RankAlpha logo
Back to Rankings

CAR

Avis Budget GroupB
Nasdaq / Transportation
Last Price
Quote time unavailable
View Chart
Documents
78
Stored
Transcripts
1
Recent loaded
Latest report
2026-08-27
Investor release

Document history

Earnings documents stored for CAR.

12 shown
Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-27

Why Is Avis Budget (CAR) Down 7% Since Last Earnings Report?

Zacks
It has been about a month since the last earnings report for Avis Budget Group (CAR). Shares have lost about 7% in that time frame, underperforming the S&P 500. Will the recent negative trend continue leading up to its next earnings release, or is Avis Budget due for a breakout? Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important drivers. Avis Budget Group reported dismal second-quarter 2026 results. CAR’s earnings of 98 cents per share missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.16 by 54.6%. Earnings improved sharply from 10 cents in the year-ago quarter. Revenues declined 1.3% year over year to $3 billion, missing the consensus of $3.08 billion by 2.8%. Lower rental days weighed on the top line, while disciplined fleet reductions helped lift total vehicle utilization to a second-quarter record of 72.6%. Avis Budget generated net income of $63 million compared with $5 million in the prior-year quarter. Net income attributable to the company was $35 million, up from $4 million a year earlier. Adjusted EBITDA increased 3.2% year over year to $286 million. The improvement came despite lower revenues, reflecting reduced fleet costs, better utilization and tighter expense management. Total rental days fell 2.3% year over year to 43.91 million. The average rental fleet declined 4.9% to 664,638 vehicles as management accelerated vehicle dispositions in response to weakening booking trends. Revenue per day increased 1% to $68.29. Excluding currency effects, revenue per day was $67.84, up slightly from $67.62 in the year-ago quarter. Management prioritized longer-duration rentals, which carried lower daily rates but offered better transaction economics and reduced handling costs. Americas revenues declined 1.9% year over year to $2.29 billion. Rental days decreased 2.1% to 32.60 million, while the average fleet contracted 5.4% to 489,192 vehicles. Americas adjusted EBITDA rose 7.7% to $237 million. Vehicle utilization improved 2.5 percentage points to a record 73.2%, helping offset lower volumes. Revenue per day, excluding currency effects, edged up to $70.22 from $70.03. International revenues were $710 million, nearly flat year over year. Excluding exchange-rate effects, revenues declined 2.5% as rental days fell 2.9% to 11.31 million. Adju…Read full document

It has been about a month since the last earnings report for Avis Budget Group (CAR). Shares have lost about 7% in that time frame, underperforming the S&P 500. Will the recent negative trend continue leading up to its next earnings release, or is Avis Budget due for a breakout? Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important drivers. Avis Budget Group reported dismal second-quarter 2026 results. CAR’s earnings of 98 cents per share missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.16 by 54.6%. Earnings improved sharply from 10 cents in the year-ago quarter. Revenues declined 1.3% year over year to $3 billion, missing the consensus of $3.08 billion by 2.8%. Lower rental days weighed on the top line, while disciplined fleet reductions helped lift total vehicle utilization to a second-quarter record of 72.6%. Avis Budget generated net income of $63 million compared with $5 million in the prior-year quarter. Net income attributable to the company was $35 million, up from $4 million a year earlier. Adjusted EBITDA increased 3.2% year over year to $286 million. The improvement came despite lower revenues, reflecting reduced fleet costs, better utilization and tighter expense management. Total rental days fell 2.3% year over year to 43.91 million. The average rental fleet declined 4.9% to 664,638 vehicles as management accelerated vehicle dispositions in response to weakening booking trends. Revenue per day increased 1% to $68.29. Excluding currency effects, revenue per day was $67.84, up slightly from $67.62 in the year-ago quarter. Management prioritized longer-duration rentals, which carried lower daily rates but offered better transaction economics and reduced handling costs. Americas revenues declined 1.9% year over year to $2.29 billion. Rental days decreased 2.1% to 32.60 million, while the average fleet contracted 5.4% to 489,192 vehicles. Americas adjusted EBITDA rose 7.7% to $237 million. Vehicle utilization improved 2.5 percentage points to a record 73.2%, helping offset lower volumes. Revenue per day, excluding currency effects, edged up to $70.22 from $70.03. International revenues were $710 million, nearly flat year over year. Excluding exchange-rate effects, revenues declined 2.5% as rental days fell 2.9% to 11.31 million. Adjusted EBITDA decreased 11% to $73 million. Management cited weaker commercial demand, lower inbound travel and increased industry fleet supply in several European markets. International revenue per day rose 3.4% as reported, but increased only 0.4% excluding currency effects. Vehicle depreciation and lease charges declined 8.3% year over year to $583 million. Total per-unit fleet costs fell 3.6% to $292 per month and decreased 4.3% to $290 excluding currency effects. Operating expenses remained flat at $1.53 billion. Selling, general and administrative expenses declined 2.8% to $385 million, while vehicle interest expense increased slightly to $232 million. Corporate interest expense decreased to $108 million from $110 million. CAR ended June with $558 million in cash and cash equivalents. Available liquidity was approximately $1 billion, with an additional $1.9 billion of fleet funding capacity. During the quarter, the company issued $300 million of senior notes due in 2031 and used the proceeds to reduce notes due in 2027. It also refinanced its $2 billion revolving credit facility, extending the maturity to June 2031. Net corporate leverage stood at 7.4 times, down one turn from year-end 2025. Avis Budget reiterated its full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance of $850 million to $1 billion. Management expects to reduce leverage by at least one full turn by the end of 2026. For the third quarter, the company expects the Americas fleet to remain down by a mid-single-digit percentage. Stronger utilization should partly offset the fleet reduction, while revenue per day is projected to remain roughly flat year over year. Management expects year-over-year adjusted EBITDA growth despite continued pressure on rental volumes. It turns out, fresh estimates have trended downward during the past month. The consensus estimate has shifted -10.91% due to these changes. Currently, Avis Budget has a average Growth Score of C, though it is lagging a lot on the Momentum Score front with an F. However, the stock was allocated a score of A on the value side, putting it in the top quintile for this investment strategy. Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of B. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in. Estimates have been broadly trending downward for the stock, and the magnitude of these revisions indicates a downward shift. Notably, Avis Budget has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). We expect an in-line return from the stock in the next few months. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Avis Budget Group, Inc. (CAR) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-14

5 Insightful Analyst Questions From Verra Mobility’s Q2 Earnings Call

StockStory
Verra Mobility’s second quarter was marked by notable progress in customer retention, but the market reacted sharply to its revised outlook. Management attributed Q2’s performance to a catch-up in New York City camera installations and improved collections in commercial services, with interim CEO Jon Keyser highlighting new multi-year agreements with both Avis Budget Group and Hertz as critical to stabilizing the business. However, Keyser acknowledged the company is navigating a challenging transition period, stating, “These contracts were executed at lower pricing levels than our existing relationships,” which weighed on profitability and investor sentiment. Is now the time to buy VRRM? Find out in our full research report (it’s free). Revenue: $263.6 million vs analyst estimates of $254 million (11.7% year-on-year growth, 3.8% beat) Adjusted EPS: $0.38 vs analyst estimates of $0.33 (15.1% beat) Adjusted EBITDA: $110.7 million vs analyst estimates of $100.2 million (42% margin, 10.4% beat) The company dropped its revenue guidance for the full year to $955 million at the midpoint from $1.03 billion, a 6.8% decrease Management lowered its full-year Adjusted EPS guidance to $1.14 at the midpoint, a 15.6% decrease EBITDA guidance for the full year is $365 million at the midpoint, below analyst estimates of $382.1 million Operating Margin: -12.4%, down from 26.8% in the same quarter last year Market Capitalization: $726.5 million While we enjoy listening to the management’s commentary, our favorite part of earnings calls is the analyst questions. Those are unscripted and can often highlight topics that management teams would rather avoid or topics where the answer is complicated. Here is what has caught our attention. Tomohiko Sano (JPMorgan) asked about the circumstances behind Avis’s initial termination notice and what led to the contract renewal. Interim CEO Jon Keyser emphasized the importance of listening to customer concerns and rebuilding trust at the executive level to secure the extension. Tomohiko Sano (JPMorgan) followed up regarding the key economic changes in the Avis and Hertz renewals, specifically around pricing and volume flexibility. CFO Craig Conti confirmed the new contracts are on less favorable terms, with customers able to modulate fleet volumes, but declined to disclose specifics. Daniel Joseph Moore (CJS Securities) inquired if new contr…Read full document

Verra Mobility’s second quarter was marked by notable progress in customer retention, but the market reacted sharply to its revised outlook. Management attributed Q2’s performance to a catch-up in New York City camera installations and improved collections in commercial services, with interim CEO Jon Keyser highlighting new multi-year agreements with both Avis Budget Group and Hertz as critical to stabilizing the business. However, Keyser acknowledged the company is navigating a challenging transition period, stating, “These contracts were executed at lower pricing levels than our existing relationships,” which weighed on profitability and investor sentiment. Is now the time to buy VRRM? Find out in our full research report (it’s free). Revenue: $263.6 million vs analyst estimates of $254 million (11.7% year-on-year growth, 3.8% beat) Adjusted EPS: $0.38 vs analyst estimates of $0.33 (15.1% beat) Adjusted EBITDA: $110.7 million vs analyst estimates of $100.2 million (42% margin, 10.4% beat) The company dropped its revenue guidance for the full year to $955 million at the midpoint from $1.03 billion, a 6.8% decrease Management lowered its full-year Adjusted EPS guidance to $1.14 at the midpoint, a 15.6% decrease EBITDA guidance for the full year is $365 million at the midpoint, below analyst estimates of $382.1 million Operating Margin: -12.4%, down from 26.8% in the same quarter last year Market Capitalization: $726.5 million While we enjoy listening to the management’s commentary, our favorite part of earnings calls is the analyst questions. Those are unscripted and can often highlight topics that management teams would rather avoid or topics where the answer is complicated. Here is what has caught our attention. Tomohiko Sano (JPMorgan) asked about the circumstances behind Avis’s initial termination notice and what led to the contract renewal. Interim CEO Jon Keyser emphasized the importance of listening to customer concerns and rebuilding trust at the executive level to secure the extension. Tomohiko Sano (JPMorgan) followed up regarding the key economic changes in the Avis and Hertz renewals, specifically around pricing and volume flexibility. CFO Craig Conti confirmed the new contracts are on less favorable terms, with customers able to modulate fleet volumes, but declined to disclose specifics. Daniel Joseph Moore (CJS Securities) inquired if new contracts included minimum volume floors that would provide revenue visibility. Conti stated he could not disclose contract details but noted the company maintains daily engagement with customers to forecast demand. Daniel Joseph Moore (CJS Securities) pressed for details on the Los Angeles government contract and its revenue potential. Keyser responded that the award could add approximately $10 million in annual recurring revenue once finalized, and highlighted the importance of legislative action in unlocking new opportunities. Faiza Alwy (Deutsche Bank) questioned whether lower commercial margin levels are now the norm or if cost initiatives could offset the decline. Conti indicated margins will remain pressured in the near term but reiterated ongoing efforts to optimize the cost base and improve profitability longer term. In the coming quarters, the StockStory team will be watching (1) the practical impact of the new Avis and Hertz agreements on both revenue stability and margin trajectories, (2) measurable progress on cost reductions and operational transformation, especially in non-labor categories, and (3) the ramp-up of government safety programs, including the Los Angeles rollout. Execution on AI integration and any shifts in parking solutions strategy will also be key indicators of future performance. Verra Mobility currently trades at $4.82, down from $5.61 just before the earnings. At this price, is it a buy or sell? The answer lies in our full research report (it’s free for active Edge members). WHILE YOU’RE HERE: Top 9 Market-Beating Stocks. The best stocks don’t just beat the market once. They do it again. And again. Robust revenue growth, rising free cash flow, returns on capital that leave their competition in the dust. The market has already rewarded these businesses. But our AI platform says the party isn’t over. Find out which 9 stocks made the cut this week — FREE. Get Our Top 9 Market-Beating Stocks for Free HERE. Stocks that have made our list include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,460% between June 2020 and June 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-small-cap company Comfort Systems (+1,154% between June 2020 and June 2025). Find your next big winner with StockStory today.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-11

Hertz Spikes Tuesday Morning. Post-Earnings Rally Continues As Retail Enthusiasm Grows.

24/7 Wall St.
HTZ jumped 39% in a week after Q2 revenue hit $2.4B, up 10% year over year, on pricing power despite operating with a smaller fleet. CAR barely moved while UBER gained 9% on the week, confirming Reddit-fueled retail traders, not sector strength, are driving HTZ higher. Multiple class-action lawsuits, $18.7B in debt, and S&P SmallCap 600 removal all hang over a stock still down 59% year to date. It sounds nuts, but SoFi1 is giving new Active Invest users up to $3,000 in stock for a limited time, and all it takes is a $50 deposit to get started.2 See for yourself (Sponsor) Shares of Hertz Global Holdings (NASDAQ:HTZ) are ripping higher in Tuesday afternoon trading, changing hands around $2.64, a 25% jump from Monday's close of $2.12. The move extends a violent post-earnings bounce, with the stock now up 39% over the past week. The catalyst traces back to Hertz's August 6 Q2 report, which surprised to the upside on nearly every operating line. Revenue landed at $2.396 billion, up 10% year over year, while adjusted EPS of -$0.11 beat consensus handily. Adjusted Corporate EBITDA came in at $81 million, and revenue per unit hit $1,542, above the company's North Star target. CEO Gil West framed the earnings report as validation of the turnaround, saying "This quarter's results reflect the disciplined execution of our strategy and our consistent commercial strength." Revenue grew 10% year over year despite operating with a 1% smaller fleet, a genuine pricing-power tell. The 8-K is on file with the SEC. The rally is happening in spite of a wall of overhangs. Multiple securities class-action complaints allege Hertz made materially false statements about liquidity and the likelihood of a dilutive capital raise between May 7 and June 23, 2026, with a lead-plaintiff deadline of September 22, 2026. A $300 million secured-notes deal announced June 24 triggered the 40%-plus drawdown that anchors those suits. SoFi Active Invest is offering a limited-time promotion. Open an account, fund it with $50 or more, and you could receive up to $3,000 in complimentary stock for Active Invest accounts. See for yourself by clicking here now. (Sponsor) Layer on removal from the S&P SmallCap 600, which forced index-fund selling, and analyst fair-value cuts from $3.78 to $2.78. The balance sheet is also stretched, with total debt at $18.7 billion and a stockholders' deficit of $628 million…Read full document

HTZ jumped 39% in a week after Q2 revenue hit $2.4B, up 10% year over year, on pricing power despite operating with a smaller fleet. CAR barely moved while UBER gained 9% on the week, confirming Reddit-fueled retail traders, not sector strength, are driving HTZ higher. Multiple class-action lawsuits, $18.7B in debt, and S&P SmallCap 600 removal all hang over a stock still down 59% year to date. It sounds nuts, but SoFi1 is giving new Active Invest users up to $3,000 in stock for a limited time, and all it takes is a $50 deposit to get started.2 See for yourself (Sponsor) Shares of Hertz Global Holdings (NASDAQ:HTZ) are ripping higher in Tuesday afternoon trading, changing hands around $2.64, a 25% jump from Monday's close of $2.12. The move extends a violent post-earnings bounce, with the stock now up 39% over the past week. The catalyst traces back to Hertz's August 6 Q2 report, which surprised to the upside on nearly every operating line. Revenue landed at $2.396 billion, up 10% year over year, while adjusted EPS of -$0.11 beat consensus handily. Adjusted Corporate EBITDA came in at $81 million, and revenue per unit hit $1,542, above the company's North Star target. CEO Gil West framed the earnings report as validation of the turnaround, saying "This quarter's results reflect the disciplined execution of our strategy and our consistent commercial strength." Revenue grew 10% year over year despite operating with a 1% smaller fleet, a genuine pricing-power tell. The 8-K is on file with the SEC. The rally is happening in spite of a wall of overhangs. Multiple securities class-action complaints allege Hertz made materially false statements about liquidity and the likelihood of a dilutive capital raise between May 7 and June 23, 2026, with a lead-plaintiff deadline of September 22, 2026. A $300 million secured-notes deal announced June 24 triggered the 40%-plus drawdown that anchors those suits. SoFi Active Invest is offering a limited-time promotion. Open an account, fund it with $50 or more, and you could receive up to $3,000 in complimentary stock for Active Invest accounts. See for yourself by clicking here now. (Sponsor) Layer on removal from the S&P SmallCap 600, which forced index-fund selling, and analyst fair-value cuts from $3.78 to $2.78. The balance sheet is also stretched, with total debt at $18.7 billion and a stockholders' deficit of $628 million. Year to date, HTZ is still down 59%. It's worth noting that Hertz opened the day flat. Buying pressure built between 9:45 a.m. ET and 10:45 a.m. ET. Most of Hertz' gains came from that period as the stock has traded mostly sideways since the morning. The bounce looks idiosyncratic. Avis Budget Group (NASDAQ:CAR), the closest rental peer, is up 3% today to $142 and essentially flat over the past week. Mobility partner Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER), which is teaming with Hertz's Oro Mobility unit on an AV launch in the San Francisco Bay Area later this year, has climbed 9% on the week, while Lyft (NASDAQ:LYFT) is up 5%. HTZ is running its own race. Retail is fueling the move. Reddit's r/wallstreetbets sentiment score hit 93 on August 7, with posts titled "Upcoming Hertz 10+ Bagger" and "Full port, life savings in HTZ, I have never felt this alive" drawing hundreds of comments. The warrant lock-up expired August 9, which may be adding to the whipsaw as short positioning gets tested. Looking to grow your money but unsure where to begin? SoFi Active Invest is offering a limited-time promotion—open a new Active Invest account, fund it with $50 or more, and you could receive up to $3,000 in complimentary stock. From $0 commission trading3 to fractional shares4 and automated investing, this app is designed to simplify investing for everyone, whether you’re just starting or already experienced. Its easy to sign up and secure your bonus.(Sponsor) Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-06

Verra Mobility Q2 Earnings Call Highlights

MarketBeat
Interested in Verra Mobility Corp? Here are five stocks we like better. Second-quarter results exceeded expectations: Revenue growth in Government Solutions and Commercial Services, stronger collections and improved operations helped drive $111 million in adjusted EBITDA and $33 million in free cash flow. However, Verra Mobility recorded a $48 million GAAP net loss after a $104 million non-cash impairment charge tied to T2 Systems. Rental-car contract renewals reduced the outlook: New seven-year and five-year agreements with Avis Budget Group and Hertz provide longer-term visibility but carry less favorable pricing and flexible fleet-volume terms. Verra Mobility now expects 2026 revenue of $945 million-$965 million and adjusted EBITDA of $360 million-$370 million. Growth investments and restructuring continue: The company was selected for automated speed-enforcement programs in Los Angeles and all six California cities authorized under AB 645, while pursuing an expected $20 million in annualized cost savings. Management is prioritizing cash preservation and balance-sheet strength despite having $66 million remaining under its share-repurchase authorization. 3 Stocks You’ll Love to Own, But Hate To Encounter Verra Mobility (NASDAQ:VRRM) reported second-quarter results that exceeded its internal expectations, supported by New York City camera-installation timing, operational improvements and stronger collections in its Commercial Services segment. However, the company lowered its full-year outlook after renewing major rental-car customer agreements on terms that Chief Financial Officer Craig Conti said were materially less favorable than prior contracts. The company announced a new seven-year tolling and violation-services agreement with Avis Budget Group and a new five-year agreement with Hertz. The Avis agreement follows a termination notice received in May, while the Hertz renewal was completed ahead of its expected 2027 renegotiation period. → SpaceX’s First Earnings Report Could Decide Whether Shorts or Bulls Have Control Verra Mobility Stock Has Returned Back to the Station “Together, the ABG and Hertz agreements represent meaningful progress towards stabilizing our Commercial Services customer base,” Interim Chief Executive Officer Jon Keyser said. He said the agreements reflect the company’s technology, integrations, operating scale and efforts to esta…Read full document

Interested in Verra Mobility Corp? Here are five stocks we like better. Second-quarter results exceeded expectations: Revenue growth in Government Solutions and Commercial Services, stronger collections and improved operations helped drive $111 million in adjusted EBITDA and $33 million in free cash flow. However, Verra Mobility recorded a $48 million GAAP net loss after a $104 million non-cash impairment charge tied to T2 Systems. Rental-car contract renewals reduced the outlook: New seven-year and five-year agreements with Avis Budget Group and Hertz provide longer-term visibility but carry less favorable pricing and flexible fleet-volume terms. Verra Mobility now expects 2026 revenue of $945 million-$965 million and adjusted EBITDA of $360 million-$370 million. Growth investments and restructuring continue: The company was selected for automated speed-enforcement programs in Los Angeles and all six California cities authorized under AB 645, while pursuing an expected $20 million in annualized cost savings. Management is prioritizing cash preservation and balance-sheet strength despite having $66 million remaining under its share-repurchase authorization. 3 Stocks You’ll Love to Own, But Hate To Encounter Verra Mobility (NASDAQ:VRRM) reported second-quarter results that exceeded its internal expectations, supported by New York City camera-installation timing, operational improvements and stronger collections in its Commercial Services segment. However, the company lowered its full-year outlook after renewing major rental-car customer agreements on terms that Chief Financial Officer Craig Conti said were materially less favorable than prior contracts. The company announced a new seven-year tolling and violation-services agreement with Avis Budget Group and a new five-year agreement with Hertz. The Avis agreement follows a termination notice received in May, while the Hertz renewal was completed ahead of its expected 2027 renegotiation period. → SpaceX’s First Earnings Report Could Decide Whether Shorts or Bulls Have Control Verra Mobility Stock Has Returned Back to the Station “Together, the ABG and Hertz agreements represent meaningful progress towards stabilizing our Commercial Services customer base,” Interim Chief Executive Officer Jon Keyser said. He said the agreements reflect the company’s technology, integrations, operating scale and efforts to establish more flexible, customer-focused partnerships. Government Solutions service revenue increased 17% year over year in the second quarter, driven by New York City camera installations and 8% service-revenue growth outside New York City. Within New York City, service revenue rose 36% from a year earlier as incremental camera installations exceeded the impact of revised contract pricing, Conti said. → 3 Drone Stocks That Should Soar After the Summer Slump If You Hate Speed Cameras, Then You’ll Like Verra Mobility Stock Verra Mobility had experienced weather-related delays in New York City installations during the first quarter, but Conti said the company caught up during the second quarter and returned to its anticipated installation level by the end of the first half. Commercial Services revenue rose 6% year over year, including a 5% increase in rental-car tolling revenue and 3% growth in fleet-management revenue. Rental-car tolling growth was driven by product adoption and tolling activity despite a 1% decline in U.S. travel volume compared with the prior-year quarter. Commercial Services profit margin expanded 100 basis points, aided by operating leverage and lower bad-debt expense from improved collections. → Meta’s Earnings Drop Shows Wall Street Wants More Than Ad Growth Parking Solutions generated $20 million in revenue and roughly $2 million in segment profit. SaaS and services sales rose approximately 1%, while product revenue was effectively flat. Segment margins declined 465 basis points year over year because of product-sales mix and the timing of operating expenses. Consolidated adjusted EBITDA was $111 million. GAAP net loss was $48 million, reflecting a $104 million non-cash goodwill and intangible-asset impairment charge related to T2 Systems. GAAP diluted loss per share was $0.32, compared with income of $0.24 per share a year earlier. Adjusted EPS was $0.38, compared with $0.34 in the second quarter of 2025. Operating cash flow was $56 million, while free cash flow totaled approximately $33 million. Government Solutions recorded $25 million in new annual recurring revenue and contract awards during the quarter, including work-zone speed and school-bus stop-arm programs. Over the trailing 12 months, new incremental annual recurring revenue bookings totaled about $74 million. Keyser said Verra Mobility was selected as the automated speed-safety vendor for Los Angeles and is negotiating the final contract. He said the company expects approximately $10 million in annual recurring revenue from the agreement once finalized. California Assembly Bill 645 authorized speed-enforcement pilots in six cities. Keyser said Verra Mobility has been selected as technology partner by all six cities authorized under the legislation. The company also cited safety outcomes from existing programs, including a 28% reduction in red-light violations within the first 60 days of San José’s program and a nearly 50% decline in traffic fatalities in Merced. Conti said the Avis Budget and Hertz agreements provide longer contractual visibility but carry lower pricing than the prior arrangements and permit customers to modulate fleet volumes. The new commercial terms took effect immediately. Verra Mobility now expects 2026 total revenue of $945 million to $965 million and adjusted EBITDA of $360 million to $370 million, implying an adjusted EBITDA margin of about 38%. The company forecast adjusted EPS of $1.11 to $1.17 and free cash flow of $105 million to $115 million. The free-cash-flow outlook includes higher capital spending than previously anticipated, primarily for Government Solutions implementation work tied to the accelerated Los Angeles Metro contract award and school-bus stop-arm awards. The company also expects a $30 million working-capital use, largely related to rental-car contract renewals and the timing of New York City installation expenditures and collections. Commercial Services revenue is now expected to decline in the negative high-single-digit range for the full year compared with 2025, as growth decelerates in the third and fourth quarters. The company expects full-year Commercial Services segment margins in the low 60% range. Government Solutions is expected to produce total revenue growth at the high end of the mid-single-digit range for 2026. The company continues to expect segment profit margins to contract by roughly 450 to 500 basis points from 2025, largely due to New York City pricing adjustments and subcontractor requirements. Parking Solutions revenue is projected to rise low to mid-single digits, with margins slightly accretive to 2025. Keyser said Verra Mobility has reorganized its customer-facing operations, appointing Stacey Moser as chief customer officer and unifying sales, account management and marketing leadership across its major commercial and government businesses. The company is also pursuing approximately $20 million in annualized cost reductions, with full run-rate savings expected beginning in 2027. Conti said the principal headcount actions have been completed, while the company continues to examine non-labor spending, procurement, third-party costs, roadside customer service and operational processes. Verra Mobility ended the quarter with approximately $1 billion in net debt and net leverage of 2.4 times. Its credit revolver was fully repaid and undrawn at quarter-end. The company had $66 million remaining under its $250 million share-repurchase authorization, though Conti said the current priority is strengthening the balance sheet and building cash reserves. Management is also evaluating whether its evolving organizational structure could result in changes to operating and reportable segments, potentially including reporting as a single operating and reportable segment. No reporting changes were made for the second quarter. Verra Mobility, traded on the Nasdaq under the ticker VRRM, is a leading provider of smart mobility solutions designed to improve safety, efficiency and compliance for transportation authorities and commercial fleets. The company develops and operates automated traffic enforcement systems, toll and violation management platforms, and connected-vehicle services. Through its technology offerings, Verra Mobility helps public agencies enhance road safety, reduce congestion and streamline revenue collection for tolling and parking. Verra Mobility’s core products include red-light and speed-camera enforcement programs, license plate recognition systems, and cloud-based violation processing software. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "Verra Mobility Q2 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for August 2026.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-08-04

Avis Budget Stock Plunges 17% Since Reporting Q2 Earnings Miss

Zacks
Avis Budget Group, Inc. CAR reported dismal second-quarter 2026 results. CAR’s earnings of 98 cents per share missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.16 by 54.6%. Earnings improved sharply from 10 cents in the year-ago quarter. Revenues declined 1.3% year over year to $3 billion, missing the consensus estimate of $3.08 billion by 2.8%. Lower rental days weighed on the top line, while disciplined fleet reductions helped lift total vehicle utilization to a second-quarter record of 72.6%. Avis Budget Group, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | Avis Budget Group, Inc. Quote The lower-than-expected earnings and revenue results dragged the stock down 16.5% since the earnings release on July 28. Avis Budget generated net income of $63 million compared with $5 million in the prior-year quarter. Net income attributable to the company was $35 million, up from $4 million a year earlier. Adjusted EBITDA increased 3.2% year over year to $286 million. The improvement came despite lower revenues, reflecting reduced fleet costs, better utilization and tighter expense management. Total rental days fell 2.3% year over year to 43.91 million. The average rental fleet declined 4.9% to 664,638 vehicles as management accelerated vehicle dispositions in response to weakening booking trends. Revenues per day increased 1% to $68.29. Excluding currency effects, revenues per day were $67.84, up slightly from $67.62 in the year-ago quarter. Management prioritized longer-duration rentals, which carried lower daily rates but offered better transaction economics and reduced handling costs. Americas revenues declined 1.9% year over year to $2.29 billion. Rental days decreased 2.1% to 32.60 million, while the average fleet contracted 5.4% to 489,192 vehicles. Americas adjusted EBITDA rose 7.7% to $237 million. Vehicle utilization improved 2.5 percentage points to a record 73.2%, helping offset lower volumes. Revenue per day, excluding currency effects, inched up to $70.22 from $70.03. International revenues were $710 million, nearly flat year over year. Excluding exchange-rate effects, revenues declined 2.5% as rental days fell 2.9% to 11.31 million. Adjusted EBITDA decreased 11% to $73 million. Management cited weaker commercial demand, lower inbound travel and increased industry fleet supply in several European markets. International revenues per day rose 3.4% as reported, but inche…Read full document

Avis Budget Group, Inc. CAR reported dismal second-quarter 2026 results. CAR’s earnings of 98 cents per share missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.16 by 54.6%. Earnings improved sharply from 10 cents in the year-ago quarter. Revenues declined 1.3% year over year to $3 billion, missing the consensus estimate of $3.08 billion by 2.8%. Lower rental days weighed on the top line, while disciplined fleet reductions helped lift total vehicle utilization to a second-quarter record of 72.6%. Avis Budget Group, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | Avis Budget Group, Inc. Quote The lower-than-expected earnings and revenue results dragged the stock down 16.5% since the earnings release on July 28. Avis Budget generated net income of $63 million compared with $5 million in the prior-year quarter. Net income attributable to the company was $35 million, up from $4 million a year earlier. Adjusted EBITDA increased 3.2% year over year to $286 million. The improvement came despite lower revenues, reflecting reduced fleet costs, better utilization and tighter expense management. Total rental days fell 2.3% year over year to 43.91 million. The average rental fleet declined 4.9% to 664,638 vehicles as management accelerated vehicle dispositions in response to weakening booking trends. Revenues per day increased 1% to $68.29. Excluding currency effects, revenues per day were $67.84, up slightly from $67.62 in the year-ago quarter. Management prioritized longer-duration rentals, which carried lower daily rates but offered better transaction economics and reduced handling costs. Americas revenues declined 1.9% year over year to $2.29 billion. Rental days decreased 2.1% to 32.60 million, while the average fleet contracted 5.4% to 489,192 vehicles. Americas adjusted EBITDA rose 7.7% to $237 million. Vehicle utilization improved 2.5 percentage points to a record 73.2%, helping offset lower volumes. Revenue per day, excluding currency effects, inched up to $70.22 from $70.03. International revenues were $710 million, nearly flat year over year. Excluding exchange-rate effects, revenues declined 2.5% as rental days fell 2.9% to 11.31 million. Adjusted EBITDA decreased 11% to $73 million. Management cited weaker commercial demand, lower inbound travel and increased industry fleet supply in several European markets. International revenues per day rose 3.4% as reported, but inched up 0.4% excluding currency effects. Vehicle depreciation and lease charges declined 8.3% year over year to $583 million. Total per-unit fleet costs fell 3.6% to $292 per month and decreased 4.3% to $290 excluding currency effects. Operating expenses remained flat at $1.53 billion. Selling, general and administrative expenses declined 2.8% to $385 million, while vehicle interest expenses increased slightly to $232 million. Corporate interest expenses decreased to $108 million from $110 million. CAR ended June with $558 million in cash and cash equivalents. Available liquidity was approximately $1 billion, with an additional $1.9 billion in fleet funding capacity. During the quarter, the company issued $300 million of senior notes due in 2031 and used the proceeds to reduce notes due in 2027. It also refinanced its $2-billion revolving credit facility, extending the maturity to June 2031. Net corporate leverage stood at 7.4 times, down one turn from the end of 2025. Avis Budget reiterated its full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance of $850 million to $1 billion. Management expects to reduce leverage by at least one full turn by the end of 2026. For the third quarter, the company expects the Americas fleet to remain down by a mid-single-digit percentage. Stronger utilization should partly offset the fleet reduction, while revenues per day are projected to remain roughly flat year over year. Management expects year-over-year adjusted EBITDA growth despite continued pressure on rental volumes. Avis Budget carries a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) at present. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Verisk VRSK reported second-quarter 2026 diluted adjusted earnings of $1.98 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.94 by 2.1%. The figure increased 5.3% from the year-ago quarter. Revenues of $806.3 million topped the consensus mark of $802.4 million by 0.5% and rose 4.3% year over year. ADP ADP posted fourth-quarter fiscal 2026 adjusted earnings of $2.64 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.59 by 1.9%. The metric increased 17% from the year-ago quarter. Revenues of $5.47 billion surpassed the consensus mark of $5.42 billion by 0.9% and rose 7% year over year. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Avis Budget Group, Inc. (CAR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) : Free Stock Analysis Report Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-29

Avis Stock Is Tumbling. Inside the Shift in Rental Trends That Drove a Massive Earnings Miss.

Barrons.com

The company fell short of expectations on both earnings per share and revenue in the second quarter.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-29

Avis Budget Group (CAR) Is Down 5.8% After Recall-Driven Costs Weigh On Q2 Earnings Outlook

Simply Wall St.
Avis Budget Group’s second-quarter 2026 results showed sales of US$2,998 million versus US$3,039 million a year earlier, while net income rose to US$35 million and diluted EPS from continuing operations reached US$0.98, up from US$0.10. Despite this year-on-year EPS improvement, the company missed Wall Street forecasts and highlighted pressures from softer Americas travel demand, fleet reductions and more than US$50 million in recall-related costs so far this year. We’ll now examine how this earnings miss, particularly the recall-driven cost burden, reshapes Avis Budget Group’s investment narrative and outlook. AI is about to change healthcare. These 41 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10b in market cap - there's still time to get in early. To own Avis Budget Group, you need to believe the company can turn its large global rental footprint, premium Avis First rollout and tech investments into steadier profits, despite its cyclical travel exposure and leveraged balance sheet. The latest quarter’s recall-driven costs and softer Americas demand weigh on the near term, but the key catalyst remains execution on higher-margin offerings, while the biggest immediate risk is further operational or fleet disruptions that pressure already thin earnings. In that context, management’s decision to reiterate full year adjusted EBITDA guidance of US$850 million to US$1,000 million, while absorbing more than US$50 million in recall-related costs, stands out. It links directly to the premiumization and efficiency story behind Avis First and digital fleet management, but also underlines how sensitive the earnings path is to fleet quality, utilization and any additional, unplanned vehicle-related headwinds. Yet beneath the premium and technology upside, investors should be aware of how high leverage and ongoing capital needs could quickly amplify any further recall or demand shock... Read the full narrative on Avis Budget Group (it's free!) Avis Budget Group's narrative projects $12.5 billion revenue and $638.8 million earnings by 2029. Uncover how Avis Budget Group's forecasts yield a $134.14 fair value, a 13% downside to its current price. Some of the most optimistic analysts were banking on revenue reaching about US$13.1 billion and earnings of roughly US$472 million by 2029, yet Q2’s recall costs…Read full document

Avis Budget Group’s second-quarter 2026 results showed sales of US$2,998 million versus US$3,039 million a year earlier, while net income rose to US$35 million and diluted EPS from continuing operations reached US$0.98, up from US$0.10. Despite this year-on-year EPS improvement, the company missed Wall Street forecasts and highlighted pressures from softer Americas travel demand, fleet reductions and more than US$50 million in recall-related costs so far this year. We’ll now examine how this earnings miss, particularly the recall-driven cost burden, reshapes Avis Budget Group’s investment narrative and outlook. AI is about to change healthcare. These 41 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10b in market cap - there's still time to get in early. To own Avis Budget Group, you need to believe the company can turn its large global rental footprint, premium Avis First rollout and tech investments into steadier profits, despite its cyclical travel exposure and leveraged balance sheet. The latest quarter’s recall-driven costs and softer Americas demand weigh on the near term, but the key catalyst remains execution on higher-margin offerings, while the biggest immediate risk is further operational or fleet disruptions that pressure already thin earnings. In that context, management’s decision to reiterate full year adjusted EBITDA guidance of US$850 million to US$1,000 million, while absorbing more than US$50 million in recall-related costs, stands out. It links directly to the premiumization and efficiency story behind Avis First and digital fleet management, but also underlines how sensitive the earnings path is to fleet quality, utilization and any additional, unplanned vehicle-related headwinds. Yet beneath the premium and technology upside, investors should be aware of how high leverage and ongoing capital needs could quickly amplify any further recall or demand shock... Read the full narrative on Avis Budget Group (it's free!) Avis Budget Group's narrative projects $12.5 billion revenue and $638.8 million earnings by 2029. Uncover how Avis Budget Group's forecasts yield a $134.14 fair value, a 13% downside to its current price. Some of the most optimistic analysts were banking on revenue reaching about US$13.1 billion and earnings of roughly US$472 million by 2029, yet Q2’s recall costs and travel softness highlight how uncertain that path is, especially if high leverage and major fleet spending keep biting into the cash those forecasts assume. Explore 3 other fair value estimates on Avis Budget Group - why the stock might be worth over 3x more than the current price! Don't just follow the ticker - dig into the data and build a conviction that's truly your own. A great starting point for your Avis Budget Group research is our analysis highlighting 3 key rewards and 2 important warning signs that could impact your investment decision. Our free Avis Budget Group research report provides a comprehensive fundamental analysis summarized in a single visual - the Snowflake - making it easy to evaluate Avis Budget Group's overall financial health at a glance. Our top stock finds are flying under the radar-for now. Get in early: Uncover the next big thing with 20 elite penny stocks that balance risk and reward. This technology could replace computers: discover 26 stocks that are working to make quantum computing a reality. Invest in the nuclear renaissance through our list of 90 elite nuclear energy infrastructure plays powering the global AI revolution. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include CAR. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email [email protected]

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-29

Avis Budget Group Q2 Earnings Call Highlights

MarketBeat
Interested in Avis Budget Group, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. Avis Budget reduced its Americas fleet by 5% year over year as travel demand softened, prioritizing utilization, transaction profitability and returns over rental-day growth. Utilization reached a record second-quarter 73.2%, limiting the decline in rental days to 2%. Americas adjusted EBITDA rose 7.7% despite a 1.9% revenue decline, but recalls remained a major headwind, costing more than $50 million year to date. International operations weakened, with adjusted EBITDA down 11% amid lower inbound travel and increased European fleet supply. Avis Budget reiterated full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance of $850 million to $1 billion and expects to reduce leverage by at least one full turn by year-end. The company also anticipates receiving $650 million from its Pentwater settlement, subject to court approval, to help retire debt due in 2027. MarketBeat Week in Review – 04/27 - 05/01 Avis Budget Group (NASDAQ:CAR) said it adjusted its fleet strategy during the second quarter of 2026 as travel demand softened from earlier expectations, reducing vehicle supply and emphasizing utilization, transaction profitability and returns over rental-day growth. Chief Executive Officer Brian Choi said summer bookings had been showing mid-single-digit growth entering April, but forward-booking momentum weakened by early May. The company accelerated vehicle dispositions during April and early May, when the used-vehicle market was still seasonally strong, rather than wait for weaker demand trends to become more pronounced. → This Tiny AI Supplier Could Be More Important Than the Chipmakers Avis Short Squeeze Shocked the Market: Are These 3 Stocks Next? The Americas fleet ended the quarter down 5% year over year, marking the company’s lowest second-quarter fleet size since the second quarter of 2021. The original plan had contemplated fleet growth tied to expected travel activity around the World Cup, America 250 and a stronger summer travel market, Choi said. Choi cited broader consumer uncertainty, higher travel costs and geopolitical volatility. TSA check-ins moved from flat year-over-year in April to down 0.7% in May and down 1.3% in June, while overseas visitors to the U.S., based on CBP I-94 data, declined 8% during the quarter. → Refiner Stocks Are Near Record Highs—Can Iran-Driven Margins Keep Them Th…Read full document

Interested in Avis Budget Group, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like better. Avis Budget reduced its Americas fleet by 5% year over year as travel demand softened, prioritizing utilization, transaction profitability and returns over rental-day growth. Utilization reached a record second-quarter 73.2%, limiting the decline in rental days to 2%. Americas adjusted EBITDA rose 7.7% despite a 1.9% revenue decline, but recalls remained a major headwind, costing more than $50 million year to date. International operations weakened, with adjusted EBITDA down 11% amid lower inbound travel and increased European fleet supply. Avis Budget reiterated full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance of $850 million to $1 billion and expects to reduce leverage by at least one full turn by year-end. The company also anticipates receiving $650 million from its Pentwater settlement, subject to court approval, to help retire debt due in 2027. MarketBeat Week in Review – 04/27 - 05/01 Avis Budget Group (NASDAQ:CAR) said it adjusted its fleet strategy during the second quarter of 2026 as travel demand softened from earlier expectations, reducing vehicle supply and emphasizing utilization, transaction profitability and returns over rental-day growth. Chief Executive Officer Brian Choi said summer bookings had been showing mid-single-digit growth entering April, but forward-booking momentum weakened by early May. The company accelerated vehicle dispositions during April and early May, when the used-vehicle market was still seasonally strong, rather than wait for weaker demand trends to become more pronounced. → This Tiny AI Supplier Could Be More Important Than the Chipmakers Avis Short Squeeze Shocked the Market: Are These 3 Stocks Next? The Americas fleet ended the quarter down 5% year over year, marking the company’s lowest second-quarter fleet size since the second quarter of 2021. The original plan had contemplated fleet growth tied to expected travel activity around the World Cup, America 250 and a stronger summer travel market, Choi said. Choi cited broader consumer uncertainty, higher travel costs and geopolitical volatility. TSA check-ins moved from flat year-over-year in April to down 0.7% in May and down 1.3% in June, while overseas visitors to the U.S., based on CBP I-94 data, declined 8% during the quarter. → Refiner Stocks Are Near Record Highs—Can Iran-Driven Margins Keep Them There? The Trade Desk: Down 75%, But a Reversal May Be Near Despite the smaller Americas fleet, rental days declined only 2%, aided by improved utilization. Americas vehicle utilization reached 73.2%, the company’s highest second-quarter level on record, according to Choi. He attributed the improvement to technology deployments, operating discipline and a greater focus on fleet as capital at risk. Chief Financial Officer Daniel Cunha said Americas adjusted EBITDA increased 7.7% year over year while revenue declined 1.9%, producing roughly 100 basis points of margin expansion. Rental days fell 2.1%, reflecting a fleet that was 5.4% smaller year over year, while inbound rental days declined 5%. → Innovative ETF Strategies That Are Paying Off This Summer Americas utilization improved 250 basis points year over year. Cunha said the company’s operating performance came despite continued recall-related constraints. The company chose to prioritize longer-duration rentals over some one-day transactions, which tend to generate higher revenue per day, or RPD. Choi said the approach reduced handling costs and operational complexity while improving overall transaction economics. Revenue per transaction rose 6% year over year, while Americas RPD was essentially flat. Excluding changes in rental-length mix and other mix shifts, the company said Americas RPD would have increased about 3%. Cunha said RPD excluding foreign-exchange effects rose 0.2% in the Americas. The company recorded two consecutive quarters of positive global RPD growth for the first time in 12 quarters, and consecutive quarterly RPD growth in the Americas for the first time in 16 quarters. Recall campaigns remained a material cost and utilization headwind. Cunha said recalls in July 2025 had grounded about 4.6% of the fleet at their peak, and new recalls announced by three original equipment manufacturers in April 2026 resulted in approximately 18,000 grounded vehicles. That exceeded the roughly 15,000 grounded vehicles at the end of 2025. Year-to-date recall costs exceeded $50 million before lost profit, Cunha said. The company expects recall costs during the remainder of 2026 to be slightly more than half of the first-half impact, assuming parts become available at the rates promised by manufacturers. The company’s accelerated vehicle dispositions also affected depreciation. Per-unit depreciation was $301 in the quarter, which Cunha said was unusually low because of elevated sales activity. Under a more normalized sales pattern, the company estimated per-unit depreciation would have been approximately $320. International operations faced a more difficult environment. Revenue excluding exchange-rate effects declined 2.5% year over year, while adjusted EBITDA fell 11%. Rental days declined 2.9%, including a 10% drop in strategic accounts. Cunha said geopolitical tensions in the Middle East pressured inbound European travel, with flight capacity down as much as 38% in April and May. International RPD rose 0.4% excluding exchange rates, or 2.2% excluding the suspended Zipcar UK operations. Increased fleet supply in several major European markets also pressured pricing, with vehicle registrations rising more than 10% in several of the company’s largest markets. As of June 30, Avis Budget had more than $1 billion of available liquidity and about $1.9 billion of fleet funding capacity. Its net corporate leverage ratio was 7.4 times, down 100 basis points from year-end 2025. The company expects to reduce leverage by at least one full turn of adjusted EBITDA by the end of 2026. During the quarter, the company issued $300 million of senior notes due in 2031 and used proceeds to partially redeem notes due in 2027, reducing that maturity from $650 million to $350 million. It also extended the maturity of its $2 billion revolving credit facility from December 2028 to June 2031 and added a temporary $200 million facility. The company expects to receive $650 million in cash under its short-swing profit settlement with Pentwater, subject to final court approval. Choi said the company expects the matter to be resolved by year-end. Avis Budget plans to use part of the proceeds to retire the remaining $350 million of senior notes due in 2027. Avis Budget reiterated its full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance of $850 million to $1 billion. Choi said the Americas fleet is expected to remain down by a similar mid-single-digit percentage in the third quarter, with utilization improvements offsetting some of the impact on rental days. The company expects RPD to be roughly flat year over year as it continues to favor longer-duration, higher-value transactions. The company also reported progress in autonomous vehicle operations and premium rentals. Choi corrected an earlier statement during the call, saying Avis Budget assumed operational responsibility for Waymo’s Dallas ride-hail operations in June, rather than July. The company is responsible for vehicle maintenance, uptime, charging and real-estate infrastructure, while Waymo handles the technology and customer acquisition. In addition, Avis First, the company’s premium rental offering, expanded to Orlando, Washington Dulles, London Heathrow and Paris Charles de Gaulle. Choi said the program added select Mercedes and BMW models and has maintained an average customer rating of 4.9 out of five stars. Avis Budget Group, Inc operates as a leading global provider of vehicle rental and mobility solutions. Through its two core brands, Avis® and Budget®, the company offers a broad range of rental options including daily, weekly and monthly car rentals for leisure and business travelers. In addition to traditional airport and off-airport car rental services, Avis Budget Group delivers innovative mobility platforms such as car-sharing programs and connected fleet solutions designed to meet the evolving needs of corporate, government and individual customers. The company's roots trace back to Avis Rent a Car, founded in 1946, and Budget Rent a Car, established in 1958. This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]. The article "Avis Budget Group Q2 Earnings Call Highlights" was originally published by MarketBeat. View MarketBeat's top stocks for July 2026.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-29

Avis Budget Group Inc (CAR) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Highlights: Record Utilization and Strategic ...

GuruFocus.com
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Revenue: Declined 1.9% year-over-year in the Americas. Adjusted EBITDA: Grew 7.7% year-over-year in the Americas; highest second quarter adjusted EBITDA margin in the last three years. Fleet Size: Americas fleet down 5% year-over-year. Rental Days: Declined 2% in the Americas. Vehicle Utilization: Reached 73.2% in the Americas, highest second quarter utilization level in company history. Revenue Per Transaction: Increased 6% year-over-year. RPD (Revenue Per Day): Essentially flat year-over-year; would have been up nearly 3% without mix shift. Net Corporate Leverage Ratio: 7.4 times, down 100 basis points since year-end 2025. Liquidity: More than $1 billion in available liquidity and approximately $1.9 billion of fleet funding capacity. Settlement Agreement: $650 million in cash from Pentwater settlement, subject to final court approval. Full-Year Adjusted EBITDA Guidance: Reiterated at $850 million to $1 billion. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 8 Warning Signs with CAR. Is CAR fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: July 29, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Avis Budget Group Inc (NASDAQ:CAR) achieved record second quarter utilization globally, with the Americas reaching the highest second quarter utilization level in company history at 73.2%. The company reported a 7.7% year-over-year growth in adjusted EBITDA in the Americas, despite a 1.9% decline in revenue, demonstrating strong operational leverage. Avis Budget Group Inc (NASDAQ:CAR) successfully reached a settlement agreement with Pentwater, resulting in a $650 million cash recovery, which is expected to benefit shareholders. The partnership with Waymo has progressed with the launch of autonomous ride-hail operations in Dallas, marking a significant milestone in their autonomous vehicle strategy. Avis First, the premium rental offering, continues to expand and gain traction, with high customer satisfaction ratings and expansion to major airport locations. The company faced a softer-than-expected demand environment, with rental days in the Americas declining by 2.1% year-over-year. International segment revenues declined by 2.5% year-over-year, with adjusted EBITDA down 11%, pressured by higher variable costs and a challenging operating environment. Avis B…Read full document

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Revenue: Declined 1.9% year-over-year in the Americas. Adjusted EBITDA: Grew 7.7% year-over-year in the Americas; highest second quarter adjusted EBITDA margin in the last three years. Fleet Size: Americas fleet down 5% year-over-year. Rental Days: Declined 2% in the Americas. Vehicle Utilization: Reached 73.2% in the Americas, highest second quarter utilization level in company history. Revenue Per Transaction: Increased 6% year-over-year. RPD (Revenue Per Day): Essentially flat year-over-year; would have been up nearly 3% without mix shift. Net Corporate Leverage Ratio: 7.4 times, down 100 basis points since year-end 2025. Liquidity: More than $1 billion in available liquidity and approximately $1.9 billion of fleet funding capacity. Settlement Agreement: $650 million in cash from Pentwater settlement, subject to final court approval. Full-Year Adjusted EBITDA Guidance: Reiterated at $850 million to $1 billion. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 8 Warning Signs with CAR. Is CAR fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Release Date: July 29, 2026 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Avis Budget Group Inc (NASDAQ:CAR) achieved record second quarter utilization globally, with the Americas reaching the highest second quarter utilization level in company history at 73.2%. The company reported a 7.7% year-over-year growth in adjusted EBITDA in the Americas, despite a 1.9% decline in revenue, demonstrating strong operational leverage. Avis Budget Group Inc (NASDAQ:CAR) successfully reached a settlement agreement with Pentwater, resulting in a $650 million cash recovery, which is expected to benefit shareholders. The partnership with Waymo has progressed with the launch of autonomous ride-hail operations in Dallas, marking a significant milestone in their autonomous vehicle strategy. Avis First, the premium rental offering, continues to expand and gain traction, with high customer satisfaction ratings and expansion to major airport locations. The company faced a softer-than-expected demand environment, with rental days in the Americas declining by 2.1% year-over-year. International segment revenues declined by 2.5% year-over-year, with adjusted EBITDA down 11%, pressured by higher variable costs and a challenging operating environment. Avis Budget Group Inc (NASDAQ:CAR) experienced significant recall-related constraints, grounding approximately 18,000 vehicles, which represented over $50 million in costs year-to-date. The company had to adjust its fleet strategy due to a decline in forward bookings, resulting in a 5% reduction in fleet size year-over-year, the lowest since the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite efforts to optimize transaction economics, revenue per day (RPD) remained flat year-over-year, indicating challenges in achieving pricing growth. Q: Given the lower demand environment, is there anything Avis Budget Group can do to further manage costs on the operating side? A: Brian J. Choi, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, emphasized that cost discipline is foundational to Avis Budget Group's operations. The company has tightened its belt on core operating costs while continuing to invest in future growth areas like technology. This balanced approach helps fund investments while monitoring the revenue environment. Q: With the rollout of autonomous vehicles (AV) in Dallas, is Avis Budget Group considering purchasing AVs or maintaining fleet management on someone else's balance sheet? A: Brian J. Choi stated that the decision on purchasing AVs is not being accelerated. The company is developing relationships with AV providers and vehicle manufacturers to keep both options open, whether managing a fleet on someone else's balance sheet or purchasing the vehicles themselves. Q: How does Avis Budget Group view the current competitive environment, especially with one competitor facing liquidity questions? A: Brian J. Choi noted that the company observed a decline in international inbound travelers and adjusted its fleet accordingly. Avis Budget Group made early decisions to reduce fleet size and capitalize on residual gains, and they believe the supply-demand dynamics are better aligned now than earlier in the year. Q: Can you provide more details on the technology investments that have enabled Avis Budget Group to maintain high utilization rates despite weaker demand? A: Brian J. Choi explained that Avis Budget Group has overhauled its tech stack to improve fleet visibility and management. The new platform, which is implemented in over 90% of the Americas fleet, allows for efficient decision-making and minimizes unrentable days, contributing to improved utilization. Q: What is Avis Budget Group's outlook for the used vehicle market, and how would the company respond if used vehicle prices moderate while demand remains subdued? A: Brian J. Choi indicated that the used vehicle market appears stable and in line with expectations. Avis Budget Group plans conservatively, building a cushion into the fleet to manage potential declines in demand. The company uses technology to decide which vehicles to hold or sell, ensuring financial health and flexibility. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-29

Is Avis Budget Group a Buy After Its Latest Earnings Report?

Motley Fool
With the exception of a brief pop during a meme-stock craze, Avis Budget Group (Nasdaq: CAR) has had a relatively quiet year. The company faces a challenging competitive landscape as ridesharing continues to proliferate, and autonomous vehicles like Waymo threaten to render traditional car rentals obsolete, creating an overhang in the industry. Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue » In its second quarter, revenue fell 1% to $3 billion, short of estimates of $3.11 billion. Despite the slide in revenue and the double-digit after-hours decline in the stock following the results, the company made progress in some areas. Vehicle utilization rose 1.9 points from the quarter a year ago to 72.6% and 2.5 points in the Americas to 73.2%, record second-quarter highs for the company. It also lowered per-unit fleet costs by 4% to $290 per month, both of which show the business becoming more efficient, a key strategic goal for Avis. The company also kicked off an autonomous vehicle partnership with Waymo, completing thousands of trips in its first month, helping ensure it will remain relevant in the age of AVs. Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) rose 3% to $286 million, and the cutback in expenses, including vehicle depreciation and restructuring expenses, led to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) earnings per share jumping from $0.10 to $0.98. While that was a strong improvement, it still missed analyst estimates at $1.91. Management acknowledged that booking trends weakened in the quarter, and the company trimmed its fleet accordingly. Image source: The Motley Fool. Avis stock tumbled 13% after hours on the earnings miss, but investors seem to be missing the bigger picture here. A weak macroeconomic climate was the reason for the underwhelming results, as a sluggish travel market may be due to inflation, but travel demand is outside of the company’s control. However, Avis is executing effectively in the areas under its control, lifting vehicle utilization rates to records for the second quarter, lowering per-unit costs, and driving a surge on the bottom line. Still, investors seeme…Read full document

With the exception of a brief pop during a meme-stock craze, Avis Budget Group (Nasdaq: CAR) has had a relatively quiet year. The company faces a challenging competitive landscape as ridesharing continues to proliferate, and autonomous vehicles like Waymo threaten to render traditional car rentals obsolete, creating an overhang in the industry. Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue » In its second quarter, revenue fell 1% to $3 billion, short of estimates of $3.11 billion. Despite the slide in revenue and the double-digit after-hours decline in the stock following the results, the company made progress in some areas. Vehicle utilization rose 1.9 points from the quarter a year ago to 72.6% and 2.5 points in the Americas to 73.2%, record second-quarter highs for the company. It also lowered per-unit fleet costs by 4% to $290 per month, both of which show the business becoming more efficient, a key strategic goal for Avis. The company also kicked off an autonomous vehicle partnership with Waymo, completing thousands of trips in its first month, helping ensure it will remain relevant in the age of AVs. Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) rose 3% to $286 million, and the cutback in expenses, including vehicle depreciation and restructuring expenses, led to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) earnings per share jumping from $0.10 to $0.98. While that was a strong improvement, it still missed analyst estimates at $1.91. Management acknowledged that booking trends weakened in the quarter, and the company trimmed its fleet accordingly. Image source: The Motley Fool. Avis stock tumbled 13% after hours on the earnings miss, but investors seem to be missing the bigger picture here. A weak macroeconomic climate was the reason for the underwhelming results, as a sluggish travel market may be due to inflation, but travel demand is outside of the company’s control. However, Avis is executing effectively in the areas under its control, lifting vehicle utilization rates to records for the second quarter, lowering per-unit costs, and driving a surge on the bottom line. Still, investors seemed disappointed by a decline of more than 3 million available rental days, reflecting a shrinking fleet. Revenue per vehicle was flat, and it did not offer any guidance, leaving investors in the dark. CEO Brian Choi took over in early 2025, promising to focus on the bottom line rather than chasing growth, and that shift has paid off: the company has significantly reduced vehicle depreciation costs from a year ago, cutting its GAAP loss in half in the first half of the year. Avis is also outperforming rival Hertz on the balance sheet and in operational efficiency, a clear win. Avis looks like it’s on the right track, but it’s too soon in its turnaround to call the stock to buy. I’d like to see some stabilization in the rental market and continued margin improvement. Analysts expect earnings per share of $3.41 this year and $7.82 the following year. If it can hit those numbers and continue to deliver margin improvement, the stock should move higher, but I’d like to see its progress over the next two quarters first. Before you buy stock in Avis Budget Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Avis Budget Group wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $379,662!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,206,116!* Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 886% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 206% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2026. Jeremy Bowman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is Avis Budget Group a Buy After Its Latest Earnings Report? was originally published by The Motley Fool

TranscriptFY2026 Q22026-07-29

FY2026 Q2 earnings call transcript

Earnings source - 110 paragraphs
Operator

Greetings. Welcome to the Avis Budget Group second quarter 2026 earnings call. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to David Calabria, Treasurer and Senior Vice President, Corporate Finance. Thank you, David. You may begin.

David Calabria

Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us. On the call with me are Brian Choi, our Chief Executive Officer, and Daniel Cunha, our Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that we will be discussing forward-looking information, including potential future financial performance, which is subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements and information. Such risks and assumptions, uncertainties, and other factors are identified in our earnings release and other periodic filings with the SEC, as well as the investor relations section of our website. Accordingly, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a prediction of actual results; any or all of our forward-looking statements may prove to be inaccurate, and we can make no guarantees about our future performance. We undertake no obligation to update or revise our forward-looking statements.

David Calabria

On this call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to our earnings press release, which is available on our website, for how we define these measures and reconciliations to the closest comparable GAAP measures. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Brian.

Brian Choi

Thanks, David. Thank you all for joining us. I want to start this discussion not with the results themselves, but with the decisions that led to those results. Last quarter, we spoke about fleet reduction and supply discipline. This quarter, we put that operating philosophy into practice. The month of April started with summer bookings in the outer months holding at mid-single-digit growth. By early May, that momentum began to change. The strength we had been seeing in forward bookings started to erode; that deceleration appeared in the booking data before it fully worked its way into reported volumes. Once we saw it, we did not wait for the trend to become more pronounced. We moved quickly. We accelerated vehicle dispositions well beyond our original plan, taking advantage of a window in April and early May when the used vehicle market was still seasonally strong.

Brian Choi

That allowed us to monetize favorable residual values while realigning supply to a different demand environment. The result was a fleet position that looks different from what we would typically expect in a second quarter. In a normal year, this is the period when we would be building fleet ahead of the summer peak. Instead, our Americas fleet finished the quarter down 5% year-over-year, the lowest second quarter fleet size since the COVID environment of 2Q21. That was a meaningful departure from our original plan, which contemplated growth tied to World Cup activity, America 250, and a more constructive summer travel environment. The data changed. Against a backdrop of broader consumer uncertainty, higher travel costs, and geopolitical volatility, year-over-year TSA check-ins decelerated from flat in April to -70 basis points in May to -1.3% in June.

Brian Choi

Overseas visitors to the U.S., based on the CBP I-94 data, were down 8% in the second quarter. When it became clear that demand was not developing in line with our original plan, we treated that as new information and resized the fleet accordingly. Quarter after quarter, we have said that we would rather run this fleet slightly under demand than slightly over it. This quarter, we did just that. Importantly, a 5% smaller fleet did not translate into a 5% decline in rental days. Rental days in the Americas were down only 2% due to improved utilization. Vehicle utilization finished the quarter at 73.2% in the Americas, our highest second quarter utilization level in company history. This improvement was made possible by the technology deployments, operating discipline, and asset management mindset we have been building into the network over the past several quarters.

Brian Choi

It also reflects a different operating model for the business. We are treating fleet not simply as capacity to meet demand, but as capital at risk. When the data changes, the fleet plan has to change with it. In the second quarter, given the demand environment and the strength of the used vehicle market, we leaned deliberately into the asset manager side of the business and prioritized profitability and returns over rental days or market share. We believe this is the right decision, and we made it knowing it would affect the shape of our second quarter. Most notably, with fleet as a scarce resource this quarter, we made the deliberate choice to optimize for revenue per transaction versus revenue per day. Put simply, we accepted fewer one-day rentals, which carry an RPD premium in order to fulfill more weekly business.

Brian Choi

When supply is tight, longer duration rentals create better overall transaction economics because they reduce turns, handling costs, and operational complexity. If we had maintained the same length of rental mix as 2Q25, RPD would have been up nearly 3% year-over-year. Instead, RPD was essentially flat. That was a deliberate trade-off, and the economics showed up in revenue per transaction, which was up 6% year-over-year. Last quarter, we said that our expectation was for the World Cup to be a clear travel tailwind, particularly in host cities. That expectation was broadly shared across the travel industry, but it did not play out the way we expected. That is not in our control. What we can control is how quickly we adapt, and our teams did that well this quarter.

Brian Choi

Our adjusted EBITDA outcome was in line with our initial expectations, but the path to get there was very different than we anticipated. That has implications for how we will manage the third quarter, and the same principles will apply. We will stay disciplined on fleet, protect utilization, and prioritize returns over volume. I will elaborate on that later in the call. Before I turn it over to Daniel, I want to briefly touch on three additional items that are important to shareholder value in the strategic direction of the company. First, on Pentwater. You will recall that last quarter I spent time addressing the volatility in our stock price and the trading dynamics involving our second-largest shareholder. We are pleased to report that Avis and Pentwater have reached a settlement agreement related to short-swing profits, under which Pentwater agreed to pay Avis $650 million in cash.

Brian Choi

We believe the settlement represents a fair resolution of the dispute and a meaningful recovery for our shareholders. The settlement remains subject to final court approval, but we expect this matter to be resolved by year-end. Second, our partnership with Waymo reached an important milestone with the launch of autonomous ride-hail operations in Dallas. Our teams assumed operational responsibility on July 1st, and since then, we have delivered thousands of trips while steadily scaling both operation and the fleet. I want to recognize our AV team for the work they have done to build this capability the right way, with the right people, processes, and resources. We are now taking the early lessons from Dallas and applying them to a repeatable operating model. One built around uncompromising safety, world-class customer experience, and operational excellence. Third, Avis First, our premium first-class rental offering, continues to gain traction.

Brian Choi

Since our last update, we expanded the program to additional major airport locations, including Orlando, Washington Dulles, London Heathrow, and Paris Charles de Gaulle. We also broadened the vehicle portfolio with high-demand models, including select Mercedes and BMW vehicles. Customer satisfaction remains strong, with an average rating of 4.9 out of five stars, underscoring the value proposition and the momentum we continue to see in this segment. Each of these items is important in its own way, but they all support the same broader goal: creating better value for shareholders through disciplined execution, stronger customer experiences, and new capabilities that can scale over time. With that, let me turn it over to Daniel, who will provide additional detail on the quarter.

Daniel Cunha

Thanks, Brian. Before I discuss the results in detail, I want to highlight a few key takeaways from the quarter. The second quarter demonstrated the operating leverage of the actions Brian described. Despite a softer-than-expected demand environment and fewer rental days, adjusted EBITDA grew year-over-year, and we delivered our highest second-quarter adjusted EBITDA margin in the last three years. We also achieved record second-quarter utilization globally, with both the Americas and International improving sequentially and year-over-year. Importantly, we delivered two consecutive quarters of positive global RPD growth for the first time in 12 quarters. With that context, let us review each of our segments, starting with the Americas. In the Americas, adjusted EBITDA grew 7.7% year-over-year on revenue that declined 1.9%, resulting in approximately 100 basis points of margin expansion.

Daniel Cunha

That performance underscores the fact that disciplined fleet execution can support profitability even in a softer demand environment. As demand built during the first quarter, we observed encouraging signals across both RPD and rental days, particularly in World Cup markets. That dynamic changed quickly early in the second quarter. As Brian outlined, we made a strategic decision to proactively rightsize the fleet in response, rather than wait for conditions to deteriorate further. The revenue decline was driven primarily by a 2.1% decline in rental days, which reflected our intentional decision to operate with a fleet that was 5.4% smaller year over year. Rental day pressure was most pronounced in our inbound segment, which declined 5%. Importantly, the decline in rental days was significantly less than the reduction in fleet.

Daniel Cunha

That gap was driven by a 250-basis point improvement in utilization, reflecting stronger operating execution across the network. Even with continued no-fix recall constraints, Americas utilization reached 73.2%, our highest second-quarter utilization level in company history. The utilization improvement validates the investments we have made in technology and the changes we have made to operating processes. It also demonstrates that our fleet discipline is delivering measurable operational returns. RPD, excluding exchange rate effects, increased 0.2% year over year. While that was more modest than the growth we delivered in the first quarter, the underlying drivers are important. With fleet as a scarce resource, we deliberately shifted mix toward longer duration, higher contribution transactions. Absent that length of rental and other shifts in mix, Americas RPD would have increased approximately 3% year over year.

Daniel Cunha

This marks the first time in 12 quarters that the company has delivered two consecutive quarters of positive global RPD growth. The inflection is even more pronounced in the Americas, where we had not achieved consecutive quarterly RPD growth in 16 quarters. We view that as significant because it suggests that the RPD erosion experienced since the post-pandemic peak in 2022 has stabilized. The industry appears to have adjusted to the realities of higher interest rates and elevated vehicle costs, contributing to more normalized pricing dynamics. At the same time, RPD is only one measure of transaction economics. RPD has long been used as a proxy for profitability, and all else equal, higher pricing supports higher EBITDA margins. Across segments and channels, all else is not equal. Commission rates, miles driven, accident propensity, transaction length, handling costs, and depreciation all affect the ultimate profitability of each transaction.

Daniel Cunha

As we continue to evolve our asset management approach, we're increasingly focused on optimizing contribution and return on assets rather than simply maximizing headline RPD. Ultimately, we are solving for EBITDA contribution and return on assets, not simply RPD in isolation. This quarter, we also continued to manage through significant recall-related constraints. Like the broader industry, we were impacted by extensive recall campaigns in July 2025, which grounded approximately 4.6% of our fleet at peak impact. While we expected to have cycled through most of that pressure by the second quarter, we were notified in April 2026 of additional recalls from three different OEMs, resulting in a total of approximately 18,000 grounded vehicles. That exceeded the approximately 15,000 grounded vehicles we exited 2025 with. Year to date, recalls have represented more than $50 million of directly attributable costs before considering lost profit.

Daniel Cunha

This was a material headwind in the first half and will continue to affect the business in the second half. That said, utilization improvement we delivered despite those constraints, reinforces the strength of the operational execution in the quarter. Our decision to accelerate dispositions early in the quarter also proved important from a residual value perspective. Rental demand began to soften while we were still in the seasonally strongest period of the used car market. We leaned into that market strength, accelerated disposition, and reduced exposure to residual value risk. While that decision affected revenue, we believe it ultimately protected shareholder value. Because of the elevated sales activity in the quarter, per unit depreciation was unusually low at $301 per unit. Under more normalized sales pattern, we estimate per unit depreciation would have been approximately $320.

Daniel Cunha

Let's turn to our international segment. Our international segment faced a more challenging operating environment in the first half than the Americas. Revenues, excluding exchange rate effects, declined 2.5% year-over-year, and adjusted EBITDA declined 11% year-over-year, further pressured by higher variable costs associated with our mix shift. Rental days declined 2.9% year-over-year, which was a 100 basis point improvement from the first quarter, but still below our expectations. We anticipated weakness in commercial segments as we cycled through the structural mix shift actions executed in the second half of 2025. However, the weakness was more pronounced than planned, with strategic accounts declining 10% year-over-year. Geopolitical developments, particularly Middle East tensions, also pressured inbound travel to Europe, with flight capacity down as much as 38% in April and May.

Daniel Cunha

RPD, excluding exchange rate effects, increased 0.4% year-over-year or +2.2% excluding the impact of Zipcar UK, whose operations we suspended. RPD growth decelerated sequentially, reflecting a less constructive rate environment than in the Americas. Elevated fleet supply in several key international markets created additional industry capacity and placed pressure on pricing. Vehicle registration grew more than 10% in several of our largest European markets. We remain committed to our mix shift strategy toward higher return leisure demand. At the same time, we recognize that leisure demand can carry higher selling costs. Our focus is to continue improving mix while reducing the cost to acquire that demand over time, which reinforces the importance of further developing our own digital channels. With that, I will turn to our leverage, liquidity, and outlook.

Daniel Cunha

As of June 30th, we had more than $1 billion in available liquidity and approximately $1.9 billion of fleet funding capacity. Our net corporate leverage ratio of 7.4 times is down 100 basis points since year-end in 2025. We'll remain focused on deleveraging towards normalized levels during the balance of the year and expect to reduce leverage by at least a full turn of adjusted EBITDA by the end of 2026. This quarter, we have successfully addressed our near-term debt maturity profile, executing several refinancing transactions to strengthen our financial position and extend our debt maturity ladder. On May 29th, we issued $300 million of senior notes during 2031. The proceeds were used to partially redeem our senior notes during 2027, reducing that maturity from $650 million to $350 million and providing meaningful flexibility heading into year-end.

Daniel Cunha

On June 29th, we extended the maturity of our $2 billion revolving credit facility from December 2028 to June 2031 and added a temporary $200 million facility through June 2028, or upon receipt of the Pentwater settlement proceeds, strengthening our liquidity position. Beyond this corporate debt refinancings, we also executed tactical refinances across our vehicle financing programs. In June, we issued $650 million of AESOP term ABS debt, $200 million of Canadian term ABS debt, and renewed our CAD 580 million Canadian bank facility. The term transactions were oversubscribed and closed at tighter spread levels than the next most recent transactions, demonstrating continued capital markets confidence in Avis Budget Group. Most significantly, we expect to receive $650 million in proceeds from the Pentwater short-swing profit settlement.

Daniel Cunha

While this settlement is contingent on court approval, making the timing of payments uncertain, we expect to receive the funds by year-end and plan to deploy a portion of the proceeds towards retiring by year-end the remaining $350 million senior notes due in 2027. Our debt profile includes several attractively priced tranches maturing in the near and medium term. Rather than retire these low-cost obligations early, which would not be economical given current refinancing rates, we intend to take an opportunistic approach. We may refinance these lower-cost tranches closer to them becoming current, provided we have the liquidity on our balance sheets and a clear path to refinancing. In summary, we're pleased with how the second quarter turned out and how our team reacted to the changing market conditions.

Daniel Cunha

During the first half of 2026, we exceeded our adjusted EBITDA plan, and we entered Q3, our peak season demand, with strong operational fundamentals. As a result, we're reiterating our full-year guidance of $850 million to $1 billion in adjusted EBITDA. With that, I'll turn it back to Brian.

Brian Choi

Thanks, Daniel. The business environment has changed, but our operating principles remain consistent. We are pleased with how our team has navigated the second quarter, and we are managing the third quarter with those implications in mind. Because we accelerated fleet dispositions in April and May, our third quarter availability will also be lower than our original plan. We expect fleet in the Americas to remain down by a similar amount year-over-year, with utilization efficiencies offsetting a portion of that impact on rental days. Given that we are in our peak demand period, we will not have the same opportunity to generate gains from incremental fleet sales that we had in the second quarter. With the fleet remaining tight, we expect to continue prioritizing longer duration, higher value transactions over shorter rentals that may carry a higher RPD but create less attractive overall economics.

Brian Choi

As a result, we expect the third quarter to look similar to the second quarter in several respects: lower fleet, strong utilization, disciplined transaction mix, and an RPD that is roughly flat year-over-year. Overall, we are entering the quarter with better operating discipline than a year ago. We have a tighter fleet, stronger utilization, and a cleaner cost base and sharper focus on returns over volume. Those are the factors that give us confidence in year-over-year adjusted EBITDA growth in the third quarter and support our full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance of $850 million-$1 billion. The environment remains dynamic, and our outlook does not depend on a broad demand recovery. We are managing the business based on the same principles we demonstrated this quarter. When the facts change, the plans have to change with them.

Brian Choi

We will stay disciplined on fleet, protect utilization, prioritize profitability and returns, and continue building a business that can deliver across different demand environments. With that, operator, we would be happy to take questions.

Operator

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. Due to the interest of time, we ask that each analyst limit themselves to one question and one follow-up. Thank you. Our first question comes from the line of Chris Woronka with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed.

Chris Woronka

Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks for taking the questions. Brian, I think I understand the rationale for cutting fleet. The demand picture clearly changed. I guess the question is, given that you have a fairly high fixed cost structure on the operating side, is there anything you can do if this lower demand situation is going to persist? Is there anything you can do to start or further attack costs on the DOE side? I have a follow-up. Thanks.

Brian Choi

Hey, Chris. From our perspective, cost discipline is foundational to everything we do. We understand the makeup of our business, and as a levered company with a lot of operating leverage around the business as well, we need to control that which we can control, which is cost. Starting from the beginning of the year, that was an area of focus for us. From a cost basis, we think that actually is what helped contribute to our profitability growth this quarter, despite lower revenue. We expect that to continue going forward. What I will say is that there are core operating costs which we have really tightened our belts on. There are costs that flow into DOE that have to do with investments into our Future growth, yeah, in terms of technology and new resources for our operations and improved processes.

Brian Choi

We are continuing to make those investments. The way that we're thinking about it is that the cost discipline around our everyday expenses is what helps fund the investments that we're making. We think we're taking a balanced approach to this while monitoring what's happening in the overall revenue environment.

Chris Woronka

Okay. Thanks, Brian. Shifting gears a little bit on AV. I know you guys have rolled out Dallas, but as we see some of the rideshare companies, at least one of them, start to invest in AVs, does it ever reach a point where you guys have to make a decision in terms of ownership of these and placing orders for autonomous? Does it feel like that decision-making process is being sped up at all for you guys?

Brian Choi

Hey, Chris. Sorry, before I answer your question, one thing to note: I robbed our AV operators by a month of operations. I think in the prepared remarks, I said that we took over operations for Waymo in Dallas in July. We actually took over in June. We just wanted to clear that up. In terms of your question about purchasing the fleet, I don't think that anything is being accelerated right now in terms of having to make that decision. The environment and the ecosystem is still evolving currently. I think what we're trying to do right now is make sure that we develop the relationships directly with both the AV providers and the vehicle providers to give ourselves both options, whether that is just managing a fleet on someone else's balance sheet or purchasing the vehicles ourselves.

Brian Choi

At this point, it's too early to make a call one way or another, but we are keeping both options open.

Chris Woronka

Okay. Got it. Thanks, guys.

Operator

The next question comes from the line of John Healy with Northcoast Research Partners. Please proceed.

John Healy

Thanks for taking the questions, guys. Brian, I wanted to ask just a little bit more about the decision to realign fleet in Q2 and how that plays out in Q3. You made a point of calling out the 3% like-for-like pricing that would've been achieved. Now that the fleet's, I would assume, right-sized, do we get back to a normal RPD contribution of the company in Q3 relative to the market? I guess my thought process is if the fleet's down and the market is still okay, should we expect a positive RPD development here in Q3? Are investors getting ahead of themselves thinking about that for the quarter?

Brian Choi

John, from our perspective, listen, the demand environment weakened, let's say. I wouldn't say that the travel demand is weak, though. What we're seeing in TSA is down roughly 2% month to date in terms of enplanements. That's off from what we had expected, but I wouldn't characterize that as the foundational weakness over here, and you're seeing strength in different pockets of the travel ecosystem. 2% decline in the TSA enplanements is different from our 5% decline in fleet. We said that in the prepared remarks that you should expect a similar-ish decline year-over-year in fleet. We expect to be in that mid-single-digit range, which is lower than what we think the overall demand environment is. Given that, the dynamics of Q3 will still look like the dynamics of Q2, where fleet is constrained.

Brian Choi

Given that, we are going to prioritize longer-duration rentals in the third quarter as well. We think that this is having a positive contribution to our overall EBITDA margin. Even though the headline RPD number is higher for these shorter-duration one-day rentals, given the fact that we are going to be fleet constrained in Q3 and we are managing towards profitability, we need to take some of these longer-length rentals. I think that the dynamics that you're seeing in Q3 will look like what they see in Q2. Overall, like I said, if we were not making these shifts in terms of length of rental mix, the overall environment is up 3% for us in terms of like-for-like segmentation. Overall, it does seem like a fairly stable environment.

Brian Choi

It's just a little bit of noise given the changes that we're making to our fleet mix, given the supply.

John Healy

Understood. That's helpful. Then just one financing-related question. You guys are always very active on both the fleet side and the corporate side. I'm just trying to think about some of the moving parts for 2027. Any way you could think about the headwind or tailwinds of some of these financings, just on the interest expense line, both corporate and fleet, maybe hypothetically for next year? Thanks.

Daniel Cunha

Hi, John, this is Daniel. A lot of the refinances are going to come due in the medium term and have been put in place now quite a while. They are predominantly fixed rates, so the refinancing cost is likely going to be higher than what we have. It will depend a bit on the trench, but 100, 125 basis points is probably our expectation. That's why I was mentioning prepared remarks that as those come due, we're going to potentially stretch a little bit how long we hold on to them in order to delay that transition. That's the new environment we operate with, and I think it's not impacting us only.

Daniel Cunha

As I was mentioning, we do think that it's playing out to some extent, an effect in the pricing environment and the two quarters of sequential RPD growth that we've had, and that we had not seen in a long time as a result of higher interest rates, higher vehicle costs, and so on.

Brian Choi

John, I would just add that we're very well aware that the next maturity we have after paying down the $350 million is four and three-quarters, and hence why we were putting the funds in the fleet for now, right, as Daniel was saying, and taking as long as we can to pay that piece down. We're managing that interest as best we can. What's foundational for us is to make sure that our debt maturity ladder does not stack up. That is something that I think is really important, and we'll make sure that we're doing things at the right time, at the right moments, at the right cost.

John Healy

Okay, just a clarification: you said that 125 basis points would maybe be an expectation? I wasn't clear on that.

Daniel Cunha

Yeah. It would depend a bit on the trend, but that's generally what we're seeing for the near term. Yep.

John Healy

Understood. Thank you, guys.

Operator

The next question comes from the line of Dan Levy with Barclays. Please proceed.

Dan Levy

Great. Good morning. Thank you for taking the questions. In this environment where demand is a bit weaker, and you've made the strategic move to tighten the fleet, maybe you can just talk to what your competitors are doing as well, as far as operating with certain fleet levels. Maybe you could just talk to the broader competitive environment that you're seeing, especially given one of your competitors is going through some questions on liquidity.

Brian Choi

Yeah, let me answer some of that. I'll answer what I can at a high level, and then Daniel, you jump in. Listen, from our perspective, I think if you had told me that international inbound travelers was going to be down 8% in the second quarter. Yeah, with the World Cup happening, I don't think anyone planned on that. From our perspective, given that we are a rental car company that does the majority of its business on airports, the ground truth that we follow is those TSA check-ins and the international travel data. That can't be argued. What we saw happening, we were keeping a close eye on, and I think that we made the call fairly early that demand was not playing out the way that we thought. It was also a situation where you could choose. The used car market was constructive in the seasonally strong period of April and May. We had a bird in hand over there.

Brian Choi

We thought that given the volatility that we've seen in terms of earnings, with the fleet write-downs that have happened over the last two years, playing with a bit of margin of safety was the right decision. What we did was, as this was developing, we made the decision that we're going to take fleet down and harvest some of those residual gains. Again, like I said, I think this is something that we caught earlier when we saw this demand shift. Overall, I think some of our competitors have taken similar approach as the months progressed. After the 4th of July, we're seeing industry supply begin to rationalize a little as well. I think the supply-demand dynamics are better aligned today going into August than they were going into May. For us, there's still several important weeks of summer left.

Brian Choi

We're focused on optimizing every day of that demand. What I would say is that given the stability we're seeing in the pricing environment, we think that the industry is rationalizing as well.

Daniel Cunha

Yeah. I would just add then a little international perspective where some of the dynamics Brian described are also present. We saw in some of our key markets a significant increase in new vehicle registration by rental car companies, something in the order of 10%. We acknowledge that is not a full picture. We don't have visibility of the deletes that may be offsetting some of that. We do see the inflow rate of new vehicles. That paired with significant declines from inbound travel, especially from the Middle East. I think it's creating a scenario market there that's a little bit more competitive than we have experienced in North America. We also expect that to continue in Q3.

Dan Levy

Okay, great. Thank you. As a follow-up, there's been a lot of questions about one of your technology vendors that I think you had discontinued the relationship with them, then there was a press release last night that there was an agreement. I think a lot of excitement on the potential profit benefit. I think some people were putting out upwards of $100 million a year. Maybe you could just talk to, now that they have a press release out, I don't know if you can comment on the potential benefit that you see on pricing or what approach you're taking. Then more broadly, are you taking a different look at your broader use of vendors and spend and what that could do on the DOE line?

Daniel Cunha

I'll take that one. After we submitted a termination notice, management of the vendor reengaged, right? We had several conversations. We were able to find a path forward, as you saw in their announcements, right? Our position was generally pretty simple, right? We wanted to have control over the customer journey. We wanted to have more flexibility in the operating model that we had and a better customer experience around tolling and other related products. With this new management, we're able to reach in terms of preserve those vehicles, allowing the vendor to remain a provider of ours. We think it's a pretty constructive outcome for ABG. It gives us continuity, and it allows us to manage the economics in a way that's aligned with our long-term objectives. Yeah.

Dan Levy

Is there something you can talk to as far as that and broader initiatives to streamline spend? Or could this lead to material profit benefits?

Daniel Cunha

For sure. The effort here on tolls, I think is representative of other efforts that we are undertaking across the P&L, so major programs around vehicle damage, insurance, licensing, and registration. I mean, those are substantial line items for us. Just like with those, we had a very disciplined approach of re-evaluating the entirety of our operations, how we perform those services internally, externally with one vendor, multiple vendors. Those are all conversations we're having across the board. In terms of expectations here, I would just point out that those are relatively complex parts of our operations. We intend to chip at them very consistently over the course. Those are not simple fixes. Those are not changes that happen overnight. Yeah.

Brian Choi

Dan, I can just add also that given the new technology that's available to us, we are taking a broad-based look at where we can improve products that we're delivering to our customers. Yes, cost efficiencies are important, and we want to make sure that we get the best deal possible out there. Ensuring that we are delivering better products for our customer and delivering a better customer experience, and being more efficient as a company, is also, I think something that we're evaluating on a regular basis.

Dan Levy

Understood. Thank you.

Operator

The next question comes from the line of Rajat Gupta with JPMorgan. Please proceed.

Rajat Gupta

Great. Thanks for taking the question. Just had a question on, just a couple here, but the first one, just on the Waymo partnership. Two months into the operation in Dallas. Wondering if you could double-click on what role you're playing as a fleet manager, and maybe highlight some of key early innings learnings. Are you already making any incremental investments for autonomous vehicle fleet management in other regions ahead of potential contract conversions? Thanks.

Brian Choi

Yeah. Rajat, I think what we're, in terms of taking over as part of operations in Dallas, is similar to what we had described when we first announced the partnership. In terms of revenue generation and the AV technology themselves, acquiring the customers, that's on Waymo. I think everything after that is on us to making sure that the vehicles are properly maintained, that they have optimized uptime. They're charging all the real estate infrastructure. From our perspective, we are investing in Dallas, particularly in more efficient real estate footprint to make sure that we're delivering on all the service levels that we had committed to. Dallas is an important milestone because we're learning what it takes to manage an operation of this complexity safely, reliably at scale. The near-term focus for us is execution on Dallas.

Brian Choi

Over time, we want to make sure that we turn this into a repeatable operating model across additional markets. We're in discussions, and we think that this is going to be a meaningful strategic capability for the company. We're going to be disciplined about it. We're focused on Dallas today. We're evaluating future markets. We'll keep you posted as things develop.

Rajat Gupta

That's helpful. Just to follow up on recalls, a 3-point headwind utilization in 2Q. Could you give us any visibility on how you might see this easing through the remainder of the year? How should we think about any impacts from DPU pricing, et cetera? Thanks.

Daniel Cunha

Yeah. Maybe a quick comment, right? As I mentioned, we have today or have had in Q2 a bigger impact than we had exiting Q4. The availability of parts hasn't been plentiful, but what we have visibility is right now, I know is that over the second half, we'll probably have slightly over half of the impact that we've had so far, something a little bit north of $50 million year to date. About half of that for the balance of the year, assuming the parts continue to become available at the rates that the OEMs have promised. In terms of DPU, this is a little bit of a drag on the vehicles that are on recall tend to have 20%-30% or higher DPU than the average. That has, let's say, slowed down the improvement in DPU that we've had.

Daniel Cunha

In spite of, as I mentioned, the quarter we have had unusually low DPU because of the incremental sale activity that Brian described. Yeah.

Rajat Gupta

Understood. Great. Thanks for all the color, and good luck.

Operator

The next question comes from the line of Chris Stathoulopoulos with Susquehanna International Group. Please proceed.

Chris Stathoulopoulos

Morning, everyone. Brian or Daniel, where are you in the pre-purchase program for 2027? I think conversations typically start around mid-year, perhaps the spring before. Is there anything unique as we think about pressures or not with respect to the OEMs, things like supply chains, et cetera?

Brian Choi

Hey, Chris. You're right in terms of timing. Typically, this would start in the spring in earnest with a lot of our OEM partners, especially the former manufacturers. After COVID and how dynamic the supply chain became, this has been pushed out throughout the course of the year, and it's kind of stabilized that way. Right now, I'd say that we're mid-innings with our OEM partners. We have a fair number of contracts that are inked already with certain manufacturers, there's still a lot more to go. We've not been hearing from our OEM partners anything out of the ordinary in terms of supply chain issues. It's been a fairly normal, I think, environment from that perspective.

Brian Choi

Listen, the topic on everyone's minds is recall and availability of cars, we're evaluating total cost of ownership from our perspective, understanding which OEM partners that we want to lean in more heavily with that deliver us reliable products, that's going to be reflected in what we can afford to pay for this product.

Chris Stathoulopoulos

Yep. Okay. No. Okay. Daniel, thank you for the commentary on the supply commentary on the international market. If I heard correctly, I think, Brian, you said that the supply-demand dynamic as a whole today, or at least where we are in the third quarters, is a bit more balanced. I took the comments around international to sound perhaps a bit tougher versus domestic. I want to make sure that I heard that right or if there's anything unique. I heard about excess registrations and things like that. I am just wondering if you could give a little bit more color on the international side. Thank you.

Daniel Cunha

Yeah, I don't have a ton more to add there. What I think we saw is that in the Americas, maybe just to tease out the contrast, we were more actively making tweaks to the mix LORs and channels so on to increase or maximize on, it'd be the margins, that was a result of having fewer vehicles. We do not have the same dynamics in international, the mix-related changes are not as present, with the exception of Zipcar UK, that tended to push RPD up because of the nature of the business. Like short rentals, higher dollars per hour, day. In that business, we did continue. If you compare the about two points of RPD growth that we had in the quarter to the about three-ish that we had in the prior quarter, there was a small deceleration in the RPD environment.

Daniel Cunha

As best we can tell, this is driven a bit by the combination of having a bit more supply in the market as measured by the increase in registrations and at the same time, a lower amount of inbound travelers that were coming into Europe. That, I think is what's pressing maybe a little bit the RPD side of the equation in international and capturing the days a little bit more competitive.

Chris Stathoulopoulos

Okay. Thank you.

Operator

The next question comes from the line of Lizzie Dove with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed.

Lizzie Dove

Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking the question. A lot of helpful commentary here. Just to kind of tie it all together, you maintained the guidance range of the $850 million-$1 billion. Thinking about your comments that we might see a continuation of Q2 into Q3 on the revenue side and guessing decline. I don't know if that continues for the rest of the year. Some of the DPU benefit you've got unwinds. Could you maybe talk about what's embedded elsewhere in the guidance and how you think about what gets you to kind of the low end or the high end of that range?

Brian Choi

I'll take a first crack. Daniel, you chime in. Lizzie, what you said is exactly correct. I think about Q3 as a continuation of the same operating posture that we had in Q2. Freight will still be down, I think down in the same kind of mid-single digit range that we saw in Q2. We're definitely not planning the business around volume growth. Because of that's going to put some pressure on rental days and revenue. We showed in the second quarter that fleet being down does not translate one-to-one to rental days being down. We're going to continue driving utilization. That's been a focus of ours, and especially in the new technology that we've implemented, the new processes that our operating teams have put in there.

Brian Choi

We think that that's a sustainable benefit that we can continue into the third quarter. We're entering the quarter with tighter fleet, better utilization, again, a focus on cost. We're going to make sure that we maintain as efficient a cost base as we can and a focus on these higher contribution transactions. Similar kind of length of rental mix dynamics. We think that the overall RPD dynamic is going to be constructive in the third quarter; we're planning for roughly flat-ish pricing in Q3.

Daniel Cunha

On the fleet side, Lizzie, I will just add that even though we exit the first half a little bit above plan, there was a little bit of a pull forward here on the gains related to fleet rotation, which is why this performance here today doesn't necessarily translate into an increase in our expectations for the full year. In addition to, as you know, Q3 being a quarter where we make the lion's share of our earnings, small fluctuations in RPD can have a substantial impact in the quarter. We think we're still in the range; obviously the next month or two here will definitely tilt the scale one way or the other.

Brian Choi

From our perspective, Lizzie, I think we've done what we feel is the responsible decision to understand what the demand environment looks like, fleet slightly below that. I think the delta between the lower and the higher end of the range is going to be if the industry sees it that way as well.

Lizzie Dove

Makes sense. I guess just considering balance sheet, cash flow, hopefully you're going to have this pretty nice settlement from Pentwater coming. With that context in mind, assuming you get it and just where leverage is at right now, I think somewhere in the seven times range, how do you think about kind of the right ratio for you, where kind of capital allocation priorities would be with that settlement or just other cash flow otherwise, and how to kind of think about that long term?

Daniel Cunha

Yeah, listen, we exit 2025 at 7.5. We're now at 7.4. I think there's full acknowledgement from us that this, on the high end of the spectrum, this is not where we want to leave or stay. We're definitely prioritizing de-leveraging. We expect during this year a combination of debt repayment and EBITDA growth to reduce it by more than a turn, and we will not be satisfied with that. That, I think, is the direction. In terms of the leverage, we are expecting, as you mentioned, the fund from the settlement. We will allocate this to that repayment, and that will definitely contribute. Other than this, we're pulling all the other levers that you would expect.

Daniel Cunha

We're working on cash flow in general, being very tight on CapEx and being very disciplined on where we allocate that capital. We're working on some working capital levers to improve cash flow generation, and we've been allocating every bit of excess cash flow to debt repayment. Those are two levers we control, obviously, and growing the company also has a big impact on the medium-term de-leveraging efforts.

Lizzie Dove

Thank you.

Operator

The next question comes from the line of Stephanie Moore with Jefferies. Please proceed.

Stephanie Moore

Hi. Good morning. Thank you. Congrats on the good quarter and certainly the utilization performance. I do have a three-part question; bear with me because I promise they all work together here. First, maybe you could give us more specific actions or examples of what technology and other changes you have made in the last several quarters that have enabled you to better respond to the weaker demand environment and keep these utilization returns so robust. How does this just change to the prior actions of the company? I think that color would be helpful. The second part of the question is, what is your outlook for the used vehicle market over the next six to nine months?

Stephanie Moore

Third, putting that all together, let's say the demand environment does remain somewhat subdued and used vehicle prices maybe start to moderate or fall. How would Avis respond with your new tech and best practices in place in that scenario? A lot there, but I think it kind of goes together. Thank you.

Brian Choi

I'll take a first crack at it.

Daniel Cunha

Sure

Brian Choi

Daniel chime in. In terms of the tech investments, Stephanie, this is a journey that we've been on for several years now, actually. It's had to do with a overhaul of our entire tech stack within operations. It focuses around having better visibility around fleet. I think connected car has been talked about for ages, but if it's not connected to anything on the other end and a platform that allows you to make efficient decisions, there's not a lot of benefit to that. I think what we've been implementing is a brand new platform that now is in the vast majority of our Americas business. I think over 90% of our Americas fleet is now running on the new platform. Just a better way for our operators to manage the fleet that they have.

Brian Choi

This has a lot to do with just kind of the asset management side of our business, about being efficient with those assets that we manage. Can you sweat your assets? It has a lot to do with minimizing unrentable days and unrentable vehicles. Quick turns around the supply chain, making sure there's no leakage around shuttling, in order to run the tightest fleet possible while delivering on the rental demand. Again, like I said, we're still rolling this out. Certain markets are more experienced with these new tools than others. We're going to continue to invest in this. The good news is that it's on a SaaS platform. There's a dedicated team here that's focused to optimizing it. We're version 1.0 over here. As we develop, this is something that I'd like to do a deeper dive on in a future earnings call.

Brian Choi

Let me leave it there for now.

Daniel Cunha

Brian, maybe just jumping in. The impact of that is massive, right? We spoke about the 3.5 improvement in utilization. If we adjust here for the recalls that are unrelated and frankly, if there are no parts, there's not much the operations team can do. Utilization would have grown about 5.3 points in the quarter. We would be at all-time high any quarter, any period, in the Americas here. The impact here is pretty substantial.

Brian Choi

In terms of the used vehicle outlook, this is the period, seasonally, every year where you see a pullback in terms of used vehicle prices. Look at any curve you want in any year from Manheim, besides the weird ones post-COVID. It's modelable. What you see is, I think what you see in terms of gross depreciation that you put in the year, the equity that you have in the fleet might change throughout the year, but the gross debt that you're putting into the fleet has to account for the entirety of the curve.

Brian Choi

You're not switching that quarter to quarter, depending on, at least from our perspective, on how we model the end residual values. Listen, the used car market seems okay. It's what we expected at the beginning of the year. Month to month, we continue to model and reforecast and re-put into the fleet to have that margin of safety to be able to sell vehicles when we need. Stephanie, can you remind me of your third question again that dovetails from that second question?

Stephanie Moore

Yes. Sorry, I kind of hit you with a lot there. I guess the third one was, let's just assume used vehicle prices start to moderate. What would be the scenario, or how would you respond based on some of the new investments and actions that you have put into place, which help maybe manage that environment? Let's just say used vehicle prices moderate and demand also remains subdued.

Brian Choi

Yeah. Listen, I think the way that you get around that scenario where if demand is weak, you have to get out of cars. That's the responsible thing to do. In order to be able to get out of cars, even in a weakening demand environment, you have to build a cushion into the fleet. From our perspective, we're trying to be conservative in terms of how we dep our vehicles. Again, even in an overall declining market, it doesn't decline the same way for all vehicles. I think the technology that we've put in place allows us to better understand what we want to hold today versus sell today, what we want to elongate the length on, what's worth it to put in additional supply chain dollars to lengthen the life of the vehicles.

Brian Choi

All of that is at our disposal today. From our perspective, given what we've seen on the fleet side, on the balance sheet side over the last two years, this is the one thing that we cannot compromise on. We have to make sure that our fleet position and the financial health of our fleet and AESOP are rock solid. That's what we've been doing all year. That's what we'll continue to do regardless of the demand environment.

Stephanie Moore

Thank you, guys. Appreciate it.

Operator

The next question comes from the line of Andrew Percoco with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed.

Andrew Percoco

Great. Thanks so much for taking the question. Just one on my end. Thanks for squeezing me in. I think you mentioned that RPD was impacted by a longer duration within the transactions in the quarter, and that you expect that to continue, I guess, through the balance of the year. I'm just curious, what gives you the confidence that that's going to happen? Maybe what are you seeing on the customer side that's ultimately driving that? That all, to me, seems to be more of a consumer and customer-driven dynamic versus something that maybe you guys can control yourselves. Just curious if you can provide any more kind of color on the dynamics there. Thank you.

Brian Choi

Sure. Andrew, one clarification. We expect that our length of rental mix is going to be impacted in the third quarter. I wouldn't say that it's going to be for the balance of the year. We don't know what the fourth quarter yet is going to look like on that front.

Andrew Percoco

Okay.

Brian Choi

I think the biggest thing that gives us confidence, think about it as you look at it in terms of cohort of business. You have one-day rentals. You have two- to four-day rentals. You have five to 14-day rentals, whatever it is, the different cohorts we look at. On a cohort-by-cohort basis, RPD is up across those different cohorts. By different magnitudes on different cohorts, but they're all universally up. One-day rentals carry a significant premium. Two-day rentals carry a significant premium versus a week-long rental versus a monthly rental. We don't think that this is something that's structural from our perspective, just given the fact that our fleet is down right now, we took a conservative approach and that our fleet is down more than demand is. We need to be choosy about what demand that we do take in.

Brian Choi

In this period where we are constrained, we're choosing to optimize for revenue per transaction versus revenue per day. Listen, RPD, obviously an important metric. This quarter, I don't think it tells the full story. What gives us confidence is we're selecting what business we take, and we're choosing to shape the curve this way for the third quarter in terms of our business mix. This isn't something that we expect to be consistent over the long term.

Andrew Percoco

That's right. Daniel?

Daniel Cunha

I would just add that you get to do this when we're very busy, right during the peak of the season. Obviously, in Q4, as demand seasonally slows down, you have a smaller ability to influence the mix and be more choosy.

Brian Choi

Yeah. I think the takeaway from our perspective is that overall, the underlying pricing environment is still fairly constructive. It's similar to what we saw in the first quarter. It's just not fully reflected in our reported RPD figure because of the mix we choose to manage towards.

Andrew Percoco

Okay, that's very helpful. Thank you, guys.

Operator

Thank you. This concludes the question-and-answer session, and this will conclude today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. We thank you for your participation. Be well.

Investor releaseQuarter not tagged2026-07-28

Avis Budget Group (CAR) Lags Q2 Earnings and Revenue Estimates

Zacks
Avis Budget Group (CAR) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.98 per share, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.16 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.1 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of -54.63%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this car rental company would post a loss of $6.82 per share when it actually produced a loss of $8.01, delivering a surprise of -17.45%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates just once. Avis Budget, which belongs to the Zacks Transportation - Services industry, posted revenues of $3 billion for the quarter ended June 2026, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 2.83%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $3.04 billion. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates two times over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. Avis Budget shares have added about 27.6% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 8.3%. While Avis Budget has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Avis Budget was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong B…Read full document

Avis Budget Group (CAR) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.98 per share, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.16 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.1 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of -54.63%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this car rental company would post a loss of $6.82 per share when it actually produced a loss of $8.01, delivering a surprise of -17.45%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates just once. Avis Budget, which belongs to the Zacks Transportation - Services industry, posted revenues of $3 billion for the quarter ended June 2026, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 2.83%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $3.04 billion. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates two times over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. Avis Budget shares have added about 27.6% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 8.3%. While Avis Budget has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Avis Budget was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $9.92 on $3.58 billion in revenues for the coming quarter and $2.91 on $11.93 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year. Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Transportation - Services is currently in the top 37% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. (PAL), another stock in the same industry, has yet to report results for the quarter ended June 2026. This company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $0.06 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of -14.3%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has been revised 16.7% lower over the last 30 days to the current level. Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.'s revenues are expected to be $108.53 million, down 6.1% from the year-ago quarter. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Avis Budget Group, Inc. (CAR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. (PAL) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com). Zacks Investment Research

As of 2026-08-29 • Updated weeklySource: Earnings sourceIngestion runbook