MATV

Rating neutralAI MemoPost-earnings T+3

Mativ

As of 2026-05-08/Post-earnings T+3/Confidence medium

Open ticker Back to Memos

Data freshness

AI Memo

As of 2026-05-08 • Model: RankAlpha Sentiment Codex

Decision Panel

Action, confidence, horizon, and decision blockers at a glance.

Action

neutral

Confidence

medium

Horizon

—

Key catalyst

Cash conversion and leverage need to improve after a weak Q1 cash start • 2026-08-06

Expected move: +28%

Biggest risk

The bearish read is that revenue still missed consensus in secondary coverage, SAS sales declined, both segments still showed volume/mix pressure, and Q1 free cash flow remained negative. With leverage still high, the stock can stay cheap if demand does not recover enough to convert margin gains into durable deleveraging.

Invalidation

Break below $7 or thesis failure.

What would change my mind?

Primary-source earnings evidence improved the short thesis quality: Q1 margins expanded sharply, adjusted EBITDA rose 28%, and management said favorable price-cost and manufacturing efficiencies should continue through 2026. Secondary post-print coverage also pointed to an EPS beat versus consensus, which helps explain why the initial reaction was not negative despite soft revenue.

Research note

Recommendation

neutral

Confidence

medium

As of

2026-05-08

Base target

$10

p=50%

Bull target

$13

p=25%

Bear target

p=25%

Key bullets

Fast scan of bull, bear, and watch items

BullKey bullets

Q1 earnings beat on margin/EPS, but revenue and volume remain the debate
Operational self-help remains the main long thesis, not a demand recovery story
Primary-source earnings evidence improved the short thesis quality: Q1 margins expanded sharply, adjusted EBITDA rose 28%, and management said favorable price-cost and manufacturing efficiencies should continue through 2026.

BearKey bullets

High leverage remains a central risk, with net debt of about $953.5 million at 2026-03-31.
Low analyst coverage and a weak peer set limit conviction and make valuation signals harder to trust.
Management explicitly referenced a turbulent macroeconomic and demand environment, and prior materials have also highlighted trade and input-cost volatility.

WatchKey bullets

Cash conversion and leverage need to improve after a weak Q1 cash start

Summary

High-level snapshot

Recommendation

neutral

Model confidence

medium

Timeframe

Asset

Equity

Trigger

Post-earnings T+3

Base case: $10 (p=50%)

Bull/Bear spread: +60% / -17%

Vs latest close: Bull +60% · Base +28% · Bear -17%

Scenario probabilities

Bull Target: $13 (p=25%)Base Target: $10 (p=50%)Bear Target: $7 (p=25%)

Commentary

As of 2026-05-08, sentiment is cautious-to-neutral after earnings rather than outright bullish. The company source improved confidence in margin execution, while secondary coverage indicated an EPS beat but a revenue miss and only a modest post-print share move. No solid post-earnings analyst revision set was confirmed in this run, so the setup remains a monitoring view with better operating evidence but still limited forward visibility.

As of 2026-05-08 • Updated bi-weekly / post-earningsSource: Internal modelMethodology

Analyst Summary

Thesis highlights from the latest analysis

Bull Case

Bear Case

Drivers

Scannable catalysts and supporting factors

Q1 earnings beat on margin/EPS, but revenue and volume remain the debate
Operational self-help remains the main long thesis, not a demand recovery story

Scenarios

Bull Target (Scenario probability)

$13 / p=25% prob

Base Target (Scenario probability)

$10 / p=50% prob

Bear Target (Scenario probability)

$7 / p=25% prob

Price $8 as of 2026-06-17

Nearest Scenario: Bear (∆ 17%)

Targets vs latest close: Bull +60% · Base +28% · Bear -17%

Sentiment & Exposure

News Sentiment (30d)

0.10

Social Sentiment (7d)

0.00

Events

Other notable items detected

EVENT2026-08-06
Cash conversion and leverage need to improve after a weak Q1 cash start
The same earnings materials showed only $1.0 million of operating cash flow and free cash flow of negative $7.4 million in Q1, with working capital using $28.2 million of cash. Total debt was $1.036 billion, net debt was $953.5 million, and liquidity was about $498.5 million. The April credit amendment pushed major maturities out, but the stock likely needs clearer evidence of second-half cash generation and deleveraging before a stronger rerating is justified. [#10-Q-2026-05-07]
Prob 65.00% • Move 10.00% • Priced-in 60.00%

Short-term Catalysts

Next few weeks

Q1 earnings beat on margin/EPS, but revenue and volume remain the debate
2026-05-20
Mativ's Q1 release showed sales of $479.6 million down 1.1% year over year, adjusted EPS of $0.06, adjusted EBITDA up 28% to $47.5 million, and adjusted EBITDA margin up 220 basis points to 9.9%. Management said favorable price-cost and manufacturing efficiencies should continue, but both segments still referenced volume/mix pressure. With the stock around $9.40 on 2026-05-07, the near-term question is whether post-print estimate digestion rewards margin improvement more than it penalizes soft demand. [#10-Q-2026-05-07]
Prob 70% • Move 8% • Priced-in 55%

Long-term Catalysts

Months to a year

Operational self-help remains the main long thesis, not a demand recovery story
2026-12-31
FAM adjusted EBITDA margin rose to 14.6% and SAS adjusted EBITDA margin rose to 10.5% in Q1 despite flat-to-down sales, with management again emphasizing pricing discipline, manufacturing efficiencies, and supply-chain execution. That supports a longer-duration self-help case, but low coverage and still-soft end markets argue for a cautious monitoring stance until volume recovery and balance-sheet progress show up together. [#10-Q-2026-05-07]
Prob 45% • Move 18% • Priced-in 35%

Risks

High leverage remains a central risk, with net debt of about $953.5 million at 2026-03-31.
Low analyst coverage and a weak peer set limit conviction and make valuation signals harder to trust.
Management explicitly referenced a turbulent macroeconomic and demand environment, and prior materials have also highlighted trade and input-cost volatility.
Persistent volume and mix pressure despite better pricing and manufacturing performance.
Q1 free cash flow was negative and working capital consumed cash, so second-half cash conversion matters.

Peers

Symbol	Summary
PACK	Ranpak is the closest candidate in the packet by packaging/materials adjacency, but it is still only a loose comp versus Mativ's filtration, films, release liners, tapes, and specialty paper mix.
ASTL	Algoma Steel is a same-sector market-cap comp only and not an operating peer; its presence mainly underscores that the current peer set is weak for valuation triangulation.

Sources

Internal and external references used in this analysis

Model source: RankAlpha Sentiment Codex
Human targets: serper
Analysis date: 2026-05-08

AI Stock Memo: MATV - Mativ - RankAlpha