CCOI

Good morning, welcome to the Cogent Communications Holdings First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded, and it will be available for replay at www.cogentco.com. A transcript of this conference call will be posted on Cogent's website when it becomes available. Cogent's summary of financial and operational results attached to its press release can be downloaded from the Cogent website. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Dave Schaeffer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cogent Communications Holdings.

Thank you. Good morning to all. Welcome to our first quarter 2026 earnings call. I'm Dave Schaeffer, Cogent's CEO. Joining with me on today's call is Tad Weed, our Chief Financial Officer. A few key events and other significant matters in the quarter. I want to recognize some of the key achievements that we have made in the quarter. We have stated in previous calls we intend to monetize 24 of our Sprint data centers that we acquired either via outright sale or leasing the acquired space on a wholesale basis. We have entered into a non-binding LOI for the sale of 10 of these data centers. The counterparty has essentially completed its due diligence. Based on the status of this transaction, we expect closing to be early this summer. We continue to have multiple parties interested in other former Sprint data centers.

While we are working on refinancing our 2027 $750 million unsecured notes, which become due in June of 2027. At this time, we can make the following statement regarding the refinancing of our 2027 notes, and I'm going to ask Tad to read this statement.

Thank you, Dave. Good morning to everyone. The statement is as follows. The company and a limited number of holders of our 2032 $600 million secured notes, who collectively hold more than a majority of the outstanding principal amount of our 2032 notes, have reached a verbal agreement on a consent to amend the indenture for our 2032 notes. That process is underway. If and once finally documented, the amendment will increase our ability under the indenture to incur pari passu or junior lien secured debt and includes several credit enhancements for our 2032 notes. If and when the consent to the amendment is final, we will file an 8-K announcing the same and forgo our previously announced secured debt realignment plan.

Please note that this discussion does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security, nor is it a solicitation of consent from any holders of our 2032 notes. Back to you, Dave.

Okay, thanks, Tad. We intend our refinancing to be complete after the expiration of our make-whole period, which ends June 15th, 2026. Once and if this transaction closes, our debt maturities will be as follows. Our current $600 million secured notes will mature in June of 2032. Our anticipated $750 million of secured notes will mature in 2023. $206 million of our secured ABS IPv4 notes mature in May of 2029. $174.4 million of our secured IPv4 notes mature in April of 2030. Our $629 million of IRU finance leases or capital leases have various maturities extending through 2046. Couple of comments on our wavelength sales.

At quarter end, we're offering wavelength services in 1,107 locations at either 10 gig, 100 gig, or 400 gig capability. Our provisioning interval is approximately 30 days and continues to improve. Our wavelength revenues for the quarter were $13.6 million, an increase of 90.8% on a year-over-year basis and a sequential improvement of 12.3%. Our wavelength customer connections increased year-over-year by 71.2% and increased sequentially by 9.6% to 2,263. As of the end of the quarter, we have sold wavelength services in 581 unique locations, and we have sold those services to a total of 492 unique customers.

We intend to continue to focus on capturing 25% of the North American long-haul market. As of today, we have captured approximately 3% of that market. Now our EBITDA. On a year-over-year basis, our EBITDA as adjusted for the quarter increased by $1.4 million, and our EBITDA as adjusted margin for the quarter increased year-over-year by 150 basis points. Our EBITDA as adjusted for the quarter decreased sequentially by $6.6 million to $70.2 million, and our EBITDA as adjusted margin for the quarter was 29.3%. Seasonally, our SG&A expenses increased in the first quarter as compared to the fourth quarter. These changes are caused by annual CPI increases in salary, the impact of payroll taxes in the U.S., the timing of employee vacations, our annual audit fees, and our sales meeting.

Our SG&A increased from the fourth quarter of 2025 to the first quarter of 2026 by $7.1 million or 11%. By comparison, our SG&A increased by $10.6 million or 19% from the fourth quarter of 2024 to the first quarter of 2025. This seasonal pattern is normal for Cogent. We have a refined capital allocation strategy that is focused on de-levering. We have committed the proceeds of the sale of our initial 10 data centers that were formerly Sprint facilities to Cogent Communications Group, our borrowing entity, which will accelerate de-levering at that entity. Our total gross debt has adjusted for amounts from T-Mobile for the last 12 months on an EBITDA as adjusted basis was 7.4 times EBITDA. Our net debt ratio was 6.79 times at quarter's end.

Our IPv4 leasing revenues increased 4% to $18 million and increased by 25% on a year-over-year basis. Our average price per IP address was stable at $0.40. We have titles to approximately 37.8 million IPv4 addresses and have leased out approximately 15 million of these addresses as of today. At quarter's end, we are providing services in 1,744 carrier neutral data centers and 185 Cogent data centers. This footprint of data centers represents approximately 17 GW of installed power. The Cogent data centers have approximately 211 MW of installed power and approximately 1.2 million sq ft of floor space. While our revenue growth for Q1 2026 was negative, the decline in revenues from acquired Sprint customers is moderating.

We anticipate a long-term average revenue growth rate of 6%-8%, an EBITDA margin expansion of approximately 200 basis points per year. Our revenue and EBITDA guidance targets are intended to be multi-year and are not intended to be quarterly or annual specific guidance. I'd like to turn the call back to Tad to read our safe harbor language, provide some additional detail, and then I will provide some summary remarks and open the floor for questions and answers.

Thank you, Dave. This earnings conference call includes forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on our current intent, beliefs, and expectations. These forward-looking statements and all other statements that may be made on this call that are not historical facts are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially. Please refer to our SEC filings for more information on the factors that could cause actual results to differ. Cogent undertakes no obligation to update or revise our forward-looking statements. If we use non-GAAP financial measures during this call, you will find these reconciled to the corresponding GAAP measurement in our earnings release that are posted on our website at www.cogentco.com. Some summary of results. Comments on our revenue mix since the Sprint closing, which as a reminder, was May 1, 2023.

The first full quarter with Sprint combined with Cogent was the third quarter of 2023. Despite revenue decreases, we have been able to increase our margins. Our increases in gross margin and our EBITDA margin have been driven by cost reductions and a rotation to our more profitable on-net products. Comparing our revenue by connection type from the third quarter of 2023, again, the first full quarter when we were combined with Sprint, to this quarter illustrates the material change to the composition of our revenues and the strength of our underlying Cogent classic business. Our on-net revenues were 47% of our total revenues in the third quarter of 2023. Our total on-net revenues, including wavelength on-net revenues, increased from 47% to 62% of total revenues this quarter.

Our less profitable off-net revenues were 48% of our total revenues in the third quarter of 2023, and our off-net revenues have decreased to 37% of our total revenues this quarter. Lastly, our non-core revenues were 5% of our total revenues in the third quarter of 2023, and our non-core revenues have decreased to $1 million and were approximately 0.5% of our total revenues this quarter. Our total revenue for the quarter was $239.2 million. Our total revenue for the quarter declined sequentially by $1.3 million or by 0.6%. The decrease was a slight improvement from the $1.4 million sequential quarterly decline last quarter. USF tax revenues had a negative impact on our sequential revenue results of $0.3 million and a negative impact year-over-year of $0.7 million.

For the quarter and sequentially, our on-net revenues, including on-net wave revenues, increased by $2.8 million. Our less profitable off-net revenues declined by $3.9 million. Our non-core revenues decreased by $12.2 million. Our wavelength revenues, which is entirely on-net, increased by $1.5 million. Our gross margin percentage for the quarter increased year-over-year by 150 basis points to 46.1% from continued cost reduction and product optimization, including our focus on on-net products. Some comments on revenue by class. We analyze and classify our revenues into 4 network connection types and 3 customer types. Our 4 network connection types are on-net, off-net, wavelength, and non-core. Our 3 customer types are net-centric, corporate, and enterprise customers. The substantial changes in the acquired Sprint wireline revenue base have masked the underlying performance of our Cogent classic business.

Our consolidated revenue declines have been largely attributed to the reduction in the acquired Sprint wireline corporate and enterprise non-core and off-net revenues. At closing, the Sprint wireline revenues were 42% of our total revenues. That percentage has declined from 42% to only 16% of our total revenues this quarter. We acquired Sprint wireline with a revenue run rate of $118 million per quarter. This acquired revenue base has decreased from $118 million to $39 million this quarter run rate. That represents a $79 million reduction in quarterly revenue related to the acquired Sprint revenue base, or a 67% decline since deal closing.

At deal closing, our Cogent classic revenue run rate was $155 million per quarter, and that run rate has increased by 28% from $155 million to almost $200 million, $198 million for this quarter. Our total corporate business represented 42.3% of our revenues this quarter. Our quarterly corporate revenues decreased by 8.7% year-over-year and sequentially by 1.7%. The Sprint wireline corporate revenue customers represented 30% of our total corporate revenues at closing of the acquisition, and those Sprint acquired corporate customers now represent only 10% of our total corporate revenues.

The Sprint wireline acquired corporate customer base has decreased from a run rate of $39 million per quarter at closing to a current run rate of only $8 million for this quarter, an approximate 80% decline. Our total net-centric business continues to increase and to benefit from the growth in video traffic, activity related to artificial intelligence, streaming, IPv4 leasing, and wavelength sales. Our net-centric business represented 44.2% of our revenues this quarter. Our quarterly net-centric revenues increased by 14.2% year-over-year and sequentially by 2.3%. The Sprint wireline net-centric customers represented 21% of our total net-centric customer revenues at the closing of the acquisition. Those Sprint wireline acquired net-centric customers now represent only 6% of our total net-centric revenues.

The Sprint wireline acquired net-centric customer base has decreased from a run rate of $19 million per quarter at closing to a run rate this quarter of only $8 million, an approximately 60% decline. 58%, actually. Enterprise business. Our total enterprise business represented 13.5% of our revenues this quarter. Our quarterly enterprise revenue decreased by 26% year-over-year and sequentially by 5.7%, primarily due to a reduction in the acquired Sprint wireline enterprise off-net revenues. The Sprint wireline enterprise customers represented virtually all of our enterprise revenues at the closing of the acquisition, and the Sprint wireline acquired enterprise revenue base has decreased from a run rate of $60 million per quarter at closing to a current run rate of $23 million, a 62% decline. Revenue and customer connections by network type.

We serve our on-net customers in 3,605 total on-net buildings. Our total on-net revenue, including on-net wavelengths, was $149.2 million for the quarter. That's a year-over-year increase of 9.1% and a sequential increase of 1.9%. Our less profitable off-net revenues was $89 million for the quarter, a year-over-year decrease of 17% and a sequential decrease of 4.2%. Our off-net revenue results are impacted by the migration of certain off-net customers to on-net and the continued grooming and termination of low-margin off-net contracts, virtually all of the decline from the Sprint wireline acquired customers. Our average price per megabit for our installed base decreased sequentially to $0.12 from $0.14 last quarter and was $0.20 the first quarter of last year.

Our average price per megabit of new contracts for the quarter was $0.07 compared to $0.06 last quarter, so a slight increase, and $0.10 the 1st quarter of last year. Our ARPU for the quarter were as follows. Our on-net IP ARPU was $514. Our off-net IP ARPU was $1,219. Our wavelength ARPU was $2,093. Our IPv4 ARPU was $0.40 per address. Churn rate. Our on-net churn rate was stable and our off-net churn rate actually slightly improved from last quarter. Our on-net unit churn monthly rate was 1.2%, the same as last quarter. Our off-net churn rate is primarily driven by the reduction in the acquired Sprint customer base, and it was 1.7%, moderation from 1.9% last quarter.

Our wavelength monthly churn rate is less than 0.5%. Traffic. Our year-over-year IP network traffic growth continued for the quarter. Our IP network traffic for the quarter increased sequentially by 4% and increased year-over-year at an accelerated rate to 14% this quarter compared to the same quarter last year. Sales rep productivity. Our sales rep productivity was 4.1 this quarter, the same as last quarter, and compared to our long-term average of 4.8. FX. Our revenue earned outside of the U.S. was about 21% of our revenues this quarter based on the average Euro-Canadian conversion USD rates. Far this quarter, we estimate that the FX conversion impact on sequential quarterly revenues will not be material, and the impact on year-over-year would be a positive of approximately $1 million.

Our revenues and customer base are not highly concentrated. Our top 25 customers represented 16% of our revenues this quarter. CapEx. Our capital expenditures were $46.2 million this quarter. We have experienced multiple equipment price increases from vendors due to supply chain constraints so far this year. Our principal payments on capital leases were $13.4 million this quarter. Debt and debt ratios. Our total gross debt at par, including $629 million of finance lease IRU obligations, was $2.4 billion at quarter end, and our net debt, total net of our cash and our $181.7 million due from T-Mobile, was $2 billion.

Our leverage ratio, as calculated under our more restrictive unsecured $750 million 2027 notes indentures that we plan on refinancing, was 6.1, and our secured leverage ratio was 3.79. Our fixed coverage ratio was 2.29. The definition of consolidated cash flow under our $600 million secured 2032 notes indenture includes cash payments under our IP Transit Services Agreement with T-Mobile in the determination of consolidated cash flow. Our anticipated $750 million secured notes indenture will include the same definition of consolidated cash flow, again, including cash payments under our IP Transit Agreement. Our leverage ratio, as calculated under our $600 million secured 2032 notes indenture, was 4.66. Our secured leverage ratio was 2.9, and our fixed coverage ratio was 3.0.

Lastly, on bad debt and days sales, our days sales was 31 days at quarter end. Our bad debt expense was less than 0.5% of our revenues for the quarter. And with that, I will turn the call back over to Dave.

Hey. Thanks, Tad. I'd like to highlight a couple of strengths of our network, our customer base, and our sales force. We are direct beneficiaries of increased demand for over-the-top video, AI activity, and streaming video trends. At quarter's end, we were able to sell WAVE services at 1,107 data centers across North America with a reduced provisioning interval of approximately 30 days. We are selling Wavelength services as of quarter end to 492 unique customers and 581 unique data center locations. At quarter end, we're selling IP services globally in a total of 1,929 data centers. At quarter end, we are directly connected to 7,630 networks. 22 of these networks represent settlement-free peers. 7,608 of those networks are Cogent transit customers.

We remain very focused on our sales force productivity and managing out underperforming reps. Our sales force turnover rate was 4.8% per month for the quarter, below our historical average of 5.7% per month. At quarter end, we have a total quota-bearing sales force of 568 reps. This includes 285 professionals focused on the net-centric market, 269 sales professionals focused on the corporate market, and 14 sales professionals focused on the enterprise market. We've made significant progress in several areas. We're improving our margins and growing our EBITDA due to our diligence in cost reduction and our focus on selling more profitable on net services. In the first quarter of 2026, 83% of our sales were on net services.

This increased the percentage of our total base to 62% of all services being on net. We have a clear path to refinance our 2027 $750 million unsecured notes with secured $750 million notes. We are actively working to continue to monetize former Sprint facilities, and we are working to grow EBITDA, which will further accelerate our delevering and allow us to re-accelerate our return of capital program to equity. We're optimistic about our Wavelength services business. Our Wavelength services are differentiated in quality of service, breadth of footprint, uniqueness of routes, and efficiency in provisioning. Our on net services, both IP and Wavelength, offer unparalleled value to customers. We offer superior services for all of our products, a broad footprint in revenue-rich locations, expedited provisioning, and disruptive pricing. In summary, we win on value.

Now I'd like to open the floor for questions.

Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, simply press star one again. Your first question comes from the line of Greg Williams from TD Cowen. Your line is open.

Great. Thank you for taking my question. Dave, the first one just on EBITDA. It was a touch light versus the Street in our estimates. You mentioned that, you know, obviously you have the seasonal costs, the payroll taxes, CPI, et cetera, and it's up $7.1 million quarter-over-quarter. How much of that 7.1 was the seasonal cost? Maybe talk to the cost takeout progress. Essentially, I'm just trying to figure out the EBITDA cadence next quarter and the balance of the year. Are you still looking for 200 basis points of expansion or I think you said greater than 200 basis points this year? The second question is just on that data center sales process. You mentioned the 10 data centers you're looking to close this summer.

any color would be helpful in terms of, you know, valuation, price per megawatt. Is it coming close to the $10 million a megawatt? Would you just generally characterize them versus the other 14? Are they better, same, worse, larger, smaller? Any help. Thank you.

Hey. Thanks for both questions, Greg. First of all, in terms of EBITDA margin expansion, we historically experience a reduction in EBITDA margin and an increase in SG&A expenses in the first quarter. This pattern has been in place for 20 years as Cogent has been a public company. The increase this quarter was approximately $7.1 million. The vast majority of that increase will go away, and we expect to be able to resume our sequential increase in EBITDA margins as well as our year-over-year expansion. While we will probably not repeat the roughly 800 basis points of improvement last year, meaning 2025 over 2024, we do expect to be over our multi-year guidance of 200 basis points on a year-over-year basis. With regard to the 10 data centers, the aggregate proceeds are substantially more than the $144 million.

These 10 represent a pretty good average across the 24 data centers that we are looking to divest of. It does not include our largest data center or our smallest data center that we are looking to sell. We also have a number of other parties conducting due diligence on multiple other data centers. We are focused on getting this transaction completed early summer, and then using those proceeds to be able to rapidly delever at the Cogent Group level. Just to remind investors, the data centers are held at Cogent Infrastructure, which is not a borrower under our high-yield indentures. We have committed and will continue to commit to contribute the proceeds of these 10 data centers that are being divested of to the borrower group and then use that money to rapidly delever both on a gross and net basis.

Thank you.

Hey, thanks, Craig.

Your next question comes from the line of Sebastiano Petti from JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Dave, I think last quarter we talked about hitting an inflection point where, you know, the growth in the organic business would offset the Sprint declines. Despite favorable currency, I guess, sequentially here, you know, the business did contract. I mean, just help us think about, you know, any one-time anomalies in the business. How should we think about the top-line trajectory from here? I think Tad talked about it being neutral on a constant currency basis as we think about the second quarter. Any update on the WAVES installs? You know, just slowed a little bit sequentially here. Is this related at all to the supply constraints that Tad talked about in his prepared remarks?

I guess relatedly, or just to kind of confirm, the 25% market share target in WAVES, is that still anticipated by May 2028? Should we anticipate the timeline has been extended? It didn't seem you were specific in your prepared remarks. Thank you.

Yeah, sure. The inflection in revenue was related almost exclusively to several large enterprise customers churning a portion of their off-net revenues. While those were not anticipated, those revenues were out of contract and on a month-to-month basis. You know, the core Cogent business and the on-net business in totality grew both sequentially and year-over-year. Our primary focus is on growing on-net revenues. 83% of all revenues sold in the quarter were on-net, and that will help us increase our aggregate profitability and our free cash flow and EBITDA. The wavelength install rate was not impacted by our supply constraints, but it was impacted by supply chain constraints of our customers. We have not, as of yet, began to force bill wavelength services.

I think this is part of the way we've been able to grow both the number of locations and number of customers that we sell to. The supply chain constraints did hit Cogent in terms of capital equipment, from pluggable optics to normal, sequential capital installs across our network. All of our major vendors have had price increases. Actually, our primary vendor had 4 price increases in the first 4 months of the year. This is counter to a pattern of prices for technology declining. On wavelength installs, we have seen a variety of customers pushing out their acceptance of wavelengths. We actually provisioned more wavelengths in the quarter than we did in the previous quarter, but the customers did not accept them. That decision to push out acceptance is being driven by constraints. We have seen constraints of power availability in data centers.

We've seen customers actually change wavelength termination points to avoid a constraint in 1 data center in a market moving to another data center. There are equipment constraints from pluggable optics on the customer side to the ability to have GPUs installed to accept wavelengths. Probably something that should be obvious that people forget is while there is a rapid acceleration of capital for AI training, and there have been literally hundreds of billions of dollars annually of announced investments and trillions of dollars in total, almost all of those announcements are not yet online. In many cases, customers order wavelengths to facilities that are not yet either fully powered or fully constructed. We do think that will ease. You know, with regard to our ability to gain market share, you know, we have gone from 0% market in 2 years to 3% of the market.

Our goal remains to hit 25% of the inner-city long-haul market. We feel that is very reasonable based both on the number of locations and the diversity of the customer base. While we are hopeful that we can reach that by mid-2028, that is, you know, just a little over two years from now, and these equipment supply constraints may in fact impact that, we are not in a position to make that determination.

Thanks, Dave.

Thanks.

Your next question comes from a line of Christopher Schoell from UBS. Your line is open.

Great. Thank you. You mentioned the equipment prices stepping up from vendors due to the supply chain constraints, is there anything else causing CapEx to come in higher than that $25 million per quarter run rate you previously spoke to? Should we assume this level of capital spending will persist in the near term? Then maybe just one on the sales force. It appears that head count has been stepping down consistently. What is the main driver there, and do you believe you can still hit your revenue targets with a lower head count? Thank you.

Yeah. Hey, thanks for both questions, Chris. First of all, on equipment pricing, I think there have been two primary drivers that are forcing vendors to raise pricing. The first is the acute shortage of DRAM, and since DRAM is utilized both in optical transport and routing equipment, that is causing our vendors to experience a higher cost of goods sold. The second has been a shift in buying patterns. Historically, service providers represented the vast majority of equipment purchases. Those equipment purchases have become concentrated in a handful of hyperscalers that have exerted very strong pressures on gross margins for our vendors. In order to offset that margin pressure, our vendors have increased prices on service providers while offering the aggressive discounts for volume to hyperscalers. We don't have enough data to know how long or how material these trends will be going forward.

We do expect our capital intensity to continue to moderate. However, these increases in pricing were not anticipated and are not in line with historical trends. This is the first time in Cogent's 26 year history that we've seen the prices of our key technologies increase, not decrease. We do think these are not permanent, but we don't have enough data to fully answer that with conviction. With regard to headcount, you know, we have tried to manage out unproductive reps, and we have consolidated some teams in order to better affect training. We do believe we will see a acceleration in rep productivity while on a unit basis it remained flat. On a dollar of revenue acquired basis, it actually improved materially both sequentially and year-over-year. We expect to see an improvement in rep productivity, both on a unit basis and dollar of revenue acquired.

We also are continuing to hire reps and believe that the vast majority of the housekeeping that we have done is behind us now, and we should be at a point where the sales force will stabilize and then begin to resume growth as there is adequate addressable market for our services to allow us to support a larger number of sales reps across all of our products. Holding reps accountable to productivity targets is critical to our ability to hit our margin objectives.

Thanks, David.

Your next question comes from a line of Ana Goshko from Bank of America. Your line is open.

Hi. Thanks very much. David, a few questions to follow-up. Just on the timing of the data center sales, you're still at a letter of intent, and you said that you expect to close the sale early summer. That seems like a pretty fast turnaround. I think in the past you had said it might even take, like, several quarters to close the deal from the actual agreement. Like, I, you know, a few things. When do you expect that the actual sale agreement will be finalized? When that happens, will you press release or 8-K that for us, with a dollar amount? Yeah, just wanna confirm, when you say early summer, what does that really mean in terms of July or, you know, late June?

First of all, the counterparty has been actively completing its diligence with a battery of consultants. They have spent several million dollars on that diligence, it all has been confirmatory. They have indicated that they would like to accelerate the closing once we have a final purchase and sale agreement in place. They have agreed to shorten the period of time from their LOI expiring to closing. We expect that to be in early summer, which would mean probably June or early July at the latest. We will announce the economics and the locations in an 8-K once the deal has been put under a binding agreement with a non-refundable deposit, we will disclose the name of the counterparty, as well as the exact proceeds.

Finally, we have committed that those proceeds will be contributed to Cogent Group, the borrower, and that those proceeds will be earmarked for net delevering, and in some cases, a portion of those proceeds will also be used for gross delevering.

Okay, just to put that maybe in kind of simpler terms, so are you saying a portion of the proceeds will go to pay down debt, but not all of them?

We have committed to a group of bond holders that the vast majority of the proceeds will go to buy back debt, but we did not commit to a number that equals the purchase price. We just committed to a number that is a significant percentage of what the final purchase price would be since we did not disclose that information to the bond holders as it is non-public at this time.

Just another follow-up on this. You had said that you plan to refi the unsecured with the new secured, the full $750 million after the call price drop in June 15th. Have you thought about if these proceeds are gonna be coming in so soon, why do you need to do the full $750? Could you do a smaller deal and then just use the proceeds to pay down a portion of the bonds that are due in 2027, the unsecureds?

The answer is we can do that, with our current $600 million secured debt trading at a discount to par, we want to try to capture some of that discontinuity and buy back the current $600 million secures until they trade closer to par. At that point, the additional capital that we have could be used to result in a smaller new issuance. Today, the current secured debt is trading at a material discount.

Okay. Just a quick follow-up on the business model. On the cost side, you had previously talked about there being $10 million of annual synergies left from the Sprint acquisition, but then also that there were integration costs of about $3 million a month that should be rolling off this year. It's, you know, roughly maybe like $45 million of annualized cost saves that you could theoretically or hopefully in practice achieve this year. Just wanted an update on, you know, where you stand and what that outlook for the actual cost reductions looks like this year.

We have achieved a small portion of that $10 million in remaining synergies. Just to remind you, we actually increased that target after we had already achieved the initial targets that we had laid out. The remaining integration work is continuing. That number was running as high as $5 million a month or $60 million a year. Today, it is slightly below $3 million a month, and we expect both of those areas of savings to be complete by year-end. We have not disclosed the exact pacing throughout 2026, all of these roughly $45 million in costs will disappear in 2027.

Okay, great. Thank you so much.

Great. Thanks, Ana.

Your next question comes from the line of Frank Louthan from Raymond James. Your line is open.

Great. Thank you. On the wavelengths, what's the average size wave that you're selling now currently? Then, were there any dark fiber or IPv4 address sales that helped contribute to revenue or EBITDA this quarter? Thanks.

Hey, Frank. Thanks for your questions. I'm gonna actually take those in reverse order. There were no dark fiber sales in the quarter while there was some IPv4 unit activity. Actually, the number of IP addresses leased went down slightly sequentially, but the revenue went up. It is a combination of selling at higher prices and continuing to raise prices on legacy orders. We do anticipate continued growth in our IPv4 business. We do not forecast any dark fiber sales. We treat those on an episodic basis and do that only to date with parties as a way to help them out of a bind if we have a route that is particularly critical to their operations.

To date, the handful of dark fiber sales that we've done have been to counterparties where we have been a customer of theirs buying dark fiber for a number of years. With regard to wave sales, the vast majority of our waves have been 100 gig waves. We are seeing an increase in the number of 400 gig waves and a significant decrease in the 10 gig waves. I think an average number would be somewhat misleading. I think looking it at on a modal basis is the best way to do that, and roughly about 75% of our sales have been 100 gig waves.

Yeah, that's kind of how I was thinking about it. 75% are 100 gig waves. What was that last quarter? Of that 25%, are they substantially 400 gig waves? Is that the way to think about it? How much is that 400 gig wave growing as a % of your new sales?

The 100 gig percentage has remained relatively constant. I think it was 78% the quarter before. Of the remaining 25%, there definitely has been a shift away from 10 gig sales and a shift towards 400 gig sales, with today over 10% of sales being 400 gig sales.

Great. Thank you.

Hey, thanks, Frank.

Your next question comes from the line of Walter Piecyk from Lightshed Partners. Your line is open.

Thanks. Hey, Dave. On these data center sales that are coming up, I guess just getting back to Ana's question, is there anything that forces the buyer to act by a certain period of time? You know, is there a risk that they understand the dynamics of your, the refi coming up on the 750 in June of next year and try and push that out as a leverage point and to impact price? Can you just give us a little bit more on those terms? What is it that you had to consent, pay off, whatever it is, on the 2032 note holders to get them, I think you were saying to effectively enable the refi on the 27. I don't necessarily understand that connection. If you could put a little bit more color on that.

Thanks.

Yeah, sure, Walt. First of all, we entered into a letter of intent that has exclusivity for the intended buyer on these data centers. That period of exclusivity ends. Those, some of those facilities have backup agreements that are ready to spring into force if the exclusivity period is allowed to lapse. There is a significant amount of pressure on the buyer to inoculate themselves from a counteroffer. Secondly, they have spent in excess of $3 million on diligence, and they are in the process of rounding out their management team to absorb these facilities. We believe they are gonna move forward, but the biggest lever that we have is a counteroffer that would spring in if their exclusivity period lapse.

They have indicated to us that they actually want to shorten the window from the expiration of that exclusivity period to closing, and that's what gave us confidence in our decision to announce early summer rather than later in the summer. To pivot to your second question about the current 32 note bondholders, while we have every right under our indentures to do the IRU realignment that we disclosed on our last earnings call, in discussions with many of those bondholders, they preferred a more traditional way of giving us the flexibility to increase our secured leverage. While we have a substantial amount of capacity for additional leverage, we were constrained by the 4 times net leverage limitation that's embedded in the 32 notes, and it will be their decision to increase that to allow us to fully refinance the 750s with a single unitary secured issue.

In doing that, they would then be in a position to see us not realign the IRUs and keep those with their associated debt in the borrower group.

Thanks. Do you anticipate, if all goes well, you sell the data centers ahead, as you told Ana, take down secured refi the $750, what type of rate do you anticipate? Well, I think you're paying 7% on that now. Same rate, lower, higher?

We are paying 7% on the current unsecured bonds. Our current secured bonds are trading at just around 8% today. I believe our new issue will most likely price off of the trading of those bonds and will be somewhat similar. It will have both a new issue concession that's typically about an eighth of a point, and it could have a small variance based on duration. If we sell the data centers, use a portion of the proceeds to buy back bonds, it is likely that the current secured bonds will trade asymptotically to par, which is 6.5%, and then it would allow us to finance probably at a similar rate.

While I can't predict the exact trading of the bonds, you know, the sequencing of completing the data center diligence period, converting it to a binding agreement, announcing it along with the announcement that Tad mentioned around the exact mechanics of our agreement with the majority of the bondholders, and then, earmarking the exact amount of dollars that will go to repurchasing bonds of the current 32s. To Ana's point, maybe a portion of that money may be held in abeyance and just allow us to refinance a slightly smaller amount of money than the $750 that's outstanding. All of this is designed to drive down our cost of borrowing and make our new bonds similar to where our existing bonds are, which I think is an achievement considering the aggregate increased cost of capital since those bonds were issued.

I mean, my guess is operational performance like sequential revenue growth and wavelength's growth will probably have a bigger impact on where the secured debt, you know, trades relative to some asset sales, relative to a much larger debt load. I guess what would be helpful is understanding why would unsecured trade if parity was secured?

Well, today the unsecureds actually trade at a discount to secured. Our current unsecureds trade at roughly 7.1, and our secures trade at about 8.1.

Why do you think that is?

I think it's primarily duration.

Okay. The rate market will obviously have an impact. Just one last in terms of understanding cash burn. The CapEx, I think you said last year for 2026, excluding capital lease, obviously, should have been about $100 million for this year. A big cut down for the variety of reasons that you guys have talked about. You were at $46 million for the first quarter. Is it just gonna drop off a cliff in future quarters, or should the CapEx run rate maybe be higher than the $100 million that you talked about?

Yeah, Walt. Our CapEx on a Q1 2025 to Q1 2026 dropped by about $13 million. It dropped from roughly.

Yep

$59 million-$46 million.

Up sequentially.

Well, it typically declines in fourth quarter and steps up in Q1 again.

Yep

... just like our SG&A. We do anticipate our CapEx coming down on a year-over-year basis. As I mentioned, and Tad mentioned in the prepared remarks, we have been shocked by the fact that our equipment vendors have actually raised prices, which is highly unusual in a technology business. We think those may be over, and if they are, we'll be much closer to the 100 million number. If there are future increases in equipment, that will push up our costs primarily for pluggable optics, which are probably the largest single item that we spend capital on.

Okay. Just one last follow-up, Dave.

Okay

again, going back to the Ana, the Ana question. She's obviously is a debt analyst, a lot smarter about this stuff than I am. What, I guess if it's trading at a discount today, right? You're like, "Oh, if it's, if it's at par when it's time to refi," like why bother then with the secured note? If it's at par, then take a smaller unsecured note out. I mean, shouldn't that be the-

That may be-

Okay, go ahead.

That may be the case, Walt.

Okay.

That's why I said.

Got it.

we will look to capture this discontinuity while the current secures are trading at a discount.

Great. Thank you, Dave.

Okay, thanks, Walt.

Your next question comes from a line of Timothy Horan from Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. Your line is open.

Thanks, Dave. On the data center sale, the binding sale agreement, does that have to occur like a month before the final close, or can you give us, you know, some color around that? Can you talk about a little bit more color where you are with selling the other data centers? Roughly will it be the same price, when do you think you'll be able to kinda have a letter of intent? Thanks.

Yeah. Hey, thanks for the question, Tim. First of all, the period between contract signing and closing has actually been shortened at the purchaser's request. You know, normally you would have a window of up to 90 days from binding agreement to sale. This is substantially shorter than that, and that's what gives us confidence that we will end up closing this in early summer. Then in terms of the other data centers, we are in discussions with multiple counterparties, some for just 1 facility, some for several. Some are in kind of a backup position to the current party and, you know, we've informed them of the likelihood that the current party is moving forward.

You know, we have tried to focus our data center resources on getting this initial 10 centers over the finish line. For the remaining 14, we'll hopefully be in a position to, you know, work more expeditiously to getting some of those deals moved along. We've really tried to keep resources focused on getting this deal closed.

Dave, on the wavelength side, could you give us your best guess then on when you think you could hit 25% share? Can you just talk about the dynamics of where you are winning share? Is this new builds? Is it when contracts expire? Is it, you know, moves, or is it because they're increasing from 10 meg to 100? You know, any more color would be great.

Yeah. Hey, first of all, it's kind of all of the above in terms of our wins. We are winning existing waves with customers that are frustrated with their current supplier. We are winning waves from customers who are increasing their throughput. We are winning waves due to locations shifting and the breadth of our footprint. We are winning brand new builds, particularly from hyperscalers and neo clouds which are new to the market. You know, with regard to getting to a 25% market share, you know, we feel very confident that we will achieve that level. Doing it in a little over 2 years does become harder as, you know, we see the current rate of installs not being accepted by customers. We are working as diligently as we can to install if customers are ready to accept.

You know, I think, you know, we'll need another quarter or two to be able to definitively answer that question. We do see a significant pent-up demand for the locations, the routes, and the price points that we are offering.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from a line of Nick Del Deo from MoffettNathanson. Your line is open.

Hey. Morning, Dave.

Hey.

Turning back to CapEx, just to be clear, was all the increase this quarter versus what you've guided to, attributable to higher prices? Were there, you know, more units of equipment you purchased or inventory build, anything like that going on?

Yeah. As I mentioned, in Walt's answer, you know, our CapEx was down $13 million on a year-over-year basis. That was probably about half of the level of reduction that we would have anticipated and would've been, you know, kind of on plan. I would say that the majority of the overruns came from price increases, there was also some pre-ordering of equipment that, you know, we're concerned about delivery schedules on. We have probably increased our forward purchases almost double what we would normally do, as shipping windows have stretched from normally, somewhere between 60 and 90 days. We actually have one vendor today quoting 15 months for deliveries on key items. Another vendor quoting, you know, 9 to 12 months. These were items that historically would ship in 2 to 3 months.

We are also pre-ordering, just based on these elongated shipment windows. I would say the majority of the increase came from price increases to date.

Okay. That's helpful. Thanks for sharing that. Separately on the corporate front, you know, we see from various data providers that, you know, leasing in certain metro areas in the U.S. is, you know, has ticked up quite noticeably as vacancy rates are coming down and whatnot. You know, I'm wondering if you're seeing improving corporate sales trends in those markets and, you know, if so, what that might suggest about corporate growth perspectively.

Yeah. Our footprint is heavily concentrated in Class A buildings, which tend to be the first buildings to recover leasing activity. The aggregate vacancy rate in our footprint still remains about triple what it had been historically pre-COVID. While it is improving, it is improving at a slow pace. Our corporate organic business is growing at around 4% to 5% annually. The decline in corporate has been almost exclusively an off-net and almost exclusively former Sprint customers. You know, our aggregate Cogent revenue in the 3 years since deal closing has grown at 28%. That results in about an 8% compounded growth rate. That is obviously helped by wavelength sales and IPv4 leasing. We have seen improvement in corporate on-net growth. We have not seen a significant improvement in corporate off-net, even for Cogent sales.

We are continuing to see a decline in off-net Sprint corporate, as well as a even more accelerated rate of decline in Sprint Enterprise, which is now Cogent Enterprise and is roughly 88% off-net.

Okay. Thanks, Dave.

Hey, thanks, Nick.

There are no further questions. I will now turn the call back over to Dave Schaeffer for closing remarks.

Hey, thank you all very much. We appreciate everyone taking the interest in Cogent, and we look forward to seeing you at some conferences soon. Take care, all. We'll talk soon. Thanks. Bye-bye.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.

Good morning, and welcome to the Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Earnings Conference Call. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded, and it will be available for replay at www.cogent.com. A transcript of this conference call will be posted on Cogent’s website when it becomes available. Cogent’s summary of financial and operational results attached to its press release can be downloaded from the Cogent website. I would now like to turn the call over to Dave Schaeffer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. Please go ahead. Hey. Thank you, and good morning to everyone. Welcome to our fourth quarter 2025, full year 2025 conference call.

I am Dave Schaeffer, Cogent’s CEO. And with me on today’s call is Thaddeus G. Weed, our Chief Financial Officer. I would like to highlight a few key events and significant matters in the quarter. I would like to be able to go through these metrics to help you understand better our business. We are continuing to increase our margins. Our increase in gross margin and EBITDA margins have been driven by cost reductions and a rotation to more profitable on-net products. In 2023, the first full quarter Cogent was combined with Sprint wireline revenues or combined revenues by connection type for the third quarter versus this quarter have changed materially. Our on-net revenues were 47% of our revenues in 2023. Our total on-net revenues as a percentage of revenues has increased from 47% of revenues in 2023 to 61% of revenues this quarter. Our off-net revenues were 48% of our total revenues in 2023 immediately after the combination of Sprint and Cogent. Our off-net revenues as a percentage of our total revenues have decreased from 48% of revenues down to 39% of total revenues this quarter. And our non-core revenues were 5% of total revenues in 2023, our non-core revenues as a percentage of our total revenues have decreased to less than 1% of our revenues this quarter. I would like to take a moment and outline our progress in our Wavelength sales. At year end, we are offering wavelength services in 1,068 locations, all capable of 10 gigabit, 100 gigabit, and 400 gigabit services with provisioning intervals of approximately 30 days. As of today, we have actually increased our service footprint to 1,096 locations. Our Wavelength revenue for the quarter was $12,100,000, a 74% year-over-year increase compared to the comparable quarter in 2024. Our sequential Wavelength revenue growth accelerated and increased by 19%. That is better than the 12% sequential increase in Q3 over Q2. Our wavelength customers increased by 18% sequentially to 2,064 connections at the end of the quarter. Our Wavelength revenue for the full year 2025, which was the first full year we were selling Wavelength services across our footprint, was $38,500,000, an increase of 100% from the 2024 number. Our wavelength customers during that period increased by 85%. As of the end of the quarter, we had sold wavelengths in 518 locations compared to 454 locations at the ’3. We continue to anticipate capturing 25% of the highly concentrated wavelength market in North America. Now for a few comments on margins. Our EBITDA as adjusted for the quarter increased by $3,000,000 to $76,700,000. Our EBITDA as adjusted margins for the quarter increased sequentially by 140 basis points to 31.9%. Our increased margins continue to come from our cost reductions as well as our product optimization. Our EBITDA as adjusted for the full year 2025 was $55,600,000. Our EBITDA as adjusted then adding back the payments under the T-Mobile transit agreement. Our decrease in EBITDA as adjusted was as a result of the $104,200,000 reduction in our IP transit payments from T-Mobile and a reduction of $21,400,000 for other reimbursable Sprint acquisition costs that we incurred in 2024. There were no Sprint acquisition costs in full year 2025. The $104,200,000 reduction in scheduled payments and $21,400,000 reduction in these acquisition costs more than offset the organic growth of $70,000,000 in Cogent’s EBITDA or EBITDA Classic for full year 2025. Our EBITDA Classic for 2025 was $192,000,000.8. For the full year of 2024, it was $122,800,000. Our EBITDA as adjusted margins were 30% for the full year 2025, down from 33.6 for the full year 2024 because of the reductions that I just previously mentioned. Our EBITDA Classic margins, however, for full year 2025 were 19.8%, up from 11.9% for full year 2024, or an improvement of approximately 840 basis points on a year-over-year basis. Under our IP transit agreement with T-Mobile, we will continue to receive an additional 23 monthly payments of $8,300,000 per month until November 2027. There are further cash payments related to lease obligations we assumed at closing of at minimum $28,000,000. This $28,000,000 payment is to be made by T-Mobile in four equal monthly payments from December 2027 through March 2028. Now for a comment on our improvement in leverage. We have refined our capital allocation priorities and strengthened our financial flexibility and accelerated our delevering strategy. Leverage ratios have improved. Our gross debt leverage as adjusted for amounts due from T-Mobile for the last twelve months EBITDA as adjusted ratio was 7.35 as compared to 7.45 in the previous quarter. Our net debt ratio was 6.64 in Q4 compared to 6.65 in 2025. We believe that the amounts due from T-Mobile under our transit and purchase agreement should be considered in calculating our leverage ratios. We believe that these amounts essentially represent both long-term and short-term cash on our balance sheet and are discounted appropriately. And due to T-Mobile’s credit rating and payment history, we are confident that these payments will continue to be made in a timely manner. T-Mobile pays us $25,000,000 a quarter through 2027 under this IP services agreement. The monthly payments from T-Mobile under the IP transit agreement reduce from the balances that are due each month as they are received. Now for a couple of comments on our improved IPv4 leasing activity. Our IPv4 leasing revenue increased 44% year over year to $64,500,000 for full year 2025. We are currently leasing 15,300,000 addresses at year end. This is an increase of 2,200,000 incremental addresses or 17% on a year-over-year basis. We have title to 37,800,000 IPv4 addresses. Our capital expenditures for 2025 once our data center modernization program had been completed was $73,300,000, as compared to $114,300,000 for 2025. This $41,000,000 decrease was due to the completion of a significant amount of reconfiguration work in our Sprint-acquired facilities. We have converted these facilities into data centers in the first six months of 2025 as well as the last six months of 2024. We have converted a total of 125 facilities. At year end, we are providing services in 1,715 carrier-neutral data centers as well as the 187 Cogent data centers. The Cogent data centers have an aggregate capacity of 213 megawatts of installed and available power. Now as many of you know, we have intended to monetize and sell 24 of these facilities that we view as surplus. We acquired these facilities through the acquisition of Sprint. And we intend to monetize them through either outright sale or leasing on a wholesale basis. The nonbinding letter of intent we mentioned on our last call was not finalized due to a change in the original terms, not in price, but a requirement by the purchaser for Cogent to provide a portion of the purchase price in terms of owner financing, which we found unacceptable. We reverted to some of our backup agreements and are in active discussions with multiple parties for multiple offers across a broad set of these data centers. We do expect several of these to result in multisite acquisition offers. Now for a moment about our leverage and balance sheet strategy. Our 2027 June unsecured notes of $750,000,000 are still roughly eighteen months from maturity, but we have begun receiving proposals to refinance these notes. We intend to complete a refinancing transaction for new secured notes of $750,000,000 as soon as the make-whole period expires in June. Now for our long-term goals. We anticipate our revenue growth to continue to improve and be in the 6% to 8% range, we expect our rate of EBITDA margin to actually moderate to roughly 200 basis points a year that we will be able to deliver over a multiyear period. The nearly 800 basis points that we delivered this year was due to some extraordinary cost savings. And while we will continue to deliver these results, we do expect the rate of margin expansion to moderate. Our revenue and EBITDA guidance are meant to be multiyear goals and not intended to either be quarterly or even annual guidance. Now I would like to turn the call over to Thaddeus G. Weed to provide some further detail and provide our safe harbor language. Ted will also give a further breakout of the trends and the revenues acquired from the Sprint base versus the Cogent Classic base since our acquisition in 2023. I know this has been an area of focus of investors and we have been able to disaggregate those revenues and now present them with clear trends and metrics. With that, we will then open the call up for questions and answers. Task.

Thank you, Dave, and good morning to everyone.

This earnings conference call includes forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based upon our current intent, belief, and expectations. These forward-looking statements and all other statements that may be made on this call that are not historical facts are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially. Please refer to our SEC filings for more information on the factors that could cause actual results to differ. Cogent undertakes no obligation to update or revise our forward-looking statements. If we use non-GAAP financial measures during this call, you will find these reconciled to the corresponding GAAP measurement in our earnings releases that are posted on our website at cogentco.com. Some overall comments on results and revenues. So our total revenue for the quarter was $200,140,500, and $975,800,000 for the year. Our total revenue for the quarter declined sequentially by $1,400,000 or by 0.6%. This was an improvement from the $4,300,000 or 1.7% sequential quarterly revenue decline that we experienced last quarter. While our sequential revenue declined within our fourth quarter, our total revenue increased each month in the quarter. Our total monthly revenue increased from September to October, increased from October to November, and excluding a change in USF revenues, increased from November to December. This month-to-month total revenue increase continued from December 2025 to January 2026. There was a negative FX impact on our quarter sequentially revenues of $200,000. So for the quarter, we experienced a $2,200,000 sequential decline in off-net revenues. Our on-net revenues, including on-net wave revenues, increased by $900,000 or 0.6% and our non-core revenues decreased by $200,000 and now those revenues have declined to only $1,200,000. Sequential wavelength revenue growth, which is on-net, accelerated to 18.8% from 12.4% last quarter, and increased sequentially by $1,900,000. Gross margin. Our gross margin for the quarter increased sequentially by $1,600,000 to $112,500,000. Our gross margin increased sequentially by 100 basis points to 46.8% from continued cost reduction and product optimization, including our focus on our on-net products. Our gross margin for full year 2025 increased by $46,700,000 to $442,700,000. And our gross margin for full year 2025 increased by 720 basis points from 38.2% last year to 45.4% for full year 2025. EBITDA. Our EBITDA, not including payments under the IP transit agreement for the quarter, increased sequentially by $3,000,000 to $51,700,000, and our EBITDA margin increased by 130 basis points to 21.5%. Our EBITDA for the full year, not including the IP transit agreement or Sprint acquisition cost, increased by $70,000,000 to $192,800,000 from $122,800,000 for full year 2024. And the EBITDA margin for this year increased by 790 basis points from 11.9% to 19.8% for full year 2025. We analyze and classify our revenues into four network connection types, and three customer types. Our four network connection types are on-net, off-net, wavelength, and non-core. And our three customer types are NetCentric customers, corporate customers, and enterprise customers. Dave mentioned we will provide some information on Sprint wireline acquired revenue and Cogent Classic revenue. We have been hesitant to separately disclose our revenue performance related to our acquired Sprint wireline business and our Cogent Classic business once the operations have been fully integrated. However, we believe that the following analysis will be beneficial and explain some of the changes in our total combined revenues. The substantial changes in the acquired Sprint wireline revenue base have masked the underlying performance of our legacy Cogent Classic business. So in May 2023, when we closed the transaction, the Sprint wireline revenue base had a run rate of $39,400,000 per month or $118,000,000 per quarter. This acquired revenue base has decreased from that $118,000,000 per quarter at the acquisition date down to $43,000,000 for this quarter. That is a $75,000,000 quarterly revenue decline related to the Sprint wireline revenue base or 64% decline since the deal closed. At deal closing, our Cogent Classic revenue run rate was $155,000,000 per quarter. This quarterly revenue base has increased by 27% or by $42,000,000 from that $155,000,000 prior to close to $197,000,000 for this quarter, the 2025. Additionally, our Cogent Classic revenues increased sequentially by 1.5% from the third quarter of this year, increased year over year by 3.1% from 2024, and increased by 2.3% for full year 2025 over full year 2024. Our consolidated revenue declines have been largely attributed to the reduction in the acquired corporate and enterprise revenues from Sprint. At closing, the Sprint wireline revenues represented a total of 42% of our total revenues and that percentage has materially dropped from 42% down to only 18% of our total revenues at year end. Our total corporate business was 42.7% of our revenues this quarter and 43.9% for the year. Our quarterly corporate revenues decreased by 9.1% year over year and sequentially by 2.3%. For the year, our total corporate revenues declined by 9.7%. At the closing of our acquisition of Sprint wireline in May 2023, the Sprint wireline corporate revenues were 30% of our total revenues. Those Sprint wireline acquired corporate customers now represent only 10% of our total corporate revenues. The Sprint wireline acquired corporate revenue base has decreased from a run rate of $13,000,000 per month or $39,000,000 per quarter at closing to a run rate of $2,700,000 per month or $8,100,000 per quarter at year end 2025. Same analysis for NetCentric. Our total NetCentric business continues to increase and benefit from the growth in video traffic, activity related to artificial intelligence, streaming, IPv4 leasing, and wavelength sales. Our NetCentric business was 43% of our revenues this quarter and 40.3% for the year. Our quarterly NetCentric revenues increased by 10.4% year over year and sequentially by 3.1%. For the year, our total NetCentric revenues increased by 6.8%. At the closing of our acquisition of Sprint wireline, the Sprint wireline NetCentric customers represented 20% of our total NetCentric revenues. Those Sprint wireline acquired NetCentric customers now are representing only 7% of our total NetCentric revenues this quarter. The Sprint wireline acquired NetCentric customer revenue base has decreased from a run rate of $6,000,000 per month or $18,000,000 per quarter at closing to a current run rate of $2,900,000 per month or $8,700,000 per quarter at year end 2025. Lastly, the enterprise business. Our total enterprise business was 14.3% of our revenues this quarter and 15.8% of our revenues for the year. Our quarterly enterprise revenue decreased by 24.7% year over year and sequentially by 5.8% primarily due to reduction in the acquired non-core and off-net low-margin enterprise revenues. For the year, total enterprise revenues declined by 20.3%. At the closing of our acquisition, the Sprint wireline enterprise customers represented virtually 100% of our enterprise revenues as this was a new line of customer for Cogent. The Sprint wireline acquired enterprise revenue base has decreased from a run rate of $20,000,000 per month or $60,000,000 per quarter at closing to a current run rate of $8,800,000 per month or $26,400,000 per quarter at year end 2025. These substantial changes in the acquired wireline revenue base have masked the underlying performance of our legacy Cogent Classic business. Analysis on revenue by customer connection network type. On-net revenue. We serve our on-net customers in 3,579 total on-net buildings. For the year, we increased our on-net buildings by a total of 126 on-net buildings, similar to prior years. Our total on-net revenue, including on-net wave revenues, was $146,400,000 for the quarter, a year-over-year increase of 7.8% and a sequential increase of 0.6%. Our total on-net revenues, including on-net wavelength revenues, increased as a percentage of our total revenue by 400 basis points to 58.4% for this year from 54.4% for full year 2024. Off-net revenue. Our low-margin off-net revenue was $92,900,000 for the quarter, that was a year-over-year decrease of 17.9% and a sequential decrease of 2.3%. Our off-net revenue results are impacted by the migration of certain off-net customers to on-net, and the continued grooming and termination of acquired low-margin off-net contracts. Our total off-net revenues decreased to 40.7% of our revenues for this year from 43.8% for full year 2024. Some comments on pricing. Our average price per megabit for our installed base decreased sequentially by 12% to $0.14 and by 34% year over year, essentially in line with historical trends. Our average price per megabit for our new customer contracts were $0.06, a sequential decline of 18% and 46% year over year. ARPUs for the quarter. Our on-net IP ARPU was $509. Our off-net IP ARPU was $1,234. Our wavelength ARPU was $2,114. Our IPv4 ARPU was $0.30 per address. Churn rates. Our churn rates improved sequentially. Our on-net and off-net churn rates improved from last quarter. Our on-net unit monthly churn rate this quarter was 1.2% compared to 1.3% last quarter. Our off-net unit monthly churn rate was 1.9%, compared to 2.1% last quarter, and our wavelength monthly churn rate has been less than 0.5%, so relatively insignificant. Traffic. Our year-over-year IP network traffic growth accelerated for the quarter. Our IP network traffic for the quarter increased sequentially by 4% and by 10% year over year, and for the total year, our traffic increased by 9%. Sales rep productivity. Our sales rep productivity was 4.1 units this quarter compared to 4.6 last quarter and 3.5 in 2024, as compared to our long-term sales rep productivity average of 4.8. Foreign currency. Our revenue earned outside of the United States was about 20% of our revenues this quarter, similar to prior quarters. Based upon the average euro and Canadian conversion rates so far this quarter, so 2026, we estimate that the FX conversion impact on sequential revenues would be positive about $400,000 and year over year, more significant, about $3,500,000. Customer concentration. Our revenue and customer base is not highly concentrated. Our top 25 customers were 17% of our revenues this quarter, similar to prior quarters. CapEx. Our CapEx was $37,000,000 this quarter and $187,600,000 for the year. And principal payments on capital leases were $8,500,000 for the quarter and $33,800,000 for the year. Combined, those amounts have declined year over year. Comments on debt and debt ratios. Our total gross debt at par, $123,400,000 of finance lease obligations under long-term IRUs, was $2,400,000,000 at year end. Our net debt, total net debt of our cash and our $203,100,000 due from T-Mobile at year end, was $1,900,000,000. Our leverage ratio as calculated under our more restrictive covenants under our unsecured $750,000,000 2027 notes indenture was 6.13. The secured leverage ratio was 3.8. And the fixed coverage ratio was 2.38. The definition of consolidated cash flow, similar to EBITDA, under our $600,000,000 secured 2032 notes indenture includes cash payments under our IP transit services agreement with T-Mobile in the definition and determination of consolidated cash flow. Payments under our IP transit agreement were $100,000,000 for the last twelve months, so that is added to the calculation. Our leverage ratio as calculated under the $600,000,000 secured 2032 notes indenture was 4.67. Our secured leverage ratio was 2.9, and lastly, fixed coverage was 3.12. Bad debt and days sales. Our days sales outstanding was 30 days at year end, the same as last quarter. And our bad debt expense was less than 1% of our revenues for the quarter and for the year. And with that, I will turn the call back over to Dave.

Hey. Thanks, Tad. I would like to highlight a few of the strengths of our network, our customer base, and our sales force. Now for some details around our NetCentric performance. We continue to be a direct beneficiary of a number of trends in the industry, whether it be artificial intelligence or streaming activity. At year end, we are able to sell wavelength services in 1,068 data centers across North America with a provisioning interval of approximately 30 days. At year end, we are selling IP services globally in 57 countries and 1,902 data centers. At year end, we were directly connected to 7,659 networks, that is the largest number of directly connected networks of any service provider on the Internet. 22 of these were peers, and the remaining 7,637 networks were, in fact, Cogent transit customers. Now for some details around our sales force. We remain focused on sales force productivity and are disciplined about managing out underperformers. Our sales force turnover rate was 5.4% a month in the quarter, down from a peak turnover rate of 8.7% during the height of the pandemic, and also below our historical average turnover rate of 5.7% of the sales force per month. At year end, we had a total of 590 quota-bearing reps. Our sales force included 289 sales professionals focused entirely on the NetCentric market, 289 sales professionals focused on the corporate market, and finally, 12 sales professionals focused on the enterprise market. In summary, we have made significant progress in a number of areas. We have improved our revenue trajectory and performance and have returned to sequential revenue growth, which we expect to continue. We are improving our margins and growing our EBITDA due to our diligence in cost reduction and our focus in selling profitable on-net services. Over 80% of our sales in 2025 were for on-net services. We have a clear plan to refinance our 2027 $750,000,000 unsecured notes with a new longer-duration $750,000,000 secured note offering. We are actively working to monetize some of the acquired Sprint facilities, which will further accelerate our delevering and allow us to resume a more aggressive return of capital program to our equity holders. We have effectively now completed the integration of Sprint and Cogent’s network into a unified network and business. We have converted all of the intended Sprint switch sites that we intend to convert into data centers. This program is materially complete and will result in a continued reduction in our capital intensity. We are enthusiastic and optimistic about our wavelength business to add to our product portfolio. Our wavelength services are differentiated due to the uniqueness of the routes, the breadth of our footprint, our efficient provisioning, and aggressive pricing. The reliability that we deliver is unparalleled. We have since inception offered superior services, a broad footprint of revenue-rich locations, expedited provisioning, and market-leading disruptive pricing. That is why Cogent continues to be a market leader in the products that we sell. With that, I would like to open the floor up for questions.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question and answer session. At this time, I would like to give an instruction. In order to ask a question, please press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. And if you would like to withdraw your question, simply press star one again. Our first question comes from the line of Christopher Joseph Schoell with UBS. Please go ahead. Great. Thank you. Dave, you had previously talked about returning to

sequential revenue growth while sustaining sequential EBITDA growth each quarter. Can you just update us how you are thinking about total company revenues and EBITDA for 2026 as that Sprint mix continues to fall? And as we think about the Waves business scaling in 2026, any guardrails you can share on the number of or revenues you believe are achievable based on what you are seeing in the business right now? Thank you.

Yeah. Hey. Thanks for the questions, Chris. So as we mentioned, we are not in the habit of giving specific quarterly or annual guidance. But I do believe that after the significant runoff in the Sprint-acquired revenues, as Tad pointed out, 64% of the revenues that we acquired two and a half years ago have attrited. And during that period, the Cogent revenues, which represented 57% of the combined company, had grown at 27%. As a result of that, we have had now about 10 sequential quarters of revenue growth. We will be back to positive revenue growth on a quarterly basis from this point forward, and we anticipate that the annual rate of growth on average over a multiyear period will be in that 6% to 8% range. We also have a small amount of further cost reductions that will contribute to margin expansion. But the primary driver of margin expansion going forward will continue to be the revenue mix shift and the focus on on-net services. You know, 80% of our sales in the quarter were on-net. We have improved the base from 47% on-net immediately after closing to 61%. We think that percentage will continue to improve and allow us to achieve that, at minimum, 200 basis point rate of margin expansion. The reality is we did nearly 800 basis points last year. That is probably not sustainable over a multiyear period. But we do have some tailwinds there. And then for your question around Wave, you know, we have the largest North American Wave footprint. We are beginning to gain credibility with customers. We saw an acceleration in our revenue recognition and installations. We expect those trends to continue. And because our wavelength products are virtually all on-net, they are significant contributors to our margin expansion. Another way to kind of look at the markets that we operate in, in our on-net multi-tenant footprint, we today have about a 35% market share. That means we can continue to grow there but, you know, it is harder because we already have over a third of the Cogent customers. In the NetCentric market for IP services, we are the largest provider globally and have 25% market share. We will continue to gain share and grow that business, but, again, you know, with 25% share, it becomes incrementally more difficult. What is encouraging to us about wavelength is the fact that we have less than 2% market share in North America. We are now establishing our credibility with 518 sites now having actual reference customers in them. And nearly 1,100 sites wave-enabled, we think that our rate of wavelength growth will accelerate and help us try okay. Thanks, Chris. That kind of 80/20 mix and incremental business.

Great. Thank you, Dave.

Our next question comes from the line of Gregory Bradford Williams with TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Hey. Good morning. Sam on for Greg Williams. Thanks for taking our questions. Two, if I may. First, the Waves business, you mentioned before that the goal is to get the funnel to Waves funnel to about 10,000. Is the idea to get the funnel to 10,000, it kind of stays in that range because you install the backlog as it comes in? Or do you expect the funnel to grow from there? And, second, on data centers. You mentioned the contract changes that pushed out the LOI for the two data center assets mentioned on the 3Q call. Is the expectation this transaction will still close? And if so, is the $44,000,000 a taxable event, or is there some sort of tax shield from the Sprint deal? Thanks.

Yeah. Let me take those in reverse order. On the LOI that we announced last quarter, the counterparty came back to us and looked for us to provide more than 50% of the agreed-to purchase price in owner financing. Since we had a number of other interested parties who had submitted backup offers on those two facilities as well as a broader set of facilities, we decided to terminate that agreement at our choice, you know, and then reengage with some of those parties. We are far along in those negotiations and hope to be able to announce something soon. And that announcement may be for a broader set of assets. Now to the tax consequences, I will let Tad touch on that.

Sure. So as a reminder, we paid only $1 for the Sprint business. So the tax basis is essentially the assumed liabilities, which is minimal in both the buildings and the network that was acquired. However, we have material NOLs this year from the tax bill, from 2025, and given the bonus depreciation deduction, we expect to continue to incur tax losses to offset any gain on the buildings going forward. So while it is a taxable event creating taxable income, I do not think on a net basis that will result in income taxes being paid.

And now, Sam, I will touch on your Wave question. You know, while we were in the process of enabling the footprint, we felt it was critical to give funnel KPIs to show expressions of interest by customers. We have tried to be clear with investors that we do not give funnel data, you know, routinely for our other products, and we are treating wavelengths now as any other product. Now we do, in our investor presentation, typically show both our on-net and off-net conversion rates for the previous quarter. We intend to continue to do that. Our funnel is continuing to grow. But we will not be reporting specific numbers. But we do anticipate with the footprint that we now have and the credibility that we are earning with existing customers, we are starting to see a larger percentage of their wave opportunities being shown to us for bid, and as a result of that, we will close more and see further acceleration in the Waves business.

Great. Thank you both.

Our next question comes from the line of Sebastiano Petty with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Thanks for taking the question. Dave, just a quick follow-up on the Waves business there. Could you update us on the level of the installed but not yet billed balance in the quarter, did that grow off of the third quarter? Because I think last earnings you probably talked about maybe a few hundred waves that have been installed but not yet billed. And so what is the progress there? And then I have a follow-up.

Yeah. Hey, Sebastiano. So two points. First of all, in the quarter, we actually saw the unit number of waves improve, which is an indication that we were eating into that backlog, but we also have been building an additional backlog. And I would say that the installed but not yet billed base is comparable this quarter to where it was at the end of third quarter.

Got it. That is helpful. And then, I guess, maybe just help us think about, back to the data centers to some extent. I mean, I think you did mention that there were some other data centers that had been in active discussions last quarter. And so while the LOI that you just spoke of, I think from third quarter, that is kind of now been terminated, what was the progress on some of the other, I guess, remaining data centers that were in active discussions? Did those progress? And I guess maybe help us think about, as you look at your debt refinancing and the stack later this year, I mean, yes, you talked about trying to perhaps refinance with $750,000,000 of secured, I mean, is there some level of assumed cash proceeds from asset sales anticipated in the intervening period as well? Which probably helps, you know, maybe reduce the prevailing interest rate you might get at that time. Thank you.

Yeah. So, really, three different questions. The first one is, some of the backup offers on the two facilities that we had mentioned previously cover those facilities and others. So some parties were not particularly interested in moving forward without those facilities potentially being included. So it was not a one-for-one, meaning that there was a backup just for the two facilities that were under LOI. And our view was that while there was no difference of opinion on price, we felt that we would be better served with an all-cash purchase rather than one that had us taking more than 50% of the purchase price in the form of a secured note against the assets. In our refinancing, we are not assuming that there will be proceeds from the data center sales. Although, I do think there will be some proceeds. They are not baked into the point that I made around the timing of the refinancing. You know, our plan is to refinance the unsecured notes with secured notes dollar-for-dollar, no increase or decrease in aggregate face value, and do that in a way that allows us to avoid paying the make-whole, which would be due in June of, anytime between now and mid-June, of about $13,000,000. The final point I will make on that is that the proceeds for the data center sale would be reflected as cash on our entire balance sheet. But the proceeds do not go into Cogent Group, which is the borrower group of both the secured and unsecured debt. We may elect to contribute some of that cash to Group, but we are well within the coverage ratios both in terms of secured total indebtedness, and also in debt service coverage. So there is no requirement for us to contribute that capital, but it would be available at an unrestricted sister entity, Cogent Infrastructure. And therefore, could be used to either inject that capital into Cogent Group, the borrower, or dividend back to Cogent Holdings, which can then be used for the benefit of shareholders.

Thank you, Dave.

Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Frank Garrett Louthan with Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Great. Thank you. So on the data center, I think you had originally kind of focused on $9,000,000 or $10,000,000 per megawatt. I mean, what do you think the market is for that now? And why not maybe try and lease those out and then get a multiple on that value? And then what additional room do you have on pricing and maybe leasing additional IPv4 licenses? Thank you.

Hey. Hey, Frank. Let me take those again in reverse order. In terms of IPv4 leasing, we saw a material acceleration in our leasing but a lower price as we did two wholesale transactions of large blocks. We are continuing both on a retail and wholesale strategy. Today, about 46% of our addresses are leased and approximately 4% of our addresses are allocated to customers at no cost. This is nothing new. It has been part of our strategy to win business since, you know, Cogent’s inception. But we do still have half of our address space that is sitting fallow. We have greatly improved the marketability of that address space by being able to deploy RPKI or additional security features across those addresses, which have made them more desirable to counterparties. And we anticipate continuing to see growth in our IPv4 leasing business. The 44% year-over-year growth in that business, again, was extraordinary. I am not sure we can repeat that. But we will continue to see further growth. Out to the data centers, you know, I think when we established a go-to-market strategy, in 2024 and announced that we were going to begin the capital investment to convert these facilities, we looked at both public trading comps as well as transactions in the private market. If anything, over the past year, data center space has become more scarce and valuations have improved. Now we are fully conscious of the fact that our data centers are repurposed switch sites and not purpose-built campuses, which are different and attract a different customer base. We had done a minimal amount of leasing and have been focused mostly on the sales process. I think we feel that based on the number of sites that are in active discussion and a number of counterparties, that we will absolutely be monetizing through sale a significant portion of the footprint. And in terms of exact price per megawatt, we are not going to disclose that because that would impact our ability to maximize value through these negotiations. But as Tad pointed out, other than the capital that we have invested, we have no real basis in these assets. And, in fact, because the assets sit at Cogent Infrastructure, they represent a negative EBITDA cost that is not burdening the borrower Cogent Group, but is a drag on the entire complex. And by selling these data centers, we both get the cash proceeds as well as a reduction in operating expenses.

Great. Thank you very much.

Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Brandon Nispel with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thanks for taking the question, and, you know, I appreciate the analysis on the Sprint revenue versus Cogent Classic. Wanted to understand and ask a few questions there. First, maybe just can you help us understand how you came up with that? Because I think in the past, you have said it is sort of difficult or impossible to delineate between the two businesses once you integrated. Second, you know, what changed versus your expectations? I think, Dave, when you closed that acquisition, you said you would probably, you know, be more of a run rate of $350,000,000 versus a $190,000,000 annualized run rate that you gave us today. And then do you think the bottom is? What do you think that business does in terms of revenue in 2026? Thanks.

I will take those again in reverse order. One, I think that business is continuing to deteriorate, both based on the nature of the customers and the discipline that we have applied to ensuring that the services we sell have an adequate margin. While we realized that the off-net enterprise customer base is inherently less profitable, in fact, even after a diligent effort of trying to bring enterprise business on-net, we have only been able to get to an 88% off-net and 12% on-net mix, because many of these enterprises operate globally across a footprint that is just not economic to bring on-net. And therefore, we are going to be saddled with that lower-margin portion of our revenue stream, but we do intend to make sure that the margins are adequate. We have virtually completed the burn-off of the non-core products and the vast majority of the undesirable revenue. But with that said, we are still experiencing significant monthly and quarterly sequential degradation in that business. You know, I, you know, had projected the 10.9% rate of decline that we were seeing from Sprint. We thought that we could maintain that rate of decline and migrate customers to more profitable products. What we, in fact, found was that many of those customers actually intended to go away independent of our acquisition at an accelerating rate, and then that was further compounded by the discipline that we apply. You know? I think it will continue to decline. We will continue to report on it. Now in terms of why we did this and how, it was a very arduous and manual task. We had to go into the nearly 1,300 acquired customers and look at every individual order on an order-by-order basis. It was a very manual process. But I do believe based on concerns I was hearing from investors that this was an extremely important metric that they cared about, and we then basically invested what was effectively a full-time person to do this analysis. We will be able to do this going forward, and I think it gives an investor a better lens on how Cogent’s business is performing versus the acquired business, as well as the mix shift that we are focused on and being more on-net. You know? The way to improve our cash flow going forward is growth in top line, but growth in top line of more profitable business. And, you know, the 80% on-net that we sold in Q4 is actually better than we did the quarter before we acquired Sprint. So in 2023, we actually only were 76% on and 24% off. So this focus on on-net is going to be a significant driver of margin expansion.

I will just add one thing to the complexity. So when we acquired the business under the TSA, T-Mobile was billing the customers on our behalf through their billing system. We worked an incredible effort to bring all of those customers into our billing systems. We had one billing system for November 2023. But for that period from close, so May 2023 through October ’23, we were relying on the information that we got from T-Mobile billing on our behalf. So bifurcating that and post billing on our system was complicated. I will just leave it at that.

Understood. And if I could just follow up with one quick one, where would you estimate the EBITDA contribution of the Sprint business is today?

I think it is close to zero, but slightly positive, but still far below our aggregate margins. It is probably in the zero to 5% range. But we are working on improving that. That does include, in some cases, price increases.

Sorry. The next question comes from the line of Nicholas Del Deo with MoffettNathanson. Please go ahead.

Oh, hey. Morning, guys. A couple questions on the data center front. Dave, you were explicit that the LOI fell apart because of the demand to help you finance it? I recall that one of the due diligence items that the counterparty needed to complete was confirming power availability from the utilities. Was that availability confirmed?

It was confirmed by that party, and we have now made the data available to the backup providers to go through the same confirmation process. But the reason why we did not move forward with the previous LOI was not a negotiation on price. They got comfortable with both the power availability and title to the actual land, which were their two big concerns. And they just came back and tried to have us provide them financing even though when we executed the LOI, they had assured us that they had proof of funds and the wherewithal to pay all cash. They were just trying to magnify their returns through owner financing.

Got it. Are you able to share when the LOI fell apart? And if you do have, you know, new deals in hand soon as you suggested, should we expect the press release to announce those? Or would you disclose those on your next earnings call, some other conference presentation or something?

You know, I think we would probably announce it in a stand-alone announcement. And I do think we anticipate something, you know, in the next couple of months. That is probably as specific as I can be. But, you know, unless it was, you know, a day or two before the earnings call, I think we would probably announce it separately. And then to when the LOI fell apart, it was fairly recent. There was a negotiation. They had made the request. We went back and, you know, were trying to keep them moving forward under the original terms. But, eventually, earlier this year, we became convinced that they were not going to move forward unless we provided financing.

Okay. Okay. And then can I ask a couple about the legacy Cogent versus legacy Sprint revenue splits? So it looks like, you know, you are talking about a $42,000,000 growth in quarterly legacy Cogent revenue from the time of the deal closing to today. Looks like over that time, your quarterly IPv4 revenue is up about $9,000,000. Waves are now at about $12,000,000. So that would imply that about half the revenue growth was from those two line items and about half came from, call it, the core products that you focused on pre-deal. Is that a fair way to think about it? And is it correct to assume that the, okay. Yeah. Okay. Good. And the T-Mobile CSA revenue, is that in the Sprint bucket?

No. It is not. That was revenue that did not exist previously and was a drag to our revenue. You know, I guess it was about $400,000 for the quarter last quarter, and I think at peak, it was almost $6,000,000. So that was the services we were providing to T-Mobile that we had previously never provided, and it was not to a Sprint customer. It was to T-Mobile, but they have been able to reduce their reliance on our paid services by about 93%, 94%. But that remaining $400,000 is in there. So, in fact, the underlying Cogent revenue growth probably would have been a little better if we had excluded the CSA both initially and today.

Okay. Got it. That is helpful. And if I can squeeze in one more quick one about the IPv4 leasing revenue. So the revenue was down a little bit quarter over quarter despite the addresses leased being up noticeably. Can you just talk about the dynamics there?

It was actually pretty simple. One of the parties that took the large wholesale block had a small retail block with us. It was the timing of when we terminated that retail agreement and converted it to wholesale in conjunction with a much larger purchase.

Okay. Got it. Great. Thanks, Dave.

Hey. Thanks, Dan. Our next question comes from the line of Michael Ian Rollins with Citi.

Thanks. Good morning. Dave, I was curious if you could be more specific on the cost base. I think in the past, you described that there are some duplicative costs that the company is incurring during this integration. How much of those are left and the timing of those savings? And then can you also share with us what the burn rate is for the data center portfolio that you are looking to monetize? Thanks.

Yes. Two very different questions. So first of all, we have achieved the vast majority of the increased cost savings that we had targeted. So if you remember, the initial number was $220,000,000. We then increased that number to $240,000,000. And we probably have achieved over $230,000,000 of that $240,000,000 in cost savings. So there is a small tail, but it is not material. Secondly, we have incurred incremental expenses associated with integration activities. Those will continue throughout this year. They peaked at about an annual run rate of $60,000,000 or about $5,000,000 a month. Today, they are down to probably closer to $3,000,000 a month. But there is still monies being spent on various, you know, integration optimization programs, but we do anticipate those ending by the end of the year. And then to the final question, which is the burn associated with the infrastructure that we acquired from T-Mobile. So the infrastructure business, which includes the data centers and the physical fiber network, has a negative EBITDA of about $140,000,000. We have partially offset that because the IPv4 securitization sits under infrastructure and generates about $60,000,000 of EBITDA. So the infrastructure silo of Cogent’s balance sheet is about negative $80,000,000 of EBITDA. Roughly 20% of that is associated with the data centers, and we are looking to sell a significant portion of that footprint, probably at least 50% of it.

I am sorry. That 20% associated with data centers, is that 20%? Twenty percent of the—

of the $140,000,000 of negative costs associated with the Sprint assets. You know, these are primarily in three buckets. They are real estate taxes, personal property tax, and right-of-way fees. You know, we got the actual for a dollar, with no revenue. We now are completing the repurposing of that. And as we add high margin, the margins accrue to Group, but we can fund those losses over at Infrastructure through our ability to move money out of the borrower group through Holdings and back down to Infrastructure. In fact, that is how we have been funding those to date, using our restricted payments capacity. And we do have about $350,000,000 of accumulated unused restricted payments capacity at the borrower.

Thanks. And if I could just follow up real quick with two other items. You know, first, if you look at the corporate business of the heritage Cogent side of the equation, can you share with us a little bit more detail about what is driving the heritage revenue change over the last couple of years and if there is any inflection in trend there? And the same, you know, for NetCentric where it might be a little bit easier to unpack the, you know, IPv4 and the Waves, you know, impact just given the concentration of those products in NetCentric?

Yep. Yeah. So on the NetCentric side, it is easier because we do break out the IPv4 revenue, of which 85% of it is NetCentric. We break out the WAVE revenue, which is virtually all NetCentric, and then the incremental difference is the growth in the core transit product. In the corporate business, there was a mix of DIA and VPN services at Cogent, and then a mix at Sprint. At Sprint, the mix was much heavier VPN than it was DIA. At Cogent, it was much more DIA. We have converted some of the Sprint customers from MPLS to VPLS VPNs, improving the profitability, but we are continuing to support the MPLS product long term. We are trying to move as much on-net as possible. But the underlying growth in the corporate business at Cogent has come mostly from DIA.

The next question comes from the line of David Barden with New Street Research. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. Thanks so much for taking the questions. Hey, Dave. How are you doing?

Hey. Good.

Okay. So thank you for squeezing me in. I have got a few questions. The first one, Dave, and I apologize for asking this, is about your new contract that you have signed in January with the board, and how we, as investors, from the outside, look at maybe how your incentives have changed. You know, you always took stock in compensation. Now you are getting cash compensation. Does that change how you think about the business, how you think about dividends? It would be really helpful to get some insight there. I think the second question, maybe for Tad, is when you talk about secured financing, what specifically are you planning on securing? How much are you planning to secure, and what rates are you expecting? Thank you, guys.

Alright. Great. So first of all, with regard to my contract, you know, I am still in negotiations with the comp committee for some additional equity going forward. The vast majority of my compensation, you know, roughly 80% of it, remains in equity. And that equity does not vest, begin to vest, until 2029. So there is both a long-term cliff and a significant portion that needs to vest. Now, so I do not have to pledge shares going forward, which created a cascade of bad events, you know, I now have cash compensation that will allow me to pay both taxes and, you know, to be able to live, but it is a fraction of my total compensation. In terms of being able to go forward and how I think about dividends, you know, I am as committed to shareholder returns as I have ever been. You know, we have shifted our priorities to get our leverage down. And I think we will be in a position where we will see our leverage rapidly fall and be able to return to either buybacks, dividends at a higher rate, or a combination thereof. I will let Tad touch on the refi, and I may jump in as well.

Well, I mean, we are in negotiation with multiple parties. We have essentially only kind of come to terms on the amount, but not with respect to rates and the rest of the terms that we are in the process of negotiating.

Yeah. I think we have a very clear structure that will allow us to do this as secured debt. I do not think this call is the correct forum to, you know, roll that out, but we will in short order. And we also will anticipate that the current secured debt is a pretty good indication of about where our new debt will price.

Got it. And is there anything about the 2032s that is relevant to kind of rolling the 2027s?

Not really. I mean, you know, the same tests will be in place, we will be governed by the most restrictive covenants, which will probably be the existing ’32s, and that will be, you know, four times secured leverage and a 2x debt service test.

Got it. And if I could just squeeze in one more, really it, guys. Thank you much. Dave, you have kind of mentioned that the two kind of things that were going to be advantages for you in the Wave market were price and time to provision. I think you said you are down to 30 days. I think you targeted two weeks. Could you elaborate a little bit on the kind of process to get to even better provision timing and where are you do you believe on a price perspective relative to, quote, unquote, market?

Yeah. I will take the price one first. I think we are probably at a 20% to 30% discount. I also believe our advantages are more than you outlined. I think the breadth of the footprint as well as the diversity of the routes and reliability, route diversity, are all really important criteria. And I think the acceleration you are seeing in our Waves business is as a result of that. And then in terms of getting the provisioning window even shorter, I think it will be three things. It will be, one, just continued process refinement as we do more, but 30 days is still generally three to four times quicker than industry averages. A third party actually, just last month, released a report benchmarking us. And in terms of Wavelength Services, out of all of the providers, you know, where several dozen providers, both regional and national, were evaluated, we were actually number two in terms of provisioning already, and I think we will end up being number one just like we are in IP. I think the other thing that is a constraint today is actually pluggable optics lead times have become more challenging just because of, yeah, the pressures that some of the massive data center builds have put on the entire ecosystem for telecom and networking equipment.

Thank you, Dave.

Thanks. Our next question comes from the line of Michael J. Funk with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Hey. Great, Mike. Yeah. I just had one question, Dave. Going back to the to the sequential revenue growth, you know, I am looking at the street forecast, and consensus is for about $3,500,000 sequential revenue growth in 2026. And this is not why it is the twenty-ish. I think, historically, street forecast revenue growth faster than actual, probably in a combination of constructive commentary from the company, the longer-term revenue growth guidance provided, and relative opaqueness of your business. I do not think it is helpful to have revenue growth so much higher than actual. So you know, maybe help us think about the correct rate of sequential revenue growth in 2026 to reduce some of the volatility that we see in your stock on earnings?

Yeah. And, you know, it is a delicate balancing act because while I want to give clarity and guidance, I am not comfortable in giving quarterly or even annual guidance. You know, I do think that over a multiyear period, that 6% to 8% growth rate is what is absolutely appropriate to model. You know, I am going to have to leave it to every analyst to do their own diligence and channel checks, and we are just not going to give a number that says, $3.5 is too high or too low on a sequential increase in revenue. What we said is from this point forward, we are comfortable that our quarterly reported revenues are going to grow. We think that is going to continue to improve. We think that that growth is going to be driven by high-margin products. And you know, just as you said maybe street numbers were too high on top line, they have consistently underestimated our ability to expand margins.

Maybe one more if I could, Dave, sneak it in here. Rep productivity, wanted to touch on that. They have been coming down. What are you doing internally, processes, people, to improve rep productivity?

So the productivity is measured on a units basis. If you have actually noticed, our ARPUs have actually gone up somewhat. We are focused more on on-net services. So there is a higher payout for on-net versus off-net to help get to that 80/20 mix that I referenced. And then third, we continue to train, to promote internally, and try to incent our sales force to grow. But, you know, we do still have 5.4% per month of turnover. That is below the long-term average of 5.7%. The peak of 8.7%. But, you know, our productivity at 4.1 for the fourth quarter was actually about 18% better than our rep productivity in 2024. There is some seasonality to rep productivity. And while, you know, the 4.8 that we average is good, we actually think we can do better than that. And I think you will see that number trend up as, you know, this focus is on on-net and as we kind of roll through the seasonality that I am then—

Great. Thank you, Dave. And, Dave, thanks for taking all the questions today. I really appreciate it.

Yeah. Thanks, Michael.

Our last question comes from the line of Anna with Bank of America. Hi. Thanks very much, Dave. So just on the plan to refi the ’27s sort of dollar-for-dollar with new secured, so, and the prior question on the planned use of proceeds of any data center sale, clearly did not commit to using it to repay debt. So I think you said you have options. But when you reduced your dividend about a, in the last earnings announcement, the rationale that was provided for reducing the dividend was that you wanted to focus on deleveraging. And I think implicit in that was the idea that cash on the balance sheet, potential cash from asset sale proceeds, and potential cash from free cash flow would be used to repay debt. So I just wanted to revisit that concept and, you know, what the plan is to get leverage down. And I believe you cited a target of four times.

Yes. That is absolutely correct, Anna. And we are absolutely committed to not materially changing our return of capital either through buybacks or dividends until we reach four times net leverage. We each quarter have less monies due to us from T-Mobile, which we are counting in our leverage. So that is a bit of a hill that we have to climb. We also are, again, delevering both on a gross and net basis. And I think we will continue to do that. And, you know, holding cash on the balance sheet has the exact same impact on net debt. We have not been specific around a gross debt target. And we may opportunistically even buy back some of our debt if it sometimes trades at a discount, as our current secured debt has. That could also be an effective mechanism to use excess cash to reduce leverage. But we are absolutely committed. I want to leave no ambiguity that we intend to get, for the entire complex, not just the borrower group, down to four times net leverage before we materially change our return of capital strategy.

Okay. And then thanks for that. And then secondly, I know you do not provide specific guidance, but in terms of your ability to generate free cash flow, particularly this year, what is your level of confidence? And, you know, maybe some order of magnitude if you expect it to be positive?

So we absolutely, a growth in EBITDA will produce. You know, you can extrapolate what we have done, and then layer on the contribution margins with the mix shift that I described, and then layer in some of the aggregate savings. Two, we absolutely expect our capital expenditures to go down. Those two things will allow us to generate unlevered free cash flow growth, and it is likely that when we refinance the unsecureds, our coupon will be slightly higher probably than it is today for the current unsecureds, even though we will be converting them to secured. That is highly dependent on how the current bonds trade. But, you know, we do think that even on a levered basis, we will be generating free cash. That is as close to guidance as you are going to get me.

Okay. Okay. Well, thank you, Dave.

Hey. Thanks, Anna.

And that concludes our question and answer session. I will now turn the call back over to Mr. Dave Schaeffer for closing remarks.

Well, first of all, I want to thank everyone. I know it was an hour and a half. We have actually gone longer. I thought this was somewhat unique in that we added a lot more granularity to our disclosures around the trajectory of the Sprint-acquired business and also the relative mix of products. You know, I think in summary, there are three really important objectives for Cogent to build value. One is to grow top line. Two, to continue to expand margins. And then three, eliminate any overhang of a debt maturity that is, you know, seventeen months away. And I think on all three of those vectors, we are and will continue to demonstrate meaningful progress. Thanks, everyone, and we will talk soon. Take care. Bye-bye.

This concludes today’s conference call. You may now disconnect.