Back to Rankings

PMTS

CPI Card GroupA
Nasdaq / Technology Hardware & Equipment
Last Price
At close
2026-07-17
View Chart
Current thesis
Primary-source evidence is constructive: Q1 revenue growth was strong, adjusted EBITDA still increased, full-year outlook was affirmed, and the July 2026 note redemption adds a modest balance-sheet positive. The cleanest upside path is steady Arroweye integration plus continued cross-sell into contactless, personalization, instant issuance, and related payment solutions.
Posture
Constructive
Lead driver
Value
What changed
Value remains the lead driver in the composite, 7D delta +0.1.
What can break
Arroweye integration costs and execution remain a live risk after they weighed on Q1 net income despite solid top-line growth.
Momentum
74
Value
71
Sentiment
52
Setup hits (3d)
0 · Net Neutral
AI TargetsBase $22.00 · Bull $26.50 · Bear $16.00
Data freshness
Prices
As of 2026-07-17
Fundamentals
As of 2026-07-17 • Vendor: Data Vendor v1
Scores
As of 2026-07-17 • Model: HYBRID_IC_RP
AI Memo
As of 2026-07-11 • Model: RankAlpha Sentiment Codex
Investment thesis
As of 2026-07-17
Supporting evidence
What
Grade A · Constructive
Confidence Medium · Net Neutral
Target $27.50
Why
Momentum74 · Δ7d -
Value71 · Δ7d +0.1
Sentiment52 · Δ7d -
So what
Strength-led posture (Net Neutral). Favor watchlist adds and disciplined entries.
Lead driver: Value · See fundamentals
Momentum
74
26% active weight
Current posture
7d trendTrend unavailable
Trend unavailable
Δ7d
-
Δ21d
-
Value
71
39% active weight
Current posture
7d trendFlat
Δ7d
+0.1
Δ21d
+0.5
Sentiment
52
34% active weight
Current posture
7d trendTrend unavailable
Trend unavailable
Δ7d
-
Δ21d
-
Why this grade

Composite grade A. Momentum 73.8 / Value 71.3 / Sentiment 52.0

Fundamentals (TTM)
As of 2026-07-17
Market Cap
$215.86M
Beta
1.29
Shares Out
11.48M
P/E (TTM)
11.7
P/S (TTM)
0.31
P/FCF (TTM)
5.76
Rev YoY
+19.8%
EPS YoY
-56.4%
Gross Margin
+30.8%
Op Margin
+10.1%
Net Debt
$315.77M
Current Ratio
2.54
As of 2026-07-17 • Updated nightlySource: Internal modelMethodology