $91 million, originated $141 million in bridge loans and added 48 net third-party-managed properties, ending the quarter managing 1,964 stores. The Bank of Mom and Dad Is Booming—3 Stocks to Watch Extra Space Storage (NYSE:EXR) reported second-quarter core funds from operations, or FFO, of $2.15 per share, up 4.9% from a year earlier, as same-store revenue growth accelerated and expenses declined modestly. Management said the company’s operating results exceeded its internal forecasts, prompting it to raise full-year guidance. Chief Executive Officer Joseph Margolis said same-store revenue increased 2.4% year over year in the second quarter, accelerating from the first quarter and exceeding internal projections. Same-store occupancy ended the quarter at 94.2% as the company balanced pricing and occupancy across its portfolio. → Refiner Stocks Are Near Record Highs—Can Iran-Driven Margins Keep Them There? “The pricing power we have been building over the past several quarters is now clearly flowing through our results,” Margolis said. He cited steady customer demand, strong retention among existing tenants and gradually moderating new supply as factors supporting the company’s performance. Chief Financial Officer Jeff Norman said same-store net operating income, or NOI, rose 3.5% year over year, an acceleration of 230 basis points from the first quarter. Same-store revenue growth accelerated by 70 basis points sequentially to 2.4%. → Innovative ETF Strategies That Are Paying Off This Summer Same-store expenses decreased modestly from a year earlier, with all majo…Read full documentShow less
Interested in Extra Space Storage Inc? Here are five stocks we like better. Extra Space Storage reported strong second-quarter results: Core FFO rose 4.9% year over year to $2.15 per share, while same-store revenue growth accelerated to 2.4% and NOI growth reached 3.5%. Lower expenses, favorable insurance costs and stronger tenant-insurance income supported the outperformance. Management raised its 2026 outlook for core FFO to $8.25–$8.40 per share, same-store revenue growth to 1%–2% and same-store NOI growth to 0.5%–2.5%. The company cited stronger pricing power, customer retention and moderating new supply, while warning of tougher comparisons and macroeconomic risks in the second half. The company continued expanding through selective acquisitions, lending and management: It acquired 18 stores for $91 million, originated $141 million in bridge loans and added 48 net third-party-managed properties, ending the quarter managing 1,964 stores. The Bank of Mom and Dad Is Booming—3 Stocks to Watch Extra Space Storage (NYSE:EXR) reported second-quarter core funds from operations, or FFO, of $2.15 per share, up 4.9% from a year earlier, as same-store revenue growth accelerated and expenses declined modestly. Management said the company’s operating results exceeded its internal forecasts, prompting it to raise full-year guidance. Chief Executive Officer Joseph Margolis said same-store revenue increased 2.4% year over year in the second quarter, accelerating from the first quarter and exceeding internal projections. Same-store occupancy ended the quarter at 94.2% as the company balanced pricing and occupancy across its portfolio. → Refiner Stocks Are Near Record Highs—Can Iran-Driven Margins Keep Them There? “The pricing power we have been building over the past several quarters is now clearly flowing through our results,” Margolis said. He cited steady customer demand, strong retention among existing tenants and gradually moderating new supply as factors supporting the company’s performance. Chief Financial Officer Jeff Norman said same-store net operating income, or NOI, rose 3.5% year over year, an acceleration of 230 basis points from the first quarter. Same-store revenue growth accelerated by 70 basis points sequentially to 2.4%. → Innovative ETF Strategies That Are Paying Off This Summer Same-store expenses decreased modestly from a year earlier, with all major expense categories meeting or outperforming the company’s expectations, Norman said. He added that a favorable midyear insurance renewal contributed to lower premiums in June and should continue benefiting results through the rest of 2026 and into 2027. Ancillary businesses also helped drive the FFO outperformance. Net tenant insurance income exceeded expectations due to stronger customer penetration and lower claims volume, while interest income surpassed forecasts because of modestly higher interest rates and greater-than-modeled loan retention. → Why SK hynix Could Be the Best AI Chip Stock to Buy Now The company priced a $550 million bond offering at 4.9% at the end of June, with the transaction settling in early July. The proceeds were used to repay the company’s first bond maturity on July 1. Norman said Extra Space Storage had roughly $2 billion available on revolving credit lines, net of amounts reserved to backstop its commercial paper program. Extra Space Storage raised its full-year 2026 core FFO outlook to a range of $8.25 to $8.40 per share. It also increased its same-store revenue growth outlook by 100 basis points to 1% to 2%, while raising same-store NOI growth guidance by 200 basis points to 0.5% to 2.5%. The revised outlook assumes that Los Angeles-area pricing restrictions will create a 20- to 30-basis-point full-year headwind, compared with the company’s initial estimate of a 40-basis-point impact. Margolis said the restrictions were lifted around midyear, though the resulting benefit would not be fully immediate. Management cautioned that the second half faces more difficult comparisons. Norman said the company has not observed any deterioration in customer health, but management incorporated potential macroeconomic risks, including consumer confidence and inflation pressures, into its guidance range. July performance has been similar to June, according to management. Margolis said the company was modestly ahead of budget during July, with occupancy slightly ahead of the prior year but rates slightly below the prior-year level. In June, the relationship was reversed, with rates slightly ahead and occupancy slightly behind. Management said customer demand remains steady rather than expanding materially, as it has not seen a pickup in housing-market activity. Margolis attributed improving operating performance primarily to lower new supply and the company’s systems for capturing market share and optimizing pricing. President Noah Springer said Extra Space Storage closed on 18 stores for $91 million during the quarter, with nearly all of the transactions completed off market. The company remains active but selective in acquisitions, he said, as asset pricing remains elevated. Springer said acquisition cap rates in brokered transactions generally ranged from the high 4% area to the high 5% area, depending on market quality. The company has increasingly focused on proprietary deal sources, including relationship transactions, managed properties, joint ventures and bridge loans, where it believes it can find more attractive opportunities. Originated $141 million in bridge loans during the quarter. Ended the quarter with about $1.5 billion of outstanding bridge-loan balances. Added 67 third-party managed stores, for net growth of 48 stores in the quarter. Reported year-to-date net managed-store growth of 108 properties. Ended the quarter managing 1,964 stores, while its broader technology and operating platform supports more than 4,400 stores. Springer said the company views the current $1.5 billion bridge-loan balance as an appropriate level, though it retains flexibility to adjust it by selling or holding loans. The lending program generates interest income, management fees and tenant-insurance revenue, while also creating a potential pipeline for future acquisitions, management said. Management said longer customer stays have supported the company’s results. Norman said the average length of stay for in-place customers was about one and a half months longer than a year earlier, while Margolis said the share of customers storing due to a lack of space has increased as the share of moving-related customers declined. Margolis said approximately 76% of customers who leave do so because they no longer need storage. For customers receiving rent increases, the company provides some level of relief to about 16% of those tenants, helping retain them, he said. Geographically, management cited broad-based outperformance in markets including parts of the Midwest, Washington, D.C., Boston, Chicago, Richmond, Virginia, and San Diego. In the Sun Belt, Austin, Dallas and Miami turned positive in year-over-year new-customer move-in rates, while Houston, Tampa and Phoenix remained more difficult markets. Margolis also addressed the company’s $1.7 million settlement with New York City over claims tied to customer complaints. He said Extra Space Storage disputed the claims but chose to settle rather than pursue lengthy litigation. He said the matter was behind the company and that management did not expect broader repercussions. All self-storage operators in New York City are expected to require licenses beginning Aug. 24, according to Margolis. He said Extra Space Storage is prepared to comply with the licensing process and any accompanying operating requirements. Extra Space Storage (NYSE: EXR) is a real estate investment trust that specializes in the ownership, development and operation of self-storage properties. The company provides storage solutions for residential and commercial customers, offering a range of unit sizes, climate-controlled units and specialized options such as vehicle and boat storage. Extra Space Storage markets itself as a customer-focused operator, with online rentals, contactless move-in options and ancillary retail products like packing supplies and insurance to support tenant needs. Its business model combines property ownership with third-party management and development activities. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "Extra Space Storage Q2 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for July 2026.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-29Extra Space Storage Inc. Q2 2026 Earnings Call Summary
Moby
Extra Space Storage Inc. Q2 2026 Earnings Call Summary
Our analysts just identified a stock with the potential to be the next Nvidia. Tell us how you invest and we'll show you why it's our #1 pick. Tap here. Same-store revenue and NOI acceleration was driven by the company's ability to balance rate and occupancy through sophisticated pricing systems. Management attributes improving fundamentals to steady customer demand and a gradual moderation in new supply across almost all major markets. Operational leverage was enhanced by modest year-over-year declines in same-store expenses, which management describes as sub-inflationary performance. The company is capturing a disproportionate market share by utilizing best-in-class digital marketing and technology infrastructure to attract higher-quality customers. External growth remains focused on proprietary pipelines, including off-market transactions, bridge loans, and third-party management, rather than chasing expensive brokered deals. Customer retention remains high, with the average length of stay increasing by approximately one and a half months compared to the prior year. The raised full-year FFO guidance reflects stronger-than-expected store-level performance and outperformance in ancillary businesses like tenant insurance. Updated revenue guidance assumes a potential deceleration in the second half of the year due to more difficult year-over-year comparisons and macro-economic risks. Management refined the L.A. price restriction headwind to 20-30 basis points, down from the initial 40 basis point estimate, following the mid-year lifting of regulations. The bridge loan program is expected to maintain a balance of approximately $1.5 billion, serving as a natural pipeline for future accretive acquisitions. Guidance assumes no material catalyst from the housing market, with performance instead relying on continued supply reduction and internal system optimization. The company settled a New York City regulatory claim for $1.7 million to avoid lengthy litigation, though management continues to dispute the underlying claims. New licensing and registration requirements for self-storage operators in New York City are expected to create an even playing field for all market participants. A favorable mid-year insurance renewal completed in June is expected to provide continued expense tailwinds through the remainder of 2026 and into 2027. Ancillary income outperformed du…Read full documentShow less
Our analysts just identified a stock with the potential to be the next Nvidia. Tell us how you invest and we'll show you why it's our #1 pick. Tap here. Same-store revenue and NOI acceleration was driven by the company's ability to balance rate and occupancy through sophisticated pricing systems. Management attributes improving fundamentals to steady customer demand and a gradual moderation in new supply across almost all major markets. Operational leverage was enhanced by modest year-over-year declines in same-store expenses, which management describes as sub-inflationary performance. The company is capturing a disproportionate market share by utilizing best-in-class digital marketing and technology infrastructure to attract higher-quality customers. External growth remains focused on proprietary pipelines, including off-market transactions, bridge loans, and third-party management, rather than chasing expensive brokered deals. Customer retention remains high, with the average length of stay increasing by approximately one and a half months compared to the prior year. The raised full-year FFO guidance reflects stronger-than-expected store-level performance and outperformance in ancillary businesses like tenant insurance. Updated revenue guidance assumes a potential deceleration in the second half of the year due to more difficult year-over-year comparisons and macro-economic risks. Management refined the L.A. price restriction headwind to 20-30 basis points, down from the initial 40 basis point estimate, following the mid-year lifting of regulations. The bridge loan program is expected to maintain a balance of approximately $1.5 billion, serving as a natural pipeline for future accretive acquisitions. Guidance assumes no material catalyst from the housing market, with performance instead relying on continued supply reduction and internal system optimization. The company settled a New York City regulatory claim for $1.7 million to avoid lengthy litigation, though management continues to dispute the underlying claims. New licensing and registration requirements for self-storage operators in New York City are expected to create an even playing field for all market participants. A favorable mid-year insurance renewal completed in June is expected to provide continued expense tailwinds through the remainder of 2026 and into 2027. Ancillary income outperformed due to higher tenant insurance penetration and lower-than-modeled claims volume. One stock. Nvidia-level potential. 30M+ investors trust Moby to find it first. Get the pick. Tap here. Management noted that the low end of the guidance range accounts for difficult year-over-year comparisons and potential macro-economic pressure on consumer confidence. July performance has remained consistent with June, suggesting that if macro risks do not materialize, there may be further upside to the guidance. The lack of housing turnover has shifted the customer mix toward those storing due to a lack of space, who typically stay twice as long as moving-related customers. Management is focused on providing high-quality service and selective rate relief to maintain high retention levels in a low-mobility environment. Markets like Austin, Dallas, and Miami have turned positive in year-over-year move-in rates, while Houston, Tampa, and Phoenix remain more challenging. Management views the company's Sun Belt overweighting as a future growth driver once the remaining laggard markets in that region begin to accelerate. Scale advantages and efficiencies in controllable line items are expected to keep expense growth below inflation levels. The favorable insurance renewal in June will provide a structural benefit to the expense profile for the next several quarters.
TranscriptFY2026 Q22026-07-29FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript
Earnings source - 127 paragraphs
FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript
Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to the Extra Space Storage Inc. Q2 2026 Earnings Conference Call. After today's prepared remarks, I will host a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press star one again. I will now hand the conference over to Jared Conley, Vice President of Investor Relations. Jared, please go ahead.
Thank you, Connor. Welcome to Extra Space Storage's second quarter 2026 earnings call. In addition to our press release, we have furnished unaudited supplemental financial information on our website. Please remember that management's prepared remarks and answers to your questions may contain forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Actual results could differ materially from those stated or implied by our forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties associated with the company's business. These forward-looking statements are qualified by the cautionary statements contained in the company's latest filing with the SEC, which we encourage our listeners to review. Forward-looking statements represent management's estimates as of today, July 29th, 2026. The company assumes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements because of changing market conditions or other circumstances after the date of this conference call.
I would like to now turn the call over to Joe Margolis, Chief Executive Officer.
Thank you, Jared, and thank you everyone for joining today's call. In addition to our Chief Financial Officer, Jeff Norman, I am joined today by our President, Noah Springer. I am pleased to report a strong second quarter for Extra Space Storage. We delivered core FFO per share of $2.15, representing a 4.9% year-over-year growth, a result that reflects both the quality of our platform and the improving operating environment. Our same-store revenue grew by 2.4% in the second quarter, exceeding our internal projections and accelerating from the first quarter. Occupancy ended the quarter at 94.2% as our systems effectively balanced rate and occupancy to optimize revenue across the portfolio. The pricing power we have been building over the past several quarters is now clearly flowing through our results. With same-store expenses declining modestly year-over-year, same-store NOI also accelerated, demonstrating the leverage in our operating model.
We are seeing broad-based improvement across many of our markets, supported by steady customer demand, strong retention of existing customers, and gradually moderating new supply. While new customers still exhibit some price sensitivity, we continue to capture a disproportionate share of the market due to our best-in-class digital marketing, pricing, and operating systems. The rate gains we established throughout 2025 and into 2026 are now embedded in our revenue base, and we're encouraged by the momentum heading into the second half of the year. Our company, built around operational depth, cutting-edge technology, financial flexibility, and diversified growth channels, is well positioned to continue to outperform the industry. With that, I'll turn it over to our President, Noah Springer, to discuss our external growth initiatives.
Thank you, Joseph. Our external growth platform continued to perform well across multiple channels in the second quarter. In the acquisition market, we were both disciplined and active. We closed 18 stores for $91 million, almost all of which were off-market transactions. Our scale, reputation, and longstanding relationships give us broad access to deal flow. We're seeing many opportunities. That said, asset pricing remains elevated. We're maintaining our underwriting standards and staying disciplined with a focus on long-term accretion rather than chasing volume. We have significant growth capital to be opportunistic. We will continue to use our balance sheet and joint venture structures as part of our external growth strategy. We take pride in being strong capital allocators. We will remain focused on opportunities that enhance portfolio quality and generate accretive returns for our shareholders. Our bridge loan program had another strong quarter.
We originated $141 million in new loans and ended the quarter with approximately $1.5 billion in outstanding balances. The bridge loan program creates value on multiple levels. This program generates attractive interest income in addition to earning management fees and tenant insurance. Finally, the program creates a natural pipeline for future acquisitions as we continue to consolidate our fragmented industry. Third-party management also delivers similar benefits. We added 67 stores during the quarter with net growth of 48 stores, bringing our year-to-date net growth to 108 stores and our total managed portfolio to 1,964 stores at quarter end. The steady demand for our management reflects what owners experience firsthand. Our platform consistently drives superior property performance through operational expertise, sophisticated revenue management, and technology infrastructure that scales across more than 4,400 stores. Now, I'll turn it over to our Chief Financial Officer, Jeff Norman.
Thank you, Joe and Noah. Our FFO growth of 4.9% exceeded our internal forecasts and was driven primarily by store-level performance. Year-over-year same-store revenue growth accelerated 70 basis points from the first quarter to 2.4%. Same-store NOI accelerated 230 basis points, increased 3.5% year-over-year. Same-store expenses decreased modestly year-over-year with all major categories at or better than our internal expectations. Our discipline translated directly into accelerated NOI growth. Our ancillary businesses also contributed to our FFO outperformance. Net tenant insurance income exceeded our forecasts due to stronger penetration and lower claims volume. Interest income was also ahead of estimates due to modestly higher interest rates and higher than modeled loan retention. Our low leverage balance sheet remained strong, with significant access to capital. At the end of June, we priced a $550 million bond offering at 4.9%, which settled the first week of July.
Proceeds for the offering were used to pay off our first bond maturity on July 1st. Today, we have roughly $2 billion available on our revolving lines of credit. Net of amounts held available as a backstop for our commercial paper program, which gives us significant flexibility to move quickly on investment opportunities. Shifting to guidance, last night, we raised our full year 2026 FFO outlook. Our core FFO is now expected in the range of $8.25-$8.40 per share. We raised same-store revenue growth guidance 100 basis points to a range of 1%-2%. We also raised our same-store NOI guidance 200 basis points to a range of positive 0.5%-2.5%. We refined our L.A. price restriction assumption, Our updated guidance reflects approximately 20 basis points-30 basis points of headwind for the full year compared to our initial estimate of 40 basis points.
In summary, we are having a solid summer leasing season. Same-store NOI and core FFO are both ahead of expectations. Our balance sheet is strong and prepared for additional future growth, and we continue to benefit from having the strongest team, portfolio, and platform in the industry, which all have contributed to our results. With that, Operator, please open the line for questions.
We will now begin the question-and-answer session. Please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. If you would like to ask a question, again, please press star one to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press star one again. We also ask that you pick up your handset when asking a question to allow for optimum sound quality. If you're muted locally, please remember to unmute your device. Please stand by while we compile the question-and-answer roster. All right. Your first question is from the line of Michael Goldsmith with UBS.
Good afternoon. Thanks a lot for taking my question. The same-store revenue growth in the first half of 2% is equal to the high end of your updated 2026 guidance, implying a deceleration in the back half. One, what would drive a deceleration in the back half? Two, did you change any of your assumptions for the back half outside of updating for L.A.? Thanks.
Yeah. Thanks, Mike. You're spot on that depending on where you are in the range, the high end it implies that same-store revenue growth is similar to that of what we experienced in the first half of the year, and that at the low end of the range, it implies some deceleration. A couple of factors play into that. The first is, as we move deeper into the year, we do experience more difficult comps, so we're mindful of that. Second, while we haven't seen any change in customer health, be it existing customers or new customers, they're all performing consistently as they have been throughout the year. We're not unaware of the headlines and some of the macro risks related to the customer out there. We read a lot about consumer confidence being low, about there being pressure from inflation and other macro forces.
We feel like those risks are appropriate to factor into the range. All of that said, we factored those into our original range and didn't feel those specifically in the first two quarters. So far, really not felt them in July. July was quite similar to June. To the extent that those don't materialize, it presents an opportunity with the guidance, but we think the prudence is reasonable given those macro factors.
Got it. Thanks for that. Since you brought it up, can you give us an update of what you're seeing so far in July? It sounds like it's been pretty similar to June, but would love to get your thoughts on the metrics. Thanks.
Sure, Michael, this is Joe. July was a good month for us. Just as a comparison, in June, we were slightly ahead in rate year-over-year, but we're slightly behind in occupancy. In July, the system flipped that. We're now slightly ahead in occupancy and slightly behind in rate. This is a great example, I think, of our systems using different levers to optimize performance over the long term. The net result of that is so far through however many days, we are slightly ahead of our budget in July. We're having a good month.
Thank you very much. Good luck in the back half.
Thank you.
The next question is from Michael Griffin with Evercore ISI. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Great, thanks. Joe, I know you touched on this a little bit in your prepared remarks, but I'm just curious if you can expand on the customer demand side of the equation. Has top of funnel improved at all? Has the pie expanded? Are you still just sort of competing against the same customer base? As you look at this inflection and acceleration in same-store fundamentals, is it mostly driven by a moderating supply picture, or is there anything from sort of organic customer demand that you're seeing that gets you incrementally more positive?
Yeah. Our view is that customer demand is steady. We haven't seen any pickup in the housing market. We don't see any indications through our various channels that there's more customers out there. Our systems are able to not only capture more than our share of customers, we've had the highest occupancy at the highest rates in the industry for many quarters and years now. We're also capturing better quality customers through some of our channel pricing and other strategies. I think the short answer is demand is steady, performance is improving because of the continued reduction in supply, and our systems are optimizing what's available in the market.
Thanks, Joe. That's certainly some helpful context. Maybe one next for Noah on the transaction market. Can you just give us a sense of whether it was the deals you closed this quarter, sort of how we should think about those on either a cap rate or an unlevered IRR basis? Then talk a little bit about the competition that you're seeing, the interest from private capital, just as it relates to kind of institutional self-storage quality product. Thank you.
Sure, Griffin. Thanks for the question. What we're seeing is the market out there continues to be a little expensive. Where cap rates are coming in on the broker deals tends to push us towards our proprietary pipelines that we have. We continue to close deals that are relationship deals, that are managed deals, and that are joint ventures and bridge loans. We tend to go to those because as those deals come up and they're ready for us to harvest, they end up being great deals for us and for our partners. Kind of the whole idea of all of those pipelines that we have. Quite a few of the stores, in fact, the majority of the stores that we closed this quarter, were from a relationship deal that we had, and we're happy with that and happy with the accretion that we got from those stores.
We'll continue to look towards that as the market tends to be a little more expensive than we want to do on the brokerage side.
Great. That's it for me. Thanks for the time.
Thanks, Griff.
The next question is from Todd Thomas with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Hi, thanks. I wanted to ask, Joe, you talked about the July trends, mentioned that the comps get a bit more difficult in the second half. Do you see potential for move-in rents to move ahead year-over-year again in the back half of the year? You sort of mentioned the combination of the slightly higher occupancy, the slightly lower move-in rents in July, the combination of that, you're still tracking ahead of plan. Is that an environment, longer term, in which revenue growth can continue to improve generally from these levels?
Sure. There's a lot of factors that can lead to revenue growth. As you point out, rate and occupancy are two of the most important ones, but there's others, such as ECRI, unit mix optimization, other tools we have to have positive revenue growth.
Okay. I wanted to also ask about the New York City settlement. I was just curious if there are any implications or any additional considerations from that suit, or is that in the rear view mirror at this point? Can you also comment separately on the licensing and registration requirements for operators in New York City? Curious to get your view around the impact that has on the industry, whether you think it could ultimately sort of strengthen the competitive positioning for some larger, well-capitalized players, or whether that's sort of a net negative potentially. Just curious to get your thoughts on that.
Sure. Just to set the table what we're talking about, there was a claim made against us by New York City based on 117 complaints they got over three years. We had 130,000 customers over those three years. We continue to vigorously dispute those claims. We do not agree with them at all. That being said, we were forced with the choice of entering a lengthy litigation process in New York City or settling this case for $1.7 million and putting it behind us, and we felt the best thing for our shareholders was to take out the uncertainty and put this behind us. We have settled the case. There's no repercussions or reverberations that we see or have felt elsewhere in the country or in New York. This matter is now behind us.
With respect to the second part of your question, all self-storage operators in New York City will be required to have a license on, I think, August 24th of this year. We are prepared to file the papers, pay the very modest fee, and get licensed. In connection with that license, there will be a series of requirements of how you have to operate. We, the industry, are still waiting to see the final list of requirements that will come with that. I guess all I could say is, one, they'll apply to everyone, so it'll be an even playing field, and two, we will comply with the law.
Okay. All right. Thank you.
Sure. Thanks, Todd.
The next question is from Brendan Lynch with Barclays. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Great. Thanks for taking the questions. Jeff, just wanted to follow up on your commentary about macro risks and consumer confidence. Sounds like you're being a little bit conservative in guidance because of the potential for those risks to emerge. The question is, in the past, when we have had situations where the macro environment did deteriorate or consumer confidence started to wane, how quickly did you see that in actual customer behavior? How quickly did it impact the same-store NOI results?
Good question, Brendan, I hate to give you a mushy answer, it depends. As we've looked at different types of economic stress and different types of cycles, they haven't all performed the same. In general, we've seen demand hold pretty steady and in some cases even accelerate through some of those types of environments because life transitions give rise to storage, and sometimes economic strain can cause more life transitions. From a demand standpoint, it's generally been steady to even accelerated. On the other hand, you may also deal with vacates. We have not seen elevated vacate activity in our stores. In fact, our length of stay continues to elongate as we think of our in-place customers on a year-over-year basis. It's about one and a half months longer than it was last year.
We haven't seen it yet, but as you see all these headlines out there, as you look at what the consumer is facing, we certainly think it's a reasonable risk to be mindful of. To your point, we have not felt it in our customer behavior year to date. If that continues to be the case, that assumption would potentially prove conservative.
Great, thanks. That's helpful. Maybe just to follow up on that, in terms of length of stay, that's certainly an improvement. I think we've seen some other improvements in customer quality in terms of churn and lower bad debt, higher occupancy in the off-season. How much further do you think you can go in terms of improving the average customer's behavior in the portfolio and to kind of just maintaining that customer relationship for a longer time to benefit from their stay in your facilities?
Yeah, that's a very good question, but also a hard one to answer. I don't know if we have a goal for length of stay or any of these other metrics, but our scale and the amount of data we have allows us to continually test ways to optimize performance. How do we get a better customer? How do we keep them longer? Just all kinds of different metrics. I can say with confidence we continually try to improve across all of these metrics. We have been improving. We have a good track record, but I don't know how far we have to go.
Okay. Very good. Thank you.
Your next question is from Ronald Kamdem from Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Hey. Just two quick ones. Just starting on the expense side, really it looks like outside of property taxes, most of the line items was down, driving that sort of negative growth. Just thinking sort of long term about what more opportunities do you have on the expense saving side, and is there a scenario where expense growth can be lower than inflation?
Yeah. Thanks for the question, Ronald. We're really pleased with what we've seen on the expense side this year and how we've been able to continue to leverage our scale to become more efficient. I know you'd mentioned long term. I'll start with the year. As you look at the run rates we've had year-to-date in the first half what we're guiding to for the full year, it implies that we stay in those sub-inflationary ranges, which we view as a real positive, especially in the face of some of the less controllable line items like property taxes, as you mentioned. Long term, while we won't guide or forecast into future years, I think that scale advantage and the efficiencies that it drive will continue to be an operational advantage for Extra Space. I anticipate that we can continue to leverage those opportunities.
One specific one maybe that I'll call out is on the insurance expense line item, we have a mid-year renewal, which we've completed, that was very favorable. It was only applicable for the month of June within the second quarter, and you can see the positive impact that that negative year-over-year change in our premiums had, and that will continue to flow through the rest of this year and into 2027. Several reasons to be optimistic on the expense side looking forward.
Great. My second question was just back to the external growth. Obviously, the acquisition guidance went up. I guess I'd just love to hear what you're seeing in the market in terms of cap rates, in terms of expected IRRs and so forth. I think historically, you've talked about just pricing really not making a lot of sense for you guys to be really sort of aggressive and so forth. Just curious if that's still the thought and how you guys go about it. Thanks.
Yeah. We're looking at our underwriting discipline and continue to stay very disciplined in that. While asset pricing remains elevated, when we say that, I would say in anywhere from A markets-C markets, you're probably somewhere from the high fours to the high fives, if you want to look between those markets. Where we look at that, we're going to continue to harvest deals from our proprietary pipelines where it makes sense for us and where we continue to have deals that accretes us over our cost of capital.
Thanks so much.
Thanks, Ron.
The next question is from Samir Khanal from Bank of America. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Good afternoon. Jeff, I'm sorry if I missed this, but on the move-in rates, I know you excluded L.A., but just curious, where would that have been if L.A. was included? Just to confirm, did that have much of a benefit for you in 2Q?
Thanks for the question, Samir. We recognize that that number is one that is viewed not only to model our actual performance, but as a proxy for overall new customer health for our portfolio and across the industry. To include L.A. County, which is artificially regulated, doesn't make a lot of sense from our perspective because you're going to be comparing apples and oranges a little bit, especially as you think back to your comp period last year when those restrictions were in place. I won't provide a full portfolio number, but I can tell you that internally, we think of it the same way. We are not using that data. We're focused on it sans Los Angeles County because that's really the best proxy for what we're seeing across the portfolio.
Okay. I guess, Joe, certainly positive comments around the supply side of things. Maybe elaborate kind of which markets are seeing less supply, given that demand is steady here. Thanks.
I think you're seeing lower supply in almost all markets. Now, that doesn't mean that when there's still stores being delivered, and in that micro market, when we talk about self-storage markets, we're talking about very, very small areas. That's bad for that market and negative, but when we talk about MSAs and large markets, I think you're seeing a decline in deliveries in almost all MSAs.
The next question is from Jack Armstrong with Wells Fargo. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question. Can you characterize your ability to push ECRIs into the back half, particularly following a couple of quarters of lower churn and extended lengths of stay?
You're a little garbled in the question. It might be a systems problem. Do you mind repeating the question?
Yeah, sorry. Hopefully this is a little clearer.
That's better.
Can you characterize your ability to push ECRIs in the back half?
I think the question is about pushing ECRIs in the back half of the year. We take a longer view on ECRIs and don't try to maximize in any one quarter or two quarters because customers are extraordinarily sticky. When we test different ECRI levels, we don't see increased move-outs even with increase in ECRI. That being fair, we need to have a long-term, fair, sustainable program, and that's what we seek instead of maximizing ECRI.
Okay. That's helpful. Thank you. How should we be thinking about the growth in the bridge loan business going forward? Is $1.5 billion where you're comfortable keeping that book, or do you plan to grow further from here?
Yeah. The $1.5 billion I think is a good number for us. I think we'll continue to see it there. If we want to flex up or down, we can always sell the A's or hold the A's a little bit longer. Where we are currently, I think that's a good spot for us.
Okay. Helpful. Thank you.
Thank you.
Next question is from the line of Eric Wolfe with Citi. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Thanks. It's Nick Joseph here with Eric. In the release, Joe, in your quote, you mentioned that you're never satisfied. I was wondering if there's any meaning or anything you're trying to convey with that quote, kind of on the go forward in terms of any changes, either technology or M&A or kind of broader thoughts on the business to keep driving the results.
Yeah. Thanks for the question. I think what's important to understand about Extra Space is we're constantly trying to sharpen our tools. We're constantly innovating. We're using our data and technology to test, and it's really a lot of small gains. We're getting a little bit better at this, a little bit better at that. I'm not in any way announcing brand-new Extra Space or any big changes. Certainly want to give the impression that we're never satisfied with our systems and our technology stack and our processes, and we're always trying to get a little bit better, and I think it shows up in the results.
Thanks for that. This is Eric. Had a bit of a specific question. You talked in the beginning about the acceleration you saw in the first half on same-store revenue. Obviously got into a little bit of deceleration in the back half. I guess given the boost from L.A., is it not possible that we see a third quarter sort of acceleration from the second quarter? Maybe if you could just share, for the back half of the year, how much L.A. should boost same-store revenue growth, just in the back half.
At the beginning of the year, we estimated that the restrictions in L.A., if they were in place for a full year, would provide a 40 basis point headwind. Right around mid-year, they were lifted, but we don't get the whole benefit from that exactly on the day they're lifted. Now we're estimating it's a 20 basis point-30 basis point headwind as opposed to a 40 basis point headwind. Some help, but not very significant.
Okay. I guess the other part really was just on third quarter. I know everyone always tries to set up things to beat outperform. Is there sort of a path, either in occupancy or ECRIs, everyone just pays attention to move-in rates, where sort of same-store revenue could accelerate in the third quarter, or is that just sort of an unlikely thing to happen?
Yeah. Good question, Eric. I appreciate the way you asked. I think there is perhaps too much focus singularly on new customer rate as the only driver of revenue. As we've talked about on the call, there's multiple other levers. In short, there's always an opportunity to continue to accelerate revenue. We haven't necessarily guided to that, but it is certainly possible.
Okay. Thank you.
Thank you.
The next question is from Brad Heffern with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Thanks. Hey, everybody. Talked in the past about how the last few peak seasons have been sort of truncated, and the explanation has generally been the lack of housing mobility. I'm curious, did you see any difference in the shape of the curve, or the strength of the peak this year?
Good question, Brad. No. I would say no different than what we've seen in the last couple of years in a row, and very much in line with our expectations. We guided to, modeled, and assumed that we would have no material catalyst from a demand standpoint through the summer leasing season, and I think it's played out in line with that expectation.
Okay. Got it. On the recent move-in rates and occupancy, it sounds like the combination's been pretty flat in June and July. I think the traditional wisdom is that you see the same-store revenue converge with move-in rates on maybe a 12-month or 18-month lag. I'm wondering, do you think this increase that we've seen into the mid twos on same-store revenue is just because you had those high move-in rates last year, and that it's more inclined to go back to flat just based on where the leading-edge move-in rates are? Am I thinking about that wrong? I know there's tons of things that affect revenue besides move-in rates, but just all else being equal.
I think your thesis is correct that if you look at new customer rates in prior periods, they roll into the rent roll, and that gives you a sense for future revenue growth. It is only one component, and as we spoke earlier on this call, there's other components that could provide positive revenue growth in future periods, even if you have several periods of flat rate growth.
Okay. Appreciate the thoughts. Thanks.
Sure.
The next question is from Victor Fadool from Scotiabank. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Thanks. Yeah, I wanted to follow up on these move-out trends because it appears that the low housing mobility environment is actually becoming a benefit rather than a headwind, with customer stickiness, longer lengths of stay, and muted move-outs more than offsetting weaker move-in activity. How sustainable do you believe this dynamic is, and what specific actions are you taking to maintain these strong retention levels, particularly given that some of your peers are having lower occupancy levels, they may be more inclined to compete aggressively on price?
Agree with your point that the reduction in moving customers from a peak of low 60s to about 55% now has largely been replaced by customers who tell us they're storing because they lack space for their goods. The expected length of stay of those customers is at least twice as long as the moving customers. That is the benefit of the downturn in the moving, of the slowness in the housing market. The second part of the question, what are we doing? Well, you need to provide an excellent customer experience at the store. Our customer satisfaction rates are in the low 90%. Important part of that is having a manager there to make sure the store is clean and have a relationship with the tenant and address their concerns.
When the tenant gets a rate increase notice, our store managers and call center agents are empowered within certain bounds to address any concerns a customer have. We end up with about 16% of our customers who get rate increases, getting some level of relief, and staying in the store through that. That helps us retain customers. Sorry, I'm going to repeat myself. I think it all falls under providing a good experience for the customer and making them want to stay and not seek there. Most of our customers, 76% of our customers when they leave, it's because they don't need storage anymore. It's really hard to save those customers if they don't need the product anymore. The other ones, we can focus on providing a good experience to.
Makes sense. Then, the second question, which markets actually contributed most to their Q2 outperformance versus your initial expectations heading into 2026?
Victor, sorry for what will sound like a vague answer. It really was across the board. We saw general outperformance and some of the stronger markets, in terms of total same-store revenue growth, also had the strongest outperformance. As you think of some of the Midwest markets, D.C., Boston, Chicago, Richmond, Virginia, San Diego, California, across the board, we had a number of markets outperform.
Thank you.
Thanks, Victor.
The next question is from Michael Mueller of JPMorgan. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Yeah, hi. Thanks. Joe, given your comments about not focusing just on move-in rates, do you think you have the mathematical ability to kind of get back to a 3% same-store revenue number without a substantial lift in street rates in a flat occupancy world?
To get to 3% without improvement in occupancy or rate, I think would be difficult.
Okay. Do you have a sense as to, I guess, how much of a lift we need to see in street rates to kind of get you back to that level?
I think there's a lot of variables, to say, to plug in one piece of the formula is difficult without knowing what the others are.
Okay. Thank you.
I feel like I've given you an unsatisfactory answer. We believe if supply continues to decrease and we don't have any significant change in customer, the risks of which Jeff outlined, we think we can get back to kind of historical levels of revenue growth between 3%-4%. I don't know the time period. Our guidance doesn't suggest it's going to happen this year. We're certainly in the recovery stage of the storage cycle, and I would expect that's where we end up.
The next question is from Juan Sanabria of Bank of Montreal. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Hi. Good afternoon or good morning. Just a question with regards to the slope of same-store revenue expected in the second half. Should we be thinking with an eye towards the exit run rate or how you'd start 2027, that the growth in same-store revenues is getting smaller because of the comps, or that's not necessarily how we should be thinking about it? Any comments on the slope or the exit run rate would be extremely helpful. Thank you.
Yeah, apologize for being repetitive, Juan. It will depend where you are within the range, right? If at the high end of the range, you would imply flat slope heading into 2027. At the bottom end of the range, it would imply some deceleration into next year. If we outperform our range altogether, that would imply acceleration into 2027. We will stick to 2026 for now and let you all forecast 2027 and beyond, but we agree that the slope heading into it will largely impact performance in 2027.
I guess another way to ask it, are the comps tougher in the fourth quarter than the third quarter because of move-in rates last year? Just if you could remind us on how we should think about that.
Yes, the comps do become more difficult, whether it's thinking of new customer move-in rate or even just revenue altogether. We started to accelerate revenue beginning the fourth quarter last year, yes, the comp does become more difficult.
Okay, great. Just my final question, have you guys leaned on ECRI as either cadence or % increases in any noticeable or material way? Have ECRI grown this year as a contribution to same-store revenue versus last year, versus initial guidance or expectations?
No. Absent some testing we're doing, there's been no change in our ECRI policy.
Yeah. One, this is getting really on the margins, but the only one that I'd point out is with our original guide assumed full-year restrictions in Los Angeles County. With that being lifted, on the margins, a little better in the back half of the year.
Got it. Thank you.
Thanks, Juan.
The next question is from Spenser Glimcher of Green Street. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Thank you. Just one on the regulation front from me. How dependent is EXR's revenue management system on consumer specific data versus broader market level inputs? And how concerned are you, if at all, that additional legislation regarding surveillance pricing might impede rate algorithms?
Yeah, not concerned. Our algorithms are focused on historical data we have for how a certain market and store performs, vacates, rentals, demand at different times of the year, and not any individual customer data or observations.
Okay. That's very helpful. That's it for me. Thanks, guys.
Thanks, Spenser.
Thanks, Spenser.
The next question is from Omotayo Okusanya of Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Hi. Yes. Good morning out there. Congrats on a solid quarter. In terms of just this recovery story that I think we're all kind of looking forward to, curious if you could share any thoughts, just July, beginning of 3Q, and the kind of some of the operating trends you're seeing, whether do you kind of seeing occupancy holding up, whether you're kind of seeing improvement in street rates. Just any comments that you can at least just make to start off the third quarter?
Yeah. It's Jeff. As we mentioned earlier in the call, it looks a lot like June from a performance standpoint. I think Joe outlined a little bit that we've swapped a little bit of occupancy for a little bit of rate on the margins, and so far with a few days left in the month, we're on pace to modestly outperform our revenue expectations. Continues to be favorable in July and looks a lot like the second quarter.
Gotcha. Then on the third party asset management side, again, increasing store count, but you guys slightly reduced guidance on management fees. Is anything changing there? Is the economics of the third party asset management changing from your contract? Just curious any thoughts there.
Yeah. Thanks, Tayo. No big change at all. In fact, with this business, there's ups and downs where portfolios sell and portfolios come in. Beginning of July, there was a portfolio that sold, not concerning to us. We continue to add properties. We're over 100 properties net so far this year. The benefit of this program is that there's a lot of owners, and the owners have less than two stores on average per owner. Most of the time, if anybody adds or leaves, it's onesies and twosies that we add or that disappear. There was one that we had go beginning of July, and we'll continue to add and continue to feel very strong about the program. No material change whatsoever.
Thank you.
The next question is from Ravi Vaidya from Mizuho. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Hi there. Thanks for taking my question. Hope you all are doing well. Can you describe the operational inflection and momentum that you're seeing in some of your Sun Belt markets? How have the street rates been trending, and where do you think same-store revenue for these markets could increase to absent a substantial demand recovery relative to the rest of the portfolio? Thank you.
We are seeing improvement in some Sun Belt markets. Austin, Dallas, Miami all turned positive in new customer move-in rates on a year-over-year basis, all improving markets, but not all markets. Houston, Tampa, still Phoenix, still difficult markets for us. That's not at all surprising. We don't expect the Sun Belt all to act the same. We don't expect markets within the Sun Belt all to act the same, and it is one of the reasons that our portfolio is designed to be broadly diversified across mostly primary and secondary growth markets. We know markets don't act the same at the same time, and the more diversification we can get, the more we smooth out our return series.
Ravi, if I could just add a thought there. I think that's one thing that makes us even more excited about our performance this year in general is relative to the market. We're a little overweight the Sun Belt, despite the drag from those markets that haven't had as strong a performance, we've still had pretty significant same-store revenue acceleration, at some point, those markets will continue to flip and accelerate and I think give another leg to that growth.
Got it. Thank you so much.
Thanks, Ravi.
There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to Joe Margolis, Chief Executive Officer, for closing remarks.
Great. Thank you, everyone, for your interest in our company. Our team is happy to report very solid results and the ability to raise guidance. These results stem from success across all aspects of the platform. Our stores are outperforming expectations. Our expense control is very positive, both at the store level and at the G&A level, and we're getting solid contributions from our ancillary businesses. We're encouraged on where we are in the cycle and confident that we have the machine to optimize results going forward. Thank you, and look forward to talking to you next quarter.
This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-28Extra Space Storage Inc. Reports 2026 Second Quarter Results
PR Newswire
Extra Space Storage Inc. Reports 2026 Second Quarter Results
SALT LAKE CITY, July 28, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Extra Space Storage Inc. (NYSE: EXR) (the "Company"), a leading owner and operator of self-storage facilities in the United States and a member of the S&P 500 index, announced operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026. Highlights for the three months ended June 30, 2026: Achieved net income attributable to common stockholders of $1.25 per diluted share, representing a 5.9% increase compared to the same period in the prior year. Achieved funds from operations attributable to common stockholders and unit holders ("FFO") of $2.07 per diluted share. FFO, excluding adjustments ("Core FFO"), was $2.15 per diluted share, representing a 4.9% increase compared to the same period in the prior year. Same-store revenue increased by 2.4% and same-store expense decreased by 0.5%, resulting in a same-store net operating income ("NOI") increase of 3.5% compared to the same period in the prior year. Reported ending same-store occupancy of 94.2% as of June 30, 2026, compared to 94.4% as of June 30, 2025. Purchased 17 operating stores and acquired the ownership interest of our joint venture partner in one consolidated joint venture for a total cost of $90.7 million. Originated $140.6 million in mortgage and mezzanine bridge loans. Added 67 stores (48 stores net) to the Company's third-party management platform. As of June 30, 2026, the Company managed 1,964 stores for third parties and 409 stores in unconsolidated joint ventures, for a total of 2,373 managed stores. Paid a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Highlights for the six months ended June 30, 2026: Achieved net income attributable to common stockholders of $2.39 per diluted share, representing a 2.5% decrease compared to the same period in the prior year, which included a gain from real estate assets sold in 2025. Achieved FFO of $4.04 per diluted share, and Core FFO of $4.19 per diluted share, representing a 3.5% increase compared to the same period in the prior year. Increased same-store revenue by 2.0% and same-store expense increased by 1.1%, resulting in a same-store NOI increase of 2.4% compared to the same period in the prior year. Purchased 18 operating stores and acquired the ownership interest of our joint venture partner in one consolidated joint venture for a total cost of $103.2 million. In conjunction with joint venture partners,…Read full documentShow less
SALT LAKE CITY, July 28, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Extra Space Storage Inc. (NYSE: EXR) (the "Company"), a leading owner and operator of self-storage facilities in the United States and a member of the S&P 500 index, announced operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026. Highlights for the three months ended June 30, 2026: Achieved net income attributable to common stockholders of $1.25 per diluted share, representing a 5.9% increase compared to the same period in the prior year. Achieved funds from operations attributable to common stockholders and unit holders ("FFO") of $2.07 per diluted share. FFO, excluding adjustments ("Core FFO"), was $2.15 per diluted share, representing a 4.9% increase compared to the same period in the prior year. Same-store revenue increased by 2.4% and same-store expense decreased by 0.5%, resulting in a same-store net operating income ("NOI") increase of 3.5% compared to the same period in the prior year. Reported ending same-store occupancy of 94.2% as of June 30, 2026, compared to 94.4% as of June 30, 2025. Purchased 17 operating stores and acquired the ownership interest of our joint venture partner in one consolidated joint venture for a total cost of $90.7 million. Originated $140.6 million in mortgage and mezzanine bridge loans. Added 67 stores (48 stores net) to the Company's third-party management platform. As of June 30, 2026, the Company managed 1,964 stores for third parties and 409 stores in unconsolidated joint ventures, for a total of 2,373 managed stores. Paid a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Highlights for the six months ended June 30, 2026: Achieved net income attributable to common stockholders of $2.39 per diluted share, representing a 2.5% decrease compared to the same period in the prior year, which included a gain from real estate assets sold in 2025. Achieved FFO of $4.04 per diluted share, and Core FFO of $4.19 per diluted share, representing a 3.5% increase compared to the same period in the prior year. Increased same-store revenue by 2.0% and same-store expense increased by 1.1%, resulting in a same-store NOI increase of 2.4% compared to the same period in the prior year. Purchased 18 operating stores and acquired the ownership interest of our joint venture partner in one consolidated joint venture for a total cost of $103.2 million. In conjunction with joint venture partners, completed the development of one store for a total cost of approximately $15.1 million, of which the Company invested $14.4 million. Originated $146.1 million in mortgage and mezzanine bridge loans and sold $30.8 million in mortgage bridge loans. Added 151 stores (108 stores net) to the Company's third-party management platform. Joe Margolis, CEO of the Company, stated: "Our operating systems and platform continue to optimize performance as we get deeper into the storage sector's recovery. Core FFO growth of 4.9% for the quarter was driven by strong occupancy, improving store performance, and smart expense control — with meaningful contributions from our ancillary businesses, including third-party management and bridge lending. We are never satisfied with, and always seek to improve, our technology, systems, process, and people, and it is gratifying to see that commitment reflected in our results." FFO Per Share: The following table (unaudited) outlines the Company's FFO and Core FFO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025. The table also provides a reconciliation to GAAP net income attributable to common stockholders and earnings per diluted share for each period presented (amounts shown in thousands, except share and per share data): Operating Results and Same-Store Performance: The following table (unaudited) outlines the Company's same-store performance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (amounts shown in thousands, except store count data)1: Details related to the same-store performance of stores by metropolitan statistical area ("MSA") for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 are provided in the supplemental financial information published on the Company's Investor Relations website at https://ir.extraspace.com/. Investment and Property Management Activity: The following table (unaudited) outlines the Company's acquisitions and developments that are closed, completed or under agreement (dollars in thousands). The projected developments and acquisitions under agreement described above are subject to customary closing conditions and no assurance can be provided that these developments and acquisitions will be completed on the terms described, or at all. Property Sales: The Company did not dispose of any properties during the three months ended June 30, 2026, and currently has six properties held for sale. Bridge Loans: During the three months ended June 30, 2026, the Company originated $140.6 million in bridge loans. Outstanding balances of the Company's bridge loans were approximately $1.5 billion at the end of the quarter. The Company has an additional $86.3 million in bridge loans that have closed subsequent to quarter end or are under agreement to close in 2026. Additional details related to the Company's loan activity and balances held are included in the supplemental financial information published on the Company's Investor Relations website at https://ir.extraspace.com/. Property Management: As of June 30, 2026, the Company managed 1,964 stores for third-party owners and 409 stores owned in unconsolidated joint ventures, for a total of 2,373 stores under management. The Company is the largest self-storage management company in the United States. Balance Sheet: During the three months ended June 30, 2026, the Company did not issue any shares on its ATM program, and as of June 30, 2026, the Company had $800.0 million available for issuance. Likewise, the Company did not repurchase any shares of common stock using its stock repurchase program during the quarter. As of June 30, 2026, the Company had authorization to purchase up to $349.0 million under the program. On June 24, 2026, the Company priced a public bond offering issuing $550.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.90% unsecured senior notes due 2032. As of June 30, 2026, the Company's commercial paper program had total capacity of $1.0 billion, with $850.0 million in outstanding issuances. As of June 30, 2026, the Company's percentage of fixed-rate debt to total debt was 78.5%. Net of the impact of variable rate receivables, the effective fixed-rate debt to total debt was 88.4%. The weighted average interest rates of the Company's fixed and variable-rate debt were 4.3% and 4.6%, respectively. The combined weighted average interest rate was 4.3% with a weighted average maturity of approximately 4.0 years. Full details related to the Company's debt schedule are included in the supplemental financial information published on the Company's Investor Relations website at https://ir.extraspace.com/. Dividends: On June 30, 2026, the Company paid a second quarter common stock dividend of $1.62 per share to stockholders of record at the close of business on June 15, 2026. Outlook: The following table outlines the Company's Core FFO estimates and assumptions for the year ending December 31, 20261. FFO estimates for the year are fully diluted for an estimated average number of shares and OP units outstanding during the year. The Company's estimates are forward-looking and based on management's view of current and future market conditions. The Company's actual results may differ materially from these estimates. Supplemental Financial Information: Supplemental unaudited financial information regarding the Company's performance can be found on the Company's website at www.extraspace.com. Under the "Company Info" navigation menu on the home page, click on "Investor Relations," then under the "Financials" navigation menu click on "Quarterly Results." This supplemental information provides additional detail on items that include store occupancy and financial performance by portfolio and market, debt maturity schedules and performance of lease-up assets. Conference Call: The Company will host a conference call at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 29, 2026, to discuss its financial results. Telephone participants may avoid any delays in joining the conference call by pre-registering for the call using the following link to receive a special dial-in number and PIN: https://events.q4inc.com/analyst/293950168?pwd=CHtG2oiN A live webcast of the call will also be available on the Company's investor relations website at https://ir.extraspace.com. To listen to the live webcast, go to the site at least 15 minutes prior to the scheduled start time in order to register, download and install any necessary audio software. A replay of the call will be available for 30 days on the investor relations section of the Company's website beginning at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 29, 2026. Forward-Looking Statements: Certain information set forth in this release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning the benefits of store acquisitions, developments, market conditions, our outlook and estimates for the year and other statements concerning our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenues or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs, the competitive landscape, the impact of broader economic trends on the storage industry, our plans or intentions relating to acquisitions and developments, and other information that is not historical information. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "believes," "estimates," "expects," "may," "will," "should," "anticipates," "outlook," or "intends," or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. We may also make additional forward-looking statements from time to time. All such subsequent forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, by us or on our behalf, are also expressly qualified by these cautionary statements. There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in or contemplated by this release. Any forward-looking statements should be considered in light of the risks referenced in the "Risk Factors" section included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Such factors include, but are not limited to: adverse changes in general economic conditions, the real estate industry and the markets in which we operate; potential liability for uninsured losses and environmental contamination; our ability to recover losses under our insurance policies; the impact of the regulatory environment as well as national, state and local laws and regulations, including, without limitation, those governing real estate investment trusts ("REITs"), tenant reinsurance and other aspects of our business, which could adversely affect our results; the effect of competition from new and existing stores or other storage alternatives, including increased or unanticipated competition for our properties, which could cause rents and occupancy rates to decline; failure to close pending acquisitions and developments on expected terms, or at all; risks associated with acquisitions, dispositions and development of properties, including increased development costs due to additional regulatory requirements related to climate change and other factors; reductions in asset valuations and related impairment charges; our reliance on information technologies, which are vulnerable to, among other things, attack from computer viruses and malware, hacking, cyberattacks and other unauthorized access or misuse, any of which could adversely affect our business and results; impacts from any outbreak of highly infectious or contagious diseases, including reduced demand for self-storage space and ancillary products and services such as tenant reinsurance, and potential decreases in occupancy and rental rates and staffing levels, which could adversely affect our results; economic uncertainty due to the impact of natural disasters, war or terrorism, which could adversely affect our business plan; our lack of sole decision-making authority with respect to our joint venture investments; disruptions in credit and financial markets and resulting difficulties in raising capital or obtaining credit at reasonable rates or at all, which could impede our ability to grow; availability of financing and capital, the levels of debt that we maintain and our credit ratings; changes in global financial markets, increases in interest rates and the impact of enacted and proposed U.S. tariffs on global economic conditions; the effect of recent or future changes to U.S. tax laws; and the failure to maintain our REIT status for U.S. federal income tax purposes. All forward-looking statements are based upon our current expectations and various assumptions. Our expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them, but there can be no assurance that management's expectations, beliefs and projections will result or be achieved. All forward-looking statements apply only as of the date made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Definition of FFO: FFO provides relevant and meaningful information about the Company's operating performance that is necessary, along with net income and cash flows, for an understanding of the Company's operating results. The Company believes FFO is a meaningful disclosure as a supplement to net income. Net income assumes that the values of real estate assets diminish predictably over time as reflected through depreciation and amortization expenses. The values of real estate assets fluctuate due to market conditions and the Company believes FFO more accurately reflects the value of the Company's real estate assets. FFO is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. ("NAREIT") as net income computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), excluding gains or losses on sales of operating stores and impairment write downs of depreciable real estate assets, plus depreciation and amortization related to real estate and after adjustments to record unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures on the same basis. The Company believes that to further understand the Company's performance, FFO should be considered along with the reported net income and cash flows in accordance with GAAP, as presented in the Company's consolidated financial statements. FFO should not be considered a replacement of net income computed in accordance with GAAP. For informational purposes, the Company also presents Core FFO. Core FFO excludes revenues and expenses not core to our operations and transaction costs. It also includes certain costs associated with the Life Storage Merger including non-cash interest related to the amortization of discount on unsecured senior notes and amortization of other intangibles, net of tax benefit. Although the Company's calculation of Core FFO differs from NAREIT's definition of FFO and may not be comparable to that of other REITs and real estate companies, the Company believes it provides a meaningful supplemental measure of operating performance. The Company believes that by excluding revenues and expenses not core to our operations and non-cash interest charges, stockholders and potential investors are presented with an indicator of our operating performance that more closely achieves the objectives of the real estate industry in presenting FFO. Core FFO by the Company should not be considered a replacement of the NAREIT definition of FFO. The computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs or real estate companies that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of the Company's performance, as an alternative to net cash flow from operating activities as a measure of liquidity, or as an indicator of the Company's ability to make cash distributions. Definition of Same-Store: The Company's same-store pool for the periods presented consists of 1,870 stores that are wholly-owned and operated and that were stabilized by the first day of the earliest calendar year presented, or January 1, 2025. The Company considers a store to be stabilized once it has been open for three years or has sustained average square foot occupancy of 80.0% or more for one calendar year. The Company believes that by providing same-store results from a stabilized pool of stores, with accompanying operating metrics including, but not limited to occupancy, rental revenue (growth), operating expenses (growth), net operating income (growth), etc., stockholders and potential investors are able to evaluate operating performance without the effects of non-stabilized occupancy levels, rent levels, expense levels, acquisitions or completed developments. Same-store results should not be used as a basis for future same-store performance or for the performance of the Company's stores as a whole. About Extra Space Storage Inc.: Extra Space Storage Inc., headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah, is a self-administered and self-managed REIT and a member of the S&P 500. As of June 30, 2026, the Company owned and/or operated 4,410 self-storage stores in 42 states and Washington, D.C. The Company's stores comprise approximately 3.0 million units and approximately 341.0 million square feet of rentable space operating under the Extra Space brand. The Company offers customers a wide selection of conveniently located and secure storage units across the country, including boat storage, RV storage and business storage. It is the largest operator of self-storage properties in the United States. View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/extra-space-storage-inc-reports-2026-second-quarter-results-302836983.html
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-28Compared to Estimates, Extra Space Storage (EXR) Q2 Earnings: A Look at Key Metrics
Zacks
Compared to Estimates, Extra Space Storage (EXR) Q2 Earnings: A Look at Key Metrics
Extra Space Storage (EXR) reported $874.15 million in revenue for the quarter ended June 2026, representing a year-over-year increase of 3.9%. EPS of $2.15 for the same period compares to $1.25 a year ago. The reported revenue compares to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $867.44 million, representing a surprise of +0.77%. The company delivered an EPS surprise of +4.37%, with the consensus EPS estimate being $2.06. While investors scrutinize revenue and earnings changes year-over-year and how they compare with Wall Street expectations to determine their next move, some key metrics always offer a more accurate picture of a company's financial health. As these metrics influence top- and bottom-line performance, comparing them to the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated helps investors project a stock's price performance more accurately. Here is how Extra Space Storage performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts: Revenues- Property rental: $746.16 million compared to the $738.53 million average estimate based on two analysts. The reported number represents a change of +3.5% year over year. Same-store rental revenues: $690.19 million versus $683.36 million estimated by two analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +3.7% change. Revenues- Tenant reinsurance: $93.08 million compared to the $91.34 million average estimate based on two analysts. The reported number represents a change of +5.1% year over year. Revenues- Management fees and other income: $34.9 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of $34.59 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +8.9%. Net income (loss) per common share - Diluted: $1.25 versus the two-analyst average estimate of $1.15. Net operating income- Same store properties: $496.08 million compared to the $481.24 million average estimate based on two analysts. Equity in earnings and dividend income from unconsolidated real estate entities: $15.8 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of $16.02 million. View all Key Company Metrics for Extra Space Storage here>>> Shares of Extra Space Storage have remained unchanged over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +1.7% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating that it could perform in line with t…Read full documentShow less
Extra Space Storage (EXR) reported $874.15 million in revenue for the quarter ended June 2026, representing a year-over-year increase of 3.9%. EPS of $2.15 for the same period compares to $1.25 a year ago. The reported revenue compares to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $867.44 million, representing a surprise of +0.77%. The company delivered an EPS surprise of +4.37%, with the consensus EPS estimate being $2.06. While investors scrutinize revenue and earnings changes year-over-year and how they compare with Wall Street expectations to determine their next move, some key metrics always offer a more accurate picture of a company's financial health. As these metrics influence top- and bottom-line performance, comparing them to the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated helps investors project a stock's price performance more accurately. Here is how Extra Space Storage performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts: Revenues- Property rental: $746.16 million compared to the $738.53 million average estimate based on two analysts. The reported number represents a change of +3.5% year over year. Same-store rental revenues: $690.19 million versus $683.36 million estimated by two analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +3.7% change. Revenues- Tenant reinsurance: $93.08 million compared to the $91.34 million average estimate based on two analysts. The reported number represents a change of +5.1% year over year. Revenues- Management fees and other income: $34.9 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of $34.59 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +8.9%. Net income (loss) per common share - Diluted: $1.25 versus the two-analyst average estimate of $1.15. Net operating income- Same store properties: $496.08 million compared to the $481.24 million average estimate based on two analysts. Equity in earnings and dividend income from unconsolidated real estate entities: $15.8 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of $16.02 million. View all Key Company Metrics for Extra Space Storage here>>> Shares of Extra Space Storage have remained unchanged over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +1.7% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating that it could perform in line with the broader market in the near term. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Extra Space Storage Inc (EXR) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-28Extra Space Storage: Q2 Earnings Snapshot
Associated Press
Extra Space Storage: Q2 Earnings Snapshot
SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR) on Tuesday reported a key measure of profitability in its second quarter. The results surpassed Wall Street expectations. The Salt Lake City-based real estate investment trust said it had funds from operations of $475.7 million, or $2.15 per share, in the period. The average estimate of six analysts surveyed by Zacks Investment Research was for funds from operations of $2.06 per share. Funds from operations is a closely watched measure in the REIT industry. It takes net income and adds back items such as depreciation and amortization. The company said it had net income of $263.5 million, or $1.25 per share. The self-storage facility real estate investment trust, based in Salt Lake City, posted revenue of $874.2 million in the period, also surpassing Street forecasts. Three analysts surveyed by Zacks expected $867.4 million. Extra Space Storage expects full-year funds from operations in the range of $8.25 to $8.40 per share. _____ This story was generated by Automated Insights (http://automatedinsights.com/ap) using data from Zacks Investment Research. Access a Zacks stock report on EXR at https://www.zacks.com/ap/EXR
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-28Vornado Realty to Post Q2 Earnings: Is the Stock a Portfolio Must-Have?
Zacks
Vornado Realty to Post Q2 Earnings: Is the Stock a Portfolio Must-Have?
Vornado Realty Trust VNO is scheduled to report second-quarter 2026 results on Aug. 3, after market close. The company’s quarterly results are likely to display a year-over-year rise in revenues as well as funds from operations (FFO) per share. In the last reported quarter, this New York-based real estate investment trust’s (REIT) FFO per share, plus assumed conversions, on an adjusted basis, was 52 cents, in line with the Zacks Consensus Estimate. Results displayed year-over-year growth in same-store NOI and occupancy for the New York and THE MART portfolios. The company witnessed decent leasing activities in the New York and THE MART portfolios. Over the trailing four quarters, Vornado’s FFO per share, plus assumed conversions, on an adjusted basis, topped the Zacks Consensus Estimate on three occasions and missed in the remainder, the average surprise being 1.45%. This is depicted in the graph below: Vornado Realty Trust price-eps-surprise | Vornado Realty Trust Quote As we approach the release of Vornado's second-quarter 2026 earnings report, it is important to examine how this office REIT is likely to have performed amid the current market conditions. Per a Cushman & Wakefield report, the U.S. office market continued to recover in the second quarter of 2026, with AI-driven business expansion emerging as a key catalyst for demand, particularly in major gateway markets. AI companies, along with law firms and other professional-services tenants, increasingly sought high-quality office space to support employee collaboration, productivity and growth. Although quarterly net absorption was slightly negative at 360,000 square feet, the four-quarter rolling total rose to 14.3 msf — the strongest since 2020 and the seventh consecutive quarter of improvement. Demand was broad-based, with positive annual absorption in 60% of tracked markets. Vacancy stabilized at 20.1%, while available sublease space fell 15% year over year and 28% from its first-quarter 2024 peak. Class A offices continued to outperform, with vacancy declining 50 bps year over year and four-quarter net absorption reaching 24.5 msf, the highest since mid-2020. This stronger demand also supported premium pricing, with Class A asking rents averaging $44.17 per square foot in second-quarter 2026, well above the $38.38 national average across all office classes. Supply conditions also remain supportiv…Read full documentShow less
Vornado Realty Trust VNO is scheduled to report second-quarter 2026 results on Aug. 3, after market close. The company’s quarterly results are likely to display a year-over-year rise in revenues as well as funds from operations (FFO) per share. In the last reported quarter, this New York-based real estate investment trust’s (REIT) FFO per share, plus assumed conversions, on an adjusted basis, was 52 cents, in line with the Zacks Consensus Estimate. Results displayed year-over-year growth in same-store NOI and occupancy for the New York and THE MART portfolios. The company witnessed decent leasing activities in the New York and THE MART portfolios. Over the trailing four quarters, Vornado’s FFO per share, plus assumed conversions, on an adjusted basis, topped the Zacks Consensus Estimate on three occasions and missed in the remainder, the average surprise being 1.45%. This is depicted in the graph below: Vornado Realty Trust price-eps-surprise | Vornado Realty Trust Quote As we approach the release of Vornado's second-quarter 2026 earnings report, it is important to examine how this office REIT is likely to have performed amid the current market conditions. Per a Cushman & Wakefield report, the U.S. office market continued to recover in the second quarter of 2026, with AI-driven business expansion emerging as a key catalyst for demand, particularly in major gateway markets. AI companies, along with law firms and other professional-services tenants, increasingly sought high-quality office space to support employee collaboration, productivity and growth. Although quarterly net absorption was slightly negative at 360,000 square feet, the four-quarter rolling total rose to 14.3 msf — the strongest since 2020 and the seventh consecutive quarter of improvement. Demand was broad-based, with positive annual absorption in 60% of tracked markets. Vacancy stabilized at 20.1%, while available sublease space fell 15% year over year and 28% from its first-quarter 2024 peak. Class A offices continued to outperform, with vacancy declining 50 bps year over year and four-quarter net absorption reaching 24.5 msf, the highest since mid-2020. This stronger demand also supported premium pricing, with Class A asking rents averaging $44.17 per square foot in second-quarter 2026, well above the $38.38 national average across all office classes. Supply conditions also remain supportive. Office completions fell to a 14-year low, the construction pipeline stayed below 20 msf, while conversions, demolitions and repositioning surged. These trends should limit oversupply and support further improvement in premium office fundamentals. In reference to the above U.S. office market environment, strong demand for high-quality office space is likely to have supported leasing activity for Vornado’s strategically located premium portfolio in the second quarter of 2026. The company entered second-quarter 2026 with more than 1 million square feet of New York office leases under negotiation, while first-quarter 2026 Manhattan leasing generated average starting rents of $103 per square foot and positive cash mark-to-market spreads of 9.7%. However, second-quarter 2026 may reflect lower rent from the modified 350 Park Avenue master lease, with management indicating that most of this impact would begin in the said period, as well as continued pressure from financing costs despite expectations for interest expense to ease after the June bond repayment. The consensus mark for Vornado’s New York revenues is pinned at $368.7 million, up 2.9% from the prior-year quarter. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for quarterly revenues is pegged at $472.4 million, implying a 7% year-over-year gain. The consensus mark for Vornado’s other revenues stands at $84.6 million, up 1.6% from the prior-year quarter. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for occupancy in the New York office portfolio is pegged at 92%, up from 91.6% reported in the prior quarter. The company’s activities during the to-be-reported quarter were inadequate to garner analysts’ confidence. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the quarterly FFO per share has remained unchanged at 57 cents for more than three months. The figure indicates a 1.79% increase from the prior-year period’s reported number. Our proven model does not conclusively predict a surprise in terms of FFO per share for Vornado this season. The combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the chances of an FFO beat, which is not the case here. Vornado has an Earnings ESP of -1.56% and currently carries a Zacks Rank of 3. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they’re reported with our Earnings ESP Filter. Here are two stocks from the broader REIT sector — Extra Space Storage EXR and Highwoods Properties HIW— you may want to consider, as our model shows that these have the right combination of elements to report an FFO beat this quarter. Extra Space Storage is slated to report quarterly numbers on July 28. EXR has an Earnings ESP of +0.39% and a Zacks Rank of 3 at present. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. Highwoods Properties is slated to report quarterly numbers on July 28. HIW has an Earnings ESP of +0.47% and a Zacks Rank of 3 at present. Note: Anything related to earnings presented in this write-up represents funds from operations (FFO) — a widely used metric to gauge the performance of REITs. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) : Free Stock Analysis Report Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) : Free Stock Analysis Report Extra Space Storage Inc (EXR) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-27Camden Property to Post Q2 Earnings: What Should Investors Know?
Zacks
Camden Property to Post Q2 Earnings: What Should Investors Know?
Camden Property Trust CPT is slated to report second-quarter 2026 results on July 30, after market close. The company’s quarterly results are likely to witness a year-over-year decline in revenues and funds from operations (FFO) per share. In the last reported quarter, this residential real estate investment trust (REIT) reported FFO per share of $1.70, delivering a surprise of 1.80%. Results reflected higher same-property net operating income (NOI). In the preceding four quarters, CPT’s FFO per share outpaced the Zacks Consensus Estimate on all occasions, with the average beat being 1.18%. The graph below depicts this surprise history: Camden Property Trust price-eps-surprise | Camden Property Trust Quote In this article, we will dive deep into the U.S. apartment market environment and the company's fundamentals and analyze the factors that might have contributed to its second-quarter 2026 performance. The U.S. multifamily market entered the second half of 2026 with a clearer recovery taking shape, as strong renter demand and a rapidly shrinking supply pipeline began translating into lower vacancy and improving rent growth. According to a Cushman & Wakefield report, net absorption reached roughly 124,600 units, up from 83,500 units in the first quarter and 8% above the prior year, making it the fifth-strongest quarter in nearly 25 years. The supply picture also became more favorable. Approximately 88,000 units were delivered during the quarter, down 27% year over year. Around 475,000 units remained under construction at quarter-end, equal to just 3.5% of existing inventory. Improving demand and slowing supply pushed the national vacancy rate down 35 basis points quarter over quarter to 8.9%, its first move below 9% since 2024. On a trailing four-quarter basis, absorption of approximately 362,000 units exceeded deliveries of about 358,000 units for the first time since early 2022, indicating vacancy is likely to have passed its cyclical peak. The recovery was particularly pronounced in previously overbuilt markets: Austin; Charleston, SC; Savannah, GA; Huntsville, AL; Salt Lake City, UT, and Colorado Springs recorded some of the largest quarterly vacancy declines. Rent growth remains modest but is beginning to improve. National asking rents reached approximately $1,945 per month, up 1.5% year over year, compared with 1.1% growth in the first quarter. The Bay…Read full documentShow less
Camden Property Trust CPT is slated to report second-quarter 2026 results on July 30, after market close. The company’s quarterly results are likely to witness a year-over-year decline in revenues and funds from operations (FFO) per share. In the last reported quarter, this residential real estate investment trust (REIT) reported FFO per share of $1.70, delivering a surprise of 1.80%. Results reflected higher same-property net operating income (NOI). In the preceding four quarters, CPT’s FFO per share outpaced the Zacks Consensus Estimate on all occasions, with the average beat being 1.18%. The graph below depicts this surprise history: Camden Property Trust price-eps-surprise | Camden Property Trust Quote In this article, we will dive deep into the U.S. apartment market environment and the company's fundamentals and analyze the factors that might have contributed to its second-quarter 2026 performance. The U.S. multifamily market entered the second half of 2026 with a clearer recovery taking shape, as strong renter demand and a rapidly shrinking supply pipeline began translating into lower vacancy and improving rent growth. According to a Cushman & Wakefield report, net absorption reached roughly 124,600 units, up from 83,500 units in the first quarter and 8% above the prior year, making it the fifth-strongest quarter in nearly 25 years. The supply picture also became more favorable. Approximately 88,000 units were delivered during the quarter, down 27% year over year. Around 475,000 units remained under construction at quarter-end, equal to just 3.5% of existing inventory. Improving demand and slowing supply pushed the national vacancy rate down 35 basis points quarter over quarter to 8.9%, its first move below 9% since 2024. On a trailing four-quarter basis, absorption of approximately 362,000 units exceeded deliveries of about 358,000 units for the first time since early 2022, indicating vacancy is likely to have passed its cyclical peak. The recovery was particularly pronounced in previously overbuilt markets: Austin; Charleston, SC; Savannah, GA; Huntsville, AL; Salt Lake City, UT, and Colorado Springs recorded some of the largest quarterly vacancy declines. Rent growth remains modest but is beginning to improve. National asking rents reached approximately $1,945 per month, up 1.5% year over year, compared with 1.1% growth in the first quarter. The Bay Area led the recovery, with San Francisco rents rising 13%, San Jose 7% and the East Bay 4.8%. Norfolk, VA; Toledo, OH; Reno, NV, and Boise, ID, also posted strong gains. High-supply markets remained softer, with rents still declining in Austin and Sarasota, FL, although the pace of those declines moderated as excess supply was absorbed. Overall, the market appears to be shifting from stabilization into an occupancy-led recovery, with broader rent growth likely as the construction pipeline continues to shrink. Camden is expected to have benefited from gradually improving apartment fundamentals as peak leasing season gained momentum and new supply continued to moderate across its Sun Belt markets. April occupancy increased to approximately 95.4% from 95.1% in the first quarter, while blended lease rates improved by about 100 basis points sequentially. Strong resident retention, historically low turnover and renewal offers in the mid-3% range are likely to have supported revenue stability, although seasonal expense pressure, including higher repair and maintenance costs and annual merit increases, may have weighed on same-store NOI and earnings growth. For the second quarter, management guided to core FFO of $1.65-$1.69 per share, down approximately $0.03 sequentially at the midpoint. The decline is expected to reflect a roughly $0.04 reduction in same-store NOI, as improving revenues are more than offset by seasonal repair and maintenance costs, and annual merit increases, partly cushioned by $0.01 of incremental non-same-store NOI from acquisitions. For the second quarter, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for CPT’s revenues currently stands at $391.7 million, implying a 1.2% decline from the year-ago reported number. However, before the second-quarter earnings release, the company’s activities were not adequate to gain analysts’ confidence. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the quarterly core FFO per share has been revised southward by a cent to $1.67 over the past week, which lies within the guided range and shows a decline of 1.8% year over year. Our proven model does not conclusively predict a surprise in terms of FFO per share for Camden this season. The combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the chances of an FFO beat, which is not the case here. Camden currently carries a Zacks Rank of 3 and has an Earnings ESP of -0.78%. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they’re reported with our Earnings ESP Filter. Here are two stocks from the broader REIT sector — Extra Space Storage EXR and Highwoods Properties HIW— you may want to consider, as our model shows that these have the right combination of elements to report an FFO beat this quarter. Extra Space Storage is slated to report quarterly numbers on July 28. EXR has an Earnings ESP of +0.39% and a Zacks Rank of 3 at present. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. Highwoods Properties is slated to report quarterly numbers on July 28. HIW has an Earnings ESP of +0.47% and a Zacks Rank of 3 at present. Note: Anything related to earnings presented in this write-up represents funds from operations (FFO) — a widely used metric to gauge the performance of REITs. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Camden Property Trust (CPT) : Free Stock Analysis Report Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) : Free Stock Analysis Report Extra Space Storage Inc (EXR) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

