KC

Rating neutralTentativeAI MemoPost-earnings T+3

Kingsoft Cloud

As of 2026-05-29/Post-earnings T+3/Confidence low

Open ticker Back to Memos

Data freshness

AI Memo

As of 2026-05-29 • Model: RankAlpha Sentiment Codex

Decision Panel

Action, confidence, horizon, and decision blockers at a glance.

Report quality notice

peer set is too generic or lacks enough direct operating comparators; later post-earnings follow-up lacks concrete company-source and analyst/market reaction evidence

Action

neutral

Confidence

low

Horizon

—

Key catalyst

Post-earnings market reaction was negative, while analyst-revision evidence remains thin • 2026-05-29

Expected move: +50%

Biggest risk

Gross margin fell to 12.8% as AI server costs, depreciation, and upfront customer costs rose, while Q1 capex plus leased assets reached RMB3.0 billion and cash fell to RMB4.9 billion, so investors can still question whether AI growth is converting into durable economics [#PR-2026-05-27].

Invalidation

Break below $9 or thesis failure.

What would change my mind?

The primary-source print shows strong AI-led expansion: revenue rose 37.2% year over year, public-cloud revenue grew 47.5%, AI gross billing grew 90% year over year, and adjusted EBITDA margin improved to 27.6% [#PR-2026-05-27].

Research note

Recommendation

neutral

Confidence

low

As of

2026-05-29

Base target

$18

p=45%

Bull target

$23

p=30%

Bear target

p=25%

Key bullets

Fast scan of bull, bear, and watch items

BullKey bullets

Q1 2026 print confirmed AI-led growth but also heavier cost intensity
April 23 Xiaomi framework update improved demand visibility but deepened concentration sensitivity
The primary-source print shows strong AI-led expansion: revenue rose 37.2% year over year, public-cloud revenue grew 47.5%, AI gross billing grew 90% year over year, and adjusted EBITDA margin improved to 27.6% [#PR-2026-05-27].

BearKey bullets

Gross margin compressed to 12.8% because AI server costs, depreciation, and upfront customer costs outpaced revenue growth.
Q1 capex plus leased assets totaled RMB3.0 billion and cash fell to RMB4.9 billion, keeping infrastructure intensity and liquidity use in focus.
Revenue growth still leans on Xiaomi, Kingsoft ecosystem, and AI-related customers, so concentration and procurement sensitivity remain live risks.

WatchKey bullets

Post-earnings market reaction was negative, while analyst-revision evidence remains thin

Summary

High-level snapshot

Recommendation

neutral

Model confidence

low

Timeframe

Asset

Equity

Trigger

Post-earnings T+3

Base case: $18 (p=45%)

Bull/Bear spread: +87% / -25%

Vs latest close: Bull +87% · Base +50% · Bear -25%

Scenario probabilities

Bull Target: $23 (p=30%)Base Target: $18 (p=45%)Bear Target: $9 (p=25%)

Commentary

Primary evidence is constructive on growth but cautious on economics. The fetched May 27 company release confirms strong AI-led top-line growth and adjusted EBITDA margin expansion, but it also shows lower gross margin, heavier server and depreciation burden, and RMB3.0 billion of Q1 capex plus leased assets. A secondary market-data article flagged a sharp 23% pre-market drop after the print, while verified analyst-revision evidence remains unavailable. With the deterministic prior still carrying very high uncertainty and zero evidence-quality score, this stays a tentative monitoring-style hold rather than a stronger post-earnings re-rating call.

As of 2026-05-29 • Updated bi-weekly / post-earningsSource: Internal modelMethodology

Analyst Summary

Thesis highlights from the latest analysis

Bull Case

Bear Case

Drivers

Scannable catalysts and supporting factors

Q1 2026 print confirmed AI-led growth but also heavier cost intensity
April 23 Xiaomi framework update improved demand visibility but deepened concentration sensitivity

Scenarios

Bull Target (Scenario probability)

$23 / p=30% prob

Base Target (Scenario probability)

$18 / p=45% prob

Bear Target (Scenario probability)

$9 / p=25% prob

Price $12 as of 2026-05-29

Nearest Scenario: Bear (∆ 25%)

Targets vs latest close: Bull +87% · Base +50% · Bear -25%

Sentiment & Exposure

News Sentiment (30d)

0.00

Social Sentiment (7d)

0.00

Events

Other notable items detected

EVENT2026-05-29
Post-earnings market reaction was negative, while analyst-revision evidence remains thin
A secondary market-data write-up described a 23% pre-market decline after the Q1 release and framed the move as an earnings-miss reaction, but I did not verify a fresh post-print analyst target or estimate reset. That makes the reaction a real monitoring input, not enough by itself to prove a durable thesis change.
Prob 48.00% • Move 6.00% • Priced-in 55.00%

Short-term Catalysts

Next few weeks

Q1 2026 print confirmed AI-led growth but also heavier cost intensity
2026-05-27
The May 27 company release reported total revenue of RMB2,703.7 million, up 37.2% year over year, with AI gross billing up 90% year over year and more than half of public-cloud services revenue for the first time. The same release said gross margin fell to 12.8% and capex plus leased assets reached RMB3.0 billion in Q1, so the core post-print question is whether AI demand can outrun infrastructure cost pressure [#PR-2026-05-27].
Prob 68% • Move 8% • Priced-in 58%

Long-term Catalysts

Months to a year

April 23 Xiaomi framework update improved demand visibility but deepened concentration sensitivity
2026-12-31
The April 23 6-K revised Xiaomi cloud-service caps, extended the hardware-procurement term through December 31, 2027, and added API-related services, supporting scale visibility while leaving related-party concentration and hardware sourcing central to the longer-term risk-reward [#6K-2026-04-23-XM].
Prob 55% • Move 14% • Priced-in 36%

Risks

Gross margin compressed to 12.8% because AI server costs, depreciation, and upfront customer costs outpaced revenue growth.
Q1 capex plus leased assets totaled RMB3.0 billion and cash fell to RMB4.9 billion, keeping infrastructure intensity and liquidity use in focus.
Revenue growth still leans on Xiaomi, Kingsoft ecosystem, and AI-related customers, so concentration and procurement sensitivity remain live risks.
Verified post-print analyst target and estimate revisions remain unavailable, so the negative market reaction is easier to observe than to fully explain.

Peers

Symbol	Summary
BABA	Alibaba Cloud is a more relevant operating reference than the packet's same-sector software peers because it competes in China cloud infrastructure, but Alibaba's broader commerce and platform earnings make valuation read-through imperfect.
BIDU	Baidu AI Cloud is relevant for AI-cloud positioning and enterprise AI workload competition, but Baidu's search and autonomous-driving exposure mean it should be used as an operating benchmark rather than a clean valuation peer.

Sources

Internal and external references used in this analysis

Model source: RankAlpha Sentiment Codex
Human targets: serper
Analysis date: 2026-05-29

AI Stock Memo: KC - Kingsoft Cloud - RankAlpha