LARK

Rating neutralAI Memo

Landmark Bancorp

As of 2026-05-27/Confidence medium/Horizon 6‑12m

Open ticker Back to Memos

Data freshness

AI Memo

As of 2026-05-27 • Model: RankAlpha Sentiment Codex

Decision Panel

Action, confidence, horizon, and decision blockers at a glance.

Action

neutral

Confidence

medium

Horizon

6‑12m

Key catalyst

May dividend should keep income support intact • 2026-05-28

Expected move: -7%

Biggest risk

The market keeps discounting the balance sheet if deposit attrition persists, higher borrowings remain necessary, and agriculture-linked delinquencies force additional reserve builds or margin giveback.

Invalidation

Break below $22 or thesis failure.

What would change my mind?

Q1 earnings and NIM both improved, and the regular dividend remains intact; if deposit runoff slows and borrowings normalize, LARK can earn a modest rerating on steadier net interest income and cleaner credit trends.

Research note

Recommendation

neutral

Confidence

medium

As of

2026-05-27

Base target

$26

p=55%

Bull target

$31

p=20%

Bear target

$22

p=25%

Key bullets

Fast scan of bull, bear, and watch items

BullKey bullets

May dividend should keep income support intact
Q1 spread improvement still needs deposit and credit trends to stabilize
Governance overhang looks contained after internal review

BearKey bullets

ACL and delinquency trends worsened modestly, especially in agriculture, raising the risk of future reserve builds.
Deposits fell meaningfully in Q1 and borrowings rose; continued reliance on wholesale funding would pressure earnings quality.
Q1 NIM improvement may not be durable if funding costs reaccelerate or asset yields plateau.

WatchKey bullets

No analyst targets are available in the packet, so valuation has to be judged against earnings durability, funding stability, and dividend sustainability rather than a Street consensus.

Summary

High-level snapshot

Recommendation

neutral

Model confidence

medium

Timeframe

6‑12m

Asset

Equity

Trigger

Base case: $26 (p=55%)

Bull/Bear spread: +10% / -21%

Vs latest close: Bull +10% · Base -7% · Bear -21%

Scenario probabilities

Bull Target: $31 (p=20%)Base Target: $26 (p=55%)Bear Target: $22 (p=25%)

Commentary

Coverage remains thin and mostly filing-driven. Recent news is limited to a generic AP Q1 snapshot and call summary, and the packet has no analyst target data, so this stays a cautious monitoring hold rather than a conviction re-rating call.

As of 2026-05-27 • Updated bi-weekly / post-earningsSource: Internal modelMethodology

Analyst Summary

Thesis highlights from the latest analysis

Bull Case

Bear Case

Drivers

Scannable catalysts and supporting factors

May dividend should keep income support intact
Q1 spread improvement still needs deposit and credit trends to stabilize
Governance overhang looks contained after internal review

Scenarios

Bull Target (Scenario probability)

$31 / p=20% prob

Base Target (Scenario probability)

$26 / p=55% prob

Bear Target (Scenario probability)

$22 / p=25% prob

Price $28 as of 2026-05-27

Nearest Scenario: Base (∆ 7%)

Targets vs latest close: Bull +10% · Base -7% · Bear -21%

Sentiment & Exposure

News Sentiment (30d)

0.00

Social Sentiment (7d)

0.00

Short-term Catalysts

Next few weeks

May dividend should keep income support intact
2026-05-28
The Q1 2026 10-Q says Landmark declared a $0.21 cash dividend payable on 2026-05-28 and described it as the 99th consecutive quarterly dividend, which supports short-term income-oriented demand even though it is not a growth catalyst. [#10-Q-2026-05-06]
Prob 92% • Move 2% • Priced-in 88%

Long-term Catalysts

Months to a year

Q1 spread improvement still needs deposit and credit trends to stabilize
2026-12-31
Q1 net earnings rose to $5.1 million from $4.7 million and diluted EPS increased to $0.83 from $0.77, while net interest margin expanded to 4.24% from 3.76%; however, deposits fell $66.2 million, borrowings rose to $91.0 million, allowance for credit losses increased to 1.15% of gross loans, and 30-89 day accruing delinquencies rose to 0.68%, mainly in agriculture. That makes durability of the spread improvement the main rerating test. [#10-Q-2026-05-06]
Prob 45% • Move 10% • Priced-in 50%
Governance overhang looks contained after internal review
2026-12-31
The 2025 10-K says Landmark completed its internal investigation into fraudulent activity by a non-executive officer, found no additional fraudulent activity, and viewed the operational impact as immaterial; that lowers governance risk, but it is more of a cleanup item than a major upside catalyst. [#10-K-2026-04-14]
Prob 78% • Move 3% • Priced-in 72%

Risks

ACL and delinquency trends worsened modestly, especially in agriculture, raising the risk of future reserve builds.
Deposits fell meaningfully in Q1 and borrowings rose; continued reliance on wholesale funding would pressure earnings quality.
Q1 NIM improvement may not be durable if funding costs reaccelerate or asset yields plateau.
Sell-side visibility is thin, with no analyst target data in the packet, which limits re-rating conviction.

Peers

Symbol	Summary
BCBP	Closest same-sector, similar-market-cap bank peer for comparing funding mix, deposit stability, and credit drift.
BVFL	Useful small-bank comparator for dividend durability and whether modest earnings improvement is enough to support a rerating.
HNVR	Direct community-bank peer for judging whether NIM improvement and deposit pressure look idiosyncratic or broadly typical.

Sources

Internal and external references used in this analysis

Model source: RankAlpha Sentiment Codex
Analysis date: 2026-05-27

AI Stock Memo: LARK - Landmark Bancorp - RankAlpha